LeCun's stance suggests a potential reevaluation of AI investments, emphasizing practical applications over speculative AGI advancements.

The post Yann LeCun argues LLMs will drive real-world applications, but not human-level thinking appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

SpaceX's IPO could significantly influence global financial markets, highlighting the growing economic impact of private aerospace ventures.

The post SpaceX plans IPO by June with valuation akin to seven years of Hungary’s GDP appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

A7A5's evolution highlights stablecoins' potential as geopolitical tools, challenging traditional banking and dollar dominance in global trade.

The post A7A5 stablecoin aims to evolve beyond sanctions as trade tool appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The G-7's focus on global imbalances highlights growing tensions in international trade, potentially influencing market stability and investment strategies.

The post G-7 finance ministers address global growth imbalances after Trump’s China summit appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The increased crypto asset seizures highlight Brazil's intensified efforts to combat digital financial crimes, impacting market compliance dynamics.

The post Brazilian Federal Police seizes over $14M in crypto assets linked to crime in 2025 appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Open Heads to Iconic Glen Abbey Golf Club for June 8, 2026 Event

The Bitcoin Open, a combined golf and poker tournament organized by Bitcoin Sports Network and Satstreet, is scheduled for June 8, 2026, at Glen Abbey Golf Club in Oakville, Ontario. The event will take place at the club during its 50th anniversary year.

Glen Abbey Golf Club, designed by Jack Nicklaus and opened in 1976, is one of Canada’s most recognized golf venues. It has hosted the Canadian Open multiple times and is known for its championship-level layout and history in professional golf. The course is located approximately 30 minutes west of Toronto and serves as a public golf facility with a significant legacy in Canadian sports.

The Bitcoin Open consists of a scramble-format golf tournament on the main championship course during the day, followed by a Texas Hold’em poker tournament in the evening. The golf portion uses a team scramble format, typically with groups of four players. The field size is limited, with organizers noting strong demand and a reduced number of remaining team spots as of mid-May 2026.

Prizes for the event include two separate hole-in-one awards, each consisting of one Bitcoin. Additional golf prizes cover the longest drive and closest to the pin. Golf winners will also receive tickets to the 2027 Bitcoin Golf Championship, scheduled to take place in Nashville, Tennessee, ahead of the 2027 Bitcoin Conference. The winner of the poker tournament receives $5,000 CAD in stablecoins.

A list of hole sponsors for the event has been announced. These include APX Lending, Tetra Digital Group, The Canadian Bitcoin Conference, Satstreet, True North Airways, Ledn, Gator Mining Inc., Wealthsimple, CAD DIGITAL, PRIVATEDEBT Partners, McCarthy Tetrault, and Samara Asset Group.

Bitcoin Sports Network operates as an organizer of Bitcoin-themed sports and lifestyle events, including golf tournaments held in conjunction with major Bitcoin conferences. Satstreet, a Canadian Bitcoin-focused company, is co-hosting the event and serving as one of the hole sponsors. The two organizations are collaborating on this Canadian edition of The Bitcoin Open.

The event is open to participants from the Bitcoin community, including builders, investors, and others active in the industry. Registration is handled through the official event website, with tickets covering both the golf and poker components. The schedule includes on-course activities, meals, and networking periods at the venue.

This marks the first time The Bitcoin Open is held at Glen Abbey. Previous Bitcoin Sports Network golf events have taken place in locations such as Las Vegas, often timed near larger Bitcoin conferences. The Canadian event is positioned as a standalone gathering in the Toronto area.

Glen Abbey’s 50th anniversary provides additional context for the timing. Since its opening, the club has been a central part of Canadian golf, training professionals and hosting amateur and professional competitions.

This post Bitcoin Open Heads to Iconic Glen Abbey Golf Club for June 8, 2026 Event first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Juan Galt.

Bitcoin Magazine

Abu Dhabi’s Mubadala Raises Bitcoin ETF Stake 16% to $566 Million in Q1 2026

Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth fund Mubadala Investment Company has raised its position in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), reporting ownership of 14,721,917 shares valued at $565,616,051 as of March 31, 2026, according to a 13F filing released today. 

That marks a 16% increase from the 12,702,323 shares the fund held at the end of Q4 2025.

The disclosure extends a now-unbroken accumulation streak that began in Q4 2024, when Mubadala first disclosed bitcoin exposure worth at least $436 million. The fund added shares through a Q1 2025 filing that showed 8,726,972 shares at $408.5 million, then surged to 12.7 million shares worth $630.6 million by December 31, 2025 — a 46% jump in a single quarter. Today’s filing adds another 2 million shares to that ledger, pushing the position past the half-billion dollar mark for the third straight quarter.

Mubadala manages a global portfolio exceeding $330 billion in assets across technology, healthcare, infrastructure, private equity, and public markets, with its mandate centered on generating returns for the Abu Dhabi government while reducing the emirate’s dependence on oil revenues. Bitcoin, accessed through the regulated IBIT structure, has become one of the fund’s most visible public market positions. 

As of Q4 2024, IBIT was already Mubadala’s second-largest holding by a wide margin, trailing only a longer-term stake in Arm Holdings.

Abu Dhabi’s bitcoin investments

Abu Dhabi’s sovereign accumulation does not stop at Mubadala. Al Warda Investments, an entity tied to the Abu Dhabi Investment Council — itself operating under the Mubadala umbrella — has also been building an IBIT position, reporting 8.2 million shares worth approximately $408 million at year-end 2025. The two Abu Dhabi vehicles combined to hold more than $1 billion in IBIT as of December 31, marking a milestone for Gulf Cooperation Council sovereign participation in regulated bitcoin products.

The Q1 2026 filing arrives against a backdrop of broader institutional and governmental interest in bitcoin. Goldman Sachs disclosed approximately $2.36 billion in total crypto exposure through IBIT and other vehicles, while Jane Street reported 20.3 million IBIT shares worth $790 million at Q4 2025 year-end. 

On the sovereign front, Texas became the first U.S. state to purchase bitcoin for a strategic reserve during the same period.

On a similar note, new financial disclosures show the Trump family trust bought shares of several bitcoin-linked companies — including Coinbase, MARA Holdings and Strategy — during the first quarter of 2026 as the administration advances a more crypto-friendly policy agenda. 

The filings revealed thousands of trades worth between $220 million and $750 million overall. 

This post Abu Dhabi’s Mubadala Raises Bitcoin ETF Stake 16% to $566 Million in Q1 2026 first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Gemini Stock Jumps After Winklevoss Twins Make $100M Bitcoin Bet on Company Future

Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss made their boldest statement yet about Gemini Space Station’s future: a $100 million strategic investment into their own company, funded not with cash but with Bitcoin. 

The announcement, paired with a first-quarter earnings report that showed 42% revenue growth year-over-year, sent GEMI shares climbing more than 20% in after-hours trading Thursday night.

Gemini (NASDAQ: GEMI) reported total revenue of $50.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, driven by a surge in services and OTC revenue. Services and interest income jumped 122% to $24.5 million, while credit card revenue climbed 300% to $14.7 million. The net loss narrowed to $109 million, an improvement from the $141 million loss recorded in the same quarter of 2025. Shares closed at $5.26 on Wednesday before the earnings release, then hit $6.33 in extended trading — representing a gain of over 20%.

Shares were up over 30% this morning before settling at the time of writing. The headline move, however, was the Bitcoin-denominated investment. Winklevoss Capital Fund purchased 7.1 million shares at $14 per share — nearly triple the stock’s recent market price of around $4.92. 

Tyler Winklevoss, the company’s CEO, said in a statement: “We believe the market has significantly undervalued Gemini, and that this investment will allow us to set up the company for its next phase of growth.” 

The $14 entry price, paid in Bitcoin, signals the twins’ conviction that both the company and the flagship digital asset have room to run.

Bitcoin itself has traded in a tight band this week, with the coin closing at $81,051 on May 14 and hovering around $80,000 through the prior several sessions. That stability comes after a bruising stretch earlier this year — BTC crashed more than 40% from its October 2025 peak of $126,000 to a low near $60,000 in February — a downturn that rattled Gemini’s exchange business and caused trading volumes to fall to $6.3 billion in Q1 from $13.5 billion a year earlier. 

Gemini’s rough couple months

The Winklevoss twins themselves were caught in that selloff, with blockchain analytics firm Arkham flagging a $130 million Bitcoin transfer into Gemini in March, widely interpreted as a sale. They later pulled funds back, withdrawing $42.77 million in BTC from the platform in April, a sign they were rebuilding their position as prices stabilized.

The earnings follows months of turbulence for the exchange. In February, Gemini cut 25% of its global workforce, exited the UK, EU, and Australian markets, and lost its COO, CFO, and Chief Legal Officer in a single week. 

Those events sparked a wave of shareholder class action suits alleging the company misled investors in its September 2025 IPO — priced at $28 per share and initially trading as high as $45.89 — about its true financial condition. The stock at one point fell below $5, a more than 89% decline from that peak.

One regulatory win gave the bulls ammunition. In April, Gemini received a Derivatives Clearing Organization license from the CFTC, opening the door to futures, options, and a broader marketplace strategy. Cameron Winklevoss, the company’s president, framed the licensing milestone as central to Gemini’s ambition to “evolve from a crypto company into a markets company.” 

This post Gemini Stock Jumps After Winklevoss Twins Make $100M Bitcoin Bet on Company Future first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

The Trump Family Trust Bought Bitcoin-Linked Stocks in First Quarter: Filing

Donald Trump’s family trust bought shares in several bitcoin-linked companies during the first quarter of 2026, according to a financial disclosure filed with the US Office of Government Ethics. These moves come as his administration advances a more supportive stance on digital assets.

The filing, submitted through two Form 278-T reports, shows more than 3,600 transactions between January and March with a total value ranging from $220 million to $750 million. Most of the activity focused on large-cap technology firms, banks, and index funds, yet a set of targeted purchases tied to the crypto sector has raised fresh ethics questions.

The disclosure lists nine purchases of Coinbase stock, with the largest transaction on Feb. 10 valued between $100,001 and $250,000. Coinbase stands as the largest US-based crypto exchange and plays a central role in retail and institutional trading infrastructure.

The trust reported two smaller purchases of MARA Holdings, one of the largest public Bitcoin mining firms, along with trades in Strategy, the company known for holding a large Bitcoin treasury. Strategy shares often move in line with Bitcoin price swings, which has made the stock a proxy for crypto exposure in equity markets.

The filing shows eight transactions involving Strategy Class A shares, including both purchases and sales. The largest purchase ranged between $50,001 and $100,000, while a January sale reached up to $50,000. The mix of buys and sells suggests active management rather than a passive position.

Beyond those names, the trust disclosed positions in other crypto-linked or fintech firms, including Robinhood, SoFi Technologies, and Block. These companies connect to digital assets through trading platforms, payments, or blockchain initiatives.

The Trump’s broader portfolio

Crypto-related trades represent a small share of the broader portfolio, which includes large positions in Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and Boeing, with individual transactions reaching up to $5 million. The filing indicates strong gains across many of those holdings following a market rebound after a March selloff tied to geopolitical tensions.

The documents do not state whether Trump directed any trades. His assets sit in a family trust managed by his sons and external brokers. Ethics rules require disclosure of transactions but do not bar a sitting president from holding or trading stocks.

These Trump-linked purchase disclosures came as the Senate Banking Committee advanced the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act in a 15–9 vote, with Democratic Sens. Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks joined Republicans to move the sweeping crypto market structure bill forward despite fierce opposition from Elizabeth Warren and other Democrats over consumer protection, illicit finance and Trump-related ethics concerns.

The markup exposed a growing Democratic divide on crypto policy, as a bipartisan bloc backed key DeFi compromise language while progressive lawmakers warned the bill creates loopholes that could weaken anti-money-laundering enforcement and securities protections.

This post The Trump Family Trust Bought Bitcoin-Linked Stocks in First Quarter: Filing first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

DMND and RootstockLabs Partner To Bring Stratum V2 To Merge-mining

Today DMND and RootstockLabs announce a new feature rollout intending to further the decentralization of Bitcoin mining. The new feature uses Stratum V2 to enable miners at the pool engaging in their own block template construction to also handle the selection and inclusion of merge-mined block commitments from the Rootstock (RSK) sidechain as well.

Merge-mining is a process by which multiple blockchains can share, or “reuse”, the same POW from the same set of miners. One blockchain, the child chain, structures its block headers to include the headers of the parent chain, i.e. the hash of the child chain’s block header is actually included inside a parent chain block (usually in the coinbase transaction), and software for the child chain is aware of this, actually validating part of the parent chain’s blocks in the process of verifying the child chain’s blocks.

This allows miners of the parent chain to mine multiple blockchains at once by simply including blockheader commitments in their coinbase transaction, and then mining blocks for the parent blockchain. When one is found for the parent chain, one is found for all of the child chains as well.

DMND’s integration allows miners to claim the sidechain rewards in rBTC (Rootstock’s bitcoin backed token whose reserves are managed by the federation operating the sidechain) directly on the sidechain, with no revenue sharing or intermediary pool custody.

There is potential for a dynamic like this to actually have the opposite impact on decentralization, but it is nonetheless an important development that will actually put such questions to the test in the real world.

Alejandro De La Torre, CEO and Co-Founder of DMND, had this to say: “The miner controls the merge mining and the miner gets paid for the merge mining. More delegation of control to miners is our key support for further decentralisation of the Bitcoin ecosystem.”

This post DMND and RootstockLabs Partner To Bring Stratum V2 To Merge-mining first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Shinobi.

Societe Generale plans to bring SG-FORGE's EUR CoinVertible and USD CoinVertible to Canton Network as part of a push into collateral, repo financing, and settlement.

The May 13 move puts the French bank's stablecoin effort closer to the operating layer of institutional markets.

SG-FORGE has already issued regulated CoinVertible tokens, and CryptoSlate has covered the bank's push into dollar and euro stablecoins. The Canton announcement connects those tokens to the market plumbing where collateral eligibility, margin calls, repo counterparties, settlement controls, and privacy requirements decide whether tokenized finance can move beyond isolated issuance.

Related Reading

SocGen doubles down on stablecoins with USD launch and BNY custody

Societe Generale-FORGE Launches USD-Pegged Stablecoin USDCV on Ethereum and Solana, with BNY Mellon as Custodian.

Jun 10, 2025 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

In a May 13 statement, Societe Generale said it is accelerating institutional blockchain-based financial infrastructure on Canton through its digital asset subsidiary. The bank said the work will focus on tokenized collateral, on-chain financing, and institutional-grade digital settlement.

It also plans to accept certain tokenized assets as eligible collateral, act as a counterparty in repo transactions, deploy USD and EUR CoinVertible on Canton, and join the network as an Ecosystem Super Validator.

That framing separates the announcement from a routine chain deployment. A stablecoin can trade on several networks without changing much about institutional finance.

A bank-issued settlement asset within a collateral and repo workflow is a different proposition because the token has to work within balance-sheet constraints, counterparty controls, jurisdictional limits, and risk systems that traditional finance already relies on.

Market structure gives the move its context

Canton is already associated with institutional collateral and settlement tests rather than retail stablecoin distribution.

CryptoSlate reported in 2025 that Digital Asset and a consortium of major financial institutions completed an on-chain US Treasury repo transaction on Canton, using USDC as the cash leg and tokenized Treasuries as collateral.

Related Reading

US Treasuries trade on Saturday as banks join Canton blockchain settlement test

A consortium including Bank of America, Citadel Securities, and DTCC completed a weekend US Treasury repo with atomic on-chain settlement using USDC on the Canton Network.

Aug 13, 2025 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

That earlier trade was executed on Tradeweb during a weekend and positioned as atomic settlement of both legs on-chain within a public-permissioned institutional network.

Participants included Bank of America, Citadel Securities, Societe Generale, Virtu Financial, DTCC, Circle, Cumberland DRW, and Tradeweb, among others. The transaction showed how cash and collateral could be represented on the same institutional settlement rail, with participant confidentiality and established market venues still in view.

Canton's working group added more collateral context in February 2026, when it reported cross-border intraday repo transactions using tokenized Gilts, including a cross-currency repo using tokenized Gilts against non-GBP tokenized deposits.

Société Générale was listed among the participants in that set of transactions as well. Thus, Societe Generale's latest announcement reads as a follow-through on a specific market structure problem.

Institutions want faster collateral mobility and settlement outside legacy time windows, but they also need configurable privacy, permissioned access, legal restrictions, and operational controls. Canton is built around that tension, and Societe Generale is now putting its own regulated stablecoin product into the same conversation.

Super Validator participation adds another layer to that positioning.

The role signals that Societe Generale wants to support network infrastructure while building applications around collateral mobility, margin management, repo financing, and tokenized settlement. That still leaves the commercial question open, but it places the bank closer to the systems that would validate, synchronize, and govern institutional transactions if the workflow moves from tests into regular use.

Regulation comes before scale

SG-FORGE's CoinVertible product gives the announcement its bank-led settlement angle.

The CoinVertible page describes USD CoinVertible and EUR CoinVertible as fiat-pegged tokens backed by segregated collateral assets, with direct subscriptions available after SG-FORGE onboarding and broader access through exchanges, brokers, and market makers.

The page also says SG-FORGE is a regulated electronic money issuer, investment firm, and crypto-asset service provider.

The regulatory status is supported by the French AMF's white-list entry, which lists SG-FORGE as a MiCA-licensed crypto-asset services provider in France.

CryptoSlate previously reported that USDCV launched in 2025 as SG-FORGE's dollar-pegged stablecoin on Ethereum and Solana, with BNY Mellon as reserve custodian and daily reserve disclosure language tied to MiCA transparency standards.

Institutional cash legs cannot simply be liquid. They also need issuer controls, redemption rules, reserve clarity, and transfer restrictions that fit the venue and the counterparty.

The same features that make a stablecoin less open-ended for general crypto users can make it more usable inside permitted institutional workflows.

The limits are just as important.

SG-FORGE's Canton announcement says EURCV and USDCV are unregistered under the US Securities Act and restricted from offers, sales, pledges, or transfers outside of offshore transactions to permitted transferees. It also says SG-FORGE lacks a license or authorization to conduct business in the United States.

That language should prevent any reading that the Canton deployment creates broad US retail availability.

Scale also remains a constraint.

CryptoSlate's stablecoin sector data shows a market capitalization of about $301.41 billion, with Tether's USDT at around $189.8 billion and USDC at $76.57 billion.

By comparison, CryptoSlate's pages for EURCV and USDCV showed about $121.73 million and $12.89 million in market capitalization, respectively.

CoinVertible may be designed for bank-grade settlement, but a small circulating base means any meaningful financing market would still need issuance, counterparties, liquidity channels, and actual transaction demand.

The real test is repeatable repo activity

Societe Generale's announcement arrives as other market infrastructure firms are also trying to move collateral and repo workflows onto distributed ledgers.

Separate from Canton and SG-FORGE, Broadridge said in January that its Distributed Ledger Repo platform processed an average of $384 billion in daily repo transactions in December 2025, with total volumes of nearly $9 trillion for the month.

Related Reading

Tokenized assets in US near $20B as DTCC launches AppChain for real-time tokenized asset management

The DTCC's blockchain strategy aims to revolutionize collateral workflows by enabling real-time settlement and liquidity without sacrificing compliance.

Apr 4, 2025 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

That context establishes repo as a live institutional target for tokenized settlement infrastructure, while leaving Canton and CoinVertible demand to be proven on their own terms.

The question for Societe Generale is whether its Canton role turns into repeated institutional financing activity.

The bank said it plans to accept certain tokenized assets as collateral and act as a repo counterparty, but it left asset eligibility, haircuts, CoinVertible deployment timing, and client activity expectations undisclosed.

Those omissions are common in an early infrastructure announcement, but they define the next phase of scrutiny.

If Societe Generale can use Canton to support recurring collateral, margin, and financing flows, CoinVertible becomes more than just a bank-issued stablecoin seeking distribution. It becomes a controlled settlement asset inside a specific institutional market workflow.

If activity remains limited to controlled tests, the announcement will look more like another high-profile tokenization milestone: strategically coherent, technically relevant, and still short of proving that on-chain collateral markets have durable demand.

Societe Generale's Canton move is a concrete step toward regulated stablecoins serving collateral and repo settlement infrastructure. The evidence still points to early-stage activity rather than broad adoption.

The signal to watch is whether the bank turns Super Validator participation, eligible tokenized collateral, and CoinVertible settlement into repeated financing activity with named counterparties, disclosed limits, and observable market use.

The post A major bank just moved its stablecoin strategy into Wall Street’s hidden financing machine appeared first on CryptoSlate.

THORChain’s suspected multichain exploit and emergency halt on May 15 has turned into another DeFi security incident, and another test of cross-chain trust.

Emergency controls moved through chain-specific halts, Halt All Trading, Halt Signing, Halt Chain Global, Halt Churning, and repeated global node-pause updates.

One public alert described the likely exploit affecting Bitcoin, Ethereum, BSC, and Base, resulting in more than $10.7 million in losses, revised from an earlier $7.4 million estimate.

Another security estimate put the loss near $10 million, including 36.75 BTC and about $7 million across BNB Chain, Ethereum, and Base.

The chain scope was later expanded in a TRM Labs assessment, which reported that the attacker drained more than $11 million across at least nine chains. Those chains included Avalanche, Dogecoin, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, and XRP, in addition to the initial four-chain framing. The figures may still move as the accounting is reconciled, but the available record points to a multichain infrastructure event touching several native-asset routes.

The halt, therefore, carried consequences beyond THORChain. Cross-chain liquidity is supposed to make crypto feel more useful, liquid, and connected. Yet the same design that lets assets move between isolated networks can also compress the response window when something breaks.

Related Reading

Kraken moves Bitcoin to Chainlink as bridge fears spread across DeFi

Kraken is rebuilding how Bitcoin moves through DeFi after the KelpDAO shock.

May 15, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

In this case, DeFi's promise of seamless routing ran straight into the need for an emergency stop.

The Halt Became The Signal

The operational response is documented in the chain's emergency framework. THORChain's procedures describe network and chain halts as tools node operators can use when funds are at risk.

Its architecture relies on Bifrost observation, vaults, and threshold-signature signing to move native assets across chains without wrapping them.

Those controls can protect funds by stopping further activity. They also show that cross-chain infrastructure is a stack of observers, validators, vaults, signing logic, node operations, and emergency procedures.

When that stack is tested, the market asks whether a single bug can be patched and whether the system can remain credible while the response itself disrupts routing.

I think that distinction brings the THORChain incident into the broader DeFi story. Mature financial infrastructure is expected to fail safely, explain quickly, and restore confidence with a documented root cause.

DeFi often moves faster than that standard. It ships integrations, new chains, and liquidity routes before users and institutions have a clear way to price the full operational risk.

Related Reading

After the $16.5 billion in exploits, DeFi is now being forced toward the controls it once resisted

Aave’s rsETH bad debt shows DeFi’s next security crisis rests in broken assumptions across bridges, governance, collateral listings, and risk controls.

May 10, 2026 · Gino Matos

A compact confidence ladder captures the current state of record:

The Trust Discount Is Now Measurable

The damage from exploits rarely ends with the drained wallet. Immunefi's 2026 security findings put the average direct theft at $25 million, while the median loss fell to $2.2 million.

That gap shows a market where routine defenses may improve while the largest incidents still define confidence.

The same report found that the top five hacks in 2024 and 2025 accounted for 62% of stolen funds, and hacked tokens saw a median six-month decline of 61%.

Those token moves cannot be cleanly separated from market conditions or project-specific weakness in every case. Still, the pattern supports the core market reaction: exploits become long-tail business events.

They drain capital, consume team time, slow integrations, and make partners question whether the next failure will hit them indirectly.

The trust discount reflects an extra layer of skepticism toward a sector that wants to be treated as financial infrastructure, yet still produces failures that look like crisis drills.

Users, exchanges, market makers, custodians, and institutions require more evidence to trust a protocol's uptime, monitoring, key management, and emergency processes.

Recent cross-chain incidents reinforce that point. In the KelpDAO bridge exploit, attackers targeted off-chain verification and source-chain watching infrastructure rather than a conventional smart-contract bug.

The result was a false view of reality that led to valid-looking transactions releasing funds. Bridge-security fears have already influenced infrastructure decisions, including Kraken's move to use Chainlink CCIP for kBTC and future wrapped assets following the KelpDAO shock.

Related Reading

Chainlink emerges as the unlikely $3B winner of KelpDAO exploit as DeFi projects dump LayerZero

More than $3 billion in DeFi value is moving toward Chainlink’s CCIP after the KelpDAO exploit exposed weaknesses in bridge verification.

May 11, 2026 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

That makes the THORChain halt feel less isolated. The sector is being forced to prove that the trust path across chains is observable, redundant, and controllable before billions of dollars of liquidity are routed through it.

For institutional users, the issue becomes operational due diligence. Cross-chain exposure touches custody policy, liquidity commitments, incident response, and counterparty reviews.

A protocol that routes native assets across chains has to prove that the monitoring and emergency process around that routing is as strong as the connectivity itself.

For builders, that changes what counts as progress. New routes and integrations can deepen liquidity, but they also create more surfaces for monitoring, key management, and incident response.

The next credibility gains will come from showing that controls scale with liquidity before a failure forces counterparties to revisit assumptions.

THORChain Carries A Compliance Layer Too

THORChain's position is especially sensitive because the protocol combines an attack surface with a routing role in major illicit-flow episodes.

As of TRM's report, the May 15 exploit had no public actor attribution. That caveat keeps the current incident separate from earlier laundering cases unless new evidence changes the record.

The same analysis described THORChain as a recurring rail for moving stolen funds, including flows tied to the Bybit and KelpDAO incidents.

That pressure was evident after Lazarus-linked Bybit funds moved through the protocol, when THORChain faced tensions between developers and validators.

Related Reading

Thorchain faces developer exodus amid North Korean money laundering scandal

A core contributor known as TCB warned that Thorchain could face a crisis if the network is framed as a money laundering facilitator.

Feb 28, 2025 · Gino Matos

Federal investigators attributed the February 2025 Bybit theft of about $1.5 billion in virtual assets to North Korea's TraderTraitor activity.

The FBI also urged private-sector crypto entities, including DeFi services and bridges, to block transactions to or from addresses linked to laundering.

That history sharpens the current episode. A protocol can be useful because it makes native cross-chain swaps efficient. The same utility can make it attractive to attackers and difficult for compliance teams to ignore.

Once a protocol is seen as both exploitable infrastructure and a route for illicit funds, counterparties have to price in more than just smart-contract risk.

They have to price operational interruption, screening exposure, and the chance that integrations become reputational liabilities.

RUNE price reaction stays secondary. Market data on May 16 put RUNE at around $0.44, down 21.90% over 24 hours.

The broader crypto market stood near $2.61 trillion with Bitcoin dominance at 60.2%. The market noticed the incident, but the more important question is whether liquidity providers, routing interfaces, wallet integrations, and compliance desks change behavior after the halt.

The important market signal will come from the next set of operational choices rather than from a one-day chart. Liquidity interfaces can route around protocols that introduce uncertainty; custodians and market makers can raise internal risk scores.

Compliance teams can demand better screening and incident records before supporting integrations. Those reactions are slower than a token selloff, but they are the way a security event becomes a durable trust discount.

That is the slower repricing institutions notice. It shows up in due diligence questions, integration queues, and risk limits long after the emergency halt leaves the alert feed.

The Next Test Is The Postmortem

The next test starts with more than a recovery message: THORChain needs to produce a clear postmortem, reconcile the final loss figure and chain count, explain the root cause without speculation, and show what changed in its vault, key-management, node, monitoring, and halt processes.

Recovery details may help contain user harm while leaving the infrastructure question intact.

If THORChain completes compensation, resumes safely, and documents a credible fix, the incident can remain a severe but contained confidence hit.

If the root cause remains unsettled, final accounting keeps changing, or integrations pull back, the event becomes another data point in a broader repricing of cross-chain DeFi.

That is the sector-level consequence. DeFi wants to present itself as a durable, always-on financial infrastructure.

Every major cross-chain exploit makes that claim harder to defend until the industry can show that the bridges, vaults, signing systems, and emergency controls connecting its markets are as mature as the capital they aim to attract.

The post THORChain exploit turns emergency chain halt into a DeFi trust test appeared first on CryptoSlate.

AI agents could end the app era by turning software into verified, user-built systems

AI agents may make running code written by strangers one of those behaviors that later generations struggle to process.

A society can normalize a risk for decades, then later reclassify it as reckless once a safer default becomes available.

Drinking before driving, riding without seatbelts, smoking indoors, and installing arbitrary binaries from the internet all belong to the same family of historical blind spots. The common feature is social permission.

The behavior persists when the alternative is costly, inconvenient, or technically unavailable. Once the safer path becomes cheap and routine, the old path begins to look irrational.

AI agents expose the weakness in the software trust model

Modern software still runs on a bargain that we rarely inspect. A developer, company, foundation, or anonymous maintainer writes code. A distribution channel packages it. A user, enterprise, or operating system runs it.

Security then becomes a layered attempt to manage the consequences of that decision.

Permissions, code signing, app stores, endpoint detection, sandboxing, vendor due diligence, and incident response all exist because the core act remains dangerous: executing someone else’s instructions on your machine, inside your account, with access to your data.

That trust model has failed at the institutional scale. The SolarWinds compromise showed how malicious code inserted into a trusted software build process could be distributed through normal updates and reach government agencies, technology firms, telecom networks, and other targets across multiple regions.

The operational lesson was structural, and the attack surface was the vendor's legitimacy itself.

Once the build process was compromised, the normal marks of trust became delivery infrastructure for the attack.

The same pattern appeared in the XZ Utils backdoor, where CISA warned in March 2024 that malicious code had been embedded in versions 5.6.0 and 5.6.1 of a compression library present across Linux distributions.

The National Vulnerability Database later described how a disguised test file and build-process manipulation produced a modified liblzma library capable of intercepting and modifying data interactions in linked software.

A software supply chain can be compromised far upstream from the user, and then arrive through channels that appear routine. We've seen that in crypto countless times with DNS and JavaScript npm exploits.

The industry response has been to add a stronger process. The NIST Secure Software Development Framework gives organizations a common set of practices for building and acquiring software with reduced risk.

The SLSA framework pushes provenance, integrity, and tamper resistance into the artifact pipeline. These controls are necessary.

They also reveal the limit of the present model. Enterprises keep refining methods for deciding which external code deserves trust.

The next model reduces the amount of outside code that needs trust at all.

That shift changes the social meaning of software. Today, third-party code is treated as a productivity asset with security overhead.

Tomorrow, it may be treated as a liability that requires justification. The default user question moves from “Which app should I install?” to “Why should I run someone else’s app when my agent can build the function for me?”

That is a real fracture line. Software stops being primarily a product selected from a market and becomes an output generated on demand within a user-controlled execution environment.

Agent-built software turns apps into disposable expressions of intent

The direction of travel is visible in coding agents. OpenAI Codex was introduced as a cloud-based software engineering agent capable of working on multiple tasks in parallel.

Claude Code by Anthropic is an agentic coding system that maps a codebase, changes files, runs tests, and delivers committed code.

GitHub’s Copilot coding agent moved the same pattern into the GitHub workflow, with asynchronous work across issues and pull requests.

Google Jules presents a similar direction: an autonomous coding agent that absorbs product context, generates solutions, and ships pull requests.

These products are still framed as developer tools. That framing will narrow over time. For Codex, it already is. OpenAI introduced a UI option last month focused on ‘chats' and outputs rather than on code and terminals.

The bigger change is that software creation is becoming a personal act of delegation. A user describes a workflow. The agent generates the interface, logic, integrations, tests, and execution path.

The artifact may last for an hour, a week, or a year. It can be regenerated, forked, constrained, audited, discarded, or rebuilt for a new context.

The app becomes less like a permanent object and more like a local policy compiled into a usable interface.

That has immediate implications for trust. A user may still observe other people’s applications. They may inspect workflows, interface patterns, data schemas, prompts, automations, and service integrations. Yet observation can remain separate from execution.

The user can copy the idea, then ask a personal agent to rebuild the function from first principles inside an environment governed by that user’s own rules. The value migrates from the compiled artifact to the pattern.

Distribution becomes less about shipping executable code and more about publishing intent, design, proofs, schemas, and API expectations.

Crypto enters the argument through verification rather than branding. The user’s agent will still connect to outside services.

It may call payments rails, identity systems, market data endpoints, storage layers, AI model providers, compute markets, messaging systems, and compliance services. The trust boundary shifts to those endpoints and the claims made about them.

Users will need ways to rank external services by auditability, provenance, security posture, and economic alignment. A service built within a verifiable environment will be scored differently from a black-box endpoint controlled by a corporate platform.

Verifiable endpoints become the new software distribution layer

Zero-knowledge systems provide one path into that ranking layer. ZK rollups show how computation can be executed off-chain while a succinct proof verifies the validity of the resulting state transition on-chain.

The same conceptual pattern can extend beyond transaction scaling. Users may want proofs that an endpoint ran approved code, processed data under defined constraints, preserved privacy boundaries, or produced a result from a specific audited build.

The proof can preserve internal confidentiality while narrowing the trust gap between a personal agent and an external dependency.

The long-term interface may resemble an agent-controlled operating layer. The user asks for a dashboard, a portfolio tool, a research assistant, a publishing system, a personal CRM, an accounting workflow, or a security monitor.

The agent assembles it from generated code and ranked endpoints. The code is inspectable because the agent created it.

The dependencies are constrained because the agent selected them under policy. The execution environment is auditable because the user chose that as a requirement.

The user still participates in a networked economy. Control moves closer to the individual.

The endpoint of this transition is a market for verifiable functions, agent-generated clients, and ranked external services. Third-party developers still exist, yet their role changes.

They publish protocols, APIs, templates, proofs, models, components, and reference implementations. Users run their own versions.

Enterprises still exist, yet their advantage shifts from controlling distribution to proving reliability. Open-source communities still exist, yet the burden moves from asking users to trust maintainers toward giving agents enough structured material to rebuild safely.

The old software economy sold finished applications. The new one sells credible capabilities.

A portfolio tracker becomes a generated interface over market data endpoints, wallet permissions, tax logic, and reporting rules. A publishing system becomes a generated workflow over identity, editing, content management, analytics, and distribution APIs.

A research terminal becomes a surface generated from databases, model calls, provenance checks, and private notes. In each case, the user’s agent handles composition.

The external world provides verifiable resources. That change also creates a commercial test for every infrastructure provider: prove the claim, publish the interface, expose the constraint set, and let user-side agents decide whether the service deserves inclusion.

The central split becomes private software sovereignty versus managed convenience

The usual debate frames the future as local versus cloud. That division captures part of the infrastructure question, while missing the political economy.

A private system can use cloud compute under user-defined constraints. A corporate system can run locally while still enclosing identity, incentives, permissions, and monetization inside a vendor-controlled stack.

The more durable split is private versus corporate. Who defines the app?

Who decides what it can access? Who receives the telemetry?

Who sets the upgrade path? Who can revoke the function?

Who benefits from the user’s dependence?

That split will become more visible as agentic software becomes cheap enough for ordinary users. One path leads toward personal software sovereignty.

Users maintain agents that build and rebuild the tools they need. They choose endpoint providers based on attestations, cost, reliability, privacy, and alignment.

They can abandon an interface while preserving the underlying workflow. They can migrate from one endpoint to another.

They can generate a new client when an old one becomes compromised, captured, or inefficient. The software layer becomes portable because the user owns the intent, and the agent can reproduce the implementation.

The other path leads toward managed convenience. Corporate platforms will offer subsidized apps, integrated identity, credits, payments, storage, AI access, and default workflows.

Some of that will be useful. Some of it will be economically coercive.

If AI-driven abundance produces public or private UBI-adjacent income schemes, compute credits, token distributions, or platform-linked benefits, the distribution rail may become a soft lock-in mechanism. Users may receive access to services through an ecosystem that also defines what software they run, how their data moves, and which agents can act on their behalf.

The UBI layer is the most sensitive version of that problem. Sam Altman has long been associated with AI-era debates over income distribution, and Worldcoin was framed, in part, around proof of personhood and the possibility of UBI-like distributions.

The broader point is larger than one project. When economic support, identity verification, compute access, and software permissions converge, participation can become conditional while looking voluntary.

A user may be free to opt out in theory while being pushed toward a managed application layer in practice.

Convenience becomes the main battleground. The corporate stack will win users through low friction.

It will offer polished defaults, instant access, bundled AI, social compatibility, recovery flows, compliance coverage, and rewards. The private stack will need to compete on something harder: autonomy that feels usable.

It must give users a reason to accept more responsibility while avoiding technical administration. The personal agent becomes decisive because it can absorb the complexity that previously made sovereignty impractical.

The next test is whether users choose generated trust over packaged convenience

The first-order risk is that users trade control for convenience before they understand the cost. The second-order risk is that the trade becomes subsidized, normalized, and eventually required for access to economic life.

Corporate apps may become the default environment for those who accept bundled benefits. Privately generated apps may become the default for those willing to pay, verify, configure, or self-custody their software layer.

That creates a new class divide around execution control. The question is whether agentic AI compresses that divide or deepens it.

That transition will be uneven. Regulated sectors will move slower.

Enterprises will defend app ecosystems with compliance arguments. Consumers will continue to choose default convenience when the private alternative feels brittle.

Attackers will target agents, prompts, dependency selection, model supply chains, and endpoint attestations. Verification systems will create new chokepoints if they become captured by a small number of certificate authorities, cloud platforms, or model vendors.

Personal software sovereignty can become another brand claim unless users can inspect, migrate, and revoke.

Still, the direction is clear enough to define the next test. The question is whether people will accept convenience over sovereignty once their own agents can build most of what they need.

Today, the answer is largely yes because the alternative remains too demanding. Tomorrow, the answer becomes less certain.

A user who can generate a working app, constrain its permissions, audit its dependencies, connect only to ranked endpoints, and rebuild it when conditions change has a real alternative to the corporate software bundle.

That alternative will feel strange at first. Then it will feel prudent.

Then it may become the default expectation for anyone handling money, identity, health data, private communications, research, or business operations. Running opaque third-party code will survive when convenience dominates, when subsidies distort choice, and when users accept managed environments in exchange for economic access.

It will fade where agents make private generation routine.

The social reclassification will happen slowly, then suddenly. The old habit will remain familiar until the new default becomes obvious.

Once users can ask their own agents to build the application, verify the execution path, and connect only to attested endpoints, the burden of explanation flips. The person running someone else’s code will need a reason.

The person building through an agent will simply be using the safer default. However, they may also have to accept missing out on corporate incentives given to those who remain connected to the matrix.

The post App days are numbered: The end state of software will be private, personal, verified, and AI agent-built appeared first on CryptoSlate.

US-listed Bitcoin ETF flows have suffered their most severe weekly capital flight since the end of January, with investors pulling exactly $1 billion from the products.

The primary catalyst for the sudden institutional risk aversion appears to be the shifting US economic backdrop.

CryptoSlate's data show that rising inflation concerns, alongside steep ETF outflows, led Bitcoin's price to fall around 3% over the past week to $78,074 as of press time.

US Bitcoin ETF flows register largest weekly outflow in 5 months

Data compiled by SoSoValue indicates that the $1 billion ETF outflow snapped a six-week streak of consecutive positive inflows. During this reporting period, the US-listed funds had absorbed approximately $3.4 billion in net flows.

However, the net withdrawal over the past seven days totaled roughly 14,000 Bitcoin, marking a distinct pause in the recovery of institutional demand that had been building steadily since early April.

Despite the severity of the weekly outflows, Ecoinometrics, a Bitcoin-focused analytical platform, characterized the number as a period of tactical hesitation near a critical macroeconomic decision point, rather than a wholesale unwind of institutional positioning.

According to the firm, the broader structural recovery pattern for digital assets remains largely intact, as net flows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs have remained positive over the past 30 days.

US inflation data explains why ETF demand cracked

In a recent market note, Coinbase, the largest US-based exchange, emphasized that returning inflationary pressures are actively limiting the potential for a broader liquidity-driven rally in digital assets.

According to the exchange's analysis, hotter-than-expected Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Producer Price Index (PPI) prints have forced financial markets to reprice inflation risk rapidly.

While initial jobless claims remain low, pointing to a resilient labor market, falling real wages and declining consumer sentiment suggest underlying economic strain.

Ecoinometrics corroborated this view, highlighting that investors were growing increasingly uneasy about aggressively adding risk exposure without a clearer picture of the Federal Reserve's next monetary policy steps.

The firm pointed to underlying details within the latest CPI report as a cause for concern. While a jump in headline inflation was largely anticipated following a spike in global energy prices linked to recent geopolitical conflicts, the acceleration of core inflation and core services inflation presents a more structural problem.

Because these core measures strip out volatile food and energy costs, their upward trajectory suggests persistent, sticky price pressures embedded within the broader economy, rather than a temporary external shock.

As a result, traditional risk assets, including US equities and the Bitcoin ETFs, are digesting the near-term monetary uncertainty rather than transitioning aggressively out of a risk-on regime.

It added that the foundational demand that drove billions of dollars into crypto ETFs throughout the spring has paused, but it has not structurally fractured.

What could restart Bitcoin's liquidity trade?

Considering the above, the next phase for the Bitcoin funds depends on whether last week's withdrawals become a pattern.

Ecoinometrics explained that the market can treat the $1 billion exit as a reset after a strong six-week recovery if ETF flows stabilize.

However, the signal becomes more concerning if outflows continue, as it would suggest that institutional demand is no longer absorbing macro pressure at the same pace.

Meanwhile, US inflation data would be the second test. Coinbase analysts noted that a sustained “beta expansion” will likely require a definitive improvement in systemic liquidity or a clear downward trend in inflation. Beta expansion is a measure of BTC's volatility and returns relative to the broader market.

This means that a cooler run of data would help rebuild the case for improved liquidity and give traders more confidence that the Fed can eventually shift toward easier policy.

However, a further rise in core or services inflation would likely keep yields elevated and continue to limit Bitcoin's ability to expand beyond its current range.

The post Bitcoin ETF flows reverse as US funds shed $1B amid inflation fears appeared first on CryptoSlate.

A new global financial crisis is not confirmed, but the path toward one is now visible enough to map.

The sequence starts with debt and oil before it reaches credit. Long-end sovereign yields and Brent crude are already close enough to stress levels to make the policy squeeze urgent.

To close out the week, the US 30-year Treasury yield was near 5.109%, the UK 30-year gilt was near 5.857%, Brent was near $108.54, and the VIX was near 18.53.

Those numbers point to a market moving toward the part of the map where a bond shock and an oil shock can start forcing other markets to respond.

The distinction is practical. A 30-year Treasury yield above 5.25%, a UK 30-year gilt above 6%, or sustained Brent above $115 would all worsen the debt-service and inflation problem.

But a 2008-style event needs more than expensive government debt and energy. It needs stress to migrate into credit, volatility, financial conditions, funding markets, and forced selling.

The broad data still shows a different picture. US high-yield option-adjusted spreads were still only 2.82% on May 13, below the long-term average of 5.19%.

A later FRED update put the same credit-spread family at 2.76% for May 14. The Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index was still -0.524 for the week ending May 8, and negative NFCI readings indicate looser-than-average financial conditions.

That leaves markets in a split state: the warning signals are close, but the confirmation signals have not arrived.

Related Reading

Global financial crisis fears grow as bond yields hit 1998 levels and Bitcoin drops below $80,000

Sovereign bond yields are nearing historic stress levels as inflation and energy shocks revive fears of a global financial crisis.

May 13, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

The dashboard markets should watch

The closest breaks are the US 30-year, the UK 30-year, and Brent. The more important confirmation points are high-yield spreads, VIX, and NFCI.

A mechanical one-day gauge shows why the first group matters. If the US 30-year repeated its 9.6 basis-point daily move, it would reach 5.25% in roughly 1.5 trading days and 5.50% in roughly 4.

If the UK 30-year repeated its 20.6 basis-point move, 6% would be less than one trading day away. If Brent repeated its $2.82 daily gain, $115 would be two to three trading days away.

Treat those as distance markers, not forecasts. They show how close the market is to levels where the narrative changes.

Why bonds and oil break first

Long-end yields are the first pressure point because they transmit stress into almost everything else.

For governments, higher 30-year yields raise the cost of refinancing at the same time budgets are already under pressure. The IMF's April 2026 Fiscal Monitor said global public debt rose to just under 94% of GDP in 2025 and is projected to reach 100% by 2029, with public finances strained by rising interest burdens.

That makes every long-end yield spike more than a chart event. It raises the price of time for governments, households, banks, insurers, pensions, and companies that rely on long-duration valuations.

The transmission can arrive without a single dramatic failure. Higher long-end rates can lower the value of bond portfolios, pressure mortgage and corporate refinancing costs, and make equity valuations harder to defend.

They also force governments to choose between tighter budgets, heavier issuance, and higher interest bills. A move from stress to crisis can start quietly in duration markets before it shows up in layoffs, bank funding, or default risk.

Oil adds the second pressure channel. The EIA described the Strait of Hormuz as a critical chokepoint, with 2024 oil flows averaging about 20 million barrels per day, or roughly 20% of global petroleum liquids consumption.

The World Bank said Brent could average as high as $115 in 2026 under a severe-disruption scenario involving damage to critical oil and gas facilities and slow export recovery.

Related Reading

Bitcoin only has one path through 2026 because massive oil price contagion just spread to 8 major economies

Hormuz-driven oil stress is forcing policy shifts across 8 economies, leaving Bitcoin stuck between liquidity squeeze and support.

May 12, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

Brent is central to the GFC question because it can keep inflation elevated, weaken real incomes, pressure margins, and reduce the room central banks have to cut rates if markets start to fall.

It does not need to directly break the banking system to make a subsequent credit event harder to fight.

In 2008 and 2020, policymakers could eventually move hard toward financial rescue. In this setup, the constraint is different.

Rescue too early, and inflation credibility comes under pressure. Wait too long, and financial stability can break first.

What would confirm the shift into systemic stress

The hard break requires more than the US 30-year alone. A 5.25% or 5.50% 30-year Treasury would be a major warning, but it would still be a warning.

The same holds for a 6% UK 30-year gilt or Brent above $115.

The confirmation would come from migration.

First, volatility would need to stop looking orderly. A VIX move through 25 would show equity investors paying up for protection.

A move through 30 would be a more serious risk-off signal, especially if it came while long yields and oil were still rising.

Second, credit would need to reprice. The high-yield spread, around 4.5% to 5.0%, is the more important line because it would indicate that investors are no longer treating the shock as a rate problem.

They would demand more compensation for default and liquidity risk.

That is the point at which the story shifts from macro pressure to credit stress. The distance from 2.82% to 4.5% is about 168 basis points.

That gap is why the current evidence falls short of a 2008-style credit event.

Third, financial conditions would need to tighten broadly. An NFCI crossing above zero would indicate that the stress is no longer confined to rates, oil, or equities.

It would mean money markets, debt markets, equity markets, and the banking system are collectively tighter than average.

Only after that would the real systemic channel come into view: funding pressure, collateral calls, liquidity holes, bank balance-sheet stress, and forced deleveraging.

That is the part that turns a harsh macro correction into a financial crisis.

On current evidence, that remains a second-order scenario. A reasonable 12-month range remains around 10% to 15%, rising toward 15% to 20% if the US 30-year breaks 5.25%, the UK 30-year breaks 6%, Brent stays above $115, and the VIX moves above 25.

A high-yield spread move through 4.5% would matter more than any single bond print because it would show credit catching the shock.

Where Bitcoin fits into the test

Bitcoin comes after the macro test.

The crypto market is large enough to react to the same liquidity forces driving stocks, bonds, and commodities. CryptoSlate's market pages show a total crypto market value of $2.6 trillion, with Bitcoin dominance around 60%.

The Bitcoin page shows BTC near $78,000 going into the weekend, down about 2.8% over 24 hours.

Recent CryptoSlate coverage has already shown why the Bitcoin signal is complicated. BTC has at times broken from US equities while oil, yields, and the dollar pressured stocks, with Bitcoin now below $80,000 even as the S&P 500 hits new records.

Related Reading

Bitcoin decouples from S&P 500 as oil, yields, and dollar pressure stocks

BTC’s break from stocks now depends on whether buyers can absorb oil, yield, and dollar pressure at the same time.

May 5, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

Still, one or two decoupling sessions fall short of proving a durable regime change. If this remains a bond-and-oil shock without credit confirmation, Bitcoin may trade the usual mix of liquidity expectations, real-rate pressure, dollar moves, ETF flows, and risk appetite.

It can diverge for a session or two without proving that it has become a crisis hedge.

If the shock moves further into credit, the test becomes harder. In a true deleveraging phase, investors sell what they can, not only what they want to sell.

Bitcoin could trade like high-beta collateral first, especially if volatility rises and liquidity becomes scarce.

The bullish macro case would need to survive that phase. BTC would have to show investor demand, treating it as protection against fiscal stress, monetary disorder, or policy credibility risk after the forced-selling pressure subsides.

That is a higher bar than outperforming stocks on a mixed macro day.

The path also depends on what drives the selloff. A rates-led repricing tends to pressure long-duration assets and speculative exposure.

An oil-led inflation shock can hit risk appetite while also raising questions about the purchasing power of fiat. A credit-led break is harsher because it turns liquidity into a scarce asset.

Bitcoin's response across those three states would tell markets more than any single daily correlation print.

The line between correction and crisis

Markets are still short of saying 2008 is here. Yet they say the path to that kind of event is visible enough to monitor in real time.

The first part of the path is already close: long-end US and UK yields, oil, inflation pressure, and constrained central banks.

The second part is still missing: high-yield spreads above 4.5% to 5.0%, VIX above 25 to 30, and NFCI above zero.

That distinction means that if a new GFC-style event is developing, the bond and oil numbers should break first.

The confirmation comes only when credit, volatility, and financial conditions follow.

Until then, the label is a dangerous macro-correction risk rather than a confirmed systemic crisis.

The post Markets are moving toward a new global financial crisis. These are the tripwires that would confirm it appeared first on CryptoSlate.

As decentralized compute and machine learning models become integrated into financial and creative workflows, certain projects have emerged as clear leaders.

Investors are increasingly looking beyond simple "AI hype" toward protocols that provide tangible infrastructure for the future. In this article, we analyze three AI tokens that demonstrate high utility and strong market positioning.

Why AI and Blockchain are the Future of Investment

In 2026, the synergy between AI and blockchain is no longer theoretical; it is a "multiplicative" force for global efficiency. Blockchain provides the transparent, decentralized layer needed to verify AI data and secure compute resources, while AI offers the "intelligence" to optimize on-chain processes.

• Decentralized Intelligence: Reducing reliance on "Big Tech" silos for model training.
• Resource Efficiency: Tokenizing GPU power allows for a global, borderless marketplace for compute.
• Trustless Governance: AI can manage complex DAO structures with high-speed data analysis.

Top 3 AI Coins to Consider in 2026

1. Bittensor (TAO): The Decentralized Brain

Bittensor remains the premier protocol for decentralized machine learning. By creating a marketplace for intelligence, Bittensor allows different subnets to specialize in various AI tasks—from image generation to complex data analysis—rewarding participants in TAO.

Why TAO is a Strong Contender

As of May 2026, Bittensor has gained massive institutional validation. With recent reports of major tech entities exploring TAO's subnet architecture, the token has shown strong "alpha" performance. The Bittensor price (often compared to the blue chips of the sector) remains a favorite for those betting on a "World Computer" of intelligence.

• Subnet Scalability: Each subnet acts as its own specialized economy.
• Institutional Interest: Rumors of AI-specific ETFs have kept liquidity high.
• Deflationary Incentives: The halving mechanics and staking requirements create a supply crunch as demand for decentralized inference grows.

2. Render (RENDER): Powering the Visual AI Revolution

As AI-generated video and spatial computing become mainstream, the demand for GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) power has hit record highs. Render Network bridges the gap by connecting users who need compute power with those who have idle GPUs.

The Investment Thesis for RENDER

Render transitioned successfully to the Solana blockchain, which significantly lowered transaction costs and improved scalability. This move allowed it to integrate more deeply with AI training and inference workloads, moving beyond its original scope of 3D rendering.

• Burn-and-Mint Equilibrium: This economic model ensures that as network usage grows, the supply of RENDER is managed efficiently.
• Strategic Partnerships: Render's involvement in spatial computing projects with companies like Apple and Meta makes it a critical infrastructure play.
• GPU Shortage Hedge: As centralized cloud providers (AWS, Google) face capacity limits, Render provides a decentralized alternative.

3. DeXe (DEXE): AI-Driven Social Trading and DAOs

While Bittensor and Render focus on infrastructure, DeXe Protocol is revolutionizing how we interact with decentralized finance (DeFi) and governance through AI-enhanced tools. DeXe provides the framework for DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) and social trading platforms.

The Role of AI in DeXe

In 2026, DeXe has integrated advanced automated tools that allow for "meritocratic" governance. AI agents within the DeXe ecosystem help analyze trader performance and manage treasury allocations based on real-time data, reducing human error and bias.

• Social Trading Evolution: Users can replicate the strategies of top traders (Executives) with AI-powered risk management.
• Incentive Alignment: The DEXE token is used for governance, ensuring that those with the most "expertise" have a proportional say in the protocol's future.
• Multi-chain Utility: DEXE's presence across multiple chains ensures high liquidity and accessibility.

3 AI Coins to Consider in 2026

Ethereum ($ETH) has found itself under intense selling pressure over the past few weeks. Despite several attempts by bulls to push the asset back into higher trading tiers, market dynamics have shifted drastically in favor of the bears.

Is Ethereum Crashing Below $2,000?

According to current technical structures on the chart and broader market indicators, there is a substantial risk that the Ethereum price could break below $2,000. The asset is currently facing strong overhead resistance and a lack of immediate buy walls. Market data confirms that whale distribution has accelerated, heavily impacting spot market liquidity.

While short-term relief bounces are always possible in derivatives-driven markets, the overarching multi-week trend highlights a series of lower highs and lower lows. If the current support zones fail to hold back the bears, a continuation toward the next major demand zone below $2,000 appears highly probable before the end of the second quarter.

Ethereum Price Analysis in May 2026

A detailed examination of the weekly ETH/USD chart reveals a distinct breakdown of the mid-term bullish structure.

The Moving Average Crossover and Bearish Sentiment

• The chart shows the 9-period and 21-period Moving Averages (MA Cross) tracking above the current price action. The 9-period MA sits at $2,204.3, while the 21-period MA hovers higher at $2,356.1.
• The fact that the current price is trading at $2,174.5—well below both short-term moving averages—proves that the immediate momentum is firmly controlled by sellers. A sustained position below these lines often transforms previous support areas into firm overhead supply walls.

Horizontal Support and Resistance Levels

Several key horizontal zones are mapped out on this weekly timeframe:

• The Overhead Ceilings: Strong resistance lines are established at $2,400, $2,600, and $3,200. These levels previously acted as consolidation floors before the major distribution phase began.
• The Current Battleground: The immediate line of defense for buyers is situated around the green support band between $2,161 and $2,180. The current weekly candle is testing the very bottom of this range, registering a net loss of over 8.29% for the current period.
• The Sub-$2,000 Floors: If the $2,161 floor crumbles, the chart reveals a massive liquidity void. The next structured support bands wait lower at the $1,800 green line and the ultimate macro support level of $1,600.

RSI Indicator Overview

At the bottom of the chart, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) with a 14-period setting is currently printing at 40.86, with its signal line at 37.66. While an RSI reading near 40 shows that the asset is approaching an oversold territory, it has not yet hit the traditional extreme oversold threshold of 30. This implies that there is still ample room for a downward extension before the market forces a structural, momentum-based trend reversal.

Why Is Ethereum Crashing?

Accelerated Whale Distribution and Exchange Inflows

Data from blockchain analytics platforms highlights a worrying trend for Ethereum bulls. Over the past two weeks, exchange reserves for ETH have risen dramatically. Hundreds of thousands of ETH have been transferred onto centralized trading venues, heavily noting an intent to liquidate assets.

This distribution is primarily led by large-scale institutional wallets and "whales" holding between 10,000 and 100,000 ETH. When large entities transfer their holdings onto exchanges, it floods the order books with supply that retail buyers struggle to absorb.

Declining Institutional Inflows

The institutional narrative that pushed Ethereum upward throughout the previous quarters has cooled down. Net outflows from US spot $Ethereum ETFs have added pressure onto the market, dampening overall spot demand. Concurrently, major treasury firms have reported lower staking rewards and decreased yield revenue due to compressed network valuations, pushing institutional players to adjust their portfolios for maximum capital flexibility rather than long-term holding.

What Can Save the Bulls?

To invalidate this highly bearish scenario, Ethereum buyers need to step up immediately and force a daily close back above the 9-period moving average at $2,204. Reclaiming this minor level would signal that local demand is active. However, a full macro trend invalidation requires a strong push past the $2,335–$2,400 resistance cluster. Only a weekly close above $2,400 would reliably turn the structural bias back to neutral or bullish.

As macro asset trends undergo these aggressive distribution phases, securing digital assets off centralized exchanges becomes highly recommended. Utilizing cold storage options, which can be explored in detail through our hardware wallets comparison, guarantees that market volatility won't affect asset custody.

Crypto taxes are easy to ignore until your transaction history spans five exchanges, three wallets, a staking account, and a few DeFi experiments. This CoinTracking review looks at how the platform helps crypto users organize transaction data, calculate gains, and prepare tax reports without losing track of the bigger portfolio picture.

Key Takeaways

• CoinTracking is a long-running crypto tax software and portfolio tracker founded in 2012, now used by more than 2 million crypto users.
• CoinTracking supports over 300 exchanges and wallets for seamless imports, and over 400 exchanges and wallets through API, CSV, and manual workflows.
• Its crypto tax calculator can generate tax reports for many jurisdictions, with accounting methods such as FIFO, HIFO, LIFO, and ACB.
• The platform is powerful, but the interface can feel old-school compared with newer mobile-first tax software.
• CoinTracking offers DIY tax report generation plus full service support for users who need professional assistance with complex crypto transactions.

What Is CoinTracking? (2026 Overview)

CoinTracking is a Munich-based crypto portfolio tracker and crypto tax software launched in 2012, making it one of the first dedicated crypto tax tools on the market. According to CoinTracking’s own company data, it serves roughly 2.2 million active individual users, more than 25,000 corporate clients, and tracks over $41.5 billion in crypto portfolio value.

• CoinTracking is built to import trading data, wallet activity, and historical data from crypto exchanges, wallets, and blockchain addresses.
• The platform calculates realized and unrealized gains, income, fees, and taxable disposals across an entire crypto portfolio.
• Users can generate tax reports for multiple countries and share tax forms with accountants or tax authorities.
• Typical users include casual investors, crypto traders, DeFi users, NFT collectors, miners, businesses, and tax firms.
• CoinTracking operates with read-only permissions to enhance user security by not managing or holding private keys.
• It is not an exchange or wallet. CoinTracking does not hold funds, execute trades, or manage private keys; it is a tracking, analytics, and tax calculator platform.

CoinTracking Features At a Glance

CoinTracking’s key features are strongest for people who need more than a basic portfolio balance. It combines crypto management, portfolio management, tax calculations, and reporting into one detailed dashboard.

At a high level, CoinTracking includes:

• Multi-exchange exchange imports from Coinbase, Binance, Kraken, KuCoin, and many other crypto exchanges.
• API synchronization, csv files, import files, and manual entry for importing transactions.
• Portfolio analytics covering total account value, asset allocation, coin charts, trade statistics, and historical balances.
• A crypto tax calculator with 10+ accounting methods, including FIFO, HIFO, LIFO, AVCO, and ACB.
• Country specific tax reports, generic gain/loss summaries, and exports for outside tax software.
• Support for crypto assets including cryptocurrencies, tokens, stablecoins, and NFTs.
• Tools for tax firms, including multi-client dashboards and permissioned accounts.

-> Looking for the best crypto tax solution? Compare CoinTracking with other leading platforms in our full Top Crypto Tax Tools comparison and find the right tool for your needs.

CoinTracking can track over 27,500 digital assets and supports a wide range of transaction types, including trades, staking, and airdrops, which is essential for comprehensive portfolio management. The platform also offers interactive financial reports and analytics, including over 25 customizable analysis views.

Portfolio Tracking & Crypto Trading Analytics

CoinTracking started as a leading crypto portfolio tracker before crypto tax reporting became a mainstream need. That heritage still shows in its analytics. The platform helps investors aggregate transactions, analyze market trends, and generate regulatory tax documentation from one place.

CoinTracking supports seamless integration with over 300 exchanges and wallets, allowing users to effortlessly import their transaction history. CoinTracking supports integration with over 400 exchanges and wallets, allowing users to import their transaction history automatically via API or manually through CSV uploads.

This makes it useful if your crypto holdings are spread across centralized exchanges, hardware wallets, DeFi protocols, and older accounts you barely remember opening.

Importing Trades and Wallet Data

CoinTracking supports three main import methods:

1. API synchronization
2. CSV/XLS uploads
3. Manual transaction entry

The platform allows users to import data from exchanges using various methods, including API synchronization, CSV uploads, and manual entry, making it versatile for different user needs.

For active traders, the api import workflow is the cleanest option. You create a read-only api key on the exchange, connect it to CoinTracking, and let the system pull transaction details automatically. This api feature is helpful for frequent crypto trading because it reduces manual work.

For older platforms or closed accounts, CSV uploads are often more practical. Users can export transaction history from 2015, 2018, or any other available period, then upload the file for parsing. If exchange data is incomplete, users may need to manually add deposits, withdrawals, transfers, or sales price records.

Blockchain imports are also available for several networks, helping users pull on-chain transfers, swaps, liquidity pool activity, staking, and NFT activity. The platform supports advanced features for tracking decentralized finance (DeFi) activities, including liquidity pools, staking, and NFT transactions.

Make sure every api key is read-only, with no withdrawal or trading rights.

-> Want a closer look at CoinTracking? Read our full CoinTracking review to explore its features, pricing, and who it’s best for.

Portfolio Views, Charts, and Trade Statistics

CoinTracking’s dashboard shows total crypto portfolio value in fiat currencies such as USD, EUR, and GBP, as well as BTC. It can also display historical balance curves from your first import date onward.

Investors can utilize trade statistics provided by CoinTracking to analyze their realized and unrealized gains or losses. CoinTracking provides users with interactive charts and graphs that help visualize trade history, portfolio composition, and performance over time, aiding in decision-making.

Useful analytics include:

• Realized and unrealized gains by asset
• Gain/loss by exchange and time period
• Daily account value changes
• Profit by trade type, including spot, futures, and margin
• Allocation by coin, wallet, and exchange
• Open positions and cost basis
• Warnings for missing transactions and duplicate transactions

These tools are especially helpful if you want to review a specific tax year, compare the 2020–2023 cycle, or evaluate whether tax loss harvesting could reduce a future tax bill.

Crypto Tax Calculator & Reporting (Crypto Taxes)

CoinTracking is widely used as a crypto tax calculator for filing crypto taxes across multiple tax years. Crypto assets can be taxed as personal income, property, business income, capital gains, and often a mixture of these categories, making tax reporting complex.

Utilizing crypto tax software is crucial for ensuring accuracy and compliance with tax laws, as it automates the tracking and calculation of gains, losses, and taxable events.

The software features a smart categorization engine to automatically classify various on-chain actions, such as airdrops, mining rewards, and token swaps. This helps separate taxable events from non-taxable transfers, which is critical if you want to pay taxes accurately without over-reporting.

Supported Countries and Localized Crypto Tax Rules

CoinTracking provides tax reports tailored to major jurisdictions, including the USA, UK, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Canada, Australia, France, Spain, and others. It also offers a general tax reporting function for users outside the most detailed country templates.

Many countries have specific tax reporting requirements for cryptocurrencies, and tax software can generate reports tailored to these requirements, simplifying the filing process.

For the US, CoinTracking can help users prepare data for irs form 8949 and Schedule D, with exports for TurboTax and TaxACT. You can compare this with official IRS digital assets guidance when reviewing your obligations.

For the UK, reports can support HMRC-style crypto asset calculations, including pooled cost basis where relevant. HMRC’s cryptoassets manual is still worth reviewing with a tax professional.

For users outside the main supported jurisdictions, CoinTracking can still generate gain/loss, income, and transaction summaries that an accountant can adapt to local tax returns.

From Raw Data to Final Crypto Tax Report

A typical CoinTracking workflow looks like this:

1. Import all wallets and exchanges for the relevant tax year.
2. Reconcile deposits, withdrawals, missing transfers, and duplicate entries.
3. Categorize staking rewards, airdrops, mining, gifts, spending, and DeFi activity.
4. Choose an accounting method such as FIFO, HIFO, LIFO, or ACB.
5. Run the crypto tax calculator.
6. Export comprehensive tax reports as PDF, CSV, Excel, or compatible tax software files.

CoinTracking supports over 10 different accounting methods for tax reporting, such as FIFO, HIFO, and ACB, tailored to various jurisdictions.

The tool separates taxable disposals, such as sales, trades, crypto-to-crypto swaps, crypto-to-fiat exits, and spending, from non-taxable wallet transfers. Advanced users can also compare methods before finalizing tax report generation, although you should confirm which method is accepted under your local tax laws.

-> Before choosing CoinTracking, explore our Top Crypto Tax Tools comparison page to see how it stacks up against other crypto tax platforms.

CoinTracking Full Service & Professional Support

Some users do not want to clean up thousands of crypto transactions by themselves. That is where CoinTracking’s full service option becomes relevant.

Full service is a premium workflow where specialists help import, reconcile, categorize, and prepare reports. Depending on the case, this may involve a tax professional, data specialist, or full service team familiar with exchange exports, wallet movements, DeFi, NFTs, and historical reconstruction.

CoinTracking also supports tax firms with multi-client dashboards, role-based access, standardized reporting, and workflows for bulk client management.

When Does Full Service Make Sense?

Full service makes the most sense when the cost of mistakes is higher than the cost of help.

It is especially useful for:

• High-frequency crypto traders
• NFT flippers
• Yield farmers and liquidity providers
• Miners with years of rewards
• Businesses accepting crypto payments
• Users with 10,000+ transactions
• People fixing old tax years from 2017–2024
• Investors with missing data from closed exchanges

If you only have a few hundred trades, the free version or a lower paid plan may be enough. But if your records are messy, full service can save time and reduce the risk of sending inaccurate reports to tax authorities.

How CoinTracking Full Service Typically Works

The process usually starts with an initial consultation. You provide exchange access through read-only API keys, CSV exports, wallet addresses, and any relevant historical files.

The specialists then:

• Import transaction data
• Reconcile transfers between wallets
• Correct missing transactions
• Review duplicate transactions
• Categorize staking, mining, airdrops, forks, NFT sales, and token swaps
• Run the crypto tax calculator
• Prepare draft reports for review

Final outputs can be shared with your accountant or used as filing support, depending on your jurisdiction. Even with professional assistance, you remain responsible for final filing decisions and should understand the basics of your report.

Security, Privacy, and Data Protection

CoinTracking handles sensitive financial records, so security matters.

CoinTracking prioritizes the security and privacy of user data, ensuring that all servers are located within the European Union, which makes sensitive user data GDPR compliant. CoinTracking is ISO/IEC 27001:2017 certified, which involves independent auditing of all processes, reports, encryption methods, and support/management processes to ensure high security standards.

Users have the option to register with CoinTracking completely anonymously, although this limits their ability to recover passwords and access certain features. This anonymous registration option is unusual among crypto tax reporting software platforms.

CoinTracking employs encryption techniques to protect user data, including personal data and transaction details, enhancing the platform’s security against unauthorized access.

Other security features include:

• SSL/TLS encrypted connections
• Encrypted API credentials
• Read-only API requirements
• Two-factor authentication
• EU-based hosting
• Data deletion controls

The platform allows users to create backups of their data, which can be restored at any time, providing an additional layer of security against data loss.

CoinTracking App & Mobile Experience

The cointracking app is available for iOS and Android and is mainly designed for portfolio monitoring rather than deep tax work.

The cointracking mobile app syncs with the web account and shows portfolio value, coin prices, simple charts, and basic performance views. Users can check crypto holdings, monitor price movement, and review balances while away from the desktop.

Useful mobile features include:

• Portfolio value tracking
• Day and night modes
• Widgets for quick balance checks
• Coin price alerts
• Basic transaction review and editing

However, complex reconciliation, importing transactions, and generate tax reports workflows are still better on desktop. The app is convenient, but CoinTracking’s strongest tax reporting software features live in the web interface.

Pricing Plans and Limits

CoinTracking’s pricing plans are based mainly on transaction limits and advanced functionality. Always check the current CoinTracking pricing page before buying, as prices and promotions can change.

The free plan gives users a free account with basic functionality and portfolio tracking for up to 200 transactions. CoinTracking offers a free plan that allows users to manage up to 200 transactions, providing access to basic features and portfolio tracking. However, the free plan is limited for tax reports, so serious filers usually need a paid plan.

Common tiers include:

• Free: up to 200 transactions, basic portfolio view, limited tax reporting.
• Starter: low-volume users who need tax reports for a small transaction history.
• Pro: CoinTracking’s Pro plan supports up to 3,500 transactions and is priced at approximately $159 per year, making it suitable for most casual traders.
• Expert: higher transaction limits, more backups, advanced reports, and priority help.
• Unlimited: unlimited transactions, premium support, full reporting capabilities, and features for heavy traders or businesses.

CoinTracking’s pricing structure includes options for 1-year, 2-year, or lifetime plans, with longer subscriptions resulting in lower monthly costs. Some plans may also include crypto-payment discounts or seasonal tax promotions.

Before upgrading, check whether all historical transactions count toward your plan limit. A user with five active tax years can hit limits faster than expected.

CoinTracking Pros

CoinTracking has several clear strengths as a crypto tax calculator and portfolio platform:

• Broad integrations: cointracking supports hundreds of exchanges, wallets, and blockchains through API, CSV, and manual entry.
• Large asset coverage: the platform allows users to track over 27,500 digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, tokens, and NFTs, providing a comprehensive view of their portfolio.
• Strong tax engine: users can create tax reports, income reports, capital gains summaries, and exports for accountants.
• Advanced analytics: interactive charts, coin charts, trade statistics, and over 25 customizable analysis views help users understand performance.
• DeFi and NFT support: the platform can classify staking, liquidity pools, airdrops, mining, token swaps, and NFT transactions.
• Security posture: ISO/IEC 27001:2017 certification, EU servers, encryption, read-only API keys, backups, 2FA, and anonymous registration.
• Professional workflows: full service support and tax firms features make CoinTracking scalable beyond individual investors.

CoinTracking Cons

No crypto tax software is perfect, and CoinTracking has trade-offs.

The biggest drawback is usability. The interface is powerful but dense, with many menus, tables, and settings. Beginners who expect a modern mobile-first experience may find the platform overwhelming.

Other limitations include:

• Pricing can feel confusing because transaction limits, renewals, and add-ons require careful reading.
• Lower plans can be restrictive if you trade often or use DeFi.
• Support may slow down during peak tax season.
• Obscure DeFi protocols, cross-chain bridges, and legacy exchanges may still require manual fixes.
• Small buy-and-hold investors may find the feature set more than they need.

If your activity is simple, test the free version first before committing to an annual plan.

Who Is CoinTracking Best For?

CoinTracking is best for users who need precision, history, and reporting depth.

It is a strong fit for:

• People trading across multiple exchanges
• Users reconstructing 2013–2025 trading histories
• DeFi users with staking, liquidity pools, bridges, or airdrops
• NFT collectors and sellers
• Miners and businesses receiving crypto
• Crypto traders with more than a few hundred yearly transactions
• Accountants and tax firms managing multiple clients
• Investors who want audit-ready reports and detailed transaction history

Long-term HODLers with only a few purchases may not need the full feature set. They can start with the free plan or compare lighter tools before upgrading.

Conclusion: Our CoinTracking Review for Crypto Tax Reporting

CoinTracking remains one of the most mature crypto tax and portfolio platforms available in 2026. Its strengths are depth, history, integrations, tax calculations, and flexible reporting.

The main downsides are the dated interface, learning curve, and pricing complexity. Still, for serious traders, DeFi users, businesses, and tax professionals, CoinTracking is one of the strongest options for organizing crypto transactions and preparing tax reports.

If your crypto activity is complex, test the free account, import a sample of your data, and see whether the reports match your needs. Then review the output with a qualified tax advisor before filing, because crypto tax law continues to evolve quickly.

-> Curious if CoinTracking is the right crypto tax tool for you? Check out our full CoinTracking review for a clear breakdown.

FAQ – CoinTracking, Crypto Taxes, and Practical Use

Does CoinTracking connect directly to my exchanges and wallets via API key?

Yes. CoinTracking supports read-only api key connections to many major exchanges, including Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, and others. You create restricted API keys with no withdrawal or trading permissions, then paste them into CoinTracking’s import area.

If an exchange does not support API imports, you can usually upload CSV files or enter transactions manually.

Can I use CoinTracking to fix old crypto tax years like 2017 or 2018?

Yes. CoinTracking is well suited for reconstructing older trading history if you still have exchange exports, wallet records, blockchain addresses, or partial documentation.

You can import old records, run the tax calculator for each tax year, and produce backdated tax reports for your accountant or tax authority. If the data is very incomplete, the full service team or a local tax professional may be needed.

Is CoinTracking enough on its own to file my crypto taxes?

CoinTracking can generate detailed gain/loss, income, and transaction reports, but it is not a legal advisor or tax authority.

In many countries, users can take CoinTracking reports into tax software or send them to an accountant. For high-value portfolios, DeFi, NFTs, business activity, or unclear tax laws, professional review is strongly recommended.

How accurate are CoinTracking’s reports for DeFi and NFTs?

CoinTracking supports many DeFi and NFT transaction types, including swaps, staking, liquidity pool activity, airdrops, and NFT trades.

Accuracy still depends on clean imports and correct categorization. Experimental protocols, unusual bridges, or incomplete wallet data may require manual edits before final tax report generation.

What happens if a transaction is missing or mismatched in CoinTracking?

CoinTracking includes tools to detect missing transactions, duplicate transactions, unmatched transfers, and inconsistent balances.

You can manually add or edit transaction details, re-run exchange imports, upload new import files, or contact support. Clean data is essential before you generate tax reports, because small errors can change your capital gains, income totals, or final tax bill.

The total market capitalization faces a hefty correction amid shifting macroeconomic factors and unfolding regulatory changes in the United States. While several altcoins attempted a temporary breakout over the last 24 hours, the dominant sentiment across trading desks has flipped firmly back to caution.

Major Assets Break Critical Support

The entire digital asset landscape has turned red following a failed bullish push. For traders tracking real-time asset changes, the core metrics paint a clear picture of localized panic:

• Bitcoin ($BTC): Slipped below the psychological threshold of $80,000, now actively fighting to protect a foundational floor at $78,000.
• Ethereum ($ETH): Traded down sharply, landing at $2,170.
• Binance Coin ($BNB): Declined alongside the broader market to settle at $655.
• $XRP: Retreating from its recent high velocity to rest near $1.40.

What Caused the Crypto Crash?

A crypto market correction on this scale is rarely caused by a single isolated technical indicator. In this case, a confluence of institutional profit-taking and macroeconomic headwinds triggered the unwinding of leveraged long positions. High-level data published by Bloomberg Finance indicates that a hotter-than-expected US Producer Price Index (PPI) report has reignited fears of persistent inflation, driving institutional capital away from high-risk environments and toward stablecoin structures.

Furthermore, temporary policy gridlock regarding crucial financial commission appointments in Washington has left market participants guessing about the timeline for structural regulatory clarity, adding an extra layer of structural risk to spot trading pairs.

Bitcoin Price Analysis: The $78,000 Support is the Line in the Sand

The immediate trajectory of the entire digital finance economy hinges tightly on the technical behavior of the Bitcoin price.

The Bearish Breakdown Scenario

If the aggregate selling volume pushes the daily close cleanly under the $78,000 support band, it will break a multi-week ascending structure. According to order book depth across global platforms highlighted in our crypto exchange comparison, a breakdown here will likely clear the path for an aggressive correction toward deeper liquidity pools situated between $72,000 and $74,000.

The Bullish Fakeout Scenario

Conversely, technical analysts note that this aggressive dip could easily turn into a classic institutional sweep. If whale wallets exploit the retail panic to absorb spot supply at these numbers, the entire drop could conclude as a "fakeout." A swift hourly close back above $80,000 would invalidate the immediate bearish trend, trapping over-leveraged short positions and accelerating a short-squeeze back up toward previous highs.

Crypto Price Analysis Today

Jerome Powell has officially resigned as Chairman of the Federal Reserve today, May 15, 2026. His departure ends years of restrictive monetary policy that often weighed heavily on risk assets. Stepping into the role tomorrow is Kevin Warsh, making history as the first Federal Reserve Chair to hold an openly "pro-crypto" stance. This leadership flip is being viewed by institutional investors as a massive green light for the digital asset industry.

Why Powell’s Resignation Matters

The resignation of Jerome Powell is the primary catalyst for the current market shift. Powell’s tenure was defined by a battle against inflation and a traditionalist view of the dollar. By stepping down, he makes room for a successor who understands the mechanics of decentralized finance (DeFi) and the role of Bitcoin in a modern portfolio.

Kevin Warsh: The First Pro-Crypto Chair

Kevin Warsh is not your typical central banker. As a former member of the Board of Governors and an advisor to major investment firms, Warsh has long advocated for private-sector innovation over government-controlled digital currencies.

• Pro-Innovation: Warsh has expressed a preference for stablecoins and decentralized assets over a Federal Reserve-issued CBDC.
• Bitcoin Advocacy: In past interviews with CNBC, Warsh has compared Bitcoin to "digital gold," suggesting it serves as a crucial hedge against fiscal mismanagement.
• Market Liquidity: Analysts expect Warsh to be more sensitive to market liquidity needs, which is historically bullish for the crypto news cycle and asset prices.

A Massive Bullish Flip for Crypto

The transition is already being felt across the markets. Experts suggest that a Warsh-led Fed could lead to:

• Regulatory Clarity: A shift away from "regulation by enforcement."
• Increased Institutional Adoption: Large banks may feel more comfortable offering crypto services with a sympathetic Chair at the helm.
• Favorable Interest Rate Environment: Speculation of a "dovish" tilt could weaken the dollar and send Bitcoin to new all-time highs.

The micronation honored Vitalik Buterin during ETH Prague 2026 as it continued promoting blockchain-based governance and digital citizenship.

From Cydia to ChatGPT, jailbreaking went from cracking iPhones to liberating LLMs. Here's how it works, who's doing it, and why every AI lab is losing sleep.

Rapper Drake released three new albums on Friday, and described himself on one as “a BTC crypto big-timer.”

The Bitcoin DeFi protocol is moving its assets away from LayerZero following the Kelp DAO exploit that led to the loss of $292 million.

Decentralized exchange Hyperliquid has become a popular destination for speculating on oil prices.

Ripple Chief Technology Officer Emeritus David Schwartz has thrown his financial support behind pro-crypto attorney John Deaton’s latest U.S. Senate campaign.

Veteran commodity trader Peter Brandt has a fresh warning for Solana (SOL) bulls.

Hyperliquid recently delivered one of the strongest moves in the crypto market, but now it may be losing momentum.

Ethereum ETFs have recorded the highest weekly outflow seen since January as all the days of the week saw steady withdrawals. No new capital was received during the week.

Ripple's Schwartz joins XRP Ledger Foundation; XRP secures a massive milestone; Cardano founder Hoskinson calls Clarity Act section removal insanity.

TLDR:

• CZ believes US crypto competitors lobbied against his pardon to block Binance from re-entering the American market.
• CZ wrote his book, “The Freedom of Money,” during his 76-day prison sentence under difficult and restrictive conditions.
• CZ views cryptocurrency as the most undervalued asset class and essential infrastructure for an AI-driven global economy.
• CZ regrets not separating Binance US from Binance Global earlier, saying it would have prevented major regulatory problems.

Changpeng Zhao, widely known as CZ, has spoken openly about his prison experience, his pardon process, and his outlook on the future of cryptocurrency.

In a recent interview, the Binance founder discussed writing his book, “The Freedom of Money,” during a 76-day sentence. He also addressed competitor interference during his pardon process.

CZ shared his continued belief in blockchain technology and its role in the coming AI-driven economy.

CZ Claims Competitors Interfered With His Pardon Process

CZ stated that US crypto competitors actively lobbied against his pardon. He believes they did not want Binance returning to the American market. As shared by Crypto Banter on X, this was “business competition taken to the level of personal interference.”

Crypto Banter noted on X that CZ “doesn’t have hard evidence, but he’s confident it happened.” He acknowledged he could not prove the lobbying directly. However, he remained firm in his belief that it took place.

CZ also reflected on a key business regret from his time running Binance. He said he should have separated Binance US from Binance Global from the start. That decision, he believes, would have helped avoid many regulatory complications.

Beyond legal matters, CZ described the difficult conditions inside prison. He had limited computer access and faced mental anxiety throughout his sentence. His greatest struggle, though, was the absence of his family and loved ones.

CZ Sees Crypto as the Foundation for an AI-Driven Economy

CZ continues to hold a strong belief in blockchain and cryptocurrency. He views them as foundational technologies for global finance going forward.

In his view, crypto is currently “the most undervalued asset class,” poised to become the rails for a much larger global economy.

He argues that crypto will serve as the transactional layer as AI agents become more active in finance. Without crypto infrastructure, AI-driven transactions would lack a reliable settlement layer. He described crypto as “indispensable for future transactions, especially in an AI-driven economy.”

Currently, CZ is working with Google Academy, Easy Labs, BNB Chain, and advising governments. His investment focus targets mission-driven founders with strong technical backgrounds. He is particularly interested in AI and biotech for their potential positive impact.

On personal matters, CZ emphasized the value of meaningful family time over material wealth. He spoke about raising children with drive and a sense of purpose.

His approach to wealth centers on “enabling positive impact through investments” rather than accumulating personal luxury.

The post CZ Says Crypto Rivals Lobbied Against His Pardon to Keep Binance Out of the US Market appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR

• Tehran is developing an official framework to regulate and monetize maritime passage through the Strait of Hormuz
• Access will be restricted to vessels aligned with Iranian interests; ships connected to Washington’s “Project Freedom” will be denied passage
• Major technology corporations including Google, Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon face potential charges for subsea cable infrastructure traversing the waterway
• Iranian government-affiliated outlets have suggested possible interference with cable systems if payment demands are ignored
• Earlier reports indicated Tehran might accept cryptocurrency, particularly Bitcoin, for transit fees

Tehran is positioning itself to capitalize financially on its strategic hold over the Strait of Hormuz, rolling out initiatives to extract fees from both maritime traffic and international technology corporations for passage through this vital global thoroughfare.

Ebrahim Azizi, who chairs Iran’s parliamentary committee on national security, announced over the weekend that Iranian officials have developed a “professional mechanism” to oversee maritime movement through the critical waterway. According to Azizi, details of the framework will be released in the coming period, with collection systems established for vessels utilizing the authorized shipping corridor.

The proposed route would exclusively serve commercial shipping operations and entities maintaining cooperative relations with Tehran. Azizi emphasized that access would be permanently denied to operators associated with what Iranian officials term the “freedom project”—a direct reference to former U.S. President Donald Trump’s “Project Freedom” initiative, which sought to maintain open commercial navigation through the strait. Trump suspended that operation in early May.

Maritime Tolls and Cryptocurrency Speculation

Iran has maintained an effective blockade of the Strait of Hormuz following the escalation of U.S.-Israeli military actions that commenced in late February. This closure has triggered substantial increases in international oil and natural gas prices, considering approximately twenty percent of global petroleum supplies transit through this narrow passage.

Earlier reporting this year indicated Iranian authorities were exploring cryptocurrency collection methods, particularly Bitcoin, for transit payments. Iranian state broadcasting also disclosed that European governments had initiated discussions with Revolutionary Guards naval forces regarding vessel passage arrangements, though specific countries were not identified.

Trump has categorically rejected Iranian authority over the strait and has demanded the waterway’s immediate reopening. Intelligence reports from late last week suggested Trump was evaluating expanded military options against Iran, having previously declared that the regional ceasefire was hanging by a thread.

Technology Giants Face Cable Infrastructure Charges

Beyond maritime shipping, Iranian authorities are now focusing on the subsea fiber-optic cable networks running beneath the strait. These critical infrastructure systems transmit internet traffic and financial transaction data connecting Europe, Asia, and Persian Gulf nations.

Iranian military representative Ebrahim Zolfaghari announced through social media channels that Tehran would “impose fees on internet cables.” Government-aligned media outlets indicated that corporations such as Google, Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon would be required to adhere to Iranian regulations, with submarine cable operators facing mandatory licensing payments.

Under the proposed framework, exclusive maintenance and repair authorization would be transferred to Iranian-based companies.

Questions remain regarding Iran’s enforcement capabilities. Existing U.S. economic sanctions explicitly prohibit American companies from conducting financial transactions with Iran, and several analysts suggest these announcements may represent strategic posturing rather than actionable policy.

Nevertheless, government-connected media sources have issued explicit warnings about potential infrastructure damage. Security researcher Mostafa Ahmed cautioned that any deliberate attack could precipitate a “cascading digital catastrophe” with devastating consequences for banking infrastructure, military communications networks, and internet connectivity spanning multiple continents.

According to telecommunications intelligence firm TeleGeography, two specific cables—Falcon and Gulf Bridge International—do traverse Iranian territorial waters. However, the same research organization indicated that cable systems running through the Strait of Hormuz represent less than one percent of total global international bandwidth capacity as of 2025.

Iranian officials have drawn parallels between their strategy and Egypt’s successful monetization of the Suez Canal, which generates hundreds of millions annually through cable transit fees. Legal scholars, however, point out that the two waterways operate under distinctly different international maritime law frameworks.

The post Iran Demands Payment from Tech Giants for Strait of Hormuz Internet Cables appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Takeaways

• NextEra Energy is negotiating to purchase Dominion Energy through a predominantly stock-based transaction valued at approximately $250 billion when combined
• An agreement may be unveiled as early as the coming week, according to sources cited by the Financial Times, Bloomberg, and the Wall Street Journal
• Dominion operates in Virginia, which hosts the globe’s most dense collection of data centers, with electricity demand projected to climb over 5% each year
• NextEra shares have climbed roughly 15% in 2026; Dominion has gained approximately 4% this year; both declined about 2% on Friday amid widespread market weakness
• The transaction would face scrutiny from antitrust officials and both federal and state-level energy regulatory bodies

NextEra Energy (NEE) and Dominion Energy (D) are engaged in advanced discussions regarding a transaction that has the potential to fundamentally alter America’s utility landscape. The Financial Times published the initial report on Friday, subsequently corroborated by both Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal.

NextEra Energy, Inc., NEE

The proposed arrangement is anticipated to consist primarily of equity. The merged company would achieve a total market capitalization approaching $250 billion, creating an unprecedented giant in the nation’s utility industry.

NextEra presently holds a market valuation in the neighborhood of $195–$200 billion. Dominion’s market cap stands between $50–$54 billion. NextEra shares have appreciated approximately 15% during 2026, whereas Dominion has recorded gains near 4%.

Both companies experienced declines on Friday — NEE retreated roughly 2.4%, while Dominion fell approximately 2% — consistent with widespread selling pressure across equities.

The Data Center Strategy

The business rationale behind this potential combination is relatively straightforward. Dominion’s operational footprint in northern Virginia represents the epicenter of American data center expansion. This area, frequently referred to as “data center alley,” contains the planet’s densest cluster of these critical facilities.

PJM, the regional grid management entity, has projected peak summer power consumption will expand at rates exceeding 5% annually throughout the coming decade. This magnitude of load growth represents exactly the type of demand profile utilities seek.

NextEra has previously demonstrated commitment to this market segment. The firm executed an agreement with Google in 2025 to restart a shuttered nuclear facility in Iowa dedicated to powering the technology company’s operations.

Purchasing Dominion would provide NextEra with immediate access to the geographic area where artificial intelligence infrastructure leaders — Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Google — are investing enormous capital into expanding their operations.

Regulatory Challenges Ahead

A transaction of this magnitude requires extensive approval processes. NextEra must secure clearance from competition authorities, federal energy agencies, and state regulatory commissions in Virginia and the Carolinas — territories where Dominion provides electricity to roughly 4 million residential and commercial accounts.

Dominion functions almost exclusively as a regulated utility, which constrains its ability to capture extraordinary profits from rising electricity consumption, while simultaneously ensuring consistent, forecastable revenue streams.

The current administration has demonstrated receptiveness toward large-scale corporate consolidations, which may facilitate approval on competition grounds.

NextEra currently ranks as America’s most valuable utility measured by market capitalization, worth approximately double that of the runner-up, Southern Company, which trades at roughly $104 billion.

Florida Power & Light, a NextEra subsidiary, operates as the nation’s largest electric utility measured by customer count. Incorporating Dominion would substantially expand its geographic presence along the Atlantic seaboard.

The transaction remains subject to potential collapse — both organizations have refused to provide official statements, and the Financial Times indicated negotiations could terminate before any formal announcement.

Published accounts suggest an agreement, should one materialize, might be disclosed as soon as Monday.

The post NextEra Energy (NEE) Eyes Massive $250B Dominion Energy Acquisition appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Takeaways

• The Gates Foundation Trust liquidated all remaining Microsoft holdings — 7.7 million shares valued at approximately $3.2 billion — during Q1 2026.
• Just twelve months earlier, the Trust controlled 28.5 million MSFT shares valued at $10.7 billion, representing 26% of its total portfolio.
• This divestment aligns with the Foundation’s planned dissolution strategy and its requirement for liquid capital to support philanthropic initiatives.
• Bill Gates maintains personal ownership of 103 million Microsoft shares valued at approximately $43 billion.
• MSFT shares have declined 11% year-to-date, attracting buyers like Bill Ackman while TCI Fund liquidated most of its $8 billion position.

The Gates Foundation Trust has completely divested from Microsoft. Following consistent position reduction throughout the previous year, the philanthropic organization liquidated its remaining 7.7 million shares during Q1 2026 — representing approximately $3.2 billion at prevailing market prices, per SEC documentation.

Microsoft Corporation, MSFT

This transaction concludes what stands as one of the technology sector’s most historically significant institutional investments.

Twelve months prior, the Trust maintained 28.5 million MSFT shares worth $10.7 billion, constituting 26% of the fund’s total assets. By the conclusion of 2025, this had already contracted to 7.7 million. The Q1 2026 disclosure verified complete liquidation.

Bill Gates serves as the sole trustee, while operational management responsibility lies with Cascade Asset Management. Neither organization provided commentary when contacted.

The Strategic Rationale Behind the Exit

This transaction doesn’t signal pessimism about Microsoft’s prospects. The Foundation operates under a planned 20-year dissolution timeline — a strategy Gates publicly announced previously — with complete asset distribution anticipated by that deadline.

Distributing tens of billions annually in charitable grants demands substantial liquidity. Maintaining concentrated exposure to any single equity position, regardless of quality, introduces genuine liquidity constraints and concentration vulnerabilities. The Trust operated with portfolio management discipline rather than founder sentimentality.

MSFT has experienced an 11% decline year-to-date, though underlying business metrics remain robust. The corporation reported $281 billion in trailing twelve-month revenue alongside $149 billion in operating income. Azure maintains double-digit expansion momentum.

Additionally, valuation metrics appear attractive relative to technology peers. MSFT currently trades at approximately 21x forward earnings, compared with Alphabet at 28x, Amazon at 32x, and Apple at 33x.

Current Market Dynamics Surrounding MSFT

The stock has recently attracted divergent institutional positioning. Prominent hedge fund manager Bill Ackman revealed this week he established a Microsoft position following the recent price weakness.

Conversely, TCI Fund Management — led by Chris Hohn — recently liquidated the majority of its $8 billion Microsoft stake.

While the Gates Foundation has exited, Ackman is accumulating. This contrast illuminates current market sentiment dynamics.

Gates retains direct personal ownership of 103 million Microsoft shares worth approximately $43 billion, per FactSet data. The Trust’s divestment doesn’t affect this separate holding.

The corporation maintains over $78 billion in cash and short-term investments while generating more than $73 billion in trailing free cash flow. Its AI infrastructure expansion — centered on Azure and its OpenAI collaboration — positions it strategically within enterprise artificial intelligence expenditure trends.

Microsoft’s Q1 2026 13F regulatory filing documented the Trust’s position reduction to zero. This represents the latest available information regarding this development.

The post Gates Foundation Dumps Entire Microsoft (MSFT) Position — What It Really Means appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Highlights

• ZETA shares climbed more than 4% to reach $17.60 on Friday, marking the highest trading level since May 7 following the Snowflake Open Semantic Exchange (OSI) partnership announcement
• First quarter 2026 revenue reached $396 million, representing a 50% increase year-over-year and extending the company’s streak to 19 consecutive quarters of beating and raising guidance
• The super-scaled customer base expanded 19% YoY to reach 189 clients, while average revenue per user (ARPU) climbed to $1.7 million
• Adjusted EBITDA increased 42% YoY to $66 million; operational cash flow jumped 43% to reach $50 million
• Analyst consensus price target stands at $28.33, suggesting approximately 64% potential upside from current trading levels

Shares of Zeta Global (ZETA) advanced over 4% during Friday’s trading session, climbing to $17.60 — the stock’s strongest performance since May 7 — following the company’s announcement of its participation in Snowflake’s Open Semantic Exchange (OSI). Trading volume exceeded 6.9 million shares, slightly below the three-month average daily volume of approximately 8 million.

Zeta Global Holdings Corp., ZETA

The Open Semantic Exchange represents a universal framework aimed at standardizing disparate data definitions through an open, vendor-agnostic semantic architecture. For Zeta Global, this integration represents a strategic alignment of its AI-powered marketing platform with a unified data infrastructure — a critical component given the company’s emphasis on data-driven intelligence solutions for clients.

Additional momentum came from anticipation of the JPMorgan Global Technology, Media, and Communications Conference scheduled for Monday, where Zeta Global is slated to present alongside companies including DigitalOcean, Lattice Semiconductor, IMAX, and Outfront Media.

Robust First Quarter Results Support Bull Case

The OSI partnership announcement and conference participation follow Zeta Global’s impressive Q1 2026 financial results released on April 30, which represented the company’s 19th consecutive quarter of exceeding expectations and raising forward guidance. Revenue totaled $396 million, reflecting a substantial 50% year-over-year increase. This growth trajectory demonstrates accelerating demand for the company’s AI marketing cloud platform.

Operational cash flow increased 43% to $50 million, while adjusted EBITDA expanded 42% to reach $66 million. Nine out of ten industry verticals served by Zeta demonstrated growth during the quarter.

The Marigold acquisition has exceeded initial expectations, according to Needham analysts. Additionally, the company’s Athena AI solution secured its largest contract to date, a development highlighted by RBC Capital when they elevated their price target from $27 to $29 on May 1.

Management increased full-year revenue projections by $30 million, setting the midpoint at $1.785 billion. RBC Capital believes this guidance may be conservative considering the early momentum generated by Athena.

Client Base Expansion Continues

The super-scaled customer segment — representing Zeta Global’s highest-tier clients — grew 19% year-over-year to total 189, marking the sixth consecutive quarter of sequential expansion. Average revenue per user advanced to $1.7 million, up 21% from the prior year period.

Looking ahead, the company has established a long-term revenue target of $2.3 billion by 2028, compared to the projected $1.785 billion anticipated for the current year. The company forecasts adjusted EBITDA will reach $573 million by 2028, with free cash flow expected to hit $371 million.

On the analyst front, multiple firms including B. Riley, Royal Bank of Canada, KeyCorp, and Goldman Sachs have issued upgrades or reaffirmed positive ratings. Needham maintained its Buy rating on May 1 with a $25 price objective.

The Street consensus price target currently stands at $28.33 — representing approximately 64% upside from ZETA’s current trading price.

From a technical perspective, the stock is trading between support at $14.60 and resistance at $19.40, attempting to break above its 50-day exponential moving average and the 50% Fibonacci retracement level. A decisive move above $19.40 could establish a path toward $25, based on technical chart patterns.

The post Zeta Global (ZETA) Stock Surges 4% Following Snowflake OSI Partnership Announcement appeared first on Blockonomi.

The major streak that began at the beginning of the month for the spot XRP ETFs continued in the past week, as investors poured in over $60 million in net inflows for the first time in several months.

At the same time, the underlying asset tried to break out again, only to be stopped at a familiar resistance and driven south to its starting position.

Ripple ETFs on a Roll

After their highly successful first couple of months following their debut, the spot Ripple (XRP) ETFs disappeared from investors’ radar for a while in early 2026, perhaps due to the growing global and industry uncertainty and falling prices. March became the first month to end with more outflows than inflows, but that trend quickly reversed in April.

May’s start has been even more impressive. Data from SoSoValue shows that investors have already poured in more net inflows that have surpassed the $81.59 million for April, with nearly $95 million for May. This became possible after a very solid week, in which the net inflows stood at $60.50 million (more than the entire month of February).

This was the ETFs’ most impressive week since the one that ended December 26. The cumulative net inflows hit a new all-time high at $1.39 billion, according to SoSoValue.

Interestingly, Bitwise’s XRP fund has surpassed Canary Capital’s XRPC, which was the first one to see the light of day. The former now has $460 million in net inflows, while the latter trails with $444 million.

XRP Breakout Halted (Again)

Perhaps driven by the impressive inflows, the improving market conditions (up to a point), and the CLARITY Act’s progress in the US Senate, the underlying asset tried to break out mid-week and surged to $1.55 on Thursday for the first time since March.

However, its run came to a quick and painful end, and the subsequent rejection drove it south to just under $1.40 yesterday. Moreover, XRP lost its fourth spot in terms of market cap to BNB, even though it has rebounded slightly to $1.42 as of press time.

Nevertheless, analysts remain optimistic about its future, especially when it comes to XRP’s long-term perspective. EGRAG CRYPTO, for instance, outlined the major resistance levels the token has to reclaim to restart the bull run that can take it to new all-time highs.

The post Ripple ETFs Record Best Week Since December: So Why Is XRP Still Failing? appeared first on CryptoPotato.

After dumping to $60,000 during the early February crash, bitcoin rebounded swiftly and jumped to almost $83,000 a week ago, posting a massive 38% increase. This caused many analysts to speculate whether the bear market had ended.

However, the price action in the past few days has been contradictory, and BTC slipped to a two-week low of $78,000 yesterday. Analysts are not so convinced now that the bottom is in, and here are some of their warning shots.

P/L at High Levels

Ali Martinez brought up the average trader’s realized profit margin, which has reached 17%. He believes this is a “major warning sign” as the metric has hit its highest level since October 2025, shortly before the massive crash that wiped out over $19 billion in leveraged positions and was the beginning of a prolonged downtrend that culminated (for now) with a 53% drop from $126,000 to $60,000. He explained that since the average investor is now sitting on substantial gains, they might be “looking to exit.”

“What stands out to me is the historical context. The last time profit margins hit 17% while Bitcoin was testing its 200-day moving average as resistance was in March 2022.

That specific alignment signaled the exact moment the local top was in before the downtrend resumed in earnest.”

Doctor Profit Still Bearish

One of the few analysts who hasn’t changed their perspective on the current market environment is Doctor Profit. His bearish predictions began around the October 2025 peak, and, as his latest post shows, he has been putting his money where his mouth is, shorting the cryptocurrency from $120,000.

Moreover, the analyst warned a week ago that the rebound to $80,000 might be another bear trap. His new bearish targets are a drop to $50,000 or even lower if the broader macro conditions worsen.

In his latest post, he warned once again that most traders are “not ready for what’s coming.” The chart above doubles down on a path toward $50,000.

$BTC: No one is ready for whats coming , the current status is as follow:

1. Short from 120k
2. Long from 71k (30% Closed)
3. Long from 75k (30% Closed)
4. Shorts accumulated at 82k (30%)
5. Remaining short orders active (70%)

Again, most not ready for whats coming pic.twitter.com/oB5N0aTK7m

— Doctor Profit (@DrProfitCrypto) May 16, 2026

History to Be Invalidated

Rekt Capital also weighed in on whether BTC might have bottomed during this cycle, but seemed highly skeptical. The analyst noted that if investors believe BTC won’t go below $60,000, then they must believe in the following:

– The Bear Market has shortened to just 1/3 of the usual time it takes for Bitcoin to bottom

– That there has been a drastic shallowing across Bear Market corrections by ~25% (whereas the historical difference in shallowing across Bear Cycles has been up to ~10%)

– The previous Bull Market never ended, that price is currently recovering from a Bull Market correction and that the previous Bull Cycle has lengthened by over 200 days

If bitcoin has indeed bottomed, which doesn’t seem to be the case according to Rekt Capital’s estimations, then the long-standing principles of BTC market cycles have been invalidated, which is “probabilistically unlikely until proven otherwise,” the analyst concluded.

The post 3 Major Warning Signs Suggest Bitcoin’s Bottom Is Still Not In appeared first on CryptoPotato.

A federal financial disclosure filed by Donald Trump on May 14 shows his portfolio purchased shares of MARA Holdings, Coinbase, and Strategy between January and March 2026.

Out of more than 3,600 transactions listed across 113 pages, those three were the only crypto-related names in the entire filing.

What the Filing Actually Shows

The document in question is an OGE Form 278-T, the type of periodic transaction report that senior government officials are required to file, with the MARA purchase appearing at line 1106, dated March 30, 2026, in the $15,001 to $50,000 range.

Normally, the form does not disclose exact dollar amounts for individual transactions, only brackets. Furthermore, the filing noted that the holdings are managed by a third-party financial institution, not by Trump directly, which matters when reading anything into the selections.

That caveat aside, the composition of the crypto slices is worth paying attention to. MARA Holdings is the largest publicly traded Bitcoin miner in the United States by market cap. Coinbase is the dominant US crypto exchange and one of the few crypto companies with a long trading history as a public company. Strategy holds more Bitcoin on its balance sheet than any other publicly traded firm.

These are not obscure picks, but rather, they are three of the most recognizable institutional proxies for Bitcoin exposure available on US exchanges.

The Trump family also bought shares in Nvidia, whose CEO Jensen Huang was part of the entourage that accompanied the president on his first visit to China since 2017. Records also show they put money in Microsoft, Oracle, and Boeing, spending between $1 million and $5 million on those stocks.

Trump-Linked Crypto Ventures Under Scrutiny

The US president’s financial ties to the crypto industry have been under scrutiny for some time now, with one of them, American Bitcoin, a mining company backed by his family members, reporting an $82 million net loss in Q1 2026 despite mining a record 817 BTC during that period.

CEO Mike Ho framed it as an accounting issue rather than an operational one.

Meanwhile, World Liberty Financial has had a rougher run. Its native WLFI token hit an all-time low late last month after a 16% single-day drop, with the asset trading around $0.05 at the time, well below its peak near $0.33.

The project has faced additional pressure from a lawsuit by Tron founder Justin Sun and a Wall Street Journal report linking one of its partners to individuals sanctioned by the US Treasury in connection with alleged fraud operations in Southeast Asia.

Further, yesterday, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren asked the SEC to investigate World Liberty, accusing it of misleading investors and/or violating securities laws when it recently borrowed $75 million using WLFI as collateral.

The post Trump Adds Coinbase and Bitcoin Stocks to Portfolio appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Bitcoin’s recent recovery attempt appears to be losing momentum as the market once again received notable rejection below the $80K mark. The repeated inability to sustain gains above key thresholds suggests sellers remain dominant, increasing the likelihood of another corrective phase in the short term.

Bitcoin Price Analysis: The Daily Chart

On the daily timeframe, BTC recently experienced a slight bullish pullback following its rebound from the $78K support zone. However, this recovery rally was ultimately rejected around the critical $80K resistance region, which also aligns with the descending 200-day moving average near the $82K mark. The confluence of these resistance levels reinforces their significance and highlights persistent bearish sentiment across the market.

The rejection from this area suggests buyers are still unable to reclaim higher ground, while sellers continue defending overhead supply aggressively. As long as Bitcoin remains capped below the $80K-$82K region, the probability of an expanded bearish retracement remains elevated. In this scenario, the first major downside target would be the highlighted demand zone around $75K-$76K. A deeper correction could eventually expose lower support levels.

BTC/USDT 4-Hour Chart

The lower timeframe provides further confirmation of weakening momentum. Bitcoin recently broke below a key ascending trendline that had supported the latest recovery phase. More importantly, the subsequent pullback toward this broken trendline resulted in another rejection, effectively validating the initial bearish breakout.

This classic breakdown-and-retest structure often signals continuation in the breakout direction, suggesting sellers remain in control. If bearish pressure persists, Bitcoin may continue declining toward the first important order block around the $75K-$76K region. Failure to hold this support could accelerate selling activity and expose the broader demand zone around $70K-$71K, which previously served as a strong accumulation area.

Sentiment Analysis

The Coinbase Premium Gap measures the price difference between Bitcoin traded on Coinbase and other major exchanges, particularly Binance. Since Coinbase activity is heavily associated with US institutional and spot investors, this metric is commonly used to gauge demand from American participants. Positive values typically indicate stronger spot buying pressure, while negative readings often reflect weaker demand or increased selling activity.

Recently, the indicator has fallen below the neutral 0 line once again, creating a negative premium gap. This shift implies that demand from US-based investors is fading, while selling pressure or cautious positioning is increasing. Historically, sustained negative readings have often aligned with corrective phases or periods of weak momentum.

If the Coinbase Premium Gap remains below zero in the coming weeks, it could further reinforce the bearish technical structure already observed on the charts, increasing the likelihood of continued downside pressure toward lower support regions.

The post Bitcoin Price Analysis: What Does the Rejection at $80K Mean for BTC’s Future? appeared first on CryptoPotato.

The Senate Banking Committee voted 15-9 on Thursday to move forward on the CLARITY Act, a crypto market structure proposal that has been the subject of debate for a while now.

Nevertheless, just ahead of the vote, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) put out a series of tweets on X about illicit crypto flows hitting $154 billion in 2025, adding another dimension to what was already an intensely debated topic on the extent of regulation in digital assets.

Bank Advocates Lean on Crime Data

The timing of BPI’s thread drew attention because lawmakers were simultaneously debating amendments tied to stablecoin yield restrictions and enforcement standards inside the CLARITY Act markup session.

According to data from Chainalysis that the institute shared, in 2025, illicit crypto addresses received $154 billion. This was a 162% year-over-year increase, driven largely by a 694% jump in value received by sanctioned entities.

Furthermore, the on-chain money laundering ecosystem grew from $10 billion in 2020 to over $82 billion in 2025, with stablecoins, primarily Tether (USDT), now accounting for 84% of all illicit transaction volume, displacing Bitcoin as the preferred payment method for criminals.

In a separate piece, the BPI argued that banks have spent decades staffing tens of thousands of AML employees while crypto companies have been largely exempt.

It said that the GENIUS Act imposed some obligations on US stablecoin issuers, but did not cover foreign issuers operating stateside. Tether, incorporated in El Salvador, sits outside that net.

The piece also cited the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, whose crypto activity reportedly reached over $3 billion in 2025, representing roughly 50% of Iran’s total crypto ecosystem by Q4 of that year.

According to the BPI, unhosted wallets, cross-chain bridges, and mixers are “specifically designed to frustrate tracing and openly advertised as such.”

The stablecoin debate has become one of the most contentious parts of the CLARITY Act negotiations, with banking groups, including members of the American Bankers Association, spending weeks lobbying senators to tighten language restricting yield-bearing stablecoins.

As CryptoPotato reported earlier this week, banking groups sent Senate offices more than 8,000 letters ahead of the markup vote, while the crypto advocacy group Stand With Crypto said its supporters had contacted lawmakers nearly 1.5 million times in support of the bill.

But despite more than 40 amendments proposed by Senator Elizabeth Warren and procedural disputes during the hearing, the legislation advanced with support from Democratic senators Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks.

The Counter-Argument

While the BPI is demanding stricter anti-money laundering laws and sanctions regulations to be applied to crypto the same way it has been done to the traditional banking sector, data shared by Binance Research on May 14, offered some pushback to its claims.

According to Binance, trapped illicit funds on-chain have grown every year because less is being successfully laundered, not more.

Their report showed that more exit points are being blocked by KYC and more balances are being frozen by stablecoin issuers. Even the largest mixers have been processing at most $10 million per day.

The post CLARITY Act Clears Committee, But Money Laundering Question Hovers Over Crypto appeared first on CryptoPotato.