The initiative could significantly bolster Switzerland's digital currency landscape, enhancing financial innovation and operational efficiency.
The post UBS joins major banks to test Swiss franc stablecoin in sandbox appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Bitcoin rose above $72K as Trump proposed an Iran ceasefire, lifting crypto and stock futures while oil prices tumbled.
The post Bitcoin jumps above $72K after Trump signals pause on Iran strikes appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Anthropic launched Mythos and Project Glasswing days after a Claude Code leak exposed source files and caused a GitHub takedown mess.
The post Anthropic unveils Mythos cybersecurity model weeks after Claude Code leak exposed security lapse appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Morgan Stanleys Bitcoin ETF is set to debut after SEC effectiveness cleared the way for MSBT to begin trading on NYSE Arca.
The post Morgan Stanley Bitcoin ETF set to begin trading tomorrow under MSBT appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
SOL Strategies' acquisition of Darklake signifies a strategic shift towards enhancing privacy tech and expanding institutional infrastructure in Solana.
The post SOL Strategies buys Solana privacy startup Darklake as it expands beyond treasury operations appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Price Pumps Above $72,500 as Trump, Iran Announce Ceasefire
Bitcoin price surged late Tuesday, climbing roughly 5% from a day-long range near $67,000–$68,000 to an intraday high of $72,753, as geopolitical tensions eased following a surprise ceasefire announcement tied to U.S.-Iran negotiations.
The rally came after Donald Trump said he would suspend further military escalation against Iran for two weeks, provided Tehran agrees to reopen the Strait of Hormuz — a critical artery for global oil shipments. The announcement marked a sharp shift from earlier rhetoric, when Trump had threatened strikes on Iranian infrastructure if a deal was not reached by an 8 p.m. ET deadline.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump described the development as a “double sided CEASEFIRE,” saying the U.S. had “met and exceeded all Military objectives” and was now close to a broader agreement aimed at securing long-term peace in the Middle East. He added that a 10-point proposal from Iran had been received and could serve as a “workable basis” for negotiations, with most major points of contention already resolved.
Markets reacted almost immediately. Bitcoin price, which had traded sideways for most of the day amid uncertainty, broke higher within minutes of the announcement. The move coincided with a broader shift in global risk sentiment, as traders priced in a reduced likelihood of further escalation in the region.
The Strait of Hormuz has been at the center of the conflict, with Iran’s effective blockade driving oil prices sharply higher in recent weeks and raising fears of prolonged supply disruptions. Any indication that shipping lanes could reopen — even temporarily — has significant implications for global markets, from energy to equities to digital assets.
The ceasefire proposal was reportedly facilitated in part by Pakistan, with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif playing a key role in urging a delay to U.S. military action to allow diplomacy to proceed. Iranian officials signaled conditional support, stating that safe passage through the strait could resume if attacks cease.
For Bitcoin price, the action underscores its continued sensitivity to macro and geopolitical developments. While often framed as a hedge against instability, the asset has increasingly traded in line with broader risk assets during periods of acute uncertainty — falling when tensions rise and rallying when they ease.
Tuesday’s move reflects that dynamic. Earlier in the day, Bitcoin price drifted lower as traders weighed the nearness of imminent strikes. Once the ceasefire framework emerged, sentiment flipped, triggering a sharp upside move as risk appetite returned.
Still, analysts caution that the rally may depend on whether the ceasefire holds and negotiations progress. The two-week window leaves significant uncertainty, and any breakdown in talks could quickly reintroduce volatility across markets.
For now, however, the combination of easing geopolitical risk and renewed optimism around diplomacy has given Bitcoin a clear boost — pushing it back above key psychological levels and reinforcing its role as a fast-moving barometer of global sentiment.
At the time of writing, Bitcoin price is right below $72,000.

Editorial Disclaimer: We leverage AI as part of our editorial workflow, including to support research, image generation, and quality assurance processes. All content is directed, reviewed, and approved by our editorial team, who are accountable for accuracy and integrity. AI-generated images use only tools trained on properly license material. In Bitcoin, as in media: Don’t trust. Verify.
This post Bitcoin Price Pumps Above $72,500 as Trump, Iran Announce Ceasefire first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

FDIC Advances Stablecoin Oversight Framework Under GENIUS Act With New Prudential Rule Proposal
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has advanced a new regulatory framework that begins to define how U.S. banks and their subsidiaries may issue and manage stablecoins under the GENIUS Act, marking a significant step in the federal oversight of dollar-pegged digital assets.
In a proposed rule approved on April 7, the FDIC outlined requirements for “permitted payment stablecoin issuers” (PPSIs), which are expected to operate as subsidiaries of FDIC-supervised institutions. The framework sets standards for reserves, redemption practices, capital, liquidity, cybersecurity, and risk management, and is now open to a 60-day public comment period.
The proposal implements provisions of the GENIUS Act, formally known as the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, which directs federal banking regulators to create a unified system for regulating stablecoin issuance in the United States.
Under the FDIC’s framework, issuers would be required to maintain full backing of stablecoins on a 1:1 basis with eligible reserve assets. These reserves must be monitored daily and held separately from other business activities. Eligible assets include U.S. currency, balances held at Federal Reserve Banks, insured bank deposits, short-term U.S. Treasury securities, and certain overnight repurchase agreements.
The proposal also sets concentration limits on reserve holdings and restricts exposure to counterparties. The FDIC said eligible reserve assets must remain highly liquid and low risk to ensure redemption capacity during periods of stress.
Redemption standards form a central component of the rule. Issuers would be required to publish clear redemption policies and generally process redemption requests within two business days. In cases where large withdrawals exceed 10% of outstanding issuance within a 24-hour period, issuers must notify regulators and may request extensions.
FDIC Chair Travis Hill said in prepared remarks that the framework is intended to address operational risk and financial stability concerns as stablecoin usage expands in payments infrastructure.
The proposal also introduces capital requirements for issuers. New PPSIs would be required to hold a minimum of $5 million in capital for their first three years of operation, with additional requirements possible based on supervisory assessment. Ongoing capital must consist primarily of common equity tier 1 and additional tier 1 instruments.
In addition, issuers would need to maintain a separate liquidity buffer equal to 12 months of operating expenses. The FDIC described this buffer as distinct from reserve requirements backing issued stablecoins.
The rule addresses cybersecurity and operational resilience, requiring issuers to maintain systems covering private-key management, blockchain monitoring, incident response, and independent audits. Annual compliance certifications related to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing programs are also required.
The FDIC clarified that stablecoins issued under this framework would not receive deposit insurance protections under the standard $250,000 coverage limit. Reserves held at insured institutions would be treated as corporate deposits of the issuer, not individual stablecoin holders.
However, the proposal states that tokenized deposits that meet the legal definition of a bank deposit would receive standard deposit insurance treatment regardless of the technological format used.
The FDIC’s action follows earlier implementation efforts tied to the GENIUS Act and comes alongside parallel rulemaking from other banking regulators, including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
The proposal is expected to be revised following the public comment process before final adoption. The GENIUS Act sets a statutory deadline for implementation by mid-2026, placing pressure on regulators to finalize a unified stablecoin framework in the coming months.
Editorial Disclaimer: We leverage AI as part of our editorial workflow, including to support research, image generation, and quality assurance processes. All content is directed, reviewed, and approved by our editorial team, who are accountable for accuracy and integrity. AI-generated images use only tools trained on properly license material. In Bitcoin, as in media: Don’t trust. Verify.
This post FDIC Advances Stablecoin Oversight Framework Under GENIUS Act With New Prudential Rule Proposal first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Demand for Crypto Pay Surges, but Payroll Systems Fall Behind: Research
A growing share of workers are open to receiving part of their paycheck in crypto, even as most employers have yet to offer it. New survey data from Oobit shows a gap between employee demand and workplace adoption, pointing to a shift in how compensation could evolve.
The study, based on responses from 1,004 full-time employees, found that 43% of workers are interested in receiving some portion of their pay in digital assets. Among those who already own digital assets, interest rises to 57%, suggesting familiarity plays a central role in adoption.
Still, crypto payroll remains rare. Only 7% of respondents said their employer currently offers a crypto payment option. At the same time, 20% said they wish it did, underscoring a mismatch between worker preferences and company policies.
That gap may not hold. Nearly one-third of employees, 32%, said they would opt in if their employer introduced crypto payroll tomorrow. For many, the appeal lies in flexibility rather than a full shift away from traditional pay. On average, workers who expressed interest said they would want 27% of their paycheck in cryptocurrency, while keeping the rest in U.S. dollars.
The data also shows that interest in crypto compensation skews younger but is not limited to one generation. Gen Z workers led with 46% expressing interest, followed by millennials at 45% and Gen X at 35%. Experience with crypto appears to deepen that interest. Active traders or investors were more than three times as likely to favor digital asset pay compared to those with no exposure.
When asked which digital assets they would prefer, Bitcoin ranked first at 46%. Stablecoins followed at 11%, with Ethereum only at 5%. A notable share of respondents said they had no strong preference, which may reflect limited familiarity with the broader market.
Beyond preference, some workers appear willing to make trade-offs. Eleven percent of respondents said they would accept a pay cut of 1% to 5% in exchange for receiving part of their salary in cryptocurrency. Among active digital asset users, that figure rises to 26%. The finding suggests that for a subset of workers, access to digital assets carries value beyond immediate income.
This kind of compensation is not only theoretical. One in five employees, or 20%, reported having already been paid in crypto for some form of work. These payments tend to occur outside traditional payroll systems. Side hustles accounted for 45% of cases, followed by freelance work at 44%. Full-time roles made up 21%, with smaller shares across gig, part-time, and one-time jobs.
Satisfaction among those who have received crypto pay is high. Seventy-eight percent said they were satisfied with the experience. Still, how workers handle those payments varies. Some convert funds to dollars right away, while others hold or transfer them to different wallets. A portion treat crypto earnings as a long-term investment rather than income for immediate use.
Despite rising interest and early adoption, barriers remain. Half of respondents cited price volatility as the main reason they would hesitate to accept crypto pay. In total, 88% said they are at least somewhat concerned about fluctuations in value.
Other concerns include a preference for traditional currency, difficulty using crypto for everyday purchases, and a lack of trust. Tax complexity and security risks also ranked among the top issues. These concerns point to structural challenges that go beyond employer adoption.
Workers identified several factors that could make crypto compensation more appealing. Clear regulation ranked first, followed by employer incentives such as matching contributions or bonuses. Access to simple conversion tools, which allow workers to switch digital assets into dollars with one step, also emerged as a priority.
This post Demand for Crypto Pay Surges, but Payroll Systems Fall Behind: Research first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Paolo Ardoino Confirmed as a Bitcoin 2026 Speaker
Paolo Ardoino has been officially confirmed as a speaker at Bitcoin 2026. As CEO of Tether (the issuer of the world’s largest stablecoin) and CTO of Bitfinex, Ardoino sits at the center of two of the most influential companies in the Bitcoin ecosystem and arrives in Las Vegas with one of the most expansive views of where Bitcoin is headed.
Ardoino graduated from the University of Genoa’s Computer Science program in 2008 and began his career as a researcher on a military project focused on high-availability, self-recovering networks and cryptography. He joined Bitfinex as a senior software developer in 2014 and became CTO in 2016. In 2017, he also became CTO of Tether. He was named CEO of Tether in December 2023. Following the passage of the GENIUS Act, Ardoino was a guest at the White House to witness the signing of the landmark stablecoin legislation into law.
Under his leadership, Tether has grown well beyond its origins as a stablecoin issuer. At the 2025 Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas, Ardoino announced that Tether holds more than 100,000 Bitcoin as a company, alongside more than 50 tons of gold. Tether has also launched an open-source Bitcoin mining operating system, built on a self-hosted peer-to-peer architecture, designed to scale from small home installations to industrial-grade deployments managing hundreds of thousands of machines. Tether is also a majority backer of Twenty One Capital (NYSE: XXI), the Bitcoin-native public company led by Jack Mallers, also a confirmed Bitcoin 2026 speaker.
Ardoino has led Tether to invest in renewable energy and sustainable Bitcoin mining in Uruguay, and the company has expanded into AI infrastructure, telecommunications, and peer-to-peer communications platforms. His appearance at Bitcoin 2026 comes as Tether’s footprint across the Bitcoin ecosystem continues to grow across nearly every layer from stablecoin infrastructure and mining to capital markets and education. Bitcoin 2026 takes place April 27–29 at The Venetian Resort in Las Vegas.
Bitcoin 2026 will take place April 27–29 at The Venetian, Las Vegas, and is expected to be the biggest Bitcoin event of the year.
Focused on the future of money, Bitcoin 2026 will bring together Bitcoin builders, investors, miners, policymakers, technologists, and newcomers from around the world. The event will feature a wide range of pass types, including general admission passes designed specifically for those new to Bitcoin, alongside premium passes for professionals, enterprises, and institutions.
With multiple stages, immersive experiences, technical workshops, and headline keynotes, Bitcoin 2026 is designed to serve both first-time attendees and long-time Bitcoiners shaping the next era of global adoption.
Bitcoin’s flagship conference has scaled dramatically over the past five years:
Get Your Bitcoin 2026 Pass Bitcoin Magazine readers can save 10% on Bitcoin 2026 tickets using code ‘ARTICLE10‘ at checkout.
Stay at The official hotel of Bitcoin 2026, The Venetian, and get a guaranteed low rate plus 15% off your pass. Be in the middle of where the fun is all happening, and where the networking never ends.
And don’t forget:
Volunteer at Bitcoin 2026 and get Pro Pass access plus exclusive perks.
All students ages 13+ can apply for a Student Pass and get free general admission access to Bitcoin 2026.
Location: The Venetian, Las Vegas
Dates: April 27–29, 2026
For more information and exclusive offers, visit the Bitcoin Conference on X here.
Bitcoin 2026 is the definitive gathering for anyone serious about the future of money. With 500+ speakers, multiple world-class stages, and programming spanning Bitcoin fundamentals, open-source development, enterprise adoption, mining, energy, AI, policy, and culture, the conference brings every corner of the Bitcoin ecosystem together under one roof.
From headline keynotes on the Nakamoto Stage to deep technical sessions for builders, institutional strategy discussions for enterprises, and beginner-friendly Bitcoin 101 education, Bitcoin 2026 is designed for everyone—from first-time attendees to the leaders shaping Bitcoin’s global adoption.
Whether you’re looking to learn, build, invest, network, or influence, Bitcoin 2026 is where Bitcoin’s next chapter is written.
Bitcoin 2026 offers a range of pass options designed to meet the needs of newcomers, professionals, enterprises, and high-net-worth Bitcoiners alike.
Bitcoin 2026 General Admission PassIdeal for newcomers and those looking to experience the heart of the conference.

Bitcoin 2026 Pro PassDesigned for professionals, operators, and serious Bitcoin participants.
Includes all General Admission features, plus:

Bitcoin 2026 Whale Pass The all-inclusive, premium Bitcoin 2026 experience.
Includes all Pro Pass features, plus:
This is the most immersive way to experience Bitcoin 2026.

Bitcoin 2026 After Hours PassYour ticket to the night.
Most deals are done with a drink in your hand. Get exclusive access to 3 official Bitcoin 2026 after-parties across Las Vegas — each with a 2-hour open bar — where the real conversations happen and the best connections are made.

More headline speaker announcements are coming soon.
Don’t miss Bitcoin 2026.
This post Paolo Ardoino Confirmed as a Bitcoin 2026 Speaker first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Jenna Montgomery.
Bitcoin Magazine

American Crypto Fraud Topped $11 Billion in 2025, Shattering Records: FBI
The FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center released its 2025 annual report earlier today, revealing that cryptocurrency-related fraud drained more than $11.3 billion from American victims last year — a figure that now accounts for more than half of all reported cybercrime losses nationwide.
The report, covering data gathered from the FBI’s IC3 platform, logged a total of 1,008,597 complaints with $20.877 billion in combined losses — a 26% jump from 2024 .
Within that staggering total, the cryptocurrency descriptor alone generated 181,565 complaints and $11.366 billion in losses, making digital assets the single most loss-heavy category tracked in the report.
For context, cryptocurrency fraud losses sat at roughly $27 million in 2017. By 2025, that number had multiplied more than 400 times .
At the center of the crisis is cryptocurrency investment fraud — a breed of long-con scheme the FBI describes as using “psychological manipulation, the appearance of legitimacy, and exploitation of cryptocurrencies to deceive victims into investing large sums of money”.
These scams generated $7.2 billion in reported losses in 2025, making them the single greatest source of financial harm to Americans for the year .
The mechanics follow a recognizable pattern. Criminals initiate contact through text messages, social media platforms, dating apps, or digital advertisements. Victims are drawn into what appear to be exclusive investment groups led by knowledgeable insiders, then directed to send cryptocurrency to fraudulent platforms that display fabricated profits and offer loans to encourage deeper investment.
When victims attempt withdrawals, scammers demand taxes and fees before vanishing with all deposited funds.
The FBI identifies the source of these operations as organized criminal enterprises in Southeast Asia — particularly in Cambodia, Laos, and Burma — that use victims of human trafficking as forced labor to operate the scam centers .
The report does not limit cryptocurrency’s role to investment scams. Across the board, digital assets were the dominant payment method in fraud, with cryptocurrency used in 72% of investment fraud transactions, 43% of tech support scam transactions, and 40% of government impersonation scheme payments. The data makes clear that scammers across multiple crime categories have standardized on crypto as the preferred method for extracting and moving money.
Investment fraud as a broader crime category reached $8.648 billion in losses, with the cryptocurrency component accounting for the largest share. Tech support scams that involved digital assets produced $1.226 billion in losses on their own.
Among all demographic groups, Americans aged 60 and older were hit the hardest. This group filed 44,555 cryptocurrency-related complaints and suffered $4.43 billion in losses, more than any other age bracket . Within the crypto investment fraud subcategory, the 60-and-older group reported $2.76 billion in losses, compared with $1.38 billion for those aged 50 to 59.
Crypto ATM and kiosk scams — a subset where criminals direct victims to physical machines using QR codes — produced 13,460 complaints and $389 million in losses, a 58% loss increase from 2024.
Seniors filed 6,188 of those complaints and absorbed $257.5 million of those losses, or roughly 66% of the total .
Recovery scams, in which fraudsters target prior crypto victims with promises to reclaim lost funds, generated another 10,516 complaints and $1.4 billion in losses . The 60-plus group again led with $540.5 million in recovery scam losses alone.
The Bureau has not been passive. Operation Level Up, launched in January 2024, uses IC3 complaint data to identify and notify victims of cryptocurrency investment fraud while they are still being scammed . In 2025 alone, the operation notified 3,780 victims and saved an estimated $225.8 million — 78% of those notified had no idea they were targets of a scam . In one case, agents stopped a victim from liquidating $750,000 from his 401(k) to send to fraudsters; in another, a woman was prevented from selling her home to fund a $500,000 “investment.”
A separate initiative — the U.S. Attorney’s Office District of Columbia Scam Center Strike Force — combines the DOJ, FBI, Secret Service, State Department, and Treasury’s OFAC to pursue and dismantle Southeast Asian scam compound operations . The Strike Force targets Chinese organized crime affiliates running operations across the region and works to cut off U.S.-based internet infrastructure the compounds exploit.
Since Operation Level Up launched, the FBI reports more than $500 million in total savings across all notified victims — a number the agency views as a floor, not a ceiling, given how many victims never report.
Editorial Disclaimer: We leverage AI as part of our editorial workflow, including to support research, image generation, and quality assurance processes. All content is directed, reviewed, and approved by our editorial team, who are accountable for accuracy and integrity. AI-generated images use only tools trained on properly license material. In Bitcoin, as in media: Don’t trust. Verify.
This post American Crypto Fraud Topped $11 Billion in 2025, Shattering Records: FBI first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
The Cardano community has officially approved the first tranche of the Orion Fund, a venture-style initiative designed to bridge Bitcoin liquidity into its decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem.
The governance vote unlocks 50 million ADA from the network's treasury, marking a pivotal shift in how Cardano funds its long-term economic expansion.
The approval, which cleared required thresholds from both delegated representatives (DReps) and the Constitutional Committee, takes effect at epoch 624.
It initiates a $15 million deployment, which is the first phase of an $80 million total target, managed by blockchain venture firm Draper Dragon, with Draper University acting as an acceleration partner.
Unlike the network's existing Project Catalyst, which relies on a grant-based model, the Orion Fund represents Cardano’s first foray into taking direct equity and token positions in ecosystem startups.
The fund is the centerpiece of Cardano’s ambitious roadmap to cultivate a $3 billion on-chain economy by 2030.
With the network's total value locked (TVL) at around $137 million, the blockchain network developers and community members have acknowledged that purely organic, internal growth is no longer sufficient.
Instead, the strategy pivots to “scale asymmetry” by targeting the largest pool of dormant capital in the digital asset space: Bitcoin.
A March 2025 report from Binance Research estimated that only about 0.79% of Bitcoin is currently utilized in DeFi applications.
Yet, the addressable market for “BTCFi” is massive, potentially reaching $31.9 billion if adoption mirrors the historical trajectory of wrapped assets. So, even a single-digit penetration rate of Bitcoin’s idle supply could drive billions in inflows.
For Cardano, capturing just 0.01% of Bitcoin’s total market value would roughly equal the network's entire current TVL. The Orion Fund is structured to hunt for this specific slice of liquidity by backing revenue-capable projects across real-world assets (RWAs), payments, stablecoins, and institutional DeFi.
A key advantage in this cross-chain pitch is technical alignment. Both Bitcoin and Cardano utilize the Unspent Transaction Output (UTXO) accounting model.
Orion aims to leverage this shared architecture to convince self-custodied Bitcoin holders, who might be wary of account-based blockchains like Ethereum, that Cardano is a secure, familiar environment for generating yield and utilizing sophisticated financial applications.
For a 2030 target to remain credible, the foundational market infrastructure must be established well in advance. Recent weeks have shown material progress on this front, according to network data.
In late February, the stablecoin USDCx went live on the Cardano mainnet, utilizing Circle’s xReserve model. Input Output, a major development firm behind Cardano, reported that more than 15 million USDCx was minted within the first seven days.
During that stretch, Cardano's TVL rose from $127 million to $142 million, with liquidity rapidly appearing on decentralized exchanges such as Liqwid, Minswap and SundaeSwap.
The successful deployment of a dollar-pegged stablecoin is a crucial prerequisite. Analysts note that a blockchain unable to retain dollar liquidity is highly unlikely to become a credible home for Bitcoin collateral or cross-chain trading.
Meanwhile, interoperability has also seen a recent overhaul. Cardano’s integration with LayerZero, described in the materials as the broadest cross-chain connectivity expansion in the network’s history, now links Cardano to more than 150 other blockchains.
While connectivity does not guarantee immediate capital deposits, it dramatically expands the addressable market for potential capital flows.
A more specific proof-of-concept for the Bitcoin strategy arrived on March 26. The Cardano Foundation highlighted that the platform FluidTokens completed the first native Bitcoin-Cardano atomic swap on the mainnet.
The transaction exchanged native Bitcoin for native ADA, Cardano's cryptocurrency, without relying on third-party custodians, vulnerable cross-chain bridges or wrapped assets.
Furthermore, institutional market infrastructure is taking shape. In February, CME Group launched Cardano futures and recorded its first trades shortly after, establishing a clearer path for institutional pricing and hedging support.
The ultimate test for Cardano is turning these new infrastructural building blocks into durable, repeatable on-chain usage.
The near-term challenge will likely involve securing sticky dollar liquidity before attempting to attract sticky Bitcoin.
If the network can push its stablecoin liquidity materially above the current baseline, retain the TVL gains made post-launch, and demonstrate visible, sustained Bitcoin-specific usage through atomic swaps and collateral, the Orion thesis will gain significant credibility.
However, if it fails to generate real-world traction, the Orion Fund risks being seen as evidence that Cardano’s current DeFi economy remains too small to support the ambitions it advertises.
The $80 million initiative is an acknowledgment that internal ecosystem spending is no longer sufficient.
By pivoting to the massive liquidity pools of Bitcoin and giving itself a multi-year runway to 2030, Cardano has laid out an ambitious roadmap. The execution of that roadmap will dictate whether the network can evolve into a $3 billion financial hub by the end of the decade.
The post Cardano targets Bitcoin liquidity with $80 million fund to meet $3 billion DeFi goal by 2030 appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Bitcoin continued to hold near $68,000, a key long-term support level, this morning as traders waited for President Donald Trump’s latest deadline for Iran.
The tension built after Trump said on Truth Social that “a whole civilization will die tonight” as his 8 P.M. Eastern deadline for a deal with Iran approached.
The warning came alongside reports of strikes on Iranian oil infrastructure on Kharg Island, sharpening fears that the confrontation could move from deadline politics to a more disruptive energy shock.
These tensions have left the market suspended between a crypto structure that has so far resisted a deeper breakdown and a macro backdrop growing more difficult by the hour.
Throughout the trading day, Bitcoin has shown some optimism, with prices touching $69,000 before retreating to around $68,500 as traders struggle to decipher Trump's latest threat that “a whole civilization will die tonight.”
Oil has become the main channel through which the US-Iran confrontation is feeding into crypto markets.
Since the US-Iran conflict began, oil prices have soared above $100, thanks in large part to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil shipping channel that typically carries about 20% of the world’s oil on a given day.
With Trump’s latest deadline approaching, US crude climbed above $116 a barrel, extending a rally that had already pushed prices toward multi-year highs.
The risks widened further after reports that Iran had threatened to close the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, a route that accounts for roughly 12% of global seaborne trade and has become even more important since the shutdown of Hormuz.
The Kobeissi Letter said that any disruption there could place another major shipping route under pressure and raise the prospect of oil reaching $150 a barrel.
That is where the market threat becomes more serious for Bitcoin.
Once crude moves into that range, the concern extends beyond war headlines or day-to-day swings in risk appetite. Sustained strength in energy prices can reinforce inflation fears, support the dollar, and reduce the room for central banks to ease policy.
That combination tends to create a harder backdrop for speculative and high-volatility assets, including crypto.
One reason Bitcoin has held up is visible in derivatives positioning.
Data from CryptoQuant showed the flagship digital asset's recent rebound occurred while aggregate funding rates across exchanges remained negative.

This suggests the move has not been driven by traders piling into leveraged bullish bets. Instead, short sellers are still paying to keep bearish positions open even as the price stabilizes and edges higher.
That is usually a healthier setup than a rally fueled by aggressive leverage.
When Bitcoin rises while funding stays negative, it suggests spot buyers are absorbing selling pressure rather than momentum traders chasing the market higher. A rebound built on leveraged longs can fade quickly when sentiment turns.
However, a rebound supported by real buying can keep moving even while the broader market remains skeptical.
Meanwhile, this leaves short sellers vulnerable. Bearish positions opened below current levels can become fuel for a sharper move higher if Bitcoin continues to recover and forced liquidations begin to build.
That dynamic helps explain why Bitcoin has not followed the geopolitical backdrop lower in a more decisive way. The market is still leaning bearish, but price action has not yet confirmed that view.
Still, that support has limits. If the recovery loses momentum before enough short positions are cleared out, the downside can reopen quickly because the market has less leveraged long support beneath it.
At the same time, BTC is trading inside a structure that leaves little room for error.
Glassnode data showed the token in a tight negative gamma pocket between roughly $65,000 and $70,000, an area where dealer hedging can intensify short-term moves in either direction.

According to the firm, resistance is building near $72,000, while support below current levels is thinner if momentum fades. The result is a market that can appear stable for stretches and then move abruptly once a catalyst arrives.
The trigger here is coming from Washington, not from within crypto. Traders are not positioning around an earnings release, a network upgrade, or ETF flows. Instead, they are positioning around a deadline that could move oil, shift inflation expectations, and reprice risk assets in the same session.
As long as Bitcoin stays stuck in that $65,000 to $70,000 range, each new signal on whether diplomacy is holding or breaking down could send the market sharply in either direction.
Part of the restraint in price action reflects pattern recognition.
QCP Capital said markets have spent weeks absorbing weekend escalation rhetoric followed by early-week de-escalation signals, leaving stocks broadly stable and crypto more resilient than the headlines alone would suggest.
The pattern has made traders less willing to fully price in each new threat. At the same time, it has not removed the risk. Each new strike, each new warning, and each new threat to energy infrastructure raises the cost of assuming that this episode will also end in another delay.
Trump has left room for the deadline to move again if talks make progress and something tangible emerges. At the same time, Iran appeared to have halted diplomatic discussions amid the latest threats. That has kept conviction low and volatility close to the surface.
For now, Bitcoin is holding its ground without escaping the pressure around it. Buyers have defended a major support area, and negative funding suggests bearish positioning has not produced the breakdown many expected.
But the market remains stuck in a tight range while oil surges and policy risk dominates trading. A softer turn from Washington could force short sellers to cover, lifting Bitcoin back toward $70,000 and then $72,000.
However, a deeper escalation would shift attention immediately back to inflation, financial conditions, and whether crypto can withstand a broader move out of risk.
Until then, Bitcoin remains tied to the next signal from the White House.
The post Bitcoin clings to $68,000 as Trump’s final Iran deadline expires at 8 PM EST and oil screams higher appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Polymarket’s plan to roll out its own collateral token sounds, at first glance, like the kind of move that should eat into Circle's USDC. A platform swaps out USDC.e, introduces Polymarket USD, and the obvious retail question follows almost immediately: Does that mean less demand for USDC?
The short answer is no. Polymarket USD is being introduced as a token backed 1:1 by native USDC, while the platform is phasing out USDC.e, the bridged version of USDC it previously used on Polygon. The wrapper is changing, and the user experience is changing, but the underlying reserve asset still points back to Circle’s own stablecoin.
That means the move, by itself, doesn't pull dollars out of USDC circulation or mechanically shrink USDC’s market cap.
It's important to make that distinction because USDC is now so large that any kind of imprecise language can obscure more than it explains. CryptoSlate data currently places its market capitalization at roughly $77.9 billion, making it the second-largest stablecoin after Tether's USDT and the sixth-largest cryptocurrency.
Circle says USDC is fully backed by highly liquid cash and cash-equivalent assets and redeemable 1:1 for dollars, with reserve holdings disclosed weekly and tested through monthly third-party assurance reports.
To understand Polymarket's move, you need to separate three things that often get blurred together: native issuance, bridged representation, and platform-specific collateral.
Native USDC is the token that Circle issues and redeems. Bridged USDC, in this case USDC.e, is a version that represents USDC locked elsewhere. Circle’s own description of bridged USDC says it's backed by USDC on another blockchain locked in a smart contract, while native USDC is Circle-issued, fully reserved, and directly redeemable.
Polymarket USD enters as a third layer: a platform asset designed for use inside Polymarket, backed 1:1 by native USDC rather than by a separate reserve system.
A user deposits USDC, that USDC sits as backing, and Polymarket issues an equivalent amount of Polymarket USD for use on the platform. When the user exits, the platform token is redeemed, and the underlying USDC is released. The economic exposure stays anchored to the same reserve asset throughout the loop, while the visible asset label and settlement rail inside the app change.
That's one of the reasons why the usual fear of dilution misses the mark here.
The market cap for USDC tracks the value of all outstanding USDC. If native USDC is sitting underneath Polymarket USD as reserve collateral, that USDC still exists and still counts toward total supply.
For USDC’s market cap to fall, the backing would need to be redeemed for fiat or exchanged for another stable asset. A relabeling of claims can't and won't accomplish that on its own.
What Polymarket is changing, and what makes this more interesting than the initial FAQ, is its usage.
Users who previously interacted with USDC.e will now interact with Polymarket USD. That gives the platform tighter control over collateral design, product architecture, and, potentially, yield economics for idle balances. It also reduces reliance on a bridged asset that carried its own user-friction problem, since bridged tokens tend to raise questions about issuer support, upgrade paths, and redemption assumptions.
Circle’s own documentation draws a bright line here: bridged USDC is created by a third party and backed by USDC locked elsewhere, while native USDC is the official form issued by Circle and interoperable across supported chains through its own infrastructure.
The stablecoin market has grown so large and important that it has become the foundation for the growth of the entire crypto industry. Aside from serving as liquidity, they have also become a type of reserve asset that sits beneath app-level money.
A user who thinks he's holding a certain platform's dollar, like in this case, Polygon's USD, is actually holding Circle's dollar. At the next level down, Circle’s reserve system is holding cash, Treasury exposure, and repo-linked liquidity for the benefit of token holders.
The visible coin and the economic foundation can now be two steps apart, creating more room for confusion when people try to infer demand from surface-level branding.
There's a real risk conversation here, and it mostly comes from structural issues rather than market cap.
Wrappers and platform-issued collateral introduce another dependency. Users now rely on the platform’s redemption design, operational controls, and smart contract implementation in addition to the reserve asset beneath it.
Circle’s documentation states that bridged forms of USDC carry risks and are not issued by Circle, which is one reason the industry has been pushing toward cleaner, more direct forms of stablecoin settlement where possible.
The easy mistake is to hear that there's a “new stablecoin” and assume it means “new money.” Sometimes that conclusion fits, but it's not the case here.
Another mistake is to assume indirect demand does not count. If Polymarket USD adoption rises and every unit is backed by native USDC, then demand for the platform token can still feed demand for USDC underneath. It just shows up one layer deeper in the stack.
Polymarket’s move is a small case study of where stablecoins are going. USDC looks more like base-layer reserve collateral for more specialized products, and app-specific dollars are now the interface users actually see. The result is a stablecoin economy that's becoming more layered, more embedded, and a little harder to read from the top line alone.
The post What will happen to USDC now Polymarket is launching its own stablecoin? appeared first on CryptoSlate.
XRP’s recent price struggles is starting to look less like routine underperformance and more like capitulation as long-term holders who bought above $2 over the past year are now realizing millions in losses.
Data from Glassnode shows that this cohort has been realizing losses at roughly $20 million to $110 million a day amid the digital asset's 55% decline over the past six months to roughly $1.30.

This shift suggests that XRP's current selling pressure is driven by investors cutting risk on weakness rather than taking profits on strength.
As a result, the market is crowded with late buyers under pressure, even as earlier entrants from the sub-$1 accumulation phase still have room to trim positions.
That has left XRP in its longest losing streak since 2014 and given the market a top-heavy structure, where any price rebounds struggle to hold.
What makes the latest stretch more significant than an ordinary drawdown is the source of the selling.
In earlier cycles, XRP holders typically sold into strength as prices rose and profits became harder to ignore. This time, the selling is arriving as the market weakens.
Market observers have characterized the shift as “distribution into weakness,” a pattern that points to fading confidence in the token’s near-term direction.
That helps explain why the decline has become harder to arrest. Recent buyers are now sitting on losses, while earlier holders remain in profit and can still reduce exposure in rallies.
A market in that condition tends to struggle on the way up because every bounce gives one group a chance to cut losses and another an opportunity to realize gains. The result is a more fragile setup than the headline price decline alone would suggest.
Santiment data reinforce that picture. According to the blockchain analytics firm, wallets active on the XRP Ledger over the past year have averaged a 41% decline in their positions, the weakest mean-to-realized value reading for XRP since the FTX collapse in November 2022.

This effectively shows how deeply the selloff has affected recent positioning and why the market has struggled to build a durable recovery.
Meanwhile, the broader crypto market backdrop has not helped the situation. The XRP downturn has unfolded during a wider risk-off period across digital assets, with Bitcoin retreating from above $126,000 to around $66,000.
In that environment, traders have shown less willingness to chase assets without a clear near-term trigger, especially when holder behavior is already deteriorating.
Meanwhile, the XRP market is not uniformly bearish.
CryptoQuant data show spot cumulative volume delta on Binance has climbed to about $520.2 million, indicating that buyers are still stepping into the market.

At the same time, the perpetual cumulative volume delta remains negative by about $261 million, indicating that leveraged traders have not meaningfully shifted their stance.
This shows that XRP is still attracting cash-market demand, but the derivatives market is not yet confirming that interest with the sort of aggressive repositioning that often accompanies a stronger move.
That split helps explain why XRP can appear supported yet remain weak. Spot demand can cushion price and reduce the pace of the decline, but if futures traders continue to lean defensively, rallies tend to lack follow-through.
While the market can stabilize in that state, it often needs a fresh catalyst to break into a more decisive trend.
Whale behavior points in a similar direction. CryptoQuant stated that daily whale inflows into Binance have dropped to about 12.6 million XRP, while the 30-day cumulative flow has fallen to around 1.44 billion XRP, down from roughly 2.6 billion XRP in March.

Large holders are therefore sending less supply to exchanges, which reduces one source of near-term selling pressure.
However, the lower inflows do not automatically create demand. They simply leave XRP in a market with less aggressive supply and still insufficient conviction.
That is why XRP still looks like an asset in suspension. The pressure from large holders has eased. Real buyers remain active in spot markets.
Yet the token remains pinned by defensive leverage and by a broader market that has not fully turned back toward risk.
The market’s hesitation stands out because Ripple’s broader operating backdrop has improved.
The Brad Garlinghouse-led company’s multiyear fight with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ended in a settlement after a series of favorable rulings, an outcome that helped drive renewed accumulation and gave XRP its strongest run in years.
At the same time, Ripple has also pursued numerous acquisitions and licenses to expand its product reach and global footprint.
Supporters of XRP argue that those developments should eventually matter more for price.
Asheesh Birla, chief executive officer of XRP treasury firm Evernorth, said institutional momentum around XRP is building at a pace not seen 18 months ago and described the financial stack around the asset as still being built.
He pointed to regulatory progress and growing real-world blockchain activity as evidence that the structural backdrop is improving.
The market, though, is not yet rewarding XRP as if that re-rating has arrived. Data from SoSoValue show that XRP exchange-traded funds recorded their first monthly net outflow of more than $31 million in March.
This breaks a stretch that had fueled a $1.2 billion inflow streak, making them one of the strongest early crypto product launches outside Bitcoin.

That outflow does not negate Ripple’s longer-term progress, but it does show that investors remain cautious about assigning a near-term premium to the token.
That leaves XRP caught between two realities. Ripple’s legal clarity, capital raising, and institutional push offer a more constructive longer-term backdrop.
In the near term, however, XRP is still trading like a crowded and damaged position, weighed down by holders selling into weakness, a large cohort of underwater buyers, and a derivatives market that has yet to confirm a turn.
The post XRP losses are forcing late buyers out, turning every bounce into a new sell zone appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Aave commands DeFi lending, with DefiLlama showing $24.51 billion in total value locked and $17.526 billion in borrowed funds.
The margin against Morpho, its closest rival, is roughly 4.1 times. Spark, the third-largest competitor, sits at $967.52 million in borrowed funds.
Aave ended 2025 with 61.5% active loan market share and 52.4% lending TVL share, according to its own accounting. Over less than two months, three of the most visible independent contributor teams tied to Aave's code, governance, and risk management either announced departures or began winding down.
BGD Labs said on Feb. 20 it would cease contributing because “the environment no longer aligns,” with off-boarding beginning by Apr. 1. ACI said on Mar. 3 it would not renew and would wind down over four months.
Chaos Labs said on Apr. 6 it was ending its engagement on its own terms, having managed risk across Aave V2 and V3 since November 2022.
Aave's governance documents describe an operating chain in which ACI handled growth, Chaos Labs handled risk, and BGD handled technical and security verification. LlamaRisk and the Protocol Guardian serve as risk guardians.
ACI itself wrote that every major initiative required the full service-provider chain.
Three exits in sequence form a pattern that hits the protocol's documented operating model at the same juncture.

On Mar. 10, a CAPO oracle misconfiguration pushed the effective wstETH exchange rate roughly 2.85% below market.
That deviation triggered approximately $10.938 million in wstETH liquidations across 34 accounts, generating about $26.6 million in liquidation volume. Aave's post-mortem confirms no bad debt, but a reimbursement proposal of 512.19 ETH.
As a result, the move would cost the DAO 358.56 ETH, putting the event well past the threshold of a governance footnote.
Chaos Labs cited the V3-to-V4 transition as a key reason its exit creates a genuine operational burden. Aave has V4 live on the Ethereum mainnet with three liquidity hubs and deliberately conservative caps, while V3 stays active.
Chaos argued in its exit that managing a live overlap between a battle-tested version and a new hub-and-spoke architecture requires materially more risk tooling and staffing, estimating a minimum risk budget of $8 million, versus its historical $3 million engagement and Aave's roughly $142 million 2025 revenue base.
The oracle event lends that argument specific weight: even a configuration-layer error caused eight-figure harm to users.
Aave Labs is moving quickly to absorb the gap. Its “Aave Will Win” ARFC proposes that Labs take on governance tooling, DAO GitHub maintenance, Guardian coordination, CAPO pricing management, bridge adapter maintenance, governance technical reviews, and much of the proposal lifecycle and incentive infrastructure previously tied to BGD and ACI.
The Labs' consolidation argument is that the protocol should not depend on any single external shop.
V4 underwent approximately 345 cumulative days of security review, involved four audit firms plus independent researchers, and the public contest and published reports surfaced no critical or high findings.
Aave also carries over $250 million in Umbrella first-loss coverage. BGD, though departing from its lead contributor role, has proposed a two-month advisory retainer through May 31, keeping it in a narrower security-focused capacity in the near term.
LlamaRisk keeps its Aave engagement, and the new risk-agent architecture assigns Risk Guardian responsibilities to LlamaRisk and the Protocol Guardian.
The pro-consolidation logic runs like this: a smaller, well-defined set of accountabilities under Labs means faster execution and cleaner lines of responsibility. That argument works best if Labs can execute without a second operational incident during the V3/V4 overlap.
| Function | Previous lead | Current / proposed replacement | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growth / governance coordination | ACI | Aave Labs absorbing parts | Proposal flow, ecosystem coordination |
| Risk management | Chaos Labs | LlamaRisk / Protocol Guardian / Labs transition | Parameter setting, monitoring, incident prevention |
| Technical / security verification | BGD | Aave Labs + BGD advisory retainer through May 31 | Implementation review, security checks |
| CAPO pricing / governance tooling / GitHub / bridge maintenance | BGD + ACI linked workflow | Aave Labs | Operational continuity during V3/V4 overlap |

If the consolidation works, Aave holds or extends its DeFi lending share in a market that Token Terminal sized at $27.68 billion in active loans as of March, where Aave held 59.79%.
The path runs through smooth V4 cap raises, no second-control incidents, continued GHO growth, and traction from Aave Pro, Horizon, the Aave App, and its MiCA-authorized fiat ramp via Push.
Integrations, developer tooling, liquidity depth, and the sheer breadth of collateral accepted make switching costs real for large borrowers.
February's market correction showed what that resilience looks like in practice: Token Terminal's February report showed Aave handled approximately $429 million in liquidations across 12,500 transactions and $1.7 billion in stablecoin outflows without incident.
The protocol processed stress without breaking. A governance transition, even a messy one, leaves that operational record intact.
Aave is also moving beyond its lending app branding. It holds more than 80% of USDT and USDC deposits and borrows on Ethereum, with roughly $20 billion in stablecoin deposits and $13 billion in borrowed funds.
At that scale, Aave functions more like a credit infrastructure for on-chain dollar markets. Holding that position gives it a durability argument independent of any single contributor's departure.
The departing teams collectively built the operating layer that connects risk models to production.
Chaos priced every loan on Aave since November 2022 with zero material bad debt. BGD maintained the technical architecture and security review chain. ACI handled governance flow and growth coordination.
Labs is absorbing the operational texture of how those functions interact when a parameter update, a market move, and a governance proposal land simultaneously.
The March CAPO event ran through precisely that intersection. A configuration-layer decision that passed through the existing operating model still resulted in a 2.85% deviation, costing users eight figures.
Chaos Labs argues that V4 increases the surface area for that kind of error, and that the risk budget Aave historically allocated to external management falls far short of what that surface area requires.
If Labs cannot replicate the operational density of the old federated model, consisting of governance execution, parameter oversight, security maintenance, and incident response running in parallel, Morpho and Spark gain a narrative advantage on execution alone.

Morpho now holds $7.337 billion in TVL and $4.29 billion in borrowed funds, and it has structured its expansion around a modular, market-specific architecture that differs from Aave's unified liquidity model.
The current 4:1 borrowing gap is large, but slow premium leakage works through compounding capital choices.
New capital only needs to consistently choose a cleaner-looking alternative over a protocol managing a visible governance transition.
GHO, Horizon, and Aave Pro give the protocol more surface area to win on, while also meaning that Aave is expanding its ambitions exactly as its contributor bench gets thinner.
If a V4 incident occurs before Labs has demonstrated it can run the full operating chain, the contributor narrative crosses from governance-era transition into a confidence-pricing event.
The post Aave’s $25 billion lending empire faces a real test as key contributors exit appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Ethereum (ETH) has outperformed the broader market today, surging past the critical $2,200 resistance to reach a current price of $2,250. This 6.5% gain over the last 24 hours comes as a direct response to President Trump’s announcement of a two-week ceasefire with Iran, which has significantly lowered the global "risk-off" sentiment.
As geopolitical tensions ease, investors are rotating capital back into high-beta assets. While Bitcoin’s move past $71,000 grabbed headlines, Ethereum’s breakout is arguably more significant for the altcoin market, as it signals a potential shift in the mid-term trend.
The jump to $2,250 was catalyzed by reports that the Strait of Hormuz will reopen for commercial traffic during the truce. According to Bloomberg, the sudden drop in oil prices has lowered global inflation expectations, allowing the Federal Reserve more room to maintain its current interest rate trajectory—a massive win for Ethereum’s ecosystem.

Key market reactions include:
Looking at the recent price action, Ethereum has finally broken out of a multi-week descending channel. The move above $2,200 is a bullish signal, as this level had acted as a "brick wall" resistance throughout March.
However, the rapid nature of this 6% pump suggests that a short-term cooling period is likely. Technical indicators like the Relative Strength Index (RSI) are approaching overbought territory. A normal market adjustment could see ETH/USD retest the $2,200 to $2,180 zone to confirm it as new support. If this level holds, the next major target for bulls is the $2,400 psychological resistance.
The rally was further fueled by a "short squeeze." Data from major exchanges shows that over $150 million in Ethereum short positions were liquidated in the last six hours alone. This forced buying accelerated the move from $2,150 to $2,250.
Bitcoin (BTC) has staged a dramatic comeback, surging past the psychological $71,000 mark during early trading on Wednesday, April 8, 2026. The rally comes directly on the heels of an announcement by U.S. President Donald Trump regarding a temporary two-week ceasefire in the ongoing conflict with Iran. This diplomatic shift has immediately injected liquidity and "risk-on" sentiment back into the digital asset markets.
The surge was triggered after President Trump confirmed that the U.S. would suspend military strikes for 14 days, contingent on the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. According to reports from Al Jazeera, talks to finalize a peace deal are scheduled to begin this Friday in Pakistan.
As geopolitical tensions cooled, the crypto market responded with high volatility:
Despite the bullish momentum seen in the attached chart, the rapid ascent suggests a potential short-term "blow-off top." Analyzing the BTC/USD price action, the candle reached a peak of $72,000+ before showing signs of stabilization around the $71,646 level.

Historically, such news-driven pumps often lead to a "sell the news" event or a technical retracement. Investors should watch the $68,000 to $69,000 support zone. A healthy adjustment back to these levels would be a normal market response to consolidate recent gains before attempting a permanent breakout toward the all-time high of $74,000.
Market data indicates that institutional players were quick to capitalize on the de-escalation. Major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase reportedly saw massive buy orders totaling over $4.5 billion shortly after the announcement. Furthermore, spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded their highest inflows in six weeks, suggesting that professional traders are viewing this ceasefire as a window for continued accumulation.
The crypto market is entering a critical phase as geopolitical tensions between the United States and Iran intensify. While headlines around oil prices, military developments, and diplomatic talks continue to shift rapidly, Bitcoin and major altcoins remain relatively stable.
This stability is not a sign of strength — it reflects uncertainty.
Bitcoin price is currently holding near key levels, while Ethereum and altcoins are showing mild weakness. Despite major macro developments, the market is not making a decisive move yet.

👉 The reason is simple: markets are waiting for a clear outcome.
Recent developments have created a highly unstable macro environment:
Under normal conditions, such volatility would trigger large moves in crypto. But instead, Bitcoin is consolidating.
👉 This signals a compression phase, where volatility builds before a major breakout.
Traders are holding back, waiting for confirmation before committing capital. This creates a temporary “calm before the storm” effect.
The current market structure suggests that Bitcoin’s next move will depend heavily on geopolitical outcomes. Three main scenarios are now being priced in:
If negotiations between the US and Iran lead to a de-escalation:
👉 In this case, Bitcoin could rally toward the $72,000–$75,000 range, with altcoins outperforming.
This would trigger a relief rally across crypto markets.
If talks continue without a clear resolution:
👉 Bitcoin could trade sideways or gradually decline toward the $64,000–$66,000 zone.
Altcoins may continue to underperform, showing signs of weakness beneath the surface.
If tensions escalate further — especially involving critical oil routes:
👉 Bitcoin could experience a rapid sell-off, potentially testing the $60,000 level or lower.
Altcoins would likely see stronger declines due to higher risk exposure.
While Bitcoin remains relatively stable, altcoins are quietly declining:
👉 This divergence is an early warning signal.
Historically, when altcoins weaken before Bitcoin, it often indicates a risk-off shift within crypto itself.
Investors are moving into perceived “safer” crypto assets, anticipating potential downside.
One of the most important developments in recent days is the increasing correlation between oil and crypto markets.
Oil is no longer just a macro indicator — it has become a real-time trigger for market movements.
👉 Crypto is now reacting instantly to geopolitical headlines affecting energy markets.
This marks a shift in how Bitcoin behaves within the global financial system.
The next 24–72 hours are critical.
Key factors to monitor:
👉 These events will likely determine the next major move in Bitcoin and the broader crypto market.
The crypto market is not directionless — it is waiting.
Bitcoin’s current stability reflects a broader pause across global markets as investors assess the next major geopolitical development.
👉 The next move will not be gradual — it will be decisive.
Whether Bitcoin rallies or crashes from here depends on one key factor:
the outcome of the current geopolitical tensions.
Facing an unprecedented blockade from the global SWIFT banking network and a collapsing national currency, Tehran has institutionalized digital assets to facilitate international trade, procure dual-use technology, and fund military operations. Following recent military escalations in early 2026, blockchain data has revealed massive capital movements within the Islamic Republic, proving that digital ledgers are now the "front line" of modern financial warfare.
Yes, Iran is actively and systematically using cryptocurrency to bypass US-led economic sanctions. According to the Chainalysis 2026 Crypto Crime Report, Iran’s on-chain ecosystem reached a staggering $7.78 billion in 2025. By integrating crypto-mining into its state energy grid and utilizing dollar-pegged stablecoins for cross-border settlements, the Iranian government has created a parallel financial system that operates largely outside the reach of the US Federal Reserve.
To understand how a nation-state "uses crypto" to evade sanctions, we must define the three primary pillars of Tehran’s strategy:
A significant shift occurred throughout 2025: the total dominance of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) over the Iranian crypto market.
"In Q4 2025, IRGC-linked addresses accounted for over 50% of all value received by Iranian crypto services, moving more than $3 billion to support regional networks and oil sales." — Chainalysis 2026 Report.
This represents a transition from "civilian" crypto use (citizens protecting their savings from a Rial that hit 1.75 million per dollar in 2026) to "state" crypto use. The IRGC uses these funds to:
The US government is aggressively countering these moves. In February 2026, the US Treasury stepped up enforcement against platforms found to be functioning as critical nodes for Iranian state-backed finance.
However, the challenge for regulators is the "whack-a-mole" nature of decentralized finance. When one exchange is sanctioned, new liquidity hubs emerge in gray-market jurisdictions. Furthermore, the collaboration between Iran and Russia on the A7A5 stablecoin has created a bilateral corridor that processed over $100 billion in its first year, providing a blueprint for other sanctioned nations.
Iran’s use of cryptocurrency has evolved from a survival tactic into a strategic weapon. By leveraging the borderless nature of blockchain, Tehran has managed to maintain its military funding and essential imports despite being "disconnected" from the world. For investors following the latest crypto news, this highlights the dual nature of digital assets: a tool for individual financial freedom and a vehicle for state-level geopolitical maneuvering.
As the conflict in West Asia continues, the world is watching to see if digital assets can truly replace the US Dollar as the primary settlement currency for the "sanctioned bloc" of nations.
The cryptocurrency market in April 2026 is witnessing a pivotal moment for XRP. After a period of cooling off from earlier yearly highs, the XRP/USD pair has established a formidable defensive line. As of April 7, 2026, technical charts reveal that the $1.30 level is acting as a "line in the sand" for bulls, preventing further downside and setting the stage for a potential trend reversal.
Currently, $XRP is trading near $1.315, hovering just above its primary support zone. If the current consolidation phase completes with a bullish breakout, the immediate target is $1.45. Conversely, a failure to hold the $1.28–$1.30 range could see a retracement toward $1.20.
The recent price action on the 4-hour chart illustrates a clear "floor" forming at the $1.28 - $1.30 horizontal support level (marked by the orange line). Despite multiple tests over the last week, sellers have been unable to push the price decisively below this mark.

The market is currently in a state of "compressed volatility." This usually precedes a sharp move in either direction. Based on current market structure, here are the levels to watch:
If XRP maintains its position above $1.30, the first major hurdle is the $1.35 resistance. A breakout above this level, backed by increasing volume, would likely trigger a fast move toward the $1.45 yellow resistance line shown on the chart. This represents a potential 10% gain from current levels.
Should the broader market—led by Bitcoin—face a sudden downturn, XRP might lose its $1.28 footing. In this scenario, the next structural support lies at the psychological $1.20 level. Traders should keep a close eye on crypto exchanges to ensure they have the best liquidity for tight stop-loss management.
Beyond the charts, the fundamental backdrop for Ripple remains robust. Recent reports indicate that Ripple’s integration with SWIFT-certified infrastructure—following its major 2025 acquisitions—is now processing significant annual flows. This "utility-driven" valuation is a major reason why XRP is holding higher support levels compared to previous cycles.
Furthermore, with the SEC–CFTC Memorandum of Understanding providing clearer regulatory lanes in 2026, institutional "smart money" appears more comfortable accumulating XRP during these consolidation phases.
The current price action represents a classic "wait and see" period. The tight range between $1.28 and $1.35 is where the next major trend will be decided.
Crypto prices jumped on the announcement of a two-week ceasefire and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz—but macro events loom.
A decentralized exchange on Solana urged its users to exit after a former executive was alleged to be a North Korean hacker.
Prosecutors said a recent Supreme Court ruling should have no bearing on Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm’s looming retrial.
Decentralized lending giant Aave's native token fell near a 2-year-low price following news that another ecosystem contributor is leaving.
The FDIC’s proposal establishes federal oversight standards for stablecoin issuers while explicitly excluding tokens from deposit insurance protections.
XRP is beating assets from the Big Three and even smaller meme coins in ETF flows.
For years, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has stood as one of Wall Street's fiercest and vocal critics of the cryptocurrency industry.
Bitcoin's sudden surge to nearly $73,000 has triggered a $596 million volatility event, completely wiping out over 120,000 traders.
Market is extremely close to a critical point, as multiple assets are rapidly losing key support levels.
Prominent French artist and early cryptocurrency pioneer Pascal Boyart has publicly condemned the French government.
General Motors has announced a safety recall affecting 271,770 vehicles across the United States, as confirmed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The recall specifically impacts Chevrolet Malibu sedan models.
The defect involves the vehicle’s rearview camera system, which may present either a distorted visual feed or go completely blank. This malfunction significantly reduces a driver’s rear visibility and consequently elevates the probability of collision incidents.
According to NHTSA documentation, authorized service centers will examine all affected vehicles and perform camera replacements where necessary. Vehicle owners will not incur any expenses for these repairs.
General Motors Company, GM
Interestingly, the recall announcement didn’t trigger negative investor reaction. GM shares climbed approximately 4% during Wednesday’s pre-market session — an unexpected trajectory for a manufacturer announcing a six-figure vehicle recall.
To put this in perspective, GM produces and distributes millions of vehicles annually. A camera malfunction affecting 271,770 units, though certainly undesirable, represents standard operational remediation rather than a corporate emergency. Importantly, no accident-related injuries have been documented, and the recall doesn’t involve powertrain or safety-critical structural components.
Recalls affecting hundreds of thousands of vehicles typically don’t generate significant stock volatility unless they signal systemic manufacturing failures. This particular issue doesn’t meet that threshold. The anticipated financial impact remains modest — the vehicles have already been monetized through sales, and the aggregate cost of camera replacements across this population represents a manageable expenditure for an automaker of GM’s financial capacity.
Broader market dynamics may also be contributing to the positive share price movement. Global equity markets advanced on Wednesday following diplomatic reports of a 14-day ceasefire agreement between the United States and Iran, which reduced geopolitical risk premiums and triggered substantial crude oil price declines. Such macroeconomic catalysts frequently benefit automotive sector stocks regardless of company-specific developments.
For the current year, GM stock remains down approximately 10.5%, meaning Wednesday’s pre-market appreciation only partially offsets recent losses.
General Motors will directly contact owners of affected Chevrolet Malibu vehicles through official notification channels. Those impacted can schedule dealership appointments for vehicle inspection. Should camera replacement prove necessary, the service will be completed without charge.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration published the official recall documentation on Wednesday, April 8, 2026.
The post General Motors (GM) Stock Climbs 4% as Malibu Recall Announcement Fails to Dampen Investor Sentiment appeared first on Blockonomi.
Fake deposit attacks targeting multiple blockchain networks were detected and blocked by Bybit. The world’s second-largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume confirmed the incident on April 8, 2026.
The coordinated attacks attempted to exploit vulnerabilities in deposit scanning systems. Bybit’s Group Risk Control team identified and neutralized each attempt in real time.
No user funds were incorrectly credited, and no accounts were affected. Potential losses exceeded 1 billion DOT.
The fake deposit attacks used two distinct and sophisticated techniques to bypass security. In one method, attackers exploited batch transaction mechanisms to combine multiple transfers into one.
A large transfer was structured to fail while smaller transfers within the batch succeeded. Systems relying solely on overall transaction status could misinterpret such activity as valid.
The second technique involved multi-step transactions combined with ownership changes. These were designed to simulate incoming funds despite no actual net balance increase.
Systems depending on transaction logs rather than real balance validation may incorrectly credit these as deposits. Together, both methods represent a clear evolution of older fake deposit exploits.
Bybit confirmed the attacks targeted multiple blockchains at the same time. The coordinated nature made them harder to detect through conventional monitoring methods.
Each blockchain carries different transaction structures and validation models. That complexity was a deliberate advantage the attackers sought to exploit.
Fake deposit attacks are not new to the crypto industry. The Mt. Gox transaction malleability exploit between 2011 and 2014 contributed to losses of approximately 850,000 BTC.
A similar bug was exploited on Silk Road in 2012, resulting in the theft of 51,680 Bitcoin. The attacks on Bybit represent a newer generation adapted to modern blockchain transaction models.
Bybit’s deposit monitoring system operates across four distinct validation stages. The first stage provides full on-chain visibility by continuously scanning complete blockchain data.
This covers all transaction types, including complex, batched, and failed ones. The system monitors all supported networks without gaps in coverage.
The second stage applies precision filtering against user deposit addresses and related account structures. This ensures both direct and indirect interactions are captured accurately.
The third stage runs a multi-layer validation engine that breaks every transaction into atomic operations. Each operation is then verified independently before any deposit is credited.
“Our deposit monitoring system is designed to validate transactions at every level of execution,” said David Zong, Head of Group Risk Control and Security at Bybit. The fourth stage involves anomaly detection and risk scoring based on transaction structure and complexity.
Real-time alerts are triggered immediately for investigation when deviations are detected. Only verified asset movements are ultimately recognized as legitimate deposits.
Bybit continues to strengthen its risk control infrastructure through advanced transaction analysis. Balance-based validation and ownership-aware tracking remain central to the exchange’s defense strategy.
The post Bybit Blocks Coordinated Fake Deposit Attacks, Prevents Over $1 Billion in DOT Losses appeared first on Blockonomi.
Shares of Samsung Electronics (005930) climbed more than 7% to 210,500 won during Wednesday’s session, while SK Hynix (000660) stock exploded as much as 15% to 1,050,000 won following Samsung’s extraordinary Q1 earnings guidance announcement.

The preliminary earnings report from Samsung revealed operating profit of approximately 57.2 trillion won ($39 billion) during the first quarter ending in March. This represented an eight-fold jump compared to the corresponding period last year and significantly exceeded Wall Street’s consensus forecasts.
The impressive performance was driven by constrained supply combined with escalating prices for high-bandwidth memory semiconductors and additional AI data centre hardware. Samsung’s revenue projections similarly indicated expansion of roughly 68%, highlighting the magnitude of the industry’s recovery following last year’s memory chip slump.
If validated when complete financial results are disclosed, this would establish a new quarterly profit record for Samsung.
SK Hynix, ranked as the globe’s second-largest memory semiconductor manufacturer, did not publish its own first-quarter results on Wednesday. The company’s earnings announcement is scheduled for later this month. However, Samsung’s exceptional performance was sufficient to propel SK Hynix shares substantially higher, as market participants anticipate comparable positive momentum in its upcoming report.
SK Hynix stock peaked at 1,050,000 won during the session, reflecting a 15% daily increase — surpassing Samsung’s 8.7% advance and the wider KOSPI index, which itself climbed approximately 7%.
Korea Investment & Securities responded swiftly to the announcement. The brokerage elevated its annual operating profit projection for SK Hynix by 28%, now anticipating 216 trillion won ($146.55 billion). This figure would represent more than quadruple SK Hynix’s reported 2025 performance, and incorporates more robust-than-anticipated pricing gains across both DRAM and NAND semiconductor segments.
The revised forecast illustrates how dramatically market perception has transformed within the memory semiconductor industry. Previous anxieties regarding excess supply have been displaced by an environment characterized by rising chip valuations, supply limitations, and persistent demand from artificial intelligence infrastructure initiatives.
Both Samsung and SK Hynix are capitalizing on the identical fundamental catalyst: the accelerated expansion of AI-powered data centres by leading technology corporations, which necessitates substantial quantities of high-bandwidth memory and sophisticated logic semiconductors.
High-bandwidth memory has emerged as the critical competitive arena within the AI semiconductor marketplace. HBM technology is essential for AI accelerator chips — such as those manufactured by Nvidia — and production capacity has failed to match the dramatic surge in customer orders since the final months of 2023.
Samsung’s first-quarter performance indicates the company has secured substantial market share gains in this segment. The corporation had previously encountered scrutiny regarding its HBM production yields, but a historic quarterly profit demonstrates improved operational execution.
SK Hynix has maintained a dominant position in HBM technology and is commonly recognized as Nvidia’s principal supplier. Wednesday’s stock performance reflected investor conviction that its forthcoming Q1 announcement will reveal comparable strength.
The KOSPI index’s 7% rally during the trading session also demonstrated that Samsung’s earnings surprise elevated overall market confidence throughout South Korea, extending beyond the two semiconductor manufacturers directly involved.
SK Hynix is anticipated to disclose its January-March financial performance later during April.
The post Samsung Electronics (005930) and SK Hynix (000660) Stocks Soar After Historic Q1 Results appeared first on Blockonomi.
Precious metals experienced a dramatic surge on Wednesday following President Donald Trump’s announcement of a temporary two-week military standstill with Iran, pausing scheduled U.S. strikes.
Continuous gold futures climbed 3.8% to settle at $4,864.40 per ounce. Spot gold advanced 2.7% to $4,832.51 an ounce, marking its strongest position since March 19.

Silver posted even more impressive gains. Futures contracts surged 7.9%, while spot silver rallied 6% to $77.38 per ounce. Platinum also participated in the rally, advancing 4.2% to $2,044.60 an ounce.
Through his social media channels, Trump declared the U.S. would halt military operations for a two-week period. The president indicated that American forces had already accomplished their primary strategic goals.
The ceasefire declaration arrived just under two hours ahead of an 8:00 p.m. ET cutoff that financial markets had been monitoring anxiously. Throughout the day, Trump had delivered stern warnings regarding potential repercussions for noncompliance.
Pakistan facilitated the truce agreement through eleventh-hour diplomatic negotiations. The terms require Iran to maintain open access through the Strait of Hormuz for commercial shipping.
Approximately 20% of worldwide oil transportation passes through the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian officials indicated conditional acceptance to permit safe vessel passage throughout the ceasefire timeframe.
Trump additionally stated the U.S. would assist in resolving shipping congestion within the Strait.
Oil prices plunged more than 15% in the wake of the announcement. Risk-sensitive assets rallied while the U.S. Dollar Index declined nearly 1% during Asian market hours on Wednesday.
A softer dollar makes gold more affordable for international buyers holding alternative currencies, which generally provides price support.
Interestingly, both gold and silver had been declining throughout the Iran military confrontation. Elevated energy prices had intensified inflation fears, diminishing market expectations that the Federal Reserve would implement near-term interest rate reductions.
Since precious metals like gold and silver generate no yield, they typically underperform when interest rates are anticipated to remain elevated.
Market participants are now focused on Friday’s U.S. Consumer Price Index release for March. The report is anticipated to reveal monthly headline inflation growth, primarily driven by increased fuel expenses.
This economic data could significantly influence Federal Reserve policy expectations for upcoming months.
Among industrial metals, copper futures on the London Metal Exchange rallied 2.8% to $12,691.33 per ton. Copper futures in the United States gained 2.7% to reach $5.74 per pound.
Friday’s inflation report represents the initial major economic indicator reflecting how the recent energy price spike has impacted overall price pressures.
The post Precious Metals Surge as Trump Declares Temporary Iran Ceasefire appeared first on Blockonomi.
Mizuho Securities reduced its price objective for Super Micro Computer (SMCI) from $33 down to $25 this past Monday, while retaining its “Neutral” stance on the shares. This downward revision reflects a confluence of challenges including regulatory scrutiny, geopolitical trade tensions, and intensifying competition.
Super Micro Computer, Inc., SMCI
The stock commenced Monday’s trading session at $23.22, positioning it below Mizuho’s updated target and significantly under InvestingPro’s calculated fair value of $32.45.
Mizuho’s analysts continue to view AI infrastructure demand as a positive catalyst extending into 2026 and 2027, highlighting that Nvidia’s data center revenue remains on track for growth exceeding 50% year-over-year in 2027. Cloud service provider capital expenditure is projected to reach $689 billion in 2026, representing a 64% annual increase.
However, the firm identified immediate concerns linked to evolving China trade policies, suggesting potential order redirections toward Dell Technologies. Analysts emphasized that Dell operates an AI services organization ten times larger than SMCI’s and maintains an approximately $85 billion opportunity pipeline.
Concurrently with reducing SMCI’s target, Mizuho elevated its Dell price objective to $215.
Compounding these challenges, SMCI co-founder Yih-Shyan “Wally” Liaw entered a not guilty plea to federal charges alleging the illegal diversion of Nvidia-equipped servers to China, contravening U.S. export restrictions.
This criminal indictment has spawned a class action complaint in California, where shareholders claim the company failed to disclose export regulation breaches and provided misleading information to the investment community.
Rosenblatt Securities reduced its price target from $50 to $32 while preserving its Buy recommendation, acknowledging the controversy. Bank of America adopted a more pessimistic view, slashing its target from $34 to $24 alongside an Underperform rating as the export investigation unfolds.
Technical indicators show the stock’s 50-day moving average at $29.43 and its 200-day average at $35.98. The 52-week trading range extends from $19.48 to $62.36.
Despite mounting pressures, SMCI delivered robust financial results in its most recent quarterly report. The company reported earnings per share of $0.69, surpassing the $0.49 consensus estimate, while revenue of $12.68 billion exceeded projections of $10.34 billion. Top-line growth reached 123.4% compared to the prior-year period.
Management provided guidance for Q3 2026 EPS of $0.60, with full-year EPS forecasted at $1.86 according to analyst estimates.
The collective analyst perspective remains measured. Among 17 firms covering the equity, 4 maintain Buy ratings, 10 assign Hold ratings, and 3 rate it Sell. The consensus price target stands at $36.50.
Needham reduced its objective from $51 to $40 while retaining its Buy rating. Bernstein SocGen maintained Market Perform with a $37 target. Northland established a $22 target with Market Perform. Argus preserved its Hold rating without modifying its target.
Institutional investors control 84.06% of outstanding shares. Multiple asset managers expanded their positions during the fourth quarter, including HSBC, which boosted its holding by 13.7%.
SMCI’s gross profit margin of 8% continues to represent a competitive disadvantage, despite forecasts projecting AI server expenditure to expand at a 44% compound annual growth rate from 2024 through 2029.
Bank of America currently maintains the most bearish outlook among recent updates, with its Underperform rating and $24 price target.
The post Super Micro Computer (SMCI) Stock Downgraded Amid Legal Woes and Geopolitical Headwinds appeared first on Blockonomi.
Lookonchain recently flagged a suspicious cluster of trades, intensifying concerns about insider activity in prediction markets. According to its findings, four wallets collectively made about $663,000 by betting on a US-Iran ceasefire occurring by April 7.
What stood out was not just the profits, but the behavior of the wallets involved.
Most of them were freshly created and funded on the same day the bets were placed, and had no prior transaction history. These accounts entered “YES” positions just hours before the ceasefire materialized, and did so at extremely low implied probabilities, ranging from 2.9% to 10.3%, Lookonchain said in its update. This meant the market largely did not expect such an outcome at the time.
The timing, along with the lack of previous activity and the precision of the wagers, has raised questions about whether these trades were acting on non-public information. The occurrence adds to the already existing pattern of scrutiny around prediction platforms, where users can speculate on geopolitical events, including military actions, long before they are officially confirmed.
Interestingly, these concerns are not isolated. Last month, reports emerged that a trader had accumulated nearly $1 million in profits since 2024 by consistently placing well-timed bets on Polymarket tied to US and Israeli military actions involving Iran. This individual reportedly achieved a 93% success rate on high-value wagers and correctly predicted events that were not publicly announced in advance. The pattern included placing trades just hours before important developments.
An earlier report highlighted a similar case involving a user known as “Magamyman,” who reportedly earned over $553,000 by betting on outcomes tied to Iran and its Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. These trades were placed shortly before a confirmed Israeli strike on February 28, 2026, which resulted in Khamenei’s death. Many lawmakers and critics had then argued that such platforms may enable individuals with access to sensitive or classified information to monetize geopolitical events.
In February, Israeli authorities charged an IDF reservist and a civilian for allegedly using classified military information to place bets on Polymarket.
Despite all the scrutiny, prediction markets have become massively popular. Recently, prominent asset manager Bitwise filed for prediction market ETFs. Its CIO, Matt Hougan, said that insider trading “should not be tolerated in any market.”
But he said that the “existence of bad actors in a market is an argument for better enforcement,” not for eliminating it.
The post Mystery Traders Pocket $663K Hours Before Iran Ceasefire; Luck or Leaked Intelligence? appeared first on CryptoPotato.
A total of six banks in Switzerland have partnered to test potential use cases for a Swiss franc stablecoin, Reuters reported, citing banking giant UBS.
Per the announcement, the banks are going to launch a secure digital live environment – also known as a sandbox – to explore ways to connect blockchain-based applications with the Swiss franc.
The institutions, part of the initiative, are UBS, PostFinance, Sygnum, Raiffeisen, ZKB, and BCV.
According to the official press release from UBS,
The new initiative will test potential use cases for a CHF stablecoin in Switzerland. In doing so, the partners are exploring ways to connect blockchain applications with the Swiss franc, aiming to strengthen both the Swiss digital money ecosystem and the competitiveness of Switzerland’s financial center.
The post UBS and Major Swiss Banks to Test Swiss Franc Stablecoin appeared first on CryptoPotato.
The cryptocurrency market enjoyed the past 12 hours or so after the US and Iran announced a cease-fire that led to bitcoin skyrocketing to a three-week peak of nearly $73,000.
Most altcoins have produced even more impressive gains, with ETH rising to over $2,250, XRP nearing $1.40, while HYPE is close to $40.
The primary cryptocurrency’s price actions as of late have been tied to the developments on the war front against Iran. The asset slipped to a month low at $65,000 last Monday after that weekend’s threats, jumped to $69,000 a few days later, only to be rejected to under $66,000 by that Friday.
The weekend was dull in terms of price movements, even though it was highly eventful in terms of statements and threats of new strikes. The most anticipated development was a deadline set by the POTUS for Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz by Tuesday evening; otherwise, Trump threatened to strike power plants and bridges and even wipe out an entire nation.
With just hours left to the deadline’s expiration, the two sides announced a two-week cease-fire, which led to immediate price volatility for all financial markets. While oil plunged, BTC, gold, and stocks skyrocketed. The cryptocurrency neared $73,000 for the first time in three weeks before it was stopped and pushed to under $72,000 as of press time.
Its market cap has climbed to $1.435 trillion, while its dominance over the alts is close to 57% on CG.

Almost all altcoins have joined the ride north. Ethereum is up to $2,250 after a 7% increase, XRP is close to $1.40 after a 5% jump, while SOL has tapped $85 following a 6% rise. ADA and HYPE have added 7% of value, while ZEC has stolen the show with a massive 21% surge to $325.
RAIN follows suit with a 20% pump, while ZRO is up by 16% and is back in the top 100 alts by market cap. ENA, ICP, RENDER, and TAO are also part of the double-digit price increase club today.
The total crypto market cap has increased by $100 billion since yesterday and is up to $2.530 trillion on CG.

The post Crypto Markets Added $100 Billion as Bitcoin Tapped 3-Week High: Market Watch appeared first on CryptoPotato.
XRP is determined to move above $1.4. If secured, $1.6 is next.
Key support levels: $1.3, 1
Key resistance levels: $1.6, $1.4
This week, XRP is up 4% and appears ready to reclaim $1.4, which is currently acting as a key resistance level. If successfully reclaimed, then this cryptocurrency has a good shot at returning to $1.6, where sellers rejected the price in mid-March.
With momentum favoring the bulls, a reversal here is likely, even if it is only a temporary rally within a much larger downtrend. To exit the downtrend, the price will have to move above $1.6 and hold that level.

Buyers are returning this week, even if they still appear shy. While this weekly candle is bullish, it needs to close like this to give a clear signal. Nevertheless, a reversal appears likely because the price has been in a prolonged downtrend, and a relief rally is overdue.
In the past, buyers managed to spike the price to $1.6, but that resistance level rejected any attempts to move higher. A new test of this resistance would be interpreted as bullish and give XRP a new chance to exit its downtrend.

There is good news for buyers since the weekly RSI is already bullish and above its 14-day moving average. This is the first time in months that the RSI managed this. The only unknown is if XRP can close the week like this.
If the RSI remains bullish by Sunday, the chance of a rally is very high, as buyers will likely return in force if they see an opportunity to join a new XRP rally. Historically, XRP is a momentum coin that can move very fast once volume returns.

The post Ripple (XRP) Price Predictions for This Week appeared first on CryptoPotato.
After a few consecutive days of warning shots, the US and Iran reached a two-week cease-fire, which would allow them to negotiate for a permanent peace deal.
Financial markets responded immediately to the news, but in opposing ways. While most assets, such as BTC, gold, and stocks, went up, oil, which had rocketed after the war began, dumped hard.
Given the significance of the region, oil prices were impacted the most after the initial strikes began on February 28. USOIL traded below $70 per barrel at the time, but skyrocketed to $120 in just a week or so. More volatility ensued in the following weeks following comments and strikes against different infrastructure.
The latest threats from Trump against Iran, which included attacking the country’s power plants and bridges, caused another sharp uptick at the end of last week and the beginning of the current one. His statement from yesterday that “a whole civilization will die tonight” was particularly worrying, which led to Iran backing out of the negotiations at the time, according to reports.
Hours later, though, Trump announced on his social media platform that both parties had agreed to a two-week cease-fire as Iran would safely open the Strait of Hormuz. He added that the US had received a 10-point proposal from Iran, and they believe “it is a workable basis on which to negotiate.”
“Almost all of the various points of past contention have been agreed to between the United States and Iran, but a two-week period will allow the Agreement to be finalized and consummated.”
Later on, he explained that the US will be “helping with the traffic buildup in the Strait of Hormuz” as “big money will be made.” He also predicted that this would be the “Golden Age of the Middle East.”
Oil prices reacted immediately with a sharp nosedive. USOIL went from $117 to under $92 before it recovered to $95 as of press time. Nevertheless, it’s still 40% higher than it was before the war started.

All financial markets experienced enhanced volatility after the announcement. Bitcoin skyrocketed from just over $68,000 to a three-week peak at almost $73,000 before it corrected to $72,000 as of press time. Ethereum has risen by almost 7% and now sits close to $2,250. XRP, SOL, DOGE, and other altcoins have also marked notable gains of over 4%.
Gold neared $4,900 for the first time in three weeks after jumping from $4,650. The S&P 500 futures are up by over 2.5% and are just inches away from tapping a new all-time high.
The post Oil Prices Crash 20% After Ceasefire Deal as BTC and Gold Surge appeared first on CryptoPotato.