The incident underscores the fragility of global energy security and may prompt increased military and market volatility in the region.
The post “We’re going to hit them very hard,” Trump warns after drone attack on LNG tanker appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
The shift away from Fed forward guidance heightens market unpredictability, impacting investor confidence and potentially destabilizing digital assets.
The post Fed days have become a complete free-for-all appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
The unprecedented negative tariff revenue highlights fiscal challenges, potentially influencing monetary policy and investor behavior.
The post US tariff revenue turns negative for first time ever as $166B in refunds reshape fiscal landscape appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Millennium's expansion reflects a growing trend of institutional investors favoring multistrategy funds, indicating a shift in capital allocation.
The post Millennium seeks $20B from investors to expand multistrategy hedge fund operations appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Onchain vaults could democratize access to credit markets, enhancing transparency and liquidity, but regulatory clarity is crucial for growth.
The post Grayscale Research sees potential for onchain vaults to rival traditional finance’s trillion-dollar credit market appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Barely Budges as Fed Keeps Interest Rates Unchanged
Bitcoin was trading higher on Wednesday — but only slightly — after the Federal Reserve decided to keep interest rates still.
The leading cryptocurrency was recently priced at close to $64,402 per coin, after moving up by nearly 1% in the hour following the announcement.
As expected, the U.S. central bank left the federal funds rate in the 3.50%-3.75% range. Three of the 12 members of the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee “preferred” a quarter-percentage-point hike at this meeting.
Speaking to the press following the announcement, the Fed’s new Chair, Kevin Warsh, revealed little about where the central bank would go next.
“The Fed’s on the case,” he said. “I’ve been heartened by the reception I’ve received. We’re committed as ever to deliver.”
He added that the July rate decision was “a rigorous review of the economic situation.”
“I wouldn’t characterize what we did as anything like a pause,” he said. “I would characterize what we did as a rigorous review of the economic situation. I would characterize what we did as a review of the big, hard questions.”
Warsh, who took over in May, has said he has “no tolerance” for inflation that has been running above the central bank’s target for more than five years.
Bitcoin has typically performed well in a low-interest rate environment, and crypto investors have been hoping the Federal Reserve would cut rates to boost digital assets.
President Donald Trump since taking office has pushed for lower interest rates, and clashed with ex-Fed chair Jerome Powell over the matter.
For now, Warsh doesn’t seem like he’ll be going in that direction as sticky inflation continues to bother Americans.
The Federal Reserve started aggressively raising rates in 2022 in a bid to control 40-year-high inflation spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic. Bitcoin was hit by the tightening.
Then, in 2024, the central bank repeatedly cut rates. It has been hesitant to lower them since the end of 2025.
This post Bitcoin Barely Budges as Fed Keeps Interest Rates Unchanged first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.
Bitcoin Magazine

Democratic Senator Backs Clarity Act — With Proposed Law Enforcement Changes Included: Report
Bipartisan work on the long-awaited Clarity Act continues after Democratic senator Catherine Cortez Masto said that she, along with two law enforcement groups, are feeling “good” about proposed changes to the bill, according to a news report.
Along with the National Association of Assistant U.S. Attorneys and the National District Attorneys Association, Cortez backed changes to the bill and said they felt positive about “the chance to resolve this issue once and for all,” according to a POLITICO report.
The changes were sent to the White House. A number of lawmakers are hoping the Clarity Act — which would set in stone crypto regulation in the U.S. — gets passed before Congress departs for August recess. But some sticking points remain — particularly with Democrats.
According to the news report, the changes proposed by the law enforcement groups refer to a small section of the bill which seeks to protect some crypto software developers and firms from being prosecuted for illicit activity committed by others on platforms they create.
A new version of the Clarity Act has been circulating amongst lawmakers since last week; it has changes regarding ethics and bans officials and their families from issuing or promoting crypto — something lawmakers previously had issue with.
The Clarity Act was passed last year by the House of Representatives but has been in deadlock in 2026 while regulators and banking chiefs hash out a new version of the bill.
The banking lobby has raised concerns over stablecoins and the yield they would potentially pay customers and some Democrats think the bill falls short regarding ethical issues.
Still, the bill has been worked on by both Republicans and Democrats — despite crypto legislation being something pushed by pro-crypto President Donald Trump.
Major institutions, including Fidelity and Goldman Sachs, as well as crypto lobby groups and politicians, have said the revised bill works in its current form.
This post Democratic Senator Backs Clarity Act — With Proposed Law Enforcement Changes Included: Report first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.
Bitcoin Magazine

Banking Lobby CEO Talks Crypto Clarity Act as Senators Race To Pass Bill
The CEO of the American Bankers Association, Rob Nichols, has said that the banking lobby wants the Clarity Act to succeed — but small edits to the bill still need to be made.
Speaking on CNBC’s Squawk Box show Wednesday, Nichols said that while there is a “lot of good” in the Clarity Act, the issue around stablecoins and local lending needs to be fixed.
A number of lawmakers are hoping the Clarity Act — which would set in stone crypto regulation in the U.S. — gets passed before Congress departs for August recess. But a sticking point of the bill has been related to concerns banking chiefs have over stablecoin yield.
“The bill is about 600 pages and there’s only two paragraphs where we’re suggesting tiny surgical edits,” said Nichols.
“I do think that the crypto and the banking sectors can coexist. I think we can be the crypto capital of the world and I think we can be the banking capital of the world.”
The bill was passed last year by the House of Representatives but has been in deadlock after banking chiefs raised concerns over stablecoins and the yield they would potentially pay customers.
America’s biggest crypto exchange, Coinbase, pulled support for the bill in January after clashing with banking chiefs who said that earning yield on stablecoins should be banned.
U.S. banks have said they could lose customers if crypto exchanges offer more attractive products for their deposit base.
Coinbase’s Chief Policy Officer, Faryar Shirzad, this week shrugged off the concerns that the banking lobby has, claiming that top lenders are already adopting crypto technology.
Top U.S. banks — including JP Morgan and Bank of America — have expressed interest or already started debuting stablecoin products, which run on blockchain technology.
A new draft circulating last week bans officials and their families from issuing or promoting crypto — something opposition lawmakers previously had issue with.
GOP lawmakers are pushing Democrats to pass the bill. Bipartisan support for the bill exists though some lawmakers — such as senator Elizabeth Warren — have criticized the draft, claiming it would allow President Donald Trump to make money from crypto, as well as benefit criminals.
Major institutions, including Fidelity and Goldman Sachs, as well as crypto lobby groups and politicians, have said the revised bill works in its current format.
This post Banking Lobby CEO Talks Crypto Clarity Act as Senators Race To Pass Bill first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.
Bitcoin Magazine

Crypto Giant DCG Warns Senate: Pass Clarity Act or Lose Ground to Singapore, UAE
Crypto investment firm Digital Currency Group is the latest big name to throw its weight behind the Clarity Act.
In a statement posted Wednesday, the conglomerate said that the current draft of the long-awaited bill “offers exactly the kind of certainty our industry needs to grow and thrive responsibly.”
A number of lawmakers are hoping the Clarity Act — which would set in stone crypto regulation in the U.S. — gets passed before Congress departs for August recess. While the bill has been drafted bipartisanly, some Democrats are unhappy with the current version.
“The bill is the product of serious negotiation and reflects genuine compromise from industry, advocates, and members on both sides of the aisle,” the statement read.
“The competitive stakes could not be higher. The United States has long been the global center of technological innovation, but we are ceding ground at an alarming pace,” it continued, adding that “talent, capital, and innovative companies” are looking to countries like Singapore and the United Arab Emirates to set up shop.
Crypto giant DCG has over 200 companies in its portfolio, most notably Grayscale, the manager of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust.
Lawmakers have been working on the Clarity Act since last year. Republicans passed the bill in 2025 but it has been in a deadlock this year, partially because banking chiefs raised concerns over stablecoin yield.
A new draft circulating last week bans officials and their families from issuing or promoting crypto — something opposition lawmakers previously had issue with.
GOP lawmakers are pushing Democrats to pass the bill. Bipartisan support for the bill exists though some lawmakers — such as senator Elizabeth Warren — have criticized the draft, claiming it would allow President Donald Trump to make money from crypto, as well as benefit criminals.
A group of Democrats last week penned a statement claiming the bill in its current form falls short.
Major institutions, including Fidelity and Goldman Sachs, as well as crypto lobby groups and politicians, have said the revised bill works in its current format.
This post Crypto Giant DCG Warns Senate: Pass Clarity Act or Lose Ground to Singapore, UAE first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.
Bitcoin Magazine

SEC Chairman Says He’s ‘Committed’ to Helping Advance Crypto Clarity Act
Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Paul Atkins has thrown support behind the long-awaited crypto market structure bill.
Writing on X Tuesday, the chief of Wall Street’s biggest regulator said that he was “committed to supporting Congress in advancing” the bill.
A number of lawmakers are hoping the Clarity Act gets passed before Congress departs for August recess. While the bill has been drafted bipartisanly, some Democrats are unhappy with the current version.
“American leadership in the digital finance revolution means matching the energy of American innovators with a regulatory framework worthy of them,” wrote Atkins on the social media platform, adding a video from a Monday CNBC interview where he spoke about the need for such a bill.
Chosen by President Trump, Atkins was officially sworn in as the 34th Chairman of the SEC last year. He has taken a far more crypto-friendly approach to regulating the space compared to his predecessor, Gary Gensler.
The regulator is the latest big name to push for the Clarity Act to get over the line.
Major financial institutions like Fidelity and Goldman Sachs have thrown their weight behind the new bill, but a group of Democrats last week said in a statement that the bill in its current form falls short.
A number of lawmakers are hoping the bill gets passed before Congress departs for August recess.
Despite being passed in the house of representatives last year with strong bipartisan support, the Clarity Act has been in a deadlock for much of 2026, partially because big bankers raised concerns over stablecoin yield among Democrat concerns around ethics language.
Banking lobbyists have said that if crypto exchanges pay attractive yields to customers, banks could lose their deposit base.
An updated bill of the Clarity Act was introduced last week that addressed the ethics concerns, banning government officials and their families from issuing or promoting crypto.
Republicans are hoping to gain bipartisan support for the bill this week to advance the legislation. If passed, the long-awaited bill would create a regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency market.
This post SEC Chairman Says He’s ‘Committed’ to Helping Advance Crypto Clarity Act first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.
Raphael Zagury, the newly appointed CEO of Bitcoin-focused public company Twenty One Capital, says the premium-funded model behind Bitcoin treasury firms cannot provide easy returns forever. His answer is to build cash-generating businesses around the company’s BTC balance sheet.
In a July 22 fireside chat furnished to the SEC, Zagury described issuing shares above the net asset value of a company’s Bitcoin holdings and using the proceeds to buy more BTC as a temporary market dislocation. As more companies copy the strategy, he said, their market-value premiums should converge toward 1x.
“There’s no free money forever,” Zagury said. The premium could return, he added, but it should not remain the only source of shareholder returns.
Twenty One had already outlined an operating-company model in May. Its refreshed priorities now include buying or building operating businesses, expanding capital-markets capabilities, developing Bitcoin-backed financial products and creating a Bitcoin-native lending platform. Prospective acquisitions must be accretive when measured against Bitcoin.
The shift coincides with a leadership reset. Zagury became CEO effective July 20 after Jack Mallers resigned as chief executive and director. The company said Mallers’ exit was unrelated to any disagreement and that he would focus on Strike. Twenty One is no longer pursuing a combination with Strike.
Zagury used mining to illustrate the proposed return engine. He compared its potential cash generation with the role insurance played in Berkshire Hathaway’s capital-allocation model, supplying funds that could be reinvested across a portfolio. He also said Twenty One had not yet built such a model and that execution would be difficult.
Asked whether Twenty One was trying to outperform Bitcoin, Zagury initially agreed, then qualified that answer. Matching Bitcoin’s value with lower volatility could still be a good result, he said, while beating BTC over the long term would require exceptional opportunities or irresponsible leverage. He framed mining and other operating businesses as a route to better risk-adjusted returns and said shareholder value should be measured in Bitcoin terms.

Twenty One’s first-quarter filing reported 43,514 BTC as of March 31. The same filing presented no operating-revenue line and reported a $10.57 million loss from operations, meaning the planned cash-flow engine had not yet appeared in reported results.
Zagury’s discussion of using treasury assets did not announce a sale. His example of exchanging 50 BTC from a hypothetical 100-BTC treasury for a cash-generating company was explicitly hypothetical. A possible combination with Elektron Energy, the mining business whose management team he leads, remains preliminary, with no definitive agreement or assurance that a deal will be approved.
Twenty One has therefore set a harder benchmark than accumulating Bitcoin through share issuance: building businesses that can improve returns on a Bitcoin basis. Whether those businesses can deliver better risk-adjusted returns remains an unproven strategy rather than a reported result.
The post “There’s no free money forever”: Twenty One Capital’s new CEO warns the Bitcoin treasury playbook is dying appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Investors who put $1,000 into a GS Finance note linked to Strategy’s MSTR shares are on track to get about $217 back at its July 29 maturity.
MSTR’s July 24 close pushes the note deep into the downside formula in Goldman’s filing, pointing to a loss of roughly $783, or 78.3%, of the principal. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC still controls the final calculation and can postpone the date or adjust the terms.
GS Finance issued the note, with The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. backing the payout. Strategy’s share price decides what investors receive, but payment responsibility rests with GS Finance and Goldman. Wells Fargo Securities handled distribution, and Wells Fargo Advisors was named as a possible resale channel.
The SEC-filed pricing supplement set MSTR's starting price at $421.74 and its threshold at 80% of that figure, or $337.392. A closing price at or above the barrier would have returned $1,417, including a 41.7% contingent gain. A finish below it instead subjects the investment to MSTR's full decline from the starting price.
The payoff creates a steep cliff. A close exactly at the threshold would still qualify for $1,417. A close even slightly below it would switch the holder to the downside formula, calculated from $421.74 rather than from the barrier. The barrier, set 20% below the starting price, determines which formula applies and offers no loss cap after a breach.
Historical data from Investing.com and Twelve Data place MSTR's July 24 close at $91.67, after the shares traded between $89.76 and $93.68. The closing price was far below both the $421.74 starting level and the $337.392 threshold.

Under the filed downside formula, the maturity payment equals $1,000 plus $1,000 multiplied by MSTR's return from its starting price. Using the $91.67 close produces an indicated payment of $217.36. The same calculation can be expressed as $1,000 multiplied by $91.67 and divided by $421.74.
The final supplement recorded $660,000 in original aggregate face amount. It does not state how much principal remained outstanding at maturity. Without that figure, the filing supports only the holder-level result per $1,000 note and no defensible estimate of investors' total losses across the offering.
MSTR is absent from Nasdaq Trader's July 24 halt log. No CUSIP-specific postponement, corporate-action adjustment, or final payment notice was located in the reviewed public sources. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC's contractual determination therefore remains unresolved, and $217.36 is an evidence-backed estimate. If the scheduled dates and filed terms were unchanged, each $1,000 note would return about 22 cents on the dollar.
The post Goldman Sachs notes tied to Strategy set to pay just 22 cents on the dollar at maturity appeared first on CryptoSlate.
The market values Hyperscale Data’s common equity below its disclosed Bitcoin holdings. Whether that gap belongs to common shareholders is a much harder question.
The company said Tuesday that its wholly owned Sentinum and Ault Capital Group subsidiaries held 1,106.0467 Bitcoin as of July 27. It valued the combined position at about $71.7 million using a Bitcoin closing price of $64,784.
A MarketWatch quote backed by FactSet placed Hyperscale Data’s market capitalization near $56.4 million after the July 28 close. The adjacent-day figures leave the disclosed gross Bitcoin value roughly $15 million above the equity value, even before assigning anything to the company’s data centers or other businesses.
That comparison differs from net asset value. A May 18 quarterly filing covering March 31, well before the current Bitcoin total, reported $196.0 million of current liabilities and $216.7 million of total liabilities. It also disclosed a $90.1 million preferred-stock liquidation preference within stockholders’ equity, a senior claim separate from the GAAP liabilities figure. Those consolidated obligations sit against the company’s other assets as well as its Bitcoin, so the figures form a claims map rather than a calculation that subtracts every liability from the treasury.
The March 31 filing also reported $16.7 million of restricted crypto assets that included Bitcoin pledged as collateral for convertible notes issued to JGB entities. The filing leaves the restricted portion of the July 27 treasury unknown, preventing investors from treating the full $71.7 million as demonstrated unencumbered value available to common holders.
Hyperscale Data opened an at-the-market program on June 18 that can sell up to $300 million of common stock. Its June 18 prospectus supplement sets no minimum sale amount or fixed share count and says the company will report sales at least quarterly.
Public filings through July 28 leave the program’s actual share sales and proceeds undisclosed. The $300 million figure describes authorized capacity; future quarterly disclosure will determine how much stock entered the market and at what price. Issuance at GPUS’s current scale could materially change each share’s claim on the Bitcoin treasury.
Subsidiary ownership adds another unresolved layer. Tuesday’s release gave only a combined Bitcoin balance for Sentinum and ACG, although it said ACG bought 15 Bitcoin during the previous week. Hyperscale Data expects, without assurance, to divest ACG in the second quarter of 2027 through an exchange tied to Series F preferred stock. The disclosures leave the treatment of ACG-held Bitcoin before that separation unspecified.
Investors are pricing a changing pool of assets behind substantial claims, possible ATM issuance and an unresolved subsidiary split. The apparent discount is visible; the portion available to common shareholders remains uncertain.
The post Hyperscale Data sits on $71 million in Bitcoin with a $56 million market cap – Here is why its not a bargain appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Morgan Stanley’s new Ethereum and Solana exchange-traded products generated roughly $38 million in combined trading volume on their first day, giving the Wall Street firm an immediate presence in two crypto fund markets dominated by earlier entrants.
The Morgan Stanley Ethereum Trust (MSSE) recorded 933,715 shares traded Tuesday and attracted $5.15 million of net inflows. The Morgan Stanley Solana Trust (MSOL) traded 951,216 shares, producing roughly $19 million of turnover but no net creations. Each product began trading on NYSE Arca at around $20 per share.
Data from SoSoValue shows that the MSSE’s inflows represented more than a third of the roughly $14.5 million that entered US ETH funds during the session. BlackRock’s staking-enabled ETHB drew $5.9 million, and its larger ETHA product added $3.5 million.

Meanwhile, the Solana market moved in the opposite direction, with the existing fund group losing $18.1 million as investors pulled the entire amount from Bitwise’s BSOL.
The contrasting debuts provide an early test of how much market share Morgan Stanley can capture after entering both categories late. MSSE converted a sizable portion of its first-day trading into new assets, while MSOL drew comparable secondary-market activity during a session when investors were reducing exposure to the broader Solana fund complex.
Morgan Stanley Investment Management launched the two products July 28 as an extension of a crypto lineup that began with the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust in April.
MSBT had accumulated more than $400 million in assets as of press time despite entering a Bitcoin fund market already led by BlackRock and Fidelity.
The new products also push Morgan Stanley beyond simple spot exposure. Both can stake their underlying assets, placing the firm directly into a growing competition over how much yield fund issuers return to investors.
Morgan Stanley is entering that fight with one of the lowest combinations of management and staking charges available in either market.
MSSE and MSOL each carry a 0.14% annual sponsor fee. Morgan Stanley will also take no direct share of their staking rewards, while custodians and staking providers are expected to receive an aggregate 5% of gross rewards. The remainder is retained by the trusts before distributions and applicable expenses.
That structure undercuts several established competitors.
In Solana, Bitwise’s BSOL charges a 0.20% management fee and passes 6% of staking rewards to service providers. Grayscale’s GSOL charges 0.19% and gives up 7%, while Franklin Templeton’s SOEZ takes 8% of staking rewards. Staking cuts rise to at least 10% at 21Shares, 15% at Fidelity and 25% at VanEck, Farside Investors data show.

The ETH market has a similar spread, Farside data shows. Grayscale’s lower-cost ETH product carries a 0.15% management fee and a 6% staking charge, while BlackRock’s ETHB has a stated 0.25% sponsor fee and gives up 10% of staking rewards.
The staking charges on 21Shares’ TETH and Grayscale’s larger ETHE product stand at 25% and 23%, respectively.

BlackRock temporarily undercuts Morgan Stanley on ETHB’s headline management cost through a waiver that lowers its fee to 0.12% on the first $2.5 billion of assets for 12 months beginning in March. Its standard rate remains 0.25%.
Morgan Stanley’s challenge therefore extends beyond a conventional ETF fee war. For staking products, investor returns also depend on how much of the portfolio participates in the network and how much of the resulting reward is retained by intermediaries.
MSSE plans under normal market conditions to stake between 50% and 80% of its Ethereum holdings. Its prospectus sets 80% as the target maximum while allowing the amount to vary with redemption needs, network withdrawal times and market liquidity.
MSOL is more aggressive. The trust intends to stake as much as 100% of its SOL, while periodically keeping assets unstaked to meet expected redemptions and other liquidity requirements.
Both funds intend to distribute net staking rewards in cash monthly, but at least quarterly. Rewards accrue in ETH or SOL before the trusts sell an equivalent amount of the tokens to fund distributions to shareholders.
That approach gives investors access to staking income through a traditional brokerage product without requiring them to custody tokens or interact directly with validators.
Despite the lower costs, Morgan Stanley still has a substantial gap to close against funds that have spent months or years accumulating assets and liquidity.
Bitwise’s BSOL has attracted about $892 million of cumulative net inflows, accounting for most of the roughly $1.12 billion accumulated across the Solana products tracked by Farside.
BlackRock’s original ETHA product has drawn about $11.4 billion, while its newer staking-enabled ETHB has already attracted roughly $529 million.
Those balances give the incumbent products deeper trading histories and established investor bases, advantages that a lower fee does not immediately erase.
However, Morgan Stanley brings a different advantage.
Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Eric Balchunas described the new products as the most significant additions to the ETH and Solana ETF markets since their initial launch, citing Morgan Stanley’s size and reach. The firm has almost 16,000 financial advisers overseeing about $2.6 trillion in combined client assets.
Its broader Wealth Management business ended 2025 with $7.4 trillion in client assets and more than 20 million client relationships.
Morgan Stanley has also identified crypto and tokenization among the product capabilities it intends to expand as more customers move between its E*TRADE, workplace and adviser-led channels.
The firm has been building the infrastructure around those ambitions. E*TRADE completed the rollout of direct Bitcoin, Ethereum and SOL trading earlier this month, while Morgan Stanley has also created a referral arrangement with Galaxy Digital that allows eligible wealth clients to convert crypto exposure into shares of spot ETPs.
That distribution network gives MSSE and MSOL a route to investors beyond the crypto-native audience that helped establish many of their competitors.
The post Morgan Stanley is using $7.4 trillion in client assets and rock-bottom fees to hijack Wall Street’s crypto boom appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Core Scientific, a longtime Bitcoin miner now converting sites for AI computing, reported a negative 56% self-mining gross margin in the second quarter as its colocation business generated sharply higher profit.
The company’s Q2 results show self-mining generated $21.5 million of revenue against $33.7 million of cost of revenue. That left a $12.2 million segment gross loss for the three months ended June 30.
High-density colocation, which provides powered data-center capacity for AI customers, moved in the opposite direction. The segment produced $136.7 million of revenue and $80.0 million of gross profit at a 59% margin. That gross profit exceeded Core Scientific’s $70.0 million consolidated total because mining and other segment losses pulled the companywide figure lower.

The mining result is not a disclosed spot-Bitcoin breakeven or a cash-production-cost estimate. Cost of revenue included $17.9 million of power fees, $9.9 million of depreciation and other operating expenses, so the margin cannot be reduced to the price at which the machines cover electricity alone.
Core Scientific says it is repurposing its remaining mining facilities for high-density colocation “as circumstances allow.” The Q2 loss strengthens the economic case for that strategy, but the company did not identify the quarter as its trigger or say that conversion had become compulsory.
According to the Investing.com transcript of Core Scientific’s earnings call, CFO Jim Nygaard said the company was operating mining primarily to offset contractual power costs during the wind-down. He said Core Scientific ended June with nearly 30% fewer miners online than at the end of the first quarter and was self-mining at only two sites.
Core Scientific reported 395 megawatts of billing colocation capacity at quarter-end and 437 MW by mid-July. The later figure represented approximately $635 million in average annualized colocation GAAP revenue.
That operational footprint remains well below the roughly 1.1 gigawatts of leased customer power capacity tied to more than $24 billion of potential contracted revenue. The AMD relationship is anchored by 15-year agreements covering about 530 MW across five sites and more than $14 billion of potential base contracted revenue. A broader relationship could support up to 2.5 GW, but that figure is prospective, not built or billing capacity.
The gap shows how much of Core Scientific’s AI story still depends on conversion and delivery. It does not reveal how much mining power remains or when the last mining facilities could change use: neither the earnings release nor the attributed transcript quantified the two-site footprint in megawatts or supplied a complete conversion timetable.
Core Scientific’s $1.16 billion net loss also overstates the quarter’s operating damage because it was primarily driven by a $1.05 billion fair-value expense for warrants and contingent value rights as the stock price rose.
The quarter therefore stops short of proving that AI conversion is forced. It does show why mining is losing its claim on the company’s power and sites: one segment produced a negative gross margin while the other generated more gross profit than Core Scientific recorded in total.
The post Core Scientific lost 56% on Bitcoin mining but $80M in profit from its pivot to AI hosting appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Cardano is trading at $0.1638 after a sharp three-day bounce off $0.1535, and momentum has quietly shifted back in favour of buyers. The $0.18 area is where $ADA was rejected a week ago, and it is the level that would confirm the July downtrend is over. Getting there means clearing $0.1751 first. Here is what the 3-hour chart says about the odds.
The 3-hour chart shows ADA in a broad range with a clear pattern of lower highs. The month opened with an aggressive impulse that spiked into $0.200 on 5 July, a move that was rejected almost immediately and gave back every cent of the advance within 48 hours.
The second attempt came on 23 July, when Cardano pushed up to roughly $0.1805 before rolling over again. That lower high matters, because it confirms sellers are stepping in earlier on each rally. Price then slid into $0.1535 on 27 July, and that is where buyers finally defended.

The current candle prints at $0.1638, with an intraday high of $0.1648 and a low of $0.1626. In other words, ADA has recovered around 6.7% from the swing low but is still sitting almost 18% below the July peak.
The structure to keep in mind is simple: three horizontal levels define everything. Resistance at $0.1751, support at $0.1488, and a deeper support shelf at $0.1424 that dates back to the late-June accumulation base.
$0.1751 is not an arbitrary line. It is the level that capped the entire post-spike recovery in early July and it sits just above the 23 July rejection wick. Everything ADA has done for four weeks has happened underneath it.
From $0.1638, that resistance is roughly 6.9% away. A clean 3-hour close above $0.1751, ideally with expanding volume rather than a single wick, would break the sequence of lower highs and put the $0.180 area back in play as the first target. Above that, the July high at $0.200 becomes the obvious magnet, and reclaiming it would be the first genuinely bullish monthly signal ADA has produced since spring.
Until then, every push toward $0.175 has to be treated as a supply zone rather than a breakout.
The bearish scenario is equally well defined. $0.1488 is the first real support beneath current price, around 9.2% lower, and it lines up with the top of the base ADA built through late June.
Lose that on a closing basis and $0.1424 becomes the next stop, roughly 13% below spot. That level is the floor of the June accumulation range, and it is the last structural support before $Cardano is back at the multi-year lows it printed at the end of June, when ADA closed the month near $0.1453 after shedding close to 40%.
The nuance worth flagging: the 27 July low at $0.1535 held comfortably above $0.1488. That is a higher low relative to the June base, and it is the single most constructive thing on this chart.
The 14-period RSI reads 55.89, with its moving average down at 39.27. That gap tells you two things.
First, RSI dipped close to the mid-20s during the 27 July flush, which is a genuinely oversold reading on a 3-hour timeframe, and the bounce came directly off it. Second, RSI has now crossed decisively back above its own signal line, a momentum shift that usually precedes at least a test of overhead resistance.
The caveat is the speed of the move. Going from oversold to 56 in three sessions is a fast repricing, and RSI is now entering the zone where previous July rallies stalled. Momentum is improving, but it is not yet confirming a trend change. That confirmation only comes from a price close above $0.1751.
The technical picture is not operating in a vacuum. Cardano has just moved through one of its busiest development stretches: the Van Rossem hard fork took the network to protocol version 11, adding new Plutus built-in functions and updated cost models that reduce the resources needed to run complex smart contracts. It was also the first Cardano upgrade fully ratified through the on-chain Voltaire governance system.
Behind it sits Ouroboros Leios, the scalability overhaul that went to public testnet in June and is targeted for mainnet late in 2026. Charles Hoskinson has framed it as a step change in throughput, with figures in the 10x to 65x range floated by the community, though those numbers still need to survive real-world load.
On-chain, Santiment data showed wallets holding between 10 million and 100 million ADA lifting their share of supply from 37.66% to 38.13% through the June selloff. Whale accumulation into weakness does not time a bottom, but it does explain why $0.1424 has held so far. Working against that, daily transaction counts fell to roughly 17,400 at the end of June, close to a 45-day low, so usage has not yet followed the development activity.
The base case is continuation of the range: ADA grinding between $0.1488 and $0.1751 while the market waits for a catalyst. The bullish trigger is a 3-hour close above $0.1751. The bearish trigger is a close below $0.1488. Anything in between is noise.
Dubai's flagship carrier has flipped the switch. Emirates has officially launched Crypto.com Pay, allowing customers to use the digital payment solution on the airline's website and app platforms. It makes Emirates the first major Gulf airline to accept cryptocurrency payments for flight bookings, and it turns a 12-month-old paper agreement into a live checkout button.
Customers with a Crypto.com account booking on emirates.com or the Emirates App can now select Crypto.com Pay at checkout, with transactions processed in compliance with UAE regulatory standards. The option is open to eligible UAE residents for bookings priced and settled in Emirati Dirham (AED).
The rollout is the delivery of a deal signed a year ago. Emirates and Crypto.com signed a Memorandum of Understanding in July 2025 to explore integrating Crypto.com Pay into the airline's payment systems. One notable gap in the announcement: the specific cryptocurrencies accepted have not been spelled out, so the assets available at checkout will depend on what sits in a user's Crypto.com wallet.
Adnan Kazim, Emirates' Deputy President and Chief Commercial Officer, framed it as a generational shift, pointing to younger travellers who "manage their money and plan their journeys primarily from their phones" and expect airlines to keep up.
The flow splits by device. On mobile, customers booking through the Emirates App are pushed into the Crypto.com app to complete payment from their wallet, then redirected back to the Emirates App for the booking confirmation and e-ticket. On desktop, they pick Crypto.com Pay at the payment step, scan the QR code shown on the booking page and approve the payment in the Crypto.com app, after which the confirmation and e-ticket are issued on screen.
No card, no bank transfer, no manual wallet address. Functionally it behaves like any QR based mobile payment, which is exactly the point.
Want to hold the assets before you spend them? You can buy Bitcoin, Ethereum and hundreds of other coins on Bitpanda, a fully regulated European exchange. Sign up with code CRYPTOTICKER here: Get started on Bitpanda
This is the part most travel coverage is glossing over. The integration is powered by Crypto.com's Dubai entity, the first Virtual Asset Service Provider to be granted a Stored Value Facilities (SVF) licence by the Central Bank of the UAE, and it operates inside that SVF framework. emirates
In other words, this is not a crypto payment gateway bolted onto the side of a regulated business. It sits within the UAE's formal financial plumbing, under Central Bank supervision. That is why an airline of this size was willing to put it in front of customers at all. The same licence, granted in May, already lets UAE residents pay government fees with digital assets.
The state agenda is doing a lot of the work. The launch supports the Dubai Cashless Strategy under the D33 Economic Agenda, which targets 90% of all financial transactions across government and private sectors being digital by the end of 2026. It also builds on Emirates' own digital payments partnership with Dubai Finance, and follows Crypto.com's separate tie-up with Dubai Finance for government service payments.
For Crypto.com, the strategic value is distribution rather than volume. Eric Anziani, the company's President and COO, called the Emirates partnership a milestone for the Pay product. Flight tickets are high ticket, high intent purchases, and an airline with Emirates' brand weight normalises crypto at checkout in a way that a hundred smaller merchant integrations cannot.
The bear case is simple: AED settlement means the crypto leg is a funding rail, not a currency. Users spend digital assets, Emirates receives dirhams. That is the same model that made card-linked crypto spending work, and it is also why it will not, on its own, move the price of anything.
Still, for a sector that has spent a decade promising payments and delivering speculation, a working checkout button on one of the world's largest airlines is a real data point.
Russia now has a comprehensive crypto trading law. The United States, one year after the House passed its own market structure bill by a landslide, still does not. That gap closed in a single week, and this week it got a detail almost too on the nose to be true: the US Senate cleared its floor for a Russia sanctions bill and pushed the crypto bill back again.
On 21 July 2026, Russia's State Duma completed the second and third readings of bill No. 1194918-8, titled "On Digital Currency and Digital Rights." The vote was not close. It cleared with 340 in favour, after a first reading in April that carried 327 of 340 deputies.
The core provisions:
The bill still needs Federation Council approval, which has a 14-day window, then Putin's signature within a further 14 days. Main provisions are slated for 1 September 2026, with the licensed-intermediary regime fully enforced from 1 July 2027. Notably, the digital ruble rollout is scheduled for the same 1 September date, so Moscow is launching its CBDC and its private-crypto framework on one timeline.
For context on what is being formalised: Russia's Finance Ministry has estimated domestic crypto trading at roughly 50 billion rubles a day, about $640 million, most of it currently outside any oversight.
Because it does the one thing the CLARITY Act was written to do. It answers the question "who regulates what, and under which rules can a platform legally operate."
Russia's answer is narrower and far more restrictive than anything Washington has drafted. There is no equivalent of a developer safe harbour, no DeFi carve-out, and retail access is capped at a level a US trader would find absurd. It is regulation by permission slip, and the sanctions motive is explicit: lawmakers stated on the record that the law lets Russian firms pay foreign counterparties in crypto while working around sanctions restrictions.
But it is a rulebook. Firms can read it, budget for it, and know the deadline. That is the comparison that stings.
Nowhere new, which is the problem.
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, H.R. 3633, passed the House on 17 July 2025 by 294 to 134, with more than 70 Democrats crossing over. The Senate Banking Committee advanced it 15 to 9 on 14 May 2026. Since then it has sat on the Senate Legislative Calendar as Calendar No. 423. No cloture motion. No floor vote. The White House's informal 4 July signing target came and went.
Senate Republicans released revised text on 22 July, merging the Banking and Agriculture Committee approaches and adding ethics language negotiated with the White House. Senator Cynthia Lummis published it publicly. It did not break the deadlock. A group of pro-crypto Democrats responded that the draft still falls short on ethics provisions, illicit finance and conflicts of interest.
The arithmetic is brutal. Cloture needs 60 votes, meaning roughly seven Democrats on top of a fully unified Republican caucus, and the Republican whip count itself is not clean.
Then came this week. Majority Leader John Thune moved a package of nominations on Monday and a Russia sanctions bill on Tuesday, which pushes any CLARITY floor action to the final days before the 7 August recess. Thune already told reporters on 23 July that he did not expect the bill to pass before the break, though he wants to at least get the process started. White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt pushed back and said he would not count out the first week of August.
Prediction markets have voted. Polymarket odds on the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026 sank to a record low near 32% in mid-July, sat around 38% this week, and Galaxy Research has trimmed its own estimate to about 30%. Stifel's Washington strategist has warned that missing the August recess would cause the bill's prospects to deteriorate materially. After the recess, senators head into midterm campaigning, and even a Senate passage would need the House to approve the amended version.
Largely yes, and Russia is not even the most striking example.
The US still runs a multi-agency model where the SEC, CFTC and FinCEN each claim a slice, and the boundaries get drawn by enforcement actions rather than statute. For a compliance officer, that is the worst of both worlds: real legal exposure, no fixed rulebook.
Not well, though regulation is only part of it.
Bitcoin opened Tuesday 28 July at $63,706, about 2.5% below Monday's open, and traded in the $63,300 to $63,800 range through the US morning. Ethereum opened at $1,890, down 3.2%. Total crypto market cap sat near $2.26 trillion, off 1.6% on the day, with Bitcoin dominance around 56%. The Fear and Greed Index is at 29, firmly in fear.
Market breadth is the uglier number. Only 29 of the top 100 coins are trading above their 50-day moving averages, and Bitcoin and Ethereum are two of them. That is a market where the majors are holding and everything else is bleeding, which is exactly the pattern you get when institutional flows are cautious and speculative capital has no thesis to price.
Two things are pressing at once. The Federal Reserve opened a two-day meeting on 28 July, and CME FedWatch has the odds of a hike at around 35.8%, up sharply from 25.7% a week earlier. That alone is enough to drain risk appetite. Spot Bitcoin ETFs have also seen recent outflows, pointing to softer institutional demand.
Regulation sits underneath both. The honest read on the CLARITY delay is that it is not a crash catalyst, it is a ceiling. Traders who bought the "market structure passes in 2026" thesis in the first quarter have been unwinding it since, and each slipped deadline removes a reason to add risk rather than adding a reason to sell. Exchanges cannot finalise listing strategy, token issuers cannot plan disclosures, and ETF issuers cannot expand product lines beyond what the current agency posture allows. That is capital sitting on the sidelines, not capital fleeing.
The mirror image is worth noting too. Russia's framework is restrictive enough that it will not import much new demand. Retail caps of $3,800 a year and a listing filter that only clears the very largest assets do not create a bid. What it creates is a legal channel for cross-border settlement, and that matters more for stablecoin flows and commodity trade than for altcoin prices.
Four concrete markers:
If CLARITY misses the recess and the September window closes, 2027 becomes the base case, and the agency framework carries the load in the meantime. That is a longer stretch of the same limbo the market has already priced.
Crypto is red across the board today, and for once the trigger did not come from crypto at all. It came from a single subscription-only tech report about lithography machines in Shanghai. That story took down South Korea's stock market, dragged the entire AI hardware complex with it, and landed on a crypto market that was already sitting on its hands ahead of tomorrow's Federal Reserve decision.
Here is what actually happened, in order of importance.
$Bitcoin broke back below $64,000 on July 28, trading around $63,150 and down roughly 2.8% over 24 hours. It is the third time BTC has cracked that level since July 24, and each break has come with a liquidation cascade attached. Today's flush wiped out about $100 million in leveraged positions inside a single hour. The July 24 version was larger, at roughly $87 million.
Altcoins took the harder hit, as usual:
Total crypto market capitalisation sits near $2.16 trillion, with Bitcoin dominance above 56%. That dominance number matters: capital is not rotating into altcoins on this dip, it is consolidating into the largest asset or leaving entirely.

This is the actual catalyst, and it is worth understanding properly because it explains the timing.
On July 27, The Information reported that a Shanghai-based, state-backed manufacturer has started mass-producing immersion deep ultraviolet (DUV) lithography machines. First deliveries go to SMIC, Hua Hong Semiconductor and ChangXin Memory Technologies this year. Volumes are small, roughly five machines in 2026 rising to about twenty in 2027, and the tools reportedly still trail ASML on performance and reliability.
Small volumes, big implications. US and Dutch export controls have blocked China from buying advanced EUV systems, which made ASML's older immersion DUV machines one of its most important China revenue lines. If Chinese fabs can now source comparable tools domestically, that revenue has a ceiling.
Markets did not wait for the qualification data. ASML fell between 6% and 8%. Applied Materials, Lam Research and KLA followed. Then Asia opened and it got worse: the Kospi closed 10.8% lower at 6,023.66, triggering a circuit breaker, with Samsung Electronics down 13.4% and SK Hynix down 14.7%. Between them those two names are close to half the index. The Nikkei fell about 4% and Taiwan's Taiex about 4.7%.
Crypto does not have a lithography exposure. What it has is a correlation problem. Institutional allocators increasingly hold digital assets inside the same technology risk book as AI infrastructure names, so a sector-wide de-risking event sells Bitcoin whether or not the news has anything to do with it.
The closest precedent is DeepSeek's R1 release in January 2025, which triggered an identical one-day repricing of AI infrastructure. AI capex did not actually fall afterwards. It accelerated. Worth remembering before treating today as structural.
It is the reason nobody is buying the dip.
The FOMC opened its two-day meeting on July 28 under chair Kevin Warsh, with the federal funds rate held at 3.50% to 3.75% for a fourth consecutive meeting. The policy statement lands at 2pm Eastern on July 29.
A hold is the base case. CME FedWatch and prediction markets including Polymarket and Kalshi have put hold probability in the 70% to 93% range through July. The important detail is what the residual probability points at: a hike, not a cut. The reescalation of the Iran conflict and the energy prices that came with it have pushed the entire 2026 rate-cut timeline later across multiple forecasts.
For a market that spent the first half of 2026 waiting for monetary relief, that is the single most bearish framing available. There is no rescue priced in for this month.
Traders are not fully bearish either. Options and leverage positioning has clustered between the $65,000 and $70,000 strikes, and roughly $2.5 billion in notional BTC call spreads expire on July 31. That is why $64,000 keeps getting tested from both sides instead of breaking cleanly.
Washington added a crypto-specific layer to the macro problem.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune confirmed last week that the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act will not pass before the August recess. His exact framing left a crack open, saying he would like to at least get the bill started and see where the votes are, but the arithmetic is unkind. The bill needs 60 votes. Republicans hold 53 seats. No Democrat currently supports the text.
The sticking point is an ethics standoff over conflicts of interest tied to the President's crypto business interests, plus unresolved fights over stablecoin yield restrictions and developer protections.
Prediction markets have repriced accordingly: Polymarket odds on 2026 passage fell to roughly 37%, down from above 80% earlier this year. Industry support has never been broader, with BlackRock, Fidelity, Goldman Sachs and Franklin Templeton all publicly behind the bill, and it still is not enough. Miss the pre-recess window and the next realistic opening is a narrow post-midterm one.
Practically, this means US market structure stays governed by executive orders and agency discretion rather than statute, and DeFi, Layer 2 networks and yield-bearing stablecoins keep operating without legal certainty.
Because it is the one item on this list that can turn a correction into a cascade.
The yen approached 164 per dollar on July 24, a level last seen in 1986, prompting another warning from Japanese authorities that they are prepared to intervene. Japan has already spent roughly $74 billion defending the currency since late April. It did not work, and local commentary has started treating the 160s as the new normal.
That is the setup that concerns leveraged traders. Reporting on July 22 indicated officials are discussing raising rates faster than markets expect, and swap pricing now implies roughly an 80% chance of a hike to 1.25% in October, up from around 70%. If the yen spikes suddenly, whether from intervention or a hawkish surprise, yen-funded carry positions get margin-called and the forced selling hits everything at once. That is the August 2024 playbook, and it took Bitcoin down about 30% at the time.
Nothing has broken yet. But a market this close to an intervention threshold explains why nobody wants size on the books going into a Fed statement.
Yes, and this predates today.
Investors have been openly sceptical about the capital expenditure required for AI infrastructure, and the tape is showing it. SpaceX has erased more than $1.2 trillion in market cap since its June high, falling for the 13th session out of the last 16. Nvidia and the wider AI complex sold off last week even as Bitcoin held near $65,000.
Add thinning demand from the ETF channel. US spot Bitcoin ETFs posted net outflows above $200 million across July 23 and 24, breaking a seven-session inflow streak worth close to $1 billion. Ethereum spot ETFs managed a modest $9.23 million net inflow on July 27, which is functionally flat.
When the largest structural buyer steps back and market depth thins out, the same order flow moves price further. Kaiko has flagged declining depth across major exchanges all year. That is the mechanical reason today's drop feels sharper than the headline percentages suggest.
Three things resolve inside the next week, and none of them have resolved yet.
The Fed statement arrives July 29 at 2pm Eastern. The CLARITY Act either starts its Senate floor process in early August or it does not. And the July 31 options expiry unwinds the call spread positioning that has been quietly supporting the $65,000 to $70,000 zone.
Levels traders are watching: $64,000 has been the battleground all month, with the June low near $58,000 as the structural floor beneath it. On the total market cap chart, $2.15 trillion is the line that matters. Above it, this is a range. Below it, the June lows come back into play.
Sentiment is already cautious rather than panicked, with the Fear and Greed Index reading in the high 20s. That is not capitulation. It is also not a market positioned for good news.
You can buy Bitcoin, Ethereum and over 500 other digital assets on Bitpanda. Sign up with code CRYPTOTICKER to get started. Open a Bitpanda account here
Samsung, SK Hynix and ASML are all at the centre of today's selloff. You can trade real stocks and ETFs commission-free on XTB. Open an XTB account here
The single most important chart for crypto traders this week is not Bitcoin. It is crude oil.
WTI gapped straight down at Sunday's open, tearing a hole in the chart that took it from roughly $91.7 on Friday's close to $85.3 within minutes. It has since drifted lower to $84.04. Measured from last week's high near $94.3, that is a decline of almost 11% in three sessions.
The trigger was diplomatic, not economic. Washington quietly halted its bombing campaign against Iran late on Friday after 13 consecutive nights of strikes, Tehran responded by suspending its own retaliation, and talks resumed in Oman over the Strait of Hormuz. Brent, which had touched $102 last week, dropped more than 7% in the first minutes of Monday trading.
Crypto noticed immediately. $Bitcoin pushed back through $65,000, Ether ran to a two-month high near $2,000, and the total market gained around 1.7%. Here is why the two are connected, and why the connection is more fragile than it looks.
The pause was never formally announced, which is part of what makes it unstable.
The US stopped striking Iranian targets after Friday night. Iranian officials then signalled through Reuters that Tehran would refrain from attacks for as long as Washington did the same. Mediators in Oman continued working on the Strait of Hormuz, the chokepoint that carried roughly a fifth of global oil and gas before the conflict and has been effectively closed for months.
US Ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz framed the halt as room for diplomacy to work, while confirming that additional military assets are moving into the region in case it does not. Reporting also suggests Trump's advisers had warned that the campaign was running short of viable targets.
There is no signed agreement here. There is an absence of shooting, which is not the same thing.
Price spent the week from July 21 grinding steadily higher: $83.5, then $86, then a push to $89 on July 22, then a run through $90 into a peak of roughly $94.3 late on July 23. That was pure war premium being priced in, one headline at a time.

The fade began on July 24. WTI slipped from $94.3 back toward $90, bounced to $91.7 into the weekend close, and then gapped. The entire five-day climb was erased in a single, untradeable move while the market was shut.
That is the important detail. This was not a sell-off. It was a repricing that happened when nobody could react, which is why the follow-through matters more than the gap itself. So far the follow-through is bearish: WTI bounced to $86.4 on Monday morning, failed, and made a new low near $83.6 before stabilising around $84.
For context, pre-war Brent traded near $72. Even after an 11% collapse, there is still a substantial war premium embedded in the price. Oil is not back to normal. It is back to elevated.
Because oil is the transmission belt between the Middle East and your portfolio, and the mechanism runs through the Federal Reserve.
The chain works like this. Higher crude feeds into headline inflation. Higher inflation forces a more hawkish central bank. A more hawkish central bank means tighter liquidity and a stronger dollar. And tighter liquidity is poison for the longest-duration, highest-beta assets on the board, which is exactly what crypto is.
That chain was visibly tightening through July. US inflation has been running near 3.7%, well above the 2% target. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh has committed publicly to bringing it back down. As oil surged past $100, the market-implied probability of a rate hike at this week's meeting jumped from around 12% to roughly 38% in a single week.
Cheaper oil pulls that chain slack. The 10-year Treasury yield has already retreated to 4.64% from six-month highs, the dollar weakened against every G10 currency on Monday, and gold pushed back above $4,100.
In short: the oil crash is a liquidity story dressed up as a geopolitics story. Crypto is trading the liquidity.
Bitcoin cleared the $64,800 to $65,000 resistance zone it had been stuck under and now trades around $65,300, up roughly 1.2% on the day. Market cap is back above $1.3 trillion and BTC dominance sits just under 57%.

Ether is the standout. ETH gained more than 3% to trade near $1,958, its highest level in 55 days and within touching distance of $2,000. Solana and XRP added 1% to 2%. The pattern of ETH outperforming BTC is the classic signature of a risk-on rotation rather than a defensive bid.

Two caveats stop this from being a clean bullish picture.
First, the flows have not turned yet. US spot Bitcoin ETFs shed around $225 million on Thursday and another $240 million on Friday, with roughly 90% of that coming out of IBIT alone. That wipes out most of July's accumulated inflows. Price has recovered. Institutional money has not come back.
Second, sentiment is still poor. The Crypto Fear and Greed Index remains in Fear territory, even though it has improved off its recent extremes. Crypto equities also took a beating on Friday, with miners including Cipher, Iren and CleanSpark falling between 7% and 10%, and Coinbase and Strategy each down about 2%.
This looks like a relief rally in a market that is still nervous, not the start of a new leg.
Yes, and it is worth remembering how it ended.
In March 2026, Trump ordered a five-day pause on planned strikes against Iranian energy infrastructure and described talks as constructive. WTI plunged more than 10% in a single session. Crypto and equities rallied on the same logic being applied today. Within 24 hours, Iranian state media denied that any negotiations were taking place and characterised the pause as an attempt to manage financial markets. WTI climbed straight back above $91.
The setup in July is not identical. This time Iran has actually confirmed a reciprocal halt, and Oman is hosting live talks on Hormuz. But the structural risk is the same: the entire trade rests on a verbal understanding with no enforcement mechanism, and both sides retain the ability to break it overnight.
The Houthis, meanwhile, have not paused anything. They stepped up attacks on Red Sea shipping over the weekend and struck Saudi energy assets. Hormuz traffic remains a trickle.
This is arguably the densest macro week of 2026 for risk assets.
The oil crash is real, it is significant, and it removes the single biggest macro headwind crypto has faced this month. Bitcoin above $65,000 and ETH testing $2,000 are the direct consequence.
But this is a ceasefire without a treaty, priced by a market that has already been fooled once this year. The FOMC on Wednesday will decide whether the relief becomes a trend or stays a bounce.
Trade the reaction, not the narrative.
The company wants your AI to move money autonomously while you stay in control. Here's how it actually works.
Chair Kevin Warsh kept the federal funds rate at 3.5%–3.75% and offered no new signals on when cuts—or hikes—might come.
Despite being down today, ETH has clawed back from the worst levels of the year. Now it's waiting on the Fed.
Zcash is a privacy-focused cryptocurrency that enables users to hide key details of transactions by leveraging zk-SNARKs.
AI developers are quietly buying physical books by the millions, slicing them apart, scanning every page into AI training datasets, and discarding the originals.
D-Wave CEO Alan Baratz has warned that quantum computing will eventually break Bitcoin's proof-of-work protocol.
Expert trader behind 700% XRP prediction breaks down why $64,000 Bitcoin price matters.
Investment management giant Vanguard has deepened its exposure to Bitcoin treasury company Strive Asset Management.
16 years later, Satoshi Nakamoto’s iconic reply to Bitcoin skeptics becomes a trillion-dollar reality.
Shiba Inu (SHIB) in focus as Emirates rolls out crypto flight payments.
SK hynix rose 3.73% to $135.03 after publishing record quarterly results led by advanced memory demand. Revenue climbed 257% year over year, while operating profit jumped 557% during the second quarter. The company also started HBM4 mass shipments and expanded long-term supply agreements with major customers.
SK hynix Inc., SKHY
SK hynix reported second-quarter revenue of 79.3187 trillion won, up 51% from the previous quarter. Operating profit reached 60.5426 trillion won, representing a 76% operating margin. Net income totaled 93.9226 trillion won, rising 133% from the first quarter.
Compared with last year, revenue increased from 22.232 trillion won during the second quarter. Operating profit also rose from 9.2129 trillion won during the same period. Meanwhile, net income surged 1,242% from 6.9962 trillion won.
High-value memory products supported sharp gains across the company’s main business lines and strengthened its pricing position. Stronger DRAM and NAND prices also lifted profitability and cash generation during the quarter. Cash reached 88 trillion won, while debt fell to 18.6 trillion won and net cash reached 69.4 trillion won.
SK hynix began mass shipments of HBM4 during the second quarter. The product met customer speed requirements while improving power efficiency and production economics. The company plans to increase HBM4 output throughout the second half.
HBM4E samples also reached customers during the first half of 2026. SK hynix selected stable manufacturing processes to support future volume production. It also continued improving yields, product quality, and supply reliability.
Demand from expanding artificial intelligence infrastructure continues to reshape the global memory market. Major technology companies increased spending on computing systems, servers, and data centers. As a result, demand strengthened for HBM, server DRAM, enterprise SSDs, and conventional memory products.
SK hynix completed long-term agreements with about 10 customers, including several strategic partners. These contracts cover multiple years and support stable supply planning across high-growth memory products and customer programs. The company continues negotiations with other large industry customers.
The memory producer also accelerated its M15X production schedule to address demand exceeding available supply. It expects the Yongin Phase 1 cleanroom to open in early 2027. Additional projects include the P&T7 packaging facility and the planned M17 NAND production base.
321-layer NAND products now account for the largest share of total production. SK hynix plans to raise their share to about half of domestic output by year-end. The company will phase investments according to customer demand, production efficiency, financial strength, and capital discipline.
The post SK hynix Inc. (SKHY) Stock: Surges as HBM4 Drives 557% Profit Growth appeared first on Blockonomi.
AbbVie (ABBV) stock rose 1.17% to $266.27 after European regulators approved RINVOQ for severe alopecia areata. The decision expands AbbVie’s immunology portfolio across adult and adolescent patients in the European Union. It also gives eligible patients another treatment option for a difficult autoimmune hair-loss disorder.
AbbVie Inc., ABBV
The European Commission approved once-daily RINVOQ doses of 15 milligrams and 30 milligrams. The approval covers adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older with severe alopecia areata. AbbVie secured the decision after presenting evidence from its ongoing Phase 3 UP-AA clinical program.
The new indication strengthens RINVOQ’s role across several immune-mediated diseases in Europe. EU regulators already authorize the therapy for conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, and ulcerative colitis. They also allow its use for atopic dermatitis, vitiligo, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondylarthritis.
AbbVie developed RINVOQ as an oral therapy that targets immune pathways linked to inflammatory diseases. The company continues to expand the drug across dermatology, gastroenterology, and rheumatology markets. That strategy supports AbbVie’s effort to offset pressure from competition facing older medicines.
The UP-AA program includes two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase 3 studies. Researchers tested both approved doses in adults and adolescents with severe alopecia areata. Each study measured scalp hair coverage after 24 weeks of treatment.
Both doses met the primary endpoint in each study at week 24. More treated patients achieved at least 80% scalp hair coverage than placebo recipients. The studies also recorded complete scalp hair regrowth among some patients receiving RINVOQ.
Researchers reported improvements in eyebrow and eyelash growth during the same treatment period. AbbVie said the safety results matched findings from other approved RINVOQ uses. The company continues to collect longer-term efficacy and safety data through the ongoing program.
Alopecia areata causes the immune system to attack hair follicles across the body. The disease can create small bald patches or complete loss of scalp and body hair. Its unpredictable course often creates lasting physical, social, and emotional pressure.
Studies link alopecia areata with higher rates of new depression and anxiety diagnoses. The condition often carries added stigma because many people wrongly view it as cosmetic. Severe cases can disrupt work, relationships, confidence, and daily routines.
The approval gives AbbVie access to another segment of Europe’s dermatology market. It also expands RINVOQ’s commercial reach while strengthening the company’s immunology growth strategy. AbbVie stock finished higher as the market absorbed the regulatory update and its potential sales impact.
The post AbbVie (ABBV) Stock: Rises as RINVOQ Wins EU Approval for Severe Hair Loss appeared first on Blockonomi.
designation.
recognition highlights FSV’s focus on resident service standards.FirstService Corporation (FSV) shares traded at $144.76, up $1.74, after its subsidiary announced a major hospitality recognition. Sun Rose Residences earned the VERIFIED
Luxury Residences designation from Forbes Travel Guide. The recognition highlights service quality rather than financial performance and strengthens the property’s luxury residential profile.
FirstService Corporation, FSV
Forbes Travel Guide created the VERIFIED
Luxury Residences designation through its consulting division, Atelier CX. The programme recognises residential communities delivering consistent and personalised hospitality-inspired service. Sun Rose Residences joined the inaugural group of communities meeting those standards.
The verification process examined service culture, operational practices and the overall resident experience. Independent evaluators measured the community against established hospitality benchmarks. As a result, the designation confirms the property’s commitment to maintaining consistent service quality.
Sun Rose Residences also participated as a charter member of the VERIFIED
Luxury Residences programme. FirstService Residential worked directly with Atelier CX to establish signature service standards. Those standards aim to improve daily living while maintaining consistency across resident experiences.
FirstService Residential manages communities throughout the United States and Canada. The company combines property management with hospitality-focused services for residential developments. The latest recognition supports its strategy of delivering premium resident experiences.
The Sun Rose Residences occupies a prominent location along Sunset Boulevard in West Hollywood. Residents benefit from convenient access to the Sunset Strip, Beverly Hills and leading retail destinations. The community combines modern design with walkable surroundings and nearby cultural attractions.
Amy Mathieson, President of FirstService Residential California, said resident experience remains central to the community’s operating philosophy. She added that the designation reflects the property’s commitment to maintaining high service standards. Forbes Travel Guide stated that luxury living now depends on both residences and everyday service quality.
FirstService Residential operates as a subsidiary of FirstService Corporation. The parent company provides essential property services across residential and commercial markets throughout North America. Its business also supports boards, developers and property owners with tailored management solutions.
Beyond traditional property management, the company offers financial, energy and special district services. It also provides lifestyle programming, technology solutions and round-the-clock customer support. These services help residential communities improve operations and resident satisfaction.
The latest announcement represents a brand recognition milestone instead of a financial development. Earlier corporate announcements produced mixed market reactions, including a 7.41% decline following the July 23 earnings release and modest gains after previous updates. The Forbes Travel Guide designation reinforces FirstService Residential’s hospitality-driven management approach and expands its presence within the luxury residential sector.
The post FirstService Corporation (FSV) Stock: Forbes Travel Guide Honors Sun Rose Residences for Service Excellence appeared first on Blockonomi.
First Northwest Bancorp traded at $12.20, up 3.48%, after announcing a major board leadership achievement. The company confirmed Board Chair Cindy Hill Finnie received the 2026 Director of the Year award from the Puget Sound Business Journal. The recognition highlights her governance leadership and continued oversight during the bank’s strategic transformation.
First Northwest Bancorp, FNWB
The award recognises outstanding corporate and nonprofit board leadership across Washington. Finnie became one of 12 directors honoured during the publication’s tenth annual Directors of the Year programme. The recognition reflects her contributions to governance, strategy and community stewardship.
Finnie joined the First Northwest Bancorp board in 2012. She became board chair in 2022, making history as the organisation’s first female chair. Since then, she has helped guide leadership succession and strategic expansion across the Puget Sound region.
She also strengthened governance practices while supporting long-term organisational planning. In addition, she leads an independent board responsible for executive succession and risk oversight. She also serves on several board committees covering governance, compensation, executive matters and auditing.
During her tenure, Finnie helped oversee several important leadership transitions. She guided the national executive search that resulted in Curt Queyrouze becoming President and Chief Executive Officer in 2025. The board maintained continuity while adapting to changing conditions across the community banking industry.
Queyrouze said Finnie consistently provided thoughtful leadership and long-term strategic guidance. He added that her governance approach strengthened the organisation during a period of significant change. He noted that her experience supported management across key strategic decisions.
Finnie also described the recognition as a reflection of the board’s collective work. She said the leadership team remains focused on governance, responsible decision-making and community service. The award represents the broader efforts of both directors and executives.
Beyond her board responsibilities, Finnie serves as a director of the First Fed Foundation. The foundation has awarded more than $7 million to nonprofit, tribal and government organisations since 2015. Those grants support housing, economic opportunity, community development and other regional priorities.
Her public service also extends beyond the financial sector. She currently serves as vice president of the Fort Worden Foundation and participates in Port Townsend’s Lodging Tax Advisory Council. Previously, she chaired several state and community organisations while serving on additional nonprofit boards.
Before joining First Northwest Bancorp, Finnie spent 38 years at Allstate Insurance Company. She held leadership roles across underwriting, financial management, agency development and business development. Later, she co-founded Rainshadow Properties, an award-winning hospitality and property management company in Port Townsend.
First Northwest Bancorp operates through its wholly owned subsidiary, First Fed Bank. The institution has served communities across Washington since 1923 and currently operates 15 locations, including 11 full-service branches. Its business strategy focuses on sustainable earnings through banking services for individuals, businesses and nonprofit organisations.
The company also maintains investments in financial technology partnerships and a boutique investment banking accelerator. Those initiatives support innovation while expanding financial services capabilities. As a result, First Northwest continues balancing traditional banking operations with modern financial solutions.
The latest announcement recognises board leadership rather than financial performance. A previous executive leadership announcement generated a 5.52% market reaction in April, offering a historical comparison for governance-related developments. This recognition primarily strengthens the company’s corporate governance profile while supporting its long-term strategic direction.
The post First Northwest Bancorp (FNWB) Stock: Board Chair Cindy Hill Finnie Earns 2026 Director of the Year Honor appeared first on Blockonomi.
CBIZ shares climbed 17.67% following Grant Thornton’s announcement of a $5 billion acquisition proposal.
The all-cash transaction offers $55 per share, representing a 54% premium over CBIZ’s 30-day volume-weighted average.
The combined entity would rank as the fifth-largest professional services firm in the United States.
Grant Thornton intends to deploy AI-powered technology across CBIZ’s operations.
A go-shop provision allows CBIZ to entertain competing bids until August 27, 2026.
Shares of CBIZ (CBZ) surged 17.67% to reach $54.95 following Grant Thornton Advisors’ disclosure of a $5 billion all-cash takeover proposal. The transaction prices each CBIZ share at $55, delivering a substantial premium above current market levels. Once finalized, the combination would establish the fifth-largest professional services organization in the United States.
CBIZ, Inc., CBZ
Grant Thornton Advisors has reached a definitive agreement to purchase CBIZ through a deal worth $5 billion. The terms provide CBIZ stockholders with $55 in cash for each outstanding common share. This purchase price delivers approximately a 54% premium compared to CBIZ’s volume-weighted average trading price over the preceding 30 days.
New Mountain Capital will contribute additional equity capital to facilitate the transaction, building on its support of Grant Thornton’s expansion strategy initiated in May 2024. The private equity investor previously backed an initiative that accelerated Grant Thornton’s domestic footprint. These new funds will finance both the acquisition and future strategic initiatives for the merged organization.
CBIZ’s board of directors has unanimously endorsed the merger agreement and urged shareholders to vote in favor of the deal. Both parties anticipate completing the transaction in the fourth quarter of 2026. Finalization depends on shareholder ratification, regulatory approvals, and customary closing requirements.
This combination would establish a United States-based enterprise generating over $5 billion in domestic annual revenue. The resulting firm would become the nation’s fifth-largest provider of professional, tax, and advisory solutions. This transaction represents the most significant merger in the industry over the past quarter-century.
The expanded global network would span more than 20 countries and territories following deal completion. Combined annual revenue would approach $7.5 billion, with a workforce exceeding 34,500 professionals globally. Grant Thornton anticipates the enhanced scale will bolster international service offerings and deepen specialized expertise.
Grant Thornton intends to integrate its technology infrastructure throughout CBIZ’s client portfolio. The firm recently committed $1 billion toward artificial intelligence and cutting-edge technology initiatives. Consequently, the unified organization projects improvements in service quality, operational efficiency, and client engagement.
Grant Thornton intends to spin off CBIZ’s Benefits and Insurance Services division following deal closure. New Mountain Capital would support this unit as a standalone enterprise. The separated business would concentrate on insurance, retirement planning, payroll administration, and complementary services for its customer base.
CBIZ retains the right to pursue alternative acquisition proposals during a go-shop window concluding August 27, 2026. The company’s financial advisers may actively solicit, evaluate, and discuss competing bids throughout this timeframe. CBIZ’s board maintains the authority to accept a superior offer if one emerges under specified terms within the merger agreement.
Grant Thornton will assume full ownership of CBIZ upon transaction completion. CBIZ shares will subsequently cease trading and be delisted from the New York Stock Exchange. Pending closure, CBIZ will maintain its existing operational framework and public company status.
The post CBIZ (CBZ) Stock Soars 17% Following $5B Grant Thornton Takeover Announcement appeared first on Blockonomi.
Law enforcement groups backed by key Democrats have suggested some changes to the CLARITY Act that would make it easier to prosecute some crypto software developers.
However, White House officials still feel like the suggestions made fall short of what they want.
Trump’s crypto adviser, Patrick Witt, dismissed the proposal, saying claims that they were the result of “productive negotiations” with the White House and Treasury were far from the truth. He added that the administration had made its position clear to Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto for weeks and that the latest revision was “not even close” to meeting its expectations.
A report from Politico shows that two major groups representing U.S. prosecutors have submitted fresh changes to the White House, aiming to break months of deadlock over the CLARITY Act.
“Newest language is the culmination of productive negotiations with law enforcement, the White House, and Treasury, and we feel good about the chance to resolve this issue once and for all,” said Masto in a statement.
The proposal focuses on the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), with the new language removing provisions that could protect developers from criminal prosecution in some cases. At the heart of the dispute is whether law enforcement should hold crypto developers responsible for crimes committed on the platforms they build.
The Trump administration says that the authorities should protect builders who do not hold customer funds to encourage innovation. On the other side, critics and law enforcement groups disagree, warning that the current language could make it easier for financial crimes to go unchecked.
New York Attorney General Letitia James also shares the sentiment, having recently said that the CLARITY Act could weaken state enforcement against crypto fraud. According to her, this is because the legislation would limit the state’s ability to hold digital asset firms accountable for crimes.
Not everyone seems to be against the latest revision, though. The Fraternal Order of Police, the largest police organization in the U.S., recently dropped its objections and backed the crypto bill after previously raising concerns about the BRCA.
The report also says several other groups have backed the legislation, including the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives and the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association.
Last month, over 160 former national security, intelligence, and other officials also wrote a letter to the Senate in support of the bill, arguing that it would strengthen efforts to combat illicit finance in the crypto space.
The post Trump’s Crypto Adviser Rejects CLARITY Act Developer Proposal appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Although there was some uncertainty about the monetary direction the United States Federal Reserve will take following the July FOMC meeting, the central bank approved with a 9-3 vote to maintain the interest rates at 3.50% to 3.75%.
All eyes have turned to the incoming press conference by the new Fed Chair, Kevin Warsh, as investors anticipate which way he will lean.
“The Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 3-1/2 to 3-3/4 percent, in support of the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate. The Committee is continuing its policy of maintaining ample reserves in the banking system,” reads the statement.
As reported earlier today, this meeting was described as the most unpredictable since the COVID-19 pandemic broke out in March 2020. The reason for this is that all meetings since then had a 99% agreement about the outcome ahead of their conclusion.
In contrast, futures markets and prediction platforms had assigned a 30%-38% probability for a rate hike for today’s meeting.
Investors apparently had de-risked from more volatile assets like bitcoin ahead of the event today, as the asset slumped by $3,000 yesterday. It rebounded to $64,500 today, where it was rejected and slipped to under $63,800 before the meeting.
Its minor volatility returned after the announcement, pumping above $64,000 as of now. However, it’s likely that the Warsh speech will impact it even more, especially if the new Fed chair hints at what the central bank will do next – a rate hike or another pause.
The post Bitcoin Volatility Returns After Fed Holds Interest Rates Steady appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Solana’s native token has been underperforming during the persistent bear market, but some analysts view the current levels as great buying opportunities.
Others believe the asset is at a critical turning point, suggesting that a further 30% crash is not out of the question.
SOL has been in a major decline lately, with X user WIZZ noting that it has logged nine consecutive red months and is at risk of closing a tenth – something unseen in its history. Ivan on Tech said people should respect the trend and take it as a warning that the price could slip further in the near future.
As of this writing, it trades at around $74 or very close to the $73.75 mark, which the popular analyst Ali Martinez labeled a “make-or-break” moment. He outlined that more than 50 million SOL were bought around that level, making it the most critical support on the map. Martinez thinks that a sustained close under the key zone might trigger additional selling pressure, with $60 becoming the next major downside target.
“Below that, there is little meaningful support until $50,” he added.
Shortly after, the analyst claimed that SOL has lost its rising channel, arguing that if bears maintain control, the price could move south toward $60.
The waning institutional interest also signals that the token may experience a further pullback. SoSoValue’s data show that spot SOL ETFs remain unattractive to pension funds, hedge funds, and other investors. In fact, the daily total net inflow for July 28 dropped to -$18.07 million, the largest single-day red candle since December last year.

Others remain predominantly optimistic despite the ongoing depression. X user Crypto Zenkai opined that buying SOL at its current level below $80 is like investing in BTC in 2010. Their post drew mixed reactions, with many commentators saying the comparison was inappropriate.
Lucky is also among the bulls. The X user, who has almost 2 million followers, first wondered whether SOL’s plunge under $75 is “a juicy dip” that could be followed by a potential rally to roughly $160. Later on, the analyst called the asset a “go-to pick” for the next six months, grouping it together with ETH, LINK, TAO, and SUI.
The post Why Solana Could Be Heading for a Crash to $50 appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Michael Saylor believes Bitcoin has already succeeded but now faces its greatest challenge. He said the biggest threat is not an outside attacker but factions that seek to rewrite the network’s rules for their own interests.
The executive chairman and co-founder of Strategy warned that such changes could weaken economic rights and undermine the cryptocurrency’s long-term future.
In a recent post on X, Saylor described Bitcoin’s consensus rules as its “constitution,” and said that they define property rights, scarcity, settlement, and the balance of power across the network. As such, changing those rules for the benefit of any particular group would amount to an attack on every BTC participant, both now and in future generations.
He said the cryptocurrency has the potential to grow 100-fold and become the foundation of global capital, but argued that even a single “corrupt” rule adopted today could limit future markets, technologies, and economic freedom. According to Saylor, governments and political systems often justify taking away rights by claiming a crisis exists, and said Bitcoin could face a similar outcome if factions gain control of consensus.
At the center of his criticism is BIP-110, a proposal Saylor argues would censor valid fee-paying transactions. BIP-110 is a temporary soft fork that “limits data field sizes to reduce blockchain bloat and refocus development on monetary use cases.” The proposal has emerged as one of the most contentious proposals this year. He had previously said that the proposed cure is more dangerous than the condition.
Saylor didn’t stop at BIP-110. He also took aim at covenant-related proposals and larger-block proposals, and they may differ in design but share the same “constitutional offense” because they rewrite Bitcoin’s rules and impose additional costs and risks on the wider network.
He claimed that larger blocks would reduce blockspace scarcity while increasing bandwidth and validation costs, and covenants would permanently add complexity to consensus and introduce new attack surfaces. The argument also focused on the fact that miners play a critical role in securing Bitcoin by investing capital, while their block subsidy continues to decline through scheduled halvings. He wrote,
“Cripple the fee market, and you starve Bitcoin’s defenders when the network will need them most. That is not protection. It is disarmament.”
The impact would not be limited to miners. Exchanges, custodians, developers, investors, and holders could also face risks if future rule changes put their businesses and capital in the hands of whichever group controls the consensus process. For Saylor, allowing political competition to shape consensus could lead to ongoing protocol disputes and weaken Bitcoin’s security.
He instead supports keeping the base layer simple, neutral, scarce, and secure, with upgrades limited to cases of clear necessity.
The post Saylor: Bitcoin’s Biggest Threat Isn’t Attackers – It’s Those Trying to Rewrite the Rules appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Bitcoin remains trapped below key higher-timeframe resistance despite managing to stabilize above an important support region. While the broader trend is still bearish, the latest recovery attempt is accompanied by a notable uptick in the Exchange Whale Ratio, suggesting larger players are becoming increasingly active.
On the daily timeframe, BTC continues to trade below both the 100-day and 200-day moving averages, which are positioned around the $68K and $72K regions, respectively. The bearish alignment of these moving averages confirms that sellers still control the broader trend.
Following the sharp breakdown in early June, Bitcoin has entered a prolonged consolidation phase between the $58K support area and the $66K resistance zone. The price is currently hovering around $64K after several failed attempts to reclaim the overhead supply near $66K.
The $66K level represents the first major resistance, while a stronger barrier lies around $74K, just above the 100-day and 200-day moving averages. A sustained breakout above these levels would improve the medium-term outlook and could expose the $82K resistance area.
On the downside, buyers will likely defend the blue demand zone around $60K if the market visits it in the coming weeks. Below that, the next major support sits near $54K. As long as BTC remains above the $60K level, the current consolidation structure remains intact, although the inability to reclaim $66K keeps the broader bias cautious.

The 4-hour chart shows Bitcoin rebounding after sweeping liquidity below the $63K support zone. Buyers stepped in aggressively following that move, pushing price back above the level.
The price is now attempting to reclaim the former ascending channel after breaking below its lower boundary. While this recovery is constructive, BTC still faces immediate resistance between $65K and $66K, highlighted by the nearby supply zone.
A successful breakout above this resistance could trigger another attempt toward the upper boundary of the broader range around $67K. However, repeated rejection from this area would reinforce the ongoing sideways structure and increase the probability of another revisit to the $63K support level.
Momentum has also improved modestly, with RSI climbing back around the 50 mark, but buyers still need stronger follow-through to shift short-term market structure decisively in their favor.

The Exchange Whale Ratio EMA has started climbing sharply after spending several weeks at relatively subdued levels. This metric measures the proportion of the largest exchange inflows relative to total inflows, with higher readings generally indicating that larger holders are becoming more active.
Historically, rising whale activity often precedes periods of elevated volatility, particularly when price approaches important technical levels. The latest increase coincides with Bitcoin’s struggle below major resistance, suggesting that large market participants may be positioning around this consolidation phase.
If the Exchange Whale Ratio continues rising while BTC remains below $66K, the risk of renewed distribution and another leg lower could increase. Conversely, a successful breakout above resistance despite elevated whale activity would indicate that demand is absorbing larger sell-side flows, potentially paving the way for a stronger recovery toward the higher resistance zones.

The post Bitcoin Price Analysis: Bearish Sentiment Persists but BTC’s Next Move Hinges on the Fed appeared first on CryptoPotato.