Bitfinex's support for El Salvador's Bitcoin adoption highlights the need for broader institutional backing and regulatory clarity to drive market impact.

The post Bitfinex backs El Salvador’s Bitcoin adoption, eyes on $100K by June 30: FT appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Escalating tensions and market volatility highlight the fragile geopolitical landscape, complicating diplomatic efforts and economic stability.

The post US-Iran ceasefire odds drop sharply amid airstrikes and threats: 2% for April 7 appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Rising tensions and market skepticism highlight the potential for prolonged instability and the need for urgent diplomatic interventions.

The post Ceasefire odds drop sharply amid US-Israel airstrikes and Iran threats: FT appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Stalled US-Iran talks heighten geopolitical tensions, diminishing hopes for a ceasefire and increasing the likelihood of military escalation.

The post US informs Israel of deadlocked Iran negotiations, ceasefire odds plummet appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The prolonged conflict and low ceasefire odds suggest escalating regional instability and potential for broader geopolitical tensions.

The post Ceasefire odds drop to 1.8% as Iran continues missile attacks on Israel appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin Magazine

How Real Is The Quantum Threat?

A new panel has officially been announced to take place at Bitcoin 2026 titled “How Real Is The Quantum Threat?” The conversation will bring together five voices at the center of one of the most actively debated technical questions in Bitcoin today, and the lineup reflects the full range of perspectives the topic demands.

The panel features:

Hunter Beast, a senior protocol engineer for the Anduro sidechain platform incubated by MARA, is the co-author of BIP 360, a proposal that establishes a new Bitcoin wallet address type designed to protect the network from quantum computing threats. BIP 360 was merged into the Bitcoin Core BIP repository in February 2026 and was deployed on the Bitcoin Quantum Testnet v0.3.0 in March, marking significant advancements towards upgrading Bitcoin.

James O’Beirne has been a Bitcoin Core contributor since 2015 and leads multiple projects including OP_VAULT (BIP-345) and assumeutxo, having previously worked at Chaincode Labs.

Brandon Black is a Bitcoin software engineer who has spoken publicly on why quantum computing timelines are often misunderstood by the broader market.

Charles Edwards of Capriole has argued that quantum computing is advancing faster than anticipated and has advocated for a 2026 BIP-360 implementation.

Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Digital, has taken a more measured position arguing the quantum threat to Bitcoin is real but limited today, affecting only certain exposed wallets, and that developers are actively building pathways to address it over time.

The panel will cover one of the most actively discussed technical topics in Bitcoin today — how quantum computing is developing, where Bitcoin’s cryptography stands, and what the path to long-term protocol resilience looks like. Developers are already working on multiple solutions, including quantum-resistant addresses and phased upgrade proposals, and this panel brings together some of the brightest minds working on these upgrades. It takes place April 29 on the Nakamoto Stage at Bitcoin 2026, The Venetian Resort, Las Vegas.

Bitcoin 2026 is Returning to Las Vegas

Bitcoin 2026 will take place April 27–29 at The Venetian, Las Vegas, and is expected to be the biggest Bitcoin event of the year.

Focused on the future of money, Bitcoin 2026 will bring together Bitcoin builders, investors, miners, policymakers, technologists, and newcomers from around the world. The event will feature a wide range of pass types, including general admission passes designed specifically for those new to Bitcoin, alongside premium passes for professionals, enterprises, and institutions.

With multiple stages, immersive experiences, technical workshops, and headline keynotes, Bitcoin 2026 is designed to serve both first-time attendees and long-time Bitcoiners shaping the next era of global adoption.

Past Bitcoin Conferences in the U.S.

Bitcoin’s flagship conference has scaled dramatically over the past five years:

• 2021 – Miami: 11,000 attendees
• 2022 – Miami: 26,000 attendees
• 2023 – Miami: 15,000 attendees
• 2024 – Nashville: 22,000 attendees
• 2025 – Las Vegas: 35,000 attendees

Get Your Bitcoin 2026 Pass

Bitcoin Magazine readers can save 10% on Bitcoin 2026 tickets using code ‘ARTICLE10‘ at checkout.

Stay at The official hotel of Bitcoin 2026, The Venetian, and get a guaranteed low rate plus 15% off your pass. Be in the middle of where the fun is all happening, and where the networking never ends.

And don’t forget:

Volunteer at Bitcoin 2026 and get Pro Pass access plus exclusive perks.

All students ages 13+ can apply for a Student Pass and get free general admission access to Bitcoin 2026.

Location: The Venetian, Las Vegas
Dates: April 27–29, 2026

For more information and exclusive offers, visit the Bitcoin Conference on X here.

Why Attend Bitcoin 2026?

Bitcoin 2026 is the definitive gathering for anyone serious about the future of money. With 500+ speakers, multiple world-class stages, and programming spanning Bitcoin fundamentals, open-source development, enterprise adoption, mining, energy, AI, policy, and culture, the conference brings every corner of the Bitcoin ecosystem together under one roof.

From headline keynotes on the Nakamoto Stage to deep technical sessions for builders, institutional strategy discussions for enterprises, and beginner-friendly Bitcoin 101 education, Bitcoin 2026 is designed for everyone—from first-time attendees to the leaders shaping Bitcoin’s global adoption.

Whether you’re looking to learn, build, invest, network, or influence, Bitcoin 2026 is where Bitcoin’s next chapter is written.

Bitcoin 2026 Pass Types: Something for Everyone

Bitcoin 2026 offers a range of pass options designed to meet the needs of newcomers, professionals, enterprises, and high-net-worth Bitcoiners alike.

Bitcoin 2026 General Admission Pass

Ideal for newcomers and those looking to experience the heart of the conference.

• Limited access on Days 2 & 3
• Entry to Main Stage
• Access to Genesis Stage
• Full access to the Expo Hall

Bitcoin 2026 Pro Pass

Designed for professionals, operators, and serious Bitcoin participants.

Includes all General Admission features, plus:

• Full 3-day access, including Pro Day
• Entry to the Pro Pass Reception
• Access to Enterprise Hall, Enterprise Stage, and Networking Lounge
• Conference App networking features
• Access to the Bitcoin For Corporations Symposium
• Entry to Compute Village and Energy Stage
• Complimentary lunch, coffee, tea, and snacks
• Dedicated registration and check-in
• Reserved seating at Main Stage
• Huge savings when you bundle your hotel and Pro Pass

Bitcoin 2026 Whale Pass

The all-inclusive, premium Bitcoin 2026 experience.

Includes all Pro Pass features, plus:

• Reserved seating at Main Stage
• All-inclusive gourmet food and beverages
• Entry to Whale Night and Whale Reception
• Access to all official after-parties
• Networking app access to connect with other Whales
• Premium access to The Deep — an exclusive networking lounge with intimate speaker sessions
• Complimentary stay at The Venetian when you bundle your whale pass and hotel (use promo code ‘WHALEHOTEL’ here)

This is the most immersive way to experience Bitcoin 2026.

Bitcoin 2026 After Hours Pass

Your ticket to the night.

Most deals are done with a drink in your hand. Get exclusive access to 3 official Bitcoin 2026 after-parties across Las Vegas — each with a 2-hour open bar — where the real conversations happen and the best connections are made.

• Access to 3 official Bitcoin 2026 after-parties
• 2-hour open bar at each event
• Evening events across Las Vegas, April 27–29
• Network with Bitcoiners, builders, and industry leaders after hours

More headline speaker announcements are coming soon.

Don’t miss Bitcoin 2026.

This post How Real Is The Quantum Threat? first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Jenna Montgomery.

Bitcoin Magazine

MARA Conducts Ongoing Layoffs Following $1.1B Bitcoin Sale and Debt Reduction Push

Bitcoin miner MARA Holdings has begun a series of company-wide layoffs affecting multiple departments, according to reporting from Blockspace Media, marking the latest shift in the firm’s broader restructuring strategy.

Sources familiar with the matter said the layoffs have been “ongoing” and executed in a piecemeal fashion, with at least two rounds taking place this week on Wednesday and Thursday. The total number of employees impacted — as well as the percentage of the workforce affected — has not been disclosed, and the company has not publicly commented on the cuts.

The workforce reduction comes just days after MARA completed a major balance sheet restructuring that involved selling 15,133 bitcoin for approximately $1.1 billion between March 4 and March 25. The proceeds were used to repurchase portions of its outstanding 0.00% convertible senior notes due in 2030 and 2031, allowing the company to retire debt at an average discount of roughly 9% to par.

In total, MARA repurchased $367.5 million of its 2030 notes for $322.9 million and $633.4 million of its 2031 notes for $589.9 million. The transactions are expected to generate approximately $88.1 million in cash savings and reduce the company’s total convertible debt by about 30%, from roughly $3.3 billion to $2.3 billion.

Following the repurchases, MARA now has $632.5 million in 2030 notes and $291.6 million in 2031 notes remaining outstanding. Other tranches of convertible debt — including $48.1 million due in 2026, $300 million due in 2031, and $1.025 billion due in 2032 — remain unchanged.

CEO Fred Thiel previously framed the bitcoin sale as part of a deliberate capital allocation strategy aimed at strengthening the company’s balance sheet while preserving long-term shareholder value. He said the move would improve financial flexibility and position the firm for expansion beyond traditional bitcoin mining.

Bitcoin miners are pivoting to AI 

That expansion includes a growing focus on artificial intelligence and high-performance computing (HPC), areas where MARA is seeking to leverage its expertise in energy infrastructure and data center operations. The company has increasingly positioned itself as a digital energy and compute provider, rather than a pure-play bitcoin miner.

As part of this shift, MARA has also signaled that selling bitcoin could become a recurring element of its treasury strategy. The company stated it plans to sell BTC “from time to time” throughout 2026 to support liquidity needs and fund corporate initiatives.

The developments come amid a challenging environment for bitcoin miners, who are navigating tighter margins, rising competition, and increasing pressure to diversify revenue streams beyond block rewards. 

For MARA, the combination of debt reduction, bitcoin sales, and workforce cuts signals a company in transition — prioritizing balance sheet strength and strategic repositioning as it moves deeper into AI and energy infrastructure.

This post MARA Conducts Ongoing Layoffs Following $1.1B Bitcoin Sale and Debt Reduction Push first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Coinbase Receives Conditional OCC Approval to Form National Trust Company

Coinbase has received conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to establish Coinbase National Trust Company, according to a statement from the company. 

The approval marks a regulatory milestone for Coinbase as it expands its federally supervised custody and market infrastructure operations.

The company emphasized that the approval does not authorize it to operate as a commercial bank. Coinbase stated it will not take retail deposits or engage in fractional reserve banking. Instead, the charter is intended to provide federal oversight for its custody business, which the firm says has been a core part of its operations for years.

Under the conditional approval framework, Coinbase will be required to meet specified regulatory conditions before the charter becomes fully operational. The company said it intends to use the structure to bring uniform federal standards to its digital asset custody services and related institutional infrastructure.

Coinbase framed the decision as validation of its long-standing approach of working within the U.S. regulatory system. The company said it has invested heavily in compliance and engagement with regulators and views the approval as part of a broader evolution in how digital asset firms interface with federal banking supervision.

The charter is expected to provide clearer regulatory consistency across jurisdictions, particularly for institutional custody services. Coinbase said it believes the structure could support future expansion into additional financial services, including payments-related products, while remaining within the bounds of trust company oversight.

OCC is adopting pro-crypto activities

Over the past year, federal banking regulators have taken a more active role in defining the perimeter of digital asset activities within the traditional financial system. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has issued updated guidance on how banks may engage with cryptocurrency custody, stablecoin-related services, and blockchain infrastructure, while continuing to evaluate applications from crypto-native firms seeking trust or banking charters.

Industry participants have pursued federal charters in part to reduce reliance on a patchwork of state licensing regimes and to gain clearer access to national banking rails. Trust bank structures, in particular, have become a focal point for firms seeking to offer custody services without engaging in lending or deposit-taking activities.

The OCC has adapted to institutional interest in regulated custody models and the growing overlap between traditional financial infrastructure and digital asset firms. Exchanges, custodians, and fintech firms have got federal oversight and support for institutional adoption and reduce regulatory uncertainty.

At the same time, policymakers have debated how far federal banking regulators should extend oversight into crypto-native business models, particularly as stablecoins and tokenized assets continue to integrate into payments and settlement systems. 

The conditional approval for Coinbase’s trust charter reflects this broader regulatory shift toward structured supervision rather than ad hoc enforcement.

If finalized, Coinbase’s national trust status would place it among a small number of crypto-linked firms operating under direct federal trust oversight, signaling continued convergence between digital asset infrastructure and the U.S. regulated banking system.

This post Coinbase Receives Conditional OCC Approval to Form National Trust Company first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Wall Street Firms and Crypto Companies to Review New Market Structure Proposal in Private Sessions

Crypto and banking industry representatives are set to review a revised stablecoin yield proposal crafted by Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks this week, as lawmakers attempt to break a months-long lobbying standoff over how — or whether — stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer yield.

According to reporting from Politico, a small group of crypto firms and Wall Street institutions will privately review the updated legislative text over the next two days, with crypto companies expected to see the language as early as Thursday and banks on Friday. 

The process remains tightly controlled, with stakeholders permitted to view the draft only in restricted settings and barred from taking copies.

The revised proposal follows a series of staff-level negotiations between industry groups and Senate offices aimed at narrowing disagreements over stablecoin yield provisions. While some participants hope the latest draft will serve as a near-final compromise, it remains unclear whether either side will accept the terms as currently written.

Clarity Act and crypto talks are ongoing

The renewed review of a stablecoin yield proposal comes amid a broader effort in Congress to resolve one of the most contested issues in U.S. crypto regulation: whether stablecoin issuers should be permitted to offer yield-bearing products.

Stablecoins — digital tokens typically pegged to the U.S. dollar and backed by cash and short-term securities — have become a core settlement layer in crypto markets, but their regulatory status remains unsettled, particularly around interest and yield.

The fight over a U.S. crypto market-structure bill stems from a broader effort to build on 2025’s landmark stablecoin legislation, the GENIUS Act, which established a federal framework for stablecoins — requiring full backing, transparency and reserve disclosures for digital dollars.

That law was widely seen in the crypto industry as a breakthrough for regulatory clarity while attempting to align digital assets with traditional financial standards.

After the GENIUS Act’s passage, the Senate turned its attention to more expansive digital asset oversight through what’s often referred to as the CLARITY Act or the crypto market-structure bill.

This legislation aims to define how U.S. regulators would police and oversee trading platforms, tokens, custody services and other infrastructure — essentially the backbone of a regulated digital asset ecosystem.

However, negotiations bogged down over one central issue: whether regulated exchanges should be allowed to offer yield-bearing rewards on stablecoin holdings.

Banks and major financial institutions argue that these rewards resemble unregulated deposit-like products that could siphon funds away from FDIC-insured accounts, potentially threatening lending and financial stability.

Crypto firms — including major issuers like Circle and Coinbase — counter that such incentives are crucial for competitive markets and for user adoption of digital money.

The current tentative deal being negotiated between senators and the White House seeks a middle ground — potentially allowing activity-based rewards while restricting passive yield — in hopes of unlocking Senate committee action by April. Whether that compromise holds both bank and crypto support will be decisive for the future of U.S. digital asset regulation.

This post Wall Street Firms and Crypto Companies to Review New Market Structure Proposal in Private Sessions first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

LNVPN Rebrands to Nadanada.me as Privacy Infrastructure Expands with Anonymous eSIMs and Lightning Payments

Offering anonymous eSIM data plans in over 200 countries, disposable and rental phone numbers for SMS verification, WireGuard VPN access and anonymous AI chat tools, LNVPN has outgrown its original brand. The company has grown into a full-spectrum privacy infrastructure service.

The company started in 2022 as LNVPN. It began as a proof-of-concept Lightning Network VPN built for the Oslo Freedom Forum after Alex Gladstein asked the team to create a Lightning-enabled VPN for activists in oppressive regimes. The original focus was short-term VPN access paid with Lightning, allowing users to buy service by the hour or day instead of monthly subscriptions.

The service grew quickly. Users liked the flexibility of short-term access without accounts or contracts. In 2023 the company won a price in the 2023 bolt.fun hackathon and added SMS verification services. Users pay a Lightning invoice for a disposable phone number and receive a one-time confirmation code. The system uses HODL invoices so that if the code does not arrive the payment is refunded automatically.

The company later introduced eSIM data plans available in more than 200 countries. Customers buy fixed data bundles that can activate anonymously. Rental phone numbers followed last November. These let users rent a unique phone number for three, six or nine months to receive unlimited SMS messages without creating an account. At present the rental numbers are available only in the United Kingdom, with United States numbers planned for May. The team also launched anonymous AI chat services that require no sign-up or login and are free to use. 

The name nadanada.me comes from the Spanish phrase for “nothing at all.” As the company stated, “What do we know about our users? Nada. What do we log? Nada. The name is the promise.”

This approach stands in contrast to traditional service providers that collect large amounts of user data, a practice that has led to repeated large-scale breaches at major corporations and government contractors. 

In November 2025, analytics provider Mixpanel was hacked, exposing names, email addresses and approximate location data of some OpenAI API users. In early 2025, U.S. government contractor Conduent suffered a ransomware attack that compromised personal and health records of more than 25 million Americans. In January 2026, cryptocurrency hardware wallet maker Ledger reported that customer names and contact information were exposed through a breach at its third-party payment processor Global-e. Such incidents frequently enable identity theft, as stolen personal details like names, emails, addresses and health or financial records can be used to open fraudulent accounts, file fake tax returns or impersonate victims.

Nadanada.me represents a new generation of privacy services integrated with Lightning in pay-as-you-go models that leave no trace on the financial system or the blockchain, in defense of user privacy.

This post LNVPN Rebrands to Nadanada.me as Privacy Infrastructure Expands with Anonymous eSIMs and Lightning Payments first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Juan Galt.

XRP is in its deepest losing streak in more than a decade, even as Ripple aggressively expands into corporate finance and institutional infrastructure. The disconnect is forcing a key market question: why isn’t that momentum showing up in price?

XRP price is in its longest losing streak since 2014, a slide that has left one of the market’s oldest large-cap tokens searching for a fresh catalyst even as Ripple accelerates its push into corporate treasury, institutional trading, and cross-border payments.

Why this matters: Ripple is moving XRP closer to real financial workflows rather than speculative use. If treasury systems, trading desks, and payment networks begin integrating the asset at scale, it could change how demand forms. For now, the market is treating that transition as unproven.

According to Cryptorank data, the token has fallen for six straight months since October 2025, losing an average of about 10% each month and shedding more than 55% over that period, trading at $1.33 as of press time.

This represents the longest stretch of monthly declines for XRP since a seven-month skid from December 2013 through June 2014, when it lost an average of 27% per month.

Meanwhile, the current downturn has come during a broader risk-off period across digital assets. Bitcoin has retreated from a peak above $126,000 to around $66,000, dragging sentiment lower across the market and leaving traders less willing to chase assets that lack a clear near-term driver.

Related Reading

Global markets crash as everything including Bitcoin sells off at once erasing trillions

Over $800 million in long positions were wiped out in minutes as the US open turned into a brutal liquidity bloodbath for unsuspecting traders.

Jan 29, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

For XRP, the weakness has been compounded by softer market activity. Data from CryptoQuant showed the token’s 30-day liquidity index on Binance fell to about 0.062, one of the lowest readings in recent periods, while the 30-day turnover index stood at about $4.46 billion.

Together, those figures point to thinner order books, lighter participation, and a market that is more vulnerable to sharp price swings when larger trades hit.

That backdrop helps explain why Ripple’s latest corporate and institutional advances are drawing renewed attention.

The company is expanding quickly across treasury management, prime brokerage, payments, and tokenized financial infrastructure, and the question facing the market is whether those gains can eventually translate into stronger demand, deeper liquidity, and a firmer narrative for XRP.

XRP enters corporate treasury workflows

Ripple’s latest move is to place digital assets directly within the software used by corporate finance teams, an area long dominated by fiat-only systems.

On April 1, the company introduced Digital Asset Accounts and Unified Treasury inside GTreasury, the enterprise treasury management platform it acquired in 2025.

Related Reading

Global markets crash as everything including Bitcoin sells off at once erasing trillions

Over $800 million in long positions were wiped out in minutes as the US open turned into a brutal liquidity bloodbath for unsuspecting traders.

Jan 29, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

The system processed $13 trillion in payments volume last year for clients ranging from small businesses to Fortune 500 companies, giving Ripple an established corporate channel rather than a new one built from scratch.

Digital Asset Accounts allow treasury teams to hold, view, and manage XRP, RLUSD stablecoin, and other supported tokens alongside traditional cash balances inside the same platform.

According to the firm, positions are shown with live fiat valuations, while transactions are recorded automatically with native token amounts, fiat equivalents, and the market price at the time of each event.

Ripple said the system also captures balances to 15 decimal places, aligning internal records more closely with on-chain activity.

On the other hand, unified Treasury extends that approach by linking digital asset holdings from multiple custodians through the same API layer already used for bank connectivity.

For finance teams, this promises a way to bring digital assets into existing approval, reporting, and compliance processes without forcing a separate operational setup.

Renaat Ver Eecke, senior vice president at Ripple Treasury, said the additions give the office of the CFO “a trusted, single place to hold and manage both digital and fiat assets.” He added that Ripple plans to connect that setup to its payments network and prime brokerage capabilities for cross-border settlement and yield generation.

The timing is notable. Ripple’s 2026 survey of more than 1,000 global finance leaders found that 72% said they need a digital asset solution to remain competitive, but many still lack a practical way to integrate that exposure into treasury operations.

By placing XRP within a system used by the CFO's office, Ripple is trying to make the token part of routine corporate finance infrastructure rather than a stand-alone crypto allocation.

Ripple expands its market stack with Hyperliquid

Meanwhile, Ripple is also widening its footprint in institutional trading, a second front that could help strengthen the network around XRP even if the effect on the token is not immediate.

Ripple Prime, the company’s institutional trading platform, extended its HyperliquidX integration to include HIP-3 assets, opening access to on-chain perpetual contracts tied to traditional assets such as gold, silver, and oil.

The offering gives institutional clients exposure to decentralized derivatives through a framework that sits alongside more familiar portfolio and collateral management tools.

The pitch is operational simplicity. Institutions can manage these positions without handling separate Web3 wallets, fragmented collateral pools, or direct smart contract interaction.

Notably, Ripple Prime initially integrated with Hyperliquid in February 2026, becoming the sole counterparty for clients seeking access to the venue’s on-chain crypto liquidity.

Related Reading

XRP developers propose 200× leverage trading sidechain to challenge crypto’s biggest derivatives exchanges

XRP Ledger options plan may lead to permissioned pools, creating a hybrid market that welcomes institutions while keeping open DeFi

Mar 3, 2026 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

That integration comes as Hyperliquid has grown into the largest decentralized perpetuals platform, with more than $5 billion in open interest and monthly trading volume that regularly exceeds $200 billion.

Data from ASXN shows that HIP-3 daily volume has topped $2 billion, with open interest at $2 billion, and that only seven of Hyperliquid’s top 30 markets are crypto pairs.

Against this backdrop, those steps suggest Ripple is building a broader trading and brokerage stack around digital assets, one designed to appeal to clients who want regulated access to blockchain-based markets without abandoning traditional portfolio structures.

Payments, stablecoins, and permissioned finance

The third leg of Ripple’s expansion is payments, where the company is increasingly tying together RLUSD, XRPL, and its enterprise network.

Ripple Labs and Convera said this week they will work together to improve global payments using stablecoin and blockchain infrastructure. Convera, formerly Western Union Business Solutions, operates across about 200 countries and territories and supports more than 140 currencies.

The partnership is centered on a “stablecoin sandwich” model in which transactions begin and end in fiat, while stablecoins are used in the middle of the payment flow.

That model fits Ripple’s broader strategy as stablecoins move deeper into mainstream finance. Stablecoins processed $33 trillion in volume last year, up 72% from 2024, but only a small share of that activity has so far been tied to practical payment functions such as payroll, treasury transfers, and remittances.

Ripple is also extending that strategy into public-private financial infrastructure. Last week, the company joined the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s BLOOM initiative to test programmable cross-border trade settlement using the XRP Ledger (XRPL) and RLUSD.

At the same time, XRPL is being adapted for more regulated institutional use through permissioned domains and a permissioned decentralized exchange, tools designed to create controlled venues where access can be limited through credentials and compliance checks.

The common thread is clear. Ripple is trying to position XRPL and its stablecoin infrastructure as part of a regulated operating layer for moving money, managing liquidity, and settling value across borders.

Can Ripple’s momentum lift XRP?

That still leaves the central market question unanswered. Ripple’s business is broadening, but XRP remains under pressure.

The token’s weak liquidity and lower turnover suggest that market participants have yet to treat Ripple’s expansion as a decisive reason to reprice XRP higher.

In part, that reflects the distinction investors continue to make between Ripple’s enterprise progress and the token’s direct utility. Treasury integration, brokerage services, and stablecoin partnerships can strengthen the company’s strategic position without immediately changing spot demand for XRP.

Even so, the longer-term case is that these efforts could deepen the conditions XRP needs to recover. More treasury usage can increase familiarity with the asset inside corporate finance. Broader institutional access can improve market structure. Greater use of XRPL and RLUSD in payments and settlement can reinforce the network’s relevance at a time when tokenized money movement is becoming more competitive.

Bitrue Research argued that XRP is expanding beyond its legacy payments identity into a broader stack that includes stablecoins, decentralized finance, sidechains, and cross-chain settlement.

The firm outlined a base case that could see XRP rise to $2.00 by September, with a stronger scenario of $2.50 if RLUSD adoption accelerates, XRPFi expands, and regulation becomes more supportive.

For now, those targets remain a forward bet rather than a confirmed shift. XRP is still in its deepest losing run in more than a decade.

However, as Ripple pushes deeper into treasury management, institutional trading, and regulated payment infrastructure, the market is being forced to consider whether the company’s gains can eventually become the token’s turning point.

The post XRP’s longest slump in a decade collides with Ripple’s $13 trillion institutional push appeared first on CryptoSlate.

A recent paper by the Bitcoin Policy Institute on Taiwan opens with a familiar argument that the country's reserves are overconcentrated in dollars. Gold underperforms its potential, and Bitcoin could complement both.

Readers who stop there miss the more consequential claim buried in the blockade-and-invasion framework on pages 5 through 7, where the paper is trying to redefine what makes a reserve asset fail.

Traditional reserve analysis judges assets on liquidity, price stability, and credit quality. The BPI paper adds a fourth test: can the asset still be moved, spent, or mobilized when shipping lanes are blocked, the host state withdraws custodial access, or another state becomes politically hostile?

By that measure, gold can be stranded, dollar reserves can become conditional, and Bitcoin can stay electronically portable regardless of physical access or diplomatic standing.

That is a larger conceptual move than advocating for a Taiwanese BTC position.

Why this matters: This marks a shift from traditional reserve thinking. Assets like Treasuries and gold can remain valuable on paper while becoming difficult or impossible to use under sanctions, conflict, or political pressure. If reserve managers begin prioritizing access over stability, Bitcoin enters the conversation not as a return play, but as a contingency asset.

From macro bet to sovereignty insurance

For years, the state-level Bitcoin argument ran on a single track: hedge monetary debasement, diversify reserves, capture upside from adoption momentum.

That argument still appears in the BPI paper, particularly in its pages on US debt accumulation and the Federal Reserve's balance sheet expansion. The more original contribution sits elsewhere, where the paper ranks reserve assets by whether they stay accessible under coercion.

A government only needs to accept that Treasuries, correspondent banking networks, physically stored metal, and foreign sovereign paper each carry distinct dependencies.

The policy question centers on which asset stays reachable when custody, transport, or host-country politics go wrong.

Official reserve behavior already confirms that framing extends well beyond Bitcoin advocates. The IMF reports that total international reserves, including gold, reached 12.5 trillion SDR at the end of 2024.

The ECB reported that gold's share of global official reserves reached 20% by market value in 2024, surpassing the euro's 16%, and that central banks bought more than 1,000 tonnes that year.

The World Gold Council's 2025 survey found 73% of respondents expect lower US dollar holdings in global reserves over the next five years, and the share of central banks reporting domestic gold storage jumped to 59% from 41% a year earlier.

Reserve managers are already broadening the definition of reserve risk, and the BPI paper extends that logic to Bitcoin.

The live evidence for access risk

The access-risk argument draws force from concrete recent events.

In March, Russia's central bank challenged the EU freeze affecting approximately $300 billion in sovereign funds. That dispute keeps the central premise operational: reserve assets can become politically immobilized while retaining their face value.

An asset owned on paper yet frozen in practice has already failed as a reserve, regardless of its credit rating.

Brazil's central bank drew a parallel conclusion. On Mar. 31, Brazil lifted gold's share of reserves to 7.19% from 3.55% in a single year, while cutting the US dollar share to 72, citing diversification as the driver.

The BPI paper argues Bitcoin belongs in that same diversification calculus, specifically for reserve decisions driven by geopolitical logic.

The US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve adds a distinct data point. The White House order prioritizes the reserve with forfeited BTC, prohibits outright sale, and contemplates additional acquisition only on a budget-neutral basis.

That pulls Bitcoin reserve language into an actual sovereign administrative structure, setting a precedent regardless of its unconventional funding source.

Two futures for the sovereign Bitcoin argument

Scale makes the bull case concrete. Taiwan's reserves total roughly $602 billion, and a 1% Bitcoin sleeve would be about $6 billion, while a 5% sleeve would be $30 billion.

The broader math is starker: 0.1% of global reserves, roughly $16.25 billion, would represent about 1.2% of Bitcoin's entire market cap at current prices near $68,000.

Reserve system participation, even at a marginal scale, would have price consequences well before any central bank made a headline allocation decision.

The bull case requires a handful of politically exposed or sanctions-conscious states first to formalize small BTC positions in the 0.25% to 1% range, or to treat already-held seized or mined Bitcoin as a reserve asset before buying more.

Ferranti's sanctions risk modeling supports the direction: in one sanctions scenario, his model produces an optimal Bitcoin share of around 5% for exposed sovereigns. The sovereign Bitcoin discourse would then move from advocacy papers to actual balance sheet entries.

The bear case accepts the access risk critique and still concludes that Bitcoin loses.

Reserve managers acknowledge that physical gold carries logistical dependencies and that dollar reserves carry political ones, and then decide that Bitcoin's volatility, governance burden, and near-zero official-sector acceptability make it a weaker hold than domestically vaulted gold and diversified non-dollar sovereign paper.

Gold absorbs the diversification demand that the access-risk argument was supposed to generate for BTC, and Bitcoin's role as a reserve asset stays conceptual. The debate evolves while portfolios hold their composition.

Where the argument holds and where it strains

The BPI paper is strongest when it treats portability and seizure resistance as genuine reserve characteristics, grounded in observable reserve behavior.

That framing tracks official data: geopolitics now visibly influences reserve composition, and the desire to hold assets outside concentrated single-counterparty dependency is real and already moving portfolios.

The paper overreaches when adoption momentum or price appreciation enters as evidence that the policy case is settled. Official institutions still weigh acceptability, legal clarity, and operational habit alongside access risk, and those factors carry weight that portability rankings leave unaddressed.

The most credible version of the paper's argument is its own stated position: Bitcoin as a small insurance sleeve alongside gold, optimized for access.

For most of Bitcoin's history as a reserve policy topic, the central question in official circles was whether Bitcoin was safe enough to hold. That framing consistently disadvantaged BTC because its volatility kept it below Treasuries and gold on every conventional measure.

Reserve managers are now focused on which assets stay deployable in the event of a hostile geopolitical environment. Gold's resurgence, domestic vaulting preferences, sanctions-driven reserve disputes, and payment-infrastructure fragmentation all show that reserve managers are already seeking conventional assets.

Bitcoin advocates are inserting BTC into that same conversation, and the BPI paper shows how that argument works at its most sophisticated.

The post Reserve assets face new test as sanctions risk pushes Bitcoin into policy debate appeared first on CryptoSlate.

XRP enters an identity crisis as oil, inflation fears, and dollar strength hit the market all at once

XRP has reached the hardest phase of the cycle. The asset spent much of the year carrying a cleaner institutional narrative than most large-cap altcoins.

CryptoSlate has already tracked institutional migration into Ripple-linked products, ETF resilience tied to Ripple’s expanding footprint, and the growing tension between XRPL adoption and token value capture. The setup has now tightened.

A sharp overnight jump in oil, stronger dollar conditions, and renewed inflation anxiety have pulled XRP into a macro test that feels more direct than the themes that carried it through the first quarter.

That shift came quickly. Following President Donald Trump’s latest remarks on Iran, AP reported that oil surged more than 6%, while a separate market wrap from Business Insider put Brent near $108.

Brent crude pushed to roughly $108, the U.S. Dollar Index climbed back to about 100, and Bitcoin slid toward $66,666.

XRP price held near $1.35 to $1.36, according to CryptoSlate data, though the weekly move still carried visible pressure. 24-hour volume is near $1.32 billion.

Why this matters: XRP’s core pitch hinges on stress in the global financial system. If higher costs, tighter liquidity, and cross-border friction are increasing, the token should be moving closer to its use-case value. Instead, it is still reacting like a high-beta asset, which raises a more practical question for investors: when does utility start to matter in price?

The connection to XRP runs deeper than broad crypto weakness. Bitcoin usually absorbs the first layer of geopolitical and liquidity shock. XRP sits closer to the payment, liquidity, and settlement conversation.

Ripple has spent months building that frame. The company’s GTreasury acquisition and subsequent Ripple Treasury launch widened its reach into corporate cash management, while earlier reporting on Ripple’s trust-bank ambitions and broader licensing footprint gave XRP holders a practical reason to view the asset through a financial-infrastructure lens.

That lens now cuts both ways. When oil climbs, freight and energy input costs rise, and inflation expectations stiffen, the case for faster, cheaper movement of money gains urgency.

The same macro shock also boosts the dollar, tightens financial conditions, and usually pushes risk assets into a tougher zone. XRP now sits at the intersection of those two forces.

The tension is direct because it touches household budgets, portfolio drawdowns, and the cost of moving capital across borders.

Oil and the dollar have turned XRP’s payments pitch into a real-time stress test

XRP’s use-case narrative has always leaned on efficiency. Cross-border transfers, on-demand liquidity, and enterprise settlement create a cleaner economic pitch when payment rails are under strain.

That pitch becomes easier to grasp during a week when the world suddenly has to price a higher energy bill, a firmer dollar, and the risk of another inflation impulse. The macro map on the chart is blunt.

Brent jumped, DXY rose, and Bitcoin rolled over. XRP followed the pressure lower through the week, even though its long-term pitch should, in theory, become more relevant as global money flows grow more expensive and more fragile.

That contradiction is the center of the setup. XRP rallied for much of this cycle on the idea that Ripple’s regulated expansion, enterprise positioning, and capital-market traction were building a more durable floor under the token.

CryptoSlate covered that process through pieces on institutional DeFi ambitions, legacy financial integration, and recent ETF flow softening. Those themes still carry weight.

They now face a harder question. If a stronger dollar and higher oil create deeper friction across the global economy, why has XRP behaved like a pressured altcoin instead of a market leader?

Part of the answer sits in the liquidity hierarchy. Bitcoin still commands the first response in macro stress, because it carries the deepest liquidity, the broadest institutional recognition, and the strongest reflex move during periods of geopolitical uncertainty.

XRP has a narrower lane. It needs investors to believe that utility can translate into token demand on a timeline that the market can price.

That challenge has shown up repeatedly in the split between Ripple’s business traction and XRPL activity and on XRP’s amplified beta during broad crypto drawdowns. The current move forces that same issue into a macro context.

Ripple can broaden into custody, treasury management, and regulated financial software, yet XRP still trades within a market structure that responds quickly to dollar strength and falling crypto risk appetite.

Bitcoin spent the last several sessions slipping back toward the mid-$66,000s, a visible loss of altitude from the higher zones traders had defended earlier in the week.

The dollar index reclaimed the 100 handle, a psychological level that usually feeds tighter global liquidity conditions. Brent then accelerated back above $108. XRP held around the mid-$1.30s.

That set of moves creates a clean economic message. Payment friction may be rising in the real world, but capital is still seeking safety before it seeks efficiency.

For XRP, that leaves the asset in an identity crisis. Its strongest fundamental narrative says a fractured, expensive, slow-moving global financial system should increase the value of its use case.

Its current market behavior suggests investors still classify it as part of the higher-beta branch of crypto exposure.

The coming macro calendar will press on XRP’s weakest seam

The coming week further compresses the issue, as the macro calendar offers three direct tests. The Bureau of Labor Statistics employment report arrives on Friday, April 3.

The Federal Reserve’s April calendar shows the minutes from the March 17-18 FOMC meeting arriving on Wednesday, April 8. The BLS release calendar then places March CPI on Friday, April 10.

Those releases land directly on top of the new oil shock. They will shape whether markets see the latest rise in energy as a temporary disruption or the start of another inflation leg that keeps policy tighter for longer.

XRP’s response to that sequence could define the next phase of its cycle. A hotter payrolls print would strengthen the view that labor conditions remain firm enough to keep the Federal Reserve cautious.

Hawkish signals in the minutes would add another layer of restraint. A hotter CPI print next Friday would confirm that the oil move has arrived inside an already sensitive inflation backdrop.

That combination usually supports the dollar and squeezes speculative assets. XRP would then enter a zone where every part of its identity gets tested at once.

The company behind it has spent months expanding its institutional reach. The token itself would still need to show that investors are willing to price it as a beneficiary of payment-system stress.

There is a sharper retail hook inside that setup. Many people understand inflation as the price of groceries, gasoline, travel, and borrowing.

Far fewer think about what a stronger dollar and higher energy costs do to cross-border settlements, corporate treasury decisions, and the movement of liquidity through financial rails. Ripple’s own enterprise push, as reflected in its treasury platform strategy, brings XRP closer to that conversation, whether the token captures all the value today or not.

That gap between corporate utility and token pricing is where the emotional trigger sits. People with market exposure can see oil jumping and Bitcoin sliding.

They can see the dollar catching a bid. The harder question then comes into focus: if the world is becoming more expensive and more fragmented, why is the best-known payments token still struggling to trade like a payment asset?

The answer over the next week may come down to acceptance levels in price and acceptance levels in narrative. If oil cools, DXY softens, and payrolls or CPI relieve some pressure, XRP has room to reclaim its enterprise-infrastructure frame, especially with Ripple’s broader footprint still giving investors a structural reason to stay engaged.

If oil holds firm, the dollar extends, and inflation anxiety deepens, XRP may keep trading as macro beta first and payments infrastructure second. That outcome would widen the contradiction between Ripple’s strategic progress and the token’s market role.

It would also leave holders facing a more uncomfortable conclusion. XRP has spent years being sold as a bridge asset for an imperfect global financial system.

A week of higher oil, stronger dollars, and tighter conditions offers a live test of whether the market actually believes that the bridge deserves a premium.

The post XRP’s use case should benefit from global stress, so why is price acting like a risk asset? appeared first on CryptoSlate.

The CLARITY Act entered Washington as a bid to impose a durable market structure on crypto. It now sits at the center of a four-way fight over who gets to define that structure, who gets paid inside it, who supervises it, and how much of the existing financial rulebook survives the rewrite.

The bill still includes broad language for jurisdictional clarity, with the Senate Banking Committee majority outlining a framework that draws lines between the SEC and the CFTC while adding tailored disclosures and anti-fraud protections.

Around that frame, the coalition has fractured into four camps with different definitions of success. Senate and industry backers still want a federal market-structure bill that gives crypto firms a workable path into US regulation.

Bank-aligned critics want to seal off stablecoin yield and keep deposit economics from migrating out of the banking system. Regulators have begun moving through their own channels, with the SEC and CFTC signing a new memorandum of understanding and the SEC issuing a fresh interpretation of crypto assets that begins to deliver some of the clarity Congress had reserved for itself.

Structural critics still argue the bill would carve crypto out of core investor protections, a case advanced by groups such as Better Markets and by former CFTC Chair Timothy Massad in prior congressional testimony.

That collision changed the shape of the bill. What began as a question of statutory design has become a contest over bargaining power.

Each camp can slow the process, each camp can claim some version of consumer protection, and each camp enters the next phase with a different source of leverage. Senate and industry backers hold the broadest institutional ambition.

Why this matters: The CLARITY Act was intended to anchor crypto within US law, with clear rules for exchanges, tokens, and custody. If it stalls or narrows, firms remain in a patchwork regime shaped by enforcement and agency guidance, while banks retain tighter control over dollar-based financial activity. The outcome will determine whether crypto can compete directly with traditional deposits and payment rails, or operate inside a more constrained perimeter.

Related Reading

CLARITY Act deadline in weeks could kill stablecoin earnings and push money into Bitcoin

A Senate breakthrough on CLARITY could formalize a US market structure in which Bitcoin becomes the clearest institutional winner.

Mar 31, 2026 · Gino Matos

Banks and their allies hold a choke point around payments, economics, and stablecoin rewards. Regulators hold the power of partial substitution, because every piece of interpretive guidance from the SEC and CFTC narrows the pool of uncertainty that once made CLARITY the singular prize.

Structural critics hold a veto over the debate on legitimacy because their argument speaks to a long-standing Washington fear that crypto bills could create bespoke exemptions that would replace the exemptions older laws once carried.

The calendar tightened the pressure. In January, Senate Banking Chairman Tim Scott said the committee would postpone its markup while bipartisan negotiations continued.

Later that month, the Senate Agriculture Committee advanced related market-structure legislation, keeping momentum alive while underlining that the main bottleneck had shifted into the negotiating room.

By March, the fight over stablecoin rewards had become the central pressure point in the bill, with public reporting and congressional chatter converging on the same conclusion: a framework bill could move forward only if lawmakers found a way to reconcile crypto’s push for broader utility with banking concerns about disintermediation and deposit competition.

That left CLARITY in a familiar Washington posture, broad enough to attract coalitions in theory, specific enough to trigger fracture once the revenue lines came into view.

The first two camps are fighting over the economic core of the bill. The first camp still sees CLARITY as the vehicle that can finally anchor crypto market structure in federal statute.

That camp includes Senate Republicans who have spent months arguing that the industry needs rules written through Congress rather than through case-by-case enforcement, along with a large swath of the industry that wants a lawful path for token issuance, exchange activity, brokerage, custody, and participation in decentralized networks.

The core attraction has always been the same. A federal framework promises a clearer allocation of authority among agencies, a more predictable compliance process, and a narrower zone of ambiguity about what falls under securities law and what falls under commodities regulation.

The Senate Banking majority’s summary reflects that approach, leaning on the idea that a single framework can impose definitional order on a market that has spent years operating inside regulatory overlap.

For crypto firms, the appeal runs deeper than process. A statute holds out the prospect of capital formation under rules that institutions can underwrite, boards can sign off on, and legal teams can defend without having to rebuild the analysis around every enforcement cycle.

Yield politics turned CLARITY into a fight over the economics of digital dollars

The first camp’s ambition runs straight into the second camp, which has focused the fight around stablecoin yield and the economics of digital dollars. The Bank Policy Institute has made the bank-aligned position unusually plain.

Lawmakers, in that view, need to prevent stablecoin structures from recreating deposit-like products outside the traditional banking perimeter, especially if those products begin passing through rewards or yield that look and feel like interest. Under that logic, the danger is structural.

If tokenized dollars can offer returns or functionally similar incentives at scale, then commercial bank deposits face a new form of competition, payments activity migrates, and the prudential perimeter gets thinner exactly where regulators spent years trying to harden it. That is why the stablecoin rewards fight turned into the bill’s main choke point.

It is the place where market structure meets balance-sheet politics.

Those two camps can still describe their goals with overlapping language. Both can say they want consumer protection, operational integrity, and a framework that channels crypto activity into supervised forms.

The overlap ends when the discussion reaches who captures the economics created by digital dollars. The industry camp wants enough room for product development, distribution, and economic pass-through to make federally compliant crypto businesses worth building.

The bank-aligned camp wants a bright barrier around any feature set that could pull value from deposits into tokenized alternatives. That conflict reaches beyond one provision.

It shapes how lawmakers think about payments, exchange design, brokerage economics, wallet architecture, and the degree of freedom crypto firms would have to compete with institutions that already dominate dollar intermediation. Every concession made to one side tends to drain utility from the bill as imagined by the other.

The result is a negotiation whose formal subject is market structure and whose real center of gravity is control over monetary rails. That is why this phase of the CLARITY debate feels more compressed and more political than the earlier debate over jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction can be split in text. Economic control creates winners and losers with organized lobbies, committee relationships, and a direct financial interest in the final wording.

The first camp still wants a durable federal framework. The second camp wants that framework shaped tightly enough that it does not redraw the economics of digital money in a way that benefits crypto firms at the expense of banks.

Both camps can live with progress. Each one defines progress differently, and that difference is what keeps the bill from moving forward.

The third camp sits within the regulatory apparatus itself and introduced a fresh complication into the bill by moving ahead with practical coordination and interpretive guidance. On March 11, the SEC and CFTC announced a new memorandum of understanding designed to improve coordination on crypto oversight.

Days later, on March 17, the SEC issued a new interpretation clarifying how federal securities laws apply to crypto assets, with the CFTC aligning publicly with the effort. By March 20, the CFTC had added crypto-related FAQs that continued the same line of work.

Those actions did not write a statute, and they did not resolve every contested edge case, yet they changed the terrain around CLARITY in a way lawmakers can feel. Congress had been negotiating a bill designed to provide clarity.

Regulators started supplying pieces of that clarity themselves.

Regulators are shaping the field while structural critics keep the legitimacy fight alive

That shift created two immediate effects. First, it gave industry participants some of the operational breathing room they had been seeking, particularly regarding how certain crypto activities are analyzed through the lens of securities law.

Legal practitioners quickly seized on the importance of the change. In a March 19 analysis, Katten described the SEC and CFTC guidance as a major event for the sector, pointing to a more legible treatment of activities such as airdrops, mining, staking, and wrapping.

Second, the guidance changed congressional leverage. Every increment of clarity delivered through agency action reduces the urgency that once surrounded CLARITY as the exclusive route to order.

That creates a subtle but powerful dynamic. A bill under pressure usually gains energy from scarcity.

Once regulators start producing partial substitutes, lawmakers face a harder sell when they ask wavering factions to make politically costly concessions in the name of a breakthrough.

That shift does not weaken the case for statute across the board. A regulatory interpretation sits lower in the durability hierarchy than a congressional framework, and industry participants with long investment horizons still prefer statutory architecture to agency guidance.

Yet the third camp need not erase the case for CLARITY to affect the negotiation. It only needs to be shown that immediate passage is the only way to restore order.

That is already happening. The more the agencies coordinate, the easier it becomes for lawmakers to accept delay, narrower text, or a compromise version of the bill that settles the most acute fights while leaving some larger structural ambitions for another cycle.

For some senators, that can feel like prudence. For some industry players, it can feel like the center of the bill is being negotiated away in real time.

The regulatory camp also exerts pressure in a second way. It offers a political release valve.

Lawmakers who want to say Washington is making progress on crypto can point to the SEC and CFTC without forcing immediate resolution of every issue inside CLARITY. That lowers the cost of postponement and raises the threshold for what kind of final agreement is worth bringing to the floor.

A bill that once looked indispensable now has to demonstrate added value against the backdrop of agency-led adaptation. That is a difficult standard, especially for a coalition already carrying internal conflict over stablecoin rewards, federal preemption, DeFi treatment, and investor-protection language.

The fourth camp continues to ask the question that lies beneath every crypto bill in Washington: Does this framework integrate the sector into existing law, or does it carve out a special lane that weakens protections the rest of finance still carries?

That concern has animated groups such as Better Markets and has appeared in prior testimony from former CFTC Chair Timothy Massad, who argued that proposals such as CLARITY can create artificial distinctions between securities and commodities in ways that reduce the reach of investor protections.

This camp does not have to win the whole argument to shape the bill. It only has to keep the legitimacy challenge alive.

Once that challenge enters the center of the debate, every provision gets viewed through a second lens. A disclosure regime becomes a question about whether disclosure replaces stronger obligations.

A jurisdictional transfer becomes a question about whether oversight is being softened through classification. A pathway for token markets becomes a question about whether the path relies on exemptions that older sectors would never receive.

This is where the four camps collide most sharply. Senate and industry backers want a framework that firms can use at scale.

Bank-aligned critics want to close off yield dynamics that could pressure deposits and payments economics. Regulators are already showing that some clarity can emerge through agency action, reducing the pressure to accept a broad legislative bargain on weak terms.

Structural critics keep pushing on the question of whether the bill preserves the integrity of long-standing protections. A compromise that satisfies the first camp by preserving broad utility may alarm the second and fourth camps.

A compromise that satisfies the second and fourth camps by tightening the perimeter may leave the first camp with a framework that carries less strategic value. A compromise that leans heavily on regulator-led clarity may satisfy lawmakers seeking incremental progress while leaving industry participants with a less durable settlement.

That is why the final question has become a matter of coalition arithmetic rather than conceptual agreement. All four camps can say they want order.

Their conditions for the order point are in different directions.

Midterm pressure is turning a policy negotiation into coalition arithmetic

The midterm calendar sharpens every one of those contradictions. November imposes deadlines on attention, legislative bandwidth, and political appetite for complex financial legislation, generating cross-pressures within both parties.

As the calendar advances, the value of waiting rises for any camp that thinks the current bargain costs too much. Banks can wait if the alternative is stablecoin economics they dislike.

Structural critics can wait if the alternative is a framework they view as too permissive. Regulators can keep moving within their own lane.

Industry groups can keep arguing that delay carries a cost, yet that message weakens if the agencies continue to supply enough guidance to keep large parts of the market functioning.

The coalition that can pass CLARITY, therefore, needs more than a shared talking point around clarity. It needs a settlement that provides the first camp with enough usable structure, the second camp with enough protection around dollar economics, the third camp with a role that fits the statute rather than competes with it, and the fourth camp with enough assurance that core protections remain intact.

That path is narrow. It is still navigable, although the room for error has tightened.

A workable reconciliation would likely require lawmakers to frame the bill less as a maximal rewrite and more as a disciplined allocation of authority, paired with narrow guardrails on stablecoin rewards and stronger language on anti-fraud, disclosure, and supervisory obligations. Even then, the politics stay hard.

Each camp would have to accept a result that falls short of its preferred endpoint. The first camp would accept tighter limits than many crypto firms want.

The second camp would accept a federal framework that still gives compliant crypto business lines room to grow. The third camp would accept that agency guidance is a bridge into statute rather than a substitute for it.

The fourth camp would accept that integration can occur without dismantling the regulatory perimeter. Whether that bargain is possible before November is now the central test around CLARITY.

The bill can still move. The harder question is whether these four camps can converge on a version of movement that each side can live with once the votes are counted.

The post A four-way deadlock is now blocking the US Clarity Act crypto bill — and each side can stop it appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin spent the past 24 hours returning to the key levels on my channel map rather than continuing its breakout. It tested a boundary, failed to convert that test into acceptance, and rotated lower into the next pocket of support memory.

Bitcoin price slid from the upper $68,000s and low $69,000s to around $66,400 by late morning in Europe on April 2. The 24-hour move came in at roughly 3%, with the high near $69,170 and the low near $66,218.

Over 48 hours, the net change stayed close to flat, yet the path inside that window shifted the balance of the chart lower. Price gave up the white shelf near $66,894, rejected a retest, and left the market trading beneath a level that had previously held the local structure together.

Why this matters: What changed is not just the price move but the level it broke. Bitcoin lost a support zone that had been holding the recent structure together, and failed to reclaim it on the first retest. At the same time, the dollar and oil moved higher together, a combination that tends to pressure liquidity and risk appetite. That pairing raises the bar for any immediate recovery and puts the next lower support zones back into focus.

That pattern sits squarely inside the 2024 channel framework, first laid out in Bitcoin channel predictions, aligning with market movements over 6 months. The premise was simple and practical.

Repeating close prices on the 30-minute chart can identify where leverage, stop placement, and spot liquidity tend to cluster. Those shelves have kept showing up at the turning points.

They have framed rebounds, capped rallies, and guided the path between them with more consistency than many of the more elaborate narratives built around Bitcoin.

The last two days developed in three steps. First, Bitcoin spent time in the upper half of the near-term range, pushing back toward the yellow boundary near $67,995.

Second, the move stalled before any real acceptance could build above that shelf. Third, the chart rolled over sharply and carried price through the white line at $66,894 before finding a temporary footing in the mid $66,000s.

That sequence shows where control sits right now. Buyers still have a path back into the range, though that path starts with repair.

Price needs a reclaim of $66,894, then a push back through $67,995, before the structure looks constructive again.

Bitcoin lost the shelf it needed to hold, and the near-term structure turned lower

The same logic that led Bitcoin to fail 7 times to break $71,500. Repeated failure at a level adds weight to the next test.

A ceiling becomes a lid when sellers step down and meet price earlier, and a floor becomes vulnerable when buyers lose the urgency to defend it on first contact. In that February piece, the key level was $71,500, with the next friction zones above at around $72,000 and then $73,700 to $73,800.

Below, I flagged the same shelves visible on the current chart: $68,000, then $66,900, with deeper support in the low $61,000s. That ladder remains intact today.

The difference is that Bitcoin has now moved one rung lower.

The practical sequence is straightforward. The market had room to recover while it held above the white shelf.

Once it lost that level and failed the retest, the burden shifted to buyers to prove that the drop was a flush rather than a new acceptance at a lower level. So far, the rebound has lacked authority.

A brief pop back toward the broken shelf printed the kind of weak retest that usually accompanies a market still under pressure. The candles after the drop look smaller, the bounce looks labored, and the range compression is taking place under resistance rather than above support.

The 24-hour numbers reinforce that view. Bitcoin fell around 3.02% from the close 24 hours earlier, while the 48-hour change stayed only marginally positive.

That combination often appears when a market has spent one day building a base and the next day giving it back. In other words, the chart preserved the wider range while damaging the near-term structure.

For a general audience, that distinction keeps the analysis anchored to thresholds rather than emotion. The market remains inside a ladder of known shelves.

It has moved from one shelf to the next. The immediate job for bulls is to recover $66,894, then $67,995.

The immediate risk for anyone leaning bullish is that continued trading below those levels draws attention to the lower white boundary around $61,726.

That lower target should already be familiar from my original channel work, where the channels were built to identify support and resistance rather than force a single directional call. It also lines up with the roadmap in “Bitcoin to $73k? Be prepared with the price levels to watch during a bear market“, where the key point was to treat lower shelves as historical liquidity pools.

The chart here fits that framework closely. Bitcoin is trading beneath a broken support shelf, and the next meaningful repair level sits above the current price.

Until that changes, the burden of proof remains on the upside.

Support memory still follows the same channel logic that shaped the earlier calls

These levels have held up well because they are built from where the market repeatedly closed, paused, and built positioning. Some zones carry memory because they spent hours or days there.

Other zones looked dramatic on the way up or down, yet offered weaker support because Bitcoin moved through them quickly, and the market built less inventory there.

That distinction shaped my October 2024 analysis in “Above the all-time high of $73.7k these could be the new resistance levels to watch”, where I argued that Bitcoin was trading at the top of a core price channel between $67.9k and $71.5k and that the zone between $71.5k and $73.7k had relatively little historical price action.

The implication was clear. Above the well-traded shelf, the market entered thinner territory where movement could become more abrupt.

The same logic applied later on the downside. In “It’s foolish to pretend Bitcoin’s story doesn’t include $79k this year”, I described the green band around $79,000 as a more substantial region because Bitcoin had spent time consolidating there during earlier legs of the cycle.

Below that sat the deeper structural supports in the red and blue channels, roughly $49,000 to $56,000, the area Bitcoin defended repeatedly before the move toward six figures. Then, in “Akiba’s medium-term $49k Bitcoin bear thesis – why this winter will be the shortest yet“, I framed $49,000 as a cyclical support case tied to miner stress, fee share, hashprice, and ETF flow elasticity.

Those longer-horizon calls operate on a different scale than the current 30-minute move, though they all rely on the same discipline: identify the shelf, assess how well the price is holding it, and define the next level that becomes relevant when it breaks.

The current move fits that sequence cleanly. Bitcoin approached the lower yellow boundary near $67,995 and could not hold it.

It then slid beneath the white shelf near $66,894. A 30-minute breakdown candle early on April 2 accelerated the move from the high $68,000s into the upper $67,000s, and follow-through selling pulled the price down toward the low $66,000s.

Once there, the market printed a small rebound and then drifted sideways beneath broken support. That behavior usually signals a market still negotiating lower inventory rather than preparing for an immediate reversal.

Anyone following the latter channel work through the six-figure phase will recognize the same design principle in “Bull or Bear? Today’s $106k retest decided Bitcoin’s fate” and “Bitcoin price next move: $92k or $79k? Let’s break it down”. The exact prices changed as Bitcoin moved through new territory, yet the method stayed the same.

A retest that holds opens the next band. A retest that fails hands control to the lower shelf.

The current chart falls into the second category. Price still sits below the broken shelf, which keeps the lower ladder in play.

Dollar strength and higher oil arrived at the same time as the breakdown, leaving reclaim levels above and deeper support below

The broader market context over the last 24 to 48 hours adds another layer to the chart. Alongside Bitcoin moving lower, the comparison view showed the U.S. Dollar Index rebounding above 100 while Brent crude pushed toward $108.

That combination tightens conditions around risk assets. A firmer dollar usually weighs on global liquidity at the margin, and higher oil prices can amplify inflation concerns, rate sensitivity, and geopolitical caution.

Bitcoin tends to trade with greater friction when both markets are moving in the same direction, against a softer risk backdrop.

That setting sits comfortably inside the framework of the later channel pieces. In the $79k piece, I wrote that liquidity could become the problem if ETF outflows intensified and risk appetite faded.

In the $49k bear thesis, I argued that negative 20-day ETF flows, alongside weaker miner economics, would increase the probability of sharper downside legs. In the seven failures at $71,500 analysis, I pointed to a macro environment where yields remained high enough to keep conditions tight.

The current move reflects that same type of pressure from a shorter time frame; a structurally important shelf gave way while the macro backdrop offered little relief.

For the practical map, the levels now do the heavy lifting. Resistance begins with $66,894, then expands to $67,995.

If Bitcoin regains both and spends time above them, the near-term damage begins to heal, and the next higher levels come back into view: $71,523, then $72,017, then the pair around $73,519 and $73,764, and then the upper extension near $77,056. Those higher levels are already familiar from the price discovery work above the old all-time high.

Support begins with the intraday low in the low $66,000s, though the stronger structural memory sits much lower, near $61,726. That leaves Bitcoin in a narrow but important condition.

It is close enough to reclaim broken support if buyers return with urgency, and close enough to invite a deeper sweep if they do not.

The conclusion remains the same one the chart has been offering since these channels were first drawn in early 2024. Bitcoin respects shelves until one gives way, and when one breaks, the next shelf tends to become the destination.

Over the last 24 hours, Bitcoin lost the shelf it needed to hold to keep the bounce credible. Over the last 48 hours, it preserved the wider range while shifting the short-term structure lower.

The next move now hinges on whether the price can climb back above $66,894 and $67,995 quickly enough to change the feel of the chart. Failing that, the lower white boundary near $61,726 moves back into focus as the next serious test on the ladder.

The post Bitcoin breaks critical support as dollar and oil move together, raising risk of a deeper drop appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Coinbase has officially received conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to establish the Coinbase National Trust Company. This move brings the largest U.S. exchange under federal oversight, effectively bridging the gap between Silicon Valley innovation and Wall Street’s regulatory rigors.

Is Coinbase a Bank?

No. While the news is massive, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong clarified that the firm is not becoming a commercial bank. Instead, the national trust charter allows Coinbase to provide fiduciary services, asset custody, and investment management across the entire U.S. under a single federal framework, rather than navigating a patchwork of state-by-state licenses.

What Does the OCC Approval Actually Mean?

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is the primary federal regulator for national banks and federal savings associations. By granting this charter, the OCC is allowing Coinbase to operate as a National Trust Bank.

• Federal Uniformity: Coinbase can now offer custody services nationwide with consistent federal standards.
• Institutional Magnet: Large-scale institutional investors, who are often wary of state-level regulations, now have a federally overseen partner for their digital assets.
• No Retail Deposits: Unlike a commercial bank, this trust cannot take retail demand deposits or engage in fractional reserve lending.

The Perfect Storm: Market Structure Bill and Fundamentals

This approval comes at a pivotal moment. The U.S. Congress is currently advancing the CLARITY Act and other market structure bills aimed at defining how digital assets are regulated. With Coinbase securing a seat at the federal banking table, the fundamental strength of the crypto market has arguably reached an all-time high.

Why This Could Trigger the Biggest Bull Run Yet

The entry of a federally chartered trust company within the Coinbase ecosystem acts as a "green light" for trillions of dollars in sidelined institutional capital. As the crypto market structure becomes more defined, the barriers for pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and major insurance companies to hold $Bitcoin are effectively dissolving.

Institutional Custody and the Future of Payments

According to reports from Coinbase's institutional blog, the new charter will focus heavily on custody and settlement. As of late 2025, Coinbase already held over $370 billion in assets under custody. With this new federal status, that number is expected to skyrocket.

Furthermore, the charter lays the groundwork for advanced crypto payment rails. By working directly with the OCC, Coinbase intends to explore infrastructure products that allow for seamless, instant settlement of digital assets, potentially challenging traditional systems like SWIFT.

What Just Happened in the Markets?

Global markets surged after reports that Iran and Oman are working on a protocol to secure shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

The reaction was immediate:

• Over $1.5 trillion added across US markets
• Nasdaq, S&P 500, and Dow all moved higher
• Risk sentiment briefly flipped bullish

👉 On the surface, this looks like the start of a recovery.

But crypto is telling a completely different story.

Crypto Is Not Following — And That’s the Warning

Despite the bullish backdrop:

• Bitcoin is still trading under pressure
• Ethereum and major altcoins continue to decline
• No strong follow-through from crypto markets

👉 This kind of divergence is rare — and important.

When crypto fails to react to good news, it often signals that something deeper is broken beneath the surface.

The Market Got Bullish News — A Lot of It

Over the past hours, several developments should have supported crypto:

• IMF signaling that tokenization could reshape global finance
• Coinbase gaining conditional approval for a US national trust charter
• $500 million USDC minted, signaling fresh liquidity entering the system
• Equity markets recovering sharply

👉 Under normal conditions, this would trigger a strong crypto bounce.

But it didn’t.

Why Crypto Is Ignoring the Rally

The answer lies in liquidity and macro pressure.

Even though headlines are turning positive, the underlying conditions remain tight:

• Oil prices are still above $110
• Global inflation risks remain elevated
• Central banks are unlikely to ease aggressively
• Capital is still cautious and selective

👉 In this environment, investors are not chasing risk — they are managing exposure.

Crypto, being the most sensitive risk asset, reacts first.

This Is a Classic Late-Stage Signal

Markets often behave like this near key turning points.

First:

• Equities bounce on headlines

Then:

• Crypto refuses to confirm

👉 That disconnect is a warning.

It suggests that the rally may be driven by short-term positioning, not real conviction.

What Smart Money Is Likely Doing

While retail reacts to headlines, institutions tend to act differently.

The signals suggest:

• Positioning into infrastructure (tokenization, custody, stablecoins)
• Preparing liquidity (USDC minting)
• Expanding regulatory positioning (Coinbase trust charter)

👉 This is accumulation — but not in a risk-on environment yet.

What Happens Next?

The market is now at a critical point.

Two scenarios can unfold:

Bullish Case:

• Oil drops
• Tensions ease further
• Crypto catches up to equities

Bearish Case:

• Oil stays high
• Geopolitical risk returns
• Crypto leads the next leg down

👉 Right now, crypto is leaning toward the second scenario.

Final Take: This Is Not Strength — It’s a Signal

Crypto is not lagging by accident.

It is reacting to real underlying conditions, not headlines.

👉 When markets rally but crypto doesn’t follow, it usually means one thing:

The risk isn’t gone — it’s just being ignored.

Bitcoin ($BTC) plummeted below the critical $66,000 threshold on April 2, 2026. This sudden downward movement has sent shockwaves through the derivatives market, resulting in the liquidation of over $251,940,000 worth of long positions within the last 24 hours.

Why is Bitcoin Dropping Today?

The current decline is fueled by a "perfect storm" of fundamental and technical factors. Reports indicate that rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and a hawkish shift in U.S. trade policy—specifically recent tariff announcements—have pushed investors toward a "risk-off" stance.

Furthermore, institutional demand through spot $Bitcoin ETFs has cooled significantly. Data shows net outflows exceeding $170 million in recent sessions, suggesting that the aggressive buying pressure seen in previous months is tapering off. This lack of immediate demand has left the market vulnerable to the "long squeeze" we are currently witnessing.

Bitcoin Price Analysis: Why is Bitcoin Down?

Analyzing the 4-hour chart of BTC/USD, several bearish signals are evident that traders should monitor closely.

1. The Descending Resistance Line

A prominent yellow trend line (descending resistance) has been capping Bitcoin's price action since mid-March. Every attempt to break above this line has been met with aggressive selling pressure. As of April 2, Bitcoin remains trapped beneath this diagonal resistance, currently situated near the $67,500 – $68,000 zone.

2. Immediate Support Levels

Bitcoin is currently testing a horizontal support zone identified on the chart at $65,581.

• Crucial Support: The $65,500 – $65,800 range is acting as the primary line of defense for bulls.
• Secondary Target: If $65,500 fails to hold, the next significant psychological and technical floor is at $63,000.

3. RSI and Momentum

The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is currently hovering around 38.02. This indicates that while the market is approaching "oversold" territory (typically below 30), there is still room for further downside before a relief bounce becomes a high-probability event. The momentum is clearly in favor of the bears in the short term.

Market Sentiment and Liquidation Heatmap

The $251 million in long liquidations suggests that many retail traders were positioned for a breakout that failed to materialize. When these positions are forcibly closed (liquidated), it adds "sell-side" pressure to the market, often leading to a cascading effect where the price drops further, hitting more stop-losses.

According to data from CoinGlass, the majority of these liquidations occurred on major exchanges like Binance and OKX.

Bitcoin Future Outlook: Bull Trap or Consolidation?

The big question is whether this is a "healthy correction" before a move toward $100,000 or the start of a deeper bearish phase. For a bullish reversal to be confirmed, Bitcoin must:

• Hold the $65,500 support on a daily closing basis.
• Break out above the yellow descending trend line with significant volume.
• Reclaim $70,000 to shift the narrative back to a positive bias.

Safe Havens Are Failing — What’s Happening Right Now?

Global markets are entering an unusual phase where traditional safe havens are no longer behaving as expected. Despite escalating geopolitical tensions and ongoing military threats involving Iran, assets like gold and silver are declining instead of rising.

Silver has dropped below $70, losing nearly 7–8% in a single day, while gold has fallen under $4,600, wiping out over $1 trillion in market value. At the same time, oil prices are surging above $100, reflecting growing fears of supply disruptions.

Meanwhile, crypto markets are also under pressure, with Bitcoin struggling to hold key levels and altcoins seeing sharper declines.

👉 This is not a normal market reaction.

Why Gold and Silver Are Dropping During a War

In a typical risk-off environment, investors rotate into safe-haven assets like gold. However, this time the opposite is happening.

The reason lies in inflation expectations and interest rate pressure.

Rising oil prices are increasing fears of sustained inflation. When inflation rises:

• Central banks are less likely to cut rates
• Interest rates remain higher for longer
• Yield-bearing assets become more attractive

Gold and silver, which do not generate yield, become less appealing in this environment.

👉 As a result, even traditional safe havens are being sold.

The Oil Shock Is Driving Everything

The key driver behind this market behavior is the surge in oil prices.

Following statements that the US will continue strikes on Iran for the next 2–3 weeks, markets are now pricing in prolonged geopolitical instability. At the center of this risk is the Strait of Hormuz — a critical global oil route responsible for nearly 20% of the world’s oil supply.

Any disruption in this region could push oil prices significantly higher.

👉 And higher oil means higher inflation.

This creates a chain reaction across all markets.

Why Crypto Is Falling Despite Bullish News

Under normal conditions, recent developments should support crypto markets:

• Progress on stablecoin regulation
• Continued institutional involvement
• Growing adoption narratives

Yet, crypto is declining.

This is because macro conditions are overriding crypto-specific fundamentals.

When liquidity tightens and uncertainty increases, investors reduce exposure to risk assets — and crypto is one of the first to be sold.

👉 Bitcoin is not trading on news — it is trading on macro.

The Real Risk: A Liquidity Shock

What markets are facing now is not just geopolitical uncertainty — it is the risk of a broader liquidity tightening cycle.

The sequence is clear:

• Oil prices rise
• Inflation expectations increase
• Rate cuts get delayed
• Liquidity shrinks

This environment puts pressure on all major asset classes simultaneously — including stocks, commodities, and crypto.

👉 That’s why everything is falling together.

What Investors Should Watch Next

The next phase of the market will depend on a few critical developments:

• Escalation or stabilization in the Iran conflict
• Movement in oil prices above or below $100
• Signals from central banks regarding rate policy

If oil continues to rise, markets could see further downside across both traditional and digital assets.

Conclusion: This Is No Longer a Normal Market

The current environment marks a shift from isolated market movements to a fully interconnected macro-driven system.

Safe havens are failing. Risk assets are under pressure. And geopolitical uncertainty is dictating market direction.

👉 This is no longer a crypto market — it’s a macro battlefield.

As tensions in the Middle East reached a boiling point, risk assets—including $Bitcoin and major altcoins—faced a sharp "risk-off" liquidation. However, as diplomatic channels begin to signal a potential de-escalation, savvy investors are looking at the "blood in the streets" as a generational entry point.

Historically, markets overreact to geopolitical shocks. If a resolution is reached in early April, the pent-up liquidity currently sitting in stablecoins is expected to flood back into high-conviction projects that were unfairly hammered during the panic.

Is April a Good Time to Buy Crypto?

Potentially, as April 2026 is shaping up to be a prime recovery month. With many tokens trading at 20-30% discounts from their Q1 highs, the current "oversold" conditions on the RSI (Relative Strength Index) suggest a relief rally is imminent.

1. Ethereum (ETH): The Race Back to $3,000

$Ethereum remains the backbone of the decentralized economy. During the recent March turbulence, ETH slipped below its psychological support, but the fundamentals remain unshaken.

• Recovery Catalyst: The successful implementation of the "Prague" upgrade earlier this year has further reduced Layer-2 costs.
• Price Target: Analysts expect a swift recovery to the $3,000 mark as institutional ETH ETFs see renewed inflows once the global macro outlook stabilizes.

Investors should monitor the ETH price closely, as its recovery usually leads the broader altcoin market.

2. PEPE: The Volatility King

For those with a higher risk appetite, $PEPE remains the go-to memecoin for catching rapid bounces. Memecoins often act as high-beta plays on market sentiment; when the market turns green, PEPE tends to move twice as fast as the majors.

• Current State: PEPE lost significant ground in March but has maintained a strong community floor.
• Why Buy: Its extreme volatility makes it an ideal candidate for a "relief rally" play. As retail investors return to the market in April, the low-unit bias of PEPE often attracts massive speculative volume.

3. XRP: Regulatory Clarity Meets Institutional Adoption

$XRP has faced a double-whammy of geopolitical pressure and a temporary "capital flight" toward safer havens. However, its role in cross-border payments, especially in the Middle East, makes it a unique asset to watch as regional stability returns.

• Market Position: Having secured full regulatory clarity in late 2025, XRP is no longer a "gamble" but a utility-driven asset.
• Outlook: It has lost nearly 15% in the last month, making the XRP price highly attractive for those betting on the continued expansion of RippleNet.

4. Cardano (ADA): The "Deep Value" Opportunity

$Cardano is currently one of the most oversold "blue-chip" altcoins. While critics point to its slower price action, the network's resilience and growing DeFi TVL (Total Value Locked) suggest it is undervalued.

• The Dip: ADA has hit multi-month lows, hovering near critical demand zones.
• The Play: Historically, ADA performs well in the second stage of a market recovery.

5. Solana (SOL): The Ecosystem Powerhouse

No "Top 5" list for 2026 is complete without $Solana. Despite the market-wide dip, Solana continues to lead in retail transaction volume and NFT activity.

• Technical Outlook: SOL has shown incredible strength in bouncing off the $80-$100 support range.
• Why April: With the Firedancer upgrade nearing full optimization, Solana's throughput is unmatched. Any return of "risk-on" sentiment will likely see SOL outperform Bitcoin in percentage gains. You can compare Solana's performance against other majors on our exchange comparison page.

Top 5 Cryptos to Buy in April 2026

Naoris Protocol says its blockchain network uses quantum-resistant cryptography, as the wider crypto industry prepares for future threats.

Publicly traded stablecoin issuer Circle is launching a new token, cirBTC, its own wrapped Bitcoin alternative.

A Google DeepMind paper maps six attack categories against autonomous AI agents—from invisible HTML commands to multi-agent flash crashes.

Will Elon Musk's X finally zap crypto scams? Here's why one exec says the changes "should kill 99% of the incentive."

A blockchain security expert compared Drift’s lapse in security to Ethereum network Ronin's $625 million loss in 2022.

Tom Zschach, the chief innovation officer at SWIFT for the past six years, has announced his resignation.

Legendary 1.1 million BTC stash belonging to pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto is facing a major quantum threat, according to Bloomberg.

Market is being pushed to the limit, which creates an uneven battleground for the market.

A newly released report reveals that the initial crypto contribution allowed AOF to unlock and deploy capital that funded 905 individual loans for underserved small business owners..

Circle, the fintech heavyweight behind the widely adopted USDC stablecoin, is making a major play to bring the world's largest cryptocurrency into the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem.

Key Highlights

• Elon Musk’s SpaceX is negotiating with Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) for approximately $5 billion in anchor investment ahead of its public debut.
• The proposed investment would safeguard PIF’s current ownership position of nearly 1% from dilution during the share issuance.
• The aerospace company has submitted confidential documentation to the SEC, with plans to debut on public markets this year.
• The offering seeks to generate as much as $75 billion, potentially eclipsing the record IPOs of Saudi Aramco and Alibaba.
• Market analysts, including Bloomberg, project SpaceX’s valuation could exceed $1.75 trillion upon going public.

Elon Musk’s aerospace venture SpaceX is advancing toward its highly anticipated stock market debut. The company has engaged in negotiations with Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund, the Public Investment Fund, regarding a potential anchor investment of approximately $5 billion, according to two individuals with knowledge of the discussions, as first reported by Reuters.

$TSLA | SpaceX IPO Update

➤ SpaceX Has Held Talks With Saudi PIF For An Anchor Investment In Its 2026 IPO

➤ Saudi Fund Is Considering Taking An Anchor Stake Of Around $5 Billion In The SpaceX IPO

— Hardik Shah (@AIStockSavvy) April 2, 2026

The sources emphasized that negotiations are ongoing and no definitive agreement has been reached. The investment structure and terms could still undergo modifications, they noted. Representatives from both SpaceX and PIF have refused to provide official statements on the matter.

Saudi Arabia’s sovereign fund currently maintains an ownership stake representing slightly less than 1% of SpaceX. The contemplated $5 billion commitment would primarily serve to preserve PIF’s proportional ownership when the company issues fresh shares during its market debut.

In IPO transactions, anchor investors serve as major institutional participants who pledge capital commitments before the public roadshow commences. Their participation demonstrates market confidence and generates momentum for the share sale.

SpaceX has been systematically securing commitments from anchor investors considerably in advance of its public markets entrance. Sources indicate that a substantial portion of available shares will also be designated for high-net-worth individual clients of the underwriting financial institutions.

The planned offering aims to secure up to $75 billion in proceeds. Successfully achieving this target would shatter existing benchmarks established by Saudi Aramco’s $25.6 billion offering in 2019 and Alibaba’s $25 billion listing in 2014.

According to previous Bloomberg reporting, SpaceX may pursue a post-listing valuation exceeding $1.75 trillion. Such a valuation would position it among the highest-valued companies to ever conduct an initial public offering.

Expanding Saudi-Musk Business Connections

The Public Investment Fund strengthened its commercial ties with Musk’s corporate portfolio in November 2025. PIF’s artificial intelligence subsidiary HUMAIN partnered with Musk’s xAI to establish 500 megawatts of computing infrastructure capacity within Saudi Arabia.

Subsequently, PIF channeled $3 billion through HUMAIN prior to xAI’s combination with social media company X in March 2025.

Regulatory Filing and Market Entry Plans

The Texas-based SpaceX, headquartered in Starbase, has filed confidential registration documents with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The company is positioning itself for a public market launch during the latter portion of 2025.

Various financial news sources confirmed the confidential SEC submission on Wednesday, with Reuters subsequently disclosing details about the Saudi negotiations the following day.

SpaceX maintains diversified operations spanning launch vehicles, satellite connectivity via its Starlink constellation, and artificial intelligence initiatives. The enterprise has experienced explosive expansion and currently ranks among the world’s most highly valued privately held corporations.

The ambitious $75 billion capital-raising objective illustrates the enormous scale of SpaceX’s current business operations. If successfully completed, this would represent the largest initial public offering ever measured by total funds raised.

Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund manages assets valued at more than $900 billion, establishing it as one of the planet’s most powerful sovereign wealth vehicles. Its prospective anchor investor status highlights the intense international interest surrounding SpaceX’s transition to public ownership.

The post SpaceX IPO: Saudi Arabia’s PIF Considers Massive $5 Billion Anchor Investment appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Takeaways

• Binance Coin declined more than 5%, breaching the critical $600 threshold
• Crude oil prices rocketed beyond $110 amid heightened Middle Eastern conflict, creating downward pressure on digital assets
• Technical indicators reveal three consecutive bearish signals on the 4-hour timeframe pointing to institutional distribution
• Further downside toward $520 remains likely should selling pressure persist
• Daily timeframe RSI indicator has declined beneath 40, reinforcing negative market sentiment

Binance Coin has experienced a sharp decline exceeding 5% during the latest trading session, breaking through the psychologically significant $600 threshold that market participants had been monitoring carefully. The asset momentarily declined to $580 before stabilizing at temporary support.

The widespread liquidation coincides with crude oil valuations surging past $110 per barrel. Following President Trump’s warnings of potential military intervention against Iran regarding Strait of Hormuz access, worldwide financial markets reacted negatively, prompting capital flight from higher-risk investments including cryptocurrencies.

Trading activity for Binance Coin increased 35% throughout the previous 24-hour period as the asset tested the $580 demand region.

Currently positioned at $580, BNB remains 57% below its latest peak of $1,360. This substantial differential highlights the significant distribution that has accumulated throughout recent months.

Binance Coin serves two primary functions: providing trading fee reductions on the Binance platform and facilitating transaction expenses on BNB Chain. Network analytics from BSC Scan indicate daily transaction volumes fluctuating between 13 and 19 million, maintaining typical operational levels.

Bearish Momentum Dominates

The daily timeframe analysis reveals BNB has revisited the $580 price level for the third occasion within a two-month period. Multiple returns to identical support zones typically diminishes the probability of an imminent recovery.

The Relative Strength Index across the daily timeframe has descended below 40, which technical analysts interpret as a bearish confirmation.

The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy positioning contributes additional downward force. Market analysts have eliminated expectations for rate reductions throughout 2026. One month prior, approximately 47% of analysts had anticipated a June reduction.

Technical Indicators Signal Further Weakness

Examining the 4-hour timeframe, three successive bearish signals have materialized since March 18. The latest signal emerged following the conclusion of U.S. market hours on April 2.

These technical patterns suggest institutional participation in the distribution process. The 4-hour RSI has entered oversold conditions, potentially creating conditions for a temporary relief rally.

Any potential bounce might provide short-position traders with improved entry opportunities ahead of a possible continuation toward $520.

Market commentator Crypto Patel noted on X that BNB had declined beneath $570 for the initial time in more than twelve months. Patel highlighted the $400–$500 range as a significant accumulation area based on Fibonacci retracement levels at 0.5 and 0.618, referencing historical price behavior.

Binance Coin currently competes closely with XRP and USDC for fifth position by total cryptocurrency market capitalization, trailing XRP by merely $1 billion.

The Fear & Greed Index registers at 9, indicating extreme fear throughout the comprehensive cryptocurrency marketplace.

The post BNB Crashes Below $600 as Middle East Turmoil Shakes Cryptocurrency Markets appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Highlights

• Telegram’s native wallet now supports perpetual futures trading through a partnership with decentralized exchange Lighter
• Traders can access leverage up to 50x on more than 50 assets, spanning bitcoin, ethereum, commodities, stocks, and ETFs
• The rollout aims to serve Telegram’s 150 million+ registered user base, with emphasis on developing markets
• Access is restricted for users in the United States and United Kingdom during the initial phase
• Lighter, holding a $1.5 billion valuation, operates with zero trading fees and plans collaborative reward programs with Wallet in Telegram

Telegram’s integrated cryptocurrency wallet now supports perpetual futures trading, enabling users to establish leveraged positions directly within the messaging platform. This functionality became operational on April 2, 2026.

The capability is facilitated through Lighter, an Ethereum-powered decentralized exchange holding a $1.5 billion valuation after securing $68 million in funding. Lighter currently holds the fourth position among decentralized perpetual exchanges measured by trading activity.

Traders can access over 50 different assets with leverage options reaching 50x. The available instruments encompass bitcoin, ethereum, crude oil, gold, stock indices, and exchange-traded funds. All transactions process through a custodial wallet embedded natively in Telegram.

The Open Platform, responsible for developing Wallet in Telegram, created this feature. CEO Andrew Rogozov emphasized the platform’s accessibility and ease of use.

“Even my mother can start using this wallet,” Rogozov said.

Wallet in Telegram counts more than 150 million registered accounts. A significant portion of these registrations occurred during the 2024 tap-to-earn mini-application surge. The Open Platform anticipates converting some of these users into regular traders.

Perpetual futures represent derivatives contracts allowing speculation on asset price directions without expiration dates. These instruments dominate crypto trading activity. Decentralized perpetual contract volume approached $8 trillion throughout 2025, with monthly figures exceeding $1 trillion during the year’s final third.

Selection Rationale Behind Lighter

The Open Platform assessed three potential platforms before selecting Lighter: Hyperliquid, Lighter, and Aster. The final choice hinged on fee structures, reward mechanisms, and target demographic alignment.

Lighter operates without transaction fees. While Hyperliquid does impose fees and provides superior liquidity depth, Rogozov noted the distinction becomes negligible for retail-scale transactions on popular trading pairs.

Hyperliquid, dominating the market, serves over 200,000 active participants. Lighter pursues a distinct demographic—less seasoned traders—through this Telegram collaboration.

The arrangement includes a collaborative rewards initiative. Lighter will fund trading incentive campaigns where top-performing users receive its LIT token. Lighter’s backing includes Founders Fund, Ribbit Capital, and Robinhood.

United States and United Kingdom territories are excluded from this release. The Open Platform concentrates on emerging and frontier economies where conventional brokerage infrastructure remains limited.

Future Development Roadmap

The Open Platform intends to introduce referral systems, social profit-and-loss broadcasting within Telegram conversations, and copy trading capabilities. Additionally, it plans to deploy AI-powered trading agents accessible through Telegram bot interfaces.

Cryptocurrency trading bots operating on Solana generated $700 million in fees throughout 2024. TOP aims to replicate this engagement within Telegram utilizing perpetual futures instead of meme tokens.

In parallel developments, Bitget Wallet has incorporated Hyperliquid-supported markets delivering continuous trading in commodities, equities, and tokenized real-world assets.

Lighter has simultaneously broadened its offerings beyond derivatives recently, incorporating spot markets and 24/5 equity perpetual contracts into its ecosystem.

The post Telegram Wallet Introduces Leveraged Trading for 150M Users via Lighter Integration appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Highlights

• Bittensor’s TAO token experienced a near-doubling in value throughout March, reaching around $317 with a market capitalization exceeding $3 billion
• Subnet 3 of the Bittensor network unveiled Covenant-72B, a large language model with 72 billion parameters developed through over 70 decentralized nodes
• Covenant-72B achieved a 67.1 score on the MMLU evaluation, performing comparably to Meta’s Llama 2 70B model
• Grayscale submitted an amended S-1 registration statement to the SEC for establishing a Bittensor (TAO) Trust
• More than 68% of TAO’s 10.7 million token supply is locked in staking

The TAO token from Bittensor experienced remarkable growth throughout March 2026, with its value nearly doubling to reach approximately $317. This substantial price movement propelled the network’s overall market capitalization beyond the $3 billion threshold.

This significant price appreciation occurred alongside a groundbreaking technical achievement within the Bittensor network. The development team behind Subnet 3 unveiled Covenant-72B, an impressive language model containing 72 billion parameters that was trained using a network of more than 70 geographically distributed nodes.

The model demonstrated its capabilities by achieving a 67.1 score on the MMLU benchmark, an industry-standard evaluation metric for assessing large language model performance. This performance level positions Covenant-72B competitively alongside Meta’s Llama 2 70B model.

The achievement marked a significant validation point, demonstrating that decentralized, permissionless artificial intelligence training infrastructure can deliver performance metrics comparable to traditional centralized approaches. Previously, distributed training methodologies faced skepticism regarding their viability, with critics arguing they were inherently too inefficient and disjointed for practical applications.

The primary subnet token associated with this breakthrough, τemplar (SN3), experienced explosive growth exceeding 400% over the preceding month, achieving a market valuation approaching $130 million.

Expanding Ecosystem Activity Beyond Covenant-72B

The wider Bittensor subnet infrastructure experienced notable developments across multiple projects. Targon (SN4), which operates as a decentralized marketplace for GPU computational resources under Manifold Labs’ management, successfully negotiated a substantial six-figure partnership to provide infrastructure for Dippy AI’s operations, a platform serving 8.6 million active users.

The GMCI AI Index, a composite metric tracking leading AI-focused cryptocurrency tokens, experienced a 48% appreciation since early February. Bittensor holds a substantial 24.89% allocation within this index and served as the primary catalyst for the overall performance.

The index composition also features Render (RNDR) and Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (ASI), with these three assets collectively representing more than 71% of total index weighting. However, despite recent positive momentum, the index continues trading 84% below its peak valuation established during the first quarter of 2024.

Grayscale Advances SEC Registration for TAO Trust

On April 3, 2026, Grayscale filed an amended S-1 registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission for a Bittensor (TAO) Trust. The investment vehicle is designed as a passive holding structure that maintains TAO tokens and provides investors with exposure to the token’s price performance through tradable trust shares.

Bittensor’s circulating supply currently stands at 10.7 million TAO tokens. More than 68% of this available supply is currently committed to staking mechanisms.

The launch of Covenant-72B alongside Grayscale’s regulatory filing constitute the most significant recent catalysts for TAO token price action as of April 3, 2026.

The post Bittensor (TAO) Price Surges 100% in March Following Major Network Developments appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Takeaways

• Investment firm Benchmark starts coverage on Cantor Equity Partners II (CEPT) with bullish Buy rating and sets $16 price objective.
• The SPAC is preparing to complete a merger with Securitize, a tokenization platform valued at $1.25 billion.
• Securitize commands approximately 70% market share in U.S. tokenization and manages BlackRock’s $2.2B BUIDL fund.
• Securitize and the New York Stock Exchange unveiled plans for a joint tokenized securities platform offering 24/7 trading capabilities.
• Analyst estimates the addressable market for real-world asset tokenization at $300 trillion globally.

CEPT was trading around $11 at the time of writing.

Cantor Equity Partners II, Inc. Class A Ordinary Share, CEPT

Investment banking firm Benchmark has launched coverage of Cantor Equity Partners II with a bullish outlook, highlighting the upcoming combination with Miami-headquartered tokenization specialist Securitize as a significant growth driver. Research analyst Mark Palmer established a $16 price objective, which assumes Securitize will achieve $178 million in annual revenue by late 2026.

Securitize provides a comprehensive platform for converting traditional real-world assets — including equities, fixed income securities, and investment funds — into blockchain-based digital tokens. Benchmark characterizes the company as an attractive “pure-play investment opportunity in the tokenization sector.”

The business combination between CEPT and Securitize was publicly disclosed in October 2024, establishing a $1.25 billion enterprise valuation for Securitize. Following transaction completion, the merged entity will trade on the Nasdaq exchange under the new ticker symbol SECZ.

Palmer highlighted robust revenue predictability for Securitize, noting that origination fees charged to companies tokenizing assets plus ongoing servicing income provide dependable cash flow. The analyst emphasized that Securitize’s platform-agnostic approach across multiple industries represents a strategic advantage.

“Securitize is really focused on providing the process behind tokenization, from origination through servicing, in a way that’s applicable to a breadth of industry verticals,” Palmer said.

Strategic Partnerships with BlackRock and NYSE Strengthen Market Position

Securitize currently operates BlackRock’s BUIDL fund, which stands as the industry’s largest tokenized money-market product at $2.2 billion in assets under management, deployed across eight blockchain networks including Ethereum and Solana. BlackRock previously spearheaded a $47 million strategic investment round in Securitize, creating what Benchmark identifies as a meaningful competitive moat.

Just last week, Securitize and the New York Stock Exchange revealed a strategic collaboration to develop a dedicated platform for tokenized securities that will enable continuous trading around the clock. This partnership positions Securitize as a central player in modernizing American capital markets infrastructure aligned with the SEC’s “Project Crypto” regulatory framework.

Benchmark analyst Palmer contends that Securitize’s technology stack offers distinct advantages over rivals by eliminating reliance on traditional clearing systems like the DTCC. This differentiates the company from competitors such as Figure Technologies, which completed its Nasdaq listing in September 2025 with a narrower focus on tokenized home equity credit products.

Massive $300 Trillion Market Opportunity

Benchmark calculates Securitize’s total addressable market at approximately $300 trillion — representing the aggregate value of real-world assets worldwide. Since the platform works across diverse asset classes and industries, Palmer noted the company faces no artificial ceiling from vertical-specific limitations.

“The concept here really is better and faster across the board,” Palmer told Decrypt. “It’s just a matter of time before the market begins to recognize the benefits both in terms of efficiency and settlement times.”

According to Benchmark’s research, Securitize maintains roughly 70% control of the tokenization market in the United States. This dominant market position, coupled with prestigious institutional partnerships, should enable the company to expand its competitive advantage as adoption accelerates.

CEPT shares were changing hands near $11 when Benchmark released its research report, representing significant discount to the analyst’s $16 price target.

The post Cantor Equity Partners II (CEPT) Receives Bullish Analyst Rating Before Securitize Deal appeared first on Blockonomi.

U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent speech on the Iran conflict sent Bitcoin (BTC) tumbling from $69,000 to below $67,000, erasing gains made in the previous session as markets repriced the odds of a prolonged war.

XWIN Research Japan has released a bearish report that says the sell-off wasn’t just a reaction to headlines; it showed that there are serious problems with the structure of Bitcoin’s derivatives market that could cause prices to drop by as much as 80% in the worst case.

What Trump’s Speech Changed, and Why It Matters for BTC

Markets had been expecting Trump to signal a wind-down of the conflict. Instead, he said the situation would get worse over the next two to three weeks.

Investors responded by selling. The S&P 500 and the Dow both fell, the former closing down 0.23% and the latter 0.39%. Asian markets were also hit, with South Korea’s KOSPI losing 4.2%. Additionally, the price of oil went up 11.41% to $111 a barrel, and the value of the U.S. dollar went up.

According to XWIN, all of that is bad news for Bitcoin, because when oil rises, inflation expectations go up, and when the dollar strengthens, money becomes tighter globally. Both conditions tend to push investors away from risk assets like crypto.

Furthermore, XWIN noted that a widely watched measure of stock market fear, the VIX, climbed to around 25, and stress indicators in the U.S. bond market widened by 27%, pointing to deteriorating liquidity conditions across traditional finance, which historically weigh on BTC just as heavily as on equities.

The analysts identified a specific structural vulnerability at the center of all this: CME Bitcoin futures open interest has reached around 18,000 to 20,000 BTC, which are heavily concentrated in short-dated contracts.

According to them, this means price discovery is being driven more by leveraged positioning than by underlying spot demand, and under stress, those positions won’t roll over; they’ll liquidate and create cascading sell pressure that can amplify price moves well beyond what spot flows alone would justify.

Bitcoin had already been struggling before Trump’s speech, narrowly avoiding closing March in the red for a sixth consecutive month by finishing with a minor 1.8% gain. However, the quarterly picture was bad, with Q1 2026 seeing a 22.2% decline, the worst first-quarter performance since the 2018 bear market.

How Bad Could It Get?

XWIN Research outlined three scenarios, all pointing lower.

The first, and mildest case, could occur if current conditions persist without getting significantly worse, and here, Bitcoin could slide from around $70,000 to $50,000, which would be a drop of 25% to 30%.

Now, if Bitcoin ETFs see sustained outflows and buyers stay on the sidelines, the researchers said the price could fall further to between $20,000 and $30,000, a 60% to 70% decline.

Finally, XWIN says that if the Strait of Hormuz were completely blocked, or if there were a full-blown war in the region, BTC’s price would drop to $10,000, which is about 80% less than current levels.

The post Bitcoin’s Worst-Case Scenario: Analysts Warn of 25–80% Crash appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Around 27,600 Bitcoin options contracts will expire on Friday, April 3, with a notional value of roughly $1.8 billion. This event is smaller than usual, so it is unlikely to have any impact on spot markets.

Crypto prices have been mostly sideways this week, with total capitalization dipping on Friday.

Bitcoin Options Expiry

This week’s batch of Bitcoin options contracts has a put/call ratio of 0.54, meaning that there are many more longs than shorts expiring. Max pain is around $68,000, according to Coinglass, which is close to current spot prices, so many could be in the money on expiry.

Open interest (OI), or the value or number of Bitcoin options contracts yet to expire, remains highest at the $60,000 strike price on Deribit, with $1.5 billion in bearish bets.

Total BTC options OI across all exchanges has fallen back following the end of the Q1 expiry event and is currently 31 billion.

Bitcoin put (short) options are more expensive than those on Ethereum across multiple all-time frames, suggesting traders are more worried about BTC’s downside risk, noted Deribit this week.

In addition to today’s batch of Bitcoin options, around 157,000 Ethereum contracts are also expiring, with a notional value of $322 million, max pain at $2,100, and a put/call ratio of 0.73. Total ETH options OI across all exchanges is around $6.3 billion.

This brings the total notional value of crypto options expiries to around $2.1 billion in a small expiry event this week.

Spot Market Outlook

Total capitalization was flat on the day at $2.37 trillion during Friday morning trading in Asia. Markets were eyeing recovery until President Trump signaled another 2 to 3 weeks of air strikes in Iran, which rattled investors, leading to another selloff. Bitcoin topped $67,000 in late trading on Thursday but couldn’t hold it, falling back to $66,600 at the time of writing.

“The level of supply in profit and in loss is now reaching levels typical of a true bear market,” observed CryptoQuant analyst ‘Darkfost.’

Ether prices have weakened all week, falling back to $2,000 yesterday, and trading at $2,050 on Friday morning. Further reminders that most of the altcoins are at bear market bottoms are not really necessary.

Analyst ‘Daan Crypto Trades’ said that Bitcoin still has not made new lows during this conflict, as the previous drop to $60,000 has not been retested as of now.

“So, where crypto sold off by itself from October to February, it has held relatively stable thus far during this conflict.”

The post Will Crypto Markets React to $1.8B Bitcoin Options Expiring Today? appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT has once again slammed Circle and its CEO, Jeremy Allaire, following alleged inaction during the $280 million exploit tied to Drift Protocol.

He described the entire fiasco as a critical delay in response as funds were actively moved across chains.

Circle Under Fire

In a post on X, ZachXBT said the stablecoin issuer “was asleep” as millions in USDC were bridged from Solana to Ethereum during the exploit. In a separate update, he found that the transfers occurred across roughly 100 transactions. He added that “value was moved and nothing was done.” He also cited a recent incident involving the freezing of over 16 business wallets, and called Circle’s handling “incompetent” while labeling the firm and Allaire as “bad actors for the industry.”

The allegations emerged as several market commentators debated whether faster action could have limited the movement of funds during the exploit window, particularly as large volumes were reportedly transferred over several hours without interruption.

Meanwhile, Drift Protocol disclosed that the incident stemmed from a highly coordinated and sophisticated attack rather than a flaw in its smart contracts. According to the team, a fraudulent actor gained unauthorized access through a “novel attack involving durable nonces,” which enabled pre-signed transactions to be executed later.

This allowed the attacker to effectively bypass real-time detection and quickly assume control over administrative permissions tied to the protocol’s Security Council. Drift confirmed that the exploit was not caused by compromised seed phrases or code vulnerabilities but instead involved unauthorized or misrepresented approvals, which were likely obtained through social engineering. The attacker secured the required 2-of-5 multisig approvals and executed a malicious admin transfer within minutes. They then introduced a malicious asset and removed withdrawal limits.

Drift Hack Timeline

The timeline shared by Drift revealed that the groundwork for the attack began as early as March 23 with the creation of durable nonce accounts linked to both legitimate multisig members and attacker-controlled wallets. Additional preparations continued through a multisig migration on March 27 and further nonce activity on March 30, which led to the execution phase on April 1, when pre-signed transactions were triggered shortly after a legitimate test transaction.

In response, Drift froze remaining protocol functions, removed the compromised wallet from the multisig, and began coordinating with security firms, exchanges, and law enforcement to trace and potentially recover the stolen assets.

The post ZachXBT Accuses Circle of Being ‘Asleep’ as Drift Hack Funds Moved Freely appeared first on CryptoPotato.

The age of anonymous founders in the crypto space is fading fast as investors are no longer impressed by flashy slogans or vague promises of “going to the moon.” Instead, they want to know who’s actually building the project: real names, accountability, and a clear understanding of who’s behind the code and the money.

In 2026, full disclosure has become the baseline for any project to be taken seriously, and verifying the team’s identity is now a non-negotiable requirement. When developers choose to stay anonymous, it creates a trust gap that fewer investors are willing to ignore. Projects that put their credentials front and center show that they’re committed to building something that lasts.

Bitcoin Everlight is part of that new wave, ensuring that every participant is aware that the project’s foundation is built on accountability. This shift ensures that the future of finance is based on verified reputation, not on chance.

Establishing a Transparent Financial Ecosystem

Bitcoin Everlight makes a real shift in how transparency fits into Bitcoin’s infrastructure. It’s engineered to operate as a high-performance routing network, boosting the practical utility of the leading cryptocurrency. At the same time, the project realizes that technical excellence is meaningless without a foundation of trust.

By tying its development to strict identity standards, the platform offers a safe harbor for users tired of the “rug pill” culture that has haunted the industry for years.

Bitcoin Everlight isn’t just about transferring data. It raises the bar as every line of code and every team member is expected to meet a global standard of professionalism and quality.

Verified Credentials and Structural Integrity

Security is the core of this project, and it has been part of the design from the get-go. The team is aware that real protection doesn’t come from self-reported claims, but from independent checks that prove the system is actually safe.

Before the presale even opened to the public, the platform underwent several strict smart contract audits. These reviews ensure that the logic governing users’ funds is robust and free from vulnerabilities. Moreover, the commitment to transparency extends to the human element, with full identity checks conducted by regulated third-party entities.

Safety protocols include:

• Rigorous smart contract audits completed by Spywolf and Solidproof to ensure code quality.
• Comprehensive team identity verification through Spywolf and Vital Block protocols.
• A “security-first” design that allows for optional checkpointing directly back to the Bitcoin blockchain for maximum trust.
• Full non-custodial participation, meaning users retain control of their keys and can unstake their BTCL at any time.

As noted by Crypto Infinity, these multi-layered security measures provide a level of comfort that is rare in early-stage projects.

The Pulse of an Active User Base

The project’s long-term health is usually reflected in its social proof. The official X account is a constant source of information and provides real-time technical updates and tips for shard activations. This transparency has helped build a fast-growing community of shard holders who are already earning rewards in the current phase. Their active participation is recorded daily in the project’s Telegram groups, where users regularly share their dashboard success and discuss strategies.

The user dashboard provides a transparent look at the network:

• Interactive leaderboards that show the top performers and foster healthy competition.
• A live activity feed that broadcasts shard activations to the entire community in real time.
• Direct access to reward tracking, allowing for complete visibility of all earnings.

Creators like Crypto Show have pointed out that this level of community openness is a direct reflection of the project’s commitment to its users.

Navigating the Path to Global Liquid Markets

BTCL’s growth strategy is centered on making the platform accessible to everyone. The team has already prepared for listings on some of the most popular centralized exchanges, including Binance and Coinbase. To ensure a smooth process and maintain market stability, the project has dedicated 15% of the total supply to liquidity. This way, there is always enough room for entry and exit, regardless of whether users are trading on a decentralized or centralized exchange.

Early participants are the big winners from this roadmap, as more people adopt the routing network, demand for BTCL is expected to grow accordingly. Insights from Token Empire suggest that securing a position before these major listings is a key strategy for those looking for maximum upside. Additionally, Crypto Vlog has highlighted how the planned expansion into various dApps will further solidify the token’s utility in the broader market.

Strategic Entry Points and Phase Dynamics

Currently, users can participate in the BTCL journey in its third phase, with an entry price of $0.0012 per token. This represents a substantial discount compared to the upcoming fourth stage, where the price will increase to $0.0014. To date, more than $2 million has been raised from global participants.

Current metrics show a clear trajectory:

• The official launch price for BTCL is set at $0.03110.
• Participation is available through various assets, making the entry process frictionless for all.
• Users can begin activating shards immediately to lock in their reward tiers.

This phase-based approach allows early supporters to build their positions before the public launch. Crypto Tech Gaming recently discussed how the fixed token supply ensures holders aren’t diluted as the project moves toward mainnet.

Conclusion

In a world where trust matters most, Bitcoin Everlight is setting a new standard for transparency. It combines rigorous team verification, high-level security audits, and a clear market strategy to give investors a chance to earn BTC. The move toward identity-verified projects is more than a trend; it’s the future of sustainable crypto investing. Your financial future shouldn’t depend on anonymous founders but instead rely on a verified community.

Interested investors can secure their spot in the ecosystem and start earning now.

Check more here.

Disclaimer: The above article is sponsored content; it’s written by a third party. CryptoPotato doesn’t endorse or assume responsibility for the content, advertising, products, quality, accuracy, or other materials on this page. Nothing in it should be construed as financial advice. Readers are strongly advised to verify the information independently and carefully before engaging with any company or project mentioned and to do their own research. Investing in cryptocurrencies carries a risk of capital loss, and readers are also advised to consult a professional before making any decisions that may or may not be based on the above-sponsored content.

Readers are also advised to read CryptoPotato’s full disclaimer.

The post Why Team Identity Checks Are Becoming the Baseline Before Any New Crypto Investment appeared first on CryptoPotato.

The ALT/BTC chart has printed four consecutive green MACD bars for the first time in nearly 6 years, according to popular analyst Ash Crypto.

The last time this happened, there was a 60% altcoin outperformance against Bitcoin over the three months that followed.

Three Signals Converging

In an April 2 post on X, Ash Crypto explained that for four years after the 2022 bear market, ALT/BTC was often in the red and oversold, reinforcing the feeling that altcoins have never truly recovered and Bitcoin is running alone.

However, they are now pointing to three developments happening at the same time that they said would make for excellent news for altcoin holders.

First and most eye-catching is the MACD signal, which measures momentum shifts by comparing two moving averages of price. The analyst says that the metric has now printed four green bars in a row on the ALT/BTC monthly chart. This last happened in August 2020, right before a big altcoin rally against BTC, when money moved from the main cryptocurrency to the smaller assets.

The second factor is the ISM Manufacturing PMI, a monthly index that measures activity in the U.S. manufacturing sector. A reading above 55 helped trigger two alt seasons in the past, in 2017 and 2021, and Ash Crypto noted that it has gone above 52 for three consecutive months, last seen in October 2022.

Furthermore, they noted that U.S. CPI inflation has fallen to a five-year low, which puts less pressure on the Federal Reserve to tighten monetary policy, therefore creating a more favorable environment for risk assets like altcoins.

“This is the most bullish macro backdrop for risk assets including alts in years,” the analyst stated.

Not Quite Yet Alt Season

Nevertheless, Ash Crypto stopped short of calling a full altcoin season, saying for that to happen, ISM will have to go past 55, and there must be broad liquidity expansion, as well as a sustained drop in BTC dominance, all happening at the same time.

What they described instead was the possibility of a meaningful two-to-three-month recovery, provided Bitcoin clears $76,000 and Ethereum follows toward the $2,800 to $3,200 range.

However, soon after the initial analysis, Ash Crypto followed up to point out that a highly anticipated speech from U.S. President Donald Trump regarding the ongoing conflict in the Middle East had already complicated the picture.

“No analysis is going to work when Trump can destroy the chart and setup with a single speech,” they noted.

With Trump warning that the U.S. will hit Iran “extremely hard” in the next couple of weeks, BTC retreated below $67,000, and ETH dipped back under $2,100, with the crypto market shaving over 3% from its market cap, per CoinGecko.

Meanwhile, data published on March 30 by analyst Darkfost showed that more than 40% of altcoins were trading at or near their all-time lows, a reading that was way worse than what was seen during the 2022 bear market.

In addition, XWIN Research Japan today flagged a bearish outlook for most major altcoins, including ETH, XRP, Solana, and BNB, with data from CryptoRank showing that only seven tokens posted positive returns in Q1 2026, and Tron’s TRX was the only one from the top 10 that ended the quarter in the green.

The post Three Macro Signals Align for Altcoins: But Is It Alt Season? appeared first on CryptoPotato.