Cryptocurrency Posts
Crypto Briefing
Romania's shift to a technocratic government highlights challenges in coalition stability, impacting political dynamics and economic policies.
The post Romania appoints Eugen Tomac as PM amid political turmoil appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
SoftBank's AI-driven resurgence highlights the transformative potential of strategic tech investments, reshaping global economic power dynamics.
The post SoftBank’s Masayoshi Son rebounds after AI-driven recovery appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
The sanctions highlight the growing geopolitical tensions surrounding cryptocurrency's role in evading international financial regulations.
The post British teenager Alexander Browder sanctioned by Russia over crypto laundering report appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
BOJ's shift to inflation control may trigger global market adjustments, impacting yen carry trades and reducing appeal of riskier investments.
The post Bank of Japan’s Ueda pivots to inflation-fighting mode ahead of June rate hike appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
SpaceX's ambitious IPO could reshape market dynamics, but high valuation and profitability challenges pose significant risks for investors.
The post SpaceX pitches investors $1.8T valuation for historic IPO appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Bitcoin Magazine
Bitcoin Magazine
Bitcoin Privacy in 2026: A Practical Guide
Bitcoin privacy has come a long way since the early days of Bitcoin. Once marketed as anonymous, Bitcoin can be best described as a pseudonymous currency and monetary system. It does not need user personal information whatsoever to function, but companies built around it often associate user public keys — Bitcoin accounts — with user information. They do this to comply with legacy financial regimes, and in some cases, for ease of use.
As a result, users might share or expose personal information to such companies as their home IP address, which can be used to identify the users’ internet service provider, and from there, the users’ physical address. As well as their personal name, phone number, shipping address, etc. All of this information in the wrong hands can put people at risk of physical and economic harm.
It is important to note that Bitcoin does not fundamentally have a privacy problem, as many critics suggest. The modern world has a privacy problem, which it has so far failed to address, leading to regular hacks of user data across every aspect of society, from the banking sector to social networks, from government agencies to the military. The digital society we increasingly inhabit is more often than not incapable of securing user data.
Bitcoin, unlike all other comparable institutions, does not need user data to function. It is actually one of the few financial tools available for the privacy-conscious individual. Cash is the other alternative, which limits the distance at which transactions can be made and brings with it a full bag of other downsides.
But, as a digital system, can Bitcoin actually be used privately, given how prominent KYCed exchanges are, and how data-hungry modern software companies have become? The answer to this question might surprise you.
Privacy from whom?
Depending on the jurisdiction you live in and the local laws or state of your country, some risks or threats are more pressing than others. Some countries throughout the world have at times imposed heavy capital controls on their citizens, often simply enforcing the cash grabs at the banking level. Bitcoin, if held in self-custody and with the right amount of privacy, can protect users from this threat.
In other cases, the nation state is stable enough, but organized crime has run amok, leading to targeted phishing schemes and even kidnappings, like in the case of France, where honest and hard-working individuals pay their crypto taxes, and as a result of local laws, enter the public record as having crypto. Leading to an alarming rise in related home invasions.
Last but not least, there are activists who might be operating under oppressive regimes, debanked and isolated from civil institutions, Bitcoin used in subtle ways can be their only monetary respite. Depending on the situation, some tools and tactics will be better for the job than others.
Privacy also does not mean that you can not be a law-abiding citizen. Strong privacy laws exist in many countries, meant to protect civilians from a variety of threats, while also enabling compliance with tax laws, for example. Privacy does not mean you have something to hide, as Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s infamous chief of propaganda, once suggested. Instead, it is the ability to choose who you disclose your business to. It is a fundamental pillar of democracy.
Network Privacy
First things first, we have to protect your IP address, the ID your internet service provider gives your computer devices, including your mobile phone. The most popular way to deal with this is to get a VPN.
Not all VPNs are created equal; however, many are rumored to keep logs and sell your data. On this front, it’s important to do deeper research than the marketing and ask around from people who are paranoid enough to know better.
In the Bitcoin space, Mullvad VPN has a good reputation. They have been accepting Bitcoin for their services for a very long time, and are super easy to use. They are used alongside Tor and have an option to block all traffic that does not go through the VPN. One account can support multiple devices, including mobile.
Tor Browser, the infamous gateway into the dark web, is also an important tool to have handy. Many privacy tools we will discuss below support Tor connectivity, often having the required libraries built in, so you just have to push a button on the app to use the Tor network. The apps will be a little bit slower, as Tor does its anonymization magic, just FYI. Brave Browser also deserves a mention here, as it blocks most advertisement tracking and has built-in Tor support.
Getting Bitcoin Privately
The biggest challenge to Bitcoin privacy is actually how users accumulate it. Exchanges, broker-like private companies that facilitate the trade of bitcoin for fiat currency, have emerged as the most efficient and effective way to buy bitcoin. They have managed to survive hostile legal regimes, hacker groups and overzealous law-enforcement agencies by often over-complying with financial regulations that require them to collect massive amounts of personal user data.
Privacy-preserving alternatives to buy and sell bitcoin for fiat have, in turn, been harassed by government agencies regularly, often failing to survive or keep their market foothold against centralized alternatives. An excellent example of this dynamic was the first major peer to peer bitcoin to fiat exchange called LocalBitcoins, which shut down after 10 years of operation since at least 2013. The company faced increasing pressure from regulators in Finland, forced to implement KYC in 2019, and eventually shut down during the 2023 bear market and Operation Chokepoint 2.0.
LocalBitcoins connected buyers and sellers, serving as an escrow for Bitcoin, while the fiat went from the buyer to the seller’s bank account. LocalBitcoins, which pioneered the model, never touched the fiat and did not know the banking information of the seller. Such information would only move up the chain to the operators in the case of disputes. If both buyer and seller were happy with the fiat transfer, the BTC was released from escrow to the buyer.
This semi-decentralized exchange model, pioneered by LocalBitcoins, is generally called a P2P Bitcoin exchange, though many variations of it exist, with a wide range of privacy trade-offs, over the years.
Today, Bisq.network is perhaps one of the most renowned predecessors of LocalBitcoins. Taking a page from the centralized downfall of LocalBitcoins, Bisq attempted to create a Tor-anonymized, decentralized trading platform to allow buyers and sellers of bitcoin to connect all over the world. Bisq still operates today and has a variety of software tools available. Users can run Bisq on their local machines and control their account with their phones with Bisq Connect, or they can simply be notified of trade alerts via Bisq Notifications. There’s also a dedicated mobile app called Bisq Easy.
Volume for Bisq is estimated at almost 5 million dollars a month, which is low by centralized exchange standards, but good enough for civilian-grade dollar cost average purchases over time. It’s important to understand a couple of things when using Bisq. First, you should always pick a counterparty with a very high reputation. You should also pay attention to the commission they charge. It is normal for sellers to charge 5% above spot price or more, so look for the cheapest, highest-reputation option. The Bisq Easy app has a great user interface and teaches users new to P2P the basics quite well.
There’s a variety of other P2P exchanges and platforms in active use throughout the world. As a general rule, when doing P2P, it is best to keep purchases or trades small enough that you don’t take unnecessary risks. They should be significant enough to be worth your time, but any amounts above $10,000 is probably way too much. The Dollar cost average strategy, as a result, works very well with P2P stacking.
Another way to get Bitcoin with good privacy is to find your local Bitcoin community. Many major cities throughout the world have active Bitcoin communities. If there are none where you live, you might be surprised how many people show up if you start a Bitcoin meetup. From there, slow trust building with local bitcoiners might open up the opportunity to buy some BTC from them for cash. Many bitcoiners get paid in bitcoin for their work and often need to sell some to cover fiat expenses, creating an opportunity for P2P trades in real life.
Last but not least, offer your skills in exchange for Bitcoin, start a project or a Bitcoin dedicated brand. This will give you a great deal of control over how you handle information about your Bitcoin revenue.
Onchain Privacy
However, once you have some Bitcoin, there are a variety of things you can do to keep that information secure from prying eyes. Bitcoin, unlike any other money before it, functions as a public network, with its full transaction history auditable by anyone, though not tied to the holders’ personal information, but instead their public address or pseudonymous Bitcoin account number.
These public addresses live on the blockchain, and data firms can try to connect the dots about who is moving money where, especially when they collaborate with exchanges on data sharing or when other relevant information enters the public domain. Users can protect themselves from onchain analytics by using a variety of tools and tactics.
Run your own node
In order to minimize who you share information with about your addresses and balances, it becomes important for privacy reasons to run your own Bitcoin node, otherwise you are always fundamentally asking someone else running a node, what your balance is. All wallets that don’t explicitly run a Bitcoin full node on your machine have to run one on their servers, or redirect your requests to a public node someone might be hosting for charitable or not-so-charitable reasons.
While having network privacy, such as through the use of a VPN, can protect you from the risks of not running your own node, the next step in that self-sovereign, privacy setup is certainly taking control of the node you query, and thus becoming an active participant in the Bitcoin network.
Sparrow Wallet, an increasingly popular desktop wallet which has excellent support for privacy features, hardware wallets and advanced Bitcoin features like multi-signature accounts and Silent Payments, has great documentation on how to run and use your own node. Their conclusion is that Fulcrum, a wrapper on top of Bitcoin core that makes the blockchain data available to external wallets, is the way to go.
As a desktop wallet, Sparrow would work within your home network, letting you access the Bitcoin blockchain with strong privacy. If you wanted to connect to it from your phone or laptop from outside of your local network, you would need to run a Tor hidden service at home, a Tor tunnel of sorts, to access your node remotely in a secure and private way.
Boltz Exchange
Boltz is a Bitcoin-to-crypto, non-custodial exchange. It never touches fiat, and never holds custody of user funds. Users trade against Boltz using a technology under the hood called atomic swaps which means neither party has to trust the other during the trade, the crypto is moved essentially at the same time from the seller to the buyer and viceversa.
Boltz can be used without sharing any personal information and can be accessed through Tor, allowing Bitcoin users to leverage the benefits of other blockchains and payment networks if they so wish, with strong privacy.
One such network accessible via Boltz is the Liquid blockchain, a Bitcoin-denominated and collateralized federated ‘side chain’ with strong privacy features. Another example is the Lightning network, which has powerful potential privacy benefits as it is fundamentally off-chain, leaving a simple public record. Boltz can be used to convert Bitcoin to stablecoins as well on most major blockchains, letting bitcoiners access the broader crypto industry and its market integrations through a high privacy bridge.
Boltz can be used on their website or by downloading a standalone open source web app. A CLI is also available for advanced users, and since the whole stack is open source, users can even self-host the Boltz suite themselves for their business. Boltz, as a result, removes the need for centralized exchanges to move across blockchain rails, eliminating the corresponding privacy risk.
The Liquid Network
The Liquid Network, a federated blockchain created by Blockstream, is slowly becoming an important infrastructure to the Bitcoin industry. Launched in 2018, the chain is a modified fork of Bitcoin with its native asset LBTC, pegged to Bitcoin directly. To mint LBTC, you have to deposit BTC into the federation’s multisig, and to get your BTC out, you can depeg or sell your LBTC for BTC on a variety of atomic swap exchanges. While its consensus structure is different than Bitcoin’s and fundamentally permissioned, it rests on the shoulders of a double-digit group of industry-leading companies throughout the world, and has remained quite stable since it went live.
One of the interesting things about it is its privacy features; transactions on Liquid have their amounts and asset type encrypted by default. Addresses can be seen to move assets from A to B on-chain, but which asset and how much of it is encrypted, only for the involved parties to see. It uses a cryptographic technique called Confidential Transactions, pioneered by Bitcoin wizards like Adam Back, Andrew Poelstra, Mark Friedenbach, Gregory Maxwell, and Pieter Wuille. Liquid is also quite cheap to use, and has faster block times than Bitcoin, making it an interesting tool in the Bitcoin privacy tool belt, specifically with privacy bridges like Boltz exchange.
Blockstream has a mobile wallet that is quite powerful and easy to use, which supports the liquid network.
Silent Payments
Silent Payments are a novel kind of Bitcoin address that reframes the way auditing of balances happens on Bitcoin. The whole point of being able to see addresses and how much BTC is in them on the blockchain is so that users can easily verify the total supply and thus the economic integrity of the Bitcoin monetary network.
Silent payments (SP) let users receive Bitcoin in such a way that the link between the SP address and the corresponding Bitcoin public address is publicly severed. The technology is quite powerful and has a long history of development in the Bitcoin industry, gaining growing adoption in recent years.
Of the few wallets that can receive Silent Payments so far, Sparrow wallet is likely the best across the board, supporting a full range of privacy features, including connection to the user’s own node. Silent Payment addresses can be reused, so users can generate one and take it on the go, then check their balances on their desktop or laptop using Sparrow. For extra privacy, users can run a Frigate server alongside Sparrow, which deals with the Silent Payments magic in a self-hosted way.
Payjoin
Another notable technology that works quite well with the rest is Payjoin. With a dedicated foundation and wallet support growing every day, this simple transaction-building technique breaks the heuristics used by blockchain analytics to identify individual users and their flows across the chain. Sparrow wallet, alongside many others, supports Payjoin, as it continues to grow into what may become the HTTPS of Bitcoin payments.
Coinjoin
Once the bread and butter of Bitcoin privacy, Coinjoins wallets like Wasabi let you mix your Bitcoin with other people’s in a non-custodial way. The technique has significant upsides when done well, and is still used by many to this day, though it also comes with some tricky downsides. Gustavo, an entrepreneur and writer for Bitcoin Optech, says that “Wasabi works better than ever IMO, and is by far the most liquid and effective bitcoin privacy solution.” Liquidity equates to more privacy when it comes to Coinjoins. “Kruw.io is the dominating coordinator: it has over 97% of the market’s liquidity.” with “30,000 btc volume per month, about 4000 btc of fresh btc inputs.”
Coinjoins became so effective and popular that they led to the landmark Samourai Wallet case, which had its own implementation of the technology, an ongoing cultural fight for the right to privacy.
Gustavo also listed some of the downsides involved with Coinjoins that users should consider, such as the risk that a centralized exchange might be able to tell your bitcoins were moved through a coinjoin, which looks like a big cloud of transactions on-chain. And that there is some known risk of data leaks on the side of the coordinator, a server someone has to run to help users atomically mix coins with each other. However, he believes the technology only continues to improve and patch those holes, saying that “the attack surface has decreased since the last discussion in 2024.”
The Lightning and eCash Networks
Last but not least are the eCash and the Lightning Network. Fundamentally off-chain bitcoin native transaction protocols, they have a key benefit over all the onchain privacy solutions, that they do not leave a footprint on the public blockchain. As a result, privacy is theoretically far easier to achieve. In practice, however, there’s still a lot of work to do, since the most private ways to use the Lightning network are the most difficult from a user experience perspective, requiring the user to run their own Lightning node and manage their own liquidity.
While there are many easy-to-use lightning wallets in the market, most, if not all, require a certain level of data sharing trust with the servers of the wallet company. Something that network privacy can help alleviate.
Ecash is also emerging as a strong privacy technology, though it still falls short on adoption in the West. Wallets like Fedi and Cashu are on the cutting edge, letting users transact with unprecedented privacy in Bitcoin terms, though at the cost of trusting custodial mints, which collateralize the ecash tokens with Bitcoin.
Conclusion
Overall, the tools of Bitcoin privacy continue to improve as the industry’s passion for the topic has not waned. Some are easier to leverage than others. But, as Satoshi Nakamoto has demonstrated, those who take their privacy seriously are the only ones who are able to keep it.
This post Bitcoin Privacy in 2026: A Practical Guide first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Juan Galt.
Bitcoin Magazine
Michael Saylor Calls Bitcoin’s Drop a ‘Capital Rotation’ to AI as BTC Slides Below $62,000
Bitcoin fell to as low as $61,400 overnight before trimming losses to $62,400 in premarket hours Thursday, down 7% over the past 24 hours and more than 14% over the past week. Strategy and Michael Saylor’s MSTR is down nearly 15% in 5 trading days.
The drop has pushed bitcoin into a technical bear market, with bitcoin now off 22.7% from its four-week high, wiping out more than $600 billion in total crypto market value.
At the center of the debate is Strategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor, who took to X on Thursday morning to offer his read on the selloff.
“Capital markets are funding the AI buildout at historic scale: ~$400B over 6 months,” Saylor wrote. “Bitcoin ETFs have seen ~$4B of outflows since May 14, pressuring BTC. This is a capital rotation, not a Bitcoin impairment. Volatility creates opportunity.”
Saylor’s thesis holds that institutions are pulling money from bitcoin and redirecting it into artificial intelligence infrastructure — a trade, not a verdict on the asset. The AI spending figures give his argument weight. Wall Street consensus puts combined hyperscaler capital expenditures above $600 billion for 2026 alone, with CreditSights estimating roughly $450 billion of that flowing into AI hardware, servers, and networking gear.
Saylor sells some bitcoin
But Saylor’s words arrived with a footnote that bears found hard to ignore. Strategy, the largest corporate bitcoin holder in the world with 843,706 BTC, disclosed in a June 1 Form 8-K that it sold 32 bitcoin between May 26 and May 31 at an average price of $77,135 per coin, raising $2.5 million net of expenses. The stated purpose: to fund dividend payments on the company’s STRC preferred shares.
In dollar terms, the sale is a rounding error against a position worth roughly $61 billion. In psychological terms, the market treated it as a break in character.
Strategy had not sold a single bitcoin since late 2022, and Saylor’s identity as an unwavering bitcoin accumulator had become a market signal in its own right. Analysts said the move deepened bearish sentiment and accelerated the price decline.
Two weeks ago and one week before the sale, Strategy shifted its focus from buying bitcoin to strengthening its balance sheet, repurchasing $1.5 billion of its 0% convertible notes due 2029 for approximately $1.38 billion in cash—an 8% discount that reduced its debt obligations by roughly $120 million.
The move lowered the company’s outstanding convertible debt from $8.2 billion to $6.7 billion while leaving it with an $871 million cash reserve. At the time, Strategy held 843,738 BTC at the time and said it planned to rebuild its liquidity buffer through future capital raises.
This post Michael Saylor Calls Bitcoin’s Drop a ‘Capital Rotation’ to AI as BTC Slides Below $62,000 first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine
Bitcoin Buys a Home: Better and Coinbase Close First Fannie Mae-Backed BTC Mortgage
Better Home & Finance Holding Company (NASDAQ: BETR) and Coinbase (NASDAQ: COIN) on Thursday announced the funding of the first Fannie Mae-backed mortgage collateralized by Bitcoin in the United States, marking what the companies called a pivotal moment in bridging digital asset wealth and traditional homeownership.
The debut loan was closed by Joe and Amy, a married couple in their early 30s from Ann Arbor, Michigan, who used Bitcoin holdings as collateral to fund their down payment rather than liquidating their position, the companies said.
The couple pledged their crypto through Coinbase’s custody infrastructure and obtained a conforming mortgage through Better without incurring capital gains taxes or surrendering their long-term exposure to Bitcoin’s potential upside.
“Buying our first home has always been the goal, but I wasn’t willing to give up a decade of investing to get there,” said the homebuyer. “With this mortgage, I didn’t have to choose. We closed on our home and my Bitcoin stayed intact. We didn’t have to liquidate, didn’t have to time the market, and didn’t have to start over financially to achieve our homeownership goals. That meant everything.”
BREAKING: The first Federal National Mortgage Association-backed mortgage using Bitcoin in the US just closed using Coinbase
— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) June 4, 2026
The homebuyer said: “We closed on our home and my Bitcoin stayed intact. We didn’t have to liquidate, didn’t have to time the market”pic.twitter.com/SLCmNIdkLi
Bitcoin as a loan pledge
The structure involves two separate loans. Borrowers first receive a standard 15- or 30-year Fannie Mae-backed mortgage on the property itself. A second, privately financed loan — secured by pledged Bitcoin or USDC — covers the down payment. Both loans carry the same interest rate and term, consolidating into a single monthly payment.
The pledged crypto is held in Coinbase Prime custody for the life of the loan and returned upon full repayment.
Critically, the product carries no margin calls. If Bitcoin’s price declines, borrowers are not required to add collateral, and market movements alone cannot trigger liquidation. Collateral is only at risk if a borrower falls at least 60 days delinquent on payments, consistent with standard foreclosure timelines in conventional housing finance.
The product initially supports Bitcoin and USDC, with Bitcoin requiring collateral equal to 250% of the down payment loan and USDC at 125%. Better CEO Vishal Garg has noted plans to eventually expand eligible assets to include tokenized equities, fixed income, and other real estate assets.
The problem it’s targeting
Better said that 41% of its pre-approved customers qualify on income and credit but lack the cash for a traditional down payment. That gap has widened as homeownership has grown increasingly out of reach: the median age of first-time homebuyers in America hit a record 40 years old, up sharply from 32 a decade ago, according to the National Association of Realtors.
The product is designed to serve buyers whose wealth is concentrated in digital assets rather than liquid cash or traditional savings accounts.
The regulatory pathway was cleared in part by a June 2025 directive from the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) instructing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to recognize digital assets as eligible collateral in the $18.5 trillion mortgage market.
That directive laid the groundwork for this week’s announcement and product launch.
This post Bitcoin Buys a Home: Better and Coinbase Close First Fannie Mae-Backed BTC Mortgage first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine
Standard Chartered Sees Bitcoin Bottom ‘Almost In’ as Sell-Off Cuts 14% in Seven Days
Bitcoin shed 14% in seven days, sliding to levels not seen since February, as a convergence of institutional outflows, leverage liquidations, geopolitical pressure, and a shock sale from Strategy rattled digital asset markets.
Yet Standard Chartered’s global head of digital assets research, Geoff Kendrick, told clients the bear market may be in its final stages — and that the low is “almost in.”
“I think when we look back at the end of 2026 with BTC at $100k… we will say this was the buying zone we all wanted,” he wrote.
Bitcoin traded around $63,739 on Wednesday, down from a 24-hour high of $67,416.50, after touching a session low near $61,463 — the first time it breached that threshold since the February crash. The decline placed BTC roughly 51% below its all-time high of $126,277, set in October 2025.
JUST IN: Standard Chartered bank on Bitcoin dipping to $62k: "This was the buying zone we all wanted."
— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) June 4, 2026
"The low is almost in."pic.twitter.com/D8VbfJaEKK
The trigger that broke market confidence came from a Monday SEC filing. Strategy disclosed the sale of 32 Bitcoin between May 26 and May 31, generating approximately $2.5 million at an average price of $77,135 per coin.
The transaction represented the firm’s first net reduction of its Bitcoin holdings in years — a break from co-founder Michael Saylor’s well-known “never sell” posture . The sale was executed to fund dividend obligations on Strategy’s STRC preferred shares, which carry an annual variable dividend of 11.5%.
The market reaction was sharp. Bitcoin fell below $72,000 the same day as the SEC filing. Strategy’s own stock dropped near 6%, and STRC shares traded around $94 .
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are recording a 13 consecutive day streak of net outflows — the longest run since the products launched in early 2024. Total withdrawals reached approximately $3.45 billion across that stretch. The week ending May 29 alone saw $1.42 billion in net outflows, the third-largest weekly withdrawal on record.
For the full month of May, cumulative spot ETF outflows reached $2.30 billion, making it the worst month of 2026.
Kendrick’s three bitcoin pillars
Against this backdrop, Kendrick laid out three reasons he believes the market is near a floor.
First, Strategy’s behavior in 2022 offers a precedent. When the firm last sold Bitcoin in December of that year, it purchased more than it sold two days later. Kendrick said he expects the same pattern to repeat — with a potential buyback of up to 100 times the 32 BTC sold.
A confirmed purchase as early as next Monday would, in his view, serve as a tentative signal that the low is in.
Second, spot ETF holdings have held up better than feared. The cumulative net inflow since inception remains at $54.2 billion — right where it stood earlier in the year. Total BTC held by the 11 U.S.-listed funds sits at approximately 674,000 BTC, down from a peak near 682,000 but broadly unchanged in structural terms.
“This tells me that ETF holdings are more structurally strong than I had feared in February,” Kendrick said.
Third, the pool of leveraged longs available for liquidation is smaller than in prior drawdowns. Bitcoin futures bets worth $1.5 billion were liquidated by exchanges during the current sell-off, a figure in line with January’s.
With BTC already underperforming equities through 2026, forced selling risk has diminished.
Macro Headwinds Persist
Kendrick’s long-term targets remain $100,000 for Bitcoin by year-end.
This post Standard Chartered Sees Bitcoin Bottom ‘Almost In’ as Sell-Off Cuts 14% in Seven Days first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine
Bitcoin Price Plunges Below $62,000, Erasing Months of Recovery as Sell-Off Accelerates
Bitcoin price has tumbled to its lowest level in months Wednesday night, crashing below $62,000 and wiping out a sharp intraday loss of more than $5,300 — a decline of nearly 8% in 24 hours — as a perfect storm of institutional exodus, leverage liquidations, geopolitical fear, and a symbolic but jarring sale by Michael Saylor’s Strategy converged to shatter market confidence.
At approximately 10:00 PM EDT, Bitcoin price was changing hands at $61,463.22, down from a 24-hour high of $67,416.50 and dangerously close to the psychologically critical $60,000 floor. The selloff erased weeks of tentative recovery and put the world’s largest cryptocurrency nearly 51% below its all-time high of $126,277, set in October 2025.
The catalyst that many analysts believe broke the market’s will was a Monday SEC filing from Strategy revealing that the firm sold 32 Bitcoin between May 26 and May 31, generating approximately $2.5 million at an average price of $77,135 per coin.
While negligible relative to Strategy’s holdings of more than 818,000 BTC, the transaction represented the company’s first disclosed net reduction of its Bitcoin position in years — a jarring break from co-founder Michael Saylor’s long-standing “never sell” doctrine.
The move was intended to fund dividend obligations on its STRC preferred shares, which carry an annual variable dividend of 11.5%. Still, the market reacted viscerally. Bitcoin price immediately fell below $72,000 following the announcement, and Strategy’s own stock dropped nearly 6% the same day.
Today, STRC traded hands around $94.
JUST IN: Bitcoin falls to $61,655
— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) June 4, 2026pic.twitter.com/al7XpApKvN
Bitcoin price craters as BTC ETFs continue outflows
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded an 11-to-12 consecutive day streak of net outflows, the longest run since the products launched, with total withdrawals reaching approximately $3.45 billion across that period. The week ending May 29 alone saw $1.42 billion in net outflows, marking the third-largest weekly withdrawal on record.
For the full month of May, cumulative spot Bitcoin ETF outflows reached $2.30 billion — the worst single month of 2026 — even as Bitcoin’s price only fell 3.69% in that time, suggesting institutions were quietly derisking at a pace far ahead of what price action alone implied.
Beyond crypto-specific factors, Bitcoin price has been whipsawed by a deteriorating macroeconomic backdrop. Escalating U.S.-Iran tensions — including military flare-ups in the Middle East — have driven investors toward safety, triggering a risk-off move that has hammered high-volatility assets across the board.
Adding to the bearish picture is the gravitational pull of the artificial intelligence boom. Capital that might have once flowed into Bitcoin is increasingly chasing AI-linked equities, with the impending IPOs of OpenAI and SpaceX diverting speculative interest.
This post Bitcoin Price Plunges Below $62,000, Erasing Months of Recovery as Sell-Off Accelerates first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
CryptoSlate
A Casascius coin tied to 25 BTC moved this week, converting a 2011 physical Bitcoin artifact into spendable BTC during a broader market selloff.
Galaxy Research identified the item as an S1-COIN-25 Casascius physical Bitcoin, a large-denomination piece from the era when Bitcoin could still be handed across a table as a loaded coin. The reported alert valued the 25 BTC at about $1.78 million at the time.
The on-chain sequence is more precise than a simple cash-out. The watched address received a 25 BTC output in block 156,413 on Dec. 7, 2011. It later accumulated small dust outputs before spending its funded outputs this week.
The first 2026 spend landed on June 3 at block 952,159. That transaction spent 25.00002187 BTC from the address and returned 24.98998 BTC to the same address after fees and dust handling.
A second transaction on June 4 at block 952,267 moved 24.98996629 BTC to a SegWit address, leaving the watched address with no balance.
The event proves a status change rather than a confirmed sale. Bitcoin, once attached to a physical collectible, became spendable via a normal wallet path. The chain shows movement away from the old address without any evidence of an exchange deposit, custodian route, or sale.
What the Bitcoin blockchain shows
The June 3 transaction matters because it exposed activity from an address that had carried its original 25 BTC output since 2011. The spend returned most of the value to the same address, so a one-line address history can overstate what changed.
The June 4 transaction completed the visible move. The final spend sent 24.98996629 BTC from the watched address to bc1qn5snfwq447vge9ynnz66xqm9kpam9eu34z52dk. The fee was 1,371 sats.
After that, Blockstream's address view showed no remaining balance. The holder's reason remains unknown, and the available record ends with a transfer to another Bitcoin address.
That boundary matters for market interpretation. Old coins moving can look like holder behavior during a selloff, while the available data only establishes transfer to a recipient address.
CryptoSlate applied a similar standard to Mt. Gox-linked wallet movements, treating the first transfer as a warning light until later routing showed more. The same discipline applies here, where the next useful signal is onward routing.
For now, the address history supports the following conclusion: a long-dormant, Casascius-attributed 25 BTC address became active, then sent nearly all of its remaining balance away from the original address.
Casascius attribution and on-chain proof do separate jobs. The visible chain proves the key was used. Galaxy-attributed secondary coverage supplies the label that makes it a physical-coin event.
Keeping those layers separate preserves the cultural hook without turning a tracker alert into more certainty than the record can carry.
A move from an old address becomes supply-only if subsequent routing points to a venue where coins can be sold or financed.
Until then, the strongest verifiable signal is a custody transition. A private key once hidden in a physical object has been used, and the BTC now sits outside the original Casascius-attributed address.
Why a Physical Coin Still Matters
Casascius coins occupy a strange place in Bitcoin history because they turned a purely digital bearer asset into a physical object. The original site describes pieces with their own Bitcoin address and a redeemable private key sealed inside.
The Casascius FAQ explains the tamper-evident hologram and the rationale behind making a physical Bitcoin as a proof-of-concept and conversation piece.
That design created a trade-off outside ordinary wallet custody. Leaving the hologram intact preserves the object as a loaded collectible. Peeling it gives the holder control over the BTC, but changes the item from a funded artifact into a spent collectible.
The owner is choosing between numismatic scarcity and direct wallet liquidity. That choice makes this move more distinctive than a dormant wallet transfer.
A standard wallet can sit idle for years and then move without changing its form. A Casascius redemption changes the nature of the thing itself.
The coin can still exist as a physical object, but its main economic value has shifted back to Bitcoin on-chain.
CryptoSlate covered a larger version of that tension in 2025, when a holder unlocked about $10 million from a rare Casascius bar. That case also forced a choice between keeping a scarce, loaded relic and redeeming the BTC.
The current 25 BTC move lands differently because of timing. Bitcoin was already under pressure, and old-wallet activity carries a sharper edge when leverage is unwinding.
CryptoSlate's Bitcoin price page shows BTC near $63,000 on June 4, down 5.7% over 24 hours, 13.8% over seven days, and 22% over 30 days.
At that snapshot price, 25 BTC is worth about $1.58 million, which is already below the $1.78 million recently reported in the Galaxy-attributed alert.
Routing, Not Folklore
Bitcoin fell from $71,765 to $67,895 on June 2, triggering about $394 million in one-hour liquidations as leveraged long positions unwound.
That selloff makes any movement from old BTC addresses feel more consequential than it would during a calm rally.
The cultural signal and the trading signal are different. The cultural signal is clear: one of Bitcoin's early physical storage formats appears to have rejoined the ordinary liquidity layer.
The trading signal remains unresolved. The watched BTC has left the original address, while the available data leaves open whether it will be sold, stored, pledged, or moved again.
Casascius redemptions connect the Bitcoin of forums, holograms, and physical experiments with the Bitcoin of ETFs, market-cap dashboards, and institutional liquidity.
A physical coin from 2011 can sit untouched for years, then become on-chain BTC in a market where every old coin movement is scanned for supply pressure.
It is a small event compared with Mt. Gox balances, ETF flows, or miner selling, but it is vivid because the holder had to alter a collectible to make the BTC liquid.
The next signal is simple. If the June 4 recipient address routes funds toward an exchange, custodian, mixer, or known liquidity venue, the signal moves from culture and custody into market supply.
If it stays parked, the event remains a clean example of Bitcoin's long memory: old keys, old objects, and old storage habits can still wake up when the asset around them has become a global market.
The post A 2011 physical Bitcoin loaded with 25 BTC was just unlocked during the $62k selloff appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Bitcoin is enduring a multi-front assault on its spot market liquidity as exchange-traded funds, short-term speculators, and cryptocurrency miners simultaneously distribute assets.
This coordinated selling pressure has drained market demand at the fastest pace since the 2022 collapse of the Terra/Luna ecosystem.
As a result, BTC's price has tanked 12% over the past week, pushing the top crypto towards the $60,000 level amid heavy hedging activities from market traders. BTC is exchanging hands at $64,036 as of press time, according to CryptoSlate's data.
Yet, this spot-market flush has created a structural paradox that could still catapult BTC's value.
The volume of selling has twisted the derivatives market into an increasingly lopsided shape where a record wall of short positions now anchors the market.
However, while traditional spot indicators point downward, any pause in selling could spark a mechanical short squeeze and turn the traders betting against Bitcoin into the forced buyers who fuel its next rally.
Bitcoin ETF exodus runs after the AI trade
The primary driver behind Bitcoin’s recent price weakness is a sharp reversal in institutional capital flows. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recently logged a 13-day streak of consecutive liquidations between mid-May and early June.
According to Galaxy Research, these funds shed 59,351 BTC, pulling roughly $4.33 billion out of the market.
Over a seven-day window, the funds lost $2.78 billion, representing the worst such outflow on record for Bitcoin. The bleeding continued over a 10-day window with $3.06 billion in outflows. The 14-day window saw $4.21 billion exit the market, while the 20-day trailing window recorded $5.42 billion in outflows, shedding 73,080 BTC.
Galaxy Research noted this 20-day period is the single largest outflow window by both dollar value and total Bitcoin volume on record.
Industry executives view this as a macroeconomic realignment rather than an internal failure of the digital asset class. Traditional capital markets are currently routing approximately $400 billion into artificial intelligence infrastructure over a six-month window.
Michael Saylor, chairman of Strategy, said:
“This is a capital rotation, not a Bitcoin impairment. Capital markets are funding the AI buildout at historic scale. Volatility creates opportunity.”
Jeff Park, an advisor at Bitwise, echoed this sentiment. He suggested traders are tapping their Bitcoin allocations to fund the market’s upcoming “hot ball of money” trades, shifting liquidity to chase tech firms like SpaceX and Anthropic.
Moving forward, Park noted, this correlation breakdown will itself become the fuel for future market moves.
Speculative panic and miner capitulation
As institutional support softened, retail and short-term holders entered a phase of outright capitulation.
CryptoQuant data shows that overall Bitcoin demand, which is a combination of the speculative and spot market purchasing, contracted by 501,000 BTC over the past month.
At the same time, short-term BTC holders are driving the most concentrated loss-driven transfers of the year.
Over a 24-hour window, these holders moved 53,800 BTC directly onto exchanges. CryptoQuant researchers highlighted the critical split: 100% of these coins moved while at a loss, while profit-side inflows collapsed to zero.
This means that these underwater buyers are choosing to liquidate their positions directly into market weakness rather than wait out the volatility.
Historically, CryptoQuant noted, peaks in loss-driven inflows from short-term holders cluster around local capitulation events. They mark weak hands, flushing out, and supply transferring from over-leveraged late entrants to higher-conviction holders.
Adding to the overhead supply, BTC miners are also moving coins. CryptoQuant noted that on June 2, Bitcoin miner inflows to the Binance exchange spiked to 24,716 BTC, surpassing a previous February peak by 6.8%.
CryptoQuant researchers pointed out that large miner inflows do not confirm immediate, open-market selling. Miners frequently move coins for strategic purposes, including hedging, liquidity management, or internal treasury rebalancing.
However, concentrating this volume of Bitcoin on a single exchange means miner-held supply has moved directly adjacent to market liquidity.
If these inflows remain elevated in the coming days, traders may interpret the data as a sign of renewed miner distribution.
The supply absorption puzzle
This relentless selling creates a structural puzzle when contrasted with long-term accumulation data. While short-term speculators flee, veteran investors are aggressively absorbing the overhead supply.
Brian HoonJong Paik, CEO of the Bitcoin-focused firm Smash Fi, pointed out that long-term holders added 200,000 BTC to their wallets this month and now control 16.3 million BTC, which is sitting near their all-time high holdings.
Paik said:
“The people who have held Bitcoin the longest are not selling into this weakness. They are buying your panic.”
Yet, the sheer volume of coins hitting the market indicates a massive change of hands.
CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju noted that historically, bear markets conclude only after the spot price falls below the realized price. This metric places the current average investor cost basis around $53,000.
Reaching that level, however, should theoretically prove difficult given the wall of institutional capital that has entered the market.
Ki Young Ju broke down the math to illustrate the scale of this absorption: Since January 2023, Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) bought 711,206 BTC and sold only 32, effectively locking up 711,174 coins.
Furthermore, since Bitcoin traded at $63,000 in March 2024, spot ETFs absorbed an additional 509,102 BTC, while Strategy acquired another 650,706 BTC.
In total, institutions swallowed 1,240,808 BTC, yet the spot price remains anchored at the same level.
For context, total global exchange reserves hover around 2.7 million BTC, and Satoshi Nakamoto’s estimated holdings equal roughly 1 million BTC.
Despite the market absorbing a supply shock larger than Satoshi’s entire stack, the price remains suppressed.
This dynamic highlights that while traditional long-term holders and institutions accumulate heavily, an unusually motivated cohort of sellers continues to cap any upward momentum.
BTC's coiled spring set-up
While the spot market paints a picture of exhaustion, the derivatives market has transformed into a coiled spring. The rush to short Bitcoin during this slide has created a top-heavy leverage structure.
Data from analytics firm Alphractal shows a dramatic 72-hour shift in the global liquidation map. On the first day of the flush, the market sat at 66% short-heavy.
By day two, it reached 76%. By day three, the market shifted to an extreme 89% short bias. The metric now pits $98.3 billion in short positions against a $12.2 billion long stack.
The short-to-long ratio sits at 8.06x. Because the market has already washed out most leveraged longs, limited downside risk remains on the chart. The downside magnetic level at $61,054 holds just $1.3 billion in long liquidations.
Conversely, the upside is heavily clustered with short liquidation triggers. A modest upward move opens up three waves of forced buying: $2.1 billion at $72,201; another $2.2 billion at $80,293; and a final $2.0 billion layer resting at $82,630.
According to Alphractal, short sellers have stacked more than $6.3 billion in sensitive liquidation triggers between 15% and 32% above the current spot price.
The closest structural analog to this dataset occurred in November 2022, when the same metric printed an 84% short-heavy reading. Over the following 11 sessions, Bitcoin surged approximately 24%.
Bitcoin currently faces undeniable spot pressure from miners, panicked retail traders, and fleeing ETF capital.
However, by over-allocating into bearish trades, the market has set a mechanical trap.
The underlying selling pressure remains real, but the resulting structural imbalance means that the slightest pause in spot distribution could easily trigger a violent, upward cascade powered entirely by the traders betting on Bitcoin's decline.
The post Bitcoin’s selloff is creating the short-heavy setup that could reverse it fast appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Bitcoin’s relationship with the S&P 500 has stopped behaving like a simple correlation trade at exactly the wrong time for bulls.
For much of 2026, the logic was clean enough. When oil jumped during the Iran war, yields rose amid inflation fears, stocks sold off, and Bitcoin followed, as the market treated BTC as a liquidity-sensitive risk asset.
When the pressure eased, both risk trades could recover together.
That link has now fractured. The S&P 500 closed at a fresh record 7,609 on June 2, with the latest leg tied to earnings strength and AI-linked stocks.
At the same time, Bitcoin is trading near $63,508 on June 4, down 13% over seven days, down 21% over 30 days, and 49% below its Oct. 6, 2025 all-time high.
Bitcoin is doing more than quietly lagging a mild equity rally. It is in a major drawdown while the world’s most watched equity benchmark pushes higher.
Bitcoin is reacting to more than the same macro signal as stocks. It is being forced to prove whether the ETF-era bid that carried it from the 2023 anticipation trade through the January 2024 launches and into the 2025 high is still the marginal buyer.
The S&P 500 correlation made sense
The earlier correlation had a straightforward explanation. The same transmission channel hit two assets that had become sensitive to liquidity.
The Iran/Hormuz shock gave markets a physical reason to price inflation risk. EIA data showed total oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz falling from 20.7 million barrels per day in the fourth quarter of 2025 to 14.6 million barrels per day in the first quarter of 2026.
A World Bank scenario analysis framed the disruption as the largest oil-market shock in history and put 2026 Brent scenarios around $95 to $115 per barrel depending on how the disruption evolved.
That channel flowed straight into rates. The 10-year Treasury yield rose to about 4.45% from 3.96% before the U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran, as investors priced in higher inflation and fewer Federal Reserve rate cuts.
In that setup, Bitcoin could trade like a stock without being one. Higher oil threatened inflation. Higher inflation kept yields elevated. Higher yields drained risk appetite. Stocks fell, and BTC fell with them.
The earlier Iran-deal rally setup needed proof in oil flows, gasoline prices, inflation compensation, and Fed pricing before traders could treat it as more than a relief trade.
A separate May analysis noted that Bitcoin’s apparent break from U.S. stocks could have reflected different lead markets at different times of day rather than a durable decoupling.
The out-of-hours detail fits that framework. Weekend crypto trading can outpace U.S. equity desks, especially when oil headlines or rate expectations hit before cash equities reopen.
Once the S&P 500 starts trading, the larger liquidity signal can pull Bitcoin back into the same risk-asset channel. That made the prior break fragile.
This week’s pattern carries more weight. The current move has lasted beyond a weekend rally fading into the U.S. open. It is a multi-day equity high against a crypto selloff.
The current break is about the buyer
The most important Bitcoin levels are now below the market rather than above it.
Bitcoin’s flash crash below $68,000 triggered around $400 million in liquidations in under an hour and exposed how crowded bullish positioning had become.
The move also pushed BTC below several on-chain levels traders were watching, including the short-term-holder cost basis near $76,900 and the true market mean around $78,000.
That changed the tone. A market that was still trying to frame weakness as a dip suddenly had to price protection.
Current options positioning shows traders paying to protect against a fall toward $50,000 after BTC broke below $70,000, with $60,000 and $50,000 becoming live downside markers rather than distant bear-market talking points.
The immediate battle line is the old $66,900-$68,000 range. That area capped the 2021 cycle, defined part of the 2024 breakout, and is now testing whether the ETF-era rally can defend former resistance as support.
A fast reclaim would argue that the selloff was a liquidation event. Rejection would keep the downside path in control.
The ETF channel is central because it changed Bitcoin’s market structure. The SEC approved spot Bitcoin exchange-traded products on Jan. 10, 2024, opening regulated access to BTC through traditional brokerage accounts.
That channel helped turn Bitcoin from a mostly crypto-native cycle asset into a tradable part of broader institutional portfolios.
The same wrapper that brought in new demand also made flows easier to measure. If spot Bitcoin ETFs are bleeding while AI equities are rallying, a grand anti-Bitcoin thesis is unnecessary.
The marginal buyer only has to be somewhere else, and ETF-flow tables make that test visible day by day.
That is where the AI and mega-IPO angle becomes interesting. SpaceX has filed an S-1 with the SEC, and S&P Dow Jones Indices has consulted on changes to MegaCap eligibility, including reducing IPO seasoning from 12 months to 6 months and creating exceptions for MegaCap companies.
Nasdaq has also run a 2026 Nasdaq-100 consultation around very large new listings.
SpaceX’s index path remains contingent on index provider decisions and timing. The current documents show methodology pressure rather than automatic S&P 500 inclusion.
If investors are preparing for large AI or space-linked listings while the S&P is already being carried by AI earnings, Bitcoin has to compete for attention, liquidity, and risk budget in a market where the excitement is elsewhere.
DeFi gives Bitcoin little help
The broader crypto backdrop offers little help to Bitcoin.
Institutional blockchain adoption is real, but it is increasingly happening through controlled rails. CryptoSlate’s analysis of Wall Street’s on-chain push argued that tokenization can advance without reviving open DeFi in the form retail users remember.
The distinction affects price because tokenized Treasuries, controlled settlement systems, and permissioned market infrastructure create a different feedback loop from the speculative DeFi cycle that once pulled retail liquidity into crypto.
DeFiLlama data puts aggregate DeFi TVL near $73 million, down from $80 billion in late May, and the all-time high of $173 billion in October 2025, well below the kind of broad risk-appetite signal crypto bulls would want to see.
Thus, open DeFi currently offers little offset to Bitcoin’s ETF-flow problem.
Security pressure adds another drag. CertiK has warned that AI has expanded the digital-asset attack surface, as Chainalysis highlights increased pressure from crypto crime across the industry.
For Bitcoin, if institutional crypto interest shifts toward ETFs, tokenized assets, and permissioned rails while retail DeFi remains weak, Bitcoin’s price becomes even more dependent on whether regulated spot demand returns.
That leaves Bitcoin without a second speculative engine at the moment its first one is being tested. In prior cycles, weakness in BTC could still sit beside rising retail leverage, yield-farming appetite, and broad altcoin beta.
The current setup is thinner. Tokenization may be growing, but the capital showing up there is less likely to rotate quickly into open crypto risk.
That difference also changes what a rebound would look like. A retail DeFi recovery would show up as rising TVL, broader stablecoin circulation inside open protocols, stronger fee generation, and renewed leverage across lending and perpetual venues.
A tokenization-led recovery can grow balance sheets while leaving public-market crypto beta weak. For BTC, that split keeps the watchlist focused on ETF flows, options, and the $66,900-$70,000 shelf.
The two paths from here
Bitcoin is close enough to major long-term valuation models that assuming a straight collapse is too simple. It is also damaged enough that assuming an immediate recovery is premature.
The power-law framework is useful here because it shows why the current area carries weight.
For those new to the power law, Bitcoin.com’s power-law chart explains the model as a log-log price corridor with fair-value and band assumptions, while recent market discussion has framed BTC as trading near a historically low power-law zone.
The model provides context rather than destiny. Stock-to-flow looked powerful until it failed badly after the 2021 cycle. Power-law context makes the $54,000 to $58,000 area more important than a random chart level.
The market now has two credible paths:
| Path | Probability | What validates it | What breaks it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liquidity reset and base | 60% | BTC fails to reclaim $66,900-$70,000, ETF outflows persist, options demand around $60,000 and $50,000 grows, and AI equities keep attracting the marginal risk dollar. | Spot ETF flows turn positive quickly and BTC reclaims the old shelf with volume. |
| Fast recovery and recoupling | 40% | BTC retakes $68,000-$70,000, oil and yields cool, ETF flows stabilize, and the move back above short-term-holder cost basis turns the selloff into a liquidation reset. | BTC loses $60,000 and then the $54,000-$58,000 model/support cluster while ETF redemptions continue. |
The first path is more likely because the evidence is already pointing there. Bitcoin has broken key levels, ETF demand is under pressure, hedging has moved lower, and equities are rising for reasons specific to AI earnings and index-flow demand.
The base-case reset can happen without a full bear-market collapse. It points first to a support test and base-building attempt.
The second path remains live because Bitcoin is already trading near an area where long-term models and prior market structure should count.
A rapid flow reversal could quickly repair sentiment. If BTC reclaims $70,000 and the short-term holder cost basis is near $76,900, the divergence would look more like forced de-risking than a cycle failure.
My older $49,000 absolute-bottom area therefore sits as a tail-risk extension rather than the primary forecast.
It becomes credible if Bitcoin loses the $54,000 to $58,000 cluster, if ETF outflows keep running after the liquidation event, and if the AI equity trade continues to absorb the capital that might otherwise have returned to BTC.
For now, Bitcoin is testing whether it can rally with stocks. It is also revealing how much of its ETF-era advance depended on a specific buyer showing up.
The next answer will come from flows and levels, not from the S&P 500’s record alone.
The post Bitcoin’s $63k slide shows ETF demand fighting AI equities for dollar liquidity appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Thomas Lee's BitMine is turning to the preferred-stock market to raise fresh capital for its Ethereum strategy, offering investors a 9.5% annual payout.
On June 3, the company revealed plans to sell 3 million shares of 9.50% Series A perpetual preferred stock with a $100 stated amount, creating a potential $300 million raise.
The shares are expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker BMNP if the listing is approved. Moelis & Company and Cantor are serving as joint lead bookrunners.
If sold in full, the offering would add about $28.5 million in annual dividend obligations, paid weekly when declared by BitMine’s board.
The sale comes as the Ethereum treasury company faces a sharper test of the corporate crypto model. Due to current market conditions, BitMine’s unrealized losses on ETH have exceeded $8 billion after ETH’s decline pushed the asset well below the company’s average purchase price.
Still, this move will deepen the link between the firm's balance sheet, its staking operation, and the public-market investors being asked to finance its next stage of accumulation.
A payout built around Ethereum yield
BitMine said proceeds from the offering may be used for general corporate purposes, including additional purchases of ETH and other digital assets, expansion of its staking and validator infrastructure, working capital, Ethereum-related strategic investments, and repurchases of its common stock.
That broad use of proceeds makes the offering more than a balance-sheet repair. It could allow BitMine to keep accumulating ETH while market prices remain weak, reinforcing the company’s role as the largest public Ethereum treasury firm.
Over the past year, the company has built its ETH portfolio position through aggressive purchases and currently holds more than 5.3 million tokens. This represents around 4.5% of ETH's circulating supply.
Notably, a large share of that stack is staked, allowing BitMine to earn protocol rewards while it holds the tokens.
Chairman Thomas Lee has argued that those staking rewards give Ethereum treasury firms an advantage over Bitcoin-focused vehicles. Unlike Bitcoin, ETH can produce yield through staking, allowing a company to earn returns without selling the underlying asset.
That distinction is central to BitMine’s new preferred stock. At a 9.5% coupon, the full $300 million offering would cost roughly $548,000 a week in dividends.
BitMine has said its annualized staking revenue is running in the hundreds of millions of dollars, suggesting the preferred payout is small relative to the income its staked ETH could generate under ordinary market conditions.
Moreover, the broader Ethereum treasury sector is already moving in that direction. Staking accounted for 60% of disclosed revenue across publicly listed ETH treasury firms in 2025, according to a study from staking provider Everstake.
The report said the figure was drawn from companies that separately broke out staking-related income, showing how active deployment has become a larger part of the public ETH treasury model.
That revenue mix helps explain why BitMine is leaning on Ethereum’s yield profile at the same time it is asking investors to accept a fixed 9.5% payout.
The company is not merely holding ETH as a treasury reserve. It is trying to convert that reserve into a recurring income base that can support capital-market financing.
However, the company’s filing also shows why the structure is not risk-free.
BitMine does not pledge a dedicated pool of staking income to the preferred shares. Instead, the filing says dividends may be funded through available cash, ETH yield activity, securities sales, future financing, or other sources.
Meanwhile, the firm also warns that staking income may not be sufficient and that staked ETH may not be immediately available for withdrawal or sale during periods of stress.
That caveat is central to the transaction because the preferred stock turns part of BitMine’s Ethereum bet into a recurring cash obligation.
The Strategy's STRC comparison has limits
BitMine’s move closely resembles the financing model used by Strategy, Michael Saylor’s Bitcoin treasury company, which has repeatedly tapped preferred shares and other securities to fund crypto accumulation and manage its capital structure.
Both companies are using public-market instruments to transform investor demand for yield into balance-sheet capacity for digital-asset purchases. Both have sought to create securities that appeal to investors who may want exposure to a crypto treasury without directly owning the underlying token.
Both are also operating in a market where the value of their main asset can change sharply before the cash obligation attached to the security comes due.
However, this comparison has limits.
Strategy’s STRC preferred is a variable-rate product designed to help keep the shares trading near their $100 stated amount. Its dividend rate can be adjusted monthly, giving Strategy a tool to respond if market pricing drifts away from par.
BitMine’s Series A preferred is simpler in one respect and stricter in another. It carries a fixed 9.5% coupon, paid weekly in arrears when declared, rather than a variable rate that can be reset to influence the trading price.
If dividends are not paid, however, they accumulate and compound weekly. The rate on unpaid dividends can step up over time, capped at 15% annually.
| Feature | STRC | BitMine Series A |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Strategy, Bitcoin treasury | BitMine, Ethereum treasury |
| Security type | Perpetual preferred | Perpetual preferred |
| Dividend | Variable, currently 11.50% | Fixed 9.50% |
| Payment cadence | Monthly cash | Weekly cash, if declared |
| Purpose | General corporate purposes, including Bitcoin purchases | General corporate purposes, including ETH/digital assets and staking infrastructure |
| Par/stated amount | $100 | $100 |
| Market-stabilizing feature | Dividend adjusted to keep price near $100 | Liquidation preference adjusts using market-price formula, but no variable dividend targeting par |
| Redemption | STRC callable at $101 or higher, plus unpaid dividends | BitMine callable at 110% in first 18 months, 105% from 18 months to three years, then 100%, plus unpaid dividends |
The preferred shares also include a liquidation preference that begins at $100 and adjusts based on a market-price formula, while never falling below $100.
BitMine can redeem the shares at 110% of the stated amount during the first 18 months, 105% from 18 months to three years, and 100% after three years, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. Holders would also have repurchase rights if certain fundamental changes occur.
Those terms give BitMine flexibility, but they also show the price of raising capital in a weaker crypto market. A 9.5% payout is high enough to draw attention from income investors, but it also reflects the premium demanded from a company whose main asset base is tied to ETH.
The post Ethereum treasury giant offers 9.5% payout as BitMine paper losses top $8.5 billion appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Charles Hoskinson has announced that he is “taking a break” from the pressure around Cardano after an emotional plea to the community. His remarks, however, point to frustration rather than abandonment.
It seems that the Cardano founder is openly questioning his remaining power over the network at a time when ADA holders are blaming him for price weakness, governance disputes, and a fragile application ecosystem.
In a video shared on X, Hoskinson said the second half of the year would be hard for Cardano and warned that more dApps and DeFi projects could die as the ecosystem consolidates.
He asked what role he personally has in fixing that problem and said, “I don't have any special powers with Cardano.” In a separate update from his X account, he said: “I'm taking a break. TTYL.”
That combination has triggered the obvious question: has Hoskinson given up on Cardano? It leaves a public pause amid pressure rather than a resignation. He seems to be trying to separate his public responsibility for Cardano's mood from the formal controls that now sit elsewhere.
A founder without the override
Hoskinson's comments cut to the heart of the central tension in Cardano's current era. He remains the person most associated with the chain in public markets, but Cardano's own governance structure was built to make protocol and treasury control more distributed.
That context matters because Hoskinson's list of limits was specific. He said he lacks governance keys, cannot initiate a hard fork or protocol parameter change, has no access to the treasury, and does not own the Cardano trademark.
The Cardano Constitution defines hard-fork initiation, protocol parameter changes, and treasury withdrawals as governance actions.
The Cardano Developer Portal describes a governance model involving DReps, stake pool operators, and the Constitutional Committee, rather than a founder key that can force a protocol change on demand.
Hoskinson still has influence. He leads Input Output Global, commands a large public audience, and can shape debate around funding, development priorities, and ecosystem strategy.
But influence is different from custody over governance keys, direct treasury access, or unilateral authority to initiate a hard fork.
Hoskinson also pointed out that he does not even own the Cardano trademark.
The Cardano Foundation's trademark policy states that the Cardano marks are owned by the Foundation. That detail matters because his comments went beyond blaming the price. They were about whether the levers people assume he controls are actually his to pull.
Cardano's Voltaire roadmap framed voting and treasury systems as the path to a network no longer under IOHK's management.
CryptoSlate's January 2025 Plomin hard fork coverage described that upgrade as a step that gave ADA holders direct voting power over key network decisions, including parameters, treasury withdrawals, and hard forks.
Hoskinson's frustration is part of Cardano's decentralization story. The same governance structure that lets the community resist founder-backed spending also leaves the founder without a clean override when the market demands an immediate rescue.
That design creates a sharp market tension. Cardano markets still assign personal accountability to Hoskinson because he is the network's most recognizable advocate, while governance routes capital allocation and protocol changes through bodies that can disagree with him.
The more Cardano proves it is decentralized, the less realistic it becomes for traders to expect a founder rescue on demand.
The budget fight behind the break
The timing here is interesting. Cardano is in the middle of a live funding fight over how much control Input Output and other ecosystem institutions should have over treasury resources.
Intersect's 2026 budget process sets out a framework for coordinating treasury requests.
A current CGOV proposal for Cardano Vision 2026 seeks 32.92 million ADA for IO Research, with voting scheduled to run into June 8, 2026.
CryptoSlate previously reported that Hoskinson warned Cardano could lose scientists if Input Output's research funding failed.
That May 22 report described the standoff as a test of decentralized governance, with DReps resisting parts of a funding package tied to research, maintenance, scalability, developer tooling, and other technical priorities.
A later CryptoSlate article said Hoskinson was refocusing on Cardano and Midnight as governance resistance mounted.
That recent context cuts against a simple abandonment narrative. Days before the break post, the public framing was a deeper return to Cardano's political and technical fight.
Still, the break lands in a market that has little patience for governance nuance. CryptoSlate's June 4 market snapshot showed Cardano ranked No. 13, with ADA near $0.18, down 10% over 24 hours, down 25% over 30 days, and 93% below its all-time high at the time of retrieval.
The direction of pressure is clear enough. The Cardano price page shows an asset that has lost momentum while rival ecosystems compete for developers, stablecoins, and liquidity.
That is where Hoskinson's comments become more consequential. If Cardano's DeFi base, dApp sector, and funding process need to improve, the fix has to move through governance participants, builders, infrastructure teams, and ecosystem institutions.
A founder can argue, persuade, threaten to walk away from specific proposals, or take a break from public pressure. He cannot make a decentralized governance system behave like a company board that reports to him.
The real test is execution
Cardano's near-term question centers on whether the network can turn decentralized control into visible execution.
CryptoSlate's May 21 analysis of Cardano's hard-fork vote and DeFi weakness framed the Van Rossem upgrade as a test of whether cheaper scripts, cryptographic upgrades, and governance coordination can translate into developer activity.
That remains the most durable benchmark.
The bearish take is that Hoskinson's break becomes a confidence shock if the community interprets it as withdrawal while funding disputes and usage weakness remain unresolved.
That scenario would leave Cardano with the downside of founder dependency and the friction of decentralized approval: traders still blame one person, while the system requires many parties to act.
A constructive take would be that the moment forces Cardano stakeholders to use the system they built.
DReps, SPOs, Intersect, the Cardano Foundation, EMURGO, Input Output, and builders would have to make budget choices, defend priorities, and deliver measurable results without relying on Hoskinson's presence as the default coordination layer.
The next signal is whether the active research proposal clears or fails, whether Cardano's institutions respond with a clearer execution plan, and whether usage metrics such as TVL, stablecoin liquidity, DEX volume, and active deployments begin to move.
Hoskinson still appears engaged with Cardano's future, even as he steps back from immediate public pressure. His break has exposed a sharper question for the network: if the founder cannot pull the levers people want him to pull, can Cardano's governance system pull them in time?
The post Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson takes “a break” – exposing who really controls ADA’s next move appeared first on CryptoSlate.
CryptoTicker.io
Zcash is one of the biggest losers in the crypto market today, with $ZEC price dropping by more than 10% in 24 hours while the broader market also trades under pressure. The sharp Zcash crash comes after a strong rally that pushed the privacy coin back into the spotlight, making it more exposed to profit-taking once sentiment turned bearish.
According to Binance market data, Zcash was trading around the $540 range, down more than 11% in 24 hours, with a market cap near $9 billion and 24-hour trading volume above $1.3 billion. The token also moved between a 24-hour high above $631 and a low near $538, showing how aggressive the sell-off became during the day.
Why Is Zcash Crashing Today?
The main reason behind the Zcash crash is not one single event. Instead, ZEC is being hit by a combination of profit-taking, market-wide weakness, technical uncertainty, and fear around recent network-related headlines.
ZEC had already rallied strongly before the current correction. The privacy coin became one of the strongest performers in the market as traders rotated into privacy-focused crypto assets. Business Insider recently reported that Zcash had surged sharply over the past month while Bitcoin gained much less, driven by renewed interest in financial privacy and institutional attention around ZEC.
This matters because assets that rise the fastest often fall the hardest when the market turns red. Traders who entered ZEC earlier may now be locking in profits, especially after the coin moved into overextended territory.
ZEC Rally Made the Correction More Violent
Zcash did not enter this crash from a weak position. It entered it after a major rally.
That is why the correction looks sharper than in many other altcoins. When a token gains strong momentum in a short period, late buyers often enter near the top. Once the price starts falling, these buyers may exit quickly, adding more selling pressure.
This creates a chain reaction:
ZEC pumps strongly, traders chase the move, the broader market turns bearish, profit-taking starts, leveraged positions get squeezed, and the price drops faster than the rest of the market.
In simple terms, ZEC is crashing the most because it had more gains to give back.
Zcash Network Headlines Added More Fear
Another key reason behind the Zcash crash is the confusion around the network.
Reports on June 3 suggested that the Zcash blockchain appeared to stop producing blocks for several hours. However, later explanations said the issue may have been related to block explorers rather than the blockchain itself. CoinDesk reported that the apparent disruption was mainly linked to block explorers tracking activity incorrectly, not necessarily a full chain failure.
Zcash network was fully functional and that the apparent problem came from some block explorer applications being connected to a faulty node.
Even if the network was not actually down, the timing was bad. In a nervous market, headlines about a possible blockchain issue can quickly trigger fear, uncertainty, and doubt. For traders, that can be enough reason to sell first and ask questions later.
Emergency Orchard Bug Fix Increased Short-Term Risk Sentiment
The Zcash crash also comes shortly after an emergency upgrade related to the Orchard shielded pool.
Zcash Foundation released Zebra updates after engineers found and fixed a critical soundness bug in the Orchard Action circuit. Reports stated that the emergency response included Zebra 4.5.3 and Zebra 5.0.0, with no known exploit reported.
CoinMarketCap also reported that Zcash completed an emergency upgrade to fix the critical Orchard privacy pool bug, adding that no funds were lost and user privacy was not affected.
Still, the market does not always wait for full technical explanations. Words like “critical bug,” “emergency upgrade,” and “privacy pool” can create short-term panic, especially around a privacy-focused coin where trust in the protocol is essential.
Privacy Coin Narrative Is Still Strong, But Volatile
Zcash has benefited from a stronger privacy coin narrative in 2026. As blockchain transparency, AI surveillance, and financial data tracking become bigger topics, some traders see ZEC as a hedge against total on-chain visibility.
This narrative helped ZEC outperform many major cryptocurrencies recently. However, strong narratives can also become crowded trades. When too many traders are positioned in the same direction, any negative headline or market pullback can cause a sharp reversal.
That is exactly what appears to be happening now. ZEC is not necessarily crashing because the privacy narrative is dead. It is crashing because the rally became too crowded, too fast.
Zcash Price Analysis: Key Levels to Watch
From a technical perspective, ZEC’s drop below the $600 area is important. The token recently traded above $631 before falling toward the $540 range, according to Binance data.
The next important levels to watch are:
- $540–$520: This is the immediate support zone. If ZEC holds this area, the crash may slow down.
- $500: This is the psychological level. A break below $500 could trigger more panic selling.
- $600: This is now the key recovery level. If ZEC reclaims $600, traders may regain confidence.
- $630–$650: This is the recent resistance zone. A move back above this area would suggest that buyers are returning strongly.
For now, the chart suggests that ZEC is in a correction phase after a strong rally. The next move depends on whether buyers defend the $520–$540 zone or whether the sell-off continues toward $500.
Is the Zcash Crash a Buying Opportunity or a Warning Sign?
The Zcash crash could be seen in two ways.
For bullish traders, this may be a normal correction after a major rally. ZEC still has a strong privacy narrative, renewed market attention, and growing discussion around financial confidentiality in crypto.
For cautious traders, the crash is a warning that ZEC became overheated. The combination of a strong rally, emergency bug-fix headlines, and confusion around network activity shows that ZEC remains a high-volatility asset.
The most important point is that Zcash is not falling in isolation. The broader crypto market is also under pressure. But ZEC is falling harder because it had already become one of the most aggressive recent movers.
Final Thoughts: Why ZEC Is Crashing the Most
Zcash is crashing harder than the rest of the crypto market because it entered the sell-off from an overextended position. The recent ZEC rally attracted strong attention, but it also created room for heavy profit-taking.
At the same time, network-related confusion and the emergency Orchard bug fix added short-term fear. Even though reports suggest that no funds were lost and the blockchain was not necessarily offline, the headlines were enough to pressure traders during an already weak market.
For now, the Zcash crash looks like a mix of profit-taking, technical correction, market-wide weakness, and fear-driven selling. If ZEC holds above the $520–$540 support zone, the correction may stabilize. But if the price breaks below $500, the sell-off could deepen further.
$ZEC
Cardano Crash June 2026: ADA Drops Below $0.20
The Cardano crash in June 2026 has become one of the biggest talking points in the crypto market, as ADA fell sharply while the broader market also turned red. At the time of writing, Cardano is trading around $0.188, after falling from an intraday high near $0.214. This means ADA is down by roughly 12% in 24 hours, underperforming major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, and Solana.
The broader crypto market is also under pressure. Bitcoin is trading around $63,900, down from an intraday high near $66,799, confirming that the weakness is not limited to Cardano alone. However, the size of ADA’s decline shows that Cardano is facing deeper selling pressure than most top crypto assets.
Why Is Cardano Crashing?
The Cardano crash is not caused by one single factor. Instead, ADA is being hit by a combination of market-wide weakness, technical breakdowns, and Cardano-specific concerns.
The first major reason is the broader crypto market decline. When Bitcoin falls sharply, altcoins usually react with even stronger losses. This pattern is visible again, as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP, and several other major coins are trading in the red.
But Cardano’s decline is stronger because ADA is also dealing with negative ecosystem sentiment. Recent reports highlighted concerns after TapTools, a Cardano analytics platform, announced that it would wind down operations after nearly four years. The platform cited executive departures and rising operating costs as reasons behind the shutdown.
TapTools Shutdown Adds Pressure on ADA
The TapTools shutdown matters because it is not only about one platform closing. For many investors, it raises broader questions about the strength of the Cardano ecosystem, especially during a difficult market cycle.
Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson also warned that more projects could fail in 2026, pointing to harsh market conditions and funding challenges across the ecosystem. His comments added more pressure to ADA at a time when traders were already nervous.
This created a negative feedback loop: weak market conditions hurt Cardano projects, project closures hurt sentiment, and weaker sentiment pushes ADA lower.
Cardano Summit 2026 Cancellation Hurts Confidence
Another factor behind the Cardano crash is the cancellation of Cardano Summit 2026 in Singapore. The event was cancelled after a treasury funding proposal failed to reach the required two-thirds supermajority under Cardano’s governance rules. A smaller EMURGO proposal for TOKEN2049 Singapore was approved, but the cancellation of the flagship summit still created concerns around governance alignment and ecosystem momentum.
This does not mean Cardano governance is broken. In fact, it shows that Cardano’s decentralized voting system has real power. However, from a market perspective, the failed vote added to the bearish narrative around ADA at the wrong time.
ADA Price Prediction: Can Cardano Recover?
From a technical perspective, ADA’s biggest problem is the loss of the $0.20 level. This is both a psychological and technical zone. If Cardano fails to recover above $0.20 quickly, traders may continue to treat the chart as bearish.
The next important recovery zone is between $0.22 and $0.24. ADA needs to reclaim this area to reduce bearish pressure and show that buyers are stepping back in. Without that recovery, Cardano could remain vulnerable to further downside.
However, if the broader crypto market stabilizes and Bitcoin rebounds, ADA could attempt a short-term recovery. The main question is whether Cardano-specific sentiment can improve after the recent TapTools shutdown, governance controversy, and ecosystem concerns.
Is the Cardano Crash a Buying Opportunity?
The Cardano crash June 2026 could attract long-term believers who see ADA at historically low levels. However, the current setup remains risky. ADA is not only falling because of the market; it is also facing real questions about ecosystem activity, project funding, and investor confidence.
For short-term traders, the most important level is $0.20. A reclaim of this level could trigger a relief bounce. For longer-term investors, the more important question is whether Cardano can prove that its ecosystem still has enough builders, users, and funding support to compete with faster-growing blockchain networks.
Final Thoughts
The Cardano crash in June 2026 shows how quickly sentiment can shift in the crypto market. ADA is falling harder than most major cryptocurrencies because the token is being hit from several sides at once: a weak crypto market, a technical breakdown below $0.20, the TapTools shutdown, Charles Hoskinson’s warning about possible ecosystem failures, and the cancellation of Cardano Summit 2026.
Cardano is not finished, but the market is clearly demanding stronger proof of growth. Until ADA reclaims key levels and ecosystem confidence improves, the Cardano price prediction remains cautious.
$ADA, $Cardano
The cryptocurrency market is experiencing renewed selling pressure, and Ripple’s native token has become one of the hardest-hit major altcoins. The latest technical developments point to an accelerating XRP price crash, with the asset violating a critical psychological and structural baseline that had previously kept buyers in the game.
Data from the 4-hour XRP/USD chart reveals that the digital asset has officially broken below the key 1.20 support level, shifting market control entirely over to the bears.
XRP Price Analysis: How XRP Coin Crashed
$XRP has been locked in a well-defined downtrend for several weeks. This structural decline is clearly demarcated by a prominent descending yellow trendline that has consistently capped any attempt at a bullish reversal.
The breakdown unfolded rapidly through several distinct phases:
- The Consolidative Failure: XRP initially consolidated below a major horizontal resistance level at 1.30. Unable to muster enough buying volume to test or break this ceiling, sellers gradually pushed the asset lower.
- The Critical Breach: The horizontal line at 1.20 represented a vital historical defense mechanism for bulls. However, consecutive red 4-hour candles shows the price cutting straight through this level with expanding downward velocity.
- Current Position: XRP is actively trading well under the broken support, hovering near the 1.169-1.170 zone. The old support level at 1.20 has now structurally flipped into an immediate overhead resistance level.
Oversold RSI Signals Extreme Selling Intensity
The Relative Strength Index (RSI), which tracks the speed and change of price movements, further confirms the severity of this latest xrp price drop.
The 14-period RSI on the 4-hour interval has plummeted deep into oversold territory, currently printing at 31.03 with its moving average dropping even lower to 28.98. While an oversold RSI sometimes suggests a temporary relief bounce or stabilization could be on the horizon, it primarily highlights the sheer velocity of the institutional and retail distribution taking place.
Traders should exercise caution, as assets can remain technically oversold for extended periods during aggressive structural breakdowns. The fact that the price is hugging the bottom of its immediate trading range indicates that buyers are currently staying on the sidelines, waiting for a definitive macro bottom to form.
XRP Price Prediction: What's Next for XRP?
With the 1.20 support invalidated, market participants are scrambling to identify where the asset might find its next structural floor.
If the current bearish momentum cannot be arrested, the next major horizontal line of defense sits visibly at 1.15. A failure to hold the 1.15 level could accelerate panic selling, opening the door for an extension of the bear market toward psychological territory closer to the 1.00 mark.
For a bullish invalidation or recovery narrative to take shape, XRP would first need to reclaim the 1.20 level on high volume, flip it back to support, and eventually mount a challenge against the long-term descending yellow trendline. Until then, the path of least resistance remains firmly to the downside.
Crypto Price Today with the current Crash
The ongoing correction is not isolated to Ripple. The broader market showcases a synchronized retreat across major digital assets over the last 24 hours and trailing 7 days.
Below is a snapshot of the live prices and performances of the top market capitalization tokens:
| # | Name & Ticker | Price | 24h % | 7d % | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bitcoin ($BTC) | $63,969.86 | -4.17% | -11.91% | $1,281,865,048,826 |
| 2 | Ethereum ($ETH) | $1,771.81 | -4.44% | -10.52% | $213,831,951,334 |
| 3 | Tether ($USDT) | $0.9990 | +0.04% | +0.07% | $187,351,800,267 |
| 4 | BNB ($BNB) | $604.15 | -4.62% | -4.46% | $81,430,530,259 |
| 5 | USD Coin ($USDC) | $0.9999 | -0.01% | -0.01% | $75,968,697,174 |
| 6 | XRP ($XRP) | $1.17 | -4.58% | -9.65% | $72,639,040,656 |
| 7 | Solana ($SOL) | $69.81 | -5.81% | -13.52% | $40,394,064,107 |
| 8 | TRON ($TRX) | $0.3290 | -1.42% | -5.67% | $31,197,986,438 |
| 9 | Hyperliquid ($HYPE) | $67.17 | -7.16% | -18.11% | $17,030,547,488 |
| 10 | Dogecoin ($DOGE) | $0.08913 | -4.48% | -8.95% | $13,772,535,259 |
he cryptocurrency market faced an abrupt and severe wave of liquidations over the opening days of June, catching market participants off guard. Bitcoin ($BTC) and Ethereum ($ETH) both suffered double-digit percentage losses within a 72-hour window.
The aggressive deleveraging event wiped out roughly $250 billion from the total digital asset market capitalization. Paradoxically, traditional financial markets have shown zero signs of systemic stress, with major US stock indices continuing to trade near their historical highs. This stark divergence leaves investors debating whether the correction is an isolated crypto liquidity shakeout, pure market manipulation, or if digital assets are front-running a broader macroeconomic turn.
Bitcoin Plunges 17% and Drags Altcoins Lower
Bitcoin led the market downturn, crashing by 17% over the course of three days. The premier cryptocurrency plummeted by $12,800, dropping from a stable position at $74,000 down to a local low of $61,300. The rapid velocity of the decline triggered an estimated $1.1 billion in total crypto liquidations across derivatives exchanges, primarily punishing over-leveraged long positions.
The bearish momentum instantly rippled into the altcoin market. Ethereum suffered a concurrent 14% drop, breaking past critical psychological support levels. The second-largest cryptocurrency by market cap hit a 13-month low of $1,715, marking its lowest valuation since April 12, 2025.
Spot Bitcoin ETFs See Record Redemptions
A primary catalyst accelerating the spot price decline is a sudden, aggressive shift in institutional sentiment. Just four days into June, US spot Bitcoin ETFs have already registered a staggering $1.4 billion in net outflows.
This rapid institutional exit follows heightened macro uncertainty regarding upcoming United States employment data and localized geopolitical flare-ups. Analysts point out that rising Treasury yields have forced institutional desks to de-risk, treating spot crypto products as the first line of liquidity to prune from portfolios.
Is the Crypto Crash Manipulated or a Macro Front-Runner?
The lack of negative news or corresponding drops in the equity markets has fueled two competing theories across trading desks regarding whether the crypto market is being actively manipulated:
- Whale Manipulation: With major structural regulations navigating through global committees, large-scale holders ("whales") and institutional market makers may be engineering a local washout. By driving prices down rapidly, they trigger stop-losses and liquidate retail long positions, allowing them to accumulate spot supply at much cheaper price floors.
- Equity Market Front-Running: Historically, the highly liquid, 24/7 crypto market acts as an early liquidity gauge. Some analysts argue that crypto is not manipulated but is simply front-running an impending stock market correction, pricing in sticky Federal Reserve inflation expectations before traditional equities respond.
Traders are now closely watching the $60,000 macro support zone for Bitcoin. Failure to defend this boundary could open the door for an extended bearish structure heading deeper into the summer.
The cryptocurrency market is experiencing a significant downturn today, with major digital assets flashing red across the board. Data from the major token tracking indexes reveals a broad-based sell-off affecting both market leaders and prominent altcoins, wiping out billions in total market capitalization over a 24-hour period.
Crypto Crash Today: Bitcoin and Ethereum Lead the Decline
The CoinMarketCap 20 Index DTF (CMC20) has declined by 5.14% over the last 24 hours, pushing its Year-to-Date (YTD) losses to 30.18%. This underscores a broader systemic correction within the digital asset ecosystem rather than isolated token liquidations.
- Bitcoin ($BTC): The largest cryptocurrency by market cap has dropped by 5.10% over the last 24 hours, trading at $63,501.86. Zooming out, Bitcoin’s weekly performance shows a 13.21% decline, while its YTD performance stands at a loss of 27.44%.
- Ethereum ($ETH): The leading smart contract platform is trading at $1,772.45, reflecting a 5.40% daily decline. Ethereum has felt a deeper impact than Bitcoin over longer timeframes, posting a 10.80% drop over the last 7 days and a staggering 40.26% decline YTD.
Crypto Prices Face Deeper Liquidations
Excluding stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC), which have maintained their pegs, the altcoin market is bearing the brunt of the volatility.
| Asset | Current Price | 24h Change | 7d Change | YTD Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNB ($BNB) | $600.86 | -6.44% | -5.15% | -30.39% |
| XRP ($XRP) | $1.16 | -6.03% | -9.50% | -36.70% |
| Solana ($SOL) | $68.96 | -7.96% | -14.77% | -44.60% |
| Dogecoin ($DOGE) | $0.08867 | -5.36% | -9.69% | -24.44% |
- Solana (SOL) remains one of the hardest-hit large-cap assets in this correction cycle, losing nearly 8% of its value in 24 hours and over 44% since the beginning of the year. Meanwhile, Layer-1 networks like BNB and XRP are down over 6% today.
- Hyperliquid (HYPE) shows a minor variation, down 5.85% today but remaining up 19.82% over the last 7 days due to isolated ecosystem momentum. However, its intraday trajectory matches the dominant market trend.
Crypto Crash Reason: Explaining the Downturn
While digital asset volatility is standard, several macroeconomic and structural factors typically trigger synchronized market drawdowns of this scale:
1. Macroeconomic Headwinds and Interest Rate Pressures
Broader financial markets heavily influence the digital asset space. Sustained high-interest rates set by the Federal Reserve often drive capital away from risk-on assets like cryptocurrencies and tech equities toward safer yields like U.S. Treasuries. Institutional investors pull liquidity from volatile positions during macroeconomic uncertainty.
2. Derivative Liquidations
When major support levels break—such as Bitcoin falling below key psychological thresholds—it often triggers a cascade of automated liquidations on futures exchanges. Long positions are forcefully closed, introducing massive sell volume to the market within a short timeframe, accelerating the drop.
3. Outflows from Institutional Investment Vehicles
Spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs heavily impact price action. Sustained net outflows from these institutional vehicles reduce structural buying pressure, allowing spot market sell orders to push asset prices down more aggressively.
What is Next for the Crypto Market?
The short-term trend remains firmly bearish as trading volume spikes amidst the sell-off, indicating active distribution. Traders are looking for signs of price stabilization around major historical support zones before anticipating a trend reversal. Until macroeconomic indicators ease or institutional buy walls return, the crypto market is likely to experience continued choppy price action.
Decrypt
The Nobel Prize-winning AI researcher says humanity is standing in the "foothills of the singularity."
With Bitcoin falling hard this week and down nearly 50% from peak. Strategy's Michael Saylor is pointing the finger at the AI boom.
Tether investor Christopher Harborne and BitMEX co-founder Ben Delo’s outspent Britain's traditional political donors.
Bernstein is bullish on Bitcoin miners as they increasingly power the AI boom, assigning “Outperform” ratings to TeraWulf and Cipher Digital.
Some of America's biggest companies helped squash crypto fraud stemming from organized crime in Southeast Asia.
U.Today - IT, AI and Fintech Daily News for You Today
The financial world is harshly scrutinizing Michael Saylor's Strategy Inc. after the company recorded a historic $10.8 billion unrealized loss on its Bitcoin holdings.
Investment advisor Ross Gerber has fiercely criticized Michael Saylor for a perceived market "rug pull" after Strategy Inc. sold 32 Bitcoin, breaking the firm's famous "never sell" pledge for the first time since late 2022.
Dave Portnoy refuses to sell his XRP and Bitcoin holdings despite a massive crash, revealing a million-dollar reason keeping him in the crypto market.
Michael Saylor attributes the recent Bitcoin drawdown to a $400 billion capital rotation into AI infrastructure, framing the crypto market collapse as a temporary squeeze.
This mirrors a similar trend in the past month, drawing attention.
Blockonomi
Key Highlights
- Bybit integrates USDPT stablecoin with fiat conversion services for Latin American users
- Western Union’s digital dollar debuts on a leading cryptocurrency exchange platform
- USDPT combines Solana blockchain infrastructure with traditional fiat currency gateways
- Partnership aims to accelerate cross-border transactions using stablecoin technology
- USDPT transitions from payment-only utility to full trading and fiat integration
Cryptocurrency exchange Bybit has integrated Western Union’s USDPT stablecoin into its fiat gateway services, marking a significant milestone for stablecoin adoption in Latin America. This collaboration represents the first time Western Union’s digital currency appears on a prominent crypto trading platform, bridging regulated stablecoin infrastructure with local currency exchange services.
Bybit Enables USDPT Access via Fiat Gateway
Bybit has rolled out support for USDPT purchases and sales through its One-Click Buy feature. Qualified users can now transact with the token provided their accounts meet eligibility requirements. This integration establishes an immediate fiat-to-stablecoin pathway within Western Union’s digital currency ecosystem.
Built on Solana’s blockchain infrastructure, USDPT maintains a direct 1:1 peg to the United States dollar. The stablecoin is issued by Anchorage Digital Bank, N.A., which also maintains the reserve assets supporting each token. This arrangement provides the digital asset with established regulatory oversight and institutional-grade custody solutions.
Through this partnership, Bybit contributes its trading infrastructure, fiat liquidity pools, and extensive customer network. Meanwhile, Western Union supplies its established payment channels, regulatory compliance framework, and decades of settlement expertise. The collaboration seeks to minimize transaction delays and eliminate inefficiencies in international money transfers.
Western Union Advances Digital Asset Initiatives
Western Union unveiled USDPT in May as a cornerstone of its evolving digital asset roadmap. The financial services giant developed this stablecoin specifically to facilitate practical payment applications and transaction settlement. Additionally, the platform enables continuous operation independent of conventional banking schedules.
The Bybit partnership extends USDPT’s utility beyond simple payment channels into comprehensive cryptocurrency trading ecosystems. Market participants in eligible regions can acquire tokens using their national currencies and subsequently exchange them back. This functionality positions the stablecoin as a practical tool for remittance services and digital dollar accessibility.
With over 140 years of experience in global money transfer services, Western Union’s entrance into stablecoin territory signals broader payment sector momentum toward blockchain settlement solutions. Furthermore, this initiative responds to escalating consumer demand for more efficient and economical international payment options.
Payment Industry Embraces Stablecoin Technology
Dollar-backed stablecoins have become a dominant force within digital asset markets. According to DeFiLlama analytics, the combined market capitalization of USD-pegged stablecoins approaches $320 billion. As a result, established payment companies increasingly explore regulated token solutions for settlement operations and fund transfers.
MoneyGram recently unveiled MGUSD on the Stellar network to power blockchain-enabled payment infrastructure. Similarly, Mastercard has broadened its integration of USDC, PYUSD, and RLUSD across specific settlement workflows. Western Union’s USDPT introduction now adds another recognized payment industry leader to this growing landscape.
The Bybit-Western Union alliance positions USDPT as a connector between cryptocurrency trading platforms and traditional financial systems. The stablecoin enables round-the-clock settlement while maintaining connections to regulated banking reserves. This strategic launch represents a concentrated effort to accelerate stablecoin adoption throughout Latin American markets.
The post Bybit Partners with Western Union to Enable USDPT Stablecoin Trading appeared first on Blockonomi.
TLDR:
- The pre-IPO token market has recorded $1.25B in cumulative trading volume with over 20,000 active holders on-chain.
- SPV-backed protocols like PreStocks and Paimon Finance lead adoption by offering real share-backed token exposure via DEXes.
- Synthetic contracts carry no underlying share claims, introducing basis risk between oracle prices and actual private valuations.
- Closed-end fund structures offer SEC-registered exposure but limit redemptions and charge annual fees as high as 3.6%.
The pre-IPO tokenized equity sector has grown sharply on-chain, with platforms recording $1.25 billion in cumulative trading volume.
Over 3.5 million transactions have been processed across these protocols. More than 20,000 holders now participate in the space.
The combined market capitalization of tokenized pre-IPO stocks sits near $130 million, while Solana-based tokenized equity volumes continue reaching new weekly highs.
SPV-Backed and Synthetic Protocols Lead Market Adoption
Analyst Tanaka recently outlined the three main structures operating in the pre-IPO token space. SPV-backed protocols issue tokens tied to special purpose vehicles that hold actual company shares.
Synthetic contracts rely on oracles for pricing but carry no real share backing. Closed-end funds offer equity exposure inside regulated vehicles with net asset value pricing.
SPV-backed protocols currently lead in both adoption and secondary market liquidity. PreStocks operates on Solana, offering instant DEX trading, no investment minimums, and Regulation S compliance.
It lists names including SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic, Anduril, and Neuralink. Paimon Finance follows a similar model across BNB and HashKey chains, covering SpaceX, xAI, and Stripe, among others.
Both PreStocks and Paimon Finance anchor prices through internal pricing engines. They also rely on bid-ask spreads within their respective liquidity pools. This structure gives retail participants access to private company exposure without traditional barriers.
Synthetic protocols such as Ventuals and TradeXYZ price assets using real-time oracle feeds. Exits happen at market price, with funding rates serving as the primary cost.
However, these instruments carry no underlying share claims and introduce basis risk between contract prices and actual private valuations.
Closed-End Funds Prioritize Regulation Over Liquidity
Closed-end fund structures take a different approach, placing regulatory compliance at the center. Protocols like USVC and Fundrise VCX register with the SEC or equivalent regulators.
They price holdings to net asset value and restrict redemptions, often to quarterly windows following an IPO event.
Annual management fees on some of these products reach as high as 3.6%. While the regulatory structure provides investor protections, overall liquidity remains lower than what SPV secondary markets offer. This trade-off suits participants who prioritize compliance over trading flexibility.
Tanaka noted in the post that several companies have declared certain SPV token transfers void under their corporate bylaws.
This has triggered price volatility for affected tokens. Premiums over last known private valuations also remain elevated across most listings.
The timing of upcoming IPOs and public market capacity to absorb multiple large listings in 2026 also remain uncertain.
Tanaka disclosed no current positions in these instruments at present premium levels. The broader real-world asset infrastructure layer, nonetheless, continues to develop.
The post On-Chain Pre-IPO Tokens Hit $1.25B in Trading Volume as Tokenized Equity Market Expands appeared first on Blockonomi.
TLDR:
- Binance Research projects crypto exchanges will channel $2T and 300M investors into equities by 2031.
- Over 93% of Binance stock trading users come from emerging markets facing traditional brokerage barriers.
- Stablecoins cut cross-border off-ramp costs by an average of 3.6% and roughly $40 per transaction.
- AI themes captured over 70% of total fund inflows on Binance, reflecting strong early adopter awareness.
Tokenized equities and stablecoin-settled stock trading are reshaping global market access. Binance Research projects that crypto exchanges could channel US$2T in capital and 300 million new investors into global equity markets by 2031.
The report maps structural demand from emerging markets, where brokerage barriers and geographic restrictions have historically locked out most retail investors. Stablecoins are emerging as the settlement layer of choice for 24/7 equity exposure.
Emerging Markets Drive Demand for Global Equity Access
Close to 93% of Binance stock trading users originate from emerging markets. This signals deep structural demand that traditional brokerages have largely failed to serve.
Geography, brokerage requirements, and currency barriers have kept participation rates below 20% across most non-US markets.
In contrast, roughly 62% of Americans hold equities through direct ownership or retirement accounts. Meanwhile, US equities account for approximately half of total global equity market capitalization.
Foreign investors hold only around 18% of that market, creating a sharp asymmetry in capital allocation globally.
Fractionalization is a key enabler in this context. Stocks like SNDK and MU reached share prices of US$1,716 and US$1,064 respectively in 2026.
The average worker across Africa and Southern Asia earns below US$300 per month, making single-share ownership effectively out of reach without fractionalization.
The next 300 million equity investors are coming from emerging markets.
They'll be onboarded through crypto exchanges, settling in stablecoins, trading 24/7.
We mapped the US$2T opportunity in our latest report on direct stock trading and tokenised equities
…
— Binance Research (@BinanceResearch) June 4, 2026
Crypto exchanges functioning as financial super-apps remove the friction between holding capital and deploying it.
A portfolio with just 5% allocated to Bitcoin delivered 82% cumulative returns between 2020 and 2026, compared to 60% without. The Sharpe ratio also improved from 0.52 to 0.63 over that period.
Stablecoins and Tokenized Equities Reshape Market Infrastructure
Stablecoins eliminate an average 3.6% and roughly US$40 per transaction in off-ramp costs for cross-border users.
They also remove the need to route funds through local banks before reaching separate brokerage accounts. This positions stablecoins as a practical settlement layer for continuous equity exposure.
TradFi-linked perpetuals have grown from a negligible base to approximately 10% of total stablecoin trading volume. Direct stock trading is expected to deepen this further.
The integration of spot equities on the same platform as derivatives also simplifies funding rate arbitrage execution considerably.
Tokenization adds another layer of utility that traditional equity structures cannot replicate. Staked tokenized shares reduce circulating supply, requiring custodians to purchase equivalent underlying shares.
According to the Inelastic Markets Hypothesis, the realistic market value uplift for a large-cap equity sits at an estimated US$0.30 to US$1 per US$1 locked.
Semiconductors and equipment captured roughly one-third of total fund inflows on Binance’s platform, generating 3.3 times the trading volume of the next sector.
AI-related themes captured over 70% of total fund inflows, reflecting strong financial awareness among early adopters on the platform.
The post Binance Research: Crypto Could Unlock 300M Equity Investors by 2031 appeared first on Blockonomi.
The cryptocurrency market currently demonstrates an intricate balance between sudden rallies and prolonged consolidation phases. Retail buyers and institutional funds are actively shifting capital toward assets offering clear utility and definitive structures. With inflation indices showing persistent stiffness, traditional investment avenues yield lower relative returns, pushing participants to search for alternative digital networks.
Market sentiment reflects cautious optimism, driven by advancements in smart contract capabilities, enhanced privacy protocols, and interoperability solutions. As global liquidity tightens, finding sustainable value requires looking beyond surface-level hype. Investors are rigorously evaluating utility-driven frameworks and established networks that consistently deliver tangible financial benefits to determine the top crypto to buy.
1. BlockDAG: The Pure Mathematical Multiplier (The Direct Arbitrage)
When discussing the next big crypto, pure math often overrides mere speculation. A direct entry price of $0.00000044 against a guaranteed $0.001 buyback creates an unprecedented mathematical arbitrage. The ledger does not lie. BlockDAG has opened its Legacy Sale at an incredibly low floor price of $0.00000044 per token.
By immediately registering these assets for the official Buyback Program through the platform dashboard, participants lock in a contract to sell those exact coins back to the project at a fixed rate of $0.001 per token. This clear mathematical loop completely detaches the asset from standard market sentiment. Those wondering what crypto to invest in will find immense value in this setup. This specific low entry allocation is strictly capped.
Once the initial token batch is claimed, the massive price gap vanishes. Secure the $0.00000044 price floor before the direct arbitrage window closes permanently. BlockDAG is positioning itself as the next crypto to explode by offering a structured exit plan. It stands out clearly as the best crypto to buy right now for buyers who prefer calculated returns over unpredictable price action.
2. Chainlink: Securing Real-World Asset Tokenization
Chainlink continues to establish its dominance across the decentralized finance sector. In early 2026, the network facilitated a major transition by bringing an $11 billion Arizona copper mine on-chain. This milestone underscores the growing demand for secure real-world asset tokenization. The Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol now handles vast amounts of institutional data. Leading financial entities utilize Chainlink to verify reserves and execute complex smart contracts seamlessly.
As a result, Chainlink frequently appears among the top crypto gainers during periods of high institutional activity. Its robust infrastructure prevents data tampering and ensures smooth multi-chain connectivity. Buyers tracking solid long-term utility view Chainlink as a critical component for the future digital economy.
3. Toncoin: Expanding the Telegram Ecosystem
Toncoin has experienced a highly active 2026, driven by its deep integration with the Telegram messaging application. The network recently saw a massive surge when Telegram announced it would officially become the largest validator for the network. This structural shift drastically reduced transaction fees and activated new core upgrades. Furthermore, the introduction of ad revenue sharing directly in Toncoin has empowered channel owners globally.
Despite facing high volatility and heavy whale movements, the supply of USDT on the Toncoin network crossed $500 million, proving its growing utility as a global payment rail. Toncoin remains a highly watched asset for users seeking scalable social media integrations.
4. Cronos: Enhancing Layer-1 Scalability
Cronos has maintained steady development throughout 2026, focusing on enhancing its layer-1 capabilities. Supported by the extensive Crypto.com ecosystem, the network offers seamless transitions between centralized finance and decentralized applications. Developers are actively deploying new tools to improve transaction throughput and reduce latency. The platform recently introduced significant upgrades to support complex gaming and decentralized finance protocols.
By maintaining a highly interoperable framework, Cronos allows users to bridge assets across multiple networks efficiently. Its dedicated community and consistent technical improvements provide a solid foundation for future growth. Investors value Cronos for its reliable performance and strong backing within the broader digital asset exchange environment.
Last Say
Evaluating the current market requires a strict focus on utility and clear financial structures. Chainlink leads the way in institutional data verification and asset tokenization. Toncoin leverages its massive social media base to create a unique peer-to-peer payment ecosystem. Cronos provides a reliable layer-1 solution backed by major exchange infrastructure.
However, BlockDAG offers a fundamentally different approach. By providing a fixed $0.00000044 entry price and a guaranteed $0.001 buyback contract, it removes the typical volatility associated with digital assets. Participants seeking calculated returns should prioritize BlockDAG before the limited allocation completely disappears.
The post BlockDAG’s $0.001 buyback offer, Chainlink, Toncoin, and Cronos: Ranking the top crypto to buy for massive gains appeared first on Blockonomi.
Key Takeaways
- Republican senators demand equitable capital requirements for cryptocurrency banking activities
- Lummis spearheads GOP effort demanding transparent crypto banking capital frameworks
- Lawmakers oppose Basel Committee’s stringent 1,250% risk weighting for digital assets
- Republican coalition demands technology-agnostic regulatory approach for crypto
- Senate GOP intensifies scrutiny of banking agencies’ cryptocurrency capital frameworks
A group of Republican senators has called on federal banking authorities to establish equitable capital requirements for cryptocurrency-related banking operations. The legislators argue existing frameworks impose prohibitive capital burdens on financial institutions. This regulatory challenge emerges alongside congressional deliberations on comprehensive digital asset legislation.
Republican Lawmakers Oppose Basel’s Cryptocurrency Framework
Senator Cynthia Lummis spearheaded an initiative involving five fellow Republican senators, directing correspondence to key U.S. financial regulatory officials. The communication targeted Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman, FDIC Chair Travis Hill, and Comptroller Jonathan Gould. These regulatory bodies now confront mounting demands to reassess capital frameworks governing cryptocurrency exposures.
The legislative group condemned Basel Committee regulations imposing a 1,250% risk weighting on certain digital assets. They contended the benchmark categorizes the entire sector as excessively hazardous without appropriate risk assessment. Their position maintains the regulatory structure effectively functions as a prohibition mechanism.
The Basel Committee establishes international banking standards governing capital adequacy and regulatory oversight. Participating entities comprise central banking institutions and regulatory bodies from leading global economies, encompassing the United States. Nevertheless, the senators advocated for American regulators to implement an approach that remains neutral toward underlying technology.
Senate Coalition Demands Regulatory Clarity for Digital Assets
The letter urges regulatory agencies to expand upon recent directives regarding tokenized securities. During March, the Fed, FDIC, and OCC announced tokenized securities would typically receive capital treatment equivalent to conventional securities. The senators maintained regulators should extend this principle throughout additional digital asset operations.
The lawmakers contended financial institutions require definitive regulatory frameworks before expanding cryptocurrency services on their balance sheets. They emphasized banks should maintain capital reserves proportionate to genuine risk factors rather than facing blanket restrictions. Furthermore, they asserted balanced standards would facilitate legitimate participation within digital asset marketplaces.
The correspondence arrives as congressional bodies examine expansive cryptocurrency legislation. Such legislation might authorize banks to conduct expanded balance-sheet cryptocurrency operations. Consequently, the senators stressed agencies must establish capital guidance before financial institutions gain enhanced regulatory permissions.
Legislative Pressure Mounts for Cryptocurrency Market Participation
The correspondence received endorsement from Senators Dan Sullivan, Bill Hagerty, Bernie Moreno, Ted Budd, and Jon Husted. Their collective statement positions cryptocurrency capital requirements within an expansive policy discourse. It simultaneously represents escalating Republican pressure on regulatory agencies to facilitate banking sector involvement.
The senators maintained capital frameworks should account for both risk factors and market potential. They additionally argued regulations should not obstruct banks from providing supervised cryptocurrency services. Their position suggests antiquated standards might drive commercial activity beyond regulated banking infrastructure.
The disagreement now enters a more comprehensive regulatory context. Bowman, Hill, and Gould are scheduled to testify before the House Financial Services Committee on Thursday. Their testimony could influence how regulatory agencies approach cryptocurrency capital treatment throughout upcoming months.
The post GOP Senators Demand Banking Regulators Revise Crypto Capital Requirements appeared first on Blockonomi.
CryptoPotato
Strategy, the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, recorded the largest unrealized loss on its BTC holdings of over $10 billion in paper value. This reflects a 17% decline in the value of its position after years of steady accumulation.
The loss comes amid a broader market downturn as Bitcoin crashed to around $61,000 today. The apex coin is now down about 28% year-to-date, marking its weakest level since February.
Strategy Logs $10.47B Paper Loss
The company’s latest portfolio snapshot shows total invested capital at about $63.87 billion against a current valuation of $53.4 billion. This leaves a gap of about $10.47 billion in unrealized losses, alongside a smaller realized loss linked to recent portfolio activity. The figures highlight the continued pressure on its Bitcoin-heavy balance sheet after years of accumulation.
That pressure has also coincided with a notable change in its long-standing approach to Bitcoin holdings. The firm sold 32 BTC at an average price of $77,135 per coin, marking its first departure from a previously consistent no-sell stance.
According to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the sale took place between May 26 and May 31 and generated about $2.5 million. The proceeds are expected to support preferred stock distributions, including cash dividend obligations.
Broader market impact is also visible in the company’s equity performance. Strategy stock (MSTR) has declined about 77% from its peak, reflecting sensitivity to Bitcoin’s price movements and balance sheet exposure.
Over the same six-year period of sustained Bitcoin accumulation, the S&P 500 gained roughly 116%. This contrast underscores a widening performance gap between traditional equity benchmarks and firms with concentrated Bitcoin exposure.
Holding Through the Downturn
Executive Chairman Michael Saylor built the company’s Bitcoin strategy in 2020 by converting corporate reserves into digital assets as an inflation hedge. The firm maintains that it will continue holding BTC despite losses, with its strategy focused on long-term exposure rather than short-term stability.
Market observers say the unrealized loss highlights how Bitcoin price swings directly affect corporate balance sheets tied to digital asset exposure. They remain divided on whether the strategy amplifies volatility compared with diversified portfolios during extended downturns.
The post Strategy Sees Its Largest Ever Unrealized Loss at Over $10 Billion appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Cardano’s native cryptocurrency wasn’t spared today as the broader cryptocurrency market sees a wave of red. The altcoin crashed by about 11% in the past 24 hours, tumbling before the pivotal level of $0.20.
This follows a wave of declines throughout the past 24 hours, where the total market saw close to $2 billion worth of liquidated positions and billions removed from the market capitalization.
This also takes place as Charles Hoskinson, the person behind Cardano, suddenly announced that he’s “taking a break.”
I’m taking a break. TTYL
— Charles Hoskinson (@IOHK_Charles) June 3, 2026
There is no further context – we don’t know if this is just a vacation or if Hoskinson is stepping away from Cardano and the industry as a whole. That said, it doesn’t seem like ADA’s price action is that much influenced by the tweet – more so by the broader market decline.
The post Cardano (ADA) Plummets 11% Daily Below $0.2, Charles Hoskinson is Taking a Break appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Hyperliquid (HYPE) entered the top 10 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization on June 1st, after surpassing the OG meme coin, Dogecoin (DOGE), with a valuation of over $16 billion.
According to a report by CoinGecko, this development made HYPE only the second pure decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol to reach the top 10, after Uniswap achieved the feat in 2021 during the crypto bull market that followed the 2020 “DeFi Summer.”
HYPE Enters Crypto Top 10
CoinGecko said Hyperliquid’s rise was partly supported by its stronger performance compared with the broader crypto market, allowing it to establish itself as one of the few digital assets that remained in an uptrend during the 2026 bear market.
HYPE has been one of the strongest performers in the crypto market in recent weeks, as it witnessed both price action and increased community interest. As the token rallied to a record high above $73, discussions and positive sentiment around the project surged across X, Reddit, Telegram, and other crypto communities.
Although HYPE has since settled near the $65 level amid a broader market pullback, enthusiasm surrounding the token remains strong. According to market observers, the recent correction has done little to weaken the overall bullish outlook.
Zooming Out
Bitcoin has remained the largest crypto by market cap every single year since 2014, but its “grip has loosened slightly” over the past decade. Bitcoin accounted for 87% of the combined market cap of the top 10 cryptos back in June 2014, compared with 64.9% in June 2026, a decline of 22.1 percentage points over 12 years.
Despite this, CoinGecko said no other asset has come close to challenging its overall dominance.
The report also pointed to Ethereum’s arrival in 2016 as the “single most consequential structural shift” in the top 10’s makeup. Entering directly at second place with an 11.1% share, Ethereum formed a long-standing two-asset core alongside Bitcoin. Its share later peaked at 23.5% during the 2021 DeFi and NFT boom before easing to 10.6% by 2026 as competing Layer 1 blockchains gained a larger presence.
Meanwhile, Ripple (XRP) stood out as the only non-Bitcoin cryptocurrency to remain in the top 10 every single year from 2014 through 2026, as it expanded from a $32 million valuation and a 0.3% share in 2014 to $127.9 billion and a 4.3% share by 2025.
The post Hyperliquid (HYPE) Just Did What Only One DeFi Token Had Done Before: CoinGecko appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Ripple’s native token has plunged alongside the rest of the crypto market, recording a steep drop in recent days.
This comes even as the company continues to expand globally and institutional interest in the asset remains solid.
Partnerships and More
Ripple has been inking strategic deals lately, and many have focused on its USD-pegged stablecoin, RLUSD. Earlier this week, the firm shook hands with the Turkish crypto platforms BiLira, Bitexen, and Bitlo, aiming to boost adoption and usage of the product.
Moreover, it partnered with Istanbul Technical University (ITU) through RLUSD funding to support research initiatives and graduate fellowships, and establish an on-campus XRPL validator.
Most recently, the global payments giant Mastercard enhanced its infrastructure to enable merchants and partners to settle transactions using various digital assets, including RLUSD.
Besides the collaborations related to the stablecoin, Ripple strengthened its presence in its homeland by opening an expanded office in Washington, D.C., thus reinforcing its “long-term commitment to constructive engagement with policymakers, regulators, and industry partners in the nation’s capital.” Speaking on the matter was Stuart Alderoty:
“Expanding our Washington, D.C. presence reflects our long-term commitment to constructive engagement, regulatory clarity, and U.S. leadership in financial innovation. As blockchain and digital assets become more integrated into the financial system, Ripple is committed to helping shape policy that protects consumers, supports responsible innovation, and keeps America competitive.”
The ETF Front
Unlike spot BTC and ETH exchange-traded funds, those with XRP as the underlying asset have attracted substantial capital lately. Data show that inflows have outpaced outflows over the past several weeks, indicating that institutional investors have increased their exposure to the token, thereby requiring the products’ issuers, including Bitwise, Canary Capital, Franklin Templeton, 21Shares, and Grayscale, to purchase real XRP.
However, June 3 finally ended the positive streak, as spot ETFs posted a daily net flow of -$5.34 million. Since their launch, these financial vehicles have generated a cumulative total net inflow of more than $1.42 billion.
XRP Price Outlook
Ripple’s cross-border token is down 10% for the week, and that shouldn’t come as a surprise. After all, the entire crypto market has been bleeding heavily, with Bitcoin (BTC) dropping to nearly $61,000 and Ethereum (ETH) tumbling to roughly $1,700.
Recent whale activity suggests the XRP bulls may suffer further pain in the near future. As CryptoPotato reported, these big investors have sold or redistributed 60 million tokens over the last seven days. Such an exodus could spark panic across the community and cause smaller players to cash out, too. Meanwhile, some analysts believe the price could slip under $1 in the short term.
The post Ripple News and XRP Price Update Today: June 4 appeared first on CryptoPotato.
[PRESS RELEASE – KINGSTOWN, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, June 4th, 2026]
ChangeNOW, a non-custodial crypto management platform extending beyond exchange services with a full suite of B2B solutions for businesses in the digital asset space, is pleased to announce that it has been named “Best Digital Assets Fintech” at the BeInCrypto x Proof of Talk Institutional 100 Awards 2026. The award, which honors the businesses influencing institutional cryptocurrency adoption worldwide, was given out at the actual ceremony, which took place live at Proof of Talk, the Louvre Palace in Paris.
About the BeInCrypto Institutional 100 Awards
The BeInCrypto x Proof of Talk Institutional 100 is one of the most credible and rigorous independent media award programmes in the digital assets space. The awards, which cover 24 competitive categories across six pillars: Regulation & Governance, Capital Markets & Infrastructure, Retail to Crypto Bridge, Digital Assets, Tokenization & On-Chain Finance, and Enterprise Blockchain, are assessed using a two-stage process that includes blind scoring by an independent Expert Council of leaders in traditional finance and digital assets after proprietary quantitative screening using on-chain data and company disclosures.
With a global audience of 7–11 million monthly readers across 26 languages and a B2B community of over 20,000 verified professionals (70% of whom operate at C-level) a win at the BeInCrypto Institutional 100 carries significant weight across the digital finance industry.
ChangeNOW received the Best Digital Assets Fintech nomination in the Retail to Crypto Bridge category alongside Revolut, a European neobank. This award recognizes platforms that provide exceptional service at the intersection of traditional finance and the crypto economy.
ChangeNOW the Best Digital Assets Fintech Winner
ChangeNOW initially is a non-custodial cryptocurrency exchange that was established in 2017 with the goal of making it easy and accessible for everyone to trade digital assets. It serves eight million people globally and supports over 1500 digital assets.
Today its robust infrastructure spans both retail and business use cases. Alongside its web platform, iOS and Android apps, and NOW Wallet for self-custody, ChangeNOW offers a range of B2B products including NOWPayments for crypto payment processing, NOWNodes for blockchain infrastructure access, NOW Custody for digital asset storage, and a business API that enables wallets, fintech platforms, and financial services to integrate exchange functionality directly into their products.
Over the years, ChangeNOW has processed millions of transactions and built a client base that includes both individual clients and commercial partners across the digital asset space.
Industry Recognition and Company Response
Winning the Best Digital Assets Fintech Award goes way beyond just picking up a new industry title. Getting this nod from BeInCrypto matters immensely to the team. The BeInCrypto team’s endorsement indicates that the ChangeNOW platform’s speed and institutional standing truly stand out in a competitive market because of their robust reputation for editorial independence and strict grading.
These kinds of milestones don’t happen by coincidence. This win is the direct result of serious work from the whole ChangeNOW crew, alongside the trust of millions of clients who choose the platform over the alternatives. It keeps them right where they want to be: acting as a reliable fintech bridge connecting regular folks to the wider digital asset economy.
“This recognition means a lot to our team because it reflects the trust our clients place in us every day. From the beginning, our goal has been to make crypto simple, accessible, and reliable for everyone, regardless of their experience level. We’re honoured to be recognised by BeInCrypto and see this award as both a celebration of what we’ve achieved and a motivation to keep raising the standard for the industry,” says Elena Dali Bey, Senior Business Development Manager at ChangeNOW.
Planned Platform Developments
Rather than pause to applaud, ChangeNOW is taking advantage of this momentum to accelerate the extension and improvement of its service offerings. The organization intends to outperform the changing needs of both regular traders and institutional clients. In the following months, work will focus on several key initiatives:
- Leading the way with RWA Integration and Asset Expansion: The platform is rapidly expanding its listings of supported assets and market pairs, with a strong strategic focus on the growing Real-World Assets (RWAs) sector, as well as new networks and tokens. This expansion is intended to provide maximum trading flexibility and deep liquidity for highly sought-after, tokenized physical assets that are difficult to access through traditional centralized channels.
- Strategic Ecosystem Activation via the Fast-Track Program: Moving far beyond standard API infrastructure, the Fast-Track program is designed to enhance marketing strategy and visibility. It helps wallets start monetizing from day one. This proven framework includes pre-built infrastructure and comprehensive marketing support, such as targeted placement in crypto media outlets, partner posts on ChangeNOW’s social media channels, and participation in Tier-1 conferences with more than fifteen thousand attendees.
- Elevating the Client Experience: A number of product improvements, including more advanced trading tools, personalization features, and interface redesigns, are in the works. Reducing the gap between what a client wants to achieve and what the platform makes simple is the same objective shared by all of them. Depending on who is using it, that matters in different ways. It implies less guessing in the beginning for someone who is new to cryptocurrency. It implies fewer stages between concept and execution for seasoned traders.
ChangeNOW views this award not as a destination, but as a benchmark. The team remains committed to the values that earned this recognition: transparency, accessibility, and relentless improvement.
About ChangeNOW
Founded in 2017, ChangeNOW is a non-custodial crypto management platform that makes it easy to swap more than 1500 digital assets quickly and without unnecessary complexity. The platform is used by over eight million people globally. ChangeNOW has a robust B2B infrastructure that includes NOWPayments for crypto payment processing, NOWNodes for access to blockchain infrastructure, NOW Custody for institutional-grade digital asset storage, and a business API that lets wallets, fintech platforms, and exchanges plug swap functionality directly into their own products. The intent behind the suite is practical: most companies building in crypto share a common problem, they need core infrastructure that would take years to develop independently. ChangeNOW’s B2B offering is designed to remove that constraint.
The post ChangeNOW Wins Best Digital Assets Fintech at the BeInCrypto Institutional 100 Awards 2026 appeared first on CryptoPotato.
