Nvidia's surge highlights the volatile interplay between geopolitical events and tech market dynamics, underscoring short-term market optimism.

The post Nvidia hits record highs amid Middle East de-escalation, eyes top market cap spot appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The UAE's commitment to stable oil supply may temper immediate price spikes, but geopolitical tensions could still drive volatility.

The post UAE pledges stable oil supply amid Iran Strait of Hormuz blockade appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The rejection highlights ongoing geopolitical tensions, impacting market confidence and reducing the likelihood of a swift diplomatic resolution.

The post Trump rejects Iran offer, Tehran claims resilience amid US pressure appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Trump's influence on Israeli-Lebanon relations highlights U.S. diplomatic power, but contrasts with stagnant Israel-Iran peace prospects.

The post Trump’s control over Israeli military actions pushes Lebanon ceasefire endorsement appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The UAE's exit from OPEC+ may destabilize oil market coordination, potentially impacting global economic stability and energy policies.

The post UAE exits OPEC+, raising concerns over potential oil price shocks appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin Magazine

Billionaire Tim Draper: You Should Be Scared If You Don’t Own Bitcoin

Speaking on the Nakamoto Stage, Tim Draper told attendees that bitcoin has entered the financial mainstream and that governments now roll out “the red carpet” for the industry. He said the community is “starting to feel like something is happening” as adoption grows, and he cast that shift as the early phase of a larger transition in the money system.

In his view, people will move in stages: first from dollars to stablecoins, then from stablecoins to bitcoin as the final store of value and unit of account.

Draper praised Satoshi Nakamoto’s design of BTC as a system with no government control, no middleman banks, and no traditional account records. He described his own early journey with the asset, including buying large amounts of BTC, then losing those holdings amid front-running and failures at Mt. Gox. That episode led him to question whether the experiment was worth the risk until he watched crypto usage spread in markets around the world and decided to buy again.

To illustrate the fragility of fiat money, Draper told a personal story about a “one–million–dollar bill” that his father gave him when he was young. The bill turned out to be a Confederate note with no value, which he held up as a warning that government currencies can fail, leaving savers with worthless paper.

He connected that story to his decision to purchase bitcoin from the U.S. government in an auction of seized coins, where he paid above market because he viewed bitcoin as a superior long-term asset.

Draper: You should be scared if you don’t own bitcoin

Draper outlined a scenario in which retailers begin by accepting bitcoin alongside other payment methods and then transition to accepting only bitcoin.

In that world, he said, consumers would rush to banks to pull out their money and convert into BTC as trust in national currencies declines. He told the audience that anyone who manages a family “ought to have about six months’ worth of bitcoin” as protection against such a breakdown.

He extended that warning to sovereigns facing inflation or fiscal stress. If a government encounters hyperinflation and holds no BTC on its balance sheet, Draper argued, its currency and the wealth of its officials could become worthless in real terms.

“You should be scared if you don’t own bitcoin,” Draper said he is telling people these days, adding that those without exposure “should be very, very worried.”

Draper closed with a call to action aimed at the entire BTC ecosystem around him. He said that “those of us who have bitcoin are gonna help steer the world” as legacy currencies lose value, and he told attendees to go home and tell their families to buy bitcoin, their governments to buy bitcoin, and their friends to buy BTC.

Addressing founders and builders, he urged entrepreneurs to “push it as hard as you can,” saying that broad BTC ownership is both a hedge against currency risk and a path to a new monetary standard.

This post Billionaire Tim Draper: You Should Be Scared If You Don’t Own Bitcoin first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

House Republicans Warn That the America’s Bitcoin Weakness Will Benefit China

Three members of Congress positioned digital asset regulation as a matter of national security and economic competition during a panel discussion at The Bitcoin 2026 Conference in Las Vegas on Monday.

Reps. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-Iowa), Zach Nunn (R-Iowa), and Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) spoke on “The Bitcoin Bloc: A New Force in American Politics,” moderated by Faryar Shirzad, Chief Policy Officer at Coinbase.

Miller-Meeks described Bitcoin as “financial democracy” and linked cryptocurrency adoption to America’s 250th anniversary, framing support for digital assets as patriotic. She cited the Chinese Communist Party as a threat and characterized crypto policy as a national security issue.

The Iowa congresswoman shared her background working through medical school and highlighted Bitcoin’s potential to protect women experiencing domestic abuse or violence. 

She said digital assets can provide women with resources beyond government reach, citing Canada’s trucker protest as an example of government intervention in financial accounts. Miller-Meeks acknowledged that older Americans express concerns about digital asset safety.

Chinese is driving bitcoin policy urgency

Both Miller-Meeks and Nunn emphasized competition with China as a driver for U.S. crypto policy. Miller-Meeks stated that China continues to pursue leadership in the digital asset sector but said the United States remains the best environment for innovation.

Nunn warned that failing to advance American leadership in Bitcoin and digital assets creates national security risks. He called for holding China accountable and said losing the November midterm elections could reverse 18 months of legislative progress, allowing adversaries to gain ground while the U.S. falls behind.

“Decisions and elections have consequences,” Nunn said, pointing to specific anti-crypto Democrats as he discussed the stakes of the upcoming midterm elections.

Nunn highlighted progress in Congress and the crypto sector, noting that the SEC under former Chair Gary Gensler imposed fines in the millions of dollars for violations involving concepts Gensler did not understand. Gensler was fired earlier in the Trump administration.

Lawler referenced the GENIUS Act as a positive step but said Congress must establish a comprehensive federal regulatory framework. 

He cited Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s op-ed in The Wall Street Journal and stated that passing regulatory clarity will position America at the forefront of the digital asset space. Lawler said SEC regulations should serve the crypto industry’s best interests.

As a New Yorker, Lawler said he wants the crypto industry to remain in New York and feel secure operating in the state.

The ‘double taxation’ of bitcoin mining

Nunn criticized double taxation on Bitcoin mining operations, questioning why the U.S. taxes Bitcoin mining differently than other forms of asset extraction. He said excessive taxation drives innovation to other countries and emphasized the need to avoid making it difficult to conduct business in the United States.

The panel discussion reflected a broader shift in congressional Republican attitudes toward digital assets, with lawmakers framing crypto policy through the lens of geopolitical competition and individual financial freedom rather than consumer protection or financial stability concerns that dominated earlier regulatory debates.

This post House Republicans Warn That the America’s Bitcoin Weakness Will Benefit China first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Lawmakers Warn Crypto Clarity Will Decide U.S. Leadership as 2026 Election Looms

U.S. lawmakers and White House officials used a Nakamoto Stage panel to argue that clear crypto rules will decide whether the United States leads or cedes ground in the next phase of financial innovation.

The discussion, titled “Are We Getting More Clarity?”, focused on the Clarity Act, enforcement under past administrations, and the risk that political swings could undo progress on crypto regulation.

Senator Cynthia Lummis warned that another hostile administration would mean “game over for sensible regulation,” framing the 2026 election cycle as a direct test of whether Congress can lock in a durable framework for digital assets. 

She argued that predictable rules are now essential for builders and capital, and said the industry cannot plan around policy that shifts with each change in the White House. Lummis also pushed back on concerns about crypto and crime, saying “it’s easier to solve crimes in digital assets than fiat currencies” because transaction records give law enforcement a trail that cash does not.

Witt:USA should dominate in crypto

White House digital asset adviser Patrick Witt set out an aggressive vision for U.S. leadership. “We want to dominate,” he said, calling crypto “the future of financial infrastructure” and tying that claim directly to passage of the Clarity Act. He said that once lawmakers deliver a clear regime for digital assets, “Bitcoin and crypto will take off like a rocketship,” with greater integration into markets and the banking system. 

Witt described the bill’s focus as defining obligations for exchanges that list exchange-traded products, wallet providers, and developers who build on Bitcoin, and said that set of rules is “critically important” so market participants understand their responsibilities and can connect Bitcoin more deeply to the broader financial system.

Witt also criticized earlier policy and enforcement choices. He said the industry “got wrongly targeted and criticized” in recent years, which he argued pushed innovation offshore and let foreign hubs claim core parts of the market. 

He pointed to the location of the largest centralized exchanges outside the United States as “a failure of U.S. leadership,” and cast the Clarity Act as a chance to reverse that trend. In his view, the measure could bring trading venues and developers back onshore and support a domestic ecosystem around Bitcoin exchange-traded products, custody, and payments infrastructure.

Across the panel, speakers returned to the same question: whether Washington will offer lasting clarity or continue to rely on fragmented enforcement. Lummis framed the stakes in terms of investor protection and national competitiveness, while Witt stressed the opportunity to anchor the next wave of financial infrastructure in the United States. Both cast the coming legislative window, and the election that follows it, as a turning point for Bitcoin, broader crypto markets, and the country’s role in them.

This post Lawmakers Warn Crypto Clarity Will Decide U.S. Leadership as 2026 Election Looms first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Kalshi Says Bitcoin Payments and Prediction Markets Are Building a New Exchange for Big Money

Kalshi’s head of crypto, John Wang, used a Bitcoin 2026 fireside chat to argue that regulated prediction markets offer a more accessible way to trade Bitcoin than traditional spot venues. He opened by describing his path at Kalshi and pushed back on the idea that the exchange is a pure crypto platform, saying Bitcoin and other digital assets serve as key payment rails rather than its core product. 

According to Wang, Bitcoin is now the largest source of user payments into Kalshi’s apps, underscoring how deeply the asset’s audience overlaps with the platform’s trader base.

Bitcoin predictions and insider trading on Kalshi

Moderator Conner Brown asked Wang on why a Bitcoin holder would choose Kalshi over spot markets to express a price view. Wang said prediction markets are attractive because they can apply to almost any outcome while preserving a simple user experience.

He argued that people already like trading Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies and find them accessible, but that spot markets remain out of reach for many users compared with a straightforward contract that settles on a clear event result.

In his view, Kalshi can sit on top of that demand and package directional Bitcoin views in a format that feels more intuitive than managing wallets and navigating crypto exchanges.

Brown also raised concerns about insider trading and where to draw the line in event markets. Wang said Kalshi uses know-your-customer checks and internal protocols to protect traders and emphasized that information asymmetry is a challenge in equities and other markets as well. 

He framed the question as one of incentives, warning that if platforms fail to protect their users they risk turning markets into insider arenas that erode trust. The safeguards and norms for prediction markets are still developing, he said, but he expects investor protection standards to converge with those in more established asset classes.

Looking ahead, Wang positioned Kalshi as an exchange being built from the ground up for a new category of contracts rather than a niche trading venue. He said the company is constructing infrastructure for event-based exposure that can sit alongside traditional markets and added that he expects large hedge funds to take significant positions in prediction markets over time. 

Kalshi is set to launch cryptocurrency perpetual futures today, expanding beyond its core event-based contracts into continuous derivatives trading. The new product will allow traders to hold positions without expiration, using U.S. dollars as initial collateral, with plans to add stablecoins later.

Backed by its regulatory status and growing trading volumes, the move positions Kalshi to compete more directly with offshore crypto derivatives platforms.

This post Kalshi Says Bitcoin Payments and Prediction Markets Are Building a New Exchange for Big Money first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Aven Launches Bitcoin-Backed Visa Card Offering Up to $1 Million Credit Lines Without Asset Sales

Aven has introduced a bitcoin-backed credit card that allows users to borrow against digital assets without selling holdings, marking a shift in crypto-linked consumer finance, according to statements shared with Bitcoin Magazine. 

The Aven Bitcoin Visa Card, unveiled today at the Bitcoin Conference 2026 in Las Vegas, provides a credit line of up to $1 million secured by bitcoin collateral. The product targets long-term holders seeking liquidity without triggering taxable events tied to asset sales.

The card combines a revolving credit line with fixed-term loan options, offering repayment periods of up to 10 years. Interest rates for both structures start at 7.99% APR, which the company said is below typical rates in the bitcoin-backed lending market.

“The industry norm for borrowing at fixed rates against bitcoin is a 1-year term. At Aven, we have 10X the industry standard, unlocking a wide variety of use cases previously not feasible,” Aven’s Sisun Lee said, speaking at The Bitcoin Conference.

Aven’s bitcoin custody structure

Borrowers pledge bitcoin through custody and infrastructure provided by BitGo Inc. and BitGo Bank & Trust, a federally regulated digital asset trust bank. The structure separates asset custody from card issuance, which is handled by Coastal Community Bank under a Visa network license.

The product includes no annual or origination fees and offers 2% cash back on purchases. Aven positions the card as a tool that bridges crypto holdings with traditional credit access, aiming to expand the utility of bitcoin within household balance sheets.

The card also offers up to a 5-year interest-only period for added flexibility. The company is one of the few Bitcoin-backed loan providers offering both fixed-term and interest-only plans in the same product.

“At Aven we believe that the hardest money ever created deserves the best financial products. With the Aven Bitcoin Card, we’re just getting started,” Lee said.

Bitcoin-backed lending has grown with the rise in digital asset adoption, though it has faced scrutiny over risk management and collateral volatility. Fixed-rate, longer-term structures such as Aven’s may appeal to borrowers seeking more predictable repayment schedules compared with margin-style loans that can face liquidation risk during price swings.

Aven, founded in 2019, focuses on asset-backed lending products designed to lower borrowing costs. The company reports that its platform has saved customers more than $300 million in interest payments through March 2026.

The launch signals continued convergence between crypto infrastructure and regulated financial services, as firms seek to integrate digital assets into mainstream credit markets while addressing risk, custody, and compliance requirements.

This post Aven Launches Bitcoin-Backed Visa Card Offering Up to $1 Million Credit Lines Without Asset Sales first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Cathie Wood built ARK Invest's Bitcoin case on the idea that Bitcoin would become a global monetary layer that is programmable, borderless, resistant to inflation, and eventually dominant in payments.

The latest version of that argument concedes that stablecoins got there first on the payments side.

In a recent interview with The Rollup, the ARK CEO said stablecoins have taken over part of the role that ARK once expected Bitcoin to fill in emerging-market payments. At the same time, ETF-era institutions appear to be averaging down during drawdowns, softening the boom-bust severity that defined prior cycles.

Related Reading

Cathie Wood revises Bitcoin forecast as stablecoins gain ground

A data-led look at ETF flows, term premium, and BTC liquidity to decode the target cut without the hype.

Nov 9, 2025 · Gino Matos

Actual stablecoin payments run at roughly $390 billion annualized per McKinsey and Artemis, about 0.02% of global payments volume. Stablecoins have absorbed much of crypto's transactional lane in the markets where Bitcoin once competed for that role.

DefiLlama data shows that the stablecoin market cap is over $320.6 billion as of Apr. 27, up over 56% since early 2025, with USDT commanding 59.16% of the market.

TRM Labs' first-quarter adoption report found that Venezuela's retail crypto activity primarily runs on stablecoins, with USDT accounting for 90.2% of active Binance P2P Venezuelan bolivar listings and Bitcoin at 1.9%.

In Brazil, roughly 66% of crypto transaction volume was conducted via USDT, with Bitcoin at 11%, and officials noted that stablecoins functioned mainly as payment instruments.

TRM found a similar pattern in Iran, where USDT operates as a de facto savings and payments rail under currency restrictions. The stablecoins pegged to the US dollar processed $274 billion in retail transactions through virtual asset service providers in March 2026 alone.

The payments lane Wood once saw as Bitcoin's future is now stablecoin infrastructure, and the data in stressed, capital-constrained markets makes that case most clearly.

Bitcoin's new lane

What stablecoins left behind for Bitcoin is arguably the better seat. As stablecoins absorbed the transactional utility argument, Bitcoin consolidated around scarcity, institutional allocation, and macro reserve positioning.

CoinShares' latest weekly report recorded $1.2 billion in crypto investment product inflows, the fourth consecutive positive week and the third straight above $1 billion.

Bitcoin took $933 million of that total, Ethereum $192 million, and Solana $31.8 million. Total assets under management climbed to $155 billion, the highest reading since Feb. 1.

At the same time, Strategy's Apr. 27 SEC filing shows another 3,273 BTC purchased during Apr. 20-26, bringing its total to 818,334 BTC at an aggregate cost of $61.8 billion.

CME reported its crypto average daily volume rose from 191,000 to 310,000 contracts year over year in the first quarter, while average daily open interest rose 25% to 313,900 contracts from last year's first quarter.

Farside Investors' daily ETF data provide the clearest picture of Wood's “averaging down” thesis in practice, as US spot Bitcoin ETFs posted nine consecutive positive sessions from Apr. 14 to Apr. 24, with inflows totaling over $2 billion.

Institutions bought through the correction, held through the volatility, and kept adding. Wood's argument that ETF holders are stickier has that nine-session stretch behind it.

The cycle question

Wood's thesis runs ahead of its evidence on the possibility that institutions have fully reshaped the four-year cycle.

NYDIG's research placed retail at 74% of spot Bitcoin ETF AUM as of the fourth quarter of 2024, with institutions and professional advisors at 26%, an expanding share, though still a minority of ownership.

NYDIG's February 2026 note also argued that Bitcoin's recent drawdown still fit a cyclical pattern, even if it looked more orderly.

The ETF era has made the marginal buyer more institutional and more macro-responsive, while retail still generates enough selling volume through drawdowns to drive cyclical moves.

Glassnode's Apr. 22 report adds the market structure layer, noting that Bitcoin reclaimed the True Market Mean at $78,100, with the short-term holder cost basis at $80,100 as the immediate resistance ceiling.

ETF flows turned modestly positive again, and spot demand showed an early recovery, despite short-term holders' realized profits spiking to $4.4 million per hour, nearly three times the $1.5 million threshold that marked prior local tops this year.

Glassnode also noted that Binance's cumulative volume delta led much of the recent spot buying while Coinbase activity stayed muted. Since Coinbase proxies US institutional spot demand most directly, the current bid is genuine, driven more by offshore and mid-tier flows.

Two cases

The bull case for Wood's thesis runs through the Fed.

If the Apr. 28-29 FOMC meeting passes without adding fresh macro stress, weekly inflows hold near or above $1 billion, Coinbase spot participation closes the gap with offshore venues, and Bitcoin clears $80,100 with consistent absorption behind it, Wood's “institutions softening the cycle” argument becomes visible in price structure.

A market that absorbs $4.4 million per hour in realized profit without breaking the reclaimed mean would exhibit exactly the demand depth Wood describes.

ARK's published model projects roughly $710,000 in the base case and $1.5 million in the bull case for Bitcoin by 2030, targets that hold only if the institutional ownership thesis compounds across multiple cycles.

The bear case preserves the four-year cycle. If the Fed re-tightens financial conditions, the weekly flow streak breaks, and Glassnode's realized-profit warning plays out at $80,100, the recent move resolves as a distribution rally.

NYDIG's view that the market stays cyclical, that retail still owns most of the ETF float, and that the cycle's boom-bust mechanics stay stronger than institutional depth can currently get the better of Wood's framing.

Stablecoins would still have won the payments lane, but the halving cycle retains its grip on price structure, with ownership composition playing a secondary role.

Total AUM at $155 billion is 41% below the October 2025 peak of $263 billion, indicating that a large volume of unwound institutional exposure sits above current levels.

What the split actually means

Wood's most durable contribution to the current debate is the argument that Bitcoin's original monetary ambition was divided.

Stablecoins became the working dollar rail in capital-constrained markets, while Bitcoin became the scarcer, harder-to-access asset that institutional balance sheets and regulated products hold at scale.
That division is cleaner and may prove more defensible.

Bitcoin can justify a $710,000 base case price on reserve asset and institutional allocation grounds alone.

The stablecoin layer, by absorbing the transactional utility case, leaves Bitcoin with fewer competing demands on its identity, cleaner store-of-value positioning, and a payments infrastructure that keeps capital circulating in crypto without requiring Bitcoin to serve every role at once.

The Apr. 28-29 Fed decision will tell the market if the institutional bid that has rebuilt over four weeks can absorb what Glassnode is already calling elevated profit-taking.

The post Cathie Wood’s Bitcoin bull thesis concedes stablecoins won the real-world payment fight appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Paul Sztorc, LayerTwo Labs CEO and longtime Bitcoin developer, is planning an August 2026 Bitcoin hard fork called eCash, targeted around Bitcoin block 964,000.

His April 24 announcement described a new chain that would copy Bitcoin history, give holders 1 eCash for every 1 BTC at the split, and launch with a Bitcoin-Core-like base layer mined with SHA-256d alongside Drivechain-style sidechains.

For ordinary Bitcoin holders, the practical question is more specific than the backlash. The fork can create a new asset, new confusion, and new operational decisions, while BTC balances remain governed by Bitcoin software, Bitcoin consensus, and Bitcoin private keys.

In a later clarification, Sztorc said the current eCash plan would give Satoshi Nakamoto 600,000 eCash rather than 1.1 million eCash. He also repeated that BTC balances are untouched by eCash and that moving BTC always requires Bitcoin software plus the relevant Bitcoin private key.

That distinction sets the holder map. A Bitcoin holder can ignore a fork and still keep the same BTC.

The unresolved issue is whether eCash becomes a supported asset that exchanges, wallets, custodians, miners, and tax records have to process. Until that happens, the controversy is mostly about legitimacy, incentives, and precedent on a new ledger.

What eCash would copy from Bitcoin

The proposed chain starts from a familiar hard-fork mechanic. At the fork height, Bitcoin history would be copied into a new network.

A wallet holding 4.19 BTC at the split would have 4.19 eCash on the new chain, according to Sztorc's announcement. Holders could keep, sell, or ignore those coins if the new chain launches and if they can safely access them.

The base-chain pitch is intentionally close to Bitcoin. Sztorc described the eCash layer 1 as a near-copy of Bitcoin Core, mined with the same SHA-256d algorithm, with a one-time difficulty reset to its minimum value at launch.

He also said the chain would activate BIP300 and BIP301 through CUSF, a route meant to bring Drivechain-style sidechains into eCash without changing Bitcoin itself.

The Drivechain component should stay in the background for holders. BIP300 describes hashrate escrows for sidechains, while BIP301 describes blind merged mining, a design under which SHA-256d miners can collect revenue from other chains without running those chains' full software.

Those mechanics explain why Sztorc wants a separate eCash network. BTC remains governed by Bitcoin mainnet rules.

Code readiness is a separate threshold. The public LayerTwo Labs CUSF enforcer repository showed active development, while LayerTwo Labs' download page offered BitWindow software related to the Drivechain stack.

Final eCash launch software, replay rules, and user-grade splitting tools still need verification before ordinary holders can treat the fork as operational.

Preserving BTC requires no claim action during the proposal phase. Holders can leave seed phrases private, avoid importing keys into new software, and ignore claim pages while the chain remains unlaunched.

The chain has to exist first, then the ecosystem has to decide whether it will recognize the forked coins. That sequencing is the difference between a theoretical allocation and a usable asset.

Those same practical gates determine whether the 1:1 allocation becomes anything more than a paper balance in a copied ledger.

The Satoshi allocation fight lives on the new chain

The controversy grew out of the initial funding design. Reporting and Sztorc's own post described a plan to manually reassign fewer than half of the eCash coins corresponding to the presumed Patoshi-pattern coins, often framed around 1.1 million BTC, to early investors or supporters.

The Bitcoin mainnet coins would stay where they are. The dispute is over whether a fork should edit the copied version of those balances before launch.

Sztorc's latest clarification sharpens that point instead of removing it. He says eCash would gift Satoshi 600,000 eCash rather than 1.1 million, a figure closer to the lower Patoshi estimate than the common million-plus framing.

That still leaves the core objection. A straight 1:1 copy would assign every copied coin to the same keys that held the BTC at the split, while the current eCash proposal would choose a different treatment for part of the dormant copied balance.

Bitcoin's social contract treats signatures and private keys as the boundary of control. A new chain can choose different rules, but a chain that reallocates dormant copied coins tells users something about how its own ledger treats old balances.

Critics see that as a precedent problem. Sztorc has argued that a pure fork can leave contributors undercapitalized before launch, creating a chain that starts as a zombie project.

The size of the Satoshi-linked pool also deserves care. BitMEX Research found strong evidence of a dominant early miner, but argued that the evidence is less robust than the common million-plus framing suggests.

Its analysis said 600,000 to 700,000 BTC may be a better estimate than roughly 1 million or 1.1 million. That means the exact denominator behind any eCash reassignment claim is uncertain.

Earlier coverage described a possible version that did not involve Satoshi's coins. The later Sztorc clarification supplied for this update points to a different current posture: Satoshi would receive 600,000 eCash, while BTC itself remains outside the fork's control.

The eCash project site and related Satoshi Half-Airdrop material is still moving through public clarification rather than a final release package.

Related Reading

Bitcoin forks down up to 70% against BTC in since all-time high

Bitcoin forks struggle against BTC, with BCH, BSV, and XEC down significantly since November 2021 high.

Feb 14, 2024 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

The holder checklist starts with replay and custody

A fork becomes operational when people try to move coins. Replay protection is central because a transaction valid on one chain can sometimes be copied to another chain after a split.

Contentious forks without replay protection can expose exchanges and holders to replay attacks, according to Coinbase's hard-fork guidance.

Sztorc's replay clarification said default eCash software should block an eCash spend, such as a sale, from replaying on Bitcoin. He also said moving BTC may also move the corresponding eCash, and that behavior could depend on the software a holder uses.

That leaves a simple behavioral rule. Holders should avoid random claim tools, unofficial wallets, and links that promise early access.

A badly designed splitter, a malicious wallet, or a phishing site can create more risk than the fork itself. The safer threshold is public guidance from reputable wallets, exchanges, and custodians after final code and replay behavior are visible.

Custodial holders face a different decision tree. Large platforms tend to evaluate forked assets case by case, using security, liquidity, developer activity, roadmap, compliance, and engineering workload as filters.

Coinbase has described that approach in its own fork policy. That is the lens to apply here.

Even if eCash launches, a platform holding BTC for customers may decline to support the forked asset, may support withdrawals only, or may delay access until the network is stable.

Tax treatment adds another layer for US holders. Under IRS Revenue Ruling 2019-24, a hard fork without receipt of new cryptocurrency does not create gross income, while a hard fork followed by an airdrop can create ordinary income when the taxpayer receives units and has dominion and control.

For eCash, that means the tax answer may depend on whether the holder can actually access, transfer, sell, or otherwise dispose of the forked coins. It is a professional-advice question, especially for coins held through exchanges or custodians.

Miner support is the first infrastructure signal because the new chain needs security and block production separate from Bitcoin's own social consensus. Exchange support is the next signal because a forked coin with no venue, no withdrawals, and no market depth has little practical use for most holders.

Related Reading

Public miners dump record BTC and are pivoting to AI — is Bitcoin’s security backbone starting to hollow out?

Bitcoin miners face near $80,000 production costs, so they are cashing out treasuries to chase AI contracts.

Apr 20, 2026 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

Wallet and custodian policies sit beside those two signals. They determine whether ordinary users can see, split, move, or ignore the forked asset without taking on unnecessary key-management risk.

Names and market scale add another source of confusion

The proposed fork also runs into name overlap. There is already an eCash network with the ticker XEC, maintained around Bitcoin ABC software.

The existing XEC asset traded near $0.00000704 with a market capitalization around $140.9 million on April 28, 2026. Separately, Cashu describes itself as a free and open-source Chaumian ecash protocol built for Bitcoin.

That overlap has practical consequences. Search results, fake support pages, copied tickers, and social links can blur the difference between Sztorc's proposed fork, the existing XEC asset, and Bitcoin ecash tools such as Cashu.

The right user response is boring and important: verify domains, tickers, wallet instructions, and exchange notices before interacting with any fork-related asset.

The scale difference is also useful. BTC traded around $76,824.95 on April 28, with a market capitalization near $1.54 trillion and 59.9% dominance.

Any eCash fork would be trying to attach a new asset and a contested rule set to the largest crypto network by market value. That scale raises the bar for infrastructure support because even small confusion around Bitcoin balances can draw significant attention.

The fork's first test is therefore external to the argument over Satoshi's coins. It needs code that users can inspect, replay behavior that wallets can trust, a splitter that works, miners willing to secure the chain, exchanges willing to list or process it, custodians willing to explain their policy, and enough liquidity to give the forked coins a market price.

Until those pieces appear, ordinary holders have little reason to act. Their BTC remains BTC.

The risk today is mostly informational: mistaking eCash for Bitcoin, mistaking one eCash for another, or treating an evolving launch proposal as an asset they must immediately claim.

If the infrastructure arrives, the question changes. Holders would then need to decide whether to claim, split, sell, hold, or ignore the forked coins, and custodial platforms would need to explain how they handle customer entitlements.

The Satoshi-coin controversy would still be a fight over the legitimacy of the new chain. The holder risk would become operational.

The post Top Bitcoin dev is launching a new BTC fork giving holders new eCash, but claiming it may be a real risk appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Crypto investment products recorded $1.2 billion in inflows last week, capping three straight weeks above $1 billion and a fourth consecutive positive week overall.

According to CoinShares data, Bitcoin pulled $933 million of that total, Ethereum added $192 million, and the US accounted for $1.1 billion of regional demand. Total assets under management climbed to $155 billion, the highest reading since Feb. 1, though still below the October 2025 peak of $263 billion.

CoinShares attributed the three-week streak to improving institutional demand while flagging the Apr. 28-29 FOMC decision as a source of marginal caution.

The demand stack

The inflow data converges with signals from several other channels simultaneously, which is what distinguishes it from a single-report anomaly.

On regulated derivatives, CME reported that its average daily volume of crypto rose from 191,000 to 310,000 contracts year over year in the first quarter, with average daily open interest reaching 313,900 contracts, up 25% from the first quarter of 2025.

Open interest at that level means capital is staying in the marketplace, pointing to a longer-horizon positioning posture.

The CoinShares report noted that blockchain equity ETFs have taken in $617 million over the past three weeks, reinforcing the view that institutions are buying infrastructure exposure alongside direct coin positions.

Corporate treasury accumulation has continued on its own track. Strategy's Apr. 27 SEC filing shows another 3,273 BTC purchased during Apr. 20-26, bringing its total to 818,334 BTC at an aggregate cost of $61.8 billion, according to Bitcoin Treasuries.

Hong Kong-listed Bitfire is targeting over 10,000 BTC for a regulated “Alpha BTC” strategy within a year, while Avenir held $908 million of BlackRock's IBIT at the end of 2025.

The geographic spread, comprising US corporate treasuries, regulated Asian asset management, and global investment products all moving in the same direction, gives the demand recovery a structural quality that a single weekly inflow report could not establish on its own.

DefiLlama puts the total stablecoin market cap at roughly $320.7 billion, up 1.73% over 30 days, meaning the on-ramp infrastructure for deploying capital into Bitcoin is expanding.

Beyond demand

Market structure adds a layer that prevents demand recovery from being read as settled.

Glassnode's Apr. 22 report placed Bitcoin back above the True Market Mean at $78,100, with the short-term holder cost basis at $80,100 now serving as the immediate resistance ceiling.

ETF flows had turned modestly positive again, and spot demand showed early signs of recovery. Glassnode also reported that short-term holders realized profit had spiked to $4.4 million per hour, nearly three times the $1.5 million threshold that marked prior local tops this year.

At that rate, recent buyers are locking in gains at a pace the market has historically struggled to absorb without a pause or pullback.

Glassnode's spot breakdown noted that Binance's cumulative volume delta (CVD) drove much of the recent buying, while Coinbase activity stayed comparatively muted.

Coinbase is the primary venue for US institutional spot activity, and a recovery driven more by offshore retail and mid-tier funds leaves the bid less anchored than the headline inflow figures imply.

Farside Investors' daily US ETF data makes the same point from a different angle. Spot Bitcoin ETFs posted positive flows for nine trading sessions, surpassing $2 billion, before turning negative on Apr. 27.

Three weeks of billion-dollar inflow readings and a single-day reversal can both be true at once, and together they describe a demand recovery that is directionally real but still fragile enough to break on a macro catalyst.

The Apr. 28-29 FOMC meeting is now the first hard test to see if the institutional bid that has been built over four weeks can hold its ground.

CoinShares explicitly tied current investor caution to that decision window, and the market structure data from Glassnode explains that Bitcoin is pressing into the $80,100 zone, where over 54% of recent buyers would be sitting on profit, historically the zone where distribution selling has exhausted bear market rallies.

A Fed outcome that leaves financial conditions roughly unchanged removes the largest near-term macro headwind.

A hawkish surprise, or language that tightens the rate-cut timeline further, hands sellers exactly the external trigger they need to act on those elevated profit readings.

The two paths forward

The bull case rests on the Fed passing without adding fresh macro stress, weekly product inflows holding near or above $1 billion, US ETF demand re-accelerating past the Apr. 27 wobble, and Coinbase spot activity closing the gap with offshore venues.

The demand recovery becomes self-reinforcing, and Bitcoin clearing $80,100 with consistent spot absorption behind it would shift the market structure from “rally on trial” to a confirmed demand regime, pulling in the next layer of institutional allocators who have been waiting for the price structure to confirm the flow data.

In that scenario, the October 2025 AUM peak of $263 billion becomes the relevant reference point, and the three-week inflow streak gets read as the early phase of a durable re-engagement.

The bear case turns on the same variables running in reverse. If the Fed re-tightens financial conditions at the margin, the weekly flow streak breaks, and Glassnode's realized profit warning starts to dominate price action, the recent move resolves as another distribution rally, particularly if ETF demand fades and price cannot hold above the reclaimed mean.

Glassnode's own record shows that prior rallies this year have struggled at exactly that point, and with liquidity conditions still thin, a breakdown at $78,100 could accelerate faster than inflow data would predict.

Total AUM at $155 billion is 41% below the October peak, meaning far more unwound institutional exposure above current levels.

CoinShares' three straight billion-dollar weeks, CME's higher open interest, Strategy's continued accumulation, and a deeper base of stablecoin liquidity all point to capital returning to Bitcoin with greater conviction.

The recovery runs across enough channels simultaneously to rule out a single-venue anomaly, and the Fed now decides if the market can keep this movement.

The post Bitcoin’s comeback is now in the Fed’s hands after big investors piled back in appeared first on CryptoSlate.

South Korea's Kbank has signed a strategic partnership with Ripple to test blockchain-based overseas remittances, placing a bank with a central role in Upbit's KRW account access beside one of crypto's longest-running payments infrastructure firms.

Local reports describe the work as a technical verification, or proof-of-concept, focused on whether Ripple's infrastructure can improve the speed, cost, and transparency of overseas remittances. ZDNet Korea separately described the test as part of a phased push around bank-linked overseas remittance infrastructure.

For now, the commercial pieces remain open: launch date, customer access, fees, live volume, and the exact settlement asset.

Kbank already sits inside South Korea's crypto market through Upbit's real-name account system. Its Ripple pilot, therefore, lands as more than a remittance experiment: it tests whether bank-side crypto infrastructure can move from exchange access toward ordinary cross-border payments while the product design and rulebook remain unfinished.

What Kbank and Ripple are testing

The Kbank-Ripple agreement points to bank integration rather than a standalone crypto app. Local reports said Kbank CEO Choi Woo-hyung and Ripple APAC head Fiona Murray attended a signing ceremony at Kbank's Seoul headquarters, with the companies discussing a Ripple digital-wallet proof-of-concept, support for Kbank's overseas remittance model, and broader digital-asset cooperation.

The sequence starts with a separate app-based remittance structure. The next step virtually links customer accounts and internal systems to test remittance stability, checking whether blockchain remittance rails can be mapped onto account and operations layers that resemble the systems a regulated bank would actually use.

That second phase also reportedly tests on-chain transfers involving corridors such as the UAE and Thailand. The corridor detail makes the PoC more operationally specific than a generic partnership announcement while keeping the commercial model open.

Palisade brings the wallet and custody layer into the test. Global Economic said the second phase uses or evaluates Ripple's SaaS-based digital wallet Palisade, while Ripple's own Palisade acquisition announcement describes the platform as wallet-as-a-service and custody tooling with features aimed at institutional digital-asset operations.

That makes the test a wallet and key-management exercise as much as a transfer-speed exercise. Production deployment by Kbank remains unannounced.

The technical focus is still meaningful. A bank remittance product has to solve compliance, custody, account linkage, settlement, and broader regulatory requirements. The PoC appears to test parts of that stack, while the full commercial design remains open.

Related Reading

Ripple’s dollar stablecoin hits a wall in Japan, one of XRP’s friendliest markets, as megabanks earn most of the trust

Nomura’s latest survey suggests Japanese institutions trust stablecoins issued by major financial institutions most, a potential hurdle for RLUSD even in a market where XRP has long enjoyed unusual traction.

Apr 17, 2026 · Gino Matos

Why Upbit changes the stakes

Kbank's role in Upbit's fiat access gives the Ripple test its market-structure relevance. The bank was moving to extend its real-name deposit and withdrawal account partnership with Upbit through October 2026, according to ChosunBiz.

Upbit's own real-name account verification guide says deposit and withdrawal account verification is possible only with Kbank.

Taken together, the partnership report and Upbit's guide make Kbank the bank behind Upbit's KRW real-name deposit and withdrawal account verification rail. They do not show Upbit participating in the Ripple PoC or Kbank running the test on Upbit's behalf.

The size of the Upbit relationship explains why the context has force. Upbit-linked funds accounted for about 24% of Kbank's 30.4 trillion won deposit balance as of the third quarter of 2025, according to Korea JoongAng Daily.

The same report quoted Choi discussing Kbank's need to reduce reliance on Upbit while positioning stablecoins and cross-border payments as future opportunities.

Kbank's crypto-linked banking role has been built around exchange access. The Ripple test examines whether similar bank-side plumbing can be used for payments.

Related Reading

Naver merger talks to route 30M shoppers to Upbit sparking fee collapse

Cheaper stablecoin checkout could force banks and card giants to cut rates.

Sep 25, 2025 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

The first use case is account access for trading. The next possible use case is cross-border money movement. Between those two sits the unresolved question of regulation.

That context should not be stretched into Upbit participation. Upbit explains why Kbank's banking role matters to South Korea's crypto rails; the Ripple agreement remains a Kbank-side remittance PoC.

Related Reading

Wanchain-backed FinNexus expands to XRP Ledger for tokenizing real-world assets

Apr 29, 2020 · Shaurya Malwa

CryptoSlate's prior coverage helps define the surrounding terrain. A June 2025 article covered South Korean banks pursuing a won-backed stablecoin push, while an April 2026 CryptoSlate report on Ripple's RLUSD in Japan showed how bank trust can shape Asian stablecoin adoption.

Regulation keeps the test provisional

South Korea's bank-led stablecoin debate gives the remittance test a policy edge. The Kbank pilot is already being tied to South Korea's stablecoin rulemaking debate, while Seoul Economic Daily reported that delayed digital-asset legislation has kept some Korean blockchain and remittance infrastructure from moving into actual operations.

Related Reading

K-Won is coming: South Korea’s 8 mega-banks to unleash world’s newest stablecoin shockwave

Megabanks collaborate to stem foreign stablecoin dominance and bolster Korea's monetary sovereignty.

Jun 25, 2025 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

Banks can test the mechanics before they know the final rulebook. They can examine wallet architecture, account linkage, compliance controls, and cross-border flows. They can also build optionality without committing to a product launch.

Note: Kbank, the South Korean internet-only bank in the Ripple partnership, should be kept separate from Thailand's KASIKORNBANK, often branded KBank.

KASIKORNBANK has appeared in related Korea-Thailand digital-asset remittance discussions, including a February cooperation announcement with Orbix and BPMG. The connection is corridor context and naming clarity, while the South Korean Kbank and Thailand's KASIKORNBANK remain separate institutions.

The practical split is straightforward: what the pilot tests, what remains undecided, and why Kbank's Upbit rail gives the work market weight.

The next test is commercial proof

Kbank is now sitting between two roles. One is already visible: banking access for Upbit's KRW deposit and withdrawal verification.

The other is being tested: blockchain-based overseas remittances that connect with bank accounts and internal systems.

That bridge has strategic value because South Korea's crypto market already depends on tightly controlled bank-account rails. If a bank tied to those rails can also make blockchain remittances operational, the boundary between exchange access and payment infrastructure becomes less fixed.

The same compliance-heavy banking layer could become a place where crypto-linked infrastructure moves from trading access into cross-border money movement.

For now, the PoC covers testing, corridors, account-system simulation, and Palisade evaluation. It does not yet provide the commercial pieces that would turn the work into a live remittance business.

The next threshold is concrete: a named product, a live customer flow, a settlement asset, a fee model, and regulatory clearance.

Until those pieces arrive, Kbank's Ripple partnership is best read as a readiness test with unusually important surroundings. It shows that one of South Korea's key crypto-linked banking rails is examining the payments infrastructure.

It also shows how much still depends on regulation before a technical pilot can become a real remittance business.

The post The South Korean bank powering Upbit is testing Ripple integration for cross-border payments appeared first on CryptoSlate.

The European Union’s latest Russia sanctions package, its twentieth so far, brings crypto settlement squarely into an already fractured geopolitical spotlight.

Adopted on April 23, the package adds 120 new listings and rolls out financial measures that touch just about every corner of Russia’s crypto scene. That includes service providers, decentralized trading platforms, ruble-backed tokens, payment agents, and even support for the digital rouble.

Earlier rounds of restrictions mostly went after specific exchanges, wallets, or operators. This time, the EU is aiming higher up the stack, targeting the service layer that keeps Russia-linked crypto settlement running. That means third-country platforms and tools that can keep money moving globally, even if a particular exchange gets shut down.

Related Reading

Sanctions risk is forcing a rethink of reserve safety — and Bitcoin is now in the debate

Reserve managers are starting to ask not just what is safe, but what stays usable when politics, sanctions, or conflict hit.

Apr 2, 2026 · Gino Matos

The EU frames these new rules as a way to close loopholes. According to Council materials, Russia is leaning more and more on crypto for international payments as traditional finance routes get squeezed by sanctions.

The package is the bloc's largest move to sanction Russia in years, with crypto restrictions among its most specific measures.

The real test now is whether Europe can actually measure crypto settlement risk at the infrastructure level. That means platforms have to dig deeper than exchange names and look at where a provider is based, which tokens are in play, which settlement agents are involved, and whether the route relies on a state-backed digital currency.

The Ban Moves Down The Stack

The Commission says this package brings a blanket ban on doing business with any Russian crypto asset service provider. It also covers decentralized platforms if they’re being used to get around sanctions. Now, where a provider is based and how it operates matter just as much as whether it’s been named on a sanctions list.

TRM Labs ties the measure to platform succession risk after Garantex was disrupted. Its analysis of the package points to the Garantex-to-Grinex migration and the role of A7A5 as the bridge between those systems.

Chainalysis reaches a similar conclusion from a compliance angle. Its 20th package analysis describes the measure as a move against categories of evasion infrastructure rather than single named entities.

Related Reading

EU sanctions Russian crypto exchange Garantex over Ukraine conflict ties

The EU aims to close financial loopholes by directly sanctioning a Russian crypto exchange for the first time.

Feb 25, 2025 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

It’s one thing to screen a wallet address or exchange name. It’s a whole different challenge to spot a service provider set up in Russia, a third-country platform with Russian liquidity, or a settlement route built around a sanctioned token.

The Financial Times had already reported that EU officials were weighing a broad ban on Russian crypto transactions.

Prior CryptoSlate coverage of that proposal shows the continuity: Brussels was already testing a broader enforcement perimeter before the package was adopted.

Related Reading

New crypto ban targets Russia rails but one chokepoint decides whether flows die or just relocate offshore

If stablecoin issuers block redemption and the EU squeezes third country intermediaries, evasion costs spike in unexpected places.

Feb 11, 2026 · Gino Matos

The new rules reach into five different parts of the crypto settlement process.

Stablecoins Become Enforcement Infrastructure

A7A5 gives the policy a concrete example. Chainalysis identifies TengriCoin, doing business as Meer.kg, as the Kyrgyz venue where significant amounts of the government-backed stablecoin are traded.

The Council language is broader, pointing to a Kyrgyz entity operating an exchange where significant A7A5 volumes move.

The venue turns A7A5 from background context into a named enforcement path. TRM says A7A5 served as the financial bridge between Garantex and Grinex after Garantex was disrupted, while Chainalysis describes the token as a Russia-linked stablecoin rail for sanctioned businesses seeking access to the global financial system.

A 2025 U.S. sanctions report linked the Garantex, Grinex, and A7A5 network to earlier enforcement pressure. The EU package now codifies that route-level concern in its own sanctions framework.

Related Reading

OFAC targets Kyrgyzstan-based firms, stablecoins over Russian sanctions violations

Kyrgyzstan-based firms under scrutiny for facilitating Russian sanctions breaches via stablecoins.

Aug 14, 2025 · Assad Jafri

RUBx gives the package a second stablecoin layer. Russian state-owned conglomerate Rostec planned RUBx as a ruble-pegged token on Tron alongside a payment platform called RT-Pay.

The Commission now says the EU is prohibiting the use of and support for RUBx, as well as support for the digital rouble, a central bank digital currency under development by the Bank of Russia.

The policy signal is direct. The EU is treating a stablecoin, a CBDC project, and the service providers around them as parts of a sanctions-relevant payment architecture.

The role of the instrument carries more weight than the token ticker. If a ruble-backed asset can connect sanctioned businesses to liquidity, its issuer, venue, service provider, and supporting infrastructure all become part of the risk map.

Live market data shows these instruments are active across a huge global market. The focus here is on who can actually settle transactions.

Compliance Moves To The Whole Route

The netting ban shows how far the package reaches into settlement mechanics. The Commission says the package prohibits transactions with agents in Russia and other third countries that offer to facilitate international transactions from Russia to bypass EU sanctions. It also bars netting transactions with Russian agents.

Chainalysis describes this as significant for crypto compliance because netting can obscure the underlying counterparties of Russia-linked flows.

For crypto firms, risk can show up in the service provider behind the scenes, the country where an intermediary is based, the token used to settle, or the payment agent moving the money. Screening now means looking at the whole route, not just searching for familiar names.

For stablecoin issuers, custodians, exchanges, payment processors, and infrastructure providers, this means stepping up checks on any Russia-linked activity. TRM points out that the package moves the focus from just screening names to figuring out if a counterparty is actually based in Russia, even if it’s a brand-new service that hasn’t been listed yet. individual designation.

Related Reading

Russian-linked crypto wallets channel $8B to skirt sanctions using Tether's USDT

Stablecoins used to bypass global banking restrictions highlight the growing concern over cryptocurrency's role in sanctions evasion.

Sep 26, 2025 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

Chainalysis flags third-country platforms and intermediaries as sanctions-evasion risks when Russian settlement links are detected.

One likely result is more friction. If issuers, exchanges, and service providers really enforce these rules, settling Russia-linked crypto could get pricier and less dependable. The real squeeze is on the route itself; redemption, platform access, liquidity, custody, and payment-agent relationships all come under pressure.

Another outcome is migration. Successor platforms, nested services, and third-country brokers can push activity into less transparent venues. The EU's answer is to target the architecture that lets those routes keep functioning, pairing crypto restrictions with measures against third-country financial institutions and anti-circumvention channels.

Stablecoins and the digital rouble are now firmly inside the EU’s sanctions playbook, not just sitting on the sidelines. The EU has called out crypto rails as real financial infrastructure and built restrictions around the providers, tokens, platforms, and settlement mechanics that make them work. The big question now is whether enforcement can keep up as these routes keep shifting.

The post EU bans on digital rubles and anyone using Russian crypto services in 20th round of Russia sanctions appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Kevin Warsh has emerged as the clear frontrunner to succeed Jerome Powell as the Chair of the Federal Reserve. Warsh is widely considered the most "pro-Bitcoin" candidate to ever be nominated for the role. However, historical data casts a long, dark shadow over Fed leadership changes. In every major transition over the last decade, Bitcoin has suffered double-digit percentage collapses.

The "Fed Chair Curse": A History of Bitcoin Crashes

To understand the current market anxiety, one must look at the precedent set by previous appointments. Historically, the uncertainty surrounding a new Fed Chair’s "hawkish" or "dovish" stance has triggered massive sell-offs.

In 2014, Janet Yellen's arrival coincided with the post-2013 bubble burst and the Mt. Gox collapse. By 2018, Powell took the reigns just as the ICO craze deflated. Most recently, in 2022, his second term confirmation aligned with the start of aggressive interest rate hikes that fueled the "Crypto Winter."

Who is Kevin Warsh? The Pro-Crypto Nominee

Kevin Warsh is not your typical central banker. A former Fed Governor (2006–2011) and Morgan Stanley veteran, Warsh has a track record of acknowledging Bitcoin as a legitimate financial asset. During his recent confirmation hearings, Warsh stated that "digital assets are already part of the fabric of our financial services industry."

Unlike his predecessors, Warsh’s personal financial disclosures revealed significant exposure to the sector, including holdings in Web3 infrastructure and DeFi protocols.

Key Policy Stances:

• Opposition to CBDCs: Warsh has explicitly called a retail U.S. Central Bank Digital Currency a "bad policy choice," citing privacy concerns.
• Private Innovation: He favors letting the private sector lead in stablecoins and digital payments rather than government-led initiatives.
• Inflation Hedge: He has previously referred to Bitcoin as an "important asset" that informs policymakers on inflation and dollar strength.

Why 2026 Might Be Different: The Case for a Bitcoin Pump

While the "Fed Chair Curse" suggests a crash is imminent by May 2026, several factors suggest we might see a "Warsh Pump" instead of a "Powell Dump."

1. Regulatory Clarity: Unlike 2014 or 2018, the U.S. now has a maturing regulatory framework. Investors are no longer trading in a vacuum; institutional products like Spot Bitcoin ETFs have stabilized liquidity.
2. The "Shadow" Mandate: Warsh is expected to prioritize "Sound Money" and market-led growth. If the market perceives him as more "dovish" or less likely to weaponize the banking system against crypto (Operation Choke Point 2.0), capital could flood back into crypto exchanges.
3. Institutional Sentiment: According to reports from The Wall Street Journal, Wall Street views Warsh as a candidate who understands market volatility, potentially leading to a more predictable interest rate path.

The Risks: Political Friction and the "Sock Puppet" Narrative

It hasn't been all smooth sailing. Senator Elizabeth Warren and other critics have raised concerns about Warsh’s independence, fearing he may act as a "sock puppet" for the executive branch to facilitate specific crypto ventures. Any perception that the Fed is losing its independence could lead to dollar volatility, which historically sends tremors through all risk assets, including hardware wallets and cold storage holdings.

Ethereum drops below $2,300 as crypto momentum fades

Ethereum fell below the important $2,300 level after Bitcoin failed to hold its recent pump toward $79K. The move came during a broader crypto market pullback, where Bitcoin dropped below $77K and several major altcoins turned red within a short period.

The latest market data shows ETH trading around $2,277, down nearly 3% over 24 hours. This drop is important because Ethereum had recently been supported by bullish institutional headlines, including reports of major ETH accumulation by BitMine. However, the market reaction shows that short-term traders are still focused more on Bitcoin’s price action, liquidations and weak market structure than on long-term accumulation news.

In simple terms, Ethereum did not drop because of one isolated ETH-specific event. It dropped because the broader crypto market lost momentum.

Why did Ethereum drop below $2,300?

The main reason Ethereum dropped is that Bitcoin rejected a key resistance zone. BTC briefly pushed toward $79K, but the move failed quickly. Once Bitcoin lost strength and fell back below $77K, Ethereum followed with a sharper decline.

This is normal during fast market reversals. ETH often behaves like a higher-beta version of Bitcoin, meaning it can rise faster during bullish momentum but also fall harder when the market turns. When BTC rejected the breakout, traders quickly reduced exposure across major crypto assets, and ETH became one of the first large-cap altcoins to feel the pressure.

The loss of the $2,300 level then made the move worse. For many traders, $2,300 is both a psychological level and a short-term technical support zone. Once Ethereum fell below it, stop-losses and leveraged long liquidations likely accelerated the decline.

Liquidations hit Ethereum after Bitcoin’s failed breakout

The speed of the drop suggests that liquidations played a major role. Social media reports pointed to a sharp amount of value being wiped from the crypto market in a very short time, with both BTC and ETH falling almost simultaneously.

This matters because Ethereum is heavily traded with leverage. When the market moves against crowded long positions, traders are forced to close positions or get liquidated. That selling pressure can push ETH lower even if there is no major negative news about Ethereum itself.

This is why ETH can drop despite bullish long-term headlines. Institutional accumulation may support the broader narrative, but short-term leverage can still control intraday price action.

BitMine buying Ethereum was not enough to stop the selloff

One of the more bullish headlines around Ethereum was the report that Tom Lee’s BitMine bought a large amount of ETH. This should normally support confidence in Ethereum’s long-term outlook, especially as institutional interest in ETH continues to grow.

However, today’s move shows the difference between long-term accumulation and short-term trading pressure. Big buyers can strengthen the investment case for Ethereum, but they do not automatically prevent sudden corrections. If Bitcoin rejects resistance, the market deleverages, and altcoins weaken, ETH can still drop below key levels.

That is exactly what happened here. The BitMine headline helped the Ethereum narrative, but it was not strong enough to stop the market-wide selloff.

Ethereum weakens as altcoins flash warning signs

Ethereum’s decline also fits the broader altcoin weakness. XRP, Solana, Cardano, BNB and Chainlink were all under pressure, confirming that this was not only an Ethereum problem. The market was reducing risk across major altcoins.

This is important because Ethereum usually needs broader altcoin strength to build a sustainable rally. When ETH rises while altcoins confirm the move, the market often looks healthier. But when ETH drops alongside most large-cap coins, it suggests that traders are becoming more defensive.

For now, Ethereum is still being treated like a risk asset. It is not leading the market higher. Instead, it is reacting to Bitcoin’s failed breakout and the broader weakness across crypto.

Ethereum price analysis: key levels to watch

The most important level for Ethereum now is $2,300. If ETH can reclaim this level quickly, the latest drop may be viewed as a temporary shakeout caused by Bitcoin’s rejection and short-term liquidations.

A move back above $2,300 would be the first sign that buyers are trying to regain control. After that, ETH would need to push toward the $2,350 to $2,400 zone to rebuild stronger bullish momentum.

However, if Ethereum remains below $2,300, the risk of further downside increases. In that case, traders may start watching lower support areas near $2,250 and then $2,200. Losing those levels could make the ETH chart look weaker and extend the correction.

For now, ETH is in a sensitive position. The next move depends heavily on whether Bitcoin can stabilize above $76K to $77K and whether Ethereum can recover $2,300 quickly.

Is Ethereum still bullish?

Ethereum’s long-term outlook has not been destroyed by this drop. Institutional buying, ETF-related interest and the broader Ethereum ecosystem still support the long-term narrative. But the short-term chart is clearly under pressure.

The problem is not that Ethereum has no bullish catalysts. The problem is that the market is not responding strongly to them yet. When bullish headlines fail to push price higher, it usually means traders are waiting for technical confirmation before taking more risk.

For Ethereum, that confirmation starts with reclaiming $2,300. Without that, the market may continue to treat ETH as weak in the short term.

Ethereum price prediction: bounce or deeper correction?

If Ethereum reclaims $2,300 and Bitcoin stabilizes above $77K, ETH could attempt a recovery toward $2,350 and then $2,400. A stronger move above that zone would suggest that the selloff was only a temporary liquidation event.

But if ETH fails to recover $2,300, the bearish case becomes stronger. A continued rejection below this level could send Ethereum toward $2,250 or even $2,200, especially if Bitcoin loses the $76K support area.

The most likely short-term scenario is continued volatility. Ethereum is stuck between bullish institutional narratives and bearish short-term price action. Until ETH turns $2,300 back into support, traders should expect more sharp moves in both directions.

Final thoughts: why ETH dropped and what comes next

Ethereum dropped below $2,300 because Bitcoin’s failed $79K pump triggered a broader crypto market selloff. The move was accelerated by liquidations, weak altcoin momentum and traders reducing risk across major crypto assets.

This does not mean Ethereum’s long-term story is broken. But it does show that ETH needs stronger confirmation before the next major rally can begin. Bullish accumulation headlines are important, but price action still matters.

For now, the key level is clear: Ethereum needs to reclaim $2,300. If it does, the market could start looking for a recovery. If it fails, ETH may remain under pressure and test lower support zones.

Bitcoin fails to hold the $79K pump

Bitcoin gave traders a short burst of optimism after briefly pumping toward the $79K level. The move looked like a potential breakout attempt, especially after fresh institutional buying headlines entered the market. However, the momentum quickly faded, and Bitcoin dropped back below $77K, erasing the gains from the previous move.

According to the latest market data, Bitcoin is trading around $76,600, down roughly 1.7% over 24 hours. This confirms that BTC is still struggling to build a clean continuation above the $78K to $79K range. The failed move also shows that buyers are not yet strong enough to push Bitcoin into a confirmed breakout above $80K.

The key question now is simple: why did Bitcoin pump toward $79K, then suddenly lose strength?

Why did Bitcoin drop below $77K?

The first reason is a classic failed breakout. Bitcoin moved higher, attracted short-term traders, but failed to hold the breakout zone. Once the price started rejecting near $79K, leveraged positions became vulnerable. The move then turned into a fast downside reaction, with reports pointing to billions being wiped from the crypto market in a short period.

This type of move often happens when the market pumps into resistance without enough spot demand to support the rally. Traders chase the move, liquidity builds above and below the price, and once momentum slows, the market reverses sharply.

In this case, Bitcoin’s drop below $77K suggests that the $79K area was not a real breakout yet. It was more likely a liquidity move, where the price pushed higher, trapped late buyers, and then quickly reversed.

Strategy buys more Bitcoin, but BTC still drops

One of the most interesting parts of today’s crypto news is that Bitcoin dropped even after bullish institutional headlines. Michael Saylor’s Strategy reportedly bought 3,273 BTC worth around $255 million, adding more fuel to the long-term Bitcoin accumulation narrative.

Normally, this type of news would support bullish sentiment. But today’s price action shows that institutional buying does not always create an immediate pump. Large buyers may support the bigger trend, but short-term price action still depends on liquidity, leverage, resistance levels and market confidence.

In other words, Strategy buying more Bitcoin is bullish for the long-term narrative, but it was not enough to stop the short-term selloff below $77K.

BlackRock and institutions are buying, but retail momentum is weak

The broader institutional story remains strong. BlackRock has reportedly accumulated hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Bitcoin through spot ETF demand, while Strategy continues to add BTC to its balance sheet. This confirms that large players are still using weakness as an accumulation opportunity.

However, Bitcoin’s failure to break $80K shows that institutional demand alone is not enough. The market also needs stronger retail participation, better altcoin momentum, and a clear technical breakout. Without those elements, Bitcoin can continue to see sharp pumps and dumps inside the same range.

This is why today’s move is important. It shows a clear gap between the long-term accumulation story and the short-term trading reality.

Altcoins confirm the market weakness

Bitcoin was not the only asset under pressure. The latest crypto performance data shows that most major altcoins are also red. Ethereum dropped below $2,300, XRP fell by more than 2%, Solana moved lower, Cardano weakened, and Chainlink also declined.

This matters because a healthy crypto rally usually needs support from major altcoins. When Bitcoin pumps but altcoins remain weak, the move often looks defensive rather than broad-based. It means traders are not fully rotating into risk yet.

Ethereum’s weakness is especially important. ETH is trading around $2,277, down almost 3%, despite recent reports that Tom Lee’s BitMine bought a large amount of Ethereum. This shows that even bullish Ethereum accumulation headlines are not currently enough to reverse market pressure.

Peter Schiff adds bearish pressure to the Bitcoin narrative

Another headline adding attention to the market is Peter Schiff’s latest bearish comment, where he reportedly said Bitcoin could crash “close to zero.” Schiff has always been one of Bitcoin’s most vocal critics, so the statement itself is not surprising. But the timing matters.

His comment came while Bitcoin was failing to hold a breakout and dropping below $77K. This gives the market a stronger emotional contrast: institutions are buying BTC, but critics are using the failed pump as proof that Bitcoin remains fragile.

For traders, this does not mean Bitcoin is going to zero. But it does show that sentiment is still divided. The market is not in full euphoria mode. Fear, skepticism and leverage-driven volatility are still controlling short-term moves.

Why is Bitcoin weak while stocks hit all-time highs?

One of the most important parts of today’s market setup is that stocks are reportedly hitting all-time highs while Bitcoin is struggling below $80K. That is a major signal.

If US and Asian stock markets are strong, but Bitcoin cannot hold above $79K, it suggests that crypto is not currently leading the risk-on trade. Liquidity may be flowing first into equities, while crypto remains trapped by leverage, weak altcoin demand and resistance near $80K.

This does not necessarily mean the Bitcoin trend is broken. But it does mean that BTC needs stronger confirmation before traders can call the next major breakout. For now, the market is still reacting more like a fragile risk asset than a leading momentum asset.

Bitcoin price analysis: key levels to watch

The most important level now is the $76K to $77K support zone. If Bitcoin can hold this area and reclaim $78K, the market may attempt another move toward $79K and eventually $80K.

However, if BTC loses the $76K zone clearly, the failed $79K pump could turn into a deeper correction. In that case, traders may start watching lower liquidity areas and stronger support zones below the current range.

For the bullish case to return, Bitcoin needs more than another quick pump. It needs to reclaim the $78K to $79K range, hold it as support, and show enough strength to challenge $80K with real volume.

For Ethereum, the key level is $2,300. If ETH remains below this zone, altcoins may continue to struggle, even if Bitcoin stabilizes.

Is the Bitcoin rally over?

The Bitcoin rally is not necessarily over, but today’s move is a warning sign. Bitcoin is still attracting institutional buyers, and major companies continue to accumulate BTC. However, the short-term chart shows that the market is not ready for a clean breakout yet.

The drop below $77K after a pump to $79K shows that traders are still selling into strength. It also confirms that $80K remains a major psychological and technical barrier.

For now, the crypto market is stuck between two forces. On one side, institutional accumulation supports the long-term Bitcoin story. On the other side, weak altcoins, liquidations and failed breakout attempts are keeping short-term pressure alive.

Until Bitcoin turns $79K into support and breaks $80K with conviction, the market may continue to see sharp pumps followed by fast pullbacks.

Tangem is heating up the self-custody market this spring with the launch of its exclusive Prize Draw Campaign, running from May 5 to June 6, 2026. This campaign offers users a chance to win a share of over 100 prizes, including a grand prize of $5,000 in BTC.

How to Participate in the Tangem Draw

To participate in the Tangem Prize Draw, users simply need to purchase a Tangem wallet directly through our exclusive promo link here during the promotion period. Participation is entirely automatic; every wallet item purchased counts as one entry—for example, a 3-pack order equals three tickets—with no additional sign-up required.

Prize Pool Breakdown: What Can You Win?

The campaign features a robust selection of 104 individual prizes. Beyond the headline Bitcoin rewards, Tangem is giving away the latest tech and specialized hardware security gear.

Winners will be announced on July 5, 2026, following a 30-day "cooldown" period used to verify that only non-refunded purchases are eligible. The announcement will take place on the Tangem blog and via a live stream on the Tangem Discord.

Bonus Offer: Double Your Entries and Save 50%

Running concurrently with the prize draw is a significant discount on high-capacity storage. Users who purchase a Family Pack (two 3-card sets) starting with a Black or Stealth wallet can receive the second set at 50% off by using our official discount link.

Notably, both sets in the Family Pack count as separate entries for the prize draw, effectively doubling your chances to win while securing your assets at a lower cost. Eligible collections for the discounted second set include popular designs like Bitcoin, White Stealth, and the "Hold Your Freedom" series.

Why Hardware Security Matters in 2026

In an era where Bitcoin prices are pushing toward six-figure milestones, the security of your private keys is paramount. Modern hardware wallets have evolved to address sophisticated 2026 threats like AI-enabled phishing and "pig butchering" scams.

Tangem's unique approach utilizes EAL6+ certified secure element chips within a card-shaped form factor. Unlike traditional devices, Tangem is battery-free and requires no cables; users simply tap the card to their smartphone to sign transactions. This eliminates the vulnerability of a written seed phrase, as the keys are generated and stored exclusively on the card's chip.

Safety and Anti-Scam Precautions

Tangem has issued a strict warning regarding security during this campaign. Official winners will only be contacted via email from the @tangem.com domain.

• No Payment Required: Tangem will never ask for payment to claim a prize.
• Privacy First: Official staff will never ask for your private keys or seed phrases.
• Verify Sources: If you receive messages from other addresses claiming you have won, it is a scam.

While Bitcoin ($BTC) remains in a choppy consolidation range near $77,500, a handful of high-beta assets have posted double-digit gains, diverging significantly from the broader index.

Historically, vertical moves of this magnitude—often exceeding 30% in seven days—invite a period of rebalancing. For traders, this week is less about chasing the "pump" and more about identifying where the floor sits. Here are 3 tokens that soared high and need to be on every trader's radar.

1. Humanity Protocol (H): The "Vesting Choice" Volatility

Humanity Protocol (H) has been the week's standout performer, surging over 45% following a massive spike in on-chain whale activity. Large-scale transactions for $H$ recently hit a five-month high, signaling that institutional players are positioning themselves within its "Proof of Humanity" ecosystem.

However, a fundamental headwind is peaking right now. The Humanity Foundation recently presented early backers with a difficult choice: extend their vesting schedules until late 2026 or accept a 70% haircut for immediate liquidity by April 26. This creates a complex supply dynamic for the remainder of this week.

• The Bull Case: If whales continue to defend the current breakout support at $0.12, a test of the $0.18 resistance level is likely.
• The Bear Case: A significant "cliff" token unlock is approaching on June 25 for those who chose the haircut. In the immediate term, the market is pricing in this "death spiral" risk. If $H$ fails to hold $0.14, expect a retracement toward the $0.11 EMA.

2. Stable (STABLE): Navigating Regulatory Momentum

Stable (STABLE) has climbed over 30% this week, reaching a market capitalization of approximately $742 million. This rally is fueled by the evolving regulatory landscape in the United States, specifically following the GENIUS Act guidelines and new institutional reserve portfolios from major banks.

Unlike purely speculative tokens, STABLE is positioning itself as a compliance-first asset. However, after such a rapid ascent, the token is showing signs of exhaustion.

• Key Levels: STABLE is currently hovering near a psychological resistance point of $0.035. A failure to break through this week could see profit-taking dominate the mid-week sessions, leading to a healthy retracement toward $0.028.
• Watch for: New Treasury Department rules regarding stablecoin AML frameworks, which could either solidify this rally or trigger a "sell the news" event.

3. MemeCore (M): High Gains vs. Thin Liquidity

The third asset on our radar, MemeCore (M), has been the "moonshot" story of the month, gaining nearly 30% this week and pushing its valuation into the multi-billion dollar range. While the price of $M is sitting near its local highs of $4.38, technical analysts are sounding the alarm.

The project recently executed a hardfork that reduced gas fees by 99%, attracting a wave of retail interest. However, on-chain scrutiny highlights a potential risk: a discrepancy between the high market cap and relatively thin liquidity in decentralized exchange (DEX) pools.

• Risk Factor: The volume-to-market cap ratio remains low. In thin markets like MemeCore's, even small sell orders can have an outsized impact on the price.
• Technical Outlook: Watch for a "double top" pattern near $4.65. If $M fails to sustain volume above its 24-hour average of $25M, a sharp correction toward the $3.89 support level is probable.

Summary: 3 Cryptocurrencies to Watch This Week

Big Tech earnings and the FOMC are challenging investor risk appetite, with $82K as a make-or-break level for Bitcoin’s recovery rally.

Fidelity says crypto may finally be finding its floor, while the White House is teasing a major strategic Bitcoin reserve update.

Internal stumbles over ChatGPT growth and a looming IPO are putting Sam Altman's spend-everything compute strategy under the microscope.

The fintech company's third-party audited disclosure shows $1.5 billion in customer Bitcoin and $692 million in corporate treasury holdings.

The joint motion halts deadlines and enforcement in xAI’s lawsuit while Colorado lawmakers weigh changes to the state’s AI bias law.

Cardano price range has tightened, with the market now watching for the next move.

T. Rowe Price readies TKNZ ETF with XRP and SHIB, while Bitcoin targets $96,600 via Bollinger Bands, and Grayscale's DOGE ETF breaks $0 inflow streak for Dogecoin.

Hyperliquid's state on the market isn't getting better, especially after it invalidated another uptrend.

Chainlink sees rising demand as traders move tokens worth over $8.95 million out of exchanges within just 24 hours even as momentum slows.

After the synchronization of the XRP Ledger with the market performance of XRP< things went downhill.

TLDR:

• Bitcoin dropped from $78,000 to below $77,000 in one hour, erasing over $100M in leveraged long positions.

• Weekend order books lacked institutional depth, making prices far more sensitive to forced market sell orders.

• Whales and hedge funds actively target liquidation clusters to trigger cascades and buy assets at lower prices.

• Open interest has rebuilt to $25B post-drop, signaling renewed leverage risk and potential for another sharp correction.

Bitcoin experienced a sharp price decline in late April 2026, dropping from around $78,000 to below $77,000 within an hour.

Over $100 million in leveraged long positions were wiped out during that period. Analysts point to forced liquidations rather than organic selling as the main driver.

Weekend trading conditions made the move worse, as thin order books left prices exposed to sudden pressure from automated sell orders.

Weekend Market Conditions Worsened the Liquidation Cascade

Low-liquidity periods, such as weekends, create conditions where even modest capital can shift prices sharply. Institutional traders and liquidity providers step back during these windows, leaving order books thin. As a result, market orders carry more weight and move prices faster than they would on regular trading days.

Once Bitcoin breached key margin thresholds, automated systems triggered forced liquidations on leveraged long positions.

These sell orders then fed into an already fragile order book. The cascade that followed amplified downside momentum well beyond what spot selling alone could have produced.

As noted by Cryptoquant analyst @xwinfinance, “With reduced participation from institutions and liquidity providers, order books become thin, making prices more sensitive to market orders.” This structural weakness is not unique to this event but is a recurring feature of weekend crypto trading.

Algorithmic trading systems accelerated the move further. These programs react to price changes in milliseconds, adding sell pressure on top of forced liquidations.

The combination of thin liquidity and automated responses created the conditions for a rapid and outsized drop.

Professional Players Often Target Liquidation Zones for Profit

Market makers, whales, and hedge funds routinely monitor order book data and derivatives metrics to identify where liquidation clusters sit.

By pushing price into those zones, they can trigger forced selling and buy back at lower levels. This turns liquidation events into profitable setups for well-capitalized traders.

This strategy works most effectively during low-liquidity sessions. Smaller amounts of capital are needed to move price into liquidation territory when fewer participants are active. The cost of executing such a move drops significantly on weekends or during off-peak hours.

Open interest data across exchanges shows that leverage has rebuilt to around $25 billion alongside the recent price recovery.

That figure points to renewed risk appetite and a return of leveraged positioning. The market is once again vulnerable to similar liquidation-driven moves if prices shift unexpectedly.

The cycle of leverage rebuilding after liquidation events is a known pattern in crypto markets. Traders re-enter leveraged positions after a flush, gradually pushing open interest back up.

Until market structure deepens and liquidity improves, these sharp, position-driven drops are likely to remain a recurring feature of Bitcoin trading.

The post Bitcoin $78K Crash Explained: How Leverage Liquidations Triggered a Cascading Sell-Off appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Highlights

• Nasdaq 100 futures declined 0.9% while S&P 500 futures retreated 0.4% during Tuesday’s premarket session
• Reports indicate OpenAI has underperformed on revenue and user growth projections prior to its planned public offering, impacting partner companies including Oracle
• Diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran show no progress as the Strait of Hormuz blockade continues, driving crude prices upward
• Federal Reserve policymakers convene for a two-day session starting Tuesday, with no rate adjustment anticipated Wednesday
• Major technology giants Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft scheduled to release quarterly results Wednesday

American equity futures displayed mixed performance Tuesday morning as worries surrounding OpenAI’s business trajectory put pressure on technology shares while international conflicts maintained investor wariness.

Futures tied to the Nasdaq 100 tumbled 0.9%, while those tracking the S&P 500 declined 0.4%, reversing momentum after both benchmarks achieved all-time closing peaks Monday. Contracts linked to the Dow Jones Industrial Average moved against the grain, advancing 0.3%, benefiting from reduced technology sector concentration.

Technology stocks faced selling pressure following revelations in a Wall Street Journal article indicating OpenAI has failed to meet internal benchmarks for both revenue generation and user acquisition as it prepares for its anticipated initial public offering. Oracle experienced significant premarket losses as a consequence.

Market participants are directing attention toward the “Magnificent Seven” technology behemoths as the quarterly reporting period intensifies. Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft will all unveil their financial performance Wednesday.

Apple’s earnings announcement comes Thursday. These releases will provide investors with critical insights into the sustainability of artificial intelligence infrastructure investments throughout the technology sector.

Middle East Conflict Supports Elevated Energy Prices

The ongoing confrontation between the United States and Iran continues adding uncertainty to financial markets. Tehran has presented a framework to lift the Strait of Hormuz closure and suspend nuclear advancement talks, though the Trump administration has voiced doubts regarding the conditions.

The administration confirmed President Trump will issue a response to Iran’s offer in the near term. The military campaign against Iranian targets has now entered its third month.

Oil prices surged considerably during Tuesday’s session. Brent crude advanced 2.7% reaching $104.42 per barrel, while West Texas Intermediate increased 2.6% to $98.83 per barrel.

Deutsche Bank’s Jim Reid observed that financial markets are factoring in potential for a prolonged period of stagflation should diplomatic negotiations continue stalling.

The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield increased 2 basis points to 4.36%. The US dollar index strengthened 0.2% relative to other major global currencies.

Central Bank Policy Deliberations Commence

The Federal Reserve launches its two-day policy deliberation Tuesday. Financial market forecasts overwhelmingly anticipate monetary policymakers will maintain current interest rate levels when their determination is revealed Wednesday.

Investors will scrutinize Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell’s commentary closely. With Powell’s chairmanship nearing its conclusion, his statements carry heightened significance.

Bitcoin and XRP both registered losses during early Tuesday trading, market information shows. Digital asset markets have reflected the same cautious sentiment affecting traditional equities.

The S&P 500 and Nasdaq both registered unprecedented closing levels Monday. Continuation of that upward momentum hinges substantially on corporate earnings results and Federal Reserve guidance arriving this week.

The post Tech Futures Decline as OpenAI Growth Concerns Weigh on Market Sentiment appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Takeaways

• Arm Holdings shares slid approximately 8% Monday as traders locked in profits following a 50%+ rally since early April
• No company-specific catalyst triggered the decline, suggesting a broader cooling across semiconductor and AI stocks
• The stock commands a valuation near 130 times adjusted earnings, sparking debate over sustainability
• Shares surged almost 15% Friday alone, driven by optimism surrounding artificial intelligence and processor demand
• Quarterly earnings scheduled for next Wednesday will offer crucial insights into business momentum

Shares of Arm Holdings experienced a notable retreat Monday, declining roughly 8% as market participants opted to secure profits following one of the semiconductor sector’s most dramatic rallies this year.

Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares, ARM

The stock had rocketed nearly 15% higher during Friday’s trading session. Measured from its April 7 trough, ARM had already posted gains exceeding 50% before Monday’s pullback began. Such rapid appreciation typically invites selling pressure, which materialized as expected.

No adverse company-specific developments emerged to explain the downturn. Market observers instead attributed the decline to profit-taking behavior and a wider retreat among artificial intelligence and chip-related equities, including a notable decline in Intel that sent ripples through the sector.

ARM has demonstrated considerable volatility throughout the current AI-fueled market environment. As appetite for central processing units intensifies — especially surrounding agentic AI implementations — ARM has positioned itself as a primary beneficiary.

This investment thesis gained additional momentum in March when ARM announced plans to develop its first proprietary chip. This strategic pivot away from its conventional licensing approach triggered substantial price appreciation.

Premium Pricing Raises Questions

Despite Monday’s correction, ARM maintains an elevated price point. The equity currently trades around 130 times adjusted earnings, representing a valuation premium that offers minimal margin for error.

Certain analytical frameworks suggest the multiple extends even further — potentially exceeding 300 times earnings under alternative calculation methods. Regardless of methodology, the valuation remains stretched and has investors exercising caution.

Company leadership has established a long-range objective of reaching $25 billion in annual revenue by 2031. While such ambitious expansion can theoretically support elevated multiples, it demands consistent flawless execution across multiple years.

Monday’s selloff indicates a segment of market participants remains unwilling to compensate at current levels, particularly following such compressed gains.

Looking Ahead for ARM Investors

The immediate focus shifts to quarterly results, scheduled for release next Wednesday. This financial update will provide investors with current operational metrics and indicate whether management’s expansion roadmap remains viable.

Entering the earnings announcement, ARM’s year-to-date performance registers approximately 114%, positioning it among the semiconductor sector’s top performers despite Monday’s setback.

Daily trading volume typically averages 7.3 million shares, while the company maintains a market capitalization near $249 billion.

Next week’s earnings disclosure will receive intense scrutiny, especially regarding updates on the company’s chip design initiatives and initial progress within the agentic AI marketplace.

The post Arm Holdings (ARM) Stock Tumbles 8% as Profit-Taking Grips Chip Sector appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Takeaways

• SPOT shares decline sharply despite first-quarter revenue climbing 14% year-over-year
• Monthly active users reach 761 million while premium subscribers hit 293 million
• Spotify delivers €4.5 billion in Q1 revenue but faces market selloff
• Gross margin expands to 33% as operating income reaches €715 million
• Platform adds new discovery features, advertising tools, and creator partnerships

Spotify (SPOT) delivered impressive first-quarter metrics, including robust user expansion and revenue acceleration, yet investors responded by pushing shares lower. The stock closed regular trading at $495.82, shedding 4.28%, then tumbled another 8.34% to $454.74 in pre-market activity. This selloff occurred even as the streaming giant posted compelling growth across key business segments.

Spotify Technology S.A., SPOT

First Quarter Delivers Solid Performance Metrics

Spotify announced first-quarter revenue increased 14% on a constant currency basis, totaling €4.5 billion. The streaming platform’s monthly active users climbed 12% year-over-year to 761 million, while premium subscribers expanded 9% annually to reach 293 million.

Gross margin improved by approximately 140 basis points to 33% compared to the same period last year. The company generated €715 million in operating income throughout the quarter. These results demonstrated meaningful advancement in scale, profitability, and user engagement.

The streaming service characterized this period as its “Year of Raising Ambition,” noting performance aligned with or surpassed internal targets across all primary categories. Nevertheless, market participants appeared unconvinced, creating a disconnect between operational achievements and share price momentum.

Market Reaction Contradicts Business Performance

SPOT concluded regular session trading at $495.82 following a 4.28% decline. Selling pressure intensified during pre-market hours, with shares plummeting an additional 8.34% to $454.74. This movement pushed the stock significantly below the $500 threshold.

The pronounced selloff arrived after Spotify shares had experienced considerable appreciation heading into the earnings announcement. Market observers suggested the decline reflected valuation concerns rather than disappointing operational metrics. While quarterly results showcased expansion, equity holders initiated aggressive profit-taking.

The platform’s subscriber ecosystem continues driving revenue generation. Premium membership grew to 293 million as engagement deepened across music streaming, podcast content, and audiobook offerings. Additionally, total monthly active users surpassed 760 million, establishing a substantial foundation for future revenue opportunities.

Platform Enhancement Strategy Drives Innovation

Spotify rolled out numerous discovery mechanisms and user control features throughout the period. The company initiated beta testing of Taste Profile in New Zealand for premium members. Prompted Playlist functionality expanded throughout the United States and Canada markets.

Podcast and audiobook initiatives received additional investment and attention. The Prompted Playlist feature now incorporates podcast recommendations, while Audiobook Charts debuted in both the United States and United Kingdom. New features including SongDNA and About the Song enhanced music exploration capabilities.

The streaming service broadened its toolkit for advertising clients, content creators, and music industry partners. New offerings included Sponsored Playlists, Carousel Ads, Split Testing capabilities, and Automated Bid functionality. The annual Loud & Clear transparency report revealed Spotify distributed over $11 billion to music rightsholders in 2025.

Spotify maintained its strategy of creating exclusive fan experiences with prominent artists. Bad Bunny appeared at a Spotify-hosted gathering in Tokyo for devoted listeners. BTS collaborated with the platform on a New York event celebrating the group’s musical comeback.

Creator support programs received continued development through enhanced podcast initiatives and partnership resources. Good Hang with Amy Poehler earned significant industry awards during this timeframe. Moreover, Spotify helped establish B-LINE, providing round-the-clock assistance for members of the U.S. music industry.

The company posted compelling operational achievements even as SPOT encountered substantial market headwinds. Revenue figures, subscriber counts, user totals, and margin percentages all demonstrated positive momentum in the first quarter. However, share price action indicated that fundamental improvements proved insufficient to prevent aggressive valuation recalibration.

The post Spotify (SPOT) Stock Tumbles Despite Strong Q1 Performance and User Growth appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Takeaways

• First quarter 2026 earnings per share hit $1.60, falling short of the $1.93 analyst consensus by 17.1%
• Quarterly revenue surpassed projections at $4.2B versus the anticipated $4.09B
• Shares climbed 0.34% to $98.58 during premarket hours
• Ontario, California distribution facility fire projected to reduce Q2 organic growth by 70-80 basis points
• Company reaffirms 2026 full-year guidance; anticipates double-digit adjusted EPS expansion on constant currency terms

Kimberly-Clark (KMB) delivered contrasting results in its first quarter of 2026. While earnings per share landed at $1.60—significantly below the Street’s $1.93 expectation, representing a 17.1% shortfall—the top line painted a brighter picture. Revenue reached $4.2 billion, surpassing the $4.09 billion consensus estimate.

Despite the earnings disappointment, shares moved 0.34% higher in premarket activity to $98.58, indicating market participants were focusing on other positives beyond the profit miss.

The consumer goods giant achieved 2.5% organic expansion during the period, supported by a 3% uptick in volume and product mix. Chief Executive Mike Hsu highlighted that this represents the second straight year of comprehensive volume-plus-mix advancement.

Kimberly-Clark Corporation, KMB

Hsu pointed to innovation as a critical catalyst for expansion, noting that approximately 60% of aggregate net sales and over 75% of organic growth across the previous two years stemmed “from innovation.” He characterized 2026 as among the firm’s “most robust programming periods in recent memory.”

Adjusted operating earnings increased roughly 4% compared to the prior year. Adjusted selling, general and administrative expenses as a share of net sales improved 90 basis points, enabling a 60 basis point elevation in brand marketing expenditures.

Domestic Market: Market Share Expansion Despite Margin Challenges

Within North America, volume-plus-mix advanced 1.7%. Personal care segments captured additional market share—20 basis points in weighted value and 60 basis points in unit volume. The Kleenex brand seized 180 basis points of market share during the three-month period.

Domestic operating profit declined year-over-year, impacted by a 490 basis point drag from discontinuing the private label diaper operations and elevated brand spending. Management had anticipated this profitability pressure.

Overseas, personal care generated 4% organic expansion and 5.5% volume-plus-mix growth. Markets including Indonesia and Brazil recorded double-digit performance. Segment operating profit surged 21.9%, with margins widening to 16.2%—approximately 500 basis points above 2023 levels.

Distribution Facility Blaze and Commodity Headwinds Loom Over Second Quarter

A blaze at a third-party logistics warehouse in Ontario, California is projected to trim 70-80 basis points from second quarter organic growth. Chief Financial Officer Nelson Urdaneta estimated the financial impact at approximately $50 million for the period.

Energy costs associated with the incident are also anticipated to squeeze Q2 operating margins by 70 basis points. Executives indicated recovery of these expenses is expected during the latter half of the year.

Regarding raw materials, petroleum and petroleum-based derivatives constitute roughly one-quarter of KMB’s cost of goods sold. The organization has secured approximately 80% coverage for the year, though Urdaneta cautioned that sustained $100 per barrel oil prices through the second half could generate $150 million to $170 million in unexpected input cost inflation.

KMB retained its 2026 annual outlook, forecasting double-digit adjusted earnings per share growth on a constant currency foundation. Adjusted free cash generation is projected to reach approximately $2 billion.

The corporation also expressed ongoing confidence in its planned Kenvue transaction, targeting $2.1 billion in aggregate net synergies. First quarter adjusted free cash flow registered $405 million.

KMB currently trades close to its 52-week low of $92.42 and offers a dividend yield of 5.21%, having increased its payout for 53 consecutive years.

The post Kimberly-Clark (KMB) Stock: Q1 Earnings Miss Offset by Revenue Surge and Warehouse Fire Impact appeared first on Blockonomi.

The primary cryptocurrency has recently made a few attempts to reclaim the psychological $80,000 level in the past week or so, but has been rejected.

Despite being in red territory today, one popular analyst identified a rare pattern that has historically been a precursor to a major uptrend. The question now is whether the setup will play out again or the bears will keep the upper hand.

Double or Triple-Digit Rally on the Way?

BTC has slipped by 2% over the past 24 hours, currently worth around $76,200. Several hours ago, though, the popular analyst Ali Martinez argued that the asset has formed a so-called “Morning Star” pattern on the monthly timeframe. As he explained, it is a candlestick structure that signals sellers are exhausted and buyers are regaining control.

“This three-period formation represents the transition from fear to indecision, and finally, to aggressive conviction,” he added.

Martinez noted that over the past three years, BTC has printed three Morning Star patterns on the high-timeframe charts, each followed by notable rallies: a 34% ascent in 2023, a 212% surge in spring 2024, and nearly 34% later that year. The analyst claimed that as long as the valuation stays above the “star” candlestick low near $73,000, “the structural bias is firmly to the upside.”

Another well-known industry participant who issued an optimistic prediction is Arthur Hayes. The co-founder of BitMEX and CIO of Maelstrom envisioned a pump to $125,000 by the end of 2026. He thinks rising global tensions may force governments to print more money to fund spending, thereby weakening fiat. In his view, this development could push people towards scarce assets like BTC, thus creating conditions for a sustainable rally.

Hayes also highlighted other factors that could trigger a resurgence, including credit deflation linked to artificial intelligence, possible changes in the Federal Reserve, and new expectations of how American banks may have to handle the country’s growing debt.

Is the Bottom Yet to Come?

Crypto X has been buzzing with users making forecasts that go far beyond Hayes’ outlook. Nonetheless, the veteran trader Peter Brandt recently poured a cold shower on those anticipating a jump to $250,000 sometime this year, ironically saying that they “need to stop with the mushrooms.”

Carl Moon and Rekt Fencer also chipped in. The former predicted a short-lived spike to $81,000 in the near term, followed by a “liquidity flush” to $70,000-$72,000. The latter assumed that BTC has not bottomed yet, claiming that a dip below $40,000 later in 2026 is not out of the question.

The post Bitcoin (BTC) Flashes a Rare Buy Signal: How High Can the Price Go? appeared first on CryptoPotato.

“Vibe coding,” or the ability to produce code using a human language prompt, interpreted, and converted into working code, has been the biggest trend of the past year. People are literally using learning computer programs (called agents) to handle tasks more or less autonomously, while they handle different aspects of their business or life.

But sometimes, things go wrong. Horribly wrong.

AI Agent Goes Rogue: Kills Firm’s Database in Seconds

Nine seconds – that’s how much it took one AI agent to literally delete the entire codebase of a company, leaving their users without access to critical data.

PocketOS, a firm that provides software for car rental businesses, suffered a shocking outage over the weekend after an autonomous AI-based agent took erroneous actions, wiping out their entire database and all backups in a total of nine seconds.

Yesterday afternoon, an AI coding agent — Cursor running Anthropic’s flagship Claude Opus 4.6 — deleted our production database and all volume-level backups in a single API call to Railway, our infrastructure provider.

According to the company’s founder, Jer Crane, they were using Cursor, powered by Claude Opus 4.6, widely considered the most prominent model for coding tasks.

Crane explained that the agent was working “entirely on its own initiative” and decided to fix an existing problem by just deleting the database. They even asked the program to explain why it did it, when it confessed in full and outlined all of the rules that it broke.

Community Reacts

While the event is no doubt devastating for the people involved, the community had mixed reactions, with a lot of the users commenting under the thread pointing out that the main mistake was trusting the AI agent with all those permissions at the same time.

This isn’t just a “bad AI incident” , it’s a textbook enterprise failure across AI, security, and infrastructure design. If anything, the AI agent is just the trigger; the real issue is system design that allowed a single action to wipe everything.

The post The Dangers of AI Agents: Entire Firm’s Database Deleted by Claude-Based Agent appeared first on CryptoPotato.

[PRESS RELEASE – Amsterdam, Netherlands, April 28th, 2026]

NOWPayments, a crypto payment gateway, has significantly improved processing speed for transactions in USDT across major blockchain networks, achieving a fivefold acceleration in payment and payout execution on both BNB Smart Chain (BSC) and Ethereum (ERC20).

The update reflects the growing importance of settlement speed in stablecoin-based operations, where delays can directly affect business performance, customer experience, and operational predictability.

Stablecoins such as USDT are increasingly used not only for value storage but also as a practical settlement instrument across industries that rely on frequent transactions and timely payouts. In these environments, faster execution enables businesses to streamline workflows, reduce waiting times, and maintain smoother financial operations.

The performance improvement applies to both incoming payments and outgoing payouts on BNB Smart Chain (BSC) and Ethereum (ERC20), strengthening the reliability and responsiveness of the payment infrastructure used by businesses worldwide. These enhancements reflect a coordinated infrastructure optimization effort designed to improve settlement speed across multiple high-demand stablecoin networks.

Operational Impact Observed by Partners

The recent infrastructure optimization has already delivered measurable operational benefits for businesses relying on stablecoin payouts at scale.

Chipstars’ operations team reported a reduction in unresolved transactions and support escalations following the performance improvements. Faster processing times have streamlined daily operations, reduced workload for operational teams, and contributed to more predictable settlement flows, resulting in a smoother experience for both staff and end users.

Performance Benchmarks Across Major Stablecoin Networks

NOWPayments continues to optimize payout performance across multiple blockchain networks widely used for stablecoin transactions. According to internal performance data, recent infrastructure upgrades have resulted in a fivefold improvement in payout processing speed across both BSC and Ethereum networks.

To illustrate the impact of these optimizations, the following comparison highlights average payout processing times across major stablecoin networks.

Average Stablecoin Payout Processing Times Across Major Networks

USDT BEP20 (BSC)

NOWPayments Average Payout Time – 26 seconds

General Market Average Payout Time – 45 seconds

USDT ERC20 (ETH)

NOWPayments Average Payout Time – 94 seconds

General Market Average Payout Time – 3–10 minutes

These performance benchmarks demonstrate how infrastructure optimization across multiple blockchain networks – including both BSC and Ethereum – can directly improve settlement efficiency for businesses handling frequent stablecoin transactions. Achieving consistent fivefold acceleration across multiple networks highlights the scalability and reliability of the payment infrastructure supporting stablecoin operations.

Continuous Infrastructure Optimization

According to NOWPayments, enhancing transaction processing speed is part of the company’s ongoing efforts to optimize infrastructure performance and support businesses that depend on stablecoins for daily operations.

As stablecoin adoption continues to grow across digital commerce and financial services, settlement speed is becoming a defining factor in the usability and efficiency of crypto payment systems. Infrastructure improvements that reduce processing time can help businesses operate more efficiently and provide a better experience for end users.

NOWPayments will continue to focus on improving performance, reliability, and scalability across supported cryptocurrencies and blockchain networks.

About NOWPayments

NOWPayments is a crypto payment gateway that enables businesses to accept payments and send payouts in cryptocurrencies. The platform supports a wide range of digital assets and provides flexible tools for payment processing, automated payouts, and integration into business workflows.

The post NOWPayments Boosts USDT Processing Speed 5x on BSC and Ethereum to Improve Stablecoin Settlement Efficiency appeared first on CryptoPotato.

[PRESS RELEASE – Dubai, UAE, April 28th, 2026]

BNB Chain today announced the successful activation of the Osaka/Mendel hard fork, a targeted network upgrade comprising nine BNB Evolution Proposals (BEPs). The upgrade combines six selected Ethereum EIPs with two BNB Chain-specific improvements, all chosen for their proven impact on execution efficiency, stability, and usability under real-world conditions.

Building on the performance gains introduced by the Fermi and Maxwell upgrades, Osaka/Mendel refines how the network behaves when blocks are produced in under a second. By addressing small inefficiencies that become critical at high throughput – such as gas spikes, heavy computation, and inconsistent execution, the upgrade delivers more predictable gas pricing, tighter execution limits, and faster, more reliable transaction finality.

Key enhancements include:

• More predictable gas and execution: Upper bounds on computationally heavy operations (including modular exponentiation), caps on per-transaction gas limits, and refined gas cost schedules that better reflect actual resource usage. These changes reduce unexpected behavior for developers and ensure consistent transaction outcomes for users, even during periods of peak activity.
• Small but powerful engine improvements: Introduction of the CLZ opcode for counting leading zeros, providing developers with a more efficient low-level tool without altering application-level behavior.
• Stable blocks under pressure: A clear cap on block size prevents overly heavy blocks, maintaining consistent processing performance as network activity scales.
• Better real-world cryptography support: Updated gas costs for secp256r1 operations, simplifying integration with external systems and non-Ethereum cryptographic standards.

Two BNB Chain-specific upgrades further differentiate the network:

• Blob transactions are now limited by block number, preventing large data-heavy payloads from degrading block performance.
• Fast Finality has been enhanced through an in-memory voting pool, resulting in quicker and more reliable transaction confirmations.

Additionally, a new JSON-RPC method provides developers with improved visibility into node configuration, streamlining debugging and infrastructure management.

Osaka/Mendel continues the momentum established by Fermi, Maxwell, and Pascal. The upgrade strengthens the protocol’s core without introducing unnecessary complexity, ensuring the network remains optimized for the next wave of adoption.

About BNB Chain

BNB Chain is one of the largest and most active blockchain ecosystems in the world, supported by a global community of developers and users. With high throughput, low transaction costs, and full EVM compatibility, BNB Chain powers scalable applications across finance, gaming, and the broader Web3 economy. For more information, users can visit www.bnbchain.org.

The post BNB Chain Activates Osaka/Mendel Hard Fork: Faster Finality, Predictable Gas, and Enhanced Stability appeared first on CryptoPotato.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed a rule change yesterday that would make it much easier to list crypto investment products that hold XRP alongside Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL).

The filing formally names XRP as an eligible commodity under a new 85/15 framework, which would let multi-asset crypto trusts gain listed status without an exchange having to seek individual SEC approval for each product.

What the Filing Actually Says

The proposal is targeting Rule 8.201-E, which governs how commodity-based trust shares get listed on NYSE Arca. Right now, every asset in one of these trusts must independently meet specific eligibility criteria.

The new rule would drop that requirement. Instead, a trust would only need at least 85% of its net asset value in qualifying assets, with the remaining 15% free to hold assets that would not otherwise clear the bar.

Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and XRP are each explicitly named in the filing as assets that already qualify. All four meet the criteria on two counts: each one underlies a futures contract that has been trading on a regulated market for at least six months, and there is an ETF providing at least 40% economic exposure to each.

To illustrate how the rule would work in practice, the filing used a hypothetical trust holding $95 million in BTC, ETH, SOL, and XRP, alongside $5 million in other digital assets that do not meet the eligibility standards. Because the qualifying assets represent 95% of the portfolio, well above the 85% threshold, the trust would satisfy the listing requirements under the proposed change.

It is also worth noting that Nasdaq filed an essentially identical proposal under SR-NASDAQ-2026-032. NYSE Arca also pointed to two prior SEC approvals as precedent: the Grayscale Digital Large Cap Fund and Bitwise’s 10 Crypto Index ETF, both of which were cleared under a comparable 85% standard.

The filing also proposed excluding non-fungible assets and collectibles from the definition of eligible commodities, since those were never contemplated when the original generic listing standards were drawn up.

The SEC now has up to 45 days from the Federal Register publication date to act on the proposal, with the option to extend that to 90 days.

XRP Price Context and ETF Flows

While analysts like ChartNerd described the development as “massive” for XRP, the token is struggling to wring itself away from the broader market weakness, trading for about $1.39 at the time of writing, which marked a 2% dip in the last 24 hours as well as a 3% decline over seven days.

And while it has gone up 4.4% in the last month, XRP is still almost 40% lower than it was a year ago and more than 61% lower than its all-time high of $3.65 attained in July 2025.

Meanwhile, on the ETF side, things have been going much better, with spot XRP ETFs hitting a new record for cumulative net inflows at $1.29 billion. This is the highest the funds have recorded since their launch in mid-November 2025.

The post Why XRP Holders Are Watching This SEC Proposal Closely appeared first on CryptoPotato.