AI's rapid evolution necessitates urgent cybersecurity upgrades to prevent increased attack sophistication and reduced entry barriers for hackers.

The post Five Eyes warns AI could fuel severe cyberattacks within months appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Nvidia's toolkit fosters AI innovation across industries, enhancing enterprise capabilities and solidifying its influence in the AI ecosystem.

The post Nvidia Agent Toolkit enables enterprises to build domain-specific AI agents appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Increased vessel traffic through the Strait of Hormuz suggests regional stabilization, potentially boosting economic and geopolitical stability.

The post Strait of Hormuz vessel crossings triple amid easing tensions appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The $4.1T valuation surge underscores AI's transformative impact on tech markets, highlighting potential supply chain vulnerabilities.

The post Memory giants Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron reach $4.1T combined market cap appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Oobit's integration with PIX could accelerate stablecoin adoption in Brazil, challenging traditional banking and boosting crypto's mainstream appeal.

The post Oobit integrates USDT with Brazil’s PIX payment network for 170M users appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin Magazine

European Union’s ESMA Orders Unlicensed Crypto Firms to Exit EU Market as MiCA Deadline Arrives

Europe’s markets regulator has told unauthorized crypto-asset service providers to shut down EU operations without delay. The European Securities and Markets Authority issued the directive as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation transitional period expires on 1 July 2026.

MiCA is the EU’s landmark crypto regulatory framework. It requires any firm offering crypto services to EU clients to hold a formal authorization. A transitional period allowed existing providers to continue operating under national regimes while they sought approval. That window closes on July 1.

Some firms secured authorization ahead of the deadline. Others did not. ESMA’s statement targets the second group.

According to the ESMA release, unauthorized firms face a clear set of obligations. They must stop taking on new EU clients. Marketing and solicitation to EU residents must cease. New accounts cannot be opened.

Existing services must narrow in scope. Firms can only continue operating to the extent necessary to help clients sell assets, transfer holdings, close positions, or exit the platform. 

Custody of client assets is permitted only for as long as it takes to complete an exit in good order. Firms must also communicate with clients. ESMA expects communication to be clear, prompt, and repeated. 

Clients need to know the wind-down timeline, what protections are in place, and what will happen to residual positions if no action is taken. A deadline for automatic position closure must be stated.

AML crypto rules still apply

ESMA emphasized that compliance obligations do not pause during a wind-down. Firms must maintain anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing controls throughout the exit process. This includes customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, suspicious transaction reporting, and record-keeping.

Where a client transfers to a MiCA-authorized provider, the receiving firm must conduct full onboarding checks. Authorization does not carry over from an old provider.

ESMA extended the warning to firms based outside the European Union. Non-EU CASPs cannot provide MiCA-covered services to EU clients, including in business-to-business arrangements.

The regulator also noted that MiCA bars firms from outsourcing custody services to entities that lack CASP authorization under the regulation.

ESMA issued a direct warning to retail users. Clients of unauthorized providers do not benefit from MiCA’s investor protection rules. There is no guarantee of asset safeguarding under the framework if the provider is not licensed.

EU clients were advised to check whether their provider holds authorization by consulting the ESMA Register, a public database of licensed CASPs. 

The July 1 deadline marks the end of a years-long transition to a unified EU crypto rulebook.

This post European Union’s ESMA Orders Unlicensed Crypto Firms to Exit EU Market as MiCA Deadline Arrives first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

H100 Shareholders Approve Bitcoin Deal That Would Make It Europe’s No. 2 Listed Treasury

H100 Group shareholders cast their votes in Stockholm on Tuesday, giving the company’s board authority to close acquisitions of two Norwegian bitcoin treasury firms — a deal that would take the company’s holdings from 1,051 BTC to around 3,500 BTC and rank it second among Europe’s listed bitcoin treasury companies.

The annual general meeting was the decisive checkpoint for H100’s binding share purchase agreements with Moonshot AS and Never Say Die AS. 

The two Norwegian companies hold a combined 2,450 BTC. Under the deal’s structure, existing H100 shareholders retain 30% of the merged entity, with the sellers taking 70%.

Adam Back, the British cryptographer best known as the inventor of Hashcash and the CEO of Blockstream, is a central figure in H100’s expansion. 

Back invested SEK 21 million — about $1.98 million — in H100 through a convertible loan structure with an option to expand to SEK 277 million, tying his capital to the company’s bitcoin accumulation strategy. 

He is a backer of Future Holdings AG, the Zurich-based bitcoin treasury firm H100 agreed to acquire in January in a separate deal that kicked off the consolidation run.

Back’s involvement gives H100 a credibility anchor that few European treasury firms can claim. His 1997 Hashcash paper was cited in Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin whitepaper, and Blockstream has been a cornerstone institution in BTC infrastructure since its founding in 2014. 

The deal would put H100 behind Bitcoin Group SE — the German firm that holds 3,605 BTC — among Europe’s listed bitcoin treasury companies. At Tuesday’s price of $62,453 per coin, down more than 3.7% on the day amid a broader market selloff, a 3,500 BTC treasury carries a market value near $218 million.

H100’s pivot from health-tech company to bitcoin treasury vehicle has been one of the more dramatic corporate identity shifts in European markets over the past year. The company’s stock climbed 280% after its bitcoin strategy announcement, and the Moonshot and Never Say Die acquisitions are the culmination of a consolidation effort that began with the Future Holdings letter of intent in January.

The model mirrors what Strategy built on the other side of the Atlantic: treat BTC as the core reserve asset, issue shares to fund accumulation, and grow holdings through deal-making. 

H100 has added a Nordic angle, absorbing regional firms to build scale in a market where BTC treasury companies have proliferated without a clear dominant player.

Meanwhile, BSTR eyes public listing with 30,021 bitcoin

On top of all this, Cantor Equity Partners I shareholders vote Friday to bring Back’s Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company public on Nasdaq under the ticker BSTR — entering the global leaderboard at fifth place with 30,021 BTC secured at close.

The ranking may not hold long. A $1.5 billion PIPE deal is in motion, and Samson Mow ran the math on X Tuesday: fully deployed at current prices, it buys roughly 23,500 additional coins, pushing BSTR’s total to around 53,500 BTC and second place globally — behind only Strategy. 

Mow’s kicker was this: BSTR would hold the lowest cost basis of any major treasury, arriving while BTC trades near its 200-day moving average around $62,000.

This post H100 Shareholders Approve Bitcoin Deal That Would Make It Europe’s No. 2 Listed Treasury first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

US Senate Passes Housing Bill With Four-Year Fed CBDC Ban

The U.S. Senate passed a sweeping housing affordability bill Monday night — and tucked inside its pages is a provision that could permanently reshape America’s digital currency landscape: a formal ban on a Federal Reserve-issued central bank digital currency through the end of 2030.

The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act cleared the Senate 85-5, with Republican leaders insisting the CBDC restriction ride along with one of the most bipartisan bills in years. The House was poised to fast-track a vote as early as Tuesday, putting the measure on a direct path to President Donald Trump’s desk for signature.

The bill’s language is sweeping: the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or any Federal Reserve bank may not issue, create, or circulate a central bank digital currency — directly or through any intermediary — through December 31, 2030. 

It explicitly shields private stablecoins, carving out any “open, permissionless, and private” dollar-denominated asset.

Trump set the political foundation for the ban in January 2025, signing an executive order barring his administration from any CBDC activity, warning it would threaten “the stability of the financial system, individual privacy, and the sovereignty of the United States”.

New Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, who replaced Jerome Powell, has called a U.S. CBDC a “bad policy choice” — making the Fed and the White House, for once, aligned.

The crypto market, meanwhile, isn’t celebrating. Bitcoin was trading near $62,000 Tuesday morning — down more than 3.7% on the day — as a Nasdaq tech selloff bled into digital assets. 

BTC has now lost roughly half its value since setting an all-time high above $125,000 in July 2025, and some analysts say the pain may not be over: at least one widely-followed technical indicator is pointing to a potential additional drop of 15% or more before a bottom forms.

Additional crypto Senate legislation in the works 

The CBDC ban is the latest piece in a three-part legislative puzzle the Trump-era Congress has been assembling.

In July 2025, Trump signed the GENIUS Act — the first federal stablecoin law in U.S. history — requiring issuers to hold one-to-one reserves, make monthly disclosures, and obtain federal licensing. The law essentially gave private digital dollars a legal green light at the same moment the government’s version was being blocked.

The third and most complex piece is still pending. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act — the industry’s long-sought framework for determining when a crypto token is a security versus a commodity — cleared the Senate Banking Committee 15-9 on May 14 and landed on the Senate Legislative Calendar on June 1. 

Galaxy Research has put the odds of passage this year as high as 60%, but the clock is running out.

The bill needs at least seven Democratic votes to clear the Senate floor, and senators must act before August — when the legislative calendar effectively shuts down ahead of midterm campaigning. 

Senator Bill Hagerty told Fox Business on June 18 that he hoped the Clarity Act could clear the floor in the weeks ahead. Without it, a key question — who actually regulates crypto, the SEC or the CFTC — remains unanswered heading into an election cycle.

If Trump signs the housing bill this week, it will mark the most concrete federal action against a government digital dollar yet. The message from Washington is becoming harder to misread: private crypto has a seat at the table, and the Fed’s version of a digital dollar does not. 

This post US Senate Passes Housing Bill With Four-Year Fed CBDC Ban first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) Closes Last Healthcare Clinic, Completes Full Pivot to Bitcoin

Nakamoto Inc. (Nasdaq: NAKA) shut down its last legacy healthcare clinics on June 19, 2026, completing a pivot that transforms the Nashville-based company into a pure-play Bitcoin operating business with no remaining ties to the healthcare sector that once defined it.

The move has been in the works for months. Nakamoto has steadily built out three core verticals — media and information services, asset management and financial services, and consulting and advisory services — all structured to generate recurring revenue independent of Bitcoin’s price. 

Remaining administrative tasks from the healthcare wind-down are expected to close out by the end of Q3 2026.

Chairman and CEO David Bailey called it a clean break. “With our healthcare clinics now closed, Nakamoto continues to be focused on executing its strategy as a Bitcoin operating company,” Bailey said in a statement Monday. “We are now entirely focused on scaling those businesses and building durable long-term value for our shareholders.”

The media vertical is the most visible piece of the platform. Through subsidiary BTC Inc., the company controls Bitcoin Magazine, The Bitcoin Conference, and the Bitcoin for Corporations program — a suite of properties that gives the company a reach into institutional and retail Bitcoin communities that rivals cannot replicate.

The asset management arm, UTXO Management, handles public and private market investments across the Bitcoin ecosystem. The advisory practice targets corporate clients seeking Bitcoin strategy and market intelligence. 

All three businesses are designed to generate cash without relying on BTC treasury appreciation — a structural distinction that separates Nakamoto from simple Bitcoin holding companies.

Nakamoto’s transition into a pure-bitcoin play

The transition has not been without cost. In March 2026, Nakamoto sold 284 BTC, booking a $166.2 million fair-value loss for fiscal year 2025. 

In June, the company sold roughly 600 BTC and Bitcoin derivatives to repay a debt obligation to Kraken, pushing the remaining loan maturities to 2027. Nakamoto ended that transaction holding approximately 4,467 BTC on its balance sheet.

The healthcare clinic’s roots trace back to KindlyMD, Inc. (then trading as KDLY), a Salt Lake City-based healthcare provider founded in 2019 as the Utah Therapeutic Health Center, focused on holistic pain management and opioid-alternative care. 

On May 12, 2025, KindlyMD entered into a definitive merger agreement with Nakamoto. The deal was backed by over $710 million in financing, including approximately $540 million in a PIPE raise and $200 million in convertible notes, attracting more than 200 investors across six continents. 

KindlyMD shareholders approved the transaction by written consent on May 18, 2025, and the merger closed on August 14, 2025. 

Nakamoto became a wholly-owned subsidiary and the combined company rebranded as Nakamoto Inc. in January 2026 — trading on Nasdaq under the ticker NAKA.

Bitcoin Magazine is published by BTC Inc, a subsidiary of Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA)

This post Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) Closes Last Healthcare Clinic, Completes Full Pivot to Bitcoin first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Suisse Secures MiCAR License, Launches European Expansion from Liechtenstein

Bitcoin Suisse has obtained a Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP) license under the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR), issued by the Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority (FMA), marking a formal entry into the broader European financial market after more than a decade of operations in Switzerland.

The license was granted to Bitcoin Suisse (Europe) AG, a Liechtenstein-based entity founded in 2018 that had previously operated under the country’s Token and TT Service Provider Act (TVTG). 

With the MiCAR authorization now in hand, the entity gains access to the European Economic Area (EEA) passport framework, allowing it to serve clients across selected EEA markets under a single regulatory authorization — a mechanism that became fully applicable across all EU member states on December 30, 2024.

Roman Przibylla named as Bitcoin Suisse CEO

Roman Przibylla has been named CEO of Bitcoin Suisse (Europe) AG to lead the expansion. Przibylla brings over 15 years of distribution experience from senior roles at Deutsche Bank, Commerzbank, HSBC, Vontobel, and Maverix Securities. 

He joined the Bitcoin Suisse Group in late 2025 as Chief Client Officer to build out its commercial operations before being elevated to the European CEO role.

Bitcoin Suisse is positioning its European arm to serve high-net-worth individuals, corporate clients, and institutional investors. Its core product suite includes trading, custody, and staking, backed by proprietary infrastructure and a dedicated relationship manager model the company describes as a differentiator in a fragmented market.

Group CEO and Co-Founder Andrej Majcen framed the license as a strategic milestone.

 “The MiCAR authorization marks a decisive step on our journey towards a global brand and eventually becoming a global wealth management platform,” Majcen said in a statement shared with Bitcoin Magazine. 

“Together with our presence in Switzerland and Bermuda, we now have the regulatory foundation to serve clients across some of the world’s most important financial centers.”

Founded in 2013 in Zug, Bitcoin Suisse has grown into one of Switzerland’s most established crypto financial services firms, with over CHF 6 billion in crypto assets under custody and a staff of more than 200 across Switzerland, Liechtenstein, the United Arab Emirates, and Bermuda.

The Liechtenstein FMA’s embrace of the MiCAR framework — pre-implemented in the country as of February 2025 — has positioned the small alpine nation as an attractive base for crypto firms seeking EEA regulatory passporting rights at a time when competition for CASP licenses across Europe has intensified.

This post Bitcoin Suisse Secures MiCAR License, Launches European Expansion from Liechtenstein first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Elizabeth Warren has spent much of the past decade warning Americans about the risks posed by privately issued and decentralized digital assets.

Over the years, the Massachusetts Democrat has built a reputation as one of crypto industry’s most recognizable critics by persistently linking the emerging industry to money laundering, speculative excess, consumer losses, and sanctions evasion.

Throughout her crusade against Bitcoin, she frequently offered a distinct alternative in a central bank digital currency, or CBDC.

In a 2021 Senate appearance, she stated:

However, in a striking legislative twist, Warren has now co-authored and advanced a sweeping bipartisan package that explicitly prohibits the Federal Reserve from issuing that very digital alternative.

Late Monday, the US Senate passed the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act in an overwhelming 85-5 vote. The legislation is primarily designed to alleviate the nationwide housing crisis by boosting construction, streamlining permitting, and barring large private equity firms from buying up single-family homes.

Yet, buried within the hundreds of pages of real estate and zoning reforms is a provision that legally blocks the US central bank from launching a retail digital dollar through at least the end of 2030.

Even after that temporary freeze expires, the Federal Reserve would be barred from moving forward with any substantially similar digital asset without receiving explicit, affirmative authorization from Congress.

Warren’s support for the housing bill does not establish that she has permanently abandoned the CBDC concept or embraced the cryptocurrency industry. However, it places her behind legislation restricting a policy she once described as holding considerable promise for the US banking industry.

The episode reflects the compromises involved in passing a large bipartisan package. A senator who previously saw a sovereign digital currency as an answer to some of crypto’s failings has accepted its near-term prohibition to advance one of her most consequential domestic policy achievements.

How CBDC restrictions survived the Housing negotiations

The Senate floor debate preceding the vote focused almost entirely on housing affordability, construction barriers, and the role of corporate landlords.

Scott said the measure addressed a market in which housing supply remained inadequate and prices were beyond the reach of many families. Warren presented the bill as evidence that bipartisan legislation did not have to be reduced to a collection of minor compromises.

According to her:

She highlighted provisions designed to encourage construction, repair existing housing, and prevent some private-equity firms from buying additional single-family homes. Warren described the package as the most significant federal housing legislation in more than three decades.

The CBDC restriction attracted little attention during those public remarks, despite the contrast with Warren’s previous position.

The CBDC language had been added to an earlier Senate version of the legislation as negotiators sought to assemble enough support for the housing provisions in both chambers.

Republican lawmakers have repeatedly characterized a government-issued digital currency as a potential tool for financial surveillance and state control over transactions.

Notably, the provision remained in the bill during negotiations with the House. This suggests that Warren accepted the restriction as part of the broader agreement, although there is no public evidence that she personally negotiated away a CBDC initiative or that the ban was the specific price demanded for the housing measures.

Meanwhile, the 85-5 vote also should not be treated as a separate Senate referendum on central bank digital currencies. Lawmakers voted on a wide-ranging housing package containing numerous provisions, and their public statements concentrated on its effect on homebuilding and affordability.

The margin nevertheless shows that the CBDC restriction was not objectionable enough to derail legislation supported by an overwhelming number of senators from both parties.

Congress codifies an existing policy direction

The immediate practical consequences may be limited because the United States is not close to introducing a retail CBDC.

The Federal Reserve had researched the possible design, benefits, and risks of a digital dollar but had not moved beyond the exploratory stage. Officials repeatedly said the central bank would not issue one without clear authorization from Congress and support from the executive branch.

President Donald Trump also moved the federal government further away from the proposal in January 2025 when he signed an executive order directing agencies to stop developing, establishing, or promoting a CBDC.

The Senate bill would therefore place into law a policy already being followed by the executive branch and supported by the current Federal Reserve leadership.

That distinction remains significant. A future president could reverse an executive order without approval from Congress. However, a statutory restriction would be harder to unwind, requiring lawmakers to pass new legislation or allow the prohibition to expire.

The bill would close that route through 2030 while preserving Congress’s ability to revisit the issue. It does not permanently eliminate a digital dollar, nor does it necessarily prevent the Fed from conducting all research involving tokenized settlement or institutional payment systems.

The US steps back as other countries advance towards CBDC

The US decision to legislate against a central bank digital currency places it in stark opposition to the rest of the world.

Data from the Atlantic Council indicates that 146 countries and currency unions, representing over 98% of the global gross domestic product, are actively exploring or developing a CBDC.

Every other member of the G20 is currently pursuing a digital currency, with eighteen of those nations in advanced stages of exploration or active pilot programs. Three countries, including the Bahamas, Jamaica, and Nigeria, have already launched their digital currencies to the public, though they have faced significant hurdles regarding domestic adoption and technical infrastructure.

While advanced economies outside the Euro Area, including Canada and Australia, have recently deprioritized retail CBDCs, emerging markets like Kazakhstan and Rwanda are accelerating their development to counter the rapid spread of private stablecoins.

Meanwhile, central banks have also shifted attention toward wholesale projects intended for transactions between banks and other large financial institutions. Those systems focus on cross-border settlement, tokenized assets, and programmable payments rather than giving individual consumers accounts or wallets at the central bank.

Still, the United States is not absent from this technological shift; the New York Federal Reserve continues to participate in Project Agorá, which focuses strictly on wholesale, cross-border transactions.

However, the door to the possibility of a digital currency being accessible to everyday American consumers has been temporarily shut. And ironically, the final nail in the coffin was hammered in by the senator who once believed a digital dollar could be the future of American banking.

The post Elizabeth Warren once said CBDCs have a “great promise” – Now she’s helping block it appeared first on CryptoSlate.

On June 22, President Donald Trump signed two executive orders that put the federal government’s most sensitive civilian computer systems on a 2031 post-quantum security timetable while launching a national effort to accelerate the development of advanced quantum computers.

One order requires federal high-value assets and high-impact systems to adopt post-quantum cryptography for establishing encryption keys by the end of 2030 and for digital signatures by the end of 2031.

The second creates a program aimed at delivering a quantum computer capable of scientific applications beyond the reach of existing classical machines to a Department of Energy facility.

Charles Edwards, Caprioles' founder, said:

“Quantum Computing is probably the most undervalued asset class in the world by orders of magnitude.”

Washington moves the quantum clock forward

Market observers pointed out that these orders suggest that the federal government sees the timeline for both quantum development and cryptographic migration compressing rapidly.

Alex Pruden, CEO of quantum-security company Project Eleven, noted:

“From the perspective of the American executive branch, offense (quantum computing) and defense (post-quantum cryptography) are now on the same five-year horizon. Migration to post-quantum cryptography isn't tomorrow's problem anymore. It's today's.”

Notably, the first order establishes the Quantum Computer for Application Development and Discovery Science effort, known as QC-ADDS.

It expresses an explicit intent to deliver at least one quantum machine capable of scientific applications beyond classical computing to a Department of Energy facility. Structurally, the order requires the department to define technical specifications within 90 days and examine the costs, partnerships, and potential delivery timelines within 180 days.

A separate five-year provision in the order mandates that the Secretaries of Commerce, Defense, and Energy, alongside the NASA Administrator, develop operational plans to deploy quantum-enabled sensors and networks.

The second order sets strict deadlines for civilian agencies, requiring federal high-value assets and high-impact civilian systems to adopt post-quantum cryptography for key establishment by December 31, 2030, and for digital signatures by December 31, 2031.

National security systems are excluded from these specific civilian deadlines and will be handled through a distinct, classified reporting process.

White House science advisor Michael Kratsios framed the push as an expansion of long-term strategic technology goals. According to him, the new directives aim to build a robust domestic supply chain and an American quantum workforce through expanded registered apprenticeships and the creation of National Quantum Workforce Development Institutes.

Additionally, the orders reconstitute the National Quantum Initiative Advisory Committee and expand the Quantum Counterintelligence Protection Team to guard domestic research against foreign espionage.

These steps follow an established pattern of technology policies enacted over the past 18 months, including the January 2025 establishment of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and the November 2025 Genesis Mission, which focused on using artificial intelligence to accelerate scientific discoveries across quantum and advanced physics.

Notably, these Trump's executive orders build upon letters of intent signed last month by the U.S. Commerce Department to award just over $2 billion in planned funding to nine quantum computing companies.

These are designed as industrial manufacturing investments rather than standard research grants. Under the planned packages, IBM is slated to receive $1 billion to establish a quantum-grade superconducting wafer foundry, while GlobalFoundries is designated to receive $375 million for a multi-architecture fabrication plant.

The remaining $636 million is distributed among seven firms specializing in superconducting, trapped ion, photonic, and neutral-atom quantum architectures.

Nearly 7 million Bitcoin sit in the quantum computing line of fire

The compressed migration timetable immediately refocuses attention on the crypto industry, where almost 7 million BTC, worth nearly $449 billion of Bitcoin, currently sits in outputs whose public keys have been exposed and could theoretically be attacked by a sufficiently powerful quantum computer.

The security model of modern cryptocurrencies relies heavily on public-key cryptography. For a classical computer, deriving a private spending key from a publicly broadcast key requires exponential time, making it practically impossible.

However, a sufficiently powerful quantum computer running Shor's algorithm can solve the underlying discrete-logarithm problem in polynomial time. This capability would allow an attacker to recover private keys from any public keys exposed on the blockchain, granting them full control over the associated funds.

While the underlying Bitcoin protocol remains structurally sound, the danger stems from how the blockchain network users interact with it.

A 21Shares report revealed that approximately 65% of all Bitcoin remains protected from immediate exposure because the network obscures its public keys until the coins are spent. This protocol feature limits the immediate attack surface.

However, these coins are not inherently quantum-safe; once a user spends from an address, the public key is revealed on-chain, opening a window of vulnerability if the remaining funds are not handled correctly.

Meanwhile, the risk is highly concentrated among addresses that have already broadcast their credentials. Data indicates that over 70% of this exposure is caused by address reuse, which is a practice where users repeatedly receive and spend funds from the same wallet address, permanently exposing the public key.

This vulnerability continues to grow despite shifting industry standards, with address-reuse exposure alone climbing by 28,306 BTC in May 2026 and by around 500,000 BTC over the past year. This dynamic reflects a steady influx of legacy habits offsetting improvements elsewhere.

Furthermore, this vulnerable capital is heavily consolidated. Dune analytics data shows that approximately 84.5% of the exposed Bitcoin sits in just 4,079 wallets.

According to 21Shares, most of these high-value targets remain completely anonymous, as nearly 80% carry no public label, making it difficult for compliance firms to pinpoint which institutions or large holders carry the most concentrated risk.

Dormant Satoshi-era coins complicate Bitcoin’s escape plan

Beyond active users practicing poor wallet hygiene, the Bitcoin network faces a deep structural challenge originating from its earliest blocks.

21Shares pointed out that approximately 1.08 million Bitcoin mined in 2009 have remained completely stationary for 16 years.

These coins are widely believed to belong to Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, and are held in Pay-to-Public-Key (P2PK) outputs. This early format permanently reveals the public key directly on the blockchain ledger, making it the most vulnerable tier of supply on the network.

Dune analytics data shows that the voluntary attrition of these legacy addresses is exceptionally slow.

According to 21Shares, the broader permanently exposed tier is bleeding down at a rate of only about 500 BTC per month as old keys are slowly migrated or lost. At this observed pace, analysts estimate that voluntarily clearing the broader stock of permanently exposed coins could take almost three centuries.

Karim AbdelMawla, a senior analyst with 21Shares, said:

“The market doesn't need to wait for a working quantum computer. The day those 2009 coins are seen moving for the first time in 16 years, every holder reprices what Bitcoin's security is worth. Coins held well aren't the direct target. The repricing is, and it impacts the overall valuation of BTC regardless.”

This looming market risk has pushed developers to consider unprecedented technical interventions. In April, a debate emerged around BIP-361, which is a draft proposal to phase out conventional spending from vulnerable addresses and leave unmigrated legacy coins effectively unspendable.

BIP-361 outlines a multi-tiered approach. Its first phase would prevent users from sending additional funds to quantum-vulnerable addresses. A later phase, proposed to trigger roughly five years after activation, would restrict conventional Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) and Schnorr signature spending, requiring a specialized quantum-safe rescue process.

Coins whose owners cannot satisfy the new cryptographic conditions would eventually become frozen.

Implementing such a proposal forces a choice the decentralized network has never faced: allow dormant coins to be stolen in the future by outside attackers, or change the foundational rules to freeze them, breaking the immutable promise that valid coins can always be moved by their rightful keyholders.

Bitcoin’s hardest problem will be getting holders to move

Despite the rapid deployment of government capital and the tightening of federal timelines, some researchers argue that immediate alarm over digital asset security is mathematically misplaced.

Martin Hiesboeck, the head of research at Uphold, pointed out that the global cryptographic community already possesses robust post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards and is actively integrating them.

He noted:

“We are not flying blind. The near-term danger isn't the technology we currently anticipate. We know the exact vulnerabilities — specifically how Shor's algorithm impacts ECDSA and Schnorr signatures — and we are actively building the structural mitigations to swap out these legacy layers well before fault-tolerant systems arrive.”

Instead, Hiesboeck warned that the real risk lies in the systemic unpredictability of quantum hardware once it operates at true scale.

According to him, the true danger is not what can be mathematically modeled today, but rather the unmapped scope, unexpected computational efficiencies, and emergent hardware capabilities that cannot be foreseen before a fault-tolerant computer is built.

Recent technical updates suggest that while the gap is closing, a commercially relevant machine capable of exploiting blockchain vulnerabilities is still years away. Modern quantum hardware suffers from physical error rates that are roughly 10 million times too high for cryptographic attacks.

However, a technical report published by Google researchers in March demonstrated a method that cuts the physical resources required for such an attack by twentyfold. Following those findings, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake estimated the probability of a cryptographically relevant quantum computer arriving by 2032 at 1 in 10 or higher.

Even with several years of expected warning, upgrading a decentralized financial network has historically proven to be an exceptionally slow process.

The 21Shares analysis estimates that only 47.6% of Bitcoin’s total supply currently sits in Segregated Witness (SegWit) outputs, nine years after the upgrade was formally launched on the network.

So, developing a mathematically sound post-quantum signature fix may prove to be the straightforward part of the equation. The greater challenge is getting millions of independent users worldwide to coordinate and move their capital into quantum-safe addresses before capable hardware arrives.

The post Trump’s quantum computing push puts $449 billion in “exposed Bitcoin” back in the limelight appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Ripple is pursuing a coordinated expansion of its stablecoin infrastructure across Europe and Africa, combining a strategic investment in payments company Flutterwave with preliminary regulatory approval in the European Union to widen the reach of its digital-asset services.

The dual-track strategy targets high-volume cross-border payment and remittance corridors in sub-Saharan Africa while giving Ripple a potential regulatory base across the 30-country European Economic Area.

By placing its dollar-pegged RLUSD stablecoin within Flutterwave’s regional payment network, the San Francisco-based company is seeking to move beyond its role as a provider of cross-border payment and liquidity technology and become part of the infrastructure supporting regulated commercial stablecoin flows.

The plan pairs two assets that stablecoin issuers increasingly need to compete: permission to serve financial institutions in major markets and access to payment networks capable of generating regular transaction volume.

Ripple’s proposed crypto-asset service provider license in Luxembourg would provide the regulatory reach. Flutterwave, which processes payments for businesses across Africa, would supply local collection methods, payout channels, and remittance customers.

The approach shows how competition in the stablecoin market is shifting beyond token issuance. The largest providers have established deep liquidity on exchanges, but the next phase of growth is increasingly tied to whether stablecoins can be integrated into payroll, trade, treasury management, and cross-border payments without requiring customers to handle the underlying technology.

Flutterwave gives RLUSD a route into African payments

Ripple participated in Flutterwave’s Series E financing round, which valued the African payments company at $3.2 billion. The companies did not disclose the size of Ripple’s investment.

The partnership calls for Flutterwave to integrate RLUSD, Ripple Payments, and the XRP Ledger (XRPL) into infrastructure that already connects businesses with cards, bank transfers, mobile wallets, and other domestic payment methods.

Flutterwave revealed plans to use RLUSD as a settlement asset within its payment network and Send App remittance service. It also intends to use the XRPL blockchain network to clear transactions and connect its regional infrastructure with Ripple’s international payout network through a common application programming interface.

The arrangement could allow a business to accept or send money through familiar local methods while RLUSD moves between financial intermediaries in the background. That would reduce the need for merchants and consumers to hold cryptocurrency directly.

Flutterwave said its broader stablecoin infrastructure is already operating commercially and being tested within Send App. The integration of RLUSD and Ripple’s other products represents the next stage of that buildout rather than evidence that the entire system is already processing transactions at scale.

Reece Merrick, Ripple’s managing director for the Middle East and Africa, said the investment would place RLUSD within Flutterwave’s infrastructure and direct stablecoin flows through the XRP Ledger. Ripple also plans to make its payment network available for more cross-border transactions in the region.

The companies have not provided a launch timetable, expected transaction volume, or projected savings for customers. They also have not identified the first payment corridors that will use RLUSD or explained how they will manage conversion between the stablecoin and local currencies.

Those details will determine whether blockchain settlement produces lower costs for businesses. Moving tokens across a ledger can take seconds, but the full transaction may still depend on banks, currency dealers, compliance reviews, and sufficient liquidity at the point where digital dollars are converted into local money.

Nigeria shows the demand Ripple is chasing

Ripple’s investment gives it a route into markets where stablecoins are already being used for purposes beyond speculation.

Nigeria received about $59 billion in crypto-asset inflows between July 2023 and June 2024 and has accounted for roughly 60% of stablecoin inflows into sub-Saharan Africa since 2019, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) said.

Dollar-linked tokens have become an alternative for households and companies dealing with naira depreciation, inflation, and limited access to foreign exchange. They allow users to store dollar-denominated value, pay overseas suppliers, and receive money from abroad through smartphones and digital wallets.

Stablecoins can also compete with conventional remittance services. Sending $200 to sub-Saharan Africa costs about 9% of the transaction on average, compared with a global average of approximately 6%, the IMF said, citing World Bank data.

The gap creates an opening for companies that can connect blockchain settlement with local payout networks. A stablecoin transfer may move quickly between digital wallets, but it becomes more useful for commerce when recipients can reliably convert it into bank deposits or domestic currency.

That conversion layer is where Flutterwave could prove valuable to Ripple. Its existing relationships with banks, merchants, and payment providers may give RLUSD a distribution channel that would be difficult for Ripple to build independently in each African market.

Meanwhile, this opportunity also carries regulatory risks.

The IMF has warned that widespread use of dollar stablecoins can resemble digital dollarization, reducing demand for domestic currencies and weakening the transmission of monetary policy. Transactions conducted through wallets and offshore platforms can also be harder for authorities to monitor than payments routed through banks.

Ripple and Flutterwave are betting that placing stablecoin transactions inside regulated corporate infrastructure can address some of those concerns.

Even so, the companies will have to comply with different foreign-exchange, payments, and digital-asset rules across the continent rather than relying on a single African regulatory framework.

Luxembourg opens the European side

Ripple’s preliminary approval in Luxembourg addresses the institutional end of the proposed network.

On June 23, the Brad Garlinghouse-led firm announced that the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier issued Ripple a “Green Light Letter” for a crypto-asset service provider license under the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation. The decision remains subject to final conditions and is not yet a full authorization.

Once completed, the license would allow Ripple to provide covered crypto services across the European Economic Area, which includes the EU’s 27 member states as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.

Ripple intends to combine the authorization with its existing Luxembourg electronic money institution license. The company said the two approvals would allow banks, financial technology companies, and corporations to collect, exchange, and distribute fiat money, stablecoins, and other crypto assets through one integration.

That combination is central to Ripple’s strategy. The electronic money license covers parts of the conventional payments system, while the MiCA authorization would govern its provision of crypto-asset services.

Together, they could allow Ripple to link European institutional customers with payment and settlement channels outside the region.

Cassie Craddock, Ripple’s managing director for the UK and Europe, said demand from banks and fintech companies is expanding as financial institutions explore blockchain-based payments, collateral management, and tokenized assets.

Ripple says its payments platform has processed more than $100 billion and operates in more than 60 markets. It also says it holds more than 75 regulatory licenses globally.

The Luxembourg application comes as Europe approaches the end of the maximum transition period for companies operating under earlier national crypto registrations. MiCA requires service providers to obtain authorization from one member state, after which they can use the license to serve customers across the bloc.

The deadline has increased the commercial value of obtaining approval. Binance faces the prospect of losing permission to serve EU customers after its application in Greece was expected to be rejected, Reuters reported, citing people familiar with the process.

Binance said Greek regulators had not formally informed it of a rejection and that it would update users before the June 30 deadline.

Ripple’s preliminary approval does not guarantee that its final license will arrive on a particular date. It nevertheless places the company closer to authorization at a time when some larger crypto businesses are struggling to secure a European regulatory base.

RLUSD's distribution must still translate into volume

While RLUSD has shown considerable growth since its 2024 launch, it remains much smaller than the stablecoins that dominate global crypto trading.

Its market value stood at about $1.62 billion, with tokens issued on Ethereum and the XRP Ledger, according to DeFiLlama. In comparison, Tether’s USDT, the largest stablecoin by market capitalization, had about $186 billion in circulation, while Circle’s USDC had approximately $74.5 billion.

That difference explains why payment distribution is important to Ripple. RLUSD is unlikely to challenge the leading stablecoins through exchange liquidity alone.

So, embedding it within Flutterwave’s business-payment and remittance infrastructure could create transaction demand tied to commerce rather than trading. At the same time, the Luxembourg license could support the other end of those flows by giving European institutions a regulated way to access Ripple’s payment and stablecoin services.

In theory, a European business could send value through Ripple’s infrastructure while Flutterwave manages collection, conversion, or payout in an African market.

In practice, Ripple still must demonstrate that customers will choose RLUSD over bank deposits, USDT, USDC, or conventional payment networks. It must also ensure that enough liquidity exists to convert RLUSD into local currencies without widening foreign-exchange spreads and erasing the savings promised by faster settlement.

The post Ripple gives RLUSD a MiCA foothold in Europe and route into African payments – but is volume there? appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Through June 18, US-traded spot Bitcoin ETFs shed nearly $2.3 billion, and Ethereum ETFs lost around $200 million. Hyperliquid products attracted about $50 million in net inflows, XRP ETFs added roughly $24 million, and Solana finished with $3.4 million in outflows.

Altcoin inflows totaled about $74 million, less than 3% of the $2.5 billion that left Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs over the same period.

Bitcoin ETFs outpaced HYPE inflows by roughly 46-to-1 and XRP inflows by roughly 96-to-1, shutting down the argument for a rotation.

Hyperliquid's HYPE persistent bid

Bitwise launched its spot Hyperliquid ETF (BHYP) on May 14, describing it as one of the first US spot Hyperliquid products and the first to incorporate in-house staking.

Farside Investors' flow tables also list 21Shares' THYP and Grayscale's HYPG, showing cumulative HYPE ETF inflows of about $189 million through June 18, even as Bitcoin and Ethereum products bled.

The $50 million June inflow comes from a category that launched mid-May and has logged fewer than 25 trading sessions, making consistency the more meaningful signal.

The demand pattern reads as a concentrated institutional bet on an on-chain derivatives venue, specific enough in its thesis to hold while broader crypto ETF appetite contracted.

The bull case holds that persistence through a broadly negative ETF environment shows that Hyperliquid has a distinct buyer base, such as allocators who express a thesis on on-chain perpetuals infrastructure and stay in the position as BTC and ETH products shed assets.

The bear case is that the category is six weeks old, assets under management are thin, and a single week of institutional redemptions could reverse the cumulative inflow figure built across the product's entire trading history.

XRP's recurring demand

SoSoValue-aggregated data showed XRP spot ETFs added $10.6 million during the June 14-18 trading week, with cumulative inflows reaching about $1.5 billion and total net assets across the category at roughly $995 million.

XRP ETFs logged only two negative weeks since mid-March, a stretch that included several sessions when Bitcoin and Ethereum products saw outflows, pointing to recurring appetite for regulated access to an asset whose retail and institutional base predates ETF wrappers, with existing holders seeking a compliant format for exposure they already held.

The bull case is that two negative weeks in three-plus months, amid a difficult broader environment, show a durable buyer base with an appetite that persists through macro- and crypto-specific weakness.

The bear case is that $1.5 billion in cumulative inflows across several months, distributed across a category with net assets below $1 billion, describes measured demand with weekly additions of $10 million to $25 million landing far short of what would register against BTC ETF sessions like June 18's $90 million outflow.

What the Bitcoin outflow data shows

Bitcoin ETFs recorded negative flows on 11 out of the 14 trading sessions in June. The June 18 outflow of $90.7 million occurred on the same day Ethereum ETFs also shed $12.8 million.

ETF flows carry macro weight because they represent brokerage-account demand, dollars moving through regulated wrappers with settlement and custody infrastructure, the kind of institutional flow that moves price over weekly timeframes.

Citi estimated that spot Bitcoin ETF flows account for roughly 45% of weekly BTC price moves, a figure from a bank research note that could not be independently verified in Citi's primary materials, but whose directional claim tracks the persistent negativity of June sessions and BTC's price performance.

The Federal Reserve held its target range at 3.50% to 3.75% on June 17 and described inflation as still elevated relative to its 2% goal, keeping short-term dollar yields meaningful and the opportunity cost of volatile crypto exposure working against allocators who might otherwise add to ETF positions.

The two altcoin categories with net inflows carried specific narratives: Hyperliquid as an on-chain derivatives venue, XRP as a regulated-access product with a pre-existing holder base.

Whether HYPE and XRP inflows hold in July depends on whether Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs return to positive weekly flows.

If they do, the altcoin bid looks like early positioning. If BTC and ETH keep shedding assets, the residual inflows into smaller products describe the floor of crypto ETF demand, with HYPE and XRP as the last positions allocators held on to.

The post Investors pulled $2.5B from Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, but Hyperliquid and XRP still found buyers appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin is trading near $64,000, roughly mid-channel in the $57,000-$77,000 range that has defined the market since the Strait of Hormuz shock.

Can-Luca Köymen, investment strategist at Sygnum, called the current setup a catalyst-light regime in a note:

“Absent a decisive catalyst the path of least resistance is range-trading driven by positioning and flows rather than fresh spot demand.”

Angie Malltezi, chief operating officer of Altius, agrees on the mechanics:

“Markets often spend extended periods consolidating before a catalyst emerges, and that catalyst is frequently something investors weren't focused on beforehand.”

Both place the first real inflection point late in the third quarter and cite the same reason. The oil shock that drove energy to account for more than 60% of May's CPI increase has not yet been reflected in the data.

According to Köymen:

“Energy shocks pass through inflation with a lag, so a single softer reading doesn't undo it. A read that genuinely reflects post-MOU normalization realistically only shows up in the August data, which is the print the FOMC weighs in September.”

He added that the genuine inflection “is a late-Q3 story at the earliest.”

The data is still carrying the shock

The May CPI rose 0.5% month over month and 4.2% year over year, with gasoline up 7.0% for the month and 40.5% year over year.

The Fed held its funds rate target range at 3.50%-3.75% in June and described inflation as still running above its 2% goal, partly reflecting supply shocks, including energy.

Its June Summary of Economic Projections moved the 2026 PCE forecast to 3.6% from 2.7% in March, and the core PCE forecast to 3.3% from 2.7%.

Dallas Fed modeling shows the oil shock lifting headline inflation through the third quarter, even in a one-quarter closure scenario, raising quarter-on-quarter headline inflation by 0.6 percentage points and core by 0.2 percentage points.

Köymen's read of the Fed's posture carries direct weight for the calendar:

“This is a print-by-print Fed now, and the number that also matters is core PCE, not just CPI, since that's the Fed's preferred gauge. We should also expect less forward guidance from here onwards, something Chair Warsh signaled clearly at his first meeting.”

A Fed unwilling to pre-commit raises the market's incentive to front-run the data, because investors cannot anchor positioning to forward guidance, each incoming print carries more weight, and the first genuinely clean print does not arrive until August.

OFAC issued Iran General License X on Jun. 22, authorizing Iranian-origin crude and petroleum transactions through Aug. 21, and the sequencing of data releases around that window reinforces the bottleneck.

June CPI lands Jul. 14 and still carries the shock-period imprint. July CPI, due Aug. 12, gives the first cleaner read on whether energy costs are fading. The September FOMC meets on the 15th and 16th, with the August CPI in hand but not the August PCE, which the BEA releases on Sept. 30.

Malltezi flagged this:

“September remains the most likely inflection point, but it's not an absolute constraint.”

She added that the Fed retains authority to act between meetings if conditions warrant, though intermeeting moves are rare.

How the oil curve is already pricing the answer

The oil curve has already answered the question CPI will take weeks to confirm, and Köymen reads the futures curve as the signal of where the base case sits:

“The futures curve has relaxed significantly, with most dated WTI contracts now below $75 and selected 2027 contracts even below $70. The market is pricing the supply premium out across the whole curve, not just at the front.”

Physical evidence supports the read that several Middle Eastern producers have restarted refineries and oil fields, which Köymen describes as a sign “the parties on the ground are treating this as a durable peace rather than a pause.”

Malltezi reads the broader asset response the same way:

“Oil prices have retraced much of their initial geopolitical risk premium, and broader risk assets have remained resilient, suggesting investors expect the negotiations to continue without a major escalation.”

The relief is already partly reflected in Bitcoin's price, as both sources point to the mid-$60,000s as the base case where the MOU holds.

The Aug. 21 deadline on OFAC's license window is the visible risk node, but Köymen does not treat it as a hard cliff:

“The encouraging part is that the US has signaled willingness to extend the window if there's no clean solution by the deadline, which stops the deadline from becoming a hard cliff. Re-escalation risk is minor, but it isn't zero, and that residual risk is what keeps positioning hedged rather than outright long.”

Malltezi echoes the asymmetry:

“The market is assigning a relatively low probability to a severe disruption while recognizing that a breakdown in talks could quickly reprice energy markets and inflation expectations.”

The structural forces keeping the range intact

Köymen identifies a newer element in Bitcoin income products that reinforces range-bound behavior, even if macro conditions stay benign.

He mentioned BlackRock's recently launched covered-call ETF (BITA), which can reinforce range-bound behavior: it sells call options against its holdings, so it's effectively selling into rallies.

Köymen added:

“That introduces a recurring source of profit-taking on the way up that wasn't present in earlier cycles and, while still small relative to the spot ETF complex, at the margin it dampens upside follow-through.”

BlackRock's own risk disclosures confirm that writing covered calls on IBIT shares limits gains above the option's exercise price while leaving the fund exposed to downside risk.

He also flagged that the market must see meaningful accumulation by professional investors via ETFs at attractive entry levels, so investors should monitor whether demand genuinely returns and whether accumulation in size materializes.

In Köymen's read, recent ETF outflows look more like profit-taking and macro de-risking than a structural exit, and the outflow momentum has subsided at current levels.

Both conditions need to move together before Bitcoin has the fuel to break the range on its own.

Two paths through the data calendar

The bull case runs through the oil curve continuing to normalize, July CPI and PCE showing energy relief contained to headline prices, and September cut odds climbing before the Fed formally moves.

Fed funds futures currently price around a 52% chance of a September cut, per Sygnum's market read. Köymen framed the channel:

“Our base case, if flow continues and even improves through Hormuz, is the Fed holding across the next two to three meetings.”

Yet, he stated that Bitcoin can reprice on the expectation of easing before the Fed delivers it.

The bear case is that the inflation sequence proves stickier than the oil curve alone implies. EIA's June Short-Term Energy Outlook projected Brent at $105 per barrel in June and July, with wholesale gasoline running roughly 50% higher than its pre-conflict baseline.

If gasoline and goods prices keep feeding into core CPI despite easing crude, the Fed holds longer, real rates stay elevated, and Bitcoin retests the lower bound.

Malltezi puts the honest constraint on prediction:

“Identifying the specific trigger in advance is extremely challenging. Whether it's macroeconomic data, monetary policy, ETF flows, regulatory developments, or an unforeseen event — until then, continued range-bound trading remains a reasonable base case.”

The CLARITY Act sits on the sidelines in both scenarios. Köymen puts it at roughly 50/50 for 2026, consistent with Polymarket's approximately 45% odds and a Senate Banking Committee vote in May that advanced the bill 15-9.

Malltezi noted that the bill depends on congressional timelines and bipartisan support, not geopolitical developments, and that an unexpected passage would push the range higher far faster than the oil and PCE sequence could, arriving before most investors have positioned for it.

The post The oil scare is fading, but Bitcoin is still trapped by the gas-price hangover appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Ethereum Price Drops as Market Pressure Builds

Ethereum is back under pressure as ETH trades near $1,660, falling by more than 5% in the last 24 hours. The move comes during a wider crypto market selloff, with Bitcoin, Solana, XRP, BNB and Dogecoin also trading in the red.

However, Ethereum now has an additional story weighing on sentiment: the Ethereum Foundation has reportedly cut around 20% of its workforce as part of a wider internal restructuring. For traders, this creates a difficult question. Is ETH only falling because the entire market is weak, or is the Foundation’s shake-up adding extra pressure to Ethereum’s short-term outlook?

Ethereum Foundation Cuts 20% of Staff

The Ethereum Foundation has concluded a months-long reorganization process, cutting 54 staff members and moving into a new structure based around five major clusters. These include areas focused on the protocol layer, access layer, user layer, community layer and institutional layer.

The Foundation says the goal is to become leaner, more focused and better aligned with Ethereum’s long-term development priorities. In theory, that could be positive if it helps the organization execute faster and reduce internal complexity.

But markets rarely react calmly to staff cuts, especially when they happen during a major price correction. For ETH holders, the concern is simple: if Ethereum is already struggling against competitors and weaker market sentiment, does a smaller Foundation make the roadmap stronger — or does it create more uncertainty?

Why This Matters for ETH

Ethereum remains the largest smart contract blockchain, but its market position has been under pressure for months. Solana has gained attention for speed and user activity, Bitcoin continues to dominate institutional narratives, and newer chains are competing for liquidity, developers and users.

That is why the Ethereum Foundation’s restructuring matters. The Foundation is not Ethereum itself, and the network does not depend on one centralized company. Still, the EF plays a major role in supporting research, protocol development, ecosystem coordination and long-term direction.

When investors see leadership changes, staff reductions and restructuring all happening at the same time, it can create uncertainty. And in a weak market, uncertainty often turns into selling pressure.

Is This Bad News or a Necessary Reset?

The bearish view is clear. Cutting 20% of staff during a difficult market could be seen as a warning sign. It may suggest that the Foundation is under financial pressure, needs to reduce spending, or is trying to regain control after months of criticism around direction and execution.

The bullish view is different. Ethereum may be entering a necessary reset phase. A leaner Foundation could become more disciplined, more focused on core protocol development and less distracted by broad ecosystem responsibilities. If the new structure helps Ethereum improve scalability, user experience and institutional adoption, the current weakness could eventually be seen as a painful but useful transition.

In other words, this is not automatically a disaster for Ethereum. But it does come at a dangerous time for ETH price action.

Ethereum Price Prediction: Key Levels to Watch

ETH is now trading close to an important short-term support zone. The first level to watch is around $1,600. If Ethereum holds above this area, buyers may try to defend the market and push ETH back toward $1,700.

A move above $1,700 to $1,750 would be the first sign that ETH is attempting to stabilize. From there, Ethereum would need stronger volume and a broader crypto recovery to challenge higher resistance zones.

But if ETH loses the $1,600 area, the next downside risk could open toward $1,550 and then $1,500. A clean break below $1,500 would likely confirm that panic selling is still active, especially if Bitcoin remains weak and stock market pressure continues.

For now, ETH is not in a strong recovery setup yet. The price is still reacting to fear, market-wide selling and now internal Ethereum Foundation headlines.

Can ETH Recover?

Ethereum can recover, but the market needs two things. First, the broader crypto market must stabilize. If Bitcoin continues to fall, ETH will likely struggle to build an independent rebound.

Second, investors need clarity from the Ethereum Foundation. The market will want to see whether the restructuring actually improves execution or simply adds more uncertainty. If the Foundation communicates clearly and the ecosystem continues building, the negative reaction could fade over time.

The biggest risk is that ETH remains stuck between two bearish forces: weak macro conditions and confidence questions around Ethereum’s leadership structure.

Final Thoughts

Ethereum’s latest drop is not only about price charts. ETH is falling during a wider crypto selloff, but the Ethereum Foundation’s decision to cut around 20% of its staff adds a deeper layer to the story.

For traders, the key question is whether this is a warning sign or a reset. If ETH holds above $1,600 and reclaims $1,700, the market could treat the restructuring as short-term noise. But if Ethereum breaks below $1,600, the selloff could deepen toward $1,550 or even $1,500.

Ethereum is still one of the most important assets in crypto, but right now, confidence is being tested from both the market and the Foundation itself.

Markets are flashing red across every asset class. In a matter of hours, more than $3 trillion in value has evaporated, and the damage is not confined to one corner of the market — equities, crypto, gold and silver are all falling together. The synchronised drop is what has investors rattled, because it points to forced selling and liquidity stress rather than a single bad headline.

Here's where things stand:

• $Bitcoin: −3.52%
• Gold: −2.24%
• Silver: −4.78%
• KOSPI: −10.68%
• Nikkei: −4.85%
• Hang Seng: −3%
• US futures: −1%

South Korea took the hardest hit. The losses were severe enough to trigger a 20-minute trading halt on the Kospi, the fourth such suspension this year, leaving the index down 10% on the day. South Korean chip giants SK Hynix and Samsung tumbled more than 12% each to drag the Kospi index down by 10%, after Monday finished at a record high.

What's actually causing the sell-off?

1. Profit-taking in AI, tech and semiconductors

After a blistering 2026 rally, investors are cashing out of the trades that drove the gains. The latest selloff reflects a sharp unwinding of crowded AI and semiconductor trades that have dominated Asian equity performance for much of 2026. Valuations had simply run too far, too fast, and the bar for justifying them kept rising.

2. The yen carry trade is unwinding again

With USD/JPY hovering near 161–162, the same dynamic that crushed markets in August 2024 is back in play. Investors borrow cheap yen, sell it for dollars and buy higher-yielding assets, including equities, credit and other risk-sensitive assets. When the yen rises quickly, those trades become expensive to maintain, forcing traders to sell assets to raise cash and repay yen liabilities.

**CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

3. Fears the Fed stays higher for longer

Stronger US data and a hawkish tone from policymakers have gutted rate-cut expectations. The sector was hit by heavy profit-taking as investors sold on fears of higher U.S. interest rates this year, with heavyweights including Alphabet and SpaceX logging deep losses.

4. A broad risk-off rotation

This isn't just one asset cracking — everything that rallied is now being sold. Gold, silver, bitcoin and US equity futures unwound all of Monday's US-Iran relief rally, while WTI held its lows around $73/bbl. When safe-havens like gold fall alongside risk assets, it's a classic sign investors are raising cash, not rotating into defensives.

How bad is the historical context?

This ranks among the worst sessions in years for Korean equities. The KOSPI experienced its second-worst session since 2008. The contagion has already crossed into Europe, where chip names like ASML, Infineon and STMicroelectronics have shed between 5% and 8%, and US premarket pointed to a bruising open.

Where does this go from here?

The key variable is the yen. A further sharp move higher would force more carry-trade unwinding and deeper deleveraging across crypto and equities alike. For now, the market is in a position-reduction phase — and as one analyst put it, there may still be considerable selling pressure waiting in the wings before investors are willing to step back in.

• Who he is: Austrian doctor turned crypto entrepreneur, author, and YouTuber who built his wealth and fame on Bitcoin via TenX and Cake DeFi (later Bake).
• What he did: In early 2025 he exited most of his crypto holdings, even shorted Bitcoin, and rotated into the Nasdaq-100 ETF (QQQ).
• Where he stands now: One of the most vocal Bitcoin skeptics in the German-speaking world, calling crypto "pure speculation."
• Why critics are angry: They say someone who got rich on Bitcoin and once promoted it as a lifetime asset is now fear-mongering against it for personal gain — and point to his history with TenX, a BaFin investigation, and the DeFiChain collapse.
• Why supporters defend him: They say he simply changed his mind with new information and reallocated his portfolio — exactly what good investors do.

Who Is Julian Hosp?

Julian Hosp is an Austrian medical doctor who became a crypto entrepreneur, bestselling author, and YouTube personality after buying Bitcoin early. He is one of the most recognizable — and most polarizing — figures in the German-speaking crypto scene. A former competitive kitesurfer, he reinvented himself around the goal of making people "cryptofit," publishing widely-read books and building a large following across YouTube and X.

That same decade has been shadowed by repeated controversy. Hosp's name is attached to a string of high-profile projects that generated enormous attention — and, for many of their investors, painful losses.

Julian Hosp: Key Facts

• Full name: Dr. Julian Hosp
• Background: Austrian medical doctor and former competitive kitesurfer
• Known for: Co-founding TenX (2017), Cake DeFi / Bake, and DeFiChain (DFI); bestselling crypto books; large YouTube and X following
• Active in crypto since: ~2015 (bought Bitcoin early)
• Major controversy points: TenX ICO and 2019 exit; BaFin investigation into Cake DeFi (2022); DeFiChain (DFI) token collapse; legal dispute with co-founder U-Zyn Chua
• The 2025 pivot: Exited most crypto positions, went short Bitcoin for a period, moved into QQQ, declared crypto "pure speculation"
• Current role: Bitcoin skeptic, content creator, paid education ("Inner Circle")

What Are TenX, Cake DeFi, and DeFiChain?

TenX, Cake DeFi (later Bake), and DeFiChain are the three crypto ventures that define Julian Hosp's track record — and all three ended in controversy or steep losses for investors. To understand the current debate, you have to understand this history.

• TenX (2017): Hosp rose to prominence as co-founder and president of TenX, a crypto payment-card project that raised around $80 million in a 2017 ICO. The product never delivered on its ambitions, the card program faltered, and Hosp departed in January 2019 after an internal dispute. Some industry critics labelled it an exit scam — a characterization Hosp rejects.
• Cake DeFi / Bake: After TenX, Hosp co-founded Cake (later rebranded Bake) with U-Zyn Chua, offering staking, lending, and liquidity mining. In January 2022, Germany's financial regulator BaFin opened an investigation, stating the company was operating in Germany without the required license.
• DeFiChain (DFI): The blockchain associated with Cake/Bake. Its token collapsed dramatically from its December 2021 peak, leaving many holders deep underwater.

The Cake chapter ended bitterly. Co-founder U-Zyn Chua filed to wind up the company in late 2023 amid a shareholder dispute, and reporting at the time detailed allegations around financial management and use of company funds — claims Hosp's side contested. Bake was eventually sold to a subsidiary of GSTechnologies, and Hosp signaled he would step back from the crypto spotlight.

Hosp has long disputed the harshest framings of these events, attributing failures to market conditions, partners, or broader industry turmoil rather than wrongdoing on his part.

Why Is Julian Hosp Controversial Now?

The current controversy stems from Julian Hosp's early-2025 decision to exit crypto, short Bitcoin, and move into stocks (QQQ) — after years of promoting Bitcoin as a transformational asset. The flashpoint isn't a failed project; it's the pivot itself.

In early 2025, Hosp announced he had exited most of his crypto positions, at one point even going short, and rotated into other asset classes, notably the Nasdaq-100 ETF (QQQ). He framed crypto as having less and less real-world utility and called it "pure speculation."

Since then, he has become one of the most vocal Bitcoin skeptics in the German-language space. Through 2025 and into 2026 he repeatedly warned of further large declines — at various points floating scenarios of Bitcoin falling toward $20,000–$30,000 or even lower — while citing structural concerns like weakening institutional demand, quantum-computing risk, and over-reliance on a handful of large buyers such as Michael Saylor's Strategy. He has also stated that since selling near the end of January 2025, his QQQ-led portfolio outperformed Bitcoin with lower volatility and better risk-adjusted ratios.

For a man who built his fortune and fame on $Bitcoin, that reversal is exactly what lit the fuse.

What Are People Actually Saying?

The dispute has played out publicly on X, where critics accuse Hosp of hypocrisy and ingratitude, while Hosp dismisses them as bitter "Bitcoin socialists" who missed his calls. The exchange captures the two camps cleanly.

A critic, posting as mgp.eth, summed up the resentment many longtime followers feel. Paraphrased: Hosp went from kitesurfer and doctor to crypto millionaire purely because he bought Bitcoin early and built TenX and Cake with it — and without Bitcoin he'd "probably still be an accident surgeon in Innsbruck." Instead of gratitude, the critic argues, Hosp now trashes Bitcoin in almost every video, scares people, and plays the "concerned warner." The charge: that's not critical thinking, it's ingratitude and hypocrisy — and someone who'd have remained a nobody without Bitcoin shouldn't ruin the entry for those still trying to get in.

Hosp's response was equally pointed. Paraphrased: he mockingly rewrote the critic's complaint as sour grapes — that he made a fortune in Bitcoin from 2014 to 2025 and told everyone, then switched to QQQ in 2025 and told everyone that too; the critic was "too greedy," didn't listen, is now down significantly versus Hosp's returns, and rather than admitting Hosp was right is whining on X for engagement. He dismissed the critic as a "Bitcoin socialist" who wants redistribution and "never sees the fault in themselves."

Is Julian Hosp a Scam or a Smart Investor? Two Ways to Read It

• There is no consensus: some see Hosp as a savvy investor who legitimately rotated out of crypto, while others see narcissistic, self-serving behavior given his history. Reasonable people land on opposite sides.
• The "he did nothing wrong" view. In this reading, Hosp did what every investor is supposed to do: he spotted an opportunity early, profited, and reallocated when his thesis changed. Selling an asset and moving to something you believe is better isn't betrayal — it's portfolio management. He says he was transparent about both the buying and the selling, in public and in real time. Being early to Bitcoin and later cautious on it isn't a contradiction; it's an evolving view. No one is obligated to stay loyal to an asset forever, and changing your mind with new information is a feature of good investing, not a character flaw.
• The "narcissistic and harmful" view. The opposing camp sees something more troubling. To these critics, Hosp spent years promoting Bitcoin as a near-permanent, life-changing asset, built businesses and a personal brand on that promise, enriched himself — and then turned around to publicly disparage the very thing that made him, in ways they read as fear-mongering aimed at selling his own products and webinars. Layered on top is his history: TenX, the BaFin investigation, and the Cake/DeFiChain collapse and legal fight. For investors who lost money following his earlier enthusiasm, the pivot reads as self-serving and arrogant rather than principled. The tone of his rebuttals — dismissing critics as "socialists" and "whiners" — reinforces that perception for them.

What's the Takeaway on Julian Hosp?

Whether Julian Hosp is a smart investor who timed his exit or a polarizing figure who profited and then pulled the ladder up depends on how much weight you give his track record versus his returns. His story sits on a fault line that runs through all of crypto: the gap between conviction and salesmanship, between changing your mind and abandoning the people who believed you.

What's not in dispute is that he remains one of the most-watched voices in the space — and that his Bitcoin skepticism, right or wrong, will keep generating debate for as long as he keeps posting.

Frequently Asked Questions About Julian Hosp

Who is Julian Hosp? 

Julian Hosp is an Austrian medical doctor turned crypto entrepreneur, author, and YouTuber, best known for co-founding TenX and Cake DeFi (Bake) and for becoming a prominent Bitcoin critic after exiting crypto in 2025.

What happened to TenX? 

TenX raised around $80 million in a 2017 ICO for a crypto payment card, but the product failed to deliver on its goals. Hosp left in January 2019 after an internal dispute, and the project is widely viewed in the industry as a failure.

Why did Julian Hosp leave Bitcoin? 

Hosp said he exited most of his crypto positions in early 2025 — even shorting Bitcoin for a period — because he saw declining real-world utility and viewed the market as "pure speculation." He moved into other asset classes, primarily the Nasdaq-100 ETF (QQQ).

Was Cake DeFi investigated? 

Yes. In January 2022, Germany's financial regulator BaFin announced an investigation into Cake DeFi for operating in Germany without the required license.

Is Julian Hosp a scam? 

There is no consensus, and no criminal conviction has been established in the matters discussed publicly. Critics point to his track record (TenX, the BaFin probe, the DeFiChain collapse) and accuse him of self-serving behavior; supporters argue he is a transparent investor who simply changed his strategy. Readers should research the facts and form their own view.

What is Julian Hosp doing now? 

He continues to publish crypto and macro commentary on YouTube and X, runs paid education offerings, and remains a vocal Bitcoin skeptic while favoring tech-stock exposure such as QQQ.

Where Does SpaceX Stock Trade Right Now?

SpaceX (NASDAQ: SPCX) is having a brutal start to the week. On Monday the stock fell as much as 10% intraday, its third straight session of losses, trading back down toward the $165 area after closing the prior week near $185.

That puts SPCX roughly 27% below its all-time high of $225.64, set just days earlier on June 16. The slide follows a retreat of more than 8% across the previous Wednesday and Thursday, before US markets paused for the Juneteenth holiday. In other words, much of the euphoric post-IPO rally has now been unwound — though the stock still trades comfortably above its $135 IPO price.

How Did SpaceX Stock Get Here So Fast?

SpaceX listed on the Nasdaq on June 12 in the largest IPO in history, raising about $75 billion at a $135 offer price and debuting at a valuation near $1.77 trillion. The first week was pure mania: shares popped 19% on day one and ripped to $225.64 by June 16, briefly vaulting SpaceX past Amazon and Microsoft to become the world's fifth-most-valuable company.

Retail investors drove the move, buying more SPCX than any other stock on the market for several consecutive sessions. Then the music stopped — and a thin, sentiment-driven stock started falling as fast as it rose.

Why Is SpaceX Stock Falling?

The decline isn't a single scandal. It's a stack of pressures hitting a richly valued stock at the same time.

• A massive bond sale. The immediate trigger this week was news that SpaceX is preparing its first-ever investment-grade US dollar bond offering, expected to total at least $20 billion. The proceeds would refinance a bridge loan maturing in 2027 and fund the company's AI ambitions. Markets read "massive borrowing spree" against an unprofitable balance sheet and sold.
• A razor-thin float. Only around 4–5% of SpaceX shares are free to trade; the rest are locked up. That tiny supply fueled the explosive melt-up — and now amplifies the drop, since even modest selling moves the price several percent with little liquidity to absorb it.
• A stretched valuation. Even after the pullback, SPCX trades at a price-to-sales multiple north of 90x, versus the S&P 500's ~3.7x, on a company that booked an $18.7 billion revenue year but a sizeable GAAP loss. A former Nasdaq chief publicly warned this week that the stock is trading on hopes rather than fundamentals.
• Lockup expiration fears. The supply cliff is coming into view: the first insider selling windows open around the late-July to August earnings period, the standard 180-day lockup lapses near December 2026, and Elon Musk's stake stays locked until June 2027. More tradable supply over time pressures a stock built on scarcity.
• An ESG black eye. MSCI handed SpaceX a CCC rating — its lowest tier — citing governance and sustainability concerns. Musk dismissed it on X, but the headline added to the negative tape.

Is the SpaceX Crash a Sign of Trouble?

Not in the underlying business, according to most analysts. Starlink remains profitable and growing, with over 10 million subscribers, $11.4 billion in 2025 revenue and a 63% adjusted EBITDA margin, while the launch business set records in 2025. The pullback reflects an expensive stock and a tiny float — not a deterioration in operations.

That said, the caution is real. One widely-shared note this week projected SPCX could fall 50% or more by year-end as the hype fades. Morningstar's fair value estimate sits near $63, while the Wall Street consensus average is around $164 — close to where the stock trades today.

**Investments carry risks. Trade responsibly.

What Comes Next for SPCX?

Two mechanical catalysts dominate the near-term picture. Around early July, expected Nasdaq-100 inclusion could trigger an estimated multi-billion-dollar wave of forced passive buying from index funds — demand driven by rules, not sentiment. Then the first post-IPO earnings report, due in early September, will deliver the market's first hard fundamental checkpoint, alongside the end of the underwriters' quiet period and a flood of fresh analyst coverage.

Until those arrive, expect more of the same: a thinly-floated, sentiment-led stock capable of swinging double digits in a single session — in either direction.

How Does the Crypto Market Compare to SpaceX Today?

While SPCX bleeds, the crypto market is holding up far better — a useful contrast for anyone weighing where to put risk capital. As of Monday, June 22, the picture looks like this:

• Bitcoin ($BTC): trading around $65,000, up modestly on the day after opening near $63,200 — broadly steady despite a more hawkish Fed.
• Ethereum ($ETH): around $1,775, recovering after a soft open near $1,705.
• $BNB: near $593, holding firm.
• $XRP: around $1.14, roughly flat.
• Solana ($SOL): near $72, down about 2% on the day.
• TRON ($TRX): around $0.33, modestly higher.

The total crypto market cap sits near $2.21 trillion, up about 0.4% over 24 hours, with $Bitcoin dominance remaining strong as investors favor the larger caps.

The takeaway for investors is the difference in character. SpaceX is a brand-new, thinly-floated single stock swinging 10% in a session on bond-sale headlines and lockup fears. Crypto majors — far more mature markets with deep liquidity — are absorbing the same hawkish-Fed macro backdrop with relative calm. Both are volatile asset classes, but right now the volatility is concentrated in SPCX, not in BTC or ETH. For those building a diversified risk book, that contrast matters: a falling stock and a steady crypto tape can present very different entry points at the same moment.

Why Could the SpaceX Dip Be a Buying Opportunity?

For long-term investors, a sharp pullback in a high-conviction name is often where opportunity lives. The logic of buying the dip is simple: if your thesis on the underlying business hasn't changed, a lower price means you're buying the same company for less. SpaceX's pullback hasn't been driven by a broken business — Starlink is profitable and scaling, the launch business is setting records, and the AI segment is expanding. What's fallen is the price, not the fundamentals.

Several factors make this dip worth a closer look:

• The fundamentals are intact. The decline reflects an expensive valuation and a thin float, not deteriorating operations. The core businesses are still growing.
• Mechanical demand is coming. Expected Nasdaq-100 inclusion in early July could force index funds to buy SPCX regardless of sentiment — a structural tailwind that doesn't care about short-term mood.
• Dollar-cost averaging smooths volatility. Rather than trying to call the exact bottom, buying in tranches as the stock dips lets you build a position at a better average price while sidestepping the impossible task of perfect timing.
• Volatility cuts both ways. The same thin float that drives 10% down-days also drives explosive rebounds. Sharp recoveries can happen just as fast as the falls.

That said, dip-buying is not risk-free. SPCX remains expensive on any traditional metric, and lockup expirations later in 2026 could add supply. The point isn't to catch a falling knife — it's to accumulate a quality asset at a discount if you believe in the long-term story.

How Can You Buy the SpaceX Dip?

If you want to act on the dip, XTB is one of the most accessible ways to do it — offering real SpaceX (SPCX) shares, not synthetic exposure, so you actually own the equity listed on the Nasdaq.

Here's why XTB stands out for trading SpaceX:

• Real share ownership. You buy the actual SPCX stock, giving you genuine exposure to the company rather than a derivative product.
• Beginner-friendly platform. XTB's award-winning app and web platform make it straightforward to search "SPCX," set your amount, and place an order in minutes.
• Fractional investing. You don't need the full share price to get started — buy a slice of SpaceX with the budget you have, ideal for dollar-cost averaging into a dip.
• Low, transparent costs. Competitive commission structure with no hidden fees, so more of your capital goes into the position.

Getting started is simple:

1. Open a free XTB account via this link and complete the quick verification.
2. Fund your account using your preferred deposit method.
3. Search "SPCX" in the platform to find SpaceX shares.
4. Set your amount — a full share or a fraction — and place your buy order.
5. Monitor and average in by adding to your position on further dips if your thesis holds.

👉 Buy SpaceX (SPCX) shares on XTB →

**Investments carry risks. Trade responsibly.

Bitcoin is back near the $65,000 zone, but the market is still far from euphoric. After days of mixed signals, ETF pressure, geopolitical uncertainty, and cautious altcoin moves, Michael Saylor’s Strategy has once again stepped in with another Bitcoin purchase.

Strategy added 520 BTC for around $35 million, bringing its total holdings to 847,363 BTC. The latest buy comes as Bitcoin trades close to $65K, raising an important question for investors: is Saylor buying the bottom, or is Bitcoin still at risk of another rejection?

Saylor Buys Bitcoin While the Market Hesitates

The timing of the purchase is what makes this move interesting. Bitcoin is not breaking into a clear bullish rally yet. It is recovering, but still moving in a fragile range where every move above resistance is being closely watched.

This latest 520 BTC purchase is not Strategy’s largest buy, especially compared to some of its previous billion-dollar accumulation moves. However, it still sends a strong message. Strategy is continuing to accumulate Bitcoin even while the broader market remains uncertain.

That matters because the market has recently been dealing with several conflicting signals. On one side, Bitcoin is holding above the $64K area, Ethereum has recovered slightly, and major altcoins such as Solana, XRP, BNB, and Dogecoin are also trading in green. On the other side, sentiment is not fully risk-on yet, and recent ETF outflows have shown that institutional demand has not been consistently strong.

This creates a split market: long-term buyers are still active, but short-term traders are waiting for confirmation.

Why Strategy’s 520 BTC Purchase Matters

Strategy’s latest Bitcoin purchase is important for three reasons.

First, it confirms that Michael Saylor’s long-term Bitcoin thesis has not changed. Even after volatility, corrections, and concerns around previous BTC sales, Strategy remains one of the strongest corporate Bitcoin buyers in the market.

Second, the purchase comes near a critical price zone. Bitcoin trading around $65K is not just a random level. It is close to the area where traders are watching for either a breakout continuation or a rejection back toward lower support.

Third, the buy arrives at a time when market confidence is still rebuilding. Bitcoin has not yet returned to a strong bullish structure, but moves like this can help improve sentiment because they show that major corporate accumulation has not disappeared.

Still, this does not automatically mean Bitcoin will rally immediately. Strategy’s purchases are usually more important as a long-term confidence signal than as a short-term price trigger.

Bitcoin Price Prediction: Key Levels to Watch

For Bitcoin, the next move depends on whether buyers can turn the current recovery into a real breakout.

The first key level is around $65,000 to $66,000. If Bitcoin breaks above this range with stronger volume, the next targets could move toward $68,000 and then $70,000. A clean move above $70K would be much more bullish, as it could signal that the market is moving beyond short-term fear and back into a stronger accumulation phase.

However, if Bitcoin fails near $65K, the market could quickly turn cautious again. In that case, BTC may retest the $62,000 to $60,000 region. A deeper breakdown below that area would weaken the recovery and could bring back fears of another sharp correction.

For now, Bitcoin is not in a confirmed breakout yet. It is in a decision zone.

Bullish Scenario: Saylor’s Buy Supports a BTC Recovery

The bullish case is simple: Strategy’s purchase could reinforce the idea that Bitcoin is being accumulated near a local bottom.

If BTC manages to hold above $64K and push through $66K, traders may start seeing the current range as a base rather than a warning sign. That could bring fresh momentum into the market, especially if ETF flows stabilize and macro fears cool down.

In that scenario, the Saylor buy becomes part of a bigger narrative: weak hands sold, institutions slowed down, but long-term Bitcoin believers kept accumulating.

If this narrative gains strength, Bitcoin could attempt a move back toward $70K.

Bearish Scenario: Bitcoin Still Faces Rejection Risk

The bearish case is that Strategy’s buy may not be enough to change the short-term trend.

Bitcoin has already shown that corporate accumulation does not always prevent downside moves. If the broader market remains cautious, ETF outflows continue, or geopolitical risks return, BTC could still struggle to hold the $65K region.

A rejection from this area would be negative because it would show that buyers are not strong enough yet to reclaim higher resistance. In that case, Bitcoin could return toward $62K or even retest the psychological $60K level.

This is why traders should not treat the Saylor purchase as a guaranteed bottom signal. It is bullish for sentiment, but price confirmation is still needed.

Is Michael Saylor Calling the Bitcoin Bottom?

Michael Saylor is not trying to trade short-term Bitcoin candles. Strategy’s accumulation strategy is built around a long-term view of BTC as a treasury asset. That means the latest 520 BTC purchase should not be seen as a direct prediction that Bitcoin will rally tomorrow.

However, it does show that Strategy remains confident enough to buy while the market is still uncertain. That is what makes the move important.

If Bitcoin breaks above $66K and moves toward $70K, this purchase may later be remembered as another well-timed accumulation near a local bottom. But if BTC fails at resistance, the market could still face another pullback before any stronger recovery begins.

For now, the message is clear: Saylor is still buying, but Bitcoin still needs to prove itself on the chart.

Conclusion

Strategy’s latest 520 BTC purchase gives Bitcoin bulls a fresh confidence boost at a critical moment. BTC is trading near $65K, the market is slowly recovering, and major cryptocurrencies are showing green daily moves.

But the next step is confirmation. A breakout above $66K could open the door toward $70K, while a rejection could send Bitcoin back toward lower support.

Saylor’s move may support the bullish case, but the chart still has the final word.

Investors are digesting a hawkish Fed, with risk-off sentiment driving a sell-off in AI and crypto

The non-profit is cutting 54 jobs as it reorganizes into focused "clusters," following a succession of leadership departures.

Thailand's DSI says a Chinese "grey capital" network used illegal crypto mining and cash mules to launder more than $300 million a year.

Crypto majors are selling off as big Tech gets routed; Saylor is hoarding cash; and ETH heavyweights team up to fund R&D with ETHLabs.

A bipartisan housing bill the Senate passed 85-5 Monday would block a Fed digital dollar through 2030, and now heads to the House.

The Ethereum Foundation has cut roughly 20% of its workforce and plans to reduce its budget by about 40% as it shifts toward a leaner, endowment-based model.

An XRP whale faces a $30 million wipeout with zero free margin left to defend their positions as weekly losses on Hyperliquid top $3.4 million already.

Tron becomes one of the most active blockchains as user participation increases, recording nearly 4 million active addresses in just one day.

$38 million short position puts Solana in the spotlight.

XRP faces a 16.98% June plunge as a monthly Bollinger Bands breakdown triggers a sub-$1 scenario.

Key Highlights

• Major AI chip manufacturers including Nvidia, AMD, and Micron experienced significant selloffs.
• Hawkish messaging from the Federal Reserve prompted investors to adopt defensive positioning.
• Nvidia declined approximately 3%, with AMD and Micron experiencing steeper drops.
• Tech stocks continued their retreat following recent all-time peak valuations.
• Nvidia introduced a specialized AI platform designed for scientific research applications.

Shares of Nvidia tumbled Tuesday as market participants retreated from leading technology equities that had driven recent gains.

NVIDIA Corporation, NVDA

The downturn formed part of a wider retreat affecting semiconductor manufacturers and artificial intelligence-focused companies.

Nvidia’s stock price decreased roughly 3% throughout the trading session, while AMD suffered losses exceeding 5%.

Micron experienced the most dramatic decline, plunging as much as 11% before staging a partial recovery as trading progressed.

The technology sector ranked among the day’s worst performers, contributing to the Nasdaq’s second consecutive daily decline.

Market sentiment shifted toward caution following recent statements from Federal Reserve policymakers indicating persistent inflationary pressures.

These signals dampened expectations for imminent interest rate reductions and heightened worries that elevated borrowing costs may persist longer.

Technology equities have dominated market performance throughout 2026, driven primarily by robust investment in artificial intelligence computing infrastructure.

Leading AI Stocks Experience Correction

Nvidia continues to stand as a primary beneficiary of AI infrastructure spending despite Tuesday’s setback.

The company’s shares maintain approximately 12% year-to-date gains even following the recent correction.

Nevertheless, Nvidia has lagged behind numerous other chip manufacturers during the current calendar year.

Data from Dow Jones Market Data reveals that Nvidia has delivered the most modest returns within the PHLX Semiconductor Index in 2026.

Market observers pointed out that investor focus has diversified beyond graphics processing units to encompass additional components of the AI ecosystem, such as memory technologies and central processors.

Micron has emerged as a standout winner during the AI expansion thanks to strong demand for its high-bandwidth memory solutions.

Market participants were closely monitoring Micron in anticipation of its forthcoming quarterly results.

Semiconductor manufacturers across Asia similarly faced downward pressure, with Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix recording losses during regional trading.

Nvidia Introduces Scientific AI Platform

Despite the stock decline, Nvidia proceeded with launching additional AI products.

The chipmaker revealed its BioNeMo Agent Toolkit, a comprehensive platform enabling researchers to integrate AI agents into scientific processes.

Nvidia stated that the toolkit enables AI systems to compile scientific data, assess research outcomes, and execute various research-oriented functions.

CEO Jensen Huang indicated that this technology has potential to expedite discoveries across biological sciences, chemistry, genomics, and medical fields.

The product launch underscores Nvidia’s strategic push to extend beyond physical hardware and strengthen its position in AI software and scientific computing.

Investors are simultaneously tracking emerging competition for investment dollars as numerous prominent AI-focused enterprises prepare for initial public offerings.

Recent market debuts and anticipated IPOs from significant AI players have sparked discussions regarding valuation levels throughout the industry.

Currently, market participants maintain focus on monetary policy direction, AI infrastructure investment patterns, and forthcoming corporate earnings as they evaluate positioning in technology equities.

The post Semiconductor Stocks Tumble: Nvidia (NVDA), AMD, and Micron Face Sharp Declines appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Highlights

• Microsoft finished building its inaugural Wisconsin AI data center earlier than anticipated.
• The operational facility currently employs approximately 550 full-time workers.
• Between 2024 and 2028, Microsoft intends to invest roughly $4.7 billion in Wisconsin’s hyperscale data center infrastructure.
• A two-decade energy supply contract with Chevron was finalized to power upcoming AI data center operations.
• Wall Street analysts maintain a positive outlook on Microsoft, though some express concerns regarding project execution schedules.

Microsoft (MSFT) stock experienced gains following the tech giant’s disclosure that it has successfully completed its inaugural hyperscale data center campus in Wisconsin.

Microsoft Corporation, MSFT

The Mount Pleasant facility in Fairwater was delivered earlier than projected and has begun full-scale operations.

This campus represents a crucial component of Microsoft’s strategic initiative to build out the necessary infrastructure to accommodate surging demand for cloud computing and artificial intelligence capabilities.

Wisconsin Emerges as Critical AI Infrastructure Hub

According to Microsoft, the facility currently provides employment for close to 550 full-time workers, with plans for further recruitment in the coming months.

The technology leader projects total investments of around $4.7 billion in Wisconsin’s hyperscale infrastructure developments spanning 2024 through 2028.

Work has already commenced on a second data center facility in the Mount Pleasant area.

This additional project is slated for completion by 2028, which will significantly boost Microsoft’s AI processing capabilities.

Surging AI Requirements Fuel Infrastructure Investment Wave

This development arrives as Microsoft maintains aggressive investment in infrastructure essential for powering Azure cloud platforms and artificial intelligence operations.

The company recently announced a two-decade power supply agreement with Chevron connected to Project Kilby, an extensive energy development in West Texas.

This initiative is projected to deliver as much as 2.67 gigawatts of electrical capacity, supporting Microsoft’s expanding network of data centers.

Securing dependable power sources has emerged as a critical obstacle for AI infrastructure development worldwide.

Analyst Community Maintains Optimistic Stance

Although Stifel kept its Hold rating with a $415 price target intact, the majority of Wall Street analysts continue expressing confidence in Microsoft’s strategic direction.

Market observers consistently highlight Azure expansion, artificial intelligence integration, and escalating cloud services demand as primary catalysts for revenue acceleration.

Microsoft’s commercial pipeline and AI-generated revenue streams have also demonstrated consistent growth as corporations amplify investments in artificial intelligence platforms and supporting infrastructure.

Strategic Vision for AI Leadership Crystallizes

The Wisconsin data center inauguration underscores Microsoft’s dedication to constructing the tangible infrastructure required for AI’s next evolutionary phase.

With artificial intelligence computing requirements accelerating, data center facilities, energy alliances, and cloud infrastructure are transforming into essential competitive differentiators.

Microsoft demonstrates clear intent to maintain its position among the industry’s premier AI infrastructure providers as this market sector matures.

The post Microsoft (MSFT) Stock: Chevron Partnership Powers AI Data Center Expansion Strategy appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR

• JPMorgan elevated IBM to Overweight rating with $291 price objective, raised from $270
• Shares climbed over 4% to approximately $263, bucking broader market weakness
• Software division generates ~45% of total revenue but accounts for nearly two-thirds of overall profit
• Trump issued two executive orders supporting quantum technology, commending IBM’s CEO Arvind Krishna
• Company committed $10 billion toward quantum development over five-year period; Q2 results scheduled for July 22

International Business Machines received a pair of positive developments on Tuesday, driving significant investor interest.

International Business Machines Corporation, IBM

JPMorgan’s Brian Essex elevated IBM stock to Overweight from Neutral and increased his price objective to $291 from $270. Shares surged more than 4% to approximately $263.20, defying a broader market selloff where Nasdaq futures declined 2.66% and S&P 500 futures dropped 1.30%.

Essex’s investment thesis centers on a straightforward premise: IBM’s software segment serves as the profit powerhouse, with its influence expanding. While software represents about 45% of total revenue, it generates nearly two-thirds of the company’s consolidated profits. As artificial intelligence adoption accelerates, Essex anticipates this revenue mix will continue tilting toward software.

To strengthen this strategic pivot, IBM has executed approximately 50 acquisitions during the last five years, including the notable Confluent acquisition in March. While some market observers have raised concerns about the acquisition pace, Essex believes the current heavy investment in software assets will diminish future capital requirements while transitioning IBM toward predictable subscription-based revenue streams.

Essex also highlighted potential valuation expansion if IBM establishes itself as a credible AI infrastructure provider or advances its quantum computing roadmap ahead of schedule.

Presidential Endorsement for Quantum Technology

The analyst upgrade wasn’t IBM’s only positive catalyst. On Monday, President Trump signed a pair of executive orders focused on quantum technology advancement — one requiring development of a research-grade quantum computer by 2028, and another fast-tracking government adoption of post-quantum cryptographic systems by 2031.

IBM’s CEO Arvind Krishna was present at the Oval Office ceremony. Trump subsequently mentioned regretting his early exit from IBM stock holdings. Such high-level public validation carries weight.

Earlier this year, IBM partnered with the Commerce Department to pledge $1 billion toward Anderon, an independent quantum manufacturing facility. IBM subsequently announced an additional $10 billion commitment to quantum research and production capabilities spanning the next five years.

Essex highlighted that IBM has already accumulated over $1.1 billion in quantum customer agreements since 2017 and surpassed $1 billion in total quantum revenue. He views IBM as strategically positioned within what he characterizes as a substantial addressable market opportunity for quantum technologies.

IBM’s internal objective targets delivery of Starling, its most advanced quantum system, by 2029. Essex suggested any acceleration of that timeline “could result in upside” for investors.

What Analysts Are Saying

IBM has accumulated increasingly positive analyst sentiment. Barclays launched coverage earlier this month with a Buy recommendation and $350 price target, while Citigroup maintains a Buy rating with a $375 objective. Wedbush assigns an Outperform rating with a $320 target.

On Monday, IBM announced participation in OpenAI’s Daybreak Cyber Partner Program and introduced a new AI-driven application security platform designed to help enterprises detect and remediate software vulnerabilities more efficiently.

The platform leverages OpenAI’s technology to analyze code, rank high-priority security flaws, and map potential exploit pathways. It extends Project Lightwell, IBM’s $5 billion collaboration with Red Hat targeting software supply chain security challenges.

IBM releases Q2 financial results on July 22. Analyst consensus forecasts earnings per share of $3.00, compared to $2.80 in the year-ago period, with revenue projected at $17.85 billion versus $16.98 billion in the prior-year quarter.

The post IBM (IBM) Stock Surges 4% on JPMorgan Upgrade and Presidential Quantum Support appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Takeaways

• BofA Securities increased Intel’s price objective from $135 to $160.
• The revised forecast stems from expectations that artificial intelligence expenditures will maintain momentum until at least 2028.
• Semiconductor industry analysts project the total addressable market will expand to $2.7 trillion within the next six years.
• Key growth drivers include AI infrastructure buildout, memory chips, cloud computing facilities, automotive applications, and industrial technology.
• Intel stands to gain from increasingly positive market sentiment surrounding its foundry operations and artificial intelligence positioning.

Intel (INTC) stock has garnered renewed analyst support following Bank of America’s decision to elevate its price forecast to $160, up from the previous $135 target.

Intel Corporation, INTC

This adjustment signals mounting conviction that artificial intelligence infrastructure investments will serve as a sustained catalyst for chip industry expansion over the coming years.

Wall Street researchers now anticipate AI-driven capital expenditure patterns will persist through 2028 at minimum, unlocking substantial revenue potential throughout the semiconductor ecosystem.

Artificial Intelligence Investment Drives Sector Expansion

Bank of America simultaneously revised upward its projections for the overall semiconductor industry’s addressable market opportunity.

The financial institution currently forecasts the market will swell to roughly $2.7 trillion by the decade’s conclusion, underpinned by an impressive 28% compound annual growth trajectory spanning 2025 through 2030.

A substantial portion of this expansion will stem from AI computing infrastructure, advanced memory technologies, and accelerating hyperscale data center deployments.

Additional contributions are anticipated from the automotive semiconductor segment and industrial applications as both categories experience cyclical recoveries.

Manufacturing Strategy Advances Restore Market Optimism

Market perception surrounding Intel has shifted noticeably positive over recent quarters as the chipmaker makes tangible progress executing its foundry roadmap.

Industry sources confirm Intel’s advanced 18A process technology has achieved risk production status, marking a critical inflection point in the company’s multi-year transformation initiative.

Market participants increasingly view Intel as positioned to capture growing demand for leading-edge chip fabrication services amid the artificial intelligence buildout.

The corporation’s advanced packaging solutions and manufacturing expertise have emerged as central elements supporting the bullish investment thesis.

Professional Investors Maintain Significant Stakes

Institutional shareholders continue commanding substantial positions, with numerous hedge funds and money managers actively rebalancing their Intel allocations.

Regulatory disclosures revealed that multiple prominent institutional investors expanded their Intel holdings throughout the opening quarter.

Sell-side research coverage has trended more favorable as well, with a succession of rating enhancements and elevated price targets emerging during recent months.

Although consensus estimates reflect a range of perspectives, optimistic viewpoints have demonstrably strengthened.

Share Price Multiples Spark Discussion

Notwithstanding the constructive fundamental outlook, valuation metrics continue generating mixed opinions.

The equity has appreciated considerably as market excitement surrounding artificial intelligence applications, contract manufacturing prospects, and chip sector dynamics intensified.

Certain analysts maintain that projected growth trajectories warrant premium multiples, whereas others contend current valuations have already incorporated substantial anticipated progress.

Market observers will undoubtedly monitor operational performance closely as Intel pursues expanded market share in AI computing systems and third-party manufacturing services.

The post Intel (INTC) Stock Receives $160 Price Target as BofA Sees Strengthening Fundamentals appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Takeaways

• On June 19, a Tesla Model 3 struck a residence in Texas, resulting in the death of a 76-year-old occupant
• According to the driver’s statement to authorities, an automated driving assistance feature was engaged during the collision
• Federal safety regulators have initiated a special crash investigation into the fatal incident
• Two Democratic Senators previously called on NHTSA to examine Tesla’s Full Self-Driving system just days before this crash
• The probe may result in mandatory recalls or additional regulatory measures for the automaker

A fatal collision occurred in Harris County, Texas on the night of June 19 when a Tesla Model 3 veered off the roadway and struck a private residence, claiming the life of a 76-year-old woman inside. The operator informed law enforcement that the vehicle’s automated driving assistance technology was active at the moment of impact.

Federal transportation safety officials at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration initiated a special crash investigation on Monday following the tragic incident.

Shares of Tesla (TSLA) experienced downward movement as reports of the investigation emerged, compounding existing regulatory concerns surrounding the electric vehicle manufacturer’s advanced driver-assistance systems.

Tesla, Inc., TSLA

Investigators from the Harris County Sheriff’s Office reported that the electric vehicle “did not complete a right turn at an intersection and struck the residence at high velocity.” Sergeant Alex Turman stated that authorities are examining the operator’s assertion that automated systems were controlling the vehicle.

The driver showed no signs of impairment, fully cooperated with law enforcement officials, and received medical treatment at a local hospital after the incident.

The deceased woman resided in the home alongside her daughter, son-in-law, and three grandchildren, all of whom were present when the collision occurred. Her daughter recounted hearing a loud impact before discovering the tragic outcome.

Special crash investigations represent the most comprehensive examination conducted by NHTSA. Although these inquiries don’t automatically impose sanctions on vehicle manufacturers, they may trigger safety recalls or additional regulatory enforcement measures.

Tesla has not issued any statement regarding the fatal collision or the federal examination underway.

Congressional Leaders Previously Demanded Investigation

Prior to this incident, Democratic Senators Edward Markey and Richard Blumenthal submitted an official communication to NHTSA requesting a comprehensive review of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving capabilities.

The lawmakers contended that Tesla’s public safety representations regarding FSD rely on “deceptive data interpretation,” including inappropriate comparisons between dissimilar accident scenarios and reliance on partial crash statistics.

The senators additionally advocated for stricter transparency requirements for all manufacturers deploying autonomous vehicle technologies.

Mounting Federal Oversight of FSD Systems

This latest probe is far from the first instance of federal examination into Tesla’s self-driving capabilities. During the earlier months of this year, NHTSA broadened an existing investigation into FSD functionality, particularly focusing on system performance during adverse weather events.

The company promotes this technology under the designation “Full Self-Driving (Assisted)” — terminology that safety advocates argue misrepresents the system’s actual operational limitations.

NHTSA’s specialized crash investigation program systematically collects information on accidents involving advanced automotive technologies. This accumulated data informs the development of future safety regulations throughout the automotive sector.

Law enforcement officials indicated they are “continuing to assess the factors that caused the vehicle to lose speed control” immediately preceding the collision. The investigation continues with no conclusion reached at this time.

The post Tesla (TSLA) Stock Under Scrutiny as NHTSA Probes Deadly FSD Crash in Texas appeared first on Blockonomi.

Ripple (XRP) has shed almost 10% over the past week, invalidating several recovery attempts. The cryptocurrency is currently hovering near $1.11 after a 2% decline on Tuesday.

However, according to a recent market observation by crypto analyst EGRAG CRYPTO, XRP could climb to $5.70-$8 if it follows historical patterns tied to a crucial technical level.

XRP’s Next Expansion

EGRAG CRYPTO said XRP’s “Central Line” has historically separated accumulation periods from phases of strong price expansion. Previous market cycles saw the token deliver significant gains after it moved above this level, prompting the analyst to identify two potential upside targets for the current cycle.

The analyst’s chart shows that XRP is currently trading below the Central Line, which sits above the asset’s current market price and could move into the roughly $2.20-$2.60 region over time. The projected targets are derived from historical percentage gains above this level rather than from XRP’s current trading price.

EGRAG CRYPTO revealed that one cycle saw XRP rise roughly 330% above the Central Line, while another recorded gains of around 200%. Averaging those moves resulted in a projected expansion of approximately 265% above the Central Line, which the analyst said places the asset near the $8 mark.

The analyst also identified a more conservative scenario in which XRP achieves only part of the gains seen in previous cycles. If the market delivers roughly 60% of the prior cycle’s strength, the move would equate to an increase of about 120% above the Central Line, resulting in a target near $5.70.

Based on these calculations, EGRAG CRYPTO identified $5.70 as the conservative target and $8 as the average-cycle objective. The projections are based on historical price expansions above the Central Line rather than market sentiment.

The analyst added that XRP remains below the Central Line and is still trading in an “uncomfortable zone.”

Meanwhile, separate data from CryptoQuant indicates that selling pressure on XRP may be easing as large holders reduce transfers to Binance. Whale activity on the exchange has declined in recent weeks, suggesting lower short-term selling. However, XRP continues to trade below the McGinley Dynamic indicator, as overall momentum remains weak. The asset needs to reclaim this level to support a stronger recovery, while the $1.08 area remains an important support zone.

Upbit Takes the Lead

At the same time, XRP activity has increasingly shifted toward South Korea’s Upbit exchange. Data shows that Upbit’s net wallet-flow dominance rose sharply from 13% on June 8 to 37% by June 22, its highest level in more than a year.

Over the same period, Binance’s reading fell from 16% to zero, while Crypto.com also dropped to zero and Coinbase remained near 9%. Just two weeks earlier, Binance had slightly edged out Upbit, but the latest figures show XRP deposits becoming increasingly concentrated on the South Korean platform. The metric tracks whether deposits outweigh withdrawals on individual exchanges rather than total XRP holdings.

The post XRP’s Price Could Explode to $8, But This One Zone Is Holding It Back appeared first on CryptoPotato.

The U.S. Senate has approved a sweeping bipartisan housing bill that bans the Federal Reserve from issuing a CBDC until 2030.

The bill passed by a strong 85-5 vote and awaits action in the House, where leadership and committee members reportedly plan to advance it quickly.

CBDC Ban Advances Through Housing Package

The housing package is designed to make homes more affordable and reduce competition from corporate firms. Interestingly, one of its provisions prevents the Fed from issuing a U.S. central bank digital currency (CBDC) for up to 4 years.

“Agreed to, 85-5: Motion to concur in the House amendment to the Senate amendment to H.R.6644, 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act,” wrote the Senate.

Lawmakers were said to be considering a fast track that could see the bill signed into law as early as Tuesday, with House Financial Services Committee Chairman French Hill saying he “looks forward to the House moving quickly to advance this bill to President Trump’s desk.”

Senate Chair Tim Scott added that it is time for the American people to get real relief, and Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren called it the biggest housing bill in over 30 years.

The latest development follows months of negotiation, during which the Senate first added the anti-CBDC provision in March, after which the House cleared the amended version in May.

President Donald Trump signed an executive order in January 2025 banning his administration from creating a CBDC, citing concerns that it would threaten the U.S. financial system and individual privacy. However, because this would only apply under his tenure, his allies in Congress pushed to include the restriction in the unrelated housing bill.

House Schedules July CLARITY Act Hearing

As lawmakers prepare for key meetings over the next few weeks, momentum is building around the CLARITY Act. The House Financial Services Committee said it will hold a hearing in New York on July 17 to look at the impact the legislation will have on financial innovation.

Senator Cynthia Lummis has been one of the biggest supporters of the proposal, often taking to social media to urge lawmakers to act faster. In her latest commentary, the Republican warned that regulatory uncertainty has driven talented developers overseas.

But there have been serious repercussions for others, like Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm, who was found guilty of knowingly transmitting more than $1 billion in criminal proceeds. The DOJ also pushed for a retrial after the jury deadlocked on charges of money laundering and sanctions violations.

The post US Senate Clears Housing Bill That Also Halts CBDC Push appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Nasdaq 100 futures dropped 2% today alongside a 1.1% decline in S&P 500 futures, while South Korean tech stocks tanked as much as 10% before trading was briefly halted.

The past few weeks have spelled trouble for tech valuations overall with June 5th seeing the biggest daily drop for the Nasdaq since April 2025, falling well over 4%

The atmosphere has created strong risk-off sentiment, which has spilled over into crypto, leading Bitcoin and Ethereum to drop 4% and 6%, respectively.

Market factors

U.S. chip manufacturing giant Broadcom failed to meet quarterly sales expectations earlier this month, causing some uncertainty in the market. Sentiment is not aided by the major debt backing the massive AI expansion seen this year, with $750 billion worth of enterprise investment in AI and tech leaving the industry exposed to borrowing costs.

With the market now anticipating a potential interest rate hike in October, the future earning potential of AI companies for investors is now up for debate.

The SOX index measuring semiconductor stocks has now hit extreme volatility levels matching those seen in the 00’s dot com bubble, another concerning signal for tech investors.

Risk-off sellers offload crypto

Bitcoin has seen heightened correlation with tech stocks since 2025. BTC plunged below $62,000 earlier today in line with the drop in tech stocks, with Kalshi prediction market investors now favoring a decline below $60k this year.

Bearish sentiment has also stemmed from a stronger dollar, major ETF outflows earlier this year, and the executive order on quantum technologies signed by Donald Trump yesterday. ETH is now down 35% from its 2026 highs, while the broader altcoin market has often seen drops of over 50%.

While today’s price correction by no means spells doom for global markets, the price action is a firm reminder that the AI hype seen over the last year still relies on future profits rather than current revenues.

The post Bitcoin Caught in Crossfire as Tech Stocks Unravel appeared first on CryptoPotato.

XRP remains under pressure after failing to sustain last week’s recovery attempt. The latest price action shows sellers regaining control near a key resistance zone, pushing the asset back toward a major support area that is now becoming the focal point for the short-term trend.

Ripple Price Analysis: The Daily Chart

On the daily timeframe, XRP continues to trade within a broad descending channel and remains below both the 100- and 200-day moving averages. The recent rebound stalled beneath the 100-day MA and the lower boundary of the highlighted resistance zone around $1.28 to $1.35, reinforcing the bearish higher-timeframe structure.

The most recent development is the rejection from that resistance area and the subsequent move back toward the $1.07 to $1.15 demand zone. This support region has repeatedly attracted buyers throughout June and remains the most important level on the chart.

As long as XRP holds above this zone, the market may continue consolidating within its current range. However, a decisive breakdown below $1.07 would expose the previous swing low and significantly increase the probability of another leg lower.

On the upside, buyers must reclaim the $1.28 to $1.35 resistance area before any meaningful trend reversal can be considered.

XRP/USDT 4-Hour Chart

The 4-hour chart shows a clear deterioration in short-term momentum. After failing to break above the ascending resistance trendline and the $1.26 to $1.3 supply zone, XRP rolled over and erased most of its recovery gains.

More importantly, the recent rebound from the support zone produced another lower high near $1.25 before sellers regained control. Since then, price has drifted back toward the $1.1 support region and is currently trading near the lower boundary of the range.

The latest candles suggest weakening buying pressure, with XRP struggling to generate any meaningful bounce despite sitting on support. This places greater attention on the $1.07-$1.15 demand zone.

If buyers can defend the current area, another recovery toward $1.2 and eventually $1.26 remains possible. However, a breakdown below support would invalidate the recent consolidation structure and could trigger a deeper move lower.

Overall, the short-term outlook has become increasingly defensive. XRP remains trapped below key resistance while repeatedly revisiting support, leaving the $1.07 to $1.15 region as the critical level likely to determine the next directional move.

The post Ripple Price Prediction: XRP Risks Deeper Drop as $1.07 Support Comes Under Pressure appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Bitcoin remains trapped beneath a major resistance cluster after failing to sustain last week’s recovery. The latest price action has shifted back in favor of the bears, with BTC breaking below its short-term rising structure and once again moving toward the lower boundary of its recent range.

Bitcoin Price Analysis: The Daily Chart

On the daily timeframe, BTC continues to trade below the first major supply zone between $65K and $68K. After briefly recovering into this area, sellers regained control and pushed the market lower, reinforcing the importance of this resistance region.

The recent rejection also keeps BTC below the 100-day moving average near $73K and well below the 200-day moving average around $77K, maintaining the broader bearish structure.

The most important support remains the $59K to $61K demand zone, which has repeatedly attracted buyers throughout June. However, each rebound from this area has produced a lower high, suggesting that bullish momentum is gradually fading.

As long as BTC remains below $68K, the market remains vulnerable to another test of the $60K support region. A decisive breakdown beneath this zone could expose the next major support area around $54K to $56K.

BTC/USDT 4-Hour Chart

The 4-hour chart paints a more bearish picture in the short term. BTC recently broke below its ascending recovery channel after another rejection from the $65K to $68K supply zone.

More importantly, the latest recovery attempt failed to produce a new high and instead formed another lower high near $65K before sellers stepped back in. Price is now trading around $63K and moving toward the lower end of the recent range.

The loss of the rising trendline is a notable development because it signals weakening short-term momentum. Unless buyers quickly reclaim the $64K to $65K area, the probability of another move toward the $60K to $61K support zone remains elevated.

The immediate resistance remains the $65K to $68K supply region, while the blue support zone around $60K is the key level that bulls must defend.

Sentiment Analysis

The Binance BTC liquidation heatmap highlights a substantial concentration of liquidity beneath the current market price, making the downside particularly interesting from a liquidity perspective.

While liquidity exists above the market around $70K, $75K, and higher levels, the most significant and closest cluster is located below the current price action. Large liquidation pools can be seen around the $59K to $60K region, with even larger concentrations extending toward $55K and roughly $50K to $52K.

Since markets often gravitate toward large liquidity concentrations, this setup suggests that downside liquidity remains largely untapped. The repeated failures beneath the $65K to $68K supply zone further increase the risk that BTC eventually breaks below the $60K support area to target these lower-liquidity pockets.

In other words, while the $60K region continues to act as support, it is also sitting directly above a substantial liquidity vacuum. If sellers manage to force a decisive breakdown, the move could accelerate as the market seeks larger liquidation clusters between $55K and $50K.

For now, the key battle remains at $60K to $61K, but the heatmap suggests that the larger liquidity incentive currently resides below the market rather than above it, leaving the risk skewed toward an eventual downside sweep if support fails.

The post Bitcoin Price Prediction: BTC Risks Drop Toward $55K as $60K Support Comes Under Pressure appeared first on CryptoPotato.