The surge highlights Binance's dominant influence on crypto markets, potentially increasing volatility and impacting global trading dynamics.

The post Binance net taker volume surges to $618M in one hour as Bitcoin blows past $85K appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Tech stocks' surge amid favorable macro conditions highlights their pivotal role in market resilience and growth, despite global uncertainties.

The post NASDAQ closes at record high as S&P 500 nears milestone appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The launch of Akai highlights the growing trend of AI-driven automation reshaping workforce dynamics, potentially reducing job opportunities.

The post Deel launches Akai, an automation platform that reduces need for about 600 employees appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The decline in natural diamond prices, exacerbated by lab-grown alternatives, threatens mining economies and highlights shifting investment trends.

The post Diamonds crash to lowest prices this century as Bitcoin surges past them appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

OpenAI's strategic pivot to enhance existing tech highlights the intensifying AI assistant market, impacting future consumer AI dynamics.

The post OpenAI considers repackaging agent technology as SpaceXAI, Meta advance in personal assistants appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin Magazine

Jordi Visser: Why AI Agents Make the BTC Bull Case

Crypto spent 15 years building rails — lending, tokenization, stablecoins — and Jordi Visser argues the users it was built for were never meant to be human. In this conversation with Grace Remington and Sean Hagan, Visser lays out his Ghost Rails thesis, comparing today’s moment to the 14-year gap between Netscape going public and the App Store finally putting the internet in everyone’s hands. He explains why AI agents, not retail wallets, are the inflection point for the agentic economy, and why that’s “extremely positive” for Bitcoin specifically. If you’ve wondered what actually breaks the liquidity-driven narrative around this asset class, start here.

Chapters:
00:00 — Betting on nominal growth: can AI outrun the U.S. debt load?
02:06 — Why Bitcoin is the only asset surviving 20 years
04:01 — Crypto built the plumbing, AI agents became the users
07:33 — Tokenization turns $900 trillion of illiquid assets into money
09:50 — What has to break before the top 10% finally buy Bitcoin
12:18 — The Santa Claus effect and why belief beats innovation
14:23 — Swarms working 24/7 and the exponential investors ignore
16:47 — Debt-financed data centers, cancer breakthroughs, and the bond market scare
19:19 — The AI doomsday soap opera
23:09 — Bitcoin demand for 30 years and the case for good deflation

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this show are those of the participants and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of BTC Inc., Bitcoin Magazine, or any affiliated entities. This content is provided for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment, legal, tax, or accounting advice. Nothing contained in this show constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer to buy or sell any securities or financial instruments. Viewers should consult their own advisors before making financial or business decisions.

This post Jordi Visser: Why AI Agents Make the BTC Bull Case first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Patrick Green.

Bitcoin Magazine

Strategy and Strive Announce $182.7 Million Bitcoin Buy as Price Surges Past $86,000

Bitcoin treasuries kicked off Monday with a bang, with Strategy and Strive announcing they scooping up a combined 2,305 BTC for $182.7 million. 

Strategy said in a filing that it last week bought 950 bitcoins for $75.7 million — its first buy since August — and Strive snapped up 1,355 BTC for $107.7 million. 

The announcement comes as the price of the biggest cryptocurrency surges. Bitcoin’s price recently stood at $86,008, a 6% 24-hour rise, after hitting as high as $86,282 earlier on Monday. 

Strategy, the biggest corporate holder of bitcoin, also repurchased $174 million of its STRC perpetual preferred shares. The company has hit pause on buying this year to buy back its stock and build a cash reserve. 

On some occasions, the company even sold small bits of its BTC stash — despite founder and chairman Michael Saylor famously preaching to “never sell your bitcoin.”

After a 10-week hiatus, the company started buying bitcoin again in the final week of August, scooping up nearly $370 million in the leading cryptocurrency. 

Its bitcoin holdings now stand at 846,000 coins — worth $72.7 billion at today’s prices. 

Strive has continued its buying every week, going up the rankings of companies holding bitcoin. The Nasdaq-listed company is now the fifth biggest corporate holder of the cryptocurrency with 26,355 BTC worth $2.2 billion. 

Strategy’s stock (NASDAQ: MSTR) was trading 8% higher on Monday. Strive (NASDAQ: ASST) was trading slightly lower but on Friday hit above $30 per share — beating most targets given by Wall Street analysts. 

Bitcoin treasury companies have had a rough 2026. Strategy, Satsuma, Smarter Web Company, Sequans, Nakamoto, and Empery Digital have all sold bitcoin this year to repay debt, fund operations or finance buybacks, while others have folded or pivoted to AI infrastructure as their share prices collapsed.

Bitcoin’s Monday surge comes despite key crypto legislation, the Clarity Act, getting blocked last week. The Federal Reserve also raised interest rates but investors have shrugged off the central bank’s move. 

The coin’s price now sits over 30% below the all-time high it hit in October of $126,080.

This post Strategy and Strive Announce $182.7 Million Bitcoin Buy as Price Surges Past $86,000 first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.

Bitcoin Magazine

Russian Crypto Industry Could Be Operating Legally by Year-End: Central Bank

Russia’s crypto industry may have all it needs to start legally functioning by year-end, according to reports. 

The deputy governor of the country’s central bank, Vladimir Chistyukhin, said that regulations were moving ahead as scheduled, Interfax reported on Monday. 

Russia this year has pressed ahead with crypto legislation. President Vladimir Putin in August signed a law to set in stone the regulation of digital currencies and digital rights in the country — although using bitcoin for payments is still banned. 

“Right now we are talking about creating subordinate regulation; it is very large and significant,” Chistyukhin was quoted saying, adding that the “fine-tuning” of internal rules could be carried out before the end of 2026. 

Russia’s central bank has approved Bitcoin trading for the public on the country’s crypto exchanges. Law currency states that unqualified investors can buy 300,000 rubles ($3,582) worth of bitcoin and other assets through one intermediary; qualified investors have no limits. 

Sberbank, the biggest bank in Russia, plans to debut a Bitcoin and crypto wallet as well as digital asset custody by December. The bank in August said it expected trading volume with its new crypto rollout to hit 4 trillion rubles ($47 bln) in the first year. 

Using digital assets as a means of payment or legal tender within Russia has been prohibited in Russia since 2022. 

Despite Putin appearing to praise Bitcoin in the past, its use as a medium of exchange and currency has been banned for years. 

Russian lawmakers have made an exception for international payments — but most likely as a way to dodge Western sanctions.  

The U.S. and European governments cut Russia off from the SWIFT payments system after it invaded Ukraine in 2022 and Russian companies have been using Bitcoin to skirt around the penalties, according to the country’s finance minister. 

This post Russian Crypto Industry Could Be Operating Legally by Year-End: Central Bank first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.

Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Price Shrugs Off Clarity Act Fail, Blasts Past $86,000 

Long-awaited crypto legislation failed last week — but Bitcoin buyers don’t seem to care. 

The price of the leading cryptocurrency shot up Monday by nearly 7% over a 24-hour period, six days after lawmakers blocked the Clarity Act. 

Digital asset industry bigwigs have been calling for clear rules to be put in place to regulate the fast-moving space. But the key legislation aiming to do so in the form of the crypto market structure bill didn’t progress last week after Democrats mostly disagreed with the ethics side of the bill. 

Bitcoin’s price has shrugged off the bill’s collapse, and recently stood at $86,225 after touching as high as $86,247 Monday morning in New York. 

Over a 30-day period, the coin is up 10%. Bitcoin started a phenomenal run in August — its best in years — after the U.S. Treasury announced it would at least double the size of its liquidity-support buyback operations.

The asset’s price further benefited after U.S. President Donald Trump the same week hosted a meeting at the White House with crypto industry leaders and urged lawmakers to get what he called the “powerful” Clarity Act over the line. 

Both Republicans and Democrats blocked the bill but Democrats had mostly been accused of trying to deliberately stall it by pro-crypto lawmakers for months. 

The central sticking point for Democratic lawmakers was the conflict of interest posed by the Trump family’s crypto holdings. Beginning in the run-up to his return to office, the president and his sons launched a series of digital asset ventures, and Trump’s own financial disclosure reported roughly $1.4 billion in crypto-related income. 

The White House says his assets sit in a trust managed by his children and that no conflict exists.

Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, of the crypto industry’s loudest critics, told congress ahead of the vote that the bill “posed a massive risk to families.”

Though despite the bill not advancing, the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission are pushing ahead with rulemaking. 

Bitcoin exchange-traded funds in the U.S. experienced positive net flows last week after having started the week with investors cashing out. 

On Thursday and Friday, investors bought nearly $593 million in shares in the products managed by BlackRock, Fidelity, and Grayscale, according to Farside Investors data. 

The Federal Reserve also last week raised interest rates — as expected — but the price of bitcoin hasn’t been affected by the central bank’s decision. Bitcoin has performed well in the past in a low interest rate environment. 

This post Bitcoin Price Shrugs Off Clarity Act Fail, Blasts Past $86,000  first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.

Bitcoin Magazine

Billionaire Investor Tim Draper: “Irresponsible” for Apple & Meta NOT to Hold BTC

Government spending hasn’t slowed, and Tim Draper says that leaves only two real outcomes: hyperinflation or interest rates high enough to break banks. In this Bitcoin Magazine Podcast conversation with host Spencer Nichols, the Draper Associates founder makes the case that every business should hold at least four weeks of operating expenses in Bitcoin, every individual about six months, and every government a Bitcoin hedge. He explains why he considers boards that hold zero Bitcoin to be exposed — legally and financially — when a bank holding their cash goes under. Draper also maps his $250,000 Bitcoin price target to the next halving and the supply shock that follows.

Host: Spencer Nichols — Bitcoin Magazine
Tim Draper — Draper Associates

Chapters:
00:00 — Why Apple and Facebook Should Hold Bitcoin on the Balance Sheet
01:56 — Decentralization and the Speed of Innovation
04:06 — Is AI a Centralizing or Decentralizing Force?
06:31 — AI Versus Big Law, Big Banks, and the Bureaucracy
09:05 — Government Spending, Hyperinflation, and Bitcoin as a Safe Harbor
11:21 — The Confederate Million Dollar Bill and Three Paths for the Dollar
13:58 — Open Borders, Pandemic Fear, and the Marketplace of Governments
16:56 — Governance as a Service and Governments That Compete for You
20:00 — Voting on Phones, Estonia, and Bitcoin’s Road to Retail
23:28 — The $250K Target, Two More Halvings, and an All-Bitcoin Fund

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this show are those of the participants and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of BTC Inc., Bitcoin Magazine, or any affiliated entities. This content is provided for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment, legal, tax, or accounting advice. Nothing contained in this show constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer to buy or sell any securities or financial instruments. Viewers should consult their own advisors before making financial or business decisions.

This post Billionaire Investor Tim Draper: “Irresponsible” for Apple & Meta NOT to Hold BTC first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Patrick Green.

Some Bitcoin mining vardiff (variable difficulty) controllers can keep demanding work calibrated for a machine's former speed after it cuts hashrate. The miner can keep hashing and consuming electricity while accepted shares become vanishingly rare.

Bitcoin Optech highlighted the failure mode on Sept. 18, drawing wider attention to an analysis that mining engineer Eric Price published in July. The finding concerns pool-assigned share difficulty, not Bitcoin's network difficulty, and it describes a testable controller weakness rather than evidence of widespread miner losses.

How Bitcoin mining vardiff gets stuck

Pools assign each connection a share difficulty that is easier than Bitcoin's block difficulty. A higher assigned difficulty corresponds to a harder share target. The submitted shares let the pool estimate hashrate and account for contributed work, while a variable-difficulty, or vardiff, controller adjusts the assignment to keep shares arriving at a useful rate.

Price's controller analysis describes a trap after a miner slows sharply. If the controller recalculates only when a share arrives, the old, harder assignment makes the next share less likely. With no fresh share to trigger an update, the controller can hold the wrong difficulty, which keeps the share stream sparse.

Abrupt curtailment is operationally realistic. During a January 2026 U.S. winter storm, CryptoSlate reported a sharp network hashrate drop as miners reduced power use. The event was not linked to a vardiff loss.

A high share difficulty does not automatically erase a miner's expected credit over a long period. Pools can give a rare high-difficulty proof more accounting weight, as Braiins' pool documentation explains. The risk appears in the realized window: if no accepted share arrives, a pay-per-share miner receives no payment for that interval; if a few arrive, they remain payable. Under proportional accounting, missing shares can increase other participants' portion of the reward window.

The current Stratum V2 reference implementation avoids a permanent freeze by recalculating on a timer and lowering difficulty during a share drought. The analysis says recovery can still be slow on long-lived channels. That timer behavior belongs to the reference implementation, not to every deployment permitted by the Stratum V2 protocol.

The analysis and Optech identify ckpool as a deployed share-triggered example. How common the behavior is, and whether it has caused material real-world losses, has not been measured by the available sources.

Operators can now test the behavior directly. MARA Foundation's open-source shape-proxy acknowledges shares locally while forwarding a controlled fraction upstream. Step, ramp and stall profiles can make the pool see an apparent decline without changing the miner's physical output.

A falling assigned difficulty shows that the tested controller has a recovery path. A target that stays pinned is evidence of slow or absent recovery under that profile and observation window, though timer cadence, channel age and random share arrival can affect the result.

The post How cutting power to Bitcoin miners can actually burn more energy appeared first on CryptoSlate.

A coordinated attack drained 8.7 million FET and used a compromised NuNet minter key to create 408.5 million NTX.

The Sept. 19 attack emptied the Ethereum-side conversion contract used by SingularityNET’s bridge, removing 8,721,530 FET worth about $1.55 million at the time. Twenty-nine minutes later, a stolen NuNet minter created 408.5 million NTX and sent the tokens to the same receiving wallet, according to an on-chain forensic report prepared by Athena.

Fetch.ai subsequently paused AGIX-to-FET conversions and its Ethereum-side bridge contract as a precaution. The company said the affected infrastructure belonged to SingularityNET, primarily its Ethereum-Cardano bridge, while Fetch.ai’s own contracts and normal FET transfers remained operational.

The forensic report identified the affected contract as TokenConversionManagerV3, the legitimate Ethereum-side lock-and-release component of SingularityNET’s bridge. Its verified source matches SingularityNET’s public repository, and the contract is tied to the current Artificial Superintelligence Alliance FET token.

Investigators traced the loss to a compromised backend authorization key, not a flaw that let an attacker bypass the bridge contract. The transaction carried a valid signature from the address the contract was configured to trust, allowing its conversionIn function to release the entire FET balance to an attacker-controlled wallet.

The contract’s design magnified the damage. Its 1 million FET transaction cap applied to tokens moving out of Ethereum but was not enforced onconversionIn, allowing the attacker to withdraw 8.72 million FET in one transaction. The signed message also failed to bind the eventual recipient, meaning a valid authorization could direct the tokens to an address selected by the caller.

Same wallet connects separate compromised keys

The NuNet activity provides the strongest evidence that the FET drain formed part of a broader coordinated operation.

At 20:50 UTC, 29 minutes after the FET withdrawal, a NuNet minter key dormant since March 2023 created 408,532,878 NTX and sent the entire amount to the same wallet that received the stolen FET. The mint was equivalent to roughly 42% of NuNet’s documented token supply, according to the report.

A later forensic pass tightened that connection. At 19:36 UTC, 45 minutes before the FET drain, the NuNet minter sent 0.3667 ETH directly to the eventual receiving wallet, while another attacker-linked account moved 24.3 million NTX into it.

NTX sales through MetaMask’s swap infrastructure had also begun before the FET bridge was emptied, indicating that the operation involving the two compromised credentials was already underway ahead of the main withdrawal.

The attacker then began converting the assets. The stolen FET was routed through MetaMask’s swap infrastructure and exchanged largely for Ethereum, while more than 217 million of the newly minted NTX was sold through decentralized liquidity venues.

By about 1:10 UTC on Sept. 20, the central wallet held 547.89 ETH worth roughly $1.44 million and another 230 million NTX, according to the report.

Liquidity quickly became a constraint on the NTX side. Four later sales involving 38.55 million NTX increased the attacker’s ETH balance by only about 0.30 ETH as available pools were depleted. A separate 10 million NTX transaction routed through Mayan Protocol ultimately produced about 940 USDT for cross-chain dispatch.

The disruption later widened beyond the two assets examined in the forensic report. Bitvavo suspended WMTX deposits and withdrawals on Sept. 20 after citing an active security incident affecting the token, then temporarily halted trading. The exchange said customer balances remained safe.

Historical SingularityNET material shows WMTX, FET and NTX all used infrastructure connected to its Ethereum-Cardano bridge ecosystem. The available forensic evidence, however, examined the FET and NTX activity in detail and does not establish that WMTX was compromised through the same mechanism.

Fetch.ai said it was working with SingularityNET and paused conversions while it investigated the incident.

The report’s first tracking window found that the compromised FET bridge authorizer and NuNet minter credentials had not yet been rotated or revoked roughly five hours after the attack. By then, the FET bridge was empty and inactive.

That makes credential remediation central to restoring the affected services. Refilling the FET conversion contract while the same authorizer remains trusted could expose fresh liquidity to another signed withdrawal, while NuNet faces a separate risk as long as the affected wallet retains authority to create additional NTX.

Fetch.ai’s AGIX-to-FET conversion service and Ethereum-side bridge are therefore among the clearest operational markers to watch.

For WMTX, Bitvavo has said trading and transfers will remain restricted while it assesses the incident, leaving exchange reopenings and credential rotations as the next visible tests of whether the affected infrastructure is secure.

The post One wallet links $1.55 million FetchAI theft to massive 408.5 million NTX mint appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin’s rally toward $86,000 has pushed US spot exchange-traded fund (ETF) investors back into profit after months underwater.

Data from CryptoSlate showed Bitcoin gained about 6% over the past 24 hours, extending its September rebound and briefly trading near $86,000.

Bloomberg Intelligence ETF analyst James Seyffart said the move put the average US Bitcoin ETF holder above water for the first time since January. The funds’ estimated buys-only cost basis stands at about $81,722 per Bitcoin, while their net cost basis sits closer to current prices.

Bitcoin traded around $85,165 in Bloomberg Intelligence’s latest reading, clearing both levels and reversing much of the damage inflicted on ETF investors during this year’s downturn.

The turnaround has been dramatic. US Bitcoin ETF investors held about $86.32 billion in unrealized gains on Oct. 6, 2025, before the subsequent selloff erased that entire cushion. By Sept. 18, the cohort was sitting on an estimated $780 million unrealized loss.

Bitcoin’s latest advance has effectively repaired that drawdown. Capital flows have recovered more slowly, leaving ETF investors profitable again even as cumulative inflows remain well below their 2025 peak.

BTC's price recovery outruns ETF demand

The return to profitability has come well before a full recovery in ETF demand.

SoSoValue data show cumulative net inflows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs peaked at about $61.19 billion in October 2025 before falling to roughly $55.16 billion, leaving the products about $6.03 billion below their high-water mark.

The fund has recorded about $1.46 billion in net outflows so far in 2026. January accounted for roughly $1.61 billion of withdrawals and February another $206.5 million. March and April then brought a combined $3.29 billion of inflows before May and June reversed the improvement with about $6.94 billion of net withdrawals.

Demand strengthened again in the third quarter. July attracted about $172 million, followed by roughly $3.52 billion in August and another $314 million so far in September. Those inflows have steadied the cumulative total but have yet to replace the capital that left after last October’s peak.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin's price has recovered much faster.

Bloomberg Intelligence’s data show the cryptocurrency fell as low as about $58,642 during the downturn, leaving ETF investors well below both estimated cost-basis measures. Its subsequent rebound of more than $26,000 has carried the market back through the roughly $81,722 buys-only cost basis and toward the higher net measure.

That price appreciation has restored the value of Bitcoin already held inside the funds even as cumulative net inflows remain almost 10% below their October 2025 peak.

The setup differs from last year, when rising Bitcoin prices were accompanied by expanding ETF inflows and a growing pool of unrealized profits. This time, existing holders have moved back into profit while the cumulative capital committed to the products remains smaller.

The recovery is also uneven across the investor base. Bloomberg Intelligence’s buys-only cost basis sits near $81,722, giving those holders a wider cushion at current prices, while the net cost basis remains closer to Bitcoin’s market price and leaves that group nearer breakeven.

ETF breakeven will test investor conviction

That narrow cushion above breakeven is already being tested by volatile ETF flows, even though last week’s headline total looked almost unchanged.

US spot Bitcoin ETFs ended the week with just $6.21 million of net inflows, SoSoValue data show. Beneath that figure, however, investors moved sharply in and out of the products across individual sessions.

About $160 million entered the funds last Monday before roughly $450 million was withdrawn Tuesday and another $296 million Wednesday. The selling then reversed, with about $160 million returning Thursday and $433 million flowing in Friday, the strongest daily inflow since Sept. 3. Fidelity’s FBTC accounted for roughly $311 million of Friday’s total.

That left the funds almost flat for the week despite nearly $1.5 billion of gross daily inflows and outflows. Bitcoin ETF trading volume totaled about $16.17 billion, making the $6.21 million net subscription equivalent to roughly 0.04% of turnover.

The weekly result nevertheless marked an improvement from the previous period, when the funds recorded about $463 million of net outflows. More importantly, the sequence showed that heavy midweek selling did not develop into a sustained exit, with buyers rebuilding exposure rapidly over the final two sessions.

Moving ETF investors back into profit could now determine whether that re-risking continues. Holders who stayed through Bitcoin’s downturn can reduce exposure near or above their average entry levels without realizing the losses they faced earlier this year, creating the possibility of renewed selling as more positions move back into the black.

The next test is whether crossing above the ETF cost basis draws sustained new money into the products or gives investors who endured the downturn an opportunity to leave. Continued inflows would put fresh capital behind Bitcoin’s recovery, while another round of redemptions would show that the return to breakeven has released holders who were waiting for prices to recover

The post Bitcoin hits $86,000 putting ETF investors back in profit after $86 billion wipeout appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Ethereum developers are weighing Ethereum Quick Slots for Hegotá, a proposed faster block rhythm that would reduce waiting without expanding the network's per-second capacity. EIP-8198, or Quick Slots, remains Proposed for Inclusion rather than scheduled, and neither its eight-second draft parameter nor the 10-second alternative has been adopted.

That makes validator performance the deciding issue. Shorter slots could refresh onchain prices sooner and accelerate confirmations and finality, but validators would have less time to receive, check and attest to each block. The proposal's market benefits are modeled; its effect on the slowest operators remains the evidence Ethereum still needs.

The Hegotá meta-EIP lists Quick Slots as Proposed for Inclusion, while Ethereum's official roadmap says most of the upgrade's scope remains undecided. Developers are choosing whether to spend performance headroom on lower latency while preserving the broad participation that gives Ethereum its decentralization.

Ethereum Quick Slots: a faster clock with the same per-second capacity

The canonical EIP-8198 draft uses eight seconds as a placeholder, down from Ethereum's current 12-second slot. It also says the exact target should follow performance characterization and may change before deployment.

Ethlabs favors a more conservative first move. Its updated Hegotá position advocates 10-second slots first, with later cuts only as evidence of safety accumulates. An open sponsor rewrite likewise proposes 10 seconds, but it has not been merged into the canonical EIP.

The possible outcomes therefore extend beyond an eight- versus 10-second choice. Hegotá could start at 10 seconds, retain the draft's eight-second parameter, or leave the 12-second schedule unchanged if testing shows that a cut would be unsafe.

Under either shorter target, capacity per second stays broadly level only if the gas limit and maximum blob count per block fall in proportion to slot duration. Smaller blocks would arrive more frequently. Users could receive a first confirmation sooner, onchain markets could update more often, and systems that inherit Ethereum's cadence could react faster. Normal validator gas-limit voting would resume after the transition, and integer rounding could make blob capacity slightly lower rather than perfectly constant.

Keeping 32 slots in an epoch would also shorten epoch-based finality in wall-clock time. Under the draft's eight-second assumptions, EIP-8198 estimates finality falling from about 13 minutes to about 8.5 minutes. That is a proposal estimate, not an observed result from production Ethereum.

The same distinction applies to the draft's claim that a 12-to-eight-second change would reduce arbitrage losses by roughly 18%. The figure comes from a model in which those losses scale with the square root of the time between blocks. Ethereum has not operated an eight-second production regime that could demonstrate the result.

Independent work supports the direction more strongly than the exact magnitude. An empirical study of automated market maker losses found that faster blocks reduce losses to arbitrageurs, but the effect varied materially by trading pair. A newer jump-diffusion model found that sudden price jumps create a floor that shorter intervals do not eliminate.

Fresher prices could improve spreads and liquidity-provider economics while compressing some surplus available to searchers, builders and proposers. Yet fees, liquidity, volatility, jumps and burned base fees affect who captures the change. A separate Ethereum Research analysis shows why lower nominal arbitrage does not translate mechanically into a uniform 18% gain for users or liquidity providers.

Validator tails decide whether the trade works

Smaller blocks reduce peak payload size, but a faster cadence raises computational and bandwidth demands per second. Validators also face tighter absolute windows for propagation, validation and attestation aggregation. Average performance cannot settle the decentralization question because the network must remain usable for operators in slower regions, on weaker hardware and with varied client configurations.

An analysis of mainnet attestation timing found potential headroom for a shorter schedule alongside a meaningful tail. Some attestations in its sample arrived after the aggregation deadline contemplated for a six-second design, and timings differed across clients, operators and configurations. The study was exploratory and does not establish the safety of six, eight or 10 seconds.

Separate post-Pectra research found propagation delay strongly associated with reorg risk near the attestation boundary. Those observations support a distributional risk: reducing the timing margin could burden slower or poorly configured validators more than well-provisioned peers. They do not quantify validator reward losses under EIP-8198 or prove that either proposed target would centralize the network.

The proposal itself acknowledges incomplete knowledge about blob propagation, attestation aggregation, local block building and validator hardware. Developers have also linked Quick Slots to work on faster execution-payload broadcast, treating propagation improvements as part of the safety case rather than a later optimization.

The Ethereum Foundation Protocol cluster's Hegotá assessment placed Quick Slots in B tier after research teams offered stronger support than delivery-focused engineering teams. The practical requirements behind that split are clear: a complete specification, a full-spec prototype, a downstream-effects assessment and confirmation that Quick Slots will not complicate Ethereum's planned decoupled-consensus architecture.

Those requirements turn Hegotá's decision into an empirical test. A 10-second first step could deliver a measurable latency gain and defer a harder cut if client simulations and devnets show broad validator resilience. Eight seconds could remain the draft's ambition rather than the first deployment. If timing tails or reorg behavior worsen enough to favor larger operators, the market-quality benefit would carry a decentralization cost.

Ethereum Quick Slots could offer fresher markets, shorter transaction-inclusion waits and faster finality without increasing throughput. Broad validator resilience remains the condition that must be demonstrated before the faster clock is worth adopting.

The post Will proposed faster block times really fix Ethereum’s biggest market losses? appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin treasury companies Strategy and Strive bought about $183 million of BTC last week as the cryptocurrency’s rebound helped corporate balance sheets recover losses.

Strategy Inc., the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, acquired 950 BTC for $75.7 million between Sept. 14 and Sept. 20 at an average price of $79,670, according to a regulatory filing Monday. The purchase returned its holdings to 846,000 BTC, acquired for a total of $63.8 billion at an average cost of $75,416.

Strive Inc. separately bought 1,355 BTC for $107.7 million at an average price of $79,475 between Sept. 14 and Sept. 18, taking its treasury to 26,355 BTC. Cash and equivalents rose to $229.6 million over the same period.

Both purchases were made below Bitcoin’s latest market price. The token surged above $85,000 Monday, its highest level since January, extending a recovery of almost 30% from its August lows.

The buying stands out because the broader corporate treasury trade has slowed sharply. Listed companies added about 5,900 BTC over the past three months, Glassnode said in a report last week. That compares with roughly 89,000 BTC accumulated in July 2025 alone.

Glassnode estimated the sector’s average acquisition price at roughly $80,500. Bitcoin was still below that threshold when the firm published its report, leaving the aggregate corporate treasury cohort underwater. Monday’s move through $85,000 has reversed that position and pushed the group back above its estimated cost basis.

Strategy’s Bitcoin rebound collides with a capital-management pivot

For Strategy, the rally has particularly large accounting consequences.

Bitcoin ended the second quarter at $58,714, when Strategy held the same 846,000 BTC it does today. The decline contributed to an $8.32 billion loss on digital assets during the three months through June, including $8.31 billion of unrealized losses.

At $85,000, Strategy’s current Bitcoin holdings would be worth about $71.9 billion, roughly $8.1 billion above their aggregate acquisition cost. Their gross market value would also stand more than $22 billion above the value of 846,000 BTC at the June 30 closing price.

That comparison does not translate directly into Strategy’s eventual third-quarter accounting gain because the company bought and sold Bitcoin during the quarter and fair-value changes are recognized as they occur. Still, it illustrates the scale of the balance-sheet swing created by Bitcoin’s rebound.

Strategy has also been directing capital away from Bitcoin at times to manage the securities used to finance its treasury.

The company repurchased 1.77 million shares of its variable-rate STRC preferred stock for $174 million last week. It used another $57.4 million from its dollar reserve for preferred dividends and debt interest, leaving $5.04 billion in its reserve and $1.05 billion of separately designated cash as of Sept. 20.

Strategy has spent months trying to keep STRC near its $100 par value through buybacks and changes to its capital framework. Chief Executive Phong Le said in July that repurchasing the security below par can reduce future dividend obligations while supporting what the company considers a sustainable market for the preferred shares.

Since then, the firm has now spent roughly $1.1 billion on STRC buybacks.

The latest Bitcoin purchase therefore marks a return to accumulation alongside, rather than instead of, that balance-sheet management. Strategy had reported no Bitcoin purchases in the previous two weekly updates and held 845,050 BTC as recently as Sept. 13.

Strive leans on preferred stock to keep accumulating

Meanwhile, Strive has continued buying BTC more consistently while relying on its preferred stock.

Its latest purchase followed a 469-BTC acquisition the previous week and a 1,375-BTC purchase earlier in September, extending a strategy that has increasingly relied on its SATA preferred stock to raise capital.

Strive said warrant exercises also began generating fresh capital last week, producing about $21.2 million in gross proceeds. Including those funds, the company said SATA has accounted for about 57.7% of the total capital it has raised, reflecting how preferred equity has become central to financing its Bitcoin accumulation.

The latest filing showed SATA shares outstanding rose by 786,194 during the week to 11.18 million, while Strive’s Class A share count increased by about 2.07 million.

That financing model becomes easier to sustain when Bitcoin rises faster than the cost of the securities used to acquire it. Strive’s latest BTC was purchased almost $5,500 below Monday’s roughly $85,000 price, though its overall treasury remains closer to its historical acquisition cost than Strategy’s.

The broader question is whether other corporate buyers return now that Bitcoin has cleared the $80,500 sector cost basis.

Glassnode’s data suggest the treasury trade that absorbed tens of thousands of Bitcoin each month during 2025 has become increasingly concentrated among a smaller group of aggressive buyers. Strategy and Strive are adding again as prices recover, but matching last year’s corporate demand would require companies currently sitting on the sidelines to follow them.

The post Strategy and Strive buy $183 million in Bitcoin as $85,000 rally revives treasury trade appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Litecoin rose about 11.5 percent on Sunday to $63.57 (CoinGecko, September 21, 2026, 13:12 UTC), placing it 25th among the largest cryptocurrencies. Over the week it is up a good 17 percent, over 30 days by around 22 percent.

Litecoin has something many larger projects are still waiting for: its own exchange-traded fund on a US exchange. And that is exactly where something uncomfortable can be read off on this day.

The ETF is here, the capital is not

A spot ETF on Litecoin has traded on the Nasdaq since October 27, 2025, launched by Canary Capital. The product holds Litecoin directly and charges an annual fee of 0.95 percent.

Assets under management stood at around $5.49 million at the end of June 2026. For comparison: Litecoin's daily turnover on trading venues moves in an entirely different order of magnitude. A fund of that size does not move the price.

This gap is the real story. Approval of an ETF is generally regarded as an opening for institutional capital. In Litecoin's case the door has stood open for almost a year, and hardly anyone has walked through it.

What this says about ETF expectations

The same narrative forms around every ETF approval: access creates demand. With bitcoin that proved true, and billions flowed in. Litecoin shows the other possibility.

An ETF creates access. It does not create interest. Anyone with no reason to hold an asset will not buy it just because doing so becomes more convenient. For the ongoing debate about funds on further cryptocurrencies, that is the soberer benchmark than the bitcoin case.

Where the Litecoin price gain comes from

The day's gain of 11.5 percent comes from the broader market. Bitcoin reached its highest level since January at more than $85,000, triggered by the liquidation of short positions running into the hundreds of millions. In phases like this, the large, long-established assets rise along with it without needing news of their own.

Litecoin benefits from its standing: the coin has existed since 2011, is available on practically every trading venue and is seen by many investors as the more conservative choice within the crypto market. That brings inflows in upward phases without anything changing at the project itself.

The number that sets the frame

Litecoin trades about 85 percent below its all-time high. A gain of 22 percent in a month changes little about that. Anyone comparing today's level with the peaks of earlier cycles sees an asset that has lagged far behind its own records for years, while at the same time staying steadily among the 25 largest cryptocurrencies.

Together the two make up the profile: no growth story, but no project that disappears either.

What to watch

Two points can be checked and carry more weight than any forecast. First, whether the money in the Litecoin ETF rises in the coming months. If the product continues to attract barely any capital in a friendly market, the question is answered. Second, its behavior in the next downward phase: if Litecoin falls less sharply than this week's trending coins, its reputation as the more conservative choice is confirmed. If it falls just as hard, it was only another coin in a rally.

The current crypto prices give an overview of the wider market. The comparison of the best crypto exchanges shows which venues list Litecoin and at what fees.

Morpho rose about 12 percent on Sunday to $2.78 (CoinGecko, September 21, 2026, 13:12 UTC). On its own that would not be worth reporting on a day when almost everything is up. A different number is the notable one.

Morpho trades about 33 percent below its all-time high. Among the other big winners of the day the figure is 81 percent for Sui, 87 for Render and 90 for Arbitrum. Morpho is therefore the only name in the leading group anywhere within reach of its own record.

Why this number counts

The gap to the all-time high separates two kinds of price rise. An asset 90 percent below its high is recovering from a slump. An asset 33 percent below it has largely put the slump behind it and is trading near what the market credited it with in good times.

That is no buy recommendation and no seal of quality. It does shift the question, though: away from whether the price comes back, and towards why it held up so well in the first place.

What Morpho actually earns

Morpho is a lending protocol. Users deposit collateral and borrow other assets against it; the protocol mediates between the two sides and keeps part of the interest. What sets it apart from many projects with a similar description are the figures behind it.

The capital deposited in the protocol passed $10.7 billion in September. That puts Morpho second in lending behind Aave. The amount actively borrowed reached $5 billion for the first time at the start of September, around 95 percent of it in dollar-pegged stablecoins. The protocol runs on 45 chains and, annualized, generates more than $200 million in fees.

Whether that justifies the current price is a valuation question open to argument. That this is revenue and not an announcement is not.

Ten days, five integrations

Between September 9 and September 18, five institutional integrations went live or were announced. They include a lending infrastructure on Circle's Arc chain, which gathered around $220 million in deposits on its first day, lending markets against tokenized equities from Coinbase, and integration into a payments app available in more than 150 countries.

That density explains the price trend of recent weeks better than today's market push. Institutional integrations bring capital that arrives more slowly and leaves more slowly than that of speculators.

Where the risks lie

Lending protocols carry a risk that trading venues do not: when deposited collateral falls faster than positions can be unwound, bad debt arises. With $5 billion of capital lent out, that is not a theoretical point.

The fact that 95 percent of loans run in stablecoins dampens this risk on the lending side and shifts it onto the collateral. On top of that comes the spread across 45 chains: every additional chain brings usage and, at the same time, one more place where something can go wrong.

What to watch in the Morpho protocol

Three measures can be checked without forecasting. First, whether the amount actively borrowed stays above $5 billion, because it generates the fees. Second, whether the new institutional integrations bring volume or remain announcements. Third, the gap to the all-time high: if it keeps narrowing while the rest of the market falls back, the picture of an asset valued differently from its peers is confirmed.

The current crypto prices give an overview of how the wider market is moving. The comparison of the best crypto exchanges shows which venues list MORPHO.

Hedera rose about 12 percent on Sunday to $0.0921 (CoinGecko, September 21, 2026, 12:50 UTC). Trading volume climbed far more sharply than the price and came in at around $283 million. Over the week the token is up almost 18 percent.

Hedera stands out in this market. While the day's winners come mostly from the AI field or from large application chains, this network has been aimed at corporate users for years. The news flow fits that.

Ten million accounts on the Hedera mainnet

The Hedera mainnet has passed the mark of ten million accounts. A number like that should be read with care, because accounts are not users: a single application can create thousands of them. As an order of magnitude for activity on the chain it still serves.

Alongside that came connections to companies building identity and securities infrastructure. This is the clientele Hedera has targeted from the start, and it differs from the typical DeFi user base: decisions take longer, but they also last longer.

Why the volume matters more than the HBAR price

The most striking figure of the day is the jump in trading volume rather than the price gain. Volume rose about 81 percent against the previous day. With a price rise of 12 percent, that means considerably more market participants traded, and not just a few with large amounts.

This combination is regarded as more durable than a price jump on thin volume. It is no proof of continuation, but it rules out one of the most common explanations: a move that arises only from the absence of sellers.

The number that limits the cheering

HBAR trades about 84 percent below its all-time high. A gain of 12 percent changes little about that. Anyone comparing the current level with the peaks of previous years sees a network that is growing operationally while the token has not recovered a large part of its former value.

This gap between network metrics and price is no contradiction. It shows that the market values corporate connections differently from speculative narratives, at least in the short term.

The broader market as the real driver

September 21 was a strong day for the entire crypto market. Bitcoin reached its highest level since January at more than $85,000, triggered by the liquidation of short positions running into the hundreds of millions. In phases like this, assets that usually move little rise as well.

Part of the advance in HBAR therefore belongs to the market as a whole. The network figures explain why capital is landing here; they do not explain why it is flowing at all.

What to watch now at Hedera

Two things can be checked. First, whether the elevated trading volume holds for several days or disappears with the day's event. Second, whether the corporate connections turn into measurable activity on the chain, meaning transactions instead of announcements. Both can be tracked without forecasting.

The current crypto prices give an overview of the remaining assets. The comparison of the best crypto exchanges shows which venues list HBAR and at what fees.

Bitcoin Price Broke Through $84,000

$Bitcoin is trading at $84,374 after a near vertical move that started around 11:30 UTC, up roughly 4% from a previous close of $81,152. The level matters because $82,000 to $83,000 had rejected buyers repeatedly since spring. Once that shelf gave way there was very little supply above it, and the move accelerated into thin air.

The setup was built on Friday. The Fed raised rates by 25 basis points but signalled a less restrictive path than markets feared, risk assets caught a bid, and more than $445 million in crypto shorts were liquidated. The bears sitting under the range were already cleared out before today's candle even started.

XRP Price Reclaimed $1.50

$XRP moved in the same minute, jumping 5.62% to $1.4895 from a close of $1.4103, and it outpaced Bitcoin doing it. More importantly, it broke the descending trendline that had capped every rally since the late-August spike to $1.70. Underneath that break, the structure had been repairing quietly for weeks: the $1.00 floor from mid-August held, $1.30 held on the September dip, and price reclaimed the 200-day EMA at $1.3563 and stayed above it.

Why Altcoins Move Harder Than The Majors

Here is the part that matters for what comes next. When Bitcoin and XRP break out together, it tells you risk appetite has returned across the board rather than in one coin. Capital then rotates down the market cap table, and it hits smaller books.

That is where the amplification comes from, and it is arithmetic rather than magic. The same dollar of buying that nudges a $1.6 trillion asset moves a $4 billion one visibly. A coin with a $4 billion market cap and a thin order book will print a 25% day on flow that barely registers on the Bitcoin chart. This cuts both ways, and it is exactly why these moves unwind faster than they build.

The timing question is whether this holds. Rotations like this one typically play out over one to three weeks rather than a single session, because capital moves down the market cap table in stages rather than all at once. That is the window these three are positioned for.

1. SUI Has The Strongest Flow Behind It

$SUI trades at $1.03, up 25.23% on the day and 43.52% on the week, and the volume is what separates it from everything else on the board: $2.12 billion against a $4.23 billion market cap. That is a turnover ratio near 50%, meaning half the token's entire market value changed hands in a single day. This is not a thin-book drift being mistaken for demand, it is real participation. SUI remains down 26.34% year to date, so there is recovery room above, but a move with this much volume behind it can retrace just as violently.

2. Cardano Is The Large-Cap Laggard

$ADA sits at $0.2421, up 9.25% on the day and 16.10% on the week, with an $8.9 billion market cap and $865.57 million in daily volume. That is a turnover near 10%, which is healthy participation for a coin this size. It is still down 27.24% year to date, and that is the case for it: ADA has the furthest to travel just to get back to flat. It historically moves late and steadily in rotations, so it behaves as a trend follower rather than a leader.

3. Stellar Is The Defensive Pick

$XLM trades at $0.2083, up 8.87% on the day and 9.58% on the week. It has the softest momentum of the three, but it also has by far the best year: essentially flat at +0.05% year to date while SUI and ADA are both down more than 25%. XLM held its value through a brutal twelve months, and its payments and tokenization positioning overlaps directly with XRP, which is why an XRP breakout tends to drag it along. Volume is lighter at $380.23 million on a $7.26 billion cap, roughly 5%, so expect it to follow the move rather than lead it.

What Has To Hold Next Week

The whole rotation rests on two levels. XRP needs to hold $1.50, and Bitcoin needs to stay above the ceiling it just broke. If XRP fails there and slips back under its trendline, that is the textbook false breakout, and these three give back their gains in the same order they earned them with the thinnest order book falling hardest. For Bitcoin, losing $77,500 would undo the setup entirely.

Watch turnover rather than percentage gains as the week opens. Sustained volume on SUI would confirm the flow is real rather than a single-day squeeze, while ADA and XLM catching up on volume would signal the rotation is broadening rather than fading.

Bittensor rose about 14 percent on Sunday to $287 (CoinGecko, September 21, 2026, 12:50 UTC). Over the week the token is up a good 20 percent, and over 30 days by almost 27 percent. Trading volume stood at around $431 million.

No single piece of news explains the jump on the day. That is worth noting, because in situations like this one tends to get invented. TAO is in fact moving with its sector: AI-linked cryptocurrencies rose as a block, with Render gaining about 19 percent.

What sets Bittensor apart from other AI tokens

Bittensor organizes competition between AI models. The network is divided into subnets in which model providers compete against each other. Whoever delivers better results receives a larger share of the TAO that is paid out. The scoring is done by the other participants in the subnet concerned.

The approach is unusual and hard to verify. Unlike a network that brokers computing power, there is no simple metric such as images rendered or hours sold. The system assesses the quality of the results itself, and whether that assessment is robust against manipulation is the open question of the entire design.

What has changed at Bittensor in recent weeks

Two steps have widened the network's reach. In August, TAO was made available on Base, Coinbase's layer-two network, including transfers between chains. That gives the token access to DeFi applications previously closed to it.

Over the summer came a link to a payment provider through which TAO can be bought directly with conventional money. Both are improvements in access. Neither is a source of revenue. They explain no single day's gain, but they lower the barrier for new buyers.

The Bittensor price in numbers rather than narrative

TAO trades about 62 percent below its all-time high. That is remarkably little compared with other names in this rally: Render is 87 percent below, Sui 81 percent, Arbitrum as much as 90 percent. Bittensor has weathered the slump of recent months considerably better than the rest of the field.

That is the most solid statement the available data supports. It says nothing about the future, but it shows that the token has so far been steadier in down phases than comparable projects.

Why a missing trigger is itself information

When an asset rises by double digits with no news behind it, the move carries market mechanics rather than substance. On September 21 the broader market supplied the explanation: bitcoin reached its highest level since January at more than $85,000, driven by the liquidation of short positions running into the hundreds of millions. Capital that is freed up then looks for themes, and AI is currently the strongest.

Moves of this kind reverse faster than those with a concrete cause. Anyone buying at the peak of a sector rotation takes on the risk of the whole sector alongside that of the individual project.

What to watch in the Bittensor network

Two things will be telling over the coming weeks. First, the number of active subnets and the emissions paid out within them: is actual usage growing, or only the price? Second, how TAO behaves when the sector turns. If it then holds up better than Render and the other AI tokens, the picture of recent months is confirmed.

The current crypto prices show how the wider market is moving. The comparison of the best crypto exchanges shows which venues list TAO.

A lawsuit accuses UK users of running six coordinated accounts to pull at least $278,000 from X's now-defunct Creator Revenue Sharing Program.

Eligible customers can request shares at the offering price, but allocations are not guaranteed.

The central bank plans to buy euro-denominated public-sector debt and settle the transactions through its new Pontes service.

Venice (VVV) has clawed back from under a dollar to a record $34, and the pitch behind it is simple: an AI chatbot that promises to forget you the moment you close the tab.

The HashFly browser experiment uses a digital neural model for Bitcoin hashing and projects greater efficiency from a hypothetical biological version.

XRP is moving higher, futures activity has surged, open interest is expanding and a large short squeeze has already taken place.

Billionaire venture capitalist Tim Draper has taken aim at Apple, Meta and other tech giants for keeping Bitcoin off their balance sheets.

Solana’s 5-year chart pattern approaches resolution as the asset coils for a 106% run to the rim, according to veteran Peter Brandt.

Ethereum's open interest on Binance surges to its highest level on Binance in over nine months following a major breakout in its trading price.

An altcoin breakout led by XRP and NEAR triggered $666 million in crypto short position liquidations over the last 24 hours.

TLDR

• Bitcoin price jumped nearly 7% despite the CLARITY Act failing to advance in the U.S. Senate.
• Bitcoin traded above $86,000 as buyers returned following last week’s political and market uncertainty.
• U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded nearly $593 million in combined inflows on Thursday and Friday.
• Lawmakers remain divided over crypto market rules, ethics provisions, and conflict-of-interest concerns.
• Bitcoin also held firm after the Federal Reserve raised interest rates, keeping attention on ETF flows and regulation.

Bitcoin price climbed sharply on Monday, Sept. 21, even after the U.S. Senate failed to advance the Clarity Act last week. Bitcoin rose more than 6% during the session and traded above $85,000, showing that buyers returned despite the latest setback for federal crypto legislation.

Bitcoin Price Rises After Senate Vote

The Senate rejected cloture on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act on Sept. 15 by a 49-50 vote. The motion needed 60 votes to advance. The bill seeks to set clearer rules for digital commodities and divide oversight between federal regulators.

The setback initially pressured crypto markets, but Bitcoin later recovered. Recent Blockonomi coverage of Bitcoin ETF inflows reported renewed demand from U.S. spot funds as BTC moved toward higher price levels. The rebound also followed a sharp selloff around the Senate vote.

Clarity Act Stalls Over Key Disputes

Lawmakers remain divided over several parts of the market structure bill. Democratic lawmakers raised concerns about ethics rules and President Donald Trump’s family crypto interests. Republicans also faced internal opposition, leaving the measure short of the votes required to proceed.

The Clarity Act rejection came after lawmakers revised the proposal before the vote. The final draft included new ethics language and other changes aimed at addressing concerns raised during negotiations. The Senate could revisit the measure because a motion to reconsider remains possible.

ETF Demand Returns as Bitcoin Recovers

Bitcoin’s recovery also followed stronger demand for U.S. spot exchange-traded funds. As reported earlier, the funds added about $592.5 million across Sept. 17 and Sept. 18, reversing part of the heavy outflows recorded earlier in the week.

The fresh buying gave the Bitcoin price another source of support as the market recovered above $80,000. Analysts closely watch ETF flows because they show how much capital enters or leaves regulated Bitcoin products in the United States.

Fed Decision Adds Another Market Test

The Federal Reserve rate increase also failed to stop Bitcoin’s recovery. The central bank raised its policy rate by 25 basis points last week, while Bitcoin held near $76,000 shortly after the decision before moving higher in later sessions.

Bitcoin price now remains above levels seen before the Senate vote. Traders continue to track ETF demand, federal rulemaking, interest rates, and any renewed effort to advance crypto market structure legislation in Washington this week.

The post Bitcoin Price Breaks Higher—But One Risk Remains appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR

• WBD stock surged more than 10% after a major legal hurdle surrounding the Paramount Skydance merger eased.
• Paramount reached an antitrust settlement with California and other states that had challenged the takeover.
• The agreement reduces the risk of prolonged litigation and raises confidence that the merger can move closer to completion.
• Paramount accepted production, theatrical release, and editorial governance commitments as part of the settlement.
• Technical indicators show strong momentum, though the RSI near 76 suggests WBD stock has entered overbought territory.

Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) shares jumped more than 10% on Monday as investors reacted to fresh progress toward its Paramount Skydance merger. WBD stock outpaced the broader consumer services sector as legal risk around the transaction eased.

Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc., WBD

WBD Stock Rallies as States Settle Case

Paramount Skydance settled with California and 11 other states that sued to block the Warner Bros. Discovery takeover. The agreement removes a major legal barrier that had weighed on the deal and WBD stock for months.

The settlement followed recent merger progress that kept regulatory issues at the center of trading. Paramount agreed to several conditions, including production commitments and measures covering editorial independence at CNN and CBS.

Paramount previously said it had secured regulatory clearances across 69 jurisdictions before the state lawsuits became the main obstacle. The settlement now reduces the risk of a prolonged antitrust trial and removes a source of uncertainty that had pressured merger expectations.

That shift gave traders a clearer path for assessing the timing of the proposed closing.

Merger Terms Drive Warner Bros. Discovery Shares

The settlement sets a $30 million financial penalty for each film below Paramount’s pledge to release 30 movies each year. Paramount also committed $1.5 billion to film and television production in California, helping state officials end their court challenge.

Warner Bros. Discovery shares had already gained during Monday’s early market action as traders tracked settlement talks. The confirmed agreement then increased confidence that Paramount can move closer to completing the transaction.

The deal values Warner Bros. Discovery at $31 per share in cash under the revised Paramount offer. Investors have therefore focused on the gap between WBD stock and the proposed purchase price as closing risk changes.

Technical Signals Show Strong Momentum

Technical indicators also show strong short-term momentum after the sharp rally. The MACD reading stands at 0.145, while the RSI of 75.84 sits above the common 70 level that traders often associate with overbought conditions.

The latest settlement progress around the merger remains the main company-specific driver for WBD stock. Media coverage remains moderate, while the broader market sentiment index stays in neutral territory.

Investors now await the remaining administrative and court steps required before the companies can complete the transaction. Monday’s 10.7% gain shows how strongly WBD stock responded as one of the deal’s largest legal hurdles moved closer to resolution.

The post Paramount Settlement Sends WBD Stock Sharply Higher appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• Hyperliquid US plans center on Payward, Kraken’s parent company, bringing HIP-3 perpetual markets to American traders through a permissioned structure.
• Hyperliquid averaged about $9 billion in open interest during Q2 2026 as its 24/7 perpetual futures exchange continued expanding its activity.
• HIP-3 allows builders to define markets, manage oracles, set leverage limits, and operate independent margining and order books.
• Each HIP-3 deployer must stake 500,000 HYPE on mainnet, while additional asset listings use a shared Dutch auction process.

Hyperliquid US expansion is moving closer. Payward, Kraken’s parent company, outlined plans for HIP-3 markets targeting American traders. Grayscale reported that the 24/7 perpetual futures exchange averaged about $9 billion in open interest during Q2 2026. The platform continues growing while its offshore model limits access for US customers. 

Payward’s plan would create a permissioned route for selected Hyperliquid perpetuals. The proposed structure connects a US-facing operator with Hyperliquid’s builder-deployed framework. It does not confirm a launch date or approval in every state. It also tests US infrastructure. Hyperliquid US access will depend on product design, registrations, and market controls.

Hyperliquid US Expansion Takes Shape Through Payward

Grayscale described Payward as the company behind the proposed US channel. Payward is Kraken’s parent company and has expanded its derivatives and infrastructure operations. The plan would connect that corporate platform with Hyperliquid’s onchain order books.

The expansion targets HIP-3 markets rather than the entire offshore exchange. Hyperliquid documentation describes HIP-3 as builder-deployed perpetuals. A deployer defines each market, sets oracle rules, chooses leverage limits, and manages settlement.

That design gives each perpetual venue separate margining, order books, and deployer settings. The framework also uses the HyperCore trading stack and a unified API for HIP-3 assets. These features allow market creators to establish contracts outside the core listing process.

For US traders, the distinction matters. A permissioned product can apply eligibility checks, market limits, and operating controls before customers access contracts. The available markets would depend on the final arrangement between Payward and Hyperliquid.

Hyperliquid’s design does not transfer compliance responsibility to each market deployer. The US-facing operator would still need to establish customer onboarding, restricted jurisdictions, disclosures, and controls for leveraged contracts. Those requirements could shape the number and type of markets available at launch. Initial access may involve fewer US markets.

The proposed Hyperliquid US route therefore differs from direct access to the offshore platform. It would place the customer relationship, compliance process, and market interface within a US-facing structure. That setup could also determine how customers handle collateral, liquidations, and account restrictions.

Hyperliquid US Markets Will Use HIP-3 Builder Rules

Hyperliquid US activity has grown alongside demand for perpetual futures. Grayscale said the venue averaged roughly $9 billion in open interest during Q2 2026. Open interest measures outstanding contracts, not trading volume, but it shows the scale of positions held across the platform.

The exchange operates around the clock and supports crypto, commodities, indices, foreign exchange, and real-world asset markets. Hyperliquid’s platform describes these products as onchain and non-custodial. Its documentation separates HIP-3 venues from the core exchange.

HIP-3 deployers must stake 500,000 HYPE on mainnet under the published specification. The requirement applies for at least 183 days after deployment. Validators can slash the stake if market operations create protocol risks or violate listed conditions.

The framework allows any qualifying deployer to launch one perpetual DEX. The first three assets do not require auction participation. Additional assets use a shared Dutch auction, with deployers receiving defined reserve deployments.

These rules would shape any US rollout. Payward could select markets that fit its customer and risk framework. Hyperliquid’s rules would govern oracle design, leverage, margining, and settlement. The arrangement would not make every HIP-3 market available to US customers.

The market access plan also faces regulatory and operational questions. A US launch would need to address customer eligibility, disclosures, collateral, liquidations, surveillance, and state-level restrictions. None of those details appears in the reported announcement.

The Hyperliquid US plan signals a distribution route rather than a completed product launch. The exchange’s $9 billion average open interest gives the proposal scale, while HIP-3 supplies the market-building framework. Payward’s final structure will determine which perpetual contracts reach US traders.

The post Hyperliquid US Launch Brings HIP-3 Markets to American Traders appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR

• Wells Fargo downgraded Netflix, adding pressure as concerns around user engagement increased.
• NFLX stock has fallen 10.6% in one week and 21.1% year to date.
• Netflix closed at $71.79, below the widely followed fair value estimate of $82.
• Buybacks, advertising, live programming, and AI projects remain key areas investors are watching.
• Streaming competition is shifting as major media companies pursue new partnerships and consolidation.

Netflix (NFLX) entered the week under pressure after Wells Fargo cut its rating, drawing fresh attention to engagement trends. NFLX stock closed at $71.79 after a sharp reset. Shares have fallen 10.6% over one week and 21.1% in 2026. The one-year total shareholder return stands at negative 41.5%.

Netflix, Inc., NFLX

NFLX Stock Faces Fresh Rating Pressure

Wells Fargo moved Netflix from Equal Weight to Underweight and lowered its price target from $80 to $57. The bank cited softer viewer engagement and higher live sports costs. The Netflix rating cut added pressure as investors reviewed the company’s ability to defend growth.

Longer-term returns tell a different story. Netflix has delivered an 86.6% total shareholder return over three years and 21.1% over five years. That record shows stronger past performance even as current trading reflects weaker momentum and higher scrutiny around future cash generation.

Valuation Gap Draws Market Attention

Netflix now trades below a fair value estimate of $82, leaving a gap from the $71.79 closing price. The gap gives investors a data point as they compare lower engagement with buybacks, advertising, live programming, and a shrinking share count.

Competition remains active. Paramount confirmed the end of its animation partnership with Netflix after the Skydance Animation combination. Two planned films will still reach Netflix. The Paramount and Netflix partnership update adds context around changing studio relationships across streaming.

Buybacks Meet Growth Questions

Netflix continues to return capital through share repurchases, reducing the number of shares outstanding. That can support per-share results when cash flow remains strong. However, investors continue to watch whether advertising, live content, and AI projects can generate enough cash.

The debate centers on execution. Netflix remains a subscription platform with global reach, but engagement trends now carry more weight. NFLX stock could stay sensitive to viewing data, content spending, advertising progress, and future free cash flow.

Streaming Competition Stays in Focus

The wider media market is shifting as Paramount moves its Warner Bros. Discovery transaction through legal and settlement discussions. Recent Paramount merger progress shows how rivals are reshaping scale, content ownership, and distribution across entertainment.

For Netflix, the near-term picture remains mixed. The share price sits below the cited $82 fair value estimate, while recent returns remain weak. Stronger engagement, steady cash generation, and progress in revenue areas may shape how NFLX stock trades after the recent selloff.

The post NFLX Stock Drops After Wells Fargo Warning appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR

• NBIS stock gained 5.60%, outperforming the Industrial & Commercial Services sector’s 0.52% rise.
• Nebius raised prices for premium AI compute services, including Nvidia GPU and AMD CPU instances.
• Strong enterprise demand and limited high-performance computing capacity continue to support Nebius’ pricing power.
• Technical indicators remain constructive, with MACD at 1.219 and RSI at 56.523.
• Analysts maintain broadly positive ratings, with an average price target of $287.48 and a high target of $410.

Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) shares gained 5.60% as investor attention returned to artificial intelligence infrastructure demand and higher compute pricing. NBIS stock outperformed the Industrial & Commercial Services sector, which advanced 0.52%, while trading activity remained strong across the group.

Nebius Group N.V., NBIS

NBIS Stock Climbs Above Sector Peers

Nebius ranked among the sector’s most active stocks by turnover, with its shares rising about 5.70%. Comfort Systems USA fell 0.88%, while S&P Global gained 0.13%, showing stronger relative momentum for Nebius during the session.

The move follows Nebius’ decision to raise prices across premium Nvidia GPU and AMD CPU compute services. A recent AI compute pricing update showed increases across several high-performance products as tight capacity continues to meet steady enterprise demand.

Higher Compute Prices Support Growth

Nebius can collect more revenue from scarce computing capacity when customers accept higher rates. The company has also faced rising hardware, memory, power, and data center costs as it expands infrastructure for large artificial intelligence workloads.

Investors continue to watch customer demand, contract pricing, and capital spending. Low churn after rate increases can support revenue visibility, while heavy infrastructure spending still requires strong utilization to improve operating margins and shorten the payback period on new capacity.

Valuation Keeps Trading Volatile

The wider AI infrastructure market remains active. Nvidia’s Rubin platform rollout has added attention to performance and power efficiency across new systems, including deployments involving Nebius and other large cloud infrastructure providers.

NBIS stock can still move sharply during broader technology swings. High valuation multiples, large capital needs, supply constraints, and competition from major cloud companies can increase daily price changes, especially when traders adjust positions after strong rallies.

Technical Signals Remain Constructive

Technical readings remain mixed but supportive. The MACD reading of 1.219 points to positive momentum, while the RSI at 56.523 stays neutral. Williams %R at 30.797 also signals buying strength, though traders may continue watching price action closely.

Peer developments also remain relevant. CoreWeave’s Vera Rubin infrastructure deployment shows how independent AI cloud providers are expanding advanced capacity. Such spending keeps competition focused on access, efficiency, pricing, and deployment speed across the sector.

Nebius reported annual revenue of $529.80 million and net profit of $82.50 million in the provided industry data. Recent analyst coverage has remained broadly positive, with targets ranging widely, reflecting both expected growth and the risks tied to valuation and capital spending.

The post NBIS Stock Jumps 5.6% as AI Pricing Boosts Momentum appeared first on Blockonomi.

The self-proclaimed Dogecoin killer posted an 8% price increase over the past week, but its pump was less impressive than many other altcoins, and it lost its prestigious second spot in the meme coin sector.

Moreover, several factors suggest Shiba Inu bears may soon regain control.

Losing Ground

The cryptocurrency community has long accepted that Dogecoin (DOGE) is the biggest meme coin by market capitalization, with SHIB as its main rival. That trend has held for years, but in the summer of 2025, another contender emerged and changed the game.

The token in question is MemeCore (M), and its market capitalization recently soared to almost $3.5 billion after a monthly price gain of around 35%. Meanwhile, Shiba Inu climbed just 3% over the same period, and its cap now stands at around $3.37 billion, making it the third-biggest meme coin and the 34th-largest cryptocurrency.

Recall that back in the day, SHIB ranked much higher, with its capitalization briefly pumping above $20 billion in 2024 and temporarily exploding beyond $40 billion in 2021.

Further Slip Ahead?

Right now, the gap between Shiba Inu and the fourth-largest meme coin (PUMP) looks significant at around $1.3 billion, but some worrying signals suggest the former may take another hit soon.

The first one is the waning Shibarium activity. Last week, Shiba Inu’s team implemented “a small but useful” update for the layer-2 scaling solution. Specifically, it refreshed its RPC listing in the Ethereum-lists/chains registry, and Chainlist now has updated connection details. However, the protocol still facilitates a negligible number of daily transactions.

Next on the list is the rising amount of SHIB tokens stored on crypto exchanges. CryptoQuant data shows the figure has risen to around 87.6 trillion, the highest since early August. This indicates many investors have abandoned self-custody and moved to centralized platforms, increasing immediate selling pressure.

Shiba Inu’s seasonal performance is another cause for concern. September has been a predominantly poor month for the meme coin, with its valuation finishing in the red three out of five times.

The post Shiba Inu (SHIB) Takes a Serious Hit: Is the Worst Yet to Come? appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Bitcoin is following a similar trajectory seen in 2022-2023, according to the latest observation by Doctor Profit.

The analyst said that the latest move above the 50-week moving average, in particular, set the stage for the breakout toward the $82,500-$83,000 area, which took place over the past several hours.

2022-2023 Structure Is Repeating

The MA50 Weekly is currently around $78,700. BTC recently pushed past that level and was trading near $85,000 at the time of writing after an explosive rally on Monday. Doctor Profit said a weekly close above the moving average would strengthen his bullish view. His observation stems from Bitcoin’s previous market structure in 2022-2023, when the crypto asset faced several rejections around the MA50 Weekly before eventually clearing it.

Bitcoin broke below the MA50 Weekly and then reclaimed it seven times. Five instances were followed by bull markets, while two became false signals. Those occurred once in 2011, when BTC had “virtually no liquidity,” and once in 2020 during the COVID-19 crash.

The current market is showing a similar pattern. The analyst explained,

“The recent bear trap adds another similarity to 2022-2023! Same rejections, for 3-4 Weeks followed by a shakeout, then a recovery above the moving average and breakout above the MA50 Weekly, exactly of what is happening right now! Bears interpreted weakness as confirmation of another collapse, but the market reversed. I see the same broader transition!”

The latest move puts the focus on the start of the next bull market phase, which analysts have been speculating about lately. Doctor Profit has identified $88,000 as the next target once the remaining resistance levels are cleared.

Even Bolder Target

Another market commentator believes that Bitcoin could be repeating a historical cycle. Crypto Patel flagged a 364-day gap between the crypto asset’s 2017 peak and 2018 bottom, followed by a similar 364-day gap between the 2021 peak and 2022 bottom. The analyst said the 2025-peak-to-2026-bottom also appears to follow the same timing.

Bitcoin is now retesting long-term trendline support after losing the major EC zone. If the historical pattern continues, Crypto Patel said the next major expansion could target $370,000. He stressed that price action must confirm the setup.

The post From Bear Trap to $88K: Analyst Reveals Why Bitcoin’s Rally Isn’t Over appeared first on CryptoPotato.

BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) bought 27,562 Ethereum (ETH) over the week to September 20 and reported combined crypto, cash, and moonshot holdings of $17.1 billion in a press release and 8-K filed September 21.

Total holdings rose $1.3 billion from the $15.8 billion BitMine reported a week earlier, when it added 27,180 ETH. The company marked its Ether at $2,688 per token, per Coinbase, up from $2,513 a week earlier. That mark puts the week’s purchases at roughly $74 million, with the treasury at 5,983,940 ETH.

Staked Total Flat Since Late August

BitMine Chairman Thomas “Tom” Lee stated the company “has bought ETH each and every week since the inception of its ETH Treasury Strategy on June 30, 2025,” a track record he called “unmatched by any public company in the world.” The pace has swung this year; one July purchase fell to 7,430 ETH, down from more than 30,500, a slowdown Lee tied to share buybacks.

Holdings equal 4.9% of the 122.1 million ETH in supply, and BitMine puts itself 98% of the way to its target of owning 5% of all ETH, the plan it calls the Alchemy of 5%, 15 months after the strategy began.

BitMine stakes 5,067,309 ETH, worth $13.6 billion at its mark and 85% of the treasury, through MAVAN, its Made in America Validator Network. The staked count has held there for five consecutive weekly updates, even as the token total kept climbing.

Lee put projected annualized staking revenue at $357 million, up from $334 million a week earlier, rising to $421 million once the ether is fully staked, on a 2.62% seven-day yield.

Lee Sees Stronger Fourth Quarter

“We believe a crypto bull market is underway, having started in late June,” Lee said, citing “the rotation from AI back to crypto.”

He put Ether’s quarter-to-date lead over the S&P 500 at 6,519 basis points, called the run “a prelude to a potentially stronger up move in the 4th quarter of 2026,” and said the company expects institutions “to substantially increase their exposure in the final 3 months of 2026.”

Cash and marketable securities rose to $714 million from $549 million a week earlier. The release gave no reason for the increase. Alongside the ether, BitMine held 212 Bitcoin (BTC), a $180 million stake in Beast Industries and a $105 million position in Eightco Holdings (ORBS), up from $98 million.

BMNR traded $1.2 billion in average daily dollar volume over the five days to September 18, ranking 100th of 5,704 US-listed stocks, according to Fundstrat, Lee’s research firm. The release ranks BitMine first among ether treasuries and second among crypto treasuries overall, behind Strategy (MSTR), which the release said owns 845,080 Bitcoin worth about $75 billion.

The post BitMine Buys 27,562 ETH in a Week as Holdings Reach $17.1 Billion appeared first on CryptoPotato.

The cryptocurrency market has been on fire over the last few days despite negative news such as the CLARITY Act failure, rising interest rates in the United States, and escalating global geopolitical tensions.

The past 24 hours have delivered even more gains, with Bitcoin (BTC) climbing past $85,000 for the first time since January, while Ethereum (ETH) hit a nine-month high of roughly $2,750. Many analysts believe the second-largest cryptocurrency is poised for a further rally in the near future, but some describe the current setup as a classic bull trap.

Don’t Pop the Champagne Yet?

At first glance, it seems like ETH’s cycle bottom is behind us and might be gearing up for a shift toward a bull run. X user DANNY, though, doesn’t support that thesis, claiming that the asset is setting up “a huge trap.”

The analyst argued that if ETH pumps to $2,670 (as it happened), sentiment will flip fast, and then people will start projecting further pumps to $4,000 and $5,000. For the X user, that level is the area where the market can trap late buyers before the real flush starts.

DANNY envisioned a slip toward $1,800, which could trigger the first real panic, followed by $1,500 and capitulation that may occur in the final months of the year. The analyst then sees an incoming reversal and a jump above $3,250 in the second or third quarter of 2027.

X user Midas also shared a pessimistic bet, maintaining that ETH has formed “a huge bearish setup.” The analyst doesn’t expect the upward move to last in the short term and forecasts a retest of the $1,700-$1,800 range.

“And if that liquidity gets swept, ETH can extend lower toward $1.4K-$1.5K. But I still don’t expect ETH to make the same kind of new cycle lows as BTC. ETH has been showing much stronger relative structure, and I still think it will outperform once this correction is finished. There is just one major downside target left to clear before the real expansion starts. So, short-term, I’m bearish on ETH. Long term this setup can become one of the strongest opportunities of the cycle ” they added.

Ted also predicted a potential correction ahead, but expects it to come once Ethereum’s price taps the $2,900-$3,000 area.

These Factors Favor the Bulls

The combination of multiple positive elements suggests ETH’s price may keep surging in the short term. As CryptoPotato recently reported, whale transactions have been climbing, showing that large holders have become increasingly active.

Ethereum’s non-empty wallets have risen to 207.17 million, with staking remaining a major reason why ETH stays parked in the long run. Just hours ago, Lookonchain revealed that a mysterious whale has sold 1,107 BTC (worth over $86 million) over the past five days, bought 34,422 ETH, and staked it all.

The solid institutional interest is another bullish factor. Although they finally registered a red week, spot ETH ETFs have attracted a lot of capital over the past few months, which could support a more substantial price rally ahead.

Not long ago, renowned analyst Ali Martinez highlighted the $2,570 level, saying a decisive breakout could open the door to a jump toward $2,700 and even $3,000. For more ETH price forecasts, check out our article here.

The post Ethereum Crosses $2,700: Bull Trap or the Start of a Major Rally? appeared first on CryptoPotato.

[PRESS RELEASE – Tallinn, Estonia, September 21st, 2026]

NOWPayments today published new empirical data analyzing six months of enterprise payout activity, offering a comparative performance benchmark across TRON, BNB Smart Chain, Solana, Bitcoin, and Ethereum to help businesses select optimal blockchain rails based on speed, transaction volume, and cost efficiency.

The dataset reveals distinct operational advantages depending on transfer priorities: Solana recorded the fastest average payout speed at 1 minute and 45 seconds while accounting for 3.08% of volume and 3.86% of transactions. TRON led in total monetary volume at 43.69%, and BNB Smart Chain handled the largest share of individual payout transactions at 48.23%.

High-Frequency Payouts Put BNB Smart Chain in the Lead

Together, TRON, BNB Smart Chain, Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Solana accounted for 94.04% of payout volume and 77.84% of payout transactions during the period analyzed.

BNB Smart Chain accounted for 48.23% of transactions, compared with 15.73% for TRON. Its share of payout volume was lower at 21.75%.

The network handled far more individual transfers without carrying the largest share of value, a pattern consistent with higher-frequency, lower-value payouts in the NOWPayments dataset.

Higher-Value Payouts Put TRON in the Lead

TRON moved 43.69% of payout volume, more than twice BNB Smart Chain’s 21.75% share, despite accounting for a much smaller share of transactions.

Based on those shares, the average TRON payout was approximately 6.2 times larger than the average BNB Smart Chain payout during the period. The networks served different payout patterns: TRON carried more value, while BNB Smart Chain handled far more individual transfers.

Ethereum ranked third by volume at 18.84% and represented 7.42% of transactions. Bitcoin accounted for 6.68% of volume and 2.60% of transactions, while Solana represented 3.08% of volume and 3.86% of transactions.

The data suggests a practical framework for matching the network to the payout flow:

The data offers a starting point, not a universal network recommendation.

When Speed Matters, Solana Leads

Solana led on speed with an average payout time of 1:45. Bitcoin followed at 2:53, ahead of TRON at 3:08 and BNB Smart Chain at 3:13. Ethereum recorded the longest average at 5:56.

The gap between the fastest and slowest networks was 4 minutes and 11 seconds. Every network in the comparison still averaged less than six minutes, while TRON and BNB Smart Chain were separated by only five seconds.

The fastest network was not the most widely used. That points to a broader principle: crypto infrastructure should be evaluated across the full movement of funds, not by a single headline metric.

Kate Lifshits, Commercial Director at NOWPayments, applies the same data-first approach in Crypto That Works for Business, her Cryptopolitan series on the commercial impact of crypto payments. The first column, the 22% Sales Boost Hiding in Your Crypto Checkout, examined checkout performance; future editions will cover other points where payment infrastructure affects revenue, costs, and growth.

“The useful question is not which network tops a leaderboard. It is what a specific payout flow needs to optimize: value, frequency, speed, or cost,” said Kate Lifshits, Commercial Director at NOWPayments.

When Cost Matters, The Best Route May Not Be a Blockchain Network

When minimizing payout costs is the priority, comparing blockchain networks may be the wrong place to start.

NOWPayments allows businesses to send payouts to ChangeNOW Pro wallets with no network or service fees within the ecosystem. Creator Andy Tries Coding publicly tested the route and reported receiving a fee-free payout in under five seconds.

Recipients are identified by email and confirm the transfer before funds move, so businesses do not need to collect wallet addresses at the beginning of the payout process. An interactive guide walks through the process from payout creation to recipient access.

The takeaway is simple: define the payout flow first, then select the network or route. Value, frequency, speed, and cost will not point every business to the same answer.

About NOWPayments

NOWPayments is a crypto business ecosystem designed to help companies accept payments, automate mass payouts, manage stablecoin treasury, and scale global digital asset operations through a single infrastructure. The platform supports more than 350 cryptocurrencies, over 30 stablecoins, flexible settlement options, and enterprise-grade APIs.

The post NOWPayments Releases Cross-Chain Payout Data Revealing Key Performance Benchmarks Across TRON, BNB Chain, and Solana appeared first on CryptoPotato.