JPMorgan's potential entry into prediction markets could legitimize the sector, attracting more institutional interest and regulatory scrutiny.
The post JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon floats prediction market services appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Franklin Templeton's acquisition signals increased institutional interest in crypto, potentially accelerating mainstream adoption and innovation.
The post Franklin Templeton acquires CoinFund spinoff to grow crypto offerings appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Monzo's strategic pivot to Europe highlights the challenges of US market entry and underscores the importance of focusing on profitable regions.
The post Digital bank Monzo ends US venture to double down on Europe appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Bitget Wallet adds XRP Ledger integration, enabling XRP transfers, RLUSD transactions, and cross-chain swaps for 90M users.
The post Bitget Wallet plugs XRP Ledger into its payment stack for 90 million users appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
USA expansion to Celo signifies the first move beyond Ethereum, leveraging regulated digital dollars on a high-volume network.
The post Tether backed USA₮ expands to Celo in first move beyond Ethereum appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Bitcoin Magazine

Franklin Templeton to Acquire CoinFund Spinoff for Institutional Crypto Push: WSJ
Franklin Templeton has agreed to acquire 250 Digital, a crypto investment firm formed from CoinFund, according to Wall Street Journal reporting. The goal with this acquisition is to improve its digital asset strategy and create a dedicated institutional crypto division.
The deal sets the foundation for a new business line called Franklin Crypto. The unit targets pensions, sovereign wealth funds, and large institutional investors seeking exposure to digital assets through regulated investment structures.
Terms of the transaction remain undisclosed. The acquisition reflects continued expansion by traditional financial institutions into crypto markets despite a prolonged drawdown in digital asset valuations.
Franklin Templeton manages more than $1.7 trillion in assets. The firm entered digital assets in 2018 and built a team that focuses on blockchain systems, tokenized instruments, and crypto investment products. The group includes more than 50 professionals across investment and technology roles.
The firm stands among the earliest issuers of U.S. spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds launched in 2024.
The acquisition of 250 Digital brings two senior crypto investment managers into the Franklin structure. Christopher Perkins and Seth Ginns lead the firm. Both worked at CoinFund before the spinout and held roles in institutional investment and digital asset markets.
The new division will focus on portfolio construction for institutional capital. The strategy includes liquid token markets, venture exposure, and structured products tied to blockchain infrastructure.
Franklin Templeton head of innovation Sandy Kaul said market conditions in digital assets opened a path for talent acquisition and platform expansion. Kaul described a shift in institutional demand patterns and said the firm views the current environment as a point for structural buildout.
The crypto market has faced a major drawdown after prior peaks. Bitcoin has declined from highs above $126,000 to levels near half that value. Total digital asset market value has contracted by trillions. Trading volumes and valuations across token sectors have compressed across multiple cycles.
Institutional participation has not retreated at the same pace. Large asset managers continue to file for new products, expand custody relationships, and develop tokenization systems that connect traditional securities with blockchain rails.
Franklin Templeton has expanded partnerships with digital asset firms to support tokenized products. One partnership with Binance enables use of tokenized fund shares as collateral for trading activity. The structure links traditional money market products with crypto market infrastructure.
The acquisition aligns with a broader trend among global asset managers that entered crypto markets through exchange-traded products, custody partnerships, and pilot tokenization projects.
These firms continue to extend their reach into trading, venture investing, and infrastructure development tied to blockchain systems.
This post Franklin Templeton to Acquire CoinFund Spinoff for Institutional Crypto Push: WSJ first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Australia Passes Landmark Crypto Law, Mandates Licensing for Exchanges and Custodians
Australia has approved its first comprehensive digital asset framework, requiring crypto exchanges and custody providers to obtain financial services licenses, bringing the sector under the country’s core financial regulations.
The Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Bill 2025 cleared both houses of Parliament on April 1, marking a major shift in how digital assets are regulated.
The legislation integrates crypto platforms into the existing Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) regime, placing them under the same standards that govern brokers and fund managers.
The law introduces two new regulated categories under the Corporations Act. Digital asset platforms cover exchanges and similar services that hold crypto on behalf of users. Tokenized custody platforms apply to firms that hold real-world assets and issue digital tokens representing those holdings.
Operators in both categories must obtain an AFSL from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. This subjects them to obligations including safeguarding client assets, maintaining adequate capital, providing clear disclosures, and participating in dispute resolution systems.
Rather than regulating digital assets themselves, the framework targets intermediaries that control customer funds. Policymakers designed the approach to address risks exposed by past industry failures, including commingling of assets, misuse of funds, and insolvency events that left customers unable to recover holdings.
Australia’s Hostplus pension fund is also exploring offering Bitcoin and other digital assets to its nearly two million members through its Choiceplus platform. A rollout could come as early as next financial year, pending regulatory approval and final product design.
The reforms replace a fragmented system where crypto exchanges only needed to register with anti-money laundering authorities unless their products qualified as financial instruments. Under the new regime, platforms must meet stricter operational and financial standards aligned with existing financial services laws.
The legislation also grants expanded powers to the regulator to set rules on custody, governance, and risk management, with civil penalties for noncompliance. At the same time, smaller platforms receive limited exemptions.
Firms holding less than A$5,000 per customer and processing under A$10 million in annual transactions are not subject to full licensing requirements, preserving room for early-stage innovation.
The law positions Australia to capture a larger share of the digital finance market. The bill now awaits royal assent and is expected to take effect after a transition period, giving firms time to comply with the new licensing regime.
This post Australia Passes Landmark Crypto Law, Mandates Licensing for Exchanges and Custodians first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

New Hampshire’s Bitcoin-Backed Municipal Bond Moves Closer With Moody’s Rating
A first-of-its-kind municipal bond backed by bitcoin is moving closer to issuance after receiving a sub-investment-grade rating from Moody’s Investors Service, marking a major step in the convergence of digital assets and traditional public finance.
The proposed $100 million issuance, structured by the New Hampshire Business Finance Authority (BFA), earned a Ba2 rating — two notches below investment grade, according to Bloomberg reporting.
If completed, the deal would represent the first municipal bond backed by bitcoin collateral, opening a potential new pathway for institutional capital to access the asset class through regulated fixed-income markets.
Under the proposed structure, bond payments will be funded through proceeds generated from bitcoin collateral posted by borrower CleanSpark. Investors will also have upside exposure, with additional payments tied to bitcoin price appreciation.
At the same time, downside protections are built into the deal. If bitcoin’s price falls below a predefined threshold, the trust can be liquidated to repay bondholders in full.
Critically, the bonds carry no backing from taxpayers.
“No public funds of the State of New Hampshire or any political subdivision thereof may be used to pay amounts under the rated bonds,” Moody’s noted in its report, emphasizing that the issuer has no taxing authority to cover any shortfall.
Digital asset firm Wave Digital Assets will oversee transaction administration, while BitGo will serve as custodian for the bitcoin collateral, securing it in regulated cold storage.
The structure was initially approved by the BFA board back in November, 2025, positioning New Hampshire as a potential leader in integrating bitcoin into public finance markets.
Governor Kelly Ayotte backed the initiative at the time, framing it as a way to attract investment without exposing taxpayers to risk.
“This is an innovative way to bring more investment opportunities to our state and position us as a leader in digital finance,” Ayotte said.
The Ba2 rating underscores the core tension at the heart of the product: combining one of the most volatile asset classes with one of the traditionally safest.
Bitcoin has fallen nearly 50% from its October 2025 peak near $126,000, highlighting the risks tied to collateral value fluctuations. Over the same period, high-yield municipal bond indices posted modest positive returns, illustrating the contrast between the two asset classes.
Still, proponents argue the structure’s collateralization model — and liquidation safeguards — could make bitcoin viable within conservative capital markets.
The deal is part of a broader effort by Wave and its partners to create a bridge between digital assets and traditional debt markets, allowing bitcoin to function as institutional-grade collateral.
If successful, the issuance could establish a template for future crypto-backed municipal or corporate debt offerings, effectively creating a new hybrid asset class.
“This isn’t just one transaction—it’s the opening of a new debt market,” Wave co-founder Les Borsai said when the structure was first unveiled.
For now, the bond has no confirmed pricing date. But with a rating in place, the experiment to merge bitcoin with municipal finance is entering a more concrete phase, one that could test whether traditional investors are ready to underwrite crypto risk in exchange for yield and upside exposure.
This post New Hampshire’s Bitcoin-Backed Municipal Bond Moves Closer With Moody’s Rating first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Afroman Confirmed As A Bitcoin 2026 Speaker
Afroman has been officially confirmed as a speaker at Bitcoin 2026. Born Joseph Foreman, the Grammy-nominated rapper best known for his 2001 hit “Because I Got High” arrives in Las Vegas this April not just as an artist, but as someone who spent three years in court defending his right to say what happened to him.
In August 2022, law enforcement officers from the Adams County, Ohio Sheriff’s Office raided his home on suspicion of drug trafficking and kidnapping. Nothing illegal was found, and no charges were filed. Afroman did what artists do and he made music about it. Using his own home surveillance footage, he released a series of videos documenting the raid, the most viral of which, “Lemon Pound Cake,” was named after a moment in the footage in which an officer appeared to do a double take at a cake sitting on his kitchen island. Seven of the officers sued him in 2023 for defamation and invasion of privacy, collectively seeking nearly $4 million in damages.
On March 18, 2026, just a month before Bitcoin 2026, a jury ruled in Afroman’s favor on every count after a three-day trial in Adams County Common Pleas Court. Throughout the proceedings, Afroman defended his work on First Amendment grounds, arguing he had the right to use the footage to cover damages from the raid, including a broken gate and front door. Walking out of the courthouse, he told reporters: “I didn’t win, America won. America still has freedom of speech. It’s still for the people, by the people.”
His presence at Bitcoin 2026 extends beyond the stage. The American flag suit he wore throughout his legal battle will be on display in the Bitcoin Conference Art Gallery as part of Relics of a Revolution, an exhibition exploring protest art and asymmetric responses to institutional power throughout Bitcoin’s short history, with the suit up for auction through Scarce.city. For the first time ever, attendees will be able to see Afroman take the Bitcoin Conference stage in person — catch him live at Bitcoin 2026, April 27–29 at The Venetian Resort in Las Vegas.
Bitcoin 2026 will take place April 27–29 at The Venetian, Las Vegas, and is expected to be the biggest Bitcoin event of the year.
Focused on the future of money, Bitcoin 2026 will bring together Bitcoin builders, investors, miners, policymakers, technologists, and newcomers from around the world. The event will feature a wide range of pass types, including general admission passes designed specifically for those new to Bitcoin, alongside premium passes for professionals, enterprises, and institutions.
With multiple stages, immersive experiences, technical workshops, and headline keynotes, Bitcoin 2026 is designed to serve both first-time attendees and long-time Bitcoiners shaping the next era of global adoption.
Bitcoin’s flagship conference has scaled dramatically over the past five years:
Get Your Bitcoin 2026 Pass Bitcoin Magazine readers can save 10% on Bitcoin 2026 tickets using code ‘ARTICLE10‘ at checkout.
Stay at The official hotel of Bitcoin 2026, The Venetian, and get a guaranteed low rate plus 15% off your pass. Be in the middle of where the fun is all happening, and where the networking never ends.
And don’t forget:
Volunteer at Bitcoin 2026 and get Pro Pass access plus exclusive perks.
All students ages 13+ can apply for a Student Pass and get free general admission access to Bitcoin 2026.
Location: The Venetian, Las Vegas
Dates: April 27–29, 2026
For more information and exclusive offers, visit the Bitcoin Conference on X here.
Bitcoin 2026 is the definitive gathering for anyone serious about the future of money. With 500+ speakers, multiple world-class stages, and programming spanning Bitcoin fundamentals, open-source development, enterprise adoption, mining, energy, AI, policy, and culture, the conference brings every corner of the Bitcoin ecosystem together under one roof.
From headline keynotes on the Nakamoto Stage to deep technical sessions for builders, institutional strategy discussions for enterprises, and beginner-friendly Bitcoin 101 education, Bitcoin 2026 is designed for everyone—from first-time attendees to the leaders shaping Bitcoin’s global adoption.
Whether you’re looking to learn, build, invest, network, or influence, Bitcoin 2026 is where Bitcoin’s next chapter is written.
Bitcoin 2026 offers a range of pass options designed to meet the needs of newcomers, professionals, enterprises, and high-net-worth Bitcoiners alike.
Bitcoin 2026 General Admission PassIdeal for newcomers and those looking to experience the heart of the conference.

Bitcoin 2026 Pro PassDesigned for professionals, operators, and serious Bitcoin participants.
Includes all General Admission features, plus:

Bitcoin 2026 Whale Pass The all-inclusive, premium Bitcoin 2026 experience.
Includes all Pro Pass features, plus:
This is the most immersive way to experience Bitcoin 2026.

Bitcoin 2026 After Hours PassYour ticket to the night.
Most deals are done with a drink in your hand. Get exclusive access to 3 official Bitcoin 2026 after-parties across Las Vegas — each with a 2-hour open bar — where the real conversations happen and the best connections are made.

More headline speaker announcements are coming soon.
Don’t miss Bitcoin 2026.
This post Afroman Confirmed As A Bitcoin 2026 Speaker first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Jenna Montgomery.
Bitcoin Magazine

Satoshi’s 2010 Quantum Response Is Getting a 2026 Stress Test as Google Warns Timeline May Be Closer Than Expected
In 2010, long before quantum computing became a mainstream concern in crypto circles, Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, was already sketching out how the network might respond if its underlying cryptography were ever compromised.
The premise was simple but consequential: Bitcoin’s security assumptions are not permanent. They can be replaced.
In early Bitcointalk discussions, Satoshi outlined a scenario in which the system’s cryptographic primitives — whether hashing or digital signatures— could eventually weaken. If that happened gradually, the network could coordinate a transition: a protocol upgrade would introduce stronger algorithms, and users would migrate their holdings by re-signing coins into new address formats.
Even in the case of widespread signature failure, Satoshi suggested the system could still recover if there was time to agree on a transition path.
At the time, it was an abstract exercise in future-proofing. Now, it is becoming a live design question.
New research from Google’s Quantum AI division has reignited debate over how soon quantum machines could threaten modern cryptography, including the elliptic curve signatures securing Bitcoin.
In updated estimates published this week, researchers say the computational requirements for breaking elliptic curve cryptography may be significantly lower than previously believed — potentially requiring fewer than 500,000 physical qubits under optimized conditions. That marks a roughly 20-fold reduction compared to earlier projections.
More importantly, the research suggests that once sufficiently advanced systems exist, they may be capable of executing attacks within Bitcoin’s operational time frame (roughly ten minutes per block) enabling so-called “on-spend” attacks that target transactions while they are still unconfirmed in the mempool.
While no such cryptographically relevant quantum computer exists today, the updated models have compressed the perceived distance between current hardware and theoretical breakpoints.
Some industry participants now describe the shift as moving risk from the mid-2030s into the late 2020s window.
Google has also publicly targeted 2029 as a milestone for broader post-quantum cryptography migration across systems
The renewed attention to quantum risk has placed Bitcoin’s original design philosophy under a new lens. Unlike centralized financial systems, Bitcoin cannot be upgraded unilaterally. Any migration to quantum-resistant cryptography would require voluntary coordination across miners, developers, exchanges, wallet providers, and users.
That dynamic makes Bitcoin structurally slower to adapt, but also more resilient against unilateral changes.
Satoshi’s early framing anticipated this tension. The proposed solution was not prevention, but migration: if cryptography weakens, users would re-sign coins into a new scheme, effectively moving value forward into a stronger security system.
The blockchain itself would persist, but ownership proofs would evolve. What was less clear in 2010 to Satoshi was the scale and coordination challenge such a migration would require in a global, trillion-dollar network.
Recent analysis tied to Google’s findings highlights a more nuanced threat model than earlier “break Bitcoin” narratives. The concern is not only long-term key recovery, but short-window exploitation, where a sufficiently fast quantum system could derive private keys from exposed public keys during transaction broadcast and confirmation.
This introduces a distinction between dormant and active funds. According to estimates cited in the research, a substantial portion of Bitcoin supply may already have exposed public keys on-chain, increasing theoretical vulnerability once quantum capability reaches a threshold.
The response across the digital asset industry has been divided but serious.
Some researchers argue the timeline remains comfortably distant, emphasizing that quantum systems capable of breaking modern cryptography still require breakthroughs in both hardware scale and error correction.
Others, including contributors to Google’s research ecosystem, suggest the slope of progress has steepened enough to warrant immediate preparation.
Galaxy Digital’s head of research, Alex Thorn, noted that while the probability of near-term compromise remains low, the direction of progress is difficult to ignore, and that work on post-quantum migration should be treated as precautionary infrastructure planning rather than reactive crisis response.
“Google Quantum AI’s new paper describes much more efficient circuits that significantly reduce the requirements for a quantum computer to be capable of breaking classical cryptography, such as those that secure blockchains like Bitcoin,” Thorn wrote to Bitcoin Magazine.
“No such computer exists today. And Google’s researcher Craig Gidney gives 10% odds that a quantum machine capable of breaking cryptography will be built by 2030,” Thorn added.
Others find this threat feasible, but far away.
“Quantum computing represents a genuine engineering challenge for the cryptocurrency industry, but it is far from an existential threat in the current form,” Bitfinex analysts shared with Bitcoin Magazine.
The key tension in 2026 is that Satoshi’s migration model assumes time: time to detect a weakening primitive, time to agree on a replacement, and time for users to move funds safely.
Google’s updated analysis compresses that assumption.
If quantum capability develops gradually, Satoshi said that Bitcoin could theoretically transition as originally envisioned. But if capability crosses a threshold rapidly, especially with advances in “on-spend” attack feasibility, the window for orderly migration could narrow significantly.
That is the scenario now driving discussion across protocol developers: not whether Satoshi’s Bitcoin can survive quantum computing in principle, but whether its coordination mechanisms can respond quickly enough in practice.
This post Satoshi’s 2010 Quantum Response Is Getting a 2026 Stress Test as Google Warns Timeline May Be Closer Than Expected first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Paolo Ardoino said that Tether wanted to allocate 10% to 15% of its $20 billion proprietary investment portfolio to physical gold. Two days later, Tether reported more than $10 billion in profit for 2025 and $6.3 billion in excess reserves.
The company had already poached two precious metals traders from HSBC to build what Ardoino publicly called “the best trading floor for gold in the world.”
The traders were Vincent Domien, HSBC's former global head of metals trading and a board member of the London Bullion Market Association, and Mathew O'Neill, who oversaw precious metals origination across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
Tether was acting like a balance sheet empire builder, expanding its reserve footprint and cultivating the image of an institution capable of competing directly with JPMorgan and HSBC in bullion markets.
By Mar. 31, Tether had dismissed both. Reports confirmed the cuts just three months into their tenure, as gold headed for a 12.7% monthly drop, its steepest fall since October 2008.
Placed next to a leadership reset at the investment level, a formal Big Four audit engagement, and a reported pause on fundraising, the layoffs take on a different weight.
The move looks like a deliberate redrawing of what Tether wants to look like before it gets inspected.
Tether's Mar. 24 announcement that it had formally engaged a Big Four firm for its first full financial statement audit carried specific language.
The company said the process would go beyond the attestation standard used across stablecoins, covering reserve optimization, internal controls, and financial reporting.
On that same day, Tether put a planned raise of up to $20 billion on hold until the audit was completed, with prospective investors and bankers pressing for greater transparency. On Mar. 12, CIO Richard Heathcote had already stepped back from day-to-day duties, with deputy Zachary Lyons taking over.
There is a broader timeline of Tether's moves this year.

USAT launch on Jan. 27, gold allocation ambitions stated Jan. 28, profit disclosure Jan. 30, investment leadership transition Mar. 12, Big Four audit announced Mar. 24, fundraising pause reported the same day, XAUT expansion to BNB Chain on Mar. 26, and gold-desk layoffs on Mar. 31.
These movements trace a company reorganizing around a single internal priority: make the reserve perimeter legible, clearly segregate the non-reserve portfolio, and arrive at the audit process looking simpler than it did in early 2026.
Tether still held about 130 metric tons of physical gold at the end of 2025, and four days before cutting the desk, it expanded XAUT to BNB Chain and noted the tokenized gold market had grown from roughly $1.3 billion to more than $4 billion in 2025, with XAUT commanding about 60% of that market.
Tether said it was still building a “state-of-the-art gold team,” optimizing operations, and repositioning gold from an expansion symbol to a reserve asset and tokenized product.
Circle has spent years using disclosure as a competitive weapon.
| Metric | Tether / USDT | Circle / USDC |
|---|---|---|
| Circulation / market cap | $184B+ | $77B+ |
| Disclosure cadence | Attestations; now moving to full audit | Weekly reserve disclosures |
| External assurance | Big Four full audit announced | Monthly reserve assurance from Big Four |
| Reserve narrative | Large scale, broader reserve/perimeter questions | Simpler institutional disclosure pitch |
| Strategic issue in article | Credibility gap despite dominance | Disclosure used as competitive weapon |
USDC has over $77 billion in circulation as of late Mar. 31, and publishes weekly reserve disclosures and receives monthly reserve assurance from a Big Four firm.
Tether's USDT sat above $184 billion, and coexisted with a persistent credibility gap that Circle's institutional pitch exploits in enterprise sales cycles. By committing to a full financial statement audit rather than continued attestation, Tether aims to close that gap without surrendering its volume dominance.
The timing tracks a regulatory deadline. The OCC's proposed GENIUS Act rules, circulated in February 2026, explicitly cover reserve assets, redemption standards, risk management, audits, and financial reporting, including examination of foreign issuers.
The new regulatory bar demands end-to-end parsability of a stablecoin issuer's reserve system and governance. Tether's Mar. 24 announcement, calibrated to both Circle's disclosure pressure and the reality that USDT's $184 billion scale makes it a regulatory target regardless of management preference, reads as a direct answer to that standard.
Reuters noted that Tether's equity as a share of assets fell to 3.3% at year-end 2025, while cash-like reserves dropped to 76% of assets. Meanwhile, holdings like Bitcoin, gold, and secured loans rose to 24%.
Tether disclosed $6.3 billion in excess reserves against roughly $186.5 billion in liabilities, a cushion of about 3.4%. At that margin, a full audit carries solvency-optics weight for a company, backstopping the dominant quote currency across crypto trading pairs and serving over 550 million users.
The Federal Reserve published a note on Mar. 30 stating that payment stablecoins can affect liquid-asset markets, bank reserve balances, and the implementation of monetary policy.
IMF research found that a 1% increase in combined USDC and USDT market cap lowers the 1-month T-bill yield by 1.9 basis points at the trough, while a BIS/IMF paper found more than 70% of cumulative net stablecoin inflows came from non-USD currencies.
Tether's push to harden its books is happening precisely as USDT draws the attention of central banks and crypto markets alike.
If the process completes without material complexity in the reserve or affiliated-entity structure, Tether reopens its fundraise with a disclosure profile closer to Circle's, widens institutional access to USDT, and reframes the gold-desk cuts as the kind of operational decision a mature financial infrastructure provider makes.
Goldman Sachs projected gold at $5,400 per ounce by year-end 2026. If prices recover, XAUT captures the upside while the physical desk Tether cut becomes a sunk cost.
The company will have traded a few months of Empire Optics for something more durable: the right to be priced like audited infrastructure rather than a crypto-native operator running on goodwill and quarterly attestations.
| Scenario | Trigger | What changes for Tether | What it means for crypto markets |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bull case: clean audit | No material reserve or affiliated-entity complexity | Fundraise reopens; disclosure profile moves closer to Circle; gold-desk cuts look disciplined | USDT gains institutional credibility; reserve debate cools |
| Bear case: protracted audit | Control/classification/documentation issues delay completion | Fundraise stays shelved; reserve-composition scrutiny persists | Rivals gain narrative ground; every BTC/gold move revives credibility concerns |
The bear case is a protracted audit. Control or classification issues in the $20 billion proprietary portfolio, formally segregated from USDT reserves but routed through affiliated entities requiring clean documentation, delay completion, and the fundraise stays shelved.
Every price move in Bitcoin or gold reopens the debate over reserve composition in a news cycle that Tether can no longer contain with an attestation update.
The 3.4% equity cushion leaves little room for narrative drift, and each quarter without a completed audit widens the window for rivals to claim the credibility ground Tether vacated by inviting the inspection before the results arrived.
The company that built the world's most consequential stablecoin is now betting that looking auditable is worth more than looking ambitious.
The post Tether hired top HSBC gold traders, then cut them weeks before auditors arrive appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Bitcoin price started April back above $68,000 after a late-March relief rally tied to hopes that the Iran war could move toward de-escalation.
According to CryptoSlate's data, the flagship digital asset gained more than 3% in the last 24 hours to reach as high as $69,170 before retreating to about $68,456 as of press time, as investors weighed whether the bounce marked the start of a more durable recovery or only a temporary release from a bruising first quarter.
The rebound followed a rapid shift in broader market sentiment. Reuters reported that oil prices swung sharply after media reports said Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian was prepared to end the war if Tehran received guarantees, while US President Donald Trump said Washington could wind down the conflict within weeks.
Market observers noted that the relief over that possibility helped lift risk assets, including crypto, even as traders continued to price in elevated energy costs and persistent geopolitical uncertainty.
Let's look at the factors that could significantly influence Bitcoin's price performance in this new month.
The mixed signals from the Middle East indicate that the macro backdrop will continue to do much of the work this month.
Binance Research noted that the US-Iran ceasefire signals could extend the recent crypto recovery, with digital assets like Ethereum likely to outperform if risk appetite improves further.
However, the firm also warned that caution remains necessary because Iranian officials have described the contacts as message exchanges rather than formal negotiations. According to the firm, Israeli war aims remain harder than Washington’s, and threats from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps against major US companies remain a live tail risk.
This view is very important to note, considering the Iran war has driven the steepest increase in oil-price forecasts, with analysts now expecting Brent to average $82.85 a barrel in 2026, up from $63.85 in February.
Notably, Brent and US crude have both gained about 60% since the conflict began, a move that has fed directly into inflation worries and rate repricing across global markets.
That dynamic gives April a heavier macro calendar than usual for Bitcoin traders. The Bureau of Labor Statistics calendar shows the March employment report on April 3, while the Federal Reserve’s April calendar lists minutes from the March 17-18 FOMC meeting on April 8, the Beige Book on April 15, and the next Fed meeting on April 28-29.
Any sign that higher energy costs are feeding through into inflation expectations, or that the Fed is becoming less willing to ease, would complicate the case for crypto's rebound.
Against that backdrop, crypto traders are entering the new month with hope that Bitcoin's historic performance in April will provide a breather.
Data from CoinGlass show that April has often been one of Bitcoin’s better months, with an average return of 33.4% and a median gain of 7.57%.

However, BIT, formerly Matrixport, noted that these patterns have become less reliable in recent years, especially when the asset enters the month with weak momentum.
According to the firm, BTC's Relative Strength Index (RSI) near 47% puts the digital asset closer to last year’s starting point than to the overheated conditions that preceded sharper corrections in earlier cycles.
In practical terms, the firm expects volatility to rise from March’s range-bound trading as investors test whether the latest selloff is stabilizing or widening into a broader reversal.
Crypto traders' positioning in the options market reinforces that view. CME Group said March bitcoin options open interest showed about $660 million in calls against $240 million in puts, a nearly three-to-one ratio that pointed to demand for a recovery into the end of the first quarter.
However, longer-term positioning is more defensive, with the June expiry having more put open interest than calls.
That view aligns with how Bitcoin has traded through the first quarter. The market has shown enough buying interest to reclaim major round numbers after sharp dips, but not enough follow-through to quickly restore confidence.
This lack of conviction is showing up in the institutional demand for the flagship digital asset.
CoinShares said digital-asset investment products recorded their first outflows in five weeks in the week through March 30, with $414 million leaving the sector. Bitcoin products accounted for $194 million of that total, though they still held a positive year-to-date net inflow position of $964 million.
CoinShares linked the reversal to a more prolonged Iran conflict, higher inflation risk, and a shift in market expectations toward the possibility of rate hikes rather than cuts by June.
Glassnode’s data point in the same direction. The analytics firm said the seven-day moving average of US spot ETF net flows turned negative early last week, with daily net outflows ranging from 200 to 500 Bitcoin.

The figures are small compared with the largest inflow weeks seen since spot ETFs launched, but they suggest that institutional demand is no longer acting as a clean stabilizer at current prices.
At the same time, corporate treasury buying has also slowed significantly outside Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, leaving Bitcoin without the same breadth of institutional support that helped sustain earlier rebounds.
With ETF flows softening and treasury demand narrowing, the market enters April with less of a cushion against another bout of macro stress.
Taken together, those factors leave Bitcoin entering April with support in place, but without a clear all-clear signal.
Rachael Lucas, an analyst at BTC Markets, said $66,000 remains the level to watch this month. According to her, a hold there would support a consolidation argument after a volatile quarter, while a break lower would expose Bitcoin to another leg down.
Meanwhile, crypto market maker Wintermute said credible diplomatic progress and oil pulling back toward $100 would leave the short side vulnerable to a squeeze toward $70,000 to $74,000, after which resistance near $74,000 could come into focus if de-escalation holds.
However, a fresh escalation, combined with oil pushing toward $120, would reopen a path toward the low $60,000s, with the high-to-mid $50,000s also back on the table if cycle analogs hold.
Recent CryptoSlate research would suggest that April seasonality offers a weak tailwind but not a signal. Historically strong monthly returns contrast with the broader pattern that years starting from similarly weak Q1 conditions have rarely closed higher, leaving the burden on macro and flows rather than calendar effects.
The post Bitcoin traders cheer April’s historic gains, yet one Fed calendar date could flip this rally overnight appeared first on CryptoSlate.
On Mar. 30, Google Quantum AI published a 57-page whitepaper coauthored with Justin Drake of the Ethereum Foundation and Dan Boneh of Stanford.
The paper demonstrates that breaking the 256-bit elliptic-curve discrete logarithm problem, the cryptographic foundation underlying most blockchain transactions, requires roughly 500,000 physical qubits, a 20-fold reduction from prior estimates.
That compression means a sufficiently advanced quantum computer could crack a Bitcoin private key in approximately 9 minutes, placing live transactions within the 10-minute block confirmation window with roughly a 41% probability of theft.
Days earlier, Google had set a 2029 deadline for completing the industry's post-quantum cryptography migration.
Those numbers generated the expected interest around when quantum computers will be able to crack Bitcoin.”
It also raised another question asked by Bloomberg's Eric Balchunas and Bitcoin analyst Checkmate.
Checkmate asked,
This paper, if I understand it correctly, is Google saying we have cracked the design for a cryptographically relevant quantum computer.
That's a very big deal.
Why oh why, did they focus the paper on our blockchain bags?
Not government codes. Not banking infrastructure, Not internet protocols.
Internet funny money.
Balchunas added,
Not discounting threat (that's a whole sep debate) but why would Google apply this research time/money on crypto vs something of way more societal consequence, like military defense systems, the global banking system or even private emails. Is bitcoin really their biggest worry?
So why did Google choose blockchains as the vehicle for one of the most consequential responsible-disclosure exercises in the history of public key cryptography?
The paper's first move is widening. Google explicitly stated that the literature had overlooked vulnerabilities in stablecoins and tokenization, then devoted sections to USDT and USDC admin keys, Ethereum validator concentration, and real-world asset tokenization.
The document projected that tokenized assets could push quantum-vulnerable values above $16 trillion by 2030. Co-writing with the Ethereum Foundation and Stanford researchers frames the paper as an argument for industry-wide migration.
The numbers Google chose to publish make the vulnerability legible.
About 1.7 million BTC, nearly 9% of all Bitcoin, sits in P2PK scripts with public keys exposed on-chain, and dormant vulnerable Bitcoin may reach 2.3 million BTC across script types.
Roughly 6.9 million BTC in total are at heightened risk, including wallets opened by Taproot's default public-key disclosure. On Ethereum, the 1,000 wealthiest exposed accounts hold approximately 20.5 million ETH, and a sufficiently advanced machine could drain them within nine days.
These are observable, on-chain facts. A researcher can verify them without access to a bank's internal systems, a government registry, or a telecom's proprietary PKI.
Google has pursued post-quantum cryptography since 2016.

The company ran the first PQC experiments in Chrome that year, protected internal communications with PQC in 2022, enabled ML-KEM by default for TLS 1.3 and QUIC on desktop Chrome in 2024, launched quantum-safe digital signatures in Cloud KMS preview in 2025, and integrated ML-DSA-based PQC protections into Android 17 in March 2026.
The crypto whitepaper is one public-facing case study inside a migration Google already runs across its own infrastructure, and a carefully controlled one. Google withheld the actual attack circuits and instead published a zero-knowledge proof, allowing anyone to verify its resource estimates without accessing the attack roadmap.
The company coordinated with the US government before publication.
Current geopolitics amplifies the timing. The US finalized its first PQC standards in 2024 and aims to achieve full industry migration by 2035. South Korea targets the same 2035. Reports noted that China is working toward national PQC standards within 3 years.
Google's paper lands in an accelerating standards race, and crypto serves as the most visible public arena for how that race plays out in practice.
“]
Google's own introduction provides one answer: cryptocurrencies “stand out” among quantum-vulnerable systems because many blockchains rely heavily on ECDLP-based elliptic-curve cryptography, which a smaller quantum computer can break than comparable RSA systems.
| Factor | Crypto / blockchains | Closed financial or traditional systems |
|---|---|---|
| Main cryptographic exposure | Heavy reliance on ECDLP-based curves | Mixed systems, often less transparent |
| Recourse after forged signature | Often none; losses can be final | Fraud controls, reversals, legal recourse |
| Observability | Public keys, mempools, dormant wallets visible on-chain | Internal systems are private |
| Governance | Open, decentralized, slow consensus | Central authority can mandate upgrades |
| Failure mode | Public and irreversible | Often operationally contained |
Additionally, blockchains typically offer no recourse when a forged signature authorizes a fraudulent transfer.
The combination of concentrated cryptographic exposure and irreversible failure makes crypto the clearest venue to demonstrate what post-quantum signature collapse looks like.
Beneath that technical argument sits a governance argument. The paper explicitly states that Bitcoin's decentralized structure and “lack of a singular center of power” may require a “drawn-out process of consensus building” for key rotation or dormant-asset policy.
Centralized institutions deploy software updates through a single authority, and Bitcoin's equivalent requires decentralized consensus, a process that runs in public at whatever pace the community permits.
Google chose the domain where the migration problem plays out in the open, where failures turn permanent and public, and where no single authority can resolve the coordination problem by mandate.
The same vulnerable cryptography protects TLS web traffic, firmware updates, end-to-end messaging, passports, MFA, SSH, and DNS.
Blockchains layer on top of all that a set of properties unique to open networks: public-key registries, observable mempools, on-chain dormant wallets, and governance debates that run in real time and are open to any observer.
The inference that the paper's structure supports is that those properties give Google a venue to explain the blast radius of a signature migration failure in observable, public terms before the same migration becomes necessary in systems with lower tolerance for public failure.
The paper could force chains, wallets, and stablecoin issuers to make PQC migration visible and measurable early.
Google already points to live or test PQC deployments on Algorand, Solana, and XRP Ledger.
Projects that demonstrate clean key-rotation paths, hybrid-signature support, and a credible approach to dormant assets earn governance credibility they can carry into the tokenization wave.
Crypto would then move from the first visible venue for quantum vulnerability to the first public laboratory for post-quantum trust infrastructure, and Google's paper becomes the founding document for that transition.
The result is a controlled disclosure that forced the hardest governance conversation before a quantum computer relevant to cryptography existed.
| Scenario | What happens | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Bull case | Chains, wallets, and stablecoin issuers make PQC migration visible and measurable early | Crypto becomes the first public laboratory for post-quantum trust infrastructure |
| Bear case | Coordination fails, Bitcoin key-rotation politics drag, validator/admin-key complexity stays unresolved | Crypto becomes the best public example of how trust migration can fail in the open |
If coordination fails visibly, Bitcoin's consensus politics drag on key rotation, Ethereum-style validator and admin-key complexity stays unresolved, and stablecoins or tokenized assets start selecting host chains unevenly on PQC readiness.
The 6.9 million BTC in high-exposure wallets then constitute a permanent liability that the network cannot address without a breakthrough in social coordination; it has never been managed at this scale.
Google's paper ages into a different kind of record: documentation that crypto earned its place in the research through the visibility of its failure modes and the finality of its losses, with the most consequential systems requiring a different kind of disclosure altogether.
Google published its research as a controlled warning about the internet's coming trust migration and chose the domain where that migration runs in public, turns irreversible on failure, and falls to no single authority to mandate.
The post Why Google’s new breakthrough quantum research focuses on Bitcoin rather than banking or nuclear codes appeared first on CryptoSlate.
The Midnight Foundation declared its network live on Mar. 29, with the genesis block dated Mar. 17.
That launch gives Cardano's community its first production test of Charles Hoskinson's argument that public blockchains cannot reach regulated finance, identity, and business use unless the infrastructure itself embeds privacy and compliance from the start.
Cardano enters that test in an unusual position: a market cap above $9.1 billion, 672 active developers per Electric Capital data, and a DeFi footprint that hasn't matched the valuation's weight.
DefiLlama shows roughly $134 million in total value locked, about $47 million in stablecoins, and less than $2,000 in daily chain fees.
The gap between Cardano's perceived scope and its on-chain activity persists. Midnight's premise is that privacy-first infrastructure can attract a class of users and use cases that Cardano's base layer never targeted.
| Metric | Figure in article | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Above $9.1 billion | Shows Cardano carries large market expectations |
| Active developers | 672 | Suggests a meaningful builder base already exists |
| DeFi total value locked | Roughly $134 million | Indicates limited financial activity relative to valuation |
| Stablecoins on Cardano | About $47 million | Shows modest settlement/liquidity footprint |
| Daily chain fees | Less than $2,000 | Suggests restrained day-to-day economic usage |
| Core takeaway | Large valuation + developer base, but relatively light on-chain finance | Sets up Midnight as a test of whether privacy/compliance can close the gap |
Hoskinson framed Midnight at launch as an addition to a generational arc: Satoshi gave sound money, Ethereum gave programmability, Cardano brought governance and interoperability, and Midnight returns identity and privacy.
Institutional stablecoin volume reached $1.22 trillion, yet only 0.0013% settled on private rails, per Aleo's 2025 Privacy Gap Report.
RWA.xyz now tracks about $26.67 billion in distributed tokenized assets, with McKinsey projecting that tokenized financial assets could reach around $2 trillion by 2030.
At that scale, privacy becomes a market-structure issue. Public ledgers expose positions, counterparties, and reserve data in ways that regulated compliance frameworks cannot readily accommodate.
Midnight's architecture targets that friction directly. Its key building blocks enable institutions to demonstrate compliance or solvency without broadcasting sensitive data that would render transparent chain participation commercially untenable.
Compact, a TypeScript-influenced smart contract language, provides enterprise developers already familiar with TypeScript with a direct onboarding path to the network.
The dual-token NIGHT/DUST model adds further structural logic: separating governance and security (NIGHT) from transaction costs (DUST) provides enterprises with predictable operating economics.
This token model eventually abstracts crypto exposure away from end users entirely, a feature that compliance-driven buyers often value over cryptographic architecture alone.
Other protocols are also betting on the privacy-plus-compliance pitch.
Aztec combines a public and private smart contract state with client-side proving. Namada advances selective disclosure and privacy for viewing keys. Aleo recently announced USAD, a privacy-by-default stablecoin built on the same institutional gap rhetoric.
The field has become a genuine competitive cluster, and Midnight's edge sits in a specific combination: Cardano-linked validator selection that accounts for SPO stake delegation, NIGHT's initial launch on Cardano mainnet, and Lace wallet support added in early March.
| Network | Privacy model described in article | Compliance / disclosure angle |
|---|---|---|
| Midnight | Privacy-first infrastructure; shielded/unshielded assets; private proofs | Selective disclosure; compliance and solvency can be demonstrated without exposing sensitive data |
| Aztec | Public and private smart contract state with client-side proving | Implied compliance-friendly privacy posture |
| Namada | Privacy with viewing keys | Selective disclosure |
| Aleo | Privacy-by-default positioning | Institutional privacy-gap framing; USAD stablecoin |
Those linkages give Midnight access to Cardano's existing staking infrastructure and builder base that competitors cannot replicate.
The network opens on a federated operator model, consisting of names such as Google Cloud, Blockdaemon, MoneyGram, Pairpoint by Vodafone, eToro, Worldpay, and Bullish running block production from day one.
Each brings a different theory of where regulated on-chain finance goes next. Midnight bets that a Cardano-adjacent, enterprise-first operator model gets there first.
The federated operator set is both a design choice and a constraint. A curated infrastructure environment lowers the trust bar for regulated institutions evaluating deployment, as they can verify who operates the network before committing sensitive workflows to it.
Google Cloud's role is infrastructure and node operation. MoneyGram is exploring a confidential payment network settlement with regulatory trust, acting as both a node operator and an active collaborator in the network's early phase.
Monument Bank represents the clearest near-term product case: the bank wants to bring up to £250 million in tokenized retail deposits onto Midnight in a first phase, drawing from £7 billion in deposits managed for more than 100,000 customers.
Worldpay is running a stablecoin payments proof of concept using USDG, while Bullish is building a proof-of-reserves tooling on the privacy layer.
Each of those arrangements sits at the proof-of-concept stage, and the Midnight team said in January it was still compiling a definitive inventory of applications targeting the launch window.
A separate restraint applies to token metrics. NIGHT traded above $1 billion in market cap in late January 2026, but CoinGecko placed it at nearly $731 million as of Mar. 30.
That earlier episode measured attention, and treating it as evidence of sustained network adoption would misrepresent the data.
Broader community-driven block production is scheduled for later in 2026, which gives decentralization skeptics a clear opening: the network is asking observers to trust a curated launch environment before it has proved decentralized demand.
In the bull case, Monument discloses visible issuance milestones over the next 90 days, and at least one of Worldpay, Bullish, or MoneyGram publishes a production milestone or public demo.
| Test area | Bull-case signal | Bear-case signal | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monument Bank | Visible issuance milestones tied to tokenized deposits | No visible issuance progress | Most concrete near-term product case in the article |
| Worldpay / Bullish / MoneyGram | Public demo, production milestone, or clear workflow in use | Announcements remain exploratory | Shows whether enterprise names become real usage |
| Application pipeline | Named live apps or credible launch-window deployments | Pipeline stays thin through mid-2026 | Distinguishes infrastructure readiness from adoption |
| Institutional traction | Regulated-finance use cases begin moving on-chain | Interest stays at proof-of-concept stage | Tests whether privacy/compliance actually unlocks new demand |
| Network structure | Progress toward broader community-driven block production later in 2026 | Federated launch becomes a lasting criticism | Determines whether enterprise trust and decentralization can coexist |
| Cardano ecosystem impact | Midnight starts pulling in builders and institutions beyond Cardano’s base-layer activity | Activity stays narrative-driven, not usage-driven | Measures whether Midnight expands Cardano’s orbit |
| NIGHT market cap | Retests the $1 billion-plus range alongside real adoption signals | Token price becomes the only visible traction point | Keeps token metrics secondary to network usage |
| Bottom line | Architecture turns into measurable adoption | Thesis remains technically credible but commercially unproven | Frames the verdict readers should watch for |
Midnight begins to function as the first credible bridge between Cardano's infrastructure and regulated on-chain finance, pulling in builders and institutions that transparent ledgers have never served.
Additionally, NIGHT retests the $1 billion-plus range as Midnight becomes the dominant new narrative for Cardano's broader orbit.
In the bear case, the application pipeline stays thin through mid-2026. Enterprise commitments result in announcements before live application deployment. The federated launch draws more criticism from participants focused on decentralization.
Midnight still carries technical credibility but fails to establish product-market fit in its stated institutional target, and the privacy-and-compliance thesis never graduates from architecture to an adoption record.
Hoskinson can now point to a full stack running from Cardano's governance and interoperability layer to Midnight's identity and privacy layer.
The verdict will come later, from the applications builders deploy, the deposits Monument actually tokenizes, and the workflows the institutional operators commit to past the launch window.
The post Cardano’s $9B network has little real activity — its new system aims to fix that appeared first on CryptoSlate.
America holds roughly 38% of global Bitcoin mining capacity, and the specialized hardware powering that position comes overwhelmingly from Chinese manufacturers.
Senators Bill Cassidy and Cynthia Lummis introduced the Mined in America Act on Mar. 30 to address that gap, proposing certification, domestic manufacturing support, and the codification of President Donald Trump's Strategic Bitcoin Reserve to begin unwinding a foreign hardware dependence they frame as a national industrial vulnerability.
Cassidy's office cites 97% of mining hardware coming from China. Hashrate Index's January 2026 update places US Bitcoin mining capacity at roughly 37%-38% of the global total, at around 400 exahashes per second.
Both data points describe the same supply-chain gap: American mining operations running on machines supplied by Chinese manufacturers. That combination of leading the world in an activity while relying on adversary-linked manufacturers for the machines that enable it is the argument the bill puts into legislative form.

The bill proposes a voluntary “Mined in America” certification administered by Commerce. Certified facilities would phase out mining hardware linked to foreign adversaries.
NIST and the Manufacturing Extension Partnership would support domestic hardware manufacturing by drawing on existing federal energy and rural programs. Cassidy's office says the bill operates within current program authorities.
The bill would also write the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve into statute. Trump's March 2025 executive order created the reserve using forfeited government Bitcoin and specified that any additional acquisition strategies must be budget neutral, imposing no incremental taxpayer cost.
Moving the reserve from executive action to law would give it legislative standing beyond a single administration and, for the first time, bind the hardware-sourcing argument to a federal balance sheet instrument.
The Mined in America Act rests on a specific argument: owning the activity layer while ceding the hardware layer to foreign-origin manufacturers leaves the US exposed upstream.
The bill's answer spans certification, manufacturing support, and reserve codification, three policy levers that together frame Bitcoin mining as a sector deserving the same upstream attention Washington gives to semiconductors or critical minerals.
Reuters reported that US authorities began seizing some Chinese-made mining equipment at ports in late 2024 on FCC and Customs enforcement grounds, before releasing some of it in March 2025.
Those seizures gave the hardware dependence argument concrete, documented weight.
The port-level friction raised a question that the bill now codifies in law: if Chinese-origin mining gear can be caught by customs enforcement, what does that mean for an industry whose hardware stack now connects directly to Treasury reserve policy?
For the bill's backers, the episode turned that question from theory into documented enforcement history.
Mining economics made the supply chain exposure more consequential. A CoinShares report puts network hash price in the $30 to $35 per petahash per day range, with roughly 15% to 20% of the global fleet operating at a loss at those levels.
Hardware supply disruptions land harder when the hash price environment already squeezes margins, with operators unable to quickly source replacement machines facing real operational exposure from a customs hold or tariff escalation.
The SEC released guidance on Mar. 17 clarifying the treatment of protocol mining and other crypto activities. A July 2025 White House digital assets report directed Congress and regulators to support US digital asset leadership.
Washington now treats crypto infrastructure as an industrial-policy category, and the Mined in America Act arrives as the hardware-sourcing component of that reorientation.
| Date | Event | Why it mattered |
|---|---|---|
| Late 2024 | U.S. authorities began seizing some Chinese-made mining equipment at ports | Turned hardware dependence from a theoretical concern into a real enforcement issue |
| March 2025 | Some of the seized mining equipment began to be released | Showed the issue was active and operational, not a one-off headline |
| March 2025 | Trump’s executive order created the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve | Elevated Bitcoin from a market topic to a federal policy and Treasury issue |
| July 2025 | White House digital assets report backed U.S. digital-asset leadership | Placed crypto infrastructure within a broader national competitiveness agenda |
| March 17, 2026 | SEC released guidance on protocol mining and other crypto activities | Signaled a more formal federal posture toward crypto infrastructure |
| March 30, 2026 | Cassidy and Lummis introduced the Mined in America Act | Put the mining-hardware supply-chain issue into legislative form |
The bill's logic runs through the same channel as semiconductor policy, battery manufacturing, or telecom equipment: who controls the machines behind a compute-intensive infrastructure that now touches power markets and the Federal Reserve.
In 2024, the EIA estimated that cryptocurrency mining could account for up to 2.3% of US electricity consumption at 137 identified facilities. March reporting shows data-center electricity demand already generating public pushback over grid strain and utility costs.
Mining now sits within a broader public infrastructure debate, well beyond crypto.
The harder question the bill raises is what “American” hardware actually means. Reports noted that Chinese-origin manufacturers have already begun establishing US production footholds, in part to navigate tariffs, while US-based Auradine has been promoting its products and policy case for domestically designed ASICs.
Assembly in America and design-plus-component-sourcing in America produce different supply chain outcomes, and the bill's certification framework will eventually have to define which one earns the label.
The Mined in America Act drawing broad Republican support and the White House folding it into a combined reserve-protection and manufacturing plank represents the bull case.
Domestic and domestically assembled rig capacity expands enough to capture meaningful orders from certified facilities.
The US holds its high-30s share of global hash rate while reducing upstream concentration risk, and Bitcoin mining joins semiconductors and critical minerals as a named category in US industrial policy.
In this scenario, Auradine and potential new entrants capture orders that currently go abroad.
In the bear case, the legislation stalls. “Mined in America” functions as a certification brand with limited uptake, and miners continue buying from Chinese-origin vendors because price, performance, and availability dominate purchasing decisions.
| Test area | Bull case | Bear case |
|---|---|---|
| Domestic mining hardware capacity | U.S. and domestically assembled rig supply expands enough to win meaningful orders | Domestic capacity stays too limited to shift buying patterns |
| Certified facility uptake | Miners adopt “Mined in America” certification in meaningful numbers | Certification becomes mostly symbolic with limited market uptake |
| U.S. hash-rate position | U.S. keeps its high-30s share of global mining while reducing hardware dependence | U.S. maintains mining share but remains exposed to foreign hardware supply |
| Dependence on Chinese-origin vendors | Operators diversify away from dominant Chinese-origin manufacturers | Price, performance, and availability keep miners buying from the same vendors |
| Auradine and potential new entrants | U.S.-based suppliers capture orders that previously went abroad | New entrants struggle to compete on cost and scale |
| Strategic Bitcoin Reserve relevance | Reserve policy and mining hardware policy become part of one industrial strategy | Reserve codification remains mostly separate from the actual hardware bottleneck |
| Broader policy meaning | Bitcoin mining joins semiconductors and critical minerals as a named industrial-policy category | The bill stands mainly as a statement of vulnerability rather than a reshoring success |
| Bottom line | America converts mining leadership into upstream supply-chain resilience | America continues leading in mining activity without controlling the machines behind it |
Washington's policy ambitions outpace its industrial capacity to execute them, and the bill serves as a documented statement of vulnerability that the domestic manufacturing base has yet to answer.
The bill's introduction puts the supply chain gap in Bitcoin's hardware layer onto the Senate's legislative record.
The post Washington moves to cut China out of the machines powering US Bitcoin mining appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Early this morning, things got tense fast. Several on-chain monitoring tools started flagging what looked like a serious issue on the Ethereum network—something as extreme as a “state-level” breach.
Within minutes, rumors spread across social media claiming that someone had taken control of the consensus layer, potentially allowing transactions to be reversed and $ETH to be double-spent. For about half an hour, the market reacted hard. Ethereum’s price swung wildly as panic selling kicked in across major decentralized exchanges.
If you are looking for confirmation of a total network collapse, you can rest easy. The Ethereum blockchain was not hacked. This "exploit" was an elaborate April Fools' Day scenario designed to test the community's response to misinformation and to highlight the recent "Quantum Readiness" upgrades in the 2026 Ethereum roadmap. While the data feeds on certain community dashboards were intentionally "glitched" to show a 51% attack in progress, the actual Ethereum blockchain remained perfectly secure and operational.
When people talk about "hacking a blockchain," they usually refer to one of two things:
Recent 2026 reports from Chainalysis confirm that while DeFi exploits continue to occur, the underlying Ethereum base layer has never been successfully "hacked" since its inception.
Ethereum’s security model is currently at its strongest point in history. Following the 2022 "Merge," the network transitioned to Proof of Stake, and subsequent upgrades in 2025 and 2026 have focused on "Hardening the Layer 1 foundation."
To compromise the network today, an attacker would face:

| Feature | April Fools' Claim | Reality (2026 Status) |
|---|---|---|
| Network Status | Compromised / Hacked | Fully Functional |
| ETH Price | Crashing to Zero | Stable / Market Driven |
| Consensus | 51% Attack in Progress | 100% Decentralized Integrity |
| Transaction Finality | Reverted | Immutable |
While the Ethereum blockchain is secure, users often confuse it with the applications running on top of it. For example, recent 2026 security audits have shown that 90% of "Ethereum hacks" are actually:
To stay safe, it is crucial to use secure hardware wallets and trade only on reputable exchange platforms that provide high-tier security features and insurance funds.
Early this morning, users of a prominent European cryptocurrency exchange were greeted by a chart that defied all logic. The $Bitcoin price appeared to collapse in a vertical line, crashing from its stable range of approximately $68,000 down to a mere $1,000. For several minutes, social media platforms were set ablaze with screenshots of the "crash," as traders rushed to deposit funds in hopes of catching the ultimate discount.

The sight of a 99.9% drop in the world's largest digital asset naturally sparked fears of a catastrophic systemic failure or a "fat finger" trade of historic proportions. However, investors can breathe a sigh of relief. This was an elaborate April Fools' Day prank. The exchange in question intentionally modified its front-end display to show the $100 price point as a nod to Bitcoin's early trading days, but no actual liquidations or trades occurred at this level.
A flash crash is a genuine market phenomenon where a lack of buy orders (liquidity) leads to a rapid, temporary collapse in price. While today’s event was a scripted joke, real flash crashes have occurred in the past due to:
In today's case, the global Bitcoin price remained steady on all other major platforms like Coinbase and Binance, confirming that the "crash" was localized and cosmetic.
Despite the morning's humor, the actual crypto news cycle shows a market characterized by consolidation. Recent data indicates that Bitcoin is currently navigating "macro jitters," with prices hovering around the $69,000 mark as investors weigh geopolitical tensions and interest rate trajectories.

The $1,000 price target was chosen because it represents a "holy grail" for latecomers to the space—a price not seen since 2013. By displaying this specific number, the exchange targeted the psychological FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) that drives much of the retail crypto trading activity.
"I almost threw my coffee at the monitor," one trader shared. "I knew it was April 1st, but seeing that red candle touch $100 makes your survival instincts kick in before your brain does."
While we can laugh at a scheduled prank, real market anomalies do happen. High-authority financial outlets like Bloomberg often highlight the risks of keeping entire portfolios on centralized exchanges. To mitigate the risk of actual technical glitches or exchange-side issues, many experts recommend:
| Metric | Displayed Value | Global Market Reality |
|---|---|---|
| Price per BTC | $1,000 | ~$69,196 |
| Drop Magnitude | -99.85% | +1.3% (Actual intraday move) |
| Trading Status | Visual Mockup | Fully Operational |
| Event Source | April Fools' Prank | Standard Market Macro |
Global markets are currently experiencing a strong relief rally, driven by signals that tensions between the US and Iran could de-escalate.
Stocks surged across the board:
At the same time, crypto reacted positively:
👉 On the surface, this looks like the beginning of a sustained recovery.
But the reality is far more fragile.
The current move is not being driven by improving fundamentals.
Instead, markets are reacting to a single dominant expectation:
👉 The war might end soon.
This creates a classic “risk-on” environment:
However, this rally is built on expectation — not confirmation.
And that makes it extremely vulnerable.
While headlines focus on de-escalation, a major risk is quietly building:
👉 Iran has threatened to target major US companies operating in the Middle East.
This shifts the situation from geopolitical tension to:
👉 Economic and corporate disruption
If pursued, the consequences could extend far beyond the region.
The companies at risk represent:
If disruptions occur, markets could react immediately:
👉 This would likely trigger a broader market pullback.
The most important variable in this situation is energy.
If tensions escalate:
👉 This directly pressures the crypto market.
At the moment, crypto is behaving like a risk asset, not a safe haven.
If escalation headlines emerge:
This reflects crypto’s growing correlation with traditional markets.
If the situation intensifies:
👉 This could allow Bitcoin to stabilize and potentially recover after the initial drop.
This market is now highly sensitive to headlines.
Watch closely for:
👉 These events could rapidly reverse the current rally.
Right now, markets are pricing:
But if this scenario fails:
👉 The downside reaction could be fast and aggressive.
The crypto market is rising on optimism — but that optimism is not yet supported by reality.
👉 If corporate threats become real, the current rally could unwind within hours.
For investors, this is a critical moment:
The next move will not be driven by charts — but by headlines.
$BTC, $ETH
A recent research development from Google has sparked serious concerns across the crypto industry. The paper suggests that breaking modern cryptographic systems may require far fewer quantum resources than previously estimated.
This has reignited a long-standing debate: could quantum computing eventually break Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies?
What’s been going around the market lately is pretty eye-catching:
It’s still being debated, so nothing is confirmed. But it does point to one thing: quantum computing seems to be moving faster than most expected.
To understand the risk, it’s important to look at how major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are secured.
Both rely on public-key cryptography, which could theoretically be broken by a sufficiently powerful quantum computer using algorithms like Shor’s algorithm.
However, there are important caveats:
👉 Bottom line: the threat is not immediate—but no longer theoretical either.
In response to growing concerns, developers within the Bitcoin community are actively working on solutions.
A new Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) is reportedly in development, aimed at making the network resistant to quantum attacks.
Key developments include:
This shows that the ecosystem is not ignoring the threat—but preparing for it.
If quantum computing reaches the required level, the impact could be massive:
Some estimates suggest the crypto industry has around 3–5 years to prepare before quantum computers become a real threat.
However, timelines in deep tech are notoriously unpredictable. Breakthroughs can happen suddenly—or take much longer than expected.
👉 This uncertainty is exactly why developers are acting early.
From a research and risk perspective:
Cardano ($ADA) has had a rough ride this year. Over the past 12 months, it’s dropped more than 60%, with 2026 alone already seeing a 26% decline. Many investors are asking themselves: is Cardano finished, or is it just undervalued?
The truth isn’t so clear-cut.
Sure, the price looks weak, but it’s not just Cardano—macro pressures are weighing on the entire crypto market. Rising geopolitical tensions, especially the ongoing conflict in Iran, are shaking risk assets across the board.
Still, crypto has shown it can hold up under stress. Often, during times like these, markets go into a “wait-and-see” mode rather than collapse outright, giving projects like Cardano room to recover.
Looking at the below daily chart, the trend is clearly bearish—but with signs of stabilization.

Support zones:
Resistance zones:
Right now, $Cardano is trading in a compression phase, often a precursor to a big move.
The current geopolitical situation is playing a major role.
If market conditions improve—or if the war de-escalates—Cardano could recover faster than many expect.
Some models suggest:
👉 Bottom line: Cardano is not dead—but it needs a macro tailwind + market cycle shift.
If the Iran war escalates or macro conditions worsen, ADA could still drop further.
Weak demand and declining trading activity are already visible in the market.
From an analytical standpoint:
Experts cite portfolio rebalancing and geopolitical easing as driving the crypto market rally, though caution persists.
European crypto asset manager CoinShares positions for U.S. expansion as institutional players consolidate market share against Wall Street giants.
Federal grand juries have indicted ten individuals tied to alleged pump-and-dump schemes, following an FBI undercover operation.
Research suggests fault-tolerant quantum machines could arrive sooner than expected, posing a threat to Bitcoin and Ethereum cryptography.
P2P.me was established to push boundaries, but the startup admitted that wagering on itself via Polymarket may have been a bridge too far.
XRP ETF recorded first negative monthly close in March as the market eyes new changes.
Impressive amount of Bitcoin has been shifted after a decade of inactivity.
XRP Ledger's network activity is moving in the right direction, but a proper retrace is still a matter of time.
Ethereum creator Vitalik Buterin clears his wallet this April 1, offloading gifted meme coins and moving funds to privacy protocols like Railgun, while the crypto market sees rare relief this spring.
Cardano ranked ahead of Bitcoin and XRP Ledger in quantum readiness.
Shares of NIO (NIO) climbed more than 9% during Wednesday trading and extended gains by over 2% in premarket activity after the Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer announced impressive delivery figures.
NIO Inc., NIO
The Shanghai-based automaker reported March 2026 deliveries of 35,486 vehicles, representing a substantial 136% year-over-year growth compared to March 2025.
These figures span NIO’s three-brand portfolio. The core NIO brand represented 22,490 deliveries, while the family-focused ONVO brand delivered 6,877 vehicles. The company’s newest entry, the compact premium FIREFLY brand, contributed 6,119 units.
First quarter 2026 deliveries totaled 83,465 vehicles, reflecting a 98.3% increase versus the comparable 2025 period — effectively doubling year-over-year performance.
As of March 31, 2026, the company’s all-time delivery count stood at 1,081,057 vehicles. The one million delivery threshold was surpassed during the first quarter.
The automaker published these figures on April 1, 2026, through an official statement issued from its Shanghai headquarters.
A particularly notable achievement from the announcement: NIO’s redesigned ES8 model reached 80,000 cumulative deliveries on March 20, 2026 — merely 181 days following its market introduction.
The flagship SUV maintained the number one ranking in China’s large SUV category for three straight months, competing against all powertrain types and price segments. This achievement is particularly impressive given the intense competition within China’s electric vehicle landscape.
The automaker attributed the ES8’s success to its distinctive product features and consistent customer interest.
Meanwhile, the ONVO brand, positioned for family-oriented buyers, continues expanding its market presence following its recent launch. FIREFLY, targeting the premium compact segment, delivered more than 6,000 vehicles during its initial months of full-scale production.
The Q1 delivery figure of 83,465 units represents a meaningful acceleration from previous quarterly performance. The nearly 100% year-over-year volume increase demonstrates substantial progress compared to the company’s position in early 2025.
The three-brand approach targeting diverse customer segments shows evidence of market acceptance based on March’s performance data.
With cumulative deliveries now exceeding 1.08 million vehicles since inception, the company continues expanding its market footprint.
Investor enthusiasm was evident Wednesday as the stock surged over 9% following the delivery announcement.
The post NIO (NIO) Shares Surge 9% as March Deliveries Skyrocket 136% Year-Over-Year appeared first on Blockonomi.
Shares of NIO (NIO) climbed more than 9% during Wednesday’s trading session and extended gains over 2% in premarket hours after releasing its latest delivery figures.
NIO Inc., NIO
The Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer reported March 2026 deliveries of 35,486 vehicles, representing a substantial 136% jump from March 2025 figures.
These figures encompass three distinct brands operating under the NIO’s corporate structure. The core NIO brand delivered 22,490 vehicles. The family-focused ONVO brand contributed 6,877 deliveries, while the compact premium FIREFLY brand added 6,119 units.
Across the entire first quarter of 2026, NIO’s combined deliveries totaled 83,465 vehicles, representing a 98.3% increase versus the comparable 2025 period — nearly doubling its previous year’s performance.
By March 31, 2026, NIO’s all-time delivery count stood at 1,081,057 vehicles, having surpassed the one million unit threshold during the first quarter.
The company issued these delivery figures on April 1, 2026 through an official statement from its Shanghai headquarters.
Among the notable achievements in the report: NIO’s All-New ES8 celebrated its 80,000th delivery on March 20, 2026 — accomplished in merely 181 days following its market introduction.
This flagship model dominated China’s large SUV category for three straight months, ranking first regardless of powertrain type or pricing tier. Achieving this leadership position in such a fiercely competitive market represents a significant accomplishment.
NIO attributed the ES8’s strong performance to its distinctive product features and consistent consumer demand.
The ONVO brand, designed for family-oriented buyers, continues expanding its delivery volumes following its recent market entry. Meanwhile, FIREFLY, positioned as a compact luxury EV brand, delivered more than 6,000 vehicles during its initial months of full-scale production.
The 83,465 vehicles delivered in Q1 represents a substantial improvement over previous quarterly results. With year-over-year volume nearly doubling, NIO has established a considerably stronger position compared to early 2025 performance levels.
The automaker’s three-brand approach, each targeting distinct customer demographics, shows encouraging momentum based on the March delivery data.
NIO has now delivered more than 1.08 million vehicles throughout its operational history.
Wednesday’s stock performance clearly demonstrates investor enthusiasm regarding the delivery results. NIO shares climbed over 9% following the announcement’s release.
The post NIO (NIO) Stock Soars 9% on Record March Delivery Numbers appeared first on Blockonomi.
The luxury home furnishings retailer delivered a challenging fourth quarter performance, falling short on both profit and sales metrics. RH recorded earnings per share of $1.53, significantly trailing the analyst consensus estimate of $2.24 — representing a notable $0.71 gap. Sales reached $842.6M, underperforming the anticipated $873.48M.
Interestingly, shares managed to gain ground during the trading session, potentially benefiting from end-of-month portfolio rebalancing as market participants positioned themselves for the upcoming quarter.
Looking at the complete fiscal year FY2025, the picture showed some bright spots. The company achieved 8% revenue growth year-over-year, with a two-year compound growth rate of 15%. Adjusted EBITDA reached $597M, representing a 17.3% margin. Free cash flow turned positive at $252M, a significant improvement from the negative territory seen in 2024.
Rh, RH
However, leadership characterized 2025 as a “peak investment year,” allocating approximately $289M toward adjusted capital investments along with $37M for brand acquisitions. This substantial spending is creating near-term margin compression.
Trade tariffs emerged as a significant obstacle. Company executives noted that tariffs created roughly 190 basis points of margin erosion during the fourth quarter, with the most severe impact hitting metal outdoor furniture, lighting fixtures, area rugs, and various furniture lines. Supply chain restructuring efforts compounded these challenges.
Looking to the first quarter of 2026, management projects revenue will contract by 2% to 4%. For the full fiscal year, guidance anticipates revenue expansion of 4% to 8% with adjusted EBITDA margins landing between 14% and 16%.
The analyst community responded cautiously to the results. TD Cowen maintained its “buy” stance but reduced its price objective from $265 down to $200. UBS lowered its target from $188 to $160 while maintaining a “neutral” recommendation. Stifel preserved its “hold” rating with a new target of $165, substantially down from its previous $320 target.
The current consensus among analysts stands at “Hold” with an average price target of $211.07. The coverage universe includes seven buy ratings, ten hold recommendations, and three sell calls.
Bearish sentiment intensified as short interest jumped roughly 28% throughout March, creating additional downward pressure on shares.
Despite facing near-term obstacles, RH continues advancing its expansion initiatives. The company plans to unveil RH Estates in mid-May, introducing new sub-brands RH Bespoke and RH Couture. These launches follow strategic acquisitions including Michael Taylor, Formations, and Dennis & Leen.
Global expansion remains a priority with flagship store openings scheduled for Paris, Milan, and London. The company currently manages 26 in-gallery dining concepts and targets reaching 40 locations by 2027.
Regarding insider activity, executive Eri Chaya divested 7,000 shares on March 24th at $129.42 per share, generating proceeds of $905,940. Director Mark Demilio sold 2,254 shares in January at $220.00 each. Combined insider transactions totaled $2.86M in stock sales over the trailing 90-day period.
RH’s 12-month peak stands at $257.00. Shares have declined 41.51% over the past year, with a 12-month floor of $123.03.
The post RH (RH) Stock Tumbles on Disappointing Q4 Results and Bearish Guidance appeared first on Blockonomi.
The high-end home furnishings retailer RH delivered underwhelming fourth-quarter results that fell below Wall Street expectations on both the top and bottom lines. The company recorded earnings per share of $1.53 compared to the Street’s anticipated $2.24 — representing a significant $0.71 gap. Sales totaled $842.6M, coming up short of the $873.48M analyst consensus.
Interestingly, despite the disappointing figures, shares managed to tick upward during the trading session, potentially benefiting from month-end portfolio rebalancing as institutional buyers positioned themselves for the upcoming quarter.
Looking at the broader fiscal picture, FY2025 delivered mixed signals. The company achieved 8% revenue expansion year-over-year, marking a cumulative two-year growth rate of 15%. Adjusted EBITDA reached $597M with margins of 17.3%, while free cash flow registered $252M — a notable improvement from the prior year’s negative territory.
Rh, RH
However, leadership characterized 2025 as a year of significant capital deployment, with approximately $289M allocated to adjusted capital projects and an additional $37M directed toward strategic brand purchases. This elevated spending is compressing profitability metrics in the short run.
Trade policy emerged as a meaningful obstacle. Company executives pointed to tariffs generating roughly 190 basis points of margin pressure during the fourth quarter, with particular impact felt across metal patio furniture, lighting fixtures, area rugs, and general furniture segments. Complications from supply chain reconfiguration amplified these challenges.
Looking ahead to the first quarter of 2026, RH anticipates revenue will decrease by 2% to 4%. The full-year outlook projects revenue advancement of 4% to 8% alongside adjusted EBITDA margins landing between 14% and 16%.
The analyst community responded with tempered expectations. TD Cowen maintained its “buy” recommendation while slashing its price objective from $265 down to $200. UBS reduced its target from $188 to $160 while maintaining a “neutral” stance. Stifel preserved its “hold” rating with a revised target of $165, substantially lower than its previous $320 projection.
The consensus analyst rating currently stands at “Hold” with an average price target of $211.07. The coverage breakdown includes seven buy ratings, ten hold recommendations, and three sell calls.
Bearish sentiment intensified as short interest surged approximately 28% throughout March, adding downward pressure to the equity.
Despite facing near-term challenges, RH continues advancing its expansion strategy. The company plans to unveil RH Estates in mid-May, introducing companion brands RH Bespoke and RH Couture. These launches follow strategic acquisitions of Michael Taylor, Formations, and Dennis & Leen.
Global footprint expansion remains a priority, with flagship store openings scheduled for Paris, Milan, and London. The company currently manages 26 integrated dining establishments within its galleries and aims to expand that count to 40 locations by 2027.
Regarding insider transactions, executive Eri Chaya divested 7,000 shares on March 24th at $129.42 per share, totaling approximately $905,940. Director Mark Demilio sold 2,254 shares in January at $220.00 each. Combined insider selling over the trailing 90-day period totals $2.86M.
RH’s 52-week peak stands at $257.00. The stock has declined 41.51% over the past twelve months, with a 52-week trough of $123.03.
The post RH (RH) Stock Tumbles on Disappointing Q4 Results and Cautious Forward Guidance appeared first on Blockonomi.
DeFi Technologies revealed preliminary unaudited revenue figures of $99.1 million for the fiscal year ending 2025, representing a substantial 215% increase from the $31.4 million recorded in fiscal 2024. Market participants responded immediately — shares jumped 32% in extended trading.
DeFi Technologies Inc., DEFT
The company’s return to profitability stood out as a major achievement in the report. DeFi Technologies recorded net income of $62.7 million, marking a remarkable $90.3 million improvement from the $27.6 million net loss reported during fiscal 2024.
However, the fourth quarter performance showed weakness. Q4 revenue of $20.0 million missed the Street’s $33.0 million consensus estimate. This shortfall deserves closer examination.
The company’s Valour division, which handles asset management operations, maintained average assets under management of $809.9 million throughout 2025. This growth came from introducing new products, sustained investor appetite, and positive momentum in digital asset markets.
Valour’s exchange-traded product lineup attracted net inflows of $110.1 million during the fiscal period. The division now operates more than 100 listed products across international markets.
Stillman Digital, which serves institutional clients, concluded its inaugural full year of operations in 2025. Chief Executive Officer Johan Wattenström noted that the division has “further strengthened the institutional layer” of their overall platform.
Wattenström commented that the financial performance “reflect the strength of the business model we have built,” highlighting diversified revenue channels and varied product offerings as critical factors driving the company’s stability.
DeFi Technologies announced it will not meet the scheduled deadline for filing audited annual financial statements covering the year that ended December 31, 2025. This encompasses the accompanying management discussion and analysis, along with required CEO and CFO certifications.
The company provided explicit clarification regarding the postponement: it stems from awaiting completion of a SOC 2 Type 2 report from an outside vendor. This represents an independent, auditor-validated security assessment.
Crucially, the filing delay does not involve any disputes or disagreements with the company’s auditors. Management also emphasized that no problems exist with the financial statements themselves and that no weaknesses have been identified in internal financial reporting controls.
This transparency appeared to resonate with investors. Even with the delayed filing announcement, the stock price climbed significantly based on the strong revenue growth and profitability metrics.
The fourth quarter revenue figure of $20.0 million remains the notable weak point within an otherwise impressive full-year performance.
The post DeFi Technologies (DEFT) Stock Soars 32% on Triple Revenue Growth appeared first on Blockonomi.
Bitcoin’s price volatility, prompted by the developments in the Middle East, continued today, as the asset jumped to $69,200 ahead of Trump’s highly anticipated speech.
While speaking on the escalating tension in the region, the POTUS just claimed that Iran had requested an immediate ceasefire from the US. However, Trump said his administration will consider it only once Iran safely opens the Strait of Hormuz to oil tankers.
He added that until the Middle Eastern country complies, the US will continue “blasting Iran into oblivion.”
OPEN HORMUZ FIRST
Trump: Iran’s new, more pragmatic leader seeks a ceasefire. The U.S. response: reopen the Strait of Hormuz—then we’ll talk. Otherwise, escalation continues.
— *Walter Bloomberg (@DeItaone) April 1, 2026
With just minutes after this statement went live, BTC’s price has remained relatively calm at over $68,000. The asset charted a five-day peak earlier today before it was stopped and driven south by a grand.
The situation in the Middle East continues to be the catalyst that impacts the risk-on crypto industry the most, as every major development or statement, especially from Trump, leads to new fluctuations.
As reported earlier, experts believe the next leg up or down will heavily rely on whether the tension escalates or de-escalates in the following days and weeks.
The post Trump Says When the US Will Agree to Iran’s Requested Ceasefire: How Will BTC React? appeared first on CryptoPotato.
The cryptocurrency market has taken a breath of fresh air over the past 24 hours, with multiple leading digital assets charting minor increases.
Algorand (ALGO) stands out as one of the top performers following a 22% daily pump. Some analysts believe there is more fuel left for an additional short-term rally, while certain indicators suggest a correction could also be on the way.
Earlier today (April 1), ALGO surpassed $0.10 for the first time since February, while its market capitalization neared the psychological $1 billion mark. According to CoinMarketCap, it has been among the top-trending cryptocurrencies over the past 24 hours, while its resurgence was most likely triggered by Google’s latest report.

The company’s quantum computing team recently published a white paper, claiming that future quantum computers might be able to crack the cryptography behind Bitcoin and other projects much more easily than previously believed.
The report specifically highlights Algorand as a protocol that provides “an example of real-world deployment of PQC on an otherwise quantum-vulnerable blockchain.” Google’s team has further praised the project for deploying post-quantum Falcon digital signatures for smart transactions and state proofs. For its part, Algorand Foundation noted that aside from Bitcoin and Ethereum, no other blockchain received more attention in the report than Algorand.
“The alarm has been sounded. Algorand has been answering it for years,” the team said on X.
ALGO’s ascent has caught the eye of many market observers, some of whom see further upside potential. X user Aman argued that the price has bounced from support with a falling wedge breakout, hinting at a bullish reversal.
The analyst using the moniker Clifton Fx also chipped in. They claimed that ALGO is “trying to break the descending channel” in the daily timeframe, and if that happens with a “momentum candle,” it could lead to a jump to almost $0.20.
Despite the impressive revival over the last 24 hours, ALGO remains far below its all-time high of $3.23 reached in the summer of 2019, while ongoing bearish market conditions could spur a potential rally ahead.
The asset’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) also indicates that a pullback may follow in the near future. The ratio has risen above 80, meaning that ALGO is overbought and on the verge of a possible correction. Conversely, readings below 30 are usually interpreted as buying opportunities.

The post Algorand (ALGO) Soars 22% Daily Following Google’s Warning: Further Gains Ahead? appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Global asset manager Franklin Templeton is expanding its commitment to digital assets with the acquisition of a newly formed crypto-oriented spinoff from venture firm CoinFund. The move signals continued alignment between traditional finance and cryptocurrencies.
According to a WSJ exclusive, the deal is centered on 250 Digital, a firm that was spun out of CoinFund earlier this year. It’s led by veteran crypto investors Christopher Perkins and Seth Ginns. Further details on the acquistion are yet to be brought forward.
Franklin Templeton, a well-recognized force in mutual funds and traditional portfolio management, has been building its presence in the crypto industry since entering the market all the way back in 2018. What started as an experimental and exploratory move has undoubtedly evolved into a structured approach, with the firm’s digital asset arm assembling a team of more than 50 people – specialists, focused on blockchain-based technologies, tokenized assets, and crypto strategies.
Recall that the firm launched EZBC – a spot Bitcoin ETF, which currently boasts over $427 million in total assets under management.
With that in mind, the acquisition of 250 Digital reflects a broader strategic shift amid major legacy finance institutions, many of which seem to be looking for ways to integrate digital assets into their core offerings amid growing client demand.
The post Franklin Templeton to Acquire CoinFund Crypto Spinoff, Accelerating Digital Asset Push appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Stablecoins have emerged as one of crypto’s clearest and most prominent use cases, with their total market cap exceeding $320 billion at the time of this writing. That’s more than 13% of the entire industry’s capitalization.
Attempting to take full advantage of the narrative, Ripple has been pushing its RLUSD stablecoin for a while, and today, they dropped another announcement.
According to the company’s X account, RLUSD is now live on one of the largest regulated exchanges in South Korea – Coinone.
Korean traders are now able to access the asset directly in KRW.
$RLUSD is now live on @CoinoneOfficial — one of South Korea’s largest regulated exchanges.
Korean traders can now access Ripple’s fully-reserved, enterprise-grade stablecoin directly in KRW.
Global reach. Local access. #RLUSD #Ripple
— Ripple (@Ripple) April 1, 2026
Coinone is amongst the leading crypto exchanges in the country, boasting a trading volume of around $300 million in the past 24 hours.
This is the last in a series of moves aimed at positioning RLUSD as a preferred crypto on-ramp internationally. As CryptoPotato reported earlier in March, Ripple is testing whether RLUSD can replace manual payment processes in Singapore, using the city-state’s sandbox environment called BLOOM. The latter is under the direct management of the Monethary Authority of Singapoe (the country’s de-facto central bank).
The post Important Announcement for Ripple (XRP) Traders in South Korea appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Bitcoin jumped to a new multi-day peak of over $69,200 earlier today as the markets prepare for Trump’s highly anticipated speech on the war against Iran.
Most larger-cap alts are also in the green, with ETH climbing past $2,100 and XRP defending the $1.30 support. ZEC and HBAR have posted the most gains.
The primary cryptocurrency ended the previous business week with a violent price drop that drove it from $69,000 to a then-multi-week low of $65,600, which dragged the entire market sentiment back to ‘extreme fear’ territory. The asset found some support at those levels before it dumped to a new monthly low of $65,000 on Monday morning when the legacy futures markets opened.
The bulls finally reemerged at this point and didn’t allow another breakdown. Instead, BTC began to recover some ground and tapped $68,000 later on Monday. It fell back to $66,400, jumped by two grand, and dipped again to $66,000 yesterday as the war in the Middle East continued to unfold.
Once Iran’s President said his country is ready to end the war if it receives certain guarantees, BTC jumped to $68,400 again, but was stopped. It broke through that level earlier today and tapped $69,200 after reports emerged that US President Trump will address the situation later.
For now, BTC has retraced to $68,700, avoiding a sixth consecutive decline into March, with a market cap of $1.375 trillion. Its dominance over the alts stands above 56% on CG.

Given the fact that Iran, one of the world’s biggest oil hubs, was under attack for the entire month, and the Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed, it’s expected that the commodity’s price would go on a volatile ride.
Overall, it ended March with a massive 60% surge. In fact, Brent crude oil futures marked the most significant monthly increase since the contracts were created nearly 40 years ago.
BREAKING: Brent crude oil futures prices officially end March 2026 with a +60% gain, posting the largest monthly gain since the creations of the futures contract in 1988.
US gas prices are up by +$1.25/gallon since December. pic.twitter.com/3OFL6Drukl
— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) March 31, 2026
Ethereum has jumped by over 3% in the past 24 hours and now sits well above $2,100. XRP maintained the $1.30 resistance and now sits at $1.36. BNB is above $615, while LINK, ZEC, AVAX, and HBAR have posted even more impressive gains from the larger-cap alts. In contrast, CC, BCH, and TRX are slightly in the red.
The total crypto market cap has added around $60 billion daily and sits close to $2.450 trillion on CG.

The post Bitcoin Tapped $69K, Oil Prices Ended March With 60% Surge: Market Watch appeared first on CryptoPotato.