Apple removed Jack Dorsey's Bitchat from the China App Store at the request of the Cyberspace Administration of China.

The post Apple delists Jack Dorsey’s decentralized messaging app Bitchat in China appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Skepticism over a ceasefire highlights geopolitical tensions, impacting market confidence and delaying potential diplomatic resolutions.

The post Ceasefire odds drop to 1% for April 7 as traders remain skeptical appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Market skepticism highlights the fragile nature of diplomatic efforts, with potential geopolitical and economic ramifications if talks fail.

The post US, Iran in talks for potential 45-day ceasefire as market skepticism grows appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Escalating tensions and military posturing suggest a prolonged conflict, impacting regional stability and global geopolitical dynamics.

The post Iran reactivates missile bunkers as US forces’ entry odds rise to 86% by April 30 appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Rising odds of U.S. military action in Iran highlight escalating geopolitical tensions, potentially destabilizing regional and global security dynamics.

The post Odds of US forces entering Iran by April 30 surge to 86% amid escalating tensions appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin Magazine

Charles Schwab Teases Direct Bitcoin Trading With New ‘Schwab Crypto’ Account

Financial services giant Charles Schwab is preparing to expand deeper into digital assets, announcing plans for a forthcoming product that will allow clients to buy and sell cryptocurrencies directly through its platform.

The firm revealed that “Schwab Crypto” is in development and will be offered through Charles Schwab Premier Bank, positioning the product as a gateway for retail investors seeking direct exposure to leading cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin. The company has opened a waitlist for clients interested in early access, though availability will be subject to regulatory approval and eligibility requirements.

The move marks a notable shift for Schwab, which until now has limited crypto exposure to indirect investment vehicles. Currently, clients can access digital asset markets through exchange-traded products (ETPs), crypto-related equities, and thematic funds. Examples include publicly traded firms like Coinbase, MicroStrategy, and Riot Platforms, as well as funds tied to blockchain and crypto industry performance.

All aboard the Charles Schwab Bitcoin train

Schwab’s entry into spot trading places it in more direct competition with established crypto platforms such as Coinbase, Robinhood, and Webull. 

CEO Rick Wurster first signaled the firm’s intent to enter spot crypto markets in late 2024, citing expectations for a shifting regulatory environment under the administration of Donald Trump. The company has since positioned itself to move once conditions allowed for broader participation by traditional financial institutions.

Schwab is also preparing additional crypto-related products, including a potential stablecoin offering following the passage of the GENIUS stablecoin bill.

A recent report from Charles Schwab found that Bitcoin volatility has declined significantly, with historical volatility falling to 42% in 2025 — about half its 2021 level — making it comparable to or lower than major tech stocks like Tesla and Nvidia. 

Despite fewer extreme swings, bitcoin still experiences sharp drawdowns, including a 32% drop in 2025 and a 50% peak-to-trough decline over three years. 

Long term, volatility remains elevated versus traditional assets. The report suggests bitcoin is maturing as it integrates into mainstream finance, with growing institutional adoption and ETF developments signaling increased acceptance.

Editorial Disclaimer: We leverage AI as part of our editorial workflow, including to support research, image generation, and quality assurance processes. All content is directed, reviewed, and approved by our editorial team, who are accountable for accuracy and integrity. AI-generated images use only tools trained on properly license material. In Bitcoin, as in media: Don’t trust. Verify.

This post Charles Schwab Teases Direct Bitcoin Trading With New ‘Schwab Crypto’ Account first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Jack Dorsey Reveals Bitcoin Faucet Revival with “Bitcoin Day” Announcement

Tech entrepreneur and longtime Bitcoin advocate Jack Dorsey sparked excitement in the BTC community on Friday when he posted a link to a new page titled “Bitcoin Day | Earn Free Bitcoin.”

The post quotes an announcement from the “Bitcoin at Block” account stating that “The bitcoin faucet is back” on April 6, 2026, with a link to btc.day. Dorsey’s shared URL (hosted on AWS CloudFront) currently displays only the bold headline promoting free BTC on “Bitcoin Day,” with a countdown timer. 

No further details were given. 

In 2010, a site known as the Bitcoin Faucet gave visitors 5 BTC after they completed a simple captcha challenge. This was done to help spread awareness and use of BTC, which at the time was a new digital currency with almost no market value.

The site was created by Gavin Andresen, a software developer who later became one of BTC’s lead developers. Andresen loaded the faucet with his own BTC to distribute to visitors who solved the CAPTCHA.

Over the months the faucet operated, it handed out about 19,700 BTC in total. At today’s prices, that amount would be worth in the billions of dollars.

Bitcoin’s rough price performance

Over the past six months, BTC has experienced one of its weakest performance periods in years, with the price declining sharply from late 2025 highs. According to price history data, BTC’s value is down roughly 50% over the last half-year, reflecting a significant drawdown from levels above $120,000 in November 2025 to around the mid-$60,000s today.

BTC’s retreat has erased gains made earlier in the cycle and marked its worst six-month streak since 2018, driven by a mix of macroeconomic headwinds and reduced risk appetite among investors.

In March, it seems like the price stabilized near the high $60,000s, with market participants watching key technical levels and macro signals for clues on the next move. 

Block has held 8,883 BTC since October 6, 2020, currently worth about $593.74 million at an average cost of $32,939 per BTC, for a gain of roughly +102.92% at today’s prices.

The company, trading under ticker XYZ, has a market cap of about $36–$37 billion. At the time of writing, BTC is trading near $67,000.

Editorial Disclaimer: We leverage AI as part of our editorial workflow, including to support research, image generation, and quality assurance processes. All content is directed, reviewed, and approved by our editorial team, who are accountable for accuracy and integrity. AI-generated images use only tools trained on properly license material. In Bitcoin, as in media: Don’t trust. Verify.

This post Jack Dorsey Reveals Bitcoin Faucet Revival with “Bitcoin Day” Announcement first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Cathie Wood Calls Bitcoin’s 50% Crash a “Victory” as Market Tests New Floor

Nearly six months after the Oct. 10 flash crypto crash erased millions of dollars in a single day, Bitcoin remains under pressure, trading well below its recent peak. The asset reached an all-time high of $126,080 on Oct. 6, but has since fallen about 47% to roughly $67,000.

Despite the drawdown, Cathie Wood, a long-time BTC advocate and chief executive of ARK Investment Management, is urging investors to maintain a long-term perspective.

Wood, whose firm was among the first publicly listed asset managers to gain exposure to Bitcoin in 2015, has maintained an active presence in crypto-related equities. ARK Invest continues to trade shares of companies tied to the digital asset sector, including Coinbase, Robinhood Markets, Block, Circle Internet Group, Bitmine Immersion Technologies, and Bullish, adjusting positions in response to market conditions.

In an interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, Wood addressed the current downturn, framing the magnitude of BTC’s decline as a sign of maturation rather than weakness. 

She argued that a roughly 50% drop from peak levels represents a shift from the extreme volatility seen in earlier cycles, when Bitcoin routinely experienced drawdowns of 85% to 95%.

According to Wood, such severe collapses are unlikely to recur. She described Bitcoin as a “proven technology” and a “new asset class,” suggesting that its market behavior has evolved alongside broader adoption and institutional participation. 

In her view, the current correction would be considered a “real victory” within the Bitcoin community if losses remain limited to around half of its peak value.

Bitcoin’s vicious cycles

Historical data supports the comparison to prior cycles, though the current downturn has yet to match earlier bear markets in severity. During the 2021–2022 cycle, Bitcoin fell nearly 80% from its then-record high of about $69,000, eventually bottoming near $15,600. 

Onchain data from Glassnode indicates that the present decline, measured against the October 2025 high, has reached roughly 52% at its lowest point.

All this is happening as bitcoin’s price decline forces a growing number of public companies and sovereign entities to unwind their BTC treasuries, marking a sharp reversal from the accumulation trend of the past two years. Firms that once championed long-term holding are now selling to manage liquidity, repay debt, and fund strategic pivots.

Companies like Riot Platforms, Genius Group, Empery Digital, Nakamoto Holdings, and Marathon Digital have all reduced holdings, in some cases significantly. Marathon alone sold over 15,000 BTC for $1.1 billion to cut debt, while Genius Group fully exited its position. Riot has also been offloading bitcoin as it shifts focus toward AI and high-performance computing infrastructure.

Even firms still committed to bitcoin are trimming reserves. Empery Digital sold part of its holdings to repay loans, while Nakamoto Holdings liquidated a smaller portion to support operations. Meanwhile, Bhutan has been reducing its state-backed bitcoin reserves after previously accumulating through mining.

Despite the sell-off, public companies still collectively hold about 1.16 million BTC, over 5% of the total supply. 

This post Cathie Wood Calls Bitcoin’s 50% Crash a “Victory” as Market Tests New Floor first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Riot Platforms Sells 3,778 Bitcoin in Q1 as Miner Strategy Shifts Toward AI Infrastructure

Riot Platforms sold 3,778 bitcoin in the first quarter of 2026, generating $289.5 million and marking a shift in strategy as the miner redirects capital toward infrastructure and high-performance computing.

The volume sold exceeded the company’s quarterly production of 1,473 BTC by roughly 2.6 times, signaling a drawdown of treasury holdings rather than routine profit-taking. Riot ended the quarter with 15,680 BTC, down 18% from 18,005 BTC at the close of 2025.

The selling appears to have extended beyond the reporting period. Blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence flagged a 500 BTC outflow from a wallet linked to Riot following the end of the quarter, suggesting continued liquidation activity.

The imbalance between production and sales comes as Riot accelerates its expansion into artificial intelligence and high-performance computing colocation. The company has begun repositioning its business model away from sole reliance on bitcoin mining, seeking to monetize its energy assets and data center footprint through long-term infrastructure contracts.

In January, Riot sold 1,080 BTC to fund the purchase of 200 acres at its Rockdale, Texas site. It also entered a ten-year agreement with Advanced Micro Devices to provide 25 megawatts of capacity, with an option to scale to 200 MW. The deal is expected to generate about $311 million in contract revenue over its initial term.

Operational metrics complicate a distress narrative. Riot reduced its all-in power cost to 3.0 cents per kilowatt hour, a 21% decline from the prior year, while increasing deployed hash rate by 26% to 42.5 exahashes per second. Average operating hash rate rose 23% to 36.4 EH/s, reflecting continued investment in mining capacity.

The company also generated $21 million in power credits during the quarter, more than double the year-ago period, through participation in grid services and energy programs.

Bitcoin HODLers like RIOT are selling

Industry conditions remain a factor. Rising energy costs tied to geopolitical tensions have pressured margins across the mining sector, prompting several operators to liquidate holdings. MARA Holdings, Genius Group, and Nakamoto Holdings collectively sold more than 15,000 BTC in recent days, reflecting a broader shift in capital allocation.

Riot’s Q1 activity underscores a turning point for the sector, where bitcoin reserves are deployed as funding sources for diversification rather than held as long-term balance sheet assets.

The trend extends beyond corporate treasuries. Bhutan has continued to reduce its BTC holdings, selling a total of 3,103 BTC. A single transaction on March 30 accounted for 375 BTC, according to Glassnode data. 

The country had built its position through state-backed mining operations, reaching more than 13,000 BTC at its peak in October 2024.

Despite the recent selling, public companies still hold about 1.16 million BTC, or more than 5% of bitcoin’s fixed supply of 21 million, according to BitcoinTreasuries.net.

This post Riot Platforms Sells 3,778 Bitcoin in Q1 as Miner Strategy Shifts Toward AI Infrastructure first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

The Bitcoin Treasury Model With a Built-In Valuation Floor

There is a version of the Bitcoin treasury conversation that has become almost routine at this point. Bitcoin is hard money. Fiat debases. Companies that hold Bitcoin on their balance sheet are making a rational long-term decision. All of this is true, and none of it is the interesting question anymore.

The interesting question is structural. Not should a company hold Bitcoin, but what kind of company should hold it, and what that choice implies for how the company performs across a full market cycle, not just a favorable one.

Three models have emerged. Each reflects a different level of conviction, a different capital structure, and a different set of tradeoffs.

• The pure-play. A company whose primary purpose is accumulating Bitcoin through capital raises, financial engineering, etc, with no core operating business. Lean structure, singular mission.

• The digital credit issuer. The most sophisticated expression of the pure-play thesis. These companies issue Bitcoin-backed financial instruments, preferred stock, convertible notes, and similar products, to fund continued accumulation. At scale, this creates a compounding accumulation engine that simpler models cannot match.
• The operating company with a Bitcoin treasury. A business with real revenue, real clients, and operational activity, which holds Bitcoin as a long-term reserve asset in deliberate strategic relationship with the business itself.

All three are legitimate expressions of the Bitcoin treasury thesis. They are not optimized for the same objectives, and the differences matter more than most treasury conversations acknowledge.

What pure-play gets right

The pure-play case deserves genuine treatment because its strongest version has real force.

Financial engineering pure-plays are capital-efficient in a specific and important sense: every dollar raised goes directly to Bitcoin accumulation with no operational drag. The mission is singular and the structure reflects it. For investors, this creates clarity. Allocators know exactly what they are underwriting, direct Bitcoin exposure at the corporate level, and the investment thesis is legible and short.

The digital credit model extends this further. Companies that have successfully issued preferred instruments and Bitcoin-backed products have built accumulation engines that operating businesses cannot match on a per-dollar-raised basis. The compounding effect of a sophisticated capital structure, at scale, is genuinely powerful. It represents the fullest expression of the Bitcoin treasury thesis, and the destination it points toward is one every operator in this space should understand.

The prerequisite problem and what it means in practice

The digital credit model has a prerequisite that is rarely stated plainly: it requires scale, institutional credibility, and market infrastructure that most companies building a Bitcoin treasury today do not yet have. It is a destination, not a starting point.

The path there runs through an intermediate period where the financial engineering structure carries more exposure than is often acknowledged. During that period:

• There is no operating revenue to fall back on
• The ability to raise capital tracks closely with Bitcoin market sentiment
• Strategic options narrow when conditions are not favorable
• The company’s cost structure depends entirely on capital markets remaining open

This is not a criticism of the model. It is a description of the journey. The question for executives is what structure best serves the company while that journey is underway.

What the operating company model actually provides

The operating company with a Bitcoin treasury does not accumulate Bitcoin faster than a well-run pure-play. At meaningful treasury scale, operating cash flow is not moving the needle on accumulation. The advantage is different, and worth stating precisely.

An operating business generates revenue independently of where Bitcoin is trading. That revenue covers fixed costs, which means the company is not dependent on capital markets remaining open to fund its basic operations. It can continue hiring, serving clients, and accumulating at a measured pace without being forced into capital decisions driven by timing rather than conviction.

The compounding effect works like this:

• Operating revenue covers costs and preserves the Bitcoin position through the cycle rather than drawing it down under pressure
• A preserved balance sheet improves the terms on future capital raises, lower dilution, better access to facilities, stronger negotiating position with partners
• Operational credibility widens the available capital base by providing an investment thesis that reaches allocators who cannot underwrite pure Bitcoin exposure within their current mandates

None of these mechanisms make Bitcoin accumulate faster in favorable conditions. Together, they make the company more durable across the full range of conditions it will face.

The built-in valuation floor

Most Bitcoin treasury company valuations are driven by a single number: mNAV, the premium the market assigns to Bitcoin held at the corporate level. When sentiment is strong and capital is flowing into the space, that premium expands. When the narrative cools, it compresses. The valuation moves with the market’s appetite for Bitcoin exposure, not with anything the company is doing operationally.

The operating company model introduces a second component that behaves differently. A profitable operating business carries an earnings multiple underwritten by revenue, client relationships, and operational track record. It does not expand dramatically when Bitcoin is performing. But it does not compress when sentiment turns either. It is stable in a way that mNAV alone is not.

These two components, Bitcoin NAV and an earnings multiple on the operating business, do not move together. That is the point. When mNAV compresses, the earnings multiple holds. The company retains a defensible valuation floor that a pure-play structure, with a single-component valuation entirely dependent on sentiment, does not have.

In practice this matters in three specific ways:

• Capital raises. A company with a defensible valuation floor can raise capital on reasonable terms even when Bitcoin sentiment is cold. A pure-play with a compressed mNAV and no earnings component has less room to maneuver.
• Talent. Equity compensation tied to a two-component valuation is a more legible and stable proposition for prospective hires than equity tied entirely to Bitcoin’s market sentiment.
• Allocator access. Many institutional allocators cannot underwrite a valuation built entirely on mNAV within their current mandates. The earnings component creates a bridge, opening the door to capital that would otherwise be unable to participate regardless of conviction.

The floor is not just a comfort during difficult conditions. It is a structural advantage that compounds over time, widening the capital base, strengthening the talent proposition, and maintaining strategic momentum across the full cycle.

How to think about the decision

These three models serve different objectives. The right framework starts with honest answers to a few questions:

• What does the existing business look like? A company with established revenue and clients already has the foundation for the operating company model. A company without it is choosing between building that foundation and committing to a pure-play path.
• What is the realistic path to scale? The digital credit model is the most powerful expression of the thesis but requires scale and credibility that takes time to build. The operating company model does not depend on reaching that threshold to function well.
• What does the investor base look like? Pure-play structures appeal most clearly to allocators who want direct Bitcoin exposure. Operating companies reach a broader set of capital partners, including those whose mandates require an operating business to participate.
• What kind of company do you want to be running across a full cycle? This is the question underneath all the others. The answer should drive the structure, not the other way around.

Conclusion

The companies that define the next era of corporate Bitcoin adoption will not all look the same. Digital credit issuers will operate at the frontier of Bitcoin-native capital markets. Financial engineering pure-plays will build toward that destination with focused conviction. Operating companies will build businesses where the treasury and core operations strengthen each other across the cycle.

Each model is a genuine expression of the thesis. The goal of this framework is to make the differences legible, so executives can choose the structure that fits what they are actually building, with clear eyes about what each model asks of them in return.

The question was never which model holds the most Bitcoin. It was always which model fits what you are trying to build.

Disclaimer: This content was prepared on behalf of Bitcoin For Corporations for informational purposes only. It reflects the author’s own analysis and opinion and should not be relied upon as investment advice. Nothing in this article constitutes an offer, invitation, or solicitation to purchase, sell, or subscribe for any security or financial product.

This post The Bitcoin Treasury Model With a Built-In Valuation Floor first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Nick Ward.

The “always up” idea behind crypto markets is what drives retail investors to come short-handed when they begin trading. The reality is that markets have stronger corrections, sideways movements, and downturns, leaving even experienced investors sidelined.

Crypto is a polarizing market that generates a mismatch between the perceived outcomes retail investors have and their actual financial experience. New regulations, the tech sector, and economic policies are reshaping how market cycles have evolved.

Traditional strategies lack effectiveness in today’s volatile crypto environment. Yieldfund, a Dutch quantitative trading company, illustrates how investors can adopt structured, automated strategies for greater resilience and predictability.

When Bull-Market Habits Stop Working

New retail investors rely on the default strategy of “HODLing”. Even during crypto's highs, the strategy isn’t flawless, as inexperienced traders experience euphoria from rising crypto prices and high enthusiasm. However, when cycles end and market conditions change, crypto assets can experience drawdowns.

Even with increased industry regulations, 70% drawdowns and a complete market reset can occur. Such scenarios are all but common. When panic sets in, retail investors panic. They become emotionally exhausted from the uncertainty and act on it.

Experienced traders who are active in the marekts are equally exposed to the volatility and drawdowns. A lack of discipline and increased enthusiasm lead to poor capital management. Additionally, active day trading requires ongoing position management, trading stress, and uncertainty for one's capital.

Investor analysis underscores that price uncertainty, especially during downturns, leads users to take market action out of fear. For many, it leads to 90% of new retail traders being priced out of a $4 trillion market within a year. For the remaining 10%, positive outcomes rely heavily on the market moving favorably or the investor having perfect timing.

The Rise of Structured Strategies Built for All Market Conditions

Manual trading has shown its limitations, and new industry developments have enabled retail investors to automate trading even without experience. The downside is a flawed base leading to unwanted open positions and unexpected losses. Without adequate market knowledge, investors trade and invest blindly.

For retail, the shift to structured strategies built for all market conditions is required. A new step that acts as a bridge between accessible tools and the lack of knowledge. Learning not to panic during periods of volatility is only possible when investors can read the market, but that takes time, as the learning curve for crypto is steep.

Investors – whether they are inexperienced or have deep market knowledge – recognize that predictable outcomes hold more value than theoretical, massive gains that never materialize. And it shouldn't rely on a person sitting behind a screen, trying to guess the next market move.

Companies like Yieldfund are systematically making institutional-grade trading automations available to new investor cohorts – without much restriction. They reorganize how investors access the market, allocate capital, and earn predictable returns while allowing traders to step back from the trading process.

Automation is what powers structured crypto strategies. Quantitative trading relies on data science to execute trades based on predefined logic. Yieldfund runs a quantitative trading algorithm that executes multiple trades over a shorter period, helping limit its downside exposure.

By analyzing market capitalization, volatility, and daily trading volume, these algorithms identify optimal entry and exit points. Yieldfund goes a step further, displaying all its executed trades on its performance page. Anyone can view how the fund performed, the trades executed, and their success rate.

This broader shift toward less manual trading and toward automation empowers investors to participate in the crypto market with limited knowledge.

How Yieldfund Brings A New Structured Approach To Crypto Exposure

The modern retail crypto investor has clear expectations. It wants a simple way to access crypto returns, understand yields, and avoid decoding complex blockchain metrics or managing complex private keys. Furthermore, transparency regarding performance and risk management is entirely non-negotiable.

Yieldfund provides a clear example of this model. Operating as a quantitative trading company in the Netherlands, Yieldfund simplified the crypto investment process through structured investment plans, weekly returns, and a simple onboarding process for retail investors.

Yieldfund removes the need for technical knowledge through a straightforward one-off investment model starting from €10,000, an accessible entry point, significantly lower than what traditional funds offer. It focuses on a performance-based model with zero management fees and no hidden management costs.

Investors can access predictable returns by choosing one of the three investment plans. When choosing between 1-, 2-, or 3-year plans, the company delivers returns of 24%, 36%, or 48% through a bond structure. At the end of the investment term, investors receive 100% of their initial capital back.

Investors have access to a dedicated investor relations manager who guides them and answers key questions before and after making an investment. Additionally, Yieldfund has a native online dashboard that provides key information about their contract, payment terms, wallet address, and access to customer support available Monday to Friday.

Yieldfund demonstrates how advanced technology can level the playing field. It makes financial freedom accessible without the stress and constant monitoring required by manual trading.

Where Yieldfund Fits in This Changing Landscape

Crypto markets are all about volatility, and retail isn't prepared or accustomed to capitalizing on the sudden moves. Yieldfund is adopting a quantitative trading strategy to allow anyone to participate in the digital asset economy – regardless of market movements.

Yieldfund provides a structured, automated approach that prioritizes consistent returns without passing crypto's volatility to users. New investment strategies delivered by Yieldfund democratize access to crypto yields for new investors and are helping rethink how capital can be managed amid day-to-day market turbulence.

Disclaimer: This is a sponsored post. CryptoSlate does not endorse any of the projects mentioned in this article. Investors are encouraged to perform necessary due diligence.

The post Rethinking Crypto Investment Strategies in a Market That Doesn’t Always Go Up appeared first on CryptoSlate.

At 8:30 on a Friday morning, the Bureau of Labor Statistics dropped one of the more surprising jobs reports of the past year. The US economy added 178,000 jobs in March, and the unemployment rate ticked down to 4.3%.

When put against a Wall Street consensus calling for roughly 57,000 nonfarm payrolls, the number was an especially emphatic beat. It was the strongest monthly gain since the end of 2024, higher than every estimate in Bloomberg's recent surveys.

But it came with a slight problem: nobody on Wall Street can actually do anything about it.

Related Reading

161,000 US jobs just disappeared after a revision as Bitcoin navigates increasingly messy macro data

Nearly 1 million US jobs never existed, according to a massive government revision

Mar 8, 2026 · Andjela Radmilac

Why this matters: A stronger labor print usually pushes rate-cut expectations further out, which can pressure risk assets across stocks and crypto. With traditional markets shut, Bitcoin became the only major venue where that macro shock could start getting priced in ahead of Monday.

NYSE, Nasdaq, and bond markets were closed in observance of Good Friday, sealing off every traditional channel through which a data surprise like this would normally be absorbed and repriced.

For one of the most market-sensitive economic prints on the calendar, the timing couldn't have been more off.

That's why what follows is going to be a rare and instructive moment: a forced experiment in what price discovery looks like when all the normal machinery is offline.

February had been a disaster. The economy lost 92,000 jobs that month, nearly double the expectations, marking the fourth monthly job loss in nine months. The revisions compounded the damage: December was revised down by 65,000, from +48,000 to -17,000, and January was revised down by a further 4,000.

Heading into Friday, even the most optimistic forecasters weren't calling for anything like a rebound of this scale.

Much of March's gain came from healthcare. A strike of healthcare workers had pulled February's payrolls down, and the sector added 76,000 jobs in March to push overall job growth higher. Positions were also added in construction, transportation, and warehousing.

While the bounce itself was real, it's important to note that a big part of the growth was mechanical, a catch-up from previous disruptions rather than evidence of a suddenly recovered economy.

Still, 178,000 jobs against expectations of 57,000 isn't a rounding error. The implications for the Federal Reserve's policy were immediate and precise: if the numbers come in strong, crypto prices will fall because interest rate expectations rise.

Stronger labor data reduces the Fed's space to cut rates, and tighter financial conditions ripple through every risk asset. So the question here wasn't whether markets would react, but which markets, specifically, were still open to react at all.

When the NYSE goes dark, Bitcoin becomes the market

Bitcoin remained the only major financial market still trading as the March report landed at 8:30 AM ET, with the NYSE closed and sentiment sitting at extreme fear levels. The crypto Fear and Greed Index had printed at 9 out of 100 on Apr. 3, a reading so low that it doesn't even signal panic anymore, but something closer to exhausted resignation. Bitcoin touched $66,300 in the morning, with traders seemingly focused on the incoming data.

And when the number hit, Bitcoin went nowhere.

The hot jobs print wasn't bullish or bearish per se. It was complicated, and Bitcoin, in its flatness, reflected that complexity with more fidelity than a knee-jerk rally or selloff would have.

Consider what the report contained beneath its surface. Long-term unemployment stood at 1.8 million, up 322,000 over the year. Federal government employment, under relentless contraction, continued to fall. The ongoing war with Iran still threatens to strain a delicate labor market, and developments in AI that lead to mass layoffs add further uncertainty.

As Moody's chief credit officer, Atsi Sheth, noted in their baseline for 2026, a weaker job market is expected, but not one where unemployment rises enough to tip the economy into recession.

Related Reading

Bitcoin just crossed into credit markets — with forced selling built in

The new bond structure gives BTC credit utility, but ties that access to clear liquidation thresholds if prices fall.

Apr 2, 2026 · Gino Matos

There's also one more complication. The same release that delivered 178,000 jobs also revised December's figure down by 65,000, and January's down by 4,000, erasing nearly 70,000 jobs that markets had already priced and moved on from.

This has the potential to become a pattern. The BLS has revised recent months downward with enough consistency that the March number now carries a built-in caveat: it may look considerably less impressive when April's report arrives.

Treasuries, the dollar, and the Fed's rate-hold calculus all hardened on 178,000. If that number is revised to 130,000 next month, every one of those reactions will have been calibrated against incorrect data.

The Fed has no chair, the market has no floor, and Monday has no script

Jerome Powell described the labor market in March as sitting in a “zero-employment growth equilibrium” with a feel of downside risk.

He said that before this report came out. Now, with 178,000 jobs on the ledger, the Fed's calculus shifts, not dramatically, but measurably toward holding rates higher for longer. With Powell's term ending May 15 and no confirmed successor yet, the Fed has to navigate one of the most important data weeks of 2026 without clear leadership.

Into that vacuum, the 10-year Treasury yield rose roughly four basis points to 4.35%, and the dollar edged upward: both consistent with a market reading that rate cuts are receding further into the future. These were the first legible reactions, not from the institutions that usually set the tone, but from the open edges of the financial system.

Bitcoin will price this number alone for nearly three full days before equity trading resumes on April 6.

When the opening bell rings Monday morning, stocks will be absorbing not only a jobs report that surprised every forecaster, but also whatever develops over the Easter weekend in a geopolitical environment that remains acutely fragile, with an ongoing Iran conflict still reshaping oil prices and the dollar simultaneously.

Bitcoin's stillness means that the market is holding a position, aware that any verdict rendered now may need to be revised entirely by what Monday brings.

The real judgment on March's jobs report will arrive when the institutions that normally lead this conversation are finally allowed back in the room. Until then, the numbers belong to the bond market, the foreign exchange desks, and the one financial market that does not observe holidays.
For three days, Bitcoin is the only clock still ticking. The question is whether it keeps accurate time.

The post Can markets trust the jobs report? Another revision risk hangs over Bitcoin’s macro test appeared first on CryptoSlate.

The federal government is preparing to redraw the boundaries of America's retirement accounts.

The US Department of Labor has proposed a new rule clarifying how 401(k) fiduciaries (the employer committees legally responsible for plan investment decisions) should evaluate so-called “alternative” assets, including private equity, private credit, and…digital assets.

The proposal came directly out of an executive order President Donald Trump signed in August 2025, directing the Labor Department to expand retirement plan access to alternative assets. It establishes a documented process, essentially a compliance checklist with legal teeth, and offers a “safe harbor” to employers who follow it carefully: a layer of protection if participants later challenge the decision.

Related Reading

House lawmakers urge SEC to implement Trump's crypto 401k executive order

The bipartisan coalition expressed support for expanding access to alternative assets to help 90 million Americans secure dignified retirement outcomes.

Sep 22, 2025 · Gino Matos

Why this matters: The proposal leaves Bitcoin and private funds out of retirement plans for now. It establishes the legal framework employers would rely on when adding alternative assets later. Wall Street is treating this as the opening phase of a much larger distribution battle.

Americans held $10.1 trillion in 401(k) plans alone at the end of 2025, according to the Investment Company Institute. Any rule that changes what can be offered inside those plans doesn't need to move fast to shift a great deal of money.

Even a tiny little change in how a fraction of that capital is allocated would represent one of the largest expansions of the alternative investment market in a generation, and the asset managers who run private equity and private credit funds have understood this for years.

The proposal doesn't force any plan to add new investments and doesn't label any asset class as specifically approved or endorsed. It says, in carefully neutral regulatory language, here's the process that makes a decision defensible.

After the rule was published, a 60-day public comment period opened. The final version, if it survives that process and the inevitable legal scrutiny, will reflect whatever adjustments the Department decides to make. Nothing in Washington moves quickly, and that pace is itself a form of protection for the millions of workers who've never logged into their retirement account portal.

Related Reading

Donald Trump's 401(k) executive order sparks $1.57 billion crypto ETP recovery

Bitcoin bounces back with $206 million inflow as Trump's crypto-friendly 401(k) policy takes effect.

Aug 11, 2025 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

Your employer isn't rushing to add Bitcoin, but Wall Street is very interested in what happens next

The part that most coverage of this proposal has underplayed, and the part that matters most if you want to understand what's actually being debated, is that while cryptocurrency may be the headline, private credit and private equity are actually the main event.

The Bitcoin angle is always attractive to readers and genuinely relevant to policy, but most institutional analysts who've studied the proposal believe digital assets are likely to be among the last alternatives to appear in retirement plans, not the first.

The bar for valuation, custody, and regulatory compliance is simply higher for crypto than for other alternative structures. Private equity and private credit already sit inside pension funds, university endowments, and sovereign wealth portfolios around the world. They're unfamiliar to most 401(k) participants but very familiar to the institutions that would manage them. That familiarity is a meaningful advantage when a fiduciary committee has to write a defensible rationale for inclusion.

Private markets are loans or company ownership stakes that don't trade on public exchanges. A private credit fund lends money directly to businesses that can't or choose not to access public bond markets. A private equity fund takes ownership stakes in companies, often before those companies list publicly.

These strategies have produced strong long-term returns for large institutional investors, which is a pretty good argument in their favor. The less comfortable argument, the one supporters tend to mention rarely, is that the 401(k) market represents a distribution opportunity of extraordinary scale for an industry that's spent decades selling primarily to institutions.

Critics are very vocal when it comes to risks. Alternative investments typically carry layered fee structures combining management fees, performance fees, and administrative costs in ways that are genuinely difficult for non-specialists to untangle. For a 401(k) participant in their forties with a balance of $150,000, the difference between paying 0.05% annually in a low-cost index fund and paying 1.5% or more in an alternatives structure is huge. Compounded over twenty years, that gap can consume tens of thousands of dollars in retirement income. Every dollar paid in fees is a dollar that stops compounding.

Valuation adds a second layer of complexity. Standard 401(k) options are priced every day. Participants can rebalance, adjust allocations, and take distributions with minimal friction because every holding has a clear, current market price.

Private assets don't work this way. Their valuations are typically updated quarterly, based on appraisals and models rather than live market transactions. In a fund that mixes participants buying in and out at different times, lagging valuations can create fairness problems that are difficult to resolve.

The structure can work, but only through purpose-built fund wrappers designed to manage valuation and liquidity simultaneously, and those wrappers tend to add both cost and complexity.

Liquidity is where the stakes become high for ordinary savers. Private assets are often contractually difficult to sell on short notice, and in periods of real market stress, liquidity limits can mean delays or outright restrictions on accessing your own money.

During the 2022 rate shock, some large private fund structures faced elevated redemption pressure that tested their liquidity management. Fortunately, it didn't develop into a full-blown crisis, but it offered a preview of what happens when conditions deteriorate, and participants want their money back on a schedule the fund can't accommodate.

The real obstacle has nothing to do with regulation

Even among supporters of the proposal, the expectation is that adoption will be slow and cautious. TD Cowen's financial services policy analyst wrote in a research note that it could be several years before the rule has any real impact, because fiduciaries are unlikely to move until courts have confirmed the safe harbor actually holds.

Large employers aren't eager to be early test cases for a legal standard that's still being defined, and the funds where the vast majority of retirement money actually sits (target-date default funds) change their underlying strategies through long evaluation cycles that were built to resist disruption.

The most realistic path is small optional allocations available to a subset of participants, long fiduciary review periods, and slow, incremental additions.

For crypto, the practical path to meaningful 401(k) inclusion likely runs through regulated fund structures like Bitcoin ETFs rather than direct asset exposure, and through a sustained period of price stability and regulatory clarity that the asset class hasn't yet consistently demonstrated. That doesn't mean it won't happen, just that the timeline fiduciaries will actually accept will probably be longer than the crypto industry expects.

If your plan ever announces new alternative investment options, the questions worth asking are simple and specific: How much of your account can be allocated, and is it capped? What are the all-in fees, including every layer of the structure, not just the headline number? And how does liquidity actually function when the market, especially the crypto market, isn't cooperating?

The rule being written right now will determine whether those questions have honest answers. The people most urgently interested in seeing alternatives enter 401(k) plans aren't your regular retirement savers.

They're asset managers who've spent years looking at ten trillion dollars in retirement capital and waiting for a rule that lets them make their case. The entire purpose of what the Department of Labor is drafting is to make sure those two sets of interests stay in the right order. Watch carefully whether they do.

The post Wall Street sees a $10 trillion opening as Washington rewrites 401(k) rules appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Wall Street spent the first quarter of 2026 systematically narrowing DeFi's claim to the future of finance.

In January, ICE announced NYSE was building a tokenized securities platform with 24/7 operations, instant settlement, dollar-based order sizing, and stablecoin funding, with BNY and Citi providing tokenized deposits for clearinghouse funding outside normal banking hours.

Related Reading

Why Wall Street is overhauling stock dividends with crypto

NYSE is moving to "continuous" settlement, leaving traditional banking hours in the dust forever.

Jan 20, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

In February, WisdomTree launched 24/7 trading and instant settlement for tokenized money-market fund shares under SEC relief.

In March, the Fed, FDIC, and OCC jointly said that eligible tokenized securities should receive the same capital treatment as their non-tokenized counterparts, calling the framework technology-neutral.

The SEC then approved Nasdaq's proposal to trade certain securities in tokenized form, with settlement through DTC.

NYSE and Securitize followed with a partnership to build digital transfer-agent infrastructure around institutional operating standards.

That sequence did something concrete to DeFi's competitive position. Regulated exchanges, broker-dealers, and bank-backed clearinghouses can now package 24/7 trading and on-chain settlement inside a supervised market structure, with the capital treatment to match.

The base pool of on-chain capital these moves target already exceeds $330 billion, including stablecoins at roughly $317 billion, tokenized US Treasuries at nearly $13 billion, and tokenized stocks at $1 billion.

That pool will attract institutional capital regardless of which rails it flows through.

Why this matters: the contest is no longer over whether finance will move on-chain. It is over who captures the capital once it does. If regulated venues can offer blockchain-based trading and settlement without DeFi’s governance and control-layer risks, open protocols have to prove why institutions should accept the added exposure.

Composability is DeFi's distinct advantage: the ability to build interconnected financial products on shared, permissionless infrastructure, where any protocol can connect directly to any other on open terms.

It is a genuinely DeFi-native feature. Nasdaq-approved tokenized securities still settle through DTC, are subject to exchange surveillance, and operate under existing order types and reporting frameworks.

WisdomTree's tokenized fund sits inside a broker-dealer model. NYSE designed its tokenized platform around transfer agents and institutional operating standards. All of those architectures require a central gatekeeper to approve downstream connections.

Related Reading

The SEC just gave crypto its clearest win in years, but much of it could still be reversed

The agencies drew bright lines on tokens, staking, airdrops, mining, and wrapped assets, then warned they can revise it.

Mar 23, 2026 · Gino Matos

Drift and the control-layer problem

Composability's value as a moat depends entirely on whether capital allocators believe the surrounding controls are mature enough to contain localized failures.

Drift's exploit exposed that dependency in the most direct way possible. Drift confirmed the attack exploited durable nonces and a takeover of Security Council administrative powers through a compromise of the access-control layer.

DefiLlama classified the incident as a $285 million hack driven by compromised admin access and price manipulation. Drift's total value locked fell from roughly $550 million to below $250 million.

The contagion framing from post-incident analysis is where the competitive argument becomes sharpest.

Because Drift's infrastructure is connected to downstream vaults, yield strategies, wrappers, and collateral positions across Solana DeFi, the administrative compromise radiated outward before the exposure map was clear.

Chaos Labs publicly said hidden dependencies kept surfacing in real time, leaving the final exposure tally open. Composability, functioning as a transmission channel for losses, precisely drives institutional capital allocators toward permissioned tokenization infrastructure over open protocol stacks.

The Drift incident fits a pattern that extends well beyond Solana.

Chainalysis found that private key compromises accounted for 43.8% of stolen crypto in 2024, the single-largest attack category it tracked.

TRM Labs said attackers stole $2.87 billion across nearly 150 hacks in 2025, with infrastructure attacks targeting keys, wallets, and access control planes driving the majority of losses and outpacing smart contract exploits.

TRM also noted the top 10 incidents accounted for 81% of 2025 hack losses.

The empirical record says the control layer, the governance layer, and the access management layer now carry more systemic risk than contract code alone. DeFi's security culture is still catching up to that empirical record.

What DeFi has to do

Open composability must adopt the corrective to compete for the institutional capital now pooling on-chain.

Drift's post-incident analysis and the broader Chaos Labs framing converge on the same operational list: stricter signer standards, timelocks on privileged transitions, segmented permission structures so that one compromised key cannot reach the entire control surface, explicit dependency mapping so downstream integrations are visible before a failure occurs, and faster public disclosure that lets the broader network act before contagion spreads.

Post-mortems show Drift's administrative transition used a 2-of-5 multisig with no timelock. This configuration compressed the approval window for a catastrophic change to the point where detection and intervention had no time to operate.

Those fixes are unglamorous. They build the operational credibility that makes a CFO or risk committee comfortable routing institutional capital through open infrastructure.

ICE, Nasdaq, and NYSE are competing for the same pool. The protocols that earn a share of it will be the ones that can demonstrate composability with contained, visible risk, where an interconnection means expanded utility.

Two paths forward

The on-chain capital base currently sits above $330 billion and will grow as tokenized securities and stablecoin adoption expand.

The contest is over what fraction of that pool flows through open, composable DeFi versus permissioned or semi-permissioned tokenization infrastructure.

In the bull case, DeFi protocols produce a visible, sustained upgrade in governance discipline: timelocks become standard for privileged transitions, signer hygiene improves across major protocols, teams publish dependency maps that let external allocators assess integration risk before committing capital, and disclosure lags shorten from days to hours.

Institutional allocators begin using open composability selectively for structured collateral, cross-protocol hedging, and yield strategies where the control layer is demonstrably stronger than before.

Open DeFi captures 5% to 10% of the on-chain capital pool, or roughly $16 billion to $33 billion. Composability becomes the premium layer atop the tokenization rails that traditional finance is building, running alongside a supervised market structure.

In the bear case, each successive control-layer incident raises the perceived risk premium on open composability faster than the industry can close the governance gap.

Tokenized securities, tokenized funds, and stablecoin settlement volumes have expanded, while capital stays within exchanges, broker-dealers, and permissioned custody structures.

Open DeFi captures less than 1% of the pool, with total assets of less than $3 billion. Traditional finance captures the blockchain upside through tokenization, faster settlement, and extended hours, while open composability captures retail flows and reflexive capital seeking yield on open infrastructure.

Wall Street spent 2025 and the early part of 2026 proving that blockchain rails can carry institutional assets within supervised frameworks.

DeFi's path to winning requires proving that open interconnection is worth the additional governance, disclosure, and control overhead imposed by regulatory mandates on supervised venues.

The post As Wall Street moves on-chain, DeFi faces a $330 billion trust test it can’t dodge appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Algorand has emerged as an early standout in the crypto market’s latest quantum security debate after a recent Google Quantum AI paper highlighted the blockchain as a live example of post-quantum cryptography being deployed on a network.

The attention came as the paper sharpened concerns around Bitcoin and Ethereum, two networks whose size, age, and design choices could make any future migration to quantum-resistant infrastructure slower and more complicated.

Against that backdrop, Algorand’s quieter work on Falcon digital signatures, state proofs, and key rotation suddenly looked less like a niche technical experiment and more like a practical head start.

The shift in attention helped lift Algorand’s token sharply over the past week, with traders treating the Google paper as validation of work already underway on the network.

According to CryptoSlate's data, ALGO, the blockchain network's native token, is one of the top performers over the past week, gaining around 50% to rise to $0.12 as of press time. Notably, the price performance came less than a week after the token fell to an all-time low of $0.08.

Algorand's quiet quantum computing lead over Bitcoin and Ethereum

Algorand’s advantage over Bitcoin and Ethereum is narrower than the recent enthusiasm suggests, but it is also more concrete than what many larger chains can currently show.

In its paper, Google described Algorand as an example of real-world deployment of post-quantum cryptography on an otherwise quantum-vulnerable blockchain.

Related Reading

Google slashes quantum cracking estimates by 20X creating $600 billion countdown for Bitcoin and Ethereum

Google used zero-knowledge proofs to verify quantum attack estimates without exposing the underlying attack circuits.

Mar 31, 2026 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

The distinction was important. It did not say Algorand had solved the problem end-to-end, but it did point to a network that had moved from theory into live implementation.

Algorand’s core consensus and built-in transactions still rely on Ed25519, which remains vulnerable in a sufficiently advanced quantum scenario.

However, the network has already deployed Falcon digital signatures for smart transactions and state proofs, the cryptographic attestations used to verify blockchain state across chains. It has also made Falcon verification available as a primitive for developers building on the Algorand Virtual Machine, giving the ecosystem a working set of tools rather than just a roadmap.

The network executed its first post-quantum-secured transaction in 2025, a milestone that set it apart from many larger rivals that are still debating design paths, governance trade-offs, and implementation timelines.

Algorand also allows users to rotate the private keys associated with their accounts, a feature that does not eliminate the underlying threat but could make future migrations more manageable.

That combination, live transaction capability, developer tooling, state-proof support, and native key rotation, is what turned Algorand into a focal point as the paper circulated through the market.

In a sector where many conversations around quantum risk remain theoretical, Algorand could point to infrastructure already in production.

Related Reading

New Algorand roadmap shifts power to users, targets $18.9T tokenized market

A community-led governance model and AI-enhanced toolkit position Algorand as a key player in the $18.9 trillion tokenization market.

Aug 1, 2025 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

Bitcoin and Ethereum face quantum computing risk

For Bitcoin, the concern is not only whether quantum computers will eventually be able to derive private keys from public information, but also how much of the network’s legacy footprint would be difficult to migrate in time.

The paper said a quantum computer with fewer than 500,000 physical qubits could crack the elliptic-curve cryptography protecting Bitcoin wallets, a far lower threshold than earlier estimates that ran into the millions.

Google’s own most advanced chip, Willow, remains far below that level, but the revised estimate has intensified scrutiny of how much Bitcoin could be exposed if the technology advances faster than expected.

The burden is particularly acute because some of Bitcoin’s oldest addresses keep public keys visible on-chain.

The paper cited an estimated 6.7 million BTC in older Pay-to-Public-Key addresses, including coins long associated with Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto.

Even outside those legacy wallets, the migration challenge is politically and technically heavy for a network that prioritizes backward compatibility and moves cautiously on base-layer changes.

Quantum risk, in Bitcoin’s case, is as much a governance and coordination problem as it is a cryptographic one.

Meanwhile, Ethereum’s exposure to the same quantum computing risk is somewhat broader.

Once an Ethereum user sends a transaction, the public key tied to that account becomes permanently visible on-chain. The paper said that this leaves the top 1,000 Ethereum wallets, holding roughly 20.5 million ETH, exposed under a sufficiently advanced quantum attack.

It also identified at least 70 major contracts with administrator keys visible on-chain, which ultimately control far more than the ETH they directly hold, including stablecoin minting authority and other system-critical permissions.

Moreover, the attack surface extends beyond wallets and contract administrators.

Ethereum’s proof-of-stake validator set, major Layer 2 networks, and parts of its data-availability architecture all rely on cryptographic components the paper described as vulnerable.

According to the paper, roughly 37 million ETH is staked, and much of Ethereum’s transaction load now flows through rollups and bridges that inherit assumptions from the base layer.

That means any serious post-quantum migration would have to reach not only users and validators, but also the network of applications and scaling systems built around them.

The post Algorand just jumped 50% after Google flags quantum risk for Bitcoin and Ethereum appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin has moved back above the $70,000 level — but this breakout is not being driven by crypto fundamentals.

Instead, the move comes amid rapidly shifting geopolitical headlines. Reports of a potential 45-day ceasefire between the US and Iran triggered a sharp change in sentiment, pushing oil lower and lifting risk assets across the board. Bitcoin reacted immediately, breaking resistance and accelerating higher.

At the same time, the rally was amplified by positioning.

• Over $70M+ in short positions were liquidated within a short timeframe
• Momentum kicked in as BTC cleared key resistance levels
• Thin weekend liquidity exaggerated the move

This kind of price action reflects a market caught offside — not necessarily a confirmed trend.

What Is Really Driving Bitcoin Right Now?

The key takeaway is simple: Bitcoin is trading macro, not crypto.

Recent price movements are closely tied to external factors:

• Ceasefire expectations → easing inflation pressure → bullish for risk assets
• Oil price reactions → direct impact on global liquidity sentiment
• Geopolitical uncertainty → rapid shifts between risk-on and risk-off

In this environment, Bitcoin behaves less like a standalone asset and more like a real-time macro indicator.

The Hidden Risk Behind the $70K Breakout

While markets reacted positively to ceasefire discussions, the downside scenario remains fully in play.

Jamie Dimon recently warned that an escalation involving Iran could:

• Push inflation higher again
• Drive oil toward $120+
• Put additional pressure on global financial markets

If that scenario unfolds, the current rally could reverse quickly.

This explains why the breakout above $70K, while technically significant, still lacks strong conviction.

Two Scenarios the Market Is Watching

Right now, everything depends on how the geopolitical situation evolves:

Bullish Scenario — De-escalation confirmed

• Oil continues to drop
• Stocks and risk assets rally
• Bitcoin targets $72K–$75K

Bearish Scenario — Escalation returns

• Oil spikes toward $120
• Risk-off sentiment dominates
• Bitcoin falls back toward $65K or lower

The market is not choosing between these outcomes yet — it is reacting to each headline as it comes.

Why Monday Could Define the Next Move

Another key factor: timing.

This breakout is happening during the weekend, when liquidity is thinner and moves are easier to exaggerate. These conditions often lead to temporary price spikes rather than confirmed trends.

The real test will come when:

• Wall Street reopens
• Institutional volume returns
• Macro markets (stocks, yields, oil) react in full

If traditional markets support the move, Bitcoin could stabilize above $70K. If not, this breakout risks fading quickly.

Final Take

Bitcoin price above $70K looks strong — but the context matters.

This is a headline-driven rally, not a structural shift. As long as markets remain tied to geopolitical developments, volatility will dominate over clear direction.

For now, Bitcoin is not leading the market — it is reacting to it.

Crypto markets are about to enter one of the most decisive moments of the year.

After a quiet weekend with low volatility, real trading resumes today as Wall Street reopens — and with it comes the return of institutional capital.

Bitcoin is holding near $67,000. Ethereum remains above $2,000. Altcoins are drifting lower.

👉 But this calm is not stability — it’s compression before a major move.

Why This Monday Is Different

Weekend crypto trading often creates a false sense of direction.

• Liquidity is thin
• Institutions are inactive
• Volume is limited
• Moves lack conviction

👉 That changes today.

With traditional markets reopening:

• Institutional flows return
• ETF activity resumes
• Macro-driven positioning begins
• Correlation with equities strengthens

👉 This is when the real trend forms

A $100B Move Is Not an Exaggeration

Crypto market structure suggests that a large move is building.

When liquidity returns after a compressed weekend:

• Breakouts accelerate quickly
• Liquidations amplify momentum
• Capital rotates aggressively

👉 In past setups like this, total market cap has moved $100B+ within hours

This is exactly the type of environment we are entering now.

The Market Is Sitting on Multiple Triggers

Several major catalysts are converging at the same time:

🌍 Macro Risk

• Rising tensions around the Strait of Hormuz
• Oil price pressure building
• Inflation fears returning

🏦 Institutional Momentum

• Retirement funds opening to crypto
• Major players preparing trading access
• Continued accumulation signals

⚠️ Market Structure

• Low weekend volatility
• Tight price ranges
• Decreasing momentum

👉 This combination creates a pressure cooker setup

Bullish vs Bearish — What Happens Next?

🟢 Bullish Scenario

If markets absorb macro risks:

• Bitcoin breaks resistance
• Institutional inflows push prices higher
• Momentum builds quickly

👉 Expected:

• BTC → $70K+
• ETH follows
• Altcoins rebound sharply

🔴 Bearish Scenario

If macro fear dominates:

• Risk-off hits global markets
• Liquidity pulls back
• Crypto reacts sharply

👉 Expected:

• BTC loses support
• Altcoins drop faster
• Liquidations increase

The First Hours Will Decide Everything

The most important period is not the full day — it’s the first hours after market open.

Watch closely:

• Volume expansion
• Bitcoin direction
• Stock market reaction
• Oil price continuation

👉 If volume confirms the move, it becomes a trend
👉 If not, expect more volatility and fakeouts

Final Take

Crypto is not quiet. Crypto is waiting.

👉 Waiting for liquidity
👉 Waiting for institutional flows
👉 Waiting for direction

And today…

That direction will likely be decided.

The first week of April 2026 has been a study in contrasts. While the broader financial markets grapple with macroeconomic shifts, the digital asset sector is doubling down on technical evolution. We are seeing a move away from the "meme-coin" cycles of the past toward institutional-grade infrastructure and significant protocol overhauls.

Crypto News Today: Market Highlights

The crypto market today is defined by Bitcoin’s price stability near the $67,000 mark and massive anticipation for Ethereum’s Glamsterdam upgrade. Simultaneously, a significant exploit on the Solana-based Drift Protocol has served as a stark reminder of the security risks still inherent in decentralized finance (DeFi).

Market Snapshot: Bitcoin’s Quiet Resilience

Despite a slight 0.42% dip in the last 24 hours, Bitcoin ($BTC) continues to act as a stabilizing force for the entire ecosystem. Trading at approximately $67,000, the asset has shrugged off recent geopolitical volatility.

• Institutional Inflow: Recent reports from Goldman Sachs suggest that institutional "dip-buying" is keeping the floor high.
• Price Tracking: You can monitor live movements on our Bitcoin Ticker.

Ethereum Roadmap: The Glamsterdam Era

The biggest story in the developer community is the finalized scope for Ethereum’s Glamsterdam upgrade. Scheduled for the first half of 2026, this hard fork is expected to be a "game-changer" for scalability.

What is the Glamsterdam Upgrade?

Glamsterdam is the next major evolution of the Ethereum mainnet following the Fusaka update of late 2025. Its primary goals are:

• Gas Fee Reduction: A projected 78.6% reduction in fees for smart contract calls.
• Parallel Processing: Introducing the ability to process multiple transactions simultaneously.
• Throughput: Increasing the gas limit per block from 60 million to 200 million.

This upgrade is essential for $Ethereum to remain competitive against high-speed chains like Solana.

The Solana Hack: Drift Protocol Exploit

While Ethereum builds, $Solana has hit a major speed bump. On April 1, 2026, the Drift Protocol—the network's largest perpetual futures exchange—was drained of $286 million.

"The breach was not a simple code bug, but a sophisticated six-month social engineering operation by highly resourced actors." — Drift Protocol Preliminary Report.

The attackers reportedly posed as a quantitative trading firm to gain the trust of the protocol's security council. This event has reignited discussions on the necessity of hardware wallets for all DeFi participants.

Regulatory Milestone: Coinbase Nabs OCC Approval

In a massive win for US-based crypto, Coinbase has received conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) for a national trust charter.

This does not make Coinbase a traditional commercial bank, but it provides federal regulatory uniformity for its custody business. This moves Coinbase into the same regulatory conversation as legacy giants like JPMorgan, further bridging the gap between "crypto" and "finance."

In a market often dominated by volatile meme coins and complex DeFi protocols, UNUS SED LEO ($LEO) has quietly climbed the ranks to become a heavyweight in the digital asset space. Originally launched as a utility token for the iFinex ecosystem, LEO has transitioned from its initial $1 exchange offering to a valuation exceeding $10 per token.

As of April 2026, LEO has officially broken into the top 10 largest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, boasting a valuation of approximately $9.3 billion. This article explores the unique fundamentals, the aggressive deflationary model, and the institutional backing that have fueled this 1,000% journey.

What is UNUS SED LEO?

UNUS SED LEO is the native utility token of the iFinex ecosystem, which includes the prominent Bitfinex exchange. Launched in May 2019, the token was designed to provide holders with significant fee discounts and a variety of benefits across the platform's services. Unlike many other assets, LEO is a multi-chain token, existing on both the Ethereum and EOS blockchains to maximize accessibility.

Why is it named like this?

The token's name, "Unus Sed Leo," is Latin for "One, but a lion," a motto emphasizing quality and strength over quantity. It was born out of a crisis: iFinex launched the LEO token to raise $1 billion in capital after a payment processor's funds were seized by government authorities.

While it started as a recovery mechanism, it evolved into a pillar of exchange-based utility. Its primary function is to offer:

• Trading fee reductions: Up to 25% discount for holders.
• Lending fee discounts: Significant reductions for peer-to-peer lenders.
• Withdrawal/Deposit perks: Faster and cheaper transactions on Bitfinex.

The Path from $1 to $10: Why is the Price Rising?

The rise of LEO from its $1 launch to the current $10.05 level is not merely speculative; it is driven by one of the most transparent and aggressive buyback and burn mechanisms in the industry.

1. The 27% Revenue Burn

iFinex is contractually committed to using at least 27% of its consolidated monthly revenue to buy back LEO tokens from the open market and permanently destroy them. This creates a perpetual buy-side pressure. As Bitfinex remains a top-tier exchange for professional traders, this revenue stream provides a "floor" for the token price.

2. The Bitcoin Recovery Catalyst

A major factor in the 2024–2026 rally has been the legal resolution regarding the 2016 Bitfinex hack. Following court orders, nearly 94,643 BTC were earmarked for recovery. According to the token's whitepaper, 80% of recovered funds must be used to repurchase and burn LEO tokens. With $Bitcoin prices reaching new heights, the sheer dollar value of this buyback program has caused massive supply shocks.

3. Low Volatility and Institutional Trust

Unlike highly liquid assets that fluctuate wildly, LEO often shows "resilience" during market crashes. Because so much of the supply is held by long-term investors or is being systematically burned, the circulating supply (currently around 920 million LEO) continues to shrink, making each remaining token more valuable.

How LEO Price Reached the Top 10 Cryptos

Reaching the #10 spot by market cap is a feat of endurance. LEO's ascent was accelerated by the downfall of other exchange tokens (such as FTT) and the growing demand for "safe haven" utility assets.

By maintaining a steady growth trajectory while the broader altcoin market experienced massive drawdowns, LEO became a "non-correlated" asset. This attracted portfolio managers looking for stability.

From Digital Gold to Digital Dust

In early 2022, the world of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) was at its absolute zenith. Celebrities were flocking to the space, led by pop icon Justin Bieber, who made headlines by purchasing a Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFT for a staggering sum. At the time, it was seen as a bold entry into the future of digital art and web3.

Fast forward to April 2026, and the landscape has shifted dramatically. The speculative bubble that once valued "cartoon apes" at millions of dollars has largely evaporated, leaving high-profile investors like Bieber with massive "paper" losses.

The $1.3 Million Entry: Bored Ape #3001

In January 2022, Justin Bieber acquired Bored Ape #3001 for 500 ETH. At the exchange rates of that time, the transaction was valued at approximately $1.3 million.

The purchase was immediately controversial among NFT collectors. Analysts pointed out that Bieber paid nearly five times the "floor price" for an ape that possessed relatively common traits. While $Bitcoin and $Ethereum were experiencing high volatility, the NFT market was still fueled by extreme hype and celebrity endorsements.

Why Did He Pay Such a Premium?

• Aura of Exclusivity: Ownership of a BAYC acted as a digital "black card" for elite social circles.
• Market Sentiment: In 2022, the belief was that "blue-chip" NFTs would act as a store of value similar to fine art.
• FOMO: Fear of missing out on the next evolution of social media avatars.

The 2026 Reality: A 99% Valuation Wipeout

Today, the secondary market for the Bored Ape Yacht Club collection tells a much different story. As of April 2026, the floor price for the collection has retreated to approximately 5.25 ETH to 6 ETH. With the current Ethereum price stabilizing around $2,000, Bieber’s Bored Ape is now valued at roughly $12,000.

This represents a staggering 99% decline from his initial investment. Even when compared to the broader crypto market news, the drawdown in the NFT sector has been significantly more severe than that of major cryptocurrencies like BTC or ETH.

Celebrity NFT Portfolios in 2026

Bieber isn't the only celebrity facing a "re-valuation" of his digital assets. The following table illustrates the peak vs. current estimates for major celebrity BAYC holders:

Note: Differences in loss percentages are often due to the rarity of the specific traits or the timing of the purchase.

Lessons from the NFT Bubble

The collapse of Bored Ape prices serves as a cautionary tale regarding liquidity and speculative assets. Unlike trading on major exchanges, where you can sell a token instantly, NFTs are illiquid. You need a specific buyer willing to pay your asking price for your specific token.

Furthermore, as reported by major financial outlets like Bloomberg, the shift toward "utility-based NFTs"—assets with actual function in gaming or identity—has left purely "profile picture" (PFP) projects struggling to regain their former glory.

Is there a Future for BAYC?

While the dollar value has dropped, Yuga Labs continues to develop the "Otherside" metaverse. However, for investors who entered during the 2022 frenzy, the road to "breaking even" appears nearly impossible. Most experts now categorize early NFT purchases as high-risk speculative plays rather than foundational investments.

The decentralized peer-to-peer messaging app has been used by protestors in countries including Nepal, Madagascar and Iran.

Drift Protocol said the attackers posed as traders, met contributors in person, and spent months infiltrating before draining the platform.

Bitcoin jumped on reports that Pakistan has put together a framework for a U.S.-Iran ceasefire, but analysts remain cautious.

Claude developer Anthropic registered an employee-funded PAC amid a legal battle with the White House and rising election-year scrutiny of AI.

Researchers say internal emotion-like signals shape how large language models make decisions.

Shiba Inu is somewhat alive again: SHIB on exchanges is moving away again.

James Wynn has seen his portfolio reduced to $900 in Bitcoin short bets.

XRP enters seven-day consolidation as Bollinger Bands narrow after $200 million short liquidations.

Recently published SHIB burners’ list discloses some of the biggest names in the cryptocurrency industry.

XRP Ledger builders urged to stay alert amid sophisticated social engineering scam risk in crypto space.

TLDR

• Futures for the S&P 500 climbed 0.4% while Nasdaq 100 futures advanced 0.6% during Monday trading
• Diplomatic negotiations between Washington and Tehran, with Pakistan serving as mediator, boosted investor confidence
• President Trump extended his Iran ultimatum to Tuesday at 8:00 PM Eastern, warning of strikes on electrical infrastructure
• The critical Strait of Hormuz shipping channel continues to operate at minimal capacity, impacting approximately 20% of worldwide petroleum transport
• Crude prices retreated following ceasefire news, with Brent declining roughly 1.6% to settle near $107 per barrel

Wall Street futures posted solid gains Monday following emerging reports of potential diplomatic progress between Washington and Tehran. The positive movement arrived after a weekend marked by military escalation and aggressive rhetoric from the White House.

The S&P 500 futures contract advanced approximately 0.4%. Nasdaq 100 futures climbed 0.6%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average futures showed more modest growth at 0.1%.

Equity markets experienced brief volatility overnight following fresh warnings from President Trump directed at Iran. However, sentiment improved as news of diplomatic channels emerged.

According to Reuters, both Washington and Tehran have been presented with a preliminary ceasefire framework brokered by Pakistani officials. The framework reportedly calls for an immediate cessation of hostile actions. To date, neither government has publicly acknowledged or endorsed the terms.

In parallel negotiations, American officials alongside regional intermediaries are advocating for an extended 45-day truce that could potentially conclude hostilities permanently. Sources close to the discussions caution that prospects for success remain uncertain.

President Trump’s initial 10-day ultimatum to Iran reached its expiration Monday. However, Trump announced a postponement via social media, declaring the revised deadline as “Tuesday, 8:00 P.M. Eastern Time.” In comments to the Wall Street Journal, he warned that American forces would target Iran’s entire electrical grid if the Strait of Hormuz shipping lane remains blocked beyond that timeframe.

Crude Markets Retreat on Diplomatic Progress

The strategically vital Strait of Hormuz, a waterway that typically facilitates approximately 20% of global petroleum shipments, remains severely restricted to commercial tanker traffic. This ongoing blockade has sustained upward pressure on oil prices throughout recent trading sessions.

Crude futures had surged nearly 3% at Sunday evening’s market opening. However, prices reversed course following the ceasefire developments. Brent crude retreated approximately 1.6% to trade around $107 per barrel. West Texas Intermediate declined roughly 2% to approximately $109.

A noteworthy market anomaly emerged: WTI pricing exceeded Brent levels, an uncommon occurrence. Market analysts attribute this inversion to contract timing discrepancies, with WTI still trading May delivery contracts while Brent has transitioned to June settlements.

Researchers at Gavekal Research suggest Iran may be leveraging its control over the strait to extract substantial passage fees from vessels. They characterize this as an emerging revenue strategy for Tehran.

Other Markets

Gold appreciated 0.9% to approximately $4,720 per ounce during Monday’s session. The benchmark 10-year US Treasury yield edged higher to 4.362%.

American military forces successfully extracted a US aviator who had been detained inside Iranian territory over the weekend. Iranian forces continued launching missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles toward Gulf nations and Israel through Monday morning.

The geopolitical landscape remains uncertain, with Tuesday evening’s deadline representing the next critical juncture for both financial markets and international diplomacy.

The post Stock Futures Climb as Iran-US Ceasefire Hopes Calm Investor Nerves appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Takeaways

• dYdX eliminates 12 underperforming markets to concentrate liquidity and enhance execution
• Overwhelming 91% community approval demonstrates unified support for strategic optimization
• Eliminating inactive trading pairs minimizes slippage and enhances price consistency
• Platform infrastructure remains unchanged as dYdX optimizes market offerings
• Strategic pivot emphasizes quality over quantity in exchange development

The dYdX community has greenlit a governance proposal to eliminate 12 underperforming perpetual markets in a bid to enhance platform efficiency. With approximately 91% of voters supporting the measure, the decision reflects widespread consensus among governance participants. The initiative focuses on retiring inactive trading pairs while preserving essential infrastructure and high-volume markets.

Liquidity Consolidation Through Strategic Market Removal

dYdX has begun systematically winding down multiple low-activity perpetual markets following the successful governance vote. Among the discontinued pairs are JASMY-USD and YFI-USD, both characterized by minimal trading volume and insufficient market depth. The platform seeks to eliminate operational drag associated with maintaining poorly utilized markets.

Markets with insufficient liquidity typically suffer from expanded bid-ask spreads and elevated slippage during order execution. Consequently, market participants encounter unreliable pricing mechanisms and amplified exposure to momentary price fluctuations. By channeling liquidity toward high-performance markets, dYdX aims to deliver superior execution conditions.

The gradual shutdown process provides sufficient time for position holders to close trades or migrate strategies without market disruption. Simultaneously, high-volume trading pairs and robust liquidity venues continue operating normally. This measured approach enables dYdX to maintain platform integrity while optimizing market efficiency.

Community Governance Demonstrates Platform Evolution

The governance vote conducted between April 1 and April 4 witnessed substantial community engagement across the dYdX ecosystem. The decisive 91% approval margin demonstrates increasing alignment on strategic operational matters among stakeholders. The platform continues evolving its market framework through collaborative governance mechanisms.

Notably, this proposal leaves tokenomics, fee structures, and core matching algorithms untouched. The focus remains exclusively on operational refinements that optimize capital distribution across available markets. This targeted approach allows dYdX to enhance liquidity management and platform performance metrics.

Decentralized governance mechanisms now serve as the primary driver of exchange development decisions. Community members actively determine market viability through data-driven analysis of usage patterns and liquidity benchmarks. This represents a significant evolution toward structured, community-led platform management in decentralized finance.

Operational Discipline Enhances Market Position

dYdX adopts strategies commonly employed by established derivatives platforms that regularly prune underperforming market listings. This methodology strengthens order book density and maintains consistent trading environments across active instruments. Through these measures, dYdX reinforces its standing within the decentralized derivatives landscape.

Eliminating fragile markets mitigates vulnerabilities to price manipulation and erratic trading dynamics. Enhanced liquidity concentration facilitates more accurate price discovery and dependable execution for platform users. These strategic market adjustments fortify overall platform resilience and reliability.

This decision marks a philosophical transition from aggressive market expansion toward measured operational excellence and long-term viability. Community-guided initiatives now determine the platform’s evolutionary trajectory and ecosystem management approach. Amid intensifying competition, dYdX emphasizes efficiency and liquidity depth to secure sustained competitive advantage.

The post dYdX Removes 12 Underperforming Markets Following Overwhelming Governance Approval appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Highlights

• Micron delivered all-time high quarterly revenue reaching $23.86 billion in fiscal Q2 2026, achieving 74.4% gross margin
• For fiscal Q3, Micron projects approximately $33.5 billion in revenue with gross margin approaching 81%
• SanDisk generated $3.03 billion in Q2 sales, representing a 31% quarter-over-quarter increase, while datacenter sales surged 64%
• Micron represents a pure-play AI memory investment; SanDisk offers exposure to NAND flash storage market stabilization
• Wall Street consensus rates Micron as Buy with $463.71 average target; SanDisk earns Moderate Buy rating with $594.48 target

Both Micron and SanDisk operate within the memory sector and benefit from accelerating datacenter demand. However, these companies represent fundamentally distinct investment opportunities. One serves as a cornerstone provider for AI infrastructure. The other is navigating its way through a flash storage market rebound. The choice between these stocks hinges on which technology trend investors believe offers superior growth prospects.

Micron has emerged as among the most transparent ways to gain exposure to artificial intelligence hardware expansion. The company’s offerings, especially high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and DRAM modules, address critical performance constraints in AI computing systems. As hyperscalers and AI companies expand their infrastructure, Micron’s memory solutions become essential components.

Micron Technology, Inc., MU

During the fiscal second quarter of 2026, Micron achieved unprecedented revenue of $23.86 billion. The company reported GAAP gross margin of 74.4% while net income reached $13.79 billion. Operating cash generation totaled $11.9 billion for the period.

These metrics represent exceptional performance for a semiconductor manufacturer that has traditionally experienced significant cyclical volatility.

Looking ahead, management projected fiscal third-quarter revenue at approximately $33.5 billion, with gross margin guidance near the 81% threshold. Such profitability levels are extraordinarily uncommon within the memory semiconductor industry.

Analyzing Micron’s Growth Drivers

Two specific segments are powering the company’s expansion. The Cloud Memory Business Unit generated $7.75 billion in quarterly revenue. Meanwhile, the Core Data Center Business Unit contributed $5.69 billion. Consumer electronics markets have taken a backseat to enterprise demand.

The buildout of AI-focused datacenters is creating demand for high-bandwidth memory that exceeds Micron’s current production capabilities. This supply-demand imbalance continues supporting premium pricing and elevated margins.

According to MarketBeat analyst consensus, Micron earns a Buy rating, consisting of 5 Strong Buys, 29 Buys, and 3 Hold ratings. The consensus price target stands at $463.71, suggesting appreciation potential from current trading levels.

SanDisk presents an alternative narrative. During its fiscal second quarter of 2026, the company posted revenue of $3.03 billion, marking a 31% sequential increase. Net income totaled $803 million.

Datacenter revenue at SanDisk experienced a 64% sequential jump. This demonstrates the company is capturing value from AI infrastructure investments, though primarily through NAND flash storage products rather than the premium-margin memory solutions that Micron provides.

Understanding SanDisk’s Position

SanDisk specializes in flash storage technology. Its performance recovery correlates with improving NAND pricing dynamics, increased enterprise SSD adoption, and overall datacenter capacity expansion. While this represents genuine business improvement, it lacks the supply scarcity characteristics of Micron’s high-bandwidth memory portfolio.

Sandisk Corporation, SNDK

The substantial differences in profitability margins, cash generation, and forward guidance between these companies underscore their distinct market positions.

Wall Street maintains a more reserved stance on SanDisk. MarketBeat data shows a Moderate Buy consensus, comprising 2 Strong Buys, 15 Buys, 6 Holds, and 1 Sell rating. The average analyst price target sits at $594.48. SanDisk shares recently changed hands near $701.59, indicating the stock currently trades above consensus valuation estimates.

Micron’s investment thesis centers on its direct participation in AI memory demand coupled with historically high profitability. The counterargument acknowledges that memory industry cycles can reverse rapidly when additional manufacturing capacity enters production. Reuters reporting following Micron’s recent earnings highlighted investor apprehension regarding elevated capital expenditure potentially triggering future oversupply conditions.

SanDisk’s positive case rests on sustained NAND market recovery alongside expanding enterprise and datacenter storage requirements. The skeptical view suggests much of this recovery trajectory may already be reflected in current share prices.

Investment Verdict

The post Micron (MU) vs SanDisk (SNDK): The Best Memory Stock for 2026 Growth appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Takeaways

• SpaceX has submitted IPO paperwork seeking a valuation exceeding $2 trillion, which would shatter records as the biggest public offering ever
• The announcement triggered significant gains across space industry equities, with Rocket Lab, Planet Labs, and AST SpaceMobile experiencing double-digit surges
• Industry experts are drawing parallels to Netscape’s transformative 1995 debut, which brought mainstream credibility to internet investments
• The public listing may catalyze a comprehensive revaluation of space-focused companies, drawing substantial institutional investment
• SpaceX’s groundbreaking reusable launch systems have already slashed orbital access costs by orders of magnitude, creating opportunities throughout the sector

Last week, SpaceX submitted documentation for a public offering that seeks a valuation north of $2 trillion. Should the company achieve this target, it would represent the most valuable initial public offering in financial market history.

The announcement created immediate waves throughout space industry equities. Rocket Lab shares climbed approximately 11%, while AST SpaceMobile gained about 12%. Planet Labs experienced increases exceeding 10%, and Firefly Aerospace posted impressive gains approaching 20%.

Market participants are interpreting this development as far more significant than a single corporate listing. The consensus view suggests this represents a watershed moment for how institutional investors perceive space-related opportunities.

Chad Anderson, who leads Space Capital, drew comparisons to Netscape’s 1995 market debut. Prior to that landmark event, internet technology remained largely confined to research institutions and government applications. Following the IPO, mainstream investment capital poured into the emerging sector.

Anderson believes similar forces could now reshape space investing. “Following Netscape’s public debut, massive capital flows moved into internet companies because institutional investors finally had a liquid benchmark asset,” he explained.

Glen Anderson, leading Rainmaker Securities, reinforced this perspective. He noted that space ventures have historically been classified as specialized, high-risk investments. A public offering of this magnitude could fundamentally reposition the sector as essential infrastructure.

“This isn’t simply another IPO — SpaceX is essentially establishing space as a fundamental investment category for the global financial community,” he stated.

Implications for Emerging Space Enterprises

Rainmaker Securities anticipates the offering will catalyze widespread valuation adjustments throughout the space industry ecosystem. This suggests higher market capitalizations for related sector participants and accelerated capital availability for developing companies.

Industry observers highlighted multiple companies positioned to capitalize on this shift. Trimble, which leverages commercial satellite positioning data for construction applications, received attention. EchoStar, a satellite operator that currently maintains SpaceX equity positions, was also mentioned.

Rocket Lab entered the week with momentum from separate developments. The firm recently secured an $816 million government satellite contract and approaches the inaugural launch of its Neutron launch vehicle. Planet Labs separately announced an extended satellite services agreement with Swedish authorities earlier this year.

Revolutionary Launch Economics Through Reusability

SpaceX’s technological innovations explain much of the heightened sector interest. Historical Space Shuttle operations required up to $1.5 billion per launch before the program concluded in 2011. Current SpaceX Falcon 9 missions average approximately $67 million.

In October 2024, SpaceX successfully recovered a returning Falcon 9 booster mid-flight — an unprecedented engineering achievement. This breakthrough demonstrated potential for further cost reductions.

Market analysts expect additional private space enterprises will pursue public listings following SpaceX’s example. Chad Anderson suggested numerous companies will attempt to “capitalize on the momentum now that this precedent has been established.”

SpaceX has not disclosed a definitive listing date, although industry sources indicate a mid-summer timeframe is under consideration.

The post SpaceX IPO Could Transform Space Sector: Rocket Lab (RKLB), AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) Surge appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Highlights

• Super Mario Galaxy Movie achieved a global opening of $372.5 million, establishing the year’s largest box office weekend.
• Domestic earnings reached $130.9 million during the three-day Easter holiday period across over 4,000 theater locations.
• Comcast (CMCSA) subsidiary Universal Pictures secured top position in both domestic and international markets.
• The industry’s cumulative box office revenue for the year reached $2.05 billion, representing a 26% increase over 2025’s comparable period.
• Amazon MGM’s Project Hail Mary maintained second place with $30.7 million during its third week, achieving $420.7 million globally.

Comcast (CMCSA) finished Friday’s trading session with a 0.43% decline.

Comcast Corporation, CMCSA

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie launched with a staggering $372.5 million in worldwide ticket sales during its premiere weekend, representing the industry’s strongest global box office performance since Avatar: Fire and Ash concluded 2025 in December.

Comcast’s Universal Pictures released the animated feature across more than 4,000 North American theater locations. The per-screen average reached $30,795 — an impressive figure considering the majority of tickets were purchased at reduced children’s admission rates.

North American theaters generated $130.9 million across the Easter holiday three-day period. Comscore projections indicate the film will accumulate $190.1 million domestically when accounting for the complete five-day opening stretch.

Overseas territories contributed an additional $182.4 million. This combined performance positions the global launch significantly ahead of competing 2026 theatrical releases.

Roth’s analyst Eric Handler projected opening results between $160 million and $200 million for the Wednesday-through-Sunday period, attributing this potential to Mario’s recognition as a leading gaming property with more than 430 million units distributed globally.

The production brings back key talent from the 2023 predecessor, featuring producers Chris Meledandri and Shigeru Miyamoto, co-directors Aaron Horvath and Michael Jelenic, alongside returning voice actors Anya Taylor-Joy, Chris Pratt, Jack Black, and Keegan-Michael Key.

The initial Super Mario Bros. Movie generated $204 million domestically across its inaugural five-day window in 2023, ultimately accumulating $1.36 billion in worldwide revenue.

Industry-Wide Box Office Momentum

The Galaxy Movie’s premiere contributed to a combined domestic top 10 weekend total of $195.7 million. This performance elevated Hollywood’s year-to-date earnings to $2.05 billion, reflecting a 26% growth versus the equivalent 2025 timeframe, according to Comscore data.

Amazon MGM’s Project Hail Mary retained its second-place ranking during its third week with $30.7 million in receipts. The Ryan Gosling-led science fiction feature has accumulated $217.2 million domestically and reached $420.7 million worldwide. Mexican theaters alone contributed $119.4 million to its international performance.

A24’s The Drama entered at third position with $14.4 million from 3,087 locations. The R-rated romantic comedy featuring Zendaya and Robert Pattinson has already recovered its production costs during opening weekend, complemented by $28 million in combined international sales.

Additional Weekend Box Office Results

Disney and Pixar’s Hoppers collected another $5.8 million during its fifth weekend, elevating its North American total to $149.6 million. The film’s worldwide earnings now stand at approximately $332.2 million, securing a position among 2026’s top three global performers.

Universal’s Reminders of Him completed the top five roster with $2.2 million in revenue.

Super Mario Galaxy Movie and Project Hail Mary collectively generated approximately $192.6 million of the weekend’s $195.7 million domestic top 10 aggregate.

The post Comcast (CMCSA) Stock: Super Mario Galaxy Movie Delivers Record-Breaking $372M Opening Weekend appeared first on Blockonomi.

XRP’s 30-day liquidity index on Binance has fallen to near-zero levels, with trading volume collapsing from more than $200 billion in January 2025 to almost nothing today.

That kind of collapse has set up a market that could either snap back hard on the slightest buying pressure or just keep grinding sideways while traders wait for a reason to care.

What the Data Shows

The figures were flagged on Monday by crypto analyst Arthur on X.

“The 30-day Liquidity Index has fallen to historically low levels, close to zero,” he wrote. “Trading volume has gone from over $200 Billion in January 2025 to almost nothing today.”

According to him, this has created two possible situations. First, long-term holders are not selling, which leaves supply on the exchange razor-thin, and if real buying shows up, there is not much in the way to absorb it, possibly triggering sharp upward moves.

The second thesis is less exciting; trader interest has simply evaporated, and thin liquidity is the symptom rather than the setup. All in all, the trader pointed out that in the past, when there was extremely low liquidity, a major price move, either up or down, soon followed.

The chart has something to say, too. Analysis account Alpha Crypto Signal noted that XRP has broken out of a falling wedge on the four-hour timeframe, pushing above the upper trendline and reclaiming a short-term moving average.

The breakout zone is now acting as support. Hold it, and the analysts see a run toward $1.38 to $1.42. Lose it, and the breakout turns into a false alarm. XRP is sitting around $1.34 at the time of writing, up 3.2% over the past 24 hours but down 0.8% on the week, and still roughly 63% off its all-time high of $3.65 from July 2025.

The token has also shed about 37% over the past year, but is still holding the fourth spot by market cap at around $82.3 billion, just ahead of BNB’s $82.1 billion, though it briefly lost that position earlier Sunday after Bitcoin slipped below $67,000 following fresh news about the Iran conflict.

Broader Headwinds Still in Play

The liquidity story does not exist in isolation. XRP’s spot ETF products, which launched in late 2025 to considerable fanfare, recorded their first net outflow month in March 2026: investors pulled $31.16 million, and eight out of 22 trading days logged zero inflows, according to SoSoValue.

Regardless, some are still making a bull case for the asset. One of them, XRP stalwart EGRAG CRYPTO, argued last week that the current price action echoes a pattern that last appeared between 2020 and 2024, and that a drop to around $0.83 could set up a run toward $8.30 in the next cycle. However, a close above $1.80 in the short term, the analyst warned, would invalidate the whole thesis.

The post Analyst: Near-Zero XRP Liquidity on Binance Could Trigger a Sharp Snap appeared first on CryptoPotato.

The situation in the Middle East is changing daily. The war between Iran, the US, and Israel sees almost daily updates ranging from threats on behalf of the US to obliterate Iran’s power plants and critical infrastructure to proposed ceasefire agreements.

The latest came hours ago.

According to a report from Axios, the US, Iran, as well as certain unnamed regional mediators, are currently discussing a potential 45-day ceasefire, which could potentially lead to a permanent end of the war. As CryptoPotato reported, this led to an increase in Bitcoin’s price volatility, which topped $69,000 to hit a multi-day peak.

And while the odds of a ceasefire increased following the revelation, prediction markets remain largely unconvinced.

Polymarket Odds of a Ceasefire Tell a Worrisome Tale

One of the most trending markets on Polymarket, with volume approaching $100 million, is the ceasefire between the US and Iran. There are multiple events users can speculate on, with the one with the closest expiry being on April 7th.

Odds of a ceasefire taking place by then are currently 4%, up from about 1% 24 hours ago.

The next expiration date is further out – on April 15th, and the odds of a ceasefire taking place are about 19%, up from about 11% yesterday.

46% of traders believe that there will be an agreement by May 31st, while 56% think it will happen by June 30th.

In other words, even in the most optimistic scenarios, only about half the traders actually believe a temporary truce will be struck in the next two months.

Market Implications

Surging oil prices have heightened fears of global inflation, as much of the international oil trade passes through the Strait of Hormuz, currently controlled by Iran. This has caused considerable turmoil amid risk-on assets, with indices such as the S&P500 taking a hit in the previous weeks before recovering after de-escalation talks.

That said, even in the most optimistic scenarios, traders remain on the fence of a ceasefire taking place. Should this happen, though, chances are that risk-on assets might see relief and even potential recovery, with BTC being firmly in that boat.

The post Traders Not Convinced About an Upcoming US-Iran Ceasefire, Polymarket Data Shows appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Crypto markets posted some gains after Donald Trump delivered conflicting messages about a possible Iran agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Ethereum, for one, climbed 5% over the past 24 hours.

But new data suggests that the crypto asset must break and hold a crucial level to confirm the beginning of its next bull cycle.

The $2,500 Barrier

According to analyst Ali Martinez, Ethereum’s next major rally may only begin once it reclaims its realized price around $2,500, which he describes as the crucial “start engine” level for a new bull phase. While ETH continues to hover near $2,100 and faces short-term volatility, Martinez stated that accumulation is likely taking place below this range, particularly if the $1,800 level continues to act as strong support within an ascending triangle pattern.

This level also closely aligns with the 0.80 MVRV pricing band near $1,880, which indicates a point where the market is under significant stress. The MVRV ratio compares Ethereum’s current price to the average price at which all ETH last moved, essentially showing whether holders are in profit or loss. When this metric drops to the 0.80 band, it means that most participants are holding at a loss, a condition that has, in previous instances, represented the end of sell-offs and the beginning of accumulation by stronger hands.

At the same time, chances of a deeper correction cannot be ruled out. If the broader structure turns out to be a parallel channel instead of a triangle, Ethereum risks revisiting lower levels, which will bring $1,550 and $1,070 into focus.

This downside scenario is supported by UTXO Realized Price Distribution data, which maps out where large amounts of ETH were last transacted. According to this data, there are strong clusters of buying activity at $1,584, $1,238, and $1,089. These levels represent areas where many investors previously entered the market.

The $2,500 mark for Ethereum’s next major upward move has historically served as the end of consolidation phases and the beginning of steady bullish trends. A clean break above this threshold, followed by a hold at that level, would confirm a structural change in the market. Once that happens, ETH could move into higher valuation zones. The analyst predicted $4,900 as the next major target and further upside toward the 2.40 MVRV band near $5,900.

Pre-Rally Setup

Another market expert, pseudonymously known as ” Trader Tardigrade,” also echoed a similar narrative playing out. As per their findings, Ethereum’s current price structure looks very similar to a past moment right before a major rally. Looking at the monthly chart, they observed that ETH is still holding above an important support level that has acted as a strong floor in the past.

In the previous market cycle, the altcoin showed a similar setup where it stayed above the support for a period before breaking out and rising sharply from under $100 to over $4,000.

The post Ethereum’s (ETH) Next Big Move Hinges on This ‘Start Engine’ Level appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Bitcoin’s old rivalry with gold is back in the spotlight after Peter Schiff and Michael Saylor clashed again on X, this time over how BTC has actually performed.

The argument isn’t really about numbers; it’s about which numbers to care about.

Schiff Questions Bitcoin’s 5-Year Returns

Schiff kicked things off with a blunt claim. Over the past five years, he said, Bitcoin is up just 12%. Then he stacked it against stocks, gold, and silver, all of which he claimed did better than the cryptocurrency by a wide margin.

“Over the past five years, the price of Bitcoin is up by just 12%,” wrote Schiff. “Over the same time period, the NASDAQ is up 57.4%, the S&P 500 is up 59.4%, gold is up 163%, and silver is up 181%.”

His point was simple. If Bitcoin’s main selling point is its superior long-term performance, why would anyone keep HODLing it, given that it has been beaten by the precious metals and the traditional markets?

Saylor responded with an annualized return chart stretching back to August 2020, where Bitcoin leads everything at 36% per year versus 16% for gold and 15% for the Nasdaq. His message: “Timeframes matter.”

That’s when things got out of hand. Schiff accused Saylor of cherry-picking convenient low points. But Saylor’s supporters shot back, saying Schiff was doing the same thing but in reverse, starting at the peak in 2021. One commentator summed it up well: if you move the window a few months in either direction, the whole argument changes.

Schiff wasn’t done, though. He dragged Strategy into it, pointing out that while its stock is up about 68% over the same stretch, it wasn’t because BTC was doing the heavy lifting, but because investors are paying a premium so Saylor can keep buying more of the cryptocurrency. He even urged holders of MSTR to sell.

Debate Challenge

The gold bug ended his thread with a direct challenge to Saylor, asking the Strategy executive chairman to debate him, even with a Bitcoin-friendly moderator. He also noted that Saylor had name-dropped him twice during his keynote at the Bitcoin conference in Las Vegas last year and still would not share a stage with him.

This is not the first time Schiff has pushed for such a debate, having faced off with former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao at Blockchain Week in Dubai last December in a session that sparked a fair amount of attention online.

However, Saylor has not shown much interest in litigating for BTC against Schiff. His public focus has been on credit markets, accounting changes, and institutional adoption, arguments that he made in a January 2026 appearance on What Bitcoin Did.

Meanwhile, Strategy has kept buying through 2026 regardless of price, most recently picking up 1,031 BTC at around $74,000 each, pushing its total holdings above 762,000 BTC. Those purchases are currently underwater, with Bitcoin trading well below that entry price.

Right now, the flagship crypto is hovering near $69,000, up over 3% in the last 24 hours and more than 2% on the week, but zoom out, and it still looks heavy. Over the past year, it’s down about 17%, and it hasn’t come close to reclaiming its roughly $126,000 high from October 2025.

The post Schiff vs. Saylor: The Ultimate Bitcoin vs. Gold Showdown Reignites on X appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Bitcoin’s dull weekend ended with an impressive surge that drove the asset from just over $67,000 to a multi-day peak of $69,600, where it faced some resistance.

Most larger-cap alts are also in the red, including ETH, which has reclaimed the $2,100 resistance, and ADA, which has pumped by over 5%.

BTC Neared $70K

The primary cryptocurrency went through a highly volatile previous business week after each new development in the war against Iran, including a drop to a monthly low at $65,000 and a surge to $69,200, only to be rejected and driven south to under $66,000 at the end of it.

Then came the weekend, which was expected to be less volatile as it was Easter in the US. The contradicting comments and reports from Trump on the war continued, as the POTUS first gave a 48-hour deadline to Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz by Monday, then extended it, then threatened again to attack power plants and bridges.

Another new report emerged this morning claiming that both parties have engaged in negotiations, but the chances of an actual deal were “slim.” Nevertheless, BTC jumped to $69,600 after it went out, oil prices followed suit with a surge above $110 per barrel, and Wall Street’s futures recovered from the early losses.

For now, BTC’s market cap has climbed to $1.380 trillion, while its dominance over the alts is up to 56.5% on CG.

ETH Above $2.1K

Ethereum is among the top-performing larger-cap altcoins today, surging by over 4% to reclaim $2,100. XRP has neared $1.35 after a 3.5% increase, while ADA has jumped by nearly 6% daily to overcome the $0.25 resistance. SOL, HYPE, and LINK are also in the green, while AVAX has risen by 7% to $9.4.

In contrast, RAIN has plummeted by nearly 10% in a rare red altcoin example today. Nevertheless, the total crypto market cap has added over $60 billion in a day and is up to $2.450 trillion on CG.

The post Bitcoin Neared $70K, Ethereum Reclaims $2.1K Level: Market Watch appeared first on CryptoPotato.