Rubio's remarks underscore persistent US-Iran tensions, potentially prolonging economic instability and hindering diplomatic progress.

The post Rubio calls Strait of Hormuz an economic nuclear weapon amid Iran tensions appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The IRGC's power consolidation may lead to increased regional instability and impact global oil markets due to strategic chokepoints.

The post Iran regime solidifies power under IRGC control after US-Israeli strikes appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The poll suggests a potential shift in Israeli political dynamics, challenging Netanyahu's leadership and possibly altering future governance.

The post Poll: Bennett, Eisenkot seen as more suitable than Netanyahu for Israeli PM appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Heightened tensions and military readiness could escalate regional conflict, impacting global security dynamics and economic stability.

The post Trump briefed on Iran strike options as Tehran activates air defenses appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Iran's missile recovery efforts amid a fragile ceasefire could destabilize regional peace, heightening the risk of renewed military conflict.

The post Iran accelerates missile recovery amid fragile ceasefire with US, Israel appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin Magazine

Strike CEO Jack Mallers Announces Lending Proof-of-Reserves, Volatility-Proof Loans, and Backs Tether Merger Plan

Strike CEO Jack Mallers announced a series of product updates and strategic moves Wednesday, including the launch of lending proof-of-reserves, a new “volatility-proof” bitcoin-backed loan structure built with Tether, and a $2.1 billion credit facility. 

He also said he supports a proposal by Tether Investments to merge Strike with Twenty-One Capital and bitcoin miner Elektron Energy.

Mallers said Strike’s bitcoin-backed loan and line-of-credit business has grown since launch, with users drawn to the ability to borrow against bitcoin rather than sell it. 

He described bitcoin as a savings account for many customers and said Strike cut its rate tiers across the board. Pricing now ranges from approximately 10.5% APR for loans under $250,000 to approximately 7.49% APR for loans above $5 million.

Strike announced the first iteration of its lending proof-of-reserves, which gives borrowers the ability to verify that their collateral is present and segregated in a distinct on-chain address. 

“We want you to trust us and know that we are who we say we are,” Mallers said. The disclosure mechanism was developed in partnership with Tether, which Mallers credited with helping Strike build the transparency infrastructure.

The two companies also jointly developed what Mallers called “volatility-proof” bitcoin-backed loans, a structure that removes the risk of forced liquidation when bitcoin prices fall or broader markets drop. 

Mallers said the segregated collateral product is available now through Strike’s private client desk, and the volatility-proof loan feature is available to customers as part of the bitcoin-backed lending suite.

Mallers announced that Strike has secured a $2.1 billion credit facility, which he said gives the company capacity to meet demand at any order size within its lending business.

Merger proposal

Earlier Wednesday, Tether Investments published a proposal to merge Twenty-One Capital with Strike and Elektron Energy, a large-scale bitcoin mining operator that manages approximately 50 EH/s, or roughly 5% of the current Bitcoin network hashrate. 

Tether said the combined entity would integrate bitcoin treasury holdings, mining, financial services, lending, and capital markets under a single listed platform.

Mallers said he backs the plan. “Simply put, I think it’s a great idea,” he said, adding that building a Bitcoin company — not a narrow payments app — was his founding goal. Elektron founder Raphael Zagury has been proposed as President of the combined entity under the plan.

The bitcoin company quadrant and Maller’s vision

Mallers used a quadrant framework onstage to argue that the Bitcoin industry has a gap at the intersection of high conviction and high operating income. 

He placed crypto exchanges in the high-income, low-conviction corner, saying they run profitable businesses but list many coins and build products across asset classes. He placed bitcoin treasury companies in the high-conviction, low-income corner, describing them as deeply committed to bitcoin but limited in operating business scope. 

He cited Coinbase as an exchange that could carry more bitcoin on its balance sheet, and praised MicroStrategy executive chairman Michael Saylor while drawing a distinction between a treasury strategy and a product strategy. “I love him and his company,” Mallers said of Saylor, “but I want to build bitcoin products.”

His answer to the gap was a four-pillar model: a financial services arm covering brokerage, custody, lending, payments, treasury, and prime services; bitcoin infrastructure spanning energy, power generation, mining, hardware, and hosting; a capital markets operation built around loan-book securitization, mining revenue securitization, bitcoin-backed debt, and structured products; and a mergers-and-acquisitions function targeting profitable bitcoin businesses across software, custody, payments, energy, and distribution. 

The stated goal of the M&A arm, as presented on his slide, is to give “every dollar of operating income one job: buy more Bitcoin.”

Mallers closed by saying a platform of that scope could “change the world with its products” and cited a phrase he has used throughout his career: “Fix the money, fix the world.”

This post Strike CEO Jack Mallers Announces Lending Proof-of-Reserves, Volatility-Proof Loans, and Backs Tether Merger Plan first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Strategy and Blockstream CEOs Paint Vision of Bitcoin’s Financial Future

Strategy CEO Phong Le and Blockstream CEO Adam Back appeared Wednesday on a panel moderated by Natalie Brunell, covering Bitcoin treasury strategy, tokenization, digital credit, and the enduring mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto. 

The conversation drew a picture of a financial system in transition, with Bitcoin at its center.

Le opened with a striking observation about Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings. The company now holds 818,334, putting it second behind only one entity. 

“There is only one individual entity with more Bitcoin than Strategy,” Le said. “That’s Satoshi.” 

The firm is on pace to reach 1 million BTC in the next couple of months, a milestone that would cement its place in financial history.

Digital credit in the bitcoin space

Much of the discussion centered on Stretch, or STRC, Strategy’s perpetual preferred stock that pays an 11.5% annual dividend with proceeds used to purchase Bitcoin.

Le was direct about why the product matters. “This product does good,” he said, contrasting it with industries like tobacco and processed food. 

Investors use STRC as a place to park short-term money, and it has served as a lower barrier for people seeking BTC exposure. Layer 2 products and DeFi protocols are now being built on top of it, Le said, describing STRC as “the most important credit product of all time” and a cornerstone for bringing BTC and DeFi together.

Back addressed the intersection of cypherpunk ideology and institutional finance, a tension the Bitcoin community has long wrestled with. 

He said BTC’s acceptance by sovereign wealth funds and private funds is “a sign of success,” not a compromise. Cypherpunks, he explained, believed in capital formation and free markets, not just cryptographic privacy. 

Back said treasury companies exist to grow Bitcoin per share, and when they do, individual holders benefit too.

Le reinforced the point, saying he learned much from Back when they first met. “Cypherpunks are gifted minds who understand the markets very well,” Le said, framing the movement as one that has always operated at the intersection of technology and capital.

On tokenization, both men saw it as the next structural shift. Le described it as “the digitalization of markets,” with blockchain providing the transparency layer.

He pointed to tap-to-pay as an analogy. “Why can’t you do that to a stock, peer to peer?” he asked. Back added that tokenization enables 24/7 trading, use of assets as collateral, and unlocks value in assets that are hard to discover or trade, like private notes and contracts.

When asked if major banks would compete in bitcoin digital credit, Le said he expected them to. He compared it to Amazon reshaping retail and forcing Walmart to respond. 

Then he added: “I’d love to see Morgan Stanley on that list” regarding massive bitcoin companies. 

The panel closed on a lighter note. Brunell asked Back about a New York Times investigation published earlier this month that named him as Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto. 

Back, who denied the claim when the story broke, did not address it directly. “We are in a very good place regarding people adopting the technology,” he said. 

This post Strategy and Blockstream CEOs Paint Vision of Bitcoin’s Financial Future first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Morgan Stanley Executive on Bitcoin: ‘We Are Still So Early on This Journey’

Morgan Stanley launched its bitcoin exchange-traded product, the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT), into a market it believes is still in its infancy. 

At a panel on Wednesday moderated by Tyler Evans, Amy Oldenburg, the bank’s head of digital assets, spent the better part of an hour making a case for bitcoin that few clients have heard in full, and said that gap is the industry’s most urgent problem.

“We have to start with bitcoin,” Oldenburg told the audience, citing the asset’s roughly 1.5 trillion dollar market cap and its distance from the rest of the crypto landscape. 

She was careful to draw a line between bitcoin and crypto as a broad category, a distinction she said most retail and institutional clients still do not make with confidence. The firm wants to see that distinction anchored in fundamental research, not just narrative.

Oldenburg: Bitcoin has an education problem 

The education problem, she said, runs deep. Many investors still associate bitcoin with its early history of use by bad actors, and struggle to see past that frame when weighing an allocation. 

Oldenburg said that when clients ask about yield or structured exposure, her team tries to be direct: “you can present it as a yield, but the underlying asset is bitcoin.” That clarity, she said, is still missing from most conversations in the market, and there is “so much more work to do.”

MSBT pulled in more than $100 million in its first week of trading, a strong early signal for a product the bank describes as designed for the full spectrum of its client base rather than a narrow segment. 

But Oldenburg was quick to put that number in context. All of the initial flows came through self-directed accounts, because the fund had not yet been made available on the advisory platform.

She noted that the bank has announced a 2–4% crypto allocation recommendation, and that even with that guidance in place, take-up through advisors has been slow. The product, she reminded the audience, has been on the market for less than a year.

To bridge that gap, Morgan Stanley is working from the inside out. Oldenburg said the firm is rolling out internal training so that financial advisors can speak to clients on bitcoin with confidence, and that her team spends “hour after hour after hour” on the phone walking clients through models and allocation frameworks. 

She said the bank designs products for clients with different needs and wants its platform to cover each of those needs, including clients who want a direct ETP wrapper, and that spot crypto trading is coming for those on the wealth management side.

On custodians, Oldenburg acknowledged the complexity of the decision. The market has no shortage of providers, and choosing among them was not straightforward, which led the firm to work with more than one. Morgan Stanley ultimately tapped Coinbase and BNY Mellon as custodians for MSBT.

When the conversation turned to high-beta bitcoin plays, Oldenburg called Strategy, the Michael Saylor-led company formerly known as MicroStrategy, “a good friend of Morgan Stanley,” and said the bank has worked alongside it through its evolution. 

She said most of the exposure in that vehicle so far is coming from retail and that “digital credit” as a category will take time to develop.

Morgan Stanley buying bitcoin is “not out of the question”

On the question of banks holding bitcoin on their balance sheets, Oldenburg said it is “not out of the question” if regulatory progress continues, but was measured in framing it. 

The U.S. needs greater alignment among its financial regulators, she said, and for a global firm like Morgan Stanley, the picture is more complex still — each jurisdiction comes with its own framework.

She closed where she began: on the need for research with reach. The market has commentators and personalities that investors trust and follow, she said, and the work ahead is to bring that kind of accessible, grounded analysis into the mainstream. 

“We are still so early on this journey,” she said. “So little allocation. It’s still really early.”

This post Morgan Stanley Executive on Bitcoin: ‘We Are Still So Early on This Journey’ first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin, WikiLeaks, and a Film the Streamers Wouldn’t Touch: Jack Dorsey and Eugene Jarecki Make Their Case

Filmmaker Eugene Jarecki and tech entrepreneur Jack Dorsey took the stage Wednesday to discuss The Six Billion Dollar Man, Jarecki’s documentary on Julian Assange, and the role the bitcoin community may play in getting it to the public — a conversation that stretched from censorship and surveillance to Satoshi Nakamoto and the original principles of the internet.

Dorsey joined the panel virtually. The setting itself carried weight: Jarecki told the crowd that the casino sitting close to where he stood had ties to the private security firm that spied on Assange while he lived inside London’s Ecuadorian Embassy — a revelation the documentary places at the center of its surveillance narrative.

Dorsey: Bitcoin embodies a gatekeeper-free, open network

Jarecki said he went to Dorsey first for money. He needed help distributing a film that, despite premiering at Cannes and earning recognition on the festival circuit, found no takers among major streaming platforms. Dorsey shifted the conversation. 

Rather than write a check, he told Jarecki that the bitcoin community represented something larger than a funding source — a constituency built around the same principles Assange had fought to defend.

“Bitcoin is an open protocol for money transmission,” Dorsey said. “It routes around the gatekeepers — Visa, Mastercard, the banks.” 

He described the community as one that views Assange as a hero, someone who stood for the idea that information should remain free and open, values he traced back to the founding culture of the internet itself.

Dorsey pointed to 2011 as a proof of concept. After financial institutions cut off WikiLeaks from donation channels under pressure from the U.S. government, bitcoin stepped in as the only payment rail that could not be blocked.

He called WikiLeaks adopting bitcoin out of necessity one of the most significant moments in the protocol’s early history — not because it was planned, but because it revealed an immediate, real-world use case under conditions of state pressure.

He then drew a line between Assange and Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of bitcoin. Dorsey said what matters most about bitcoin is that its founder walked away. He called that exit a selfless act — one that made the network founderless, and therefore resistant to the kind of pressure that governments and institutions can apply when a single person stands at the center of a project. 

He placed Assange and Edward Snowden in the same category: people who trusted the technology they used, put their lives at risk for principles larger than themselves, and paid for it.

Jarecki said making the film carried its own risks. While shooting in Russia, he said his crew felt they were being followed and monitored — a layer of pressure that shaped the production from the inside. He described the mutual regard between Assange and Snowden, two figures who understood each other’s positions with precision, as one of the documentary’s most striking undercurrents.

A pay-per-view watch party in less than 60 days

The film’s distribution model is the most unusual element of the project. Dorsey proposed a global private pay-per-view watch party as an alternative to the traditional release pipeline. Ticket buyers at thesixbilliondollarman.com receive a credit line on the film itself, turning the audience into participants in the project rather than passive consumers. 

Jarecki framed it as a test of whether a community organized around open financial infrastructure could do what media gatekeepers would not — get a film about press freedom in front of the people who need to see it.

Dorsey said the website and the viewing model offer a way to crowdfund and bring the community together around a shared cause. 

At the panel, Jarecki showed never-before-seen clips from the documentary — behind-the-scenes footage that gave the audience a direct look at material that has not circulated publicly.

Jarecki and Dorsey are betting that the bitcoin community, which absorbed that argument in 2011 when it mattered most, will carry the film where the streaming industry declined to go.

This post Bitcoin, WikiLeaks, and a Film the Streamers Wouldn’t Touch: Jack Dorsey and Eugene Jarecki Make Their Case first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Eric Trump, John Koudounis Call Bitcoin a Global Reserve Asset, Float $1M Price Target

At Bitcoin 2026 in Las Vegas, Eric Trump and Calamos Investments CEO John Koudounis sat down with Bloomberg senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas for a panel that covered bitcoin’s maturation from speculative instrument to global reserve contender. 

The conversation ranged across institutional adoption, government debanking, currency debasement, and the challenge of winning over ordinary investors who still view bitcoin as too risky, too complex, or both. 

It was a panel that reflected how much the room has changed — a mix of long-time bitcoin believers and fresh institutional money that, a decade ago, would have dismissed this gathering entirely.

Trump: Bitcoin is a sticky, limited supply asset

Trump opened on a structural theme, arguing that bitcoin has become “sticky.” The U.S. government now holds approximately 300,000 bitcoin and will not sell, he said, a claim consistent with the creation of a U.S. strategic bitcoin reserve. 

Corporate treasury buyers like Strategy and Metaplanet, which surpassed 40,000 bitcoin in holdings by the end of the first quarter of 2026, are doing the same. The world’s largest financial platforms — Trump named Charles Schwab and Morgan Stanley — have also moved in. 

American Bitcoin, the company Trump co-founded, is mining bitcoin and holding every coin rather than selling. 

“We are compressing bitcoin,” Trump said. “There is a limited supply.”

The argument, in essence, is that the natural sellers are leaving the market while a new class of permanent holders takes their place.

Koudounis put the bitcoin supply compression argument in the context of a broader capital shift. He cited research projecting that 124 trillion dollars in wealth will transfer across generations through 2048, and said the 60 billion dollars that have moved into spot bitcoin ETFs so far represent a fraction of what is coming. 

For context, 60 billion dollars is roughly the size of a mid-tier U.S. asset manager’s total book. Set against a 124 trillion dollar transfer of accumulated Boomer wealth to Millennial and Gen Z inheritors who are far more comfortable with digital assets, it reads as a starting line.

Koudounis told the audience that the institutional conversation has already moved on. “The question used to be, ‘Are you buying bitcoin?'” he said. “Now it’s, ‘What percent are you allocating?'”

And his conclusion on what full institutional entry means for the asset: “Once institutions get involved, it’s game over.”

How can bitcoin attract retail clients?  

Balchunas pressed both men on the retail challenge, asking how they would sell bitcoin to his mother — a stand-in for the generation of older investors who remain nervous about volatility and complexity. It is a question the industry has never fully answered. 

Bitcoin’s price history, with its 80% drawdowns and euphoric recoveries, is not a comfortable pitch to someone managing a fixed retirement income. 

In response to this quandary, Koudounis said that Calamos has built a line of protected bitcoin ETFs that cap downside and smooth returns, turning a perceived deterrent into a feature for conservative investors who want exposure without the full ride. 

The goal, he said, is to add bitcoin exposure to products that already feel familiar to traditional investors. 

Trump’s answer to the same question was more direct. Fixed income, he argued, is not a genuine alternative at current yields. 

“Do yourself a favor, go invest in fixed income at 4%,” he said. “I’ll invest in bitcoin. I’ll ride out the volatility and we’ll see who wins that equation in a 10-year period of time.” 

He claimed BTC has averaged roughly 70% annual growth per year over the past decade and called it “a better gold,” adding that “every country in this world needs it.”

The macro case Trump made was not only about returns. He pointed to currency weakness and geopolitical instability — citing Iran specifically — as reasons traditional store-of-value assets are under pressure, and argued that BTC’s ability to transfer value across borders without a bank intermediary is a feature that becomes more valuable the more fragile existing systems look.

Currency debasement, he said, is real and ongoing, and bitcoin is designed to resist it. “Would you rather have the euro,” he asked, “or would you rather have bitcoin, an asset that’s grown at 70% a year on average, year over year for the last decade? It’s not even close.”

Koudounis: Banks can ‘debank’ you at any time

On the question of why he became an advocate at all, Trump’s answer was personal. He described how major banks shut down hundreds of Trump Organization accounts — covering buildings, golf courses, and restaurants — following the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot.

JPMorgan has since confirmed it closed those accounts. Trump and the Trump Organization later filed suit against Capital One over similar closures.

“They threw us away like dogs,” Trump said on stage. 

The debanking experience, combined with what he described as slow, friction-heavy bank wire transfers, pushed him toward bitcoin’s censorship-resistant architecture. “That’s why I advocate like hell for this industry,” he said. 

On usability, Trump conceded that early crypto technology was clunky, but said banks entering the space will be the force that finally makes the experience simple.

“The industry will grow,” he said, “when the user experience is simple and easy and not torturous.”

Koudounis broadened the debanking argument beyond the Trumps. He drew on personal history, recounting Greece’s 2015 debt crisis, when the government imposed daily withdrawal limits on bank accounts that lasted roughly four years before capital controls were fully lifted. 

Citizens woke up one day to find the state had placed a ceiling on how much of their own money they could access. 

“You don’t have to be the Trumps to be targeted by banks,” Koudounis said. “This can happen to anybody. You, me, any of us.” 

Banks told you to stay away, then ‘snuck into’ bitcoin

Koudounis then turned the spotlight on the financial industry’s own behavior. While banks spent years publicly dismissing BTC and warning customers away from it, they were constructing the infrastructure to invest in it out of sight. 

“Banks got the clue,” he said, and delivered a pointed summary to the crowd: “You guys won.”

Trump closed with three statements that drew the loudest reaction of the panel. He called government spending “dangerous” and pointed to a federal investigation that found some government spending to be fraudulent, citing it as evidence for why a transparent, programmable, decentralized form of money has real-world value beyond trading.

If fraud of that scale is hard to eliminate in the best-administered country on earth, he argued, it is a structural problem that BTC’s transparent ledger is built to address. He acknowledged the macro backdrop has been rough for holders over the past three months but told the audience to stay the course.

And then he closed his remarks in plain terms: “I have absolute conviction that bitcoin is going to hit one million dollars… I’ve never been more bullish on this asset class in my life.”

This post Eric Trump, John Koudounis Call Bitcoin a Global Reserve Asset, Float $1M Price Target first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Visa said its settlement pilot for stablecoins now supports nine blockchains and has reached a run rate of $7 billion a year.

The company announced on April 29 that it added Arc, Base, Canton, Polygon and Tempo to a pilot that already used Avalanche, Ethereum, Solana and Stellar.

Visa said the annualized settlement run rate is up 50% from the prior quarter.

The pilot remains bounded by Visa's own language, but the signal is in where the volume sits. Stablecoins are entering the part of payments consumers rarely see, the settlement layer that moves value between issuers, acquirers, banks, program managers and treasury systems after a transaction has already been authorized.

That makes the update a settlement-infrastructure signal as much as a blockchain support list. Visa is testing whether stablecoins can become a parallel settlement option inside payment infrastructure that already touches banks, card programs and merchants across markets.

The operational point is direct: crypto adoption is moving into the back office before it becomes visible at the checkout screen.

The conclusion has limits. The company described a pilot and support, gave a run rate for stablecoin settlement, and left the split by chain, stablecoin, partner, and geography undisclosed.

That keeps things bounded: the network is adding optional settlement rails, while traditional settlement remains part of the stack.

Related Reading

Crypto now projected to move $719 trillion through global payments

Consumers may not see the shift yet, but the fight over how money moves is already underway.

Apr 9, 2026 · Gino Matos

How Visa got to nine chains

Visa has been building toward this point for several years. In 2023, the company said it had moved millions of USDC between partners over Solana and Ethereum to settle fiat-denominated VisaNet payments.

That announcement followed an earlier Crypto.com issuer pilot and expanded the settlement work to merchant acquirers Worldpay and Nuvei.

The operational issue is familiar in card payments. A consumer gets near-instant authorization at the point of sale, but funds still have to move between the issuing bank and the merchant's bank.

Visa's treasury and settlement systems sit inside that process, moving value across currencies and institutions.

In December 2025, U.S. issuer and acquirer partners gained the ability to settle with Visa in USDC, with Cross River Bank and Lead Bank initially settling over Solana.

The company cited faster funds movement, seven-day availability, and resilience across weekends and holidays.

Related Reading

Solana is becoming settlement rail for Visa and JPMorgan but one metric still scares insiders

Wyoming’s Frontier launch plus a Wall Street wrapper filing happened fast, and the real institutional bet is on settlement rails.

Jan 8, 2026 · Gino Matos

The April release also connected the chain expansion to Visa's stablecoin-linked card programs, which it said numbered more than 130 programs across more than 50 countries.

That makes the nine-chain footprint part of a broader payment operating model, beyond a ledger experiment.

The new run rate gives that timeline a sharper shape. The December 2025 U.S. launch put the prior annualized stablecoin settlement baseline above $3.5 billion.

The April update puts the run rate at $7 billion, with five more blockchains added to the pilot.

The table serves as a footprint rather than a volume map. The run rate applies to the pilot as a whole; the available disclosure leaves that volume undivided across the nine supported networks.

The sequence also shows a shift in who the product is for. The early work proved that USDC could move between card ecosystem participants.

The current phase asks whether the same settlement logic can be offered across a wider menu of rails while reducing the need for each partner to build separate crypto operations from scratch.

What the chain mix shows

The five additions suggest the types of environments Visa wants available to partners.

Arc is a stablecoin-native Layer 1 created by Circle. It brings USDC-denominated fees, optional privacy, sub-second deterministic finality and direct integration with Circle's stack.

That makes Arc relevant to payment flows where predictable costs, stablecoin liquidity and transfer guarantees count more than token speculation.

Arc's public materials also describe public testnet status, which keeps production claims bounded.

Base brings a different route into the same problem. Visa described Base as powered by Coinbase, while Base offers USDC payments that settle in seconds, use low gas costs and can be funded from a Base Account or Coinbase Account.

Base connects wallets, payment tooling, and exchange-linked liquidity into a consumer and developer surface.

Canton adds the institutional privacy layer. Visa had already said in March that it would become a Canton Super Validator, helping banks and financial institutions explore privacy-preserving payments, settlement and treasury use cases.

Canton centers stablecoin payments on need-to-know privacy, so counterparties, amounts and strategies can remain visible only to the parties that need them, unlike many open blockchains.

As an analytical reading of the chain mix, Polygon and Tempo fit the payment-infrastructure side of the roster. Polygon emphasizes global payments, stablecoin liquidity and lower-cost transactions.

Tempo emphasizes dedicated payment lanes, stablecoin-native gas, payment metadata for reconciliation and deterministic settlement.

Together, the additions create a wider operating menu across chain types. One partner may need low-cost stablecoin movement.

Another may need privacy controls for regulated finance. Another may value Coinbase-connected payment tooling.

Visa's role is to make those differences usable through a common settlement layer.

The result is a portfolio of settlement options across chain types. That portfolio lets Visa present stablecoins as infrastructure that can adapt to partner constraints, from regulated privacy to low-cost throughput, while keeping the payment-network relationship in the center.

The adoption signal is operational

The broader market context supports the shift while keeping price moves out of the frame. As of April 30, the crypto market stood at around $2.55 trillion, while DefiLlama put total stablecoin market capitalization at around $319.802 billion.

USDC sits in that context as a core settlement asset used for payments, treasury management, collateral, and cross-chain liquidity.

Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon Ecosystem Token are large or payment-relevant networks and tokens that can carry settlement infrastructure while keeping price data in the background.

Stablecoins already have enough liquidity and operating history for large payment networks to treat them as infrastructure options.

The adoption test shifts from whether a consumer chooses a wallet over a card to whether payment firms can use stablecoins to move value after the customer-facing transaction is done.

The market-side thesis has been building. A January analysis of BlackRock's stablecoin thesis argued that dollar tokens were shifting from trading utility to settlement infrastructure within and alongside traditional finance.

An April analysis of Visa, Stripe, and Mastercard described stablecoins as a settlement and liquidity layer beneath existing payment brands.

Visa's update provides a current operating example for that thesis. The company is connecting stablecoin settlement to issuers, acquirers, U.S. banks, and stablecoin-linked card programs.

Its March expansion with Bridge said stablecoin-linked Visa cards were live in 18 countries, with planned expansion to more than 100 countries.

That release also said issuers and acquirers involved in those programs could settle with Visa using stablecoins over supported networks.

Regulation sits in the background. Treasury framed the U.S. GENIUS Act as providing regulatory clarity for a market it expects could become much larger.

A CryptoSlate analysis of stablecoin economics under the CLARITY and GENIUS framework showed why the policy fight has moved toward who captures digital-dollar economics.

Related Reading

CLARITY Act stablecoin fight shifts from yield to who captures digital-dollar economics

Washington’s stablecoin rules are turning a yield fight into a broader contest over payments, reserves, wallets, and bank rails.

Apr 28, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

Visa tied the expansion to pilots, banks, partners, and supported networks, while the policy debate helps explain why payment stablecoins are drawing more mainstream attention.

The $7 billion run rate shows real activity, while the lack of a chain-by-chain breakdown leaves the depth of each rail unclear.

The nine-chain footprint shows optionality, while the pilot label keeps the conclusion bounded.

The adoption signal is therefore specific. Stablecoins are taking on a role beyond trading-market distribution.

Within Visa's settlement pilot, they are becoming a treasury and settlement option for institutions already within mainstream payments.

The next test is whether that option remains a specialist rail for selected partners or becomes a routine part of how global payment firms move value after the consumer never sees the transaction again.

The post Visa is quietly building stablecoins into mainstream payment plumbing without you knowing appeared first on CryptoSlate.

X has given users a new way to turn down the noise in their For You feeds. The first signal from that tool should make the crypto industry uncomfortable.

According to X product executive Nikita Bier, crypto ranked as the most-snoozed topic since the platform began rolling out topic snoozing for Premium subscribers. It came ahead of politics, sports, business and finance, artificial intelligence, gaming, and entertainment.

That is a brutal placement for an industry that has spent more than a decade treating X as its main public square. Crypto has used the platform for launches, price discovery, fundraising narratives, protocol drama, scam warnings, meme cycles, customer support, and real-time market consensus.

For many users, that same feed has become exhausting.

The strongest signal in Bier’s ranking is plain: when given the option, many users chose to see less crypto before almost anything else.

Bitcoin’s price makes the timing sharper. CryptoSlate’s Bitcoin market data showed BTC near $76,000 on April 30, down over 24 hours and seven days, yet still up more than 14% over 30 days.

That is enough of a rebound to put Bitcoin back into daily market conversation. It is also far below the October 2025 all-time high above $126,000, which leaves a large gap between the market’s recent recovery and the public’s tolerance for more crypto content.

Crypto’s biggest attention venue is becoming easier to escape

The most important part of X’s change is the user action. Crypto became the first thing users chose to mute when the platform gave them more control over their feeds.

High visibility can look like demand from inside the crypto industry. From the user side, it can feel like repetition, spam, bots, recycled charts, promotional accounts, and a stream of posts that all ask for attention at once.

X’s new product direction makes that fatigue more measurable. The platform has begun rolling out Custom Timelines, which let Premium users pin topic feeds to the home tab.

Those feeds are powered by Grok’s understanding of posts and the platform’s personalization systems. At the same time, X is giving users a way to snooze topics from the For You tab.

One tool pulls committed users deeper into a niche. The other helps tired users fence that niche off.

For crypto, that creates a split distribution system. The already-convinced can pin crypto and go deeper.

The fatigued can mute it and move on. The group in the middle, the ordinary user who checks Bitcoin now and then, becomes harder to reach by accident.

That middle group has always been important to retail cycles because many new users first encounter crypto through ambient social exposure. They see a chart, a warning, a meme, a debate, or a price milestone, then search for context.

If the feed removes more of that ambient exposure, crypto loses one of its cheapest discovery channels.

The risk is larger for the broader crypto market than for Bitcoin itself. Bitcoin has institutional products, ETFs, treasury buyers, long-term holders, and macro allocators.

It can attract capital through financial rails that do not require a casual user to enjoy crypto content on X. Meme coins, token launches, smaller chains, influencer-led trades, and narrative-driven altcoins depend more heavily on social spread.

They need users to see a theme before they search for it. They need the feed to carry excitement before fundamentals can be tested.

If crypto becomes something users actively mute, that mechanism weakens.

This also turns spam into a market-structure issue. Bier has said that no technology can fully solve spam replies on crypto accounts and the majority of crypto activity is bot-driven.

That figure should be treated as an attributed platform claim instead of a verified measure of all crypto discussion. Even with that caution, the direction is clear.

Users are reacting to an experience. If crypto content feels polluted, the feed becomes less useful for education, price discovery, and trust formation.

Bitcoin can recover while public attention keeps thinning

The uncomfortable part for the industry is that Bitcoin’s recovery and crypto fatigue can happen at the same time. Markets do not need every casual user to feel excited before price can move.

Capital can return through ETFs, fund flows, macro positioning, treasury strategies, or long-term accumulation. Attention works differently.

It depends on curiosity, trust, and the willingness to keep reading after the first few seconds.

Recent fund-flow data supports the idea that capital is moving on a separate rail. CoinShares reported weekly inflows of $1.4 billion into digital asset investment products, the strongest weekly total since January and a third consecutive week of positive flows.

That gives Bitcoin a support channel that social media sentiment alone cannot explain. Institutional and product-based demand can improve while casual-feed tolerance gets worse.

That is the core contradiction.

Google Trends adds another layer. Trends data is normalized on a scale from 0 to 100, so it shows relative interest inside a selected window rather than absolute search volume.

The recent worldwide chart for “bitcoin” over the past three months shows a spike followed by a steady fade into April. The five-year view is more mixed, with several strong bursts around major market moments. The current period is also far below the 2017 mania peak.

That does not prove public interest has disappeared. It shows that current search intensity is weaker than past peaks and softer than the recent spike.

In plain English, Bitcoin is back on the market radar, while the surrounding content layer has yet to rebuild broad curiosity at the level that usually marks full retail participation. That aligns with the X snooze data.

Users may still care about Bitcoin’s price. They may still own exposure.

They may still follow major milestones. They are also showing signs of fatigue with the surrounding content machine.

CryptoSlate previously covered a related tension when US Bitcoin search interest climbed toward 2021 levels even as Bitcoin traded far below its later highs. The lesson from that earlier period was that search interest is a receipt for attention, rather than a price signal by itself.

The current setup carries a different implication. Price can rebuild before the public mood does.

That leaves Bitcoin in a stronger position than most of crypto because it can draw demand from more than one source. It also leaves the industry with a more difficult task: proving that the content layer is worth returning to.

The next cycle may depend on who can still reach normal users

The next phase for crypto may be less about whether people know Bitcoin exists and more about whether they want crypto in their daily information diet. Awareness is no longer scarce.

Trust and tolerance are.

That is a different problem from the early cycles, when the main challenge was explaining what Bitcoin was. The current challenge is explaining why a user should keep crypto in the feed after years of scams, leverage blowups, celebrity tokens, exchange failures, spam replies, and AI-generated content farms.

That shift has practical consequences. If Bitcoin holds the $70,000 to $80,000 area and fund inflows continue, it can keep behaving like a macro asset even with weak social enthusiasm.

That would support the idea that Bitcoin has matured into a capital market instrument with its own institutional demand base. Under that path, casual users may return only after price forces the issue, which would make retail a lagging signal rather than the engine of the move.

A second path is more difficult for the broader market. Crypto remains one of the most-muted topics, search interest stays soft, and altcoin narratives fail to break into general feeds.

That would leave Bitcoin relatively insulated while smaller assets fight for attention inside narrower, more self-selected audiences. The effect would show up in weaker exchange app momentum, slower narrative spread, thinner retail participation, and more dependence on paid promotion or influencer networks.

In that environment, social reach becomes more expensive and less trusted at the same time.

A third path is more selective. X’s Custom Timelines could create a smaller but more committed crypto audience.

Users who pin crypto may engage more deeply with higher-intent content, while everyone else sees less of it. That would reward serious analysis, market data, protocol updates, and trusted media.

It would punish generic hype because generic hype would struggle outside its own bubble. The open question is whether that smaller audience can still create market-wide momentum or whether it simply produces stronger echo chambers.

The fourth path is a trust backlash. If bot complaints and spam claims keep defining the crypto experience on X, the platform may tighten reply visibility, topic distribution, or paid controls.

Users may begin treating crypto posts as unsafe by default. That would have the heaviest impact on projects that rely on fast social legitimacy.

It would also create an opening for search, newsletters, direct media brands, exchange research desks, and data platforms because users still need context, even when they do not want the firehose.

The clearest thing to watch is whether crypto stays near the top of X’s snoozed-topic ranking after the launch period. A one-week ranking can be dismissed as novelty, exposure bias, or a power-user quirk.

A persistent ranking would say something deeper about the state of crypto distribution. The second signal is Bitcoin search behavior if BTC approaches $80,000 again.

A sharp search rebound would show that price can still pull ordinary users back in. A muted search response would suggest that Bitcoin’s recovery is being driven more by capital flows than public excitement.

Crypto’s feed problem is now part of the market

The industry has often treated attention as proof of strength. That assumption needs more scrutiny.

A topic can be everywhere and still be unwanted. A feed can be full of crypto and still fail to build trust.

A market can recover while the public chooses to see less of the content around it.

The X snooze ranking is powerful because it turns a vague complaint into a user action. People used a new tool to reduce crypto in their feeds.

That is a clearer signal than sentiment slogans because it reflects behavior. For a market that still depends heavily on social distribution, behavior carries more weight than another poll, another influencer fight, or another chart thread.

Many users are tired.

They may be tired of scam replies under major accounts. They may be tired of tokens promoted with no substance.

They may be tired of market panic dressed up as certainty. They may be tired of seeing every price move converted into a demand for attention.

When a platform gives those users a switch, they use it.

Bitcoin can continue attracting capital through ETFs and institutional products, especially if macro conditions support hard-asset narratives or if investors keep treating BTC as a liquid, high-beta store-of-value trade.

The rest of crypto faces a harder distribution test. Projects that need broad retail discovery may find that the old X playbook produces less reach and more resistance.

Exchanges may need to rely more on search intent, product utility, brand trust, and direct acquisition. Media outlets may gain leverage if users still want crypto context but want less feed sludge.

Global adoption data also argues against treating X fatigue as a verdict on crypto demand. Chainalysis’ 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index ranked India and the United States at the top, showing that crypto usage remains geographically broad and driven by different local needs.

CryptoSlate has also covered how adoption often depends on practical on-ramps, payment rails, verification flows, and usable interfaces rather than online attention alone. The feed is one channel.

It is an important channel because crypto has leaned on it so heavily, but it is still one channel.

Ultimately, X shows that crypto’s free-attention layer has been damaged.

Bitcoin has enough institutional structure to keep moving even when social enthusiasm looks tired. Many other crypto assets still need that enthusiasm to travel.

The next cycle may reveal which parts of the market can survive a world where users can make crypto disappear from their feeds with one tap.

The post Crypto is the most “muted” term on X as public splits between believers and avoiders appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin's April rebound is now facing a two-front macro test. The official Treasury curve for Apr. 29 placed the 10-year yield at 4.42%, the 30-year at 4.98%, and the 5-year at 4.05%.

Today, market charts show the same pressure zone, with the 10-year near 4.40%, the 30-year near 5%, the 5-year near 4.04%, and WTI crude elevated.

At the same time, Brent crude is trading above $126, its highest level since 2022, after fresh reporting says President Donald Trump is willing to keep the Iran blockade in place for months.

Bitcoin is trading near $76,049 today, about 40% below its October 2025 high. The broader crypto market is near $2.54 trillion, with Bitcoin dominance near 59.9%.

Those levels put Bitcoin in a different kind of test. The decisive issue is whether the rate market is raising the price of taking risk faster than crypto demand can absorb it.

If the 10-year yield moves toward or through 4.5%, Bitcoin's near-term ceiling may be set by oil, Treasury supply, real yields, and Fed liquidity operations before it is set by crypto-specific flow.

The market question is direct: if bonds keep selling off, does Washington need to reduce geopolitical oil pressure or ease Treasury and Fed plumbing before Bitcoin can retake risk appetite?

Bond yields are setting the first line

The first pressure point is the nominal Treasury curve. A 10-year yield around 4.4% is already close to the level CryptoSlate highlighted in its recent Bitcoin bond-market analysis as the area where the $80,000 test becomes harder.

Related Reading

Bitcoin’s $80k test should be decided by the bond market this week

Bitcoin's next move may come from Treasuries, as a breakout in 10-year yields could decide if BTC clears $80,000 or turns its inflow streak into another failed rally.

Apr 28, 2026 · Gino Matos

The Apr. 28 analysis argued that a break above 4.35%, moving toward a 4.6% upside area, could turn a renewed inflow streak into another failed rally at resistance.

The Apr. 29 official curve put that risk within reach. The 10-year was at 4.42%, the 30-year was at 4.98%, and the 5-year was at 4.05%.

The long end is the part of the curve that speaks most directly to duration risk, equity multiples, mortgage pressure, and the discount rate investors apply to assets with distant or uncertain cash flows.

Bitcoin has no coupon, dividend, or earnings stream. That means its macro case relies heavily on liquidity, risk appetite, scarcity demand, ETF access, and balance-sheet demand.

When Treasury yields rise, those inputs face a tougher comparison. Investors can earn close to 5% at the long end of the U.S. risk-free curve while Bitcoin remains below its early-year highs.

The real-yield layer makes the setup sharper. Treasury's real curve showed the 10-year real yield at 1.96% and the 30-year real yield at 2.71% on Apr. 29.

Treasury publishes those rates as market data. The Bitcoin implication comes from the way BTC has traded in this regime.

IMF research on the crypto cycle and U.S. monetary policy found that a common crypto factor explained 80% of crypto price variation and that Fed tightening reduced that factor through the risk-taking channel.

CryptoSlate has also argued that Bitcoin's recent macro identity looks more like a liquidity-sensitive tech beta than a clean gold or dollar hedge.

In that regime, higher real yields can work like a drag on the market's willingness to pay for volatility. BTC can still rise, but it needs stronger proof that demand is deep enough to survive a higher hurdle rate.

Oil has become a rates variable

The second pressure point is oil. Reuters reported that the U.S. was seeking international support to reopen the Strait of Hormuz while crude prices surged and a U.S. blockade of Iranian oil exports remained part of the pressure campaign in stalled talks.

The Guardian then reported Brent above $126 after Trump warned the blockade could last for months.

That takes the issue beyond foreign-policy risk. Oil is now part of the rate equation because energy prices flow into inflation expectations, headline inflation, freight, input costs, consumer pressure, and the Fed's reaction function.

The Energy Information Administration's April outlook gives the scale. It said the Strait of Hormuz had been effectively closed to shipping since Feb. 28 and that nearly 20% of global oil supply normally flows through the strait.

Brent had already reached almost $128 on Apr. 2. EIA expected Brent to average $115 in the second quarter under assumptions that included the conflict easing after April.

A separate EIA release estimated that Middle East producers shut in 7.5 million barrels per day in March, rising to 9.1 million barrels per day in April.

That forecast already treated the disruption as a major energy-market event. The latest developments on a months-long blockade challenge the duration assumption underlying that base case.

The Fed has already connected the dots. Its Apr. 29 statement said inflation was elevated, in part because of increases in global energy prices, and that Middle East developments were creating high uncertainty.

Chair Jerome Powell's opening statement went further, noting that March PCE estimates pointed to 3.5% headline inflation and 3.2% core PCE, with headline inflation boosted by global oil prices.

The vote showed that the Fed's constraint was both internal and external. The FOMC held the target range at 3.50% to 3.75%.

Stephen Miran dissented in favor of a 25-basis-point cut. Beth Hammack, Neel Kashkari, and Lorie Logan supported the hold but opposed keeping the easing-bias language in the statement.

That split is the rates-market version of the oil shock. One side saw enough downside risk to prefer a cut. Another side saw enough inflation risk to resist easing language. Bitcoin sits downstream from that disagreement.

Policy levers start with plumbing

If yields keep climbing, Washington has only a few near-term channels to ease the pressure. One is geopolitical: reduce the oil shock by changing the blockade calculus or reopening a route for Gulf energy flows.

That channel would be the cleanest for risk assets because it would directly attack the inflation impulse.

Another channel is liquidity management. The Fed's implementation note kept the administered-rate structure in place and directed the Open Market Desk to buy Treasury bills, and if needed, other Treasuries with remaining maturities of three years or less, to maintain an ample level of reserves.

That is a reserve-management tool. It can support market functioning and bank-reserve conditions while still leaving oil prices and term premium outside the direct toolset.

Treasury has its own levers. Its most recent refunding page shows the next major financing documents scheduled for May 4 and May 6.

February borrowing estimates projected $109 billion in privately held net marketable borrowing for April through June, with an assumed $900 billion end-June cash balance.

The February refunding statement said Treasury could adjust bill sizes, expected the Treasury General Account to peak around $1.025 trillion in late April, and planned buybacks of up to $38 billion for liquidity support plus up to $75 billion in the one-month to two-year bucket for cash management.

Those tools can affect market plumbing. Bill issuance changes the part of the curve that absorbs supply. Buybacks can support off-the-run liquidity.

Related Reading

Bitcoin’s next risk is hiding in the gap between debt and liquidity

US debt is growing faster than M2, leaving Bitcoin trapped between a bullish liquidity thesis and tighter market plumbing that keeps capping risk.

Apr 30, 2026 · Gino Matos

TGA movements can add to or drain bank reserves. The constraint is that debt management can smooth financing pressure while energy inflation still pushes against the Fed.

Each path remains conditional. A geopolitical channel would attack oil-inflation pressure directly. A plumbing channel would need to improve funding conditions without making the response look like stress.

The market still has to prove which path is active.

Bitcoin's own market has little room

Bitcoin's price structure makes the macro squeeze more visible. BTC fell below $76,000 after the Fed decision, and Glassnode data showed short-term holder profit-taking around the $78,000 to $79,000 area.

The same report said buyers would need to absorb overhead supply to push toward $84,000, while a break below $68,000 would expose a deeper correction path.

CryptoSlate's Apr. 28 bond-market analysis placed the key battleground around $78,100 to $80,100. That area now works as a practical confirmation zone.

A reclaim would show that spot demand, ETF demand, or positioning can absorb the macro shock. A rejection would support the view that the bond market is still setting Bitcoin's ceiling.

The broader liquidity context supports that caution. CryptoSlate's Apr. 30 debt-and-liquidity analysis argued that U.S. debt is growing faster than M2 and that Treasury issuance, the Treasury General Account, reserve balances, and bank-credit conditions can keep the financial plumbing tight even as broad money rises.

A separate CryptoSlate analysis of M2 found that Bitcoin's liquidity relationship is lagged and regime-dependent, with real yields, the dollar, ETF flows, and geopolitical shocks able to override the simple money-supply argument.

Corporate treasury demand adds another channel. CryptoSlate's coverage of the Bitcoin treasury trade showed that corporate and sovereign holders can become sellers when funding pressure rises, debt needs increase, or cash becomes more valuable than balance-sheet optics.

A company built to accumulate BTC, selling $20 million at a loss, turned that risk into a concrete example.

That is why the current setup reaches beyond spot traders. Higher Treasury yields can pressure Bitcoin through discount rates, ETF demand, corporate treasury funding, collateral appetite, and the cost of leverage.

Oil keeps the Fed constrained. Treasury supply keeps reserves and term premium in focus. Bitcoin's own supply zone determines how quickly those macro forces manifest in price.

Bitcoin can still rally from here. A strong enough flow bid can absorb profit-taking for a while, and prior CryptoSlate oil-war coverage showed BTC can resist crude pressure intraday when demand is present.

Related Reading

Bitcoin surges alongside oil as BTC price finally decouples from the war narrative… until US markets opened

Bitcoin rose with crude oil while US equities were closed, then reversed as the S&P 500 fell, leaving flows, oil, and Fed risk in conflict.

Apr 29, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

The problem is durability. Once U.S. equities opened in that earlier session, Bitcoin moved back into the broader risk trade.

That is the same unresolved test now. A BTC bounce below $80,000 would show that buyers remain active. A durable move through the resistance zone would require evidence that bonds, oil, or liquidity have stopped working against the trade.

The next signal sits in the 10-year yield. If it eases back from the 4.4% to 4.5% zone, Bitcoin's demand story gets room to breathe.

If it breaks higher while oil stays elevated, BTC's ceiling is likely to stay outside crypto. The bond market would still be deciding how much risk investors are willing to own.

The post US Treasury yields spike to highest levels in a year adding new problem for Bitcoin liquidity appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin entered yesterday's Fed decision already capped below a dense on-chain supply zone, and Fed Chair Jerome Powell's press conference gave buyers little reason to push through it.

The Federal Reserve kept the target range at 3.5%-3.75% and explicitly linked elevated inflation to higher global energy prices, citing the tensions in the Middle East as a source of uncertainty for the economic outlook.

Powell added to that framing in his opening remarks, estimating that total PCE ran at 3.5% through March, core PCE at 3.2%, and that higher oil prices are set to push overall inflation up in the near term.

The committee also fractured in the most divided Fed vote since 1992. Eight officials held, one dissenter wanted a cut, while Hammack, Kashkari, and Logan objected to retaining any easing bias in the statement at all.

The internal split exposed the committee's actual posture of easing bias and kept the language in the text, while three officials argued that the language was already too accommodating.

For Bitcoin, the consequence is a macro environment where a dovish pivot has become harder to price, even as the March Summary of Economic Projections still showed a median 2026 fed funds rate of 3.4%, implying one cut this year.

Futures markets came away pricing little chance of that cut materializing by year-end, with some traders putting a small probability on a hike over the next twelve months.

The oil hinge

The Fed's inflation problem traces to an external energy shock that Powell said the central bank cannot control.

Brent oil averaged $103 per barrel in March, with the EIA forecasting a peak near $115 in the second quarter, followed by a decline below $90 in the fourth quarter.

Both headline and core inflation are running hot through separate channels, as energy is pushing up PCE, while tariff effects continue to work through core goods prices.

That two-channel setup prevents the Fed from quickly looking through the oil shock because the committee must first confirm that higher energy costs are not feeding into inflation expectations before justifying a cut.

Near-term inflation expectations are already running higher, according to Powell's own account. Bitcoin sits below a heavy supply zone at the moment, and the macro case for absorbing that supply has the least near-term traction.

Where Bitcoin gets stuck

Glassnode's latest report places Bitcoin's key resistance at the True Market Mean, near $78,000, and the short-term holder cost basis around $79,000.

Both levels converge into a supply zone between $78,000 and $80,000 that BTC has already tested and rejected. The pattern Glassnode describes is a classic bear-market rally structure: price rallies to the breakeven zone for recent buyers, those holders distribute into strength, and incoming demand fails to absorb the supply at that level.

Spot BTC trading near $75,900 puts it below that resistance band and close to $76,000, which Glassnode flags as a downside short-gamma zone.

At that level, dealer hedging flows carry a structural bias to amplify price movement in either direction, selling into any further weakness or buying into any break higher, turning $76,000 into a volatility trigger.

The main support sits between $65,000 and $70,000, with the -1 standard deviation band near $68,000 as the first meaningful structural floor.

A test of $68,000 would put the short-term market structure on trial, with the threshold Glassnode identifies as the level below which distribution accelerates, and the broader base weakens.

Two outcomes

In the bull case, oil follows the EIA's base path lower through the second half of 2026, headline inflation cools, and the Fed's one implied cut becomes more credible again.

If that repricing begins and BTC clears $80,000, Glassnode says the $82,000 short-gamma zone could force dealers to buy into strength, amplifying the move.

Perpetual futures positioning has already flipped to its most negative level on record, building deep fuel for a squeeze. A sustained break above $80,000, with spot and ETF flows confirming the move, would pull the market toward the lower band of Glassnode's overhead supply cluster near $84,000.

In the bear case, oil stays elevated through the EIA's second quarter peak and keeps headline inflation sticky enough to push any cut into late 2027.

Bitcoin keeps failing at the True Market Mean and short-term holder cost basis, and the market retreats toward the $65,000-$70,000 support cluster.

The $68,000 band then becomes a waypoint. If ETF flows fail to stabilize and spot demand remains thin, the structure below $68,000 deteriorates, opening a path toward the deeper accumulation zone from which the current rally launched.

Between those two outcomes, the oil path is the deciding variable.

Powell stated that the committee cannot calibrate away an external energy shock the way it manages a domestic demand cycle, so Bitcoin bulls need oil to cooperate at least as much as they need Powell to soften his tone.

Glassnode's positioning data adds asymmetry to an otherwise cautious picture, as perpetuals are at a record net-short level, suggesting the market has already priced in considerable pain.

Even a plateau in the inflation narrative, with oil stalling below its second-quarter peak, or a single cooler PCE print, could be enough to trigger a sharp upside move from that positioning.

Glassnode also says spot selling is easing, and ETF AUM has begun to stabilize, two early signs that distribution at current levels is losing momentum.

The breakout and retest scenarios both hinge on real demand arriving in the $78,000-$80,000 zone before macro uncertainty forces another leg lower.

The post Here’s why Bitcoin is stuck below $80,000 and what Powell’s FOMC meeting did for BTC price appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Libra launched in 2019, rebranded to Diem, and sold its blockchain assets to Silvergate Bank in 2022, three years of work that ended when regulators pushed back, and bank partners withdrew.

On Apr. 29, Meta announced USDC payouts to eligible creators through compatible crypto wallets on Solana and Polygon, starting with selected creators in Colombia and the Philippines.

Meta is plugging creator payouts into dollar-stable rails that Stripe, Circle, and others have spent years building. The current rollout asks eligible creators to connect a compatible wallet and receive USDC directly from Meta's creator payout system.

Goldman Sachs pegged the creator economy at roughly $250 billion in 2023 and projected it could reach $480 billion by 2027, spanning roughly 50 million creators whose income flows from brand deals, platform ad revenue shares, subscriptions, tips, and direct payments.

Goldman found that brand deals account for about 70% of creators' revenue, meaning most creator income flows through business-to-creator payment pipelines.

A 10% slice of a $250 billion creator economy represents $25 billion annually, roughly $2.1 billion per month, flowing over stablecoin rails. By 2027, 10% of Goldman's projected $480 billion market puts that figure at $48 billion annually, or $4 billion per month.

These TAM scenarios are pegged to the broader creator economy's total payment flow and calibrate the scale of what this pilot could open up at modest penetration rates.

According to a BIS report, payment-related stablecoin flows in 2025 reached roughly $390 billion. The amount is distinct from the $35 trillion in total on-chain stablecoin volumes, most of which are for trading and settlement.

A $25 billion to $48 billion annual creator economy flow would equal between 6.4% and 12.3% of all current real economy stablecoin payments, large enough to visibly move the real-payments share of stablecoin activity if adoption materializes.

Why the infrastructure is ready

The Libra window closed partly because stablecoin infrastructure did not exist at scale.

Stripe now explicitly markets stablecoin payouts as practical for creators, freelancers, and remote teams, offering USDC on networks including Solana and Polygon, the same chains Meta chose, with KYC/AML onboarding and reach into more than 60 countries.

Stripe says stablecoin cross-border payments settle in minutes. Businesses in 101 countries previously unsupported by Stripe Treasury can now hold dollar-denominated balances and move money across stablecoin rails.

A platform that runs USDC payouts can reach a creator in Manila or Bogotá faster and with less friction than a traditional wire transfer, while settling the transaction in dollars.

The choice of Colombia and the Philippines traces to that logic, since both markets combine meaningful creator economies with real-world friction in cross-border payouts and demonstrated appetite for dollar-denominated savings.

Because roughly 98% of stablecoins are dollar-denominated, any meaningful expansion of creator payouts over these rails would effectively move more internet income onto dollar infrastructure. This is digital dollarization of the internet labor market, settling cross-border creator income in dollars with fewer intermediaries between the payer and the creator.

Meta's own help page language walks creators through compatible wallets, blockchain network choices, and security steps, far from the interface a typical brand-deal creator would navigate without guidance.

Stripe flags the same friction, noting that assets sent across incompatible chains can vanish without recourse, and apparent low transaction costs can rise once on-ramps, off-ramps, compliance overhead, and local exchange conversion are factored in.

The BIS frames the macro version of that same problem when noting that out of the $35 trillion in total stablecoin volumes in 2025, only $390 billion traced to real-economy payments.

Paths for stablecoins in the creator economy

In the bull case, wallet abstraction advances quickly enough that creators receive USDC the way they receive Venmo payments, while off-ramps in key markets become cheap and instant.

In that setup, the 10% scenario looks conservative. Once a major platform normalizes stablecoin payouts, gig platforms, affiliate networks, brand deal intermediaries, and subscription tools all have an incentive to offer the same option.

Creator payments would become one of the first large non-trading stablecoin categories, and the real-payments share of stablecoin activity would grow in a way that cannot be explained by crypto-native volume alone.

In the bear case, wallet confusion and off-ramp friction keep crypto-native adoption at bay. Meta's pilot stays a niche feature for creators who already hold digital assets or who work in corridors where payout speed and dollar access justify the friction of managing a wallet.

The BIS's $390 billion real-payments estimate is the best evidence for that path. The rails exist, but mainstream adoption has not kept pace with the infrastructure behind them.

Between those two outcomes, the deciding variable is abstraction. If the wallet disappears from the user experience, adoption follows commerce, and the creator economy becomes a real-world stress test for stablecoins.

If creators have to manage private keys and choose networks, adoption stays inside the existing crypto base, and Meta's pilot becomes a footnote.

The post Meta’s USDC pilot shows how stablecoins could capture billions in creator payouts appeared first on CryptoSlate.

The "Digital Gold" Divergence: Why Bitcoin Just Crashed

The relationship between Gold and Bitcoin has reached a fever pitch in 2026. Historically, these two assets have been viewed as siblings in the "store of value" category, but their recent price action tells a more complex story of liquidity rotation and market psychology.

When Gold recently peaked at an all-time high of $5,589 per ounce on January 28, 2026, the crypto market didn't celebrate. Instead, Bitcoin [BTC] experienced a sharp -33% correction, sliding toward the $81,000 mark. While this might look like a decoupling, historical cycles suggest this "shakeout" is often the precursor to an explosive bull run for digital assets.

Does Bitcoin Always Drop When Gold Peaks?

Not "always," but the correlation often turns negative at critical structural peaks. In August 2020, Gold hit what was then a record high, and Bitcoin immediately cooled off with a -21% retracement. Fast forward to January 2026, and we see a similar script: Gold reaches a parabolic peak, and Bitcoin sheds roughly a third of its value.

The pattern indicates that at the height of a Gold rally, liquidity is often "tapped out" or moving into defensive postures before rotating back into higher-risk, higher-reward assets like $Bitcoin.

Comparing the 2020 and 2026 "Gold Peaks"

To understand where we are going, we have to look at where we’ve been. The current market structure bears a striking resemblance to the 2020 cycle.

The Liquidity Rotation Theory

In finance, "Liquidity Rotation" refers to capital moving from one asset class to another. When Gold reaches a "blow-off top" (a rapid increase in price followed by a steep drop), investors often take profits. That "sideline cash" doesn't stay idle for long. In 2020, that capital flowed directly into the crypto market, fueling a 559% rally that took BTC from $11,000 to over $60,000 in less than a year.

Why the -33% Bitcoin Drop Matters Now

The 2026 drop has been more severe (-33% vs -21%) due to the increased presence of institutional leverage and Spot Bitcoin ETFs. However, the fundamental "why" remains the same:

• Profit Taking: Investors hedging with Gold and BTC simultaneously often sell the "winner" (Gold) and reduce exposure to the "volatile" (BTC) during a macro shift.
• Margin Calls: When Gold fell nearly 10% in a single day in late January, it forced liquidations across multi-asset portfolios, dragging BTC down with it.
• The "Spring" Effect: Much like a compressed spring, Bitcoin's deep corrections during a secular bull market often provide the necessary energy for the next leg up.

Strategic Positioning: Is the Bottom In?

Analysts suggest that the current Bitcoin/Gold valuation is at historic lows. This typically marks a "generational bottom" for the Bitcoin-to-Gold ratio. If the 2020 fractal repeats, the -33% drop we just witnessed is the final hurdle before Bitcoin targets the $150,000 - $200,000 range.

What to Watch Next

• The $80,000 Support: BTC must hold this level to validate the "2020-style" recovery.
• Gold Consolidation: If Gold continues to bleed toward $4,500, expect BTC to start outperforming as the "risk-on" alternative.
• ETF Inflows: Watch for a reversal in ETF outflows, which peaked at $800 million during the January crash.

Following a volatile April that saw significant institutional interest through US-based spot XRP ETFs, XRP is currently consolidating within a well-defined range.

With the regulatory "dark clouds" largely cleared in the wake of landmark 2025 rulings, the market now focuses on adoption. However, the price of XRP faces new challenges, including shifting macroeconomic sentiment as Federal Reserve leadership transitions and global liquidity cycles evolve.

XRP Price Analysis: The Technical Blueprint

The daily chart for XRP/USD reveals a complex but structured price action. After a sharp decline from the $1.90 levels earlier in the year, the XRP coin has established a series of horizontal support and resistance zones that will dictate its trajectory in May.

Key Support and Resistance Levels

Based on the current technical setup, these are the levels to watch:

• Major Resistance ($1.8000): This is the "holy grail" for bulls in May. A break above this level would signal a full trend reversal and a potential run toward the $2.00 mark.
• Intermediate Resistance ($1.4500 - $1.5000): XRP has struggled to maintain candles above the $1.45 mark. This zone acted as a rejection point in mid-April.
• Immediate Support ($1.2931): The orange line on the chart represents a "must-hold" level. It has served as a reliable floor during the recent consolidation phase.
• Critical Floor ($1.2000): If selling pressure intensifies, the $1.20 psychological level is the final line of defense before a deeper correction.

Indicators and Momentum

The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is currently hovering around 44.30, suggesting that the XRP coin is neither overbought nor oversold. This neutral stance provides "fuel" for a move in either direction. Historically, when the RSI bounces from the 40-level while the price holds horizontal support, it often precedes a bullish relief rally.

Will XRP Price Go Up in May 2026?

While technicals provide the "where," fundamentals provide the "why." Several key events are scheduled for May that could spark volatility for the XRP coin:

1. Institutional ETF Inflows

In April 2026, XRP ETFs saw consistent net inflows, suggesting that despite the stagnant price action, institutional "smart money" is accumulating at these levels. If this trend continues into May, the reduced exchange supply could lead to a "supply shock" if demand spikes suddenly.

2. The RLUSD Stablecoin Integration

Ripple’s stablecoin, RLUSD, is expected to see wider integration across European corridors in May. Increased utility for the XRP Ledger (XRPL) often correlates with positive sentiment for the native XRP coin, as it serves as the bridge asset for high-liquidity transactions.

3. Macroeconomic Shifts

The broader crypto market is currently influenced by Bitcoin's attempt to stabilize above previous all-time highs. As Jerome Powell’s term as Fed Chair nears its end in May 2026, uncertainty regarding future interest rate cuts may lead to increased volatility in risk assets like Bitcoin.

XRP Price Prediction May 2026: High and Low Targets

Given the current data, we can project two primary scenarios for the upcoming month:

The Bullish Case (High Target: $1.85)

If Bitcoin breaks its current resistance and the XRP ETF volumes accelerate, the XRP coin is positioned for a breakout.

• Target: A move past $1.50 would likely see a rapid squeeze toward the $1.80 - $1.85 resistance zone.
• Probability: Moderate, contingent on market-wide momentum.

The Bearish Case (Low Target: $1.15)

If macroeconomic headwinds (high inflation or hawkish Fed signals) dominate, XRP could test lower liquidity zones.

• Target: A breakdown of the $1.29 support would likely lead to a retest of the $1.15 - $1.20 area.
• Probability: Low to Moderate, as institutional buying provides a strong "floor."

How to Trade XRP Coin?

For those looking to trade the $XRP coin in May, the strategy remains "wait and see" near the $1.45 resistance. A daily close above $1.45 with high volume would be a classic entry signal for a swing trade toward $1.80. Conversely, long-term holders may view the $1.25–$1.30 range as a value accumulation zone.

As of April 30, 2026, the primary driver of market sentiment is the $2.44 billion net inflow into US spot Bitcoin ETFs. This figure nearly doubles March’s performance, suggesting that the "institutional winter" is over. Furthermore, the U.S. SEC has recently issued a statement clearing the path for decentralized user interfaces to operate without broker-dealer registration, a massive win for the DeFi sector.

Institutional Resurgence: The Bitcoin ETF Boom

BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and Fidelity’s Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) have dominated the headlines. IBIT alone captured over 70% of the month's total inflows, bringing its total holdings to approximately 812,000 BTC.

• April Net Inflows: $2.44 Billion
• Total AUM for US Spot ETFs: ~$102 Billion
• Market Leader: BlackRock (IBIT) holding 49-62% of the ETF market share.

This structural shift indicates that large-scale capital is now absorbing supply faster than daily mining output, providing a strong floor for the Bitcoin price.

SEC Regulation: A Win for Decentralized Finance

In a surprising move this month, the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets issued a "no-action" stance regarding "Covered User Interface Providers." This allows software developers to offer interfaces for trading crypto asset securities without the burden of registering as traditional brokers, provided they do not exercise discretion over transactions.

This development is a significant milestone for the DeFi ecosystem, reducing the legal risks for developers of self-custodial wallets and decentralized exchanges.

Altcoin Watch: Ethereum and Solana Market Trends

While Bitcoin leads, Ethereum is holding steady near $2,270. Despite a slight dip today, analyst sentiment remains bullish, with long-term Ethereum price predictions suggesting a climb toward $8,000–$10,000 as staking ETFs gain traction.

Meanwhile, Solana is making waves in the real-world utility space. South Korea’s Shinhan Card has begun testing stablecoin payments on the Solana network, highlighting the chain's growing dominance in the payments sector.

Comparison of Key Assets (April 30, 2026)

Global Impact: Expansion and Security

The crypto industry's reach continues to expand globally. The payments network Mesh recently announced a major expansion into the Asia-Pacific region after reaching a $1 billion unicorn valuation. On the security front, the FBI led a successful global operation, arresting 276 individuals involved in "pig butchering" scams, a move praised by the community for cleaning up the industry's reputation.

Meta Platforms Inc. is reportedly preparing to launch stablecoin payouts for content creators across Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. According to recent industry reports and internal leaks surfacing in April 2026, the social media giant is targeting the second half of 2026 for a rollout that leverages third-party infrastructure rather than a proprietary token.

Meta’s New Crypto Strategy: Distribution Over Issuance

Unlike the ill-fated Libra (Diem) project, Meta’s new approach is focused on being a "distribution channel." By integrating existing, regulated stablecoins—likely USDC—Meta aims to solve the high-cost friction of international creator payments.

This "arm's length" strategy allows Meta to avoid the regulatory hurdles that crushed its previous attempts to act as a currency issuer. Instead, the company has issued Requests for Proposals (RFPs) to external infrastructure firms to handle the heavy lifting of compliance and settlement.

Will Stripe be Part of Meta Crypto Payments?

The leading candidate for this partnership is Stripe, specifically utilizing its Bridge platform. This connection is bolstered by the fact that Stripe CEO Patrick Collison joined Meta’s board in 2025. Stripe’s acquisition of Bridge for $1.1 billion and its recent OCC approval for a national trust bank charter position it as the ideal bridge between Web2 social platforms and Web3 liquidity.

Why Will Meta Use Stablecoins as Crypto Payments?

For Meta, the primary motivation is the efficiency of the engagement flywheel. Currently, creators in emerging markets receiving small payouts (around $100) lose a significant percentage to wire fees and foreign exchange margins.

• Traditional Payouts: 1–3 business days with 3%–7% fees.
• Stablecoin Payouts: Near-instant settlement with estimated fees below 1%.

By lowering these barriers, Meta ensures that creators remain on its platforms rather than migrating to rivals like Telegram or X, which have already made strides in crypto-integrated payments.

Fed Rate Decision Today

Today, Wednesday, April 29, 2026, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) will release its third interest rate decision of the year. This specific meeting carries historic weight as it marks the final policy announcement and press conference for Jerome Powell before he concludes his tenure as Fed Chair.

What to Expect at 2 PM ET

Market participants are currently pricing in a near 99% certainty that the Fed will keep interest rates unchanged at the current target range of 3.50% to 3.75%. However, the "early query" for crypto investors isn't the rate itself, but the language used regarding inflation and the transition to incoming leadership.

• Announcement Time: 2:00 PM ET (Statement release)
• Press Conference: 2:30 PM ET (Jerome Powell’s final Q&A)
• Crypto Context: Bitcoin (BTC) is hovering around $77,200, showing a "wait-and-see" approach.

Why the Fed Announcement Matters for Crypto Today

Cryptocurrencies are widely categorized as "risk-on" assets. Their prices are heavily influenced by global liquidity conditions, which are directly controlled by the Federal Reserve's monetary policy.

When the Fed keeps rates high, borrowing becomes more expensive, and the US Dollar typically strengthens, which can put downward pressure on $Bitcoin and altcoins. Conversely, if Powell’s tone today leans "dovish"—suggesting that the peak of the rate cycle is behind us—it could provide the fuel needed for Bitcoin to break past the $80,000 psychological resistance level.

How does the Fed Rate Affect Crypto Prices

Historically, the minutes following a Fed announcement see "stop-hunting" behavior, where prices swing wildly in both directions before establishing a trend.

The Powell "Swan Song" Factor

Jerome Powell’s final appearance adds a layer of uncertainty. Analysts at major institutions, such as JPMorgan, suggest he may use this meeting to solidify his legacy as the Chair who tamed the 2020s inflation surge, potentially maintaining a hawkish stance to ensure price stability.

BTC and ETH Levels to Watch

• BTC Support: $74,500 remains a critical support zone.
• BTC Resistance: A move above $78,200 post-announcement could signal a new rally.
• Altcoin Impact: Ethereum and smaller caps often follow BTC's lead but with higher percentage swings.

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the rare Western entry in the open-source top tier, but it costs multiples more than Chinese rivals that beat it on benchmarks.

The admission in federal court is a rare acknowledgment of the use of distillation techniques as AI firms compete to build more capable and cheaper models.

Analysts warn that the Bitcoin rally was fueled by speculative futures trading, mirroring conditions that preceded the 2022 crypto crash.

OpenAI's new opt-in security feature requires passkeys, limits recovery options, and excludes chats from training.

Canonical announced plans to bake AI into Linux's most popular distro. The community that chose Ubuntu specifically to avoid this kind of thing was not thrilled.

Ripple CTO Emeritus David Schwartz is once again pouring cold water on the hyper-bullish $10,000 XRP price targets frequently hyped by social media influencers.

Despite the explosive performance of Dogecoin, things aren't as bright on its counterparts.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse is celebrating the company's massive expansion in the Middle East.

Despite his reputation as one of the most pro-crypto nominees in Federal Reserve history, Kevin Warsh's impending confirmation as Fed Chair could spell short-term trouble for Bitcoin.

Why most successful traders on Hyperliquid are betting on a "Sell in May" correction for XRP and how one whale is holding a 1,557% profit.

The monero price prediction carries real weight this cycle because XMR hit a new all-time high of $798 in January 2026 and now trades 52% below that peak at $376. Monero (XMR) climbed 26% in April on pure spot buying with zero retail participation according to Santiment data, and Strategy added another $255 million in Bitcoin on April 27 per Yahoo Finance, proving that institutional capital is positioning hard during fear.

While the XMR forecast plays out over months, Pepeto is pulling in the kind of capital that only appears before the biggest moves. More than $9.66 million raised, a Binance listing approaching, working tools already live, and a presale price of $0.0000001867 that disappears the second trading opens.

Monero Price Prediction Sharpens as Spot Buying Drives April Without Retail Participation

Monero (XMR) climbed from $320 to $405 between April 7 and April 26 while retail futures activity registered neutral every session according to Santiment data. Spot taker volume showed buy dominance in 24 consecutive sessions.

When a privacy coin gains 26% on spot accumulation alone with no retail crowd, the monero price prediction shifts from hope to pure timing.

XMR at $376 and Pepeto at $9.66M: Where the Timing Already Points

Pepeto: The Presale That Solved the One Problem XMR Holders Know Too Well

Monero (XMR) holders know the best entries happen when nobody is paying attention and the price has not caught up to the truth. That is where Pepeto sits right now, except the catalyst is not time and adoption. It is a single event, the Binance listing, and once it happens, the presale price is gone forever.

Every tool in the Pepeto network is already running. The exchange processes trades with no fee on either side, a bridge transfers tokens across Ethereum, BNB, and Solana and delivers the full amount with nothing removed, and a contract scanner reads every token’s code and rejects anything designed to take funds. SolidProof confirmed the full system with results on-chain.

The original Pepeto domain was targeted by attacks as the project grew in size and attention. The team secured a new address, and Pepeto is where the presale now operates.

The same person who created the original Pepe token and grew it to $11 billion shipped every tool before this presale started, and a former Binance executive handles the listing. At $0.0000001867 with staking at 177% APY compounding positions every single day, the distance between presale price and listing price is the kind of gap that even the best monero price prediction cannot produce from a $6.94 billion base.

Monero (XMR) Price at $376 as Spot Accumulation Drives the Strongest April Rally in Years

Monero (XMR) trades near $376 with a $6.94 billion cap, sitting 52% below its January 2026 all-time high of $798 per CoinMarketCap. Analyst Will Taylor targets $1,160 per NewsBTC, while Changelly projects a bull case of $555 by year end.

The $400 zone is key resistance, and a break above it confirms a fresh move higher. Even the bull case delivers 47% from current levels, strong for a privacy coin but months away.

Conclusion:

Monero (XMR) holds the privacy narrative and a 26% spot-driven April rally that proves serious capital is behind it, but even the bull case at $555 delivers 47% over months from a $6.94 billion base, and that is a trade, not the kind of event that changes how someone lives. The returns that change lives come from one decision made at the right time, before the listing opens and the entire market has to pay what early holders already locked in.

The person who built the $11 billion Pepe token shipped a full working exchange this time, a SolidProof audit sits on-chain for anyone to check, a former Binance executive runs the listing process, and $9.66 million came in from wallets that have seen presale-to-listing events turn small entries into life-altering returns and are placing themselves exactly where the biggest return sits.

The Binance listing is approaching, the presale price of $0.0000001867 disappears the moment trading opens, and every day closer to that date is one less day to enter at a price the open market will never offer again. Visit Pepeto right now, because when this listing hits, the difference between the people who acted and the people who waited will be the story of 2026.

Click To Visit Pepeto Website To Enter The Presale

Important Notice:

The Pepeto project is moving forward fast, and because of its growing impact, bad actors have hit the official website.

The backup domain is now « PepetoSwap DOT com » in place of « Pepeto DOT io » until further updates. Users must always check they are on the correct URL before connecting wallets or sharing personal information.

FAQs

How does the April spot rally affect the monero price prediction for 2026?
The monero price prediction improved because XMR gained 26% in April on pure spot buying without retail participation, and analyst targets now reach $1,160 per Cryptoinsightuk. Pepeto at presale pricing with an upcoming listing delivers returns XMR needs months to match.

What is Pepeto and why is it drawing more capital than privacy coins this cycle?
Pepeto is a working cross-chain trading hub where every trade costs nothing in fees, a verified bridge delivers the full token amount across chains, and a scanner rejects risky contracts before capital enters. More than $9.66 million raised and a Binance listing approaching make it the presale with the strongest capital flow during fear.

The post Monero Price Prediction Gains Momentum as XMR Rallies 26% and Pepeto Presale Pulls Smart Capital appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Highlights

• AAPL demonstrates 17% revenue increase, though shares decline in extended trading
• Quarterly performance surpasses Wall Street projections on both earnings and sales
• Company unveils $100B share repurchase initiative alongside robust services performance
• iPhone sales maintain momentum while market response remains cautious post-announcement
• Solid Q2 performance meets mixed investor sentiment in after-hours session

Apple Inc. (AAPL) shares climbed following the tech giant’s impressive quarterly performance, though momentum cooled during extended trading hours after initial gains. The Cupertino-based company delivered robust financial results powered by sustained iPhone sales and expanding services offerings. Nonetheless, certain segment shortfalls and ongoing supply challenges tempered enthusiasm in after-market activity.AAPL shares concluded regular trading at $271.35, registering a 0.44% increase following the earnings announcement.

Apple Inc., AAPL

Quarterly Financial Performance Shows Robust Top-Line Expansion

Apple disclosed quarterly sales totaling $111.2 billion, representing a 17% year-over-year improvement. The technology leader posted earnings per share of $2.01, surpassing consensus estimates from analysts. Sustained consumer appetite for iPhone products underpinned overall results, even as certain product categories delivered mixed outcomes.

iPhone division generated $56.99 billion in revenue, falling marginally short of projections while still demonstrating healthy annual expansion. Both Mac and iPad product lines outperformed expectations, providing diversified revenue contributions. The services division continued reinforcing the company’s subscription-based income foundation.

Services segment revenue climbed to $30.97 billion, showcasing consistent growth from subscription offerings and digital content. Gross profit margin expanded to 49.3%, signaling enhanced operational efficiency. The company sustained earnings momentum despite persistent global supply chain complexities.

Expanding Services Division and Capital Allocation Strategy Bolster Position

Apple’s services business unit posted consistent advancement, fueled by increasing subscriber adoption across multiple digital platforms. The corporation strengthened its ecosystem spanning payment solutions, cloud infrastructure, and media entertainment services. Consequently, the services segment generated higher-margin revenue contributions.

Management authorized a fresh $100 billion stock buyback initiative designed to maximize shareholder value. The company simultaneously raised its quarterly dividend to 27 cents per share, reinforcing its commitment to returning capital. These measures bolstered investor sentiment in the wake of earnings disclosure.

Research and development expenditures surged substantially, demonstrating ongoing commitment to emerging technologies and innovation. R&D costs jumped 33% compared to the prior year, totaling $11.42 billion. The company remains focused on advancing artificial intelligence capabilities and next-generation product development.

Regional Performance, Supply Dynamics, and Executive Succession Frame Future Direction

Apple achieved notable expansion in Greater China, generating $20.49 billion in regional revenue. This outcome surpassed market forecasts and illustrated strengthening demand in key territories. The organization benefited from sustained premium device positioning across international markets.

Worldwide memory component shortages stemming from AI data center infrastructure buildout created manufacturing constraints for hardware divisions. Elevated memory pricing pressured margins throughout the broader technology industry. Apple successfully preserved profitability despite these headwinds.

Executive leadership succession planning introduced additional strategic considerations for investors. Tim Cook announced his planned September departure, with John Ternus designated as his replacement. The company continues advancing its artificial intelligence roadmap through strategic collaborations and product innovation initiatives.

The post Apple (AAPL) Stock: Q2 Earnings Beat Expectations with 17% Revenue Jump and $100B Buyback appeared first on Blockonomi.

The WLFI price prediction shifted again after Tron founder Justin Sun filed a federal lawsuit against World Liberty Financial on April 22 per CoinDesk, claiming the Trump-backed protocol illegally locked $45 million in WLFI tokens. WLFI holds at $0.063 per CoinMarketCap while the courtroom pressure adds fresh risk to the chart.

Meanwhile, a presale is gaining speed where the return math looks very different. Pepeto has pulled more than $9.66 million, and the 100x gap between presale pricing and an approaching Binance listing is the type of early position worth studying before the bell rings.

WLFI Under Courtroom Pressure After Justin Sun Files Federal Suit on April 22

The complaint filed in federal court on April 22 claims the protocol illegally froze his WLFI position and misrepresented token rights per CoinDesk. The $45 million was committed in 2024 partly on the Trump family connection, and the relationship broke down once Sun turned down additional capital requests. A Senate crypto bill that stalled on April 28 over ethics provisions added regulatory pressure.

WLFI sits at $0.063 with over $39 million in daily turnover per CoinMarketCap. The 4.5 billion token burn proposal removed 4.5% of the 100 billion cap. The lawsuit and regulatory delay land on a float where over 31.7 billion WLFI circulates, leaving the unlock calendar as the biggest variable in any positive WLFI price prediction this year.

How WLFI Recovery Compares to Pepeto’s Presale Math

Pepeto: A 100x Entry Sitting in Plain View Before Binance

When a $45 million backer files a federal lawsuit over frozen tokens, the lesson is clear: infrastructure matters more than political backing. No WLFI price prediction pushing toward $0.20 delivers the math a clean, audited presale offers. Pepeto gives direct access to a working exchange with a cross-chain router and a token risk checker, the exact tools that WLFI was supposed to build but never shipped.

Due to rapid growth, Pepeto has faced attacks on its original domain name. The team launched a temporary domain. Buyers should visit Pepetoswap.com as the current active link.

PEPETO is priced at $0.0000001867 with 420 trillion tokens in the float, and the 100x figure analysts reference goes live the moment Binance order books open. SolidProof cleared the full audit before any sale began, the person who created the original Pepe token leads direction, and a former Binance operations lead runs the exchange.

Staking at 177% APY compounds daily, giving early holders a growing position while everyone else waits. Listing day is close, and once trading starts, this presale price becomes a number on a history chart that nobody can access again.

WLFI Price Prediction: WLFI Targets $0.20 While Pepeto Rewrites the Math on $2,000

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) sits at $0.063, down 78% from the $0.33 all-time high per CoinMarketCap. Community models set the WLFI price prediction near $0.20 by year end, roughly 174% above current price.

A $2,000 position in WLFI at $0.063 returns roughly $5,480 on the $0.20 target. The same $2,000 in Pepeto at $0.0000001867 buys 10.7 billion tokens. A 100x move converts that into $200,000. Even a $0.40 WLFI target caps at roughly $10,960, still 18 times behind what Pepeto lines up.

Conclusion:

The first WLFI buyers who got in during the opening rounds at fractions of today’s price still hold meaningful gains despite a 78% drawdown. That lesson plays out every cycle. Getting in early is where the returns are made, and anyone who paid the $0.33 peak is underwater while anyone waiting for the lawsuit to clear will carry the same late-entry cost cautious buyers always carry.

Pepeto is sitting at that exact early stage right now. The presale is live, the price has not moved, and every tool on the platform already works. The 100x distance between presale and listing mirrors what rewarded WLFI’s first participants, except this project has a cleared audit, shipped products, and a Binance listing approaching. Once listing day turns this round into a closed chapter, the wallets that acted hold returns that late buyers will chase for the rest of the year.

The entry showing on Pepeto right now is the number that stretches a small position into the kind of outcome this entire market was built to deliver, and that number holds only until listing day lands. Visit Pepetoswap.com to enter the presale before the listing opens.

Click To Visit Pepeto Website To Enter The Presale

Warning:

The Pepeto project is growing fast, and due to its rising reach, bad actors have launched attacks on the official website. The temporary domain is now « PepetoSwap DOT com » in place of « Pepeto DOT io » until further notice.

Users should always check they are on the correct URL before connecting wallets or sharing personal information.

FAQs

What does the WLFI price prediction say about reaching $0.20 after the Justin Sun lawsuit?
The WLFI price prediction points to $0.20 by year end, a 174% move above the current $0.063 level, with Justin Sun’s April 22 federal suit over locked tokens adding legal pressure per CoinDesk. The 4.5 billion token burn remains active while WLFI trades 78% below its $0.33 all-time high.

Why is Pepeto a stronger early entry than WLFI at $0.063 right now?
Pepeto is stronger because the presale at $0.0000001867 offers 100x distance to listing while WLFI’s best case of $0.40 caps at roughly 5x from $0.063. The project raised $9.66 million with 177% APY staking, a SolidProof-audited platform, and a Binance listing on the near-term calendar.

The post WLFI Price Prediction at $0.063 After Justin Sun Lawsuit as Pepeto Presale Offers 100x Early Entry appeared first on Blockonomi.

There is a moment in most industries when a new entrant does something well enough that it stops being a differentiator and starts being a baseline expectation. Players who experience fast crypto withdrawals do not go back to waiting five days. Players who understand rakeback do not go back to accumulating points they cannot value. Players who explore a library of 11,000 games from 63 providers do not settle for 1,500 titles from 10 suppliers.

This is how expectations shift. Not through announcements or marketing campaigns but through player experience. Once a player knows what better looks like they carry that knowledge into every platform evaluation they make from that point forward. The platform that showed them better raised the bar — not just for itself but for everyone it is competing against.

ZunaBet launched in 2026 and is one of those platforms. What it offers across payments, game library depth, sportsbook coverage, and loyalty program design is not just better than the standard in several important areas — it is different enough to change what players consider acceptable from any platform they evaluate going forward. This article looks at where those expectation shifts are happening and what they mean for players choosing where to spend their time.

The Withdrawal Expectation Has Already Changed

The five-day withdrawal window was the industry standard for so long that most players accepted it as an unavoidable feature of online gambling rather than a choice built into platform design. It is not. It is the consequence of building a payment infrastructure around fiat banking — bank transfers, card networks, e-wallet processors — where delays are structural rather than incidental.

Players who have experienced crypto withdrawals on a natively built platform know this now. Minutes rather than days. No banking intermediaries. No processing windows. No weekend hold. The money moves when the player requests it.

ZunaBet supports more than 20 cryptocurrencies natively — BTC, ETH, USDT across multiple chains, SOL, DOGE, ADA, XRP, and others — with no platform processing fees. A player who withdraws from ZunaBet and receives their funds within minutes has a new reference point. Every subsequent platform evaluation includes the question of whether withdrawals are that fast. For most traditional platforms the answer is no — and that answer now costs them in a way it did not before players knew what fast actually looked like.

The expectation has shifted. A platform that cannot offer fast crypto withdrawals is not neutral on that dimension anymore. It is behind.

The Coin Support Expectation Has Shifted

Bitcoin support used to be enough to call a platform crypto-friendly. It is not anymore — not for players who hold a range of cryptocurrencies and expect their gambling platform to accommodate their existing portfolio rather than requiring them to convert before depositing.

ZunaBet supports more than 20 coins. BTC, ETH, USDT across multiple chains, SOL, DOGE, ADA, XRP, and others are all available natively. A player who uses ZunaBet and experiences genuine multi-coin support without forced conversions or third-party processing layers carries that expectation forward. Platforms supporting three or four coins look limited by comparison in a way they did not when Bitcoin-only was the crypto casino standard.

The practical consequence for the industry is that the coin support threshold for what counts as genuinely crypto-friendly has moved. Players who have experienced broad native support do not consider limited support adequate. ZunaBet did not invent multi-coin support but at 20-plus coins it is contributing to a shift in where players set their expectations.

The Game Library Expectation Has Shifted

A library of 1,500 titles from 15 providers used to be considered a well-stocked casino. That assessment was made in a market where players had limited visibility into what else was available. That market no longer exists. Players can compare libraries across platforms in minutes and the ones that have seen what a library of 11,000-plus titles from 63 providers looks like do not evaluate 1,500 titles from 15 providers the same way they did before.

ZunaBet’s library is 11,294 titles from 63 providers. Evolution for live dealer, Pragmatic Play across multiple categories, Hacksaw Gaming for high-volatility mechanics, Yggdrasil for slots and table variants, BGaming and dozens of others. The provider diversity is as important as the title count because it produces genuine variety in mechanics, volatility profiles, and visual design rather than a large selection of similar content from a small pool of suppliers.

A player who has spent time in a library of this scale and provider diversity brings a new frame of reference to every platform evaluation they make. Libraries that felt adequate before feel limited now. The expectation of what a casino library should offer has moved and platforms that have not invested in content depth are increasingly visible as behind rather than normal.

The Loyalty Expectation Has Shifted

The points-based loyalty program is one of the oldest and most persistent design choices in online gambling. It survived as long as it did partly because players lacked a clear alternative to compare it against. Rakeback existed in poker rooms but was not standard in casino loyalty programs. Once players encountered it and did the comparison the points system lost its cover.

ZunaBet’s dragon evolution loyalty system runs across six tiers — Squire, Warden, Champion, Divine, Knight, and Ultimate — with a gamified mascot called Zuno and direct rakeback rates of 1%, 2%, 4%, 5%, 10%, and 20%. A player at the Ultimate tier receives 20% of their activity value back as a direct cash return. No points. No conversion rates. No redemption process.

A player who has experienced that directness and then looked at what their previous platform’s points system was actually delivering per dollar spent has had their loyalty program expectations permanently recalibrated. The question is no longer whether a loyalty program exists — it is what it actually returns and whether that return is stated clearly enough to evaluate without reading the terms document.

Additional benefits at higher ZunaBet tiers — up to 1,000 free spins, VIP club access, double wheel spins — build on a core structure that already delivers direct financial value. For players who have experienced this level of loyalty program design, programs that obscure their value behind points conversion are no longer an acceptable alternative.

The Sportsbook Expectation Has Shifted

The sportsbook at most online casinos has historically been a supporting feature — functional enough to justify the label without being built seriously enough to serve as a player’s primary betting destination. Major football leagues, some basketball, basic odds. A player who wanted serious sports betting coverage went to a dedicated sportsbook.

ZunaBet’s sportsbook covers football, basketball, tennis, NHL, and other major global sports alongside a full esports offering — CS2, Dota 2, League of Legends, and Valorant — plus virtual sports and combat sports. It is a complete sportsbook operating within the same platform as the casino, under the same account and the same loyalty program.

For players who bet on both traditional sports and esports — an audience that is large and growing — experiencing a platform where everything is consolidated in one place raises the expectation of what a casino sportsbook should be. A token sports section with three leagues and no esports no longer reads as neutral. It reads as inadequate.

The esports coverage in particular is reshaping expectations for a younger demographic of players who follow competitive gaming alongside traditional sports. CS2, Dota 2, League of Legends, and Valorant are mainstream betting markets now. A platform that does not cover them seriously is behind the expectation curve.

The Welcome Bonus

New players receive a bonus across three deposits totalling up to $5,000 plus 75 free spins. The first deposit is matched 100% up to $2,000 with 25 free spins. The second is matched 50% up to $1,500 with 25 spins. The third is matched 100% up to $1,500 with 25 spins. The multi-deposit structure distributes value across the early period of engagement giving players time to explore the full platform before the promotional period ends.

ZunaBet’s Credentials

ZunaBet is owned by Strathvale Group Ltd, operates under an Anjouan gaming license, and is registered in Belize. The team behind it brings over 20 years of combined industry experience. Apps run on iOS, Android, Windows, and MacOS. Live chat support operates around the clock. The platform runs on modern HTML5 technology with a dark-themed interface and fast load times across devices.

ZunaBet launched in 2026 and its operational track record is still being built. That is worth acknowledging plainly — long-term trust requires long-term operation and newer platforms carry a different risk profile than established ones. But the expectation shifts it is contributing to are already visible in how players evaluate platforms after experiencing what it offers.

What Raised Expectations Mean for Players

Raised expectations are good for players. When a platform demonstrates that fast withdrawals are possible, that 20-coin support is achievable, that 11,000 games from 63 providers can sit under one roof, and that a loyalty program can state its return rate clearly without a conversion table — every other platform is evaluated against those standards.

The platforms that meet those standards benefit. The platforms that do not face increasing pressure from players who know what better looks like. ZunaBet launched in 2026 as a platform that meets them — and in doing so is contributing to a shift in what the next generation of online casino players will accept from any platform they consider.

For those players the bar is higher now. ZunaBet helped raise it.

The post ZunaBet Is Raising The Bar For What Players Expect From An Online Casino appeared first on Blockonomi.

Quick Overview

• Alphabet delivered Q1 earnings per share of $5.11, demolishing the analyst consensus of $2.63, while revenue reached $109.9B — representing 22% growth year-over-year
• Cloud division revenue exploded 63% to $20B, while the backlog nearly doubled quarter-over-quarter to surpass $460B
• Shares of GOOGL rallied nearly 10% during Thursday’s trading session after the earnings release
• Scotiabank upgraded its price objective to $450, suggesting approximately 30% potential upside; Barclays set a $405 target
• The company increased its quarterly dividend payment by 5% to $0.22 per share

Alphabet unveiled its Q1 2026 financial results on Thursday, significantly exceeding Wall Street’s projections and propelling GOOGL stock upward nearly 10% — climbing from an opening level of $347.31 to approximately $383.69 by midday trading.

Alphabet Inc., GOOGL

Adjusted earnings per share registered at $5.11, essentially doubling the Street consensus of $2.63. Total revenue reached $109.9 billion, surpassing expectations of $106.81 billion and representing 22% year-over-year expansion.

The quarter marked Alphabet’s 11th consecutive period of double-digit revenue expansion.

Cloud Division Delivers Outstanding Results

The Google Cloud business emerged as the quarter’s star performer. Revenue skyrocketed 63% to $20 billion, powered by enterprise artificial intelligence offerings and fundamental cloud infrastructure services.

The Cloud division’s committed backlog almost doubled from the previous quarter, now exceeding $460 billion. Chief Executive Sundar Pichai attributed AI solutions for enterprise customers as the primary catalyst behind Cloud’s exceptional growth.

Google Services revenue advanced 16% to $89.6 billion. Search revenue expanded 19%, YouTube advertising increased 11%, and the subscriptions, platforms, and devices segment rose 19%.

Operating margin widened by two percentage points to 36.1%. Net income surged 81%, benefiting partially from a $37.7 billion gain on unrealized equity securities.

Total paid subscription count hit 350 million. Gemini Enterprise experienced 40% quarter-over-quarter expansion in paid monthly active users.

Wall Street Responds with Higher Targets

Scotiabank elevated its price objective from $400 to $450 after reviewing the quarterly results, keeping a “sector outperform” recommendation. This target represents approximately 30% upside potential from pre-earnings price levels.

Barclays analyst Ross Sandler increased his objective to $405, noting that Alphabet’s comprehensive positioning throughout the AI technology stack is fueling the strongest growth in four years across virtually every business segment.

The consensus recommendation among Wall Street analysts stands at “Buy,” with an average price objective of $355.07. Seven analysts have assigned Strong Buy recommendations and 29 have issued Buy ratings.

Wells Fargo elevated GOOGL to “strong-buy” during February. JPMorgan increased its objective to $395 with an “overweight” recommendation.

Alphabet simultaneously announced a 5% dividend boost to $0.22 per share on a quarterly basis.

Challenges Remain Despite Strong Quarter

Some concerns persist despite the impressive results. Swiss regulators initiated an investigation into alleged keyword-bidding tactics, while the European Union continues adjusting oversight regulations concerning cloud and AI operations.

Insider transactions have been notable. Chief Executive Sundar Pichai divested 32,500 shares during February at $335.18 per share, reducing his holdings by 1.47%. Director John Hennessy similarly reduced his position in March.

Substantial AI infrastructure investments and reported cloud capacity limitations could potentially squeeze margins in upcoming quarters.

Employee opposition regarding Pentagon contracts and classified AI initiatives has also introduced some reputational concerns for the technology giant.

The Scotiabank $450 price objective was established on April 30, 2026, coinciding with Alphabet’s Q1 earnings announcement.

The post Alphabet (GOOGL) Stock Soars 10% as Q1 Results Demolish Analyst Projections appeared first on Blockonomi.

[PRESS RELEASE – Miami, United States, April 30th, 2026]

Following a cash and equity transaction, Stratosphere has acquired Movimentum, bringing together two highly experienced teams in Web3 growth and marketing under one brand. As part of the deal, equity in Stratosphere was extended to the Movimentum team, reinforcing a long-term commitment from both sides to build and operate together.

The integration combines complementary strengths across growth strategy, network access and execution, allowing Stratosphere to better support founders and brands focused on real market impact. By aligning execution depth with broader distribution and reach, the combined team is positioned to deliver more consistent results.

Two Agencies, One Operating Structure

With the acquisition complete, Stratosphere will operate as the unified brand, focused on execution and distribution, with an emphasis on measurable, long-term outcomes.

Tony Sco, former CEO of Movimentum and now newly appointed COO and equity partner at Stratosphere, will lead operational integration and execution.

“This is the next chapter,” said Tony. “This isn’t about adding capacity, it’s about multiplying output. We’re combining execution and access to drive results that actually move the market.”

The combined team has supported many of the space’s most recognized projects, including Jupiter, Bonk, Polymarket, Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC), Avalanche, Magic Eden, Meteora, Azuki, Animoca Brands, DeLorean, Shiba Inu, Beam, Pudgy Penguins, Polkadot and Polygon.

Beyond its Web3 client base, Stratosphere has delivered campaigns for globally recognized brands and leading media organizations, including Lamborghini, Oracle Red Bull Racing, Forbes and NBCUniversal, reflecting experience across both crypto and traditional markets.

The firm is also actively expanding into the AI sector, working alongside companies such as Targon and Venice, as it continues to strengthen its capabilities across AI initiatives.

About Stratosphere

Stratosphere operates as a Web3 ecosystem partner and digital asset consultancy firm, leveraging a deep industry network to connect founders with the right people and support their growth initiatives. The firm works with projects across strategy, positioning and execution, providing practical support in navigating complex market environments.

Website: www.stratosphere.vip

X: @stratospherevip (www.x.com/StratosphereVIP)

About Movimentum

Movimentum built its reputation as a go-to name in CoinMarketCap marketing, recognized for delivering some of the most effective growth and visibility campaigns in the Web3 space. Its campaigns, community strategies and distribution playbooks consistently set the benchmark for token visibility and exchange-level growth across the ecosystem.

The post Stratosphere Acquires Movimentum to Expand Full-Stack Web3 Growth Capabilities appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Widely followed analyst Benjamin Cowen said in an X post Thursday that crypto’s slide since early 2025 tracks a deeper loss of trust that began after Gary Gensler left the SEC, with Bitcoin falling from $109,000 then to about $75,000 now.

His warning goes beyond crypto: he says cheering Jerome Powell’s exit from the Federal Reserve could create the same kind of credibility problem in traditional markets.

A Celebration That Became a Turning Point

Cowen’s argument is blunt: Gensler’s departure was widely cheered, but it essentially removed the threat of consequences for bad actors. What followed, in his view, was a period where influencers and politicians launched meme coins, rug-pulled their followers, and paid no price for it.

Capital that might have flowed into projects with actual utility got sucked into what he called “useless assets,” thinning out liquidity across the board. Bitcoin moved marginally higher after Gensler left, then turned lower, with the rally many expected never materializing in any meaningful way.

According to Cowen, there’s a similar pattern forming around Fed Chair Jerome Powell, following what is expected to be his last meeting as chair on Wednesday, where the Fed held its benchmark interest rate unchanged for the third straight time, leaving rates at 3.50%-3.75%, with four officials dissenting.

Trump appointee Kevin Warsh, already cleared by the Senate Banking Committee, is set to succeed Powell, and just as with Gensler, large parts of the market are treating the former’s exit as a bullish development, expecting the new chair to push through rate cuts more aggressively.

Cowen does not share that confidence:

“If the Fed just becomes another cabinet of the executive branch,” he wrote, “it may lead to a lack of trust in the institution itself.”

His read is that the markets are better off with a Fed that feels independent than with one that feels compliant, even if the compliance delivers the rate cuts traders want in the near term.

What Happens After the Cheer Fades

Turkish crypto commentator Cihan0x.ETH extended Cowen’s logic further, noting that rate cuts are no longer expected any time soon, with the timeline shifting from 2026 expectations to 2027, driven primarily by energy-side inflation rather than demand.

The war in Iran has kept global energy prices elevated, which is showing up in US inflation data: the Fed’s own statement cited “the recent increase in global energy prices” as a contributing factor. That kind of inflation gives the Fed less room to act, not more, regardless of who chairs it.

The other dimension of Wednesday’s news is structural. Powell announced he plans to remain on the Fed’s board after his chairmanship ends next month, citing what he described as “unprecedented” legal pressure from the Trump administration as a reason he does not yet feel it is appropriate to leave.

His decision denies Trump a chance to fill an additional board seat and could create what some analysts are calling a “two Popes” dynamic, with a sitting chair and a former chair both on the same seven-member governing board.

The post Analyst Says Gensler Exit Hurt Crypto Trust, Warns Powell Could Too appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Chainlink (LINK) has been trading in a tight range between $9 and $9.50 over the past week, but one technical indicator suggests that the consolidation may be replaced by heightened volatility in the near future.

The recent whale accumulation and other bullish elements point to a higher probability of an upward move.

Prepare for Potential Turbulence

Several hours ago, the renowned analyst Ali Martinez disclosed that LINK’s Bollinger Bands have squeezed on the 3-day chart. The metric, developed by John Bollinger in the 1980s, uses a moving average flanked by two channels (upper and lower) that widen in volatile markets and narrow when things calm down. Squeezing the bands usually foreshadows a major move, but it offers no clarity on whether a rally or pullback is on the horizon.

The majority of analysts who have touched on the asset lately believe an upside is the more likely option. X user Celal Kucuker claimed that LINK’s graph looks “solid and strong,” envisioning a pump to $100 during the next bull market.

For their part, CRYPTOWZRD suggested that the asset could be at a crossroads as its performance remains deeply correlated to Bitcoin’s price action.

“Above $9.55, we’ll see a further bullish move. Below, random movement will take place,” they predicted.

The Whales Step in

X user CryptoBusy revealed that whales (investors holding over 1 million LINK tokens each) have increased their exposure recently. As explained by the analyst, this move aligns with the latest real-world asset developments surrounding Chainlink and is a pattern historically linked to regime shifts.

Such accumulation is typically viewed as bullish for the price because it signals strong conviction from the big holders, which can encourage smaller players to follow their lead. It is important to note that whales are known as experienced, better-informed investors, suggesting they may be preparing for upcoming news that could positively impact LINK’s valuation.

The declining amount of tokens stored on exchanges is another factor that may favor the bulls. Earlier this week, LINK saw its largest daily net outflow since December of 2025. When investors move their holdings into self-custody, those tokens are less likely to be sold quickly. This, in turn, creates conditions that can support a possible price increase.

The post Chainlink (LINK) Might be Gearing up for a Huge Move: Here’s Why appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Crypto analyst and trader Flood made a candid post this week arguing that the sector has reached a level of apathy comparable to 2019 to 2022, and that smart money is rotating into AI.

His argument, however, is less a warning than a counterintuitive call to action for those willing to stay.

Years of Scams Have Taken Their Toll

The mood across crypto right now resembles those prior lows more than most people want to admit, and Flood says that is exactly the point.

“Crypto is paying a high price for years of altcoin scams and grifts,” the analyst wrote. “It can feel like a toxic industry where very little value is created.”

The observation tapped into something that has been building for a while. Many companies and investment firms have already started moving capital toward AI-related businesses and startups, and Flood is not dismissing that choice, saying that if someone feels the pull, they should go. But for those who stay, his read on the setup is blunt:

“The risk-reward will be as asymmetric as it’s been in recent history.”

With less capital watching the space than at any point he can remember, he thinks the concentration of upside will actually make large returns easier to generate, not harder, and the argument rests on a simple dynamic: thinner competition for the same opportunities.

His reference to 2019 and 2022 carries weight, considering that those were the years widely regarded as the most painful in recent memory, when casual participants left, and the remaining community shrank. They were also, by his own account, the periods that generated the bulk of his returns outside of his position in Hyperliquid.

“I almost quit crypto to go back to TradFi,” he admitted, framing the current moment as a near-identical setup.

A Thinning Field May Be the Setup, Not the Problem

Flood’s longer-term view is straightforward. Bitcoin will reprice sharply this year, he believes, and when it does, the reset in attention and capital flows will be rapid.

He wasn’t specific about timing or targets but framed it as inevitable, with the current regime, in his words, being “new” and different from the prior cycle’s problem of too much capital chasing too little opportunity.

For builders, his message is almost optimistic. Companies still operating and developing during this downturn will be positioned better than those that only show up when conditions are easy.

That read aligns with what some prominent players in crypto are doing. For instance, Michael Saylor’s Strategy recently added another 3,273 BTC at the start of this year’s Bitcoin conference, bringing its total holdings to 818,344 BTC, even with the asset trading more than 30% below last year’s conference highs, a gap that critic Peter Schiff has been quick to cite as validation of his 2025 sell call.

The post Crypto Apathy Matches 2019 Lows: Analyst Calls it a Buy Setup appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Most leading cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), have charted minor price declines following the Fed’s decision to keep interest rates unchanged and amid ongoing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), though, has performed much more poorly, falling 16% over the past 24 hours.

Another Red Day

WLFI saw the light of day in September last year and quickly gained momentum, with its price soaring to nearly $0.25 and its market cap surpassing $6.6 billion. Over the past several months, however, it has been on a major decline, and the latest 24 hours only worsened its condition. Currently, WLFI trades at around $0.06, representing a new all-time low.

The latest retreat follows a controversial proposal that was initially submitted to the World Liberty governance in mid-April and which went live for voting on April 29.

The plan covers over 62 billion locked WLFI tokens, which would stay off the market for at least two years if approved. Founders, team members, and partners could have up to 45.2 billion units moved to a new two-year lock, with 4.5 billion burned if they choose to join.

Early supporters would have up to 17 billion coins shifted to the same place and later vesting with no burn involved. The proposal will remain open for voting until May 6, and as of now, 99.94% of participants have supported it.

WLFI’s association with Donald Trump and his inner circle fueled backlash after the token’s collapse, with some analysts arguing that the connection contributed to the steep losses investors suffered.

X user Carl Moon told his 1.5 million followers that “Trump’s family has ruined crypto,” reminding that other tokens related to POTUS, including TRUMP and MELANIA, have crashed by over 90% since their launch.

Additional Drama

Besides the controversial proposal, WLFI recently made the headlines after Justin Sun filed a lawsuit against the project. Tron’s founder alleged that certain team members have frozen all of his tokens, stripped him of his voting rights, and even threatened to burn his holdings without proper justification.

Even though he is suing the project, Sun said he remains a strong supporter of President Trump and “his administration’s efforts to make America crypto-friendly.”

WLFI also drew attention after reports surfaced that one of its partners had previously been connected to a suspected international fraud syndicate. The blockchain network in question is called AB, and it struck a deal with World Liberty Financial in November last year.

The post World Liberty Financial (WLFI) Plunges to New ATL: Has Trump’s Family Ruined Crypto? appeared first on CryptoPotato.