Eric Trump's advisory role at Metaplanet signals a strategic shift in corporate Bitcoin investment, potentially influencing global crypto markets.

The post Eric Trump joins Metaplanet’s advisory board to boost Bitcoin strategy appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The potential US-Iran agreement could reshape Middle Eastern geopolitics, impacting global markets and crypto valuations significantly.

The post Iran foreign ministry focuses on finalizing MOU with US as Bitcoin climbs past $82K appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Ethereum's low transaction fees boost network accessibility but challenge its deflationary model, impacting long-term investor expectations.

The post Ethereum transaction fees hit all-time lows as activity surges appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Jane Street's shift towards ETH ETFs may prompt increased institutional interest in Ethereum, potentially altering crypto market dynamics.

The post Jane Street reallocates $82M into ETH ETFs, cuts BTC ETF positions by 70% appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Nvidia's ambitious CPU market entry could reshape the AI landscape, challenging existing players and navigating geopolitical complexities.

The post Nvidia forecasts $200B CPU market, includes China demand despite export restrictions appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin Magazine

SEC Delaying Plan to Allow Crypto Versions of US Stocks: Report

The Securities and Exchange Commission has pumped the brakes on its highly anticipated “innovation exemption” for tokenized stocks, pushing back the release of the framework as it weighs input from traditional stock exchanges and other market participants wary of the plan’s sweeping implications, according to Bloomberg reporting.

The SEC, under Chair Paul Atkins, was preparing to release the so-called innovation exemption as soon as this week.

The framework would create a new regulatory pathway allowing digital tokens linked to publicly traded company shares to trade on decentralized crypto platforms — 24 hours a day, seven days a week — bypassing the constraints of traditional stock exchanges. 

The exemption is part of Atkins’ broader “Project Crypto” initiative, which aims to relax existing crypto restrictions in line with the Trump administration’s pro-crypto agenda.

The SEC was reportedly leaning toward permitting third-party tokens — digital representations of stocks like Apple, Nvidia, or Tesla — to be issued and traded without the consent of the underlying public companies. 

This means outside actors, not the issuers themselves, could create blockchain-based wrappers tracking a company’s share price and list them on decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms.

These tokens may not carry traditional shareholder rights like voting or dividends, though the SEC is reportedly considering requiring platforms to provide those rights or risk delisting.

Why the SEC is delaying

The timing of the exemption’s release has been pushed back as the agency weighs feedback from stock-exchange officials and other market participants who met with SEC staff in recent days. 

The World Federation of Exchanges — whose members include Nasdaq, Cboe, and CME Group — previously warned the SEC in a November 2025 letter that such exemptions could “dilute” existing investor protections and “distort” competition by giving crypto exchanges a regulatory shortcut unavailable to traditional markets. 

The group cautioned that granting legitimacy to tokenized stocks before full compliance implementation would “undoubtedly have negative — potentially acute — consequences” for U.S. markets.

The tokenization debate is unfolding against a backdrop of competing visions for the future of U.S. equity markets. Nasdaq, which received SEC approval in March 2026 for its own tokenized securities proposal, is pursuing a different model: one that keeps all trades on-exchange with full shareholder rights intact, built on the DTCC’s enterprise blockchain. 

The innovation exemption, by contrast, would sanction a parallel, crypto-native market running alongside the existing system — potentially fragmenting liquidity across dozens of third-party token issuers for the same underlying stock.

This post SEC Delaying Plan to Allow Crypto Versions of US Stocks: Report first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

A Freshman Congressman from Nashville Wants to Make the National Bitcoin Reserve Permanent

When Rep. Matt Van Epps helped lead the American Reserve Modernization Act of 2026 this week, he framed the bill not as an abstract national security measure — but as a direct extension of what he sees happening in his own backyard.

“Nashville is one of the nation’s leading Bitcoin hubs,” Van Epps said in a statement to Bitcoin Magazine, pointing to Bitcoin Park, the city’s growing digital asset community, and the annual Bitcoin conference, set to return to Nashville in 2027. 

“Nashville is quickly emerging as one of the nation’s leading Bitcoin hubs, with a growing digital asset community, institutions like Bitcoin Park, and the annual Bitcoin conference, which is scheduled to come back to Nashville in 2027,” Van Epps said. “Supporting this bill means supporting the financial innovation taking place in my district.” 

For the freshman congressman from Tennessee’s 7th District — a West Point graduate and combat helicopter pilot who won his seat in a December 2025 special election — this is personal. The bill is, in his telling, a statement about what his district already represents.

Van Epps co-led the legislation alongside Rep. Nick Begich (R-AK), who introduced the American Reserve Modernization Act of 2026, known as ARMA. The bill would codify President Trump’s March 2025 executive order establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve — giving it the force of statute rather than leaving it to the discretion of future administrations. 

The reserve would sit inside the U.S. Department of the Treasury and hold BTC seized through federal law enforcement forfeitures and civil penalties.

Van Epps’ central argument for the legislation is fiscal. “With a national debt of $39 trillion, this is an essential piece of legislation,” he said. Under ARMA, any future sale of Bitcoin from the reserve would be permitted for only one purpose: reducing the national debt. No transfers to other government programs, no discretionary spending — just debt reduction. The reserve, he stressed, “would be established without cost to American taxpayers”.

The bill also draws a firm line on property rights. Van Epps and Begich included language affirming that the federal government cannot interfere with an individual’s right to own, transfer, or self-custody digital assets — a provision that reflects the libertarian undertow running through much of the pro-Bitcoin caucus in Congress.

Van Epps: Bitcoin can fix some problems in the U.S. 

For Van Epps, the argument goes beyond portfolio management. He described the reserve as something with the potential to “solve major problems” for the country, with the national debt chief among them. Bitcoin’s fixed supply and its appreciation over time, in his view, give the United States a tool that gold certificates and traditional reserves cannot match.

The bill requires BTC in the reserve to be held for a minimum of 20 years — a provision designed to take the asset out of short-term political calculations and treat it as a generational balance sheet decision. 

Quarterly public Proof of Reserve reports and independent third-party audits would accompany the reserve, adding a layer of statutory transparency that the existing executive order lacks.

Eighteen original co-sponsors signed on, stretching across nine states. The Senate remains the harder terrain — competing crypto legislation is moving through committee there, and the path to 60 votes is unclear. 

This post A Freshman Congressman from Nashville Wants to Make the National Bitcoin Reserve Permanent first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Trump Media (DJT) Moves to Sell Bitcoin as Losses Reach $455 Million

Trump Media & Technology Group (Nasdaq: DJT), the parent company of the Truth Social platform, has transferred another 2,650 Bitcoin worth approximately $205 million to the exchange Crypto.com, a move widely interpreted as preparation for a potential sale of the company’s digital asset holdings.

The transfer, confirmed by on-chain data tracked by blockchain analytics firm Lookonchain, occurred in two transactions between roughly 1:22 a.m. and 2:22 a.m. GMT on May 22, originating from wallets labeled as Trump Media accounts by Arkham Intelligence.

The company has yet to issue any official statement confirming or denying the intent behind the move.

Trump Media originally purchased 11,542 BTC for approximately $1.37 billion at an average acquisition price of $118,522 per coin. 

With Bitcoin trading around $77,000 to $77,300 at the time of the transfer — well below that cost basis — the company is now estimated to be sitting on roughly $455 million in unrealized losses on its cryptocurrency holdings. Following the transaction, Trump Media’s visible on-chain holdings stand at an estimated 6,889 to 6,892 BTC, valued at approximately $533 million at current prices.

This is not the first time the company has moved Bitcoin off its books. 

Four months ago, Trump Media shifted 2,000 BTC valued at roughly $175 million — at the time, with Bitcoin trading near $87,378 — in what the company later characterized as a collateral movement.

Trump bitcoin ETF withdrawal

The latest crypto transfer comes just days after Trump Media withdrew its applications for a spot Bitcoin ETF and a combined Bitcoin-Ethereum ETF from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20. 

The company’s fund sponsor, Yorkville America, filed for withdrawal, citing a decision not to pursue the public offering “at this time.” 

ETF analysts noted that the decision appeared driven less by regulatory headwinds and more by competition from established players like BlackRock and Morgan Stanley, which now dominate what has become a $57 billion Bitcoin ETF market.

The Bitcoin strategy has coincided with a dramatic deterioration in Trump Media’s financials. In its first-quarter 2026 earnings report, the company posted a net loss of $405.9 million on just $871,200 in revenue — a staggering widening from a $31.7 million loss during the same period a year earlier. The bulk of those losses, approximately $368.7 million, stemmed from non-cash unrealized losses on digital assets and equity securities.

DJT shares have fallen roughly 60% over the past 12 months and were trading around $7.95 to $8.15 on Thursday and Friday. 

The company, which was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Sarasota, Florida, has struggled to build meaningful advertising revenue even as it has aggressively bet on crypto as a core pillar of its financial strategy.

This post Trump Media (DJT) Moves to Sell Bitcoin as Losses Reach $455 Million first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Happy Bitcoin Pizza Day, The 16th Anniversary of Laszlo Hanyecz Paying 10,000 BTC For Two Papa John’s Pies

Sixteen years ago today, a Florida programmer named Laszlo Hanyecz paid 10,000 Bitcoin for two large Papa John’s pizzas. At the time, those coins were worth roughly $41. On this Pizza Day, they are worth $777.87 million — down $328 million from last year’s anniversary price. 

Bitcoin Pizza Day, observed each May 22, marks the first commercial transaction using Bitcoin — the moment a digital currency stopped being a theoretical experiment and became a medium of exchange for real goods.

On May 18, 2010, Hanyecz posted on the BitcoinTalk forum with a straightforward offer: 10,000 BTC to anyone willing to order him two pizzas. Some forum users were skeptical — one pointed out he could sell the coins for $41 in cash. 

Hanyecz’s reply was simple: “I just think it would be interesting if I could say that I paid for a pizza in Bitcoins”. Four days later, a then-19-year-old forum user named Jeremy Sturdivant accepted, ordered the pies from Papa John’s, and collected 10,000 BTC via manual transfer. Bitcoin had its first exchange rate against a consumer good.

The $328 million bitcoin haircut

Every May 22, that fixed 10,000 BTC gets revalued at the day’s spot price — the cleanest annual benchmark crypto has. In 2024, the stack was worth $674 million. In 2025, it hit a record $1.106 billion, with Bitcoin trading at $110,568 on that day’s all-time high. Today, with Bitcoin near $77,300, the stack sits at $777.87 million — down 29.7% from last year.

The decline began on October 6, 2025, when Bitcoin reached a fresh all-time high of $126,000. Four days later, President Donald Trump announced 100% tariffs on Chinese imports and export controls on critical U.S. software. 

Within hours, total crypto market capitalization fell nearly $200 billion in a single session, Bitcoin dropped from $122,000 to $107,000, and approximately $19 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated — the largest single-day liquidation event in crypto history.

The worst start since 2018

Q1 2026 became Bitcoin’s third-worst opening quarter on record, closing down 23.2%, with spot Bitcoin ETFs bleeding $4.5 billion in outflows across the first eight weeks of the year. Iran tensions compounded the pressure, as U.S.-Israeli airstrikes on February 28 triggered a sharp risk-off rotation, trapping Bitcoin between $60,000 and $75,000 for much of March. 

Q2 has brought partial recovery — Bitcoin has climbed roughly 14% over the quarter — but the broader crypto market cap sits at $2.65 trillion today, down from $2.9 trillion just one week ago.

This post Happy Bitcoin Pizza Day, The 16th Anniversary of Laszlo Hanyecz Paying 10,000 BTC For Two Papa John’s Pies first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Mark Cuban Sells Most of His Bitcoin, Calls It a Failed Hedge

Billionaire investor Mark Cuban has parted with most of his Bitcoin holdings, saying the asset failed to deliver on its core promise as a hedge against fiat currency weakness and geopolitical turmoil.

Cuban made the remarks during an interview with Front Office Sports, where he said Bitcoin “has lost the plot.” The Shark Tank personality and former Dallas Mavericks owner had long positioned Bitcoin as a superior alternative to gold, citing its fixed supply and decentralized structure. That conviction has eroded.

“I always thought it was a better version of gold than gold,” Cuban said. “But gold just blew up and went to $5,000. Bitcoin dropped.”

The billionaire pointed to price behavior during the U.S.-Iran conflict as the moment his confidence broke. Gold surged through the period of heightened tensions, setting a record above $5,500 per ounce earlier this year. 

Bitcoin, meanwhile, struggled to hold momentum. Cuban said he expected Bitcoin to rise each time the dollar fell. It did not.

“Every time the dollar dropped, Bitcoin should’ve gone up,” he said. “It’s not the hedge I expected it to be.”

Bitcoin traded near $77,500 on Thursday, down roughly 30% over the past year and 38% below its all-time high of $126,080 set in October. Gold, despite its own pullback from recent peaks, remains up more than 37% over the same 12-month stretch and commands a market cap above $31 trillion — the largest of any asset in the world.

Bitcoin has outperformed gold since the Iran conflict

The data does offer a counterpoint to Cuban’s critique. Since the first signs of U.S.-Iran conflict emerged in late February, Bitcoin has risen more than 16% while gold has fallen over 15%. Bitcoin’s defenders argue that framing matters — the asset’s performance depends on the window of analysis chosen.

Cuban acknowledged a distinction within the crypto space. He expressed less disappointment in Ethereum, which he sees as underpinned by real utility through decentralized finance and blockchain applications. He was categorical about meme coins and speculative tokens, calling them “garbage.”

His earlier crypto profile was broader. In 2021, he held a portfolio split roughly 60% Bitcoin, 30% Ethereum, and 10% in other assets. He was a vocal NFT enthusiast, displayed his wallets publicly, and even accepted Dogecoin as payment for Mavericks merchandise. He once predicted Dogecoin would reach $1 and function as a stablecoin.

Cuban said the crypto sector as a whole has disappointed him by failing to find mainstream utility. “It hasn’t found an application for grandma,” he said.

This post Mark Cuban Sells Most of His Bitcoin, Calls It a Failed Hedge first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

While major cryptocurrencies remain mired in a prolonged slump, the native token of the decentralized exchange Hyperliquid has surged to a record high.

Data from CryptoSlate showed that HYPE crossed $60 for the first time, reaching as high as $62. This marks a 120% year-to-date gain and propels its market capitalization above $15 billion.

This comes as DeFiLlama data shows that the total value locked on the platform surpassed $5 billion for the first time since October 2025. At the same time, its open interest reached a six-month high of nearly $10 billion.

Market observers noted that this breakout was driven by a fundamental structural shift, with Hyperliquid rapidly evolving from a niche decentralized finance application into the primary on-chain Wall Street platform in the cryptocurrency sector.

By aggressively collapsing traditional finance silos, which typically separate brokerage, exchange, and custody services across different entities, the network is creating a unified venue that captures a new class of institutional capital.

How HYPE defied the broader crypto market gravitational pull

HYPE’s milestone arrives amid a broadly pessimistic period for digital assets, with Bitcoin and other major cryptocurrencies struggling.

This is because the broader cryptocurrency sector has faced sustained downward pressure since September 2025.

To contextualize Hyperliquid's divergence from the broader market, the total crypto market capitalization has declined by 36.5% during this period. Major assets have mirrored this slide, with Bitcoin falling 33.4%, Ethereum dropping 53.3%, and Solana shedding 65% of its value.

For months, the market traded in sync, with alternative cryptocurrencies taking heavier losses than Bitcoin.

According to cryptocurrency analyst Aletheia, Hyperliquid was among the worst performers until January 2026. However, a sudden shift in trend, catalyzed by strong spot exchange-traded fund flows and institutional partnerships, decoupled HYPE from its peers.

Moreover, HYPE's rally has been further accelerated by market mechanics.

Blockchain analytics firm Santiment reported a severe spike in negative funding rates across exchanges, indicating a disproportionate number of traders opening short positions in anticipation of a price drop. Instead, HYPE continued to climb, triggering a classic short squeeze.

According to the firm, bearish traders were automatically forced to buy back their positions, adding upward pressure to the token.

Despite these liquidations, HYPE’s open interest, which measures the total value of active futures contracts, has remained elevated at $1.92 billion. Rather than collapsing after liquidation, open interest continued to rise as new buyers entered the market to replace liquidated short positions.

Institutional Validation and the ETF Catalyst

The primary catalyst supporting this sustained open interest is the introduction of traditional financial wrappers.

Earlier this month, asset managers including Bitwise and 21Shares launched exchange-traded funds tied to HYPE. These products allow traditional equity investors to gain exposure to the token without navigating decentralized exchanges or managing private keys.

The institutional uptake has been swift. Data from SoSoValue indicates these newly minted products are already managing $81.13 million in assets.

Bloomberg exchange-traded fund analyst Eric Balchunas noted that the suite of HYPE-related products recently saw trading volumes approach $100 million, jumping 42% since their mid-May launch.

Due to this strong demand, data from Velo indicates that over 40% of the token’s recent price gains occurred during US trading sessions.

However, this strong performance is occurring despite US residents being geofenced from trading directly on Hyperliquid.

Market experts have linked Hyperliquid's appeal for institutional investors to its quantifiable fundamentals. Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan said:

“Hyperliquid should be valued as a global super-app. Its addressable universe is not the $3 trillion crypto market, but the $600 trillion market for global assets.”

According to Hougan, Hyperliquid's platform covers every asset class, and its tokens capture real value. He added that the trading venue is “an early, credible look at what crypto becomes when it’s allowed to grow up.”

Hyperliquid's expanding trading footprint

Hougan's thesis about Hyperliquid is that the platform is becoming an all-encompassing financial app, as evidenced by its expanding asset offerings and underlying protocol upgrades.

The platform is pulling trading volume away from legacy markets by offering perpetual contracts on traditional commodities, pre-IPO equities, and outcome-based events in a single environment.

With ongoing geopolitical tensions, including the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, traditional commodity markets face weekend closures precisely when international news often breaks.

Traders have increasingly turned to Hyperliquid to hedge their positions, making gold, silver, and oil perpetuals a major segment of the exchange's volume alongside native digital assets.

Notably, open interest in this kind of trade has doubled over the last two months to a new all-time high of $2.6 billion.

Furthermore, the platform's pre-IPO trading feature provides a distinct utility that shields cryptocurrency traders from digital asset downturns.

By offering exposure to private companies like SpaceX, Hyperliquid provides diversification previously reserved for accredited traditional finance investors.

Meanwhile, its recent expansion into prediction markets via the HIP-4 upgrade is also helping to boost the platform.

Research firm Delphi Digital highlights that HIP-4 completes the platform's mission of collapsing brokerage, exchange, and custody into a single venue by introducing outcome contracts.

These binary options allow traders to express market views that standard perpetual futures cannot capture.

Historically, a trader taking a long position on Bitcoin ahead of a Consumer Price Index report could correctly predict the inflation data but still lose money if the market reacted unpredictably to the news.

The HIP-4 upgrade allows traders to place capital directly on the event outcome itself, bypassing the secondary price reaction entirely.

HYPE's road to $100

Considering all of the above, HYPE’s latest record high has pushed the $100 target from a fringe wager into a central question for traders tracking Hyperliquid’s rally.

Polymarket data show traders assigning a 70% probability that HYPE reaches new highs around $66, a 62% chance that it breaks $70, and a 30% chance that it reaches $100 before year-end. The odds of a move to $100 have doubled in the past week, reflecting how quickly sentiment has shifted.

For that trade to hold, several drivers need to work together. ETF demand must continue bringing in buyers beyond Hyperliquid’s native user base. Futures positioning must avoid becoming too crowded. Platform volume must stay high enough to generate fees. Total value locked, stablecoin balances, and open interest must remain strong enough to support the view that more capital is settling inside the venue.

Still, market analysts believe HYPE's current momentum could sustain its uptrend.

Shaunda Devens, a research analyst at Blockworks Research, said the speed of the move reflects an imbalance between aggressive buyers and a seller base that had already spent months distributing tokens in the prior range.

In that environment, higher prices can become self-reinforcing. Existing holders feel less pressure to sell as the market validates their position. Sidelined buyers feel more pressure to enter as the price moves away from them. That dynamic can push prices higher even as valuation multiples expand.

However, the risk is that the same reflexive setup can unwind quickly. If ETF demand cools, if open interest becomes too crowded, or if long-term holders begin taking profit, the market could lose some of the pressure that has driven the breakout.

The post HYPE’s path to $100 runs through Hyperliquid becoming crypto’s on-chain Wall Street platform appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Rio de Janeiro Civil Police launched an operation targeting a Comando Vermelho operational nucleus and found a crypto mining setup with roughly 30 computers arranged on shelves in a room on an apparently abandoned lot.

The farm drew power from a clandestine electrical connection running directly from a utility pole. The machines carried high-capacity fans and exhaust systems, including remote-monitoring hardware.

As G1 reported, police are investigating whether the faction used the structure for money movement or laundering.

The physical configuration already describes the possibility that a criminal organization with territorial control can convert stolen electricity into portable digital value.

Territorial control provides access to space and utilities, a clandestine electricity connection eliminates the primary operating cost, and the mining output converts directly into portable value.

Stolen electricity is the load-bearing element of that model, since mining only makes economic sense when electricity is cheap, subsidized, or free.

Cambridge's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index methodology identifies electricity as one of mining's highest operating costs. Brazil's electricity regulator, ANEEL, reported that energy theft and other non-technical losses cost the country roughly $2 billion in 2024, with Rio de Janeiro among the states recording the highest levels of power theft.

At 1.5 kilowatts per machine, 30 computers would draw about 45 kilowatts, consuming about 32,400 kilowatt-hours per month. At $0.20 per kilowatt-hour, that is $6,400 in avoided monthly electricity costs, a real operating advantage delivered without payment.

The unknowns are the hardware type, the coin mined, the hash rate, and whether the crypto was ever cashed out. Stolen electricity removes one of mining's highest variable costs regardless of those unknowns.

Comando Vermelho's infrastructure evolution

The UK Home Office identifies Comando Vermelho as one of Brazil's two largest organized criminal groups alongside PCC, with territorial reach across urban favelas, border areas, and the Amazon.

The organization originated in Rio's prison system in the late 1970s, expanding into international cocaine trafficking and control of working-class neighborhoods where armed groups often manage basic services, including gas, internet, and transportation.

AP reported in 2025 that Rio police accused Comando Vermelho of coercing over 300 motorcycle drivers into using a clandestine ride-hailing app in Vila Kennedy, generating up to $200,000 per month, with revenue allegedly funneled through shell companies to finance drug trafficking.

On May 4, local news Folha reported that CV had intensified its presence in illegal gold mining near Brazil's border with Peru, treating gold as a profitable and stable alternative to cocaine and using the activity for investment and money laundering.

Each activity monetizes territory and controlled resources as a standalone revenue line, with transaction flows that run outside the cash-and-drugs channels investigators have historically targeted.

The Rio findings also sharpen the current picture of crypto crime in Brazil.

Folha reported on May 9 that Brazil's Federal Police seized $14 million in crypto in 2025, with seized assets appearing across drug trafficking, money laundering, human rights violations, environmental crimes, and online fraud.

On May 12, a national operation spanning 16 states deployed 165 search-and-seizure warrants and 71 arrest warrants focused on drug trafficking, criminal factions, and money laundering.

Chainalysis' 2026 Crypto Crime Report described the illicit on-chain landscape as having built large-scale infrastructure to help transnational criminal networks procure goods and launder crypto.

A Malaysian comparison provides the stolen power model with global context, as reports have noted that Malaysia's national utility, Tenaga Nasional, lost more than $1 billion to illegal power use by crypto miners between 2020 and August 2025.

Malaysian authorities responded with raids, smart meters, and databases of suspicious premises.

Where the grid trail leads

In the bull case, police link the setup to faction finances, locate wallet addresses or remote operators connected to CV leadership, and the case becomes the first documented example of a major Brazilian criminal faction running crypto production as a formal revenue line.

The investigative perimeter would then need to expand to include hardware procurement, power theft, cooling equipment, and utility access.

In the bear case, investigators identify independent operators who opportunistically used a CV-controlled area, find no faction wallet trail, and the setup generates too little revenue to function as a viable operation.

Investigators seize the machines, operators face energy-theft charges, and the case closes as a local footnote.

The configuration of clandestine power, remote monitoring, an abandoned lot, and a controlled neighborhood serves as a replicable model for anyone with access to a gang-controlled grid.

The power line shows that organized crime can build crypto-production infrastructure from territorial control, stolen electricity, and off-the-shelf hardware, forcing investigators to watch the grid as closely as they watch the blockchain.

The post Brazilian gang raid reveals a new crypto-crime model: turning stolen power into digital money appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Cardano could lose a core group of scientists if Input Output fails to secure treasury funding for a slate of research and infrastructure proposals that are still awaiting approval.

Last month, Input Output, the development firm behind the Cardano network, revealed that it was seeking $46.8 million to finance its operations for the 2026 development cycle.

However, the funding request has encountered significant resistance as the May 24 voting deadline approaches. A look at the major proposals shows that they face weak support, heavy abstentions, and large blocs of votes left uncast, leaving the network’s technical future hanging in the balance.

The escalating tension prompted a stark warning from Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson, who cautioned that failing to approve the treasury withdrawal could trigger an exodus of top talent and potentially shutter the network's flagship research laboratory.

Trailing the threshold

The $46.8 million request is fractured across several specialized workstreams, each requiring a 67% ratification threshold from the network’s DReps. As the voting window narrows, almost none are on track for approval.

The largest line item is the Cardano Maintenance Initiative, an ask of more than 62.1 million ADA designed to cover continuous core maintenance from the third quarter of 2026 through the first quarter of 2027.

The proposal covers nine functional areas, including bug fixing, disaster recovery, mainnet monitoring, and incident response.

Despite its critical nature, described by developers as the protective foundation that ensures network uptime and security, the proposal currently holds just 46.58% affirmative votes. A massive 9.25 billion ADA is logged as abstaining, while 45.61% of voting power has yet to weigh in.

Other critical infrastructure proposals are faring even worse. A 10.4 million ADA request to fund Layer 2 scalability solutions, including a data availability solution and the launch of Midgard, the network’s first permissionless optimistic rollup, sits at just 16.08% approval.

Layer 2 architecture is widely considered the only viable path to achieving the 10,000-plus transactions per second and sub-cent fees necessary to attract high-frequency decentralized finance and artificial intelligence micropayments in the current cycle.

A $2.95 million pitch to build “Pogun,” an end-to-end Bitcoin liquidity and credit engine meant to capture a share of the $1.5 trillion Bitcoin asset class, is polling at 19.04% in favor, weighed down by 24.15% active rejections and overwhelming abstentions.

Cardano's development and tooling on the brink

The hesitation among DReps extends to proposals that target developer experience and smart contract capabilities, areas where Cardano has historically struggled to gain ground against rivals like Ethereum and Solana.

A 13 million ADA proposal to bring automated formal verification to decentralized applications has performed the best thus far, but still trails the needed supermajority at 57.79%.

The initiative aims to extend the Blaster verification tool across multiple smart contract languages, lowering the barrier for developers to mathematically prove their code's correctness.

Similarly, an 11.8 million ADA request to expand the capabilities of Cardano’s native Plutus smart contract language, aimed at reducing script costs and improving expressiveness, is hovering around 32% approval.

A separate 3.6 million ADA pitch explicitly designed to boost developer growth by 30% over the next year, by streamlining onboarding and documentation, sits below 30%.

Also struggling is Project Cayley, a 7.92 million ADA initiative aimed at decentralizing data indexing. Currently, indexing the entire Cardano blockchain dataset requires massive computational resources, a burden that will only grow as the network scales.

Project Cayley introduces decentralized slice indexing, allowing node operators to index only specific portions of the chain. This lowers the barrier to entry and prevents data-serving infrastructure from centralizing around a few well-funded providers.

Yet, the proposal is languishing at 13.83% approval, with nearly 30% of active voters rejecting it outright.

Finally, a 13.1 million ADA proposal that would introduce Babel Fees, allowing users to pay transaction costs in any native asset, such as stablecoins, rather than holding ADA, has garnered nearly 60% support but remains shy of the 67% hurdle.

The upgrade is widely viewed as essential for removing onboarding friction for new users.

A clash over the “science coin”

For years, Cardano has staked its reputation on rigorous, peer-reviewed academic research and formal methods. This methodical approach has occasionally drawn criticism for moving too slowly, but it has cultivated a fiercely loyal community.

However, the stakes of the treasury vote also appear to be impacting a research-focused proposal called “Cardano Vision 2026: Human Centered, Scalable, Post Quantum Secure – IO Research.”

This proposal seeks nearly 33 million ADA tokens, approximately $8 million, to “preserve Cardano’s evidence-based approach” and “ensure that research outputs translate more reliably into measurable ecosystem growth.”

However, YUTA, a Cardano Drep, stated that the “proposal is a mix of a waste of funds and a potentially excellent proposal for Leios and quantum resistance research.”

In response, Hoskinson stated:

“We are deeply saddened that some Japanese dReps voted against our research proposal…If this proposal does not pass, we want the entire Japanese community to fully recognize that Cardano will lose its scientists, and our lab will be forced to close.”

Hoskinson emphasized that building the organization’s research apparatus took more than a decade and hundreds of millions of dollars.

He warned against dismantling the world's strongest cryptocurrency research group over “piecemeal funding support,” asserting that the organization's scientists would simply leave for ecosystems offering greater certainty and professional respect.

He added:

“This doesn't have anything to do with me. This has to do with destroying the entire core of our ecosystem. Cardano is the science coin. That's our brand. We spent hundreds of millions of dollars and a decade to earn the right to say that. You don't throw it away.”

As of press time, the proposal has secured only a 13% support, and its voting is expected to close on June 8.

Cardano's decentralized governance experiment tested

The funding friction is particularly notable given that Input Output explicitly scaled back its financial demands for this cycle.

The 2026 treasury request represents a nearly 50% reduction from the previous year's budget, signaling an intent to transition the ecosystem toward long-term self-sufficiency.

Yet, even this tightened fiscal belt has failed to win immediate favor from the newly empowered governance body.

The gridlock illustrates the double-edged sword of Cardano's decentralized governance era. By placing the keys to the treasury directly in the hands of token holders and elected DReps, the ecosystem has achieved a level of financial decentralization rarely seen in major blockchain networks.

However, the current voting impasse highlights the vulnerability of that model. With large swaths of voting power either abstaining or remaining dormant, funding for vital infrastructure is essentially frozen.

For Input Output, the proposals represent a bare-minimum operational baseline to keep the network secure and competitive. For the DReps, the vote is an exercise in budget discipline and accountability, requiring the software laboratory to justify every dollar.

If the proposals fail to cross the 67% threshold by the May 24 deadline, Cardano faces an unprecedented scenario. Without the requested treasury disbursements, key upgrades could be delayed, and essential maintenance operations may be forced to scale back.

More critically, as Hoskinson warned, the talent pipeline that built Cardano’s sophisticated, academically rigorous architecture could begin to fracture, fundamentally altering the ecosystem's trajectory.

The post Cardano founder warns network could lose its scientists in Input Output’s 33M ADA funding vote fails appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Mark Cuban sold most of his Bitcoin because it failed to provide a hedge when fiat confidence weakened and geopolitical risk rose.

Cuban called it “not the hedge I expected it to be,” and the price record supports his frustration. Bitcoin traded around $77,663 in mid-May 2026, roughly 38% below the record high of $126,000 set in early October 2025.

Spot gold hit a record $5,594.82 on Jan. 29, while silver touched $121.64 the same day, driven by the same macro variables Cuban cited: inflation fears, dollar weakness, and geopolitical pressure.

World Gold Council data shows that gold demand in the first quarter reached 1,231 tonnes, including OTC, and the dollar value of quarterly demand jumped 74% year over year to a record $193 billion.

Central banks bought 244 tonnes net in the same period, and bar-and-coin demand hit 474 tonnes, up 42% year over year. Cuban also told Portfolio Players he is moving more money into Ethereum than Bitcoin, but the hedge critique is specific to Bitcoin.

The ‘digital gold' pitch always had a problem

Bitcoin.org describes the asset as peer-to-peer money with no central authority or banks and specifies that issuance halves over time, eventually stopping at 21 million Bitcoin. Nothing in that description commits Bitcoin to rising when geopolitical stress rises.

Cuban built a thesis on the “digital gold” narrative that the market constructed and the Bitcoin whitepaper never endorsed.

Bitcoin has traded as a liquidity-sensitive, high-beta asset that correlates with the Nasdaq during risk-off episodes and surges when risk appetite returns.

Last year, crypto moved with broader equities through the April tariff shock before Bitcoin hit its October record, then suffered a major leverage wipeout. More recently, Glassnode's May 20 report describes Bitcoin as structurally resilient but notes that spot demand has weakened, ETF accumulation has slowed, and options positioning has turned defensive.

Cuban applied a gold benchmark to an asset that has never consistently moved like gold, and the resulting distance between what he expected and what the price did is what drove him to sell.

Bitcoin long-term holder supply rose by over 2 million BTC during the current drawdown, reaching 16.3 million BTC, with roughly 200,000 BTC added in the past month alone. Cuban is judging Bitcoin by whether it acts like gold in a crisis, while long-term holders are judging it by whether the network still functions and the supply cap holds ten years from now.

A hedge reduces portfolio risk during stress events with some consistency, but Bitcoin's realized volatility runs far above gold's, its price responds to ETF flows, regulatory headlines, and leverage cycles, and it has repeatedly correlated with equity drawdowns during acute stress.

Those are the mechanics of an early-stage monetary network still pricing in adoption uncertainty, with an asset that may be powerful over a long horizon precisely because it is too volatile and too liquidity-sensitive to function as a short-term panic hedge.

Investors reach for Bitcoin, if the adoption thesis holds, when they expect the monetary system itself to look different in the next decade. The fixed supply, permissionless transferability, and absence of a central issuer are the properties that make Bitcoin worth considering as long-duration monetary optionality.

The distance between $58,000 and $165,000

Citi's March 2026 forecast is a 12-month base target of $112,000, a recessionary downside of $58,000, and a bull case of $165,000, which captures how wide the resulting uncertainty runs.

Glassnode places the Realized Price near $54,900 as a lower structural boundary, while the $70,000 level carries weight as the pre-election anchor.

In the bear case, higher yields, continued ETF outflows, and weak spot demand keep Bitcoin pinned near structural support.

Bitcoin trades like a de-risking asset, fails to distinguish itself from the broader risk-off environment, and gold continues to absorb the crisis-hedge flows that Bitcoin's marketing promised to capture.

In the bull case, ETF demand recovers, regulatory progress in the US provides institutions with cleaner on-ramps, and risk appetite returns enough to push Bitcoin back through the $112,000 Citi target and toward $165,000.

Bitcoin survives the critique by operating as a scarce, borderless, permissionless monetary network that gains value as more institutions and sovereigns want an asset outside traditional finance.

The 21 million supply cap and the absence of a central issuer are the properties that make Bitcoin worth holding as a long-duration bet on monetary distrust becoming infrastructure, and those properties held through the same drawdown Cuban is citing as proof of failure.

Bitcoin's actual case rests on offering exposure to a world where more people want money outside the traditional system, which holds regardless of how Bitcoin performs against gold in any given crisis.

Bitcoin as a call option on monetary distrust

Cuban wanted Bitcoin to act like a predictable and consistent protection against the specific risks he saw coming.

Yet, Bitcoin may be closer to a call option on monetary distrust: valuable if the thesis plays out over a decade, volatile in the meantime, and a poor substitute for gold during acute stress.

Gold is still the cleaner crisis asset by every recent measure, shown through record prices, record quarterly demand value, sustained central bank buying, and consistent performance against the macro variables that define genuine panic.

The asset Cuban sold most of his stake still has a 21 million supply cap, still operates without a central issuer, and still accumulated 200,000 BTC of long-term holder supply in the past month.

Whether that is enough to justify the price range of $58,000 to $165,000 over the next year depends on whether the adoption thesis can replenish what the hedge thesis has lost.

The post Mark Cuban’s Bitcoin sale tests the gap between a failed hedge and a surviving monetary bet appeared first on CryptoSlate.

XRPL's known amendments page lists fixCleanup3_1__3 for activation on May 27, and by design the event is a maintenance upgrade.

Version 3.1.3 of rippled bundles fixes for NFTs, Permissioned Domains, Vaults, and the Lending Protocol, and the XRPL blog set the default vote to Yes because of the importance of those fixes.

The amendment process requires more than 80% support from trusted validators sustained for two weeks before the new rules become permanent.

What makes the episode worth examining beyond the deadline is what XRPL co-creator David Schwartz said about what a real fork would actually require, because his answer reveals how protocol legitimacy works on any blockchain.

Schwartz's central point is that raw node count is a poor proxy for consensus power. A system where nodes vote in proportion to their number creates an attack surface where anyone can spin up thousands of machines at low cost.

In the XRPL model, each server operator maintains a curated set of validators the server trusts not to collude, the Unique Node List, and the UNL determines which validation votes the server counts during consensus.

A server receives validation messages from many nodes across the network, and the validators on its UNL determine which of those messages shape the server's view of the ledger.

Schwartz explained that consensus legitimacy on XRPL flows through trust lists and validator coordination, producing a system in which UNL alignment and economic adoption determine which ledger survives a split.

Why a real fork requires a full coordination campaign

For the XRPL vote on May 27, servers that become amendment-blocked lose the ability to determine ledger validity, submit or process transactions, participate in consensus, or vote on future amendments.

That makes the deadline operationally important for any exchange, wallet, explorer, or infrastructure operator still running pre-3.1.3 software, as those servers become non-participants in the canonical ledger until the operator updates.

Amendment-blocked infrastructure loses access to the upgraded chain and lacks the coordination infrastructure to anchor a functional rival.

To produce a credible fork, a dissenting group would need validators willing to keep producing ledgers under the old rules, and without validators, there is no ledger stream to follow.

They would then need a competing Unique Node List that servers can configure or software can default to, because without a trusted validator list, nodes have no mechanism for coordinating around the old rules.

On top of that, they would need a code distribution that preserves the old rules and ships with defaults pointing to the rival UNL, and they would need infrastructure support from wallets, exchanges, explorers, and apps sufficient to make the old-rule ledger accessible and tradable.

XRPL documentation cites research showing that competing UNLs may need 90% overlap in the worst case to prevent a fork, meaning any rival UNL would need to share nearly the entire trusted validator set with the canonical one to maintain internal coherence.

A fork forming around a radically different validator set risks producing a ledger that cannot sustain its own consensus, let alone attract market adoption.

What the amendment process actually tracks is validator support, and the 80%-for-two-weeks threshold ensures that the entities the network trusts have reached a durable agreement before new rules become permanent.

A large share of unupgraded non-validator nodes can reflect infrastructure lag without implying anything about the canonical ledger's trajectory.

The distance between infrastructure lag and a rival chain

In the bear case, exchanges, wallets, or infrastructure operators that lag behind the May 27 activation become amendment-blocked and stop functioning as ledger participants.

Users routing through those providers encounter service disruptions, such as transactions that cannot be submitted, explorers that cannot confirm ledger validity, and apps that cannot process payments.

That operational cost falls on operators who deprioritized the upgrade, and it is worth tracking, particularly for any major exchange or custodian still running pre-3.1.3 nodes at activation.

Sustained infrastructure lag across enough providers would create real user-facing friction even as the canonical ledger continues under the new rules.

In the bull case, fixCleanup3_1_3 activates on schedule with the validator supermajority intact, infrastructure operators update without major incident, and the episode becomes a routine amendment activation.

The fixes to NFTs, Permissioned Domains, Vaults, and the Lending Protocol take effect, and the network moves on. The governance debate the upgrade surfaces survives either outcome, because Schwartz's explanation of what a real split would require applies to any future amendment.

Sustaining old rules requires a dissenting group running old software, recruiting validators around a competing UNL, and convincing wallets, exchanges, and market makers to recognize their ledger as the canonical XRP Ledger, against a default configuration pointing everyone else to the upgraded chain.

Every blockchain has a governance layer

Schwartz drew a comparison to Stellar, whose Protocol 24 upgrade is itself a stability fix for a state-archival bug in Stellar Core, which was a maintenance event requiring the same kind of coordinated validator adoption.

Bitcoin's equivalent legitimacy layer runs through miners, economic nodes, client implementations, and exchange listings. Ethereum's runs through validators, staking infrastructure, client diversity, core developers, and app-layer adoption.

What XRPL makes explicit through UNLs, other networks embed in mining power distribution, staking economics, or the social consensus around which client software developers trust.

The mechanisms differ across Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRPL, while the dependence on coordinated human decisions to make rule changes permanent runs through all three.

The May 27 activation illustrates how XRPL's governance layer converts validator agreement into ledger permanence, with UNL configuration determining which agreements count.

An operator who disagrees with fixCleanup3_1_3 has the technical freedom to run old software and configure a rival UNL.

Whether any exchange lists the resulting token, any wallet supports it, or any market maker provides liquidity is a question the protocol cannot answer for them.

That coordination disconnect is why protocol upgrades on well-adopted networks rarely produce durable forks: the economics of following the canonical chain almost always outweigh the economics of building a parallel chain from scratch, and the canonical chain is whichever the market decides is real.

The post XRPL’s May 27 upgrade shows how validators and markets decide a blockchain split appeared first on CryptoSlate.

The broader digital asset market is grappling with an aggressive correction, leaving major cryptocurrencies vulnerable to deeper losses. The macroeconomic environment has taken a severe hit as multi-theater geopolitical instabilities threaten global trade and energy markets, triggering systemic risk-off behavior among institutional investors.

When the macro financial landscape suffers simultaneous systemic shocks, high-beta altcoin leaders inevitably bear the brunt of the volatility. Ethereum (ETH) is currently caught in this macro crossfire, experiencing a sharp downward trend that puts its multi-month market structure at serious risk.

Will Ethereum Crash Below $2,000?

For traders watching the charts, the threat of Ethereum dropping below $2,000 is highly probable. Driven by a broader market liquidation, ETH has broken multiple short-term support levels over the last week. Whether the asset plunges below the psychological $2,000 mark depends entirely on technical defense at the current horizontal support and how rapidly global military and regulatory escalations unfold over the weekend.

What's Happening with Wars?

A crypto crash is rarely triggered by a single technical malfunction; it is almost always the byproduct of capital flight from risk assets due to major global developments. Today, two major geopolitical flashpoints are driving the sell-off:

1. The US-Iran Strike Threat and Inflation Risks

According to reports from CBS News, the United States is actively positioning assets for potential military strikes against Iran. This has severely choked commercial traffic through the crucial Strait of Hormuz. The imminent threat of an expanded conflict has driven crude oil prices upward, reigniting aggressive consumer price index (CPI) inflation fears. Consequently, expectations for Federal Reserve interest rate cuts have vanished, forcing investors to price in a prolonged hawkish era that drains liquidity from the crypto markets.

2. China's Massive Naval Deployment Near Taiwan

Adding heavy pressure to global markets, Taiwan's National Security Council Chief Joseph Wu confirmed that China has deployed over 100 navy, coast guard, and military vessels across regional waters stretching from the Yellow Sea to the South China Sea and Western Pacific. This aggressive military maneuvering follows a high-stakes summit in Beijing between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, where the "Taiwan problem" took center stage.

Compounding the anxiety, the U.S. Navy officially paused a scheduled $14 billion weapons sale to Taiwan to conserve munitions for the worsening Middle East theater. This leaves the self-governed island exposed. A potential Chinese military blockade or attack on Taiwan threatens the heart of global semiconductor supply chains, forcing global markets into a defensive panic and accelerating capital flight out of alternative assets like Ethereum.

Ethereum Price Prediction: Will ETH Coin Crash?

A close examination of the daily ETH/USD chart reveals a distinctly bearish market structure that has been building momentum throughout the month.

• Moving Average Cross Failure: The daily candles show a clear rejection from the 9-day and 21-day Moving Averages ($2,125 and $2,236 respectively). The faster moving average crossing below the slower tracker has acted as dynamic resistance, capping any attempts at a bullish relief rally.
• The Highlighted Drop Zone: As emphasized by the yellow highlight on the chart, Ethereum has printed consecutive, large-bodied red daily candles. This aggressive selling pressure has pushed the asset down to a current price of $2,037.
• RSI Breakdown: The Relative Strength Index (RSI) has plunged deeply into oversold territory, currently registering at 29.64. While an oversold RSI typically hints that a temporary bounce is due, in a high-volume macro sell-off, it can remain depressed while price continues to drift lower toward primary liquidity pools.

Traders looking to navigate this volatility and lock in liquidity can benchmark top-tier trading venues using our crypto exchange comparison.

Two Potential Market Scenarios for Ethereum

With the price hovering just above the critical psychological threshold, the market is facing two distinct structural paths over the coming days.

Scenario 1: The Bearish Breakdown Below $2,000

If the macroeconomic or geopolitical triggers worsen—such as the materialization of rumored military strikes in Iran or further naval incursions around Taiwan—the crypto market will face another wave of automated liquidations.

In this scenario, the immediate horizontal support line at $2,000 will break. Given the lack of dense historical order blocks immediately below $2,000, a breach of this level will likely trigger stop-losses and panic selling. This would swiftly drive the price down to test the major macro support line visible at $1,800 (marked by the green line on the chart), representing an additional 11% drop from the psychological boundary.

Scenario 2: The Oversold Support Bounce and Reversal

Conversely, if geopolitical tensions ease, the Strait of Hormuz reopens cleanly, and China de-escalates its naval positions, the technical setup favors a strong defensive stand by bulls.

The $2,000 level is a major structural pivot point. Because the RSI is already hovering in deeply oversold territory ($29.64), the selling pressure could exhaust itself right at the threshold. A successful defense of the $2,000 support would spark an aggressive short-squeeze, pushing Ethereum back up to retest the $2,125 resistance zone and the descending moving averages by next week.

Strategic Overview and Key Takeaways

As the market navigates this intense volatility, protecting your spot holdings from counterparty platform risk is vital. Reviewing cold-storage infrastructure via our hardware wallets comparison remains a recommended practice for risk management during market-wide crashes.

The cryptocurrency market has entered a sharp correction, erasing recent gains and catching many retail traders off guard.  Bitcoin (BTC) has plunged below the critical $75,000 support level, triggering a broader wave of liquidations across the altcoin space.

Why Are Cryptos Crashing Today?

For investors asking why cryptos are crashing right now, the sudden downturn is not tied to a single isolated event. Instead, it is the result of a simultaneous breakdown in geopolitical stability, fading momentum for favorable U.S. regulatory legislation, and severe stress building up in global fixed-income markets. These factors have collectively forced institutional investors to scale back risk, putting downward pressure on token prices.

Top 3 Reasons Behind the Crypto Crash

1. Escalating Geopolitical Tensions with Iran

Geopolitical instability remains a premier driver of financial market volatility. Recent reports from major media outlets, including CBS News, indicate that the United States could execute new military strikes against Iran. This comes amidst an ongoing conflict that has already heavily restricted commercial traffic through the vital Strait of Hormuz.

The immediate economic fallout of an expanded military intervention is felt in the energy sector. Crude oil prices, which have hovered near the $100 per barrel mark, face immediate upward pressure. Higher energy costs directly accelerate consumer price index (CPI) inflation. For the Federal Reserve—now led by newly appointed Chairman Kevin Warsh—resurgent inflation fears diminish the probability of anticipated interest rate cuts. Instead, it forces the central bank to maintain a hawkish stance or even consider further interest rate hikes, which historically drains liquidity out of speculative environments like cryptocurrency trading.

2. Diminishing Odds for the Clarity Act and SEC Delays

On the domestic front, regulatory headwinds are shifting from tailwinds to obstacles. In a matter of two weeks, political forecasting models tracking the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (H.R. 3633) saw the odds of the crypto market structure bill passing into law drop from a promising 75% down to 50%. The bill is highly anticipated by institutional players because it establishes a clear federal rulebook, distinguishing digital commodities under CFTC jurisdiction from securities.

Compounding this regulatory friction, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) officially delayed a highly anticipated plan that would grant innovation exemptions for crypto firms to trade tokenized stocks on public blockchains. The regulatory pushback, driven by concerns over third-party token compliance and investor protection, has dampened short-term institutional optimism. Investors looking to benchmark exchange infrastructure before deploying capital can monitor institutional grade platforms via our crypto exchange comparison.

3. Global Bond Market and Debt Stress

The third pillars of the downturn rests heavily within the fixed-income markets. Government bond yields worldwide are surging to multi-year highs. The yield on the U.S. 10-year Treasury note has neared 4.7%, while the 30-year yield touched 5.19%. Concurrently, Japanese government bond yields are testing new heights as international debt holdings shift.

High sovereign debt yields present two distinct problems for crypto assets:

• Increased Cost of Capital: High yields make corporate and margin borrowing significantly more expensive, reducing the amount of speculative capital flowing into alternative assets.
• Risk-Free Return Competition: When traditional, government-backed bonds offer reliable yields near or above 5%, institutional capital frequently rotates out of volatile risk assets (like Bitcoin and altcoins) and into the safety of debt instruments.

Bitcoin Price Analysis: What Happens Next for BTC?

From a technical perspective, Bitcoin's failure to maintain its footing above $75,000 exposes the asset to further downside risk over the weekend.

If military strikes manifest over the weekend, the immediate emotional reaction from algorithms and spot traders will likely push BTC toward the primary support zone between $72,000 and $72,500. Conversely, if geopolitical headlines calm and no strikes occur, the market will likely experience an aggressive short-squeeze and reversal heading into the next weekly candle open.

During periods of heightened market volatility and rapid price movements, keeping your long-term assets secure in cold storage is paramount; you can explore market-verified security options via our hardware wallets comparison.

Harvard University's endowment fund has aggressively scaled back its exposure to cryptocurrencies. According to recent regulatory filings, the world's largest academic endowment fund reversed its bullish stance on crypto assets during the first quarter of the year.

The move highlights an emerging divergence among Wall Street's elite regarding the long-term viability of spot crypto products. While some multi-billion-dollar entities continue to accumulate digital assets, others are rapidly taking profits or mitigating risk amid a choppy macroeconomic landscape.

What Did Harvard Sell?

The latest Form 13F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reveals that the Harvard Management Company (HMC) completely eliminated its $86.8 million position in BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA).

Compounding this full exit, Harvard also downsized its position in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) by roughly 43%. The endowment offloaded approximately 2.3 million shares of the spot Bitcoin ETF, leaving it with 3,044,612 shares valued at approximately $117 million at the end of the quarter.

Understanding Institutional Rebalancing and 13F Filings

To contextualize Harvard's recent trades, it is essential to define what these regulatory disclosures mean. A Form 13F is a quarterly report required by the SEC from institutional investment managers holding at least $100 million in equity assets. It offers the public a snapshot of long positions in U.S. listed equities, options, and exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

While these filings provide transparency, they feature an inherent time lag. The data disclosed in mid-May reflects the portfolio architecture exactly as it stood on March 31. Therefore, any tactical adjustments made by Harvard during the second quarter remain unknown to the public until the next reporting cycle.

Why Did Harvard Dump Its Ethereum and Bitcoin?

Harvard's rapid exit from Ethereum after only one quarter of exposure points to several macroeconomic and internal crypto headwinds that occurred early in the year.

Underperformance and Volatility of Crypto Assets

The primary catalyst behind the sudden divestment appears to be the lackluster price action of major cryptocurrencies relative to standard equities. Ethereum experienced notable downward pressure during the first quarter, dropping significantly from its late-2025 local highs. Faced with an asset that underperformed projections, Harvard's risk management protocols likely triggered an automated stop-loss or a tactical rotation to preserve endowment capital.

Ecosystem Uncertainties at the Ethereum Foundation

Beyond price action, internal governance matters within the Ethereum ecosystem have raised eyebrows among institutional investors. A series of high-profile departures at the Ethereum Foundation—including key long-time researchers—created a narrative of organizational turbulence. Critics and analysts have argued that competing Layer-1 blockchains are aggressively capturing market share while the Ethereum Foundation remains heavily focused on ideological parameters rather than refining native tokenomics to appeal to Wall Street.

A Rotational Play Toward Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The capital freed up from selling crypto news-driven assets did not sit in cash. The 13F filing indicates that Harvard actively pivoted its portfolio toward booming tech and hardware manufacturing. HMC significantly increased its equity exposure to top-tier semiconductor and AI infrastructure firms, ramping up allocations in:

• Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC)
• NVIDIA (NVDA)
• Broadcom (AVGO)

The Broader Institutional Landscape: A Divided Frontier

Harvard's retreat does not necessarily point to a universal institutional rejection of crypto. Instead, the broader 13F data outlines a severe fragmentation in how major funds view the asset class.

For example, sovereign wealth funds took the exact opposite approach during the same period. Abu Dhabi's Mubadala Investment Company expanded its spot Bitcoin ETF allocations by 16%, pushing its net holding close to $566 million. Concurrently, banking giants like JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo reported increased stakes in both Bitcoin and Ethereum spot funds.

Conversely, hedge funds like Millennium Management and Capula Management mirrored Harvard's conservative approach by significantly paring down or entirely liquidating their respective spot crypto trust shares.

Mining and Masternodes: Private Hobby or Commercial Activity?

Crypto mining has long been the symbol of the digital gold rush. A computer, electricity, processing power – and with a bit of luck, new coins are created. What once sounded like an experiment to many tech enthusiasts is now taken much more seriously from a tax perspective. Those who earn income from mining, masternodes, or similar validation models quickly find themselves in a zone where the crucial question arises: Is this still a private hobby or already a commercial activity?

This distinction is more than just a formality. It determines how income must be reported, what costs can be deducted, whether a business registration is necessary, and whether additional tax obligations arise. Especially since many crypto users start their activities on the side, the risks are often underestimated.

Why Mining is Taxed Differently than Just Buying and Holding

Those who buy Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies and sell them later typically engage in private sales transactions. The situation is different with mining. Here, coins are not simply purchased on the market but earned through active effort. Miners provide processing power, secure networks, validate transactions, and receive rewards or fees in return.

Thus, mining is more akin to an active occupation than a passive investment from a tax perspective. This is precisely why the question arises as to whether the income is to be treated privately or if a commercial enterprise is already in place. The answer does not depend on a single characteristic but rather on the overall picture.

An occasional technical experiment with minimal income is assessed differently than a professionally set up mining operation with multiple devices, an optimized electricity contract, ongoing profitability calculations, and a clear profit-making intention.

Private Hobby: When Mining Can Still Have Hobby Characteristics

Not every mining activity is automatically a business. Those who test how a network works out of technical interest, experiment with small hardware, and do not pursue serious profit-making can remain in the private realm.

Typical for a private hobby are small amounts, lack of systematic approach, and no professional market presence. The user does not operate mining as an economically organized project but out of curiosity. The setup is modest, there is no elaborate infrastructure, no ongoing optimization, and no clear intention to generate sustainable profits.

However, this is where the difficulty lies: Even small activities can generate income. And income does not automatically become insignificant just because it arises from a hobby. Those who regularly receive rewards should not hastily assume that there is nothing to report for tax purposes.

When the Tax Office is More Likely to Consider it a Business

The more professional the mining operation, the closer it is to being classified as a commercial activity. Several factors are crucial: Is the activity carried out on a permanent basis? Is there a clear profit-making intention? Has specific hardware been acquired? Are electricity costs, cooling, location, and efficiency systematically optimized? Is there a recognizable organization?

A single laptop in the living room is different from a mining rig with multiple graphics cards or ASIC miners. Those who invest capital, calculate returns, and continuously adjust their activities to market conditions are no longer just playing around. Then, mining resembles a business activity.

Mining pools can also play a role. Joining a pool to receive rewards more regularly does not automatically mean acting commercially. However, it can be an indication of a systematic and sustainable activity, especially if further professional characteristics are present.

Masternodes: Sounding Passive, but Not Simple Tax-wise

Masternodes appear less active at first glance than classic mining. Users hold a certain amount of coins, operate a server, or provide network functions and receive rewards in return. Technically, it is not just about pure computing as in proof-of-work mining, but about network services, validation, governance, or transaction processing.

From a tax perspective, what actually happens is crucial. Those who operate a masternode typically provide a service to the network. In return, they receive compensation. This can be assessed differently for tax purposes than merely holding a coin.

With masternodes, the questions of scope, organization, and profit-making intention also arise. A single test run with low returns is viewed differently than operating multiple nodes with server costs, technical maintenance, and yield planning.

Income is Relevant Even Before Sale

A common misconception is that taxes only arise when mined coins or masternode rewards are sold. This perspective is too simplistic. The inflow of rewards can already be tax-relevant. The key factor is the value of the received coins at the time of inflow.

Later, a second tax event may occur. When the received coins are sold or exchanged, it must be re-evaluated whether a profit or loss has occurred. This leads to a two-stage consideration: First, the receipt of the coins, and later their utilization.

This complexity makes mining and masternodes more complicated than mere buying and holding. Those who only consider the later sale may overlook the original inflow value.

Costs: Electricity, Hardware, and Hosting

Mining and masternodes often incur significant costs. These include electricity, hardware, repairs, cooling, internet, servers, hosting, software, fees, or proportional space costs. Whether and how these costs can be considered for tax purposes largely depends on the classification of the activity.

In commercial mining, operating expenses can generally play an important role. Hardware may be depreciated under certain circumstances, and ongoing costs can reduce profits. However, obligations also increase: Income must be accurately recorded, expenses documented, and business transactions clearly substantiated.

In the private realm, tax treatment is less clear and often more limited. Those who wish to claim expenses must carefully examine whether they can be deducted for tax purposes and in what context they arise.

Hobby Activity: When No Profit is Generated Over Time

Another term is hobby activity. If an activity consistently produces losses and no realistic profit-making intention is evident, the tax office may question the tax recognition of losses.

This is particularly relevant for mining, as high electricity costs and fluctuating prices can quickly lead to losses. Those who spend more over the years than they earn cannot automatically expect to claim all losses for tax purposes.

Conversely, simply labeling something as a hobby does not automatically exempt one from tax obligations if income is regularly generated and the activity is economically organized. The classification depends on the overall picture.

Documentation Becomes the Crucial Evidence

Mining and masternodes can only be accurately classified for tax purposes if the data is complete. Important factors include the time of inflow, the amount of coins received, the euro value at the time of inflow, transaction IDs, wallet addresses, hardware used, electricity costs, server costs, pool settlements, and later sales or swaps.

Especially with masternodes, server data, node uptime, reward histories, and fees should be documented. Those who use multiple wallets or platforms should be able to clearly assign individual transactions.

Without documentation, a problem quickly arises: The blockchain shows movements, but it does not automatically explain why a coin was received, which transaction it must be assigned to, and whether costs are related.

Business Registration: Not Just a Tax Question

If mining or masternodes are operated commercially, a business registration may also become relevant. This is not solely a question of income tax but also involves organizational obligations. Depending on the scope, issues such as trade tax, value-added tax, bookkeeping, and profit determination may also arise.

Many investors start with a small setup and gradually grow into it. This transition is precisely where the risk lies. What initially begins as a private test can take on a different character due to increasing income, investments, and professionalization.

Therefore, the classification should not wait until the end of the year. Those who seriously engage in mining or use masternodes with a yield goal should check early on whether their activity already appears commercial.

Conclusion: The Line is Not Drawn by One Device, but by the Overall Picture

Mining and masternodes are not a trivial matter from a tax perspective. Whether an activity remains private or becomes commercial is not determined by a single factor. Neither the number of devices nor the amount of income alone provides the answer. The overall picture of scope, sustainability, organization, profit-making intention, and technical implementation is crucial.

For investors, this means: Even those who are just experimenting should document income and transactions. Those who want to systematically generate returns should treat their activity from the outset as an economic project.

The most important rule is: Mining and masternodes are not a tax-free playground. The more professional the activity becomes, the more it approaches a commercial activity. Recognizing this early can help fulfill obligations better, accurately record costs, and avoid future conflicts with the tax office.

Bitcoin is trading near the $78,000 level after a volatile week in the crypto market. The latest market data shows BTC holding a market cap of around $1.56 trillion, while daily momentum remains weak and technical ratings still lean cautious. However, a new macro signal is now getting attention: Fed liquidity may be turning supportive again.

For Bitcoin traders, this matters because liquidity has often played a major role in previous crypto cycles. When financial conditions tighten, risk assets usually struggle. When liquidity improves, Bitcoin and other crypto assets often become more attractive again, especially if investors start looking for higher-upside opportunities.

Now, with the Federal Reserve balance sheet showing signs of expansion after the end of quantitative tightening, the question is simple: could this be the liquidity shift Bitcoin needs for its next major move?

Bitcoin Price Holds Near $78K as Market Momentum Stays Mixed

Bitcoin is currently trading around $78,000, slightly lower over the past 24 hours. The move comes after BTC failed to hold stronger upside momentum above the $80,000 zone, keeping traders focused on whether the market is entering another correction phase or simply consolidating before the next attempt higher.

Despite the short-term weakness, Bitcoin remains the largest crypto asset by market cap, with a valuation of around $1.56 trillion. Trading volume also remains significant, showing that market activity has not disappeared even as price action becomes more uncertain.

The main issue now is direction. Bitcoin has not broken down aggressively, but it also has not confirmed a strong bullish continuation. This is why macro liquidity is becoming increasingly important. If liquidity conditions improve while BTC holds key support, the setup could shift from defensive to constructive.

Fed Liquidity Turns Bullish: Why This Matters for Bitcoin

The latest discussion across crypto markets is focused on the US central bank balance sheet. Some analysts are pointing to a bullish crossover in Fed liquidity indicators, comparing the current setup to 2019, before a major market expansion.

According to recent market commentary, the Fed has added around $193 billion in liquidity since quantitative tightening ended in December 2025, with another liquidity injection expected soon. While traders should be careful with viral chart signals, the broader idea is important: if liquidity is returning to the system, Bitcoin could benefit.

Historically, Bitcoin performs better when global liquidity improves. This does not mean BTC rises in a straight line, and it does not remove downside risk. However, it can create a stronger environment for risk assets, especially if investors believe the worst of the tightening cycle is over.

The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet remains a key macro indicator because it reflects how much liquidity is available in the financial system. When the balance sheet expands or reserve conditions improve, markets often become more comfortable taking risk. For Bitcoin, that can support demand from traders, institutions, and long-term holders looking for exposure before a larger market recovery.

Bitcoin Price Prediction: Can BTC Reclaim $80K?

The first major level to watch is still $80,000. Bitcoin needs to reclaim this zone with strong volume to confirm that buyers are regaining control. A clean move above $80,000 could open the door for another attempt toward the $82,000 to $85,000 range.

If BTC fails to recover $80,000, the market could remain under pressure. In that case, traders may watch the $76,000 to $75,000 range as the next important support zone. A breakdown below that area would weaken the current setup and could trigger another wave of selling.

For now, the most realistic Bitcoin price prediction is neutral to cautiously bullish. BTC is not showing a confirmed breakout yet, but the liquidity backdrop is becoming more supportive. If Fed liquidity continues to improve and Bitcoin holds above its key support levels, the probability of a move back above $80,000 increases.

Michael Saylor’s Bitcoin Signal Adds to Bullish Sentiment

Another factor supporting Bitcoin sentiment is Michael Saylor’s latest hint at more BTC buying. Saylor recently posted “Big Dot Energy,” which many traders interpreted as a sign that Strategy may be preparing for another Bitcoin purchase.

This matters because Strategy remains one of the most visible institutional Bitcoin buyers. Whenever Saylor hints at accumulation, it tends to attract attention from crypto traders and long-term BTC investors. Even if one company cannot control the entire Bitcoin market, the signal still reinforces the idea that institutional conviction remains strong.

In the current environment, this is important. Bitcoin is struggling below $80,000, but large buyers may still see the current range as an accumulation opportunity. If Strategy confirms another purchase, it could support short-term sentiment and add pressure on sellers.

Why This Bitcoin Setup Is Different from a Regular Bounce

This is not just a typical short-term bounce story. The important difference is the combination of price, liquidity, and institutional behavior.

Bitcoin is holding near a key psychological level. Fed liquidity signals appear to be improving. At the same time, Saylor’s latest post suggests that institutional Bitcoin accumulation may continue. Together, these factors create a stronger narrative than price action alone.

However, traders should not ignore risk. Bitcoin still needs confirmation on the chart. A bullish liquidity signal is not the same as a confirmed breakout. If macro conditions worsen again, or if BTC loses support, the market could quickly return to a defensive mood.

What Bitcoin Traders Should Watch Next

The first thing to watch is whether Bitcoin can reclaim $80,000. This remains the cleanest short-term signal for a possible recovery. A strong daily close above that level would make the bullish case stronger.

The second factor is Fed liquidity. If the balance sheet continues to expand and reserve conditions remain supportive, the macro environment could become more favorable for Bitcoin and the broader crypto market.

The third factor is institutional buying. Any confirmed Bitcoin purchase from Strategy could support sentiment, especially if it happens while BTC is holding key support.

Finally, traders should watch whether altcoins start reacting. If liquidity improves and Bitcoin stabilizes, capital may eventually rotate into Ethereum, Solana, and selected altcoins. But if BTC remains weak, the broader market may stay cautious.

Is Bitcoin Preparing for Its Next Move?

Bitcoin is still in a critical zone. The price has not confirmed a major breakout, but the market is also not showing full capitulation. With BTC holding near $78,000 and Fed liquidity signals turning more supportive, the setup is becoming more interesting for bulls.

The next move depends on confirmation. If Bitcoin reclaims $80,000 and liquidity continues to improve, BTC could attempt a stronger recovery toward the mid-$80,000 range. If it fails, the market may revisit lower support levels before any meaningful rebound.

For now, the Bitcoin price prediction remains cautiously bullish. Liquidity is improving, institutional interest remains visible, and BTC is still holding above major support. But until Bitcoin breaks back above $80,000 with strength, the market remains in a waiting phase.

Token Mentioned: $BTC, Bitcoin

A real astrology engine disguised as a fortune teller. A scammer-punishment machine loaded with the Shrek screenplay. A tool that reads any book and maps every idea to your actual life. These are not normal skills.

User losses weren’t immediately clear.

The SEC’s expected regulatory framework would have provided clarity for companies looking to tokenize traditional assets like stocks.

Fara1.5 is a family of open-weight browser agents from Microsoft Research that outperforms OpenAI's Operator and Google's Gemini 2.5 Computer Use on the industry's toughest live-web benchmark.

Kalshi unveiled Americans for Fair Markets, an advocacy group to help shape policymakers’ perception of prediction markets.

Peter Schiff predicts pain ahead for Bitcoin, doubling down on skepticism.

XRP has recorded a massive 57% decrease in its whale transaction volume as its large holders appear to be taking caution amid the broader market slowdown.

New XRPL version in the works signals stronger security push for XRP Ledger.

As Hyperliquid's HYPE token dominates inflows, tokenomics and technical resistance complicate a post-Clarity Act breakout for XRP.

Shiba Inu's exchange flows turn negative with a possibility of bringing more pain to the market.

TLDR:

• • Bitcoin was rejected near the $82,400 200DMA, mirroring the March 2022 pattern that preceded a prolonged price downtrend.
  • CryptoQuant’s Bull Score Index fell from 40 to 20, returning to extremely bearish levels last seen in early 2026.
  • The Coinbase Premium stayed negative throughout the rally, pointing to weak U.S. institutional and retail spot demand.
  • Analysts are watching the $70,000 Traders’ On-chain Realized Price as the next critical support zone for Bitcoin.

Bitcoin’s recent price recovery is drawing scrutiny from on-chain analysts. BTC rebounded sharply from April lows and briefly climbed back above $82,000.

However, data from CryptoQuant suggests the move was largely speculative rather than demand-driven. XWIN Japan has flagged this as a critical turning point for the market.

The underlying structure of the rally points to futures activity rather than genuine spot accumulation.

Bitcoin’s 200DMA Rejection Echoes a Familiar Bearish Pattern

Bitcoin’s rejection near the 200-day moving average is one of the clearest warning signs right now. The 200DMA sits around $82,400, a level BTC failed to close above convincingly.

CryptoQuant’s data draws a direct comparison to March 2022’s price action. That period saw a strong relief rally before BTC resumed its broader downtrend shortly after.

The parallel is worth taking seriously given the current market conditions. Back in 2022, the same technical level acted as a ceiling rather than a launchpad.

That rejection marked the beginning of a prolonged correction phase for the asset. The current setup is following a similar sequence, according to available on-chain data.

Futures activity played a central role in driving the recent price recovery above $80,000. Leveraged long positions began unwinding as prices approached that resistance zone.

That unwinding reflects reduced conviction among speculative traders at higher price levels. Without fresh futures demand stepping in, the upside momentum has since stalled.

Spot demand has also softened alongside the futures pullback. US spot Bitcoin ETFs, which were net buyers earlier in May, recently flipped to net sellers.

That reversal removes a key demand pillar that supported BTC during earlier recovery attempts. The shift in ETF behavior is one of the more telling data points in recent weeks.

Bull Score Index and Coinbase Premium Signal Deepening Market Weakness

The Coinbase Premium Index remained mostly negative throughout Bitcoin’s recent rally. That reading points to weak spot demand from both US institutional and retail participants.

Historically, Bitcoin bull markets that hold have been accompanied by a consistently positive premium. The absence of that condition raises questions about the rally’s staying power.

CryptoQuant’s Bull Score Index has since dropped from 40 to 20. That level places market conditions back into “extremely bearish” territory.

The last time the index sat at similar readings was during the February to March 2026 correction. That comparison reinforces the view that broader market structure remains under pressure.

Analysts are now closely watching the $70,000 area as the next major support level. That zone corresponds to the Traders’ On-chain Realized Price, a historically reliable floor during bear market conditions.

A correction toward that level would not be unprecedented given the current data. It remains a key area for market participants to monitor in the near term.

The overall demand picture for Bitcoin has shifted into contraction territory. Spot buying has slowed, futures-driven momentum has faded, and institutional participation has pulled back.

Each of these factors, taken together, paints a cautious picture for the weeks ahead. Whether $70,000 holds as support may define the next major move for BTC.

The post Is Bitcoin’s Recovery Built on Shaky Ground? On-Chain Data Raises Red Flags appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• Staked ETH has reached all-time highs in 2026, reducing circulating supply and easing selling pressure on the market.
• MVRV data shows Ethereum investors remain profitable but are far from the overheated levels of previous cycle tops.
• Binance depositor activity is not rising aggressively, reducing the short-term distribution risk for ETH holders.
• A steadily rising Realized Cap signals continued capital inflows, a pattern linked to late-stage bull market cycles.

Ethereum continues showing resilience despite ongoing short-term selling pressure across the crypto market. On-chain data, covering Realized Profit, MVRV, Staked Amount, and Binance depositor trends, supports a structurally strong long-term outlook.

While corrections remain possible, analysts note that pullbacks are being absorbed by long-term holders. This activity shows that most participants prefer buying dips over exiting positions.

Rising staked supply and continued capital inflows further support Ethereum’s uptrend as markets head deeper into 2026.

Staked ETH Reaches All-Time Highs as Supply Pressure Eases

ETH staked on the network has grown aggressively since 2023, reaching all-time highs heading into 2026. This trend reflects a growing preference among investors to lock up their holdings for long-term rewards.

A large portion of circulating supply is now locked, reducing the amount available for active trading.

Crypto analyst PelinayPA noted in a recent post that rising staked ETH shrinks available supply and builds structurally bullish conditions.

With fewer coins available on the open market, selling pressure is naturally reduced over time. This dynamic often supports price stability during periods of short-term volatility or profit-taking activity.

The MVRV metric shows that the market is not currently sitting in an undervalued zone. Many investors remain in profit, though the reading remains far from overheated levels recorded during previous cycle tops.

This middle-ground positioning suggests the long-term bull trend is still active and has not yet peaked.

Short-term corrections remain a possibility given the current profit levels across the Ethereum market. However, the broader structure continues to favor buyers rather than pointing toward a sustained bearish reversal.

The combination of reduced circulating supply and profitable investor positions keeps the long-term outlook intact.

Binance Depositor Divergence Points to a Potential Supply Squeeze

Binance depositor activity is one of the most closely tracked metrics for spotting short-term selling pressure. When more investors send ETH to Binance, it typically signals that profit-taking or distribution is approaching.

Previous spikes in depositor numbers have historically been followed by periods of weaker ETH price performance.

At this point, depositor activity on Binance is not rising aggressively despite the broader market environment. Meanwhile, staked ETH continues to climb, showing that larger long-term participants are still withdrawing ETH from circulation.

This divergence between short-term depositors and long-term stakers is creating a growing supply squeeze.

A rising Realized Cap for Ethereum signals continued capital inflows into the network. This metric tracks the total value of all ETH at the price it last moved on-chain.

A steadily climbing Realized Cap is typically associated with late-stage bull cycles rather than bear market conditions.

Taken together, the data suggests that Ethereum pullbacks are likely to remain buying opportunities for the near term.

As PelinayPA noted, unless Binance depositor activity spikes aggressively, the current market structure should continue favoring bulls. Long-term players appear to be positioning for a continued uptrend rather than preparing for any major exit.

The post Ethereum Pullbacks Are Only Being Viewed as Buying Opportunities, On-Chain Data Shows appeared first on Blockonomi.

The American online gambling market has been a two-front war between legacy casino brands and tech-forward sportsbook operators. Caesars brought decades of brick-and-mortar credibility into the digital world. DraftKings built its empire from daily fantasy sports and pivoted into one of the largest online sportsbooks in the country. Both are publicly traded, heavily regulated, and deeply invested in the US market. But while these two fight for dominance within the traditional system, a different kind of platform is gaining ground outside of it. ZunaBet launched in 2026 with a crypto-first model, a massive game library, and a loyalty structure that neither Caesars nor DraftKings comes close to matching.

Caesars: The Legacy Brand Goes Digital

Caesars needs no introduction in gambling. The name has been synonymous with casinos since the 1960s. The company’s move into online gambling was inevitable, and the acquisition of William Hill in 2021 gave it the sportsbook infrastructure to compete digitally.

Caesars Sportsbook operates in multiple US states with a product built around its famous rewards program. The Caesars Rewards system ties online activity to the broader Caesars ecosystem, including physical casinos, hotels, dining, and entertainment. For players who visit Caesars properties, this integration adds genuine value that purely online platforms cannot replicate.

The sportsbook itself is competent. Market coverage is solid across major American sports — NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL — along with college sports, soccer, tennis, and others. Live betting is available. The interface is functional without being remarkable.

On the casino side, Caesars offers slots, table games, and live dealer options in states where online casino gambling is legal. The game library is decent but limited by the regulatory requirements of each state. Players in New Jersey see a different selection than players in Michigan or Pennsylvania.

Payments run through standard US channels. Bank transfers, cards, PayPal, and approved e-wallets. Withdrawals can take one to five business days depending on the method. Welcome bonuses rotate and occasionally hit large numbers, but the terms and wagering requirements are typically complex.

The strength of Caesars is its physical footprint and the emotional connection players have with the brand. The weakness is that its online product feels like an extension of a land-based operation rather than something built natively for digital players.

DraftKings: The Tech Company That Became a Sportsbook

DraftKings came at gambling from the opposite direction. It started as a daily fantasy sports platform in 2012, built a massive user base, and then leveraged that audience when sports betting legalization began sweeping across the US after the 2018 Supreme Court decision.

The DraftKings Sportsbook is now one of the most popular in the country. The app is well designed, the odds are competitive, and the platform invests heavily in promotions to acquire and retain users. Same-game parlays, odds boosts, and free bet offers are constant.

DraftKings also operates an online casino in states where it is permitted. The game selection is reasonable and growing, with slots, table games, and live dealer titles from established providers. Like Caesars, the library varies by state due to regulatory differences.

The DraftKings rewards program uses a tiered system based on crowns earned through play. Players unlock different benefits at each level, including free bets, profit boosts, and entries into exclusive promotions. The system is more active and gamified than the traditional comp-point model, which fits the younger demographic DraftKings attracts.

Payments follow the same traditional paths as Caesars — bank accounts, cards, PayPal, Venmo, and similar options. Withdrawal times depend on the method and can take several days. Bonus terms tend to be aggressive on the marketing side but carry significant playthrough requirements in the fine print.

DraftKings succeeds because it thinks like a tech company. It moves fast, iterates on its product, and markets relentlessly. Where it falls short is the same place every US-regulated platform falls short — it is bound by state-by-state licensing, traditional payment infrastructure, and game libraries constrained by regulatory approval processes.

The Limits of the US Regulated Model

Caesars and DraftKings both operate within a system that was designed for a different era of gambling. State-by-state regulation means that neither platform offers a consistent experience across the country. A player in New Jersey has access to a full casino and sportsbook. A player in a state with only sports betting legalization gets half the product. A player in a state with no legal online gambling gets nothing.

Payment processing is tied to the US banking system, which means KYC verification, processing delays, and the occasional declined transaction when a bank flags a gambling deposit. Withdrawals are functional but never fast by crypto standards. And the bonus structures, while sometimes headline-grabbing in dollar amounts, come loaded with wagering requirements that reduce the actual value significantly.

None of this is the fault of Caesars or DraftKings specifically. They are operating within the rules they have been given. But for players who have experienced what crypto-native platforms offer — or players outside the US entirely — those rules create a product that feels limited.

ZunaBet: No Boundaries, No Compromises

ZunaBet entered the market in 2026 without the constraints that define Caesars and DraftKings. Owned by Strathvale Group Ltd, licensed in Anjouan, and led by a team with over 20 years of gambling industry experience, the platform was built from the ground up as a crypto-first operation with global reach.

The difference is visible immediately in the game library. ZunaBet launched with 11,294 games from 63 providers. Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw Gaming, Evolution, Yggdrasil, BGaming, and dozens more are all available from day one. There are no state-by-state restrictions filtering what players can access. Everyone gets the full library — slots, RNG table games, and live dealer titles included. For players used to browsing a few hundred games on a US-regulated platform, the jump to eleven thousand is staggering.

Crypto payments remove the friction that traditional platforms treat as normal. ZunaBet supports over 20 cryptocurrencies — BTC, ETH, USDT across multiple chains, SOL, DOGE, ADA, XRP, and more. No platform processing fees. Withdrawals are fast. There is no waiting for a bank to approve a transfer or a payment processor to release funds. Players deposit from their wallet and withdraw back to it without intermediaries slowing things down.

The sportsbook holds its own against any competitor. Football, basketball, tennis, NHL, and other major sports are covered with full market depth. Esports betting includes CS2, Dota 2, League of Legends, and Valorant. Virtual sports and combat sports expand the menu further. A player can bet on a Premier League match and a CS2 tournament from the same account using the same crypto balance.

New players receive up to $5,000 plus 75 free spins spread over three deposits. The first deposit matches 100% up to $2,000 with 25 spins. The second gives 50% up to $1,500 with 25 spins. The third matches 100% up to $1,500 with 25 spins. The terms are straightforward compared to the layered wagering requirements common on US platforms.

Apps are available for iOS, Android, Windows, and MacOS. The interface is fast, dark-themed, and responsive. Live chat support runs around the clock.

Dragon Loyalty vs Traditional Rewards: A Clear Gap

Caesars ties its rewards to a broader hospitality ecosystem. That works if you visit Caesars properties. If you are a purely online player, much of that value disappears. DraftKings uses a crown-based system that gamifies the experience but keeps the most meaningful rewards tied to volume and promotional cycles.

ZunaBet took a fundamentally different approach with its dragon evolution loyalty program built around the mascot Zuno. Six tiers with published rewards at every level. Squire starts at 1% rakeback. Warden gives 2%. Champion gives 4%. Divine gives 5%. Knight hits 10%. Ultimate reaches 20% rakeback. Additional perks include free spins scaling up to 1,000, VIP club access, and double wheel spins.

The entire system is visible before a player deposits a single dollar. No hidden tiers. No invitation gates. No ambiguity about what each level delivers. And 20% rakeback at the top is a number that neither Caesars nor DraftKings offers in any form to their online players.

Two Different Visions of Online Gambling

Caesars and DraftKings are competing to win within a defined system. They are doing it well, each in their own way. Caesars leans on brand heritage and physical integration. DraftKings leans on technology and marketing firepower. Both will continue to be major players in US regulated markets.

ZunaBet is playing a different game entirely. It is building for a generation of players who hold crypto, expect instant transactions, want access to thousands of games without geographic restrictions, and demand loyalty programs that are transparent and genuinely rewarding.

The platform is new and still establishing its reputation. But what it launched with — 11,000-plus games, 20-plus cryptocurrencies, a complete sportsbook with esports, and a loyalty program topping out at 20% rakeback — is a product statement that the established brands should be paying attention to. For players ready to look beyond the traditional model, ZunaBet is the most exciting option available in 2026.

The post Caesars vs DraftKings: The Established Brands — and ZunaBet’s Opportunity appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• XRP’s Open Interest has spiked sharply, pointing to aggressive position-taking in the futures market.
• XRP’s stable Market Cap suggests large holders are not yet distributing, reducing short-term crash risk.
• An overheated NVT Ratio shows XRP’s valuation is outpacing on-chain activity, making rallies fragile.
• The most probable XRP near-term scenario is an upside squeeze followed by a sharp correction afterward.

XRP is showing early signs of building short-term bullish pressure as several market indicators align. Open Interest has spiked in the futures market, reflecting fresh position accumulation among traders.

The NVT Ratio, however, continues producing irregular spikes while remaining at elevated levels. Market Cap has stayed stable, with no aggressive sell-off recorded from large holders.

These combined signals point to a potential squeeze setup, though overall market conditions remain fragile.

Rising Open Interest Signals Active Accumulation in XRP Futures

Open Interest in XRP’s futures market has risen sharply, reflecting aggressive position-taking by active traders. This type of OI increase, when paired with price support, typically strengthens short-term bullish momentum conditions.

The current market structure reflects that environment, though price follow-through will ultimately be the deciding factor. This pattern has historically served as a precursor to sharp directional moves in crypto.

Analyst PelinayPA flagged this pattern in a recent post, noting that XRP’s Market Cap has held steady. This stability suggests large investors are not yet actively exiting or distributing positions.

The probability of a sharp near-term downside crash therefore remains relatively low given the current setup.

That said, risks grow if OI keeps climbing while XRP fails to break new price highs. In that scenario, long squeeze pressure could intensify and produce sudden downside wicks in the market.

Traders watching the OI-versus-price relationship must stay alert for early divergence signals as conditions evolve.

Conversely, a breakout above resistance on rising OI could produce a short but powerful upside move. The current structure leans slightly bullish in the near term, though clear risks continue to persist.

Price action confirmation in coming sessions will separate genuine breakouts from false moves.

Overheated NVT Ratio Raises Fragility Concerns in XRP’s Market

The NVT Ratio is one of the key risk factors currently present in XRP’s broader market picture. It remains extremely elevated and continues producing irregular spikes.

A high NVT means the asset’s market valuation is growing faster than actual on-chain transaction volume. This disconnect between price and network activity is widely associated with fragile and unstable rallies.

Network usage is not expanding at the same rate as the broader market cap growth. That gap suggests price moves are not fully supported by genuine organic demand from the network. Short-term rallies built primarily on futures activity carry a notably elevated risk of sudden reversal.

Given elevated NVT alongside surging OI, an upside squeeze followed by a sharp pullback looks most likely. The initial move higher could be fast and aggressive, driven primarily by futures-market positioning.

Without stronger on-chain activity to support valuations, any rally in XRP remains structurally vulnerable to reversal.

For XRP traders, monitoring how both OI and NVT develop will remain a key priority. Should OI keep rising while XRP breaks new price highs, the squeeze could extend further to the upside.

But if network activity fails to catch up with market cap, correction risk stays persistently elevated across sessions.

The post XRP Long Squeeze Setup: Why Rising Open Interest Could Spark a Sharp Reversal appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• SUI Network has eliminated gas fees for stablecoin transfers, removing a major barrier for everyday crypto users.
• Stablecoin projects like USDC, Agora AUSD, and Bucket Protocol BUCK now operate in a more accessible payment environment.
• SUI’s DeFi layer spans lending, trading, and liquid staking, with protocols like Cetus, NAVI, and Haedal leading activity.
• Gaming, NFT marketplaces, and cross-chain bridges round out an ecosystem built to support long-term blockchain adoption.

SUI Network has removed gas fees for stablecoin transfers, allowing users to send payments without holding SUI tokens.

This change removes a long-standing barrier for new crypto users. It also positions SUI as a practical option for everyday payments and remittances.

The move draws attention to the broader SUI ecosystem, which already includes a wide range of DeFi, gaming, and infrastructure projects.

Gasless Transfers Open Doors for Everyday Payments

The decision to make stablecoin transfers gasless changes how users interact with the SUI blockchain. Previously, users needed native tokens to cover transaction costs, which created friction for newcomers. Now, anyone with a SUI wallet can send stablecoins without worrying about gas.

As noted in a post by @ourcryptotalk: “The chain that removes friction for stablecoins doesn’t just win DeFi. It wins payments. It wins remittances. It wins the normie user who never wants to think about gas.”

This development benefits the stablecoin projects already operating on SUI. Circle’s native USDC integration, Agora AUSD, and Bucket Protocol’s BUCK token all stand to see increased usage. Each of these projects now operates in a more accessible environment for regular users.

The change also works alongside SUI’s technical design. Its parallel execution model and object-based architecture already improve transaction speed. Combined with gasless transfers, the chain becomes more competitive for real-world payment use cases.

A Growing Ecosystem Backs the Infrastructure Shift

SUI’s DeFi layer includes established protocols across lending, trading, and liquidity staking. Cetus Protocol leads as the largest decentralized exchange on SUI with concentrated liquidity. NAVI Protocol and Scallop Lend handle lending, while Haedal Protocol leads in liquid staking.

Beyond DeFi, SUI has made a notable push into gaming. Projects like Abyss World, Panzerdogs, and E4C Final Salvation represent different gaming formats on the chain.

Mysten Labs even launched SuiPlay0X1, a dedicated gaming handheld, showing the team’s long-term commitment to the gaming sector.

Infrastructure support continues to strengthen as well. Walrus provides decentralized storage, while bridging solutions like Wormhole, LayerZero, and Axelar connect SUI to other networks. BlockVision and Shinami handle data indexing and node services, keeping the backend running smoothly.

NFT marketplaces, wallet options, and even memecoins round out the ecosystem. BlueMove leads NFT trading, while wallets like Ethos and Sui Wallet offer accessible entry points.

Together, these projects form a layered ecosystem that supports the gasless payment shift from multiple angles.

The post SUI Network Goes Gasless on Stablecoin Transfers, Pushing Crypto Closer to Everyday Payments appeared first on Blockonomi.

Ethereum’s native token has taken the most recent crypto market correction hard, with the asset diving to just over $2,000 earlier today, which became its lowest price point in almost two months.

Moreover, it has dropped by 17% since its monthly high at $2,425, and the overall landscape seems quite bearish. Although Santiment Intelligence believes this could be the necessary factor for a major trend reversal, the current environment is nothing short of underwhelming, to say the least.

More Trouble Ahead?

After it was stopped at $2,400, $2,300, $2,200, and $2,100 earlier this week, the latest crucial support to give in was the $2,050 level during today’s decline. According to popular analyst Ted Pillows, this opens the door for more profound corrections. Moreover, he warned that if ETH loses the psychological $2,000 support as well, new lows “will just be a matter of time.”

Fellow analyst CW noted that a large amount of ETH longs were liquidated on the way down. More specifically, data from CoinGlass shows that the total value of liquidated ETH longs is over $250 million on a daily scale, second only to bitcoin’s $380 million.

CW added that as short positions closed, the Open Interest declined significantly and the Net Position Delta increased. They concluded that high-leverage longs are getting wrecked, while bearish bets are closing, which could lead to some market calmness.

During the decline, $ETH long positions were liquidated in large amount.

Subsequently, as short positions closed, the Open Interest (OI) decreased and the Net Position Delta increased.

High-leverage long positions are being liquidated, and bearish bets are closing. pic.twitter.com/bTYuT7tjnG

— CW (@CW8900) May 23, 2026

OG Whale Returns

The silver lining for the Ethereum ecosystem at the moment is the return of an OG whale, as reported by Lookonchain. The analytics company’s data shows that this market participant, who is known for pocketing a 376x return on their initial ETH investment from 10 years ago, has started accumulating again.

On-chain data reveals that this whale has acquired over $8 million worth of ETH at prices of around $2,050. Previously, they sold when the altcoin stood above $2,850.

As the market drops, another #EthereumOG who made $34.2M(376x return) is buying the dip on $ETH!

10 years ago, this OG received 12,001 $ETH from ShapeShift at just $7.58 each.

Over a year ago, he sold them for 34.3M $USDC at $2,856, making $34.2M in profit – a 376x return.… pic.twitter.com/vSfrYyo2Bl

— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) May 23, 2026

The post Ethereum Tanks to 2-Month Low: Whales Return but Sub-$2K Fears Mount appeared first on CryptoPotato.

It’s hard to believe that it has been less than a year since Ripple’s cross-border token was riding high and tapped a new all-time high of $3.65. That was last July. A lot has changed since then, and the current landscape shows little to no indication that the bulls will reemerge and push XRP back to its former glory.

That’s why we decided to ask three of the most popular AI chatbots about their opinion on whether the token will ever go back even above $2, let alone $3 or higher.

Yes, but Not That Easy

ChatGPT’s most likely answer was ‘yes, but not anytime soon.” It believes that going beyond $2 is definitely possible, especially since the asset spent more than a year there before it lost that level several months ago. However, it’s not guaranteed in the short-term as the broader market conditions remain underwhelming, to say the least.

The AI model predicted a more “gradual and uncertain path” heavily dependent on external factors rather than pure hype. ChatGPT outlined what needed to change:

Strong overall crypto market (led by bitcoin), clear regulatory environment (such as the passing of the CLARITY Act), and sustained institutional demand.

Interestingly, Gemini’s factors for a future XRP bull run were rather similar. The only difference is that the Google AI believes XRP would need more real-world settlement involving the network behind it. As such, it also concluded that XRP still has the “structural foundation” to jump past $2. However, the days of “rocketing upward purely on legal drama and speculative frenzy are over.”

Perplexity, the last AI that we asked, shared the common opinion above, suggesting that going beyond $2 is “far from certain and may require better market conditions than investors are currently seeing.”

“The worrying path is not that $2 is impossible, but that the token seems to need a lot of help to get there, and that makes the move feel fragile rather than inevitable.”

Why $2 Matters So Much

Perplexity and Gemini answered in tandem that the psychological level of $2 is “more than just a round number.” They believe it has become a massive threshold that “traders watch closely because breaking above it would suggest stronger momentum and renewed confidence in the token.”

However, they outlined a significant problem, which has been more than evident for months: XRP has been rangebound since the February crash, and every breakout attempt has been halted at $1.6 or lower. This usually means that “the market is waiting for a major driver before making a decisive move,” which seems to be lacking at the moment.

The post We Asked 3 AIs: Will XRP Ever Break Above $2? The Answers Were Not What We Expected appeared first on CryptoPotato.

After it was rejected at $78,000 earlier this week, bitcoin’s troubles worsened with a nosedive to a monthly low of just over $74,000, where it finally found some support.

Most altcoins have followed suit on the way down, with ETH dipping to $2,000 today, BNB going down to $640, and XRP sliding to $1.31.

BTC Charts Monthly Low

The progress made on the CLARITY Act at the end of the previous week resulted in an impressive but short-lived BTC price pump that drove the asset to $82,000. However, it was almost immediately rejected at that level for the second time that week, but this correction has been a lot more painful.

The cryptocurrency first slipped to $79,000 by that Friday before it dropped to $78,000 during the weekend. The business week began on the wrong foot with a nosedive to $76,000. After it bounced to $78,000 on Tuesday and Wednesday, the bears stepped up on the gas pedal once again and didn’t allow a more impressive rebound.

Just the opposite; bitcoin dropped to $76,000 yesterday evening and kept plunging on Saturday to $75,000 at first and then to $74,200 minutes ago. The latter became BTC’s lowest price point in just over a month. Here are some possible reasons for its $8,000 drop in less than 10 days.

For now, its market capitalization has dumped below $1.5 trillion on CG, while its dominance over the alts has retreated slightly to 58%.

Alts Bleed Out

As mentioned above, bitcoin’s correction is not an isolated case. Essentially, the entire larger-cap altcoin field is in the red today. Ethereum dipped to $2,000 earlier today before it jumped slightly to $2,025 as of now. BNB is down to $640, XRP struggles to remain above $1.30, while SOL has plunged by over 6%.

Similar or more painful declines come from DOGE, HYPE, ZEC, ADA, BCH, LINK, SUI, and many others.

The cumulative market cap of all crypto assets has shed $100 billion since Thursday and is down to $2.570 trillion on CoinGecko.

The post Bitcoin Sees New Monthly Low, Ethereum Dips to $2K: Weekend Watch appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Bitcoin’s price troubles seem to have no end currently, as the asset just posted yet another leg down that drove it to a monthly low of just over $74,000.

This comes as popular analyst CW claimed that retail investors have been disposing of their assets, while whales have set up buy orders that can absorb the pressure.

Bearish Market Structure Returns

After losing $8,000 in just over a week, many analysts have turned the page on their price analysis. Jelle, for example, warned that BTC has dropped below both the 100D and 50D Moving Averages as the local market structure is “back to bearish.”

Previously, the analyst cautioned that a price drop beneath both these crucial levels could open the door for a more profound correction as “there’s a lot of untapped liquidity ripe for the taking below.”

Fellow analyst CW tried to bring some positivity to the table, arguing that bitcoin whales have stepped up by attempting to absorb the selling volume through buy orders at current price levels. After they removed their sell orders at higher prices, they are “absorbing selling volume from retail investors,” CW added.

CryptoPotato listed five reasons earlier today behind BTC’s crash, which at the time was stopped at $75,000. Some of them include selling from major investors, but perhaps the most valid one is the growing uncertainty and tension between the US and Iran. The most recent reports on the war front indicate that the ceasefire might be coming to an end soon, which has historically led to immediate price declines from risk-on assets like BTC.

What BTC Needs to Do

Another popular analyst, Daan Crypto Trades, outlined bitcoin’s potential path to recovery if it’s to rebound soon. The key level that has to be reclaimed remains the low $80,000 region with the “horizontal and Daily 200MA/EMA sitting right around” it.

He explained that the bulls need to “turn this into a higher low and proceed to break that resistance.” However, he warned that a failure to do so soon will become just another “lower high in what has been a bigger down trend ever since the October 2025 all-time high.”

$BTC It is still pretty straight forward from here looking at the chart.

Bitcoin needs to clear that low $80Ks region with the horizontal and Daily 200MA/EMA sitting right around the same region.

This is the first “bigger sell off” this leg up after the April move higher.… pic.twitter.com/01yL1CqatF

— Daan Crypto Trades (@DaanCrypto) May 22, 2026

The post Bitcoin Slumps Again to $74K as Bearish Market Structure Intensifies appeared first on CryptoPotato.

It was less than ten days ago when the popular cross-border token challenged the $1.55 resistance. The subsequent rejection, though, was both immediate and violent.

The past 24 hours have only intensified the retracement. Although almost the entire market is in the red today, with BTC sliding to $75,000 for the first time in three weeks, XRP’s drop is actually worse.

Whale Activity Disappears

With the token currently trading at $1.33, the 10-day chart shows a substantial 14% decline since the local peak. Moreover, XRP has dropped to its current price for the first time since April 13, marking a six-week low. Its market capitalization has dumped toward $82 billion, and the gap with BNB has only widened to over $5 billion as of press time.

What’s perhaps even more worrying is the fact that whale activity on the XRP network has declined from 157 large transactions of over $1 million a few months ago to 67 today. This 57.3% drop, according to popular analyst Ali Martinez, suggests that the underlying asset could “be entering a compression phase.”

Whales have seemingly stepped back to let “the current price range settle, which naturally reduces immediate volatility and allows the order books to mature.”

In the last 9 days, whale activity on the $XRP network has dropped from 157 large transactions worth over $1 million to just 67 today, representing a 57.3% decline.

When large-scale transaction volume thins out like this, it tells me the market could be entering a compression… pic.twitter.com/lVQGjhqVzG

— Ali Charts (@alicharts) May 23, 2026

On the more positive side, XRP saw a massive 4,300 new wallet creations in a single day earlier this week, which was the fourth-largest such spike in its network activity in 2026. According to Santiment, such network growth is among the strongest signals for possible market reversals.

But Maybe More Pain Ahead?

While weighing in on XRP’s recent price moves, fellow analyst CRYPTOWZRD warned that the token had closed bearish. They predicted more troubles ahead, especially if BTC continues to decline.

Additionally, CW said XRP continues to show an “increasing trend in short positions,” and cautioned that there are “no reversal signals in the futures market yet.” In a separate post, the analyst warned that the cross-border altcoin could fall further to $1.30.

The post XRP Plunges to 6-Week Low as Fading Whale Activity Spells Further Trouble Ahead appeared first on CryptoPotato.