The shift in production locations highlights the complex interplay of tariffs, cost management, and strategic supply chain decisions in North America.
The post US manufacturers shift production to Canada to cut costs by 30% appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
The US stake in Venezuela's oil reshapes global energy dynamics, challenging China's influence and potentially stabilizing US energy prices.
The post Trump administration secures stake in Venezuela’s oil industry, complicating China’s strategy appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Dangote's IPO could redefine African capital markets, showcasing private sector capability in large-scale infrastructure projects amid inherent risks.
The post Dangote seeks $1.5B in IPO for Africa’s largest refinery, plans to double capacity appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Ethereum's reduced post-quantum verification costs enhance scalability and security, paving the way for broader adoption of advanced cryptographic standards.
The post Ethereum’s post-quantum signature verification cost drops 6.6x appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
The Fed's perceived shift from a strict 2% inflation target could reshape market expectations, influencing investment strategies and economic policies.
The post JPMorgan strategist claims Fed has surrendered on 2% inflation appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Dips Below $80,000 on Strong US Jobs Report
Bitcoin slid Friday after a better-than-expected labor report showed that the U.S. job market accelerated in August.
The leading cryptocurrency was recently trading for close to $79,764 after dropping as low as $78,706 earlier in the morning in New York. It’s currently down over 1% over a 24-hour period. On Thursday, the coin soared above $82,000.
The Federal Reserve is typically more likely to raise interest rates when the labor market is strong, because more people employed means more spending, and more spending can push inflation up.
Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh last week gave his first major speech as head of the U.S. central bank and said he had “more work to do” to fight inflation. Bitcoin has typically done well in a low-interest rate environment.
Traders currently view a U.S. Federal Reserve interest rate hike at the upcoming September 15–16 policy meeting as roughly a 50% to 60% probability.
But U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday demanded the Federal Reserve slash interest rates.
Writing on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump said: “Lower the interest rates because the U.S.A. is a much stronger credit than it was just a short time ago!”
He added: “We should have the LOWEST RATE of any country in the World, like ‘the old days.'”
Bitcoin has decoupled from stocks recently as investors have renewed concerns around dollar debasement.
The cryptocurrency started surging last month, after the U.S. Treasury Department said it would more than double the size of its government debt repurchases. The coin had its best run in three years and third best August ever.
The much-talked about debasement trade is back in the spotlight, and bitcoin has been trading in lockstep with gold, according to analysts. The so-called debasement trade is when investors buy an asset as a way to hedge against a currency losing value.
News dropped last month that U.S. public debt exceeded $40 trillion for the first time too. Excessive debt also undermines confidence in the dollar, making assets like bitcoin and gold attractive.
This post Bitcoin Dips Below $80,000 on Strong US Jobs Report first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.
Bitcoin Magazine

National Sheriffs’ Association Drops Opposition to Clarity Act
The National Sheriffs’ Association this week dropped its opposition to the crypto Clarity Act, after having previously warned that the proposed bill could help criminals.
Writing Thursday to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, the association said it was changing its stance to neutral given how complex the issue is.
A number of lawmakers were hoping to vote on the Clarity Act in August. After a delay, a vote will now go ahead this month. The bill will establish a framework for distinguishing between digital assets that are securities, commodities or payment stablecoins — legislation that the crypto industry has long called for.
“Given the complexity of the legislation and the number of important details that remain under consideration, the NSA is changing its position on the Clarity Act to neutral,” the letter from NSA President Sheriff Troy Wellman and Executive Director Justin Smith read.
“At this time, we believe the most appropriate course is to step back and allow the legislative process to proceed to establish a clear, effective, and much needed regulatory framework.”
The NSA had previously warned that the bill could create regulatory and anti-money laundering loopholes by exempting certain crypto developers and infrastructure providers from money transmitter rules.
Despite being passed in the house of representatives last year with strong bipartisan support, the Clarity Act has been in a deadlock for much of 2026. The banking lobby raised concerns over stablecoin yield and some lawmakers have said improvements need to be made surrounding ethics.
An updated bill of the Clarity Act was introduced in July that addressed some of these concerns — banning government officials and their families from issuing or promoting crypto.
Pro-crypto senator Cynthia Lummis wrote on Friday that the “bipartisan bill” gives “law enforcement real tools to fight the illicit finance crimes hurting hard working Americans.”
Major financial institutions, lawmakers and companies have said they support the latest draft of the new bill, but some Republicans have accused Democratic lawmakers of deliberately playing politics and holding the bill back.
This post National Sheriffs’ Association Drops Opposition to Clarity Act first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.
Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Bear Market May Not Yet Be Over, Says Fidelity
Bitcoin may be rallying but that doesn’t mean the bear market is over. Not yet, anyway.
A new report from asset manager Fidelity said that while bitcoin was behaving like it did in previous cycles, it could still hit a bottom in November.
Bitcoin started rallying in mid-August after the U.S. Treasury Department said it would more than double the size of its government debt repurchases. The asset’s price recently stood at close to $81,639, up nearly 30% over a 30-day period.
Some have since argued that bitcoin is out of its bear market. The coin touched a record high in October last year, hitting $126,080.
“Given bitcoin’s recent performance, the bottom could already have occurred in July,” Chris Kuiper, Vice President of Research at Fidelity Digital Assets, wrote.
“It could also drop again to make another new low in November or later,” he continued, adding that bitcoin cycles have historically not been precisely four years long, so they “aren’t reliable for timing the market.”
Throughout most of June and July, bitcoin’s volatility was particularly muted, and the coin traded below $65,000.
But that all changed in August after the Treasury Department’s announcement, which has since brought the so-called debasement trade back in the picture again.
To get an idea of where bitcoin moves next, Kuiper argued that investors should pay attention to what happens with the crypto Clarity Act. Proponents argue it could provide “greater regulatory certainty and support continued innovation in the U.S. digital asset ecosystem,” he wrote.
President Donald Trump in August urged lawmakers to get the long-awaited crypto market structure bill over the line, helping spur bitcoin’s run. The president called the draft “very, very powerful” after meeting with crypto industry bigwigs at the White House.
The digital asset industry has long called for clear rules on how regulators should treat bitcoin, stablecoins and other cryptocurrencies.
Lawmakers will vote on the bill this month.
This post Bitcoin Bear Market May Not Yet Be Over, Says Fidelity first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.
Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin-Gold Correlation Hits Six-Year High as Debasement Fears Mount
Bitcoin’s correlation with gold is at its highest in six years as investors increasingly look for ways to hedge against currency debasement.
That’s according to a new report from Bitwise, which this week pointed out that the precious metal and leading cryptocurrency are trading in lockstep because the U.S. government has “materially intervened in the macro picture.”
Bitcoin started surging last month, after the U.S. Treasury Department said it would more than double the size of its government debt repurchases. The coin had its best run in three years and third best August ever.
“The last time the bitcoin-gold correlation was that high was in 2020, following the rounds of fiscal and monetary stimulus during the Covid crisis,” Bitwise’s European Head of Research, André Dragosch, wrote.
He added that bitcoin’s correlation with the stock market dropped to a one-year low, “implying some kind of decoupling between hard assets and the stock market.”
Bitcoin has been pushed as “digital gold” for years but has sometimes traded with tech stocks as a “risk-on” asset.
But the so-called debasement trade — when investors buy an asset as a way to hedge against a currency losing value — was a much-talked about investment strategy last year and appears to be back.
The reason is down to the government intervening in markets, Dragosch argued. When the Treasury said it would try to rein in long-term borrowing costs, the dollar’s value slid and sent investors flooding back to gold — and bitcoin.
The Treasury the same week also said the U.S. public debt exceeded $40 trillion for the first time. Excessive debt also undermines confidence in the dollar.
“Investors are no longer asking whether to hedge currency debasement with gold or bitcoin. They’re simply hedging with both,” the report added.
“Bitcoin spent its first fifteen years being priced as a risk asset. If this correlation trend with gold holds, the next fifteen may look very different.”
The leading cryptocurrency again rallied this week, and was recently trading for close to $81,438 after jumping nearly 6% over a 24-hour period.
This post Bitcoin-Gold Correlation Hits Six-Year High as Debasement Fears Mount first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.
Bitcoin Magazine

French Hill Eyes Bipartisan Path for Clarity Act Ahead of September Vote
U.S. congressman French Hill expressed the importance of bipartisan support to get the long-awaited crypto market structure bill, the Clarity Act, over the line before the midterms.
The lawmaker told Fox Business Thursday that Democrats and Republicans have come to “narrow their differences in getting the bill drafted.
Pro-crypto lawmakers were hoping the Clarity Act passed before Congress departed for August recess. After a delay, a vote will now go ahead on September 15.
“Can Democrats work with Republicans and make sure America leads the world in distributed ledger technology and financial services?” Hill said.
“This one remaining significant issue is the ethics provision, and that is best solved by passing the legislation because everybody — no matter what family they belong to, the Trumps or not — would then be under a regulatory framework fully scrutinized by the United States government in commodity and securities and banking regulators,” he added.
The Clarity Act was first introduced by Hill, the House Financial Services Chairman, last year.
Crypto companies have long called for clear regulations for the industry. The Clarity Act drafts a framework to formally divide oversight between regulators, distinguishing which digital assets are securities, commodities or stablecoins.
The House of Representatives passed the bill last July but it has been stalled this year, mostly because the banking lobby clashed with crypto companies over paying customers stablecoin yield.
A new draft tackling the issue of ethics started circulating in July. It bans government officials from promoting or making money from crypto — something Democrats have criticized the Trump family for doing.
A group of Democrats said the bill fell short and wanted amendments. Some were accused of deliberately holding it back by Republicans like Cynthia Lummis.
Some have praised the bipartisan work that has already gone into the bill, namely Coinbase, America’s biggest crypto exchange. The company’s Chief Policy Officer, Faryar Shirzad, said in July that while some Democratic lawmakers were holding back the long-awaited legislation, younger Democrats wanted to pass it.
President Donald Trump in August said that in order for the U.S. to remain the “undisputed leader in Bitcoin and crypto,” lawmakers had to pass the “very, very powerful legislation.”
This post French Hill Eyes Bipartisan Path for Clarity Act Ahead of September Vote first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Mathew Di Salvo.
A Michigan judge has placed prediction-market exchange Kalshi under a preliminary injunction that keeps its sports event contracts fenced off from people in the state until the court issues a final order. The ruling moves the dispute beyond a short-term restraint and into an open-ended compliance regime.
Kalshi calls the products federally regulated event contracts, while Michigan treats the covered sports products as internet sports betting subject to state licensing. That classification fight explains why the order is more than routine sportsbook enforcement and why its reach is contested.
The Sept. 1 order bars Kalshi and people acting with it from offering or facilitating covered internet sports-betting contracts for anyone located in Michigan. It also reaches deposits, advertising and solicitation, account access, and functionally similar sports-betting products in the state.
Kalshi must use a third-party geolocation provider licensed by the Michigan Gaming Control Board and capable of meeting the regulator’s geofencing specifications. If the court finds Kalshi failed to comply with that requirement, the order directs the company to pay $500,000 for each day of noncompliance.

The injunction also reaches intermediaries that can give customers access to Kalshi’s exchange. Within three business days after the order was entered, Kalshi must send a copy and contact details for Michigan’s counsel to every futures commission merchant that makes its sports event contracts available to customers. The order does not hold Kalshi liable for an FCM’s later action or inaction after notice.
The new order is the next procedural stage after a temporary restraining order whose initial stated term was 14 days. The Michigan Gaming Control Board said that the June measure carried a $120,000 daily noncompliance penalty. The preliminary injunction raises the stated geolocation-specific penalty to $500,000 per day and remains effective until a final order in the case.
That duration does not make the ruling a final judgment. The judge found at this stage that Michigan and its residents would face immediate and irreparable harm without relief, based on harms the state alleged were tied to unlicensed sports products. Whether Michigan ultimately proves its allegations remains unresolved. WILX reported on Sept. 2 that Kalshi had not released a statement about that week’s ruling.
Michigan’s order applies only inside the state. It gives Michigan enforcement control for now without settling Kalshi’s key federal defense: that the Commodity Exchange Act leaves regulation of its federally registered market to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
In April, the Third Circuit found Kalshi had a reasonable chance of showing that federal law preempts New Jersey’s enforcement effort and preserved preliminary protection for the exchange. On Aug. 28, the Ninth Circuit reached the other side of the dispute in Nevada, holding that Kalshi had not shown preemption for its sports event contracts.
The CFTC has argued that it has exclusive jurisdiction over prediction markets offered on designated contract markets. Michigan’s injunction does not resolve that national conflict. It instead adds another state-specific restriction while the appellate split leaves operators, regulators and intermediaries facing different rules across jurisdictions.
The post Kalshi faces $500,000 daily fines as Michigan forces sports event contracts offline appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Japan’s 30-year government-bond auction cleared at a 4.079% average yield on Sept. 3, underscoring a tougher backdrop for future capital raised by Metaplanet to buy Bitcoin. The long bond is a market signal; the nearer test for the company is the price of shorter-tenor debt and refinancing.
The average yield rose 14.2 basis points from 3.937% at the previous 30-year auction on Aug. 6. Japan’s Sept. 1 10-year auction averaged 2.995%, placing the 4% threshold at the long end rather than across the entire curve. The Bank of Japan, meanwhile, maintains an operating guideline of around 1% for the uncollateralized overnight call rate.
Metaplanet’s existing fixed obligations retain their contractual cash flows. Its ¥8 billion 20th-series ordinary bond is zero-coupon and matures on April 23, 2027, while its inaugural BitBonds carry fixed coupons. The shift in Japanese yields instead raises the benchmark for future issuance and refinancing.
That leaves a narrower version of Metaplanet’s funding advantage intact. The bilateral zero-coupon bond protects near-term cash flow, but repeating such favorable terms at the scale required for sustained Bitcoin purchases remains uncertain.
Metaplanet’s inaugural 21st through 24th-series BitBonds total ¥200 million, pay fixed coupons ranging from roughly 4.0% to 4.3%, and mature in about three years. Recent government auctions cleared at average yields of 1.708% for two-year debt and 2.163% for five-year debt.
A straight-line interpolation between those official results produces an estimated three-year sovereign benchmark of 1.8597%. The estimate is an analytical tenor comparison rather than a traded three-year quote or a cash-flow duration calculation.
Against it, the inaugural BitBonds pay an estimated premium of about 214 to 244 basis points. Future coupons would rise if the sovereign benchmark increased while Metaplanet’s credit spread stayed constant. A wider credit spread would add further pressure.
The bond terms explain why investors may require that premium. The BitBonds are unrated, unsecured and unguaranteed senior obligations. They carry transfer restrictions, and secondary-market liquidity is unassured. Metaplanet has said later series may differ in maturity and interest rate according to market conditions and investor demand.
Existing instruments face a different equation. Higher rates can affect their market value, while the stated coupon and principal cash flows remain fixed. The company’s 20th-series ordinary bond funded Bitcoin purchases before all expected cash arrived from its 27th-series stock acquisition rights. Part of the warrant proceeds was designated to repay the bond, allowing Metaplanet to bring forward funding without an annual coupon bill.
Metaplanet was already drawing on several channels at midyear. At June 30, it reported 43,000 BTC, $414 million drawn from a $500 million Bitcoin-collateralized credit facility, ¥67.486 billion of short-term borrowings, ¥8 billion of bonds due within one year and ¥1.805 billion of first-half interest expense.
Second-quarter Bitcoin purchases used proceeds from the 20th-series bond, the credit facility, the 27th-series rights and Bitcoin-income revenue. This mix kept purchases moving while mNAV remained below 1.0x for most of the half and the company made no discretionary common-share allotments during the quarter. The funding inventory therefore separates into two parts: fixed structures protect current economics, while each new round of capital faces prevailing market terms.
The inaugural BitBond issue is too small to transform Metaplanet’s economics. At 4.15%, the midpoint of its coupon range, annual interest on ¥200 million is about ¥8.3 million, equivalent to roughly 0.07% of the company’s ¥11.4 billion full-year operating-profit forecast.
The same rate applied to larger illustrative programs produces a different result:
| Illustrative BitBond principal | Annual interest at 4.15% | Share of ¥11.4bn operating-profit forecast |
|---|---|---|
| ¥200 million | ¥8.3 million | About 0.07% |
| ¥10 billion | ¥415 million | About 3.6% |
| ¥100 billion | ¥4.15 billion | About 36.4% |

The ¥10 billion and ¥100 billion rows are sensitivities rather than issuance forecasts. They show why the ability to expand the program at acceptable rates matters more than the first tranche’s small coupon bill.
A one-percentage-point increase on an illustrative ¥100 billion program would add ¥1 billion to annual interest. At an assumed Bitcoin purchase price of ¥12.5 million, that amount equals 80 BTC a year when the additional interest comes entirely from cash otherwise available for accumulation.
Metaplanet could instead meet the expense through operating cash flow or another financing source. The 80 BTC figure applies only to the stated price and cash-use assumptions. Its purpose is to translate a rate move into the company’s capacity to add Bitcoin for each share outstanding.
The balance-sheet effect grows faster than the headline drama. A 4.079% 30-year sovereign yield changes little about a ¥200 million BitBond issue. A large future debt program near the current coupon range would consume a meaningful portion of forecast operating profit before any additional rise in the benchmark or credit spread.
The 27th-series rights generally may be exercised only when company-notified mNAV is at least 1.01x. No rights were exercised in August. At Aug. 31, 947,300 rights representing 94.73 million potential shares remained, equal to about 7.0% of the company’s 1.345 billion issued shares.
That leaves a material but conditional dilution overhang. If the mNAV threshold prevents exercise, warrant-funded Bitcoin purchases may stall and the proceeds intended partly for repaying the zero-coupon bond arrive more slowly. If the threshold is satisfied and exercises resume, Metaplanet gains funding while existing holders absorb more shares.
The company also held authority to repurchase as many as 150 million shares for up to ¥75 billion through Oct. 28. It bought zero shares in August and zero cumulatively under that authorization through Aug. 31, leaving buybacks absent from the period’s offset to potential dilution.
For the first half, Metaplanet’s issuer-defined measure of Bitcoin holdings per 1,000 fully diluted shares increased 9.6% to 0.0263554 BTC. The reported funding mix was accretive over that period. Future accretion becomes harder as debt principal expands, coupons rise or more rights convert into shares.
Japan’s Sept. 3 auction therefore tests Metaplanet’s funding advantage at the margin. The zero-coupon bridge preserves the clearest benefit on existing terms, and the BitBond program demonstrates access to fixed-rate yen debt at a meaningful premium over a comparable sovereign tenor. The next funding round’s price and scale will determine how much of that advantage continues to reach Bitcoin per share.
The post Japan’s 4% bond yield spike threatens the low-cost borrowing strategy behind corporate Bitcoin buying appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Arthur Hayes has a new market alarm for crypto traders: EUR/JPY. The pair has started to fall, yet the Federal Reserve channels that would turn currency stress into dollar liquidity remain dormant.
The European Central Bank's reference rate fell from 185.63 yen per euro on Sept. 1 to 181.21 on Sept. 3, a 2.38% drop. Hayes says a fall to 140 or below by June 2027 would herald a much larger increase in dollar liquidity. The latest reading still sits 29.4% above that threshold.
That distance is crucial. The exchange rate is only the first link in a sequence that runs through French sovereign and bank funding, foreign central bank dollar borrowing at the Fed, and Fed purchases of Treasury securities. Current official data show vulnerability in France, but the rest of Hayes's proposed chain has yet to activate.
In his Sept. 2 essay “Atención,” Hayes argued that political and financial pressure in France would weaken the euro while Japanese capital repatriation strengthened the yen. A falling EUR/JPY would warn that French banks were nearing stress in sovereign and dollar repo markets.
Hayes then looks to two different Fed tools. The FIMA repo facility allows approved foreign monetary authorities to raise dollars temporarily against Treasuries. Reserve-management purchases, known as RMPs, add short-dated Treasury securities to the Fed's portfolio to maintain an ample supply of bank reserves.
In his scenario, those channels expand the supply of dollars and ultimately support risk assets. Hayes kept a structural Bitcoin long and reiterated a $10,000 Ether target for the end of 2026. Those positions depend on the proposed mechanism and provide no confirmation that it has started.
The public scorecard makes the gap visible:
| Link in the thesis | Current reading | Signal that would strengthen the case |
|---|---|---|
| EUR/JPY breaks lower | 181.21 on Sept. 3, down from 185.63 on Sept. 1 | A sustained move toward 140 would validate the currency leg alone |
| French funding stress spreads | Higher sovereign yields and known repo vulnerabilities alongside a covered OAT auction and resilient aggregate bank-liquidity measures | Disorderly sovereign funding, weaker bank liquidity or funding data, and evidence of French banks retreating from repo markets |
| FIMA supplies emergency dollars | $0 outstanding in the latest H.4.1 release | A positive and rising foreign-official repo balance |
| Fed Treasury buying accelerates | No RMPs scheduled for the current monthly window | Renewed purchases tied to persistent reserve or market pressure rather than routine portfolio reinvestment |
| Crypto responds | Research supports broad sensitivity to Fed conditions, with no historical test of this exact chain | A concurrent liquidity expansion and crypto move that holds after accounting for other risk drivers |

The table also shows why a lower currency pair cannot carry the argument by itself. Hayes's forecast spans markets with separate participants, mandates and disclosure schedules. Confirmation requires those independent gauges to turn in sequence.
The Fed describes FIMA repo as a backstop for approved foreign monetary authorities. They can temporarily obtain dollars against Treasuries instead of selling the securities into the market. The facility is generally priced above private repo when markets function normally, directing its use toward periods of unusual stress.
The latest H.4.1 balance sheet reported zero under “Repurchase agreements: Foreign official” for Aug. 26. The Fed's accounting guidance identifies that line as outstanding FIMA repo. Central bank liquidity swaps were also small at $121 million.
A larger foreign-official figure in the same release measures the opposite transaction. Foreign-official and international-account reverse repurchase agreements averaged $361.883 billion for the week and stood at $355.456 billion on Wednesday. These reverse repos are a Fed liability used by foreign official institutions to invest cash. FIMA repo is an asset-side transaction in which the Fed supplies cash against Treasuries. Treating the reverse-repo balance as FIMA usage would invert the signal.
Hayes's larger scenario assumes removal of the FIMA facility's per-counterparty limit. The FOMC authorization in force as of Jan. 27 retained a $60 billion total outstanding limit per counterparty, although the relevant subcommittee can approve changes. Current policy therefore remains well short of the uncapped facility embedded in his forecast.
The RMP channel points in the same dormant direction. For the Aug. 14 to Sept. 14 window, the New York Fed scheduled about $17 billion of reinvestment purchases and zero reserve-management purchases. RMPs had already stepped down to $10 billion in each of the prior three monthly windows after running at $40 billion per month through mid-April.
Reinvestment replaces principal payments from maturing agency securities. RMPs increase Treasury holdings to maintain ample reserves. SOMA Manager Roberto Perli explained in March that the present program began after reserves entered the ample range in December 2025, with the initial $40 billion pace smoothing an expected April tax-season drain into the Treasury General Account.
Perli also placed RMPs outside the large-scale asset-purchase programs used to ease financial conditions during the global financial crisis and the pandemic. A renewed rise in RMPs would matter for Hayes's framework only when accompanied by evidence that reserve or repo pressure was driving it. The current schedule shows deceleration to zero.
French sovereign markets give Hayes's thesis its strongest observable foundation. Agence France Trésor listed its 10-year benchmark yield at 4.21% on Sept. 3. The day's long-dated OAT auction nevertheless attracted €35.879 billion of purchase orders for €13.497 billion served, producing about 2.66 times coverage.
The Banque de France's June stability report had already identified the channel that could make future stress contagious. France's 10-year yield reached 3.75% on June 12, while the OAT-Bund spread widened 8 basis points over the conflict period analyzed. The report warned that leveraged hedge-fund trades in OAT repo, often using very short maturities and potentially procyclical margin practices, could amplify a liquidity shock.
A separate ECB study of dollar repo funding gives the mechanism scale. Euro-area banks had about €1.6 trillion of dollar repo exposure in November 2024, with 85% maturing within one week and most government-bond collateral consisting of Treasuries. French bank branches were the most active euro-area branches in the U.S. repo market. The study established a structural channel; it reported no current French retreat from that market.
Aggregate bank data remain resilient. The ECB reported a 142.44% liquidity coverage ratio for French significant institutions in the first quarter of 2026. France's bank supervisor said in July that liquidity and solvency were comfortable and that medium- and long-term funding programs were well advanced. Those lagged measures leave room for later strain, while offering no support for a systemwide funding break at the time measured.
France's average TARGET balance was a liability of about €195.239 billion in June. TARGET records the net result of cross-border payments between national central banks, and the ECB publishes the series monthly with a lag. The balance can serve as a directional gauge of cross-border flows. On its own, it cannot establish a bank run or an imminent rupture in the euro.
Together, the French indicators describe a market carrying more risk rather than a system already in flight. Yields and repo structure justify close attention. Auction demand, capital and liquidity figures define the counterweight.
Crypto's sensitivity to Fed conditions gives the thesis an intuitive endpoint. International Monetary Fund research found that a common crypto factor explained 80% of price variation in its sample and that tighter U.S. monetary policy reduced that factor through the risk-taking channel.
That result links crypto broadly to monetary policy and global risk appetite. It falls short of establishing EUR/JPY as a reliable leading indicator for Bitcoin or Ether, and it does not test the path through French repo markets, FIMA and RMPs.
The proposed sequence also lacks enough direct history for a clean backtest. FIMA usage is currently zero, while the present RMP regime began only in December 2025. Repeated cases in which this exact sequence preceded crypto gains do not exist in the supplied evidence.
At the Sept. 3 research check, CryptoSlate's Bitcoin market data showed BTC near $81,008, while its Ethereum market data showed Ether near $2,498. Those prices locate the market when Hayes published his forecast. Future gains would still need to be paired with the balance-sheet signals he named before they could count as evidence for his mechanism.
EUR/JPY remains the simplest gauge in Hayes's framework, but its move only opens the test. A more persuasive signal would combine a sustained approach toward 140 with worsening French sovereign and bank-funding data, positive FIMA repo usage, and renewed RMPs tied to market pressure. Until those gauges turn together, Hayes's smoke alarm remains at the monitoring stage.
The post Arthur Hayes calls EUR/JPY prices crypto’s smoke alarm, but the Fed’s plumbing still shows no fire appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Bitcoin fell below $80,000 on Friday after a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report abruptly raised rate-pressure concerns across crypto and other markets.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics said nonfarm payrolls increased by 162,000 in August, compared with a Reuters consensus of 56,000. The release arrived at 8:30 a.m. ET, and was followed immediately by a sharp cross-asset reaction. Unemployment held at 4.1%, while earlier payroll estimates were revised up by a combined 55,000.
Bitcoin lost about 2% and slipped below $80,000 in the immediate reaction. Within hours Bitcoin market data from CryptoSlate put BTC back near $79,570, still up 0.83% over 24 hours. Ethereum market data showed Ethereum near $2,454 and up 1.41% over the same window, suggesting the immediate selloff cut into earlier 24-hour gains rather than producing a full-day crypto collapse.
The market treated the payroll surprise as a reason the Federal Reserve could keep policy tighter. Reuters reported that the implied probability of a quarter-point September rate increase rose to 59% from 52% after the release.
The two-year Treasury yield, which is especially sensitive to Fed expectations, climbed 7.6 basis points. Ten-year and 30-year yields rose 3.2 basis points and 1 basis point, respectively, while the dollar index gained about 0.3% to 99.3.
That combination creates a familiar headwind for Bitcoin. Higher yields raise the return available on dollar assets, while a stronger dollar tightens financial conditions for assets priced in the currency. Gold faced the same pressure from a different angle: Reuters reported bullion down between 1.7% and 2.2% as higher rate expectations reduced the appeal of a non-yielding asset.
US stocks did not move in perfect unison. S&P 500 futures turned negative after the report and were down 0.22% at 8:33 a.m. ET, but Nasdaq 100 futures remained 0.07% higher. Average hourly earnings also rose a steady 0.3% for the month and 3.1% over the year. Those details show why the first reaction was not a one-way verdict across markets, even though the initial rate repricing was clear.
Oil was carrying its own catalyst. Brent was only slightly lower near $95 after the jobs report but remained more than 8% higher for the week amid renewed US-Iran hostilities and supply concerns. The payroll surprise offers the strongest explanation for the synchronized 13:30 BST jolt, but not for every move that followed.
The post Bitcoin falls below $80,000 as hot US payrolls revive Fed hike risk appeared first on CryptoSlate.
The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, or GENIUS Act, is the new federal framework for payment stablecoin issuers. Its reserve rules aim to make each token a safer dollar claim, while the public blockchains moving those tokens retain their own fee markets and capacity limits.
A Federal Reserve staff paper, first dated June 2, 2026, and updated Aug. 31, 2026, models how transaction congestion can destabilize even a perfectly backed digital dollar. The authors are Federal Reserve economists, and the paper carries the standard disclaimer that their views do not necessarily represent the Federal Reserve Board or Federal Reserve System.
When fees climb far enough, small payments become uneconomic and a token’s usefulness can fall. The model predicts that weak payment-network effects can then turn individual exits into coordinated redemptions. In the paper’s empirical work, however, “redemption” means a drop in Ethereum circulation and can include either a cash-out to fiat or migration to another blockchain.
The paper presents a latent mechanism, not a forecast of a current run. It sharpens an unresolved question as Treasury implements GENIUS: the law gives regulators broad tools for policing issuers, reserves and redemption promises, while its explicit reserve provisions and Treasury’s current section 3 proposal set no price or capacity standard for a public blockchain.
Traditional stablecoin analysis starts with the issuer’s assets. If a token promises one dollar but its reserves lose value or cannot be sold quickly, holders have a reason to redeem before others do.
The Fed economists deliberately remove that problem from their model. The stablecoin is fully and safely backed. The source of fragility is instead the interaction between transaction fees and payment-network effects: people value a payment asset partly because other people accept and use it.
Under low congestion, that network can absorb a shock. Under high congestion and weak network effects, the paper finds a threshold beyond which redemptions can become coordinated and abrupt. Higher fees reduce use; reduced use makes the token less attractive; the weaker network then gives more holders a reason to leave.
“Redemption” needs care here. In the paper’s main empirical panel, it is measured as a negative change in a stablecoin’s Ethereum circulation. That can represent redemption for fiat, but it can also represent migration to another blockchain. The data therefore capture pressure on Ethereum-based circulation, not a clean count of customers cashing out at an issuer.
The study uses an unbalanced weekly panel of five stablecoins from November 2017 through December 2025 where data are available. Its starkest distributional result comes from 2021 through 2025: for below-median USDC transfers, the fee-to-value ratio at the 75th percentile frequently exceeded 100%. For above-median transfers, it was almost never more than 5%.
The statistic describes the distribution of attempted and completed transfer economics rather than a claim that users routinely paid more in fees than they sent. During expensive periods, a representative network fee could exceed the value of many small transfers. A holder can avoid completing such a transfer, wait, batch activity or move through a custodian. The pattern shows how congestion can ration access by transfer size even while the token remains redeemable.
The paper combines a theoretical model with several empirical tests. Those pieces answer different questions and should not be collapsed into one causal claim.
| Evidence | Result | What it supports | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weekly stablecoin panel | A one-standard-deviation, $10.83 increase in gas was associated with a roughly 0.9 percentage-point rise in weekly redemptions when network effects were low | Fee sensitivity is strongest when a token’s payment network is weak | Gas alone was insignificant, and the result applies to the low-network-effects state |
| Ethereum empty-slot design | The raw empty-slot rate averaged 0.7%; a one-standard-deviation increase of 0.004 corresponded to about $0.77 more gas | A plausibly exogenous congestion shock raises fees | The design identifies the capacity-to-fee link, not the later redemption response |
| 1,230 matched ETH-Tron USDT transfers | From May 2020 through December 2025, the average matched transfer was about $176 million; $1 more in lagged, demeaned gas was associated with 3% to 4% more net matched value moving from Ethereum to Tron | Higher Ethereum fees coincide with cross-chain reallocation | The association cannot identify every owner or establish the motive behind every transfer |
Gas by itself was statistically insignificant in the weekly panel. The reported 0.9-point effect appeared only when high fees interacted with weak network effects, a state covering roughly 7% to 7.5% of observations. The pattern is consistent with the model’s threshold logic, while remaining a historical association rather than a universal causal estimate.
The empty-slot exercise offers a stronger causal design for the first link in the chain. Empty Ethereum blocks are plausibly unrelated to stablecoin demand but reduce capacity and push up gas. The design helps establish that a capacity shock can raise fees. It does not directly establish that the same shock caused every later redemption.
The matched-transfer analysis is an association as well. It links transfers of identical USDT amounts on Ethereum and Tron within a 60-minute window, consistent with a chain switch. The method cannot observe the beneficial owner behind every pair, establish the motive for each move or exclude every alternative explanation.
Together, the findings support a conditional warning, not a forecast: congestion can create an exit incentive, and some historical activity moved toward a cheaper rail when Ethereum became more expensive.
The GENIUS Act requires permitted payment stablecoin issuers to maintain reserves at least one-to-one in specified liquid assets. It also requires public redemption procedures, disclosure of issuer purchase and redemption fees, monthly reporting, examination and certification, and regulatory standards covering capital, liquidity, diversification, operations and information technology.
Those rules address important failure modes: weak assets, opaque redemption promises, undercapitalized issuers and poor operational controls. They also give regulators a clearer path to supervise the entity that creates the dollar token.
Treasury’s Aug. 17 implementation proposal, published in the Federal Register on Aug. 18, focuses on section 3’s restrictions on offering or selling payment stablecoins in the United States. Comments are due Oct. 19. Treasury says the expected effective date for the issuer licensing framework is Jan. 18, 2027, with the broader digital asset service provider restriction expected July 18, 2028.
The proposed rule distinguishes direct transfers between two people acting on their own behalf, including self-custody transactions, from compensated services such as exchanges, transfer businesses and custodians that can qualify as digital asset service providers.
That division affects who carries compliance duties. The economics of a congested base layer persist across the categories. A reserve can remain liquid while a user still confronts a transaction fee larger than the intended payment.
The distinction is narrow. Issuer purchase and redemption fee disclosure covers different charges from blockchain gas and exchange withdrawal fees. The text now on the table leaves base-layer pricing and capacity outside its explicit stablecoin rules, while GENIUS also gives supervisors broad authority over an issuer’s operational and technological risks. Regulators could therefore scrutinize how an issuer manages rail exposure even though they do not control public blockspace. Treasury’s process remains open, and implementation choices can still change before the rules take effect.
That leaves two safety tests operating at once. Supervisors can examine whether an issuer can honor the dollar claim and manage its operations. Users also experience whether the chosen network can carry that claim at a price proportionate to the payment.

Stablecoins are already spread across rails with different fee markets. A snapshot taken shortly before drafting from DefiLlama’s chain dashboard and API put stablecoin supply at roughly $147.3 billion on Ethereum, $93.2 billion on Tron and $15.7 billion on Solana. The dashboard’s displayed totals were slightly higher, at about $148.0 billion, $93.6 billion and $15.8 billion respectively, reflecting timing and methodology differences.
Ethereum was not congested in the snapshot. Etherscan showed roughly 0.127 to 0.128 gwei gas, while ETH traded near $2,404. Using an illustrative 65,000 gas units for an ERC-20 transfer, that implies a network cost around two cents. Actual gas use and wallet estimates vary.
Costs on the other two chains are structured differently. Tron charges 100 sun per Energy unit; a third-party estimator placed an unstaked USDT transfer around 65,000 Energy to an existing account and 131,000 to a new account, or roughly 6.5 and 13.1 TRX before staking or rented Energy. Solana’s base fee is 5,000 lamports per signature, while a recent analytics snapshot showed a median total fee near 5,800 lamports and a 99th-percentile fee of about 651,400 lamports.
A direct dollar-price comparison would be misleading because each network uses a different fee system and observation method, and all of the figures can change quickly. The useful comparison is structural: a “stablecoin fee” varies by rail and transaction conditions. Network charges also differ from exchange withdrawal or platform fees, which an intermediary sets separately.
The first direct effect of congestion falls on the transaction with the least value to absorb a fixed network charge. A small self-custody user may delay a payment, combine transfers, move to an exchange or stop using the chain. That response can be economically forced even if the token remains redeemable at par.
The visible balance movement is more likely to come next from larger intermediaries. Exchanges, market makers, bridges, issuers and corporate treasury desks can move enough liquidity to alter chain-level circulation or restore inventory where users want to transact. That ordering is an inference from how the market operates, not an owner-level finding in the Fed paper.
Destination chains can inherit both activity and pressure. A surge may deepen their stablecoin liquidity while testing the routes and intermediaries that rebalance inventory. Those second-order effects are analytical inferences rather than findings identified in the paper’s owner-level data. The policy question is broader than whether an issuer holds enough Treasury bills: users also need a tolerably priced route to the redeemable dollar claim when a rail is under stress.
The Sept. 3 snapshot establishes only that Ethereum fees were calm at the observation time; it does not measure systemwide redemption pressure. The paper turns the rail-safety gap into a monitorable risk rather than evidence of an imminent event. Regulators and market operators can watch fee-to-transfer-value ratios by transaction size, abrupt changes in chain-level stablecoin circulation, matched cross-chain flows and exchange wallet imbalances.
GENIUS can make a stablecoin safer without making every route to that stablecoin resilient. If implementation treats reserve quality as the full definition of safety, the next stress episode may reveal that the dollar token was sound while access to it was not.
The post Why GENIUS could leave digital dollars vulnerable to sudden blockchain network ‘bank runs’ appeared first on CryptoSlate.
HTTP error 429 on https://cryptoticker.io/en/feed/
Failed to fetch feed.
Lawyers question AMC’s grounds for a securities-law challenge, but say the tokens’ branding and marketing could leave room for a dispute.
The a16z-backed startup chose a full national charter over the trust-bank route most crypto firms have taken, clearing a path toward insured deposits and conventional lending alongside stablecoin issuance.
The privacy coin's squeeze rode a Fed-driven crypto rally that reversed hours later, when a stronger-than-expected jobs report sent Bitcoin back under $80,000.
The activity began in May and remained undisclosed until Friday, a day after OpenAI launched Astra and U.S. lawmakers proposed restrictions on advanced AI.
The Dow dropped 226 points and Bitcoin erased some of its gains after August payrolls tripled estimates, pushing September rate-hike odds to 58%.
Robinhood's Vlad Tenev backs the $104 million "stock token" market, defying AMC's legal threats over on-chain trading.
Ripple has landed a multi-year partnership with the University of Florida’s athletic department.
Binance has listed twelve cryptocurrencies that it will remove from its crypto trading platform, specifically on Binance Alpha, later today.
Nasdaq micro-cap AIXC dumps its crypto treasury for a robotics pivot, locking in a bruising 50% loss.
Critical security alert issued as XRP Ledger based wallet users get Hit by unauthorized transactions.
SoundHound AI (SOUN) shares closed its LivePerson acquisition, expanding its enterprise reach and customer engagement platform. The combined company now targets over $500 million in future revenue from existing customers. SOUN shares fell 1.11% to $6.66 after trading near $6.78 earlier in the session.
SoundHound AI, Inc., SOUN
The transaction adds LivePerson’s digital messaging tools to SoundHound’s voice and automation capabilities. Together, the businesses now serve customers across voice, web, mobile, SMS, and social channels. The combined customer base also includes 25 of the Fortune 100 companies.
SoundHound plans to integrate LivePerson’s platform into OASYS, its system for automated customer interactions. The integration will give enterprise clients one platform for customer service across several channels. It also expands SoundHound’s intellectual property portfolio to more than 750 patents.
The deal broadens SoundHound’s presence across enterprise sectors and creates new cross-selling opportunities. Management expects the existing customer base to support over $500 million in future revenue. Meanwhile, the company plans to use its larger scale to capture rising demand for automated customer service.
SoundHound retired LivePerson’s outstanding debt during the transaction, leaving the combined business debt-free. That structure gives management more flexibility for product development, integration spending, and commercial expansion. It also reduces financing pressure as SoundHound works toward stronger margins and sustainable profitability.
The company has started integrating operations after receiving regulatory and shareholder approvals. Product teams are combining voice automation, digital chat, and social messaging into one customer engagement offering. SoundHound expects expanded capabilities to reach global customers during the coming quarters.
The merged platform aims to improve resolution speeds, containment rates, and service consistency across channels. LivePerson customers will gain access to SoundHound’s broader automation tools and voice capabilities. Meanwhile, SoundHound can extend its technology across LivePerson’s established enterprise relationships.
SoundHound appointed John Collins as chief financial officer following completion of the acquisition. Collins previously held senior roles at LivePerson, including chief financial officer and chief operating officer. He also served as interim chief executive officer and worked across finance, data science, and enterprise software.
Collins will lead financial integration while focusing on margins, cost controls, capital allocation, and profitability. His previous work included restructuring debt, reducing costs, and improving free cash flow at LivePerson. That background gives SoundHound direct financial leadership from the acquired company during integration.
The acquisition marks a major expansion step for SoundHound’s customer service business. LivePerson common shares will stop trading on Nasdaq following the completed transaction. SoundHound will now focus on product integration, enterprise sales, and converting its larger customer base into future revenue.
The post SoundHound AI Inc (SOUN) Stock: LivePerson Acquisition Targets Over $500M in Future Revenue appeared first on Blockonomi.
U.S. equity markets experienced broad declines Friday following robust August employment figures that prompted investors to reassess Federal Reserve policy expectations.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average retreated approximately 0.7%, shedding roughly 380 points. The S&P 500 declined 0.5%, while the Nasdaq Composite gave up around 0.4%.

The monthly employment situation report revealed 162,000 positions were created in August. Wall Street analysts had projected only 55,000 additions. This substantial upside surprise reinforced the resilience of the employment landscape.
The robust employment figures prompted an important debate among market participants: would Federal Reserve officials interpret this strength as justification for additional monetary tightening?
Data from CME Group indicated that market participants elevated the probability of a September rate increase to around 60% in the wake of the employment release. This represented a notable adjustment from sentiment earlier in the trading week.
Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh has indicated he avoids overreacting to individual economic releases. He has additionally noted that wage trends may have a weaker correlation with inflation than conventional wisdom suggests, potentially reducing the impact of employment data on policy decisions.
Several market observers contend that Friday’s employment report may not provide sufficient justification for policy action on its own. The next critical data release will be the August Consumer Price Index report, scheduled for September 11.
The Personal Consumption Expenditures price index, which serves as the Federal Reserve’s primary inflation gauge, isn’t scheduled until September 30. This timing places it after the upcoming policy meeting, suggesting officials might decide without access to this preferred metric.
Government bond yields advanced Friday as market participants recalibrated their interest rate outlook.
Even with Friday’s retreat, all three benchmark indexes remained within proximity of their all-time peaks. The modest nature of the selloff could suggest investor belief that the economy possesses sufficient strength to absorb higher borrowing costs.
Employment statistics are frequently adjusted in subsequent months. Some market participants may be adopting a wait-and-see approach before the August figure is confirmed.
Beyond macroeconomic developments, Lululemon emerged as Friday’s most significant individual equity story. The athletic apparel retailer’s stock collapsed approximately 16% after management reduced full-year revenue and earnings projections and disclosed a second quarter sales decline.
No other significant corporate earnings announcements were scheduled for Friday’s session.
The S&P 500 finished trading near 7,708, the Dow closed around 53,301, and the Nasdaq settled near 26,463.
The post Wall Street Tumbles as Robust Employment Data Sparks Rate Hike Speculation appeared first on Blockonomi.
Shares of SanDisk experienced a significant rally Friday, climbing as much as 8.9% and touching an intraday peak of $1,693.71 before stabilizing near $1,687 during mid-morning hours. The advance left SNDK up approximately 8.5% for the session, though trading volume remained notably below its typical 13.9 million share average.
Sandisk Corporation, SNDK
What sparked the rally? Nvidia revealed Thursday evening its plans to purchase Hugging Face in a transaction valued at $12.9 billion. The widely-used open-source AI development platform boasts more than 18 million registered users, hosts 3 million AI models, and serves over 200,000 enterprises building and launching artificial intelligence solutions.
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang emphasized that over half the company’s revenue stems from customers “largely driven by open models,” noting that Nvidia ranks as Hugging Face’s top contributor of open-source models. Industry observers interpret the acquisition as Nvidia’s strategic play to strengthen its position within the AI developer community.
What’s the connection to SanDisk? The insatiable appetite for Nvidia’s graphics processing units has created corresponding demand for SanDisk’s NAND flash memory products, essential building blocks for modern AI-focused data centers. Essentially, whatever benefits Nvidia’s artificial intelligence strategy typically translates into stronger demand for SanDisk’s components.
This relationship received validation earlier this week when Dell Technologies’ Chief Operating Officer Jeffrey Clarke identified memory as the critical constraint facing AI server production. “The constraints remain the same,” Clarke explained. “DRAM, DRAM, DRAM, followed by NAND, NAND, NAND.”
Looking past the Nvidia announcement, underlying NAND market conditions remain robust. Worldwide NAND flash revenue jumped approximately 70% on a sequential basis during Q2, powered by continued AI infrastructure expansion requiring substantial flash storage capacity. Industry supply remains constrained while pricing holds steady.
Investment firm Bernstein continues recommending SNDK with a $3,000 price objective, citing what analysts describe as a sustained, multi-year NAND supply shortage scenario.
Industry peer Micron Technology similarly gained ground Friday, advancing roughly 4%, indicating the momentum extends across the entire memory chip sector rather than being isolated to SanDisk alone.
U.S. Treasury yields declined ahead of Friday’s crucial economic releases, giving market participants another incentive to return to high-growth semiconductor stocks that had suffered recently amid climbing interest rates.
The wider market provided minimal assistance. The S&P 500 declined 0.5% while the Nasdaq Composite fell 0.48%, underscoring that SanDisk’s strength stemmed clearly from sector-specific factors.
Despite Friday’s gains, SNDK remains more than 30% beneath its 52-week peak of $2,354.39. Trading at 23 times trailing earnings and merely 8 times forward earnings estimates, the shares appear reasonably valued compared to other AI-focused memory chip manufacturers.
Regarding insider activity, SanDisk Chief Legal Officer Bernard Shek divested 600 share units at $1,525.60 on September 1 through a previously established Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement, representing standard administrative activity without meaningful market implications.
Bernstein’s $3,000 price objective for SNDK stands unchanged, with shares currently trading around $1,687.
The post SanDisk (SNDK) Shares Surge 8% Following Nvidia’s Massive Hugging Face Deal appeared first on Blockonomi.
Planet Labs announced second-quarter revenue totaling $116.1 million, representing 58% year-over-year growth and easily surpassing Wall Street’s $104.5 million projection. The company’s adjusted EBITDA of $13.9 million significantly outperformed expectations of $2.3 million.
On a non-GAAP basis, earnings per share reached 2 cents, compared to the consensus forecast calling for a 2-cent loss. This represents a comprehensive earnings beat across all major metrics.
The defense and intelligence division experienced explosive growth exceeding 90% year-over-year, expanding to represent 70% of total company revenue compared to 57% during the same period last year. The segment generated approximately $81 million, nearly doubling from the previous year.
Planet Labs PBC, PL
The commercial segment posted growth exceeding 15%, while civil government revenue expanded by more than 5%. From a geographic perspective, the Europe, Middle East and Africa region delivered the strongest performance with revenue surging over 130%.
The satellite imagery company also secured an $8 million agreement with the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency for its Global Monitoring Service. Additional wins include a seven-figure European defense contract and a German government satellite-services tender valued at up to 25 million euros spanning five years.
The company’s backlog expanded 11% year-over-year to $815 million. Remaining performance obligations increased 9% to approximately $753 million. Management anticipates recognizing over $400 million in revenue during the next four quarters based solely on existing backlog.
Management provided Q3 revenue guidance ranging from $101 million to $105 million, missing the $114 million analyst consensus. The company also anticipates a Q3 EBITDA loss of approximately $3.5 million, contrasting with Wall Street’s projection of positive $2.5 million EBITDA.
Citi analyst John Godyn indicated that a portion of the Q2 outperformance resulted from revenue pulled forward from the third quarter, accounting for some of the guidance miss. He maintained that the investment case remains “intact.”
Needham analyst Ryan Koontz pointed out that Q2 revenue benefited from accelerated recognition related to Sweden’s inaugural sovereign satellite. When combining actual Q2 and projected Q3 revenue, year-over-year growth still stands at 42%.
Planet Labs increased the lower bound of its fiscal 2027 revenue guidance to $430 million from $425 million, while maintaining the upper end at $441 million. Current analyst consensus stands at $435.67 million.
Management is aiming to achieve the Rule of 40 benchmark in fiscal 2027, measured by combining revenue growth percentage and adjusted EBITDA margin.
Adjusted gross margin decreased modestly to 59% from 61% in the prior year, attributed to investments in satellite services agreements and AI-powered partner solutions.
Through the first half of the fiscal year, the company produced approximately $68 million in operating cash flow. Free cash flow amounted to $21 million, while adjusted free cash flow totaled $29 million.
Planet Labs closed the quarter with approximately $865 million in cash and short-term investments, and generated around $120 million through its at-the-market equity offering at an average net price of $31.95 per share.
Management has identified satellite-services opportunities exceeding $4 billion in its pipeline.
PL stock traded down approximately 1.25% at $18.12 at the time of publication Friday, following its more than 11% premarket surge. The stock has appreciated over 180% during the past 12 months.
The post Planet Labs (PL) Stock Surges 11% on Strong Q2 Beat Fueled by Defense Sector Growth appeared first on Blockonomi.
Shares of Oracle experienced a 2% uptick during morning hours, reaching $157.13, as Wall Street firms issued updated research notes and market participants prepared for the company’s upcoming quarterly report.
Oracle Corporation, ORCL
The gain extends Thursday’s robust 5.7% advance, which was sparked by Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller’s comments favoring stable interest rates pending additional inflation information. This development carries particular weight for Oracle, given the company’s substantial debt load accumulated to finance its artificial intelligence data center expansion.
Morgan Stanley increased its price objective to $210 from $207 while maintaining an Equalweight stance. The adjustment reflects an enhanced margin forecast for Oracle’s GPU-as-a-Service operations. The firm applied approximately 19 times its calendar 2028 non-GAAP earnings per share projection of $10.98 in its valuation model.
The shares remain approximately 20% lower year-to-date, trading below historical valuation benchmarks. Oracle’s PEG ratio stands at 0.77, with InvestingPro identifying the equity as undervalued when measured against near-term earnings expansion potential. The company’s gross profit margin has maintained a level of 66% throughout the trailing twelve months.
Bernstein reaffirmed its Outperform designation and indicated Oracle may be nearing the conclusion of its capital-raising requirements. This would represent a significant transition for an organization that has relied extensively on borrowing to support its AI infrastructure objectives. Bernstein also observed that Oracle has the potential to emerge as the third-largest hyperscaler.
Jefferies maintained its Buy recommendation while reducing its price objective to $290 from $320. The firm identified 115% OCI revenue growth and a 41% operating margin as the critical metrics to monitor.
Mizuho similarly reaffirmed an Outperform rating with a $320 target, highlighting an enhanced agreement with the Department of Veterans Affairs. The contract’s maximum value increased by approximately $17 billion and may continue through May 2031.
Options market activity suggests a possible 10% price swing in either direction when Oracle unveils its Q1 fiscal 2027 performance on September 10, following the market close.
Broader equity markets are providing minimal support today. The S&P 500 has declined 0.1% while the Nasdaq trades marginally higher. Oracle’s movement appears driven by company-specific developments.
Execution challenges and constrained free cash flow throughout the forecast horizon represent the primary concerns Morgan Stanley highlighted in justifying its Equalweight rating despite the increased price target.
Jefferies is monitoring OCI expansion and margin trends as the most transparent indicators of whether Oracle’s AI data center capital deployment is producing tangible outcomes.
The Veterans Affairs contract enhancement, which Mizuho emphasized this week, incorporates optional extensions that could prolong the arrangement through May 2031, providing Oracle with a durable government revenue stream.
The post Oracle (ORCL) Stock Climbs 2% as Wall Street Analysts Update Targets Before Quarterly Report appeared first on Blockonomi.
US spot Bitcoin ETFs ended August on an impressive note and appear to have continued to build momentum, recording $731 million in net inflows on September 3rd, their strongest single-day performance since January.
Now, a pattern has sparked speculation over whether Bitcoin could see another short-term top following the latest surge in ETF demand.
Analyst Ted Pillows said that on the previous two occasions when Bitcoin ETFs recorded daily inflows above $700 million, first in October 2025 and then in January 2026, BTC went on to form a local peak shortly afterward.
Despite a minor hiccup on September 1st, which saw outflows of over $236 million, US-based spot Bitcoin ETFs have bounced back strongly. Total net assets reached $103.34 billion, representing just over 6% of Bitcoin’s market capitalization. Cumulative net inflows since the ETFs launched in January 2024 stood at $55.44 billion.
Data shared by SoSoValue revealed that BlackRock’s IBIT led the gains with around $454 million. Next up was Ark and 21Shares’ ARKB at $137.7 million, followed by Fidelity’s FBTC at $74.4 million. Grayscale’s two products attracted a total of $57 million in capital.
On the other hand, VanEck’s HODL and WisdomTree’s BTCW were the only funds to have posted outflows of $20 million and $5 million, respectively.
Over the past month, Bitcoin saw around 105,000 BTC equivalent in net capital inflows, and the US spot Bitcoin ETFs accounted for approximately 42,800 of that total. According to Axel Adler Jr., the fund inflows accounted for about 41% of the overall capital entering the market during the period.
Alongside these inflows, Bitcoin surged by over 4% to trade near $81,130. Open interest on Binance and Bybit reached levels not seen since May 5, which suggested that derivatives activity is rebuilding alongside the latest price advance. These developments have prompted some experts to believe that the crypto bear market may be coming to an end.
However, Fidelity believes that the recent recovery does not yet prove the bear market is over. The firm noted that BTC’s historical four-year cycle could leave room for another market low around November 2026, although the pattern is not guaranteed.
The latest technical setup, however, looks more bullish. Bitcoin moved back above the weekly EMA ribbon after recently falling below it, a level that previously signaled the start of a sell-off. Dami-Defi explained that the EMA ribbon currently sits between about $71,000 and $78,000. The reclaim is seen as a positive shift, but the crypto asset still needs to hold above the ribbon on weekly closes. If it does, the next major resistance level to watch is around $95,000-$96,000. A drop below the ribbon, however, could invalidate the recovery.
The post Bitcoin ETF Inflows Exceed $700M as Historical Pattern Points to BTC Local Top appeared first on CryptoPotato.
The OG meme coin has jumped by 5% over the past 24 hours following the renewed green wave sweeping through the broader cryptocurrency market.
According to Ali Martinez, several key factors suggest a much more substantial rally may unfold in the near future.
As of press time, DOGE is worth approximately $0.087 (per CoinGecko), representing a 24% increase over the past month. Martinez revealed that the asset’s Tom DeMark Sequential has flashed a buy signal on the daily timeframe, suggesting that the meme coin could be preparing to resume its uptrend.
His second optimistic element is the formation of a so-called “morning doji star” on the 24-hour chart. The analyst claimed that this reversal pattern usually occurs near the end of a downtrend, signaling that selling momentum may be fading as buyers step in.
Next on Martinez’s list is whale activity. He disclosed that large holders have scooped up more than 400 million DOGE over the last five days, “adding meaningful buying pressure at current levels.”
The analyst opined that the accumulation has reinforced a major on-chain support near $0.0813, where almost 35 million units were previously traded.
“As long as this level holds, the bullish setup remains intact, with $0.1552 and $0.1774 as the next upside targets,” he concluded.
Interestingly, earlier this week, Martinez suggested that the $15 Dogecoin target he has been tracking for a long time was invalidated after the price briefly plunged below the lower boundary of the channel that had defined the thesis for such a potential explosion.
Other X users who recently made DOGE predictions include Crypto With Gopal and Celal Kucuker. The former claimed the meme coin has formed a massive falling wedge, with the price compressing near the $0.08 support zone and sellers gradually losing momentum.
He claimed that a breakout above the upper trendline (which sits at over $0.10) could trigger a major reversal toward the $0.40 target. “Bulls are waiting for confirmation – long-term sentiment is turning bullish,” the analyst added.
For their part, Celal Kucuker envisioned a 10x expansion in DOGE’s market cap, which could push the price to a new historic record beyond the $1 milestone.
The asset’s recent exchange netflow supports the bullish perspective. Over the past several days, outflows have outpaced inflows, indicating that investors have shifted from centralized platforms to self-custody, which in turn has reduced immediate selling pressure.

The post 3 Reasons Why Dogecoin (DOGE) Is Ready for a Breakout appeared first on CryptoPotato.
It was another eventful week in the cryptocurrency markets as August closed, with BTC ending in the green for the first time during a bear market, further signaling a major shift in sentiment. However, Friday’s jobs report flipped the script again.
Before we dive into all of that, let’s rewind the clock by a week and see what the landscape was last Friday. Despite briefly surging past $81,000 on a couple of occasions, BTC was quickly halted and driven south to just under $80,000. Most altcoins, though, produced major weekly gains.
The rejection at the time came after the hawkish stance taken by Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, and the leg down drove BTC to just under $77,000 on Saturday morning. However, the asset rebounded swiftly and tapped $79,000 on Sunday. Another leg down to $77,000 took place on Monday morning as the US and Iran initiated new attacks against each other.
The primary cryptocurrency remained volatile in the following few days, but was contained in a relatively tight range between $76,400 and $79,000. It last tested the upper boundary on Wednesday morning, and the bulls managed to defend it. The subsequent leg up came on Thursday and was significantly more successful.
Bitcoin broke out of its $79,000 barrier and surged past $80,000. It kept going during the early hours on Friday and jumped to $82,400 for the first time since mid-May. Although it was stopped there, it remained above $81,000 until earlier today, when the much stronger-than-expected US jobs report came out.
BTC slumped immediately by two grand as the general assumption is that the Fed will be more inclined to raise the hikes at the end of the month. The weekly performance shows a few clear winners – ZEC has gained 20%, and it even surpassed $1,000 earlier today, XMR is up by 10%, while UNI has rocketed by almost 40%.

Market Cap: $2.775T | 24H Vol: $121B | BTC Dominance: 57.6%
BTC: $79,270 (-0.35%) | ETH: $2,450 (-2.5%) | XRP: $1.39 (-1.5%)
Strategy Is Buying Bitcoin Again After 2-Month Pause: Here’s How Much. Monday began with a bang as the world’s largest corporate holder of BTC resumed its purchases for the first time in over two months, accumulating 4,603 BTC for $370 million. The problem for the company is that it sold at low prices only to buy back at much higher levels.
Gold Just Erased All Its August Gains – Bitcoin Is Holding Up Better at $77K. The precious metal exploded alongside BTC in the middle of August, hitting $4,700 for the first time in months. However, it lost all gains, even dipping below its starting price of $4,360 earlier this week. In contrast, BTC is up by roughly 25% even after today’s correction.
Arthur Hayes Says Ignore Warsh and Watch EUR/JPY for Bitcoin’s Next Move. BitMEX’s former CEO believes the Fed and Kevin Warsh are not the most important factors to determine BTC’s next move. Instead, he urged investors to pay more attention to the euro-yen exchange rate.
Trezor Breach Is Much Bigger Than Initially Thought: Another 67,000 Customers Exposed. The hardware wallet manufacturer admitted today that the ShipMonk breach was significantly more worrisome than initially believed. Its latest update showed that the actual number of affected US customers from the data leaks is over 80,000, not 13,689.
Bitcoin Makes History With First-Ever Green August During a Bear Market. As mentioned above, bitcoin ended August in a highly unexpected manner. History suggested that the asset wouldn’t enjoy the eighth month of the year, but reality was much different. BTC closed with a near-25% surge for the first time in bear market years.
Bitcoin Is Back Above $80,000, But Fidelity Says the Bear Market May Not Be Over Yet. The flagship digital asset surged past $80,000, as explained earlier, but analysts at Fidelity weren’t convinced BTC is out of the woods. They outlined some historical references and determined that the bear market might not be over yet.
This week, we have a chart analysis of Ethereum, Ripple, Cardano, Binance Coin, and Hyperliquid – click here for the complete price analysis.
The post BTC Stopped at $82K as Strong US Jobs Report Shakes Markets, Strategy Resumes Buying: Weekly Recap appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Ethereum has staged a sharp recovery from the June lows and is now consolidating below $2.5K after reclaiming several important technical levels. The daily structure has improved materially, but ETH is still struggling at a key resistance area, while the latest taker-flow data suggests that aggressive buying has not yet fully confirmed the move.
The daily chart shows a clear structural recovery from the $1.5K area. ETH subsequently reclaimed the $1.9K zone and pushed above the $2K mark, with the latest impulsive move taking price toward $2.5K.
The most important development is the price moving above the previous swing-high area around $2.45K and finally creating a higher high after months of decline. However, the asset is still sitting directly below the $2.5K resistance zone and has not yet cleared it after it was rejected again today. Therefore, further upside may require a decisive daily breakout rather than another rejection from the same area.
The 100-day and 200-day moving averages have also become more constructive. Both are now sloping upward after being reclaimed, with the 200-day moving average around the $2K region being the most important support element buyers should defend.
If ETH establishes a daily close above the $2.5K resistance zone, the next major upside area visible on the chart is the next swing high at $3.4K. Conversely, a rejection could send ETH back toward the $2K-$2.1K region, which appears to be the key structural support that must be held at all costs.

The 4-hour chart shows that most of the recent advance occurred through a very aggressive vertical move from roughly $1.9K toward $2.5K. Since then, ETH has been consolidating inside a tight range, roughly between $2.35K and $2.55K.
This consolidation is important because it follows a strong impulsive breakout. Rather than immediately giving back the entire move, ETH has spent several weeks holding above the previous breakout area. The latest candles are also moving toward the upper boundary of the range.
The $2.4K-$2.5K area is therefore the key near-term pivot. Holding around this region would preserve the bullish structure and could allow another attempt to break out higher. This would strengthen the continuation case and potentially expose the $2.8K area before the larger $3.4K resistance zone.
On the downside, a loss of the consolidation range’s low around $2.4K would weaken the immediate setup and could trigger a deeper retracement toward the $2.25K order block. Meanwhile, the 4-hour RSI remains constructive, although it has cooled from its recent spike. This suggests that momentum is still positive without being as stretched as it was immediately after the breakout.

The Ethereum Taker Buy/Sell Ratio chart provides a more cautious signal. The 30-day moving average of the metric has recently dropped below the neutral 1.0 level again and appears to be hovering around 0.995, meaning aggressive sell orders have slightly outweighed aggressive buy orders across exchanges.
This is notable because ETH has simultaneously remained close to $2.5K. In other words, the latest price strength has not been accompanied by a strong increase in taker buying pressure.
The divergence does not necessarily invalidate the bullish technical structure, but it does suggest that the current consolidation may need another wave of genuine spot or aggressive futures demand before ETH can sustain a larger breakout. A move back above 1.0 in the taker buy/sell ratio alongside a decisive break above $2.5K would provide stronger confirmation for continuation and potentially lead to a genuine market recovery after months of downtrend.

The post Ethereum Price Analysis: ETH Rejected at $2.5K Again – What Happens Next? appeared first on CryptoPotato.
[PRESS RELEASE – Chicago, United States, September 4th, 2026]
Liquid Mercury today announced that ACQUA1, LLC completed the initial closing of its MERC exchange offering on September 1, 2026.
ACQUA1 is a Liquid Mercury subsidiary that operates Liquid Mercury’s Lab Company program, licensing Liquid Mercury technology to companies primarily tokenizing real-world assets and receiving fees plus a minority equity stake in return. Liquid Mercury is the majority holder and Manager.
“Over the past 18 months, dozens of companies have approached Liquid Mercury seeking to tokenize their assets,” said Tony Saliba, CEO and founder of Liquid Mercury. “Many assumed they would need to raise capital and build this infrastructure from scratch. Licensing Mercury RWA lets them launch on systems that were already live and proven, at a fraction of the time and cost. ACQUA1 token holders now own a slice of the business that earns equity, plus fees from the companies in the Lab Company program.”
Verified accredited investors subscribed by exchanging MERC for non-voting Class B units of ACQUA1 at the initial conversion rate of 10 MERC per unit. Under its operating agreement, ACQUA1 must burn 100% of the MERC it receives at each closing within five business days and may not transfer, trade, lend, stake, pledge, or otherwise deploy it.
On September 2, all 563,230,000 MERC received at the initial closing were burned via a transfer to the dead address, as the offering documents require.
Initial Closing Highlights
Verification Links
Burn transaction
ACQUA1-C contract
Verified accredited investors can request full terms at acqua1.liquidmercury.com/contact.
About Liquid Mercury
Liquid Mercury powers professional crypto trading and digital asset marketplaces. The company delivers institutional-grade infrastructure, access to deep liquidity, and best-in-class trading tools and workflow automation across its Pro, OTC, and RWA platforms. Through Mercury RWA, Liquid Mercury is extending that infrastructure into tokenized real-world assets, with $MERC serving as the access and platform layer token. For more information, visit www.liquidmercury.com.
Investor Notice
This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Class B units of ACQUA1, LLC and the ACQUA1 tokens representing them are offered and sold in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Rule 506(c) of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, solely to verified accredited investors as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D, and solely pursuant to ACQUA1’s confidential private placement memorandum, as supplemented, and definitive subscription documents, which contain important information, including risk factors. ACQUA1 tokens are restricted securities, are subject to transfer restrictions under ACQUA1’s operating agreement and may remain illiquid indefinitely; investors should not assume that Rule 144 will be available. Statements regarding future revenues, valuations, portfolio performance, and subsequent closings are forward-looking and subject to risks and uncertainties; actual results may differ materially. The MERC contract has no burn function; tokens are removed from circulation by transferring to the dead address. Supply outstanding excluding the dead address is 5,436,770,000 MERC, as of the date of publication.
The post Liquid Mercury Announces Initial Closing of ACQUA1 Offering appeared first on CryptoPotato.