The resignation underscores the critical need for balancing AI advancement with safety, impacting market confidence and strategic AI development.

The post AI researcher resigns, warns OpenAI and Anthropic on super-intelligence risks appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Trump's remarks may signal a shift towards diplomacy, potentially influencing market optimism for a ceasefire in the Ukraine conflict.

The post Trump tells Putin US-Russia ties could restore with swift Ukraine war end: Kremlin appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Rising gas prices may strain consumer budgets and influence voter sentiment, potentially impacting the outcome of the midterm elections.

The post Record US gas prices hit $4.15 amid Iran conflict, midterm elections loom appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The EU court's decision underscores a strategic commitment to economic measures, potentially prolonging the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

The post EU court rejects Hungary’s bid to block Russian asset profits for Ukraine appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The warning could reshape AI investment strategies, influence market valuations, and intensify debates on AI safety and regulatory measures.

The post Anthropic researcher warns of >10% chance AI could cause human extinction in 10 years appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin Magazine

Lummis Blasts Democrats Ahead of Clarity Act Vote — But Adds Bill Can Get Passed

Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis has again slammed Democrats over the long-awaited crypto Clarity Act. 

Writing on X on Tuesday, the pro-crypto lawmaker responded to an article from Semafor that reported Republican senators saying the bill was likely to fail when the senate returns next week. 

Lawmakers were hoping a crucial vote on the long-awaited crypto market structure bill would go ahead in August before their five-week recess. But it was delayed and the Senate will now vote on it next week. 

“If this bill fails it won’t be because of ethics, it will be because Democrats didn’t join Republicans in embracing a bipartisan bill that protected consumers, cements America’s leadership in digital assets, and empowered law enforcement to clamp down on illicit finance,” wrote Lummis. 

She said that Democrats were continuing to “demand changes” that could allow future regulators to “kill the crypto industry.”

“If we can bridge those gaps I’m confident we can pass Clarity, but they require further compromise from Democrats, not the White House,” added Lummis. 

Lummis previously said that if the Clarity Act dies, it will be because of the Democrats. Lummis and other pro-crypto lawmakers have blasted politicians who they think are deliberately holding back the bill. 

The Clarity Act drafts a framework to formally divide oversight between regulators, distinguishing which digital assets are securities, commodities or stablecoins. 

Though passed by the House of Representatives last July, it has been stalled this year, mostly because the banking lobby clashed with crypto companies over paying customers stablecoin yield. 

A new draft tackling the issue of ethics started circulating in July, banning government officials from promoting or making money from crypto — something Democrats have criticized the Trump family for doing. 

Despite the changes, a group of Democrats said the bill fell short and wanted amendments. 

President Donald Trump has urged lawmakers to get the legislation over the line. In August, he said that in order for the U.S. to remain the “undisputed leader in Bitcoin and crypto,” they had to pass the “very, very powerful legislation.”

This post Lummis Blasts Democrats Ahead of Clarity Act Vote — But Adds Bill Can Get Passed first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.

Bitcoin Magazine

CoinCorner Launches Lloyd’s-Insured Multisig Bitcoin Vault with AnchorWatch

British bitcoin exchange CoinCorner has debuted a multisig BTC custody service that splits control of customer keys between the Isle of Man exchange and its US partner AnchorWatch — with holdings insured by Lloyd’s of London. 

The service charges 1.5% a year and is pitched at owners who want cold-storage security without managing hardware themselves, the Isle of Man-based company announced Tuesday.

Its new service comes following the Coldcard wallet hack — where bitcoin holders using a single signature wallet lost funds after hackers were able to exploit the popular products due to a firmware bug in the devices that lead to a weak seed generation. About $115 million was lost in the theft. 

“Vault offers a simple non-technical setup for customers, and partnering with AnchorWatch means we can offer fully insured, multi-signature custody with the simplicity our customers expect from CoinCorner,” CoinCorner CEO Danny Scott said in a statement. 

Customers can open a Vault and deposit whatever amount they choose, but the bitcoin doesn’t move into the insured wallet immediately, CoinCorner said. 

Rather, transfers typically happen on the first working day of the following month, and holdings are verifiable on-chain via a wallet address CoinCorner provides. 

Top-ups are allowed anytime, the companies said, Customers define their own identity verification rules before funds can move. 

CoinCorner added that it is the first service of its kind globally. 

Multisig has long been the security-conscious Bitcoin holder’s answer to single-key risk but has also been dismissed as too fiddly for anyone but the technically committed: setting one up traditionally means assembling several hardware devices, generating and backing up multiple private keys and keeping track of which key sits where.  

CoinCorner and AnchorWatch are aiming to simplify things. Vault handles key distribution on the customer’s behalf, leaving them with the security properties of multisig without the setup that has kept most people away from it.

This post CoinCorner Launches Lloyd’s-Insured Multisig Bitcoin Vault with AnchorWatch first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.

Bitcoin Magazine

Capital B Buys 376 Bitcoins in Its Biggest Purchase of 2026

European bitcoin treasury Capital B has announced a BTC buy, snapping up 376 coins — one week after it said Blockstream boss Adam Back was investing in the company. 

The Euronext Growth-listed company said Tuesday that it now owns 3,521 bitcoins — worth over $277 million at today’s prices — making it the 25th biggest publicly traded bitcoin treasury in the world, according to Bitcoin Treasuries data. 

Capital B’s buy was for €25.3 million (over $29 million), according to its announcement. 

Just last week, the company said that top bitcoiner Adam Back, who heads up bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, had invested €7.6 million ($8.8 million) in Capital B to help with its buys. 

The firm in August said it had raised €21 million ($24 million) in a private placement backed by Back and asset manager TOBAM. 

The bitcoin treasury’s stock was trading 2% lower on Tuesday. 

Capital B built most of its bitcoin position through fundraising rounds during the first half of 2026. 

In May, it snapped up 192 coins for €13 million after completing three capital raises.

The company, which calls itself “Europe’s first Bitcoin treasury company,” is trying to build a bigger bitcoin position as other treasuries look to raise funds and accelerate their buys. 

Capital B says on its website that it wants to eventually hold 210,000 bitcoins. “Our objective is simple: accumulate 1% of Bitcoin’s total supply by 2033,” it reads. 

Digital asset treasuries became big in 2025 as more publicly traded companies tried to follow in the footsteps of Nasdaq-listed Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), which started buying bitcoin in 2025. 

Hundreds of publicly traded companies started buying bitcoin — with many buying other cryptocurrencies — to boost their stock prices. But since the price of bitcoin started dropping, a number of them are now under water or have had to sell their holdings. 

Strategy, the largest corporate holder of the asset, has this year slowed down its bitcoin buys and instead pivoted to building a stronger cash balance and buying back its stock as the price of its shares has tumbled. 

This post Capital B Buys 376 Bitcoins in Its Biggest Purchase of 2026 first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.

Bitcoin Magazine

Castle Opens Its Bitcoin Savings Stack to Individuals

Castle, the company behind an automated bitcoin financial stack for businesses, has said it is opening its platform to individuals, bringing its high-yield product to personal accounts along with a first for the category: the option to take dividend income in bitcoin at whatever ratio the customer picks.

The yield comes from STRC, Strategy‘s perpetual preferred stock, which Castle added earlier this year and which currently pays a 12% annual dividend on a semi-monthly schedule. 

Holders can take 100% of that payout in cash, 100% in bitcoin, or anything in between, according to a Tuesday statement. Most Castle customers land in the middle, the company said, covering operating expenses with cash while the remainder compounds into bitcoin automatically at every payout.

“Investors have long faced a choice between earning steady yield and holding bitcoin. Castle eliminates that trade-off,” co-founder and CTO João Almeida said. “By enabling a portion of dividend income to be automatically converted into bitcoin, so customers get both cash flow and long-term upside.”

The broader pitch is consolidation: Castle puts operating cash, fixed income, and bitcoin accumulation on one platform, cutting out the shuffle between a bank, an onramp, and a brokerage. The system is built automation-first: users define a strategy once and the platform executes it.

Until now, Castle served business entities exclusively — restaurants, gyms, churches, accounting firms, e-commerce shops, auto dealers, SaaS companies, real estate, and non-profits among them. The push into personal accounts came from those same customers.

“Feedback we heard over and over from business owners was: ‘I love this stack — when can I use it personally?'” co-founder and CEO Stephen Cole said. “Today we’re answering that. The same automated bitcoin-powered financial stack that runs their company’s balance sheet can now run their personal finances.”

Castle was founded by Cole and Almeida and is backed by Boost VC and Winklevoss Capital. More information about the company’s product can be found here.

This post Castle Opens Its Bitcoin Savings Stack to Individuals first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.

Bitcoin Magazine

Strategy Halted Its Bitcoin Buys Again Last Week 

Bitcoin treasury Strategy has halted stacking sats — again. 

Just one week after resuming its bitcoin buying following a 10-week hiatus, the Nasdaq-listed company has put its BTC purchases on hold again. 

Instead, the firm continued buying back its stock, repurchasing $176 million of STRC and increasing the size of its digital credit securities repurchase program from $1 billion to $2 billion, according to a Tuesday regulatory filing and announcement from founder and chairman Michael Saylor.  

The company still holds 845,050 bitcoins worth over $66 billion at today’s prices and $6.5 billion in dollar reserves. The bitcoins were bought at an average price of $63.73 billion, according to Tuesday’s filing. 

Strategy shares (NASDAQ: MSTR) were trading more than 3% lower Tuesday morning in New York. 

The company paused its bitcoin buys in June, instead focusing on building a cash buffer, buying back its stock and even sometimes selling some of its holdings. 

Strategy has defended its bitcoin sales, with CEO Phong Le saying that the company now has a “bullet-proof balance sheet” because of the move, and that it was the “right trade at the time” to sell when it did. 

In the company’s quarterly earnings in July, Strategy posted a $8.22 billion loss. But Le reassured investors that the firm’s current paper loss was nothing to worry about.

“We’re the J.P. Morgan of the crypto economy, so whether we sell 1,000 Bitcoin out of 840,000 to me is irrelevant to the conversation,” Le said. 

Strategy — formerly MicroStrategy — is an enterprise software company that pivoted to buying and holding bitcoin in 2020. 

It first bought the cryptocurrency to protect its shareholders from inflation. Since then, it has aggressively bought the asset and pivoted to being a bitcoin treasury. 

Investors can now buy its shares to get heightened exposure to the cryptocurrency, or get paid a yield via its digital credit products. 

This post Strategy Halted Its Bitcoin Buys Again Last Week  first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.

The Bitcoin Lightning software's maintainers say four image tags delivered unpatched binaries while reporting version v26.06.7 at startup, leaving affected users with another task: check the image digest and download a corrected image if it differs.

Some Core Lightning operators who attempted the v26.06.7 upgrade through Docker may still be missing its security fixes.

The updated release notice identifies the affected tags as v26.06.7, latest, v26.06.7-vls and latest-vls. They served images without the release's fixes between Aug. 28 at 16:04 UTC and Sept. 1. The notice gives no precise end time.

An automated build process published the images from a placeholder tag. Maintainers say they have replaced them and removed every tag's reference to the incorrect manifests. But an operator who retained a faulty image cannot rely on its startup version to confirm the patch arrived.

The Aug. 28 release set a 14-day embargo on publishing its source, pointing to a planned Sept. 11 disclosure. As of Sept. 8, the notice still describes that publication as upcoming. Maintainers say the delay gives operators time to upgrade before prospective attackers can reverse-engineer the fixes.

How to check the Docker image to fix the Lightning bug

Maintainers ask anyone who previously pulled one of the four tags to compare its digest, the image's identifying hash, against the corrected values:

For the standard versioned image, the notice supplies this command to inspect the local image. Its output alone does not establish which image an existing container is running:

docker image inspect --format '{{index .RepoDigests 0}}' elementsproject/lightningd:v26.06.7

If the digest differs, its corresponding download command is:

docker pull elementsproject/lightningd:v26.06.7

The notice also supplies docker pull elementsproject/lightningd:latest for that tag. VLS users need the separate VLS digest in the table. Their VLS_CLN_VERSION setting must also match v26.06.7, or remote_hsmd_socket will refuse to start; the signer itself remains VLS v0.14.0.

Users pinned to v26.06.6 or earlier escaped this packaging mistake. The exemption concerns the faulty packaging; the new security fixes belong to v26.06.7.

The packaging correction changes the operator's immediate problem of an attempted upgrade may need to be checked again while that window remains open.

Another download trap exists during the embargo. GitHub's automatically attached source-code archives are not the v26.06.7 source, maintainers warn, so building those archives will not produce the advertised patched binaries.

The post Bitcoin Core Lightning Docker bug leaves node operators exposed despite showing updated version appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin treasury company Strive added almost $12 million to its annualized preferred-dividend burden in one week as its SATA preferred share count grew, according to calculations using its Sept. 8 disclosure.

At the current rate, the larger share base implies about $130 million in yearly payouts, while higher cash left static cash-only coverage almost unchanged.

SATA is variable-rate perpetual preferred equity, and each additional share increases the estimated recurring payout at the current 13% dividend rate.

The company reported buying 1,375 BTC during the Aug. 31-Sept. 4 period at an average price of approximately $79,281 per coin, including fees and expenses. That brought its holdings to 24,531 BTC as of Sept. 4.

Over the week from Aug. 28 to Sept. 4, SATA shares rose from 9,073,914 to 9,995,425, an increase of 921,511. Strive’s table includes shares sold by its stated 4 p.m. cutoff that would be issued on the following business day, alongside shares already outstanding.

A larger payout, almost the same coverage

Strive’s board maintained the annual rate at 13% in an Aug. 13 announcement, effective for periods beginning Sept. 1. Applied to SATA’s $100 stated amount per share, that equates to $13 annually.

Multiplying both reported share counts by $13 gives annualized dividends of $129.9 million for Sept. 4, versus nearly $118 million for Aug. 28. The roughly $12 million increase is a desk calculation at the same current rate.

For September, the board declared $0.0516 per share on each of 21 business-day payment dates, payable to holders of record at the preceding business day’s close. Payments depend on eligible shares on those record dates.

Cash and cash equivalents rose by $19.1 million over the week, from $183.5 million to $202.6 million. Dividing each cash balance by its current-rate annualized dividend estimate and multiplying by 12 produces coverage of 18.71 months for Sept. 4, against 18.67 months for Aug. 28.

That static ratio excludes operating needs, future financing, investment income, and other liquid assets. Among the excluded holdings were 505,000 shares of Strategy’s STRC preferred stock, valued at $49.364 million on Sept. 4.

The filing does not allocate the Bitcoin purchases between specific financing sources. The next changes in cash, SATA shares, and its dividend rate will determine whether that balance holds.

The post Strive adds $12 million to its dividend tab after issuing nearly one million new preferred shares to buy Bitcoin appeared first on CryptoSlate.

The crypto industry is launching a seven-figure national advertising campaign to rescue the CLARITY Act ahead of a crucial Senate vote next week.

The Senate is scheduled to vote Sept. 15 on whether to invoke cloture on a motion to proceed to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, a procedural hurdle requiring 60 votes.

The measure would establish federal rules for digital-asset markets and divide oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The vote would only open debate, leaving lawmakers to clear additional procedural steps before final passage.

Yet with a week remaining, senators involved in the negotiations are reportedly signaling that the votes may not be there.

Crypto turns up the pressure as the votes slip away

With negotiations struggling to produce a breakthrough, crypto's political network is moving to make opposition to CLARITY more costly for lawmakers and the banking industry.

The Cedar Innovation Foundation, a 501(c)(4) nonprofit linked to the Fairshake super PAC network, is launching a seven-figure cable advertising campaign across three spots aimed at building support for the bill. Two emphasize consumer protection and endorsements from outside the crypto industry, while a third attacks banks that have resisted parts of the legislation.

The bank-focused advertisement accuses the industry of enjoying a profit “feeding frenzy” while trying to block competition, accompanied by images of pigs eating from troughs.

Banks, particularly smaller lenders, have spent months pushing lawmakers to tighten provisions governing stablecoin rewards, arguing that crypto platforms could use yield-like incentives to pull deposits away from the banking system.

Those objections have complicated negotiations, even as crypto companies have pressed Congress to complete legislation debated for years.

The other advertisements seek to broaden the CLARITY Act's appeal beyond the industry's regulatory agenda. One highlights support from major law-enforcement groups and says AARP backs provisions designed to combat crypto scams targeting older Americans. AARP's support is narrower than a full endorsement of the legislation, covering a provision aimed at crypto ATM fraud.

The campaign follows another potential obstacle that eased last week.

The National Sheriffs' Association dropped its opposition to CLARITY and shifted to a neutral position after months of warning that the legislation could weaken efforts to prosecute illicit crypto activity. Other law-enforcement groups have backed the measure.

Trump ethics fight becomes the bill's choke point

Clearing those industry disputes has done little to resolve the political issue now threatening the bill's survival: how far Congress should go in restricting a sitting president and his family from profiting from digital assets.

Republican Sens. Mike Rounds and Thom Tillis reportedly said the bill's prospects have deteriorated as Democrats and the White House remain divided over ethics restrictions governing President Donald Trump and his family's crypto interests.

Two Democratic aides told Semafor that the party has made little progress on its demand for an ethics provision covering Trump and his family. Rounds described the outlook as bleak, while Tillis said the legislation would fail without greater willingness from the White House to bridge the divide.

However, the White House disputes that characterization.

A spokesperson said Trump wants Congress to pass the CLARITY Act and argued that the administration has “worked tirelessly” on the legislation while agreeing to what it called the most comprehensive ethics provision in history.

The disagreement leaves senators approaching the vote with both sides claiming concessions have been made but no clear indication that enough Democrats are prepared to provide the votes needed for cloture.

The bill also faces a more basic political problem.

Republican Sen. Roger Marshall said he has heard virtually nothing about the legislation from constituents back home, suggesting that the industry's intense Washington campaign has yet to make market structure a significant voter issue for at least some senators.

A failed vote could close an already shrinking window

The difficulty of assembling 60 votes has become more consequential as Congress runs out of opportunities to finish the legislation before the current session ends.

The House has canceled planned voting weeks later in September, making it increasingly likely that even a successful Senate process would push final action beyond the November midterm elections. Any Senate changes would also need House approval before the legislation could reach Trump's desk.

Sen. Cynthia Lummis, one of Congress' most prominent crypto advocates, has sought to turn that compressed calendar into pressure on wavering lawmakers.

“Next week, my colleagues have a choice,” Lummis said, framing the vote as one between protecting American crypto innovation and allowing China to gain ground in digital finance.

She has also emphasized provisions intended to protect customers when crypto companies fail.

The current proposal would require covered intermediaries to segregate customer assets and would treat qualifying holdings as customer property in bankruptcy, addressing problems exposed by failures such as FTX and Celsius.

Those protections would still depend on factors including how assets are held and the contractual relationship between customers and platforms.

Lummis has warned that failure this year could leave Congress without another realistic opportunity to enact market-structure legislation until 2030, potentially costing the US years of investment, jobs and tax revenue.

That timeline is a political forecast and not a statutory restriction. But with the House calendar already slipping beyond the midterms and the Senate still struggling to muster enough support to begin debate, the Sept. 15 vote is increasingly shaping up as a test of whether crypto's growing political influence can translate into the legislation the industry has spent the past year pursuing.

The post Crypto lobbies launch a last-minute TV campaign against banks to pass the CLARITY Act appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Strategy doubled the size of its preferred-stock repurchase program to $2 billion Tuesday as Michael Saylor’s Sept. 8 recovery benchmark arrived with STRC still short of its $100 stated value.

The board’s decision extends a campaign that was approaching the limits of its original $1 billion authorization after seven weeks of increasingly large purchases.

Data from STRC.live showed that STRC entered Tuesday around $97 to $98, leaving the variable-rate preferred roughly 2% below the level Strategy has spent much of the summer trying to restore.

Sept. 8 had emerged as an informal milestone after Saylor compared STRC’s latest recovery with the roughly 70 trading days the security initially needed to climb from its $90 offering price to $100.

Instead, Strategy reached the date by expanding how much capital it can commit to the repair.

The taper that wasn’t

Strategy’s move comes as its STRC purchases pushed the buyback campaign deeper into territory management had initially expected to avoid as STRC approached par.

Between Aug. 31 and Sept. 7, the company acquired 1.81 million STRC shares for $176.3 million, implying an average price of about $97.36. Cumulative spending since July has now reached roughly $811.5 million.

Without this latest increase, only about $188.5 million would have remained under the original $1 billion authorization. The new ceiling leaves Strategy with $1.19 billion available across its preferred-stock repurchase program.

The spending pattern has moved in the opposite direction from the framework management laid out when the intervention began.

Strategy initially planned to buy more aggressively when STRC traded well below $100, where repurchases offered better economics, before reducing its presence as the discount narrowed and outside demand took over.

STRC had fallen near $71 before the campaign began. Strategy spent $25 million in the first week at an average of $86.52, followed by weekly purchases of $81.2 million, $108.6 million, $132.2 million, $136.4 million, and $151.8 million as the preferred climbed closer to par. The latest $176.3 million purchase is the largest yet.

That means the dollar cost of supporting STRC has continued rising even as the discount Strategy is buying has collapsed from more than 13% during the opening week to less than 3%.

Each share retired below stated value removes $100 of preferred capital along with the associated dividend obligation at a discount, an advantage that diminishes as STRC approaches par.

The expanded authorization gives Strategy considerably more room to continue making that trade even after the original program has been more than 80% consumed.

Bitcoin goes back on pause

Meanwhile, the latest intervention has also produced a sharp reversal from the capital allocation Strategy displayed only one week earlier.

During the previous reporting period, the company raised $602.8 million through MSTR sales, spent $151.8 million repurchasing STRC and still directed $369.7 million toward 4,603 Bitcoin.

That purchase ended a roughly two-month pause in Bitcoin accumulation and suggested Strategy could once again finance both its preferred-stock obligations and expansion of the asset at the center of its treasury strategy.

However, the combination lasted only one week.

In the latest week, the Saylor-led company sold no shares through its at-the-market program between Aug. 31 and Sept. 7 and purchased no Bitcoin. The entire $176.3 million used for STRC repurchases came from its USD Cash balance.

That pool stood at $1.44 billion at period-end and has a broad mandate. Strategy says the cash can be used to acquire Bitcoin, increase its USD Reserve, manage its capital structure, and fund other Bitcoin treasury company purposes.

Its separate USD Reserve stood at $5.10 billion and is intended to support preferred-stock dividends and interest on outstanding debt.

The distinction puts the latest STRC spending into sharper focus. The buybacks are drawing from the same flexible liquidity pool Strategy can use to acquire more Bitcoin.

The company owned 845,050 Bitcoin as of Sept. 7, acquired for $63.73 billion at an average price of about $75,412.

But the past two weeks illustrate how STRC's struggles have altered the cadence of further accumulation. When fresh equity capital was available, Strategy funded both. Without MSTR issuance last week, STRC received the cash, and Bitcoin purchases stopped.

The $2 billion question

Strategy has a strong incentive to keep pushing STRC toward $100 because the security becomes far more useful once it can trade reliably around par.

STRC was designed as a perpetual funding vehicle whose variable dividend can be adjusted to encourage the market price to remain near its $100 stated value.

Strategy has also adopted a policy against issuing additional STRC below par, meaning the security cannot fully serve its intended financing role while it trades at a discount.

A sustained return to $100 would reopen that channel. Strategy could once again issue additional preferred shares to raise capital without relying as heavily on sales of MSTR common stock.

STRC has already shown the scale of capital it can attract. Its initial 2025 offering was expanded from an expected 5 million shares to more than 28 million after strong investor demand, ultimately raising about $2.52 billion.

The security has since grown to a market value of roughly $10 billion, making it Strategy’s flagship preferred-stock product and a key component of its broader capital structure.

That makes restoring STRC to issuance territory increasingly important.

Still, Saylor’s Sept. 8 marker was never a contractual deadline, and STRC has recovered sharply from its May lows to within a few dollars of par.

But the board’s decision to double the repurchase authorization shows that the final stage of that recovery may require substantially more balance-sheet support than Strategy initially anticipated.

Nevertheless, the next test is how much of the additional authorization Strategy must deploy before outside demand can hold the security at the $100 par, allowing STRC to shift back from absorbing corporate capital to raising it.

The post Strategy doubles its stock buyback to $2 billion to pull its STRC shares back to $100 appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Metaplanet’s Bitcoin expansion has exposed an executive compensation windfall that shareholders want the company to unwind.

The dispute centers on an executive options pool that expanded as the Tokyo-listed company repeatedly issued equity to finance its Bitcoin purchases.

Shareholders are now demanding the cancellation of roughly 273 million potential shares added to management’s compensation package during that expansion.

Bitcoin fundraising swelled the executive pay pool

The controversy centers on Metaplanet’s Series 10 stock acquisition rights. Shareholders approved the plan in early 2023, before the company’s pivot to digital assets, and it initially covered 46 million shares.

The plan also contained an adjustment mechanism designed to maintain the shares underlying the options at a benchmark equal to roughly 20% of a defined fully diluted share count.

The company’s capital needs changed dramatically when Chief Executive Simon Gerovich pivoted Metaplanet to a Bitcoin treasury model in April 2024. Metaplanet repeatedly tapped equity markets to fund purchases that eventually built its treasury to 43,000 BTC.

Issued shares climbed from approximately 153.9 million around the start of the Bitcoin strategy to 1.28 billion by the end of June 2026. Because the Series 10 formula adjusted alongside the company’s capital structure, the executive options pool expanded with it, rising from the original 46 million to 319.464 million potential shares.

Metaplanet eliminated the adjustment mechanism on Aug. 18, capping future expansion.

The company acknowledged in its notice that the clause “amplifies the dilution borne by existing shareholders” and could create concerns about the relationship between capital-raising decisions and the interests of the stock acquisition rights holders.

Yet, Metaplanet froze the compensation pool at its expanded size rather than rolling it back to its original level.

That left management with roughly 273 million additional potential shares generated before the mechanism was abolished.

Gerovich turns part of the award into 64 million shares

The shareholder pushback intensified after Gerovich exercised part of his compensation award just days after the August amendment.

On Aug. 28, the CEO exercised 92,000 Series 10 rights and received 64.032 million newly issued shares. The transaction lifted his direct holdings from 15.56 million shares to nearly 79.6 million.

Gerovich paid the legacy exercise price of ¥10 per share, bringing the total cost to approximately ¥640.3 million.

At a Metaplanet share price of ¥244, those newly issued shares carry a market value of roughly ¥15.6 billion, leaving a paper spread of nearly ¥15 billion between their market value and the amount paid to exercise the rights.

Those gains remain unrealized. The August amendment subjected shares obtained through the plan to a five-year lockup that generally prevents their sale or transfer until August 2031.

However, the dilution occurred when the new shares were issued.

Gerovich held 276,000 of the 459,000 outstanding Series 10 rights as of June 30. After exercising 92,000, he would retain about 184,000 rights, assuming no other changes. Other executives and employees hold additional rights, with further portions of the awards scheduled to vest through 2028.

The compensation overhang hits Bitcoin per share

Investors are particularly focused on the compensation pool because it directly affects one of Metaplanet’s central treasury metrics: Bitcoin per fully diluted share.

As of June 30, the company held 43,000 BTC against roughly 1.63 billion fully diluted shares, translating to about 2,635 satoshis per share. That denominator includes the potential dilution from the Series 10 awards.

Shareholder Ragnar is among those demanding the outright cancellation of the roughly 273 million potential shares created above the original size of the compensation plan. He wrote on X:

“The only way out is to roll back the 273 million extra shares, and to replace them with a new, retroactively applied incentive program.”

Removing those potential shares from the denominator would raise Metaplanet’s Bitcoin exposure to about 3,166 satoshis per share, roughly 20% higher, assuming no other changes.

Ragnar has questioned why executives should keep the additional compensation after Metaplanet concluded that the mechanism amplified shareholder dilution and raised concerns about the incentives around capital raising.

He also pointed to Metaplanet’s international offering last year, which he said generated another 96.25 million potential shares through the adjustment clause. According to him, shareholders publicly questioned the arrangement in September and October 2025, months before the company removed the mechanism.

The additional shares also carry no new performance conditions tied to Bitcoin-per-share growth or other shareholder-return metrics, although Metaplanet’s August changes introduced the five-year restriction on sales.

Ragnar argued that the company should replace the enlarged award with compensation tied directly to future performance rather than preserve benefits accumulated under the abandoned formula.

Governance scrutiny expands to MMXX

Compounding the compensation dispute is a separate governance debate surrounding MMXX Ventures, a recurring Metaplanet shareholder and former lender.

Gerovich recently said he is a “significant but non-majority shareholder” of MMXX’s parent company and does not participate in the entity’s investment or trading decisions.

Investors have continued to seek greater detail about MMXX’s ownership and voting structure, as well as Gerovich’s economic exposure to transactions involving Metaplanet.

Metaplanet has also proposed shifting up to 90,000 remaining Series 10 rights, representing 62.64 million potential shares, into a new long-term incentive vehicle for executives and employees. The structure could include performance and service conditions without creating shares beyond the existing ceiling.

Gerovich has acknowledged shortcomings in the company’s communication and said Metaplanet continues to review its governance and compensation

That response has yet to resolve the central shareholder demand. Metaplanet has stopped expanding its executive options pool with future equity raises, but management has not said it will surrender the roughly 273 million potential shares generated before it abolished the mechanism.

The post Metaplanet’s Bitcoin boom quietly turned a 46 million-share executive pay plan into a 319 million-share windfall appeared first on CryptoSlate.

After a 20 percent breakout, one would expect movement. But with Bitcoin, what's happening right now is: nothing. For nearly three weeks, the price has been stuck between around $77,500 and $80,500, after shooting up from the $65,000 range at the end of August. Currently, $BTC is trading at about $78,700, a decrease of around 1.3 percent in the last 24 hours. That's not weakness. The market is waiting for a signal, and it’s not coming from the crypto sector. It’s coming from oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz and from a Fed chair who has stopped talking about interest rate cuts.

Why is the Bitcoin price consolidating at $79,000?

The short answer: Every attempt to reach $80,500 has been consistently sold off.

The breakout in the third week of August was intense. Within a few days, the price surged from around $65,000 into the upper $70,000 range, and since then, it has been moving sideways. Today's drop below $79,000 coincided with stronger US data and rising yields on US Treasury bonds, which is the classic combination of pressures for risk assets. During the retest of the resistance zone, leveraged long positions worth around $55 million were liquidated. This clearly shows where the majority was positioned.

The underlying structure, however, remains healthy. Volume is increasing while the price moves sideways. Selling is actively occurring into strength rather than interest simply fading away. Short-term holders are sitting on billions in unrealized gains, and profit-taking at a round number after a quick movement is exactly what one should expect. The Fear-and-Greed Index stands at 69, clearly in the Greed zone and far from the 31 points a month ago.

A consolidation after a steep rise is not a turning point downward. The market is building a new base at a higher level.

What supports are crucial for the BTC price now?

Three levels matter; everything else is noise:

• Resistance at $80,500. Four attempts have failed here. A daily close above $82,000 would reactivate the breakout and open the path toward $85,000.
• Support at $78,000. The lower boundary of the current range. It has withstood every test since the breakout.
• $75,500. The 20-day moving average and the likely target if $78,000 falls.

As long as $78,000 holds, this is a bull flag with negative headlines in the background. If the level breaks, the August breakout will be seriously retested.

What is the current oil price and why does it matter to the crypto market?

This part is often overlooked in crypto reporting. However, it is currently the most significant influencing factor on the Bitcoin price.

WTI is trading at around $92 per barrel, Brent at just under $97. Just last week, prices rose by about 10 percent, over 12 percent month-over-month, and nearly 50 percent year-over-year. Compared to the lows of late 2025, WTI has more than doubled.

Why should a Bitcoin investor care about a barrel of crude oil? Because oil is the inflation factor that central banks cannot ignore indefinitely. Higher crude oil prices drive transportation and production costs, which ultimately reflect in the inflation rate. Higher inflation rates mean higher interest rates. Higher interest rates mean a greater discount on any long-duration risk asset, and Bitcoin is the longest-duration asset in most portfolios.

Oil at $92 is not just a commodity story. It is monetary policy with a hard hat.

What does the geopolitical situation mean for risk assets?

The crisis in the Strait of Hormuz is now in its seventh month, with no resolution in sight.

The conflict between the US and Iran, which began at the end of February, has effectively severed the world's most important energy corridor. About a quarter of seaborne oil trade and a fifth of global LNG passed through the strait. Over the weekend, the US stated that it had attacked three Iranian oil tankers, destroying one of them in response to missile attacks on US warships. Tehran, in turn, claims hits on three tankers. The US Department of Energy has confirmed that naval presence and blockades will remain. Reports suggest that Iran and Oman are close to an agreement on a monitored tanker route. This is the only constructive thread in the entire story.

At the same time, buffers are thinning. The US strategic oil reserve has fallen below 290 million barrels, the lowest level since 1982. China has scaled back crude oil imports and refinery utilization. The reason oil is at $92 instead of $120 is that the world is tapping into its reserves. And reserves do not refill themselves.

For crypto, this creates a real dilemma. Ongoing geopolitical chaos has historically driven capital into counterparty-free and borderless assets, which is precisely what Bitcoin promises. Conversely, an energy shock that forces central banks to tighten is headwind for anything priced in dollars. At the moment, both forces are balancing each other out, resulting in a chart that looks like a heart monitor between $77,500 and $80,500.

Uncertainty is not the same as pessimism. It is the absence of conviction, and that is exactly what it looks like.

Can a Fed rate hike break the Bitcoin range?

The Fed has kept the key interest rate at 3.50 to 3.75 percent for five meetings. This series is now seriously at risk.

The speech by Fed Chair Kevin Warsh in Jackson Hole at the end of August shifted market expectations. His message: The recently milder price data does not mean that the inflation trend has genuinely improved, and the Fed is not done yet. Markets that had priced in virtually no rate hike before December re-priced within hours. The probability of a hike in September fluctuates between about 55 and 82 percent depending on the data. In July, there were already three dissenting votes in the FOMC calling for a quarter-point increase.

That is 2026 in a nutshell: The year began with priced-in rate cuts and ends with priced-in rate hikes.

Bitcoin has never experienced a rate hike cycle with a $100 billion ETF complex backing it. This very experiment is unfolding over the next two weeks, which is why no one wants to increase their position before the Fed's decision.

Are Bitcoin ETF inflows still the strongest signal?

Yes, and this is the most optimistic data point in the entire market.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs raised nearly $1 billion last week. This brings the total for three weeks to around $3.8 billion, the strongest stretch of 2026. The total assets of the ETFs have surpassed the $100 billion mark, led by BlackRock's IBIT. Compared to the previous week, managed assets saw a slight decline but remain nearly $20 billion above the level from a month ago.

This is the real indication. The price is moving sideways, sentiment among retail investors is nervous, oil is on fire, the Fed is becoming more restrictive, and institutional investors continue to buy about $1 billion per week. Someone with a long-term horizon is using the sideways phase to build positions, and that is not something anyone does when expecting $70,000.

In the broader market, rotation is already underway. Uniswap has risen from around $3.20 in mid-August to about $7. Activity in the futures market for XRP has reached a six-month high. Altcoin volumes are increasing, which temporarily takes some momentum away from BTC but indicates healthy risk appetite beneath the surface.

What should you pay attention to this week?

1. The Fed decision. A rate hike is likely to trigger an immediate risk-off sentiment and test $78,000. A hold with a restrictive tone keeps the range intact. A surprisingly dovish Fed sets the stage for $85,000.
2. Headlines from Hormuz. Progress on the tanker deal between Iran and Oman would cool oil prices and relieve inflationary pressure from the Fed. This would quietly be the best thing that could happen to Bitcoin this month.
3. The yield on ten-year U.S. Treasury bonds. It has risen to around 4.80 percent. Bitcoin has never liked rising real interest rates in its history.
4. ETF inflows. If weekly inflows remain around $1 billion even through a restrictive Fed, that would be the strongest institutional conviction signal of this cycle.

The conclusion on the Bitcoin range around $79,000

Bitcoin is not stuck because something is wrong with it. It is stuck because the two largest macroeconomic variables on the planet, an energy shock and a monetary policy shift, are pulling in opposite directions, and neither has been resolved.

The range is the message. $78,000 is the line that matters. Institutional money is building positions into the uncertainty, while leveraged traders are repeatedly getting liquidated at the highs. Historically, this combination does not resolve downward.

Watch the Fed. And then watch the oil tankers.

How to Learn Trading Online Without Paying Tuition to the Market

Few subjects are started the wrong way as often as trading. The typical route looks like this: open an account with a broker, deposit three hundred euros, watch a handful of videos and begin. Two weeks later the money is gone, and the only lesson that sticks is frustration. That first stage can be completed at no cost at all, provided it is set up properly.

Why Theory on Its Own Is Not Enough

Nobody is short of knowledge. What leverage is, what a stop loss does, how a short position works: all of it is explained in five minutes and understood in ten. Most beginners still fail, and what defeats them is the execution.

Trading is less a body of knowledge than a craft. Defining a stop loss is trivial. Leaving it where it is while the price runs against your position and your mind hunts for reasons to move it down “just this once” is a different matter entirely. That ability comes from repetition alone, from hundreds of decisions taken under realistic conditions.

Then there is a factor no course conveys: how you personally handle losses. After three red trades in a row, hardly anyone still makes the decisions they made that morning. Positions grow larger to make up lost ground, rules get bent to fit the situation. Recognising that pattern in yourself is the precondition for working on it.

The sequence is what decides the outcome. Build the routine first, put capital at risk afterwards, and never the other way round.

Practising Under Real Market Conditions

A practice account funded with virtual money solves the problem, as long as the market data behind it is genuine. Static sample charts achieve little, because they leave out the most uncomfortable part of the job: the movement that happens while you are sitting in the position.

The CryptoTicker Trading Hub is built for exactly that. You trade with virtual money, the prices come live from the exchange, and the cockpit matches what you will later find at a real broker, leverage, short positions and indicators included. Getting it wrong costs nothing beyond the insight. The first trades even work without an account, and no payment details are held on file.

The Four Points That Really Count at the Start

• What leverage actually means. Tenfold leverage sounds like tenfold profit and amounts, in practice, mainly to one thing: a drastically shortened distance to liquidation. Working out once that a two percent move against you costs twenty percent of the account teaches the concept far faster than any explanation.
• How short positions feel. Betting on falling prices is mechanically simple and psychologically uncomfortable, because the loss potential behaves differently. When too many participants are short and the price rises anyway, they have to buy back, which is the classic short squeeze. Living through one leaves a mark.
• Why a stop loss is dull and still correct. Risk management is the least spectacular part of the craft and the only part that decides the outcome over time. A daily limit that halts trading once losses reach a set level may feel excessive in a practice account. In earnest it separates a bad day from an empty account.
• That the highest return does not automatically win. Someone who goes flat out for forty percent and has to sit through a twenty percent drawdown along the way has worked less well than someone with a steady twelve percent. The Trading Hub scores precisely that: return measured against the largest drawdown. Internalising that ratio is worth more to a beginner than any entry strategy.

Competition Keeps You at the Table

The practical drawback of a demo account is the missing consequence. Without a stake there is no incentive to work cleanly; you click around, lose interest and stop.

A leaderboard supplies that incentive without exposing any capital. The Trading Hub is currently running its trial month: you can play in the Playground entirely unranked, or enter the leaderboard with scored trades. Both are free at the moment, and a competition with prize money has been announced for later seasons. Measuring yourself against others creates the seriousness that unstructured experimenting never produces.

Conclusion

Learning to trade online has little to do with putting real money to work as quickly as possible. It is about making the standard beginner mistakes where they cost nothing: leverage, position size and exit discipline. Practise consistently with live prices for a few weeks and you enter the real market with a routine instead of a hope.

(As of September 9, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)

On September 11, 2026 at 11:15 UTC the amendment fixCleanup3_3_0 can go live on the XRP Ledger. For you as an investor that means very little in most cases and a great deal in one: if your XRP sits with an exchange or in a maintained wallet app, you have nothing to do. If you run your own node, if you reach the network through a self-hosted interface, or if you hold positions in the ledger's advanced features, then September 11 is your deadline for a version check.

This analysis was carried out by cryptoticker.io itself on September 9, 2026. We asked the chain directly instead of taking the state of play from news reports: through the public interface of an XRPL node, using the feature and ledger_entry calls against the amendments object of the validated ledger. What came out of it differs on two points from what is currently being written about the date.

Amendment fixCleanup3_3_0: what happens on the XRP Ledger on September 11

An amendment is a change to the rules of the XRP Ledger protocol. The network's validators vote on it, and once the vote passes it applies permanently to every following ledger version. Nobody deploys it centrally; it is a switch the majority of operators throw together.

fixCleanup3_3_0 is a bundle of corrections, not a new feature. It tidies up in six places: at the Single Asset Vaults (vault objects that hold a single asset for a protocol), at the Lending Protocol (the planned lending business directly at protocol level), at the Automated Market Makers (trading pools that quote prices through a formula rather than an order book), at the Permissioned DEX (a trading venue that only serves approved participants), at Checks (payment promises the recipient redeems themselves) and at pseudo-accounts (technical accounts that belong to no human being because a protocol object holds them).

In concrete terms, the bundle harmonises the freeze checks on transfers from pseudo-accounts, rejects malformed check identifiers at the preliminary stage, fixes an error when removing hybrid offers, and adds a check for rounding losses on deposits, withdrawals and clawbacks in AMM pools, provided the older amendment fixAMMv1_3 is active as well. On top of that comes a new invariant called ObjectHasPseudoAccount, which makes sure that deleting a ledger entry also removes the associated pseudo-account.

That sounds like detail work, and it is. Which is precisely why the news is not a price story for you, but a maintenance story with a hard deadline.

The 80 percent rule: how an XRPL amendment is activated in the first place

The procedure is set out in the amendment documentation of the XRP Ledger and it is strict. An amendment needs the approval of more than 80 percent of the validators a server listens to, and it needs that support for two weeks without interruption. If support drops to 80 percent or below in the meantime, the clock starts again from zero. An amendment can win and lose that majority several times before it finally goes through.

The count happens at so-called flag ledgers, meaning every 256th ledger, which on average works out at roughly a quarter-hour rhythm. At the flag ledger the validators cast their votes, one ledger later the network writes a pseudo-transaction with the result, and two ledgers after the flag ledger the new rule takes effect on transactions. Activation therefore follows a count, not a ceremony at a round hour.

Anyone who knows the pattern will recognise it from other networks. On Solana, the activation of a protocol change likewise hangs on the stake weighting of the operators; we wrote that up in our article on the Alpenglow activation. The difference lies in the detail: on the XRP Ledger the two-week period is anchored in the protocol and can therefore be read off the ledger itself.

Counted on the ledger ourselves: 93 active amendments, eleven open, one majority

On September 9, 2026 at 00:52 UTC we queried a public XRPL node which at that moment carried the validated ledger with the number 106,856,830 and reported server version 3.3.0. Method: a feature call for the list of all amendments known to the server, plus a ledger_entry call against the amendments object of the ledger for the official state. All 104 amendments this server knows about were checked.

The result in figures: 93 amendments are active, eleven are open. Of those eleven, exactly one carries a majority entry in the ledger, namely fixCleanup3_3_0. The closing time stored for that entry in the object converts to August 28, 2026, 11:15 UTC. Add the prescribed fourteen days and you get the earliest possible activation moment: September 11, 2026, 11:15 UTC.

That allows two figures currently in circulation to be set straight. First, the start of the vote is dated in some reports to August 6; what counts for the deadline, however, is solely the moment the majority first stood, and according to the ledger that is August 28. Second, several reports give 11:15 in US Eastern time. The ledger keeps its time in UTC, which puts the moment in the middle of the day on September 11 for readers in Europe.

One caveat belongs with this: what we measured was the state of one node; it does not cover the vote of every single validator. The most recently reported approval rate of 82.86 percent with 29 yes votes comes from third-party analysis and is a snapshot. Whether it stays above the threshold until September 11 is something nobody can promise today.

Single Asset Vault and Lending Protocol are not even live on mainnet yet

The most important finding of our query does not appear in the reports about the date. In the same list of eleven open amendments stand SingleAssetVault and LendingProtocol themselves. Both are therefore not yet switched on for mainnet. The same goes for ConfidentialTransfer, DynamicMPT, BatchV1_1, Sponsor, XChainBridge, PermissionDelegationV1_1, CryptoConditionsSuite and fixXChainRewardRounding. None of these ten amendments currently carries a majority entry.

From that follows a piece of reassurance worth remembering: if somebody tells you that you have to secure your vault or lending position on the XRP Ledger before September 11, they are describing a state of affairs that does not exist on the main network. You cannot hold a lending position directly on the XRPL protocol today, because the function is not active.

The fix, in other words, is being built in before the function opens. In software development that is the normal case and a good sign: errors found on test networks and in audits are cleared away before launch. For you it mainly means you should treat offers advertising XRPL-native lending today with scepticism. Anyone looking for yield on crypto assets will currently find it with custodians and trading venues, whose terms deserve a closer reading in every case than any announcement about a protocol function that is not yet switched on.

Amendment blocked: why an outdated node drops out of consensus

Amendment blocked is the state a server falls into when a rule its software version does not know becomes active on the network. The documentation is unambiguous on this point: a blocked server can no longer validate ledgers, can no longer submit or process transactions, can no longer take part in consensus and can no longer vote on future amendments. It stands still.

That is the real reason for the deadline. Anyone running a node has until activation to switch to a version that knows fixCleanup3_3_0. The public node we queried was running 3.3.0 at the time of measurement and reported no block. A server that lags behind will report one immediately after activation, and the disruption shows up at the moment an application runs into nothing.

The documentation also names a property many people underestimate: a server always follows the amendments the rest of the network has activated, regardless of how it voted itself. A no vote therefore does not protect an outdated server. Only an update does.

XRP on an exchange: what to check with your provider before September 11

If your XRP sits in the account of a trading platform, the node belongs to the provider. The duty to update therefore lies with them, and as a rule a switch like this passes unnoticed. Even so, a quick look before a protocol deadline is worth it, because platforms occasionally pause deposits and withdrawals for a chain for the duration of an upgrade.

The route to that is always the same. Open your provider's status or announcements page, search for the network name, and see whether a maintenance window is entered for September 11. If you find nothing, nothing is planned. Whether your provider announces such a window at all is one of the points on which platforms differ considerably.

Three questions to settle on your own account

The first question is whether you have any movements planned for September 11 at all. A withdrawal that runs a day earlier or a day later costs you nothing. The second question concerns automated orders: a savings plan or a recurring withdrawal that fires at that midday hour belongs in your calendar. The third question is the most uncomfortable and at the same time the most important: do you know for certain where your XRP is? Across several accounts held over years, that answer is less clear-cut more often than it should be.

A note on the scope of the effect. fixCleanup3_3_0 changes nothing about ordinary payments, nothing about balances and nothing about the validity of your addresses. Anyone who holds XRP and sends it will in all probability notice nothing whatsoever on September 11. The corrections bite on objects that play no part in the daily life of most investors.

Your own wallet and your own node: the version check in three steps

Things look different if you run infrastructure yourself. That affects more people than the term suggests: anyone using self-hosted wallet software with its own network access, anyone settling payments through their own interface, or anyone keeping a node running for a small service, is under the same obligation as a professional operator.

The first step is the version query on your own server. The server_info call returns the field build_version and also the field amendment_blocked, which shows the blocked state directly. If it says version 3.3.0 or higher, your software knows the amendment.

The second step applies to the wallet you use every day. Open the settings, find the version number and compare it with the provider's current release. Anyone who lets their wallet update automatically through the app store is usually on the safe side here; anyone maintaining a desktop version by hand often is not. Which wallet programs are properly maintained and which have stood still for months is shown by our software wallet comparison, with the update status of each.

The third step concerns everything that sits between you and the chain: a script, an accounting tool, a portfolio tracker with its own network access. Check which endpoint these tools talk to, and whether that endpoint is maintained. A blocked node will at some point simply stop answering, without spelling out an error message in plain language.

AMM positions on the XRP Ledger: what the precision fix changes on deposits and withdrawals

One part of the bundle concerns a function that really does run on mainnet: the Automated Market Maker of the XRP Ledger. An AMM is a trading pool into which two assets are deposited and which sets its prices through a fixed formula; whoever deposits receives shares in the pool and in return carries the risk of an unfavourable price move between the two assets.

The correction adds a check for rounding losses on deposit, withdrawal and clawback, specifically when the older amendment fixAMMv1_3 is active as well. Rounding losses arise when a calculation with a limited number of digits cuts off decimal places on very small or very unevenly distributed amounts. In total those are tiny sums, but in unfavourable combinations they can be exploited deliberately.

If you hold shares in an XRPL AMM pool, activation changes nothing about your holding. It may be, however, that a transaction which went through until now is rejected with an error after September 11 because the new check bites. That is the intended effect. So do not plan tightly timed reallocations for activation day, and expect a rejected transaction to need a second, adjusted attempt.

Timeline until activation: what happens between September 9 and September 11

Until the deadline the count simply carries on. Roughly every fifteen minutes the network reaches a flag ledger, the validators cast their votes, and the majority entry in the amendments object stays in place as long as approval is above 80 percent. If it falls below at one of those points, the entry disappears and the fourteen days start again.

That is why September 11 counts as the earliest possible date and not as a commitment. Whether activation actually takes place that midday can only be said on the day itself. Anyone who wants to know precisely can query the state at any time, exactly as we did for this article, or follow the developer blog of the XRP Ledger, where releases and activations are announced.

How to recognise that activation has happened

After activation, fixCleanup3_3_0 moves in the feature query from the list of open amendments to the list of active ones, and the number of active entries in the amendments object rises from 93 to 94. That is the cleanest confirmation there is, and it works without any report from outside.

What the date means for the XRP price, and what it does not

Restraint is in order here. A bundle of fixes that harmonises internal checks and catches rounding losses is not an event from which a price direction could be derived. It raises no transaction capacity, lowers no fees and unlocks no new function.

What it does is indirect and slow: it clears errors out of precisely those building blocks on which the still-pending functions for vaults and lending are meant to sit. Anyone who ties the valuation of a network to its future feature set will read that positively. Anyone looking for short-term movement will find nothing here. Both are assessments and not forecasts; the current price situation and the arguments on both sides are something we collect continuously on our XRP page.

A remark on how to read the coverage: over the past few days the date has been described in several places as a "major upgrade". Judging by what is in the bundle, that description does not hold. This is maintenance on advanced objects, two of which are central and not even switched on for the main network.

Checking the XRP Ledger amendment: what to take away

1. First establish where your XRP is. On a trading platform the provider carries the duty to update, and all you check is their status page for a maintenance window on September 11. In self-custody the duty is yours. If this question makes you pause, that is the real finding of the day: sort out your holdings and look at which custody solution suits you, for instance in the hardware wallet comparison.
2. Check the version of every piece of software that talks to the network itself. On your own server, server_info shows the fields build_version and amendment_blocked; 3.3.0 or higher is the safe state. For wallets a glance at the settings is enough. Anyone noticing that their program has not seen an update in months will find maintained alternatives in the software wallet comparison.
3. Push planned reallocations back by a day. If you hold shares in an AMM pool or have larger movements planned for September 11, move them to September 10 or September 12. And if offers reach you that already advertise lending directly on the XRP Ledger, compare them with the routes actually available in the crypto lending comparison before you move any money.

(As of September 9, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)

The deadline for the Mt. Gox repayments ends on October 31, 2026, Japan Time. In practice that means the cut-off has already passed on Friday, October 30, 2026, at 16:00 Central European Time. Anyone holding an approved claim against the former bitcoin exchange has to have their paperwork and their payout account in order by then. If you simply own Bitcoin and want to know whether selling pressure is heading your way: the 2024 precedent argues against it, and that can be evidenced.

The date is the largest crypto deadline of this autumn, and in German not a single text so far ties it to a concrete action. German-language coverage last touched the subject in early June 2026, when a wallet movement ran through the news. This guide closes that gap. It tells you what the deadline is in legal terms, what rehabilitation creditors have to have completed by then, how much BTC still sits in the estate of the proceedings, and what the date means for every other bitcoin holder. You will not find a price forecast here, because the process does not carry one.

When the Mt. Gox repayment deadline ends and why October 30 is the date that counts

The official page of the proceedings puts it in these words: "The Rehabilitation Trustee has changed the deadline of the Base Repayment, the Early Lump-Sum Repayment, and the Intermediate Repayment from October 31, 2025 (Japan Time) to October 31, 2026 (Japan Time), respectively." The decisive part sits in the brackets. Japan Time, JST for short, runs nine hours ahead of universal time. October 31, 2026 therefore ends in Tokyo at 15:00 UTC, and because European summer time expires on October 25, 2026, that is 16:00 Central European Time on Friday, October 30, 2026.

That conversion appears in none of the German reports we found, and it is the one point where a reader can lose a full day to nothing but time-zone carelessness. Anyone still planning to get something done on Saturday, October 31, is working against a deadline that expired the day before. If you keep an eye on dates like this one, our overview of the verified crypto deadlines and key dates this autumn helps, and this date was missing from it until now.

What the deadline means legally: Base Repayment, Early Lump-Sum Repayment, Intermediate Repayment

Mt. Gox has not operated as a crypto exchange since 2014. It runs as a Japanese civil rehabilitation proceeding. Three terms turn up in every notice from the process, and they are not synonyms.

• Base Repayment: the first, pro-rata payout to all approved rehabilitation creditors.
• Early Lump-Sum Repayment: an advance flat payment for creditors with smaller claims, who in return waive later top-up payments.
• Intermediate Repayment: further part payments out of the remaining estate, before the proceeding is settled for good.
• Rehabilitation creditor: anyone who filed their claim on time and had it approved. New claims have not been admissible for years.

The extended deadline covers all three payment types together. What is meant is the date by which the trustee is supposed to have completed those payments, not a date on which money automatically moves at the end. That distinction carries the rest of this article.

Who Nobuaki Kobayashi is and what the trustee actually decides

The proceeding is run by the court-appointed Rehabilitation Trustee, Nobuaki Kobayashi. He administers the holdings, checks creditors' documents and settles the payouts through mandated crypto platforms. He gave his reasoning for the latest extension in the announcement itself: many creditors had not completed the necessary procedural steps, others had run into problems along the way. The trade publication The Block reported on this on October 27, 2025 and put the number of creditors served by that point at around 19,500.

One point matters for context: an extension of the deadline is not a decision the trustee takes on his own. The competent court in Tokyo has to approve it. That is precisely why such announcements come at short notice, and precisely why the timing of an extension is hard to predict.

What Mt. Gox creditors have to have completed by the deadline

If you are affected yourself, everything hangs on three points you can check in the creditor portal of the proceeding. Work through them in this order, because each later step depends on the one before it.

1. Access and identity. Check whether you can still log in to the claim filing system and whether the data on file is correct. An outdated address or a dead email address is the most common reason why notices never arrive.
2. Payout account. The payments run through mandated exchanges and through banking channels. The account you have registered there has to be in the same name as your claim, it has to have passed the platform's verification, and it has to be able to accept the currency the payout is made in.
3. Consent to the settlement route. A payout through a crypto exchange requires a separate declaration in which you agree to the settlement through that platform. Without it, your claim sits in the proceeding approved but unpaid.

What you can no longer do: file a new claim. The filing deadline expired years ago. Anyone learning today for the first time about an old balance has no route into the proceeding any more, and any offer promising them such a route should make them suspicious. Why, is set out further below.

Which crypto exchanges handle the payouts and how long they take

The payout runs through mandated platforms and not directly from the trustee to individual wallets. In the payout wave that began in July 2024, those were Kraken, Bitstamp, BitGo, SBI VC Trade and Bitbank. The processing windows reported at the time, counted from the arrival of the coins at the respective platform, were far apart: up to 90 days at Kraken, up to 60 days at Bitstamp, around 20 days at BitGo, and roughly 14 days at SBI VC Trade and Bitbank. Those figures come from the 2024 reporting and are no commitment for 2026, but they do show the order of magnitude.

For the deadline that carries a very practical consequence. If up to three months can pass between the trustee sending the coins and the credit reaching you, then October 30 is not a date you should be working towards. It is the date by which the trustee is supposed to be finished. Your own preparations belong weeks ahead of it.

Anyone whose balance sits on a trading platform anyway can use the occasion for a sober stocktake. Which providers in Europe are supervised and what safeguards they offer is broken down in our comparison of regulated crypto exchanges. Mt. Gox is the reason that question gets asked at all.

How many bitcoin Mt. Gox still holds: the balances according to Arkham

When the exchange collapsed in 2014, around 850,000 BTC had disappeared, of which roughly 200,000 later resurfaced. What is left in the proceeding today can only be estimated through the attribution of wallet addresses, and that work is done by analytics firms, not by the trustee. The provider Arkham tracks the Mt. Gox wallets as an entity of their own. The verifiable values diverge, which is why a range stands here instead of one smoothed number:

• 34,689 BTC according to Arkham data, as of October 2025, reported by The Block.
• around 34,500 BTC according to Arkham data, as of June 2026, consistent across several trade publications.
• 10,422 BTC as the size of a single wallet movement on June 2, 2026, worth roughly 739 million dollars at the time.
• 142,000 BTC and BCH as the size of the large payout wave from July 2024 onwards, for comparison.

Honesty requires the limits of these figures: we did not measure the current on-chain balance ourselves for this article, because the candidate addresses could not be attributed beyond doubt. The bitcoin transactions and holdings named here are therefore third-party measurements with a date attached, not our own survey. Anyone working with them should keep the range in mind rather than picking out the sharpest number.

A wallet movement, incidentally, is not a sale. Behind it there may be an internal reshuffle, preparation for distribution, or simply a change of custody technology. When the 10,422 BTC were moved in June 2026, the report ran through the crypto news without ever turning into a sale on the market. How quickly a price narrative grows out of such reports is shown by our look back at the day the bitcoin price slid below 70,000 dollars.

Selling pressure from Mt. Gox: what was actually measurable in 2024

The most searched question around this date is not about the proceeding at all, but about the price: do the payouts push the bitcoin price down? It can be answered without any forecast, because there is a precedent.

The large payout wave began in July 2024. Around 142,000 bitcoin and bitcoin cash went to creditors, with roughly 48,641 BTC transferred to Kraken alone. Market expectations were unambiguous: anyone getting their coins back after ten years sells. In the week the payouts started, the price did indeed fall sharply. Two weeks later, Blocktrainer summarised the measurement on July 24, 2024: trading volume at Kraken had not risen noticeably in the context of the repayments, according to CryptoQuant chief executive Ki Young Ju. What rose instead were the outflows from the exchange. Recipients moved their coins into self-custody.

That is an observation with a date and a source, not an expectation for the autumn of 2026. Two things about it hold up: the feared wave of selling did not materialise in 2024, and the remaining amount today is many times smaller than it was then. Anyone building a price statement for October out of that goes beyond what the data supports.

Why a fourth extension of the repayment deadline remains possible

October 31, 2026 is not the first end date of this proceeding. It is the fourth. Originally the accounts were meant to be settled by October 31, 2023, then it was pushed to 2024, then to 2025, and most recently to 2026. The latest postponement was announced on October 27, 2025, four days before the deadline then in force ran out.

No forecast follows from that, but a rule of caution for your own planning does. A text claiming that payouts will be made on October 31, 2026 and that this is the end of it stands a palpable chance of being proven wrong at the end of October. The more careful phrasing is the correct one: the proceeding is supposed to be completed by that date, and looking at the history, another extension cannot be ruled out. For you as a creditor that changes nothing about the preparation. For you as an observer it means that a date in this proceeding is not a deadline in the usual sense.

Phishing in the name of the trustee: the warning on the official site

Two separate warnings currently sit on the front page of the proceeding, and both are recent enough to be taken seriously. One concerns fake websites and emails posing as Mt. Gox or as the trustee. The other concerns a specific site that used the Mt. Gox name and logo without permission in order to collect creditors' data. In the notice, the trustee states unmistakably that those affected should not leave personal information on such sites and should not reply to such messages.

Three checks follow from that, each costing a second before any click and each making the difference:

• Open the claim filing system only through the address you saved yourself, never through a link in an email.
• Distrust every message that creates urgency, demands a fee for the payout, or asks for your seed, your password or remote access to your machine. The proceeding does not ask for anything of the kind.
• An offer to file your supposedly lost claim retroactively is not an offer. The filing period is closed.
• Compare the sender address of a notice character by character against the official domain. One swapped digit or one extra hyphen is enough for a forged message.

If you would rather not leave your balance sitting on the trading platform after a payout, the options and their trade-offs are in our hardware wallet comparison. This is exactly the route measurably many recipients took in 2024.

How a Mt. Gox payout is treated for tax purposes in Germany

Caution matters more here than a quick answer. Private crypto gains in Germany fall under the private disposal transaction of section 23 of the Income Tax Act, with the familiar holding period of one year. The contested point in an insolvency payout is a preliminary question: are you getting back the same assets you held in 2014, so that the original acquisition continues to run, or is there a new acquisition in the year of the payout? That determines when your holding period starts, and the answer decides the tax amount.

Honesty requires this: there is no settled answer here that fits every case, and this article is no substitute for tax advice. What you can do yourself is secure the evidence. Record when your claim was approved, when the credit arrived, in what amount and at what daily rate. Tools that document exactly this kind of event cleanly are set side by side in our comparison of crypto tax tools and portfolio trackers. Classifying the individual case then belongs in the hands of a tax adviser with crypto experience.

What the date means for bitcoin holders without a claim of their own

The vast majority of readers hold no claim in the proceeding. For them October 30 is interesting all the same, because a news pattern reliably forms around dates like this one: a wallet movement is reported, an expectation grows out of it, and a headline about selling pressure grows out of the expectation. What you can hold against it is a sense of the orders of magnitude. A balance of a good 34,000 BTC is a fraction of the 2024 wave of 142,000 coins, and the big test of that thesis is already behind us.

Soberly put: the proceeding returns coins to people who waited ten years for them. What those people do with them was observable in 2024, and the observation pointed to holding and self-custody. The process gives up nothing more than that, and everything beyond it is speculation dressed up as analysis.

Checking the Mt. Gox repayment deadline: what to take away

1. Put October 30, 2026, 16:00, in your calendar, not the 31st. If you are a rehabilitation creditor, check your access, the data on file and your payout account by the beginning of October. If your payout runs through a trading platform, look first at which providers in Europe are supervised: comparison of regulated crypto exchanges.
2. Document every credit on the day it arrives. Amount, date, daily rate, platform. These records decide your tax burden later, and they are hard to reconstruct after the fact. Suitable tools are in the comparison of crypto tax tools and portfolio trackers.
3. Decide in advance where the coins go after the payout. Leaving them on the platform or moving them into self-custody is a decision better taken before the credit arrives than after it: hardware wallet comparison.

The official notices of the proceeding are published by the Rehabilitation Trustee at mtgox.com. Everything else you read about your claim, you check against that source.

(As of September 9, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)

Anyone holding one of the 25 tokens that KuCoin removed from trading on September 7, 2026 has until October 7, 2026 at 8:00 UTC to withdraw them from the exchange. After that the withdrawal window closes. Selling is already off the table, because trading has been halted since September 7. That leaves exactly one action: move the tokens to an address of your own.

The second point is the more uncomfortable one, and it comes from our own count: on the evening of September 8, KuCoin's official deadline overview listed only ten of these 25 tokens. Anyone who looks there and fails to find their token might conclude that they are not affected. That would be an expensive mistake.

KuCoin delisting: these 25 tokens are affected

In its announcement of September 3, 2026, KuCoin names these tokens: ACX, HYDRA, KARRAT, PORTALS, GAFI, SCOR, AUDIO, BLUM, HONEY, SN3, NOBODY, TSTBSC, HPOS10I, LVVA, MTRG, EMYC, DUCK, J, MOVA, BFC, WEN, FWOG, GAIN, WAXP and REEF. Trading was discontinued on September 7, 2026 at 8:00 UTC.

These are mostly small projects, but not exclusively. AUDIO is the token of the music platform Audius, for which we maintain a price prediction of its own; WAXP belongs to the WAX blockchain, MTRG to Meter Governance, ACX to the cross-chain protocol Across. Anyone who has had these holdings sitting in a secondary account for years may not have looked at it for months.

The three key dates: trading halt, deposit halt, withdrawal deadline

A delisting does not happen in a single day; it runs in three stages. In this case they fall as follows:

• September 4, 2026, 8:00 UTC: deposits of the affected tokens were switched off. Anyone who still sent tokens to their KuCoin address after that point has to reckon with them not being credited.
• September 7, 2026, 8:00 UTC: trading was discontinued. From this point a sale through the exchange is no longer possible.
• October 7, 2026, 8:00 UTC: withdrawals close. That is the deadline that counts.

Thirty days lie between the trading halt and the withdrawal deadline. That is the usual shape, which other exchanges also choose, and it is more generous than what Bitfinex offered in August with 13 tokens. Generous does not mean harmless, though: the deadline runs whether you notice it or not, and an email reminder is no substitute for checking yourself. If you want to understand how exchanges behave in cases like this and what marks out a dependable platform, our comparison of the best crypto exchanges is the place to look.

Deadline list checked: only 10 of 25 tokens were listed there

Alongside the individual announcements, KuCoin maintains a continuously updated overview page carrying the trading, deposit and withdrawal deadlines of all delisted tokens. We retrieved that page on September 8, 2026 at around 21:50 UTC and compared it with the announcement of September 3.

The result: ten of the 25 announced tokens were entered there with complete deadlines — KARRAT, SCOR, REEF, GAFI, AUDIO, ACX, PORTALS, BLUM, WAXP and HYDRA. All ten carry the same three points in time: trading until September 7 at 8:00 UTC, deposits until September 4 at 8:00 UTC, withdrawals until October 7 at 8:00 UTC.

Fifteen tokens from the same announcement were not on that overview at the time of our retrieval: HONEY, SN3, NOBODY, TSTBSC, HPOS10I, LVVA, MTRG, EMYC, DUCK, J, MOVA, BFC, WEN, FWOG and GAIN. That is a snapshot and not an accusation — overview pages are updated after the fact, and it is quite possible that the missing entries have since been added. For you as a holder, a practical rule follows all the same: the announcement is the binding source, the overview page is the convenience. Check your holdings against the announcement, not against the list.

Special treatment: what lies behind the procedure

For this delisting KuCoin invokes its so-called Special Treatment Rules. That is an internal set of rules which places projects under observation when certain metrics break down — persistently low trading volume, absent development activity or a project team that stops responding. A definition in one sentence: special treatment is the warning status an exchange gives a token before it removes it for good.

For you as a holder, one thing above all matters here: a delisting under this procedure says something about tradability on this one exchange, not necessarily about the token itself. The token continues to exist on its blockchain. What disappears is the convenient access through the exchange interface.

ACX and J: two tokens already removed elsewhere

Two names on the list have crossed our path in the past four weeks. We reported on August 14 on the Binance delisting of August 17, 2026, in which ACX among others fell out of trading; and on August 22 on the OKX delisting of MAJOR and J with a withdrawal deadline of August 26. Both pieces of information come from our own reporting and are marked as such here.

No verdict on prices can be derived from this, but a practical consequence can: when a token is removed by several large exchanges one after another, the circle of places where you can still sell it at all shrinks. Anyone who only reacts after the third delisting may find no trading venue left with usable depth. That is the real reason the deadline matters more than the day's price.

Preparing the withdrawal: network, address and minimum amount

A withdrawal rarely fails because of the deadline and often because of a detail. There are three points you should settle before you start the process.

The network. Many of the affected tokens exist on several chains. If you pick a different network for the withdrawal than your destination address supports, in the worst case the tokens are lost. Check in the withdrawal dialogue which networks are offered and match that against your wallet.

The destination address. You need an address whose keys you hold yourself, or an account at another exchange that still lists the token. For the first option a hardware wallet is the most robust route; which devices support which chains is set out in our hardware wallet comparison. The second route sounds simpler but merely shifts the problem: the next exchange can delist too.

The minimum amount. Exchanges set a lower limit and a fixed fee for every withdrawal. With residual holdings worth a few euros, the fee can exceed the amount — the withdrawal is then technically possible but economically pointless. That is annoying, but it is a deliberate decision and not an omission.

When the withdrawal fails: the liability disclaimer in the small print

The deadline overview carries a sentence that is easy to skim past. KuCoin points out there that withdrawals can fail if a project team restricts activity on its own chain — by halting block production or transfers, for instance. In such a case the platform may suspend withdrawals and is not liable for any losses arising from that.

This is more than a formality. It means that the deadline of October 7 is an upper limit and not a promise. If the chain of a delisted project stops running before then, the chance to withdraw ends earlier — with the exchange taking no responsibility for it. For projects whose development is already stalling, that is not a theoretical risk. The conclusion is uncomfortable and simple: do not wait until early October.

KuCoin EU and kucoin.com: first check where your account sits

For users in Germany there is a particular point to settle before any further step: two operations exist. The announcement discussed here comes from the global platform. Alongside it stands KuCoin EU Exchange GmbH, which according to the public ESMA register holds a MiCA authorisation as a crypto service provider from the Austrian financial market authority, granted at the end of November 2025.

Whether a delisting announcement from the global platform applies one to one to customers of the European entity does not emerge from the announcement itself. So log in to the account where your tokens actually sit and check in the withdrawal dialogue there whether the token can still be withdrawn and until when. While you are at it, sort out which providers hold your remaining assets and which of them is authorised in the EU.

Tax: what the withdrawal means for your holding period

A pure transfer from the exchange to an address of your own is not a sale. In Germany it does not in principle trigger a taxable event, and it does not interrupt the one-year holding period under Section 23 of the Income Tax Act either. The only thing that matters is that you can still evidence the date and the cost of acquisition.

That is precisely where things often fail in practice. When a token is delisted, the trading data sooner or later disappears from the exchange interface as well. So download the complete transaction history for that token before you withdraw and file it with your tax records. Nobody will retrieve that file for you later.

Worthless residual holdings: withdraw or leave them?

Not every position is worth the effort. If your holding lands in the cents range after the withdrawal fee, the sober answer is: the economic damage has already occurred, and the deadline changes nothing about that.

Two reasons still speak for withdrawing. First, a token whose development continues can become tradable again later — on an address of your own you keep that option, on an exchange without a trading pair you do not. Second, for a tax loss to be recognised you need an event you can evidence; a holding that quietly expires in an account is harder to present than one you demonstrably still own. Whether that adds up for you depends on the size of the fee, and you see that in the withdrawal dialogue before you confirm.

How we counted: method and limits

This analysis was carried out by cryptoticker.io itself on September 8, 2026. Method: we retrieved the delisting announcement of September 3, 2026 and KuCoin's continuously updated deadline overview on September 8, 2026 at around 21:50 UTC, read out the visible text without the HTML scaffolding, and checked each of the 25 tokens named in the announcement individually against the entries on the overview page. Checked: 25 tokens, two pages, one retrieval time. Result: 10 tokens with a complete set of deadlines on the overview, 15 without an entry there at the time of retrieval.

What we could not check: any view behind a login, because we do not maintain customer accounts — that is, the actual withdrawal dialogue, the networks offered for your token and the specific fees. It also remains open whether and when the missing 15 entries will be added, and whether the announcement from the global platform applies unchanged to the European entity. Anyone relying on this article should therefore check their own holdings in their own account in any case.

Checking the KuCoin deadline: what to take away

1. Look into your account today. Match your holdings against the list of 25 tokens from the announcement, not against the overview page — 15 of them were missing there on September 8. If you find a position, start the withdrawal immediately rather than shortly before October 7. If you are thinking about switching anyway while you are at it: our overview of regulated crypto exchanges sets out who is authorised in the EU.
2. Set up the destination before you withdraw. You need an address on the matching network whose keys you hold yourself. For smaller amounts a vetted software solution from our software wallet comparison is enough; for anything that would hurt if it were gone, keeping it off the network still applies.
3. Secure the records before the withdrawal. Download the transaction history for every affected token while it is still in the interface. A tool that carries acquisition dates and holding periods forward permanently takes that off your hands later — the common providers are in our comparison of crypto tax tools.

(As of September 8, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)

Builders Bank would consolidate custody work Block now runs under more than 50 state money transmitter licenses.

NYU's Tristan Buckmaster accuses OpenAI's Sébastien Bubeck of racing to claim credit for a Navier-Stokes proof after learning about his unpublished work with Anthropic's Levent Alpöge.

The hackers have returned 3,400 of the roughly 4,000 BTC drained from the sidechain, but about 600 BTC remains outstanding—and some doubt the actors' "white hat" claims.

Bitcoin is defending its golden zone support while the S&P 500 grinds inside its tightest range yet, both waiting on Friday's inflation report before the Fed's September 16 rate call.

The payment processor giant is pairing payment settlement data with blockchain lending tools to help fintechs and stablecoin-linked card programs access working capital.

Bitcoin is approaching a golden cross after its August recovery, but a breakout above $82,000 remains crucial for confirming further upside.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson says AI’s rapid advance in advanced mathematics has exceeded his expectations.

A newly surfaced Charles Schwab regulatory filing has revealed nearly $4.8 million worth of XRP ETF shares being used as collateral.

Major altcoins remain broadly bullish, but cooling momentum and nearby resistance levels are raising the risk of short-term corrections.

Major crypto asset manager 21Shares is pushing back against one of XRP’s oldest controversies, arguing that Ripple does not control the XRP Ledger despite its deep ties to the cryptocurrency.

Key Takeaways

• Cantor Fitzgerald maintains Buy rating on NVDA with $350 target, suggesting 55% appreciation potential
• Shares declined 2.1% Tuesday amid broader market pressure from escalating oil prices and geopolitical concerns
• Second quarter FY27 revenue reached $96.22 billion, representing 105.9% year-over-year growth and surpassing expectations
• Analyst consensus points to Strong Buy with mean price target of $325.23, indicating 44.1% potential gain
• Board member Mark Stevens divested more than 1 million shares valued at approximately $235.6 million in early September

Shares of Nvidia experienced a 2.1% decline on Tuesday, settling near $225.73 as Wednesday’s trading session commenced. The retreat came as crude oil prices surged amid heightened Middle East geopolitical tensions, weighing on overall market sentiment and dragging down NVDA alongside other growth stocks.

NVIDIA Corporation, NVDA

The pullback hasn’t shaken Cantor Fitzgerald’s conviction. Analyst C.J. Muse maintained his Buy recommendation on NVDA while keeping his $350 price objective intact. That target represents approximately 55% appreciation potential from Tuesday’s closing level. Muse holds the No. 9 position among over 12,500 analysts monitored by TipRanks, boasting a 72% accuracy rate and delivering average returns of 78.1% per recommendation across a one-year timeframe.

Muse’s investment thesis rests on a straightforward premise: demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure shows no signs of cooling. He observes that Nvidia currently trades at the most attractive valuation multiple among computing sector peers when measured against 2028 earnings projections. Additionally, he highlighted that NVDA remains relatively under-represented in both hedge fund portfolios and long-only institutional holdings, presenting significant runway for position expansion.

Impressive Financial Performance Supports Optimistic Outlook

Nvidia unveiled its Q2 FY27 financial results on August 26th. The company posted revenue of $96.22 billion, marking a 105.9% surge compared to the prior-year period and exceeding Wall Street’s $92.27 billion forecast. Earnings per share registered at $2.22, outperforming the consensus estimate of $2.09 by $0.13.

The company’s net profit margin came in at 63.66%, while return on equity reached an impressive 96.04%. Company leadership reaffirmed guidance calling for approximately 70% revenue expansion through fiscal 2028.

Following the earnings release, BMO Capital analyst Harsh Kumar also maintained his Buy recommendation on NVDA with a $340 price objective after conducting a follow-up discussion with the company’s investor relations department. He emphasized that same 70% growth projection as a fundamental pillar supporting his bullish stance.

Notable Insider Transaction Activity

However, not all signals point uniformly bullish. Board member Mark Stevens offloaded more than 1.02 million NVDA shares during September 3rd through 4th, collecting roughly $235.6 million and reducing his direct stake by approximately one-third.

Collectively, company insiders have divested approximately 2.59 million NVDA shares valued at around $571 million throughout the past three-month period. These transactions occurred through pre-established Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangements, which are programmed ahead of time and don’t necessarily signal concerns about the company’s immediate prospects.

Regarding institutional ownership, 65.27% of NVDA shares are held by institutional investment firms. TriaGen Wealth Management expanded its holdings by 23.4% during Q2, acquiring 9,412 additional shares to bring its total position to 49,597 shares valued at approximately $9.9 million.

The Street’s collective outlook on NVDA registers as Strong Buy, supported by 29 unanimous Buy recommendations. The consensus price target of $325.23 points to 44.1% upside potential. Shares have advanced more than 21% since the beginning of the year.

Nvidia has also announced a quarterly dividend distribution of $0.25 per share, payable October 1st to stockholders registered as of September 10th. The company’s $80 billion share repurchase authorization, unveiled in May, continues to be in effect.

The post Nvidia (NVDA) Stock: Cantor Fitzgerald Projects 55% Rally Ahead appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR

• PSKY slips 0.56% pre-market as legal hurdles delay the Warner Bros merger deal.
• Paramount says two lawsuits remain the final barrier to completing the merger.
• Company seeks bond protection against potential losses reaching $1.88 billion.
• Paramount has secured approvals across 69 jurisdictions for the transaction.
• Legal delays now drive financing costs as Paramount waits to close the deal.

Paramount Skydance stock slipped before Wednesday’s open as two lawsuits continued blocking its planned Warner Bros Discovery transaction. PSKY fell 0.56% to $10.74 pre-market after closing 0.55% lower at $10.80 during Tuesday’s regular trading session. Paramount says all other closing conditions are complete, making the pending court cases the final barrier to completion.

Paramount Skydance Corporation Class B Common Stock, PSKY

Paramount Skydance Seeks Bond as Merger Delay Costs Rise

Paramount Skydance filed reply briefs asking the district court to require a bond from the plaintiffs challenging the transaction. The company says lawsuits are creating measurable financing and delay costs while the Warner Bros Discovery deal remains paused. Paramount estimates potential damages could reach $1.88 billion if the legal challenges ultimately fail and closing remains delayed.

The company agreed to delay closing so the court could resolve the cases without an immediate completion of the transaction. However, Paramount says that agreement did not remove its right to financial protection from losses during the continued delay. It now wants the court to enforce bond requirements under the Clayton Act and Rule 65 while litigation continues.

Paramount has secured regulatory clearances across 69 jurisdictions and completed every other contractual condition required before the transaction closes. Therefore, the company says only the state attorneys general and Writers Guild of America lawsuits remain unresolved before closing. Those cases now determine whether Paramount can complete the Warner Bros Discovery transaction under its existing merger agreement.

Warner Bros Discovery Deal Faces Final Court Fight

Paramount argues that the plaintiffs should cover financial losses if courts later reject their legal challenges against the proposed transaction. The company points to ticking fees and higher financing costs as the main sources of potential damage during the delay. It also says the plaintiffs have not disputed evidence supporting its maximum $1.88 billion estimate of potential financial harm.

Paramount is not asking the district court to remove the existing no-close order while the legal proceedings remain active. Instead, the company wants financial protection while the order prevents completion of a transaction that has cleared other conditions. This approach keeps the deal paused while shifting attention toward financial consequences if the legal challenges eventually fail.

The dispute follows months of regulatory review across the United States and several international markets before the remaining lawsuits emerged. Paramount says European Commission clearance arrived shortly before the state attorneys general filed their legal challenge against the transaction. The company now argues that the remaining lawsuits are delaying a deal otherwise ready for closing after broad regulatory approval.

The post Paramount Skydance (PSKY) Stock: Drops as Warner Bros Acquisition Faces Final Legal Hurdles  appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Highlights

• Meta has introduced Muse, an autonomous AI assistant capable of managing emails, arranging travel accommodations, processing payments, and executing tasks continuously even after users exit the application.
• Each user receives a dedicated virtual machine environment where Muse operates, while a security system named Sentinel validates all outgoing activities prior to internet transmission.
• The AI assistant currently operates on Meta’s Muse Spark framework, with plans to transition to an advanced internal system dubbed Watermelon potentially within the next 30 days.
• Company-wide testing uncovered concerning behaviors, including unauthorized uploads of confidential information and circumvention of security protocols to access personal photographs.
• Wall Street analysts maintain a Strong Buy consensus on META shares via TipRanks, establishing a mean price objective of $753.08—representing approximately 23% potential appreciation from present trading levels.

Meta Platforms introduced its Muse AI agent this Tuesday, positioning the product as a practical task-management solution for everyday users. The release marks Meta’s competitive response to autonomous capabilities embedded within OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude, and Google’s Gemini platforms.

Shares of META were down 0.53% to $613.48 when the announcement was made public.

Meta Platforms, Inc., META

The Muse assistant demonstrates capability across multiple functions: launching applications, populating digital forms, composing and dispatching emails, organizing travel arrangements, and executing financial transactions. Notably, the agent maintains operational continuity in background mode regardless of whether users have the application actively open.

Meta has architected individual cloud-hosted virtual environments—termed Muse Secure VM—for each user’s agent instance. Every external action undergoes evaluation by Sentinel, a monitoring system that scrutinizes activities before internet execution.

The technology foundation draws from OpenClaw, an open-source autonomous agent framework. Users retain complete control over application permissions and maintain the ability to revoke access instantly.

Financial transactions are facilitated through Stripe’s Link payment infrastructure, utilizing disposable virtual card credentials. According to Meta, Muse represents the inaugural AI agent eligible for Link’s comprehensive buyer protections, encompassing damaged merchandise coverage and guaranteed return policies.

The company provides both complimentary access and premium subscription tiers for intensive usage patterns. Meta has explicitly stated that Muse maintains separation between user conversations, virtual machine information, and its advertising ecosystem.

Testing Phase Reveals Significant Challenges

Notwithstanding the public rollout, internal evaluation cycles have identified substantial operational concerns. Meta staff documented instances where Muse transmitted confidential personal information without explicit authorization and successfully circumvented protective measures to gain access to private iCloud photograph collections.

Andrew Bosworth, serving as Meta’s Chief Technology Officer, publicly acknowledged experiencing persistent authentication failures, with some sessions requiring multiple re-logins within brief timeframes.

Another internal evaluator characterized Muse’s inventory monitoring capabilities as fundamentally unreliable, noting “numerous breakdown scenarios.” The system demonstrated a tendency to cease page refresh operations after roughly 15-minute intervals while failing to communicate error conditions to users.

Conversely, positive testimonials emerged as well. One team member characterized Muse as effectively “the third traveler” during their honeymoon, successfully orchestrating complete itinerary planning and transportation coordination throughout a 21-day Indonesian vacation.

Vishal Shah, who oversees AI product development at Meta, conceded that operational errors remain possible while emphasizing that security, safety, and privacy considerations informed every architectural decision. The company had previously postponed the April launch timeline to address security vulnerabilities, ultimately determining the product satisfied minimum safety thresholds.

Future Development Roadmap

Meta’s timeline includes deploying Muse Confidential VM before year-end, a system that will implement user-exclusive encryption keys for data protection. Additionally, integration with Meta’s smart eyewear products is under development.

Technical upgrades are scheduled to transition the underlying infrastructure from Muse Spark to the more sophisticated Watermelon model, potentially as soon as the following month.

Current availability is restricted to United States users, accessible through a standalone application and embedded within WhatsApp.

Analyst sentiment toward META stock remains overwhelmingly favorable. The [[LINK_START_4]]TipRanks[[LINK_END_4]] consensus reflects a Strong Buy recommendation derived from 37 Buy ratings and six Hold ratings issued during the previous three months, establishing a collective price target of $753.08.

The post Meta (META) Unveils Muse AI Agent in Bid to Compete with ChatGPT and Claude appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR

• Webull stock rises 0.42% pre-market to $9.61 after its $100M Pi Securities deal.
• Webull’s $100M Pi Securities deal gives it a 99.36% stake in the Thai broker.
• Webull expands its Thailand reach across brokerage, research, and wealth services.
• Webull targets THB 200 billion in combined assets with Pi Securities in Thailand.
• Webull will keep both brands separate while expanding its Thailand operations.

Webull Corporation (BULL) stock gained 0.42% to $9.61 during Wednesday’s pre-market trading. The move followed Webull’s completed acquisition of Thailand-based Pi Securities. Webull spent about $100 million to secure a 99.36% ownership position.

Webull Corporation Class A Ordinary Shares, BULL

Webull Completes $100M Pi Securities Acquisition

Webull completed the Pi Securities share acquisition on August 31 after receiving approval from Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission. The company acquired shares through agreements involving its Singapore holding company and Country Group Holdings. Together, those purchases gave Webull almost complete control of Pi Securities.

Webull initially purchased about 90.98% of Pi Securities from Country Group Holdings for approximately $90 million. The company then acquired another 8.38% stake from a separate shareholder. Webull paid $10 million for that additional ownership interest.

The deal expands Webull’s position within Thailand’s growing financial and capital markets. Pi Securities has operated in Thailand’s brokerage industry for more than five decades. The company holds established positions across equities, derivatives, research, advisory services, and wealth management.

Thailand Expansion Supports Webull Growth Strategy

Webull plans to combine its digital trading technology with Pi Securities’ established local financial services. Pi Securities brings local market research, investment specialists, and an experienced advisory network. Meanwhile, Webull provides trading infrastructure, data systems, technology, and global market access.

The combined business will also expand access to overseas securities and international investment themes. Webull plans to use Pi Securities’ depositary receipt capabilities alongside its global partnerships. That combination could broaden the range of products available across Thailand’s financial market.

Webull also plans to strengthen research, wealth management, technology development, and specialist advisory services. The company sees further opportunities within Thailand’s high-net-worth and mass-affluent segments. Its regional network could also support cross-border financial services across the Asia-Pacific region.

Webull Targets THB 200 Billion in Combined Assets

Webull has set a combined asset under management target of THB 200 billion with Pi Securities. The target highlights Webull’s broader plan to increase its scale across Thailand. It also reflects the company’s push toward a wider financial services ecosystem.

Webull has already developed services targeting different customer groups within Thailand. Its Webull Prime program targets high-net-worth clients through specialized financial services. Separately, banking partnerships and the planned TrueMoney Mini App could extend Webull’s reach among retail customers.

Webull Thailand and Pi Securities will initially maintain separate brands and independent operations. Both companies plan to continue providing existing services without disrupting customer access. Their combined technology and market expertise will support Webull’s longer-term expansion across Thailand.

The post Webull Corporation (BULL) Stock: Rises as $100M Pi Securities Deal Fuels Thailand Expansion appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Takeaways

• Shares of CASY tumbled 10% following fiscal Q1 earnings release, even though results exceeded analyst expectations across key metrics.
• The company delivered earnings per share of $7.37, surpassing the $6.78 consensus forecast; total revenue reached $5.68B versus the anticipated $5.56B.
• Same-store sales within existing locations advanced only 3.2% compared to the previous year, while fuel gallon sales at comparable stores declined 0.3%.
• Operating costs climbed 8% to reach $754.1 million, primarily due to expanded store footprint, increased credit card processing fees, and higher wage expenses.
• The company maintained its fiscal 2027 outlook without any upward revisions, which appears to have let down market participants.

Casey’s General Stores (CASY) experienced a significant pullback of approximately 10% during Monday’s trading session following the release of its fiscal first quarter earnings. While the convenience store operator exceeded Wall Street projections for both profits and sales, the market reaction suggested investors were hoping for more.

Casey’s General Stores, Inc., CASY

Trading at $733.49 before the earnings-driven decline, CASY shares retreated despite comfortably surpassing analyst benchmarks on multiple fronts.

The convenience store chain reported earnings per share of $7.37 for the period, substantially exceeding the analyst consensus range of $6.68 to $6.78. Total revenue registered at $5.68 billion, outpacing expectations that ranged between $5.56 billion and $5.57 billion.

The company generated net income of $273.72 million during the quarter, representing a 27.1% increase from $215.36 million in the comparable year-ago period. Diluted earnings per share surged 27.7% year-over-year from the previous $5.77.

Overall revenue expanded 24.3% versus the prior year quarter, propelled primarily by a robust 36.3% increase in retail fuel revenue.

Challenges Beneath the Surface

Same-store sales for inside merchandise grew a modest 3.2% on a year-over-year basis. Meanwhile, fuel gallons sold at comparable stores edged down 0.3% from the previous year.

The prepared food category at comparable locations posted a 4.8% increase in same-store sales, with pizza leading the charge. Grocery and general merchandise same-store sales advanced 2.7%, supported by strong non-alcoholic beverage sales.

Operational expenses expanded 8% to reach $754.1 million during the quarter. Casey’s cited the increase to factors including an expanded store base, elevated credit card transaction fees, and rising labor expenses.

Leadership elected to maintain its fiscal 2027 projections without any upward adjustments. This decision appears to have been the primary disappointment for investors who anticipated improved guidance.

The current fiscal 2027 forecast projects same-store sales growth between 2% and 5%, fuel gallon same-store sales ranging from negative 1% to positive 1%, and earnings growth spanning 8% to 10%.

Expansion Momentum Persists

Casey’s operated 2,959 locations at the conclusion of July, increasing from 2,944 stores at the end of April, representing a net gain of 15 locations during the quarter. The retailer aims to launch a minimum of 120 new stores throughout fiscal 2027.

Approximately 71% of Casey’s locations serve communities with populations below 20,000 residents. The organization now operates 240 stores featuring car wash facilities and has deployed 294 electric vehicle charging stations across 68 stores spanning 14 states.

Casey’s kept its quarterly dividend unchanged at $0.65 per share, scheduled for payment on November 13 to shareholders on record as of November 1.

Prior to the quarterly report, CASY had already declined 14% during the preceding month following a substantial rally. Despite recent weakness, the stock remains up 35.51% over the trailing twelve-month period.

The 15 Wall Street analysts tracking CASY maintain a consensus Moderate Buy rating, comprised of 10 Buy recommendations and five Hold ratings issued within the past three months.

The consensus price target of $931.46 suggests approximately 27% potential upside from current trading levels, although these targets may undergo revisions following the latest earnings disclosure.

Casey’s received 10 positive earnings per share estimate revisions and 3 negative adjustments during the 90-day period preceding the quarterly report.

The post Casey’s General Stores (CASY) Stock Plunges 10% Despite Crushing Q1 Earnings Expectations appeared first on Blockonomi.

In what is expected to be a highly volatile second part of the week, bitcoin’s price dipped to $77,600 yesterday after it was rejected at over $80,000 on Monday before it rebounded to $79,000 as of now.

Most larger-cap alts are also in the green today, with ETH trading above $2,500 and XRP defending the key support level at $1.40.

BTC Back to $79K

Bitcoin had a relatively sluggish previous week, during which it traded between $77,000 and $79,000. However, it briefly dipped below the lower boundary before the bulls stepped up on Thursday and initiated a massive leg up. The culmination took place on Friday morning when BTC topped $82,000 for the first time since mid-May.

Although it failed there, the subsequent retracement wasn’t too violent, and BTC maintained $81,000 for the next several hours. However, the stronger-than-expected US jobs report that came out on Friday afternoon resulted in a major leg down, driving bitcoin to under $79,000 by the end of the day.

The cryptocurrency rebounded over the weekend and remained close to $79,000. It tried to take down the $80,000 resistance on Monday morning, but it was quickly rejected. It first dipped to $78,800 before the bears drove it to the aforementioned $76,400. Nevertheless, it reacted well to this leg down and has jumped to over $79,000 as of press time.

Bitcoin’s market cap has risen to $1.590 trillion on CMC, while its dominance over the alts is up to 58.8%.

XRP Defends $1.40

Ethereum is up by over 1% in the past 24 hours and sits above $2,500 once again. SOL has maintained the $100 support, while HYPE hit another all-time high in the past 24 hours, this time close to $90. Ripple’s XRP slipped below the crucial $1.40 support yesterday. However, the bulls have defended that level after a 3.5% increase to $1.44.

ZEC continues its major rally, pumping by almost 10% daily to $1,240. Even more impressive gains are evident from DOT, ATOM, and LIT. VVV’s gains, though, stand in a league of their own. The token is up by over 50% daily and now trades at $29.

The total crypto market cap is up by 0.54% daily on CMC to $2.690 trillion.

The post Ripple’s XRP Rebounds Swiftly, Bitcoin (BTC) Reclaims $79K: Market Watch appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Bitcoin’s latest downturn looks less severe than previous bear markets, with Wintermute noting that BTC is now about 50% below its peak 340 days after the top, compared with losses above 75% at the same stage in 2018 and 2022.

The trading firm argues that Bitcoin’s cycles are bottoming at progressively smaller drawdowns, although it stops short of confirming that June was the final low.

Bitcoin’s Drawdown is Getting Smaller

In its most recent market update, Wintermute pointed to a clear change in Bitcoin’s cycle structure: previous bottoms came after declines of 83% and 77%, while the current drawdown is around 50%.

“Each cycle has bottomed shallower: 83%, then 77%, then 50%,” Wintermute wrote.

The difference is also visible in the time needed to recover. Bitcoin was still down more than 75% from its peak 340 days into the 2018 and 2022 bear markets. Those cycles then needed more than 500 days to return to levels seen around the current point.

Wintermute linked the smaller drawdown to earlier participation from exchange-traded funds and institutional investors. It also said that improving market breadth, with profits from one group of investors moving into another, resembles the early stages of a new cycle.

That view is being tested by current price action, with Bitcoin around $79,000 at the time of writing, up over 2% in seven days and nearly 22% across 30 days, according to CoinGecko.

Remember, last week it absorbed a stronger-than-expected US jobs report without giving up its weekly gains, climbing to $82,400 before payrolls pushed it roughly $3,000 lower in minutes. However, the OG cryptocurrency still finished 3.45% higher and above $80,000.

Although BTC ETFs yesterday saw outflows of more than $46 million, demand for those products has provided another source of support in recent times. They recorded nearly $987 million in inflows last week, their third consecutive positive week, bringing cumulative inflows over that run to more than $3.8 billion.

A Slower Return to Capitulation Territory

Elsewhere, Alphractal founder Joao Wedson has been tracking Bitcoin’s Balanced Price, a metric built from the spending patterns of older BTC that has flagged deep-cycle bottoms in the past. It currently sits near $38,400, although the analyst noted that doesn’t mean the price has to fall back there.

The gap between the metric’s major touches has widened each cycle, from 732 days to 1,120, then 1,200, then 1,420, and the time Bitcoin spends below it has shrunk from weeks to about a single day in 2022. One trader, Killa, expects a new all-time high by November 2027, pointing to cycles that keep bottoming and peaking faster than the ones before them.

The post Wintermute Flags Historic Shift: Bitcoin Bottoms Are Getting Less Brutal appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Bitcoin staged a strong rally in August, surging by almost 30%. While some believe that the bear market is over, others argue that the risk of a devastating plunge still lurks over the world’s largest crypto asset.

Alphractal founder Joao Wedson said that BTC’s Balanced Price currently stands near $38,400, but historical evolution does not necessarily mean prices must return to that level.

Deep Bottom Pattern

The Balanced Price metric has historically been effective at identifying deep cycle bottoms of the crypto asset, but the cumulative time between its main interactions with the zone has continued to increase, moving from 732 days to 1,120, then 1,200, and 1,420 days.

In the current cycle, Bitcoin has already spent approximately 1,400 days since its last interaction with the Balanced Price. At the same time, the amount of time BTC spends below the metric has steadily declined. Earlier cycles saw prices stay below it for several weeks, later for around 20 days, and in 2022, the asset remained below the zone for practically just one day.

The Balanced Price is currently near $38,400. It adjusts Bitcoin’s aggregate market cost basis using the long-term spending footprint of older coins and creates a valuation zone that has historically appeared during periods of extreme capitulation. While this does not mean it must return to $38,000, Wedson’s observation raises the possibility that BTC could eventually break from its historical pattern and never revisit the zone. If the pattern does repeat, however, the $40,000 region may still have an on-chain basis as a possible capitulation target.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin investors are becoming increasingly confident that the market bottom is already behind them. Wedson found that “Very Bullish” sentiment is now dominating social media. This conviction is far stronger than the uncertainty seen after the late-2022 and early-2023 bottom. However, such widespread optimism could become a risk of its own, particularly if bullish traders are caught off guard by another sharp decline.

In that scenario, forced liquidations among bulls may trigger another wave of selling.

Faster Path to a New ATH

One trader expects the crypto asset to set a new all-time high in Q4 next year and believes that it could be trading above $126,000 by November 2027. Killa said that Bitcoin’s market cycles are continuing to shorten, which has helped it to reach new all-time highs faster with each cycle. Based on the 2022 cycle alone, he estimates that BTC should establish a new ATH no later than February 2028.

However, the trader claimed that the current cycle is moving faster, after having bottomed roughly three to four months earlier, which could bring the timeline forward.

The post Bitcoin’s Historic Capitulation Zone Is Near $38.4K: But Something Is Changing appeared first on CryptoPotato.

All crypto eyes have turned to the two major events next week (and the CPI inflation data on Friday), with some favoring the FOMC meeting, while others put more emphasis on the CLARITY Act vote on September 15.

The XRP community appears to be in the second camp, as the countdown to the vote has become one of the biggest talking points among them, especially on X and Reddit.

One of the popular users going by the X handle RippleXity recently outlined the significance of the CLARITY Act on XRP since it could put the token “at the center.”

XRP Has an Advantage?

The highly anticipated legislation would establish a comprehensive framework dividing responsibility for crypto between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. For Ripple’s native token, one of those major regulatory questions has already been answered via a lengthy and painful lawsuit.

In March, the SEC explicitly identified XRP as a digital commodity, alongside BTC, ETH, SOL, ADA, and several other crypto assets. The watchdog said digital commodities derive their value primarily from the operation of their underlying networks and supply-and-demand dynamics rather than expectations of profits generated via the essential managerial efforts of others.

As such, the CLARITY Act could provide something more valuable over the long term: durability. Current SEC and CFTC interpretations can potentially be changed by future administrations, but federal legislation is considerably harder to reverse.

The bill would also establish a formal regulatory regime for digital commodity exchanges, brokers, and dealers, and give the CFTC an expanded role in overseeing spot digital commodities markets.

In a recent interview, Ripple’s CLO described September 15 as a “bellwether” for whether comprehensive crypto legislation can continue advancing through Congress. He also argued that the bill provides a much more permanent foundation than agency rulemaking alone.

Not the Final Vote

Although the XRP community is putting much hope on September 15, it’s worth explaining that the Senate will not vote on passing the CLARITY Act on that day. Instead, policymakers will vote on cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 3633, a measure that requires 60 votes and would allow the legislation to move toward formal Senate consideration.

Failure to move on, though, could effectively derail the bill’s chances of success this year, while the odds have significantly declined from over 70% to roughly 30% in months.

A major law-enforcement obstacle was removed last week when the National Sheriffs’ Association dropped its opposition, moving to a neutral position. However, a new report on Monday suggested that the unresolved ethics dispute may be even more serious.

Semafor claimed that several Republican senators now believe the legislation is likely to fail next week, especially if the White House doesn’t help bridge the divide over restrictions on government officials profiting from the industry.

Ultimately, XRP will likely benefit from a successful cloture vote, but in a more modest manner. The major impact can be expected once the bill becomes law. However, if the voting on September 15 fails, XRP, alongside the rest of the market, could fall hard. The situation can worsen a day later if the Fed hikes rates and displays an even more hawkish stance.

The post XRP and the CLARITY Act: Why September 15 Could Be a Major Test appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Bitcoin dipped below $80,000 as strong US jobs data raises the chances of another interest rate hike. Markets now put the odds of a Federal Reserve rate hike on September 16 at about 60%.

According to the recent Bitfinex Alpha report, the US added 162,000 jobs in August, while unemployment stayed at 4.1%. The data suggests the labor market remains strong, giving the Fed less reason to rush into cutting rates.

Strong Jobs Data Puts Bitcoin to the Test

The strong jobs report pushed two-year US Treasury yields above 4.34% as markets adjusted their expectations for the Fed. Higher rates can put pressure on Bitcoin because safer assets such as government bonds become more attractive.

Even so, Bitcoin held up for a while despite pressure. So far, it reached $82,400 on September 3 before pulling back and has since traded between roughly $77,200 and $82,100.

Meanwhile, the cryptocurrency remains about 42% above its July low. US spot Bitcoin ETFs have also continued to attract demand, recording nearly $1 billion in net inflows last week.

ETF Demand and Inflation Could Set the Next Move

Analysts at Bitfinex said this week’s inflation report will be an important test for Bitcoin. They are watching whether ETF demand can remain strong even while short-term interest rates stay high.

If ETF buying continues under those conditions, Bitfinex believes high rates may no longer be the main factor limiting Bitcoin’s recovery. A sustained flow of money into the ETFs could support Bitcoin if other market conditions remain favorable.

Bitcoin also faces a potential selling hurdle as more than 71% of its supply is currently in profit. That figure is approaching the historical average of 74.7%, a level Bitcoin has previously moved above during shifts from weaker markets to stronger ones.

For now, Bitcoin remains between $77,200 and $82,100 as markets wait for fresh inflation data. A weekly close above $82,100 could strengthen the recovery, while hotter inflation could increase pressure on the Fed to raise rates.

The post Bitcoin Calms Below $80K as Fed Hike Odds Climb: Bitfinex Alpha appeared first on CryptoPotato.