Rising European gas prices highlight vulnerabilities in energy security, emphasizing the need for diversified supply sources amid geopolitical tensions.

The post European gas prices surge amid Iran conflict concerns appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

FTX's early sale of Anthropic shares highlights the potential for significant missed gains, underscoring the volatility and timing risks in investments.

The post FTX sold its Anthropic stake for $1.34 billion. It may now be worth over $30 billion appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The minting could boost Solana's DeFi liquidity, but actual impact depends on USDC circulation and broader market developments.

The post Circle mints 500 million USDC on Solana in past 24 hours appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Anthropic's reduced target may signal cautious investor sentiment, impacting foreign IPO strategies and market dynamics in Japan.

The post Anthropic cuts Japan share offering target to $3 billion appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

The market's reaction to the allegations highlights vulnerabilities in corporate governance and potential impacts on U.S. export policies.

The post Nvidia loses $430B in market value amid espionage allegations against CEO appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Heated Hot Tubs and 278 Washington Bitcoin Merchants : Now Accepting Bitcoin

Washington Bitcoin merchant list has 278 businesses, from coffee shops and salons to a hot tub maker that heats its tubs with bitcoin mining. The list spans 94 named cities, and Seattle leads the way with 46 listings. First up is a homegrown US manufacturing business from Washington that makes a super unique product.

Snorkel: A Hot Tub Maker That Heats With Bitcoin

Snorkel has been making hot tubs in the Pacific Northwest since 1979, and its wood-stove business dates to the late 1970s. What makes them special is their full cedar tubs, and the wood stove which is fully submerged into the water of the cedar hot tub and has the “snorkel” coming out of the water. This is very convenient for anyone who has no electrical hook up.

It started with a bet in 2025. Michael Diederich, the owner, began accepting bitcoin for hot tubs after a wager with his brother. Payments were slow to trickle in at first, but bitcoiners kept asking him to build a hot tub powered by bitcoin miners. He started building one, pairing the tub with miners that heat the water. Snorkel works with Dane Soja of Hashrate House on the build.

The prototype with two S19J Pro miners drawing about 8 kW, which it says heated a tub from cold to 104°F (40°C) in under four hours. The project won an innovation award at the Heat Punk Summit in Denver, and a Snorkel tub is on display in Denver. Diederich sees a future where every electric hot tub is heated by miners, because the mining income helps pay back the cost of energy that would otherwise be wasted as heat.

The Rose Gift House and Coffee, Renton

The Rose sits at 226 Main Ave S in downtown Renton, in the Old Renton Pub building. Owner Katie Newman opened it in October 2020 as a gift shop that happened to serve coffee, and the coffee side grew into the larger part of the business. The shop stocks locally roasted coffee, handpicked artisan goods, and grab-and-go food. It won Best Customer Service in the 2025 Best of Renton readers’ poll.

Overcast Coffee, Seattle

Overcast Coffee is on Capitol Hill, and it started as a walk-up counter at 312 15th Ave E beside Kaiser Permanente. Owner Jonathan Pak opened the first shop there in June 2020. A second location, at 1517 12th Ave inside the Metier bike complex, came later, and the company buys its coffee and ingredients from small, local Seattle businesses.

Washington Bitcoin Merchant Directory

These 278 businesses come from the BTC Map survey of Washington. BTC Map is community-maintained, please write BTC Map and our series vagabond@b.tc if you’d like to see an update.

Coffee, Bakery & Sweets (42)

• Overcast Coffee (312 15th Ave E), Seattle, WA
• Overcast Coffee (1517 12th Ave), Seattle, WA 98122
• Toasted. Bagels & Coffee, Bellevue, WA 98004
• Ashuri Baklava & Cafe, Bellingham, WA 98225
• Daytrip Cafe, Bellingham, WA 98225
• Aloha Cafe, Blaine, WA 98230
• Koa Table Café, Blaine, WA 98230
• Dg Coffee, Bothell, WA 98011
• Los Encantos World Bakery, Bremerton, WA 98312
• Rustic Heritage Bakery, Centralia, WA 98531
• Two Brewnettes LLC, Centralia, WA 98531
• Mint City Coffee Roasting, Chehalis, WA 98532
• Stout Coffee House, Chehalis, WA 98532
• Chickalatte beautiful coffee, Everett, WA 98203
• Make It Healthy, Federal Way, WA 98003
• Fortunato Chocolate, Issaquah, WA 98027
• Fortunato Chocolate, Issaquah, WA 98027
• Fumie’s Gold, Kirkland, WA 98033
• Hub Boba, Mercer Island, WA 98040
• Little Prague Bakery, Mukilteo, WA 98275
• Bar Francis, Olympia, WA 98501
• Glowies, Olympia, WA 98501
• Buckin Coffee, Omak, WA 98841
• Mountain Goat Coffee Roaster and Bakery, Packwood, WA 98361
• Pink Pony Cafe, Port Angeles, WA 98362
• The Rose Gifts & Coffee, Renton, WA 98057
• Bright Spot, Seattle, WA 98144
• Cannolo, Seattle, WA 98109
• Hellenika Cultured Creamery, Seattle, WA 98101
• Panino, Seattle, WA 98109
• Samra Cafe & Baklava, Seattle, WA 98118
• Theo’s Gyros, Seattle, WA 98103
• TOASTED. Bagels & Coffee, Seattle, WA 98109
• TOASTED. Bagels & Coffee, Seattle, WA 98105
• Toasted. Bagels & Coffee, Seattle, WA 98104
• Tres Lecheria, Seattle, WA 98103
• Yoka Tea, Seattle, WA 98122
• Half Baked & lil Fruity, Spokane, WA 99207
• Half Baked and a Lil Fruity, Spokane, WA 99207
• Happy Belly Eatery & Juice Bar, Tacoma, WA 98402
• Naomi Joe Coffee Roasters, Tacoma, WA 98402
• Rooster Brew Espresso, Woodland, WA 98674

Restaurants & Fast Food (44)

• La Pasta @ West Seattle Farmers Market, WA
• Skylar’s, Bay Center, WA 98527
• La Tia Angelina, Bellevue, WA 98007
• La Tía Angelina, Bellevue, WA 98007
• Grouchy’s Diner, Bellingham, WA 98225
• Luchadora Burger, Bellingham, WA 98225
• Super Duper Teriyaki, Bellingham, WA 98225
• Taqueria El Rinconcito Express, Bingen, WA 98605
• Alaska Wild Fish & Chip Co., Blaine, WA 98230
• Virasat Indian Cuisine, Camas, WA 98607
• Good Fork, Chehalis, WA 98532
• Yabes Food Truck, Forks, WA 98331
• The Popcorn Shoppe, Grand Coulee, WA 99133
• Barbe-Queen Kitchen, Ilwaco, WA 98624
• Papa Zuzu’s Pizza, Kelso, WA 98626
• Skooder’s Hot Dog, Kent, WA 98032
• The Hive, Klickitat, WA 98628
• Leavenworth Coffee and Waffles, Leavenworth, WA 98826
• Zuri’s Gourmet Donutz, Lynnwood, WA 98036
• Maggie’s Kitchen, Moses Lake, WA 98837
• Best Pizza Ever, Pasco, WA 99301
• Alderdale Boneyard, Prosser, WA 99350
• Appethaizing Thai Food, Puyallup, WA 98371
• Fast and Curryous, Richland, WA 99354
• Teriyaki Thai Etc, Ridgefield, WA 98642
• Last Roadhouse, Ronald, WA 98940
• Ahadu Ethiopian Restaurant, Seattle, WA 98125
• El burrito feliz, Seattle, WA 98107
• Ka Pow Thai On Wheels, Seattle, WA 98106
• La Pasta Storefront, Seattle, WA 98109
• La Pasta Storefront, Seattle, WA 98115
• Ooink Ramen, Seattle, WA 98103
• Ooink Ramen, Seattle, WA 98122
• Poke Fresh, Seattle, WA 98115
• Wing Xscape by Hot Potato 1.2.3. Express, Seattle, WA 98105
• Burrito House, Spokane, WA 99202
• Island Style Food & BBQ, Spokane, WA 99207
• Craft & Gather, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
• Flying Boots & Wings, Tacoma, WA 98418
• Taco’n Madre, Toppenish, WA 98948
• Wild Nectar, Tumwater, WA 98512
• Steak Your Claim, Vancouver, WA 98682
• Fiddle’s Lunch Box, Yakima, WA 98902
• Jerk Juicy BBQ, Yelm, WA 98597

Bars, Breweries & Wine (11)

• The Hub Bar & Restaurant, Centralia, WA 98531
• Jones Creek Brewery, Chehalis, WA 98532
• McFiler’s, Chehalis, WA 98532
• Union Hill Cider Co., East Wenatchee, WA 98802
• Headworks Brewing, Enumclaw, WA 98022
• 3 Dog Cider and Brewstillary, Ethel, WA 98542
• Strange Ways Bar, Everett, WA 98201
• Plain Valley Brewing Club, Leavenworth;Plain, WA 98826
• Barley POP! Brewing, Snohomish, WA 98290
• Bonaparte Creek, Tonasket, WA 98855
• Paradisos del Sol Winery and Organic Vineyard, Zillah, WA 98953

Groceries & Food Shops (12)

• Bitcoin Lightning Newspaper Machine, WA
• La Pasta, WA
• La Pasta, WA
• Alucinor Farms, Chehalis, WA 98532
• Mt. Capra, Chehalis, WA 98532
• Mt. Capra Wholesale, Chehalis, WA 98532
• Tree To Me, Colbert, WA 99005
• Zambezi Market & Hair Supply, Federal Way, WA 98003
• Oak Meadows Farm, Ferndale, WA 98248
• Northsea Apothecary, Lopez Island, WA 98261
• Serendipity Farm, Quilcene, WA 98376
• Northwest Butchery, Woodinville, WA 98072

Beauty & Wellness (46)

• Rani Beauty Clinic, WA
• Wynn Nail Spa, WA
• Chavez Barbershop, Aberdeen, WA 98520
• Maria’s Beauty Salon, Aberdeen, WA 98520
• Michael Redhawk Salon, Bellevue, WA 98004
• Harbor Moon Salon, Bellingham, WA 98225
• Absolute Hair, Everett, WA 98203
• Beauty37 Studio, Federal Way, WA 98003
• The Shop Hair Studio, Gig Harbor, WA 98335
• Skintegrity Medspa, Kirkland, WA 98033
• Massage Restoration, Lacey, WA 98503
• Flippd Fades Cut Lounge, Lakewood, WA 98499
• Brand X Piercing & Fine Jewelry, Longview, WA 98632
• Beyond Beautiful Salon, Moses Lake, WA 98837
• NW Lash Boutique, Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
• Lucid Skin Studio, North Bend, WA 98045
• Bright & Bold, Olympia, WA 98502
• Beauty By Suzi, Port Angeles, WA 98362
• Aqeel at Black Castle Barbershop, Puyallup, WA 98373
• Fuji Therapy, Renton, WA 98057
• 14th Avenue Hair, Seattle, WA 98122
• Botanabliss, Seattle, WA 98146
• CamStyledYou, Seattle, WA 98122
• Citron Aesthetics, Seattle, WA 98107
• Cleopatra Ink, Seattle, WA 98101
• CoCo & Company Hair Salon, Seattle, WA 98116
• Jerry Porter Massage Therapies, Seattle, WA 98119
• Lalascuts, Seattle, WA 98109
• Sal’s Pike Street Barbers, Seattle, WA 98122
• Snorkel Hot Tubs, Seattle, WA 98108
• Southpaw Barbershop, Seattle, WA 98116
• Treehouse Massage Therapy at Annie Firefly, Seattle, WA 98115
• Zara Jo Beauty Supply, Seattle, WA 98122
• Ace Of Fades, Selah, WA 98942
• Renay at Saluk Salon, Snohomish, WA 98290
• Flow: Massage and Fitness, Spokane, WA 99201
• Fragrance Station, Spokane, WA 99216
• Kate’s Barber Shop, Spokane Valley, WA 99212
• Flawless Tacoma, Tacoma, WA 98406
• The Crown Correction Lounge, Tacoma, WA 98444
• Cutter’s Barbershop, Tumwater, WA 98501
• Tonsor, Vancouver, WA 98660
• Exhala Wellness, Wenatchee, WA 98801
• Themaadstylist, Wenatchee, WA 98801
• Locs ‘N’ Braids, Yakima, WA 98902
• Valley Barbers, Yakima, WA 98901

Auto & Transport (22)

• Eco Car Cafe, Bellevue, WA 98004
• A&M automotive, Centralia, WA 98531
• Ricks Auto Tint, Ephrata, WA 98823
• Shop Mothership, Everett, WA 98203
• Lexy’s Oil Change, Goldendale, WA 98620
• Anytime Repair and Service, Kennewick, WA 99336
• Marty’s Place at Strawbridge Farm, Langley, WA 98260
• Mukilteo House Of Wax, Mukilteo, WA 98275
• Three Sixty PowerSports, Port Angeles, WA 98362
• OceanHills Auto Detailing, Redmond, WA 98052
• JK Towing, Republic, WA 99166
• S&J Automotive n Tires, Republic, WA 99166
• Abdi Complete Auto Service And Body, Seattle, WA 98108
• Rapid Towing, Seattle, WA 98125
• Tony’s Greenwood Auto Body, Seattle, WA 98103
• Union Square, Seattle, WA 98101
• University Used Tires, Seattle, WA 98105
• CB Automotive, Sedro Woolley, WA 98284
• AR Automotive, Stanwood, WA 98292
• Mad Max Creations, Washougal, WA 98671
• The Paddock, Woodinville, WA 98072
• Refined Rides Detail & Tint, Yakima, WA 98901

Retail, Shopping & Entertainment (31)

• Nova Vita, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
• Kim’s Unique Boutique, Castle Rock, WA 98611
• Let’s Play Something, Centralia, WA 98531
• Vintage Vault 33, Centralia, WA 98531
• McFiler’s Chehalis Theater, Chehalis, WA 98532
• Eastsound Sporting Goods, Eastsound, WA 98245
• Dragonfire, Kennewick, WA 99336
• Gamebound Video Games, Kent, WA 98030
• SBC Kent Snooker & Billiard Club, Kent, WA 98032
• Adorkable Flowers & Gifts, Liberty Lake, WA 99019
• Pirates Keep, Long Beach, WA 98631
• Hello Nature, Moses Lake, WA 98837
• Dos Casas Thrift, Port Orchard, WA 98366
• Park Avenue Studio, Port Townsend, WA 98368
• GameBound Video Games, Renton, WA 98059
• The Little Plant Shop, Richland, WA 99352
• Shoe Express, Seattle, WA 98101
• Slow Love Vintage, Seattle, WA 98105
• Ugly Baby, Seattle, WA 98101
• Art Room 509, Spokane, WA 99212
• Fern Plant Shop, Spokane, WA 99201
• Petunia & Loomis, Spokane, WA 99201
• Teleport Vintage, Spokane, WA 99202
• Zap Lab Fun, Spokane, WA 99207
• Sincere Tacoma, Tacoma, WA 98406
• Aqua Gallery, Vancouver, WA 98660
• Briz Loan & Guitar, Vancouver, WA 98660
• Corridor Gallery, Vancouver, WA 98660
• Petal Me Home Flowers, Walla Walla, WA 99362
• Morning Moon Mercantile, Wenatchee, WA 98801
• Geetaku Market, Yakima, WA 98902

Health, Services & Professional (50)

• Caffery Photo, WA
• Darey Philbrick MD, Aberdeen, WA 98520
• High Performance Homes, Auburn, WA 98002
• New Town Cleaners, Battle Ground, WA 98604
• Stambaugh Designs – Web Design & SEO, Bellingham, WA 98225
• Hero Fence, Camas, WA 98607
• Zues Digital Designs, Eatonville, WA 98328
• Ezzia Healthcare, Everett, WA 98204
• Amigo Cell Phone Repair & PC Kennewick, Kennewick, WA 99336
• iPhone BLVD, Kennewick, WA 99336
• Let’s Go Dog Training, Kennewick, WA 99336
• Sylvia Income Tax And Plus, Kennewick, WA 99301
• Precision Hardscapes & Irrigation, Kent, WA 98032
• Silky – The Screen Print Shop, Kent, WA 98032
• Destak Cleaning Services, Kirkland, WA 98034
• Blessed Driving School, Lacey, WA 98503
• FixLab Electronics, Longview, WA 98632
• Bal Driving School of Lynnwood, Lynnwood, WA 98036
• Cellaxs, Lynnwood, WA 98037
• iRepair Xpert, Lynnwood, WA 98037
• Speedys Multi Services, Mattawa, WA 99349
• Institute of Beauty Professionals, Moses Lake, WA 98837
• J & M Custom Upholstery, Moses Lake, WA 98837
• Sylvia Income Tax And Plus, Pasco, WA 99301
• Purewag, Redmond, WA 98052
• Ez Fix Cell Phone Repair, Richland, WA 99354
• Purewag, Sammamish, WA 98075
• 4th Systems, Seattle, WA 98146
• Farr Design, Seattle, WA 98103
• Gadget Rehab, Seattle, WA 98105
• Nauti Stitches, Seattle, WA 98178
• Savvi Kenpo, Seattle, WA 98103
• Hood Canal Street Eats & Catering, Shelton, WA 98584
• Gig-techs, Shoreline, WA 98155
• Advanta Insurance Brokers, Spokane, WA 99203
• Kalea, Spokane, WA 99207
• North West Terraria, Spokane, WA 99202
• The Guilded Dragon, Spokane, WA 99207
• Cellaxs, Tacoma, WA 98409
• Dubreezy Entertainment, Tacoma, WA 98402
• iRepair Xpert, Tacoma, WA 98409
• Puget Sound Locksmith, Tacoma, WA 98409
• Alianza Hispana, Union Gap, WA 98903
• Adams Chimney Specialist, Vancouver, WA 98682
• Double Barrel Print, Vancouver, WA 98665
• High Performance Homes, Vancouver, WA 98661
• The PC Smith, Wenatchee, WA 98801
• Gorge Ink, White Salmon, WA 98672
• Axiom Technologies, Yakima, WA 98902
• Anderson Woodwork’s, Yelm, WA 98597

Other (20)

• Alucinor Farms, WA Chehalis
• Charron Vision Therapy, WA Bellingham
• Crazy Jumpers, WA Bellingham
• Fancy Flamingo Massage, WA Kennewick
• Health And Exercise Prescriptions, WA Bellingham
• Jennifer Branch Reiki Master, WA Anacortes
• Living Well Family Chiropractic, WA Chelan
• MOHI Sports Performance, WA Bellingham
• Northwest Pastoral Counseling, WA Tacoma
• On Deck, WA Vancouver
• Sacred Path Medicine, WA Lynnwood
• Sarah Enera Manual + Movement Therapy, WA Seattle
• South Sound Hypnosis, WA Olympia
• Strait Fitness, WA Port Angeles
• Terrain Gym, WA Bellingham
• Triangle Bowl, WA
• Bitcoin ATM, Chehalis, WA 98532
• Modulo, Chehalis, WA 98532
• Glacier Foods, East Wenatchee, WA 98802
• Doug Varenas Realtor, estate_agent, WA Vancouver

This post Bitcoin Heated Hot Tubs and 278 Washington Bitcoin Merchants : Now Accepting Bitcoin first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Vagabond.

Bitcoin Magazine

LNbits Releases 1.7.0 Urgent Security Update After November 8 Attacks Drain Funds

LNbits, the open-source Lightning Network wallet and accounts platform, released version 1.7.0 on November 10 as an urgent security update and instructed all operators to upgrade before restarting their servers. The project’s official X account posted the announcement with a link to the GitHub release, calling it a “SECURITY UPDATE”.

The release follows a wave of attacks that began over the weekend. On November 8, LNbits posted on X that all users should stop their LNbits servers immediately after reporting active attacks, adding that security patches were being prepared and that it was “better to err on the side of caution.” 

The project also disabled instances on its hosted service. Multiple reports documented unauthorized account creation and fund withdrawals. 

Kevin Ravensberg, operator of the Telegram tipping service BitTipBot, publicly stated that attackers created new accounts on his instance and withdrew 2,285,545 satoshis (approximately 0.0229 BTC) between roughly 09:22 and 14:00 UTC on November 8.

According to the official upgrade guidance published alongside the release, versions prior to 1.7.0 are affected and “funds running on prior versions of LNbits are at risk of being stolen.” The project stated that 1.7.0 includes security fixes in response to the incident discovered on November 8 and that a full technical report on the exploit will follow. 

Operators are advised to set up a fresh server if compromise is suspected, because updating alone cannot remove access an attacker may already have gained. Additional recovery steps include rotating all user wallet keys as Super Admin, replacing funding-source credentials (API keys or macaroons), rotating other secrets stored in settings, and reviewing or re-creating connections for extensions such as NWC Provider, LNDHub, Bolt Cards, TPOS, Bleskomat, and FOSSA.

The GitHub release notes describe extensive security hardening across authentication, extension management, and payment handling, plus dependency updates. New features shipping with the version include on-chain wallet support, BOLT12 offer payments, TOTP two-factor authentication, NIP-17 support, a job scheduler, automatic extension updates, and hold invoice support for the LNbits funding source. The project notes that LNbits functions as a hot wallet and that operators should keep only operational balances online, regularly review activity, and move excess funds to offline keys.

LNbits was founded as a free and open-source project in 2019 by Ben Arc and later incorporated a commercial entity to support development. It provides multi-user accounts and a large suite of extensions on top of any Lightning funding source (including LND and Core Lightning). Bitcoin Magazine profiled the project in September 2024, describing it as “the WordPress for your Bitcoin Lightning node” noting its widepsread use by individuals, businesses, and node operators seeking accessible Lightning tooling. The software is widely deployed both self-hosted and via managed instances.

As of the v1.7.0 announcement, the project has not published an aggregate total of funds lost across all affected instances. Operators who have not yet upgraded are directed to the official guidance before bringing servers back online.

This post LNbits Releases 1.7.0 Urgent Security Update After November 8 Attacks Drain Funds first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Juan Galt.

Bitcoin Magazine

Texas Rep. Files Bill Letting Cities Invest $10 Million in Bitcoin

A Texas lawmaker filed a bill Monday that would let each city and county in the state invest up to $10 million of public money in bitcoin or another cryptocurrency, without setting any rules for how those coins would be held.

House Bill 815, filed by Rep. Ron Reynolds, a Missouri City Democrat, on the first day of prefiling for the 90th Texas Legislature, carries the caption “Relating to the authority of a municipality or county to invest money in cryptocurrencies.” The introduced text, posted on the Texas Legislature’s site, is two sections long.

The bill would amend the Public Funds Investment Act, Chapter 2256 of the Texas Government Code, by adding a new Section 2256.0165, titled “Authorized Investments: Cryptocurrency.” Under that section, “a municipality or county may invest not more than $10 million of its money or money under its control in Bitcoin or another cryptocurrency.” The authority would take effect Sept. 1, 2027, if the bill becomes law.

The $10 million figure is a cap on each city or county, not a single statewide pool. School districts and other local governments covered by the investment act are left out.

What the bill does and does not say

The measure borrows its definitions of “Bitcoin” and “cryptocurrency” from Section 403.701 of the Government Code, the definitions written into law last year by Senate Bill 21, which created the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. Bitcoin is defined as a decentralized cryptocurrency created by a peer-to-peer network that operates independently of any central authority or bank. Cryptocurrency is defined more broadly as a virtual currency that uses cryptography to secure transactions recorded on a distributed ledger, such as a blockchain.

That means a city or county would not be limited to bitcoin. The bill also does not import the reserve law’s requirement that coins bought for the state fund have an average market capitalization of at least $500 billion over the most recent 24-month period, or its provisions on cold storage and qualified custodians.

The Public Funds Investment Act already requires local governments to adopt a written investment policy that emphasizes safety of principal and liquidity, and to invest with the care a prudent person would use in managing their own affairs. A city or county would still have to add cryptocurrency to that policy before buying any. The new section itself is silent on custody, on audits specific to digital assets, and on how a loss would be handled.

A narrower version of last year’s proposal

Reynolds filed a broader measure, House Bill 4258, on March 10, 2025, with Rep. Mihaela Plesa. That bill would have let the comptroller invest as much as $250 million of the Economic Stabilization Fund, the state’s rainy day fund, in bitcoin or another cryptocurrency, and it included the same $10 million cap for cities and counties. It was referred to the House Delivery of Government Efficiency Committee on April 1, 2025, and did not become law.

House Bill 815 drops the rainy day fund language and keeps only the local-government piece. The state’s own reserve was created separately through Senate Bill 21, which Gov. Greg Abbott signed in June 2025.

The Texas Comptroller’s office later bought $5 million of BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust on Nov. 20, 2025, as a placeholder while it worked on direct custody, The Texas Tribune reported, with the office confirming the purchase. A second purchase brought the reserve’s IBIT exposure to about $10 million. In May, Acting Comptroller Kelly Hancock named an advisory committee and issued a request for proposals for a custodian, a step toward holding bitcoin directly.

What comes next

Prefiling for the 90th Texas Legislature opened Monday, and the regular session convenes Jan. 12, 2027. The bill has been filed but has not yet been referred to a committee, a step that typically waits until lawmakers convene. Even if it passes both chambers and is signed, cities and counties could not use the new authority until Sept. 1, 2027.

This post Texas Rep. Files Bill Letting Cities Invest $10 Million in Bitcoin first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Poland’s Parliament Votes 240-202 to Let Officials Freeze Crypto Before Court Review

Poland’s lower house of parliament voted 240-202 on Friday to let the interior minister freeze crypto assets, bank accounts and other property of people placed on a national sanctions list, before any court reviews the order.

The Sejm, Poland’s lower house, passed the Act on Restrictive Measures at its 68th sitting, with one member abstaining and 17 not voting. The Senate received the bill Monday and has 30 days under Article 121 of the Constitution to adopt, amend or reject it, after which it would go to President Karol Nawrocki.

The law, a government bill that also implements European Union sanctions rules, treats crypto assets as financial means that can be frozen, using the definition in the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation. A freeze, as the text defines it, is meant to stop any movement, transfer, use or other change that would let the holder benefit from the assets.

The freeze applies only to people and entities the interior minister adds to a public national list, either on the minister’s own initiative or at the request of agencies that include the financial watchdog, the central bank, the financial intelligence unit and the internal security service. Grounds include supporting a country already under EU sanctions, serious human rights abuses, or initiating or financing information manipulation that poses a serious threat to Poland’s national security.

A listing on that last ground requires a showing of a real and serious threat to Poland’s interests, borders, security or elections. The bill carves out ordinary journalism, political speech and publishing, unless that activity is a knowing campaign of the kind the law describes.

A freeze that starts before a judge weighs in

The interior minister’s decision takes effect the day after it is posted in the ministry’s Public Information Bulletin and is immediately enforceable. There is no request to the minister to reconsider. A listed person may file a complaint with an administrative court, but the law says the decision remains in force until a judgment becomes final, and it sets aside the usual rule that would let a court pause a challenged order.

The measures also bar making funds or property available to listed persons and can exclude them from public contracts. In some cases, the economy minister may appoint a temporary administrator to sell frozen assets or, under a separate order, take them over for the State Treasury.

What the freeze would mean for bitcoin

The Poland bill does not target ordinary bitcoin holders in Poland. It reaches crypto assets owned, held or under the control of people and firms on the sanctions list. Banks, exchanges and other parties face administrative fines if they fail to freeze those assets or make them available, and compliance is checked by the financial intelligence unit and the Polish Financial Supervision Authority for the firms they already oversee.

The text does not describe a way for officials to obtain the keys to coins held in self-custody. The practical enforcement path in Poland runs through exchanges, custodians and other obliged institutions that can actually stop a transfer.

What comes next for the bill

The bill still has to clear the Senate and Nawrocki’s desk. The president refused to sign a separate crypto-assets market bill the Sejm passed on May 15, and lawmakers in September failed to override that veto, voting 241-198. He had also vetoed earlier versions of that market bill, arguing the rules went too far.

That earlier fight was about licensing and supervision under the EU’s crypto-assets rulebook, not about a sanctions freeze. Whether the Senate trims the pre-court freeze, and whether Nawrocki will sign a sanctions law that reaches bitcoin, is the question the bill now leaves open.

This post Poland’s Parliament Votes 240-202 to Let Officials Freeze Crypto Before Court Review first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Bitcoin Magazine

Canaan (CAN) Swings to an $8 Million Profit on Bitcoin Gains as Rig Sales Collapse 96%

Canaan Inc. (NASDAQ: CAN) swung to $8.0 million of third-quarter net income on a $51.9 million fair-value gain in its bitcoin holdings and derivatives, the mining-rig maker said Tuesday, even as machine sales collapsed 96%.

The company filed the unaudited results Tuesday in a 6-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Total revenue fell to $14.5 million from $150.5 million a year earlier, including $4.8 million from product sales and $9.5 million from mining. Canaan sold 1.0 million terahashes per second of computing power and mined 133 bitcoin.

The profit did not come from the business. Canaan posted an $8.6 million gross loss and a $42.9 million operating loss. Chief financial officer Jin “James” Cheng said a recovery in bitcoin prices toward quarter-end generated the $51.9 million fair-value gain and called it “distinct from underlying operating performance.”

The $51.9 million is the sum of a $20.1 million gain on cryptocurrency and a $31.9 million gain on financial derivatives. Canaan also reported $22.4 million of non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA, a figure that still includes those gains. Strip them out and adjusted EBITDA would have been a loss of about $29.5 million.

Nangeng Zhang, Canaan’s chairman and chief executive officer, pointed to “continued weakness in bitcoin mining equipment demand and intense industry pricing competition.” Products revenue dropped from $13.6 million in the second quarter and from $118.6 million in the same period of 2025. The company blamed lower volumes and a lower average selling price.

The treasury carries the quarter

Canaan took $8.2 million of inventory-related write-downs, down from $25.3 million in the second quarter. Mining operations posted a gross margin of about 30% before depreciation, with an all-in power cost of about $0.043 per kilowatt-hour and roughly 10 exahashes per second of installed capacity outside joint ventures.

The company held 1,875.5 bitcoin as of Sept. 30. Of that, 517.5 coins were owned outright, 1,258 were pledged for secured term loans and 100 sat in a fixed-term product. It booked $43.7 million of cryptocurrency assets and $114.2 million of cryptocurrency receivables.

The stack is down about 40 bitcoin from the 1,915.5 Canaan reported at the end of the second quarter, even after the company mined 133 in the period, implying it moved roughly 173 bitcoin off the treasury. Zhang said Canaan is “selectively monetizing cryptocurrency holdings to fund share repurchases.”

On Nov. 6, the board approved a new $100 million share repurchase authorization over 12 months and launched an initial $20 million program under that cap.

A 2-gigawatt Texas bet, and a reverse split

Canaan is trying to recast itself around power and compute infrastructure. Its 1-gigawatt project in Duval County, Texas, received a conditional “Studied Load – Firm” classification under ERCOT’s Batch Zero process, a grid-connection step Zhang said remains “subject to further studies and approvals.” A second 1-gigawatt project in Zapata County is in early-stage development.

To support those plans, Canaan set aside $50 million of restricted cash as collateral for a letter of credit tied to infrastructure contracts and made about $3.3 million of project prepayments. In October it bought a parcel of U.S. land for about $1.1 million. Cash ended Sept. 30 at $72.8 million, $50 million of it restricted, leaving $22.8 million unrestricted.

Canaan also plans a 1-for-25 reverse ADS split, effective on or about Dec. 4, changing each ADS from 15 Class A ordinary shares to 375. The move is meant to help the company regain compliance with Nasdaq’s minimum bid price requirement.

For the fourth quarter, Canaan expects revenue of $18 million to $22 million.

The shift toward power and compute puts Canaan in the same lane as other public bitcoin miners. MARA sold 13,597 bitcoin to fund AI infrastructure, and Hyperscale Data sold its last coins for a Michigan data center.

Whether a paper gain on 1,875 bitcoin and a pair of early-stage Texas power projects can carry Canaan until customers start buying machines again is the question the quarter leaves open.

This post Canaan (CAN) Swings to an $8 Million Profit on Bitcoin Gains as Rig Sales Collapse 96% first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

The OCC authorized a November 9 opening and approved gradual account transfers, while client-level migration timing remains undisclosed.

Read the full story on CryptoSlate

Understand the crypto stories that matter and what to watch next. Get The Catalyst in your inbox

The v8.3.3 release gives staking and non-staking beacon nodes high priority, while validator-client updates remain routine.

Read the full story on CryptoSlate

Understand the crypto stories that matter and what to watch next. Get The Catalyst in your inbox

Babylon reports ARFC passage for the plan, with proposed credit limits and a restricted mainnet rollout still ahead.

Read the full story on CryptoSlate

Understand the crypto stories that matter and what to watch next. Get The Catalyst in your inbox

At 12 months, Rosie users showed no significant anxiety or depression advantage over a monthly children's book program.

Read the full story on CryptoSlate

Understand the crypto stories that matter and what to watch next. Get The Catalyst in your inbox

The November 2–8 filing reports no STRC ATM sales, while buybacks absorbed two-thirds of the week’s MSTR proceeds.

Read the full story on CryptoSlate

Understand the crypto stories that matter and what to watch next. Get The Catalyst in your inbox

You read a candlestick chart by treating each candle as a summary of one period: the thick body shows where the price opened and closed, and the thin wicks show the high and the low in between. If the candle is green, the closing price was above the opening price; if it is red, below. With these four values, open, high, low and close, you can see at a glance how sharply a market swung and which side came out ahead at the end.

In crypto, the candlestick chart is the default view: almost every exchange and every charting tool first opens the price of Bitcoin and other coins as a candlestick chart. Anyone buying or selling there sees candles all the time, whether they want to or not. This guide explains how candles are built, the best-known candlestick patterns and their limits. On top of that comes our own analysis: we checked 999 daily bitcoin candles to see what actually happened to the price after a hammer, a doji or an engulfing pattern.

What a candlestick chart shows: open, high, low and close

A candlestick chart is a way of displaying price data in which each period appears as its own candle. Analysts speak of OHLC data, after open, high, low and close. A simple line chart only connects the closing prices and so hides what happened between two closes. The candle, by contrast, also shows the swings up and down.

An example makes this concrete: if bitcoin opens a day at $74,000, climbs to $76,000 along the way, drops to $72,500 and closes at $73,500, the result is a red candle. Its body runs from $74,000 down to $73,500, the upper wick reaches $76,000 and the lower wick $72,500. A line chart would have kept only the point at $73,500 from that day.

A bar chart, also called an OHLC chart, contains the same four values but draws them as a vertical line with two small horizontal ticks. The information is identical. The candlestick chart won out because the filled bodies and the colours are quicker to take in, especially when a hundred or more candles sit side by side.

Candle body and wick: which side had the upper hand at the end

The body of a candle is the distance between the opening and the closing price. A long green body means buyers carried the price higher throughout the period. A long red body shows the opposite: selling pressure lasted until the close. A very short body means that open and close barely differ and neither side won the period.

The wicks, also called shadows, mark the extremes. A long upper wick shows that the price was clearly higher at some point, but sellers pushed it back down. A long lower wick shows that the price slumped and buyers brought it back up. A candle with no wick at all forms when the price never moved beyond the close or below the open during the entire period.

The colour is a convention, not a law of nature. Most crypto exchanges draw rising candles green and falling ones red. In older books and some programs, rising candles are hollow or white and falling ones filled or black. Many trading apps let you swap the colours, and in parts of Asia red traditionally signals rising prices. So when you read an unfamiliar chart, check the legend first.

Timeframes in a candlestick chart: why the daily crypto candle closes at night

Each candle stands for a period you can choose freely, known as the timeframe. Common settings are one minute, five minutes, one hour, four hours, one day and one week. The same market can look completely different depending on the timeframe: a thick red daily candle may, on the hourly chart, consist of a brief slump in the morning and a slow recovery in the afternoon.

For stocks, the daily candle starts and ends with the exchange's trading hours. Cryptocurrencies, by contrast, trade around the clock, weekends included. The daily candle therefore needs a fixed time. On Bitstamp, whose data our analysis below uses, it starts at midnight Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), which is 1 a.m. German time in winter and 2 a.m. in summer. Other platforms may use different times, and then the same daily candle looks different on two charts.

A second peculiarity concerns price gaps. With stocks, the price often opens well above or below the previous day's close in the morning because news came in overnight. With bitcoin, the opening price almost always matches the previous close: in our 999 daily candles, the open was less than 0.1 percent away from the prior close 995 times. Patterns that textbooks describe as requiring such a gap therefore rarely appear in pure form in crypto trading.

Doji, hammer and shooting star: the key single-candle patterns

A candlestick pattern is a shape made of one or more candles to which chart analysts attribute a message about the price's next move. You should be able to recognise the three best-known single candles, because they show up in almost every chart analysis.

Doji: open and close almost identical

In a doji, the opening and closing prices are so close together that barely any body is visible. The candle looks like a cross or a plus sign. The doji is seen as a sign of indecision: buyers and sellers pushed the price back and forth, and in the end it stood where it had started. Textbooks distinguish subtypes such as the dragonfly doji with a long lower wick and the gravestone doji with a long upper wick. Our older article on candlestick patterns illustrated with the Ethereum price shows an example.

Hammer: long lower wick after a decline

The hammer has a small body at the top and a lower wick at least twice as long as the body. It only counts as a hammer when it appears after a move lower. The reading: sellers pushed the price down hard, and buyers won it back almost entirely by the close. If the same shape appears after a rise, it is called a hanging man and is read as a warning sign.

Shooting star: long upper wick after a rise

The shooting star is the mirror image of the hammer. The small body sits at the bottom with a long wick above it. After a rise, it shows that buyers drove the price far higher, but sellers caught it again by the close. The same shape after a decline is called an inverted hammer.

Engulfing, morning star and harami: patterns made of two and three candles

Patterns made of several candles describe a shift in sentiment over several periods. In a bullish engulfing pattern, a red candle is followed by a green one whose body completely covers the red body. After a decline, this is taken as a sign that buyers have taken control. The bearish engulfing pattern is its counterpart after a rise: a large red candle swallows the green one before it.

The harami is in a sense the reverse of the engulfing pattern. Here, a small candle sits entirely within the body of the large candle before it. The pattern is read as a sign that the previous move is losing strength. The morning star consists of three candles: a long red one, a small candle with barely any body and a long green one that reaches deep into the body of the first. Its counterpart at the end of a rise is the evening star.

What all patterns have in common is that they need context. A hammer in the middle of a sideways phase says little. Analysts therefore also look at the prior trend, at the candle's trading volume and at whether the pattern forms at a level where the price has turned before. Many also combine candles with indicators such as the Relative Strength Index, which our article on bitcoin's RSI explains.

Candlestick patterns put to a bitcoin test: 999 daily candles analysed

Whether the patterns are any use for bitcoin can be measured. To do so, we analysed the 999 daily BTC/USD candles on Bitstamp from February 16, 2024, to November 10, 2026. For each pattern, we counted how often the price five days after the signal candle was higher than at its close. The benchmark is the same share across all days.

The rules were simple and set in advance. A doji is a candle whose body makes up no more than a tenth of the range between high and low. A hammer has a lower wick at least twice the length of the body, a short upper wick, and follows a decline, measured by the close being below the close five days earlier. The shooting star is the counterpart after a rise. For the engulfing patterns, the new body has to fully enclose the old one and be longer.

The result: across all days, bitcoin was higher five days later in 51.0 percent of cases. After the 39 hammer candles, the figure was 59.0 percent, and after the 47 bullish engulfing patterns 53.2 percent. After the 31 shooting stars, the price was higher in only 45.2 percent of cases, and after the 37 bearish engulfing patterns in 45.9 percent. The 110 doji candles, at 51.8 percent, came in almost exactly at the average. On average, the price rose 1.29 percent in the five days after a hammer and fell 0.75 percent after a shooting star.

So the direction matches the textbook reading, but the gap to chance is small. With 39 cases, 59 percent amounts to a mere three more hits than the 51 percent average. With so few cases, a genuine edge cannot be told apart from luck, especially since trading fees and the spread between bid and ask further erode the advantage in real trading. In this test, the doji turns out to be exactly what its reputation suggests: a signal without direction.

Candlestick analysis in research: what a study of Dow Jones stocks found

Our small bitcoin test is not alone. In 2006, the economists Ben Marshall, Martin Young and Lawrence Rose examined in the Journal of Banking & Finance whether candlestick patterns could make money on the stocks of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Their data set ran from 1992 to 2002. The study's title asks the question directly: "Candlestick technical trading strategies: Can they create value for investors?" The authors' answer was sobering: the three economists found no evidence that the candlestick signals they examined predicted the price moves of large US stocks.

That does not make candlestick charts worthless. Candles remain the clearest way to read price data: anyone who understands a candlestick chart grasps volatility, buying pressure and selling pressure faster than in any table. Problems only arise when a single pattern is treated as a reliable buy or sell signal. Neither the research nor our bitcoin analysis supports that expectation.

Where candlestick charts come from: the rice trade in Osaka

Candlestick charts are often traced back to the Japanese rice trader Munehisa Homma, who lived from 1724 to 1803 and traded on the Dojima rice exchange in Osaka. The English-language Wikipedia cautiously describes him as "sometimes considered the father of the candlestick chart". Whether Homma himself already drew candles or whether the method only emerged later is disputed among historians. What is documented is his reputation as a trader who closely observed the mood of market participants.

The method only became known in the West in the early 1990s, when the US analyst Steve Nison published his book "Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques". Many of the Japanese names you read on crypto learning sites today, such as doji or harami, come from this tradition. Harami roughly means "pregnant", because the small candle sits inside the body of the large one.

Candlestick charts in crypto trading: common mistakes with leverage and one-minute candles

The most common mistake when reading candlestick charts is using too short a timeframe. On the one-minute chart, some pattern forms all the time; a hammer or doji turns up there several times an hour. The shorter the timeframe, the more random noise drowns out any signal. Anyone guided by patterns therefore looks at the daily or weekly chart first and only then at shorter periods.

The second mistake is trading patterns with leverage. A signal that in our analysis moved in the expected direction in six out of ten cases at best loses in four out of ten. With leverage, one such miss can wipe out a position entirely. How liquidations and margin calls work is explained in our guide to liquidations in leveraged trading.

The third mistake concerns the unfinished candle. As long as a period is still running, the candle keeps changing. What looks like a hammer in the afternoon can turn into a long red candle by the daily close. Candlestick patterns are therefore only assessed once the candle has closed. If you need price data, indicators and alert levels in one place, our comparison of crypto analytics platforms lists tools with candlestick charts, alerts and custom timeframes.

Candlestick analysis: trend and timeframe first, then the pattern

Candlestick charts are a tool for reading the market, not an oracle. Three steps help you get started:

1. Use charts with clean data: choose a platform that offers candlestick charts in several timeframes, indicators and price alerts. Our comparison of crypto analytics tools gives an overview.
2. Set the rules in advance: if you want to use patterns systematically, write down the conditions beforehand and test them on historical data, as in our bitcoin analysis. Such rules can be automated with trading bots, which our comparison of crypto trading bots sets side by side.
3. Trade without leverage first: when making your first decisions, buy coins directly on the spot market of a regulated exchange and do without leverage. Fees and licences are shown in our crypto exchange comparison.

(As of November 11, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)

XRP trades at $1.058, or €0.95, on Wednesday morning, according to CoinGecko at around 7:40 a.m. CET. That is 3.8 percent lower than 24 hours earlier, 16.4 percent lower than a week ago and roughly 30 percent below October 5, when XRP still stood at $1.52. The coin last closed lower on August 19. Even so, traders betting on rising prices with leverage are paying more for their positions than at any time since October 2025.

What the data show: the cumulative funding rate for XRP on Binance stands at 0.18 percent over 30 days, the highest reading since October 2025, and on OKX the long side has paid at 76 of 100 settlements since October 9. Our assessment follows further down: as long as these long bets are not unwound, the price lacks a floor, even though another seller is about to leave the market.

Where the price could head over a horizon of months is covered in our XRP price prediction with its long-term scenarios. This piece sticks to the futures market, fund flows and a measurement taken on the XRP Ledger overnight into Wednesday.

XRP funding rate: long bets have been paying up for weeks

The funding rate is a balancing payment between buyers and sellers of perpetual futures. Perpetual futures are derivatives contracts with no expiry date that let traders bet on rising or falling prices, usually with borrowed money. To keep their price from drifting away from the spot price for long, one side pays the other at fixed intervals. If the rate is above zero, long positions pay short positions. If it is below zero, the flow reverses.

A positive rate therefore shows that more capital is betting on rising than on falling prices and is willing to carry an ongoing fee for it. In a rising market, that barely stands out. In a market that has been falling for five weeks, it is unusual: buyers are holding on to their positions even as the price moves against them, or they are buying every dip.

For the coming days, this cuts both ways. If the hoped-for recovery arrives, these positions will amplify it. If the price keeps falling, these are exactly the positions that will be forcibly closed, and every forced closure is an additional sale.

CryptoQuant data on Binance: 0.18 percent in 30 days, the highest since October 2025

The Binance figure comes from the analytics firm CryptoQuant and was published on Tuesday by Coinpedia. It measures the sum of all funding payments over the past 30 days. That sum stands at plus 0.18 percent, as high as it was last in October 2025. Back then, XRP's record high of $3.55 was only a few months in the past.

The comparison shows how far sentiment and price have drifted apart. In October 2025, the high rate came from a market that had only just come off its peak. Today, it comes from a market that has lost a quarter of its value in a month. Coinpedia sums this up as an expression of crowded optimism rather than a guarantee of a recovery.

Futures market on OKX: the long side paid at 76 of 100 settlements

To cross-check the figure, cryptoticker.io queried the public interface of the OKX exchange on Wednesday morning, pulling the last 100 funding settlements for the XRP contract against USDT. The series goes back to October 9, with settlement every eight hours. At 76 of these 100 settlements, the rate was above zero. Together, they add up to 0.39 percent.

The most recent settlements fit the picture. On Tuesday at 1 a.m., 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. CET, 0.0062, 0.0096 and 0.0060 percent fell due, and overnight into Wednesday 0.0056 percent. Only a single settlement in the past three days came in just below zero, on Monday evening at minus 0.0001 percent. For the current period, OKX showed 0.01 percent on Wednesday morning.

Translated into money, that looks small, but it adds up. Anyone holding a $10,000 long position pays $1 per settlement at 0.01 percent, or $3 a day. Based on the OKX data, the same position would have cost around $39 in funding since October 9, on top of a price loss of around $2,300, since XRP still stood at $1.38 on October 9.

Open interest and long-short ratio: leverage is shrinking more slowly than the price

Open interest measures the value of all open futures contracts. On OKX, it stood at $132.1 million for XRP on November 4 and at $101.9 million on November 10, a decline of 23 percent. Because the price fell from $1.28 to $1.10 over the same period, a good half of that decline is down to the lower price alone. Measured in coins, open positions have shrunk by only about a tenth.

The ratio of accounts betting on rising prices to those betting on falling prices stood at 3.70 on OKX on Tuesday. On Sunday it had been 4.27, the highest reading of the past two weeks. For every account with a short position, there are still almost four accounts with a long position.

On November 7, our analysis of the long squeeze at $1.15 described how long positions worth more than $16 million were forcibly closed in a single day. The price has since dropped by just under 10 percent, but the number of long bets has barely declined.

XRP spot ETFs: $10.4 million in outflows ahead of the first anniversary

While the futures market is buying, fund investors are pulling money out. According to Coinpedia, the US spot ETFs for XRP saw net outflows of $10.4 million, equivalent to around 9.37 million XRP. Before that, the funds had recorded neither inflows nor outflows on four consecutive trading days from November 3 to 6, the first such streak since August, as Bitcoin.com News reported based on SoSoValue data.

On Friday, November 13, the first US spot ETF on XRP turns one year old. The Canary Capital fund launched on November 13, 2025. In October, the XRP funds had still logged inflows for the seventh month in a row, albeit only $18.8 million. For the outlook over the coming weeks, what matters is whether this stream returns. An ETF inflow means the issuer buys XRP on the market and holds it in custody. An outflow means it is selling down its holdings.

Since Tuesday's XRP price prediction: $1.04 already breached on day one

Our XRP price prediction from Tuesday set out three scenarios through the end of November: $1.04 in the weak case, $1.13 in the base case and $1.27 in the strong case. On Tuesday morning, XRP stood at $1.10. A little over 24 hours later, the price is at $1.058, and the daily low reached $1.034, according to CoinGecko.

The weak scenario was therefore already hit on the first day, not because of any new development at Ripple but in the wake of the broader market. Bitcoin trades at $73,715 on Wednesday morning, 1.2 percent lower than the previous day. After Tuesday's US inflation data, market participants are once again pricing in a rate hike by the Federal Reserve, as our overnight market report shows. The Fed's next meeting ends on December 9.

The $1.08 level, which still held at Monday's daily close, has broken. What is new, by contrast, is what happened on the XRP Ledger.

Binance attacker: the last untouched wallet has been empty since midnight

For this article, cryptoticker.io queried the wallets of the attacker behind the October 29 Binance hack on the XRP Ledger again on Wednesday at 7:44 a.m. CET, in validated ledger 108,255,241. On Tuesday, they still held 61.8 million XRP, 33.46 million of them in a wallet that had not sent a single payment until then.

That wallet moved overnight. At 1:01 a.m. CET, it transferred 33,455,915 XRP in one go to the collection wallet ryB7NE…ktmx, through which the attacker has been passing on the loot in small tranches since November 5. On Wednesday morning, that wallet held 29,466,416 XRP. The other five wallets now carry only residual amounts in the single or low double digits.

Since Tuesday morning's measurement, the collection wallet has sent out 32.34 million XRP in 193 payments. Tuesday from 6:28 a.m. CET accounted for 28.29 million XRP in 171 payments, and Wednesday up to 4:05 a.m. for 4.05 million XRP in 22 payments. The median payment was around 127,000 XRP, the largest 963,000 XRP. Since 4:05 a.m., no further payment had gone out by the time of the query.

Analytics firm Elliptic writes that the XRP moved out were mostly swapped into bitcoin via the THORChain exchange service. Who exactly is buying on the other side cannot be determined from the ledger alone. Of the 233.46 million XRP originally stolen, around 87 percent have now been passed on. If Tuesday's pace holds, the rest would be gone in about a day; at the slower overnight pace, it would take several days.

Our view: without an unwind of long bets, XRP lacks a floor

In the newsroom's view, two forces are pulling against each other. In favour of stabilisation: the largest single seller of the past week will soon have no coins left. Against a global daily trading volume of around $2.3 billion, according to CoinGecko, 29.5 million XRP is a manageable amount.

The futures market argues the other way. A funding rate at its highest level in 13 months, a long-short ratio of 3.7 and open interest that has barely fallen in coin terms show that the market has not yet responded to the drop from $1.52 to $1.06 by cleaning out its long bets. If the price falls below the daily low of $1.034, a large number of forced liquidations sit underneath. Only when the funding rate drops below zero over several settlements will leveraged buyers have pulled back.

What speaks against this view: a positive funding rate can also mean that large investors are deliberately using the decline and hedging it via futures instead of buying directly. If inflows return around the ETF anniversary, the recovery could come faster than the futures market suggests.

XRP levels through the end of November: $1.00, $1.10 and $1.16

Three levels can be derived from the data, each with its rationale.

Weak case: $1.00

Below the daily low of $1.034 lies the zone around $1.00. XRP last closed lower on August 19, and the year's low based on CoinGecko daily closes was $0.993 on August 17. A break of $1.034 would hit the long bets in the futures market, and a wave of forced liquidations could quickly carry the price into that zone.

Base case: $1.03 to $1.10

The range of the past 24 hours runs from $1.034 to $1.10. If the outflow from the attacker's wallet runs dry and ETF flows stay neutral, much points to XRP moving sideways within this range while the funding rate slowly declines.

Strong case: $1.16

XRP closed at $1.16 last Sunday. According to Coinpedia, analyst Lana Valentis names $1.15 as the first target after a confirmed rebound from the lower edge of the downward channel, with further targets at $1.32 and $1.60. That would require fresh ETF inflows and a market that takes on risk again after the inflation print. Above $1.10, short positions would also come under pressure.

Leveraged products in Germany: no holding period, CFDs capped at 2:1

Anyone looking to trade in this environment should keep two things apart. XRP bought directly is tax-free in Germany after a one-year holding period; gains before that are exempt up to €1,000 a year and fully taxable above it. Where plans to abolish this rule stand is summarised in our overview of the holding period reform. The holding period does not apply to futures and CFDs: under the prevailing view, gains from them count as income from forward transactions and are subject to the 25 percent flat-rate withholding tax plus the solidarity surcharge.

Investor protection differs too. Under a rule from the securities regulator ESMA, adopted by BaFin, retail clients in the EU may trade CFDs on crypto assets with leverage of no more than 2:1. The broker has to close the position once the margin falls to half of the initial deposit. For an entry at $1.058, that would be roughly at $0.79, a decline of 25 percent. You can find regulated providers for this in our crypto broker comparison.

Perpetual futures with leverage of 10x or more are mainly offered by exchanges outside these rules. MiCA does not cover such products; in the EU they fall under the MiFID II financial markets directive. At 10x leverage, the liquidation threshold for a long position opened at $1.058 lies roughly at $0.96, only about 9 percent lower, and at 5x at around $0.85. Funding payments come on top for any holding period. If you want to look at providers for decentralised futures trading, you will find them in the perp DEX comparison.

XRP at $1.06: without negative funding, the floor stays open

Three steps you can take today without betting on a direction:

1. Check your leverage. If you hold a long position in XRP, compare your liquidation threshold with the daily low of $1.034 and with the zone around $1.00. If it sits above them, the buffer is too thin. Licensed providers with leverage caps are listed in the broker comparison.
2. Spot rather than futures if you want to buy. If you buy XRP directly, you pay no funding rate and cannot be liquidated, and in Germany the gain becomes tax-free after a year. Exchanges with a MiCA licence are listed in the comparison of regulated crypto exchanges.
3. Document your purchase dates. For the holding period, every single purchase counts. A crypto tax tool records purchase date and price and works out which tranche becomes tax-free when.

(As of November 11, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy. Crypto assets can lose their entire value.)

RollerCoin pays out real cryptocurrencies, but only in small amounts and only once your balance reaches the minimum for the coin in question. Playing mini-games in the browser earns you virtual computing power, not coins. The coins only come into being when that computing power wins a share of your league's block reward. What eventually lands in your own wallet therefore depends on three variables: your share of the league, the size of the reward and the withdrawal threshold.

For you as an investor, RollerCoin is therefore no substitute for buying Dogecoin or Bitcoin, but a game with a small return in real coins. As soon as a withdrawal is due, you need your own wallet or an account with an exchange that accepts the coin. If you later want to swap the coins you withdraw into euros, you inevitably end up on a trading platform; regulated crypto exchanges compared gives an overview. This guide works out how long the road to the first withdrawal takes and shows what you should plan for in terms of waiting time and tax.

What is RollerCoin? A browser-based mining simulator with no real hardware

RollerCoin is a browser game that recreates cryptocurrency mining. You set up a virtual room, place virtual miners on racks and increase your computing power through short arcade games. No graphics card or ASIC miner does any work in the process. Your computer solves no cryptographic puzzles, and your electricity meter runs no faster than when you are browsing.

Mining on real blockchains means computing new blocks, for which a network such as Bitcoin pays out new coins and fees. RollerCoin borrows the vocabulary of that process, namely hashrate, block and reward, and turns it into a game mechanic. According to the provider's help pages, mining power is simply the number of hashes per second the game credits to you. That number only exists in the operator's database.

The difference from bitcoin mining apps on smartphones is smaller than the name suggests: there, too, the phone does not really compute anything, and the payouts come from the app's business model. With RollerCoin, that model is openly designed as a game, with shops, events and an in-game currency of its own.

Hashrate and block reward: how RollerCoin distributes coins across 15 leagues

At RollerCoin, the block reward is the amount of a token shared among all active players in a league. According to the FAQ, this happens roughly every ten minutes. Your share depends on your computing power relative to the total power of all players in your league mining the same coin. The provider's example: if the reward is 100 DOGE, all DOGE miners in your league split exactly those 100 DOGE according to their power.

The leagues replace an earlier system with a single shared pot. RollerCoin now splits players into 15 leagues, ranked by their maximum power from miners, bonuses and racks. Each league has its own reward pot with a fixed amount of tokens and its own selection of coins. The higher the league, the more coins there are to choose from.

This leads to an important property: your reward falls when others upgrade, even if you change nothing yourself. League power, the sum of all power in your league, works like the mining difficulty of a real network. If many new players join or many choose the same coin, your slice of the pie gets smaller. The provider itself writes that block time can stretch beyond ten minutes for coins in high demand.

Game power expires after one to seven days

RollerCoin recognises five kinds of power: the base power of the miners, bonus power from your miners' percentage values, the rack bonus, power from games and temporary power from events. For beginners, game power matters most, because it costs nothing but time.

That is exactly the power that is time-limited. According to the FAQ, it lasts one, three, five or seven days depending on your PC level. Anyone who does not play for a week therefore loses most of their hashrate, unless they own permanent miners. The provider accordingly recommends playing every day, ideally twice. For your calculation, this means the return is tied to the time you spend playing, not to a device bought once.

Only miners and racks provide permanent power. You buy them in the game, and this is where the in-game currency comes in.

RLT and RST: two in-game currencies with no withdrawal

RLT (RollerToken) is RollerCoin's main currency. You receive it from games, quests, loot boxes, events and offers on the Task Wall, and you spend it on miners and equipment. According to the FAQ, RLT can neither be withdrawn nor exchanged for other tokens; the currency is intended exclusively for use in the game. RLT can also be bought with real money.

RST is a season token earned from daily and weekly tasks. You use it to buy items in the season shop. RST expires at the end of each season. If you do not spend it, you lose it.

When it comes to what RollerCoin pays out, both currencies are therefore ruled out. Only the cryptocurrencies you mine with your power can be withdrawn, and not every one of those either: according to the provider, some coins can only be mined or deposited.

Minimum amount per coin: the threshold decides the first withdrawal

Every withdrawable coin at RollerCoin has its own minimum amount. If your balance is below it, the system does not accept a withdrawal request. You can see the current threshold in the game's wallet section next to each coin; the provider has changed it several times in the past.

One example comes from a blog post from April 2021, in which RollerCoin lowered the minimum withdrawal for DOGE from 360 to 150 DOGE because beginners could hardly reach the old threshold. Review sites cite figures of around 0.0001 BTC for bitcoin, without the provider confirming that number on its help pages. Always check the threshold yourself in your account before you build a strategy around a particular coin.

The threshold is the real bottleneck. As long as your balance is below it, the coins are not effectively yours yet. The balance sits with the operator, and you can neither sell nor transfer it.

Dogecoin worked example: a 0.01 percent league share is enough for around 104 days

How long it takes to reach the first withdrawal can be estimated from the provider's own figures. The following values are assumptions so that the calculation stays easy to follow, not a promise of returns.

Assume the block reward for DOGE in your league is 100 DOGE, as in the FAQ example, and a block is produced every ten minutes. The league then pays out 144 blocks a day with 14,400 DOGE in total. If you consistently hold 0.01 percent of your league's DOGE power, you receive 1.44 DOGE a day. Reaching the 150 DOGE threshold from the 2021 blog post would then take around 104 days.

What this comes to in euros depends on the price. On November 10 we reported Dogecoin at around $0.067, which put 150 DOGE at about $10. The calculation also assumes that your share stays constant. Because game power expires and other players upgrade, that tends to be the exception in practice. If your share halves, the waiting time doubles.

For comparison: anyone running real Dogecoin mining with Scrypt hardware has to factor in the device price, electricity and pool fees. RollerCoin does away with these costs; instead you pay with playing time and, if you buy miners for RLT, possibly with real money.

Withdrawal with a confirmation code: valid for 30 minutes, up to ten business days of review

Once you have reached the threshold, the withdrawal takes a few steps: open the wallet in the game, choose the coin, enter the destination address and amount, add the MEMO number for XRP, then confirm. RollerCoin then sends you a code by email, which you enter in the game. According to the FAQ, this code is only valid for 30 minutes. If it expires, the request lapses and you have to start again.

According to its own help pages, processing usually takes up to ten business days, or roughly two weeks. The provider itself names longer periods: during an investigation of suspicious activity on the account, when many requests come in at once, or when there are technical problems with a blockchain. Requests can also be cancelled if the system detects irregularities.

Double-check the destination address before you confirm. A wallet address is the public identifier to which coins are sent on a blockchain. A wrong address or the wrong network cannot be corrected once the coins have been sent.

Who sets the block rewards: game economics instead of proof of work

With bitcoin, the protocol determines how many new coins a block brings, and no company can change that amount. This process is called proof of work: whoever solves the computational puzzle first receives the reward, and every participant can verify this. At RollerCoin, the operator decides on the rewards. In the blog post mentioned above, RollerCoin writes that the size of the rewards is based on its own AI forecasts and is adjusted to market conditions.

The coins paid out are real coins on their respective blockchains. How many of them are distributed in the game, however, is a business-model decision, not the outcome of an open network. For you, this means that rewards, thresholds and league rules can change at any time, and you cannot verify whether the distribution follows a fixed rule.

Tax on RollerCoin earnings: the €256 exemption limit and the holding period

A mining game is not explicitly covered in the German Federal Ministry of Finance's guidance on crypto assets of March 6, 2025. Classification as other income under Section 22 No. 3 of the German Income Tax Act (EStG) seems likely, similar to rewards from staking or bonuses for tasks. An exemption limit of €256 a year applies to this. If all your income of this kind stays below it, the amount is tax-free; just one euro more makes the entire amount taxable.

What counts is the market value in euros of the coins at the time you receive them. That value also serves as the acquisition cost. If you later sell the coins you withdrew, the rules on private disposal transactions under Section 23 EStG apply: within one year of receipt, a gain is taxable provided all such gains in the year exceed €1,000; after one year, the sale is tax-free. Anyone deploying hashrate on a large scale should check whether the tax office will treat mining as a business.

Record every withdrawal with its date, amount and euro value. The withdrawal history in the game and the transaction on the blockchain are your proof. This classification is not tax advice; for larger amounts, a tax adviser can help.

Buying real coins: an exchange with a MiCA licence instead of game hashrate

If you want to hold DOGE or BTC, buying directly gets you there faster than a mining game. Since the EU's MiCA Regulation, crypto service providers in Germany need authorisation as crypto-asset service providers. Such a MiCA licence governs, among other things, how the exchange keeps customer funds segregated.

RollerCoin, by contrast, is a game. Your balance there is a claim against the operator until you withdraw it. For the coins you withdraw, you need two things: a wallet whose keys you control yourself and, for swapping into euros, an exchange authorised in the EU.

RollerCoin withdrawals: the threshold matters more than playing time

1. Check the threshold: look in the wallet section to see from what amount your coin can be withdrawn, and use your league share to work out the waiting time. For the later swap into euros, compare regulated crypto exchanges.
2. Prepare a wallet: set up your own wallet for the coin before you submit the request, and check the network. Suitable apps can be found in the software wallet comparison.
3. Keep records: log every withdrawal with its date and euro value so that you keep an eye on the exemption limit. Tax tools and portfolio trackers can help.

(As of November 11, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)

Bitcoin trades at around $73,700, or roughly €66,000, on Wednesday morning, November 11, 2026, leaving it just above its 200-day moving average. What is established: money keeps leaving the US bitcoin funds, and BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) has redeemed shares for seven trading days in a row, $1.66 billion in total. Our assessment follows further down: as long as these outflows do not reverse, the price lacks the buyer that would carry it back above last week's levels.

According to CoinGecko, the range over the past 24 hours ran from $72,744 to $74,896, a decline of just over 1 percent. Where the price could head over a horizon of months is covered in our Bitcoin price prediction. This piece is about the morning: the fund flows, the gap to the stock market and the levels that will decide Wednesday.

Bitcoin price on Wednesday morning: $73,700, 200-day moving average at $73,143

The 200-day moving average is the mean of the daily closing prices over the past 200 days. Many funds and traders read it as the line between an intact and a damaged uptrend. By our calculation from CoinGecko's daily data, it stands at $73,143 on Wednesday morning. The price is therefore only about $600, or 0.8 percent, above it.

The shorter averages sit well higher. The 20-day average stands at $78,107 and the 50-day average at $81,386, so bitcoin trades below both. It is a good 12 percent away from the highest daily close of the past 30 days, $84,082 on October 22.

For a year-on-year comparison: on November 12, 2025, bitcoin closed at around $103,100 according to the same data. Anyone who bought then is almost 29 percent down today. That matters for tax purposes, more on which below.

IBIT outflows: money has left BlackRock's bitcoin fund for seven straight trading days

The twelve US spot bitcoin funds lost a combined $201 million on Monday, November 9. That is shown by data from Farside Investors, analysed on Tuesday by Finwire, citing Cointelegraph. IBIT alone shed $213 million, while Morgan Stanley's fund (MSBT) took in $22 million and softened the outflow slightly. On the Friday before, the figure had still been $412 million, so the pace eased.

Over six trading days, outflows from all bitcoin funds add up to around $1.5 billion. IBIT has lost money every day since October 30, seven sessions in a row and $1.66 billion in total. Year to date, the funds stand at net outflows of $1.1 billion. In both 2024 and 2025 they had gathered around $25 billion each by early November. Complete figures for Tuesday were not yet available early on Wednesday morning.

Ether funds are losing money too: according to SoSoValue, around $185 million flowed out of the US spot ether funds on Monday, the largest daily outflow since October 6.

How a fund outflow pushes down the bitcoin price

A spot bitcoin fund holds actual bitcoin. When investors redeem shares, the issuer has to sell bitcoin through its trading partners or deliver it from its holdings in order to pay out the shares. At $213 million in a single day, that comes to just under 2,900 bitcoin at today's price. That is more than twice what the network creates in a day: since the 2024 halving, around 450 new bitcoin have been produced daily.

The mechanism works in both directions. In the months of inflows, the funds took more bitcoin off the market day after day than was newly created. Now that is reversing, and the selling pressure meets a market in which retail investors are holding back as well. According to the analytics firm Santiment, the bitcoin network has lost around 108,700 addresses holding a balance since October 16, as CoinDesk reported on Tuesday.

Since Tuesday: bitcoin fell to $72,744 and climbed back above the line

Our Bitcoin price article from Tuesday morning gave $74,600 as the starting point, $75,500 as the level to the upside and $73,636 to the downside. The upper level was not reached, with the daily high stopping at $74,896. The lower level, however, gave way: after the US consumer price figures for October came in higher than expected, bitcoin slid to $72,744 over the past 24 hours and so briefly dropped below the 200-day moving average.

Two things are new since then. First, the price has not given up the line and has returned above it; a daily close below it has yet to happen. Second, the picture in the rates market has hardened, because a member of the US Federal Reserve is openly backing a rate increase in December. On Monday the line stood at $73,170; today it is at $73,143, so it is edging lower as well.

Stocks versus bitcoin: the S&P 500 rises as bitcoin decouples from the Nasdaq

The start of the week on Wall Street was striking. According to CoinDesk, the S&P 500 had its best day since April 8 on Monday, and the Nasdaq Composite gained 2.7 percent. Bitcoin did not follow. For weeks the price had tracked Nasdaq futures closely; it fell with them on October 30 and again during the sell-off in AI stocks the week before. That link now only holds on the way down.

A second finding fits the picture: Brent crude fell below $90, for the first time since August. Falling energy prices ease inflation, which normally helps every asset that thrives on low interest rates. That bitcoin is not benefiting from this either suggests the pressure is coming from within its own market, from the funds and from the retreat of small investors.

Fed rate hike in December: Waller pushes the FedWatch probability to 96 percent

The tone for the rates market was set on Tuesday by Christopher Waller, a governor of the US Federal Reserve. Speaking at the Bank of England Watchers Conference in London, he said, according to Cointelegraph: "I would still support a 25 basis point increase in the FOMC's policy rate at our December meeting." Should inflation come in markedly higher than he expects, a larger step could also become necessary.

The CME's FedWatch tool, which derives expectations from interest rate futures, then jumped from 76.3 to 96.3 percent for a 0.25 percentage point increase on December 9. Other sources put the figure lower, at around 84 percent after the inflation data; the spread shows how quickly expectations are moving at the moment. For bitcoin this is a headwind: higher rates make safe assets more attractive and raise the cost of the loans traders use to leverage their positions.

Fear and Greed Index at 29: sentiment stays in fear territory

The Fear and Greed Index from alternative.me measures market sentiment on a scale from 0 to 100, based on volatility, trading volume, social media and dominance. On Wednesday it stands at 29, down from 32 on Tuesday. On Saturday, November 7, it was at 25, in the extreme fear zone, and as recently as November 5 it showed a neutral 50. Our Fear and Greed chart shows how it has moved.

A low reading is not a buy signal in itself. It describes a market in which many participants are cautious and selling prevails. The jump from 50 to 25 within two days last week stands out: sentiment flipped faster than the price fell.

Resistance at $75,451, support at $73,143: the bitcoin levels

To the upside, the first level is the daily high of $74,896. Above that comes $75,451, Strategy's average purchase price, which our Bitcoin price prediction from Tuesday evening described as a boundary. Only a close above it would interrupt the downward move that began on October 22. The next hurdle after that is the 20-day average at $78,107.

To the downside, the 200-day moving average at $73,143 is the decisive level, with the 24-hour low of $72,744 beneath it. If that breaks as well, the zone around $72,000 comes into view, which Tuesday's Bitcoin price prediction named as the next support. If you trade with leverage, you do not place your stop directly on one of these round levels: many orders sit there, and a brief swing like Tuesday's triggers them all at once.

Leverage and liquidation below the 200-day moving average

A liquidation occurs when the collateral behind a leveraged position is no longer sufficient and the exchange closes it by force. At 10x leverage, a decline of around 10 percent, to about $66,300 from today's price, is enough to wipe out a long position without a margin top-up. At 20x, a drop of around 5 percent to about $70,000 already does it. If you are leveraged, check the liquidation threshold in your account today and decide whether to add collateral or reduce the position.

Bitcoin funds in Germany: why IBIT does not end up in German portfolios

The US funds that are getting so much coverage right now generally cannot be bought by retail investors in Germany. They lack the key information document required under the European PRIIPs Regulation, without which banks and brokers cannot offer them to small investors. Anyone who wants to hold bitcoin in a securities account turns to exchange-traded products from European issuers, usually ETNs or ETPs backed by bitcoin. Which products exist, and what matters on costs and custody, is set out in our overview Buying crypto ETFs in Germany.

Buying bitcoin directly works through a crypto exchange or a broker. Since the European MiCA Regulation, providers serving customers in Germany need a licence as a crypto-asset service provider. A list of vetted providers with fees and licence status can be found in our crypto exchange comparison.

Holding period and loss offsetting with bitcoin below $75,000

In Germany, gains from bitcoin are tax-free if more than one year passes between purchase and sale. Anyone who sells earlier pays tax on the gain at their personal income tax rate, provided all private disposal gains for the year together reach €1,000. The current state of the debate over this holding period is tracked on our page on the status of the crypto holding period reform.

The decline has a second side. Anyone who bought at higher prices within the past twelve months and sells now realises a loss. That loss can be offset against gains from other private disposal transactions in the same year or carried forward to later years. Someone who got in at around $103,000 in November 2025, for example, is almost 29 percent below that today and only has until the anniversary of the purchase: after that a sale is tax-free, but a loss can then no longer be offset either. A tax tool that imports purchase data from the exchanges shows which holdings reach the deadline when.

Our assessment: the 200-day moving average only holds with new buyers

In the newsroom's view, Wednesday will be decided less by the chart than by the fund data for Tuesday. The mechanics support this: seven days of IBIT outflows totalling $1.66 billion have cost the market more bitcoin than was newly created over the same period, and retail investors are not buying the dip, according to Santiment. A stock market in positive territory and a falling oil price did not close that gap on Monday.

Against this, the pace has slowed, from $412 million on Friday to $201 million on Monday, and the price returned above the line after slipping below $73,000. If Tuesday's figures show the first inflow since October 30, the 200-day moving average would have a reason to hold. If they show an eighth day of outflows at IBIT, a close below $73,143 would become more likely. This is an assessment of the situation, not a recommendation to buy or sell; bitcoin can fall sharply at any time, up to a total loss of the money invested.

Bitcoin ahead of the fund data: the 200-day moving average remains the test

1. Settle how you buy: if you want to add to your position, use a MiCA-licensed provider and compare trading fees and spreads beforehand in the exchange comparison.
2. Record your tax position: transfer purchase dates and entry prices for all holdings into a crypto tax tool, so that holding periods and possible losses are visible before year-end.
3. Spread your entry rather than betting on one level: if you are unsure whether the 200-day moving average will hold, you can spread the purchase over several dates with a bitcoin savings plan.

(As of November 11, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)

What is confirmed: in the NEAR AI hack, an attacker exploited a flaw in the inference software SGLang to obtain the names and email addresses of around 100 users, in some cases also their plan and account balance, along with chat histories, settings and logs from 18 AI agents. The NEAR AI incident report makes no mention of stolen coins, wallets or private keys; the target was the company's AI service, not the NEAR Protocol blockchain. Our assessment follows further down: the biggest risk for users now comes from phishing messages built on exactly this data.

NEAR AI published the report on November 9, and the trade outlet Decrypt picked it up on November 10. If you have a NEAR AI account, run agents through the service or simply hold NEAR tokens, this piece sets out what is known, what remains open and which steps make sense now.

What happened in the NEAR AI hack via the SGLang flaw

The way in was a remote code execution vulnerability, meaning a flaw that lets an outsider run their own code on a machine from afar. It sat in SGLang, the open-source software NEAR AI uses to run its language models on its own servers. The attacker was able to execute commands on a single inference server and work their way further into the company's infrastructure from there.

According to the report, the intruder reached an internal system behind Private Chat, a feature NEAR AI had already discontinued. The attacker also accessed 18 agents on an older deployment of NEAR AI Agents. These agents were not running in the confidential computing environment the company otherwise promotes.

After discovering the breach, NEAR AI says it revoked all active sessions and administrator access, replaced every agent token, took Private Chat offline and patched the SGLang flaw on all inference servers. All remaining credentials have since been rotated, a forensic review has been completed and access to NEAR AI Cloud has been restored. The company does not say which SGLang vulnerability was exploited. It says it has reported it to the SGLang developers.

Which data the attacker took from NEAR AI

The report distinguishes between confirmed access and a residual risk. These records are confirmed:

• Account data: email address and name of around 100 users, and for some of these accounts also the subscribed plan and the balance held with the service.
• Agent data: chat history, settings and logs of 18 agents on the older agent platform.
• API keys: the logs contained the NEAR AI Cloud API keys of two cloud customers. An API key is a digital access code that programs use to log in to a service. NEAR AI has revoked both keys; the report leaves open whether the attacker used them.

The residual risk concerns November 8. On that day the attacker could have observed requests being processed on the compromised server at the time, including those in confidential mode. NEAR AI says it found no sign of access to stored Private Chat conversations or uploaded files.

One point matters for reading the account balance correctly: it refers to credit for the AI service, in other words what a user has deposited with NEAR AI for model calls or a subscription. A balance in this sense is not a wallet address and not a key. It does, however, tell a fraudster who is a paying customer, and that is precisely what makes the data valuable for targeted deception.

Are NEAR coins and wallets affected by the security incident?

Based on everything NEAR AI and Decrypt report, no. The incident played out on servers that run language models. The NEAR blockchain, its validators and its smart contracts do not appear in the report, and neither do seed phrases, private keys or drained tokens. If you hold NEAR in your own wallet or on an exchange, there is no need to move anything.

The structure helps draw the line. NEAR Protocol is a layer-1 blockchain with its own token, which we describe in detail in our guide NEAR Protocol explained: sharding, staking and the use of the NEAR token. NEAR AI is the AI branch around this ecosystem; the service is operated by Jasnah Inc. and sells private AI computing power. A leak at NEAR AI is therefore a leak at a service provider, comparable to a data incident at a hosting company, and not a fault in the protocol.

The case at the end of September was different. Back then, NEAR Intents halted withdrawals after an exploit of around $3.8 million, as cryptoticker.io reported on October 1 in NEAR Intents halts withdrawals after $3.8 million exploit. That involved funds in an application within the ecosystem. The current incident involves personal and usage data.

The market shows no move of its own. According to CoinGecko, NEAR traded at €3.19 on Tuesday evening, about 2 percent below the previous day and a good 37 percent below its level 30 days ago. That decline started long before the report and tracks the weak overall market; in early November we had already classified it as a price effect in NEAR Protocol falls to $3.70.

What SGLang is and why an inference engine became the entry point

SGLang is an open-source inference engine. Inference is the step in which a fully trained AI model takes a request and produces an answer. The engine loads the model into the memory of the graphics cards, distributes the requests and delivers the answers. Many AI providers use SGLang because the software is fast and supports open models directly.

That very position makes it sensitive. An inference engine sees every request in plain text, because the model has to process the text. Anyone who can run code on that server therefore sits at the point where confidential data is necessarily exposed.

The problem is not new. Decrypt points out that the CERT Coordination Center at Carnegie Mellon University flagged vulnerabilities in SGLang back in July, including flaws that, depending on the server configuration, could allow commands to be executed or credentials to be read. Whether the attacker used one of these flaws is unclear, because NEAR AI does not name the specific vulnerability.

Confidential computing and TEE: where hardware isolation ends

NEAR AI's business model rests on confidential computing. Calculations run in a trusted execution environment, or TEE for short: an area sealed off by the processor that not even the server operator can look into. Prompts are meant to stay encrypted and isolated while the model processes them. According to Decrypt, Brave's browser assistant Leo also uses this infrastructure for one supported model; the report does not, however, list Brave users among those affected.

The incident shows the limit of this approach, and NEAR AI names it itself. Confidential computing protects data from the operator and the host, the company writes, but it does not protect against a vulnerability in the software running inside the environment. That is exactly what happened: the SGLang flaw let the attacker execute code inside an inference server, at the very point where requests are processed in decrypted form.

An analogy makes this tangible. A TEE is like a vault with an armoured door. The door keeps out anyone coming from outside. But if an employee inside lets a stranger control them remotely, the door is useless. In this picture, SGLang is the employee.

NEAR AI says it will in future audit the inference software and the services around the isolated environment as strictly as the environment itself. According to the company, the code, dependencies and configuration of its confidential inference remain public so that third parties can verify what runs there.

Phishing after the data leak: the typical scams with a NEAR AI angle

Phishing refers to fraudulent messages that pose as a trusted sender in order to obtain login details, keys or payments. With a name, email address, plan and account balance, scammers have exactly the material that makes such a message credible. NEAR AI therefore explicitly advises treating unsolicited messages that refer to your account or balance with caution. The company has contacted affected users directly, and the owners of the 18 agents individually.

Data leaks at other crypto services have produced a few well-known patterns. They tend to resurface after incidents like this one:

• The supposed security check: an email styled like NEAR AI asks you to re-verify your account via a link, or your balance will be frozen.
• The compensation offer: affected users are promised restitution in NEAR tokens and asked to connect their wallet or sign a transaction for it. With such a signature, victims often unknowingly grant approval over their tokens.
• The support call: a supposed staff member correctly states your name and plan and asks for a confirmation code or your seed phrase.
• The migration: after the incident, all agents or balances supposedly have to move to a new address supplied in the message.

None of these scams works if you stick to one simple rule: no reputable provider will ever ask for your seed phrase or private key, whether by email, phone or chat.

How to protect your NEAR account and seed phrase after the incident

The following steps take little time and cover the realistic consequences of the data leak:

Contact NEAR AI only through the official website

Open the NEAR AI website yourself via the address bar or a saved bookmark instead of following links in messages. That is where the incident report is published and where you reach genuine support. With every email, check whether the sender address really belongs to the provider's domain.

Renew your password and API keys

If you use NEAR AI Cloud, it is best to create new API keys and delete the old ones, even if your account is not one of the two named. If you have used your NEAR AI password elsewhere, change it there too and enable two-factor authentication wherever the service offers it.

Keep wallet and seed phrase separate

The seed phrase is the sequence of words from which all keys of a wallet can be restored. It belongs offline on paper or a metal plate, never in a chat, an AI assistant or a cloud document. Anyone holding larger NEAR amounts is better off storing them on a hardware wallet; our hardware wallet comparison shows which devices support NEAR and what they cost.

Review signatures and approvals

Do not sign any transaction whose purpose you do not understand. If you have responded to a suspicious message in recent days, check in your wallet's explorer which approvals and access keys sit on your NEAR account, and remove any unknown entries.

GDPR rights after the NEAR AI incident: access and complaints

For users in Germany, the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, generally also applies to providers outside the EU if they offer their services to people in the EU. NEAR AI says it will make the required notifications to authorities; the report does not say which supervisor this concerns.

Regardless of that, Article 15 GDPR gives you a right of access: you can find out from the provider what data it holds about you and whether it was caught up in the incident. Under Article 17 you can request deletion if you no longer use the service. If you receive no answer or an inadequate one, you can lodge a complaint with the data protection authority of your federal state. A written request by email to support is enough; keep the reply.

A claim for damages under Article 82 GDPR requires concrete harm. With around 100 people affected and no sign of financial losses, the scope is narrow; anyone who actually loses money through a phishing message using the stolen data should document the case and report it to the police.

NEAR Protocol after the Intents exploit and the AI data leak: our assessment

For the NEAR ecosystem it is the second security incident within six weeks, even though the two cases have nothing to do with each other technically. The Intents exploit hit funds in an application, the current incident hit data at an AI service.

Our assessment: the damage is limited, the effect on trust in the promise of private AI is not. It is confirmed that the number of people affected is small, at around 100 accounts and 18 agents, that no tokens were drained and that NEAR AI disclosed the cause, scope and countermeasures within a short time. It is equally confirmed that the company sells privacy as its core product and that requests in confidential mode may nevertheless have been visible on November 8. For investors, this means the report contains no reason to sell NEAR tokens because of this incident. Arguing against that reading: the investigation does not quantify the exact number of observed requests, and any link to the price trend would only show up over weeks. This is not a buy recommendation; crypto assets can fall all the way to a total loss.

Other factors remain decisive for the price: the state of the overall market, activity on the blockchain and demand for NEAR applications. Our NEAR price prediction collects scenarios on this. How quickly attacks on devices and wallets are currently piling up is also shown by the iOS flaw from the start of the week, which we described in iOS vulnerability worse_query.

NEAR AI data leak: the danger now arrives by email

The incident itself is contained; the consequences for those affected are only beginning. Three steps are enough to avoid phishing and costly mistakes:

1. Check the trading venue: if you buy or sell NEAR, do it on an exchange with EU authorisation under MiCA rather than via links in messages. Our comparison of regulated crypto exchanges shows which providers hold a licence.
2. Keep keys offline: store larger holdings on a device that never exposes the keys to the internet. Models and prices are listed in the hardware wallet comparison.
3. Secure your everyday wallet: for smaller amounts, an app wallet with PIN, biometrics and a carefully noted seed phrase is enough. The software wallet comparison shows which apps support NEAR.

(As of November 10, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)

The Bitcoin miner says its Boden facility could generate $45 million annually, but a June letter of intent remains nonbinding as executives negotiate financing and customer protections for the project.

Truth Social’s parent booked $409.7 million in quarterly income largely from crypto investments, even as its stock remained more than 94% below its March 2024 peak.

The chipmaker has erased its 2026 gains as a suspected Chinese espionage case brings fresh scrutiny of CEO Jensen Huang.

An SGLang flaw let an attacker reach internal systems and potentially view confidential AI requests, exposing the limits of hardware-backed privacy protections.

Elon Musk says the incoming Grok 4.8 will trail Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5.5, praising his rival’s model while predicting Grok 5 could surpass it in two or three months.

Suiball, a hardware wallet built for Sui, has closed before shipping its first unit after the Sui Foundation judged the project too risky.

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has touted Gram's strong performance amid the broader crypto sell-off, predicting that the Telegram-linked cryptocurrency will eventually break into the top three by market capitalization.

Former Ripple CTO David Schwartz has revealed that he has slashed his XRP holdings by a staggering 23 million tokens, while also selling nearly all his Bitcoin and Ethereum holdings, citing his extremely low risk tolerance.

Chainlink, Cardano, Ethereum and Dogecoin remain under pressure as bearish sentiment drives the market toward critical fear levels.

Chicago-based investment management firm Rothschild Investment LLC has disclosed its first reported stake in the Bitwise XRP ETF, adding the Ripple-linked cryptocurrency to its portfolio.

TLDR:

• BTC trades near $73.9K, down 5% in seven days, with $72.3K emerging now as a key technical support level.
• Andreou’s first setup targets $98,067 after a reclaim of $72,300, at a projected 5.1:1 risk-reward ratio.
• Failure at $72.3K could expose $69K; Andreou then watches a 62.8K-67.3K buying zone for a second entry.
• U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs posted $95M in outflows on Nov. 10, extending the net outflow streak to four days.

Bitcoin is trading near $73,900 after falling from $82,172, leaving traders focused on support around $72,300. 

CoinGecko data puts BTC at $73,908.71, down 1.08% over 24 hours and 5% across seven days. The decline has also coincided with sustained withdrawals from U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds.

SoSoValue recorded $95.0012 million in Bitcoin ETF net outflows on November 10, extending the streak to four consecutive days. Against that backdrop, market analyst Giannis Andreou has outlined two conditional routes toward the $98,000 area.

Bitcoin Price Holds Near a Key Fibonacci Support

Andreou’s daily chart places Bitcoin near the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement at $72,272. 

The level also sits close to the lower boundary of a rising price channel. That makes the area important for traders watching whether buyers can defend the broader structure.

In Andreou’s first scenario, BTC briefly moves below $72,300 before reclaiming the level. 

A sweep occurs when price dips below support, triggers stop-loss orders, then reclaims the level. He identifies a potential long entry near $72,355, with a stop-loss at $67,314 and a target of $98,067. The setup offers a projected risk-reward ratio of roughly 5.1 to 1.

A recovery would first need to clear $75,200, according to Andreou’s analysis. The previous swing high near $87,600 would then become another level to watch. These are conditional technical levels, not confirmation that Bitcoin has started a sustained recovery.

The alternative scenario begins if $72,300 breaks and becomes resistance. 

Andreou then watches $69,000, followed by a broader buying zone between $62,800 and $67,300. If buyers defend that zone, his second setup identifies an entry near $65,030.

That trade places its stop at $60,540 and its target at $97,979. Andreou estimates a risk-reward ratio of approximately 7.3 to 1. Both scenarios therefore point toward similar upside, but depend on buyers defending different support areas.

Bitcoin ETF Outflows Add Pressure to the Market

Shorter-term trading data shows how sharply Bitcoin has pulled back. 

CoinAnk’s two-hour Hyperliquid chart recorded BTC at $73,967, down 1.11%, with a 24-hour range of $72,668 to $74,979. The chart also showed $3.62 billion in volume, $108.70 million in liquidations, and $3 billion in open interest.

CoinAnk’s chart also showed multiple fair value gaps and order blocks left by the sell-off. Traders often monitor these zones for possible price reactions. The long-short ratio stood at 0.97, while funding remained positive at 0.0013%.

ETF flows provide another measure of demand from traditional investment channels. 

SoSoValue reported that U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs lost $95.0012 million on November 10. That marked four straight sessions of net outflows. Spot Ethereum ETFs lost $1.3168 million, extending their outflow streak to four days.

ETF outflows do not determine Bitcoin’s next move, but they confirm that net withdrawals have continued. Traders face a clear test: Bitcoin must defend $72,300 or risk extending its decline toward lower support. 

A move toward $98,000 remains Andreou’s conditional target, not the market’s confirmed direction.

The post Bitcoin Price Prediction: BTC Nears $73.9K as Spot ETF Outflows Hit $95M for Fourth Day appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• Lubin says ETH shares gold and Bitcoin’s non-debt monetary design, while offering added network utility.
• Ethereum’s censorship resistance and guaranteed transaction execution form key parts of Lubin’s argument.
• Stablecoins, DeFi, collateral and smart contracts could expand demand for ETH as onchain activity grows.
• Lubin predicts quantum-safe, AI-safe ETH by 2027–28, but provides no technical details for the forecast.

Joseph Lubin argues that ETH could become a stronger store of value as inflation and economic volatility rise. In a post on X, Lubin warned that nation-state currencies and other assets could lose purchasing power during heightened instability.

He described gold and Bitcoin as established stores of value, but argued that ETH offers additional monetary and utility features. These include censorship resistance, programmable transactions, collateral use, and Ethereum’s role in stablecoin activity. 

Lubin also predicted that ETH would become quantum-safe and AI-safe money by the end of 2027 or partway through 2028.

Why Lubin Sees ETH as a Store of Value

Lubin’s argument starts with ETH’s monetary design. He said ETH, like gold and Bitcoin, is not debt-based or credit-based money. He also pointed to Ethereum’s resistance to censorship.

According to Lubin, transactions on Ethereum’s layer 1 cannot be blocked. This applies to simple payments and complex decentralized finance applications. 

He added that valid transactions are guaranteed to execute, whether they move one dollar or billions. Lubin also said Ethereum is cheap and easy to use at any scale.

Lubin described ETH as disinflationary. He said periods of high network activity can make its supply deflationary. He sees this feature as another reason ETH could preserve value over time.

He further argued that ETH is relatively inexpensive to hold and secure. That could matter to users seeking assets they can store and use across different market conditions. However, these characteristics do not guarantee that ETH’s market price will rise.

Ethereum Utility Could Strengthen ETH’s Monetary Role

Beyond scarcity, Lubin’s thesis depends on Ethereum’s expanding economic activity. 

He described ETH as useful across decentralized finance, stablecoins, and smart-contract-based business processes. Ethereum also hosts what he called the bulk of stablecoin activity.

He expects finance and eventually other industries to move more activity onchain. Stablecoins serve as payment money and units of account, while ETH can support applications and collateral arrangements. 

Lubin argued that collateral becomes more powerful when the asset backing agreements can grow in value. That remains a thesis, not a guaranteed outcome for borrowers or investors.

He also emphasized programmability, which lets developers attach logic to transactions. Smart contracts can automate agreements, payments, and business processes. Lubin linked this capability to a future economy involving people and machine intelligence.

His post also addressed privacy and transparency. He said Ethereum-based financial instruments can be public or private, while remaining selectively disclosable and auditable. He cited tools including Railgun, stealth addresses, privacy pools, and zero-knowledge proofs.

Lubin expects Ethereum’s base layer and modular layer-2 networks to support more high-value transactions and agreements. His post did not provide technical details supporting his quantum-safety and AI-safety timeline.

The central point is that Lubin sees ETH as more than a scarce digital asset. He believes its monetary properties and Ethereum’s utility could reinforce each other as onchain activity expands. Whether that translates into lasting price appreciation will depend on adoption, network activity, and market demand.

The post Ethereum Co-Founder Says ETH Goes Beyond Bitcoin and Gold as a Store of Value appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR:

• XRP whales accumulated 65.32M XRP worth nearly $72M in four days, according to Santiment’s whale data.
• Bitcoin whales reduced holdings by over 34,000 BTC, worth $2.6B, as BTC dropped below $73,000 this week.
• Ethereum whale wallets shed about 17,800 ETH worth $40M over the past week, according to Ali Charts.
• Unlike BTC and ETH whale balances, XRP whale holdings recovered toward 4B tokens in Santiment charts.

Large cryptocurrency holders are taking different positions as BTC’s decline continues, with XRP whales increasing their balances while Bitcoin and Ethereum whales reduce theirs. Santiment charts shared by analyst Ali Martinez on November 10 show that large XRP holders added approximately 65.32 million tokens over four days, valued at nearly $72 million. By contrast, Bitcoin whales reduced holdings by more than 34,000 BTC, while Ethereum whales shed around 17,800 ETH during the previous week.

Bitcoin Whales Reduce Holdings as BTC Drops Below $73,000

Bitcoin recorded the largest reduction by dollar value among the three assets. Martinez reported that whale holdings declined by more than 34,000 BTC, worth roughly $2.6 billion, as the cryptocurrency fell from $79,000 to below $73,000.

The accompanying Santiment chart shows a broadly consistent decline in the balances tracked, with the latest reading near 5.24 million BTC. Earlier bars were closer to 5.28 million BTC, indicating that large-holder exposure contracted alongside the price.

The sequence matters as accumulation during falling prices can sometimes absorb available supply. In this case, however, the tracked Bitcoin wallets were reducing their balances rather than increasing them. The figures do not establish which wallets sold on exchanges or why their holdings changed.

Ethereum Whales Trim Exposure as XRP Accumulation Accelerates

Ethereum recorded a smaller reduction. Martinez said large holders shed approximately 17,800 ETH over seven days, equivalent to around $40 million at the prices used in his analysis. Its Santiment chart shows a less uniform pattern than Bitcoin’s.

Holdings rose early in the observed period, declined afterward and briefly recovered before the latest reading weakened again. Although both groups reduced exposure, their reported dollar changes differed substantially. Bitcoin’s $2.6 billion contraction was about 65 times Ethereum’s $40 million decline. Meanwhile, XRP moved in the opposite direction.

According to the same analysis, whale wallets accumulated 65.32 million XRP over four days, bringing the value of the increase to almost $72 million. The XRP chart shows balances recovering after a midperiod decline. Its final bar rises toward 4 billion XRP, the highest point in the displayed sequence, contrasting with Bitcoin’s falling bars.

What the Whale Divergence Means for Crypto Markets

These movements indicate different short-term holding patterns among the wallet groups tracked for each cryptocurrency. They do not prove that funds withdrawn from Bitcoin or Ethereum were transferred into XRP.

Basically, changes in wallet balances can reflect purchases, sales or transfers, while the charts alone cannot identify investor intentions. The monitoring windows also differ: four days for XRP versus roughly one week for Bitcoin and Ethereum.

For now, the reported data documents XRP whale accumulation occurring alongside reductions in Bitcoin and Ethereum holdings, without establishing whether that divergence will persist or affect prices.

The post XRP Whales Scoop Up $72M as Bitcoin and Ethereum Holders Reduce Exposure appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR

• BBAI shares fell 5.10% to $2.3250 despite a new European security certification.
• Pangiam earned ECAC approval alongside SureScan’s DETECT 1000 CT baggage scanner.
• ECAC lists Pangiam among only two third-party approved APIDS software solutions.
• The certification builds on Dutch approval secured by BigBear.ai in July 2026.
• BigBear.ai plans additional tests with equipment makers and certification bodies.

BigBear.ai Holdings (BBAI) shares fell 5.10% to $2.3250 as the company announced a new European aviation security certification. Its Pangiam Threat Detection software met a screening standard alongside SureScan’s DETECT 1000 CT system. The milestone strengthened the platform’s credentials, although the stock remained under selling pressure.

BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc., BBAI

BigBear.ai Secures European Certification for Pangiam Threat Detection

BigBear.ai announced that Pangiam Threat Detection received certification from the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC). The approval covers its integration with SureScan Corporation’s DETECT 1000 CT baggage screening system. Moreover, the certification confirms compliance with the ECAC/EU Automated Prohibited Items Detection System (APIDS) Standard 1.

The certification places Pangiam among only two third-party software solutions on ECAC’s APIDS approval list. Aviation security authorities across 44 ECAC member states use the list when evaluating airport screening equipment. Consequently, the recognition expands the platform’s regulatory standing beyond its previous national approval.

BigBear.ai previously secured Dutch national approval for the same screening configuration in July 2026. However, that approval covered the Netherlands rather than the wider European aviation security framework. The latest certification establishes another regulatory milestone as the company pursues additional testing with equipment manufacturers.

Pangiam AI Platform Expands Airport Security Capabilities

Pangiam Threat Detection uses artificial intelligence to analyze three-dimensional CT scans of passenger cabin baggage. The system identifies potential prohibited items and alerts security officers during screening operations. Its near-real-time analysis supports faster assessments while maintaining human oversight of security decisions.

The platform also provides smart device interfaces that help airport personnel manage screening operations remotely. These tools support incident escalation, employee training, security audits, and operational supervision. Furthermore, its threat analytics help screening teams evaluate flagged items within established airport security procedures.

BigBear.ai has tested the platform extensively, including continuous deployment at a major European airport. The company has also integrated its software with modern CT screening equipment and airport security workflows. These deployments provide operational experience as BigBear.ai continues developing its aviation security technology.

BBAI Stock Declines Despite European Regulatory Milestone

Despite the certification announcement, BBAI shares remained under selling pressure during the trading session. The stock’s decline contrasted with the company’s progress in securing European aviation security recognition. However, the announcement provided no financial projections or confirmed revenue contributions from the certification.

The ECAC approval creates a broader regulatory reference for airports evaluating compatible automated baggage screening systems. Nevertheless, individual aviation authorities retain responsibility for equipment approval decisions within their jurisdictions. BigBear.ai plans further certification testing with additional regulatory bodies and screening equipment manufacturers.

The company’s aviation security operations form part of its wider defense and security technology business. Its latest milestone strengthens Pangiam’s technical credentials across European aviation screening markets. Meanwhile, BBAI stock’s decline highlights the gap between regulatory progress and the company’s immediate share price performance

.

The post BigBear.ai Holdings (BBAI) Stock: Drops 5% as Pangiam Secures European Certification appeared first on Blockonomi.

TLDR

• Ondas secures a Digital Bat order to develop affordable tactical attack drones.
• ONDS shares decline 7.45% even as the company advances its defense drone plans.
• Planned ARAN deal would add 4,400 square meters of Israeli manufacturing space.
• Airobotics will lead drone technology, while ARAN may support manufacturing.
• Ondas targets capacity for thousands of drones as it expands precision strike.

Ondas Inc. secured a new purchase order for its Digital Bat tactical drone program, advancing its plans for larger production. Meanwhile, Ondas stock traded at $5.53, down 7.45%, despite the company’s announcement about expanding its autonomous defense operations. The contract covers development and production of affordable attack drones, while Ondas prepares additional manufacturing resources for future defense programs.

Ondas Holdings Inc., ONDS

Ondas Secures New Digital Bat Drone Purchase Order

Ondas announced the purchase order on November 10, marking another step in its previously awarded Digital Bat defense program. The program focuses on low-cost tactical attack drones that combine autonomous functions with capabilities for precision strike missions. The company plans to create dedicated production operations as demand grows for affordable unmanned systems across defense markets.

The latest order moves Digital Bat toward manufacturing, although Ondas did not disclose its value or delivery schedule. Ondas also identified potential demand for tens of thousands of affordable drones, but this figure represents its market assessment. For now, the confirmed development and production order provides a foundation for the company’s broader manufacturing expansion strategy.

The program forms part of Ondas’ Precision Strike business, one of four operating segments across its defense portfolio. Its other activities include aerial security, intelligence and surveillance systems, and autonomous ground vehicles for military and security applications. Together, these segments support the company’s objective of integrating unmanned platforms, software, sensors and manufacturing within one organization.

Planned ARAN Acquisition Supports Manufacturing Expansion

Ondas intends to combine its Airobotics technology business with the manufacturing infrastructure of ARAN Defense following its planned acquisition. The company announced the acquisition agreement in August 2026 and expects to complete the transaction during the fourth quarter. ARAN’s planned contribution to Digital Bat manufacturing depends on the transaction closing and the companies completing operational integration.

ARAN operates approximately 4,400 square meters of engineering and manufacturing facilities in Israel, offering substantial industrial capabilities. Its services include CNC machining, prototyping, electromechanical assembly, 3D printing, procurement, quality checks and supply-chain coordination for complex projects. Through these resources, Ondas aims to improve production efficiency and establish repeatable processes for manufacturing affordable autonomous defense systems.

Airobotics will oversee Digital Bat development, autonomous functions, mission software and the integration of its drone systems. After the acquisition closes, Ondas expects ARAN to contribute industrial engineering and manufacturing support across the expanding program. The combined operation aims to establish capacity for thousands of systems while supporting other projects within Ondas’ defense businesses.

Digital Bat Order Advances Ondas Defense Strategy

Ondas seeks to expand serial production as defense customers increase their focus on cost-effective and rapidly deployable autonomous aircraft. The company also plans to develop scalable facilities that can serve additional programs and international customers over time. These objectives extend beyond the current Digital Bat order, and the company has not announced completed production at that scale.

Ondas connected its expansion strategy with broader defense procurement efforts that emphasize large fleets of affordable drones. The company cited the United States Drone Dominance Program as an example of demand for lower-cost unmanned aircraft. Its approach combines artificial intelligence, mission software, physical platforms and engineering resources to support a wider range of operations.

The planned manufacturing structure could also serve Ondas’ aerial security, surveillance and autonomous ground vehicle operations after integration. Digital Bat offers an initial application for infrastructure that Ondas expects to use across several defense programs. The purchase order marks progress toward production, while the proposed ARAN acquisition remains a key step in expansion.

The post Ondas (ONDS) Stock: New Drone Contract Advances Mass Production Plans appeared first on Blockonomi.

Telegram CEO Pavel Durov has said that The Open Network’s native GRAM token is undervalued and predicted that it will eventually rank among CoinMarketCap’s three largest cryptocurrencies.

This was after GRAM gained about 8% on November 11, while pretty much every other asset above it, including Bitcoin and the top 10 altcoins by market cap, traded lower.

Durov Says GRAM Is the Only Coin Rising in a Red Market

“Crypto’s a sea of red. Only GRAM is up +8%,” Durov wrote in a post on X. This was accompanied by a market snapshot showing coins like LTC, AVAX, SUI, and HBAR, all losing between 1.70% and 3.57% while GRAM was trading at approximately $1.12, with an 8.65% gain and a market cap of $3.21 billion.

At the time of writing, figures from CoinGecko had the former Toncoin changing hands near $1.14, with a market capitalization of approximately $3.26 billion and a 50% jump in trading volume in the last 24 hours to reach $113 million.

Durov attributed the performance to the token’s connection to an established social platform:

“No surprise there. It’s the only coin built into a real social ecosystem.”

The Telegram founder was even more bullish about GRAM’s longer-term position, declaring that it was “still ridiculously undervalued” and that it “belongs in CMC’s top 3.”

That performance came as BTC and ETH struggled, with the former hovering below $74,000 after shaving off about 1% from its price in the last day and the latter just above $2,000, having dipped by about 2.4% over the same period.

It was just as bad with other heavyweights such as Ripple’s XRP and Solana (SOL), which had both shaved off 3.5% from their prices in 24 hours, while Zcash (ZEC) was the worst hit among the top ten, plunging by almost 12% in that time.

GRAM Still Facing a Much Larger Recovery

Despite GRAM’s daily advance, its broader performance figures paint a less optimistic picture than Durov’s post portrayed. The coin is still down nearly 8% across two weeks and almost 21% lower than where it was 30 days ago.

Across the last 12 months, the world’s #29-ranked crypto by market cap (CG) has lost over 46% of its value, keeping it about 86% below its all-time high price of $8.25 attained in July 2024.

Market conditions have also not been all smooth, as October’s US Consumer Price Index came in above expectations, with headline inflation going up by 0.4% and core inflation increasing by 0.3%, which helped push BTC below $74,000 as expectations of another Federal Reserve rate increase intensified.

The post Pavel Durov Calls GRAM ‘Ridiculously Undervalued’ After 8% Surge appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Goldman Sachs and Citigroup are among the banks that have committed about $270 million to a joint stablecoin company, Bloomberg reported on Tuesday.

Banco Santander and Deutsche Bank have also joined, according to people familiar with the matter. That money is meant to cover five years of operations at the new company, which will issue a dollar-denominated stablecoin and is expected to be incorporated in the US, the sources said.

Participants call the initiative Project Faro. The project is still searching for a chief executive, and its final name remains under discussion. Goldman and Citi referred questions to a project spokesperson, who declined to comment.

Ten Founders Became 21

Project Faro dates back to October 10, 2025, when ten banks said they were jointly exploring a 1:1 reserve-backed form of digital money on public blockchains, focused on G7 currencies. Barclays and BNP Paribas were in that group, alongside the four banks Bloomberg named.

On September 1, the group expanded to 21 institutions and committed to set up a company in the second half of 2026, subject to closing conditions. The new members included Wells Fargo, Fidelity Investments, Lloyds Banking Group and Standard Bank. Barclays and BNP Paribas were not on the September list.

The consortium plans a dollar token first, with a market launch targeted for the first half of 2027. After that, the group’s priority is a euro version. The group said the product will serve wholesale, institutional, and retail markets, including cross-border payments and digital asset settlement. It intends to comply with the US GENIUS Act and the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) rules, where they apply.

Banks Back Competing Projects

Bank of America, Citi, and Wells Fargo also back a separate blockchain payment effort. Those three banks were building a tokenized deposit network called The Bridge through the Clearing House, the Wall Street Journal reported in June. The report put that network’s launch in the first half of 2027.

European banks run a separate euro project through Qivalis, an Amsterdam company backed by 37 banks across 15 countries. On October 14, Qivalis said the Dutch central bank had authorized it as an electronic money institution.

New entrants have struggled to dent the lead of Tether and Circle, Bloomberg noted. Tether’s USDT has about $176 billion in circulation, according to DefiLlama. Circle’s USDC is second at about $70 billion. All dollar-pegged stablecoins tracked by DefiLlama total about $293 billion.

The post Goldman, Citi Among Banks Committing $270M to Fund Joint Stablecoin Issuer for Five Years appeared first on CryptoPotato.

The cryptocurrency market is once again in a dire state, with bitcoin dumping from over $81,000 a week ago to a multi-month low of under $73,000 yesterday. Today’s rebound attempt has seen little success.

While essentially all major assets are down since their explosive rallies after the midterm elections last Wednesday, Ripple’s cross-border token has taken the correction harder than most.

Why So?

Current data from CoinMarketCap shows that BTC’s weekly declines stand at just over 5%, while ETH has tanked by nearly 10%. SOL is down by a similar percentage to ETH, while HYPE has plummeted by 14.6%. Ripple’s XRP, though, has shed 17% of its value, dropping to $1.06 as of press time. Moreover, the asset slumped to $1.03 yesterday, which brought its losses to over 23% at one point. XRP has lost the fifth position in terms of market cap to USDC as a result.

Popular crypto analyst EGRAG CRYPTO flagged this underperformance by XRP and outlined why he believes the token has fallen much harder than most larger-cap digital assets. He attributed 20% of the blame to OG wallets disposing of their holdings, commenting, “early holders potentially taking profits and rotating into other coins.”

30% of the blame went to leverage flush: “Long liquidations and weak buying demand accelerating the crash.” The remaining 50% was attributed to market manipulation, though. EGRAG argued that major players are deliberately hunting liquidity at lower levels to “shake out weak hands.”

He admitted that these are his personal estimates, and outlined $1.00-$1.04 as the critical stabilization zone that XRP has to maintain to potentially reverse its trajectory. If it does, then he predicted a surge to the $1.15-$1.25 cluster, which XRP must reclaim to stage a more notable recovery.

XRP ETFs Bleed

CryptoPotato reported on Monday morning that the spot XRP ETFs basically turned into a ghost town during the previous business week, with demand disappearing in four out of the five trading days. The landscape worsened on November 9 and 10 as investors started pulling funds out of the ETFs.

Monday was particularly painful, with $10.42 million leaving the financial vehicle; the most since May 9. Tuesday saw another $7.62 million in net outflows, bringing the total to over $18 million in just two days. The cumulative net inflows have dropped from ATH levels of $1.81 billion to $1.79 billion.

The post Why Has XRP Plunged Harder Than Most? Analyst Blames Manipulation appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Earlier this week, the leading cryptocurrency plunged to roughly $73,500, its lowest level since August. Bulls have reclaimed some of the lost ground, but BTC still trades near $74,100, down about 10% over the past month.

Despite the minor rebound, bears remain in charge, while two key factors suggest that the asset may post additional losses in the near term. Here’s why traders and investors should tread carefully.

Inflation Data and More

The main economic event scheduled for today (November 10) is the US CPI data, which will show the inflation rate for October in the world’s biggest economy. It is important because it could influence the Federal Reserve’s future monetary policy decisions, including the path of interest rates.

X user Ted said overall expectations are for a 0.3% month-over-month increase. More importantly, the analyst warned that the previous CPI report preceded a 9% drop in BTC’s price over the following fortnight.

His post fueled a heated discussion, with numerous members sharing their thoughts. X user Abhi | AP Collective, for instance, claimed that a 0.3% increase is mostly priced in and that a potential 0.4% spike could trigger a price pullback.

The actions of one mysterious whale can also be classified as a bearish factor. Max Crypto revealed that the large investor, who has previously made over $4 million in profits, has opened a massive $94 million short position on BTC with 13x leverage.

This doesn’t guarantee that the asset’s valuation will head south in the short term, but some crypto enthusiasts believe whales may possess information about upcoming developments that could affect the asset’s price. Consequently, such moves can spark panic across the community, leading others to sell their holdings and intensifying the downside pressure.

The Bigger Picture

While the CPI report will likely influence BTC’s near-term trajectory, some analysts are already looking beyond the immediate volatility and trying to pinpoint the start of the next major bull market.

X user Wealthmanager highlighted that the asset is testing trendline support for the third time, saying the current structure closely resembles early 2023, or just before a major rally began. Ali Martinez shared a similar stance, anticipating the recent drop to be followed by a significant upswing.

Those willing to explore additional BTC price predictions can take a look at our dedicated article here.

The post 2 Reasons Why Bitcoin (BTC) Could Bleed Even More in the Short Term appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Initia, a network designed for interwoven optimistic rollups, has halted its layer 1 blockchain after it detected unauthorized transfers from escrow accounts holding assets bridged to several rollups.

According to the team, approximately $615,000 left the network before the shutdown, with the incident raising new concerns for a project that only recently restored operations after another exploit that cost it about $2.7 million.

Initia Identifies Compromised Rollup Infrastructure Keys

In a post on X last night, Initia said it was “investigating an issue affecting rollup infrastructure” and that they had been paused temporarily.

“We have not identified any impact to user funds and we hope rollups will resume producing blocks soon,” the team wrote at that stage.

However, today, the story changed, with the team saying it had halted L1 operations at 06:18 UTC after preliminary investigations identified unauthorized transactions from the network’s escrow accounts where assets bridged to a number of rollups were being kept.

According to them, the unauthorized transfers originated from compromised rollup infrastructure keys, which allowed an attacker to fabricate Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) transfers and make away with about $605,000 in USDC through Noble, along with another $10,000 in other tokens, before validators paused the network.

However, they noted that most of the remaining assets that had been moved out of the escrow accounts are still halted on the L1. The team also told users that they were still trying to establish the full extent of the incident and would provide more details as they became available.

Second Attack In Less Than a Month

This is not the first time Initia has had to deal with such a problem. Less than three weeks ago, an attacker took advantage of a vulnerability in its MoveVM script caching system to create unbacked WETH, iUSD, and USDC balances without changing the corresponding token supplies.

In that incident, the attacker managed to bridge approximately $2.7 million through LayerZero and Noble before the network was shut down. Per Initia’s own accounting, by October 24, the thief had managed to convert the stolen assets into 1,135 ETH. The Initia Foundation later approved funding to restore the 1:1 backing of the affected assets, covering up to 1.08 million USDC, 105 ETH, and 1.4 million AUSD0.

Then on November 2, just over a week before the new exploit, the network resumed operations after making upgrades that included an independently audited MoveVM patch as well as isolating the attacker’s remaining forged balances.

Back-to-back hits are not new in crypto. You may recall that in July, the Verus bridge lost $7.55 million to a hacker barely two months after thieves made off with $11.58 million, with security firm Blockaid linking both attacks to the same bridge contract and bug class.

Interestingly, despite Initia’s L1 halt, CoinGecko data at the time of writing showed its native INIT token up by almost 60% in 24 hours and over 71% in the last seven days. It was also in the green across longer timeframes, having gained 45% in the last fortnight and well over 88% in 30 days, although it is still 84% below its May 2025 all-time high of $1.42.

The post Initia Halts Blockchain After $615K Leaves Bridged Asset Escrows appeared first on CryptoPotato.