Rising oil prices amid stalled talks highlight market vulnerability to geopolitical tensions, impacting global economic stability.

The post Oil prices climb amid stalled US-Iran peace talks, traders reassess exposure appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin's rise amid Iran talks suggests geopolitical stability boosts confidence in risk assets, potentially reducing market volatility.

The post Bitcoin hits 12-week high at $79,488 amid Iran nuclear proposal talks appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Apple's increased iPhone sales highlight a need for profitability focus to challenge NVIDIA's market cap dominance amid AI valuation strength.

The post Apple iPhone sales surge 13% in March, low-end demand hits margins appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Iran's strategic delay in nuclear negotiations heightens geopolitical tensions, complicating US diplomacy and impacting global markets.

The post Iran offers to delay nuclear deal for Strait of Hormuz reopening appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The EU's crypto ban on Russia tightens financial isolation, reducing diplomatic flexibility and signaling prolonged geopolitical tensions.

The post EU bans Russia-based crypto providers in latest sanctions package appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin Magazine

UTXO Management Launches Dual-Class Digital Credit Income Fund

UTXO Management, a subsidiary of Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA), announced the formation of UTXO Preferred Income Strategies LP, a Delaware limited partnership structured to provide access to income from preferred digital credit securities. 

The fund introduces a dual-class structure designed to serve different allocator objectives within a single vehicle.

The structure includes a Senior Income Class and a Total Return Class. The Senior Income Class targets a fixed annual coupon paid monthly as return of capital sourced from preferred dividend streams, according to a company release.

Distributions flow first to this class, ahead of fees and junior allocations. The structure seeks to deliver yield above short-term U.S. Treasury bills, supported by a junior equity cushion. This class carries no management or performance fees.

The Total Return Class targets return through residual income after senior distributions. The strategy includes disciplined leverage, relative value positioning across the preferred digital credit stack, and participation in new issuance. This class absorbs first loss and captures upside tied to spread compression and income growth.

The fund’s initial portfolio is expected to include digital credit instruments such as the Strategy Variable Rate Perpetual Stretch Preferred Security (STRC). These instruments form part of a growing segment within capital markets that blends features of fixed income with digital asset exposure.

Chief Investment Officer Tyler Evans said the digital credit market has reached a stage of development that supports structured products, though access remains limited across institutional channels. 

“We designed our first structured credit product, UTXO Preferred Income Strategies LP, to give allocators access to these dividend-paying securities, with the capital structure enhancements, institutional servicing, and operational transparency they require,” Evans said. 

UTXO’s expansion into credit

Since 2019, UTXO Management and its affiliates have launched and managed several investment vehicles across the Bitcoin ecosystem. These include the Bitcoin Ecosystem Fund, focused on venture investments, and 210k Capital, LP, a hedge fund strategy centered on Bitcoin and related instruments. The launch of UTXO Preferred Income Strategies LP marks the firm’s entry into structured credit, extending its platform into income-oriented strategies.

UTXO Management operates as a Bitcoin-native asset manager across public and private markets. The firm allocates capital across liquid securities, venture investments, and strategic partnerships tied to Bitcoin infrastructure and adoption. Nakamoto Inc., its parent company, holds and operates a portfolio of Bitcoin-native businesses.

The fund will be offered to accredited investors who also meet the definition of qualified purchasers under applicable securities laws. Interests will be sold through private placement and will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933. Investment decisions must rely on the fund’s offering documents, which contain full details on terms, risks, and structure.

The strategy involves a high degree of risk. Digital credit securities face regulatory uncertainty, liquidity constraints, and valuation challenges. The fund may employ leverage, which can increase losses. The dual-class structure depends on the performance of underlying assets and the sufficiency of the junior equity layer to protect senior distributions.

No capital has been deployed under the strategy at the time of announcement. Target yield and return figures represent internal objectives based on modeled scenarios and do not constitute forecasts or guarantees. Actual performance may differ based on market conditions, issuer credit quality, and broader economic factors.

Disclaimer: Bitcoin Magazine is published by BTC Inc, a subsidiary of Nakamoto Inc. UTXO Management is also a subsidiary of Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA)

This post UTXO Management Launches Dual-Class Digital Credit Income Fund first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

VanEck Flags Dual Bullish Signals for Bitcoin as Funding Turns Negative, Hash Rate Slips

Bitcoin’s latest onchain and derivatives data point to a constructive setup, with VanEck highlighting negative funding rates and a clustered hash rate drawdown alongside softer volatility and cautious positioning. 

The firm notes in their latest report that realized volatility fell from about 56% to 41% as US‑Iran tensions eased, while the 7‑day average funding rate dropped to roughly -1.8%, its lowest level since 2023 and in the 10th percentile of readings since late 2020.

Since 2020, bitcoin’s average 30‑day return during periods of negative funding has been 11.5%, compared with 4.5% across all periods, with a 77% hit rate for positive performance. When annualized funding sank below -5%, subsequent 30‑day returns averaged 19.4%, and 180‑day returns reached 70%, making negative funding a recurrent contrarian buy signal. VanEck also reports that 19 of the top 50 180‑day return windows since 2020 began on days with negative funding, despite such periods representing only about 13.6% of the sample.

The Bitcoin hash rate is falling

On the mining side, the 30‑day moving average hash rate has fallen to the 16th percentile over 30 days and 9th percentile over 90 days, while difficulty has slid to the 5th and 6th percentiles on those horizons. 

Three sustained hash rate decline episodes have appeared since December 2025, the densest cluster since China’s 2021 mining ban, with the latest drawdown of about 6.7% ending on April 15, 2026. Across seven completed historical drawdowns, bitcoin was higher 90 days later in six cases, with a median gain of 37.7% and a 63.1% median gain over 180 days.

Derivatives and onchain activity reflect guarded sentiment rather than capitulation. Put premiums relative to spot volume are more than six times their April 2024 level, while active supply over the last 180 days slipped to 28.4%, signaling greater holder dormancy. 

Long‑tenured cohorts, particularly 7‑10 year and 10+ year holders, increased spent volume to the 85th and 90th percentiles of the past four years, but VanEck stresses that such movements do not always represent outright selling. 

Taken together, the firm concludes that negative funding and hash rate stress form a reinforced bullish backdrop for bitcoin.

“Both mining rate drawdowns and negative funding rates have been associated with strong forward BTC returns. As such, we have become increasingly bullish on bitcoin,” the analysts wrote. 

Editorial Disclaimer: We leverage AI as part of our editorial workflow, including to support research, image generation, and quality assurance processes. All content is directed, reviewed, and approved by our editorial team, who are accountable for accuracy and integrity. AI-generated images use only tools trained on properly license material. In Bitcoin, as in media: Don’t trust. Verify.

This post VanEck Flags Dual Bullish Signals for Bitcoin as Funding Turns Negative, Hash Rate Slips first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

DOJ Drops Criminal Probe of Fed Chair Powell, Clearing Path for Warsh

The Department of Justice ended its criminal investigation into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Friday, removing the last major obstacle to Senate confirmation of Kevin Warsh as the central bank’s next leader — a development with consequences for monetary policy and Bitcoin.

U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro announced the closure of the probe, which had been launched over alleged cost overruns on a $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed’s Washington headquarters. 

Pirro said she was transferring the matter to the Fed’s own inspector general, calling for “a comprehensive report in short order.” She left open the possibility of reopening criminal proceedings if warranted.

The investigation had no legal foundation. A federal judge, James Boasberg, quashed DOJ subpoenas in March after a prosecutor conceded the government had found “essentially zero evidence” of a crime, branding the justification as “thin and unsubstantiated.” Powell himself called the probe a political weapon, stating in January that it was “a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President.”

A ‘bogus’ probe into Powell

Senator Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, had vowed to block Warsh’s confirmation until the probe ended, describing it as “bogus.” His opposition, combined with unified Democratic resistance, had stalled the nomination. With the investigation now closed, leadership expects a swift committee vote and floor confirmation before Powell’s term expires on May 15.

Warsh, 56, a former Fed governor and Stanford professor, testified before the Senate Banking Committee on Tuesday and pledged “strict independence” from the White House on rate decisions. “The president never once asked me to commit to any particular interest rate decision, period,” Warsh said. 

Senator Elizabeth Warren called him a “sock puppet” for Trump, while Republicans praised his qualifications.

For Bitcoin, the stakes are significant. The cryptocurrency has traded in the $70,000–$92,000 range this year as the Fed held rates steady at 3.5%–3.75%, with traders watching every signal from the central bank. 

Lower interest rates historically reduce yields on conventional assets, pushing capital toward risk assets like Bitcoin. When the DOJ first launched its probe in January, Bitcoin climbed toward $92,000 as institutional investors read the attack on the Fed as a threat to dollar credibility and a potential catalyst for rate cuts.

Warsh is considered more hawkish than Powell on inflation, having called the Fed’s post-pandemic rate response “the biggest policy error in 40 or 50 years.” 

Should he take the helm on May 15 and maintain a restrictive stance, Bitcoin bulls betting on rate-cut-driven liquidity expansion may find themselves waiting longer than expected.

This post DOJ Drops Criminal Probe of Fed Chair Powell, Clearing Path for Warsh first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

7 Reasons JPX Should Reconsider Its Proposed Digital Asset Exclusion From TOPIX

A closer look at why the consultation’s proposed deferral sits awkwardly inside a rules-based benchmark and what a better path forward might look like.

JPX Market Innovation & Research (JPXI) is considering a new rule that would defer companies whose principal asset is cryptoassets from new inclusion in TOPIX and other periodically reviewed indices. The proposal is measured in tone, and the underlying concern, how to treat a newly emerging category of issuer, is a reasonable one for any index provider to think about.

But the specific rule under consultation raises real questions. It would affect companies like Metaplanet, Remixpoint, and ANAP Holdings, along with a growing set of Japanese issuers whose business models are fully legitimate, fully regulated, and fully aligned with long-standing corporate treasury practices.

Here are seven reasons JPXI should reconsider the proposal before February 2026.

1. The Rule Doesn’t Measure What TOPIX Normally Measures

TOPIX is designed to function as a broad, neutral, investable benchmark of the Japanese equity market. Its methodology already contains objective tools for that purpose: liquidity screens, free-float-adjusted market capitalization criteria, continuation buffers, and established treatment for delistings and other listing-quality events.

A crypto-asset screen is a different kind of test. It doesn’t measure liquidity, free float, turnover cost, market capitalization, or listing quality. It looks instead at the composition of a company’s balance sheet.

That’s a meaningful departure from how TOPIX eligibility has historically worked, and it deserves a clearer justification than the consultation currently provides. If a company satisfies TOPIX’s ordinary eligibility requirements, deferring it because of one category of asset introduces a new kind of judgment into a methodology that has been valued precisely for its objectivity.

2. “Principal Asset Is Cryptoassets” Needs a Clearer Definition

The consultation refers to companies whose “principal asset is cryptoassets,” but leaves several administrative questions open:

• Is the test based on parent-only holdings or consolidated holdings?
• Would exposure through wholly owned subsidiaries, affiliated companies, or strategic equity stakes be captured?
• Would indirect exposure through securities, derivatives, or economically similar instruments count?
• Is the inquiry formal (direct legal title) or substantive (economic exposure)?

These aren’t edge cases. They determine which companies the rule actually applies to. Index methodology gains its credibility from rules that are objective, measurable, and consistently administrable, and a clearer definition would help everyone: issuers, investors, and JPXI itself.

3. The Rule May Be Easier to Work Around Than to Apply

A practical concern follows from the definitional question. If direct Bitcoin holdings by the parent company are disfavored, but equivalent exposure through other structures is not, the rule becomes sensitive to legal form rather than economic substance.

Consider the asymmetry:

• A direct Bitcoin position would trigger the rule
• A position in the iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) likely would not
• A position in a listed Bitcoin miner likely would not
• A stake in a crypto-linked subsidiary likely would not

The economic exposure in these cases can be very similar. The index treatment would be quite different. That creates an incentive for issuers to restructure toward less transparent forms of exposure rather than disclose direct holdings on the balance sheet. A benchmark rule generally works better when it encourages clear disclosure rather than the opposite.

4. The Carve-Out for Existing Constituents Creates an Internal Tension

The consultation contemplates deferring new inclusion while not applying the rule to existing constituents. This is understandable from a stability standpoint, no one wants unnecessary index churn.

But it also creates an internal tension in the rule’s logic. If Bitcoin treasury exposure were genuinely incompatible with TOPIX, it would be difficult to justify exempting current members. And if it isn’t incompatible, it’s worth asking why new entrants meeting the same investability criteria should be treated differently.

Reconciling that asymmetry would strengthen the proposal considerably.

5. “For the Time Being” Leaves the Timeline Open-Ended

The consultation says the deferral would apply “for the time being,” without specifying a review period, exit standard, or sunset mechanism. In practice, that leaves the timeline open-ended.

The timing matters here. October 2026 will be the first periodic review under the next-generation TOPIX framework in which Standard and Growth market companies can become eligible through the new process. A deferral that coincides with that review, without a defined path back to eligibility, could function as a longer-term exclusion even if it isn’t framed that way.

A clearer review cadence, or an explicit sunset, would make the proposal easier to evaluate on its merits.

6. Global Peers Have Taken More Time on the Same Question

JPXI is not the only index provider thinking about this. MSCI recently considered a threshold-based approach to digital-asset treasury companies and ultimately did not adopt a blanket exclusion, acknowledging the need for further work to distinguish operating companies from non-operating or investment-like entities. FTSE Russell has not announced a comparable rule.

The common thread is that the classification question is genuinely unsettled. Operating companies that hold Bitcoin alongside other business lines: media, energy, retail, mining, infrastructure, don’t fit neatly into existing categories, and the global index community is still working out how to think about them.

Given that, there’s a reasonable case for JPXI to engage further with issuers and market participants before codifying a rule, rather than moving ahead of where the broader conversation has landed.

7. An Asset-Neutral Framework Would Be More Durable

If the underlying concern is that some listed companies have become more concentrated or investment-like, that concern is worth addressing, but it isn’t unique to cryptoassets. Concentrated holdings can take many forms: listed equities, private-company stakes, fund interests, real estate, or other non-operating assets.

A framework that applies consistently across these categories would likely be more durable than a single-asset rule. It would also sidestep the definitional and arbitrage concerns above, since the test would focus on the economic characteristic JPXI actually cares about rather than on one particular asset class.

Several paths could accomplish this:

• Enhanced disclosure standards for concentrated treasury positions of any kind, giving investors clarity without changing index composition
• An asset-neutral concentration framework that applies the same test to any non-operating asset held above a defined threshold
• An optional index variant for investors who want exposure to the Japanese market with cryptoasset-heavy companies excluded, offered alongside, not in place of, the flagship benchmark

Where This Leaves the Proposal

None of this is to say JPXI’s instinct to think carefully about a new category of issuer is wrong. It isn’t. Bitcoin treasury companies are relatively new, and their prominence in Japan has grown quickly enough that questions about how to treat them are worth taking seriously.

But the specific rule on consultation is narrower, vaguer, and more open-ended than the questions it’s trying to answer. A clearer definition, a defined review period, and an asset-neutral framing would go a long way toward addressing the underlying concerns while preserving what has made TOPIX a trusted benchmark: objective, rules-based eligibility that reflects the Japanese equity market as it is.

That combination, substance over form, clarity over ambiguity, neutrality across asset classes, seems like the stronger path forward.

Add Your Signature

Bitcoin For Corporations has organized a coalition letter urging JPXI to withdraw the proposed exclusion and preserve TOPIX as a neutral, rules-based benchmark. The public comment period closes May 7, 2026 and every signature strengthens the case that this issue matters to issuers, investors, and market participants worldwide.

If the arguments above resonate, add your name. Individuals and organizations from any jurisdiction can sign.

→ Sign the coalition letter at topix.bitcoinforcorporations.com

You can also review the full position letter, see who has already signed, and share the campaign with your network from the same page. The deadline is firm, and the window to shape JPXI’s final decision is short.

Disclaimer: This content was prepared on behalf of Bitcoin For Corporations for informational purposes only. It reflects the author’s own analysis and opinion and should not be relied upon as investment advice. Nothing in this article constitutes an offer, invitation, or solicitation to purchase, sell, or subscribe for any security or financial product.

This post 7 Reasons JPX Should Reconsider Its Proposed Digital Asset Exclusion From TOPIX first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Nick Ward.

Bitcoin Magazine

Nakamoto (NAKA) Launches Bitcoin Derivatives Program to Capture Volatility Income and Hedge Downside Risk

Nakamoto Inc. has launched an actively managed Bitcoin derivatives program aimed at generating income from market volatility while reducing downside exposure, according to a company statement released Friday.

The program, in operation since the first quarter of 2026, is structured as a complement to Nakamoto’s core strategy of holding Bitcoin as a treasury asset. It uses a portion of the company’s Bitcoin holdings as collateral in a derivatives strategy managed by Bitwise Asset Management through a separately managed account. Custody services are provided by Kraken Institutional.

The initiative centers on two primary components: an income sleeve and a hedging sleeve. The income sleeve involves writing covered calls and call spreads against a defined share of Nakamoto’s Bitcoin holdings. This approach seeks to capture premiums from options markets, where implied volatility in Bitcoin pricing often exceeds realized volatility.

The hedging sleeve focuses on purchasing protective puts and put spreads. These positions are designed to offset potential losses during periods of price decline, providing a buffer against adverse market moves. According to the company, premiums generated from the income sleeve may help fund the cost of these protective positions.

Bitcoin’s volatility as opportunity 

Tyler Evans, chief investment officer of Nakamoto and UTXO Management, said the firm views Bitcoin’s implied volatility as a consistent source of opportunity. He described the program as a structured effort to convert that volatility into shareholder value while maintaining exposure to the underlying asset.

Bitcoin used as collateral within the program remains under Nakamoto’s ownership and continues to be counted toward its reported holdings. The company emphasized that derivatives positions supplement its spot Bitcoin exposure rather than replace it.

Premiums collected through the program may be received in either Bitcoin or U.S. dollars, depending on the structure of each trade. Nakamoto said these proceeds can be allocated toward hedging costs, additional Bitcoin purchases, or general corporate needs in line with its capital allocation strategy.

The program operates under a unified investment mandate that defines limits on notional exposure, eligible instruments, counterparties, and custody requirements. It also accounts for the tradeoff between income generation and potential limits on upside participation due to call option positions.

Nakamoto framed the strategy as part of a broader effort to generate yield from its Bitcoin treasury while maintaining long-term accumulation goals. The company said the hedging component is intended to support balance sheet stability and reduce the risk of forced asset sales during periods of market stress.

Performance details from the program’s first quarter of operation are expected to be disclosed in Nakamoto’s upcoming Form 10-Q filing.

Bitcoin Magazine is published by BTC Inc, a subsidiary of Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA)

This post Nakamoto (NAKA) Launches Bitcoin Derivatives Program to Capture Volatility Income and Hedge Downside Risk first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

The post Bitcoin’s drop below $78K exposes the market’s weakest support zone appeared first on CryptoSlate.

The Bitcoin ETF trade sold investors a simple promise: crypto exposure inside a wrapper that looked and felt like mainstream finance. Advisors could buy it, compliance teams could understand it, and institutions could route capital into digital assets through a product that fits the rest of their strategy.

That promise worked, and the US spot Bitcoin ETF complex had reached $91.71 billion in assets under management by April 8, according to CryptoSlate data.

Given the size of the spot Bitcoin ETF market, we can clearly see that there's no lack of demand. The main problem the industry is faced with now is infrastructure.

On April 20, Grayscale amended its proposed Hyperliquid ETF filing and named Anchorage Digital Bank as custodian in place of Coinbase.

On its own, that looks like a modest filing change tied to a newer crypto product, but in context, it's a sign that issuers are starting to think harder about how much of the regulated crypto ETF market still runs through one back-office gatekeeper.

As CryptoSlate reported on April 12, funds whose launch documents name Coinbase as custodian or primary custodian account for about $77.10 billion of the market, or 84.1% of total US spot Bitcoin ETF AUM. A stricter method that excludes multi-custodian arrangements or unclear split allocations still leaves roughly $74.06 billion, or 80.8%, tied to Coinbase in some custody role. Those numbers make custody concentration part of the institutional appetite for Bitcoin, not a side detail buried in the documents.

A single filing doesn't establish a migration trend, and the market shouldn't turn one amendment into a sweeping break. Even so, custody choices inside ETFs carry real informational value because issuers, lawyers, and boards tend to repeat the safest available template. When a market that has spent years making the same custody decision starts to show variation, it's worth paying attention.

The ETF boom built a custody market around one default choice: Coinbase

Coinbase became dominant in crypto ETF custody for practical reasons that made sense from the start.

When spot Bitcoin ETFs won approval in January 2024, issuers needed a provider with a recognizable compliance profile, institutional operating history, and an infrastructure stack that already looked credible to boards, auditors, market makers, and regulators. Coinbase had that advantage. Once the largest issuers chose it, the rest of the market inherited a strong template effect.

That pattern kept extending into 2026. Morgan Stanley’s updated filing in March named Coinbase Custody and BNY as custodians for its proposed Bitcoin exchange-traded product, which later launched as the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust.

Another blue-chip institution entered the market and plugged into the same custody backbone already supporting much of the ETF complex. That's how concentration deepens in financial infrastructure, with each new entrant reinforcing the same operational standard.

Coinbase’s own regulatory trajectory has only strengthened that position. On April 2, the company said it had received conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to charter Coinbase National Trust Company. That was an important milestone, because a federal trust framework offers a cleaner supervisory map for the custody business that sits underneath products like ETFs.

Coinbase’s scale reflects institutional trust, launch readiness, and regulatory familiarity. Those strengths are also what made it the market’s central operational node. Crypto has spent years arguing about decentralization at the asset layer, while the institutional wrapper built around Bitcoin moved toward a highly concentrated custody structure. We can now clearly see that product variety expanded faster than infrastructure variety.

ETF investors spend most of their time looking at inflows, fees, and price action, though it's custody that shapes how the system functions day to day. If the wrapper is supposed to make digital assets legible to mainstream finance, then the resilience of that wrapper matters almost as much as the underlying asset. The live question now is whether the market has reached the point where resilience requires more redundancy.

Grayscale’s Anchorage switch points to a market thinking harder about redundancy

Grayscale’s amended Hyperliquid ETF proposal names Anchorage Digital Bank as custodian in place of Coinbase. Anchorage brings a different regulatory and institutional profile to crypto custody. It's the first federally chartered crypto-native bank in the United States, and it's already been moving deeper into the institutional stack. Grayscale had previously tapped Anchorage as a secondary custodian for part of its Bitcoin and Ethereum trusts, while BlackRock added Anchorage in April 2025 to support its spot crypto ETFs.

That makes the Grayscale amendment look like part of a slow broadening in the custody field. The important point is that issuers now have stronger reasons to add alternatives into the mix as the category grows larger and the cost of concentration becomes easier to quantify. A market carrying more than $90 billion in spot Bitcoin ETF assets starts to look different when more than four-fifths of that exposure still depends on one custody provider in some form.

The biggest risks are in operations, reputation, and market-wide spillover.

ETF assets are segregated, custody agreements impose fiduciary duties, and the legal structure around these funds differs sharply from the exchange failures and balance-sheet collapses that shaped crypto’s earlier crises.

That architecture is important, but so is the fact that a dominant provider can still become a choke point if it faces outages, settlement disruption, licensing complications, or regulatory pressure. The larger Coinbase’s role becomes, the larger the consequences become for any event that interrupts its ability to perform that role across multiple issuers at once.

Markets mature by building backups, widening their vendor maps, and reducing the number of points where one institution’s disruption can spill across an entire category. Crypto ETFs have already done the first part of institutionalization by attracting demand and embedding themselves in mainstream portfolios.

The next part is about whether the system underneath those products can carry that growth without leaning so heavily on a single provider, even when that provider remains strong and increasingly well connected to regulators.

Hyperliquid is a newer and more politically sensitive product than a plain spot Bitcoin ETF, and its core perpetuals venue remains ring-fenced in the US.

That alone may have given Grayscale an extra reason to lean on a federally chartered custodian. Even if that turns out to be the narrow explanation, the choice still reveals something important: when issuers encounter a product with more regulatory edge, they may see value in bringing a different type of custodian into the structure. And once that habit enters the market, broader diversification becomes easier to imagine.

That is why this launch belongs in the bigger conversation around Coinbase, Anchorage, and the institutional path of Bitcoin ETFs. The category no longer needs to prove that investors want regulated crypto exposure. It needs to show that the infrastructure underneath that exposure can evolve beyond the first template that worked.

Wall Street’s relationship with crypto keeps moving through familiar stages. First came access, then came legitimacy, and the next stage is resilience. Grayscale’s switch to Anchorage doesn't settle that transition, but

it does make the direction easier to see. The ETF boom made Bitcoin legible to traditional finance. What comes next will determine how durable that wrapper looks at scale.

The post Grayscale moves away from Coinbase for new ETF product – Is Wall Street building a post-Coinbase custody map? appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Bitcoin is heading into a rare macro window where the first reaction may age fast.

The Federal Reserve is scheduled to conclude its April meeting on April 29, with the FOMC decision and press conference landing that afternoon. The next morning, the US Bureau of Economic Analysis is scheduled to release the first quarter GDP and March Personal Income and Outlays, the report that includes PCE inflation.

That gives traders a two-step test with almost no pause between the steps. First, they get the Fed's view on rates, growth, and inflation. Then they get fresh data that can support that view, complicate it, or force a quick rewrite.

For Bitcoin, this setup is much more important than a regular Fed preview.

Bitcoin traders watch the central bank for the same reason equity traders do: rates shape liquidity, liquidity shapes risk appetite, and risk appetite shapes how much investors are willing to pay for volatile assets. When easier policy looks closer, Bitcoin usually gets a better backdrop. When rates look higher for longer, the market starts charging more for risk.

Next week compresses that entire process into roughly 48 hours. The Fed will speak first, but the data will get the last word.

This is a sequence trade

A normal Fed week gives markets time to build a take, but this time the market gets a much shorter runway.

GDP tells traders how strong the economy looked in the first quarter. Strong growth can support the idea that the economy can handle tight policy. Weak growth can raise concerns that the Fed is staying restrictive into a slowdown.

PCE gives traders the inflation read the Fed watches most closely. Hotter PCE pushes the market toward a higher-for-longer rate path. Cooler PCE gives rate-cut expectations more room.

Bitcoin is exposed to both. Growth affects risk appetite, and inflation affects rate expectations. A strong economy with sticky inflation can tighten financial conditions. A soft economy with cooling inflation can make easier policy feel more plausible. A messy combination can create volatility because traders have fewer clean signals to price.

The danger for Bitcoin is being right on the Fed and wrong the next morning.

A dovish Fed followed by soft data is the easiest bullish mix. The central bank sounds open to easing, and the data gives it cover. A dovish Fed followed by hot data is the dangerous version. Traders hear patience on Wednesday, then get numbers on Thursday that make that patience hard to defend.

A cautious Fed followed by soft data creates confusion, and the market may start asking whether policymakers are moving too slowly. A cautious Fed followed by hot data is the clean higher-for-longer setup, and likely the hardest version for Bitcoin.

We’ve seen this sensitivity around prior FOMC windows, PCE releases, and inflation surprises. Next week puts those pressure points into one tight sequence.

The second reaction to PCE may decide the move

Bitcoin is a scarce digital asset with its own long-term thesis. But in short macro windows, it also trades like a high-beta expression of liquidity expectations.

It’s that second identity that will get tested next week.

If the Fed sounds comfortable and Thursday's data cooperates, traders can lean back into the idea that rate relief remains alive for later in the year. That would support bitcoin through the same channel that often supports growth stocks: lower expected rates, easier financial conditions, and a stronger appetite for risk.

If the Fed sounds calm and the data arrives hot, the market has to revise quickly. Rate-cut expectations move further out, and Bitcoin has to absorb that reset alongside the broader risk complex.

If the Fed sounds cautious and the data is weak, the reaction can get choppy. Traders may price more cuts while also worrying about slower growth. Bitcoin can benefit from the liquidity side of that trade, then struggle if risk appetite fades.

The bearish version is simple: cautious Fed, resilient growth, sticky PCE. That gives traders fewer reasons to expect near-term relief. It suggests the economy still has enough strength to keep inflation pressure alive, while the Fed has little reason to soften its stance.

The bullish version runs the other way: Fed language leaves room for cuts, GDP shows cooling demand, and PCE gives policymakers more confidence on inflation. We've already seen how cooler inflation data can support Bitcoin. A compressed version of that trade could move fast if the numbers line up.

Bitcoin is heading into a week where markets may price the Fed, sleep on it, and wake up to data that changes the meaning of the first move. That creates a 48-hour stress test of rates, growth, inflation, and the near-term case for risk.

The post Why this week could reprice Bitcoin in 48 Hours: Fed first, GDP and PCE right after appeared first on CryptoSlate.

The official DeFi United site shows over 69,550 ETH raised from 222 wallets across 1,623 transfers, all aimed at restoring rsETH backing, acting as DeFi's emergency recapitalization desk.

The effort is the closest thing the industry has built to a lender of last resort, assembled without a regulator, a central bank, or a mandate.

Aave's governance proposal puts the original rsETH shortfall at approximately 163,183 ETH.

Recoveries and freezes, which include 43,168 ETH from Kelp, 30,766 ETH frozen by the Arbitrum Security Council, up to 12,323 WETH from Aave liquidations, and 1,845 WETH from Compound, reduce the residual funding gap to about 75,081 ETH.

Related Reading

Crypto censorship resistance is questioned as major fight breaks out over who gets to freeze your digital dollars

Circle says freezes should follow lawful process. Tether is proving the appeal of fast intervention. After Drift and Rhea, stablecoin users may care more about stopping thieves than old crypto slogans.

Apr 17, 2026 · Gino Matos

DeFi United's current top line covers roughly 92.5% of that residual, leaving approximately 5,632 ETH. A broader tracker snapshot shows 100,200 ETH committed against a 116,500 ETH target when the Arbitrum frozen recovery path is included, putting total coverage at about 86%.

Both numbers carry the same caveat that the fund is close on paper, while most of the largest pieces are still pending governance votes, and several key contributions carry no disclosed amount.

How the hole got this large

KelpDAO's rsETH bridge ran a 1-of-1 configuration with LayerZero Labs as the sole verifier.

Galaxy's research found that the attacker exploited that setup to unlock 116,500 rsETH from Ethereum mainnet escrow, then used the stolen tokens as collateral across Aave, Compound, and Euler to borrow an estimated $236 million in WETH and wstETH.

Within 48 hours, DeFi's total value locked fell by roughly $13 billion. Aave alone shed about $8.45 billion in TVL, with WETH utilization hitting 100% as users rushed for the exits, simultaneously pushing USDT and USDC pools to full utilization.

LayerZero's own incident statement characterized the attack as RPC poisoning targeting infrastructure used by its decentralized validator network (DVN), stopping short of identifying a flaw in the LayerZero protocol itself.

The bridge route still depended on LayerZero Labs as the sole verifier, a configuration that concentrated trust in a single point. DeFi United lists LayerZero as “Confirmed, TBD.”

Because the entire incident ran through that bridge configuration, LayerZero's undisclosed contribution is one of the most consequential missing numbers in the recovery.

The coordination case

DeFi United assembled without a regulatory mandate, a central bank, or an order from anyone.

Before Aave's treasury proposal even entered governance, EtherFi, Lido, Mantle, Ethena, Ink, BGD Labs, Emilio Frangella, Ernesto, and Aave's founder Stani Kulechov had already assembled 14,570 ETH in pledges.

The fund's named contributors now include Mantle with 30,000 ETH pending vote, Aave DAO with 25,000 ETH pending vote, Kulechov personally committing 5,000 ETH, EtherFi at 5,000 ETH pending vote, Lido at 2,500 ETH pending vote, Golem Foundation at 1,000 ETH, Frangella at 500 ETH, and BGD Labs plus Ernesto at 350 ETH.

LayerZero, Ethena, Ink Foundation, and Frax Finance are confirmed, with amounts still undisclosed.

Aave's ARFC frames its participation under a “No Ghost Left Behind” posture, citing the DAO's prior decision to cover CRV-related bad debt directly, shielding suppliers from socialized losses.

That framing of voluntary, cross-protocol, and publicly visible is the strongest argument the industry can make for its own self-governance capacity.

The centralization embedded in the rescue

Aave's proposal authorizes Aave Labs to negotiate loans, settlements, indemnities, under-collateralized lending arrangements, warrants, token sales, and deployment of future protocol revenue.

The Mantle contribution is structured as a credit facility, with later donations earmarked to repay Mantle, leaving Aave's treasury ask unchanged.

Aave's math treats the Arbitrum Security Council's 30,766 ETH as a recoverable stream that requires further governance action to release and sits outside DeFi United's control, as the site explicitly acknowledges. The same applies to KelpDAO reopening withdrawals and LayerZero reopening the bridge.

The Arbitrum intervention cuts to the center of the decentralization contradiction. A security council with emergency powers froze tens of thousands of ETH linked to the exploit and moved it into a controlled intermediary wallet.

That action helped contain the damage, and also required someone with the power to say no and to use it unilaterally in a crisis. In a system built around credible neutrality, the freeze both saved and complicated the narrative.

What governance is actually debating

Aave's forum has already produced the backlash the situation invites. One commenter argues the recovery math is sound but says the DAO should not move to a Snapshot vote until governance adopts a collateral-risk framework that would have blocked rsETH from being listed at those parameters.

Paying the bill without fixing the kitchen solves the immediate crisis and creates conditions for the next one.

Another voice in the same thread argues that the parties most responsible for the configuration are contributing proportionally less than the burden they impose on Aave.

Lido's parallel forum debate sharpens the question of precedent. Its proposal authorizes up to 2,500 stETH but only as part of a fully funded recovery package, with Lido noting that the alternative could expose its EarnETH vault to roughly 9,000 ETH in losses.

Delegates are openly debating if the contribution is a donation, if it should carry better terms, and if participation sets a precedent for covering losses originating outside Lido's own protocol.

Two paths forward

In the bull case, the pending governance votes clear quickly, Kelp and bridge-side mechanics reopen in an orderly sequence, Arbitrum governance releases the frozen ETH, and the remaining TBD participants close the gap.

The recovery becomes a working model for cross-protocol crisis coordination, proof that DeFi can self-insure without external backstops, and that the governance layer functions even when composability fails at the infrastructure level.

The backlash about collateral risk reform gets folded into the next governance cycle, leaving the rescue intact.

In the bear case, one or more of the largest pending votes or external recovery steps slip. The Arbitrum freeze stays politically contested.

LayerZero's contribution, once disclosed, falls short of what the bridge's structural role in the incident warrants. Aave's balance sheet absorbs more of the residual for longer than the proposal anticipates, and the governance backlash hardens around who decided that a 1-of-1 bridge-backed token qualified as acceptable collateral at those parameters.

DeFi United still exists in this version, but it becomes the case study in how the industry coordinates around downside on terms set by the largest actors.

DeFi United may close the gap, restore rsETH backing, and demonstrate that decentralized protocols can absorb a nine-figure exploit without systemic collapse. The recovery effort so far gives genuine grounds for that conclusion.

The rescue's architecture of pending votes, a private credit facility, a security council's freeze button, undisclosed negotiations, and legal instruments authorized by a DAO also describes a financial system that runs on credible neutrality until the losses are large enough, and then runs on whoever has the keys.

The post DeFi lost $13B this month as the KelpDAO rescue shows both the best and worst of DeFi appeared first on CryptoSlate.

A crypto founder had his laptop compromised when he joined what appeared to be a Microsoft Teams call with Pierre Kaklamanos, a Cardano Foundation contact he had spoken with before.

When “Pierre” reached out about Atrium and sent a Teams invite, nothing looked out of place. On the call, the face and voice matched what he remembered, and two other apparent foundation members were present.

When the call lagged and dropped him, a prompt told him his Teams software was out of date and needed reinstalling through Terminal. He ran the command, then shut the laptop off because the battery was dying, which limited the damage in retrospect.

He describes himself as “quite technically savvy,” which is part of the point that the attack worked because the context felt legitimate.

Social engineers have always relied on familiarity, and executing that at scale once required either a compromised account or weeks of text-based rapport-building.

The video call was the authentication layer, the thing victims learned to trust, and replicating it is now within reach.

Fake update

Microsoft documented campaigns in February and March 2026 in which malicious files masqueraded as workplace apps, such as msteams.exe and zoomworkspace.clientsetup.exe, with phishing lures that mimicked legitimate Teams and Zoom meeting workflows.

In a separate warning, Microsoft described “ClickFix”-style prompts targeting macOS users, instructing them to paste commands into Terminal and targeting browser passwords, crypto wallets, cloud credentials, and developer keys.

The fake Teams update fits both patterns simultaneously.

Google Cloud's Mandiant unit described a crypto-focused intrusion built on the same structure. A compromised Telegram account, a spoofed Zoom meeting, what witnesses described as a deepfake-style executive video, and troubleshooting commands that launched the infection.

Mandiant said it could not independently verify which AI model, if any, generated the video, but confirmed the group used fake meetings and AI tools during social engineering.

On Apr. 24, the real Pierre Kaklamanos posted on X saying his Telegram had been hacked and that someone was impersonating him, along with “a few other people in the industry this week.”

He told followers to avoid clicking links or booking meetings through the account and to verify contact through LinkedIn direct messages.

By then, the founder had already messaged the account suggesting they switch to Google Meet. Whoever controlled Pierre's Telegram account replied that he had gotten busy and asked to reschedule, with the attacker still managing the persona once the call ended.

That exchange turns the incident from an isolated embarrassment into a live campaign signal that the method is active, the account compromise is the entry point, and the relationship history is the weapon.

Why generative media changes the threat surface

The founder said he now believes the call may have involved AI-generated or manipulated video. Forensic confirmation of the tools is lacking, and the OpenAI connection here is governed by its own safety documentation.

OpenAI launched its 4o image generation model on Mar. 25, describing it as capable of “precise, accurate, photorealistic outputs,” and released the ChatGPT Images 2.0 System Card on Apr. 21.

The firm stated that the model's “heightened realism” could, absent safeguards, enable more convincing deepfakes of real people, places, or events. One of the leading AI labs has now put on record that its own image model raises the ceiling on what a convincing fake can look like.

The World Economic Forum said in January 2026 that generative AI lowers the barrier to phishing while raising its credibility, through realistic deepfake audio and video that can evade both detection systems and human scrutiny.

INTERPOL declared financial fraud one of the world's most severe and rapidly evolving transnational crimes in March 2026, identifying deepfake videos, audio, and chatbots as tools that make impersonation of trusted people easier to carry out at scale.

Chainalysis estimated that crypto scams and fraud reached $17 billion in 2025, with impersonation scams up 1,400% year over year and AI-enabled scams generating 4.5 times as much revenue as traditional methods.

Crypto attracts this class of attack because it combines high-value targets, fast settlement rails, and an informal communications culture in which Telegram introductions and ad hoc video calls between founders are routine.

Mandiant documented that the group behind the crypto Zoom intrusion targeted software firms, developers, venture firms, and executives across payments, brokerage, staking, and wallet infrastructure.

Mandiant noted that the victim's data could be used to seed future social engineering, with each compromise generating material for the next.

Two paths forward

Zoom announced on Apr. 17 a partnership to add real-time human verification to meetings, a “Verified Human” badge, and a “Deep Face Waiting Room,” treating participant authenticity as a product problem.

Gartner predicts that by 2027, 50% of enterprises will invest in disinformation-security products or TrustOps strategies, up from less than 5% today.

In the bull case, that buildout reaches critical mass quickly enough that attackers must defeat multiple independent trust layers to complete a conversion, and the economics of impersonation campaigns deteriorate.

In the bear case, the timeline compresses before defenses do. Gartner warned that AI agents may halve the time required to exploit account takeovers by 2027, narrowing the window for human hesitation or security team intervention.

Deloitte estimated that generative AI-enabled fraud losses in the US alone could climb from roughly $12 billion in 2023 to $40 billion by 2027.

Every public-facing crypto executive becomes both a target and a lure asset, a source of voice recordings, video clips, and relationship graphs that attackers can deploy against the next victim.

Zoom is building liveness checks into meetings, Microsoft is documenting attack chains that impersonate its own software, and the FBI has warned that malicious actors are already using AI-generated voice and text to impersonate trusted contacts, advising against assuming a message is authentic because it appears to come from a known person.

Verification now requires independent rails, such as a known phone number, a hardware key, a shared passphrase established before any meeting, or a pre-agreed internal channel that no attacker has accessed.

The post OpenAI’s new image model shows why crypto scams are about to get much worse appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Tangem is heating up the self-custody market this spring with the launch of its exclusive Prize Draw Campaign, running from May 5 to June 6, 2026. This campaign offers users a chance to win a share of over 100 prizes, including a grand prize of $5,000 in BTC.

How to Participate in the Tangem Draw

To participate in the Tangem Prize Draw, users simply need to purchase a Tangem wallet directly through our exclusive promo link here during the promotion period. Participation is entirely automatic; every wallet item purchased counts as one entry—for example, a 3-pack order equals three tickets—with no additional sign-up required.

Prize Pool Breakdown: What Can You Win?

The campaign features a robust selection of 104 individual prizes. Beyond the headline Bitcoin rewards, Tangem is giving away the latest tech and specialized hardware security gear.

Winners will be announced on July 5, 2026, following a 30-day "cooldown" period used to verify that only non-refunded purchases are eligible. The announcement will take place on the Tangem blog and via a live stream on the Tangem Discord.

Bonus Offer: Double Your Entries and Save 50%

Running concurrently with the prize draw is a significant discount on high-capacity storage. Users who purchase a Family Pack (two 3-card sets) starting with a Black or Stealth wallet can receive the second set at 50% off by using our official discount link.

Notably, both sets in the Family Pack count as separate entries for the prize draw, effectively doubling your chances to win while securing your assets at a lower cost. Eligible collections for the discounted second set include popular designs like Bitcoin, White Stealth, and the "Hold Your Freedom" series.

Why Hardware Security Matters in 2026

In an era where Bitcoin prices are pushing toward six-figure milestones, the security of your private keys is paramount. Modern hardware wallets have evolved to address sophisticated 2026 threats like AI-enabled phishing and "pig butchering" scams.

Tangem's unique approach utilizes EAL6+ certified secure element chips within a card-shaped form factor. Unlike traditional devices, Tangem is battery-free and requires no cables; users simply tap the card to their smartphone to sign transactions. This eliminates the vulnerability of a written seed phrase, as the keys are generated and stored exclusively on the card's chip.

Safety and Anti-Scam Precautions

Tangem has issued a strict warning regarding security during this campaign. Official winners will only be contacted via email from the @tangem.com domain.

• No Payment Required: Tangem will never ask for payment to claim a prize.
• Privacy First: Official staff will never ask for your private keys or seed phrases.
• Verify Sources: If you receive messages from other addresses claiming you have won, it is a scam.

While Bitcoin ($BTC) remains in a choppy consolidation range near $77,500, a handful of high-beta assets have posted double-digit gains, diverging significantly from the broader index.

Historically, vertical moves of this magnitude—often exceeding 30% in seven days—invite a period of rebalancing. For traders, this week is less about chasing the "pump" and more about identifying where the floor sits. Here are 3 tokens that soared high and need to be on every trader's radar.

1. Humanity Protocol (H): The "Vesting Choice" Volatility

Humanity Protocol (H) has been the week's standout performer, surging over 45% following a massive spike in on-chain whale activity. Large-scale transactions for $H$ recently hit a five-month high, signaling that institutional players are positioning themselves within its "Proof of Humanity" ecosystem.

However, a fundamental headwind is peaking right now. The Humanity Foundation recently presented early backers with a difficult choice: extend their vesting schedules until late 2026 or accept a 70% haircut for immediate liquidity by April 26. This creates a complex supply dynamic for the remainder of this week.

• The Bull Case: If whales continue to defend the current breakout support at $0.12, a test of the $0.18 resistance level is likely.
• The Bear Case: A significant "cliff" token unlock is approaching on June 25 for those who chose the haircut. In the immediate term, the market is pricing in this "death spiral" risk. If $H$ fails to hold $0.14, expect a retracement toward the $0.11 EMA.

2. Stable (STABLE): Navigating Regulatory Momentum

Stable (STABLE) has climbed over 30% this week, reaching a market capitalization of approximately $742 million. This rally is fueled by the evolving regulatory landscape in the United States, specifically following the GENIUS Act guidelines and new institutional reserve portfolios from major banks.

Unlike purely speculative tokens, STABLE is positioning itself as a compliance-first asset. However, after such a rapid ascent, the token is showing signs of exhaustion.

• Key Levels: STABLE is currently hovering near a psychological resistance point of $0.035. A failure to break through this week could see profit-taking dominate the mid-week sessions, leading to a healthy retracement toward $0.028.
• Watch for: New Treasury Department rules regarding stablecoin AML frameworks, which could either solidify this rally or trigger a "sell the news" event.

3. MemeCore (M): High Gains vs. Thin Liquidity

The third asset on our radar, MemeCore (M), has been the "moonshot" story of the month, gaining nearly 30% this week and pushing its valuation into the multi-billion dollar range. While the price of $M is sitting near its local highs of $4.38, technical analysts are sounding the alarm.

The project recently executed a hardfork that reduced gas fees by 99%, attracting a wave of retail interest. However, on-chain scrutiny highlights a potential risk: a discrepancy between the high market cap and relatively thin liquidity in decentralized exchange (DEX) pools.

• Risk Factor: The volume-to-market cap ratio remains low. In thin markets like MemeCore's, even small sell orders can have an outsized impact on the price.
• Technical Outlook: Watch for a "double top" pattern near $4.65. If $M fails to sustain volume above its 24-hour average of $25M, a sharp correction toward the $3.89 support level is probable.

Summary: 3 Cryptocurrencies to Watch This Week

Ethereum ($ETH) has spent much of 2026 consolidating, leading many investors to ask the golden question: will Ethereum break its previous all-time high (ATH) of $4,900? A series of technical "ceilings" and shifting macroeconomic factors are currently dictating its pace toward a new record.

Can Ethereum Break its $4,900 ATH?

While a break above $4,900 is technically possible in 2026, it remains an optimistic target rather than a guaranteed outcome for the first half of the year. Analysts from major institutions like Standard Chartered and JPMorgan have set year-end targets ranging from $5,440 to as high as $10,000, contingent on a successful breakout from the current $2,300–$2,800 accumulation zone. However, as of April 26, 2026, ETH is trading near $2,333, indicating that the bulls still have significant work to do.

What Defines an "ATH Breakout"?

In technical analysis, an All-Time High (ATH) breakout occurs when an asset surpasses its highest ever recorded price—in Ethereum's case, approximately $4,878 (often rounded to $4,900). This event is significant because it enters a "price discovery" phase where no historical sell-side resistance exists. For ETH, the $4,900 mark isn't just a number; it is the final psychological barrier that separates the current range-bound market from a parabolic bull run.

Ethereum Price Prediction fr 2026

The journey to $4,900 is currently blocked by several key technical layers.

• The $2,750 Pivot: This is the immediate "line in the sand." Ethereum must reclaim this level to flip the medium-term trend from neutral to bullish.
• The $3,300 Resistance: A major supply zone. Historically, significant profit-taking occurs here, which could lead to temporary corrections back to $2,000.
• The Golden Cross: Traders are watching for the convergence of the 50-day and 200-day Moving Averages. A definitive "Golden Cross" in mid-2026 could be the catalyst for the final push toward the $4,900 ceiling.

Major Institutional Forecasts for 2026

The Role of External Catalysts

While internal technicals are vital, Ethereum's trajectory is heavily influenced by Bitcoin ($BTC). Bitcoin is currently trading near $78,000, maintaining high dominance. For Ethereum to lead the market toward its ATH, we typically look for a "rotation" of capital where investors move profits from BTC into ETH. Furthermore, news regarding US-Iran geopolitical de-escalation and energy price stability—often reported by Reuters—plays a silent but massive role in risk-on sentiment for 2026.

Bitcoin price successfully reclaimed the $78,000 level within the last 24 hours. While broader sentiment remains cautious, major tokens suggest a robust underlying demand even in the face of international diplomatic friction.

Crypto News Today

As of April 26, 2026, the market is showing a clear "flight to quality."

• Bitcoin (BTC): Trading at $78,000, up from the mid-$77k range seen earlier.
• Ethereum (ETH): Stabilizing at $2,330, tracking Bitcoin's recovery closely.
• Solana (SOL): Holding firm at $86, despite being one of the more volatile assets in recent weeks.

Geopolitical Impact on Digital Assets

In the context of modern finance, "geopolitical impact" refers to how international conflicts and diplomatic negotiations influence investor behavior. While Bitcoin was once considered purely a risk-on asset, it is increasingly behaving like a neutral reserve. As noted by analysts, Bitcoin has managed to hold stability even as other cryptocurrencies face a "phase of indecision" caused by global uncertainty.

US-Iran Tensions and the $344 Million Seizure

The most significant driver of the crypto news today is the escalating financial pressure from the Trump administration on Tehran. In a major move, the U.S. Treasury recently froze approximately $344 million in cryptocurrency allegedly linked to Iranian financial lifelines.

Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent confirmed that the agency is targeting multiple wallets to cut off financial avenues used to bypass international sanctions. This news has created a dual-effect:

• Short-term Fear: Initial concerns over regulatory crackdowns on "unhosted" wallets.
• Long-term Stability: A market realization that Bitcoin remains a transparent and trackable ledger, which may actually invite further institutional adoption under clear enforcement.

Crypto Analysis: Resistance and Support Levels

Despite the geopolitical stalemate, Bitcoin's technical structure remains intact. The RSI (Relative Strength Index) is currently hovering slightly above 50, indicating that bullish momentum has not fully disappeared.

• $BTC Key Resistance: The $84,000 zone remains the most relevant level for a major bullish breakout.
• $BTC Immediate Support: $76,000 is the near-term barrier; staying above this level is crucial for maintaining the current recovery.

World News Integration: The "Stalemate Premium"

Traditional markets are currently pricing in a "stalemate premium" as the US and Iran remain at an impasse. While oil prices and the Nasdaq have seen fluctuations, $Bitcoin has capitalized on its status as a "borderless" asset. The cancellation of high-profile diplomatic trips has not triggered the massive sell-off many feared, largely because institutional Bitcoin ETFs continue to see consistent, albeit smaller, inflows.

Crypto News Today April 26, 2026 Prices

MemeCore ($M) has surged into the spotlight, but for all the wrong reasons. While the token’s price action on the daily charts looks like a dream for bulls, a series of onchain investigations have pulled back the curtain on a troubling reality: extreme supply concentration.

Recent reports suggest that over 90% of MemeCore’s supply is held by a tight cluster of insider wallets, creating what experts call a "ghost market cap." This structure mimics the architectural flaws seen in RaveDAO (RAVE), which recently suffered a catastrophic 95% wipeout.

What is a "Ghost Market Cap"?

The term "ghost market cap" refers to a project with a multi-billion dollar valuation on paper, but with very little actual liquidity or "free float" (tokens available for the public to trade).

• Valuation: MemeCore currently boasts a market cap north of $5.5 billion.
• The Discrepancy: Despite this massive valuation, its 24-hour trading volume often struggles to stay above $30 million.
• The Risk: When insiders control the vast majority of tokens, they can manipulate the price with relatively small amounts of capital. This allows for artificial "short squeezes" that trap retail traders before the eventual exit.

Will M Price Crash like RaveDAO (RAVE)?

The warning signs for MemeCore are nearly identical to those seen in the RaveDAO (RAVE) collapse. RAVE was touted as a "Live-to-Earn" revolution, surging from $0.25 to nearly $28 in April 2026. However, onchain sleuth ZachXBT revealed that insiders controlled 95% of the supply.

Once the "pump" was exhausted, a single multisig wallet moved millions of tokens to exchanges, causing a liquidity vacuum. RAVE plummeted from its peak to sub-$1 levels in less than 48 hours, wiping out $6 billion in market value. MemeCore’s current structure suggests it is walking the same tightrope.

MemeCore Price Analysis: Is the Rally Sustainable?

Based on the current M/USD price data, the token is showing classic signs of a "low-float" pump.

• Parabolic Growth: Since early March 2026, M has climbed from $1.50 to its current levels around $4.60.
• RSI Divergence: The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is currently sitting at 81.01, deep in overbought territory. Historically, an RSI this high without significant volume growth is a precursor to a "blow-off top."
• Support Levels: The yellow lines on the chart indicate critical psychological supports at $3.00 and $2.00. A break below $3.00 could trigger a cascade of liquidations similar to the RAVE event.

Should you Sell MemeCore TODAY?

If you are holding or considering M, these are the "red flag" signals to monitor:

1. Wallet Movement: Sudden transfers from top-100 wallets to exchange deposit addresses.
2. Liquidity Depth: If the "buy-side" orders on order books begin to thin out while the price stays high, a "liquidity rug" may be incoming.

France has recorded 135 crypto-linked incidents since 2023, amid a nationwide surge in so-called “wrench attacks."

The USDPT stablecoin launching next month will serve as an alternative to SWIFT for agent settlements rather than consumer transactions.

Coachella is experimenting with AI-built artist tools, immersive digital worlds, and 3D performance archives that could shape future fan experiences.

A new GitHub plugin makes your coding agent emit escalating human moans as it suffers through your spaghetti code.

Researchers found that xAI's Grok was the riskiest AI model tested, often validating delusions and offering dangerous advice.

Ripple’s David Schwartz has issued warning to the crypto community about an emerging phishing scam involving Robinhood.

Bitcoin is finally regaining momentum on the market, but the rally might be short-lived.

Ripple inks partnership with South Korea's first pure online bank, expanding its footprint in the Asia region.

Shiba Inu's exchange netflows are calming down which can create a possibility of a proper market recovery.

Adam Back debunks the "first-ever" quantum attack on crypto, explaining why the 1 BTC prize from Project Eleven was awarded for what is no more than statistical guessing.

Key Highlights

• X-Energy secured $1 billion through its Nasdaq public offering, finishing 27% higher than its offering price on day one
• Major investors include Amazon and Ken Griffin, founder of Citadel
• Shares gained an additional ~16% during Monday’s premarket session
• The nuclear energy firm achieved a valuation of $11.6 billion by the end of Friday’s session
• Despite generating $109.3 million in 2025 revenue, X-Energy recorded a $390 million net loss

X-Energy (XE), a nuclear power provider with financial backing from Amazon (AMZN), delivered an impressive first day on the Nasdaq Friday, finishing 27% higher than its offering price after securing $1 billion through its initial public offering.

X-Energy, Inc. Class A Common Stock, XE

Momentum carried into the next week, with shares climbing approximately 16% during Monday’s premarket hours. This represents a substantial gain above the IPO price within just two trading sessions.

The nuclear energy firm set its IPO pricing to generate $1 billion in capital, attracting investments from Amazon alongside Ken Griffin, who established Citadel. By Friday’s market close, X-Energy’s valuation stood at $11.6 billion.

X-Energy deploys small modular nuclear reactors to deliver electricity to manufacturing operations and data centers. Its customer base features Dow, Inc. and Amazon among others.

The firm enters a expanding roster of nuclear and energy companies capitalizing on AI infrastructure requirements. Similar players in this sector include Oklo (OKLO) and Fermi (FRMI), though both experienced declines Monday, dropping 7.15% and 9.04% respectively.

Amazon’s investment stems from its requirement for dependable, carbon-neutral power to operate AWS data centers. With AI computing demands escalating within these facilities, securing adequate power sources has evolved into a critical operational priority.

Financial Performance

X-Energy generated $109.3 million in revenue during 2025. However, the company incurred a $390 million net loss over the same period, highlighting the challenges of developing nuclear reactor infrastructure in its formative stages.

The firm’s small modular reactor platform remains in expansion mode, with profitability prospects largely dependent on winning and fulfilling extended energy supply agreements with substantial clients such as Amazon.

Competitive Landscape With Strong Demand

The artificial intelligence surge has driven energy consumption forecasts significantly upward, positioning nuclear power as a prominent option due to its consistent output and minimal carbon emissions.

X-Energy’s public debut introduces another tradable option in this space, distinguished by its established commercial partnership with a leading global cloud computing provider.

While Amazon’s support lends legitimacy, it simultaneously introduces questions regarding dependency risks should the Amazon relationship constitute a disproportionate share of future earnings.

The stock’s robust initial performance indicates continued investor enthusiasm for the nuclear-AI energy narrative, despite some competitors retreating Monday.

During Monday’s premarket session, XE traded roughly 16% higher, extending Friday’s impressive 27% opening day performance.

The post X-Energy (XE) Stock Jumps 27% in Nasdaq Debut Fueled by Amazon Partnership appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Highlights

• Micron (MU) shares have surged over 70% in the current year while maintaining a modest 8.4x forward P/E ratio
• The company’s entire 2026 high-bandwidth memory inventory has been secured through long-term customer agreements
• HBM4 manufacturing commenced in April 2026, delivering 2.8TB/s bandwidth and 20% enhanced energy efficiency versus HBM3E
• The memory chipmaker is advocating for stricter U.S. restrictions on semiconductor equipment exports to China
• Hard drive leader Seagate (STX) reports complete 2026 allocation for its data center nearline storage products

Micron Technology (MU) has experienced remarkable momentum throughout the past twelve months, delivering year-to-date gains exceeding 70%. Even after this substantial rally, shares continue trading at an attractive 8.4x forward earnings multiple that market analysts view as compelling.

Micron Technology, Inc., MU

The primary catalyst behind this performance has been the company’s high-bandwidth memory portfolio. HBM technology utilizes vertical chip stacking architecture instead of traditional horizontal layouts, enabling dramatically superior data transfer rates compared to conventional DRAM solutions. Micron’s HBM3E variant achieves 1.2TB/s data movement while consuming 30% less energy than competing offerings.

Nvidia selected Micron as a key HBM provider for its Blackwell graphics processing unit series. This partnership has generated demand levels that far exceed current production capabilities. Micron’s complete 2026 HBM manufacturing capacity has been committed through extended customer contracts.

Volume manufacturing of Micron’s advanced HBM4 technology started in April 2026. The new generation delivers bandwidth exceeding 2.8TB/s while boosting energy efficiency by over 20% compared to HBM3E. Market pricing for this cutting-edge product has climbed more than 50%.

Policy Advocacy Creates Competitive Implications

Micron has been engaging with U.S. policymakers to strengthen export restrictions on sophisticated semiconductor manufacturing equipment destined for China. Company leadership frames these efforts around national security concerns. The initiative also carries strategic business implications.

Limiting equipment exports to Chinese semiconductor manufacturers would constrain capacity expansion for competitors including Samsung, SK Hynix, and Chinese domestic DRAM producers. This scenario would reinforce Micron’s established position in artificial intelligence memory markets. Conversely, enhanced restrictions might reduce Micron’s market access within China and potentially trigger retaliatory measures.

Market observers have identified elevated non-cash earnings components and recent insider stock sales as factors deserving continued scrutiny alongside regulatory developments.

Seagate Benefits from Parallel Trends

Seagate Technology (STX) is capitalizing on the identical AI infrastructure expansion cycle. As the global leader in hard disk drive manufacturing, Seagate addresses distinct storage requirements. Approximately 90% of AI-created data ultimately resides on HDD systems, which deliver per-terabyte costs up to six times lower than solid-state alternatives.

Seagate’s heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) technology powers its Mozaic product line, achieving storage density exceeding 4TB per platter — an industry-leading specification. This capability enables data center operators to more than double storage capacity within existing physical infrastructure.

Seagate’s nearline drive portfolio, consisting of high-density units deployed in data centers, has reached full allocation through 2026.

Both organizations count hyperscale cloud providers — including Microsoft, Google, and Amazon — among their principal customers. Capital spending commitments from these technology giants represent a critical variable for future performance. Any deceleration in hyperscaler infrastructure investment could rapidly alter demand dynamics for Micron and Seagate.

Micron launched volume HBM4 production in April 2026, with pricing elevated over 50% compared to previous technology generations.

The post Micron (MU) and Seagate (STX) Stocks Rally as AI Infrastructure Fuels Memory Chip Shortage appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Highlights

• NTLA shares climbed 25% ahead of data release before retreating 3% post-announcement
• HAELO Phase 3 study achieved primary endpoint alongside all significant secondary measures
• Single lonvo-z infusion demonstrated 87% reduction in hereditary angioedema episodes versus control group
• Rolling biologics license application to FDA now in progress
• Company anticipates U.S. commercial availability during early 2027 pending regulatory approval

Intellia Therapeutics experienced dramatic share price volatility Monday. The stock rallied 25% as traders positioned ahead of crucial Phase 3 results, only to surrender those advances and finish the session down 3% following the actual announcement.

Intellia Therapeutics, Inc., NTLA

The clinical findings themselves proved impressive. The HAELO study evaluating lonvoguran ziclumeran — abbreviated as lonvo-z — successfully achieved both its primary objective and all crucial secondary measures.

Participants receiving the experimental therapy experienced an 87% decline in hereditary angioedema episodes relative to those on placebo. Monthly attack frequency averaged 0.26 among treated patients compared with 2.10 in the control cohort.

The study encompassed 80 participants total. Fifty-two individuals were administered lonvo-z, while 28 received placebo treatment. The majority of treated patients remained attack-free without requiring additional ongoing prophylactic treatment during the six-month assessment period.

Based on data collected through February 10, every lonvo-z recipient remained free from long-term preventive therapy requirements. This represents a promising outcome for a single-administration treatment approach.

The safety data also proved encouraging. The predominant adverse reactions included infusion-related symptoms, headaches, and tiredness. Every documented adverse event fell into mild or moderate categories — zero serious adverse events occurred among lonvo-z recipients.

Regulatory Path Forward

Intellia has initiated a rolling biologics license application submission to the FDA. Should regulators grant approval, the organization projects a United States market introduction during the first half of 2027.

The therapeutic approach functions by silencing the KLKB1 gene, permanently reducing kallikrein and bradykinin concentrations. Administration occurs in outpatient facilities via a single infusion.

This represents a historic achievement for gene editing technology. The HAELO study marks the inaugural worldwide Phase 3 data release for an in vivo gene editing treatment.

Additional findings from the clinical trial will be unveiled at the 2026 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Congress scheduled for June.

Financial Metrics for NTLA

Intellia maintains a market capitalization near $1.61 billion. The company’s GF Score registers at 70 out of 100, featuring a Growth Rank of 7/10 but a Profitability Rank of merely 1/10.

The price-to-sales ratio sits at 21.93, indicating market expectations of substantial future expansion rather than current profitability.

Insider trading activity has remained minimal. Zero purchases occurred during the previous three months, though two sales transactions totaling 1,818 shares were documented.

The organization maintains strategic partnerships with Regeneron and Novartis supporting its expanded pipeline, which encompasses treatments for ATTR amyloidosis and sickle cell disease.

Supplementary HAELO clinical findings are scheduled for presentation at the EAACI Congress in June 2026.

The post Intellia (NTLA) Shares Drop Despite Breakthrough Phase 3 Gene Editing Success appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Takeaways

• Shares of Qualcomm climbed more than 11% during premarket hours Monday following partnership news with OpenAI
• Supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo reveals OpenAI is collaborating with Qualcomm and MediaTek on smartphone chip development
• Luxshare has been selected as the sole system co-design and assembly partner for the project
• The AI-driven smartphone is slated for mass production beginning in 2028
• Final specifications and supplier selection are anticipated by late 2026 or the first quarter of 2027

Shares of Qualcomm experienced a dramatic surge exceeding 11% during Monday’s premarket session following a report from analyst Ming-Chi Kuo indicating that OpenAI has entered into a collaboration with Qualcomm and MediaTek for the development of processors designed for an AI-centric smartphone.

QUALCOMM Incorporated, QCOM

Kuo, who serves as an analyst at TF International Securities and has built a reputation for reliable supply chain intelligence, shared his findings via X. According to his report, OpenAI has chosen Luxshare Precision Industry to serve as the sole partner handling system co-design and production duties.

The timeline calls for volume production to commence in 2028. Final product specifications and supplier partnerships are projected to be determined by the end of 2026 or during the opening quarter of 2027.

Kuo structured his analysis around a fundamental inquiry: “Why would OpenAI make a phone?” His conclusion centers on autonomy. “Only by fully controlling both the operating system and hardware can OpenAI deliver a comprehensive AI agent service,” he explained.

He further noted that OpenAI’s core advantages — including its established consumer brand recognition, extensive user data, and advanced AI models — complement the existing sophisticated smartphone hardware supply infrastructure.

Implications for Qualcomm’s Business

From a commercial perspective, Kuo indicated that OpenAI might integrate subscription services directly with hardware sales and establish a fresh AI agent ecosystem designed for developer engagement.

Both Qualcomm and MediaTek are identified as processor co-development collaborators. Kuo emphasized that both chipmakers stand to gain from sustained replacement demand as device refresh cycles potentially accelerate.

He referenced MediaTek’s Google TPU Zebrafish chip as a comparative benchmark, observing that a single chip’s revenue generation roughly equals that of 30–40 AI agent smartphone processors. Given that the premium smartphone market ships approximately 300–400 million units annually, the resulting replacement cycle could emerge as a substantial growth catalyst.

Qualcomm shares were changing hands at $164.30 at 5:27 AM ET, representing a 10.38% premarket increase. According to subsequent reports, the gains peaked at 11.12%.

Luxshare’s Strategic Position

Kuo also examined the strategic significance of this agreement for Luxshare. He observed that surpassing Foxconn’s assembly dominance within Apple’s supplier network would prove challenging for the company.

“That makes this project especially meaningful for Luxshare,” Kuo stated. “With an early position in the supply chain, Luxshare could become a leading beneficiary in the next smartphone generation.”

Monday’s premarket momentum builds on robust performance from Friday’s trading session, during which Qualcomm climbed 11% as part of a widespread semiconductor sector rally.

Friday’s gains were partially attributed to impressive Q1 2026 financial results from Intel, which elevated investor confidence throughout the chip industry.

Representatives from OpenAI, Qualcomm, MediaTek, and Luxshare have not provided comments in response to inquiries.

The post Qualcomm (QCOM) Shares Soar 11% as OpenAI Smartphone Chip Partnership Emerges appeared first on Blockonomi.

Key Highlights

• Shares of POET Technologies climbed 108% over the prior week, reaching an 11-year peak of $15.50 during Friday trading
• A confirmed supply agreement with Marvell Technology for 800G optical engines sparked the rally
• CFO Thomas Mika indicated orders are projected to drive total 2025 bookings beyond $5 million, with shipments beginning in Q3
• Shares retraced to $15.10 (+28.84%) by Friday’s close as investors locked in profits
• CNBC’s Jim Cramer warned the stock is “trading like they’re already in mass production” despite early-stage operations

Shares of POET Technologies reached an intraday peak of $15.50 on Friday before settling at $15.10, marking a single-session advance of 28.84%. The weekly surge of 108% represents the stock’s strongest performance since August 2014.

POET Technologies Inc., POET

The primary driver behind the rally was official confirmation of a supply partnership with Marvell Technology. During a Stocktwits discussion, CFO Thomas Mika disclosed that POET had formally locked in orders from Marvell for its 800G optical engine products.

According to Mika, these orders are anticipated to elevate POET’s complete 2025 order portfolio above the $5 million threshold. Initial shipments are scheduled to commence during the third quarter of this year.

The firm is also awaiting responses from two additional prospective customers: Foxconn and Luxshare. “We expect to hear back from at least one of those,” Mika stated.

The company’s year-to-date performance now reflects a 138.55% increase, with its market capitalization currently standing at $2.31 billion.

Profit-Taking Pressure

The initial surge attracted momentum-driven traders, contributing to the stock’s intraday peak. However, once investors began securing profits, the upward momentum reversed dramatically.

A short squeeze phenomenon intensified both the ascent and subsequent decline. Elevated trading activity — with average daily volume exceeding 13.7 million shares — magnified price fluctuations in both directions.

Company leadership also addressed a short-seller report that emerged earlier in the week. Announcements regarding potential U.S. redomiciling temporarily boosted investor confidence, though excitement waned without additional developments.

Wall Street analysts have not significantly adjusted their price projections following Friday’s volatility. Technical indicators for the stock continue to signal a buy rating.

Cramer’s Cautionary Perspective

Jim Cramer, veteran hedge fund manager and Mad Money host, advised investors to exercise restraint regarding POET.

“Let’s not get ahead of ourselves with these recent announcements,” Cramer remarked. “POET’s got a joint development agreement. They’re not producing this stuff at scale.”

He continued: “The stock’s trading like they’re already in mass production, and that bothers me. Just look at the numbers. POET’s financials make it look more of a science project than a business.”

Cramer highlighted the substantial gap between laboratory-stage innovation and full-scale commercial manufacturing as the primary risk factor investors should carefully consider.

POET’s current confirmed status: orders from Marvell secured, Foxconn and Luxshare responses awaited, Q3 shipment timeline established.

The post POET Technologies (POET) Stock Soars Over 100% Following Marvell Partnership Announcement appeared first on Blockonomi.

Pi Network’s native token debuted at the start of 2025, rising to as high as $3 shortly after. Since then, though, it has undergone a deep pullback and currently trades about 94% below its all-time peak.

According to some market observers, a potential PI listing on Binance could spark a bull run. One analyst, though, claimed that such a scenario could only create a FOMO effect, rather than a meaningful shift in the token’s long-term valuation.

Beware of This Possible Effect

It was in February last year that Pi Network finally launched its Open Network, making PI publicly accessible and enabling exchanges to list it. The first to hop on the bandwagon were Bitget, OKX, and MEXC, while Binance was widely speculated to follow suit.

The company added more fuel to the rumors by holding a community vote asking its users whether they want to see the coin available on the platform. Over 85% of voters selected the “yes” option, yet Binance has not respected their wish.

Since then, a potential listing on the world’s biggest crypto exchange has been among the most discussed topics within the PI community, as most members believe such a development could act as a major catalyst for a price explosion.

X user PiCoin Fan recently argued that backing from the behemoth may indeed trigger a rally, but only in the form of FOMO (fear of missing out) as liquidity increases.

The psychological phenomenon happens when people rush to buy a certain token only because they are afraid others will profit without them. It usually creates a fast, emotional price spike that isn’t based on real fundamentals but hype. FOMO rallies are typically short-lived and followed by a sharp correction as excitement fades and early buyers take profits.

The analyst claimed that the long-term future of PI depends on building a healthy ecosystem where Pioneers can actually use the token to trade, make purchases, develop technology, and launch real dApps. Without that utility, any price growth driven by FOMO would be unsustainable.

A similar pattern played out last month when Kraken listed PI. The token climbed steadily amid rumors of the upcoming listing, reaching a multi-month high of $0.30 once the news became official. The excitement, though, was short-lived, and the price quickly dropped back below $0.20.

Waiting for This Development

Another factor that could drive a price revival in Pi Network’s native cryptocurrency is the project’s ecosystem’s advancement. Over the past several months, the Core Team has rolled out numerous updates, with the migration to protocol 22 coming next.

Some community members revealed last week that the mandatory upgrade must be completed by April 27, but Pi Network has not yet confirmed or commented anything on the matter.

The post Binance Listing May Boost Pi Network’s (PI) Price – But Don’t Expect a Game-Changer appeared first on CryptoPotato.

South Korea’s internet-only lender KBank is moving beyond early-stage trials with blockchain remittances through a new partnership with Ripple, as it shifts focus toward testing real-world integration and scalability of the technology.

The agreement was signed at the bank’s Seoul headquarters with KBank CEO Choi Woo-hyung and Ripple Asia-Pacific Managing Director Fiona Murray, among the attendees, alongside other officials.

Inside KBank’s Ripple Deal

Under the partnership, KBank plans to use Ripple’s global network and infrastructure to evaluate whether the technology can improve the speed, cost efficiency, and boost transparency of its existing cross-border transfer system. The companies also discussed broader cooperation, such as a digital wallet-based proof of concept to support KBank’s remittance model and potential expansion into digital asset-related services.

KBank said it is already running a two-phase proof of concept. The first phase tested transfers through a separate application, while the second phase involves assessing transaction stability by virtually linking customer accounts with internal systems. This phase will also include on-chain transfer tests with partners in the United Arab Emirates and Thailand, where KBank has signed memorandums of understanding for stablecoin-based transactions.

The bank added that it initially used an in-house wallet but will switch to Ripple’s SaaS-based digital wallet, Palisade, in the second phase to test a more scalable and compliant model. Separately, KBank remains the sole banking partner of South Korean crypto giant Upbit.

In an official statement, Fiona Murray, Managing Director, Asia Pacific at Ripple, stated,

“We are pleased to partner with KBank, which has helped set the standard for digital banking in Korea and continues to drive innovation.”

Ripple Expands South Korea Footprint

Ripple has been building out its presence in South Korea for some time now. Earlier this month, the company announced a strategic partnership with life insurance company Kyobo Life Insurance to develop institutional digital asset infrastructure in the country. The focus was on tokenized government bond transactions.

The collaboration will use Ripple Custody to provide secure storage, transfer, and settlement of tokenized assets within a regulated framework. Both firms will assess the technical and regulatory feasibility of tokenized Treasury settlements. The aim is to replace manual processes with on-chain execution. The initiative is designed to improve transparency and efficiency, while also enabling near real-time settlement and reducing counterparty risk. Ripple will additionally support stablecoin-based payments, which would enable continuous, 24/7 transactions.

The post Ripple Announces Another Major South Korean Deal appeared first on CryptoPotato.

After a quiet weekend despite some notable developments on the war front and a White House event evacuation, BTC’s volatility returned on Monday morning with a surge to almost $80,000 and an instant rejection.

Most altcoins followed suit, but red continues to dominate the 24-hour charts. HYPE and RAIN are among the few exceptions from the larger-cap alts.

BTC Stopped at $80K

After dipping below $75,000 at the beginning of the previous business week, BTC went on a run to touch $79,500 just hours later following the ceasefire extension by Iran and the US. The subsequent few trading days were a lot less eventful, as the cryptocurrency remained sideways between $77,000 and $78,500.

The weekend was just as calm, with the asset failing to make a major move. The only two exceptions were on Saturday morning and evening. At first, Trump canceled the US delegation’s trip to Pakistan to talk with the Iranians, and BTC slipped to $77,200.

However, it surged by a grand 12 hours later after reports emerged that Trump and all attendees at a special White House event were successfully evacuated following multiple gunshots fired by a 31-year-old California resident.

It wasn’t until Monday morning that BTC showed more volatility and jumped to $79,500 for the second time in the past week after reports that Iran has offered a deal to the US on how to end the war. However, bitcoin was rejected there and driven south to $77,500, where it found support and now sits close to $78,000 once again.

Its market cap is back at $1.560 trillion, while its dominance over the alts is still above 58% on CG.

PENGU Pumps

PENGU has stolen the show from the top 100 alts by market cap, surging by over 10% to near $0.01. JUP, HASH, and STABLE follow suit. The biggest gainers from the larger-cap alts are RAIN and HYPE, with price pumps of 4.5% and almost 3%, respectively.

In contrast, ETH, BNB, XRP, SOL, DOGE, ADA, and BCH have all posted minor losses, while XMR and ZEC are up by just over 1%.

The total crypto market cap remains at essentially the same spot as yesterday, at $2.680 trillion on CG.

The post Bitcoin (BTC) Halted at $80K, Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) Rockets by Double Digits: Market Watch appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Ripple’s cross-border token has been trading in a relatively tight range for about a month and even a smaller one for the past week or so.

However, popular analyst Ali Martinez believes this sluggishness is nearing an end as the asset prepares for a big price move.

Major Move Ahead for XRP?

Martinez’s analysis begins by acknowledging the triangle in which XRP has been consolidating for a while. Now, though, it has approached the apex, which means that “the probability of a large price move increases.”

However, he noted that triangles can be broken in either direction, which is why it’s still uncertain where XRP is headed. He advised his over 165,000 followers to keep an eye on the most key levels of support and resistance, located at $1.41 and $1.43, respectively.

It’s worth noting that the token tested and even briefly surpassed the upper boundary in the early Monday morning hours after reports claimed that Iran has proposed a new deal to end the war permanently to the US. However, it was rejected there and currently trades at the aforementioned support, which, if broken, could lead to a more profound decline, according to Martinez.

Fellow analyst CW outlined the recent rejection at $1.45, which they categorized as a “short-term decline,” but reassured that “there is no downward momentum.”

$XRP has saw a short-term decline, but there is no downward momentum. pic.twitter.com/AgHLQGCa8X

— CW (@CW8900) April 27, 2026

The Resistance That Needs to Fall

Ted Pillow, another very popular crypto analyst on X, also spoke about XRP’s sluggishness in the past few weeks, even when BTC climbed to a 12-week peak at almost $80,000. He believes this sideways action has “led both bulls and bears to get aggressive,” building a “decent chunk of short-side liquidity” above $1.50 and a similar liquidity cluster below $1.40.

CRYPTOWZRD, on the other hand, outlined the significance of the $1.445 resistance, which, as mentioned above, was tested earlier today but didn’t give in. They explained that if the Ripple bulls want to take the token higher, they need to reclaim that level, but for now, XRP’s position remains “indecisive.”

The post Ripple (XRP) Is Finally Ready for a Big Price Move: Analyst appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Doctor Profit, a well-known crypto trader, has said that Bitcoin (BTC) could climb into the $83,000 to $87,000 range before a sharp sell-off.

According to him, both bulls and bears are about to get wiped out in what he calls a “brutal event.”

A Bull Trap Playing Out to Plan

In his April 27 Sunday Report on X, Doctor Profit laid out his positioning in detail. After riding a long from $71,000, he’s now preparing to take profits and “add more shorts to the existing 120K short position” in the $83,000 to $85,000 range.

More than 90% of his short orders are clustered there, and he still sees the $79,000 to $84,000 zone as “a great area to accumulate shorts.” However, he said he’s “certain” the market pushes past $83,000 first, which is why he moved his entries higher.

The market watcher also flagged a resistance level sitting at $87,700, just 3% above the $85,000 area, and kept it on the table as a possible extension before the larger drop. His longer-term targets remain below $50,000, a call baked into his plan well before the current bounce started.

Doctor Profit’s read on the dynamic is blunt: influencers calling for shorts too early are providing the fuel to push prices higher, their positions getting liquidated on the way up while the real move gets set up.

“It will be a brutal event that is liquidating late bears and bulls! Both sides will lose unless you play it clever,” he wrote.

On the macro side, he flagged Wednesday’s FOMC as a likely non-event for rates but noted it’s Jerome Powell’s final press conference as Chair, with Kevin Warsh widely expected to take over, which would potentially put rate cuts on the table as early as June or September. However, Doctor Profit said he “highly doubts” that the dovish pivot materializes.

Sentiment Swings and Analysts Disagree

The setup Doctor Profit is describing fits a broader pattern playing out in real time. On-chain analytics firm Santiment tracked a swing from “extreme pessimism” at the start of last week to what it called “ultra FOMO mode” by Thursday, April 23, after Bitcoin recovered above $78,000. The firm flagged the crowd’s enthusiasm as a “clear caution signal” rather than a green light.

Analyst views beyond that are all over the place. Writing on April 26, Ali Martinez pointed to $96,000 as the next major resistance after BTC reclaimed the $73,700 MVRV band but warned a break below that level could send prices toward $55,000.

EGRAG CRYPTO’s worst-case target lands at the same level, although that analyst also mapped out a path to a new all-time high if Bitcoin reclaims $90,000.

On his part, Michaël van de Poppe believes a breakout above $84,000 to $87,000 would be enough for him to call the bear market over, with $100,000 as his most bullish scenario.

The post Bitcoin to Hit $83K-$87K Before Brutal Reversal, Says Trader appeared first on CryptoPotato.