Kalshi and Polymarket discuss new funding rounds that could value each prediction market platform near $20 billion.

The post Kalshi and Polymarket weigh funding rounds at $20B valuations appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Susquehanna backed crypto trading firm BlockFills seeks restructuring after losses, frozen withdrawals, and a lawsuit from a customer.

The post Crypto trading firm BlockFills explores restructuring amid losses and customer lawsuit appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Google says Anthropic AI models will remain available on Google Cloud despite Pentagon restrictions limiting defense use of Claude systems.

The post Google says Anthropic AI will remain available on Google Cloud despite Pentagon risk designation appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Florida passes stablecoin bill creating licensing and compliance rules for issuers awaiting Gov. Ron DeSantis signature.

The post Florida becomes first US state to pass stablecoin framework appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The penalty underscores the critical need for robust system safeguards to prevent costly disruptions in financial markets.

The post NYSE hit with $9 million SEC penalty over 2023 market disruption appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin Magazine

Utexo Raises $7.5M to Launch Bitcoin-Native USDT Settlement Infrastructure

Utexo, a startup building Bitcoin-native stablecoin settlement infrastructure, announced a $7.5 million seed round co-led by Tether, Big Brain Holdings, and Portal Ventures. 

The round also included participation from Franklin Templeton, Maven11 Capital, Fulgur Ventures, Alchemy VC, Ethereal Ventures, Auros Ventures, Arcanum Capital, Paper Ventures, Axia8, FlowTraders, Plan B, Gate Ventures, Sats Ventures, and strategic angels including operators from Ledger, Hyperion, BTC Turk, Echo, Legion, and SOLV.

The company was founded to address a longstanding gap in the cryptocurrency ecosystem: enabling USDT to settle natively on Bitcoin with robust, production-ready payment rails. Tether’s 

CEO, Paolo Ardoino, said that Bitcoin has been central to the stablecoin issuer’s long-term vision for USDT. “Market cycles come and go, but the need for open and resilient settlement infrastructure remains constant,” Ardoino said. 

He added that Utexo provides a layer that makes Bitcoin-native USDT settlement viable at scale, strengthening Bitcoin’s role as a global settlement rail for real-world dollar transactions.

Historically, the Lightning Network and RGB protocols have offered technical capabilities for Bitcoin-based payments, but their complexity limited adoption in production environments. Utexo abstracts these complexities behind a single API layer, allowing payment operators to route USDT settlement over Bitcoin-native rails without modifying custody, compliance workflows, or user experiences.

Chris Hutchinson, co-founder of Utexo, explained the system’s value proposition: “We built Utexo so that USDT could move on Bitcoin the way money is supposed to move: instantly, privately, with no surprises on costs. Our partners integrate our API once and can route USDT on the most resilient open network ever built, with full control over cost structure.” 

Viktor Ihnatiuk, co-founder, added that the infrastructure allows wallets to offer free USDT transactions while boosting adoption of Bitcoin-native stablecoins.

The infrastructure supports atomic settlement, privacy-preserving execution, and predictable fees for every transaction, independent of network congestion. 

Settlement occurs in USDT and is anchored to Bitcoin’s security model, completing in under one second. Utexo encrypts all on-chain transactions, preventing disclosure of counterparties and wallet addresses, distinguishing it from public transaction graphs on other networks.

Tether and Bitcoin 

By providing a reliable, predictable settlement layer, the company enables Bitcoin to serve as a viable rail for dollar-denominated payments, advancing Tether’s vision of native USDT on Bitcoin.

In February, Tether open-sourced MiningOS (MOS), a modular operating system for managing and automating bitcoin mining operations, unveiled at the 2026 Plan ₿ Forum in San Salvador. 

The system provides unified control over hardware, energy, and site infrastructure using a peer-to-peer architecture, reducing reliance on proprietary or centralized software.

Targeted at exchanges, wallets, payment service providers, high-frequency trading firms, and platforms handling large volumes of USDT, Utexo focuses on routing existing stablecoin flows over Bitcoin rather than launching speculative L2 solutions. 

This post Utexo Raises $7.5M to Launch Bitcoin-Native USDT Settlement Infrastructure first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Kazakhstan’s Central Bank to Channel $350 Million of Reserves into Crypto and Bitcoin  Investments

The National Bank of Kazakhstan plans to allocate up to $350 million from the country’s gold and foreign exchange reserves toward investments tied to digital assets, marking one of the most significant steps by a central bank to gain exposure to the crypto sector.

Governor Timur Suleimenov said the initiative will focus on companies and financial instruments connected to cryptocurrency markets rather than direct purchases of assets like Bitcoin. The investments are expected to include shares of technology firms involved in digital asset infrastructure as well as index funds whose performance tracks crypto-related markets.

The allocation represents a small portion of Kazakhstan’s overall reserves. 

As of February, the country held roughly $69.4 billion in gold and foreign exchange reserves, according to data from the central bank.

Deputy chair Aliya Moldabekova said the investment program is scheduled to begin in April and May as the bank finalizes a list of eligible companies and financial instruments.

“We are not talking about any large investment in cryptocurrencies,” Moldabekova said, noting that officials are concentrating on firms involved in digital asset infrastructure and related technologies.

Kazakhstan already plays a prominent role in the global crypto ecosystem. Following China’s sweeping ban on crypto mining in 2021, many mining operations relocated to the Central Asian country due to its energy resources and permissive regulatory environment. 

As a result, Kazakhstan emerged as one of the world’s leading centers for industrial-scale bitcoin mining.

Bitcoin-fiat facing services

Financial institutions in Kazakhstan are also experimenting with consumer-facing crypto services. Suleimenov said two banks have already launched crypto-fiat payment cards that allow users to transact between traditional currencies and digital assets. Two additional banks are preparing to introduce similar products.

These initiatives are currently operating in a regulatory sandbox while authorities finalize broader legislation governing digital financial assets.

The central bank is also pushing to create a licensing framework for cryptocurrency exchanges operating in the country. Under the proposal, exchanges would be required to comply with anti-money laundering rules, tax regulations and other financial oversight measures.

Officials say the broader regulatory push aims to integrate digital asset services into Kazakhstan’s financial system while maintaining oversight of the sector.

Suleimenov has framed the effort as part of a broader transformation of financial markets driven by technology. According to the governor, innovations such as tokenized assets, digital bonds and crypto-linked payment rails are creating entirely new categories of financial instruments.

“In essence, a completely new sector of the financial market is emerging,” he said.

The central bank believes digital financial assets could expand access to funding for businesses and investors. For example, real estate developers could tokenize property holdings and sell fractional ownership through digital tokens, offering an alternative to traditional bank financing.

This post Kazakhstan’s Central Bank to Channel $350 Million of Reserves into Crypto and Bitcoin  Investments first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Russia Considers Simplified Licensing Path for Bank-Run Crypto Exchanges

Russia’s central bank is weighing a plan that would allow banks and brokerage firms to operate cryptocurrency exchanges through a simplified licensing pathway tied to their existing financial permits, according to remarks from Governor Elvira Nabiullina.

Under the proposal, financial institutions could obtain authorization to run crypto trading platforms through a “notification process,” rather than applying for a new standalone license. 

The approach would allow firms that already hold banking or brokerage licenses to expand into digital asset services using their current regulatory status.

Back in January, Anatoly Aksakov, head of the State Duma Committee on the Financial Market, made comments that Russia was preparing to introduce its first comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, with lawmakers aiming to finalize the draft for a parliamentary vote by the end of June.

Nabiullina presented the idea during a meeting between the central bank and Russian lending institutions, according to reports from the Interfax news agency.

The governor framed the proposal as an effort to integrate cryptocurrency activity into Russia’s existing financial infrastructure. 

She argued that banks already maintain compliance systems designed to meet anti–money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism requirements, which could provide a foundation for supervising digital asset markets.

“We have proposed allowing banks and brokers to obtain crypto exchange licenses through a notification process and to act as intermediaries based on their current banking licenses,” Nabiullina said, adding that the sector’s existing compliance frameworks could help protect customers entering the crypto market.

The central bank also outlined limits designed to manage financial risk during the early stages of integration. 

Under the proposal, banks’ exposure to cryptocurrency activities would be capped at 1% of their capital.

Nabiullina said regulators plan to monitor how institutions operate within that threshold before considering any expansion.

“Let’s start by seeing how banks operate within the one percent cap, and then see whether we need to move forward,” she said.

The licensing proposal forms part of a broader effort by the Central Bank of Russia and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation to establish a clearer legal framework for digital assets in the country.

In late 2025, the central bank submitted a regulatory concept to the Russian government that would formally recognize cryptocurrencies and stablecoins as currency assets that can be bought and sold through regulated intermediaries. The framework would allow trading through exchanges, brokers and trustees operating under existing financial licenses.

Crypto for domestic payments 

At the same time, the proposal maintains a strict ban on the use of cryptocurrencies for domestic payments, a position the central bank has held for years. Digital assets would function as investment instruments rather than alternatives to the national currency.

Draft legislation reflecting the concept is expected to reach the State Duma during the spring legislative session. Deputy Finance Minister Ivan Chebeskov has indicated that lawmakers could review the bill as early as March, with the main regulatory framework scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2026.

The proposed rules would also introduce a tiered system governing who can access crypto markets.

Qualified investors would face no limits on purchases. Non-qualified investors would be restricted to buying up to 300,000 rubles, or roughly $3,800, in crypto assets each year through a single intermediary.

Russia updated the definition of “qualified investor” last year. Individuals may now qualify based on several criteria, including a master’s degree in finance, annual income of at least 20 million rubles, or meeting property ownership thresholds set by regulators.

Those wealth requirements are scheduled to rise in 2026, when the property threshold increases from 12 million rubles to 24 million rubles.

This post Russia Considers Simplified Licensing Path for Bank-Run Crypto Exchanges first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Strike Secures New York BitLicense, Opening Bitcoin Financial Services to State Residents

Strike, a Bitcoin financial services firm founded by Jack Mallers, has received both a BitLicense and a money transmitter license from the New York State Department of Financial Services, allowing the company to operate in one of the most tightly regulated digital asset markets in the United States.

The approval allows Strike to offer its Bitcoin brokerage, payments, and custody services to individuals and businesses across New York.

The state’s regulatory framework requires firms to meet standards for capital reserves, cybersecurity, and operational transparency.

New York’s BitLicense regime has long served as a gatekeeper for digital asset companies seeking access to the state’s financial markets. Several crypto firms have opted not to pursue the license because of the compliance requirements and ongoing regulatory oversight.

Mallers described the license as a major step in the company’s effort to build a Bitcoin-focused financial platform.

“Receiving our BitLicense is a defining milestone for Strike,” Mallers said in a statement. “Strike is building the leading Bitcoin financial institution. With our BitLicense, we can now bring that mission to New York, the global center of finance.”

Strike’s bitcoin services

With the approval, New York users will gain access to Strike’s suite of Bitcoin services. The platform allows customers to buy and sell bitcoin through linked bank accounts, debit cards, or wire transfers. 

Users can also directly deposit their paychecks and convert a portion, or all, of their wages into bitcoin.

The platform includes automated trading tools such as recurring purchases and price-triggered orders. Recurring buys allow customers to schedule bitcoin purchases on a set interval, while target orders execute trades when bitcoin reaches a specific price.

Strike also allows users to pay bills from a bitcoin balance, including utility payments, credit card balances, and mortgage bills. The feature reflects the company’s effort to position bitcoin as a tool for daily financial activity rather than only as an investment asset.

According to the company, customer bitcoin and cash balances are held one-to-one and are not lent or used for company operations. Strike said users can withdraw bitcoin to personal wallets at no cost, with the firm covering on-chain transaction fees.

The license also places Strike under the supervision of the New York State Department of Financial Services, which requires periodic audits, cybersecurity reviews, and capital reserve compliance.

Strike’s expansion into New York comes as the company outlines broader growth plans for its platform. In late 2025, Mallers said the firm intends to add bitcoin-backed lending, which would allow customers to borrow fiat currency while holding their bitcoin.

This post Strike Secures New York BitLicense, Opening Bitcoin Financial Services to State Residents first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

The Core Issue: Consensus Cleanup

Protocol developers often come across as more pessimistic about Bitcoin’s future than most Bitcoiners. Daily exposure to Bitcoin’s imperfections certainly shapes a sober perspective, and it’s important to reflect on what Bitcoin has achieved. Anyone in the world, no matter their race, age, gender, nationality, or any other arbitrary criterion, is able to store and transfer value on a neutral monetary network more robust now than ever. That said, Bitcoin does have issues that many Bitcoiners are not aware of, but could threaten its long-term prospects if not addressed properly. The vulnerabilities fixed by the Consensus Cleanup are one such example.

The Consensus Cleanup (BIP 54¹) is a soft fork proposal aimed at patching multiple long-standing vulnerabilities within the Bitcoin consensus protocol. As a soft fork proposal, it is separate in nature to most other Bitcoin Core efforts featured in this edition. Although the proposal has historically been championed by individuals associated with the Bitcoin Core project, it really belongs to the broader category of Bitcoin protocol development.

We will walk through each of the proposal’s four items, describing the impact of the issue addressed and the remediation applied. We’ll discuss how the proposed mitigations evolved to address feedback as well as newfound vulnerabilities. We’ll finish with a brief overview of the current status of the soft fork proposal.

A vulnerability in Bitcoin’s Proof of Work

The Bitcoin network adjusts mining difficulty to maintain an average block rate of one per 10 minutes. An “off by one” bug (a common programming mistake) in its implementation opens up an attack called the Timewarp attack, whereby a majority of miners can artificially speed up the rate of block production by manipulating the difficulty downward.

This attack fortunately requires a 51%+ threshold of miners, but artificially speeding up the block rate is a critical issue. It means that full nodes are not in control of resource usage anymore, and that an attacker can considerably accelerate the bitcoin subsidy emission schedule.

Even though it requires a “51% miner”, it is a significant departure from the standard Bitcoin threat model. A 51% attack traditionally enables a miner to prevent the confirmation of a transaction for as long as they maintain their advantage. But the presence of this bug grants them the power to cripple the network within just 38 days by rapidly reducing the network difficulty.

Instead of taking down the network, it is more probable that an attacker would exploit this bug to a smaller extent. Current miners could coordinate to quadruple the block rate (to 2.5 minute blocks) while keeping the Bitcoin network in a seemingly functioning state, effectively quadrupling the available block space and stealing block subsidies from future miners. Short-sighted users may be incentivized to support this attack, as more available block space would mean -ceteris paribus- lower fees for onchain transactions. This would of course come at the expense of full-node runners and undermine the network’s long term stability.

The Timewarp attack exploits the fact that difficulty adjustment periods do not overlap, allowing block timestamps to be set so that a new period appears to start before the previous one has finished. Because making them overlap would be a hard fork, the next best mitigation is to link the timestamps of blocks at the boundaries of difficulty adjustment periods. The BIP 54 specifications mandate that the first block of a period cannot have a timestamp earlier than the previous period’s last block by more than two hours.

In addition, the BIP 54 specifications mandate that a difficulty adjustment period must always take a positive amount of time. That is, for a given difficulty adjustment period, the last block may never have a timestamp earlier than the first block’s. Surprised this isn’t already the case? We were surprised it was at all necessary. Turns out this is a simple fix for a clever attack, related to Timewarp, that pseudonymous developer Zawy and Mark “Murch” Erhardt came up with when reviewing the Consensus Cleanup proposal.

Blocks that take hours to validate

Any miner can exploit certain expensive validation operations to create blocks that take a long time to verify. Whereas a normal Bitcoin block takes in the order of a hundred milliseconds to validate, validation times for these “attack blocks” range from more than ten minutes on a high-end computer to up to ten hours on a Raspberry Pi (a popular full-node hardware choice).

An externally-motivated attacker may leverage this to disrupt the entire network, while in a more economically rational variant of the attack, a miner can delay its competition just long enough to increase its profits without creating widespread network disruption.

Historical attempts to mitigate this issue have been tumultuous, because it requires imposing restrictions on Bitcoin’s scripting capabilities. Such restrictions have the potential of being confiscatory, which is paramount to avoid in any serious soft fork design.

Matt Corallo’s original 2019 Great Consensus Cleanup proposed to solve these long block validation times by invalidating a couple of obscure operations in non-Segwit (“legacy”) Script. Some raised concerns that although transactions using those operations had not been relayed nor mined by default by Bitcoin Core for years, someone, somewhere, may still be depending on it unbeknownst to everyone. Of course, this has to be weighed against the practical risk to all Bitcoin users of a miner exploiting this issue.

Even though the confiscation concern is fairly theoretical, there is a philosophical point on how to perform Bitcoin protocol development in trying to design an appropriate mitigation for the vulnerability with the smallest confiscatory surface possible. My later iteration of the Consensus Cleanup proposal addressed this concern by introducing a limit which pinpoints exactly the harmful behaviour, without invalidating any specific Bitcoin Script operation.

Forged proofs of payment

Bitcoin block headers contain a Merkle root that commits to all transactions in the block. This makes it possible to give a succinct proof that a given transaction is part of a chain with a certain amount of Proof of Work. This is commonly referred to as an “SPV proof”.

Due to a weakness in the design of the Merkle tree, including a specifically-crafted 64-byte transaction in a block allows an attacker to forge such a proof for an arbitrary fake (non-existent) transaction. This may be used to trick SPV verifiers, commonly used to validate incoming payments or deposits into a side-system. Mitigations exist that enable verifiers to reject such invalid proofs; however, these are often overlooked—even by cryptography experts—and can be cumbersome in certain contexts.

The Consensus Cleanup addresses this issue by invalidating transactions whose serialized size is exactly 64 bytes. Such transactions cannot be secure in the first place (they can only ever burn funds or leave them for anyone to spend), and have not been relayed or mined by default by Bitcoin Core since 2019. Alternative approaches were discussed, such as a round-about way of improving the existing mitigation^a, but the authors chose to fix the root cause of the issue, eliminating both the need for implementers to apply the mitigation and the need for them to even know about the vulnerability in the first place.

^a: committing to the Merkle tree depth in part of the block header’s version field

UTXO Doppelgängers: duplicate transactions

“Mirco… Mezzo… Macroflation—Overheated Economy” is the title of a blog post⁴ Russell O’Connor published in February 2012, in which he describes how Bitcoin transactions can be duplicated. This was a critical flaw in Bitcoin, which broke the fundamental assumption that transaction identifiers (hashes) are unique. This is because miners’ coinbase transactions have a single blank input, meaning that any coinbase transaction with the same outputs would have an identical transaction identifier. 

This was fixed by Bitcoin Core (then still called “Bitcoin”) developers with BIP 30², which required full nodes to perform additional validation when receiving a block. That extra validation was not strictly necessary to solve the issue, and was side-stepped with BIP 34³ the same year. Unfortunately, the fix introduced in BIP 34 is imperfect and the BIP 30 extra validation will once again be required in 20 years. Beyond not being strictly necessary, this validation cannot be performed by alternative Bitcoin client designs such as Utreexo and would effectively prevent them from fully validating the block chain.

The Consensus Cleanup introduces a more robust, future-proof fix for the issue. All Bitcoin transactions, including the coinbase transactions, contain a field to “time lock” the transaction. The value of the field represents the last block height at which a transaction is invalid. The BIP 54 specifications require that all coinbase transactions set this field to the height of their block (minus 1).

Combined with a clever suggestion from Anthony Towns to make sure the timelock validation always occurs, this guarantees that no coinbase transaction with the same timelock value may have been included in a previous block. This in turn guarantees that no coinbase transaction may have the same unique identifier (hash) as any past one, without requiring BIP 30 validation.

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure

The vulnerabilities addressed by the Consensus Cleanup (BIP 54) are not an existential threat to Bitcoin at the moment. While some have the potential to cripple the network, they are unlikely to be exploited for now. That said, this might change and it is paramount that we proactively mitigate long-term risks to the Bitcoin network, even if it means having to bear the short term burden of coordinating a soft fork.

The work on the Consensus Cleanup started with Matt Corallo’s original proposal in 2019. It came together 6 years later with my publication of BIP 54 and an implementation of the soft fork in Bitcoin Inquisition, a testbed for Bitcoin consensus changes. Throughout this time the proposal received considerable feedback, various alternatives were considered and mitigations for additional weaknesses were incorporated. I believe it is now ready to be shared with Bitcoin users for consideration.

The Consensus Cleanup is a soft fork. Bitcoin protocol developers choose which improvements to prioritize and make available to the public. But the ultimate decision to adopt a change to Bitcoin’s consensus rules rests with the users. The choice is yours.

Don’t miss your chance to own The Core Issue — featuring articles written by many Core Developers explaining the projects they work on themselves!

This piece is the Letter from the Editor featured in the latest Print edition of Bitcoin Magazine, The Core Issue. We’re sharing it here as an early look at the ideas explored throughout the full issue.

[1] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0054.md 

[2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0030.mediawiki 

[3] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0034.mediawiki 

[4] https://r6.ca/blog/20120206T005236Z.html 

This post The Core Issue: Consensus Cleanup first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Antoine Poinsot.

AI is raising demand for builders, not erasing them

In February, a Citadel Securities analysis using Indeed data showed software-engineer job postings rising while overall job postings stayed weaker.

That split does not mean AI is creating jobs across the whole economy. However, one of the clearest fears around large language models may be somewhat overblown. The current narrative is that companies will need fewer skilled builders as the tools improve, but this has not shown up in this part of the labor market.

The sharpest conclusion is narrower and stronger. AI is increasing the value of people who design systems, test outputs, fix failures, and own results, while putting more pressure on roles built around repeatable processes such as formatting, scheduling, and throughput.

In the crypto industry, exchanges, wallet teams, data providers, staking firms, and protocol developers can use AI to write code faster, review documents faster, and automate support tasks. They still need people who know what a secure product looks like, what a broken workflow looks like, and what can go wrong in production.

Labor data points in the same direction. A January 2026 report found tech job postings rose 13% month over month, even as tech industry employment fell by about 20,155. Companies appear willing to cut in some places while still hiring for scarce technical capacity.

Related Reading

Bitcoin advocate Jack Dorsey wants to slash 50% of Block’s workforce in AI-era overhaul

The cuts take Block from 10,000+ employees to under 6,000, while filings project $450M–$500M in restructuring charges.

Feb 27, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

Longer-term projections also do not fit the simple replacement narrative. Federal projections show software developers, quality assurance analysts, and testers growing 15% from 2024 to 2034, with about 129,200 openings each year.

The same federal forecast projects 6% growth in project management specialist jobs over that span, with roughly 78,200 openings a year. Those numbers do not say every developer or manager wins. Firms still expect to need large numbers of people who can ship products, coordinate teams, manage budgets, and own delivery. And that aligns with what the current AI tools are actually used for.

A January 2026 index found that computer and mathematical tasks still accounted for about a third of Claude.ai conversations and nearly half of first-party API traffic in November 2025.

The single most common task was modifying software to correct errors, at 6% of usage. In other words, one of the most visible uses of AI is not replacing software work. It is speeding up software maintenance, debugging, and iteration.

That same workflow logic reaches beyond code

For illustration or graphic design, the evidence is thinner, but the mechanism looks similar.

When a company uses AI to generate concepts, draft a visual identity, or expand a design system, it still needs a person who can judge composition, coherence, brand fit, and finish.

AI can widen the output of a skilled designer. It does not remove the need for someone who knows what good looks like and can reject what does not.

For crypto firms, that applies to product art, marketing assets, exchange interfaces, wallet flows, dashboards, campaign creative, and brand systems.

A designer using AI can move faster across variations, mockups, and production tasks. The value shifts toward direction, editing, taste, and final approval.

The value shifts toward architecture, verification, integration, and release judgment. AI compresses production time. It does not erase the need for expert oversight.

That is why the cleanest framing is not “AI saves jobs” or “AI kills jobs.”

The better assessment is that AI is changing the mix of work inside firms. The workers who gain the most are those who can set direction, judge quality, test claims, and take responsibility when a model fails.

The workers at higher risk are those whose output can be measured as a sequence of rules and handed off to a cheaper human-plus-software workflow.

Related Reading

Op-ed: The dawn of the Post-Knowledge Era: AI's threat to white-collar Jobs

The internet, the mobile phone, social media, and now A.I. The four horsemen of the technological apocalypse, or the dawn of a new era?

May 15, 2023 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

AI use is spreading, but the pressure is uneven

Adoption data supports change rather than panic. A late-2025 survey found generative-AI use among adults ages 18 to 64 rose from 44.6% in August 2024 to 54.6% in August 2025.

Work use rose from 33.3% to 37.4% over the same period. The share of work hours spent using generative AI moved from 4.1% in November 2024 to 5.7% in August 2025. Those numbers show real diffusion. They do not show a labor market already hollowed out by automation.

The same survey estimated AI time savings equal to 1.6% of all work hours and said labor productivity may have risen by up to 1.3% since ChatGPT’s release. It also found that industries with one percentage point higher AI-related time savings saw 2.7 percentage points higher productivity growth relative to prepandemic trend, while noting that the relationship was not necessarily causal.

Productivity can rise before headcount falls. In many firms, the first move is not elimination. It is asking the same team to produce more.

That pattern fits what crypto firms have been doing for years, even before this AI cycle.

Related Reading

Bitcoin is at risk of a talent drain because AI just created 1.3 million jobs

AI took almost half of global VC in 2025, now crypto’s top operators are switching domains

Feb 14, 2026 · Gino Matos

Teams stay lean. Work moves into software where it can. Functions with clear rules get automated first. What changes with LLMs is the range of tasks software can now touch: internal search, policy drafting, coding assistance, support triage, fraud review, and document handling.

But crypto products still involve security trade-offs, operational risk, compliance judgments, user-experience decisions, incident response, and release discipline. A model can help with all of those tasks. It does not own any of them.

The same applies on the creative side inside crypto businesses. Teams can use AI image and design tools to generate options faster, test multiple directions, and build more variants for social, editorial, product, and campaign use. But speed does not settle the hard parts. Someone still has to choose which visual language fits the product, which illustration style matches the brand, which dashboard or landing page reads clearly, and which asset crosses a line on quality or trust.

In that sense, AI can make skilled creative workers more productive, just as it makes skilled developers more productive: by reducing time spent on first drafts and widening the range of outputs they can explore.

That is also why managers and senior individual contributors look more durable than the public debate assumes. Federal definitions for project management specialists still center on staffing, schedules, budgets, milestones, and risk. Those are not ornamental functions.

The work of turning a product idea into something a firm can ship, maintain, defend, and explain still requires humans to lead.

In crypto, where teams often move across jurisdictions, smart contract stacks, and shifting market conditions, that coordination burden can rise as AI lowers the cost of producing drafts and prototypes.

Even the debate inside AI usage data points to a mixed picture rather than a clean handoff from humans to models.

A September 2025 report found directive conversations rose from 27% to 39% between early 2025 and late summer 2025, suggesting users were delegating more. But a January 2026 update found augmented use had regained the lead on Claude.ai in November 2025, at 52% versus 45% for automated use. Firms are still testing where they trust the model to act on its own and where they still want a human-in-the-loop.

For the crypto sector, that line likely runs through security, treasury operations, listings, market surveillance, product launches, and brand-facing work.

AI can reduce the time spent on repetitive work inside those functions. But as the financial and reputational stakes rise, the value of judgment, review, and accountability rises too. That tends to favor experienced operators, editors, designers, and technical leads over firms hoping to run critical systems or public-facing outputs on autopilot.

The bigger labor question is who still gets a path in

The strongest warning sign is not a collapse in demand for experienced builders. The strain at the bottom of the ladder is increasing, and a January 2026 paper found lower employment only for younger workers in the most AI-exposed occupations, with the share of employment in those jobs slipping from 16.4% in November 2022 to 15.5% in September 2025.

The authors stressed that aggregate effects remained small, estimating that even if the entire decline translated into unemployment, it would explain only a 0.1 percentage-point rise in aggregate unemployment since November 2022. Still, the signal is there.

That fits the rest of the evidence. Routine office and administrative support work rose by 3 percentage points to 13% of API traffic in a January 2026 index. The categories include email management, document processing, CRM work, and scheduling.

A 2025 study also found that clerical occupations remained the highest exposure category globally, while estimating that one in four workers worldwide were in jobs with some generative-AI exposure, and only 3.3% of global employment sat in the highest exposure category. Transformation looks more common than outright replacement. But transformation is not painless when it starts by cutting junior tasks.

The same risk could extend into junior creative and junior technical roles. If entry-level work gets absorbed into AI-assisted workflows, fewer people may spend their early years doing the production tasks that once taught pacing, taste, debugging, revision, and client judgment.

In software, that may mean fewer junior coding and QA openings. In design, it may mean fewer production-heavy roles where people learned layout, systems thinking, and visual discipline by doing. Firms may gain speed in the short run and still weaken their own pipeline.

That is where the forward-looking case gets more serious. If firms use AI to shrink the volume of entry-level coding, coordination, support, research, drafting, and production work, then fewer people will get the apprenticeship that once led to senior jobs.

The short-term economics can look good. Teams stay smaller. Output rises. Margins improve. But the medium-term risk is a thinner talent pipeline.

Crypto firms, which already struggle to hire people who understand market structure, security, product, and trust under pressure, could end up competing even harder for experienced operators if they stop training enough new ones.

Global forecasts support a mixed outcome rather than a one-line verdict

A 2025 forecast projected structural labor-market change equal to 22% of today’s jobs by 2030, with 170 million jobs created and 92 million displaced, for a net gain of 78 million. The same forecast listed AI and machine learning specialists, fintech engineers, and software and application developers among the fastest-growing roles in percentage terms. But an IMF review warned that advanced economies would feel both the benefits and the disruptions sooner, and that gains could concentrate among higher-income workers and capital owners.

That leaves a cleaner conclusion than the public debate usually offers. AI is not yet showing up as a broad collapse in demand for high-skill builders. The numbers point the other way. They show stronger hiring signals for developers than for the broader market, rising use of AI inside work, measurable productivity gains, and clearer substitution pressure in administrative and clerical tasks than in expert technical roles.

The same logic also appears to apply to creative work. In both cases, AI looks more like a force multiplier for skilled workers than a substitute for them.

For crypto companies, the next step is plain. Firms can use AI to produce more drafts, ship more tests, generate more concepts, and automate more support work. They still need humans to decide what gets shipped, what stays secure, what meets policy, what fits the brand, and what breaks trust.

The near-term winners are likely to be the teams that use AI to widen the output of experienced operators without destroying their own training pipeline.

The next open question is whether companies keep hiring the people who can own outcomes while quietly cutting the people who once learned how to do so.

The post AI is boosting demand for high skill tech jobs while quietly killing entry-level roles appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Washington lawmakers are moving on multiple fronts to curb the most politically toxic corners of prediction markets after millions of dollars flowed into bets tied to US-linked military action in Iran.

Over the past week, several Democratic lawmakers have been pursuing multiple paths to rein in the fast-rising business.

One effort, led by Rep. Mike Levin and Sen. Chris Murphy,  focuses on war-related contracts that critics say should never have been listed.

Another, spearheaded by US Senators Jeff Merkley and Amy Klobuchar, would seek to bar elected officials and senior executive branch officials from trading event contracts altogether.

The central tensions in these efforts show that the mounting wagers tied to military action, leadership killings, and other national security events have created intolerable incentives and invite the abuse of nonpublic information.

So, US lawmakers are making a significant effort to nip these activities in the bud and prevent widespread profiteering from these events.

Still, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is preparing a broader rulemaking that could preserve a legal path for many prediction markets rather than shut the sector down outright.

How Iran war bets became the trigger

The immediate spark was a surge in trading around the US-Israel joint military action against Iran last weekend.

Reuters reported that $529 million was wagered on contracts tied to the timing of attacks and another $150 million on contracts linked to whether Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei would be removed from power.

At the same time, crypto analytics firm Bubblemaps pointed out that about 10 accounts made about $1.4 million in profit on Polymarket bets funded in the hours before the strikes.

Those figures gave lawmakers a vivid example of the risk they have been warning about for months.

On the social media platform X, Murphy revealed that he was working on legislation to ban these platforms after the trades raised questions about whether anyone with advance knowledge of military action had profited from it.

He argued that such trades should not be legal and added:

“A handful of people made big, unusual $100,000+ bets on Polymarket – that the U.S. would strike Iran the next day. The Iran War is fueling a new kind of corruption: White House officials secretly profiting off war. It's disgusting. We need to ban it.”

That line of attack reflects how quickly the issue has moved beyond a narrow dispute about platform rules.

In Washington, the argument is now about whether event contracts tied to war, terrorism, assassination, or other violent outcomes are a moral hazard, a national security vulnerability, or both.

Onshore and offshore markets diverge

The political backlash has also highlighted the divide between regulated US venues and offshore crypto-based platforms.

Kalshi, which operates as a CFTC-regulated exchange, has said it bans insider trading and does not list markets directly tied to death.

On X, Tarek Mansour, the platform's Chief Executive, said the company did not profit from the Khamenei market after refunding fees to users.

Nonetheless, the episode still exposed how messy these products can become when real-world events outrun the assumptions traders bring to the market.

Polymarket sits in a different position. The platform is currently mostly operating overseas, and it has defended its model by saying that prediction markets harness the wisdom of crowds to create accurate, unbiased forecasts. The platform is making substantial efforts to reenter the US market.

However, it is the same platform that has become the symbol of the current backlash because so much of the controversial volume, including the Iran-related trading and the market on a global nuclear explosion, was concentrated there.

That split matters because it points to the likely shape of any crackdown.

Washington has the clearest leverage over regulated US exchanges such as Kalshi. Offshore venues that rely on crypto rails are harder to police directly.

So, that raises the prospect of a two-tier market in which the most controversial contracts are pushed abroad while domestic platforms stay inside a narrower regulatory perimeter.

Notably, CFTC Chairman Michael Selig acknowledged that risk this week when he warned that blocking these markets outright could simply drive them offshore, “just like crypto.”

US legislative efforts on prediction markets

In light of the above, the policy response now taking shape in Washington is best understood as three overlapping tracks.

The first is a targeted push against war-linked and death-adjacent contracts. Levin and Murphy are working on legislation meant to ban restrictions on contracts that they say exploit military action or reward access to sensitive information.

Levin believes the Commodity Exchange Act, which already bars event contracts considered contrary to the public interest, still leaves too much room for such wagers to exist.

The second is an ethics bill aimed at public officials. Here, Merkley and Klobuchar wants to ban the president, vice president, members of Congress, and other public officials from trading event contracts.

Merkley framed the issue not as a fight over market innovation but as a question of public trust, saying:

“When public officials use non-public information to win a bet, you have the perfect recipe to undermine the public’s belief that government officials are working for the public good, not for their own personal profits. “Perfectly timed bets on prediction markets have the unmistakable stench of corruption.”

The third track runs through the CFTC itself. On Feb. 4, the agency withdrew the prior administration’s proposed event-contract rule and said it would pursue a new rulemaking instead.

Then, this week, Reuters reported that the CFTC sent an advance notice of proposed rulemaking to the White House budget office, the first formal step in building a new framework.

Selig has made clear that he does not want the United States to respond by trying to eliminate the sector. He wants the government to define the rules and preserve federal control over lawful contracts.

Meanwhile, that regulatory approach is colliding with state-level resistance.

On Feb. 17, the CFTC filed an amicus brief in a Ninth Circuit case to reaffirm its exclusive jurisdiction over commodity derivatives markets, including prediction markets.

Selig said CFTC-registered exchanges had faced an “onslaught of lawsuits” designed to undermine the agency’s sole regulatory authority.

In other words, Washington is not only debating what contracts should be legal. It is also fighting over who gets to decide.

Wall Street raises the stakes

The timing of these moves comes at an awkward moment for policymakers, as prediction markets are no longer a fringe experiment.

Data from the crypto research firm Predictefy showed that weekly transactions on these platforms reached nearly 45 million, with notional volume exceeding $6 billion.

At the same time, traditional financial institutions like Intercontinental Exchange, the parent of the New York Stock Exchange, said in October that it would invest up to $2 billion in Polymarket.

That institutional interest complicates the politics. For industry backers, it is evidence that prediction markets are becoming part of mainstream market structure and should be regulated like other derivatives.

For critics, it means a business once dismissed as a novelty is now attracting serious capital even as the most inflammatory contracts center on war, assassination, and government action.

Considering this, the likely outcome of Washington's latest regulatory onslaught is not a blanket ban on prediction markets.

Congress is divided, the CFTC is moving toward rulemaking rather than prohibition, and platforms still argue that event contracts can serve legitimate forecasting and hedging functions.

However, the Iran wagers appear to have changed the conversation in one important way. They gave opponents a vivid example of how prediction markets can collide with national security, official ethics, and public outrage all at once.

That makes the next battle less about whether prediction markets should exist and more about which ones Washington is willing to tolerate.

If lawmakers succeed, contracts tied to war, death, and sensitive government action may become the first casualties. If regulators move faster than Congress, the US may end up with a narrower, more formalized onshore market while offshore venues continue to test how far crypto-based betting can go.

Either way, the era when prediction markets could present themselves as a niche experiment on the edge of finance is ending.

The post After $679 million in Iran war bets, Democrats move to ban prediction markets tied to military action appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin’s brief rally above $73,000 during the past day has the feel of a price performance that could still fade, fast, noisy, and familiar to anyone who has watched bear-market rebounds fail.

What is different this time is not the price print, but the growing alignment of signals pointing to a possible transition out of peak negative momentum.

For context, Swissblock’s momentum framework showed that Bitcoin was climbing out of a deeply negative zone that has tended to appear near major transitions.

According to the firm:

“We’re exiting peak negative momentum, the kind of transition that often precedes a regime change. The key test now is simple: can momentum consolidate above +0.5 and hold. That +0.5 zone is the point of no return, where caution starts giving way to expansion.”

This is because the flagship digital asset has seen several market indicators, including ETF demand and indicators tied to selling behavior, all improving simultaneously.

However, none of them, on their own, declares a new bull market. Instead, they outline the early conditions of a regime change if the improvement holds.

This is why CryptoQuant continues to argue that Bitcoin conditions remain bearish despite the current upside. Its Bull Score Index remains extremely low at 10 out of 100, a reading that signals the broader set of indicators tied to a bullish regime has not recovered.

The split matters because markets often begin to change before they look healthy. A regime change does not require bullish conditions today. It requires deterioration to stop, then improvement to persist.

Demand is improving, mainly because it stopped getting worse

The clearest “what changed” signal is not a burst of fresh buying. It is the easing of spot-demand contraction, a shift from bad to less bad, that can matter more than it sounds.

CryptoQuant’s estimate of Bitcoin “apparent demand” suggests spot demand contraction improved from roughly -136,000 BTC at the start of 2026 to about -25,000 BTC more recently.

The timing aligns with Bitcoin establishing a support base since early February, a shift that looks less like a breakout and more like early evidence that the market can absorb supply without continuing to slide.

The nuance is crucial because while -25,000 BTC is still negative, BTC transitions often begin this way: demand weakens, volatility compresses, and price becomes more sensitive to incremental changes in flows.

That is the stage where rallies can start behaving more like early accumulation and less like purely mechanical squeezes.

Another part of the demand picture is a return of a US-led bid.

CryptoQuant says the Coinbase Bitcoin Premium, a proxy for US-based buying pressure, moved from deeply negative territory in early February to its most positive level since October.

Notably, this has been driven by spot Bitcoin ETFs, which saw net inflows of around $917 million during the first week of this month.

This marks a significant divergence from their performance during the first two months of the year, where they recorded net outflows of more than $1.8 billion.

In practical terms, it suggests the marginal buyer is shifting back toward US spot demand as the market tests regime boundaries.

Selling pressure is easing, and price can move quickly when supply fades

Price does not always need a flood of new buyers to rise. It can jump when the market stops leaking supply.

CryptoQuant data suggests trader selling pressure cooled after unrealized losses reached levels last seen in July 2022.

When a large share of traders are already underwater, the incentive to sell at the margin often diminishes. Capitulation can exhaust near-term supply, and it takes less incremental demand to push the price higher.

At the same time, long-term holders also appear to be easing off their selling activities.

CryptoQuant data shows long-term holder selling fell to its lowest 30-day pace since June 2025, dropping from around 904,000 BTC in late November to about 276,000 BTC more recently.

That does not guarantee a new bull market. However, it does remove one of the most persistent bear-market accelerants, steady distribution from holders who bought much lower and are willing to sell into strength.

It also explains why momentum models can flip quickly once demand stabilizes, because supply pressure is no longer pushing down on every rally attempt.

Resistance levels double as the regime test

The near-term battlefield is clear, and the levels are not arbitrary.

CryptoQuant points to $79,000 as the first key resistance, the lower band of traders’ on-chain realized price, a level that has historically acted as a ceiling in bear phases.

Above that sits a larger hurdle around $90,000, near the traders’ on-chain realized price itself, which capped prices during a previous rally earlier in the year.

These levels matter because they approximate where the active cohort’s cost basis sits.

In bear markets, that cohort often sells rallies to get back to even, turning cost basis into resistance. In bull markets, once price reclaims those levels, behavior can shift, with former resistance defended as support.

That is why the move above $73,000 is not the finish line. It is the approach to the line.

If Bitcoin breaks through $79,000 and then holds, while demand continues to improve, it would strengthen the argument that momentum is shifting into an expansion regime.

If it rejects, and momentum cannot hold above Swissblock’s +0.5 threshold, the rally risks being written off as another relief bounce.

Three paths for the next 4 to 12 weeks

With Bitcoin attempting to exit negative momentum, the next phase is likely to be decided less by headlines and more by whether the market can hold its improvements.

One outcome is a failed flip. Momentum fails to remain above Swissblock’s +0.5 threshold, spot demand remains negative, and ETF flows flatten.

Here, BTC price likely rejects near $79,000 and drifts back into the recent support zone, a reset that would fit a bear-market structure.

A second outcome is chop and base. Momentum hovers around the threshold, apparent demand improves slowly but does not flip positive, and flows stay mixed.

In this case, BTC price ranges for weeks, building a base that makes a later breakout more credible, even if it tests patience.

The third outcome is a true regime change. Momentum holds above +0.5 for multiple weeks, apparent demand flips positive, ETF inflows persist, and derivatives pricing becomes less defensive.

Price reclaims $79,000, challenges $90,000 and starts converting former resistance into support, a hallmark of a structural shift.

For now, the rally is best understood as an attempted transition. Selling pressure is easing. Demand is stabilizing. Momentum is trying to move into a higher regime. The proof is deceptively simple, not that Bitcoin can spike, but that it can hold.

The post Bitcoin could tag $90,000 again but only if this level stops acting like a sell wall for trapped traders appeared first on CryptoSlate.

President Donald Trump projected four to five weeks for the conflict with Iran to come to an end. The market priced its playbook: headline shock, brief spike, diplomatic theater, then normalization.

That script worked in 2019 when drones hit Saudi Aramco facilities, and Brent jumped 15% only to surrender the entire gain within weeks. Traders bought the panic, sold the resolution, and moved on.

However, six days into the US/Israel-Iran escalation, Brent is at $85.49, up 17% from the $73 pre-strike anchor price. The question traders can't answer is whether this resolves before week four or stretches past week seven.

That's 50 days, the threshold where the nature of the shock fundamentally changes.

The distinction between a three-week disruption and a seven-week conflict matters more than the current price. Macquarie's commodity desk frames the inflection cleanly: the global system absorbs a Hormuz disruption for one to two weeks without structural economic damage.

Pain accelerates past week three. Week four becomes the cliff where risk premium transforms into an inflation story that central banks can't ignore.

By week seven, 50 days, the test is whether the Federal Reserve can deliver its projected June rate cut or must hold the line at 3.75% to prevent inflation expectations from breaking loose.

For Bitcoin, which has spent the past months riding the “Fed pivot” narrative as its primary bullish catalyst, the shift from a liquidity tailwind to a liquidity stall represents a headwind the asset has no mechanism to avoid.

The transmission mechanism no one wants to price

Oil moves through the Strait of Hormuz, channeling roughly 20% of global oil flows and a similar share of LNG. Geography converts regional conflict into a global supply constraint.

JPMorgan flags that a prolonged Hormuz closure threatens 3.3 million barrels per day, modeling how physical tightness translates into macro repricing that forces its way into central bank frameworks.

Asian refining margins telegraph the stress. Complex margins hit $30 per barrel, jet fuel cracks above $52, and gasoil above $48. These levels indicate refiners can't source alternatives.

China asked refiners to halt export contracts and cancel shipments to protect domestic supply amid a spike in wholesale prices. Diesel jumped 13.5% in one week, gasoline 11%.

Japan's refiners requested access to strategic stockpiles even as officials signaled that no immediate release was planned. The request shows actors with physical exposure pricing the possibility that this extends long enough to strain inventories.

Duration rewrites impact. A $10 spike reversing in 10 days is noise. A $15 move persisting 50 days forces into inflation prints, into expectations surveys central banks monitor, into the rate path governing system liquidity.

Allianz quantifies the threshold: beyond four to six weeks, implications compound. At three months, recession risk shifts from tail to base case.

Every 10% sustained oil move adds 0.1 to 0.2 percentage points to CPI. Pushing Brent from $73 to $100 is equivalent to a half-point inflation impulse, keeping the Fed at 3.75% through 2026 and abandoning the June cut.

What $100, $125, and $150 actually mean

Markets don't need to speculate. Multiple banks have stress-tested the scenarios, their price targets mapping to escalating economic damage.

At $100, Brent jumps 37% above the $73 baseline, and the scenario is in prolonged-disruption territory, where the risk premium persists without collapsing the economy.

Goldman Sachs modeled this as a severe case. Allianz uses it as the threshold where Fed cuts evaporate.

From today's $85.49, $100 would require an 18.6% increase, which is plausible if Hormuz remains contested or if infrastructure damage compounds shipping constraints.

That level implies 37% crude climb from baseline, generating a 0.5 to 0.7 percentage-point inflation impulse. The Fed's 2026 easing path rests on inflation grinding toward 2%.

A half-point shock doesn't permanently break that, but delays cuts from June to the fourth quarter, or eliminates them if oil stays elevated through summer.

At $120 to $150, framing shifts from “inflation complication” to “growth threat.” Bernstein discussed this as an extreme, prolonged conflict in which infrastructure is targeted and shipping adapts slowly.

At $125 Brent, up 48.2%, the inflation impulse climbs to 0.8-1.6 percentage points. Economists deploy “meaningful drag” and “material damage.” Earnings forecasts get revised down. Equities reprice as discount rates move against risk assets.

Bitcoin accelerates that repricing, trading as levered beta to liquidity.

At $150, it's a recession prep. The 77.9% move implies 1.3 to 2.6 percentage points added to CPI. Central banks debate whether to hike into a slowdown to prevent unanchoring.

The 2008 oil spike to $147 preceded easing only after crude collapsed, and the crisis forced central banks' hands. Initial response to $140+ was tightening bias.

Bitcoin gets repriced as high-beta risk, with no cash flows and no anchor beyond liquidity conditions.

Bitcoin's problem isn't oil

The line from oil to Bitcoin runs through inflation expectations and monetary response. When Brent stays elevated, inflation prints rise.

When inflation rises, central banks delay easing or hold rates higher. When rates stay higher, risk assets face valuation headwind, and the opportunity cost of holding volatile, zero-yield instruments increases.

Related Reading

Bitcoin drops after inflation surprise — but one quiet detail just changed the rate-cut story

Hotter producer inflation knocks Bitcoin lower as rate-cut bets shift into March.

Feb 27, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

Academic work finds that a one-basis-point tightening shock to short rates corresponds to roughly a 0.25% move in Bitcoin. Not a law, but a sensitivity estimate that provides the scaffold for modeling what 50 days of elevated oil do.

If Brent averages $95 to $105 through week seven, you're in “cuts postponed.” The Fed holds, real yields grind higher. Bitcoin faces 5% to 15% headwind as liquidity expectations reprice.

If Brent averages $100 to $110, you're in Allianz's “no 2026 cut” world. Long-end yields reflect higher-for-longer. Bitcoin, behaving like a levered tech stock when liquidity tightens, sees a 10% to 25% drawdown.

If Brent tests $120 to $150, you're in forced de-risking. Recession talk enters discourse. Volatility spikes across assets. Bitcoin doesn't rally on inflation-hedge narrative—it sells with everything else, down 25% to 45%.

The overlooked second channel: miner economics

Oil moves electricity costs, and electricity costs govern miner profitability. VanEck flags breakeven thresholds: older rigs like the S19 XP become uneconomic above roughly $0.07 per kilowatt-hour before overhead or depreciation.

When energy prices surge, miners sell Bitcoin to cover costs or shut down capacity. Either price pressure, sell-off, or reduced network security.

This channel moves more slowly than rates but compounds over the course of weeks. A 50-day war tests whether miners in expensive-power regions stay online and whether sell pressure builds while macro attention fixates on inflation.

What does week four actually tests

The market doesn't need $150 oil to hurt Bitcoin. It needs oil elevated enough and sustained long enough to rewrite the assumptions baked into rate expectations and liquidity forecasts.

Related Reading

Bitcoin gets liquidity lifeline as US injects $3 billion into banking system amid oil price spike

As Iran tensions mount, Bitcoin faces an economic puzzle with inflation risks and Fed's liquidity signals.

Mar 3, 2026 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

Week four is where Macquarie says the pain “definitely” accelerates.

Week seven puts the oil price past every threshold where banks model “manageable” and into the zone where macro damage becomes the baseline assumption.

Trump said four to five weeks. If he's right, Brent returns to $80, inflation fears fade, and the Fed's June cut stays on the table. Bitcoin trades in the relief rally as liquidity expectations stabilize.

However, if the conflict extends to 50 days, the scenarios stack differently. At $100 Brent, the no-cut case is tested. At $125, the test is on pricing recession risk. At $150, there is no test, the market is already there.

Bitcoin doesn't control oil. It doesn't control the Fed. What it does is reflect the liquidity regime that those forces create.

And when a conflict that was supposed to last weeks stretches into its seventh, the regime shifts from “easing ahead” to “higher for longer.” That shift is the headwind no volatility surface can hedge.

The post Oil shock could send Bitcoin down 45% if price surge forces Fed to delay cuts appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Blue Owl Capital's OBDC II fund permanently halted redemptions in February. The firm replaced quarterly tenders with return-of-capital distributions funded by loan repayments and asset sales, committing to return roughly 30% of net asset value within 45 days.

Blue Owl also announced plans to sell $1.4 billion of assets across three credit funds to generate cash and pay down debt.

This isn't a Blue Owl problem, but a private credit structure problem under stress at scale.

Blackstone's BCRED managed $3.7 billion in first-quarter withdrawals by raising its quarterly redemption cap from 5% to 7% and injecting over $400 million in support capital, including more than $150 million from senior executives.

When executives writing the checks start writing bigger checks, the message is clear: the system is discovering that promising liquidity in a market built on illiquid loans creates pressure someone must absorb.

The question for Bitcoin isn't whether private credit stress matters, but which assets get sold first when the dash for cash begins.

The liquidity mismatch nobody wanted to price

Private credit is lending outside traditional banks, typically to mid-sized companies unable to access public bond markets.

The loans are hard to sell: no exchange, no continuous pricing, no depth. That works if everyone treats it as a long-term hold. The problem emerges when the fund wrapper promises quarterly or monthly redemptions while underlying assets remain illiquid.

When redemption requests exceed the 5% threshold, funds face a binary choice: gate withdrawals and destroy confidence, or sell into a market with limited buyers.

Blue Owl chose gates. Blackstone chose a hybrid approach: raise caps, inject capital, manage the flow. Both confirm that the liquidity mismatch is real and being tested.

Scale matters. Private credit estimates range from $2 trillion to $3.5 trillion, depending on the definition used. MarketWatch frames it around $3 trillion. Any of these represents a market large enough that confidence cracks don't stay contained.

AM Best data shows life and annuity insurers held approximately $1.8 trillion in private credit in 2025, roughly 46% of total debt holdings. Close to $1 trillion sits in the less-liquid bucket. Insurers don't panic-sell, but they reassess when liquidity becomes a topic.

Listed business development companies offer a real-time stress gauge. BDCs trade around 73% of net asset value. That 27% discount reflects market skepticism about mark accuracy and monetization ability without haircuts.

Why Bitcoin becomes the pressure valve

When liquidity stress hits, the response isn't careful rebalancing: it's a dash for cash.

The rule: sell what you can, not what you want. Private credit loans can't be sold instantly. Corporate bonds have buyers, but spreads widen when everyone's selling. Equities are liquid, but dumping large positions moves prices.

Bitcoin trades 24/7 with deep liquidity and near-instant settlement. No waiting for the market open. No broker calls. You can raise cash immediately. That makes Bitcoin a natural first stop when priority shifts from “optimize returns” to “get liquid now.”

March 2020 offers the template. When the COVID liquidity shock hit, Bitcoin dropped nearly 50% in a day. The selloff reflected funds liquidating the most accessible risk assets to meet margin calls and redemptions.

Related Reading

Bitcoin sentiment has hit rock bottom – as bad as COVID and FTX crashes

At these levels, the question stops being "how scared are people?" and becomes "does extreme fear actually predict anything?"

Nov 18, 2025 · Gino Matos

Bitcoin sold first because it could be sold first.

If private credit stress escalates, the pattern repeats. Redemptions rise. Funds trimming liquid holdings. Investors are reducing leverage preemptively. Bitcoin, trading 24/7 with no circuit breakers, absorbs selling pressure ahead of traditional markets.

The three scenarios for Bitcoin prices

If the private credit selloff accelerates, there are three likely scenarios for Bitcoin.

The first scenario is a contained scare. A few more funds adjust liquidity terms. Headlines fade after two weeks. Credit spreads widen modestly but stabilize. BDC discounts remain elevated but don't collapse.

Bitcoin experiences choppy trading, down as much as 10%, then recovers. Base case if no major fund beyond OBDC II announces full suspension, and BCRED-style capital injections become standard.

The second scenario consists of cash grab spreads. Multiple funds raise caps or implement partial gates. BDC discounts deepen past 30%. Leveraged loan and high-yield spreads widen noticeably. Insurers publicly discuss private credit exposure.

The media uses “shadow banking stress” language. Bitcoin faces 10% to 25% downside over two to eight weeks as “sell what you can” takes hold. Requires visible contagion beyond Blue Owl and Blackstone.

The third scenario, and the more aggressive, is a systemic run narrative. Broad gating across large funds. Visible write-downs as firms mark loans closer to BDC levels. Coverage shifts to insurer exposure and regulatory scrutiny.

Credit markets price default-cycle acceleration. Bitcoin initially drops 25% to 45% as forced deleveraging hits all risk assets.

However, if stress looks systemic enough to shift Fed policy toward easier conditions, Bitcoin can flip from victim to rebound leader.

An IMF working paper documents that a single “crypto factor” accounts for roughly 80% of the variation in cryptocurrency prices, with stronger links to US monetary policy than in earlier periods.

When markets pivot from “risk off” to “the Fed will ease,” Bitcoin moves faster than traditional assets.
The 2023 regional banking crisis offers precedent. Bitcoin initially sold on contagion fears, then rallied as markets priced in a Fed pause on hikes.

The plot twist nobody wants to price

Track fund-level actions. Every raised redemption cap, suspended tender mechanism, or injected manager capital confirms that stress is spreading. OBDC II established the template: if others followed, quarterly liquidity would never be sustainable.

BDC pricing provides a real-time fear gauge. The 73% of the NAV level signals deep skepticism. If discounts widen to 65% or 60%, markets are pricing meaningful write-downs and fire sales.

Credit spreads reveal whether concern is liquidity-specific or default-driven. Leveraged loan spreads widening by 50 basis points suggests jitters. A 150-basis-point widening suggests markets are pricing in a turning credit cycle.

Rate cut expectations determine whether Bitcoin rebounds or stays suppressed.

If stress forces the Fed to pause tightening or accelerate cuts, Bitcoin benefits from easier conditions. If stress stays contained and Fed holds course, Bitcoin faces sustained pressure as a high-beta asset.

Bitcoin feels pain when private credit proves less liquid than advertised and investors simultaneously need cash.

Bitcoin sells first because it can. The irony is that if the selloff gets large enough to shift monetary policy expectations, Bitcoin can recover faster than the credit instruments that triggered the stress in the first place.

Private credit funds will spend months or years unwinding positions and managing redemption queues. Bitcoin will trade the Fed pivot in real time, 24 hours a day, with no gates and no waiting periods. The pressure valve cuts both ways.

The post The $3 trillion private credit boom is starting to crack — and Bitcoin could feel it first appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Is a Global Liquidity Shock Starting?

Global financial markets are entering a period of rising uncertainty as multiple macroeconomic signals begin flashing simultaneously. Oil prices are surging, geopolitical tensions in the Middle East are escalating, and investors are increasingly questioning whether a broader liquidity shock could be forming across global markets.

At the same time, the crypto market is experiencing renewed volatility. Bitcoin is testing key support levels while institutional flows fluctuate and macro headlines dominate market sentiment.

The key question now is whether these developments represent temporary turbulence — or the early signs of a deeper liquidity squeeze.

Oil Surge Raises Global Inflation Concerns

One of the clearest signals of market stress is the rapid surge in energy prices. Brent crude recently climbed above $90 per barrel after rising more than 25% in the past week.

The move comes amid escalating geopolitical tensions and concerns over potential disruptions to global energy supply routes. Markets are particularly focused on developments in the Middle East, where conflict risks have increased dramatically.

Energy shocks often ripple through the global economy. Higher oil prices raise transportation and production costs, fueling inflation and tightening financial conditions for businesses and consumers alike.

Historically, sharp oil spikes have frequently preceded periods of market volatility.

Geopolitical Risks Are Driving Market Anxiety

Recent reports of intensified geopolitical tensions involving Iran, the United States, and regional actors have added another layer of uncertainty for investors.

Geopolitical instability tends to trigger a “risk-off” reaction in financial markets. Investors often rotate capital away from risk assets such as equities and cryptocurrencies while seeking perceived safe havens.

Indeed, U.S. equity markets recently saw significant selling pressure at the open, with hundreds of billions of dollars temporarily wiped from market capitalization as traders reacted to the evolving situation.

These sudden shifts in sentiment can amplify volatility across multiple asset classes.

Bitcoin Faces Volatility as Liquidity Tightens

The cryptocurrency market is particularly sensitive to changes in global liquidity conditions. Bitcoin has recently been testing the $70,000 level as ETF flows fluctuate and macroeconomic uncertainty weighs on sentiment.

While some investors view Bitcoin as a long-term hedge against geopolitical instability, the short-term reality is that crypto often behaves like a risk asset during periods of market stress.

When liquidity tightens, leveraged positions unwind and traders reduce exposure to volatile assets. This dynamic can produce rapid price swings across the crypto market.

Are We Entering a Global Liquidity Shock?

A liquidity shock occurs when capital suddenly becomes scarce in financial markets. This can happen when several forces align simultaneously, including rising energy costs, geopolitical risk, and shifts in monetary policy expectations.

The current environment shows early signs of such a convergence. Oil prices are rising rapidly, geopolitical tensions are intensifying, and macroeconomic data is creating uncertainty about the path of global interest rates.

However, it remains too early to determine whether these developments will escalate into a full liquidity shock or stabilize as geopolitical risks evolve.

For crypto investors, the coming weeks may prove critical. Bitcoin and the broader digital asset market often react quickly to shifts in global liquidity conditions.

If macro uncertainty continues to build, volatility may remain elevated across both traditional financial markets and cryptocurrencies.

Conclusion

The recent surge in oil prices, combined with escalating geopolitical tensions and shifting macroeconomic signals, is creating a fragile environment for global markets.

While it is not yet clear whether a full liquidity shock is underway, the alignment of these factors is already influencing investor behavior and driving volatility across multiple asset classes.

For Bitcoin and the broader crypto market, the interaction between macro liquidity conditions and geopolitical developments will likely remain one of the most important forces shaping price movements in the near term.

$BTC

Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, has formally responded to an inquiry from the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations regarding allegations of massive sanctions evasion. In a letter dated March 6, 2026, the exchange's legal representatives asserted that an exhaustive internal review found no evidence of accounts on its platform transacting directly with Iranian entities. This response marks a significant pushback against regulatory pressure following a period of intense scrutiny over the exchange's crypto news footprint and historical compliance record.

Addressing the $1.7 Billion Allegation

The exchange's response directly addresses concerns raised by Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) concerning reports that roughly $1.7 billion in digital assets had flowed to Iran-linked groups. Binance characterized these reports as "demonstrably false" and "defamatory," emphasizing that its internal monitoring systems are designed to prevent exactly the type of illicit activity described in recent media investigations. The exchange maintains that the figures cited in the probe overstate the actual exposure and misinterpret the nature of blockchain data.

Defining Direct vs. Indirect Transactions

In the context of global finance, Direct Transactions involve a primary transfer between a user account and a sanctioned entity. Indirect Exposure, which Binance admitted to finding, occurs when funds pass through multiple intermediate wallets before eventually interacting with a flagged address. This distinction is critical in digital asset compliance; while direct flows indicate a failure of KYC (Know Your Customer) protocols, indirect flows often highlight the inherent difficulty of tracking assets across a decentralized ecosystem. You can see how these flows impact major assets like Bitcoin prices during periods of regulatory uncertainty.

From Media Reports to Internal Audit Facts

The Senate probe was sparked by investigative reports from major outlets like the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. These reports suggested that Binance's own compliance staff had identified nearly $2 billion in transfers involving two specific partners: Hexa Whale and Blessed Trust.

Binance’s March 6 letter clarifies several specific points:

• No Direct Links: No Binance account was found to have a direct financial relationship with the Iranian government or its proxies.
• Proactive Investigations: The concerns regarding Hexa Whale and Blessed Trust were identified following a proactive internal review triggered by law enforcement inquiries.
• Account Termination: Once the indirect exposure was confirmed, Binance removed the associated entities from its platform.
• Staff Retention: The exchange rejected claims that compliance personnel were fired for flagging these transactions, maintaining that departures were unrelated to the Iran investigation.

Navigating Compliance and Third-Party Risks

A significant portion of the allegations centered on "vendor accounts" and partners acting as conduits. According to the Senate inquiry, these intermediaries allegedly allowed sanctioned Iranian individuals to access over 1,500 Binance accounts. Binance argues that it maintains a rigorous compliance protocol and that any breach of these rules by third-party vendors resulted in the immediate termination of those partnerships. Users interested in the security of their assets often turn to an exchange comparison to evaluate which platforms offer the most robust regulatory safeguards.

Bitcoin Price Analysis: The $70,000 Battleground

The $Bitcoin price is currently navigating a period of heightened volatility, trading at approximately $70,559 as of March 6, 2026. After a significant rally earlier this week that saw the premier cryptocurrency touch the $74,500 mark, a cooling-off period has settled in. This retracement is largely driven by a combination of profit-taking at psychological resistance levels and a shift in the macroeconomic landscape.

Why Is Bitcoin Crashing Today?

The primary catalyst for today’s downward pressure appears to be a reversal in institutional sentiment. Following three days of strong inflows, spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a net outflow of over $227 million on Thursday. This suggests that institutional players are de-risking as geopolitical tensions in the Middle East—specifically involving Iran—continue to simmer, casting a shadow over "risk-on" assets.

Technical Outlook: Key Levels to Watch

From a technical perspective, the $BTC chart reveals several critical zones:

• Immediate Support: The $70,000 psychological level. A sustained close below this could trigger a move toward the $68,500 horizontal support.
• Major Resistance: The $72,000 to $74,000 range remains the primary obstacle for bulls.
• RSI Indicator: The Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the 2-hour chart is hovering near 46, indicating a neutral-to-bearish momentum as the market searches for a floor.

BTC Coin Analysis: Market Sentiment and Macro Factors

While the immediate price action is choppy, the broader crypto news cycle remains focused on the long-term resilience of the market. According to recent reports from S&P Global, Bitcoin's volatility is on a long-term downward trend as it integrates further into traditional financial systems. However, in the short term, it remains highly sensitive to the US Dollar Index (DXY) and interest rate expectations.

"Bitcoin is increasingly functioning as a hedge against long-term currency debasement, though it still behaves like a high-beta risk asset during sudden geopolitical shocks." — Market Analyst Insight.

ETF Dynamics and Institutional Flow

The impact of spot ETFs cannot be overstated. With BlackRock’s IBIT maintaining a dominant market share, the daily "flow" data has become the most watched metric for short-term traders. The recent flip to negative outflows has led some to fear a "dead-cat bounce," though others view this as a healthy consolidation after a 20% surge from February lows.

What’s Next for Bitcoin?

Investors should keep a close eye on the $70,000 mark. If Bitcoin manages to hold this level through the weekend, the stage could be set for another attempt at the $75,000 all-time high territory. However, if the "higher-for-longer" interest rate narrative gains more steam following upcoming employment data, we might see a deeper retest of the $63,000 baseline.

The global energy landscape has shifted overnight. Following the escalation of military operations by the United States and Israel against Iran in early March 2026, the Strait of Hormuz—the world’s most critical maritime chokepoint—has seen a near-total halt in traffic. This disruption has sent shockwaves through both the fossil fuel and maritime logistics sectors, forcing traders and analysts to re-evaluate supply security in real-time.

Brent Crude Price Analysis

The price of Brent Crude Oil has experienced a vertical move on the charts. After trading in a relatively stable range earlier in the year, the onset of hostilities saw prices jump by approximately 18% within just six days.

As of March 6, 2026, Brent is testing the $84 per barrel mark, with some analysts at Goldman Sachs suggesting a "risk premium" of up to $15 could be added if the closure of the Strait remains absolute. Technical indicators show a clear "breakout" pattern, driven by the fear that 20% of the world's daily oil supply is currently stranded behind a naval blockade.

What are LNG Shipping Rates?

Before diving into the surge, it is essential to understand the metric. LNG shipping rates (or charter rates) represent the daily cost to hire a specialized tanker to transport Liquefied Natural Gas across the ocean. These rates are highly sensitive to "tonne-mile" demand—the distance a cargo must travel and the time a vessel is occupied.

LNG Rates Surge: From $40,000 to $300,000

The most dramatic escalation, however, is not in the commodity itself but in its transportation. LNG spot charter rates have surged from a baseline of $40,000 per day to as high as $300,000 per day—a staggering 650% increase.

Why the Massive Spike?

• Vessel Entrapment: Many tankers are currently "trapped" or stationary near the Persian Gulf, unable to exit the Strait of Hormuz safely.
• Rerouting: Ships previously destined for the Gulf are being diverted to the US or Australia, significantly increasing voyage lengths and absorbing all available global "spot" capacity.
• Force Majeure: Major producers like QatarEnergy have suspended production and declared force majeure, leaving buyers in Asia and Europe scrambling to secure any available vessel to bring gas from alternative, more distant sources.

Bitcoin Price Analysis: BTC Holds the $71,000 Line

While energy markets are in a frenzy, the Bitcoin price is showing remarkable resilience as a "digital gold" hedge. According to the latest 1-month chart, $BTC saw significant volatility throughout February, dipping as low as $63,000 on February 24th.

However, as the geopolitical tension escalated into March, Bitcoin staged a massive recovery. The chart shows a sharp vertical ascent starting on March 1st, breaking through the previous resistance at $68,000 and peaking near $73,000 on March 5th. As of today, March 6, 2026, BTC is consolidating around $71,044. The ability of $Bitcoin to maintain this psychological $70k level despite the global energy shock suggests that investors are increasingly viewing it as a safe-haven asset amidst fiat and commodity uncertainty.

Market Outlook and Connectivity

The current market structure is in deep backwardation, meaning spot prices are significantly higher than future delivery prices. This suggests that while the immediate "shock" is severe, the market is pricing in a hope for a diplomatic resolution by the summer of 2026.

However, for energy-heavy industries and consumers, the "Strait-jacket" effect on the Persian Gulf means higher inflationary pressures are inevitable. Investors looking for hedges have already begun rotating into safe-haven assets, with gold surpassing the $5,100 per ounce mark during this same period.

The landscape of artificial intelligence is undergoing a radical shift in 2026. We are moving beyond the era of simple chatbots like ChatGPT—which only react to prompts—into the era of AI agents that act independently. These autonomous systems can manage their own money, pay other AIs for services, and execute complex workflows without human intervention.

However, for an AI to be truly autonomous, it needs a financial system that doesn't require a physical ID, a credit card, or a bank's permission. This is why cryptocurrency has become the foundational infrastructure for the emerging Machine Economy.

What is an AI Agent?

An AI agent is an autonomous software entity designed to achieve specific goals by planning, deciding, and executing tasks. Unlike a chatbot (a tool you use), an agent acts as a digital employee that works for you.

While a traditional bot follows rigid "if-then" rules, a modern AI agent understands context, adapts to market changes, and learns from its environment. This "Agentic AI" is now capable of managing Bitcoin portfolios and interacting across platforms like Discord, Telegram, and Slack.

The AI Agent Stack

To function as a sovereign economic actor, an AI agent requires three core pillars:

1. Digital Identity: Verified on-chain identities (such as ERC-8004) allow agents to build a reputation and prove who they are to other systems.
2. Payments: Agents need to settle transactions in real-time. This is made possible by the x402 protocol, an open standard that allows machines to pay for API calls or data using stablecoins like USDC.
3. Execution Environment: Frameworks like OpenClaw provide the environment where these agents run 24/7, monitoring markets and coordinating workflows.

Why AI Agents Specifically Need Crypto

Traditional banking systems are built for humans. They require KYC (Know Your Customer), physical signatures, and manual approvals—all of which are "friction" for a piece of code.

Crypto is permissionless. Any autonomous system can generate a hardware wallet address and start holding or sending funds immediately. In the Machine Economy, an "Agent A" might need data from "Agent B." Through crypto, the payment is instant, programmatic, and requires no central bank.

Practical Examples of AI Agents in 2026

• Portfolio Management: Agents track yields and rebalance assets across different exchanges based on real-time risk analysis.
• Autonomous Research: Instead of you reading 50 news articles, an agent filters on-chain data and social signals to deliver high-signal insights.
• Automated Trading: Some agents now trade autonomously, executing swaps on decentralized protocols without needing a human to click "confirm."

The Rise of OpenClaw and the x402 Protocol

One of the most significant developments in this space is OpenClaw, an open-source framework that allows users to run agents on their own hardware. By connecting OpenClaw to a crypto wallet, users are essentially giving their AI a "company card" to pay for its own resources.

This is supported by the x402 protocol, which revitalized the long-dormant "402 Payment Required" HTTP status code. According to reports, this protocol has already handled over 115 million micropayments between machines by early 2026.

AI Risks and Challenges

Despite the efficiency, the integration of AI and crypto carries significant risks:

• Security: Autonomous wallets can be targets for sophisticated fishing and "Algorithmic Resonance" scams.
• Liability: If an AI agent makes a financial error or executes a "bad" trade, the legal framework for liability remains largely undefined.
• Regulation: The technology is moving faster than global regulators can keep up with, leading to a "Wild West" environment for autonomous commerce.

Kalshi is facing a class action lawsuit based on its handling of a recent market related to Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

The bill establishes Florida-centric consumer protections and safeguards against money laundering

Grammarly's “Expert Review” feature uses AI to give feedback through the lens of noted writers and scholars—some of whom are no longer living.

Binance denied $1.7 billion in Iran sanctions violations and stood behind its compliance operations, in a new letter to Senator Richard Blumenthal.

Nevin Shetty secretly moved $35 million in company funds to his own DeFi platform, before losing nearly all of it in the Terra collapse.

Market is finally getting closer to a potential recovery, thanks to stabilization on the biggest assets out there.

Crypto news digest: Ex-Ripple CTO reacts to XRP price; SHIB faces “mark of the beast”; DOGE clears zero for eight hours.

The long-awaited Clarity Act could be signed into law as early as July, according to veteran Washington insider Kristin Smith.

Crypto philanthropy hit a record $100 million in 2025, and Ripple is leading the surge..

XRP Ledger lending protocol adds the ability to create loans on the XRPL.

TLDR:

• Binance processed over 71,000 law enforcement requests in 2025, helping seize $752 million in illicit assets worldwide.

• Exposure to illicit wallets on Binance dropped nearly 97% between January 2024 and July 2025, per blockchain analytics data.

• Hexa Whale and Blessed Trust were offboarded following proactive internal investigations, not media pressure or regulatory orders.

• Binance denied WSJ claims of 2,000 Iranian-linked accounts, linking the allegation to its ongoing VPN circumvention detection efforts.
  

Binance has formally responded to a February 24, 2026 letter from U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

The exchange giant directly challenged allegations drawn from recent media reports by the New York Times, Fortune, and the Wall Street Journal.

In its response, the company defended its compliance program, disputed claims about Iranian user accounts, and addressed the treatment of former employees. The letter was published publicly on March 6, 2026.

Compliance Record and Enforcement Cooperation

The company stated that it has invested hundreds of millions of dollars building its compliance infrastructure. Over 1,500 specialists currently work across sanctions, counter-terrorism financing, and financial crime investigations.

Binance also deploys more than 25 advanced monitoring tools for transaction screening and behavioral analytics.

In 2025, the exchange processed more than 71,000 law enforcement requests globally. Over the past three years, it also assisted in seizing more than $752 million in illicit assets, with nearly $579 million recovered for U.S. agencies. These figures reflect a broad commitment to supporting law enforcement operations worldwide.

Richard Teng, Binance’s CEO, addressed the matter publicly on social media. He wrote, “We’ve voluntarily responded to Senator Blumenthal’s inquiry which raises false and defamatory allegations reported by the WSJ.” He further noted that the company’s response was meant to protect its more than 300 million users.

Additionally, blockchain analytics data showed that Binance’s exposure to illicit wallets dropped from 0.284% to just 0.009% of total exchange volume between January 2024 and July 2025.

That represents a decrease of nearly 97% over the period. Exposure to major Iranian crypto exchanges also fell by 97.3% in two years, from $4.19 million to $110,000.

The response also referenced the T3 Financial Crime Unit, which froze over $300 million in its first year of operation alone. This network operates in real time and acts before tainted funds can move further in the system.

Hexa Whale, Blessed Trust, and Employee Matters

Regarding the two entities named in the Senator’s letter, Binance clarified that both investigations began following law enforcement inquiries.

In April 2025, law enforcement flagged wallet addresses with potential terrorist financing ties. Binance then launched a comprehensive internal review that went beyond the original request. Hexa Whale was subsequently offboarded on August 13, 2025.

Similarly, the Blessed Trust investigation began in summer 2025 after a separate law enforcement request. After a thorough source of funds analysis, Binance offboarded the entity in January 2026. The company stated that no Binance account had transacted directly with an Iran-based entity in either case.

On the Iranian account allegation, the company was direct. The WSJ claim that Binance identified 2,000 Iranian-linked accounts was described as false.

The company suspects the claim relates to its ongoing efforts to detect VPN circumvention rather than any confirmed Iranian user base. All users must complete mandatory identity verification to use the platform.

On employee matters, the company confirmed that some compliance staff had recently left. Most departures were voluntary resignations.

One employee was terminated for leaking internal user data, not for raising compliance concerns. The company stated clearly that no workers were dismissed for escalating issues internally.

Binance closed its response by affirming its continued commitment to compliance improvements, law enforcement cooperation, and user protection across the global crypto ecosystem.

The post Binance Fires Back at Senate Inquiry, Calls Media Allegations False and Defamatory appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• Coinbase Prime now offers 20+ CFTC-regulated futures contracts with 24/7 trading through Coinbase Financial Markets.

• Unified cross-margin allows institutions to manage spot and futures exposures within one single capital framework.

• Assets are secured under Coinbase’s NYDFS-regulated custodian, keeping all trading within a fully regulated structure.

• Coinbase’s Deribit acquisition moves the platform closer to one unified exchange for spot, futures, and options.

Coinbase Prime has taken a major step forward in institutional crypto infrastructure. The platform announced integrated regulated futures trading and unified cross-margin functionality across spot and derivatives markets.

Through Coinbase Financial Markets, its CFTC-regulated futures commission merchant, institutions now access over 20 futures contracts.

These include perpetual-style products with round-the-clock trading availability. The launch positions Coinbase Prime as a full-service, regulated prime brokerage built specifically for institutional-grade digital asset operations.

Unified Cross-Margin Reshapes Capital Management for Trading Desks

Traditionally, spot and futures trading required separate collateral pools and independent risk systems. That separation often created inefficiencies for institutional trading desks managing complex multi-market strategies. Coinbase Prime now brings both under one capital framework through unified cross-margin.

With this setup, institutions can evaluate spot and futures exposures together within a single portfolio view. Capital moves more freely across strategies, while risk is monitored holistically across the entire platform.

This is particularly useful for basis trading, where hedged positions can benefit from more efficient margin treatment.

Coinbase Institutional shared the development on X, stating that Prime is now “the most comprehensive operating system for institutional crypto.”

The post noted that institutions can now “trade, finance, and manage assets within a regulated full-service crypto prime brokerage framework.”

Prime’s deterministic risk model also allows trading desks to calculate margin requirements before execution. That transparency reduces reliance on opaque margin engines that have historically complicated pre-trade planning for institutions.

Regulated Infrastructure Brings Futures Directly Into the Prime Workflow

Futures access through Coinbase Financial Markets, a CFTC-regulated FCM, is now embedded directly into the Prime workflow.

Institutions no longer need separate platforms to access derivatives markets. Execution, custody, and risk management now operate within a single environment.

Assets remain secured within Coinbase’s NYDFS-regulated qualified custodian throughout the trading lifecycle. This structure allows institutions to operate within a fully regulated framework while accessing both spot and derivatives markets simultaneously.

Beyond futures, Coinbase Prime also covers financing, lending, and operational infrastructure at institutional scale.

The platform is designed so trading desks no longer need to coordinate across fragmented or self-assembled systems.

Coinbase’s recent acquisition of Deribit, the world’s leading crypto options exchange, further broadens this ecosystem.

The goal is a single platform where institutions can access spot, futures, perpetuals, and options together. That consolidated model reflects Coinbase Institutional’s broader objective of building what it describes as an “Everything Exchange” for professional market participants.

The post Coinbase Prime Integrates Regulated Futures and Cross-Margin Trading for Institutional Crypto appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• Ethereum daily ETH burn reached $1.2B in February 2026, still outpacing the 0.8% annual inflation rate.

• Validator APR held at 4–5% in March 2026, marginally above the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield of 4.2%.

• After removing L2 batch submissions, spam transactions account for only 4% of real network activity.

• Active Ethereum addresses surged 117% year-over-year, led by real users on Arbitrum, Base, and zk-EVMs.

Ethereum metrics challenge bearish claims as network burn continues to outpace supply in early 2026. A short report from Culper Research raised concerns about fee compression, spam activity, and validator sustainability.

However, on-chain data from February and March 2026 presents a contrasting picture. Daily ETH burn remained at $1.2 billion in February, exceeding the 0.8% annual inflation rate. The network continues to destroy more ETH than it produces, keeping supply dynamics intact.

Burn Rate and Fee Data Contradict the Bearish Narrative

Culper Research pointed to a 90% drop in median gas prices as a sign of network deterioration. Fees fell from roughly $2 to $0.20 following the Fusaka upgrade.

That decline, however, was built into the upgrade’s design from the start. The goal was to lower costs and redirect activity toward Layer 2 solutions. The drop was expected, not alarming.

Total daily ETH burn held at $1.2 billion through February 2026, despite lower per-gas prices. That figure still exceeds the network’s 0.8% annual inflation rate.

As a result, Ethereum remains deflationary in practice, with more ETH destroyed than created. The tokenomics argument against ETH loses ground when burn data is factored in.

Ethereum Daily, a crypto commentary account on X, addressed the report directly. The account wrote: “We need more clowns like Culper. Short $ETH if you want, but nobody cares.”

The post systematically challenged each claim in the Culper report. The response resonated broadly across crypto communities online.

The Fusaka upgrade’s fee reduction is also drawing more participants into the ecosystem. Lower transaction costs make Ethereum more accessible to everyday users.

That accessibility supports growing adoption across retail and institutional segments. Over time, broader usage tends to increase total burn volume even at lower per-unit rates.

Validator Yields and User Growth Support Network Stability

Validator economics also remain competitive heading into Q1 2026. Block rewards hold steady at approximately 2 ETH per block.

Total validator APR, including MEV rewards, ranged between 4% and 5% in March 2026. That return sits marginally above the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield of around 4.2%.

Staked ETH currently stands at roughly 19 million, representing about 66% of total supply. That level is well above the 30–40% threshold considered sufficient for network security.

The staking withdrawal queue has stayed flat near 3.2 million ETH for six consecutive months. Culper’s claim of a growing withdrawal backlog does not align with that data.

On the activity side, Culper flagged dust attacks as making up 22% of all transactions. After stripping out L2 batch submissions, spam transactions represent only about 4% of real network activity.

Non-spam wallet creation grew approximately 12% year-over-year in Q1 2026. Active addresses also rose 117% year-over-year, driven by users on Optimism, Arbitrum, Base, and zk-EVMs.

BitMine (BMNR) also drew scrutiny in the report for its ETH holdings. The firm holds roughly 4.47 million ETH, valued at around $9 billion.

Staking operations generate approximately $350 million annually in fees. With over $3 billion in cash equivalents on hand, the firm shows no signs of a financial strain.

The post Ethereum Defies Bearish Short Report as $1.2B Daily Burn Continues to Outpace Network Inflation appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• Minimmit achieves finality in one signing round, replacing Casper FFG’s two-round justification and finalization process. (truncate to fit — 105 chars)

• The new gadget lowers fault tolerance from 33% to 17%, but raises the unilateral censorship threshold from 67% to 83%.

• Buterin argues censorship poses a greater threat than finality reversion, as it lacks immediate, verifiable on-chain evidence.

• Minimmit requires 83% of clients to share a bug before incorrect finalization occurs, giving developers a wider safety margin.

Minimmit has been put forward as a direct replacement for Casper FFG within Ethereum’s consensus layer. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently shared a detailed technical post comparing both finality gadgets.

Casper FFG has long served as a two-round finality mechanism on the network. The proposed system, by contrast, achieves finality in a single round of validator signatures.

The proposal is drawing attention as the Ethereum community continues to evaluate changes to its consensus architecture.

Why the New System Operates in a Single Round

Casper FFG asks each attester to sign a block on two separate occasions. The first signature “justifies” the block, and the second “finalizes” it.

Minimmit cuts this down to a single signing round. This makes the process more efficient for validators across the network.

The change comes with a direct cost to fault tolerance, though. The new system’s threshold sits at 17%, compared to 33% under Casper FFG.

A smaller portion of malicious stake can therefore disrupt finality under the new model. Still, Buterin’s post makes the case that other properties of the system more than offset this drop.

In the post shared on X, Buterin described himself as a long-standing “security assumptions hawk” in Ethereum’s consensus research. He cited his past push for 49% fault tolerance under synchrony.

He also referenced his work on DAS for dishonest-majority-resistant data availability checks. Despite this record, he stated he is “even enthusiastic” about the proposed design.

The asynchronous network case also differs between the two systems. Under ideal 3SF, finality holds as long as an attacker controls less than 33% of stake.

The proposed gadget lowers that same protection to 17%. In both cases, any reversion of finality triggers massive slashing penalties against offending validators.

Censorship Resistance and the Broader Security Picture

Buterin’s argument centers on identifying censorship as the more dangerous threat. Unlike finality reversion, censorship produces no immediate, publicly verifiable evidence against the attacker.

A reversion event, on the other hand, results in automatic, large-scale slashing. This asymmetry is a core reason behind his support for Minimmit’s design.

Both systems require an attacker to control over 50% of staked ETH to carry out censorship. The key distinction lies in what happens at higher thresholds.

In 3SF, an attacker above 67% can finalize the chain unilaterally, removing any coordination point for honest validators. The new system raises that threshold to 83%.

Software bugs present another area where the proposed gadget holds an advantage. Under 3SF, a flaw shared by 67% of client software can accidentally finalize an incorrect chain state.

Minimmit raises that bar to 83%. This wider margin gives developers more time to identify and respond before errors become permanent.

Buterin also addressed the economic argument against finality reversion attacks. With 15 million ETH staked, reverting finality under 3SF would require slashing 5 million ETH, or roughly $10 billion.

He noted that the 17% baseline still represents an enormous deterrent on its own. From there, he argues the proposed system’s other properties make it the stronger overall consensus design for Ethereum.

The post Vitalik Buterin Backs Minimmit Over Casper FFG for Ethereum’s Consensus Layer appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• Tokenized real-world assets on Ethereum mainnet surpassed $15 billion in total market capitalization this month.

• Aave crossed $1 trillion in all-time cumulative loans, marking a major milestone for decentralized lending on Ethereum.

• BNP Paribas and BlackRock deepened their presence on Ethereum through new tokenized fund launches and integrations.

• Ethereum’s Layer 2 networks advanced significantly, with Linea peaking at 218 mGas/s and Optimism shipping Upgrade 18.

Ethereum builders delivered a remarkable month of progress across the ecosystem, with milestones that captured attention across both crypto and traditional finance.

Tokenized real-world assets on Ethereum mainnet crossed $15 billion in market cap. Aave surpassed $1 trillion in all-time loans, marking a major threshold for decentralized lending.

These achievements arrived alongside 25 distinct ecosystem deliverables spanning privacy, scaling, institutional adoption, and developer tooling.

Tokenized Real-World Assets and Institutional Products Hit Record Levels

Ethereum builders pushed tokenized real-world assets past $15 billion in total market cap on mainnet. The figure reflects sustained growth in onchain financial products built on Ethereum infrastructure. Several institutions contributed directly to that growth through new product launches this month.

BNPParibas launched a euro-denominated money market fund directly on Ethereum’s public blockchain. The move brought one of Europe’s largest banks into Ethereum’s financial infrastructure in a meaningful way. It also added to the growing list of regulated financial products now operating onchain.

OndoFinance brought tokenized stocks, SPYon and QQQon, live as DeFi collateral on @Morpho. @eulerfinance also accepted tokenized equities as collateral through a collaboration with Ondo Finance, Sentora, and Chainlink. Traditional financial exposure is now usable inside Ethereum-native lending markets without leaving the chain.

Uniswap integrated with Securitize to make BlackRock’s BUIDL fund tradeable through UniswapX. @StartaleGroup introduced JPYSC, the first trust bank-backed Japanese yen stablecoin on Ethereum. Together, these launches show institutions treating Ethereum as core financial infrastructure rather than experimental technology.

Aave Crosses $1 Trillion as DeFi Activity Compounds Across the Ecosystem

Aave crossing $1 trillion in cumulative all-time loans stands as one of the month’s most watched milestones. The figure represents years of consistent lending activity built on Ethereum’s open financial layer. It also reflects growing trust in decentralized protocols to handle serious financial volume over time.

MetaLeX_Labs added to DeFi’s expanding use cases by launching cyberSign this month. The product allows users to sign legally binding agreements using Ethereum or Base as the signing infrastructure. It bridges legal execution with blockchain-native identity in a practical and accessible way.

RobinhoodApp launched the public testnet for Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum L2 powered by Arbitrum. The platform targets institutional settlement and aims to bridge traditional brokerage activity with public rollup infrastructure. It joins a growing set of financial platforms building directly on Ethereum’s Layer 2 ecosystem.

@base also announced that Y Combinator startups can now receive funding in USDC on Base. The development connects early-stage startup capital with Ethereum’s stablecoin and payment rails. It opens a practical path for new companies to operate natively within the Ethereum ecosystem from day one.

Builders Advance Privacy Tools, Scaling Capacity, and Staking Infrastructure

Ethereum builders made parallel progress in privacy, performance, and staking throughout the month. @payy_link announced Payy Network, a privacy-first EVM Layer 2 with default private token transfers.

@hinkal_protocol enabled private ETH and stablecoin payments on Arbitrum, extending privacy further across L2s.

Starknet integrated Nightfall for confidential institutional DeFi and released Starkzap, an open-source SDK for consumer apps. @blockscout launched a Tor-native onion service, giving users a private way to view Ethereum state.

The @ethereumfndn also released the One Trillion Dollar Security Dashboard, offering a full view of ecosystem security.

LineaBuild sustained over 100 mGas per second throughout the month, peaking at 218 mGas per second. @Optimism shipped Upgrade 18, targeting a more performant and customizable OP Stack for builders. These results confirm that Ethereum’s rollup layer is actively delivering on its throughput promises.

Rocket_Pool activated Saturn One, introducing 4 ETH megapool validators to strengthen decentralized staking. @ether_fi released its Android app, lowering the barrier for mobile users entering staking and DeFi.

The @ethereumfndn also published its 2026 priorities — Scale, Improve UX, and Harden the L1 — keeping long-term development coordinated and public.

The post Ethereum Ecosystem Hits $15B in Tokenized RWAs and $1T in Aave Loans in a Single Month appeared first on Blockonomi.

Vitalik Buterin has outlined his perspective on how artificial intelligence (AI) could redefine the next generation of Web3 wallets.

He also proposed a model where humans remain directly involved in approving high-value transactions.

AI Will Shape Newer Crypto Wallets

The Ethereum co-founder shared his views on the decentralized social media platform Farcaster, noting that it is “pretty obvious” that the next iteration of wallets will heavily involve AI.

Despite this, Buterin added that he would not trust LLMs with multi-million-dollar transactions or control over large amounts of money. Instead, he gave an approach in which AI systems assist users while leaving the final decision in human hands.

He described an optimal workflow in high-value situations that would involve an AI system proposing a plan, after which a local light client simulates the transaction. The person would then review the intended action and the required outcome before manually confirming it.

However, Buterin warned that this approach must be implemented conservatively with a strong emphasis on security. He suggested that one way to achieve this is by removing decentralized application interfaces from the transaction process. By eliminating dApp user interfaces from the flow entirely, the system could reduce several attack vectors associated with theft and privacy risks.

The 32-year-old has previously discussed how cryptocurrency and AI could evolve together. He envisions blockchains and the technology working hand-in-hand, with crypto providing the trust, privacy, and economic infrastructure that it needs to operate safely and fairly.

Proposed AI-Assisted Wallet Workflows

Other developers and community members responded to Buterin’s comments by describing potential implementations of the idea.

Ethereum developer Andrey Petrov suggested two additional scenarios. In the first, a user initiates a transaction as usual while AI analyzes the payload about to be signed. The technology would then attempt to guess their intended action and explain it in plain language, allowing them to confirm whether the transaction accurately reflects what they meant to do.

In the second case, the user either states their intended action directly or relies on the explanation generated in the first step. The AI then tries to reconstruct the transaction independently, without referencing the original amount, to determine whether it arrives at the same outcome. He explained that any differences between the two would show areas that require further review before the process is finalized.

Another Farcaster user, identified as fkaany, described a framework in which AI plans complex crypto strategies such as multi-hop swaps, yield optimization, and gas minimization.

This would involve a local light client simulating the outcome, which would allow individuals to review a clear summary and manually confirm the transaction, helping reduce risks from blind signing, phishing interfaces, and malicious dApp payloads.

The post Vitalik Buterin Proposes Human-Verified AI Wallets for Crypto Transactions appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Bitcoin’s impressive price surge to $74,000 earlier this week came to a somewhat expected halt, and the asset has lost $6,000 since then, dropping to and under $68,000 today.

The latest price slip came after the US jobs report that came out on Friday and Trump’s new set of threats against Iran and Cuba.

The report, published earlier today, indicated that the country lost 92,000 jobs in February and the unemployment rate rose to 4.4%. This meant that the nation’s labor market had lost steam last month, which contrasted with experts’ expectations. Most anticipated before the report went out that the US had gained around 60,000 jobs last month.

The second reason behind the price correction today could be linked to the new remarks from the POTUS. At first, he threatened Cuba, indicating that the country’s regime is “going to fall pretty soon.”

He added that the US is currently focused on the war against Iran, but they want to make “a deal badly” and suggested that Marco Rubio could handle the negotiations with Cuba.

Additionally, while weighing in on the situation with Iran, Trump said there will be no deal with the Middle Eastern country. Instead, he wanted “unconditional surrender.”

The analysts from the Kobeissi Letter, though, outlined a similar development last year when the US attacked Iran again. At the time, the POTUS made the same strong statement on his social media platform, but the two sides made a deal just six days later.

Today, President Trump called for Iran’s “unconditional surrender.”

The last time we saw this happen was on June 17th, 2025.

6 days later, on June 23rd, a ceasefire was announced.

Will history repeat itself on March 12th? pic.twitter.com/2NxZ6rxBKY

— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) March 6, 2026

Unlike BTC, which is down by 4% in the past 24 hours, US oil prices have skyrocketed in the past several hours after Trump’s statements, going past $92 per barrel. USOIL now trades at its highest levels since September 2023.

The post Why Is Bitcoin’s Price Down 4% to $68K Now? appeared first on CryptoPotato.

[PRESS RELEASE – Vilnius, Lithuania, March 6th, 2026]

WhiteBIT, the largest European cryptocurrency exchange by traffic and the official title crypto partner of the Ukrainian National Football Team, has introduced a new fan-focused initiative that blends digital innovation with real-world experiences.

As part of the initiative, WhiteBIT is launching an exclusive Ukrainian National Football Team skin for its WhiteBIT Nova VISA card and giving fans the chance to win tickets to upcoming national team qualification matches.

This campaign reflects WhiteBIT’s broader mission to make crypto accessible and meaningful to everyday users by connecting digital assets with real-life passions. For football fans, crypto becomes a gateway to exclusive experiences, community engagement, and moments that extend far beyond the screen.

New Ukrainian National Team Skin Unlocks Matchday Perks

From March 3, WhiteBIT Nova VISA card holders gain access to a limited-edition skin designed in collaboration with the Ukrainian National Football Team. It celebrates national pride while turning a daily payment tool into a symbol of support for the team.

WhiteBIT also introduces functional perks for fans attending the Ukraine–Sweden games in Valencia on March 26 and March 31. The WhiteBIT Nova VISA cardholders will receive 50% cashback on purchases made with the card at the stadium bars on the match day. Further prize giveaways are also planned at the stadium, extending the campaign beyond the digital environment into the live event experience.

Ticket Giveaway: Chance to See Ukraine Live

In parallel, WhiteBIT is rolling out a ticket giveaway campaign for fans eager to see the Ukrainian National Football Team live. The image of the Ukrainian National Football Team skin is hidden on the WhiteBIT website and must be found to participate in the giveaway. Five randomly selected participants will each receive two tickets to the Ukraine–Sweden game at Estadi Ciutat de València on March 26, creating an unforgettable matchday experience for supporters.

To participate in the ticket draw, users should:

• Open a WhiteBIT Nova card in the WhiteBIT app
• Find the image of the Ukrainian National Football Team skin on the official WhiteBIT website — a hint: the skin image can be found “where everything begins”.
• Click on the skin and complete the required action
• Five random users who successfully find the skin will receive two tickets to a Ukrainian national team match in Valencia.

With this initiative, WhiteBIT once again reinforces its position as a brand that brings crypto closer to real life — where passion meets opportunity, and every fan can unlock more than just a payment experience.

About WhiteBIT

WhiteBIT is the largest European cryptocurrency exchange by traffic, offering over 900 trading pairs, 350+ assets, and supporting 8 fiat currencies. Founded in 2018, the platform is a part of W Group which serves more than 35 million customers globally. WhiteBIT collaborates with Visa, FACEIT, FC Juventus and the Ukrainian national football team. The company is dedicated to driving the widespread adoption of blockchain technology worldwide.

The post WhiteBIT Unlocks Fan Benefits: Exclusive Ukrainian National Football Team Card Skin and Match Tickets Giveaway appeared first on CryptoPotato.

The crypto research firm Santiment has identified network data indicating that Bitcoin adoption is rising despite the market’s weakened state.

Santiment’s findings revealed that not only is Bitcoin adoption rising, but cold storage is increasing as well. Investors are increasingly sending their bitcoins (BTC) to offline storage platforms, a pattern usually seen among users who intend to hold for the long term.

Bitcoin Adoption is Rising

According to Santiment’s tweet, the number of separate non-empty wallets on the Bitcoin network has climbed to an all-time high of 58.45 million. This metric witnessed a 1.69 million rise in six months, reflecting a 3% uptick. Such growth indicates that more investors have been buying and holding BTC over the last few months, regardless of the decline in prices and the widely-believed onset of the bear market.

In addition, the amount of BTC on known exchange wallets has plummeted to its lowest level since December 2017. Currently, such wallets hold only 1.17 million BTC.

The rising adoption and the move to offline storage reflect a “buy the dip” trend among investors. Both retail and institutional investors have been accumulating the digital asset; however, at an insignificant pace. It also appears institutional investors have been accumulating more than their retail counterparts.

Earlier this month, CryptoPotato reported that last week, U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) recorded their first major accumulation wave since mid-October 2025, while retail flows declined. As ETF inflows totalled $1.45 billion on February 25, data shared by analysts showed a $5 billion contraction in retail inflows over the 30-day period from February 6 to March 2.

Genuine Accumulation Drives Spot Demand

Meanwhile, spot demand is also climbing amid war tensions. Despite geopolitical uncertainty shaking markets, unleveraged investors and institutions are still buying. A part of the demand can also be traced to U.S. investors, as seen in the Coinbase Premium, which flipped positive after a long negative streak.

Data from the derivatives market also shows that the demand is not driven by speculative activity stemming from leveraged trades, but by genuine accumulation. This spot demand has pushed BTC back above $70,000 for the first time in three weeks. At the time of writing, the leading crypto asset was trading around $70,560, down slightly over the past 24 hours.

The post Bitcoin Adoption and Offline Storage on the Rise Despite Weak Market Conditions (Santiment) appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Bitcoin (BTC) held near $70,000 on March 6 after a geopolitical shock tied to tensions around the Strait of Hormuz pushed energy prices higher and triggered risk-off behavior across global markets.

Despite the turbulence, blockchain data shows BTC continuing to leave exchanges, suggesting many holders are not preparing to sell.

Energy Shock Rattles Markets

Analyst GugaOnChain linked the latest volatility to disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz, a major energy shipping route, which remains effectively closed amid the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran.

The market watcher noted that Brent crude traded near $85 and West Texas Intermediate around $81 as the situation pushed up fuel costs, including a $0.27 increase in U.S. gasoline prices during the week.

According to the same analysis, the shock drained liquidity across global markets and led to outflows of just under $228 million from Bitcoin exchange-traded funds on March 5. However, exchange flow data showed an unusual divergence. Using a seven-day moving average, Bitcoin’s net exchange flows remained negative, meaning more coins were leaving exchanges than entering them. Daily data showed withdrawals of 500 BTC, while the weekly total reached about 6,500 BTC, leaving trading venues.

According to GugaOnChain, such movements often signal that investors are transferring holdings into cold storage, which reduces the supply immediately available for sale.

“Given the notable on-chain resilience, the directive is to adopt a tactical defensive stance, maximizing cash now and awaiting confirmation of a reversal in institutional flows before raising exposure again,” the analyst advised.

Trading Activity Intensifies on Major Exchanges

While coins are leaving exchanges overall, trading activity inside platforms has accelerated. Data shared by Arab Chain on March 6 showed Bitcoin turnover on Binance reaching about 425,000 BTC over the past 30 days, one of the highest readings since December.

Binance’s Bitcoin reserves currently stand near 660,000 BTC, and compared with the 30-day turnover figure, the liquidity ratio sits around 0.64, meaning about 64% of those reserves have been traded or transferred during the period.

That pattern suggests the same coins are changing hands repeatedly within a short time frame, which reflects increased speculative activity and stronger liquidity circulation within the market.

Bitcoin has fallen from a monthly peak attained earlier in the week, with price data from CoinGecko showing the asset trading just under $71,000 at the time of writing, down about 2% in the last 24 hours but still up close to 5% over seven days.

At the moment, the flagship cryptocurrency is sitting between renewed institutional demand and global macro pressure. Exchange withdrawals imply that many holders are waiting rather than rushing to exit positions, even as traders remain active inside the market.

The post Analysis: Bitcoin Exchange Outflows Signal Holder Conviction Amid Hormuz Crisis appeared first on CryptoPotato.