Iran's retaliation threat heightens tensions, diminishing ceasefire prospects and increasing market volatility and uncertainty.
The post Iran vows retaliation against US attacks, reducing ceasefire odds significantly: FT appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
The declining ceasefire odds highlight persistent geopolitical tensions, impacting market sentiment and increasing volatility risks.
The post Ceasefire odds drop for US-Iran talks, April 7 now at 1.1% YES appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
The U.S. mission in Iran signals potential escalation, impacting geopolitical stability and influencing market predictions significantly.
The post US forces confirm ground operations in Iran, April 30 market hits 86.5% YES appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Powell's caution on inflation suggests a prolonged period of high rates, impacting economic growth and market stability amid global tensions.
The post Powell’s inflation warning dampens rate cut expectations for June FOMC meeting: FT appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Powell's inflation concerns highlight the Fed's cautious stance, impacting market sentiment and complicating future monetary policy decisions.
The post Powell’s inflation concerns lower odds for June 2025 Fed rate cut appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Bitcoin Magazine

Charles Schwab Teases Direct Bitcoin Trading With New ‘Schwab Crypto’ Account
Financial services giant Charles Schwab is preparing to expand deeper into digital assets, announcing plans for a forthcoming product that will allow clients to buy and sell cryptocurrencies directly through its platform.
The firm revealed that “Schwab Crypto
” is in development and will be offered through Charles Schwab Premier Bank, positioning the product as a gateway for retail investors seeking direct exposure to leading cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin. The company has opened a waitlist for clients interested in early access, though availability will be subject to regulatory approval and eligibility requirements.
The move marks a notable shift for Schwab, which until now has limited crypto exposure to indirect investment vehicles. Currently, clients can access digital asset markets through exchange-traded products (ETPs), crypto-related equities, and thematic funds. Examples include publicly traded firms like Coinbase, MicroStrategy, and Riot Platforms, as well as funds tied to blockchain and crypto industry performance.
Schwab’s entry into spot trading places it in more direct competition with established crypto platforms such as Coinbase, Robinhood, and Webull.
CEO Rick Wurster first signaled the firm’s intent to enter spot crypto markets in late 2024, citing expectations for a shifting regulatory environment under the administration of Donald Trump. The company has since positioned itself to move once conditions allowed for broader participation by traditional financial institutions.
Schwab is also preparing additional crypto-related products, including a potential stablecoin offering following the passage of the GENIUS stablecoin bill.
A recent report from Charles Schwab found that Bitcoin volatility has declined significantly, with historical volatility falling to 42% in 2025 — about half its 2021 level — making it comparable to or lower than major tech stocks like Tesla and Nvidia.
Despite fewer extreme swings, bitcoin still experiences sharp drawdowns, including a 32% drop in 2025 and a 50% peak-to-trough decline over three years.
Long term, volatility remains elevated versus traditional assets. The report suggests bitcoin is maturing as it integrates into mainstream finance, with growing institutional adoption and ETF developments signaling increased acceptance.
Editorial Disclaimer: We leverage AI as part of our editorial workflow, including to support research, image generation, and quality assurance processes. All content is directed, reviewed, and approved by our editorial team, who are accountable for accuracy and integrity. AI-generated images use only tools trained on properly license material. In Bitcoin, as in media: Don’t trust. Verify.
This post Charles Schwab Teases Direct Bitcoin Trading With New ‘Schwab Crypto’ Account first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Jack Dorsey Reveals Bitcoin Faucet Revival with “Bitcoin Day” Announcement
Tech entrepreneur and longtime Bitcoin advocate Jack Dorsey sparked excitement in the BTC community on Friday when he posted a link to a new page titled “Bitcoin Day | Earn Free Bitcoin.”
The post quotes an announcement from the “Bitcoin at Block” account stating that “The bitcoin faucet is back” on April 6, 2026, with a link to btc.day. Dorsey’s shared URL (hosted on AWS CloudFront) currently displays only the bold headline promoting free BTC on “Bitcoin Day,” with a countdown timer.
No further details were given.
In 2010, a site known as the Bitcoin Faucet gave visitors 5 BTC after they completed a simple captcha challenge. This was done to help spread awareness and use of BTC, which at the time was a new digital currency with almost no market value.
The site was created by Gavin Andresen, a software developer who later became one of BTC’s lead developers. Andresen loaded the faucet with his own BTC to distribute to visitors who solved the CAPTCHA.
Over the months the faucet operated, it handed out about 19,700 BTC in total. At today’s prices, that amount would be worth in the billions of dollars.
Over the past six months, BTC has experienced one of its weakest performance periods in years, with the price declining sharply from late 2025 highs. According to price history data, BTC’s value is down roughly 50% over the last half-year, reflecting a significant drawdown from levels above $120,000 in November 2025 to around the mid-$60,000s today.
BTC’s retreat has erased gains made earlier in the cycle and marked its worst six-month streak since 2018, driven by a mix of macroeconomic headwinds and reduced risk appetite among investors.
In March, it seems like the price stabilized near the high $60,000s, with market participants watching key technical levels and macro signals for clues on the next move.
Block has held 8,883 BTC since October 6, 2020, currently worth about $593.74 million at an average cost of $32,939 per BTC, for a gain of roughly +102.92% at today’s prices.
The company, trading under ticker XYZ, has a market cap of about $36–$37 billion. At the time of writing, BTC is trading near $67,000.
Editorial Disclaimer: We leverage AI as part of our editorial workflow, including to support research, image generation, and quality assurance processes. All content is directed, reviewed, and approved by our editorial team, who are accountable for accuracy and integrity. AI-generated images use only tools trained on properly license material. In Bitcoin, as in media: Don’t trust. Verify.
This post Jack Dorsey Reveals Bitcoin Faucet Revival with “Bitcoin Day” Announcement first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Cathie Wood Calls Bitcoin’s 50% Crash a “Victory” as Market Tests New Floor
Nearly six months after the Oct. 10 flash crypto crash erased millions of dollars in a single day, Bitcoin remains under pressure, trading well below its recent peak. The asset reached an all-time high of $126,080 on Oct. 6, but has since fallen about 47% to roughly $67,000.
Despite the drawdown, Cathie Wood, a long-time BTC advocate and chief executive of ARK Investment Management, is urging investors to maintain a long-term perspective.
Wood, whose firm was among the first publicly listed asset managers to gain exposure to Bitcoin in 2015, has maintained an active presence in crypto-related equities. ARK Invest continues to trade shares of companies tied to the digital asset sector, including Coinbase, Robinhood Markets, Block, Circle Internet Group, Bitmine Immersion Technologies, and Bullish, adjusting positions in response to market conditions.
In an interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, Wood addressed the current downturn, framing the magnitude of BTC’s decline as a sign of maturation rather than weakness.
She argued that a roughly 50% drop from peak levels represents a shift from the extreme volatility seen in earlier cycles, when Bitcoin routinely experienced drawdowns of 85% to 95%.
According to Wood, such severe collapses are unlikely to recur. She described Bitcoin as a “proven technology” and a “new asset class,” suggesting that its market behavior has evolved alongside broader adoption and institutional participation.
In her view, the current correction would be considered a “real victory” within the Bitcoin community if losses remain limited to around half of its peak value.
Historical data supports the comparison to prior cycles, though the current downturn has yet to match earlier bear markets in severity. During the 2021–2022 cycle, Bitcoin fell nearly 80% from its then-record high of about $69,000, eventually bottoming near $15,600.
Onchain data from Glassnode indicates that the present decline, measured against the October 2025 high, has reached roughly 52% at its lowest point.
All this is happening as bitcoin’s price decline forces a growing number of public companies and sovereign entities to unwind their BTC treasuries, marking a sharp reversal from the accumulation trend of the past two years. Firms that once championed long-term holding are now selling to manage liquidity, repay debt, and fund strategic pivots.
Companies like Riot Platforms, Genius Group, Empery Digital, Nakamoto Holdings, and Marathon Digital have all reduced holdings, in some cases significantly. Marathon alone sold over 15,000 BTC for $1.1 billion to cut debt, while Genius Group fully exited its position. Riot has also been offloading bitcoin as it shifts focus toward AI and high-performance computing infrastructure.
Even firms still committed to bitcoin are trimming reserves. Empery Digital sold part of its holdings to repay loans, while Nakamoto Holdings liquidated a smaller portion to support operations. Meanwhile, Bhutan has been reducing its state-backed bitcoin reserves after previously accumulating through mining.
Despite the sell-off, public companies still collectively hold about 1.16 million BTC, over 5% of the total supply.
This post Cathie Wood Calls Bitcoin’s 50% Crash a “Victory” as Market Tests New Floor first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Riot Platforms Sells 3,778 Bitcoin in Q1 as Miner Strategy Shifts Toward AI Infrastructure
Riot Platforms sold 3,778 bitcoin in the first quarter of 2026, generating $289.5 million and marking a shift in strategy as the miner redirects capital toward infrastructure and high-performance computing.
The volume sold exceeded the company’s quarterly production of 1,473 BTC by roughly 2.6 times, signaling a drawdown of treasury holdings rather than routine profit-taking. Riot ended the quarter with 15,680 BTC, down 18% from 18,005 BTC at the close of 2025.
The selling appears to have extended beyond the reporting period. Blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence flagged a 500 BTC outflow from a wallet linked to Riot following the end of the quarter, suggesting continued liquidation activity.
The imbalance between production and sales comes as Riot accelerates its expansion into artificial intelligence and high-performance computing colocation. The company has begun repositioning its business model away from sole reliance on bitcoin mining, seeking to monetize its energy assets and data center footprint through long-term infrastructure contracts.
In January, Riot sold 1,080 BTC to fund the purchase of 200 acres at its Rockdale, Texas site. It also entered a ten-year agreement with Advanced Micro Devices to provide 25 megawatts of capacity, with an option to scale to 200 MW. The deal is expected to generate about $311 million in contract revenue over its initial term.
Operational metrics complicate a distress narrative. Riot reduced its all-in power cost to 3.0 cents per kilowatt hour, a 21% decline from the prior year, while increasing deployed hash rate by 26% to 42.5 exahashes per second. Average operating hash rate rose 23% to 36.4 EH/s, reflecting continued investment in mining capacity.
The company also generated $21 million in power credits during the quarter, more than double the year-ago period, through participation in grid services and energy programs.
Industry conditions remain a factor. Rising energy costs tied to geopolitical tensions have pressured margins across the mining sector, prompting several operators to liquidate holdings. MARA Holdings, Genius Group, and Nakamoto Holdings collectively sold more than 15,000 BTC in recent days, reflecting a broader shift in capital allocation.
Riot’s Q1 activity underscores a turning point for the sector, where bitcoin reserves are deployed as funding sources for diversification rather than held as long-term balance sheet assets.
The trend extends beyond corporate treasuries. Bhutan has continued to reduce its BTC holdings, selling a total of 3,103 BTC. A single transaction on March 30 accounted for 375 BTC, according to Glassnode data.
The country had built its position through state-backed mining operations, reaching more than 13,000 BTC at its peak in October 2024.
Despite the recent selling, public companies still hold about 1.16 million BTC, or more than 5% of bitcoin’s fixed supply of 21 million, according to BitcoinTreasuries.net.
This post Riot Platforms Sells 3,778 Bitcoin in Q1 as Miner Strategy Shifts Toward AI Infrastructure first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

The Bitcoin Treasury Model With a Built-In Valuation Floor
There is a version of the Bitcoin treasury conversation that has become almost routine at this point. Bitcoin is hard money. Fiat debases. Companies that hold Bitcoin on their balance sheet are making a rational long-term decision. All of this is true, and none of it is the interesting question anymore.
The interesting question is structural. Not should a company hold Bitcoin, but what kind of company should hold it, and what that choice implies for how the company performs across a full market cycle, not just a favorable one.
Three models have emerged. Each reflects a different level of conviction, a different capital structure, and a different set of tradeoffs.
All three are legitimate expressions of the Bitcoin treasury thesis. They are not optimized for the same objectives, and the differences matter more than most treasury conversations acknowledge.
The pure-play case deserves genuine treatment because its strongest version has real force.
Financial engineering pure-plays are capital-efficient in a specific and important sense: every dollar raised goes directly to Bitcoin accumulation with no operational drag. The mission is singular and the structure reflects it. For investors, this creates clarity. Allocators know exactly what they are underwriting, direct Bitcoin exposure at the corporate level, and the investment thesis is legible and short.
The digital credit model extends this further. Companies that have successfully issued preferred instruments and Bitcoin-backed products have built accumulation engines that operating businesses cannot match on a per-dollar-raised basis. The compounding effect of a sophisticated capital structure, at scale, is genuinely powerful. It represents the fullest expression of the Bitcoin treasury thesis, and the destination it points toward is one every operator in this space should understand.
The digital credit model has a prerequisite that is rarely stated plainly: it requires scale, institutional credibility, and market infrastructure that most companies building a Bitcoin treasury today do not yet have. It is a destination, not a starting point.
The path there runs through an intermediate period where the financial engineering structure carries more exposure than is often acknowledged. During that period:
This is not a criticism of the model. It is a description of the journey. The question for executives is what structure best serves the company while that journey is underway.
The operating company with a Bitcoin treasury does not accumulate Bitcoin faster than a well-run pure-play. At meaningful treasury scale, operating cash flow is not moving the needle on accumulation. The advantage is different, and worth stating precisely.
An operating business generates revenue independently of where Bitcoin is trading. That revenue covers fixed costs, which means the company is not dependent on capital markets remaining open to fund its basic operations. It can continue hiring, serving clients, and accumulating at a measured pace without being forced into capital decisions driven by timing rather than conviction.
The compounding effect works like this:
None of these mechanisms make Bitcoin accumulate faster in favorable conditions. Together, they make the company more durable across the full range of conditions it will face.
Most Bitcoin treasury company valuations are driven by a single number: mNAV, the premium the market assigns to Bitcoin held at the corporate level. When sentiment is strong and capital is flowing into the space, that premium expands. When the narrative cools, it compresses. The valuation moves with the market’s appetite for Bitcoin exposure, not with anything the company is doing operationally.
The operating company model introduces a second component that behaves differently. A profitable operating business carries an earnings multiple underwritten by revenue, client relationships, and operational track record. It does not expand dramatically when Bitcoin is performing. But it does not compress when sentiment turns either. It is stable in a way that mNAV alone is not.
These two components, Bitcoin NAV and an earnings multiple on the operating business, do not move together. That is the point. When mNAV compresses, the earnings multiple holds. The company retains a defensible valuation floor that a pure-play structure, with a single-component valuation entirely dependent on sentiment, does not have.
In practice this matters in three specific ways:
The floor is not just a comfort during difficult conditions. It is a structural advantage that compounds over time, widening the capital base, strengthening the talent proposition, and maintaining strategic momentum across the full cycle.
These three models serve different objectives. The right framework starts with honest answers to a few questions:
The companies that define the next era of corporate Bitcoin adoption will not all look the same. Digital credit issuers will operate at the frontier of Bitcoin-native capital markets. Financial engineering pure-plays will build toward that destination with focused conviction. Operating companies will build businesses where the treasury and core operations strengthen each other across the cycle.
Each model is a genuine expression of the thesis. The goal of this framework is to make the differences legible, so executives can choose the structure that fits what they are actually building, with clear eyes about what each model asks of them in return.
The question was never which model holds the most Bitcoin. It was always which model fits what you are trying to build.
Disclaimer: This content was prepared on behalf of Bitcoin For Corporations for informational purposes only. It reflects the author’s own analysis and opinion and should not be relied upon as investment advice. Nothing in this article constitutes an offer, invitation, or solicitation to purchase, sell, or subscribe for any security or financial product.
This post The Bitcoin Treasury Model With a Built-In Valuation Floor first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Nick Ward.
Wall Street spent the first quarter of 2026 systematically narrowing DeFi's claim to the future of finance.
In January, ICE announced NYSE was building a tokenized securities platform with 24/7 operations, instant settlement, dollar-based order sizing, and stablecoin funding, with BNY and Citi providing tokenized deposits for clearinghouse funding outside normal banking hours.
In February, WisdomTree launched 24/7 trading and instant settlement for tokenized money-market fund shares under SEC relief.
In March, the Fed, FDIC, and OCC jointly said that eligible tokenized securities should receive the same capital treatment as their non-tokenized counterparts, calling the framework technology-neutral.
The SEC then approved Nasdaq's proposal to trade certain securities in tokenized form, with settlement through DTC.
NYSE and Securitize followed with a partnership to build digital transfer-agent infrastructure around institutional operating standards.
That sequence did something concrete to DeFi's competitive position. Regulated exchanges, broker-dealers, and bank-backed clearinghouses can now package 24/7 trading and on-chain settlement inside a supervised market structure, with the capital treatment to match.
The base pool of on-chain capital these moves target already exceeds $330 billion, including stablecoins at roughly $317 billion, tokenized US Treasuries at nearly $13 billion, and tokenized stocks at $1 billion.
That pool will attract institutional capital regardless of which rails it flows through.
Why this matters: the contest is no longer over whether finance will move on-chain. It is over who captures the capital once it does. If regulated venues can offer blockchain-based trading and settlement without DeFi’s governance and control-layer risks, open protocols have to prove why institutions should accept the added exposure.

Composability is DeFi's distinct advantage: the ability to build interconnected financial products on shared, permissionless infrastructure, where any protocol can connect directly to any other on open terms.
It is a genuinely DeFi-native feature. Nasdaq-approved tokenized securities still settle through DTC, are subject to exchange surveillance, and operate under existing order types and reporting frameworks.
WisdomTree's tokenized fund sits inside a broker-dealer model. NYSE designed its tokenized platform around transfer agents and institutional operating standards. All of those architectures require a central gatekeeper to approve downstream connections.
Composability's value as a moat depends entirely on whether capital allocators believe the surrounding controls are mature enough to contain localized failures.
Drift's exploit exposed that dependency in the most direct way possible. Drift confirmed the attack exploited durable nonces and a takeover of Security Council administrative powers through a compromise of the access-control layer.
DefiLlama classified the incident as a $285 million hack driven by compromised admin access and price manipulation. Drift's total value locked fell from roughly $550 million to below $250 million.
The contagion framing from post-incident analysis is where the competitive argument becomes sharpest.
Because Drift's infrastructure is connected to downstream vaults, yield strategies, wrappers, and collateral positions across Solana DeFi, the administrative compromise radiated outward before the exposure map was clear.
Chaos Labs publicly said hidden dependencies kept surfacing in real time, leaving the final exposure tally open. Composability, functioning as a transmission channel for losses, precisely drives institutional capital allocators toward permissioned tokenization infrastructure over open protocol stacks.
The Drift incident fits a pattern that extends well beyond Solana.
Chainalysis found that private key compromises accounted for 43.8% of stolen crypto in 2024, the single-largest attack category it tracked.
TRM Labs said attackers stole $2.87 billion across nearly 150 hacks in 2025, with infrastructure attacks targeting keys, wallets, and access control planes driving the majority of losses and outpacing smart contract exploits.
TRM also noted the top 10 incidents accounted for 81% of 2025 hack losses.
The empirical record says the control layer, the governance layer, and the access management layer now carry more systemic risk than contract code alone. DeFi's security culture is still catching up to that empirical record.
| Signal | Article detail | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Drift exploit size | $285M | Large enough to become a sector-wide risk event |
| Attack vector | Durable nonces + takeover of Security Council administrative powers | Shows the failure was in the control layer, not just contract logic |
| DefiLlama classification | Compromised admin access + price manipulation | Reinforces governance/access risk framing |
| TVL impact | From roughly $550M to below $250M | Shows immediate market damage and confidence loss |
| Contagion channel | Vaults, wrappers, yield strategies, collateral positions | Highlights how composability can transmit losses |
| Chaos Labs takeaway | Hidden dependencies kept surfacing in real time | Supports the argument that exposure was not fully visible upfront |
| Broader pattern | Private-key and infrastructure attacks dominate hack losses | Places Drift inside a larger industry trend |
Open composability must adopt the corrective to compete for the institutional capital now pooling on-chain.
Drift's post-incident analysis and the broader Chaos Labs framing converge on the same operational list: stricter signer standards, timelocks on privileged transitions, segmented permission structures so that one compromised key cannot reach the entire control surface, explicit dependency mapping so downstream integrations are visible before a failure occurs, and faster public disclosure that lets the broader network act before contagion spreads.
Post-mortems show Drift's administrative transition used a 2-of-5 multisig with no timelock. This configuration compressed the approval window for a catastrophic change to the point where detection and intervention had no time to operate.
Those fixes are unglamorous. They build the operational credibility that makes a CFO or risk committee comfortable routing institutional capital through open infrastructure.
ICE, Nasdaq, and NYSE are competing for the same pool. The protocols that earn a share of it will be the ones that can demonstrate composability with contained, visible risk, where an interconnection means expanded utility.
The on-chain capital base currently sits above $330 billion and will grow as tokenized securities and stablecoin adoption expand.
The contest is over what fraction of that pool flows through open, composable DeFi versus permissioned or semi-permissioned tokenization infrastructure.

In the bull case, DeFi protocols produce a visible, sustained upgrade in governance discipline: timelocks become standard for privileged transitions, signer hygiene improves across major protocols, teams publish dependency maps that let external allocators assess integration risk before committing capital, and disclosure lags shorten from days to hours.
Institutional allocators begin using open composability selectively for structured collateral, cross-protocol hedging, and yield strategies where the control layer is demonstrably stronger than before.
Open DeFi captures 5% to 10% of the on-chain capital pool, or roughly $16 billion to $33 billion. Composability becomes the premium layer atop the tokenization rails that traditional finance is building, running alongside a supervised market structure.
In the bear case, each successive control-layer incident raises the perceived risk premium on open composability faster than the industry can close the governance gap.
Tokenized securities, tokenized funds, and stablecoin settlement volumes have expanded, while capital stays within exchanges, broker-dealers, and permissioned custody structures.
Open DeFi captures less than 1% of the pool, with total assets of less than $3 billion. Traditional finance captures the blockchain upside through tokenization, faster settlement, and extended hours, while open composability captures retail flows and reflexive capital seeking yield on open infrastructure.
Wall Street spent 2025 and the early part of 2026 proving that blockchain rails can carry institutional assets within supervised frameworks.
DeFi's path to winning requires proving that open interconnection is worth the additional governance, disclosure, and control overhead imposed by regulatory mandates on supervised venues.
The post As Wall Street moves on-chain, DeFi faces a $330 billion trust test it can’t dodge appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Algorand has emerged as an early standout in the crypto market’s latest quantum security debate after a recent Google Quantum AI paper highlighted the blockchain as a live example of post-quantum cryptography being deployed on a network.
The attention came as the paper sharpened concerns around Bitcoin and Ethereum, two networks whose size, age, and design choices could make any future migration to quantum-resistant infrastructure slower and more complicated.
Against that backdrop, Algorand’s quieter work on Falcon digital signatures, state proofs, and key rotation suddenly looked less like a niche technical experiment and more like a practical head start.
The shift in attention helped lift Algorand’s token sharply over the past week, with traders treating the Google paper as validation of work already underway on the network.
According to CryptoSlate's data, ALGO, the blockchain network's native token, is one of the top performers over the past week, gaining around 50% to rise to $0.12 as of press time. Notably, the price performance came less than a week after the token fell to an all-time low of $0.08.
Algorand’s advantage over Bitcoin and Ethereum is narrower than the recent enthusiasm suggests, but it is also more concrete than what many larger chains can currently show.
In its paper, Google described Algorand as an example of real-world deployment of post-quantum cryptography on an otherwise quantum-vulnerable blockchain.
The distinction was important. It did not say Algorand had solved the problem end-to-end, but it did point to a network that had moved from theory into live implementation.
Algorand’s core consensus and built-in transactions still rely on Ed25519, which remains vulnerable in a sufficiently advanced quantum scenario.
However, the network has already deployed Falcon digital signatures for smart transactions and state proofs, the cryptographic attestations used to verify blockchain state across chains. It has also made Falcon verification available as a primitive for developers building on the Algorand Virtual Machine, giving the ecosystem a working set of tools rather than just a roadmap.
The network executed its first post-quantum-secured transaction in 2025, a milestone that set it apart from many larger rivals that are still debating design paths, governance trade-offs, and implementation timelines.
Algorand also allows users to rotate the private keys associated with their accounts, a feature that does not eliminate the underlying threat but could make future migrations more manageable.
That combination, live transaction capability, developer tooling, state-proof support, and native key rotation, is what turned Algorand into a focal point as the paper circulated through the market.
In a sector where many conversations around quantum risk remain theoretical, Algorand could point to infrastructure already in production.
For Bitcoin, the concern is not only whether quantum computers will eventually be able to derive private keys from public information, but also how much of the network’s legacy footprint would be difficult to migrate in time.
The paper said a quantum computer with fewer than 500,000 physical qubits could crack the elliptic-curve cryptography protecting Bitcoin wallets, a far lower threshold than earlier estimates that ran into the millions.
Google’s own most advanced chip, Willow, remains far below that level, but the revised estimate has intensified scrutiny of how much Bitcoin could be exposed if the technology advances faster than expected.
The burden is particularly acute because some of Bitcoin’s oldest addresses keep public keys visible on-chain.
The paper cited an estimated 6.7 million BTC in older Pay-to-Public-Key addresses, including coins long associated with Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto.
Even outside those legacy wallets, the migration challenge is politically and technically heavy for a network that prioritizes backward compatibility and moves cautiously on base-layer changes.
Quantum risk, in Bitcoin’s case, is as much a governance and coordination problem as it is a cryptographic one.
Meanwhile, Ethereum’s exposure to the same quantum computing risk is somewhat broader.
Once an Ethereum user sends a transaction, the public key tied to that account becomes permanently visible on-chain. The paper said that this leaves the top 1,000 Ethereum wallets, holding roughly 20.5 million ETH, exposed under a sufficiently advanced quantum attack.

It also identified at least 70 major contracts with administrator keys visible on-chain, which ultimately control far more than the ETH they directly hold, including stablecoin minting authority and other system-critical permissions.
Moreover, the attack surface extends beyond wallets and contract administrators.
Ethereum’s proof-of-stake validator set, major Layer 2 networks, and parts of its data-availability architecture all rely on cryptographic components the paper described as vulnerable.
According to the paper, roughly 37 million ETH is staked, and much of Ethereum’s transaction load now flows through rollups and bridges that inherit assumptions from the base layer.
That means any serious post-quantum migration would have to reach not only users and validators, but also the network of applications and scaling systems built around them.
The post Algorand just jumped 50% after a Google flags quantum risk for Bitcoin and Ethereum appeared first on CryptoSlate.
The US economy added 178,000 jobs in March, nearly three times the consensus estimate of 60,000, and unemployment dipped to 4.3%. That is the kind of print that resets macro narratives and hits risk assets before traders finish their first read.
Bitcoin traded around $67,000, unfazed by the data. The 10-year Treasury yield climbed four basis points to 4.35%, and the dollar index ticked up to 100.08.
The market's first-order read was straightforward: a labor market that looks this strong gives the Federal Reserve less reason to cut, which in turn yields tighter financial conditions and weighs on a macro-sensitive asset like Bitcoin.
Why this matters: Bitcoin reacted to more than a jobs beat. The signal was a stronger labor market that reduces the Fed’s urgency to cut rates. If that view holds, yields and the dollar can stay firm, maintaining pressure on liquidity-sensitive assets like BTC.
Zoom in on where those 178,000 jobs came from, and the picture gets less clean. Health care alone added 76,000 positions, and 35,000 of those were workers returning from a strike in physicians' offices. The numbers represented a catch-up hiring.
Construction added 26,000, partly weather-aided, and transportation and warehousing contributed another 21,000. Federal government employment fell by 18,000, and financial activities shed 15,000.
BLS noted that total payroll employment had moved little on net over the prior 12 months.
That backdrop makes March read as a rebound from a noisy February, with sector-specific catch-up doing most of the lifting.

The household survey, which tracks employed and unemployed individuals across the population, moved in the opposite direction from the payroll numbers.
The civilian labor force contracted by 396,000 in March, with participation falling to 61.9%. Household employment declined by 64,000, and the number of people not in the labor force rose by 488,000.
Marginally attached workers jumped 325,000 to 1.9 million, and discouraged workers climbed 144,000 to 510,000. The average workweek is shortened to 34.2 hours.
Average hourly earnings rose just 0.2% month over month and 3.5% year over year, with no wage acceleration to complement the payroll beat.
| Indicator | March reading | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Nonfarm payrolls | +178K | Strong headline beat versus expectations |
| Unemployment rate | 4.3% | Makes the labor market look firm at first glance |
| Civilian labor force | -396K | Suggests weaker labor-market participation beneath the headline |
| Labor-force participation rate | 61.9% | Fewer people working or looking for work |
| Household employment | -64K | The people-based survey moved opposite the payroll survey |
| Not in labor force | +488K | Reinforces the softer under-the-hood read |
| Marginally attached workers | +325K to 1.9M | Shows weaker labor attachment at the margin |
| Discouraged workers | +144K to 510K | Signals more workers are giving up on job searches |
| Average workweek | 34.2 hours | A shorter workweek can point to softer labor demand |
| Average hourly earnings | +0.2% m/m, +3.5% y/y | No wage reacceleration to confirm the payroll beat |
February's revision adds another layer. BLS marked February down to -133,000 from -92,000 and revised January up to 160,000 from 126,000. The net two-month revision was only -7,000, making the pattern noisy and lacking a consistent directional pull.
Payroll growth in the first quarter averaged roughly 68,000 per month, a soft pace by any expansion standard.
BLS revises monthly estimates twice as additional employer reports arrive and seasonal factors reset.
Since 2003, the average absolute revision from the first to the third estimate has been 51,000 jobs. A revision of that size would take March from 178,000 to around 127,000, which is noticeably less dramatic.
To erase the entire beat, March would need a job-creation figure exceeding 118,000, roughly 2.3 times the historical average, and ordinary revision noise does not get there.
BLS's annual benchmark revision stripped 898,000 jobs from the March 2025 payroll level, four times the average absolute benchmark revision of the prior decade.
The revision established that first-print payrolls have recently carried more uncertainty than markets typically price in during the first trading hour following a strong print.
The Federal Reserve held its target range at 3.50% to 3.75% in March.
The median participant's projection put 2026 unemployment at 4.4%, PCE inflation at 2.7%, and the year-end fed funds rate at 3.4%. March unemployment at 4.3% and a payroll print of 178,000 gave policymakers no urgency to move.
NYDIG's research frames the Bitcoin-to-macro link in the same terms: BTC trades in line with real rates, liquidity, and risk appetite. A Fed that holds its position on a firm labor market removes the near-term catalyst that Bitcoin most needs.
The February JOLTS report reinforces this without turning alarming. Openings held near 6.9 million, but hires fell to 4.8 million, and the hiring rate dropped to 3.1%, the lowest reading since April 2020.
Initial jobless claims for the week ended March 28 came in at 202,000, near cycle lows.
Together, these data points describe a labor market in stasis, with layoffs contained, new hiring tepid, and firms holding headcount steady.
That environment does not trigger a Fed pivot, and a Fed that does not pivot keeps financial conditions tighter for longer.
Bitcoin's price action on April 3 ran through the rates channel. Labor strength reduced cut expectations, firmer yields, and a stronger dollar tightened conditions for liquidity-sensitive assets. This channel can reverse.
If BLS revises March payrolls materially lower toward sub-100,000, and April payrolls also land soft while participation rebounds, the “headline-only strength” thesis gains traction.
Cut expectations would reopen, yields would ease, and Bitcoin would have room to rally on liquidity repricing. The weakness in the household survey, the strike-return distortion in health care, and the low-hiring JOLTS backdrop each make that path plausible, but April data on May 8 would need to confirm it.
If March holds near current levels or BLS revises it higher, and April payrolls land above roughly 125,000 while unemployment stays near 4.3% or below, February becomes the clear outlier.
The Fed extends its pause with more confidence, cuts get pushed further out, and Bitcoin keeps trading as a macro risk asset with no near-term liquidity catalyst.
The cross-asset move on April 3, with yields up, the dollar up, and BTC down, showed the market had already begun pricing that path.

The next Employment Situation release is scheduled for May 8 at 8:30 a.m. ET, bringing both April payrolls and the first revision to March.
That makes it the real checkpoint for every argument built on the April 3 print. March CPI is released on April 10, and the next FOMC meeting runs April 28-29, two data points the Fed absorbs before setting policy again.
CPI, in particular, will test if labor market firmness pairs with sticky inflation or with the wage deceleration that the March print already hinted at.
The post US jobs crush forecasts, yet hidden labor weakness could keep Bitcoin under pressure appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Circle's biggest selling point may be becoming its biggest liability. On-chain investigator ZachXBT's “Circle Files” allege that the USDC issuer has inconsistently applied its freeze powers.
Circle was too slow in 15 cases involving more than $420 million in allegedly illicit funds since 2022, yet broad enough to sweep 16 operational business wallets in a sealed US civil matter. The wallets were tied to exchanges, casinos, and forex services that ZachXBT said did not appear connected.
Why this matters: USDC is a core settlement asset in crypto, widely used by exchanges, traders, payment flows, and DeFi protocols. Circle’s freeze decisions extend beyond individual legal disputes or hack responses and set the boundary for how much operational risk businesses accept when holding or moving dollars on-chain.
The firm later unfroze at least one of those wallets, belonging to Goated.com, adding weight to the question of how precisely Circle reviews the addresses it blocklists.
That sequence of “slow on theft, sweeping on civil process” lands at a difficult moment.
USDC held roughly $77.2 billion in circulation as of April 3, in a total stablecoin market of nearly $316.8 billion, accounting for about 24.5% of that pool. One of the cases ZachXBT cites, the Drift exploit, saw more than $280 million in USDC move across 100-plus transactions in roughly six hours.
At that scale and speed, the gap between “can freeze” and “froze in time” is the entire practical question.

Circle's control surface has real on-chain teeth. Its EVM stablecoin contract includes a blocklist feature under a blocklister role, and blocklisted addresses cannot transfer or receive tokens.
Circle designed the contract to be both pausable and upgradeable.
That architecture existed long before this controversy arose, and Circle's Access Denial Policy codifies when that power is triggered.
Circle can block individual addresses on every blockchain where its stablecoins are issued. Once denied, the associated balance cannot move on-chain.
The policy limits freezes to two narrow triggers: when Circle decides, in its sole discretion, that failing to act would threaten network security or integrity, or when a valid legal order from a recognized US or French authority requires it.
Reversals require formal confirmation that the legal obligation or security basis no longer applies.
The USDC Terms add a second layer. Nothing in those terms obligates Circle to track, verify, or determine the provenance of users' USDC balances.
Yet, Circle also reserves the right to block addresses and freeze associated USDC that it determines, in its sole discretion, may be tied to illegal activity.
The Circle Mint User Agreement goes further: Circle may suspend accounts in its sole and absolute discretion, including under a court order, and may restrict redemptions or transfers when the law or a court order prohibits them.
The access-denial policy reads narrower and more formally rules-based, blocking sounds exceptional, tied to security events or legal compulsion. The broader USDC terms and user agreement grant the issuer considerably greater discretion.
Circle's legal terms afford the issuer considerably more latitude than the access-denial policy's narrow framing implies. When legal process and user continuity collide, Circle's own hierarchy prioritizes compliance and issuer control.
| Document / layer | What it says Circle can do | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| EVM stablecoin contract | Blocklisted addresses cannot transfer or receive tokens; contract is pausable and upgradeable | Shows Circle’s control exists directly in token architecture |
| Access Denial Policy | Can block addresses across chains; freezes tied to network security/integrity or valid U.S./French legal orders | Frames freezing as narrow and exceptional |
| USDC Terms | Circle may block addresses and freeze USDC tied to suspected illegal activity in its discretion | Expands Circle’s room to act |
| USDC Terms | Circle is not obligated to track, verify, or determine provenance for users | Limits what users can expect Circle to do for them |
| Circle Mint User Agreement | Circle may suspend accounts in its sole and absolute discretion, including due to court orders | Shows compliance can override user continuity |
The 16-wallet incident illustrates why that hierarchy now troubles operators. Circle's freeze power executed quickly and broadly when a sealed civil matter arrived at its desk.
ZachXBT's “Circle Files” allege the same power moved too slowly across 15 theft cases since 2022, and the Drift window, $280 million-plus across more than 100 transactions in six hours, is the sharpest example because the scale and transaction count appeared on-chain in real time.
The GENIUS Act, passed in July 2025, created a US regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, treating USDC-type products as regulated financial infrastructure.
The OCC's implementing proposal has a comment deadline of May 1. FATF's March 2026 report stressed that supervisors should assess whether blockchain analytics and controls deliver tangible enforcement outcomes, and that timely public-private coordination is crucial for asset recovery.
That is the precise standard ZachXBT and affected operators are now applying to Circle.
Circle markets USDC as fully backed, transparently managed, and the world's largest regulated stablecoin. Circle's own 2026 Internet Financial System report cited $50 trillion-plus in cumulative USDC settlement, 40% of stablecoin transaction volume, and 29% of stablecoin circulation as of September 2025.
At that scale, freeze governance operates at systemic weight, and the examination it now faces reflects the infrastructure role Circle has claimed for itself.

The bull path runs through transparency and speed.
If Circle publishes a clearer review standard for freezes tied to civil process, detailing what internal review fires before Circle blocklists operational business wallets, and demonstrates materially faster coordination in future hack response situations, the controversy becomes a governance maturation story.
In that scenario, regulation under the GENIUS framework and MiCA rewards the most institutionalized issuer, and USDC circulation could recover to the $82 billion to $90 billion range, with 25% to 27% market share.
The 16-wallet incident, with Circle having already restored one wallet, would read as the moment Circle clarified its process.
The bear path runs through accumulation. More examples of slow hack responses or overbroad civil-process freezes, and operators who hold USDC in hot wallets, such as exchanges, payment companies, and DeFi protocols, are starting to diversify settlement routes.
A stablecoin can maintain its $1 peg while losing strategic relevance, and operators diversifying away from Circle would not trigger any depeg alert.
Tether, PYUSD, and a widening field of issuer-specific tokens each give operators a route away from Circle's control stack.
In that outcome, USDC circulation drifts toward a $68 billion to $75 billion range and a 20% to 23% market share, as businesses reprice the operational risk of sitting within Circle's discretion.
The next checkpoint arrives through operational performance, depending on how quickly Circle responds to the next hack, how quickly it restores blocklisted wallets, and if freezes land on operators with a clearer rationale than the last batch.
The OCC comment window closes on May 1, and the regulatory regime for payment stablecoins is taking shape while this dispute is live.
The market now wants to know if the compliance used by Circle model protects users or concentrates power in an issuer whose review standards operators cannot see.
The post Circle’s USDC freeze power faces fresh scrutiny after wallets were blocked while stolen funds moved appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Charles Schwab operates 38.9 million active brokerage accounts and holds $12.22 trillion in client assets. For years, investors in those accounts could reach Bitcoin and Ethereum through ETFs, crypto-related equities, and futures.
A phased launch beginning in the second quarter closes the gap with direct investments. Schwab Crypto, offered through Charles Schwab Premier Bank, SSB, will let qualifying clients buy and sell Bitcoin and Ethereum directly.
The offer is available in all US states except New York and Louisiana, on a timeline that starts with employees and a small initial cohort before broadening.
Why this matters: Schwab is not introducing crypto to a crypto-native audience. It is testing whether direct Bitcoin and Ethereum ownership can sit inside the workflow of a mainstream brokerage customer. If that model gains traction, the implications reach beyond Schwab to product design, broker competition, and the next layer of retail crypto adoption.
The product architecture includes a structural boundary that clients and operators will immediately feel. Schwab Crypto operates through a dedicated account with an affiliated bank subsidiary.
This means that the structure is in a separate account from the brokerage accounts where investors already hold stocks, bonds, and ETFs. The crypto assets carry no SIPC or FDIC protection.
Schwab currently accepts no crypto deposits and does not settle securities or futures transactions in crypto. Mainstream access is real, and it arrives on carefully controlled broker-defined terms.

What drove the timing into 2026 is a policy calendar that dissolved three major institutional frictions within four months.
In January 2025, SAB 122 rescinded the earlier SAB 121 crypto safeguarding guidance that had made custody economics unattractive for traditional banks.
In March 2025, the OCC reaffirmed that crypto custody, certain stablecoin activities, and participation in distributed ledgers are permissible for national banks and removed the supervisory nonobjection requirement.
In April 2025, the Federal Reserve withdrew its earlier crypto guidance and moved to supervise those activities through the standard process.
Schwab CEO Rick Wurster described those regulatory moves as “pretty green” for large firms to expand into crypto, and the launch's timing confirms how directly the policy calendar shaped the product calendar.
| Date | Regulatory / market development | Why it mattered to Schwab |
|---|---|---|
| January 2025 | SAB 122 rescinded SAB 121 | Reduced a key accounting friction around crypto custody |
| March 2025 | OCC said crypto custody, certain stablecoin activity, and DLT participation are permissible; removed supervisory nonobjection requirement | Made bank-linked crypto activity easier to pursue |
| April 2025 | Federal Reserve withdrew earlier crypto guidance and moved to normal supervision | Reduced special-process friction for large institutions |
| March 2026 | Schwab research said Bitcoin had matured into a mainstream asset | Showed internal positioning had shifted toward normalization |
| Q2 2026 | Schwab began phased crypto rollout | Product timing followed the policy shift |
In March 2026, Schwab published research describing Bitcoin as having matured into a mainstream asset and noting that by some measures it had become less volatile than certain Magnificent 7 stocks.
The research reflects the internal positioning that led to direct trading as the natural next step.
Reuters reported Wurster's view that the target user is an investor who already owns stocks and bonds and wants to hold a small slice of Bitcoin or Ethereum alongside those positions.
That is a narrower and more defensible market than the speculative base that drove 2021 volumes. Schwab is building a product for the mainstream investor who already trusts the brokerage brand and wants direct exposure within the brokerage environment they use.
Schwab enters a market that Fidelity already occupies. Fidelity's crypto account lets customers buy, sell, and transfer crypto through its platform and the Fidelity app alongside their existing brokerage positions.
E*TRADE has published a coming-soon page for direct trading in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, and reports point to Morgan Stanley plans to run that service through Zerohash in the first half of 2026.
Schwab enters this race as the scale normalizer, being the firm whose distribution footprint turns a multi-broker pattern into an industry default.
When Fidelity launched direct crypto, the market could read it as one firm's idiosyncratic call.
When Schwab, Fidelity, and E*TRADE each offer some version of direct BTC and ETH access, the mental category moves. When Schwab, Fidelity, and E*TRADE each offer some form of direct BTC and ETH access, direct crypto ownership sits on the same mental shelf as any other optional asset sleeve in a diversified brokerage account.

Schwab's own site already markets crypto exposure “from a brand you know,” and the launch extends that branding promise from wrappers to the asset itself.
A distribution thought experiment frames the scale without overclaiming a price surge.
If 0.5% of Schwab's 38.9 million accounts eventually hold direct crypto, that equals roughly 194,500 accounts. At 1%, it becomes approximately 389,000, and at 2% adoption, that funnel reaches roughly 778,000 accounts.
The bull path opens if Schwab broadens eligibility faster than the phased language implies, and if the product experience proves clean enough for existing clients to consolidate crypto holdings into the new account.
In that scenario, Fidelity, E*TRADE, and Schwab together create a demand flywheel within the mainstream brokerage channel, the kind of end-investor adoption that Citi cited in its bull case of $165,000 for Bitcoin and $4,488 for Ethereum.
Schwab's distribution footprint alone would push every broker that still routes crypto clients exclusively to ETFs or education pages to accelerate its own platform-parity timeline.
The bear path runs through friction. The Schwab Crypto account's state restrictions, bank-subsidiary architecture, absence of crypto deposits, and current transfer limitations each create gaps relative to crypto-native venues that more engaged users will notice.
If those frictions keep adoption narrow and investors who want direct crypto exposure continue to prefer Coinbase, Kraken, or Fidelity's more integrated setup, the launch reads as operationally thin.
An investor who wants crypto to sit alongside equities within a single operational view may find the bank-subsidiary rail an exposure vehicle with tighter product boundaries than the brand's integrated-portfolio framing implies.
The next readable data point arrives when Schwab discloses how quickly the initial second-quarter cohort converts and if the broader rollout accelerates on schedule.
How quickly Schwab moves this cohort to general availability will tell the market whether this launch is a genuine scale ambition or a carefully managed compliance exercise.
The post Charles Schwab’s Bitcoin and Ethereum rollout shows crypto is moving deeper into mainstream brokerage accounts appeared first on CryptoSlate.
The first week of April 2026 has been a study in contrasts. While the broader financial markets grapple with macroeconomic shifts, the digital asset sector is doubling down on technical evolution. We are seeing a move away from the "meme-coin" cycles of the past toward institutional-grade infrastructure and significant protocol overhauls.
The crypto market today is defined by Bitcoin’s price stability near the $67,000 mark and massive anticipation for Ethereum’s Glamsterdam upgrade. Simultaneously, a significant exploit on the Solana-based Drift Protocol has served as a stark reminder of the security risks still inherent in decentralized finance (DeFi).
Despite a slight 0.42% dip in the last 24 hours, Bitcoin ($BTC) continues to act as a stabilizing force for the entire ecosystem. Trading at approximately $67,000, the asset has shrugged off recent geopolitical volatility.

The biggest story in the developer community is the finalized scope for Ethereum’s Glamsterdam upgrade. Scheduled for the first half of 2026, this hard fork is expected to be a "game-changer" for scalability.
Glamsterdam is the next major evolution of the Ethereum mainnet following the Fusaka update of late 2025. Its primary goals are:
This upgrade is essential for $Ethereum to remain competitive against high-speed chains like Solana.
While Ethereum builds, $Solana has hit a major speed bump. On April 1, 2026, the Drift Protocol—the network's largest perpetual futures exchange—was drained of $286 million.
"The breach was not a simple code bug, but a sophisticated six-month social engineering operation by highly resourced actors." — Drift Protocol Preliminary Report.
The attackers reportedly posed as a quantitative trading firm to gain the trust of the protocol's security council. This event has reignited discussions on the necessity of hardware wallets for all DeFi participants.
In a massive win for US-based crypto, Coinbase has received conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) for a national trust charter.
This does not make Coinbase a traditional commercial bank, but it provides federal regulatory uniformity for its custody business. This moves Coinbase into the same regulatory conversation as legacy giants like JPMorgan, further bridging the gap between "crypto" and "finance."
In a market often dominated by volatile meme coins and complex DeFi protocols, UNUS SED LEO ($LEO) has quietly climbed the ranks to become a heavyweight in the digital asset space. Originally launched as a utility token for the iFinex ecosystem, LEO has transitioned from its initial $1 exchange offering to a valuation exceeding $10 per token.
As of April 2026, LEO has officially broken into the top 10 largest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, boasting a valuation of approximately $9.3 billion. This article explores the unique fundamentals, the aggressive deflationary model, and the institutional backing that have fueled this 1,000% journey.

UNUS SED LEO is the native utility token of the iFinex ecosystem, which includes the prominent Bitfinex exchange. Launched in May 2019, the token was designed to provide holders with significant fee discounts and a variety of benefits across the platform's services. Unlike many other assets, LEO is a multi-chain token, existing on both the Ethereum and EOS blockchains to maximize accessibility.
The token's name, "Unus Sed Leo," is Latin for "One, but a lion," a motto emphasizing quality and strength over quantity. It was born out of a crisis: iFinex launched the LEO token to raise $1 billion in capital after a payment processor's funds were seized by government authorities.
While it started as a recovery mechanism, it evolved into a pillar of exchange-based utility. Its primary function is to offer:
The rise of LEO from its $1 launch to the current $10.05 level is not merely speculative; it is driven by one of the most transparent and aggressive buyback and burn mechanisms in the industry.
iFinex is contractually committed to using at least 27% of its consolidated monthly revenue to buy back LEO tokens from the open market and permanently destroy them. This creates a perpetual buy-side pressure. As Bitfinex remains a top-tier exchange for professional traders, this revenue stream provides a "floor" for the token price.
A major factor in the 2024–2026 rally has been the legal resolution regarding the 2016 Bitfinex hack. Following court orders, nearly 94,643 BTC were earmarked for recovery. According to the token's whitepaper, 80% of recovered funds must be used to repurchase and burn LEO tokens. With $Bitcoin prices reaching new heights, the sheer dollar value of this buyback program has caused massive supply shocks.
Unlike highly liquid assets that fluctuate wildly, LEO often shows "resilience" during market crashes. Because so much of the supply is held by long-term investors or is being systematically burned, the circulating supply (currently around 920 million LEO) continues to shrink, making each remaining token more valuable.
Reaching the #10 spot by market cap is a feat of endurance. LEO's ascent was accelerated by the downfall of other exchange tokens (such as FTT) and the growing demand for "safe haven" utility assets.
| Feature | UNUS SED LEO (LEO) |
|---|---|
| Current Price | $10.05 |
| Market Cap Rank | #10 |
| Circulating Supply | ~920.9 Million |
| Max Supply | Decreasing Monthly |
By maintaining a steady growth trajectory while the broader altcoin market experienced massive drawdowns, LEO became a "non-correlated" asset. This attracted portfolio managers looking for stability.
In early 2022, the world of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) was at its absolute zenith. Celebrities were flocking to the space, led by pop icon Justin Bieber, who made headlines by purchasing a Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFT for a staggering sum. At the time, it was seen as a bold entry into the future of digital art and web3.
Fast forward to April 2026, and the landscape has shifted dramatically. The speculative bubble that once valued "cartoon apes" at millions of dollars has largely evaporated, leaving high-profile investors like Bieber with massive "paper" losses.
In January 2022, Justin Bieber acquired Bored Ape #3001 for 500 ETH. At the exchange rates of that time, the transaction was valued at approximately $1.3 million.
The purchase was immediately controversial among NFT collectors. Analysts pointed out that Bieber paid nearly five times the "floor price" for an ape that possessed relatively common traits. While $Bitcoin and $Ethereum were experiencing high volatility, the NFT market was still fueled by extreme hype and celebrity endorsements.
Today, the secondary market for the Bored Ape Yacht Club collection tells a much different story. As of April 2026, the floor price for the collection has retreated to approximately 5.25 ETH to 6 ETH. With the current Ethereum price stabilizing around $2,000, Bieber’s Bored Ape is now valued at roughly $12,000.

This represents a staggering 99% decline from his initial investment. Even when compared to the broader crypto market news, the drawdown in the NFT sector has been significantly more severe than that of major cryptocurrencies like BTC or ETH.
Bieber isn't the only celebrity facing a "re-valuation" of his digital assets. The following table illustrates the peak vs. current estimates for major celebrity BAYC holders:
| Celebrity | Asset | Purchase Price (Est.) | Current Value (2026) | Total Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Bieber | BAYC #3001 | $1,300,000 | ~$12,000 | -99% |
| Eminem | BAYC #9055 | $462,000 | ~$78,000 | -83% |
| Stephen Curry | BAYC #7990 | $180,000 | ~$85,000 | -53% |
Note: Differences in loss percentages are often due to the rarity of the specific traits or the timing of the purchase.
The collapse of Bored Ape prices serves as a cautionary tale regarding liquidity and speculative assets. Unlike trading on major exchanges, where you can sell a token instantly, NFTs are illiquid. You need a specific buyer willing to pay your asking price for your specific token.
Furthermore, as reported by major financial outlets like Bloomberg, the shift toward "utility-based NFTs"—assets with actual function in gaming or identity—has left purely "profile picture" (PFP) projects struggling to regain their former glory.
While the dollar value has dropped, Yuga Labs continues to develop the "Otherside" metaverse. However, for investors who entered during the 2022 frenzy, the road to "breaking even" appears nearly impossible. Most experts now categorize early NFT purchases as high-risk speculative plays rather than foundational investments.
Michael Saylor has sparked a fresh wave of debate with his latest X post, claiming it is a "Good Friday to buy Bitcoin." This comes as the $BTC price lingers near $67,400, a staggering 46% drop from its 2025 peak of $125,000.
MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor is back to his usual bullish antics. On April 3, 2026, he took to X (formerly Twitter) to declare, "It’s a Good Friday to buy Bitcoin." For the "HODL" community, this is a standard rallying cry. However, for investors who watched Bitcoin plummet from a euphoric $125,000 in October 2025 to its current level of approximately $67,400, the message feels different this time.

The market is currently grappling with a "correlation crisis." While Saylor remains the ultimate $Bitcoin maximalist, his firm has shifted focus toward its new "STRC" preferred stock dividends. With significant unrealized losses on recent tranches, many are wondering: Is this a genuine "buy the dip" opportunity, or is the "Saylor Signal" losing its luster?
Whether "now" is a good time to buy depends on your time horizon. Technically, Bitcoin is in a clear downtrend on the daily charts. However, historically, buying during 40-50% drawdowns from all-time highs (ATH) has been a profitable long-term strategy. The current price of $67,400 represents a significant discount for those who missed the $100k+ rally, but macro headwinds suggest the bottom may not be in yet.
To understand why Saylor is calling for buys now, we must look at why the price crashed. The decline from $125,000 was not a single event but a "perfect storm" of factors:
While Saylor's post uses the holiday as a backdrop, does Bitcoin actually perform well on Good Friday? Historically, the Friday of Easter weekend sees lower trading volumes as traditional markets are closed. This "thin" liquidity can lead to sharp, erratic moves, but there is no statistically significant "holiday pump" trend. In fact, Bitcoin price action today remains largely sideways, reflecting what analysts call "aggressive caution."
From a technical standpoint, Bitcoin is currently testing a critical psychological floor.
Hedge funds have reportedly unwound nearly a third of their Bitcoin exposure according to recent Bloomberg market data. This institutional exit is the primary reason the price hasn't bounced as aggressively as retail traders hoped.
If you are following Saylor’s advice, risk management is paramount:
As of April 4, 2026, the XRP price (referenced against major pairs) is trading near the $1.31 mark. Following a rejection at the $1.60 resistance level in late March, the token has entered a period of consolidation. Technical indicators like the Money Flow Index (MFI) are currently hovering around 35, suggesting that XRP is approaching oversold territory.

Traders are closely watching the $1.25 support level. A breakdown below this could see a retest of the 52-week low near $1.21. Conversely, a daily close above the 7-day Moving Average ($1.33) is required to signal a short-term trend reversal.
A major highlight in today's news is the continued expansion of Ripple’s dollar-pegged stablecoin, RLUSD.
The legislative landscape is shifting with the introduction of the CLARITY Act in the U.S. Senate. This bill aims to provide a definitive framework for stablecoins and digital assets.
The latest draft of the CLARITY Act proposes a ban on yield for passive stablecoin holdings. While this could hurt competitors like USDC, analysts suggest that RLUSD is uniquely positioned. Because RLUSD’s growth is driven by cross-border payments and institutional collateral rather than retail yield incentives, it may emerge as a primary beneficiary of these new rules.
Despite the current price stagnation, institutional sentiment remains cautiously optimistic. Many analysts, including those from Standard Chartered, maintain year-end targets for XRP above $2.50, citing the eventual "re-risking" of the market as regulatory clarity settles.
Claude developer Anthropic registered an employee-funded PAC amid a legal battle with the White House and rising election-year scrutiny of AI.
Researchers say internal emotion-like signals shape how large language models make decisions.
Financial giant Charles Schwab is set to launch spot buying of Bitcoin and Ethereum by the end of the quarter, the firm said Friday.
The FIFA World Cup will feature a prediction market platform built on ADI Chain, with the network’s token hitting a new high Friday.
Publicly traded Bitcoin miner MARA cut 15% of its staff this week after selling $1.1 billion in Bitcoin to fuel an AI push.
According to recent market data, XRP's open interest is climbing sharply while funding rates remain persistently negative.
Saylor has countered Peter Schiff's MSTR sell warning with data showing 36% returns since the "Bitcoin Era" started.
Bitcoin and XRP face fresh pressure as Brent crude surges to $113 amid Middle East choke point risks. All eyes turn to the April 9 U.S. inflation report for signs of a Fed rate pivot.
XRP metrics stay muted in holiday trading, but past precedents suggest bulls might have other plans for its price.
XRP hits 8.1M wallets despite a price slump, 13-year BTC whales lock 5,000x gains, and Shiba Inu (SHIB) faces North Korea rumors. Plus, Bitcoin is at $67,000 ahead of the April 9 CPE report.
Ripple trades near $1.32 right now. The company just made a significant move by integrating XRP and its stablecoin RLUSD directly into its enterprise treasury management system (through its 2025 acquisition of GTreasury). This allows corporate CFOs to manage digital assets alongside traditional fiat money in a single dashboard for the first time. On top of that, Ripple announced a major partnership with Convera, a $190 billion payments giant, to settle cross-border payments using RLUSD on the XRP Ledger.
Taurox, an AI-driven trading protocol, is designed to help regular stakers benefit from this growing corporate adoption through smart autonomous agents that focus on steady, risk-managed returns.
Even when Ripple announces big institutional partnerships and treasury tools, XRP often still swings 20-30% on normal market noise. Many holders feel like the real-world progress doesn’t always show up in the price right away. Taurox was built to solve that disconnect. It pools deposits of USDT, BTC, or XRP into one shared trading pool and lets a global team of developers, quants, and AI engineers run multiple diversified strategies at once.
Each strategy is strictly limited to 2% of the total pool to keep risk controlled, and smart built-in rules automatically maintain balance. The result is much smoother performance, without the constant stress of trying to guess how the market will react to every new partnership.

Taurox has opened the Pre-KYA Registration Table ahead of schedule. This early window lets developers, quants, and AI builders submit their trading agents before the full system launches. The first ones in get priority testing in the Proving Ground, faster access to pool capital, and extra rewards from the Agent Creator Fund (10% of total TAUX supply). If you already have a working trading strategy, this is your chance to get positioned ahead of the crowd.
When you stake, your funds go into one shared trading pool and you receive txTokens that represent your share of the pool’s value, starting at $1.00 each. The protocol keeps 15% in stablecoins as a safety buffer and puts the rest to work through autonomous agents. These agents only go live after passing strict tests in the Proving Ground. Daily loss limits of 2%, single-trade caps of 5%, and an automatic pause if the pool drops 5% all help protect your capital. Everything is on-chain and fully transparent.

TAUX has a hard-capped supply of 2 billion tokens that can never be increased after launch. Taurox charges zero upfront fees, it only takes 5% of the profits the agents make, buys TAUX on the open market, and permanently burns 30% of it. The rest is shared between stakers, the DAO, and the strategy creators. This setup creates real scarcity: the bigger and more successful the pool becomes, the more valuable TAUX can get over time.
The Taurox Presale has entered Phase 4 and has already raised over $950K. TAUX is currently priced at $0.018. Investors joining in this phase are positioned for nearly 4.5x returns when the token lists at $0.08. If Taurox reaches its $1 billion pool target, these early participants could see up to 103x gains as TAUX potentially climbs to $1.85. For example, a $500 investment today would grow to roughly $2,220 at listing and approach $28,000 if TAUX hits the $1 level.
The presale includes a 1-month cliff and 20% monthly unlocks from month 2 to 5, so you can start staking quickly while limiting early selling. Combined with 30% burns and strong reserves, it offers real potential for both short-term and long-term upside.
As Ripple quietly brings XRP and RLUSD into mainstream corporate treasury and payments infrastructure, Taurox gives you a practical way to stay exposed without the usual volatility and guesswork. It combines intelligent AI agents with clear risk controls and a token that actually becomes scarcer as the protocol grows. If you’re watching Ripple’s shift into enterprise finance and want simpler returns, Taurox is built for exactly this kind of moment.
Buy TAUX: https://taurox.io
Whitepaper: https://docs.taurox.io/
Official Telegram: https://t.me/tauroxlabs
Official X/Twitter: https://x.com/TauroxProtocol
The post Ripple (XRP) Corporate Treasury Expands, Yet Taurox (TAUX) Pre-KYA Opening Boosts AI Agents Developments appeared first on Blockonomi.
Investors are preparing for a pivotal week featuring critical inflation measurements, quarterly corporate results, and continued monitoring of the Iran conflict’s economic ramifications.
Last week’s trading session saw the S&P 500 advance 1.6%, while the Dow Jones climbed 1.2%, and the Nasdaq Composite surged 2.2%. The rally ended a five-week decline for all three benchmarks. Year-to-date, the S&P 500 and Dow remain lower by 3.8% and 3.2%, respectively.
Friday’s employment data for March significantly exceeded analyst projections. The report revealed 178,000 nonfarm payroll additions versus consensus estimates of 65,000. This represented a sharp reversal from February’s 92,000 job losses.
“The message here is equilibrium,” noted Gina Bolvin, president of Bolvin Wealth Management Group. “Robust employment growth diminishes pressure for immediate rate reductions, though it doesn’t alter the overall deceleration pattern.”
Michael Feroli, JPMorgan Chase’s chief US economist, indicated the figures provided “somewhat greater assurance that economic expansion can absorb the current energy cost surge without substantial lasting harm.”
Thursday delivers the February Personal Consumption Expenditures index, an inflation gauge the Federal Reserve prioritizes. Analyst consensus projects a 0.4% monthly advance and 2.8% annual growth.
Friday presents the more significant release: March’s Consumer Price Index. Forecasters anticipate a 0.9% monthly increase and 3.4% annual rise. February’s CPI registered 2.4% annually. This upcoming report represents the initial measurement incorporating Iran war-related pricing effects.
National average gasoline prices exceeded $4 per gallon last week, per AAA data. Goldman Sachs analyst Ben Shumway noted escalating costs are “contributing to further deterioration in consumer sentiment from previously depressed readings.”
Andy Schneider, senior US economist at BNP Paribas, observed that “supply disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz have materialized while tariff impacts continue spreading,” noting that “initial petroleum price transmission will be reflected in March figures.”
Goldman economist Manuel Abecasis characterized the present supply disruption as “less worrisome than previous instances that generated inflation challenges,” pointing to its constrained scope and range.
Delta Air Lines releases quarterly results Wednesday morning before market open. The carrier’s performance will illuminate how elevated aviation fuel expenses are impacting airline sector margins. Constellation Brands and Levi Strauss additionally report during the period.
#earnings for the week of April 6, 2026 https://t.co/hLn2sKQhEY $APLD $STZ $AEHR $DAL $BB $SMPL $GBX $LEVI $NEOG $KRUS $SKIL $WDFC $RELL $ERGP $LOT $XELB $RPM $SLP $CLIR $EVO $IQST $BYRN $PXED pic.twitter.com/aKqX72tj9u
— Earnings Whispers (@eWhispers) April 2, 2026
Street analysts forecast earnings expansion exceeding 13% across the S&P 500 overall, per FactSet data.
Oil prices have climbed over 50% during the five weeks since hostilities commenced. Shipping activity through the Strait of Hormuz remains virtually nonexistent. Trump conducted a Monday briefing alongside military leadership as his self-established deadline for strait reopening nears.
Capital.com analyst Daniela Hathorn observed that “investors have shifted from pricing in de-escalation scenarios to assessing escalation likelihood.”
Paola Rodriguez-Masiu, Rystad Energy’s chief oil analyst, indicated the temporary cushion that initially contained price increases from pre-conflict petroleum inventories is now depleting.
The Federal Reserve’s March policy meeting minutes release Wednesday at 2 p.m. ET. Market participants broadly anticipate the Fed will maintain current interest rates at its upcoming April session.
The post Market Preview: CPI Inflation Reports and Delta (DAL) Earnings Amid Iran Conflict appeared first on Blockonomi.
Bitcoin price prediction shifted this week after the OCC granted conditional approval for the biggest US crypto exchange to become a federally regulated trust bank, pulling digital assets deeper into the traditional banking system.
While the wider market has cooled with major coins pulling back, Pepeto stands out as the top presale entry with its Binance listing getting closer every day.
With a working exchange already live and $8.68 million raised, Pepeto combines real technology with a presale that analysts see running 100x once the listing opens, making it the play that the next rally is about to reward.
The OCC gave Coinbase conditional approval for a national trust bank charter on April 2, placing the largest US crypto exchange under direct federal oversight, according to CoinDesk.
The charter lets Coinbase handle custody services across all 50 states under one set of rules instead of juggling separate state licenses, according to Bitcoin Magazine. Pension funds and sovereign wealth funds often need bank-grade oversight before moving capital into crypto, and this approval knocks down one of the last walls.
The biggest stamp of trust in crypto history just dropped, and the presale entries set to ride that wave are where the real gains live.
While the CLARITY Act sits stuck in committee, the direction is obvious, and sharp traders are hunting for the best entries to catch the recovery forming underneath.
Pepeto ranks near the top because a live exchange with $8.68 million committed and a Binance listing closing in gives it everything needed to stand as one of the best plays of 2026.

The math speaks for itself. At $0.0000001862, analysts see 100x once the Binance listing opens. The person who created the original Pepe token, which hit $11 billion on hype alone, built this exchange with a veteran from Binance’s listing team. Every swap runs through PepetoSwap at zero cost, every cross-chain move between ETH, BNB, and Solana lands at full value, and every token gets flagged for scam patterns before your capital touches it, all verified clean by SolidProof.
What drives Pepeto daily is real utility, and 188% APY staking grows every position while the listing window gets tighter. The entries that turned early believers into millionaires in past cycles all shared one trait: they found a working project before the crowd showed up, and Pepeto at presale pricing is that exact setup right now.
ETH trades at $2,041 per CoinMarketCap, holding just above the $2,000 floor as the broader rally has not yet carried altcoins higher.

Standard Chartered keeps a $7,500 year-end target, but from here that is a 3.6x over nine months, decent for big portfolios, while Pepeto at presale pricing targets 100x from a single listing event the Binance debut is set to kick off.
XRP trades at $1.29 per CoinMarketCap, drifting below key moving averages as sellers stay in control.
Standard Chartered recently cut its year-end call to $2.80, roughly a 2x that takes patience, but presale entries grab the multiples that XRP at an $81 billion cap can no longer produce.
The picture is forming fast and the math is simple. The OCC handing a federal bank charter to the largest US exchange means the bitcoin price prediction just got backed by the same system that watches over Wall Street. ETH at $2,041 targets $7,500 over nine months, a 3.6x that pays patience, and the investors who grabbed ETH at $0.30 turned $1,000 into $16,000 because they spotted a working platform at early pricing and moved.
The bitcoin price prediction shows early bull signals building while the presale window gets tighter by the day. Visit the Pepeto official website and secure your spot before this chance turns into a headline you read about instead of a gain you earned, because projects with real products, viral buzz, and a Binance listing on deck do not sit at presale prices for long.
Click To Visit Pepeto Website To Enter The Presale

The OCC gave Coinbase a federal trust bank charter, pulling crypto under Wall Street-grade rules. The bitcoin price prediction turns structurally bullish.
ETH targets $7,500 by year end, XRP targets $2.80, and Pepeto targets 100x from the Binance listing. The Pepeto official website still takes entries.
Pepeto has a live exchange, a SolidProof audit, $8.68 million raised, and 100x projected from the coming Binance listing.
The post Bitcoin Price Prediction: OCC Grants Crypto Bank Charter as Pepeto Targets 100x While ETH and XRP Hold appeared first on Blockonomi.
The blockchain industry has a strange relationship with visibility. Projects pride themselves on transparency — open-source code, public ledgers, on-chain governance — yet most of them are completely unknown to anyone who does not already follow cryptocurrency. Ask a mainstream technology journalist to name ten blockchain companies and they will struggle past three or four. Ask a potential enterprise client and the list gets even shorter.
This is not because blockchain companies lack substance. Many have shipped working products, attracted real users and secured significant funding. The problem is that their visibility begins and ends within the crypto ecosystem. Outside of that ecosystem — where the next wave of users, investors, enterprise buyers and regulators lives — these companies might as well not exist.
Kooc Media, a PR distribution agency that has operated across the crypto and fintech industries since 2017, has launched dedicated services to solve this problem. The agency gives blockchain and Web3 companies guaranteed press coverage on publications it owns, global distribution that reaches mainstream financial media, and editorial support from writers who can explain decentralised technology to any audience without losing accuracy or credibility.
Blockchain marketing has become extraordinarily efficient at reaching people who already care about blockchain. Crypto Twitter threads go viral within the community. Discord announcements reach dedicated followers instantly. Telegram groups buzz with discussion every time a protocol ships an update. These channels are essential for community engagement and they perform that function well.
What they do not do is introduce the company to anyone new.
A DeFi protocol announcing a new lending product on Discord reaches its existing community. The institutional investor who might allocate capital to DeFi never sees it. A layer-1 network posting about its latest upgrade on X reaches developers already building on the chain. The enterprise CTO evaluating blockchain infrastructure for a supply chain project never encounters it. A Web3 gaming platform sharing a trailer in its Telegram group reaches current players. The mainstream gamer who might become a Web3 convert has no idea it exists.
This is the echo chamber problem, and it is the single biggest constraint on blockchain adoption. The technology cannot grow beyond its current user base if the only people who hear about it are already using it.
“Every blockchain company we talk to has the same ambition — mainstream adoption,” said Michelle De Gouveia, spokesperson for Kooc Media. “But almost none of them are doing the one thing that drives mainstream discovery, which is getting covered by publications that mainstream audiences actually read. That is what our service delivers.”
Press articles on recognised news, finance and technology publications serve as a bridge between the blockchain ecosystem and the rest of the world. They introduce blockchain companies to audiences that would never encounter them through crypto-native channels.
When a finance publication covers a DeFi protocol, traditional investors who read that publication learn about decentralised lending for the first time. When a technology outlet writes about a layer-2 scaling solution, developers working in non-blockchain environments discover that the technology has matured beyond what they assumed. When a mainstream business platform covers an enterprise blockchain implementation, corporate buyers add a new vendor to their evaluation shortlist.
These introductions do not happen through Twitter threads or Discord updates. They happen through media coverage on publications that sit outside the crypto bubble. And for most blockchain companies, that kind of coverage has been nearly impossible to secure — until now.
Kooc Media’s crypto PR services are structured around two assets that most PR agencies do not have: owned publications and specialist editorial expertise.
The agency operates Blockonomi, CoinCentral, MoneyCheck, Parameter, Beanstalk and Computing. These are active news sites covering blockchain, cryptocurrency, DeFi, Web3, finance and technology, all listed on the brands page. Kooc Media controls these publications editorially, which means client articles are reviewed internally and published directly. No pitch to an external journalist is required. No editorial gatekeeper at a third-party publication decides whether blockchain is worth covering this week.

Every campaign includes guaranteed placements on the owned sites. Clients know which publications will carry their article before the campaign begins. Same-day turnaround is standard. Homepage placements are available for articles that need premium visibility for a defined period.
Beyond the owned network, press releases are distributed through hundreds of partner websites and thousands of syndicated outlets worldwide. Premium distribution packages place blockchain articles on major platforms including Business Insider, Bloomberg, Benzinga, MarketWatch, USA Today and Dow Jones feeds. These are the publications that reach the mainstream audiences blockchain companies need to grow.
The editorial challenge with blockchain PR is that the content often needs to serve two completely different audiences simultaneously. Crypto-native readers expect technical precision. They will notice if an article confuses optimistic rollups with ZK-rollups or mischaracterises how a governance token works. Mainstream readers need accessibility. They will stop reading if the first paragraph is impenetrable jargon about consensus mechanisms and finality guarantees.
Kooc Media’s editorial team has spent years mastering this balance. They write about blockchain technology every day across the agency’s owned publications and have developed the ability to present complex concepts clearly without sacrificing the technical accuracy that crypto-literate readers demand.
The writers cover every angle a blockchain company might need to communicate. Protocol launches and network upgrades. Smart contract audit completions. Tokenomics announcements. Partnership integrations. Developer ecosystem milestones. Total value locked achievements. Governance transitions. Enterprise implementations. Funding rounds. Mainnet migrations. Cross-chain interoperability solutions. Whatever the story is, the team can produce content that does it justice for any audience.
Clients who have their own content teams can submit finished articles for editorial review. Most choose the in-house writing service because translating blockchain concepts into content that works across both specialist and mainstream publications is a specific skill that takes years to develop.
Kooc Media’s Web3 PR services are designed for companies at every level of the blockchain stack.
Infrastructure projects — layer-1 chains, layer-2 networks, oracle providers, cross-chain bridges and developer tooling companies — get coverage that establishes their technology as credible infrastructure in the eyes of developers, validators, enterprise evaluators and institutional participants.
DeFi protocols — lending platforms, decentralised exchanges, yield aggregators, liquid staking providers and algorithmic stablecoins — get coverage on finance publications that introduces decentralised finance to traditional investors and positions individual protocols as trustworthy platforms for capital deployment.
NFT and creator economy platforms get coverage that reaches beyond the existing collector community to mainstream audiences interested in digital art, music, gaming and entertainment.
DAOs and governance platforms get coverage that demystifies decentralised decision-making for audiences unfamiliar with the concept, supporting contributor recruitment and institutional relationship building.
Web3 gaming, social and metaverse platforms get coverage on technology and entertainment publications that introduces blockchain-based experiences to mainstream users who might never visit a crypto news site.
Enterprise blockchain companies get B2B coverage that reframes distributed ledger technology as a practical business tool rather than a speculative investment, supporting sales cycles and partnership development.
Every article published through Kooc Media’s network becomes a permanent entry in the blockchain company’s search results. When someone types the company name into Google — whether they are a potential user researching before signing up, an investor conducting due diligence, a journalist looking for background, or a regulator reviewing an application — those articles appear.

Articles on high-authority domains rank particularly well. A single placement on a trusted publication can appear on the first page of Google results within days. Multiple placements across several authoritative sites can dominate that first page entirely, creating a search presence that communicates credibility before the visitor even clicks through to the company’s own website.
This compounding search value is one of the reasons PR delivers a better long-term return for blockchain companies than most other marketing channels. Paid advertising disappears when the budget stops. Community posts get buried by newer content. Press articles stay indexed and keep ranking for months or years, continuously introducing the company to new audiences.
How blockchain companies communicate publicly about their technology, tokens and financial products is under increasing scrutiny from regulators worldwide. The language used in press releases and articles matters. Claims about returns, token utility, decentralisation and financial performance all carry regulatory implications that vary by jurisdiction and evolve constantly.
Kooc Media’s editorial team writes for regulated industries daily. Beyond blockchain, the agency handles gambling PR for iGaming companies operating under strict advertising frameworks. This cross-sector experience has embedded regulatory awareness deeply into the editorial process. Every article is written with current compliance expectations in mind.
“The regulatory environment for blockchain is a moving target,” said De Gouveia. “What was acceptable language a year ago might attract attention from regulators today. Our writers track these changes and make sure every piece of content we produce reflects the current landscape.”
Fixed-price packages give blockchain and Web3 companies a straightforward entry point with confirmed placements, editorial support and complete link reporting. Custom campaigns accommodate larger projects with specific publication targets, multi-announcement roadmaps, geographic focus or ongoing monthly coverage programmes.
Kooc Media is a PR distribution agency specialising in blockchain, cryptocurrency, Web3, fintech and technology. The company owns and operates multiple news websites and distributes press releases and sponsored articles through a global partner network. Founded in 2017, Kooc Media provides content creation, guaranteed placements, newswire distribution and managed PR campaigns for blockchain networks, DeFi protocols, Web3 platforms, DAOs, NFT marketplaces, token launches and digital finance companies.
Kooc Media’s Crypto PR packages are available now through the company’s website at https://kooc.co.uk.
The post Most Blockchain Companies Are Invisible Outside Crypto — Kooc Media’s PR Services Change That Overnight appeared first on Blockonomi.
Ripple trades near $1.32 right now. On April , the International Monetary Fund released a major new note on “Tokenized Finance,” calling tokenization a fundamental shift in how global finance works, not just a small tech upgrade. The IMF highlighted faster settlement, better transparency, and huge potential for real-world assets and cross-border payments. This directly aligns with what Ripple and XRP were built for.
Taurox, an AI-driven trading protocol, is designed to help regular stakers benefit from these big-picture shifts through smart autonomous agents that focus on steady, risk-managed returns.
Even with the IMF validating the exact type of tokenized future Ripple has been pushing, XRP holders often see sharp 20-30% swings due to escrow releases, market sentiment, and short-term noise. It can feel frustrating when the long-term story is strong but the price doesn’t always reflect it. Taurox was created to solve that. It pools deposits of USDT, BTC, or XRP into one shared trading pool and lets a global team of developers, quants, and AI engineers run multiple diversified strategies at once.
Each strategy is strictly limited to 2% of the total pool to keep risk controlled, and smart built-in rules automatically maintain balance. The result is smoother performance, without the constant stress of trying to time every headline or paying high management fees like traditional funds charge.

Taurox has opened the Pre-KYA Registration Table ahead of schedule. This early window lets developers, quants, and AI builders submit their trading agents before the full system launches. The first ones in get priority testing in the Proving Ground, faster access to pool capital, and extra rewards from the Agent Creator Fund (10% of total TAUX supply). If you already have a working trading strategy, this is your opportunity to position yourself early in the Taurox ecosystem.
When you stake, your funds go into one shared trading pool and you receive txTokens that represent your share of the pool’s value, starting at $1.00 each. The protocol keeps 15% in stablecoins as a safety buffer and puts the rest to work through autonomous agents.
These agents only run real strategies after passing strict tests in the Proving Ground. Daily loss limits of 2%, single-trade caps of 5%, and an automatic pause if the pool drops 5% all help protect your capital. Everything is on-chain and fully transparent.

TAUX has a hard-capped supply of 2 billion tokens that can never be increased after launch. Taurox charges zero upfront fees, it only takes 5% of the profits the agents make, buys TAUX on the open market, and permanently burns 30% of it. The rest is shared between stakers, the DAO, and the strategy creators. This design creates real scarcity: the bigger and more successful the pool becomes, the more valuable TAUX can get over time.
The Taurox Presale has entered Phase 4 and has already raised over $950K. TAUX is currently priced at $0.018. Investors joining in this phase are positioned for nearly 4.5x returns when the token lists at $0.08. If Taurox reaches its $1 billion pool target, these early participants could see up to 103x gains as TAUX potentially climbs to $1.85. For example, a $500 investment today would grow to roughly $2,220 at listing and approach $28,000 if TAUX hits the $1 level.
The presale includes a 1-month cliff and 20% monthly unlocks from month 2 to 5, so you can start staking quickly while limiting early selling. Combined with 30% burns and strong reserves, it offers real potential for both short-term and long-term upside.
The IMF just put a global spotlight on tokenized finance, exactly the space Ripple has been building toward for years. While the broader market sorts out the short-term noise, Taurox gives you a practical way to stay exposed without the usual volatility and guesswork. It combines intelligent AI agents with clear risk controls and a token that actually becomes scarcer as the protocol grows. If you believe in Ripple’s long-term role in the tokenized future, Taurox is built for exactly this moment.
Buy TAUX: https://taurox.io
Whitepaper: https://docs.taurox.io/
Official Telegram: https://t.me/tauroxlabs
Official X/Twitter: https://x.com/TauroxProtocol
The post Ripple (XRP) Aims to Revolutionise Finance, Yet Analysts Say Taurox (TAUX) Might Make it Sooner After Opening Pre-KYA appeared first on Blockonomi.
The spot exchange-traded funds tracking the performance of Ripple’s cross-border token continue to dig new lows, as they just ended their first month in the red in March.
The landscape is even more worrying when we examine the details, while XRP is currently losing the battle for the fourth spot against BNB.
After years of building anticipation, the first spot XRP ETF (Canary Capital’s XRPC) had a highly successful debut day, breaking the launch-day trading volume for 2025. Four more such products followed suit, and they attracted over $1 billion in about a month. Moreover, they didn’t have a single red day in terms of net flows for almost two months before that streak broke on January 7 – something that even the BTC and ETH ETFs couldn’t do.
In November and December, they gained $666.61 million and $500 million, respectively. The before-launch hype seemed justified. However, the following two months were more modest, perhaps driven by quickly escalating global tension. January recorded just $15.59 million in net inflows, while February saw $58.09 million.
The landscape worsened in March as the war-induced tension skyrocketed, oil prices soared, and uncertainty and doubt crept into all financial markets. Investors pulled out $31.16 million from the spot XRP ETFs, making it the first red month since their launch in November last year.
What’s even more concerning is the fact that there were multiple days with no reportable inflows at all. 8 out of the 22 trading days have $0.00 against them on SoSoValue, clearly showing disappearing demand.

Amid this ongoing investor exodus from the ETFs, the underlying asset has expectedly underperformed, slipping by over 3% weekly. Moreover, XRP now stands inches below the coveted $1.30 support, which, if lost decisively, could lead to more profound corrections.
Popular analyst CW recently warned that a potential drop to $1.26 could trigger mass high-leverage long liquidations.
If $XRP falls to around $1.26, most high-leverage long positions will be liquidated. pic.twitter.com/wnyErpC1Bu
— CW (@CW8900) April 5, 2026
Fellow analyst CRYPTOWZRD noted that XRP had closed the previous daily candle indecisively and is “teasing the $1.32 intraday resistance.” If it remains below it, the analyst predicted more “weakness and short opportunities.”
The post Ripple (XRP) ETFs Went From Bad to Worse: First Red Month and No Inflow Days appeared first on CryptoPotato.
The controversial and contrasting actions and comments from US President Donald Trump regarding the war in Iran continue, with the latest examples going live in the past 24 hours.
The question now is when and how bitcoin will finally react, as it has remained unusually calm over the weekend. Will history repeat and drop later today?
Although it has been a boring weekend in terms of price actions, it’s actually been highly eventful on the US/Israel-Iran war front. It started with more threats from Trump that Iran has 48 hours to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, otherwise it would “rain hell” on the country.
Then, he declared Tuesday as “Power Plant and Bridge Day,” suggesting that these key infrastructures will be attacked next. Meanwhile, a US Navy SEAL team extracted the ejected US F-15E pilot from Iran in what was described as a “massive operation” involving hundreds of special operations troops and military personnel.
US intelligence claims Iran is unlikely to open the Strait soon because it’s the country’s biggest bargaining chip left. However, the POTUS reportedly said a few hours ago that the US and Iran have opened negotiations regarding the Strait and believes they can get a deal done by Monday. If they don’t, Trump is considering ‘blowing everything up,’ the report added.
*FOX: TRUMP SAYS MULLING TAKING OVER OIL IF NO IRAN DEAL
*TRUMP SAYS HE COULD GET DEAL W/ IRAN BY TOMORROW: FOX NEWS
*TRUMP SAYS NEGOTIATORS FOR IRAN GRANTED AMNESTY FOR NOW: FOX
*TRUMP MULLS ‘BLOWING EVERYTHING UP’ IF NO IRAN DEAL ‘FAST’: FOX
— *Walter Bloomberg (@DeItaone) April 5, 2026
Previously, one of his posts on Truth Social, which used unprecedented language from a sitting president, fooled even Grok, as the AI platform called it a “meme-style image of a fabricated Trump post.” The caveat, though, is that the post is real and it’s still active on Trump’s social media page.
President Trump’s Truth Social post about Iran this morning is so unprecedented, that even Grok is calling it a “meme-style image of a fabricated Trump post.”
This post is entirely real, buckle up for an eventful week ahead. https://t.co/kosStlB5Ok pic.twitter.com/i1qjQywvlS
— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) April 5, 2026
Despite all of these escalations and contradicting messages, BTC’s price has remained unusually stable at around $67,000 for the entire weekend. The question now is, when will the reaction come?
Bitcoin has shown a similar lack of volatility on several occasions in previous eventful weekends after the war started. However, once the legacy financial markets started to open on Sunday evening and Monday morning, its volatility returned, usually heading south.
The post Calm Before the BTC Storm as Trump Says a Deal or Obliteration Is Next for Iran? appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Ethereum’s price action continues to reflect a market in equilibrium, where neither buyers nor sellers have established decisive control. Following the sharp corrective phase earlier in the year, ETH has transitioned into a broad consolidation structure, with volatility compressing as the market searches for direction.
On the daily timeframe, Ethereum is clearly bounded within a well-defined range between the $1.8K support and the $2.4K resistance zone. The asset has repeatedly reacted to both boundaries, confirming them as key areas of supply and demand. The recent price action further reinforces this narrative, as Ethereum continues to oscillate within this range without any sustained breakout attempt.
This indicates a balance between accumulation and distribution, where market participants are positioning rather than committing to a directional move. As long as the price remains within this range, the broader outlook stays neutral, with range-trading conditions dominating the market structure.
A decisive breakout from either side of this range will likely define the next major trend. A confirmed move above $2.4K would signal strength and open the path toward higher resistance levels, while a breakdown below $1.8K would invalidate the current consolidation and expose the market to deeper downside continuation.

Zooming into the 4-hour timeframe, the structure reveals a rising wedge formation developing within the broader range. This pattern typically reflects weakening bullish momentum, as the price continues to make higher highs and higher lows, but with diminishing strength. The wedge suggests that the recent upward movements are corrective rather than impulsive, aligning with the broader consolidation observed on the daily chart.
As the price approaches the apex of this formation, a breakout becomes increasingly likely. A downside break of the wedge would confirm the corrective nature of the structure and could trigger another leg lower, potentially driving price back toward the $1.8K support zone. Until such a breakdown occurs, short-term fluctuations may persist within the wedge boundaries, but the risk of a deeper correction remains elevated.

From a liquidity standpoint, the liquidation heatmap highlights a significant concentration of liquidity at and below the $1.8K level. This cluster represents a pool of resting liquidity that could act as a magnet for the price, particularly if bearish momentum begins to build. Markets tend to gravitate toward such zones, as they provide fuel for volatility through forced liquidations.
In this context, a breakdown of the rising wedge on the lower timeframe could act as the trigger that drives Ethereum toward this liquidity pocket. If that scenario unfolds, the $1.8K region becomes not only a technical support level but also a key liquidity target where a reaction or potential reversal could emerge.
Overall, Ethereum remains trapped in a broader consolidation phase, but the lower timeframe structure suggests increasing vulnerability to the downside. The interaction between the rising wedge and the $1.8K liquidity cluster will likely play a critical role in shaping the next directional move.

The post Ethereum Price Analysis: Will ETH Break Out or Plunge to $1.8K Next? appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Under the current crypto market conditions, Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and some institutions are still in accumulation mode. However, spot demand remains weak. Market research platform CryptoQuant explained why this contraction has persisted in its latest weekly report.
According to the firm’s findings, spot demand has remained in deep contraction because broader market selling pressure outweighs institutional buying. Selling from retail and other market participants is more than offsetting incremental institutional buying; this trend is sustaining the current wave of distribution.
In March, ETF 30-day purchases increased sharply to roughly 50,000 bitcoin (BTC). This was the highest the investment products had recorded since October 2025. On the other hand, the business intelligence entity, Strategy, recorded a 30-day accumulation of approximately 44,000 BTC.
Contrarily, the 30-day apparent demand growth hovered at -63,000 BTC by the end of March. This figure reflected persistent selling pressure in the broader market. Spot demand has witnessed sustained contraction since late November 2025, confirming a distribution phase.
Among other market participants, Bitcoin whales have become net distributors, with the one-year change in their holdings reading -188,000 BTC. This cohort of investors accumulated over 200,000 BTC in 2024, but began distributing aggressively from mid-2025, with an increased pace in the last quarter of the year and early 2026.
“The 365-day SMA remains in a declining trend, confirming that this distribution is structural rather than temporary. Historically, sustained negative whale accumulation has coincided with periods of prolonged price weakness, and the current reading suggests selling remains a significant structural headwind,” CryptoQuant explained.
Unlike whales, mid-tier holders, also known as dolphins, have remained net accumulators, but at a reduced pace. The one-year change in the holdings of these investors has declined by more than 60% from almost 1 million BTC in October 2025 to 429,000 BTC today.
Furthermore, demand from U.S. investors has also weakened in recent weeks, as seen in the Coinbase Premium turning negative again. The metric turned negative after BTC hit its all-time high of $126,000 in early October and has since been unable to sustain a meaningful positive trajectory.
Given the market’s state, CryptoQuant analysts believe BTC may rebound toward $71,500-$81,200 in the short term if macro conditions, especially the US-Iran conflict, improve. In essence, de-escalating geopolitical tensions may serve as a positive catalyst, triggering a relief rally.
The post Bitcoin ETFs and Institutions Are Buying, So Why Is Spot Demand Still Weak? (CryptoQuant) appeared first on CryptoPotato.
It appears that the era of loud, energy-draining mining rigs is coming to an end, or at least to a change in 2026. The cryptocurrency market has matured considerably and is moving away from speculative noise toward functional utility that actually pays.
Investors are no longer happy with holding coins – they want their assets to work for them. In fact, a lot of the regulatory lobbying is focused that way as well. This shift has sparked a considerable surge in passive BTC models, which allow users to earn the world’s most valuable digital asset without having a degree in computer science or a massive electricity budget.
Bitcoin Everlight is at the forefront of this movement. It offers a streamlined way to tap into network transaction fees. The protocol prioritizes accessibility and real-world efficiency, proving that the next phase of Bitcoin won’t just be about hardware but also about decentralized infrastructure that rewards its community effortlessly.

Exclusive bonuses up now. Use Code SHARD15 at Checkout to Receive an Extra 15%
Bitcoin Everlight (BTCL) is a considerable shift in the way we perceive blockchain-based rewards. It’s not a speculative fork or a copycat coin. On the other hand, the team introduces a sophisticated routing layer, which is built to scale the Bitcoin network. At the time of this writing, the project is in Phase 4 of its presale, and the tokens are priced at $0.0014. The team has already secured $2.5 million from participants who are apparently eager to join the very next generation of finance.
With a fixed supply of 21 billion tokens, BTCL mirrors the scarcity of Bitcoin while offering a launch price target of $0.03110. This ecosystem turns participants into vital components of a decentralized network, ensuring that the rewards generated are rooted in actual network utility and speed improvements.
The center of the model is the so-called Shard system. It provides a direct path to native Bitcoin earnings. That said, the recently launched Jade Shard allows users to enter for as little as $100 in BTCL tokens. It offers a 6% yield during the current phase, which will convert into native BTC rewards upon activating the mainnet.
It’s important to note that participants will retain 100% of the ownership of their BTCL tokens and can choose to sell once the official launch happens. However, to keep a Shard active, they will have to keep their balance above the required threshold. Otherwise, the Shard will enter a dormant state.
The tiered rewards are designed to grow as the user contributes: Azure ($500 / 12%), Violet ($1,500 / 20%), and Radiant ($3,000 / 28%+ APY).
Going forward, the rewards are generated from actual transaction routing fees. This eliminates the need for high energy bills or ASIC-based equipment. The shards upgrade automatically once the user’s cumulative contributions across assets like BTC, SOL, or ETH hit the following tier.

It goes without saying that social proof is a very important indicator for a project’s health. Bitcoin Everlight has already managed to establish a notable presence. The official X account is a primary source for real-time news and technical insights, while the Telegram community is a hub for shard holders to share their dashboard successes. This transparency is reinforced by live leaderboards and activity feeds, which foster a sense of healthy competition.
When it comes to the BTCL token’s growth potential, it’s worth noting that it’s closely tied to its upcoming listing on major centralized exchanges. The team is now working on securing debuts on global platforms. To ensure the price stays stable and the market remains healthy, 15% of the total token supply is reserved for liquidity on both decentralized and centralized exchanges.
As some industry observers have pointed out, early participants who secure their shards now are positioning themselves for significant upside as the project gains mainstream visibility. This strategic reserve ensures that as adoption grows, the ecosystem remains liquid and accessible for all holders.
Bitcoin serves as a lightweight routing and validation layer that operates alongside the original chain, unlike traditional Layer-2 solutions. It’s designed to address real-world usability issues, including transaction speed and high fees, without changing Bitcoin’s core consensus.
Everlight Nodes handle the optimized routing paths, ensuring that security remains anchored to the base layer.
Crypto Nitro has noted that this security-first approach is what gives the platform its competitive edge in a crowded market.

The platform is built for everyone, not just technical experts.
The dashboard is fully responsive on both mobile and desktop, featuring WalletConnect integration for a secure and immediate link to your assets. With a simple three-step process: buy, activate, and earn, the friction of participating in Bitcoin rewards is gone. Support for multiple payment options ensures that anyone can participate without being slowed down by technical hurdles.
The live reward tracking and visual tier progress help users stay informed about their earnings in real time, making the journey toward passive income as simple as possible.
The transition toward passive BTC models is the defining trend of 2026, and Bitcoin Everlight is leading the way. By combining a secure shard system with a transparent technical foundation, the project offers a sustainable alternative to traditional mining. The opportunity to secure tokens at Phase 4 prices is a limited window that allows you to participate in the growth of the Bitcoin payment layer. As the project moves toward its mainnet launch and major exchange listings, the momentum continues to build for those ready to embrace the next phase of digital wealth.
To get started, visit our official site and use code SHARD15 at checkout to receive your exclusive 15% bonus.
Interested investors can find more information here or check Bitcoin Everlight’s X and Telegram.
Disclaimer: The above article is sponsored content; it’s written by a third party. CryptoPotato doesn’t endorse or assume responsibility for the content, advertising, products, quality, accuracy, or other materials on this page. Nothing in it should be construed as financial advice. Readers are strongly advised to verify the information independently and carefully before engaging with any company or project mentioned and to do their own research. Investing in cryptocurrencies carries a risk of capital loss, and readers are also advised to consult a professional before making any decisions that may or may not be based on the above-sponsored content.
Readers are also advised to read CryptoPotato’s full disclaimer.
The post The Next Phase of Bitcoin: Why Passive BTC Models Like Bitcoin Everlight Are Gaining Momentum in 2026 appeared first on CryptoPotato.