Rising US power demand driven by AI and crypto mining could strain energy resources, prompting shifts in energy policy and market dynamics.
The post EIA projects US power demand to hit record highs in 2026 and 2027, fueled by AI and crypto mining appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Messi's equalizer highlights the volatile nature of fan tokens, underscoring their speculative appeal and potential market impact during major events.
The post Messi’s late World Cup equalizer sparks renewed interest in Argentina fan tokens appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Nongshim RedForce's consistent victories over G2 Esports highlight a potential strategic gap, impacting G2's future tournament prospects.
The post Nongshim RedForce extends lead over G2 Esports on Haven at EWC 2026 appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Kula's dashboard could revolutionize transparency in impact investing, potentially setting new standards for real-time ESG data verification.
The post Impact investment platform Kula unveils real-time dashboard to verify emerging market ESG data appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Messi's record-breaking World Cup performance boosts his Golden Boot prospects, influencing market expectations and revitalizing fan enthusiasm.
The post Messi sets World Cup record with 21 goals, surpassing Klose appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Bitcoin Magazine

Vanguard Warms to Crypto With Search for Digital Assets Chief
Vanguard, one of the world’s largest asset managers and a longtime skeptic of cryptocurrency, has opened a search for a head of digital assets, a senior role that would shape the firm’s strategy across crypto and blockchain-based finance.
The job, posted this week within Vanguard Personal Wealth and based in Dallas, calls for an executive to develop the firm’s digital asset vision, identify business opportunities, and lead execution across product, technology, operations, legal, and compliance teams.
According to the posting, the hire would serve as Vanguard’s “senior subject matter expert,” advise senior leadership on market developments, and represent the firm in discussions with regulators and industry groups.
Vanguard also wants the executive to help shape “market standards” and build a scalable, end-to-end strategy for personal wealth clients.
The listing extends beyond crypto trading. It names tokenization, stablecoins, digital wallets, custody, and blockchain-based settlement as areas the new leader would evaluate, along with deciding whether Vanguard should build capabilities in-house, partner with outside firms, or hold off on entering parts of the market.
The role would involve constructing a multi-year roadmap and designing governance and risk frameworks.
Vanguard reported $12 trillion in assets under management at the end of 2025, a scale that places it second only to BlackRock.
The move appears to mark the first time the firm has sought to hire someone dedicated to cryptocurrency strategy, and it comes after years in which the bank stood apart from rivals. BlackRock, Fidelity, and Franklin Templeton rolled out spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds and other blockchain products while Vanguard declined to follow.
The firm’s public posture has been pointed. Vanguard has described Bitcoin as an “immature asset class” ill-suited to long-term investors.
Chief Executive Salim Ramji, who joined the company from BlackRock in July 2024 after leading its iShares business — the unit behind the large iShares Bitcoin ETF — has said the decision not to launch a Bitcoin ETF was “entirely consistent” with the firm’s investment philosophy, stressing the value of consistency in the products a firm offers.
Even so, Vanguard has not stayed on the sidelines entirely. In December, the firm began allowing brokerage clients to trade cryptocurrency ETFs and mutual funds on its platform, a shift that opened access to funds holding Bitcoin and some other crypto.
At one point last year, the bank also became the largest shareholder in Strategy, the company that holds the world’s biggest corporate Bitcoin treasury — a position that flowed from its index funds rather than an active bet on the asset.
The new search does not signal an imminent product launch, and Vanguard has maintained that it has no plans to issue its own crypto investment vehicles.
What the posting does suggest is a broadening of focus beyond simply granting access to third-party funds, toward assessing how digital assets might fit within its wealth management business over the long term.
This post Vanguard Warms to Crypto With Search for Digital Assets Chief first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

New Hampshire’s $100 Million Bitcoin-Backed Bond Faces Final Vote
New Hampshire’s plan to issue what backers call the world’s first Bitcoin-backed municipal bond goes before the state’s Executive Council on Wednesday, the last approval the $100 million project needs before it can move forward, The Boston Globe reported today.
Governor Kelly Ayotte, who has called the effort “historic,” and the five-member council will hold a public hearing Wednesday morning at the request of James Key-Wallace, executive director of the New Hampshire Business Finance Authority.
Key-Wallace asked the council to find the proposal feasible and beneficial to the public and to authorize the quasi-governmental agency to proceed. He has said the model would position the state as “a global leader in responsible crypto finance.”
The structure differs from a conventional municipal bond in a key respect: no public money is at stake. Rather than the government repaying investors, a private borrower does. The borrower is CleanSpark, a Bitcoin mining company that posts Bitcoin as collateral.
Bond payments are funded from proceeds tied to that collateral, and investors gain upside exposure through additional payments linked to Bitcoin price appreciation. If the price falls below a set threshold, a trust holding the collateral can be liquidated to repay bondholders in full.
Digital asset firm Wave Digital Assets is set to administer the transaction, while BitGo would serve as custodian, holding the Bitcoin in regulated cold storage.
Moody’s has noted that “no public funds of the State of New Hampshire or any political subdivision thereof may be used to pay amounts under the rated bonds.”
The idea is part of a broader push to draw blockchain business to New Hampshire, a state that in 2025 became the first to pass a strategic Bitcoin reserve law. Supporters argue the bond gives the Business Finance Authority a revenue stream to fund its investment programs without exposing taxpayers to Bitcoin’s price swings.
That volatility remains the central concern. Because the three-year bond relies on a fluctuating asset as collateral, a downturn could trigger an automatic liquidation before the term ends.
Documents Key-Wallace submitted to the council argue the state is shielded because the loan agreement creates a conduit between private investors and a private borrower, with the cryptocurrency serving as collateral rather than any government guarantee.
Ratings reflect the risk. Moody’s assigned the bonds a provisional “Ba2” rating — two notches below investment grade — labeling them speculative with substantial credit risk, a tier often described as “junk.” Keith Ammon, a Republican state representative active in the state’s crypto policy, told the Granite State News Collaborative that the rating “makes sense” as a cautious starting point given the novelty involved.
Outside analysts have raised further questions. David Krause, an emeritus finance professor at Marquette University, examined the plan and found that recent Bitcoin price movements would be “highly likely” to trigger the liquidation provision, according to The Boston Globe.
While the state would be “legally insulated from direct financial liability,” Krause wrote, introducing so volatile a form of collateral challenges the transparency, predictability, and stability that municipal finance has historically emphasized, and shielding the state from liability does not remove reputational risk.
“While the bond may serve as a proof of concept for integrating digital assets into structured finance, it is not well suited as a general-purpose public finance tool,” he concluded.
A vote in favor Wednesday would clear the Business Finance Authority to issue the bond.
This post New Hampshire’s $100 Million Bitcoin-Backed Bond Faces Final Vote first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

SpaceX Nasdaq-100 Entry Brings Bitcoin Exposure to Passive Index Investors
Today (July 7, 2026) SpaceX formally joins the Nasdaq-100 Index. The inclusion comes just weeks after the company’s public debut and follows its disclosure of 18,712 BTC on the balance sheet. JPMorgan estimates that index rebalancing will drive approximately $4.3 billion in passive inflows from Nasdaq-100-tracking funds and ETFs.
This development is more than headline news. It creates a structural, rules-based channel for institutional capital to gain exposure to Bitcoin through a corporate treasury vehicle, without requiring active allocation decisions, new mandates, or direct cryptocurrency purchases.
For corporate treasury teams, capital allocators, and institutional investors evaluating Bitcoin on balance sheets, the move provides a clear data point on how the strategy can intersect with mainstream equity infrastructure.
Passive index funds and ETFs must hold securities in proportion to their index weighting. When a new component is added, these vehicles buy shares mechanically. In SpaceX’s case, the estimated $4.3 billion in inflows represents capital that will flow into the stock regardless of short-term views on Bitcoin or the broader crypto market.
SpaceX’s Bitcoin holdings, disclosed in regulatory filings at approximately $1.2 billion in fair value, now sit within one of the most widely held equity indices globally. This is distinct from direct Bitcoin ETF flows or voluntary corporate purchases. It is demand generated by index rules rather than discretionary conviction.
Combined with Tesla and Strategy, the Nasdaq-100 now contains three companies with material Bitcoin treasuries. While SpaceX’s initial weighting will be modest, the precedent matters: high-growth, high-visibility companies can bring Bitcoin exposure into institutional equity portfolios through existing governance and allocation frameworks.
Corporate Bitcoin strategies have historically been evaluated on two primary dimensions: balance sheet optionality and long-term value preservation. SpaceX’s inclusion introduces a third dimension, potential for structural equity demand tied to index membership.
For treasury operators, this suggests that Bitcoin holdings, when paired with strong underlying business fundamentals, can contribute to broader market visibility and liquidity. Index inclusion often correlates with increased analyst coverage, improved trading volumes, and easier access to capital markets.
For institutional allocators, the development offers a form of Bitcoin beta that fits within traditional equity sleeves. Many large investors already maintain significant Nasdaq-100 exposure through passive mandates. SpaceX’s addition layers incremental Bitcoin exposure into those portfolios without requiring changes to investment policy statements or new product approvals.
This aligns with patterns observed across the corporate treasury landscape. Public companies now collectively hold more than 1.26 million BTC. The strategy is expanding beyond dedicated Bitcoin-focused entities into diversified operating businesses. SpaceX’s move illustrates how the approach can scale into the core of institutional equity markets.
To illustrate the mechanism, consider a simplified hypothetical involving a public company that adopts a Bitcoin treasury strategy and later gains meaningful index attention.
Assumptions (illustrative only):
Step-by-step impact:
While the numbers are simplified and depend on actual market cap, weighting, and Bitcoin valuation at the time of inclusion, the directional point is clear: index membership can create sustained, non-discretionary buying interest that benefits the Bitcoin component of the balance sheet proportionally.
Treasury teams evaluating this path should model similar scenarios using their own projected holdings, target market capitalization, and relevant index weighting assumptions. The exercise highlights how Bitcoin treasury decisions can interact with traditional equity market dynamics in ways that pure cryptocurrency allocations do not.
SpaceX’s Nasdaq-100 entry is one data point in a broader evolution. Corporate Bitcoin adoption is moving from early experimentation toward integration with established financial infrastructure. Passive flows, index rules, custody solutions, and regulatory clarity are all contributing to this shift.
For organizations actively building or evaluating Bitcoin treasury capabilities, developments like this reinforce the importance of treating Bitcoin as a strategic balance sheet asset with multiple potential transmission channels into institutional capital markets.Key questions for treasury and allocation teams to consider:
The corporate Bitcoin strategy continues to mature. Events that embed Bitcoin exposure within widely tracked equity indices represent one of the more durable forms of institutional adoption currently unfolding.
Disclaimer: This content was prepared on behalf of Bitcoin For Corporations for informational purposes only. It reflects the author’s own analysis and opinion and should not be relied upon as investment advice. Nothing in this article constitutes an offer, invitation, or solicitation to purchase, sell, or subscribe for any security or financial product.
This post SpaceX Nasdaq-100 Entry Brings Bitcoin Exposure to Passive Index Investors first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Nick Ward.
Bitcoin Magazine

Tether Invests $20 Million in Brazil’s Mercado Bitcoin
Tether said Tuesday it will invest $20 million in a strategic growth financing round for Mercado Bitcoin, a move that deepens the stablecoin issuer’s push into Latin America’s fast-growing market for blockchain-based financial services.
Tether, the largest company in the digital asset industry and the issuer of the USDT stablecoin, framed the deal as part of a broader strategy of backing platforms that pair regulatory licensing with market scale.
Mercado Bitcoin, founded in São Paulo in 2013, has grown from a cryptocurrency exchange into what it describes as a full-stack on-chain financial services platform.
The company now serves 4.5 million users and says it has issued more than 2 billion reais in tokenized assets. It holds more than 10 licenses across Brazil and Europe, including a payment institution license from Brazil’s central bank, along with broker-dealer, securitization and asset management capabilities.
Its business spans trading, tokenized investment products, credit and lending, stablecoin-based payments, and cross-border services.
“Mercado Bitcoin has built exactly that, a regulated, full-stack on-chain financial platform serving millions of users across one of the world’s most dynamic financial markets,” Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said in a statement. He said the company’s mix of licensing, tokenization infrastructure and integrated services is unmatched in the region.
Roberto Dagnoni, chairman and chief executive of Mercado Bitcoin, said the shift of finance onto blockchain rails is underway and that the focus has turned to building infrastructure for tokenization, stablecoins, payments and capital markets at scale. He said the investment strengthens the company’s ability to expand its on-chain services in Brazil and abroad.
Mercado Bitcoin said it will use the capital to expand its payments infrastructure, scale tokenized investment offerings for retail and institutional investors, grow its lending and credit business, advance on-chain capital markets, and continue international expansion.
The investment lands as banks and consumers move toward programmable, blockchain-based systems for moving and accessing money.
Tether pointed to Brazil as a leader in that transition, citing the country’s large financial market, high digital adoption and developing regulatory framework. Brazil has drawn attention from crypto and payments firms in part because of Pix, the central bank’s instant-payment system, which has reshaped how money moves in the country.
The deal continues an active stretch of dealmaking for Tether, whose reserves back one of the world’s most widely used stablecoins. In June, the company said it would lead a Series C round of up to $1.4 billion for the German firm NEURA Robotics, one of the largest private raises on record in humanoid robotics.
It also signed a memorandum of understanding with the Dubai Multi Commodities Centre to explore work on tokenization and blockchain education. The same month, Tether said it would wind down Alloy by Tether and its aUSDT token after reviewing user activity and market demand.
Neither company disclosed the size of the full financing round or the valuation attached to the investment. Tether described its role as that of a strategic partner and investor in Mercado Bitcoin’s next phase of growth.
The transaction reflects a wider bet across the industry that tokenization and stablecoins will move into mainstream finance, and that regulated platforms in high-growth markets are positioned to capture that demand.
For Tether, backing Mercado Bitcoin extends its reach beyond issuing USDT and into the infrastructure that companies and consumers use to hold, invest and transfer digital value.
This post Tether Invests $20 Million in Brazil’s Mercado Bitcoin first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

U.S. Bitcoin Reserve Stalls as Treasury and Commerce Vie for Control: Report
Sixteen months after President Donald Trump ordered his administration to build a federal bitcoin reserve, the White House says it is still working out how the fund should be structured, and a dispute between two departments has slowed the effort, according to recent reporting from Bloomberg.
Trump signed an executive order in March 2025 to create what he called a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, along with a separate U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile for other cryptocurrencies.
The order directed the Treasury and Commerce departments to develop budget-neutral methods for acquiring bitcoin, ones that would not draw on taxpayer money.
The reserve was to be funded in large part with bitcoin the government already holds through criminal and civil forfeitures.
According to Bloomberg, the plan has run into two obstacles. Treasury and Commerce are each making a case to run the reserve, and questions have arisen over whether Treasury has the legal authority to manage the holdings.
People familiar with the matter, who were not authorized to speak in public, said housing the reserve inside the Commerce Department is one option under review.
The Justice Department said its Office of Legal Counsel “is working closely with both the Treasury and Commerce departments to determine legally available options to accomplish the president’s policy.”
A further concern is whether the government can hold bitcoin for an indefinite period, as the order intended, given the currency’s price swings.
“President Trump campaigned on a vision of cementing America as the global capital of cryptocurrency and other cutting-edge technologies,” White House spokesperson Liz Huston said in a statement. “To deliver on the president’s vision, the Trump administration continues to evaluate the best structure for a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile.”
The administration’s chief crypto adviser, Patrick Witt, said in April that he expected a major announcement within weeks. That announcement has not come.
Officials have said a presidential order alone cannot complete the project. The order does not carry the force of law, and Congress has not passed legislation to authorize the reserve.
Yesterday, while speaking on the newly introduced Trump Accounts, President Trump said bitcoin could eventually be added to the accounts, saying “something could happen” when asked about the asset. Trump also said he’s “a big fan of crypto.”
A bill from Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., and Rep. Nick Begich, R-Alaska, would codify the order and set a target of acquiring 1 million bitcoin over five years through budget-neutral strategies. No such measure has advanced. If Republicans lose their House majority in this year’s midterm elections, the prospect of passage could dim.
The government’s bitcoin position ranks among the largest in the world. Estimates put it above 300,000 coins, worth more than $20 billion at current prices, according to Arkham Intelligence. The White House has said premature sales of seized bitcoin cost taxpayers about $17 billion over the years, and that a single reserve holding the asset for the long term would give the country a strategic advantage.
Timing has also worked against the plan as an investment. Bitcoin reached a record in October, a rally the administration tied in part to enthusiasm about Trump, then fell close to 50% from that peak. When Trump first called for the reserve, bitcoin traded near $93,000; it now sits above $64,000, a drop of about a third.
While the structure remains unresolved, Trump has built a personal bitcoin position of more than $50 million, according to his recent financial disclosure.
The reserve, described by the administration as strategic, differs from a conventional strategic reserve because it is meant to be held for the long term rather than tapped during market emergencies.
This post U.S. Bitcoin Reserve Stalls as Treasury and Commerce Vie for Control: Report first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
BonkDAO said a governance proposal drained about $20 million in BONK from its treasury, exposing how DAO votes can become a path to treasury funds.
The group behind BONK said the proposal was malicious and that investigators had identified exchange wallets that had been used to buy BONK ahead of the vote.
It added that investigators had identified exchange wallets used to buy BONK ahead of the proposal and that the DAO was working with exchanges, bridges, the Solana Foundation, and law enforcement to manage the aftermath and pursue recovery.
The disclosed path points to the vote itself as a security boundary: a proposal moving through the DAO's own decision system, with treasury assets on the other side.
For DAOs with liquid treasuries, participation levels and execution delays become core security controls.

Attackers reportedly gathered about $4 million in BONK before the proposal.
Wu Blockchain post reported the vote-weight details, including a small number of voting addresses and an overwhelming amount of attacker-linked voting power.
The problem is clear. If a DAO treasury can be reached through token-weighted approval alone, an attacker can bypass many technical defenses by gathering enough influence, achieving low participation, and using a proposal path that allows a vote to become execution before the community or signers can stop it.
BonkDAO's own background material describes it as the decentralized arm of BONK with a substantial BONK-denominated treasury and a mission to fund BONK utility, Solana public goods, and ecosystem projects.
The loss could therefore affect resources available for grants, integrations, community programs, and the credibility of the governance model itself.
The next security test for memecoin DAOs is as much operational as it is technical. Large treasury movements may face more pressure to sit behind timelocks, higher quorum thresholds, voting-concentration alerts, proposal review windows, multisig or council checkpoints, and separated treasury buckets that limit how much a single vote can move.
Those controls reduce the promise of instant, frictionless community execution. After BonkDAO, that friction may be the point.
A DAO treasury is only as decentralized as its voting, and only as secure as the delay, review, and failure points between a vote and the funds.
The post BonkDAO’s estimated $20M drain exposes how memecoin treasuries can be raided by a simple vote appeared first on CryptoSlate.
The Black Bull (ANSEM) is up roughly 299% over seven days, trading with $64.9 million in 24-hour volume and a market cap near $173 million, per CoinGecko.
That size puts ANSEM in a category that traders treat as a read on Solana's broader risk appetite. Traders are calling the move a sign the trenches are back, and DefiLlama shows Pump.fun volume at $5.33 billion in weekly DEX volume and $18.22 billion over 30 days.
July 4 was the first day Pump.fun and PumpSwap crossed $1 billion in daily volume since April 8, and the week of June 29 to July 5 was the first above $5 billion since late March.
On July 1, Solana's memecoin factory hit its highest daily numbers for token launches and graduations in 80 days, driven largely by ANSEM. The token has already spawned competing variants, and copycat dilution is usually one of the first signs that a trench cycle is picking back up.
Phemex's July 1 note added that Pump.fun had regained roughly 62% of its Solana launchpad revenue and about 55% of its trading volume over the prior two weeks.

That pickup is showing up in the wider market too, with Blockworks data putting memecoins at over 20% of Solana's weekly trading volume, the first time since mid-May.
Galaxy's research from October 2025 showed Solana memecoins accounting for as much as 50% of weekly volume in the fourth quarter of 2024, so 20% reads as a recovery well short of that old peak.
Galaxy's research also explains that memecoins pull retail users into wallets, decentralized exchanges, bridges, and token launchpads faster than more “serious” crypto products usually manage. They're fast, social, and permissionless, turning attention itself into a tradable asset.
The trenches only become a problem when the trading game becomes fast and asymmetric enough that ordinary users end up supplying exit liquidity for the fastest players. That's the tension ANSEM's rally reopens: the same mechanics that bring users in let a small group extract value from everyone who arrives late.
Galaxy's data shows that the median memecoin holding time is now around 100 seconds, down from roughly 300 seconds. Snipers and bundlers capture large portions of a token's supply in its first moments, then sell it once real demand emerges.
A 2026 ACM Web Conference paper, “Resisting Manipulative Bots in Meme Coin Copy Trading,” lays out the mechanism behind that speed in a market where copy trading has become a major entry strategy.
The paper found sniper bots buying within the first one to five blocks of a token's launch, faster than any human can react, and traced those bots to the majority of the 6,000 memecoin projects it studied.
MELT, also known as MemeTrans, covers over 41,000 Solana memecoin launches and over 200 million transactions. It found coordinated accounts holding an average of 36.5% of the token supply, obscuring true ownership concentration, and labeled 84.13% of the launches it studied as high risk.
A separate cross-chain study, “A Midsummer Meme's Dream,” examined 34,988 memecoins and found that among the highest-return tokens, 82.8% exhibited signs of artificial growth, such as wash trading or liquidity-pool price inflation, and that more than 17,000 addresses showed realized losses exceeding $9.3 million.
| Research source | Market studied | Key finding | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy Research, 2025 | Solana memecoins | Median hold time fell to roughly 100 seconds, down from about 300 seconds | Shows trench trading has become faster and more PvP |
| ACM Web Conference paper, 2026 | 6,000+ memecoin projects | Sniper bots bought within the first 1–5 blocks and appeared in the majority of projects studied | The game can begin before ordinary traders can react |
| MELT / MemeTrans, 2026 | 41,000+ Solana launches and 200M+ transactions | Coordinated accounts held an average 36.5% of supply; 84.13% of launches labeled high risk | Ownership can look more distributed than it really is |
| A Midsummer Meme’s Dream, 2025/2026 | 34,988 cross-chain memecoins | 82.8% of high-return tokens showed artificial-growth signs; 17,000+ addresses had realized losses above $9.3M | Biggest winners can be the most manipulation-prone |
That pattern is specific to the biggest winners: manipulation is common among memecoins that post the largest gains.
The bull case has Pump's daily volume repeatedly clearing $1 billion and Solana's memecoin share of weekly volume pushing toward 30%.
ANSEM-style tokens would need to continue producing secondary winners along that path, with user growth, launch speed, and attention feeding into each other, more closely resembling an early memecoin season.
The bear case has ANSEM's own copycat variants siphoning attention, Pump's weekly volume dropping back under $3 billion, and memecoin share slipping to 15%-18% of Solana's total. Along that path, ANSEM becomes a one-off cultural moment, and traders drift back toward SOL, majors, and more-liquid alts.
| Scenario | What confirms it | Pump.fun volume | Solana memecoin share | Market read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull case: trenches revive cleanly | ANSEM-style tokens create secondary winners without major blowups | Daily volume repeatedly clears $1B | Moves toward 30% | Memecoins become a broader user-growth and attention cycle |
| Base case: selective revival | ANSEM stays liquid, but most launches remain short-lived | Weekly volume holds near $4B–$5B | Holds around 20%+ | Trenches are active again, but leadership stays narrow |
| Bear case: one-off cultural flare | Copycats dilute attention and liquidity fragments | Weekly volume drops below $3B | Falls to 15%–18% | Traders rotate back to SOL, majors, and more liquid alts |
| Risk case: predatory cycle returns | Snipers, bundled wallets, fake volume, or a major rug dominate the narrative | Volume may spike first, then fade | Volatile | Activity returns, but trust deteriorates |
Solana's trenches have already proven they can attract users, volume, and attention that many “serious” crypto products struggle to generate.
The next part is whether the revival can happen without rebuilding the sniper-heavy, bundle-heavy market that measured success in hold times of seconds, made the last cycle profitable for the fastest traders, and cost everyone who showed up later.
The post ANSEM soars 299% and brings Solana’s memecoin trenches back to life – but do we need it now? appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Bitcoin's dominance dropped to a one-month low of 54%, down from 58.12%, according to CoinGecko's dominance table.
Over the same stretch, the “Others” bucket, representing everything outside Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoins, climbed from 19.39% to 24.68% of total crypto market cap.
BTC dipped below $58,000 last week, then recovered to find an intraday high of $63,976.16, while the Fear & Greed Index climbed from 12 to 24 this week, though it's still sitting in Extreme Fear territory.
Bitcoin's dominance had already slid from 63% to 56% over the past year, while stablecoins nearly doubled their market share over the same period, from 7% to 13%.

The rebound centers on tokens that carry real protocol fees, run buyback or burn programs, sit within Solana's on-chain trading stack, or plug into institutional distribution. Traders are pricing altcoins in a narrower bet than the “everything pumps” alt seasons of past cycles.
HYPE gained just 24% over 30 days, the smallest move of the period among the top runners, though its year-to-date run is near 200% as it trades near $71. The token sparked the selective altcoin run of the past few weeks.
Trading volume converts directly into token demand as Hyperliquid's Assistance Fund routes over 97% of fees into token buybacks.
Lighter is the biggest gainer in the group, up 83.85% over 30 days, as traders hunt for the next Hyperliquid-style perp exchange winner.
DefiLlama puts Lighter's 30-day perp volume near $40 billion, and the protocol began burning repurchased LIT once the second quarter closed, giving it the same buyback logic as HYPE.
Aave and Aerodrome are telling a similar story from different corners of DeFi, with Aave climbing 59% once Aavenomics 3.0 tied GHO and protocol revenue directly to an automated AAVE buyback.
Aerodrome gained 82.3% on an expected merger with Velodrome and a “Predictive Allocation” upgrade built to replace weekly gauge voting with faster liquidity routing on Base.
Uniswap rose 31.3% on a related bet, as Standard Chartered set a $100 target for the token in 2030, and UNI's own fee-switch-and-burn debate is still live.
Solana's own corner of the market is rotating together, as Jupiter rose 57.2% on a proposal to lift its buyback rate to 70% of fees and push into lending and on-chain stocks.
Solana itself is up 32.74% as the base layer catches that same activity, and Jito gained 45% on Solana's MEV and staking flow.
Pyth rose 46.5% on a June 30 deal to distribute Nasdaq's TotalView order-book data through its network, then an integration with Arc's testnet in early July.
Morpho climbed 21.8% on a related institutional hook, as Standard Chartered initiated coverage with a $60 target for 2030, and Robinhood picked Morpho vaults to power its Earn product using USDG balances.
Zcash added 25.2% on its own separate logic, driven by the token's Tachyon quantum-readiness roadmap on June 30, and an Ironwood mainnet upgrade lands July 21 with supply verification and shielded-pool changes.
| Token | 30-day move | Recovery bucket | Main market driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lighter — LIT | +83.85% | Next-HYPE perp DEX | Traders seeking another Hyperliquid-style revenue/buyback token |
| Aerodrome — AERO | +82.3% | Base liquidity infrastructure | Velodrome merger expectations and Predictive Allocation upgrade |
| Aave — AAVE | +59.0% | DeFi value accrual | Aavenomics 3.0 automated buyback tied to protocol/GHO revenue |
| Jupiter — JUP | +57.2% | Solana DeFi superapp | Proposal to lift buybacks to 70% of fees |
| Pyth — PYTH | +46.5% | Institutional data rail | Nasdaq TotalView data distribution through Pyth |
| Jito — JTO | +45.0% | Solana MEV/staking | Solana MEV and staking-flow exposure |
| Solana — SOL | +32.7% | Base-layer beta | Rotation into Solana trading infrastructure |
| Uniswap — UNI | +31.3% | DeFi/tokenization | Fee-switch debate and Standard Chartered long-term thesis |
| Zcash — ZEC | +25.2% | Privacy/roadmap | Tachyon roadmap and July 21 Ironwood upgrade |
| Hyperliquid — HYPE | +24.0% | Anchor revenue token | Fee-funded buybacks; template for the rotation |
| Morpho — MORPHO | +21.8% | Institutional lending rail | Standard Chartered coverage and Robinhood Earn integration |
The first mechanic powering this movement is on-chain revenue, as protocols such as Hyperliquid, Lighter, and Aave now route trading fees or protocol income directly into buybacks or burns, turning usage into direct price support.
The second is institutional access, with Nasdaq's data deal with Pyth and Robinhood's use of Morpho vaults plugging two of these tokens straight into regulated finance.
If the buyback template keeps spreading, tokens without a fee or burn mechanism will need to build one to compete for capital. Traders are already rewarding protocols that can show revenue, raising the bar for new listings too.
The bull case has Bitcoin holding its price while its dominance continues to slip toward the 50%-52% range, with Others expanding past 27%. Under that path, an “Altcoin Season” becomes more reasonable.
Capital piling into HYPE, LIT, and AAVE is spreading to second-tier names still waiting for a catalyst of their own. Dominance below 53% with Others above 25% would confirm it's underway.
The bear case has Bitcoin reclaiming its share, dominance snapping back above 56%, and Others retreating below 22%. Extreme Fear doesn't need to lift much further before high-beta altcoins give back these gains.
| Scenario | Trigger | BTC dominance | Others share | Market read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull case: selective recovery broadens | BTC holds price while capital rotates into revenue and infrastructure alts | 50%–52% | 27%+ | Altcoin Season becomes plausible; second-tier names start catching up |
| Base case: narrow recovery continues | HYPE, LIT, AAVE, PYTH, MORPHO keep leading, but weak alts lag | 53%–55% | 24%–26% | Not full altseason; market rewards fee, buyback, and institutional narratives |
| Bear case: BTC dominance snaps back | BTC pullback, thin liquidity, unlock pressure, or Fear & Greed stays depressed | 56%+ | Below 22% | High-beta alts give back gains; rotation reverts to BTC safety |
| Speculative-risk signal | Memecoins outperform revenue tokens | Variable | Variable | Rally becomes less durable because capital stops rewarding fundamentals |
A Bitcoin pullback, thin weekend liquidity, or a poorly absorbed token unlock could do it. Memecoins beating the revenue tokens, or Fear & Greed stuck near Extreme Fear despite climbing prices, would confirm the bear case instead.
Bitcoin's falling dominance measures a narrow set of tokens that have learned to make revenue look like a product, and traders are paying up for it.
LIT, AAVE, AERO, JUP, PYTH, and Morpho are each testing how far that template extends beyond a single exchange token.
The next month will decide whether the business-model bar becomes the actual price of admission to this rally, or the rotation slides back toward paying for beta with no fee behind it.
The post Bitcoin dominance hits one-month low as altcoin winners start breaking away appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Bitcoin cleared $60,000 again the week the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported June payrolls grew by just 57,000, unemployment climbed to 4.2%, and labor-force participation slipped to 61.5%.
The dollar index dropped 0.56% to 100.83, September Fed-hike odds fell to 54% from 67%, and Bitcoin is trying to breach $64,000 as of June 6.
Stephen Coltman, head of macro at 21Shares, watched the same reversal play out across precious metals, the dollar, and Bitcoin in a single session.
The caveat is that the move only becomes durable once the Fed admits policy is already tight enough to bring inflation back to 2% without another hike, according to Coltman. That's a taller order than one soft jobs report, and it's the bar Bitcoin has to clear before the BLS puts out June's CPI number on July 14.

Policymakers are starting to treat the Iran-driven oil spike as a fading factor in inflation, giving the Fed room to stop citing it as grounds for tighter monetary policy.
Bitcoin is pricing how much weight regulators still assign to the recent oil shock, a policy judgment now being made at the Fed and the ECB.
ECB Chief Economist Philip Lane said the US-Iran agreement pushed oil prices closer to the ECB's baseline forecast, and the quick retreat in crude eased the urgency for another ECB hike.
ECB officials also warned that the energy shock hasn't fully worked its way out of the system.
Brent traded near $72.19 a barrel and WTI near $68.81, both close to pre-war levels now that Hormuz exports have resumed, Saudi Arabia has cut its own prices, and OPEC+ has raised output targets again.
The world absorbed over a billion barrels of lost supply during the war by draining its own buffers, and those buffers still sit close to empty.
Chair Kevin Warsh held rates at 3.50%-3.75% on June 17 and told reporters inflation is still running well above the Fed's 2% goal, with no room to declare victory.
San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly later described policy as only “slightly restrictive” and said the next move isn't decided yet.
The EIA's latest weekly data show refineries operating at 96.6% of capacity and producing 10 million barrels of gasoline per day. Total gasoline stocks fell by 2.3 million barrels, leaving them 7% below the five-year seasonal average.
Citi cut its 12-month price target to $82,000 from $112,000 and reduced its expected net ETF inflows to zero from $10 billion, citing ETF flows already down $3.3 billion for the year. Its own bear case: $53,000, if the economy cools and outflows keep coming.
Weak jobs data lowers the odds of a Fed rate hike, which weakens the dollar. A weaker dollar lifts hard assets like gold and Bitcoin because both become cheaper for holders of other currencies and because traders read soft labor data as room for policy easing later.
Gold hit a two-week high on the same cooling numbers, then gave back some of that once the dollar firmed again. Bitcoin has held its ground better, clearing $60,000 and staying there.
A one-year, normalized chart of RBOB gasoline futures against WTI crude shows the part of the story oil headlines skip.

Crude, in blue, spiked through the spring during the Iran war and has largely reversed since, sitting close to where it started, last near 102.66 on a normalized basis. Gasoline, in white, sits near 139.39 on the same scale, up close to 40% over the year.
Gasoline is running 40% above pre-war levels, and the BLS's May CPI report backs that up, with gasoline prices climbing 7% that month and sitting 40.5% higher year over year.
That disconnect between pump prices and the WTI number on a screen feeds directly into how households read inflation and into what the Fed hears when it studies CPI.
The New York Fed's Global Supply Chain Pressure Index tells the same story from a different angle: it eased to 1.25 in June from 1.81 as Middle East disruption faded, but stayed above its level before the Iran war started.
June's CPI report lands July 14 at 8:30 a.m. Eastern, the first clean read on whether May's gasoline spike was the peak or the start of a longer run.
The bull case is that June CPI shows gasoline cooling from May's pace, inventories start rebuilding, the dollar weakens further, and Fed officials start talking about policy being restrictive enough on its own.
Bitcoin gets room to retest $70,000 and beyond, with Citi's own $82,000 target as the number the market has to answer to.
The bear case consists of gasoline pass-through staying sticky, June CPI running hot, and hike odds climbing back up.
The dollar and real yields firm again, Bitcoin ETF outflows continue to drain, and Citi's bear case puts Bitcoin at $53,000 under that combination.
| July 14 CPI path | Macro signal | Fed read | Bitcoin implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bull case | Gasoline cools, CPI softens, dollar weakens further | Fed can say policy is restrictive enough | BTC retests $70,000+, with Citi’s $82,000 target as the upside reference |
| Base case | CPI mixed; crude calm but gasoline still elevated | Fed stays cautious and noncommittal | BTC holds above $60,000, but trend remains unconfirmed |
| Bear case | Gasoline pass-through keeps CPI hot | Hike odds rise again; dollar and real yields firm | BTC risks losing $60,000 and revisiting Citi’s $53,000 bear case |
Bitcoin hasn't yet won the argument inside the Fed, where one voice treats 2% as untouchable and another says policy is close enough already.
Whichever way July 14 reads, what a tank of gas costs this month will decide Bitcoin's next move.
The post Bitcoin’s $70K path now runs through pump prices as Iran shock fades appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Bitcoin's rebound has cleared the first test: price recovered. The harder one starts now: proving buyers remain after the squeeze.
#1 BTC is trading near $63,195 on July 7, up 6.6% over the past seven days, according to CryptoSlate's Bitcoin market data. That puts it back above the worst levels of last week's selloff, yet the rally still needs proof of cash demand after traders caught short finish buying back positions.

The macro backdrop helps. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that US payrolls rose by 57,000 in June, while April and May were revised down by a combined 74,000 jobs. For Bitcoin, weaker labor data can ease the rate-pressure story that had weighed on risk assets.
ETF flows also improved at the right moment. Farside Investors showed US spot Bitcoin ETFs moving from $296 million of total outflows on July 1 to $223 million of inflows on July 2 and $265 million on July 6. That repaired one visible demand channel, while a lasting recovery needs broader confirmation.
The reason is market structure. Glassnode's Week 28 market pulse described Bitcoin as moving from aggressive distribution toward equilibrium, with spot selling pressure easing, ETF outflows cooling, and long-term holders helping anchor the market. The same report also said spot trading volumes remained subdued while futures open interest and long-side funding had risen. That leaves a cleaner market than last week, with the next leg dependent on participation beyond leverage.
That combination defines the immediate risk. Price can rise quickly when futures traders cover shorts or rebuild leverage, then lose support once the forced flow passes. CoinGlass showed roughly $46.7 billion in Bitcoin open interest on July 7, with 24-hour futures volume near $81.2 billion compared with about $5 billion of spot volume. Its liquidation data also shows why rallies can force shorts to buy back exposure quickly. Those figures support caution around a derivatives-heavy rebound.
The next test is simple. ETF inflows need to persist beyond one or two sessions. Spot volume has to improve without futures leverage doing most of the work. Buyers also need to defend the $61,000 to $62,000 area if Bitcoin retraces again.
If those signals hold, the July rebound starts to look like the beginning of a new base. If they fade, the move toward resistance will look like macro relief and short-covering arriving ahead of durable demand. For now, the burden sits with follow-through. The first leg showed sellers had lost momentum; the second has to show buyers are willing to stay.
The post Bitcoin price rebounds to $63K as leverage returns creating short term volatility risk appeared first on CryptoSlate.
There was no code exploit. No compromised private key. No phishing link. And yet BonkDAO says attackers stole about $20 million in BONK through a malicious governance proposal targeting its Solana treasury.
The attacker didn't break the rules — they bought them.
$BONK is a Solana-based memecoin, and BONK DAO is the community body that governs it. Token holders vote on proposals, and if a vote passes, it executes automatically on-chain. That design is exactly what got weaponized.
The sequence began on June 30, when an anonymous wallet submitted a proposal to transfer the treasury's holdings to a wallet it controlled. That proposal was titled "BIP #76 – Sowellian BonkDAO," and it read more like a pitch than a heist: it sought to "implement Sowellian governance, install new members and council, rebuild from the ashes, monetize holdings, and stop the bleeding," and dangled a reward promising all "yes" voters would be eligible to receive BONK tokens.
Buried underneath the marketing language sat the only line that mattered — an instruction to transfer roughly 4.4 trillion BONK straight to the attacker's wallet.
This is the part that should keep every DAO up at night. The proposal needed "yes" votes equal to 1% of BONK's supply to hit quorum. So the attacker simply went and bought it. Over July 4 and 5, a separate wallet acquired exactly that much, spending about $4.4 million to buy BONK on the exchanges Bybit and Binance.
By the time voting closed, the numbers were almost surgically precise. The proposal passed with just seven wallets voting, against more than 18,000 members who did not — a turnout of 2.9%. It cleared quorum by the narrowest margin, 882.38 billion BONK in favor against an 879.95 billion threshold, almost exactly the stake the attacker had spent days assembling.
The result? The 99.9% "yes" result was effectively a single voter agreeing with itself. The DAO then did what it was built to do — it executed the transfer automatically, and about $20 million in BONK moved out of the treasury into the attacker's wallet.
The stolen tokens didn't stick around. More than 4.4 trillion BONK — valued at approximately $19.3 million at the time of transfer — moved out of the treasury to an address ending in "JHvQ," identified via Solscan as having been funded through a Bybit account. By 3:30 p.m. ET the same day, the tokens had been moved again, this time to a different Solana address ending in "eh42."
The promised voter rewards never materialized. The tokens were never distributed — instead they were shuffled to a second address hours later, a pattern consistent with an attacker trying to obscure the trail rather than honor any community commitment. Security firm PeckShield later flagged that roughly $148,000 worth of stolen BONK has already moved to OKX.
Technically, no — and that's the uncomfortable part. The attacker didn't exploit a bug in any smart contract. The root issue was governance design, not code. Every single step was a valid, authorized on-chain transaction.
With no timelock, quorum minimum, or multisig check in place to catch an anomalous proposal before it executed, a well-funded attacker was able to turn a $4 million token purchase into control over a $20 million treasury. A timelock would have forced a delay between approval and execution, giving the community a window to spot the drain. A multisig override could have frozen it in an emergency. BONK DAO had neither.
This has reopened an old debate. Because every step was a valid transaction, some on-chain observers argued the attacker simply exploited a weak governance design rather than breaking in. The lesson stands either way: a treasury that can be drained by whoever assembles a temporary voting majority is only as secure as the cost of buying that majority — and here, that cost was a fraction of the prize.
BonkDAO has notified law enforcement and is working with the Solana Foundation, centralized exchanges, and network bridges to recover funds. It said it had identified the exchange wallets used to buy tokens ahead of the vote — and the involvement of law enforcement makes clear the DAO is treating this as an attack, not a clever loophole.
Recovery, though, is an uphill battle. Governance attacks are notoriously hard to reverse precisely because they run through the protocol's own legitimate machinery.
The market response was surprisingly contained given the scale. BONK prices are down about 7% in the past 24 hours in the aftermath of the attack. Exchanges moved fast — South Korean exchange Upbit and American exchange Kraken both paused deposits and withdrawals of the BONK token, with Upbit citing "user protection measures following the circumstances of a security incident."
Ethereum is back in the spotlight as the crypto market rebounds, but this time the main story is not only about price. While Bitcoin reclaimed the $63,000 level after President Trump’s latest pro crypto comments, a deeper institutional shift may be forming between Bitcoin and Ethereum.
BitMine, the Ethereum treasury company chaired by Tom Lee, has continued adding ETH to its balance sheet. Its latest weekly update shows that the company acquired 42,197 ETH, bringing total holdings to 5,742,237 ETH, equal to around 4.8% of Ethereum’s total supply. BitMine also said its total crypto, cash, marketable securities, and “moonshot” holdings reached $11.1 billion.
At the same time, Michael Saylor’s Strategy sold 3,588 Bitcoin for around $216 million to fund dividends on its preferred stock. Strategy still holds a massive 843,775 BTC, but the sale matters because it challenges the long running market belief that Saylor’s company only buys and never sells.
That contrast is now shaping the latest Ethereum price prediction: is institutional capital slowly rotating from Bitcoin into ETH?
BitMine has become the biggest Ethereum treasury story in the market. The company’s strategy is clear: accumulate ETH, stake a large portion of it, and move closer to its long term goal of owning 5% of Ethereum’s total supply.
According to BitMine’s latest update, the company now owns 5.74 million ETH, with 4.87 million ETH staked. This means BitMine is not only holding Ethereum as a treasury asset, but also using it to generate staking rewards. The company said its staked ETH could generate hundreds of millions of dollars in annualized staking revenue depending on yields and full deployment.
This is important because it gives Ethereum a different institutional narrative from Bitcoin. Bitcoin is mainly seen as digital gold, a reserve asset, and a macro hedge. Ethereum, on the other hand, can be held, staked, and used as infrastructure for stablecoins, DeFi, tokenization, and smart contract activity.
That is why BitMine’s buying matters for ETH price predictions. The story is no longer just “Ethereum follows Bitcoin.” The market now has a direct Ethereum treasury buyer with a clear accumulation target.
Strategy’s Bitcoin sale does not mean Michael Saylor has turned bearish on BTC. The company still owns more Bitcoin than any other public company and remains the largest corporate BTC holder in the world.
However, the sale changes the psychology of the market.
For years, Strategy was viewed as the ultimate Bitcoin accumulator. Every purchase supported the idea that institutional demand would keep absorbing supply. But the latest sale shows that even the largest BTC treasury company may need to sell coins when corporate obligations, dividends, or balance sheet pressure require liquidity.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Strategy sold 3,588 BTC to fund dividends on preferred stock, raising around $216 million. The company still holds 843,775 BTC, but the sale came after it unveiled a broader plan to strengthen investor confidence.
This does not destroy the Bitcoin thesis, but it does introduce a new question: if BTC stays under pressure, could Strategy sell more?
That uncertainty is exactly why Ethereum’s treasury story looks more attractive today. While Strategy is selling some Bitcoin to manage obligations, BitMine is still adding Ethereum.
Ethereum is trading near the $1,790 area in the latest market snapshot, up around 1% on the day. The key level to watch now is the $1,800 to $1,850 resistance zone.
If ETH breaks above this area with volume, the next upside targets are:
$1,900 as the first breakout confirmation level.
$2,000 as the psychological target.
$2,150 to $2,200 if the market starts pricing in stronger institutional ETH demand.
The bullish case depends on three factors. First, Bitcoin needs to hold above the $63,000 area and avoid another sharp rejection. Second, ETH needs to reclaim $1,850 and turn it into support. Third, BitMine’s accumulation story needs to remain strong enough to convince traders that Ethereum has its own catalyst.
If these conditions align, Ethereum could outperform Bitcoin in the short term.
However, the bearish scenario is still possible. If ETH fails to hold above $1,750, the price could retest the $1,700 area. A deeper correction could bring Ethereum back toward $1,620 to $1,600, especially if Bitcoin loses momentum or if investors treat Strategy’s BTC sale as a warning sign for crypto treasury stocks.
The strongest part of this story is the contrast.
Bitcoin is rebounding after political support from President Trump and a broader market recovery. But Bitcoin is also dealing with a major treasury headline: Strategy sold BTC.
Ethereum is also recovering, but it has a cleaner institutional accumulation story. BitMine is buying ETH, staking ETH, and openly moving toward a 5% supply target. That gives Ethereum a fresh narrative at a time when traders are looking for the next crypto leader.
This does not mean Bitcoin is weak. BTC remains the largest crypto asset, the main institutional gateway, and the market’s liquidity anchor. But Ethereum may now have the more interesting short term setup because its story is shifting from underperformance to accumulation.
If Bitcoin stability combines with continued ETH buying, Ethereum could become the stronger rebound trade.
The latest Ethereum price prediction is becoming more bullish, not only because ETH is recovering, but because the market narrative is changing.
BitMine is buying and staking Ethereum while Strategy is selling part of its Bitcoin holdings to meet corporate obligations. That contrast creates a powerful headline: Bitcoin may still be the king, but Ethereum is becoming the new institutional treasury battleground.
As long as ETH holds above $1,700 and pushes toward $1,850, the next move could target $1,900 and then $2,000. But if the market loses confidence and Bitcoin falls back below key support, Ethereum could still retest lower levels before any bigger breakout.
For now, Ethereum has something it has lacked for months: a fresh institutional catalyst that could help ETH outperform if the crypto rebound continues.
Ripple, the company behind the XRP Ledger, has landed one of the most significant regulatory milestones in its European history — and $XRP has climbed roughly 8% over the past week to trade near $1.15. But before you read this as "XRP got approved," there's an important distinction worth understanding.
On June 23, 2026, Luxembourg's financial regulator, the CSSF, issued Ripple a preliminary Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP) license under the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation. The approval, in the form of a "Green Light Letter," is subject to final conditions, and will enable Ripple to scale regulated cryptoasset services to financial institutions and businesses across all 30 countries of the European Economic Area.
Here's the catch: this is a company-level license, not a token approval. $XRP the asset didn't "get approved" to do anything — MiCA licenses are granted to service providers, not to coins. Combined with Ripple's existing EU Electronic Money Institution (EMI) licence, the CASP license means European banks, fintechs and corporates can access Ripple's full cryptoasset and stablecoins payments infrastructure — collect, exchange and pay out — through a single integration for the first time.

A Green Light Letter is not the finished product. It's the CSSF's signal that a firm has met the substantive requirements, but full authorization — and with it, the ability to formally passport services across the EEA — follows only once all remaining conditions are met. There's precedent for this moving quickly, though: Ripple's EMI license went from Green Light in January to full authorization by early February 2026.
The timing is also strategic. The approval arrives just days before the July 1, 2026, hard deadline, after which unlicensed crypto firms operating in the EU are in breach of MiCA rules. By mid-2026, around 83% of EU crypto firms had not secured MiCA licenses, leaving Ripple among approximately 210 compliant firms — a pool that notably does not include Binance.
This is where objectivity matters. The commercial engine of this approval is RLUSD, Ripple's regulated stablecoin, and Ripple Payments infrastructure — not the $XRP token directly. In Ripple's own announcement, XRP appeared essentially as boilerplate. Tellingly, $XRP actually fell around 2.9% on the day the news broke, dragged down by a broader risk-off sell-off rather than repriced by the license.
That said, there's a longer-term ecosystem argument. The XRP Ledger is the rail Ripple's payment products run on, so deeper institutional adoption of RLUSD and Ripple Payments in Europe means more activity potentially routed through the same infrastructure $XRP secures. The honest framing: this is a genuine win for Ripple's European standing that could translate into token relevance over time — but it is not a direct, mechanical demand catalyst for $XRP.
Look at the chart and the story becomes clearer. $XRP started July near $1.04 and has since recovered to around $1.15 — a roughly 8-11% weekly gain depending on the data source. This move is largely a market-wide bounce, not a delayed reaction to the two-week-old MiCA news.

A few real tailwinds are supporting the recovery: XRP ETF inflows have now run positive for eight straight weeks, with cumulative net inflows reaching roughly $1.47 billion, and on-chain data shows exchange outflows deepening — a sign holders may be pulling supply off exchanges with intent. July is also historically one of $XRP's stronger seasonal months.
But the resistance overhead is real. The first hurdle sits at the $1.18 area (the 0.382 Fibonacci level), with heavier resistance clustered around $1.20-$1.22 — the zone that has capped every recent bounce inside XRP's year-long falling channel. Below, the $1.05-$1.10 area is the critical support that bulls need to defend. A clean break and hold above $1.20 would be the first genuine signal that the downtrend is cracking.
The crypto price today is starting July on firmer footing. $BTC is trading around $63,148, up 0.70% on the day and 6.09% over the past week, as buyers step back in after a brutal first half. Bitcoin jumped above $63,000, reversing end-June losses and hitting its highest level in over a month during thin July 4 trading, with XRP up 5% in 24 hours to lead gains among majors.
Still, zoom out and the pain is visible: the bitcoin price remains down 27.84% year-to-date. Bitcoin started 2026 above $93,000 but closed June around $60,000 after falling to a fresh 21-month low in the final week of the month.

Two forces are pulling the market in opposite directions.
On the bearish side, ETF demand cratered last month. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded their highest monthly outflow since inception, roughly $4.51 billion in June, led by BlackRock's IBIT. The scale of these crypto ETF outflows prompted Citigroup to cut its one-year $BTC target from $112,000 to $82,000.
On the bullish side, large holders have been buying the dip aggressively. Bitcoin whales bought $16.7 billion of bitcoin over two weeks even as ETFs bled a record $4 billion — a divergence that has appeared near past cycle bottoms. Softer macro signals fed the BTC rebound too: Bitcoin climbed back above $61,000 after Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh suggested inflation risks had eased, tempering fears of further hawkish policy.
The recovery is broad-based across the majors.
$ETH (Ethereum) is trading near $1,774, up 0.57% on the day and a strong 13.25% on the week. Despite the bounce, the ethereum price remains the weakest of the top names on a YTD basis at -40.20%.

$BNB (BNB) sits at $583.85, up 2.30% over 24 hours and 6.38% on the week, roughly tracking Bitcoin. $XRP (XRP) is at $1.14, up 0.62% on the day and a solid 10.04% weekly — one of the clear leaders in the current bounce. $SOL (Solana) trades near $80.53, up 13.04% over seven days despite a small 0.36% hourly dip, making solana one of the strongest weekly performers among the large caps. $TRX (TRON) holds steady at $0.3287, up 1.30% on the day and notably one of the few majors in the green YTD at +15.64%.
$HYPE (Hyperliquid) is the standout of the entire top 10, trading at $71.53, up 4.52% on the day and an eye-watering 181.28% year-to-date. Hyperliquid remains by far the best YTD performer on the board while most majors sit deep in the red.

$DOGE (Dogecoin) sits at $0.07689, up 1.26% on the day and 6.42% on the week, though dogecoin is still down 34.44% YTD as meme-coin appetite stays muted. Rounding out the leaderboard, $USDT and $USDC hold their dollar pegs near $1.00, while $LEO (UNUS SED LEO) trades at $9.36, up 2.18% on the day.
That is the open question for the crypto price today. Peter Schiff warned that the $58,000 support level must hold to avoid a capitulation below $50,000, while a reversal in ETF selling could spark a rebound in the coming days. Traders are watching whether the whale accumulation and easing macro backdrop are enough to sustain July's "green month" pattern after a red June.
The most talked-about story in crypto this week isn't a price move — it's a question that strikes at the philosophical core of Bitcoin: should the network freeze Satoshi Nakamoto's untouched coins to stop a future quantum computer from stealing them? Binance founder Changpeng "CZ" Zhao put that question on the table, and the industry's biggest names have lined up on opposite sides.
Here's what's happening, why it matters, and where the debate goes from here.
Speaking on the Galaxy Brains podcast with Galaxy Research president Alex Thorn on June 18, CZ floated a hypothetical sequence rather than a formal plan. His idea: after Bitcoin eventually upgrades to quantum-resistant cryptography, holders of older, vulnerable addresses — including whoever controls Satoshi's estimated 1.1 million $BTC — would get a six-to-twelve-month window to move their coins to newly secured addresses. If those coins stayed put after that deadline, the community could then decide whether to freeze them.
His reasoning was blunt. In his words, if nothing is done with those dormant coins, the network is effectively handing them to whoever eventually hacks them. Those 1.1 million coins are worth roughly $68 billion at Bitcoin's current price near $62,000.
Crucially, CZ was careful about who gets to decide. He stressed that any such change would require a soft fork or hard fork approved by the Bitcoin community — not a decision by Binance or any single company. He also later pushed back on the idea that he personally wants to freeze Satoshi's wallet, noting that telling Satoshi's addresses apart from other early-miner addresses is technically imprecise, with roughly 22,000 addresses of about 50 BTC each grouped under the Satoshi estimate.
The concern is that a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could break the cryptography (ECDSA) that protects Bitcoin wallets — scanning the blockchain for exposed public keys and mathematically deriving the private keys behind them.
This moved from sci-fi to serious developer conversation for a concrete reason. On March 30, 2026, Google Quantum AI published a 57-page whitepaper — co-authored with the Ethereum Foundation's Justin Drake and Stanford researchers — that sharply revised the estimated resources needed to break Bitcoin's cryptography, cutting the qubit requirement roughly twentyfold. Drake himself said his confidence that a quantum computer could recover a Bitcoin private key by 2032 had risen significantly after the paper, putting it at least at a 10% probability.
The scale is bigger than just Satoshi. As of March 1, 2026, more than 34% of all bitcoin in circulation have a public key exposed on-chain, making those coins theoretically vulnerable to a powerful enough quantum machine. To be clear, the gap between today's hardware and a Bitcoin-breaking machine is still enormous — Google's most advanced quantum chip, Willow, has 105 physical qubits today — but it's the direction of travel that has developers acting now.
This is where it gets interesting: some of the most respected voices in Bitcoin can't agree, and they've split into roughly three camps.
Beyond the philosophy, there's a real market dimension. Those dormant coins represent a meaningful chunk of total supply, and how the network handles them touches on the deepest questions of Bitcoin's identity — is it truly immutable and censorship-resistant, or can the community override those principles when the stakes are high enough?
The timing also lands in an already-fragile market. This week's debate arrived as Bitcoin was clawing back from serious pain: it touched a 21-month low near $57,950 in late June before recovering back above $63,200, and spot Bitcoin ETFs posted their worst-ever monthly outflow of around $4 billion in June, turning year-to-date flows negative for the first time. A structural question about Bitcoin's security is exactly the kind of narrative that shapes long-term institutional confidence.
The Capital Markets Authority wants to monitor over 20 blockchains for fraud, laundering, and sanctions evasion under Kenya's new crypto law.
Market maker Wintermute remains cautious, suggesting that recent Bitcoin action is a relief rally rather than a fundamental market change.
The FCA authorization lets the exchange offer equities and derivatives to UK users, a step toward its "everything exchange" ambitions.
Michael Saylor becomes a major Bitcoin seller. A memecoin gets "exploited" via governance. And Bernstein doubles down on a $150k BTC call.
The plaintiffs say Polymarket added a rule after the fact, turning their winning "Yes" bet on Strategy's Bitcoin sale into a loss.
Stablecoin issuer Tether has announced a $20 million strategic investment in Latin American digital asset heavyweight Mercado Bitcoin.
Solana’s Anatoly Yakovenko fights back against Bitcoin maximalism, explaining why true tokens exist and hold a unique form of ownership.
Digital Chamber files a Supreme Court brief to block a lawsuit attempting to seize 3.8 million dormant BTC under a 1958 lost-property law.
US-based spot XRP exchange-traded funds hit $1.05B as a 10.5% price jump to $1.15.
Coinbase secures major license in the UK to allow it to offer traditional investment products, including equities and derivatives, to its customers within the country.
Technology stocks experienced broad-based weakness on Tuesday as market participants secured profits following an extended rally in artificial intelligence-related equities.
Major players including Nvidia, Broadcom, AMD, Intel, and Micron all posted declines, dragging the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index significantly lower.
The selloff wasn’t triggered by any particular catalyst. Rather, market participants seemed to be booking gains after an impressive run that elevated many chip stocks to elevated valuation levels ahead of upcoming quarterly reports.
Data center and AI infrastructure spending by major cloud platforms remains at elevated levels, indicating that underlying demand for semiconductor products continues to show resilience.
Nvidia captured significant attention during Tuesday’s session following news reports that Chinese artificial intelligence firm DeepSeek is developing its own AI processing chip.
This development sparked renewed worries about competitive pressures in China, which represents a strategically important market for Nvidia’s international operations.
While Nvidia maintains commanding market leadership in the global AI accelerator space, market participants remain vigilant regarding potential threats to this dominance, particularly as China accelerates efforts to develop indigenous chip manufacturing capabilities in response to American export controls.
Near-term business momentum remains supported by sustained purchasing from cloud service providers, enterprise customers, and governmental entities.
SpaceX garnered market attention as its shares declined after officially joining the Nasdaq-100 Index.
The pullback caught some market watchers off guard, since index inclusions typically generate purchasing activity from exchange-traded funds and institutional investors. However, traders evidently decided to take profits after several weeks of anticipatory buying pushed shares higher.
SpaceX continues to attract significant investor interest due to its innovations in reusable rocket technology, the expanding Starlink satellite internet service, and lucrative government launch agreements. Industry observers generally view the company as a compelling long-term opportunity in the commercial aerospace industry.
Micron shares also retreated on Tuesday as the semiconductor sector’s broad weakness persisted.
The memory chip manufacturer has emerged as a primary beneficiary of AI-fueled demand for high-bandwidth memory products. However, solid underlying business conditions couldn’t shield the stock from Tuesday’s selling wave.
Micron produces cutting-edge memory components essential for AI server infrastructure, where demand has regularly exceeded analyst projections. Industry experts continue to forecast that memory chips will represent one of the semiconductor industry’s fastest-growing segments in coming years.
Samsung announced a substantial jump in quarterly operating profits, yet the positive results failed to energize the semiconductor sector.
Typically, robust financial performance from one of the planet’s largest memory chip producers would provide support for related stocks. Instead, market participants remained preoccupied with valuation concerns and intensifying competition in AI hardware markets.
The muted response illustrates how elevated expectations have become for semiconductor companies following a year of exceptional stock performance. Solid quarterly results alone are insufficient — investors now demand compelling forward-looking guidance as well.
Nevertheless, Samsung’s financial results validate that worldwide demand for advanced memory products utilized in AI infrastructure remains healthy.
The post Chip Stock Plunge: Nvidia (NVDA), Micron (MU), and AMD (AMD) Lead Semiconductor Sector Decline appeared first on Blockonomi.
Shares of First Solar continued their descent on Tuesday, dropping 1.6% to finish at $229.28, despite receiving an upgrade from Deutsche Bank that elevated the stock to Buy status alongside a price target increase from $245 to $272.
First Solar, Inc., FSLR
Corinne Blanchard, an analyst at Deutsche Bank, characterized the solar manufacturer as a “fundamentally strong” investment opportunity, emphasizing its substantial $2.1 billion net cash position recorded in the second quarter. She views the current valuation as an attractive entry point for investors with medium- to long-term horizons.
FSLR has tumbled more than 12% year-to-date in 2026, significantly underperforming the S&P 500’s 9.4% gain during the same timeframe.
Blanchard noted that the momentum generated by a clean-energy sector rally in May has dissipated. However, she emphasized that the company’s core investment thesis remains intact.
Trading well below its 52-week peak of $320.95, the stock’s recovery trajectory may depend heavily on developments in the nation’s capital.
Blanchard anticipates a positive stock reaction following clarity on the federal government’s Section 232 investigation examining foreign polysilicon imports. The decision, projected to arrive by early August, would enable company leadership to finalize strategic decisions regarding domestic and overseas operations — both currently in a holding pattern.
The solar manufacturer has already begun relocating equipment to domestic facilities after committing to onshore its finishing operations last year. Blanchard forecasts an “acceleration of financial performance” in upcoming quarters, with 2027 positioned to represent a more normalized operational year.
First Solar holds a unique position as America’s sole thin-film solar panel producer. This status provides significant advantages under Section 45X of the Internal Revenue Code, which provides cumulative manufacturing tax incentives for U.S.-based solar production.
This domestic manufacturing footprint has garnered additional attention during the Trump administration’s national security examination of Chinese-manufactured energy inverters. As a producer operating without Chinese technology dependencies, First Solar could gain considerably if domestic content requirements become more stringent.
Wells Fargo joined the bullish chorus, elevating its price target from $255 to $320 while reaffirming an Overweight recommendation. The firm’s analyst pointed to “asymmetric upside” linked to the Section 232 determination, suggesting a positive outcome could elevate domestic solar module pricing and generate substantial earnings growth.
This upgrade came on a day when options trading volume in FSLR was notably elevated at market open, indicating some market participants were positioning themselves ahead of the analyst action.
Broader market strength provided supportive backdrop. The Nasdaq advanced 1.1% while the S&P 500 climbed 0.8% during the session when Wells Fargo released its analysis.
The solar industry has experienced significant headwinds recently. The Zacks Solar sector had plummeted over 23% in the month preceding the Wells Fargo commentary. FSLR’s analyst-driven momentum represented a notable sentiment shift for the industry, albeit temporarily.
Wall Street consensus on the stock tilts decidedly positive. Among 37 analysts monitored by FactSet, 23 assign Buy or Overweight ratings, 11 recommend Hold, and two rate it Underweight. KeyBanc Capital Markets stands alone with a Sell recommendation.
Notwithstanding the recent upgrades, FSLR shares have declined by double-digit percentages since early June. The stock’s next significant movement likely hinges on the timing and substance of the forthcoming polysilicon tariff determination.
The post First Solar (FSLR) Stock Dips Despite Analyst Upgrades From Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo appeared first on Blockonomi.
As 2026 unfolds, healthcare equities are capturing significant investor attention amid a broader rotation away from elevated technology valuations. Three pharmaceutical and medical device leaders stand out: Eli Lilly, Abbott Laboratories, and Johnson & Johnson.
Eli Lilly has emerged as a dominant force in modern pharmaceutical innovation.
Eli Lilly and Company, LLY
The Indianapolis-based giant commands the rapidly expanding obesity and diabetes therapeutic market with its blockbuster GLP-1 medications Zepbound and Mounjaro. Global appetite for these treatments shows no signs of slowing, with market researchers projecting sustained revenue expansion throughout the decade.
Wall Street firms including JPMorgan have maintained bullish ratings on the stock, citing accelerating Medicare coverage and sustained prescription growth for weight management therapies.
Lilly’s innovation extends far beyond metabolic health. The company maintains an impressive development portfolio spanning cancer treatments, neurological disorders, autoimmune conditions, and cardiometabolic diseases. Strategic acquisitions and substantial manufacturing investments position the firm for continued expansion.
While shares command elevated multiples, market analysts argue the premium pricing reflects exceptional earnings growth prospects within the pharmaceutical sector.
Abbott Laboratories operates with a distinctly different business model compared to traditional drug manufacturers.
Abbott Laboratories, ABT
This Chicago-based healthcare giant maintains operations across four major segments: medical devices, diagnostic products, nutritional supplements, and generic pharmaceuticals. This diversified structure has enabled consistent performance across varying market environments.
Abbott’s FreeStyle Libre continuous glucose monitoring system represents a breakthrough in diabetes management technology. Meanwhile, its cardiovascular device portfolio and diagnostic testing divisions benefit from global demographic trends and expanding healthcare access.
The company produces dependable free cash flow, funding both product innovation and a progressively increasing dividend payout.
Johnson & Johnson has refined its strategic direction following the separation of its consumer products division.
Johnson & Johnson, JNJ
The New Brunswick-based corporation now centers exclusively on prescription medicines and medical technology platforms. Its oncology franchise continues expanding, powered by robust demand for Darzalex. Following recent European regulatory clearance, the company is broadening its cancer therapy offerings ahead of quarterly financial disclosures.
Cardiovascular interventional devices and surgical equipment categories are posting solid advancement. Johnson & Johnson’s exceptional track record includes over 60 consecutive years of dividend increases, establishing it as a cornerstone holding for income-focused portfolios.
Healthcare equities are attracting capital for compelling fundamental reasons. Demographic aging, escalating demand for breakthrough therapies, and promising pharmaceutical development pipelines collectively support sector momentum throughout 2026.
Eli Lilly represents the highest growth trajectory among the three. Abbott delivers portfolio diversification and operational consistency. Johnson & Johnson merges pharmaceutical innovation with an unmatched dividend growth history.
Collectively, these three holdings provide comprehensive exposure to prescription drugs, medical equipment, diagnostic testing, and resilient healthcare spending patterns.
The post Top 3 Healthcare Stocks to Buy and Hold in 2026 appeared first on Blockonomi.
Amazon (AMZN) is returning to debt markets with another substantial capital raise. The e-commerce and cloud computing giant submitted a 424B5 filing Tuesday, detailing plans for a minimum $25 billion bond sale structured across eight separate tranches—comprising one floating-rate note and seven fixed-rate securities.
Amazon.com, Inc., AMZN
Shares of AMZN closed at $247.03 on Tuesday, gaining $2.87 during the session, though remaining considerably below the 52-week peak of $278.56.
This offering represents the latest chapter in an aggressive debt-raising campaign. Amazon secured $37 billion via a U.S. bond sale during March, subsequently adding approximately C$14 billion through Canadian dollar-denominated bonds last month. With Tuesday’s announcement, the company’s 2026 debt issuance surpasses $72 billion.
The strategic timing appears calculated. Corporate bond spreads—representing the additional yield investors demand above U.S. Treasury rates—reached 73 basis points on June 15, marking the tightest levels since June 1998. In an environment where capital costs hit generational lows, aggressive borrowing makes financial sense.
Amazon indicates the capital will address “general corporate purposes,” encompassing business investments, capital expenditure programs, and refinancing maturing obligations. The underlying message is clear: substantial AI infrastructure investments are planned.
Amazon’s debt activity mirrors broader industry trends. Nvidia completed a $25 billion bond offering in June. Alphabet executed a ¥576.5 billion yen-denominated bond sale in May—establishing a record as the largest yen bond issuance by any foreign entity. Morgan Stanley research indicates approximately $236 billion in global debt was issued through May specifically for AI-related initiatives, representing more than quadruple the comparable 2025 period.
Morgan Stanley projects hyperscaler capital expenditure will exceed $1 trillion by 2027. Amazon clearly intends to secure substantial positioning within that forecast.
Institutional investment activity reflects continued confidence in AMZN. Matrix Asset Advisors expanded its position by 8.1% during Q1, acquiring 10,150 additional shares to reach 135,469 total units valued near $28.2 million. Several additional investment firms increased holdings in Q4, notably Arrowstreet Capital, which raised its stake by 21%. Institutional ownership collectively represents 72.2% of outstanding shares.
Wall Street sentiment toward Amazon remains decidedly bullish. Among 60 tracked analysts, 57 maintain Buy ratings while three hold neutral positions. The consensus price target stands at $312.79—approximately 27% above current trading levels.
Recent analyst actions include New Street Research elevating its target to $350, while Truist increased its objective to $320. Both firms maintained Buy recommendations.
Amazon’s latest quarterly results, released April 29, significantly exceeded market expectations. Earnings per share reached $2.78 versus consensus estimates of $1.63. Revenue totaled $181.52 billion, representing 16.6% year-over-year growth and surpassing projected $177.28 billion.
Technical indicators show the 50-day moving average at $254.57, positioned above the current $247.03 trading price. The 200-day moving average registers at $234.65.
The post Amazon (AMZN) Stock Taps Bond Market for $25B to Accelerate AI Investments appeared first on Blockonomi.
The memory chip sector has officially crossed into bear market territory. Major players including Micron, Samsung, SK Hynix, and the Roundhill Memory ETF have all tumbled more than 20% below their latest closing peaks.
Micron Technology, Inc., MU
The dramatic downturn persisted despite Samsung delivering impressive financial results. The South Korean tech giant unveiled a remarkable 19-fold jump in operating profit, with preliminary figures indicating approximately $59 billion in operating profit alongside $113 billion in revenue. Yet the market response was decidedly negative.
This classic “buy the rumor, sell the news” dynamic quickly rippled through the entire semiconductor landscape.
Western Digital plummeted nearly 9% during Tuesday’s session. SanDisk, Intel, Applied Materials, and Lam Research collectively surrendered over $100 billion in valuation. Across the board, chip stocks tracked by Yahoo Finance have witnessed approximately $1.5 trillion in market value disappear since June 25.
That represents just seven trading sessions.
Twenty-five semiconductor companies have now experienced declines of at least 20% during this timeframe. The casualties include Western Digital, Seagate, Teradyne, ON Semiconductor, and GlobalFoundries.
Previous pullbacks in memory and semiconductor stocks following the late-March market bottom were quickly absorbed by buyers. This correction has demonstrated greater staying power and forced major names below the bear-market threshold.
The PHLX Semiconductor Index would require an additional 9% decline to officially enter bear territory. However, memory-focused companies are experiencing more acute pain.
Micron by itself has shed nearly $350 billion in market capitalization since June 25.
Despite the severe pullback, the sector still maintains a median return approaching 60% since late March. The industry added nearly $5 trillion in market value throughout that rally, meaning this represents a retracement from lofty valuations.
SK Hynix’s forthcoming US listing, initially positioned to capitalize on the memory boom, now arrives amid considerably more challenging circumstances. Market observers are monitoring the offering as a crucial indicator of investor confidence in the sector.
The central question revolves around whether a prominent listing under current conditions confirms the investment thesis or suggests that positive expectations have already been fully incorporated into valuations.
Certain portfolio managers remain composed. Mikhail Zverev, who co-manages the Amati Global Innovation Fund, characterized the correction as profit-taking from overextended positions rather than evidence of fundamental deterioration.
However, he identified a more strategic concern. He highlighted Chinese memory manufacturers Yangtze Memory Technologies and ChangXin Memory Technologies as emerging competitive challenges to Samsung and comparable companies.
“We’re still holders of Samsung Electronics, but we’re a lot more nervous holders than we were this time last year,” Zverev said.
Western Digital’s upcoming earnings announcement is projected for July 29, 2026. Wall Street analysts forecast earnings per share of $3.27, representing growth from $1.66 in the prior year period. The stock maintains a Buy consensus rating with an average analyst price target of $542.31 based on 46 covering analysts.
The post Memory Chip Stocks Plunge Into Bear Territory: What’s Behind the Decline? appeared first on Blockonomi.
Crypto analyst Matthew Hyland says the macro backdrop that punished digital currencies for four straight years is finally turning, pointing to patterns that came before crypto’s two biggest bull runs.
In a pair of posts on X, he argued that the market is entering a two- to three-year stretch of what he calls “max opportunity,” with risk appetite moving back toward crypto for the first time since 2016 and 2020.
Hyland’s case rests on comparing three stretches he labels macro risk bear markets: 2014 to 2016, 2018 to 2020, and 2022 through 2026. In each of them, he says, crypto performed poorly while the wider risk backdrop stayed hostile, only for conditions to flip and set off the sector’s strongest runs. He’s now betting the current cycle is following the same script.
“Macro-Risk is now exiting the Bear Market for the first time since Mid-2016 & Mid-2020,” he wrote, adding that this kind of setup produced “max opportunity for the long term” both previous times it showed up.
He also pointed to two chart signals he sees as confirmation. Bitcoin dominance just posted a death cross for the first time since 2016 and 2020, which he treats as an early marker of the shift. He also expects altcoin dominance to follow with a golden cross this fall, something that he says would repeat what happened in those earlier cycles.
According to the market watcher, his own macro risk ratios turned at the same points in 2016 and 2020, and are turning again now, which is why he’s calling the next two to three years “the most optimal time” for crypto. However, his forecast should be taken as a market thesis and not a certainty, especially since crypto cycles have also historically been influenced by liquidity, investor sentiment, and broader economic conditions.
Hyland’s call landed with Bitcoin (BTC) trading near $63,000 after earlier hitting a two-week high above $64,000, even after Strategy sold 3,588 BTC on Monday to fund dividends.
Analytics firm Swissblock described the price action as showing “signs of stabilization,” although it cautioned that a genuine recovery still needs buyers to keep showing up.
Elsewhere, analyst Credible Crypto has argued that altcoins trading 80% to 90% below their highs could outperform BTC if sentiment turns, pointing to long-term holders now controlling close to 80% of the flagship cryptocurrency’s supply. On Ethereum, trader Michaël van de Poppe said over the weekend that “the worst period for ETH is over” and cited a possible higher low against Bitcoin after three straight quarterly losses of more than 20% each.
Another market observer, Merlijn The Trader, separately flagged ETH’s dip to 0.026 against BTC, a level that foreshadowed a 230% run against Bitcoin last time it showed up. While none of these calls directly tie to Hyland’s thesis, the timing, with all landing within the same week, is hard to ignore.
The post Analyst Predicts 2-3 Years of Crypto Gains as Risk-On Environment Emerges appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Bitcoin continues to recover from its recent sell-off, but the market remains trapped beneath a major resistance cluster that has capped every relief rally since the June breakdown. While short-term momentum has improved, BTC is now approaching a decisive area where the next move could determine whether the recovery evolves into a larger trend reversal or remains a corrective bounce within a broader bearish structure.
On the daily timeframe, Bitcoin remains in a clear downtrend, trading below the 100-day and 200-day moving averages, both of which continue to slope lower. The recent recovery from the $58K-$61K demand zone has helped stabilize the price action, but the asset is still trading beneath the major resistance area between $64K and $66.5K.
It recently formed another higher low inside the broader support region, while the RSI has continued to print higher lows despite the weakness seen throughout June. This developing bullish divergence suggests that downside momentum is fading and that buyers are gradually regaining control.
However, the market structure remains bearish until Bitcoin can reclaim the $64K-$66.5K supply zone. This area aligns with previous support turned resistance and continues to act as the primary obstacle preventing a larger recovery. A successful breakout above this region would likely expose the next major resistance near $72K-$74K, while rejection could send the price back toward the $60K support zone.

The 4-hour chart shows a much more constructive picture. After establishing a base around the $58K-$59K demand region, Bitcoin produced a strong impulsive rally and pushed directly into the descending trendline that has defined the corrective structure since mid-June.
The asset recently swept the local liquidity resting above previous highs within the $61K-$62K region before encountering resistance near the descending trendline. This liquidity grab is important because it removed nearby buy-side liquidity and allowed the market to test a key technical level.
The current structure suggests that Bitcoin is attempting to transition from a series of lower highs into a potential breakout formation. A confirmed move above the descending trendline and the $64K-$66K resistance zone would significantly improve the bullish outlook and could accelerate upside momentum toward higher resistance levels.
Conversely, failure to break the trendline could trigger another period of consolidation between the $60K support and the $64K-$66K supply zone. As long as Bitcoin holds above the $60K-$61K support area, the short-term recovery structure remains intact.

The 48-hour liquidation heatmap highlights a notable concentration of liquidity above the current market price, particularly around the $64K-$66K region. This cluster aligns closely with the resistance zone identified on the 4-hour chart, reinforcing its significance as a major magnet for price action.
Importantly, the intra-range liquidity highlighted on the technical chart is also confirmed by the liquidation heatmap. The recent push into the $61K-$62K area successfully targeted nearby liquidity resting within the range, validating the idea that price has been moving between liquidity pockets rather than trending directionally.
At present, the largest liquidation concentration remains overhead near $65K-$66K, making it a logical target if buyers maintain momentum. Markets often gravitate toward these liquidity pools before determining the next directional move.
If Bitcoin manages to sweep this overhead liquidity and secure acceptance above the $64K-$66K region, it would strengthen the case for a broader recovery toward the higher resistance zones. However, if the sweep is followed by rejection and an inability to sustain prices above resistance, the move could simply represent a liquidity-driven rally before another test of lower support levels.
For now, both the technical structure and the liquidation data suggest that the path of least resistance remains slightly higher, with the overhead liquidity cluster acting as the most likely near-term destination.

The post Bitcoin Price Analysis: BTC’s Structure Remains Bearish Until This Key Level Is Reclaimed appeared first on CryptoPotato.
[PRESS RELEASE – Curaçao, Willemstad, July 7th, 2026]
Crypto casino 1win is expanding its Web3 strategy with the development of its native ecosystem token, 1win Token ($1WIN). The initiative combines a dual-chain infrastructure, Telegram-based user engagement, and an ecosystem designed to connect platform activity with token utility.
The upcoming launch represents another step in the growing convergence of blockchain technology and online entertainment. Rather than positioning cryptocurrency solely as a payment method, the company is developing a broader ecosystem in which digital assets play an active role across platform services.
Unlike traditional platform tokens that primarily function as payment instruments, 1win Token has been designed with a strong focus on iGaming utility. The token will be integrated across the 1win platform, allowing users to utilize $1WIN in casino games, sports betting, exclusive lotteries, and future platform services.
The project introduces two independent tokenomic mechanisms designed to support the long-term sustainability of the ecosystem. Through its Weekly Buyback program, 1win will use 10% of the revenue generated from gameplay conducted with $1WIN to repurchase tokens from the open market. The buyback mechanism is intended to create continuous market demand while reinforcing the token’s long-term utility within the ecosystem.
Alongside this model, the ecosystem implements a Daily Token Burn mechanism. Every day, 10 percent of all 1win Token spent across supported platform products – including games, lotteries and other ecosystem activities – will be permanently removed from circulation. By gradually reducing the total token supply over time, this mechanism is designed to reinforce long-term scarcity while supporting the broader economic balance of the ecosystem.
Beyond token utility, the launch introduces several benefits for both platform users and cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Players will have access to crypto deposit bonuses of up to 600 percent, with a combined value of up to $2,000, while cryptocurrency deposits and withdrawals are expected to be processed in less than 90 seconds. Token holders will also gain access to exclusive lotteries and dedicated airdrop campaigns through the 1win Telegram Mini App, where users can complete tasks, participate in community activities, and prepare for future token distribution events.
To keep up with the 1win Token news and updates, users can follow on X.com (@1winToken) and other social media platforms.
About 1win
1win is an international iGaming platform offering sports betting, online casino entertainment, and cryptocurrency payment solutions to users worldwide. Since its launch, the company has continued to invest in blockchain technologies and Web3 products, including the development of 1win Token and its Telegram Mini App ecosystem.
Website: https://1wintoken.com
The post 1win Announces the Expansion of Its Web3 Ecosystem with the Upcoming Launch of 1win Token appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Ripple’s cross-border token is among the most polarizing, often being the center of attention within the cryptocurrency community for major price predictions (whether bullish or bearish).
One of the recent examples came from EGRAG CRYPTO, among the most optimistic XRP commentators on X, who outlined a highly favorable chart for the asset. On the other hand, shah wondered what all the hype is about the token.
EGRAG has made some major price predictions in the past for XRP, many of which sound unreasonable now given the asset’s struggles to remain above $1.10. However, the analyst tends to focus on the long-term price performance, trying to isolate the structure from the noise and emotion.
In their latest post on the matter, they published a chart mapping out the token’s possible future movement. It first envisions a price dip to $0.95, which aligns with other analysts’ expectations for a new low beneath $1.00, before the next major leg up.
The promising green wick for the bulls charts a run toward a new all-time high and well above. In fact, EGRAG has frequently posted targets of up to $27 for XRP during the most intense expansions of the next bull cycle.
#XRP – CHART, No Comment
:
Men Lie, Women Lie But Charts and Numbers do not Lie.
Structure > Noise > Emotion. ONLY FEW
pic.twitter.com/GLbM1W1Xpd
— EGRAG CRYPTO (@egragcrypto) July 7, 2026
In contrast to EGRAG’s bullish charts on XRP, shah asked their over 400,000 followers on X to explain all the hype around XRP. They wondered, “Why on Earth would this coin ever go to hundreds per coin?”
The comments below were quite unfavorable for the cross-border token and those who believe it may go beyond $100. Kendall Tart explained that a triple-digit price tag would require its market cap to rocket past $6 billion. This would make XRP bigger than Apple, which sounds far-fetched, to say the least, at the moment.
Others compared XRP holders to MAGA believers, indicating that Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, is “their president and his cabinet are paid influencers that say buzzword points that get regurgitated over multiple social media platforms.”
Another comment predicted that it can’t and won’t go anywhere near $100. Moreover, the user proclaimed XRP as “dead” given its tokenomics, never-ending selling pressure, and “horrible internal organization.”
The post XRP’s Chart Doesn’t Lie: Analysts Clash Over Ripple’s Next Move appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Ethereum’s slow and gradual rebound from the $1,500 lows reached recently continues, but the asset is now testing one of the most important resistance lines on its path to recovery.
Analysts are convinced that breaking through this level will open the door for a run to $2,000 and even beyond. For now, though, it remains a mirage.
With ETH trading close to $1,800, analyst Ali Martinez noted that this is the key bullish trigger that needs to fall decisively. In a post on X, he explained that its significance stems from the fact that the 0.8 MVRV Pricing Band is positioned there as resistance.
He predicted that a daily close above it, followed by a successful hold as support, would “strengthen the bullish case and could open the door for a move toward Ethereum’s Realized Price at $2,245.” Recall that the altcoin hasn’t traded above $2,000 in a month, and the last time it stood at its Realized Price was in mid-May.
Martinez doubled down on the importance of the $1,800 level, suggesting that the TD Sequential resistance trendline also sits there.
“A break above both $1,796 and $1,816 could trigger a bullish breakout. From a technical perspective, such a move would also increase the probability that ETH breaks through the top of the channel at $1,844 and begins marching toward the $2,245 Realized Price.”
Fellow analyst Ted Pillows shared a similar opinion, noting that ETH recently challenged the $1,820-$1,850 resistance, only to be rejected. The good news is that it continues to trade above $1,750, and Pillows predicted a surge to $2,000 if the aforementioned resistance is reclaimed.
Michaël van de Poppe, on the other hand, outlined a rather unexpected correlation that would support the narrative for a bigger Ethereum rally soon. He noted that the “business cycle is often phrased through the copper/gold chart,” which was evident during the 2017 and 2021 cycles. Only the 2024 cycle didn’t see such a positive correlation.
He believes the chart between the precious metals is a “great indicator of market momentum” that has just broken upwards massively, and it has “flipped a 4-year-long downtrend up to an upwards trend.”
“Usually, ETH follows through, although with some lag, as there needs to be more confidence in the markets. A matter of time until the crypto markets are finally picking up momentum,” he concluded.
The post ETH’s Path Beyond $2K Depends on This One Condition: Analyst appeared first on CryptoPotato.