Grayscale files S-1 for spot HYPE ETF that would hold Hyperliquids native token and seek to list on Nasdaq under ticker GHYP.
The post Grayscale eyes Hyperliquid with new HYPE ETF filing appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Nvidia fell below its 200-day moving average after GTC as oil, inflation, and rate fears pressured tech and the broader market.
The post Nvidia stock falls below 200-day moving average for first time in a year appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Hyperliquids licensed S&P 500 perpetual tops $100M in daily volume, extending 24/7 onchain trading of traditional markets.
The post Hyperliquid’s S&P 500 perpetual tops $100 million in daily volume after licensed launch appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Eightco's increased investment in OpenAI underscores the growing influence of AI in reshaping global industries and investor strategies.
The post Tom Lee-backed Eightco doubles down on OpenAI as total stake hits $90 million appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Bluesky disclosed a $100 million Series B led by Bain Capital Crypto as its user base topped 43 million amid a leadership transition.
The post Bluesky discloses $100 million Series B as user growth tops 43 million appeared first on Crypto Briefing.
Bitcoin Magazine

White House Reaches Tentative Crypto Regulatory Agreement: Report
Key senators and the White House have reached a tentative agreement on cryptocurrency legislation aimed at resolving a dispute between banks and digital asset firms over stablecoin yields, according to Politico reporting.
The move could clear the way for a landmark crypto regulatory bill stalled in the Senate Banking Committee since January.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Sen. Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) said Friday they have an “agreement in principle” on language intended to balance innovation with financial stability. The legislation seeks to prevent stablecoin rewards programs from triggering widespread deposit withdrawals from traditional banks, a concern raised by Wall Street groups.
“The agreement allows us to protect innovation while giving us the opportunity to prevent widespread deposit flight,” Alsobrooks said. Tillis described the deal as a positive step but noted the need to consult with industry stakeholders before finalizing details.
While specifics of the agreement remain unclear, early indications suggest it could bar yield payments on passive stablecoin balances. The tentative deal signals progress toward an April vote on the crypto market-structure bill, potentially unlocking the first major federal regulatory framework for digital assets.
The fight over a U.S. crypto market‑structure bill stems from a broader effort to build on 2025’s landmark stablecoin legislation, the GENIUS Act, which established a federal framework for stablecoins — requiring full backing, transparency and reserve disclosures for digital dollars.
That law was widely seen in the crypto industry as a breakthrough for regulatory clarity while attempting to align digital assets with traditional financial standards.
After the GENIUS Act’s passage, the Senate turned its attention to more expansive digital asset oversight through what’s often referred to as the CLARITY Act or the crypto market‑structure bill.
This legislation aims to define how U.S. regulators would police and oversee trading platforms, tokens, custody services and other infrastructure — essentially the backbone of a regulated digital asset ecosystem.
However, negotiations bogged down over one central issue: whether regulated exchanges should be allowed to offer yield‑bearing rewards on stablecoin holdings.
Banks and major financial institutions argue that these rewards resemble unregulated deposit‑like products that could siphon funds away from FDIC‑insured accounts, potentially threatening lending and financial stability.
Crypto firms — including major issuers like Circle and Coinbase — counter that such incentives are crucial for competitive markets and for user adoption of digital money.
The current tentative deal being negotiated between senators and the White House seeks a middle ground — potentially allowing activity‑based rewards while restricting passive yield — in hopes of unlocking Senate committee action by April. Whether that compromise holds both bank and crypto support will be decisive for the future of U.S. digital asset regulation.
This post White House Reaches Tentative Crypto Regulatory Agreement: Report first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Phong Le Calls Morgan Stanley’s BTC ETF a “Monster Bitcoin” Bet With $160 Billion Potential
Phong Le, President and CEO of Strategy, the world’s first and largest Bitcoin treasury firm, said Morgan Stanley’s proposed bitcoin ETF could unlock as much as $160 billion in demand under a modest portfolio allocation scenario.
“Morgan Stanley Wealth Management oversees about $8 trillion in AUM and recommends 0–4% bitcoin allocation,” Le wrote on X. “A 2% allocation would represent $160 billion, about three times the size of IBIT. MSBT: Monster Bitcoin.”
In other words, Le is saying that even a modest 2% bitcoin allocation across Morgan Stanley’s $8 trillion wealth platform could drive about $160 billion into bitcoin, far exceeding the size of existing ETFs like BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust.
The comment landed as Morgan Stanley advanced plans for its own spot BTC ETF, revealing new details in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The fund would trade under the ticker MSBT, a symbol that Le cast as shorthand for the potential scale of institutional demand.
Morgan Stanley’s amended S-1 outlines a structure familiar to the growing class of spot BTC ETFs. The trust is set to list on NYSE Arca with a 10,000-share creation unit and an initial seed basket of 50,000 shares, expected to raise about $1 million. The bank also disclosed it purchased two shares earlier this month for audit purposes.
Key service providers mirror those used across the ETF ecosystem. BNY Mellon will act as cash custodian, administrator, and transfer agent, while Coinbase is set to serve as prime broker and custodian for the fund’s bitcoin.
The product would hold BTC directly, aligning with the structure that has defined the current wave of the U.S.-listed spot ETFs.
Le’s framing points to a larger question that sits beyond the mechanics of the filing: how much capital wealth managers may allocate if BTC becomes a standard portfolio component. Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, with trillions in client assets, has signaled that bitcoin exposure can range from zero to four percent depending on client profile.
Even a midpoint allocation, as Le noted, would imply flows that exceed the size of existing flagship products such as iShares Bitcoin Trust.
So far, adoption has moved in stages. Since spot BTC ETFs launched in 2024, the category has attracted more than $50 billion in inflows, driven in large part by self-directed investors. Within advisory channels, uptake remains uneven, shaped by internal policies, risk models, and client demand.
Morgan Stanley has already taken steps in that direction, allowing brokerage clients to access spot BTC ETFs and widening availability over time. The MSBT filing suggests a shift from distribution toward ownership of the product itself, a move that could deepen the bank’s role in the market if approval is granted.
The SEC has not provided a timeline for a decision, and approval is not assured. Still, the application marks a notable development: a major U.S. bank seeking to issue its own spot bitcoin ETF in a market it once approached with caution.
This post Phong Le Calls Morgan Stanley’s BTC ETF a “Monster Bitcoin” Bet With $160 Billion Potential first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Price Holds $70,000 as War-Driven Inflation Fears Meet Defensive Market Positioning
Bitcoin price held near the $70,000 level today as geopolitical risks tied to the conflict involving Iran shifted and macro expectations weighed on broader risk markets, while derivatives data and on-chain metrics pointed to a market in consolidation rather than capitulation.
The bitcoin price hovered around $70,500 in early Friday trading, following a pullback from a recent high near $76,000.
The move came as energy markets surged and inflation concerns returned to the forefront, limiting upside across risk assets. Despite the pressure, Bitcoin price has shown relative stability compared with commodities and equities during the same period.
Research from VanEck frames the current environment as a post-stress reset. The firm’s mid-March ChainCheck report notes that Bitcoin price’s 30-day average price declined 19%, yet spot prices stabilized as realized volatility fell from 80 to near 50.
At the same time, futures funding rates dropped from 4.1% to 2.7%, signaling reduced leverage and lower speculative intensity.
Options markets reflect a defensive posture. VanEck data shows the put-to-call open interest ratio averaged 0.77, the highest level since mid-2021, placing current positioning in the 91st percentile of observations since 2019.
Demand for downside protection remains elevated, with put premiums reaching record levels relative to spot trading volume. Investors continue to allocate capital toward hedging, even as volatility declines.
This pattern has historical significance. According to VanEck, similar levels of options skew have preceded positive forward returns. Periods with comparable readings have produced average gains of more than 13% over the following 90 days and more than 100% over a one-year horizon.
The data suggests that extreme caution in derivatives markets has often coincided with late-stage drawdowns rather than the start of new declines.
Onchain activity presents a quieter picture. Transfer volume fell 31% over the past month, while daily fees dropped 27%. Active addresses declined modestly, indicating limited participation at the network level.
This trend led to the growing role of offchain venues, including exchange-traded products and derivatives platforms, which now account for a larger share of trading activity.
Long-term holders appear to be reducing distribution. Transfer volume declined across all age cohorts, signaling that older coins remain largely inactive. This shift points to reduced selling pressure from experienced market participants, a factor often associated with price stabilization phases.
Miner behavior adds another layer. Revenues declined 11% in the past month, reflecting tighter economics. Yet selling pressure from miners has not surged. Onchain flows to exchanges rose only 1%, while aggregate miner balances declined at a gradual pace. Over the past year, miners have sold most newly issued supply but have not accelerated liquidation of existing reserves.
Institutional flows, however, have softened.
Spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds recorded net outflows in recent sessions, reversing a prior streak of inflows. The shift aligns with broader risk aversion as investors respond to macro uncertainty and rising energy costs.
Yesterday, Morgan Stanley confirmed that its proposed spot bitcoin exchange-traded fund will trade under the ticker MSBT on NYSE Arca, according to an updated filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
At the time of writing, the bitcoin price is $70,371.
This post Bitcoin Price Holds $70,000 as War-Driven Inflation Fears Meet Defensive Market Positioning first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

North Carolina Lawmakers Propose State Bitcoin Reserve
North Carolina lawmakers introduced legislation on Wednesday to create a state-controlled Bitcoin reserve.
Senate Bill 327, titled the North Carolina Bitcoin Reserve and Investment Act, would allow the Office of the State Treasurer to allocate up to 10% of public funds into BTC as part of the state’s long-term financial strategy.
The bill, sponsored by Senators Johnson and Overcash, passed its first Senate reading and was referred to the Rules and Operations Committee. Its stated goals include establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, promoting BTC as a financial innovation, and positioning North Carolina as a leader in state-level crypto adoption.
Under the proposal, the Treasurer would manage the reserve using cold storage wallets with multi-signature authentication.
A new department within the Treasurer’s office would take custody of the assets, ensuring state control. The bill also calls for a Bitcoin Economic Advisory Board composed of industry experts to provide guidance and monthly audits to verify reserve balances, security, and performance.
Bitcoin acquisitions would be conducted through regulated U.S.-based exchanges, with bulk purchases timed to take advantage of market conditions. The bill also directs the Treasurer to explore BTC mining operations as a potential method to increase state holdings.
Use of the reserve would be restricted to severe financial crises, approved investment strategies, funding for critical infrastructure and economic development projects, and support for Bitcoin-related research, education, and business incentives.
Any liquidation of BTC would require approval from at least two-thirds of both chambers of the General Assembly. The bill allows the reserve to back bonds as an alternative financing tool for public projects.
The Treasurer would submit quarterly reports to the General Assembly detailing the reserve’s status, value, and performance.
Reports would also be publicly available on the Treasurer’s website, according to the bill’s text. The bill includes provisions to comply with federal and state laws regarding cryptocurrency holdings and taxation and encourages advocacy for federal regulations favorable to Bitcoin.
Several U.S. states are exploring or have implemented BTC reserves as part of state treasury strategies.
Texas, New Hampshire, and Arizona have enacted laws allowing portions of state funds to be allocated to Bitcoin, while Maryland, Iowa, Kentucky, North Carolina, Michigan, South Dakota, Illinois, Tennessee and Missouri have introduced legislation proposing similar reserves.
Other states, including Oklahoma, Utah, and Pennsylvania, have considered bills that remain in committee, while proposals in Wyoming, Montana, and Florida have stalled or been rejected. These efforts reflect a growing trend to use BTC as a potential store-of-value hedge and diversify state financial assets.
This post North Carolina Lawmakers Propose State Bitcoin Reserve first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.
Bitcoin Magazine

Adam Back Confirmed As A Bitcoin 2026 Speaker
Adam Back has been officially confirmed as a speaker at Bitcoin 2026, returning to the conference as one of the few people in the world whose contributions to Bitcoin predate Bitcoin itself. As Co-Founder and CEO of Blockstream and CEO of Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), Back comes to Las Vegas operating at the intersection of Bitcoin infrastructure and capital markets like never before.
In 1997, Back invented Hashcash — a proof-of-work system originally built to combat email spam that became the direct technical foundation for Bitcoin’s mining process. Satoshi Nakamoto cited Back by name in the Bitcoin white paper, writing that the network would need “a proof-of-work system similar to Adam Back’s Hashcash.” Before the genesis block was ever mined, Satoshi emailed Back directly.
Blockstream, which Back co-founded in 2014, develops Bitcoin infrastructure across three areas: consumer self-custody tools including the open-source Jade hardware wallet, enterprise settlement and asset issuance on the Liquid Network, and institutional products through Blockstream Asset Management — with with Liquid Network closing 2025 with close to $5 billion in TVL. At Bitcoin 2025, Back framed the company’s direction: “We’re laser-focused on Bitcoin. At Blockstream, we are here to provide the infrastructure to enable that.”
On the capital markets side, Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company has entered into a definitive agreement to go public through a merger with Cantor Equity Partners I (CEPO), structured with 30,021 BTC on its balance sheet and up to $1.5 billion in PIPE financing — the largest ever announced alongside a Bitcoin treasury SPAC merger. As of March 2026, BSTR is awaiting completion of the de-SPAC process, with shareholder approval targeted as early as April, after which the combined company is expected to trade on Nasdaq under the ticker “BSTR.”
From inventing the proof-of-work system that makes Bitcoin possible, to building the infrastructure layer on top of it, to now bringing over 30,000 BTC to public markets — Back’s is unlike anyone else on the Bitcoin 2026 stage. His appearance at The Venetian this April will be one of the most technically credible perspectives at the conference on where Bitcoin’s protocol, infrastructure, and capital markets are all heading at once.
Bitcoin 2026 will take place April 27–29 at The Venetian, Las Vegas, and is expected to be the biggest Bitcoin event of the year.
Focused on the future of money, Bitcoin 2026 will bring together Bitcoin builders, investors, miners, policymakers, technologists, and newcomers from around the world. The event will feature a wide range of pass types, including general admission passes designed specifically for those new to Bitcoin, alongside premium passes for professionals, enterprises, and institutions.
With multiple stages, immersive experiences, technical workshops, and headline keynotes, Bitcoin 2026 is designed to serve both first-time attendees and long-time Bitcoiners shaping the next era of global adoption.
Bitcoin’s flagship conference has scaled dramatically over the past five years:
Get Your Bitcoin 2026 Pass Bitcoin Magazine readers can save 10% on Bitcoin 2026 tickets using code ‘ARTICLE10‘ at checkout.
Stay at The official hotel of Bitcoin 2026, The Venetian, and get a guaranteed low rate plus 15% off your pass. Hotel Prices increase soon, be in the middle of where the fun is all happening, and where the networking never ends.
And don’t forget:
Volunteer at Bitcoin 2026 and get Pro Pass access plus exclusive perks.
All students ages 13+ can apply for a Student Pass and get free general admission access to Bitcoin 2026.
Location: The Venetian, Las Vegas
Dates: April 27–29, 2026
For more information and exclusive offers, visit the Bitcoin Conference on X here.
Bitcoin 2026 is the definitive gathering for anyone serious about the future of money. With 500+ speakers, multiple world-class stages, and programming spanning Bitcoin fundamentals, open-source development, enterprise adoption, mining, energy, AI, policy, and culture, the conference brings every corner of the Bitcoin ecosystem together under one roof.
From headline keynotes on the Nakamoto Stage to deep technical sessions for builders, institutional strategy discussions for enterprises, and beginner-friendly Bitcoin 101 education, Bitcoin 2026 is designed for everyone—from first-time attendees to the leaders shaping Bitcoin’s global adoption.
Whether you’re looking to learn, build, invest, network, or influence, Bitcoin 2026 is where Bitcoin’s next chapter is written.
Bitcoin 2026 offers a range of pass options designed to meet the needs of newcomers, professionals, enterprises, and high-net-worth Bitcoiners alike.
Bitcoin 2026 General Admission PassIdeal for newcomers and those looking to experience the heart of the conference.

Bitcoin 2026 Pro PassDesigned for professionals, operators, and serious Bitcoin participants.
Includes all General Admission features, plus:

Bitcoin 2026 Whale Pass The all-inclusive, premium Bitcoin 2026 experience.
Includes all Pro Pass features, plus:
This is the most immersive way to experience Bitcoin 2026.

Bitcoin 2026 After Hours PassYour ticket to the night.
Most deals are done with a drink in your hand. Get exclusive access to 3 official Bitcoin 2026 after-parties across Las Vegas — each with a 2-hour open bar — where the real conversations happen and the best connections are made.

More headline speaker announcements are coming soon.
Don’t miss Bitcoin 2026.
This post Adam Back Confirmed As A Bitcoin 2026 Speaker first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Jenna Montgomery.
Britain’s bond scare is reopening a question Bitcoin was built for – moments when trust in sovereign debt and monetary management starts to crack.
Britain’s fiscal squeeze turned sharper after official borrowing data showed February public sector net borrowing hit £14.3 billion, up £2.2 billion from a year earlier and the second-highest February reading since records began in 1993.
Public sector net debt stood at £2.88 trillion, or 93.1% of GDP. On the same day, the Bank of England held the Bank Rate at 3.75% and warned that the latest energy shock would push inflation back up over the next couple of quarters while raising household fuel and utility costs.
The immediate market response sits in gilts, rate expectations, and mortgages. The slower shift shows up in savings behavior. Britain does not need a rush into Bitcoin for the asset to enter the conversation in a new way. A fresh round of doubt about cash, government bonds, and delayed rate cuts is enough to change how savers rank risk.
That shift starts with arithmetic rather than ideology. The Bank of England said in its latest minutes that preliminary staff estimates now put CPI inflation between 3% and 3.5% over the next couple of quarters. It also said higher household fuel and utility costs would squeeze real incomes. By January, the central bank’s own data showed the average rate on household instant-access deposits at 2.02%.
Easy-access cash is therefore paying less than the inflation range the Bank itself now expects. The gap is plain, about 0.98 to 1.48 percentage points below the near-term CPI path. For savers, that is where the definition of safety starts to shift. Cash still protects nominal value. It does less to protect purchasing power.
Britain’s household channel is also moving quickly. The latest forecast from UK Finance estimates that about 1.8 million fixed-rate mortgages will end in 2026. The Office for National Statistics already showed in its household-costs index that inflation was running at 3.6% for all households and 3.7% for mortgagors in the fourth quarter of 2025. That came before the Bank’s latest warning that energy prices would push costs higher again.
The UK sequence runs through government borrowing, gilt repricing, and household budgets. Gilts look less calm. Easy-access cash runs below the near-term inflation path. Mortgage pain is set to hit more households as fixed deals expire.
Bitcoin gains relevance in that setting as savers consider whether a small asset outside the sovereign stack should be included in the mix.

| Indicator | Latest figure | How it changes saver behavior |
|---|---|---|
| February public borrowing | £14.3 billion | Shows fiscal pressure is still building rather than easing |
| Public debt | 93.1% of GDP | Limits room for a clean fiscal reset |
| Bank Rate | 3.75% | Confirms the Bank did not deliver fresh relief |
| BoE near-term CPI view | 3% to 3.5% | Points to renewed pressure on real incomes |
| Instant-access deposit rate | 2.02% | Leaves easy cash below the Bank’s inflation range |
| Mortgages resetting in 2026 | 1.8 million | Speeds up the household effect of higher rates |
The Bank of England’s latest account of the shock gives the cross-market backdrop. In its March statement, the Bank highlighted that around one-fifth of global oil and LNG supply normally passes through the Strait of Hormuz, Brent crude and Dutch TTF gas prices were about 60% above pre-shock levels, and that UK gas futures implied the next Ofgem cap could rise by 35% to 40%.
That is the bridge between the macro data and the retail saver. A government can run a large deficit for years without changing how households think about money. However, a jump in utility bills lands every month. A mortgage reset lands with a letter and a direct debit. Those are the moments when a saver starts comparing trade-offs across purchasing power, liquidity, volatility, and trust in the issuer.
The distinction is useful as Bitcoin fell about 50% from October 2025 to February 2026, while options volatility climbed to its highest level since 2022. During an active squeeze, investors still sell volatile assets and raise cash. Bitcoin remains sensitive to liquidity stress in those periods.
That pattern also strengthens the longer Bitcoin case in this UK move. Gilts are volatile, expected rate cuts have moved further out, and easy-access cash yields less than the inflation the central bank now expects. Under those conditions, Bitcoin starts to look less like a pure speculation and more like an opt-out from sovereign monetary promises. It carries its own volatility and offers a different source of risk than the one now confronting cash and government debt holders.
The regulatory setup in the UK makes that discussion easier to have than it was a few years ago. The Financial Conduct Authority’s latest consumer research found crypto awareness above 90%, and 25% of crypto users said they would be more likely to invest if the market were more regulated.
The finding supports familiarity with the asset class and sensitivity to regulatory clarity. It leaves the size and timing of any new demand open.
Britain deserves attention outside the UK because the household mechanism is unusually visible. The US still dominates crypto flows, ETF headlines, and dollar liquidity. Yet, Britain shows the pressure points more quickly.
When debt is high, borrowing surprises on the upside, utility bills rise, and a large block of mortgages heads for reset, the question reaches the kitchen table faster. The crypto implication is a broader willingness to treat sovereign paper and bank deposits as incomplete answers to the word “safe.”
The official forecasts point in the same direction. In its March outlook, the OBR projected 10-year gilt yields at 4.5% and 30-year yields at 5.3% before this latest shock, while also seeing public sector net debt rising from 94.5% of GDP in 2025-26 to 96.5% in 2028-29.
It expects the tax burden to rise toward 38% of GDP by 2030-31. Those figures point to sustained fiscal strain and leave little room for a comforting version of the old playbook in which rate cuts, calm bonds, and patient savers solve the problem together.
The plausible paths for next year each have a different effect on savings behavior.
The Bank’s 3% to 3.5% inflation range proves roughly right for the next couple of quarters, utility bills rise, and households rebuild precautionary cash even though real returns stay soft.
In that version, Bitcoin may not attract large flows, though it gains narrative ground. The case is simple: if cash is liquid but losing purchasing power, and bonds are no longer calm, a non-sovereign asset looks easier to justify as part of a broader savings mix.
The National Institute of Economic and Social Research modeled a persistent-shock scenario in which UK inflation runs 0.7 percentage points higher in 2026, GDP comes in 0.2% lower in 2026 and 0.3% lower in 2027, and Bank Rate ends up about 0.8 percentage points above baseline.
Before the latest move, NIESR’s winter forecast had Bank Rate at 3.25% by the end of 2026. Taken together, those ranges keep a path above 4% in play if the shock sticks.
That is the scenario most likely to deepen the Bitcoin case. High debt narrows fiscal room. Sticky inflation cuts into cash. Higher-for-longer rates hit mortgages. The combination increases interest in assets that sit outside the state’s liabilities, even while Bitcoin itself remains volatile and sensitive to broader market stress.
The third path would hit Bitcoin in the short run and strengthen its appeal over a longer period. NIESR’s separate bond-market note warns that a sovereign duration shock can move from repricing into a financial-stability event, where central banks may need market-functioning support even while inflation is still uncomfortable.
That is the institutional contradiction Bitcoin was designed to answer. It is also the kind of market period that can still pressure Bitcoin first if investors rush for liquidity.
That tension explains why Britain’s latest bond move stands out. The trade is messy. The mechanism is clear. When a state borrows heavily, energy costs rise, inflation firms again, and households face mortgage resets, the social meaning of safety begins to change. The debate moves from macro theory to monthly outflows and preserved purchasing power.
Britain’s latest bond move could become a Bitcoin development before many Americans view it that way.
The UK data already shows the ingredients: £14.3 billion in February borrowing, debt at 93.1% of GDP, a policy rate held at 3.75%, near-term inflation back at 3% to 3.5%, easy-access cash at 2.02%, and 1.8 million mortgages due to reset in 2026.
None of those figures points to an immediate Bitcoin win. Together, they show rising pressure on the old definition of safety.
If energy prices stay elevated, if the next utility cap rises as futures imply, and if mortgage resets keep landing into a period of high gilt yields and delayed rate relief, more savers may decide that cash and government paper no longer answer the whole problem.
The post Britain’s bond panic is currently making the case for Bitcoin many people seem to have forgetten appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Fresh March data tied one household pressure point to one market trade. The preliminary survey from the University of Michigan put consumer sentiment at 55.5, the lowest reading of 2026, and said gasoline prices had exerted the most immediate impact felt by consumers.
The same release showed one-year inflation expectations at 3.4%, above 2024 levels. A day earlier, Freddie Mac data cited by the report showed the average US 30-year fixed mortgage rate rose to 6.22%, the highest in more than three months.
Then spot Bitcoin ETFs logged another day of net redemptions, with flows showing -$90.2 million on March 19 after -$163.5 million on March 18.
That sequence points to a household inflation shock moving through rates markets before it reaches Bitcoin.
The move starts with fuel. It reaches consumers fast, because drivers see gasoline prices every week and often every day. It then feeds into inflation expectations, pushes Treasury yields higher, lifts mortgage costs, and makes the Federal Reserve look less likely to cut quickly.
By the time the move reaches Bitcoin, the market is pricing tighter financial conditions.
Daily yields show the 10-year Treasury rose from 3.97% on Feb. 27 to 4.25% on March 19, a 28 basis point move in three weeks. Freddie Mac’s 6.22% mortgage rate followed that shift. The ETF flow data flipped as well.
After two inflow days of $199.4 million each on March 16 and March 17, US spot Bitcoin funds swung to two outflow days totaling $253.7 million on March 18 and March 19, based on data.
Bitcoin’s own price action fits the same frame. BTC sat around $69,983 after touching an intraday low of $69,156. The move points to a market that is treating the shock as a reason to demand more compensation for risk, especially in assets that have become more tied to institutional flows.
A broad inflation hedge label does not explain the current move very well. The type of inflation now hitting markets raises near-term financing costs first. That changes behavior faster than a long-run scarcity argument can.
The preliminary Michigan release is useful because it captured both sides of the move in one report. Sentiment fell, and inflation expectations rose. The details also help keep the timing straight.
Interviews ran from Feb. 17 through March 9, with about half completed after the Iran conflict began, so the survey does not prove that one day of ETF selling came directly from the same-day consumer release. It does show that the consumer side of the shock had already started to register while rates were moving higher.
Energy prices explain why the consumer signal reached rates so quickly. The EIA said the Brent spot price rose from an average of $71 a barrel on Feb. 27 to $94 on March 9 after military action began. Its March outlook lifted the US retail gasoline forecast to $3.58 a gallon in March, about 60 cents above the prior month’s forecast, and about 70 cents higher in the second quarter.
The agency’s base case still expects Brent to remain above $95 for the next two months before moving below $80 in the third quarter if flows normalize. That outlook keeps the near-term inflation risk alive, while also giving markets a reason to look past the shock if supply routes stabilize.
That is where the Fed enters the equation. The March 18 statement held rates at 3.5% to 3.75% and said the implications of Middle East developments for the US economy remained uncertain.
The central bank’s projections put 2026 PCE inflation at 2.7% and the year-end federal funds rate at 3.4%, while 17 of 19 participants saw upside risks to inflation. That is not a policy shock by itself. It gives traders another reason to price a slower path to easier money.
Bitcoin sits at the far end of that chain. Pressure can build whenever enough holders respond to financing costs, Treasury yields, and portfolio volatility.
The ETF market increased that sensitivity. Regulated fund wrappers made Bitcoin easier for traditional investors to buy. They also made it easier to trim when macro conditions turned less friendly.
| Indicator | Latest figure | What it showed |
|---|---|---|
| Michigan sentiment | 55.5 | Lowest reading of 2026, with gasoline cited as the most immediate pressure on consumers |
| One-year expectations | 3.4% | Above 2024 levels, pointing to firmer near-term inflation fears |
| 10-year yield | 4.25% | Up from 3.97% on Feb. 27, reflecting tighter financial conditions |
| 30-year mortgage | 6.22% | Highest in more than three months as rate pressure spread to households |
| Spot BTC ETF flows | -$90.2M on March 19 | Second straight day of net outflows after -$163.5M on March 18 |
| Brent oil | $94 on March 9 | Up from $71 on Feb. 27, driving the inflation leg of the move |
Bitcoin is moving alongside broader macro signals, and the contrast with adjacent markets helps show where capital is going. Gold ETFs took in $5.3 billion globally in February, the ninth straight month of inflows, with North America accounting for $4.7 billion, according to the World Gold Council’s March update.
At the same time, Bitcoin has stayed in a $60,000 to $72,000 range since the early-February sell-off, and stablecoin dominance has risen to about 10.3% after roughly $22 billion in net flows over three weeks. That is a defensive signal inside crypto, not just outside it.
Those cross-currents point to a clear near-term conclusion. Investors do not need to reject Bitcoin’s long-run scarcity case to sell it in a rates shock.
However, a preference for cash-like positioning, shorter duration, or classic defensive assets (while oil keeps inflationary pressure elevated and the Fed maintains restrictive policy) supports the case for gold as a safer-haven allocation.
Bitcoin, meanwhile, remains a higher-beta expression of broader risk appetite. In that setup, gold can absorb a safe-haven allocation while Bitcoin remains a high-beta expression of broader risk appetite.
Kaiko research adds another layer. It argues that this year looks less like a retail frenzy and more like institutional consolidation. That change helps explain why the old inflation-hedge shorthand falls short.
As Bitcoin sits inside more ETF portfolios and macro books, its short-run price can be shaped by the same forces that move equities, credit, and rates. A portfolio manager facing higher yields and weaker risk appetite does not need a crypto-specific reason to cut exposure.
The outlook is more nuanced than a simple bearish call. The EIA’s base case expects oil to cool later in the year if supply routes normalize. BlackRock’s weekly commentary said risk assets could recover over a six- to 12-month horizon if a clear end to the conflict emerged. Those views leave room for Bitcoin to recover if the energy shock fades before it hardens into a broader inflation problem.
For now, the most useful scenario map starts with the range already visible in market data.
Bitcoin can continue to trade within the recent $60,000 to $72,000 range if oil stays elevated in the near term but eases later, the 10-year yield holds in the low-to-mid 4% area, mortgage rates stay above 6%, and ETF flows remain mixed.
A clearer path to de-escalation, cooler yields, and a return of net ETF inflows could open a move into roughly $72,000 to $85,000.
If oil stays higher for longer, it leaves inflation expectations sticky and extends ETF redemptions, which would put roughly $55,000 to $62,000 back in view.
There's also the possibility of a prolonged disruption in the Strait of Hormuz. The EIA said 20.9 million barrels a day moved through Hormuz in the first half of 2025, about 20% of global petroleum liquids consumption, while bypass capacity in Saudi Arabia and the UAE was about 4.7 million barrels a day. That is the scenario where the inflation shock turns into a deeper stagflation shock.
The next set of data will show whether this repricing holds. The consumer side of the shock is already visible. The rates side is already visible. The ETF side is already visible. The next reported checkpoints are close.
The Michigan survey will publish its final March reading on March 27. Freddie Mac will update mortgage rates again on Thursday. Daily Treasury data will show whether the 10-year yield slips back toward 4.0% or stays near 4.25%. And the ETF flow sheets will show whether this week’s redemptions were a brief response to oil and rates, or the start of a broader repricing in which Bitcoin trades as a risk asset exposed to macro pressure.
The post Why rising mortgage rates and gas prices are suddenly impacting Bitcoin holders directly appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Bitcoin’s real macro risk right now is more discreet than simply watching the price of oil. Behind the scenes, a Fed liquidity cushion is nearly gone, and it can quickly become a headwind for Bitcoin's attempt to avoid a deep crypto winter.
On March 19, usage of the Federal Reserve’s overnight reverse repo facility stood at just $0.637 billion. Separately, the Fed’s weekly balance-sheet release for March 18 showed total assets at $6.656 trillion, reserve balances at $2.999 trillion, and the Treasury General Account at $875.833 billion.
As a result, one of the market’s easiest shock absorbers has shrunk to almost nothing.
For much of the last two years, cash could leave the overnight reverse repo facility and move back into bills, repo, bank reserves, or risk assets.
That process did not solve every macro problem, but it softened some of the pressure when the Treasury rebuilt cash, when issuance rose, or when markets had to absorb tighter financial conditions.
That passive release valve has now shrunk to a rounding error. So the next inflation scare, oil-driven repricing, or funding squeeze gets less automatic relief. Pressure can land more directly on reserves, or it can force a more active policy response.
That dynamic sits beneath the week’s focus on oil and the Fed.
Bitcoin sold off this week, dipping below $70,000, while U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs posted two straight days of outflows totaling $253.7 million, with $163.5 million on March 18 and $90.2 million on March 19.
Crypto traders often talk about “net liquidity,” usually as a shorthand for how the Fed’s balance sheet interacts with the Treasury’s cash balance and the reverse repo pool.
The recent numbers explain why that framework should be back in focus. The balance sheet rose again. Reserves fell. The Treasury’s cash balance stayed large. And the passive buffer that once helped absorb stress is now effectively gone.
The shift also lines up with the way Bitcoin has traded through the ETF era, more in step with rates, flows, and broader liquidity conditions than many holders expected at the start of the cycle.
This week’s ETF outflows do not establish causation on their own. They do fit a market that remains highly sensitive to macro repricing and less supported by old balance-sheet plumbing than many holders may assume.
The first thing we should pin down is around composition. The near-zero overnight reverse repo print does not mean every reverse repo liability on the Fed’s books has disappeared. The March 18 weekly balance-sheet data still showed $331.352 billion in total reverse repos. But almost all of that sat in foreign official cash.
A separate series showed foreign official and international accounts at $330.654 billion, leaving only about $698 million in the domestic “others” bucket that traders usually have in mind when they talk about the old ON RRP liquidity cushion.
The Fed still carries reverse repo liabilities, but the domestic pool that could quietly run down and feed liquidity back into markets is basically exhausted.
The core figures look like this:
| Metric | Date | Value | Why traders watch it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overnight reverse repo facility | March 19, 2026 | $0.637 billion | The passive domestic cash buffer is close to empty |
| Fed total assets | March 18, 2026 | $6.656 trillion | The balance sheet rose again |
| Reserve balances | March 18, 2026 | $2.999 trillion | These balances absorb drains when the Treasury or repo liabilities rise |
| Treasury General Account | March 18, 2026 | $875.833 billion | A larger Treasury cash balance can pull liquidity out of reserves |
| Total reverse repos | March 18, 2026 | $331.352 billion | Most of this is foreign official cash, rather than the domestic cushion traders mean |
| Foreign official reverse repos | March 18, 2026 | $330.654 billion | Shows why the domestic and total reverse repo story are different |
A January Fed research note said changes in the Treasury General Account, the ON RRP facility, and the foreign repo pool affect reserve balances one-for-one unless the Fed offsets them.
That same work argued that money-market rates become more sensitive when reserve buffers are smaller. The issue, then, is transmission. Shocks that once could be softened by a falling ON RRP balance now reach the system more directly.
The Fed has already moved on this front. The FOMC ended balance-sheet runoff starting Dec. 1, 2025, and began reserve management purchases of Treasury bills in December 2025 to maintain ample reserves.
Markets have lost an automatic cushion, while policymakers have already shifted toward a more active reserve-management stance.
That shift carries through to Bitcoin because the market has already shown how fast it responds when rates and flows move together.
The Fed’s March 18 policy statement held the federal funds target range at 3.50% to 3.75%, described economic activity as still expanding at a solid pace, and said inflation remains somewhat elevated.
It also said uncertainty around developments in the Middle East had increased. Markets did not need a rate hike to reprice. They only needed a reminder that inflation risk and geopolitical risk can still keep yields firm.
The two-year Treasury yield moved from 3.68% on March 17 to 3.76% on March 18. That is only an eight-basis-point move, but short-end repricing carries weight when Bitcoin is already leaning on ETF demand and broad risk appetite.
The two straight ETF outflow days fall short of proving that Fed balance-sheet plumbing caused the move. They do show investors were willing to cut exposure as the rates backdrop turned less friendly.
The ON RRP data helps explain why the move hit so hard. Oil can still shape the market by feeding inflation concerns. But the mechanism runs deeper.
With the market’s passive liquidity release valve nearly empty, the same inflation scare can travel faster into funding conditions, yields, and allocation decisions than it did when the reverse repo pool still held hundreds of billions that could run down.
For Bitcoin, that is a more durable macro frame than a single move in crude, which the Fed’s own research supports.
The January research paper said quarter-end repo effects have already intensified as reserves and ON RRP balances declined, with SOFR rising seven basis points above the ON RRP rate at the March 2023 quarter-end and by as much as 25 basis points at later quarter-ends.
That is a market-structure signal rather than a crypto-specific one. It shows how tighter buffers can become visible first in funding markets.
There is also a clear offset. The New York Fed’s February 2026 reserve-demand elasticity update said the fed funds rate’s sensitivity to reserve changes was very small and statistically indistinguishable from zero, which suggests reserves are still abundant.
The market is dealing with a setup in which the old passive cushion has thinned out, while the remaining reserve pool still looks ample for now.
That combination can produce a new regime for Bitcoin. In the earlier phase, markets could watch the reverse repo pool fall and treat that decline as a quiet source of support.
In the current phase, there is much less quiet support to assume. Either reserves absorb shocks cleanly, or the Fed leans harder on bill purchases and standing facilities, or risk assets do more of the adjustment on their own.
The most useful framework from here is to identify the set of conditions to watch.
The most likely scenario is that reserve balances stay near current levels, the Fed keeps rates unchanged, and ETF flows continue to swing day by day with mixed demand. In that setup, Bitcoin likely remains tied to short-end yields and broad risk appetite, but without a visible funding break.
The firmer-risk case is easy to sketch from the numbers already on the table. If the Treasury keeps a large cash balance, the domestic reverse repo pool stays near zero, and inflation worries keep the short end under pressure, reserve drains should land more directly on the banking system than they did when ON RRP still had room to fall.
Bitcoin only needs tighter financial conditions, more cautious ETF demand, and less confidence that passive liquidity support is still there in the background to feel that change.
The softer-risk case is also clear. If reserve management purchases keep reserves stable, if quarter-end funding stays orderly, and if ETF flows recover after this week’s outflows, the market may treat the disappearance of the ON RRP cushion as a change in plumbing rather than a fresh source of stress.
The regime shift would still be there. The difference would be that the Fed’s active tools were doing enough work to keep the strain from spilling into broader markets.
So the next checkpoints are mechanical.
Bitcoin’s immediate pressure may still arrive through oil, inflation, or a hawkish rates repricing. The larger macro signal sits one layer lower.
The passive liquidity cushion that once softened market stress is nearly exhausted. The next shock will show whether active Fed management can keep that from becoming crypto’s next macro headwind.
The post While the world watches oil prices, one critical Fed cash backstop is almost empty appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Bitcoin investors are buying protection around $50,000 even as the flagship digital asset holds near $70,000 and has recently outperformed gold, the S&P 500, and the US dollar during the ongoing Iran war.
According to CryptoSlate’s data, Bitcoin was trading at about $70,688 at press time, which means hedging around the $50,000 level means investors are guarding against a roughly $20,000 drawdown, even as the spot price remains firm.
The contrast has become one of the clearest signals in the market. Spot Bitcoin has shown resilience through the first phase of the conflict, but the derivatives market still shows traders paying for downside insurance.
On Deribit, the latest public options-flow note showed buying in the $50,000 to $60,000 put zone, along with March put spreads and fresh downside structures after attacks on Middle East energy infrastructure and a hot US producer-price print.
That split suggests investors are no longer treating Bitcoin as a one-directional war trade. Instead, they are weighing two outcomes at once.
One is that Bitcoin continues to absorb geopolitical stress better than many expected. The other is that the oil shock spills into inflation, pushes rate-cut expectations further out, and drags risk assets lower, forcing BTC back toward the low-$50,000s.
Oil helps explain why that hedge has stayed in place. Reuters reported Brent settled at $108.65 a barrel on March 19 after reaching an intraday high of $119.13, while West Texas Intermediate touched $100.02 before ending at $96.14. Brent later traded at $107.29 after hitting $119 the previous day.
The Kobeissi Letter, a macro analysis platform, noted that the more severe move has been in the Middle East itself.

According to the firm, Dubai crude, a regional benchmark tied more closely to Gulf exports, hit $166.80 on March 19, while physical cargo prices for crude and fuel also set records as the conflict around Iran disrupted shipments through the Strait of Hormuz.
Oman’s oil price rose to $167 a barrel, while Brent remained near $113 and WTI traded around $97, leaving the gap between regional and global benchmarks at one of its widest levels in years.
That divergence has changed the market’s reading of the oil shock. Brent remains the headline benchmark, but the bigger stress is showing up in Gulf-linked cargoes, where traders are pricing the direct effect of disrupted shipping, lower exports, and supply fears around the Strait of Hormuz.
The Kobeissi Letter explained:
“When the war first began, US oil prices surged in the wake of uncertainty. However, as the Strait of Hormuz closed, markets began reassessing risks. While the Strait of Hormuz is closed, ~18% of global crude oil supply is offline.”
So, once that war premium moved from futures into physical barrels, the macro risk became harder for Bitcoin traders to ignore.
That would essentially shift the question for crypto investors from whether oil is rising to whether the rise remains contained in global benchmarks or continues feeding through Middle East cargo markets, keeping inflation pressure elevated for longer.
That backdrop is showing up clearly in Bitcoin derivatives.
Deribit’s March 19 note described buying $50,000 to $60,000 puts and said downside protection was provided through April and December risk-reversal structures as the energy shock and inflation data hit the tape.
The current market structure of the flow also adds nuance, with some of the recent downside positions expressed through put spreads and risk reversals rather than outright crash bets.
This suggests a market that manages costs and defines risk rather than simply positioning for panic. Investors are still paying for defense, but they are doing so with targeted structures around a specific lower range.
Meanwhile, broader derivatives data point in the same direction. K33 Research said CME Bitcoin futures open interest had climbed back above 110,000 BTC, while perpetual open interest held between 260,000 and 270,000 BTC.
It also said the seven-day average funding rate was -2.2% and the 30-day average had been negative for 18 consecutive trading days, the longest streak since December 2022.
In practical terms, the futures and perpetuals markets are still leaning defensive, even as Bitcoin trades near the top of its recent range.
Deribit’s weekly report with Block Scholes showed the same caution in options. BTC at-the-money implied volatility was around 50%, seven-day implied volatility stood at 52%, and the futures-implied yield curve remained flat at 2% to 3% across tenors.
Put-call skew had recovered from the late-February low, but the surface had still not rotated toward calls. So, traders were no longer chasing downside hedges at the same pace as earlier in the month, yet they were still willing to pay for protection.
Glassnode’s positioning data reinforces that picture, showing that perpetual funding remained firmly negative, while directional premium remained bearish, and directional perp premium turned negative for the first time since 2022.

This means that traders were still leaning short even after BTC's recovery from recent lows.
The upside case is that this hedge-heavy positioning becomes fuel for a squeeze. Glassnode said the combination of crowded shorts, negative funding, and easing options stress leaves Bitcoin vulnerable to further squeeze-driven upside if spot demand continues to recover.
In that setup, the same defensive posture that now reflects caution could turn into forced buying if traders have to cover shorts into strength.
Meanwhile, CryptoQuant’s more constructive scenario points the same way.
The crypto analytics firm said daily demand from accumulator addresses remained high at 224,700 BTC, above the monthly average, while exchange outflows reached 11,300 BTC in three days. At the same time, the Coinbase Premium remained positive, suggesting US buyers were still active.
Under that view, institutions are absorbing liquidity while retail sells into war headlines, creating the conditions for a bear trap rather than a breakdown.
However, the downside case remains tied to a wider conflict and a more persistent inflation shock. CryptoQuant said that if the US sends more troops to Iran and the conflict escalates further, restrictive Fed policy could remain in place for longer.
In that scenario, BTC's probability of a revisit to the February bottom near $60,000 rises, with the final liquidation zone around $54,800.
For traders trying to time the next entry, the more useful signal may be less about headlines and more about positioning.

CryptoQuant’s framework argues that price could continue to fluctuate between $69,000 and $65,000 amid heavy military tension, with a clearer entry only once the Bitcoin Price Momentum indicator returns toward its balance point near 50 and begins to show a reversal in the support region.
The post Bitcoin beating gold and stocks right now is making “smart money” worried appeared first on CryptoSlate.
When Vanity Fair published “Crypto's True Believers Demand to Be Taken Seriously” on Mar. 17, the backlash arrived within hours.
Hayden Adams said he had passed on the shoot after being asked to pose in a bathrobe in a sauna. Camila Russo called the framing “so off.” Nic Carter compared the group photograph to the Alliance of Magicians from Arrested Development.
Dennison Bertram, a former fashion photographer and Tally co-founder, went further. He dissected the lighting and angles as a deliberate composition designed to diminish rather than document.
The industry's first instinct was to call it a hit job, while the reactions on X told a more complicated story.
The backlash sorted into three competing instincts, and that sorting exposed more than the outrage did.
One camp argued legacy media still cannot read crypto with any seriousness, claiming that the framing read as anachronistic, written from a mental model of the sector that predates ETFs, treasury strategies, and congressional PAC money.
Russo's reaction belongs here: the piece felt like it described an industry that no longer exists.
A second camp held that the shoot was engineered to manufacture ridicule. The lighting, angles, and costuming choices were deliberate acts of visual condescension.
Bertram made that case in technical photographic terms, which gave it more evidentiary weight than standard X venting.
The third camp was quieter and more honest, noticing that the photographs stung partly because they captured something real.
Dean Eigenmann had put the harshest version of this on record months earlier, in a February essay arguing that crypto went to institutions and got reshaped in their image.
An industry that spends years lobbying for establishment legitimacy eventually hands those establishments the vocabulary to satirize it back. The Vanity Fair spread arrived as illustrated proof.
Noelle Acheson bridged the outrage to the forward-looking question: is this how mainstream media sees the industry, and if so, how much work remains?
The X reaction was largely a class panic about how legacy media reads crypto, with costumes, eccentricity, and nouveau-riche theater.
The problem is that some of it still is, and crypto has not resolved that internally.
| Reaction camp | Representative voice | Core claim | What it reveals |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legacy media still cannot read crypto seriously | Camila Russo | The framing felt stale and “so off,” as if describing an older version of the industry rather than one shaped by ETFs, treasury strategies, and political influence | Crypto sees itself as more institutionally mature than mainstream media still does |
| The shoot was engineered to manufacture ridicule | Dennison Bertram | The lighting, angles, and styling were not neutral documentation but deliberate visual condescension | The backlash was about photographic framing and status signaling, not just editorial tone |
| The photos stung because they captured something real | Dean Eigenmann; Noelle Acheson as the bridge to the broader question | Crypto sought establishment legitimacy and became vulnerable to establishment satire in return | The reputational problem is partly external, but also reflects unresolved internal contradictions about what crypto culture has become |
One detail in the Adams reaction went mostly unexamined: he passed on the shoot.
The spread reflects who accepted Vanity Fair's framing, who showed up, on what terms, in what setting. The industry's internal hierarchy regarding legitimate representation is so unresolved that a glossy magazine could define it by default.
What Vanity Fair's own reporting reveals cuts deeper still.
The piece notes that Meltem Demirors is buying Bitcoin again, and mentions that Cathie Wood and Olaf Carlson-Wee are accumulating Bitcoin.
In a feature built around broad crypto culture, the capital allocation answer from several of its most prominent subjects is not more tokens, more protocols, or more ecosystem bets. It is BTC.
However, the magazine framed it as a “crypto believers” story. The believers, when describing where their conviction actually points, keep naming the same asset.
That detail maps onto a structural reality that the X reaction cycle largely bypassed.
Public companies collectively hold roughly 1.179 million BTC across 195 firms, with Bitcoin accounting for approximately 95% of public company crypto treasury assets, per BitcoinTreasuries.
Strategy alone held 761,068 BTC as of Mar. 19, and spot US Bitcoin ETFs pulled $199.4 million in net inflows on the same day the Vanity Fair piece published, before shedding $163.5 million on Mar. 18 as the Fed held rates at 3.50%-3.75% and revised its 2026 inflation projections to 2.7% for both headline and core PCE.
That ETF volatility is what institutionalization looks like when macro headwinds hit. Bitcoin now trades against rate expectations and energy prices, and a magazine profile does not move it.
The political ledger sharpens the contradiction. Crypto poured $135 million into the 2024 election and won more than 90% of the races it backed.
Fairshake and its affiliates entered the 2026 cycle with more than $193 million in cash on hand, while the broader industry prepared roughly $200 million for the midterms.
An industry with that electoral infrastructure does not need Vanity Fair's approval. Yet, the X reaction proved it still wants cultural legitimacy badly enough to spend a news cycle fighting for it.
The backlash put a contradiction on display: political power on one side, reputational insecurity on the other.

Citi's current scenario framework sets the financial stakes. Its 12-month Bitcoin target sits at $112,000, revised down from $143,000. The bull case reaches $165,000. The bear case lands at $58,000.
The bull case depends on Bitcoin continuing to pull away from the cultural version of crypto. If ETF inflows resume, treasury adoption broadens, and Washington delivers enough regulatory clarity, the Vanity Fair episode could accelerate the sorting the industry already needs.
Builders and allocators who want credibility gain another reason to emphasize Bitcoin, infrastructure, compliance, and payments over personality-driven spectacle.
The magazine's caricature of “crypto” becomes self-limiting: the sector it satirized looks increasingly unlike the sector where serious capital sits, and Bitcoin trades on its own macro logic entirely outside the cultural cringe cycle.
The bear case is that the piece landed on a real structural weakness. Crypto sought elite validation across a decade, and elite validation responded with a bathrobe in a sauna.
If legislation stalls, ETF flows remain choppy, and the macro environment tightens further. Brent crude hit an intraday high of $119.20 on Mar. 19, already past the ECB's own adverse-scenario peak, with its severe scenario projecting euro-area headline inflation at 4.4% in 2026.

The reputational drag compounds existing market fragility.
Eigenmann's thesis proves out more completely in that setup: crypto went to the institutions, got reshaped in their image, and earned their satire in return.
Bitcoin falls with risk assets under that pressure but outperforms the broader crypto complex as capital consolidates into the most liquid, institutionally integrated asset.
Bitcoin has Wall Street's pipes and Washington's ear. The Vanity Fair shoot put the remaining unsettled question before a much wider audience: what culture Bitcoin actually belongs to.
The post Vanity Fair “bathrobe-gate” proves $135 million bought the crypto industry leverage but not respect appeared first on CryptoSlate.
The cryptocurrency market is currently navigating a dual-force storm: a historic regulatory breakthrough in Washington and a terrifying escalation of geopolitical tension in the Middle East. While US Senators have finally reached a tentative agreement with the White House to resolve the long-standing stablecoin dispute with banks, the news is being overshadowed by reports that the United States is preparing for a potential ground invasion of Iran.
In a move that could define the US crypto market structure, Senators Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD) announced an "agreement in principle" on Friday. The deal seeks to bridge the gap between digital asset firms and traditional banks regarding stablecoin yields.
Banks have argued that allowing crypto exchanges to pay rewards on stablecoin holdings would trigger "deposit flight" from traditional savings accounts. The new compromise reportedly limits yield payments on passive balances while protecting the ability of firms to innovate within the payment sector. This agreement clears the path for the landmark Market Structure Bill to move to a committee vote as early as April.
The regulatory optimism was quickly met with a "risk-off" wallop. According to CBS News, Pentagon officials have drafted detailed plans for the deployment of ground forces into Iran. While the White House maintains that no final decision has been made, the "Operation Epic Fury" preparations suggest a significant shift from localized strikes to a broader theater of war.
Investors are reacting to the prospect of a prolonged conflict. Historically, $Bitcoin has often been touted as "digital gold," but in the immediate wake of sudden military escalations, it frequently behaves like a high-beta risk asset, selling off alongside tech stocks as traders scramble for liquid cash and traditional havens like the US Dollar.
The current market downturn is driven by three primary factors:
Despite the immediate carnage, the long-term outlook for crypto remains anchored by the "CLARITY" of new regulations. If the Senate passes the stablecoin deal, it provides a legal "green light" for institutional capital to enter the space with reduced litigation risk.
| Asset | Immediate Reaction | 2026 Outlook |
|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin | Bearish (Volatility) | Bullish (Regulatory Clarity) |
| Stablecoins | High Demand/Premium | Regulated Asset Class |
| Altcoins | Deep Correction | Selective Recovery |
Traders should monitor the support levels for BTC at $60,000. If this level holds despite the war rhetoric, it could signal a massive "accumulation" phase once the initial panic subsides.
Bitcoin has gone through multiple crashes, corrections, and market cycles since its creation in 2009. From drops of over 80% to new all-time highs, volatility has always been part of the journey.
Yet one question still appears frequently: Can Bitcoin ever go to $0?
While short-term crashes are always possible, a complete collapse to zero is extremely unlikely. Here are three strong reasons why Bitcoin will not crash to $0.
Bitcoin is no longer a niche experiment used by a handful of tech enthusiasts. Today, it is a globally recognized asset class.
This level of adoption creates a strong demand floor.
For $Bitcoin to go to $0, every institution, company, and investor worldwide would have to abandon it simultaneously—a scenario that is highly unrealistic.
Bitcoin operates on a decentralized network secured by thousands of nodes and miners across the world.
To bring Bitcoin to $0, the entire network would need to fail or be compromised globally.
Given its distributed nature and continuous upgrades, this is extremely unlikely. In fact, the network has only grown stronger over time.
Bitcoin has a fixed supply of 21 million coins, making it one of the scarcest assets in the world.

This scarcity creates a long-term value proposition, similar to digital gold.
Even during major crashes, Bitcoin has never reached zero because there is always buyers stepping in at lower levels.
Bitcoin can be volatile. It can drop 50%, even 80% during bear markets. But a complete collapse to $0 would require:
All three happening at the same time is highly improbable.
Instead, Bitcoin continues to follow cycles of boom and correction, with each cycle bringing higher adoption, stronger infrastructure, and deeper liquidity.
Cardano ($ADA) is currently trading around $0.26–$0.27, moving sideways after a prolonged downtrend.
Over the past few weeks, ADA has shown limited volatility, with price action stuck in a tight range and no strong breakout attempts. Buyers are present, but not strong enough to push the price higher.
Looking at the chart, ADA is no longer trending down aggressively, but it is also not in a confirmed uptrend.

Key levels:
Price has repeatedly failed to hold above $0.30, showing that sellers remain active at higher levels.
👉 This suggests a neutral to slightly bearish structure.
Let’s calculate:
👉 Required increase:
+85%
This would need to happen within days to a couple of weeks — a very aggressive move.
👉 Mostly unlikely
Here’s why:
Reaching $0.50 before April would require a rapid move with sustained momentum — something not currently visible on the chart.
ADA would need to break:
Each level increases selling pressure and slows the move.
The current consolidation between $0.25 and $0.30 shows hesitation rather than accumulation for a breakout.
The RSI is around 47–48, indicating:
👉 This supports the idea that ADA is not building strong upward pressure yet.
Cardano has delivered 80%+ rallies, but typically:
👉 Right now, these conditions are not present, especially within such a short timeframe.
Based on the chart:
👉 Mostly unlikely
To reach $0.50 before April 2026, ADA would need:
These conditions are currently missing.
Cardano is stabilizing, but not yet ready for a major breakout.
While $0.50 remains a valid long-term target, expecting it before April 2026 does not align with:
👉 The key level to watch remains $0.30 — a break above it could be the first sign of recovery.
$Bitcoin price news today shows a market at a critical turning point. Despite recent volatility, BTC is holding firmly above a key ascending trendline, trading around the $70,000 level.
Looking at the 4-hour chart, Bitcoin continues to respect a rising support structure that has been forming since early March. This trendline has acted as a strong foundation, preventing deeper corrections even during sharp sell-offs.

From a technical perspective, the chart reveals a clear structure:
Bitcoin recently corrected from the $75K–$76K range but found strong buying interest exactly at the ascending trendline. This confirms that buyers are still defending higher lows — a classic bullish continuation pattern.
As long as BTC remains above this trendline, the structure favors an eventual move higher.
The RSI indicator currently sits around 42–43, showing that momentum has cooled after the recent drop.
This is important for two reasons:
Historically, such RSI resets within an uptrend often precede the next bullish leg.
One of the biggest catalysts in recent bitcoin price news is Morgan Stanley filing for a spot Bitcoin ETF.
This development signals:
The ETF narrative has been one of the strongest drivers of Bitcoin’s recent rally. With another major financial institution entering the space, the long-term outlook remains supported by growing institutional demand.
If Bitcoin continues to hold the ascending trendline:
If the trendline breaks:
However, current price action suggests buyers are still in control.
XRP is currently trading around $1.40–$1.44, struggling to gain momentum after weeks of consolidation. Despite a few short-term rebounds, the price remains under pressure and continues to follow a broader downtrend.
XRP has failed to reclaim higher levels and is now hovering below key resistance zones, with buyers showing limited strength.

The below chart clearly shows $XRP trading inside a descending channel, which is a classic bearish pattern.

Key observations:
Even recent upward moves have been weak and quickly rejected, suggesting that the market lacks strong bullish conviction.
👉 As long as XRP remains inside this channel, the trend is still bearish to neutral.
Let’s break it down:
👉 Required move: +38.9% increase
This is a significant move — especially within a very short timeframe.
While crypto can be volatile, a move of nearly 40% in 12 days is unlikely under current conditions.
Here’s why:
XRP has been ranging between $1.35 and $1.50 with no strong breakout continuation.
Large moves typically require:
None of these are currently driving XRP.
The descending channel suggests sellers still control the market.
Without a breakout, upside remains limited.
Yes — but under very different conditions.
XRP has previously delivered large double-digit gains in short periods, but these happened:
👉 Current market conditions do not reflect that environment.
Based on the chart:
That kind of shift typically takes more time than a few days.
👉 Mostly unlikely
To reach $2 before the end of March 2026, XRP would need:
None of these signals are currently present.
Bitcoin's volatility has subsided over the last month, but traders are still paying a premium for downside protection, VanEck said.
Prosecutors say automated plays of AI-generated songs fraudulently diverted royalties from human artists—to the tune of $8 million.
Kalshi's sports, politics, and entertainment prediction markets will be banned in Nevada for at least the next 14 days.
OpenAI will consolidate its fragmented desktop products into a single superapp, a report claims, as rival Anthropic gains momentum.
Kalshi has raised $1 billion at a $22 billion valuation, doubling its worth in just three months.
Bitcoin is increasingly challenging gold’s status as the world’s premier store of value, decoupling from a massive sell-off in precious metals that has seen gold drop more than $1,100 from its February peak.
Evernorth CEO Asheesh Birla has addressed the growing divergence between XRP’s surging on-chain activity and its stagnant price.
Bitcoin is showing a "striking divergence" from traditional assets this March, maintaining a structural floor at $60,000 despite a surging U.S. dollar and rising bond yields.
Ledger has officially launched a multi-million dollar expansion into the United States, marking its largest global move to date with a new headquarters in New York City.
Evernorth confirms XRP Ledger's use for tokenization and lending. Discover why the firm bets on XRP's unique regulatory clarity in 2026.
The online gambling conversation used to revolve around a small group of major operators. DraftKings, along with a few other household names, dominated headlines, advertising, and player sign-ups. That has not changed entirely, but something else is happening alongside it. A growing number of players are actively searching for crypto-native alternatives, and platforms like ZunaBet are showing up in those searches with increasing frequency.
This does not mean ZunaBet is about to replace DraftKings. They serve different audiences in different ways. But understanding how they compare reveals a lot about where different segments of the gambling market are heading. Here is what each platform brings and where the differences matter most.
DraftKings grew from a daily fantasy sports startup into one of the biggest legal gambling operators in the United States. It is publicly traded, licensed across multiple US states, and backed by partnerships with major sports leagues and media companies. Its brand recognition is enormous, built on years of advertising during live sports broadcasts and integration into mainstream sports culture.
The sportsbook is the centrepiece. DraftKings covers NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, soccer, tennis, golf, MMA, and just about every other sport with a significant American following. Live betting, same-game parlays, and regular promotional odds boosts keep the experience engaging for bettors who follow the major leagues closely.
Casino games are available in states that permit online casino gambling. The selection includes slots, table games, and live dealer options from recognized providers. The library is solid within each approved market, but availability and game count vary from state to state based on what local regulators allow.

All transactions at DraftKings run through traditional payment channels. Bank transfers, debit cards, and approved processors handle deposits and withdrawals. Full identity verification is required before any wagering can take place. These are standard conditions for any operator working within the US legal framework.
The loyalty program operates under the Dynasty Rewards banner. Players collect Crowns through wagering, which convert into DK Dollars at fixed rates. Multiple tiers exist, and the system provides some return on play. However, the actual percentage returned to players is modest, and the structure is designed more to encourage continued betting volume than to deliver substantial cashback.
DraftKings excels at what it was built for: serving American sports bettors within a regulated, fiat-based environment. For that specific audience, it is one of the best products available. But its design leaves gaps for players who want something different.
ZunaBet launched in 2026 and was purpose-built for a different kind of player. It is operated by Strathvale Group Ltd, registered in Belize, and holds an Anjouan gaming license (ALSI-202510047-FI2). The founding team carries more than 20 years of combined experience across the online gambling industry.
The first thing that separates ZunaBet from a platform like DraftKings is the game count. ZunaBet hosts 11,294 games from 63 different providers. That library includes titles from Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw Gaming, Evolution, Yggdrasil, BGaming, and many more. Slots lead the catalog, but RNG table games and live dealer rooms with professional hosts contribute meaningful depth. No single US-regulated platform comes close to matching this number, primarily because regulatory requirements cap what can be offered in any given state.

The sportsbook at ZunaBet runs as a full product alongside the casino. Coverage spans football, basketball, tennis, NHL, and other major leagues. Esports betting goes deep with markets for CS2, Dota 2, League of Legends, and Valorant. Virtual sports and combat sports add categories that traditional sportsbooks often overlook. The entire offering operates as an integrated platform where switching between a casino session and a sports bet takes seconds.
Payments are crypto-first. ZunaBet accepts over 20 cryptocurrencies: BTC, ETH, USDT across multiple blockchain networks, SOL, DOGE, ADA, XRP, and additional tokens. The platform charges no processing fees, and withdrawals move quickly. Players use whatever coin they already hold in their wallet.
The welcome bonus package reaches up to $5,000 in matched deposits plus 75 free spins over three deposits. The breakdown is clean: 100% match up to $2,000 and 25 spins on the first deposit, 50% up to $1,500 and 25 spins on the second, and 100% up to $1,500 and 25 spins on the third. No progressive unlock systems or points-based release mechanics. Just clear matched deposits spread across three visits.
Native apps exist for iOS, Android, Windows, and MacOS. The web platform runs on HTML5 with a dark interface, responsive layout, and fast performance. Live chat support is available at all hours.
DraftKings operates under state-by-state licensing in the US. Each state has its own gaming commission that approves which providers and games can appear on the platform. The result is that game libraries differ depending on where a player is located, and the total count in any single state is a fraction of what an internationally operating platform can offer.
ZunaBet does not face those constraints. With 63 providers contributing to the platform, the game catalog runs deeper and wider than what any single regulated US market permits. Players get access to studios and titles that may never appear on DraftKings due to licensing limitations. For anyone who values having the broadest possible range of games available at any time, the structural advantage sits firmly with ZunaBet.
This is not a criticism of DraftKings. The company operates within the rules of its markets. But it does illustrate why players looking for maximum variety often end up exploring platforms outside the traditional regulatory framework.
DraftKings has one of the best sportsbooks in the US market. Coverage of American sports is excellent, the live betting product is smooth, and the promotional calendar keeps regular bettors engaged. If you want to bet on the Super Bowl, March Madness, or the World Series within a legal, regulated environment, DraftKings handles that about as well as anyone.
ZunaBet’s sportsbook takes a more global approach. Mainstream sports are well covered, but the platform also invests heavily in esports markets. Dedicated betting options for CS2, Dota 2, League of Legends, and Valorant reflect a deliberate choice to serve the growing audience of younger bettors who follow competitive gaming as closely as traditional sports. Virtual sports and combat sports fill out the rest of the lineup.

The audiences these sportsbooks serve overlap in places but diverge in others. DraftKings is optimized for American sports culture. ZunaBet is built for a global, digitally native audience that bets across categories. Neither approach is wrong, but one is more future-facing than the other as the betting audience continues to get younger and more internationally connected.
DraftKings runs frequent promotions tied to specific sporting events. Odds boosts, deposit matches on certain occasions, and free bet offers appear regularly. The specifics change often, which keeps things interesting but can also make it difficult for players to plan around a consistent offer.
ZunaBet goes with a fixed welcome structure. Up to $5,000 across three deposits plus 75 free spins. First deposit gets 100% up to $2,000 and 25 spins. Second gets 50% up to $1,500 and 25 spins. Third gets 100% up to $1,500 and 25 spins. The offer does not change from week to week. Players know what they are getting before they sign up, and the three-deposit format gives them a reason to come back without adding any confusion.

Both approaches have their logic. But for players who prefer knowing exactly what a platform will give them upfront, ZunaBet’s transparency is appealing.
DraftKings Dynasty Rewards tracks wagering through Crowns, which convert to DK Dollars. The system has tiers and provides incremental returns. It functions as a standard rewards program that gives something back to active players, though the actual return rate stays relatively low across all tiers.
ZunaBet built its loyalty program around a dragon evolution concept featuring a mascot named Zuno. Six tiers carry defined rakeback percentages: Squire at 1%, Warden at 2%, Champion at 4%, Divine at 5%, Knight at 10%, and Ultimate at 20%. Each tier adds additional perks including free spins scaling to 1,000, VIP club access, and double wheel spins.

The contrast is significant. DraftKings rewards continued betting with modest returns. ZunaBet rewards continued betting with escalating returns that top out at 20% rakeback. For regular players comparing the long-term value of sticking with one platform, ZunaBet’s program returns substantially more at every level. That 20% ceiling is not standard in this industry. It is exceptional, and it gives serious players a financial reason to commit to ZunaBet over other options.
DraftKings handles all transactions through traditional financial channels. Bank accounts, cards, and approved processors move money in and out. Deposits are generally quick, but withdrawals can involve waiting periods depending on the method. Identity verification is mandatory for every account.
ZunaBet runs entirely on crypto. More than 20 coins are accepted, including stablecoins on multiple chains. No platform fees are charged. Withdrawals are fast. There is no requirement to connect a bank account or go through the kind of identity verification that fiat platforms demand.
These are fundamentally different experiences. Players who operate within the traditional banking system and value regulatory oversight will naturally lean toward DraftKings. Players who hold crypto and want the speed, flexibility, and privacy that comes with it will find ZunaBet a far better fit. As crypto adoption continues to grow, the audience for platforms like ZunaBet grows with it.
DraftKings has a locked-in position in the US gambling market. Its brand recognition, regulatory licenses, sports partnerships, and advertising spend ensure it will remain a dominant force for years to come. That is not in question.
What is worth watching is the growing interest in platforms like ZunaBet among a segment of the market that DraftKings was never designed to serve. Crypto-native players, international audiences, esports bettors, and players who want massive game libraries and generous loyalty returns are actively searching for alternatives. ZunaBet meets those players exactly where they are.
More games than any regulated US platform can offer. More cryptocurrency options than most crypto casinos provide. A sportsbook that covers traditional and emerging betting markets. A welcome bonus that is straightforward and generous. And a loyalty program that returns up to 20% to its most committed players.
DraftKings owns the present of mainstream American sports betting. ZunaBet is building something for the next generation of gamblers who think differently about payments, play differently across game categories, and expect more back from the platforms they choose. The search momentum suggests that audience is growing, and ZunaBet is exactly what they have been looking for.
The post DraftKings and ZunaBet: Two Platforms, Two Directions for Online Gambling appeared first on Blockonomi.
Bitcoin is trading near $70,000 as Eid 2026 approaches, reflecting steady market conditions. Historical data show that Eid periods often bring increased activity, though price direction varies each year depending on broader market cycles and liquidity conditions.
Recent market data places Bitcoin at $69,764.71, with a 0.23% daily increase. Estimates suggest a range between $65,000 and $75,000 during Eid 2026. This aligns with the consolidation seen throughout March.
A post from Syndicate Official noted similar expectations. The tweet pointed to current trading levels between $68,000 and $70,000. Such projections reflect cautious market positioning ahead of the holiday period.
Compared to past Eid cycles, current levels remain elevated. In 2024, Bitcoin traded near $69,350 during Eid. Meanwhile, 2023 and 2022 recorded lower levels at $27,270 and $38,520. This contrast shows stronger market positioning entering 2026.
Earlier cycles also showed upward movement. Bitcoin reached $2,590 in 2017 and $8,720 in 2020 during Eid periods. These shifts followed broader market expansions rather than isolated seasonal drivers.
Historical patterns show increased trading activity during Eid. Liquidity often rises due to bonuses and festive spending. As a result, short-term buying pressure tends to increase during this period.
However, price direction has not remained consistent. While some years recorded gains, others showed declines despite higher participation. This indicates that external market conditions continue to guide price movement.
Social media discussions frequently mention the “Eid effect” in crypto markets. These narratives often point to higher retail engagement. Still, data suggest that broader trends remain the dominant factor in price behavior.
Institutional players also monitor these periods closely. Increased retail activity can create short bursts of volatility. Even so, overall direction depends on macro trends and ongoing market cycles.
The post Eid Crypto Trends: Bitcoin Holds Near $70K as Seasonal Patterns Reappear appeared first on Blockonomi.
Ledger, the global leader in digital asset security, has appointed John Andrews as its new Chief Financial Officer. The announcement came alongside the opening of a new U.S. office in New York City.
Andrews joins from Circle, where he led capital markets and investor relations. The move signals Ledger’s growing ambitions in its largest global market.
Reports suggest the company is preparing for a potential IPO, with a valuation possibly exceeding $4 billion.
John Andrews brings over 25 years of experience across corporate finance and financial services. He previously served as Head of Capital Markets and Investor Relations at Circle.
His role there included direct involvement in Circle’s own IPO process. That background makes him a strong fit for Ledger’s current growth trajectory.
At Circle, Andrews worked at the intersection of traditional finance and digital assets. That experience closely mirrors the institutional shift Ledger is now targeting.
Banks, asset managers, custodians, and stablecoin issuers are among the company’s growing client base. Andrews is expected to lead financial strategy as that demand continues to rise.
Ledger CEO Pascal Gauthier shared the news publicly, tying both announcements together. He wrote on social media: “John Andrews brings the institutional rigor and financial leadership needed to scale Ledger’s global vision.”
Gauthier added that Andrews’ experience at the crossroads of traditional finance and digital assets is “exactly what we need.” He also noted the New York office places Ledger Enterprise “at the heart of the financial world.”
Andrews, in turn, expressed confidence in the company’s market position. “Ledger has built the most trusted security platform for digital assets,” he said.
He added that institutions are increasingly seeking secure infrastructure to operate in this ecosystem. Andrews described Ledger as “uniquely positioned to support that transition.”
The IPO timeline remains uncertain due to current market volatility. However, preparations are already reported to be underway.
Andrews’ background in investor relations places him at the center of those efforts. Ledger has not yet confirmed a specific timeline for any public listing.
Ledger’s New York office represents a multi-million-dollar investment in the company’s U.S. presence. The office will serve as a strategic hub for Ledger Enterprise, its institutional infrastructure platform.
Dozens of roles are being created across enterprise and marketing functions. The expansion reflects the growing demand from financial institutions for secure digital asset tools.
Gauthier was direct about the role institutions now play in Ledger’s strategy. “Institutions today require the cryptographic certainty that only Ledger provides,” he stated.
He further noted that Ledger Enterprise Multisig and Tradelink give banks and asset managers “the tools to govern and trade assets with total control.” Those products sit at the core of the company’s institutional offering.
Andrews echoed that sentiment upon joining. “I’m excited to join the company at such an important moment for its growth,” he said.
He also expressed gratitude to Gauthier for the trust placed in him. Andrews called it an honor to join a team “respected across the industry for its leadership.”
The New York office will be formally celebrated on March 23rd. The event will bring together industry leaders, partners, and members of the digital asset ecosystem.
It follows a multi-year global partnership with the San Antonio Spurs. That deal further strengthened Ledger’s brand presence across the United States.
Ledger currently secures more than 20% of the world’s crypto assets and has sold over 8 million devices across 165 countries. The company also helps secure over 30% of dollar stablecoins held by retail investors.
As adoption accelerates, Ledger is positioning itself as the go-to infrastructure layer for institutional crypto operations. The New York office places the company firmly at the center of that shift.
The post Ledger Appoints John Andrews as CFO, Opens New York Office Amid U.S. Expansion Push appeared first on Blockonomi.
DarkSword, a newly identified iPhone exploit, is placing millions of crypto users at serious risk. Google’s Threat Intelligence Group disclosed the threat in March 2026.
The exploit targets devices running iOS 18.4 through 18.7. Estimates put the number of vulnerable iPhones at around 270 million.
The attack works silently in the background with no clicks required. A single visit to a compromised website can lead to a full device takeover.
DarkSword exploits a chain of six vulnerabilities, three of which are classified as zero-days. When a user visits a fake or compromised website, hidden code activates on the device.
The process happens in the background, with no visible warnings shown to the user. There is no need for the user to click anything for the attack to succeed.
Once inside the device, attackers can access crypto wallet data and seed phrases stored on the phone. Saved passwords are also exposed, along with private conversations across Telegram, WhatsApp, and iMessage.
On top of that, the malware can extract photos, location history, and record audio through the device microphone.
Crypto Patel shared on X that attackers are specifically hunting for crypto wallet apps and seed phrases. That statement separates DarkSword from a standard espionage operation. It is a targeted financial attack designed to drain the holdings of crypto users.
The threat is especially serious for those who store seed phrases digitally. Security professionals have long advised against saving such data on a mobile device.
DarkSword now provides a concrete reason for crypto holders to reconsider how they secure sensitive information. Moving seed phrase storage offline is a practical step that reduces risk considerably.
Google’s investigation linked DarkSword to three separate threat actors. Among them are Russian espionage group UNC6353, Turkish surveillance vendor PARS Defense, and an additional cluster known as UNC6748.
The presence of multiple well-resourced groups behind a single exploit makes the campaign particularly concerning.
Reported targets include users in Ukraine, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Malaysia. Still, because the attack spreads through websites, any iPhone user could encounter it. Location alone does not determine who is at risk. Users everywhere should treat the threat as active.
Apple acted swiftly and patched all six vulnerabilities connected to DarkSword. The fix is available through an update to iOS 26.3.
Users who delay that update remain exposed to the full scope of the exploit chain. This is the second major iOS attack reported this month, making timely updates more important than ever.
Beyond the software update, Apple’s Lockdown Mode provides an added layer of defense. Hardware wallets are the safest option for anyone holding large crypto amounts.
Avoiding suspicious websites and refraining from storing seed phrases on any phone remain practical steps every crypto user should follow.
The post DarkSword iPhone Exploit Threatens Crypto Wallets: What Every Holder Must Know Now appeared first on Blockonomi.
After pursuing advertising opportunities for more than four years, Roblox is implementing its most significant policy transformation to date.
Roblox Corporation, RBLX
Beginning May 4, 2026, the platform will roll out comprehensive changes to its advertising framework — marking the first time the company will directly participate in revenue generated from brand partnerships within games hosted on its ecosystem.
The revised guidelines establish that promotional material includes any content funded by brands or featuring products available beyond the Roblox platform. This represents a more comprehensive and explicit framework than previous standards.
The updated policy also introduces age-specific restrictions. Players younger than 13 will not see advertisements for pharmaceutical products or financial services. Additionally, this demographic will be excluded from interactive ad experiences that provide in-game incentives for viewing or interacting with sponsored content.
According to the company, these changes aim to streamline brand integration. Through standardized guidelines, transparent pricing structures, and measurable outcomes, Roblox seeks to create a more attractive environment for advertising investment.
The pursuit of advertising revenue has been part of Roblox’s strategic plan since at least 2021. Leadership has consistently highlighted opportunities including video advertisements, virtual billboards, and branded virtual merchandise as potential revenue streams benefiting both the platform and its creator ecosystem.
Several independent creators have already generated substantial income — in some cases exceeding hundreds of thousands of dollars — through branded experiences and virtual items. The upcoming revenue-sharing framework formalizes these arrangements and ensures Roblox receives a portion of future deals.
Specific details regarding the revenue split structure remain under development. The company has indicated that comprehensive information will be released during the second quarter of 2026.
Roblox stock (RBLX) declined 1.23% at the time of reporting.
On March 19, 2026, Roblox welcomed Dennis Durkin as an independent Class II director on its Board of Directors.
Durkin brings extensive gaming industry credentials, having served as CFO and President of Emerging Businesses at Activision Blizzard. His career also includes executive positions within Microsoft’s Xbox and gaming divisions — representing nearly 30 years of technology and gaming sector expertise.
He has been assigned to both the Audit and Compliance Committee and the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee.
Durkin’s compensation package includes standard cash retainers for board and committee participation, supplemented by time-based restricted stock unit grants aligned with the company’s established outside director compensation framework.
The board appointment was formally disclosed on March 20, 2026.
The latest Wall Street rating on RBLX maintains a Buy recommendation with a $110.00 price objective. TipRanks’ AI analyst assigns a Neutral rating, acknowledging robust cash flow generation and positive booking trends while highlighting ongoing profitability challenges, margin fluctuations, and balance sheet concerns.
The post Roblox (RBLX) Stock Dips as Platform Introduces Revenue Share on Brand Sponsorships appeared first on Blockonomi.
There is a notable divergence in Bitcoin’s on-chain structure, where realized losses have surged to cycle extremes even as supply activity continues to contract. This points to a potential phase of selling exhaustion.
According to the latest analysis shared by Axel Adler Jr., Bitcoin’s Net Realized Profit/Loss, which tracks the balance between realized gains and losses across all UTXOs, has fallen sharply into negative territory, and losses reached nearly $2 billion during January-February 2026. The metric was last observed at these levels during the 2022-2023 bear market.
Such a pattern comes after a long period from October 2023 through the end of 2024, when the metric remained consistently positive amid a rally from $30,000 to a peak of $125,000. The current dominance of realized losses, particularly with prices stabilizing in the $65,000-$75,000 range, points to capitulation pressure among weaker holders, which is historically associated with periods of market stress and compression in selling activity.
However, Adler Jr. explained that this alone does not confirm a trend reversal. At the same time, the Supply Active 30D Change metric, which measures changes in the proportion of recently moved coins, has declined below zero. This indicates a contraction in “young” UTXOs and reduced coin movement, and contrasts with prior bullish phases, where sharp upward spikes above 12% in this metric accompanied strong price advances.
The present decline means coins are increasingly dormant and reflects a lack of broad-based distribution despite high realized losses. Adler Jr. went on to add that these factors demonstrate exhaustion in loss-driven selling rather than a confirmed recovery in demand.
The divergence implies that while some market participants are capitulating, a larger share of holders remains inactive. Structurally, this aligns with accumulation or absorption phases, though confirmation requires a steady recovery in the 7-day moving average of Net Realized PnL back into positive territory while supply activity remains subdued.
More importantly, the primary risk lies in a scenario where supply activity accelerates before PnL recovers, which would indicate renewed distribution rather than organic recovery.
Until such confirmation emerges, the current market regime remains neutral, and conditions suggest compression in selling pressure rather than the onset of a definitive bullish reversal.
The post Bitcoin Realized Losses Hit Extremes While Supply Remains Frozen appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Bitcoin briefly climbed past $71,000 early Friday, as it slightly bounced back from earlier weakness. This comes as authorities worked to address oil supply disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz and restore market stability.
Amid these developments, Bitcoin is nearing a long-standing support trendline that has “guarded” its price action since 2017.
According to data shared by crypto analyst Ali Martinez, historically, each prior retest of this level preceded major rallies, including gains of 963% in 2017, 261% in 2018, 1,126% following the 2020 COVID-19 market crash, and 660% after the 2022 FTX collapse.
The flagship cryptocurrency is currently approaching this support zone between $60,000 and $56,000. Martinez added,
“If this floor holds, we aren’t just looking at a bounce. Indeed, we are looking at the potential launchpad for the next major bull cycle.”
Additionally, the TD Sequential flashed a buy signal on Bitcoin, which means that the recent downtrend may be losing momentum. Based on this setup, the asset may be positioned for a rebound from its current levels.
Separate data shows Bitcoin is exhibiting a significant divergence as the number of whale wallets holding at least 100 BTC has increased to 753 over the past three months. During the same period, Bitcoin’s market value declined by 20%, indicating accumulation by large holders despite falling prices.
But a deeper look at market structure reveals that the latest move is not yet backed by strong conviction across all segments. Bitcoin has cleared a major supply cluster, which pushed the asset into a relatively thin liquidity zone up to $82,000. This suggests reduced resistance in the short term. However, the breakout has yet to confirm a broader structural shift.
Around 60% of Bitcoin’s supply is currently in profit, below the typical 75% seen in stronger bull phases, while short-term holders are realizing profits at a pace of $18.4 million per hour, pointing to ongoing sell-side pressure. Although spot demand has improved, supported by renewed inflows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs and stronger exchange buying activity, derivatives data show limited conviction.
CME futures open interest remains low, and negative funding rates indicate continued short positioning, which has partly fueled the rally through short covering. Options markets reflect declining volatility and rising call interest, pointing to a more balanced outlook. Glassnode observed that holding above $70,000 while absorbing profit-taking could support a move toward $78,000 and potentially $82,000, though further upside will likely depend on stronger capital inflows and increased leverage.
The post The Ultimate Launchpad? Why Bitcoin’s Current Price Action Mirrors the 2017 and 2020 Bull Runs appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Many leading cryptocurrencies have posted slight declines or negligible increases over the past 24 hours, but this isn’t the case for Bittensor (TAO), whose price soared by 15%.
The question now is whether this momentum can hold or if a pullback is coming next.
Earlier today (March 20), TAO’s price soared to $306 (per CoinGecko data), the highest since the start of December 2025. Its market capitalization pumped to roughly $2.7 billion, making it the 35th-biggest cryptocurrency.

The most evident catalyst of the resurgence appears to be the discussion between NVIDIA’s CEO Jensen Huang and the well-known entrepreneur Chamath Palihapitiya. Both men endorsed the project, with Huang praising Bittensor for successfully training a 4-billion-parameter Llama model using a fully distributed computing model.
According to multiple market observers, the price has yet to reach new peaks. X user John claimed that TAO “looks like it’s about to go on a massive run,” while Ardi envisioned a pump to $360-$370 if TAO initiates a decisive breakout above the $302 resistance level.
Andrew Crypto and Altcoin Sherpa also chipped in. The former forecasted heightened volatility in the coming months and an eventual rise beyond $500 after the summer. For their part, Altcoin Sherpa doesn’t see the current conditions as a perfect buying opportunity, although the comments from NVIDIA’s boss might change the picture.
“This is not a great place to be buying, but with NVIDIA having their conference and AI being in the news, maybe you can consider top blasting and not caring. Strong bounce; sad I didn’t take it earlier like I charted,” the analyst stated.
Those curious to observe other recent price predictions involving Bittensor’s native cryptocurrency can take a look at our dedicated article here.
Contrary to the aforementioned optimism, TAO’s exchange netflow suggests the price may soon head south. Over the past several days, inflows have outweighed outflows, meaning that investors have been flocking toward centralized platforms and abandoning self-custody. This doesn’t guarantee a price crash but is typically considered as pre-sale behavior.

The asset’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) also signals trouble ahead for the bulls. The indicator has soared past 70 on a daily scale, thus entering overbought conditions, which could be a precursor of a pullback. The RSI ranges from 0 to 100, with anything below 30 considered a buying opportunity.

The post Bittensor (TAO) Hits a 3-Month Peak: What Caused the Rally and What Comes Next? appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Morgan Stanley has filed a second amended S-1 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to launch its spot Bitcoin ETF.
The update adds operational details and signals progress in the bank’s application, even though approval is still uncertain.
In its filing, the bank outlined plans for an initial seed basket of 50,000 shares, which is expected to raise about $1 million. Earlier in the month, the bank revealed that it had undertaken another routine step in ETF preparation, buying a couple of the fund’s shares for auditing purposes.
In its previous amendment, the investment giant disclosed that it had roped in BNY Mellon and Coinbase as key service providers, with the former acting as its cash custodian, administrator, and transfer agent, while the latter will serve as prime broker and custodian for the fund’s BTC holdings. Additionally, the filing also confirmed that if approved, the proposed BTC ETF will trade on the NYSE Arca, with MSBT as its ticker.
The financial institution submitted its BTC ETF application back in January, alongside filings for products linked to Solana (SOL). At the time, it stated that it had decided to embrace crypto assets due to improved regulatory clarity under the Trump administration. And while it is yet to disclose its management fees, the spot Bitcoin ETF could go live in the next few weeks, thanks to the SEC’s generic listing standard.
Were that to happen, it would place Morgan Stanley among a growing list of issuers competing in the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF market, where products launched in January 2024 have attracted over $56 billion in cumulative flows, according to data from SoSoValue.
Morgan Stanley’s foray into crypto isn’t exactly new. It previously allowed certain brokerage clients access to digital asset trading, and recent ETF launches from fellow Wall Street giant BlackRock could show them what to expect.
BlackRock has been in the crypto ETF space for a while now, but it recently launched a staked Ethereum ETF that recorded a trading volume of more than $15 million on its first day. While the figure seemed modest, especially compared to the firm’s more established funds, it showed that there is still interest in new crypto investment structures.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin itself was trading around the $70,000 level at the time of writing, up less than 1% in the last 24 hours and showing a dip of over 2% in the past seven days. In the last month, the OG cryptocurrency added at least 4% to its value, although it is still nearly 44% below its all-time high price recorded in October 2025, when it went past $126,000.
The post Morgan Stanley Files Second Amendment for Direct Spot Bitcoin ETF Product appeared first on CryptoPotato.
The cryptocurrency market has remained shaky over the past 24 hours, and sentiment remains in “Extreme Fear” according to the popular Crypto Fear and Greed Index. The total market capitalization is dwindling, currently at about $2.47 trillion as of this writing.
Before we proceed with the altcoins, let’s have an overview of what happened to Bitcoin this week. Tensions in the Middle East are far from over, while in the US, the Federal Reserve held its second FOMC meeting of the year.
Just a week ago, BTC’s price surged toward $74,000 for the second time in ten days, but was then faced with rejection and slipped back toward $70K during the weekend. The decline was exacerbated by one of the most severe US bombing operations on Iranian infrastructure, as described by the POTUS himself.
Despite all of this pressure, BTC held the $70K level and managed to reverse course early in the week. The momentum picked up on Monday and especially Tuesday, when the price soared to about $76K – a level we hadn’t seen in nearly six weeks.
However, the rally lost its steam soon after. By Wednesday, the leading cryptocurrency had pulled back to $74K, and then dropped sharply ahead of the FOMC decision, which, by the way, was in line with expectations. Comments from the Fed Chair, expressing concern about inflation and the broader economy, triggered another wave of selling, ultimately pushing BTC below $70K.

Many altcoins have lost their footing in the past 24 hours, and many of them are also charting insignificant increases in the range between 0% and 1%. That’s especially true for the large-caps such as Binance Coin (+0.02%), XRP (-0.47%), ETH (-0.07%), Solana (+0.7%), and so forth.
As mentioned above, the broader market sentiment has once again shifted to extreme fear, and the uncertainty in major markets is evident.

That said, there are always exceptions to the rule. Siren (SIREN) – a coin that recently entered the top 100 is performing really well today. It has managed to soar by 10% in the past day and by 60% in the past week. Bittensor’s TAO is the clear winner from the top 100, gaining more than 14% during the last 24 hours, riding on the back of the AI hype.
One coin that is flying under the radar but boasts strong fundamentals and visible traction, though, is the newly-launched GCOIN by PlayNance. The altcoin sits on a fully diluted valuation of about $80 million, meaning that it doesn’t take that much for it to gain traction.
On the other hand, nearly 10% of the currently circulating supply is locked and essentially out of the market for the foreseeable future, removing considerable immediate selling pressure.
GCOIN is the native cryptocurrency of the PlayNance ecosystem and is powering its entire infrastructure. The protocol is oriented toward some of the hottest current narratives in the face of gaming and entertainment and already boasts thousands of applications and millions of daily transactions, all powered by GCOIN. Following a successful token generation event (TGE) from a few days ago, GCOIN is available for trading on the popular MEXC exchange.
Those who want to get in on the action early can find more information about GCOIN here.
Disclaimer: The above article is sponsored content. CryptoPotato doesn’t endorse or assume responsibility for the content, advertising, products, quality, accuracy, or other materials on this page. Nothing in it should be construed as financial advice. Readers are strongly advised to verify the information independently and carefully before engaging with any company or project mentioned and to do their own research. Investing in cryptocurrencies carries a risk of capital loss, and readers are also advised to consult a professional before making any decisions that may or may not be based on the above-sponsored content.
The post These Trending Altcoins Are Turning Heads: Bittensor (TAO), SIREN, and GCOIN by PlayNance appeared first on CryptoPotato.